• Ralph Nader on Bernie Sanders, the TPP “Corporate Coup d’État” & Writing to the White House | Democracy Now!
    Friday, May 1, 2015
    http://www.democracynow.org/2015/5/1/ralph_nader_on_bernie_sanders_the

    AMY GOODMAN: Senator Sanders’ announcement came one day before May Day, celebrated around the world as International Workers’ holiday. Many events are planned across the country today, many mass protests that will also show solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement, the immigrants’ rights movement, as well.

    Well, today we’re joined by a former presidential candidate, Ralph Nader. His new book is called Return to Sender: Unanswered Letters to the President, 2001-2015, the book dedicated in part to the workers of the U.S. Postal Service.

    Ralph Nader, welcome back to Democracy Now! First, let’s get your response to the announced candidacy of Bernie Sanders. It might bring back memories for you, the number of times that you ran for president.

    RALPH NADER: Well, that’s a good—good news. We don’t want a coronation of Hillary Clinton. We want a vibrant debate in the televised primaries next year, and Bernie Sanders will provide an alternative view of where the country should be going. I hope he’ll be stronger on pulling back on empire. I’ve always thought his foreign policy and military policy were not up to his great domestic reforms and corporate accountability from Wall Street to Houston.

    AMY GOODMAN: The issue of TPP, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, that doesn’t get a heck of a lot of attention in the mainstream media—when it does, presenting largely one point of view—is a mainstay, one of the things that Senator Sanders has been speaking against. It’s also an issue that you have been taking on, dealing with 40 percent of the global economy.

    RALPH NADER: Well, the people have got to demand that their members of Congress block the fast track that is now beginning to circulate in Congress, which will allow an up-or-down vote, no amendments whatsoever to the subsequent Trans-Pacific Partnership, so-called. This is a corporate coup d’état. This is worse than NAFTA. It’s worse than the World Trade Organization. It’s bad for consumers, for labor, for the environment. All these necessities are subordinated to the supremacy of international commercial trade, and a tremendous invasion on local, state and national sovereignty. And all the disputes that may affect American workers and dealing with poverty and investment in poor areas in this country, all the disputes are going to be before secret tribunals. They cannot go to our courts. This is blatantly unconstitutional. But any citizen that tries to take these trade agreements to the federal courts are dismissed because of no standing to sue. So, we’ve got a real fight coming up. Go to GlobalTradeWatch.org, and you’ll get the details. I’m telling you, people, if this one passes, with about a dozen other countries on the Pacific Rim, it’s going to affect the pace of exporting jobs and industry, and subordinating the ability of the United States to be first, and environmental, labor and consumer standards.

    2ème partie de l’entretien :
    http://www.democracynow.org/blog/2015/5/1/pt_2_ralph_nader_on_bernie

    • Un socialiste à la Maison-Blanche ?
      par Richard Hétu - Jeudi 30 avril 2015
      http://blogues.lapresse.ca/hetu/2015/04/30/un-socialiste-a-la-maison-blanche


      Bon, disons que je ne vous conseille pas de parier sur l’élection de Bernie Sanders à la Maison-Blanche en 2016. Mais le sénateur du Vermont ne pourrait accuser Fox News et autres médias conservateurs de fabuler en le qualifiant de « socialiste ». Utilisant lui-même cette étiquette pour se décrire, il a donné aujourd’hui un aperçu de sa vision politique marquée à gauche en annonçant son intention de défier Hillary Clinton à l’occasion de la course à l’investiture démocrate pour l’élection présidentielle de 2016. Je cite quelques-unes de ses déclarations recueillies par l’AFP :

      « 99 % de tous les revenus générés dans ce pays vont aux 1 % les plus riches. »

      « Comment est-il possible que les 1 % les plus riches détiennent presque autant de richesses que les 90 % les moins riches ? »

      « Ce type d’économie est non seulement immoral, non seulement mauvais, il est insoutenable. »

      « Nous ne pouvons continuer à avoir un pays qui a à la fois le plus haut taux de pauvreté chez les enfants parmi tous les grands pays de la Terre, et une prolifération de millionnaires et milliardaires. »

      Pour le moment, le sénateur Sanders est le seul adversaire de l’ancienne secrétaire d’État aux primaires démocrates. L’ancien gouverneur du Maryland (et maire de Baltimore) Martin O’Malley pourrait bientôt se joindre à eux.