The New York Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia

/live

  • Et maintenant l’armée israélienne utilise la FINUL comme bouclier humain… Israeli troops have set up near U.N. peacekeepers in Lebanon, satellite images show.
    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/10/06/world/israel-iran-hezbollah-lebanon#israeli-troops-have-set-up-near-un-peacekeepe

    The Israeli military established new positions beside a United Nations peacekeeping mission in Lebanon during its invasion of the country’s southern region last week, according to two U.N. spokesmen and satellite imagery obtained by The New York Times.

    Andrea Tenenti, a spokesman for the mission — commonly known by its acronym, UNIFIL — said the Israeli military had been firing at Hezbollah positions from those locations, putting the peacekeepers increasingly in the crossfire.

  • Opinion | Zeynep Tufekci - Instagram’s New Protections for Kids Don’t Go Far Enough - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/09/17/opinion/thepoint#instagram-children-regulation

    Zeynep Tufekci
    Sept. 17, 2024, 3:56 p.m. ETSept. 17, 2024

    Instagram’s New Protections for Kids Don’t Go Far Enough

    Instagram just announced “sweeping” changes to how it handles minors’ accounts, a belated acknowledgment that a social platform that seeks to encourage engagement can have pernicious effects on children. Accounts whose owners self-identify as minors will now be private by default, stop notifications between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m., and allow parent accounts to see who receives their children’s messages.

    But these new policies will have little impact on many teenagers, because the platform has not set up age verification.

    In response to Instagram’s new policy, many kids will simply create “finstas” — fake accounts — and carry on as before. Additionally, 16- and 17-year-olds will be able to opt out of these settings without needing parental approval. Anyone familiar with teenagers and the platform can see that Instagram’s new policy is less of a solution and more of a performance of doing something in response to public outcry.

    Even these minor changes came only after dozens of lawsuits by state attorneys general and recent legislation aimed at protecting minors online that overwhelmingly passed in the Senate. In an age of polarization, such consensus is a strong indicator of how bothered the public is by all this.

    While our new connected reality does have upsides, many teenagers suffer greatly from the constant judgment that characterizes social media platforms. And then there are the many documented cases of blackmail and exploitation of vulnerable youngsters.

    Obviously, those best able to protect themselves from social media’s harms are going to be the young people who already have trusting relationships with their parents. Those kids are more likely to voluntarily self-identify as minors and now have slightly better default settings. But what about the rest of them?

    Age verification is the kind of policy that would allow such changes to have widespread effect. But it’s not an easy fix. And it would certainly not be without major downsides, especially if it allowed a company to collect even more information on everyone. It also might overly stifle legitimate and necessary access to online information and speech. But those problems are potentially solvable in part by developing new technological approaches, if companies had the incentive to try.

    So far, tech companies have little incentive to do much else besides belatedly change a few settings. Little else is likely to happen until Congress finally gets serious, resists the lobbying by these wealthy companies and puts some thoughtful effort into legislation with sharp enough teeth to force platforms to act.

    Until then, the most vulnerable kids are still on their own.

    #Instagram #Adolescents #Meta #Faire_semblant

  • Opinion | The Point: Conversations and insights about the moment. - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/08/27/opinion/thepoint

    Zeynep Tufekci
    Aug. 27, 2024, 12:05 p.m. ETAug. 27, 2024

    ‘Free Speech’ Should Not Shroud Criminal Activity

    The detention in France of Pavel Durov, the founder and chief executive of the messaging app Telegram, has sparked a loud outcry about free speech. Elon Musk has portrayed the arrest on his X account as an ominous threat to free speech, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. referred to the app as an “encrypted, uncensored” platform and said “the need to protect free speech has never been more urgent.”

    It’s a curious case, and the French government hasn’t helped matters by releasing information in dribs and drabs. While it is possible that there are free speech issues entangled here, some early details suggest the issue may be one of criminal activity.

    On Monday, the French prosecutor said in a statement that Durov — who is a citizen of France, Russia, St. Kitts and Nevis and the United Arab Emirates — was being held for questioning in connection with an investigation into criminal activities on the app, including the trading of child sexual abuse material as well as drug trafficking, fraud and money laundering. Notably, Telegram explicitly boasts that it has never disclosed user data to any government, ever.

