• Who Are Western Europeans? New Study Reveals True Origins - Archaeology - Haaretz.com
    https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/2024-01-16/ty-article/who-are-western-europeans-new-study-reveals-true-origins/0000018d-0dfa-de9c-a3df-6ffb44030000


    Mesolithic tomb at Téviec, with two women between 25 and 35 with head injuries and arrow wounds.
    Credit: Didier Descouens

    […]
    Three great migrations
    The ancestry of today’s western Europeans was determined largely by three great migrations, the paper sums up. The first was the exit from Africa around 45,000 years ago.

    Indeed, representatives of Homo sapiens had been leaving Africa for at least 200,000 years, going by (somewhat controversial) fossil finds in Israel and Greece. But those lineages apparently died out, meaning they have no descendants alive today insofar as is known.

    Finally, modern humans who reached Eurasia didn’t die, though it was so cold 45,000 years ago they may have wished they had. But while the chill apparently didn’t deter our ancestors, who plausibly had invented footwear by then, plants can be more persnickety.

    The last Ice Age peaked perhaps 26,000 years ago, and some people around the Mediterranean began to abandon the cave. In southeast Turkey, archaeologists have uncovered the stunning prehistoric monumental architecture of the “Gobekli culture” starting about 12,000 years ago, which had been built by hunter-gatherers. There is no sign that agriculture had begun to emerge yet, archaeologists there told Haaretz.


    "Urfa Man," a statue found at Gobekli. Now at the Sanliurfa Museum.
    Credit: Valence Levi Schuster

    But by 11,000 to 10,000 years ago, agriculture and animal husbandry had begun to emerge there and in the Fertile Crescent. That spurred the second great migration that would shape today’s western Europeans: early farmers spreading out of Anatolia.

    The Neolithic clime in Anatolia was apparently so gorgeous that some think this is where the legendary Garden of Eden was. Be that as it may, shortly after their newfound knack emerged, early farmers began to disperse. We don’t know why. Possibly the lifestyle based on taming plants and animals combined with settlement could support larger populations and created density that needed alleviating.

    These early farmers brought not only knowhow but also their plants and animals with them: cereals, legumes, and cows, sheep and goats. As they spread, they mixed with local hunter-gatherers, begetting early European farmers – but only to the west of that invisible Black Sea-Baltic line.


    Simplified diagram of the spread of agriculture between 11,600 and 5,800 years ago (approximated dates and routes of diffusion)
    Credit: Detlef Gronenborn, Barbara Horejs, Börner, Ober

    To its east, hunting and gathering as a subsistence lifestyle persisted for another 3,000 years. This is even though the distances from Anatolia were about the same, the team elaborates.

    Why would early farmers penetrate western Eurasia but not the east? Maybe because the entire transition to farming was based on crops and animals of Middle Eastern origin.

    Consider the chickpea, a staple in the Middle East that actually has a very small natural stamping ground. The nutritious legume is native only to part of Turkey. Today it grows around the world, including in Israel because we force it to.

    Not every crop and animal can thrive wherever we so wish, leaving technology out of it. Plausibly the conditions east of that boundary were unsuitable to farming practices developed in the paradisiacal conditions of the Neolithic Near East and therefore, hunter-gatherer societies persisted there for 3,000 years more than in the West, the team postulates.

    And then came the third great migration, which eradicated that invisible boundary once and for all: nomads of the Yamnaya culture riding out of the Pontic steppe 5,000 years ago, on the newly domesticated horse. And they brought a little something with them.

    The clue of the multiple sclerosis
    The Pontic steppe sprawls from Europe to central Asia. As the Yamnaya nomads raced over the grasslands into western Eurasia, they brought not only their enslaved steeds (who exactly domesticated the horse and climbed on its back is controversial).

    The Yamnaya also carried elevated genetic risk for multiple sclerosis, according to a separate paper published in Nature on Thursday by William Barrie of the University of Cambridge, UK.

    https://img.haarets.co.il/bs/0000018d-0e1e-d71c-ad9f-4f9e988d0000/d8/35/ec60b60e476a80e3c909f649cab2/82194.jpg_Bronze Age spread of Yamnaya steppe pastoralist ancestry into Europe and South Asia from about 5,000 years ago
    Credit: פטליפוטרה_

    Today, the highest incidences of this incurable neurodegenerative disease are in northern Europe. There is a clear north-south gradient. Now, the genetic information from the Mesolithic onward, compared with information on 410,000 white Europeans, may have solved the enigma of why that is, Barrie and the team posit. Their results indicate that the genetic risk for multiple sclerosis emerged among the Yamnaya.

    • Population genomics of post-glacial western Eurasia | Nature
      10/01/2024 (article librement accessible, 161 co-auteurs…)
      https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06865-0


      a,b, Geographical (a) and temporal (b) distribution of the 317 ancient genomes sequenced and reported in this study. Insert shows dense sampling in Denmark34. The age and the geographical region of ancient individuals are indicated by the colour and the shape of the symbols, respectively. Colour scale for age is capped at 15,000 years; older individuals are indicated with black. Random jitter was added to geographical coordinates to avoid overplotting. c,d, PCA of 3,316 modern and ancient individuals from Eurasia, Oceania and the Americas (c), and restricted to 2,126 individuals from western Eurasia (west of the Urals) (d). Principal components were defined using both modern and imputed ancient (n = 1,492) genomes passing all filters, with the remaining low-coverage ancient genomes projected. Ancient genomes sequenced in this study are indicated with black circles (imputed genomes passing all filters, n = 213) or grey diamonds (pseudo-haploid projected genomes; n = 104). Genomes of modern individuals are shown in grey, with population labels corresponding to their median coordinates. BA, Bronze Age.

      Abstract
      Western Eurasia witnessed several large-scale human migrations during the Holocene. Here, to investigate the cross-continental effects of these migrations, we shotgun-sequenced 317 genomes—mainly from the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods—from across northern and western Eurasia. These were imputed alongside published data to obtain diploid genotypes from more than 1,600 ancient humans. Our analyses revealed a ‘great divide’ genomic boundary extending from the Black Sea to the Baltic. Mesolithic hunter-gatherers were highly genetically differentiated east and west of this zone, and the effect of the neolithization was equally disparate. Large-scale ancestry shifts occurred in the west as farming was introduced, including near-total replacement of hunter-gatherers in many areas, whereas no substantial ancestry shifts happened east of the zone during the same period. Similarly, relatedness decreased in the west from the Neolithic transition onwards, whereas, east of the Urals, relatedness remained high until around 4,000 BP, consistent with the persistence of localized groups of hunter-gatherers. The boundary dissolved when Yamnaya-related ancestry spread across western Eurasia around 5,000 BP, resulting in a second major turnover that reached most parts of Europe within a 1,000-year span. The genetic origin and fate of the Yamnaya have remained elusive, but we show that hunter-gatherers from the Middle Don region contributed ancestry to them. Yamnaya groups later admixed with individuals associated with the Globular Amphora culture before expanding into Europe. Similar turnovers occurred in western Siberia, where we report new genomic data from a ‘Neolithic steppe’ cline spanning the Siberian forest steppe to Lake Baikal. These prehistoric migrations had profound and lasting effects on the genetic diversity of Eurasian populations.

  • What Killed the Mummified Swiss Woman ? Maybe Something We’ve Never Seen Before - Archaeology - Haaretz.com
    https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/2023-02-07/ty-article/what-killed-the-mummified-swiss-woman-maybe-something-weve-never-seen-before/00000186-2c41-df2e-a59f-ee5b7b280000

    (extrait) J’ai sélectionné une partie sur l’infection mycobactérienne du cerveau. Je conseille toutefois la lecture complète car l’essentiel du texte est au sujet du traitement de la syphillis (et des conséquences du mercure sur le corps humain) au cours des siècles.

    Anna Catharina Bischoff died at the age of 68 in 1787, and was buried beneath the floor of Basel’s Barfüsser Church, right in front of where the choir stands. But what really killed her? Was this distinguished member of Swiss high society, judging by her final resting place, really done in by syphilis, as scientists have suggested?

    This cause of death has been assumed based on damage to her bones and the high concentration of mercury discovered in multiple organs; bone lesions and mercury treatments are diagnostic hallmarks of syphilitic infection in archaeology. Yet it seems that this isn’t what killed her, Mohamed Sarhan of the Eurac Research Institute for Mummy Studies and colleagues reported in BMC Biology on Wednesday.