    Questions have long swirled around Telegram. Contrary to widespread belief, Telegram is not encrypted in any meaningful sense. That would be “end to end” encryption, so that even the company couldn’t read users’ messages. Telegram — and anyone it chooses — can read all group chats, and there is no way to fully encrypt them. Those very large groups are the main attraction of the platform.

    Private chats on Telegram also lack end-to-end encryption by default. Here, though, users can undergo an onerous process to turn on end-to-end encryption, which then applies only to that conversation. Even the protection provided to private chats is murky: Cryptography experts have long questioned whether Telegram’s limited encryption actually meets security standards.

    Durov was born in Russia, where Telegram is used widely. The Kremlin has Durov’s back: It issued a statement that unless more evidence is provided, Durov’s detention may be “a direct attempt to limit freedom of communication.” Russian antiwar activists have long wondered how the Kremlin seems to know so much about their activities on Telegram. (Good question.)

    Free speech is an important value, but protecting it does not mean absolving anyone of responsibility for all criminal activity. Ironically, Telegram’s shortage of end-to-end encryption means the company is likely to be more liable simply because it can see the criminal activity happening on its platform. If, for example, Telegram did not cooperate with authorities at all after receiving legal warrants for information about criminal activities, that would mean trouble even in the United States, with its sweeping free speech protections.

    #Telegram #Pavel_Durov #Zeynep_Tufekci #Chiffrement

  • Opinion | Zeynep Tufekci - Wealthy Nations Must Prioritize the Global Fight Against Mpox - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/08/13/opinion/thepoint

    Zeynep Tufekci
    Aug. 14, 2024, 2:48 p.m. ETAug. 14, 2024
    Wealthy Nations Must Prioritize the Global Fight Against Mpox

    The W.H.O. has declared a new global public health emergency for an outbreak of deadly mpox, primarily in the Democratic Republic of Congo. In response, wealthy nations must do everything possible to stop the disease’s spread.

    Mpox, formerly known as the monkeypox virus, made the news in 2022 when a global outbreak, including in the United States, prompted a public health emergency. But by May 2023, cases in wealthy nations had receded, largely because of vaccination drives and behavior change among those most at risk of contracting the virus. The W.H.O. ended that mpox emergency.

    But the virus hadn’t disappeared, and it’s now back on the rise, potentially with a vengeance.

    The mpox virus has two types: a much deadlier Clade I and a less severe Clade II. In 2022, the United States experienced an outbreak of Clade II. But lacking support for eradication efforts, including vaccination drives, Clade II simmered in African countries. Worse, Clade I — estimated to have a 3 percent to 6 percent fatality rate — also spread, though it was confined to the war-torn Democratic Republic of Congo. Despite all the global attention heaped on this disease at the time, African countries never received enough vaccines or sufficient support to eradicate the virus.

    Now, Clade I cases are sharply on the rise in Congo, where the disease has claimed the lives of more than a thousand people, most of them children. It has reached more urban areas. Cases have begun to pop up in other African countries, including Burundi, Kenya and Uganda.

    So far, wealthy nations have failed to send enough vaccines to counter the disease’s quick spread. The African Union’s health agency Africa C.D.C. has said it has only about 200,000 mpox vaccine doses available out of the 10 million needed. The global vaccine alliance GAVI told Reuters it needs $84 million to respond in areas at most risk, but it has raised only $8 million.

    But providing vaccines alone is not enough. In Congo, stigma, regulatory obstacles and other crises — including measles and cholera outbreaks — have made a coordinated response difficult. The country finally approved two mpox vaccines just a few weeks ago, Reuters reported, but it has only about 65,000 vaccines available in the short term (for a population of about 100 million people) and vaccination campaigns appear unlikely to begin before October. Comprehensive international support may be the only thing that could beat back the disease.

    Will we get it right this time around? If not, the United States and the rest of the world may get an unfortunate shot at a Round 2 of the virus too, perhaps in its much deadlier form.

    #Zeynep_Tufekci #Mpox #Epidémiologie #Vaccination

  • Zeynep Tufekci - The Problem Is Not A.I. It’s the Disbelief Created by Trump. - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/08/07/opinion/thepoint#the-problem-is-not-ai-its-the-disbelief-created-by-trump

    Zeynep Tufekci
    Aug. 12, 2024, 1:57 p.m. ETAug. 12, 2024

    The Problem Is Not A.I. It’s the Disbelief Created by Trump.

    Current artificial intelligence technologies have become surprisingly good at creating realistic images and video, unleashing fears that fake images can be used for political and election manipulation.

    Well, yes and no.

    Fake A.I. imagery is a challenging problem, and not simply because it looks realistic. The key issue is that these images muddy the waters of credibility for everyone while providing a handy excuse for political operatives willing to lie to their supporters already eager to believe the lie.

    Take Donald Trump’s social media post on Sunday in which he accused Kamala Harris’s campaign of manipulating an image to make her crowd seem bigger at a Detroit airplane hangar last week.

    “Has anyone noticed that Kamala CHEATED at the airport?” he wrote. “There was nobody at the plane, and she ‘A.I.’d’ it, and showed a massive ‘crowd’ of so-called followers, BUT THEY DIDN’T EXIST!”

    How do we know an image is real in this day and age? An average person can no longer be certain of the authenticity of images or, increasingly, even videos through individual sleuthing. The A.I. is that good and is getting better. (That’s why the classic media literacy advice — do your own research — doesn’t work anymore.)

    This makes it difficult to know what to believe, except through a key mechanism: trusting sources and trusting that they have either taken the image or video themselves or carefully vetted it as authentic.

    That’s how we know that the crowd waiting for Harris was real, because there are pictures from photo agencies like Getty, as well as images and reports from multiple other news organizations that were on the tarmac, that match the circulating social media photos that caught Trump’s ire. We know that credible news organizations and photo agencies have very strict rules about images and videos. But that, in turn, requires trusting the photo agency or other media source furnishing the image or video.

    While this made-up falsity by Trump & other right-wing provocateurs are posted/viewed by millions, here is video taken by @NnamEgwuon of the Michigan rally — not that this needs to be proven true: pic.twitter.com/Ul1IdyJ0RW https://t.co/MhJYG4As9e
    — Vaughn Hillyard (@VaughnHillyard) August 11, 2024

    It’s no accident that Trump has made it a habit to portray credible news organizations as untrustworthy liars, and many of his supporters seem to have internalized that message they were open to in the first place.

    Once trust is lost and all credibility is questioned, the lie doesn’t have to be high quality. It doesn’t have to be supported by highly realistic fake A.I. It doesn’t have to be so easily disprovable. To work, the lie just needs a willing purveyor and an eager audience. The A.I., then, is but a fig leaf.

    #Intelligence_artificielle #Images #Crédibilité #Fake_news #Manipulation #Sources_crédibles

  • Ouvrir le lien ; le NYT une fois de plus barbote dans la laideur dès qu’il s’agit des civils palestiniens : “former school” (après avoir écrit “ex-school”)

    (1) Israeli Airstrike on Gaza School Kills at Least 40 : Live Updates - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/06/06/world/israel-gaza-war-hamas

    The Israeli military said it had targeted Hamas operatives at a U.N.-run school complex. Palestinian officials said the dead included women, children and older people.

  • Opinion | Scarlett Johansson’s Voice Isn’t the Only Thing A.I. Companies Want - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/05/21/opinion/thepoint#openai-scarlett-johansson

    Par Zeynep Tufekci

    When OpenAI introduced its virtual assistant, Sky, last week, many gasped. It sounded just like Scarlett Johansson, who had famously played an artificial intelligence voice assistant in the movie “Her.”

    On the surface, the choice made sense: Last year, Sam Altman, the C.E.O. of OpenAI, had named it his favorite science fiction movie, even posting the single word “her” around the assistant’s debut.

    OpenAI approached Johansson to be the voice for its virtual assistant, and she turned it down. The company approached her again two days before the debut of Sky, but this time, she said in a blistering statement, it didn’t even wait for her official “no” before releasing a voice that sounds so similar to hers that it even fooled her friends and family.

    In response to Johansson’s scathing letter, OpenAI claimed that the voice was someone else and “was never intended to resemble hers,” but it took Sky down anyway.

    The A.I. industry is built on grabbing our data — the output that humanity has collectively produced: books, art, music, blog posts, social media, videos — and using it to train their models, from which they then make money or use as they wish. For the most part, A.I. companies haven’t asked or paid the people who created the data they grab and whose actual employment and future are threatened by the models trained on it.

    Politicians haven’t stepped in to ask why humanity’s collective output should be usurped and monopolized by a handful of companies. They’ve practically let the industry do what it wants for decades.