    The team reports that reanalysis of her remains, now stored at the Basel Natural History Museum, found no evidence of syphilis bacteria while screening for pathogens. What they did find, though, was infection in her brain by a bacterium previously unknown to science, which had no business being there. It belongs to the greater family of non-tubercular mycobacteria, and how she was infected is a mystery, the team explains.

    (...)

    She was identified, among other means, by a vast genealogic analysis effort that produced a 15-generation female family tree. This also revealed that she is Boris Johnson’s great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandmother.

    (...)

    In short, the team concludes that they cannot categorically conclude what killed Anna Catharina Bischoff or Byschoff, but it doesn’t seem to have been syphilis, which may be a relief to her descendants worldwide.

    More importantly, their results indicate that nontuberculous mycobacterium normally happy in soil and water may be an understudied cause of diseases that, even now, doctors often fail to recognize. Their paper also provides proof-of-concept for the discovery of completely unknown ancient pathogens using de novo metagenomic assembly. And lastly, it indicates that even when finding an ancient body with all the hallmarks of a deadly venereal disease, one shouldn’t leap to bawdy conclusions.

  • A Brief History of Cannibalism: Not Just a Matter of Taste - Archaeology - Haaretz.com
    https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/2022-12-14/ty-article/a-brief-history-of-cannibalism-not-just-a-matter-of-taste/00000185-10a9-dfac-ad97-ddab6a170000

    Cannibalism in human history is rarely just about eating. It even became a justification used by Western imperialists to explain the enslavement of millions

    Terry Madenholm
    Dec 14, 2022

    #cannibalisme

    cc @mad_meg

  • New discoveries fundamentally change the picture of human evolution - CNN
    https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/31/africa/human-evolution-africa-inland-scn/index.html

    (Google Trad)

    On pensait que l’histoire des origines de l’humanité s’était largement déroulée dans une grotte avec vue sur la mer.

    Les premières preuves suggérant que les humains modernes étaient capables d’une pensée symbolique et d’un comportement complexe - l’utilisation de pigments ocres, de peintures et d’objets décoratifs - proviennent de sites côtiers d’Afrique qui remontent à environ 70 000 à 125 000 ans. Ces types d’objets nous donnent un aperçu de l’esprit humain car ils suggèrent une identité partagée.

    Les archéologues avaient supposé que bon nombre des innovations et des compétences qui rendent Homo sapiens unique ont évolué dans des groupes vivant sur la côte avant de se répandre à l’intérieur des terres. Des ressources marines prévisibles comme les mollusques et crustacés et un climat plus indulgent ont peut-être permis à un plus grand nombre d’humains primitifs de ces régions de prospérer. De plus, une alimentation riche en fruits de mer, qui contient des acides gras oméga-3 importants pour la croissance du cerveau, peut également avoir joué un rôle dans l’évolution du cerveau et du comportement humain.

    Cependant, de nouvelles découvertes à 600 kilomètres (environ 370 miles) à l’intérieur des terres dans le sud du désert du Kalahari contredisent ce point de vue, et une nouvelle étude suggère que les premiers humains modernes vivant dans cette région n’étaient pas à la traîne de leurs homologues vivant sur la côte.

    On pense que 22 cristaux de calcite et fragments de coquille d’autruche - trouvés dans le Ga-Mohana Hill North Rockshelter en Afrique du Sud et datés d’il y a environ 105 000 ans - auraient été délibérément collectés et amenés sur le site. Les cristaux n’ont aucune utilité évidente et les chercheurs ont suggéré que les coquilles d’autruche auraient pu être utilisées comme bouteille d’eau.
    "Ils sont vraiment bien formés, blancs et visuellement frappants et beaux. Les cristaux du monde entier sont vraiment importants pour des raisons spirituelles et rituelles à différentes périodes et à différents endroits", a déclaré Jayne Wilkins, paléoarchéologue à l’Australian Research Center for Human. Evolution à l’Université Griffith, Brisbane, Australie, et auteur principal de l’étude publiée mercredi dans la revue Nature.

    « Nous avons vraiment essayé de savoir si les processus naturels pouvaient expliquer comment ils étaient entrés dans les gisements archéologiques, mais il n’y a pas d’explication. Les gens doivent les avoir amenés sur le site.