    I am someone who believes in the true upside of technology, including A.I. But amid all the lofty talk about its transformational power, these companies are perpetuating an information grab, a money grab and a “break the rules and see what we can get away with” mentality that’s worked very well for them for the past few decades.

    Altman, it seems, liked Johansson’s voice, so the company made a simulacrum of it. Why not?

    When you’re a tech industry star, they let you do anything.

    #Zeynep_Tufekci #Intelligence_artificielle #OpenAI #Voice

    • After a U.N. official says there is famine in northern Gaza, Israel pushes back.
      https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/05/05/world/israel-gaza-war-hamas#after-a-un-official-says-there-is-famine-in-northern-

      After one of the strongest indications yet from a United Nations agency that parts of the Gaza Strip are experiencing famine, the Israeli agency that oversees the Palestinian territories pushed back, saying it had “increased its humanitarian effort to flood the Gaza Strip with food, medical equipment and equipment for tents.”

      In an interview with NBC’s “Meet The Press,” which released a portion of it late Friday, Cindy McCain, the director of the U.N.’s World Food Program, said there was a “full-blown famine” in northern Gaza. She said her assessment was “based on what we have seen and what we have experienced on the ground.”

      In response on Sunday, the Israeli agency, the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories, or COGAT, said in a statement that 350 aid trucks, mostly carrying food, were entering the Gaza Strip each day. About 100 of those trucks were reaching northern Gaza, the most isolated and hard-hit area of the territory. It also said April saw a “great surge” in new aid, with more than 6,000 relief trucks entering Gaza, a 28 percent increase from the previous month.

      COGAT also listed several projects to improve conditions in Gaza, including opening the Israeli port of Ashdod for humanitarian aid shipments.

      But aid groups say the amount of shipments arriving is far below what is needed in Gaza, where the authorities say the war with Israel has killed more than 34,000 people, left roughly two million more homeless and destroyed the territory’s infrastructure and economy.

      Ms. McCain, who became head of the World Food Program last year after a stint as an ambassador appointed by President Biden, is the second American official to say there is famine in Gaza. The first was Samantha Power, the director of the U.S. Agency for International Development, who made her remarks in congressional testimony last month.

      But Ms. McCain’s remarks do not constitute an official declaration, which is a complex bureaucratic process that involves both a U.N. agency, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, and the government of the country where the famine is taking place.

      It is unclear what local authority might have the power to do that in Gaza. Israel’s goal in Gaza is overthrowing its Hamas-backed government, which was not widely recognized before the war and has lost control of most of the enclave since the fighting began.

      Last month, Arif Husain, the chief economist for the World Food Program, said that the increased levels of aid reaching Gaza in recent weeks were a good start but that they were not enough to address the risk of famine.

      He said the arrival of increased amounts of aid “cannot just happen for a day or a week — it has to happen every single day for the foreseeable future.”

      “If we can do this, then we can ease the pain, we can avert famine,” he said.

      Aaron Boxerman contributed reporting.

      — Liam Stack reporting from Jerusalem

  • Opinion | The Point: Conversations and insights about the moment. - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/04/02/opinion/thepoint#avian-flu-cows-outbreak

    The discovery of the country’s second human case of H5N1 avian flu, found in a Texas dairy farm worker following an outbreak among cows, is worrying and requires prompt and vigorous action.

    While officials have so far said the possibility of cow-to-cow transmission “cannot be ruled out,” I think we can go further than that.

    The geography of the outbreak — sick cows in Texas, Idaho, Michigan, Ohio and New Mexico — strongly suggests cows are infecting each other as they move around various farms. The most likely scenario seems to be that a new strain of H5N1 is spreading among cows, rather than the cows being individually infected by sick birds.

    Avian flu is not known to transmit well among mammals, including humans, and until now, almost all known cases of H5N1 in humans were people in extended close contact with sick birds. But a cow outbreak — something unexpected, as cows aren’t highly prone to get this — along with likely transmission between cows, means we need to quickly require testing of all dairy workers on affected farms as well as their close contacts, and sample cows in all the dairy farms around the country.

    It is possible — and much easier — to contain an early outbreak when an emergent virus isn’t yet adapted to a new host and perhaps not as transmissible. If it gets out and establishes a foothold, then all bets are off. With fatality rates estimated up to 50 percent among humans, H5N1 is not something to gamble with.

    Additionally, H5N1 was found in the unpasteurized milk of sick cows. Unpasteurized milk, already a bad idea, would be additionally dangerous to consume right now.

    Public officials need to get on top of this quickly, and transparently, telling us the uncertainties as well as their actions.

    The government needs to gear up to potentially mass-produce vaccines quickly (which we have against H5N1, though they take time to produce) and ensure early supplies for frontline and health care workers.

    It’s possible that worst-case scenarios aren’t going to come true — yet. But evolution is exactly how viruses get to do things they couldn’t do before, and letting this deadly one have time to explore the landscape in a potential new host is a disastrously bad idea.

    #H5N1 #Zeynep_Tufekci #contagion #Santé_publique

  • Opinion | Who’s to Blame for Those Kate Middleton Conspiracies? |Conversations and insights about the moment. - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/03/26/opinion/thepoint#kate-middleton-russia-interference

    Par Zeyneo Tufekci

    Who’s to Blame for Those Kate Middleton Conspiracies?

    A British government source, reportedly, told the British newspaper The Telegraph that “hostile state actors” — China, Russia and Iran — are “fueling disinformation about the Princess of Wales to destabilize the nation.” British morning shows promptly picked up the story, comparing it to election interference.

    It’s certainly possible that countries with a history of online conspiracy mongering played some role in amplifying the most salacious rumors about Catherine, the Princess of Wales. But it’s also undeniable that large numbers of people — and celebrities and newspapers and everything else — were intensely interested in the princess’s whereabouts.

    The claim about foreign bots and the Princess of Wales is just the latest of similar claims of foreign interference or social media manipulation made without convincing public evidence. Young people are dissatisfied with President Biden’s policies over the Israel-Hamas war? Blame TikTok. Consumer sentiment soured amid high inflation and housing prices? Must be social media!

    If our institutions turn foreign meddling on social media into the new “the dog ate my homework,” it will become an easy excuse to ignore public dissatisfaction with divisive policies. And how will such claims be believable when they actually involve consequential foreign meddling in elections?

    There is nothing mysterious about the Kate Middleton rumors and conspiracies. She completely disappeared from view amid conflicting claims about her whereabouts. Then photo agencies conceded that the one photo the palace released of her and her children was doctored. Because the royals cultivate a headline-grabbing parasocial relationship with the public, the topic merged with the global water cooler chat online and rumors ran wild.

    But there is a lesson. Kensington Palace is the latest institution to discover that lying to the public will make people suspicious. Mistrust will swirl on social media, as valid questions and bonkers conspiracies percolate.

    It was true for the pandemic and for the war in Gaza. It’s true in the royals’ case, too. Western institutions should first worry about shoring up their own behavior. Then they can talk about meddling — with evidence, please.

    #Zeynep_Tufekci #C_est_la_faute_aux_rezosociaux

    • Je suis arrivé à cet âge où il y a des théories du complot sur une certaine Kate Middleton, mais je ne le savais pas, et je m’en fous.

      Avant, c’était les vedettes secondaires qui font la couverture du journal télé vendu à la caisse du supermarché : ça fait bien 25 ans qu’à chaque fois je me demande « mais qui est cette personne ? ». Je vois que maintenant, j’arrive même à passer à côté des théories du complot des interwebz.

  • The Israeli military acknowledges mistaking a bike for a weapon in a strike, but stands by the attack.
    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/03/12/world/israel-hamas-war-gaza-news#the-israeli-military-acknowledges-mistaking-a-bi
    Published March 12, 2024Updated March 13, 2024
    https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1767610105686585345/pu/vid/avc1/540x540/vZfJ0pC1BFOyxJbF.mp4?tag=12

    The drone footage shows two people walking down a road in Gaza, when they are suddenly blasted by an Israeli strike, their forms disappearing in the flash of an explosion.

    Text appearing over the video, which was released by the Israeli military, described the scene as showing the “elimination of terrorists.” One person is labeled as holding a rocket-propelled grenade.

    The person actually held a bicycle, the military acknowledged on Monday in response to questions from The New York Times, saying in a statement that it regretted the mistake in the video. The Israel Defense Forces still defended the strike, asserting that the two people were combatants, without providing its evidence.