    Wilkins a déclaré qu’à la lumière de ces découvertes, les idées reliant l’émergence de l’Homo sapiens et les environnements côtiers "devaient être repensées". Elle a suggéré que l’histoire de l’origine des humains était plus complexe, impliquant différents endroits et environnements en Afrique et différents groupes de personnes primitives interagissant les uns avec les autres et contribuant à l’émergence de notre espèce.

    « Auparavant, le Kalahari n’était pas considéré comme une région importante pour comprendre les origines des comportements complexes des Homo sapiens, mais nos travaux le montrent. En fin de compte, cela signifie que les modèles se concentrant sur un seul centre d’origine, comme la côte sud-africaine , sont trop simplistes », a-t-elle déclaré à CNN dans un e-mail.

    Pamela Willoughby, professeure au département d’anthropologie de l’Université de l’Alberta à Edmonton, au Canada, qui n’a pas participé à la recherche, a souscrit à cette évaluation.

    "Les objets qu’ils ont trouvés suggèrent qu’il est temps de revoir la réflexion actuelle sur l’émergence d’innovations culturelles parmi les premières populations humaines", a-t-elle déclaré dans un commentaire publié parallèlement à l’étude.

    Le climat dans le Kalahari il y a 100 000 ans aurait été très différent de celui de l’aride où il se trouve actuellement.

    Les artefacts nouvellement découverts auraient été entre des mains humaines à une époque de pluies accrues. Les chercheurs ont déclaré que la plus grande disponibilité de l’eau aurait pu conduire à une plus grande densité de population, ce qui aurait pu influencer l’origine et la diffusion de comportements innovants.

    Willoughby a déclaré qu’une partie du problème pour démêler l’histoire complexe des origines humaines est que seules quelques régions africaines ont été étudiées en détail.

    Elle a dit que les archives fossiles en Afrique << indiquent maintenant qu’il ne semble pas y avoir de modèle unique de développement technologique et social au fil du temps. Le lancement d’enquêtes et de fouilles dans des zones moins connues aidera à clarifier ce qui a fait nos ancêtres immédiats. vraiment moderne, à la fois biologiquement et culturellement. "

    • Somebody in the Kalahari Had a Crystal Collection 105,000 Years Ago
      https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/.premium-somebody-in-the-kalahari-had-a-crystal-collection-105-000-years-ag
      (Google Trad)

      Le professeur Israel Hershkovitz, également de l’Université de Tel Aviv, souligne que tous les premiers sites Homo sapiens en Israël où des preuves de comportements complexes ont été découverts ne se trouvent pas sur la côte, ils sont assez loin de là.

      Les exemples incluent un os d’aigle gravé trouvé à Nesher Ramle qui date d’il y a environ 120 000 ans. Des perles ont été trouvées à Skhul il y a 100 000 ans ; l’enterrement à l’ocre a été identifié à Qafzeh à peu près à la même époque ; les coquilles perforées trouvées dans le nord d’Israël qui peuvent avoir été portées comme boucles d’oreilles ou pendentifs peuvent être aussi vieilles que 160 000 ans, et suggèrent indirectement que les premiers humains avaient craqué le concept de « ficelle » ; et il y a bien plus encore, soulignent Barkai et Hershkovitz.

      De plus, il est évident que les hominins et les humains auraient pu utiliser des choses apparemment non utilitaires pour toutes sortes de raisons, note Barkai.

      « Les cristaux ont été liés à des croyances spirituelles et à des rituels pendant de nombreuses périodes à travers le monde, y compris en Afrique australe de l’âge de pierre », écrivent Wilkins et l’équipe. Ainsi, la collection de cristaux dans l’abri sous-roche et les jolies pierres ailleurs auraient pu avoir une certaine utilité sous la forme d’une signification symbolique que nous ne pouvions pas, des centaines de milliers d’années après l’événement, espérer reconnaître.

  • Ancient girl Amazon warrior no older than 13 is confirmed by modern scientific techniques
    https://siberiantimes.com/science/casestudy/news/ancient-girl-amazon-warrior-no-older-than-13-is-confirmed-by-modern-s

    The ’stunning’ discovery appears further confirmation of ancient Greek claims about female fighters known as Amazons among the Scythians of central Asia.

    In 1988 Dr Marina Kilunovskaya and Dr Vladimir Semyonov came across the partially mummified young warrior’s grave Saryg-Bulun in Siberia’s modern-day Tuva republic during an emergency excavation.

    The archeologists found the prepubescent warrior’s remains so well preserved that a ‘wart’ was visible on the face, and yet at the time there were no indications that this was a female.

    ‘It was so stunning when we just opened the lid and I saw the face there, with that wart, looking so impressive,’ said Dr. Kilunovskaya.

    There was a rough seam on the skin in the abdomen area, implying an attempt at artificial mummification - but no traces were found of trepanation, which was usual among such burials.

    The age was estimated at 12-to-13 years yet - at the time - all the clues suggested this was a male.

    There were no beads, or mirrors, or other indications that this was the grave of a girl, and three decades ago the ancient remains were classified as a young male warrior.

    Yet modern scientific advancements mean more detailed genetic tests are now available.

  • Israeli archaeologists shed new light on Great Wall of Mongolia - Archaeology - Haaretz.com
    https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/.premium-israeli-archaeologists-shed-new-light-on-great-wall-of-mongolia-1.


    Aerial view of a fort (square) and possible animal pen (round) along the Great Wall of Mongolia: such forts were built every 30 kilometers
    Credit: Nachem Doron

    The monumental wall running almost 750 kilometers in Mongolia and China wasn’t built to fend off Genghis Khan and his horde but to control mass migrations of climate refugees, archaeologists suggest

    The Great Wall of China is one of the most prominent mysteries on the face of the planet. We can see it from outer space, yet surprisingly little is known about much of it. What purpose did the Great Wall of China really serve, whose purpose did it serve, and when did it serve said purpose?

    In fact, the so-called great wall is a series of ancient high walls uncomfortably grouped under the soubriquet “Great Wall of China” in today’s China and Mongolia, and a bit in Russia and North Korea too. The earliest one dates to 2,500 years ago and the latest was erected in the 17th century. Their purpose has been assumed to have been defensive.

    Now, an unusual collaboration of Israeli, Mongolian and American archaeologists propose that at least one of these great walls – dubbed the “Genghis Khan Wall” and stretching almost 750 kilometers (466 miles) from Mongolia to China – doesn’t have the hallmarks of a military installation. Nor does it separate between ecological regions, as had been suggested by some: the ecology on both sides is much the same.

    This great wall may have been built – and fast at that – to control vast migrations by nomads in a climatically challenging time, propose Prof. Gideon Shelach-Lavi and a multidisciplinary team from the Hebrew University, with Otgonjargal Batzorig of the Mongolian company Oyu Tolgoi Mines, Chunag Amartuvshin of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences and William Honeychurch of Yale.


    Map of the many Great Walls of China: the Mongolian one is the northern-most
    Credit: Maximilian Drrbecker / (Chumw[…])

    This great wall may have been built – and fast at that – to control vast migrations by nomads in a climatically challenging time, propose Prof. Gideon Shelach-Lavi and a multidisciplinary team from the Hebrew University, with Otgonjargal Batzorig of the Mongolian company Oyu Tolgoi Mines, Chunag Amartuvshin of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences and William Honeychurch of Yale.

    The collaboration reported on surveying the “understudied” stretch in Mongolia, erected during the medieval period, and the discovery of clues to its functions, in the journal of Antiquity.

    Genghis Khan and the great walls
    In total, the “great walls” built over more than 2,000 years stretch 21,196 kilometers, according to the China Highlights website, which qualifies that the calculation is downside because it doesn’t count sections built on older ones, or isolated sections. Some segments were later connected.

    The new report relates to the 737 kilometer-long structure in Mongolia dubbed the “Genghis Khan Wall,” though it seems Genghis Khan (aka Chinggis Khaan) or fear of him had nothing to do with its construction.

    Let us describe it first: The Great Wall of Mongolia is the northernmost of the great walls and, like most of the rest, it stretches east-west. About half of it is in Mongolia; it continues into China, passes through Russia (southeast Siberia) and ends back in China. There has been some archaeological investigation of this wall by Mongolian, Chinese and Russian archaeologists.