    “When the video was published, the bicycle carried by one of them was mistakenly marked as a rocket launcher,” the military said in a statement to The New York Times. “The I.D.F. regrets the marking error.”

    The acknowledgment came after The Times asked the Israel Defense Forces about a Times analysis of the footage suggesting that one of the people was holding a bicycle instead of a weapon. The mistake had been first identified by Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, an advocacy group that focuses on documenting and calling attention to potential human rights violations in Gaza.

    The brief video clip, which the military released on March 3, shows two people walking in southern Gaza City, one with the bicycle and the other with what appears to be a white sack of flour. An annotation on the video incorrectly identifies the bicycle as an “RPG” or rocket-propelled grenade launcher. The date of the strike is unknown.

    The Times analysis found that the dimensions of the object in the video were consistent with a bicycle and, at one point, the front wheel of the bike can be seen slightly turning. The handlebars of the bike are also visible. Additionally, underneath the bicycle the ground is disturbed as its tires roll forward, an effect that would not have happened had the object been a shoulder-mounted weapon.

    Despite the error in identifying the bicycle as a weapon, the I.D.F. stood by its claim that the people targeted were combatants.

    “During the several days leading up to the documented strike, armed terrorists used the route shown in the video in order to transfer ammunition and attack I.D.F. forces,” the statement said. “The strike took place after real-time identification of the people as armed terrorists, based on information gathered ahead of the strike.”

    The statement said that the decision-making process behind the strike would be referred to military investigators who examine possible cases of misconduct by Israeli forces. Some human rights groups say that the Israeli military lacks the capacity for independent accountability and rarely penalizes soldiers for harming Palestinians. Israeli officials have defended the military’s efforts to limit harm to civilians and have opened investigations into some cases.

    Mohammed Qreiqea, a researcher for Euro-Med, told The Times that, according to witnesses he spoke with, the people were returning from collecting aid. One of the people in the strike died, while the other suffered a lung puncture but survived, he said. Their families did not immediately respond to phone calls, and the Israeli military did not describe the condition of the two people targeted.

    The strike was conducted on a road just a block away from Salah al-Din street, the main north-south highway in the Gaza Strip.

    As of Tuesday evening in Israel, the video with the incorrect annotation remained on the Israeli military’s website and social media accounts.

    Aaron Byrd contributed video production.

    — Aric Toler, Haley Willis and Neil Collier

  • Opinion | The Increase in Measles Cases Is Utterly Avoidable | Zeynep Tufekci. - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/02/13/opinion/thepoint#measles-outbreak-vaccine

    The Increase in Measles Cases Is Utterly Avoidable

    The World Health Organization has reported a “staggering” increase in the number of measles cases and deaths around the world. Millions of these victims are in poor countries and war zones, where vaccination programs have faltered because of the pandemic, violence or a lack of resources. In 2022, there were an estimated nine million measles cases globally, with 136,000 deaths.

    Increasingly, measles outbreaks have been taking place in wealthier countries, largely because of vaccine refusal. This is a dangerous situation — and not just for the willfully unvaccinated.

    Measles is airborne, wildly contagious and deadly. While the measles vaccine is greatly protective, losing herd immunity against the disease would result in many victims, and not just those who are willfully unvaccinated.

    A small percentage of fully vaccinated people will develop breakthrough measles infections if exposed to the disease. While their cases may be mild, they can transmit the disease to others. That’s how measles will spread to infants too young to be vaccinated, older people and the immunocompromised. (In the United States, babies get vaccinated against measles between 12 and 15 months of age.) Because the vaccinated can have few to no symptoms, vaccinated breakthrough cases are easy to miss — until that potentially deadly transmission.

    Some Republican politicians and state legislatures have toyed with removing or weakening vaccine mandates against measles, mumps and rubella in children. The number of Republicans who believe parents should be able to forgo vaccines for their children — even if that choice increases the risk of disease to others — is now up to 42 percent. That’s more than double the number before the pandemic, when the percentages were similar between the parties.

    Make no mistake: If efforts to remove these mandates succeed, there will be more outbreaks. Many unvaccinated children will die horrible deaths, while the vaccinated will be largely spared. But many babies, grandparents and immunocompromised patients will get sick and die, too.

    In a sane world, our country would allocate the resources to get vaccines to those in poorer countries and conflict zones and would refuse to budge on compulsory childhood vaccines. The alternative should be unthinkable.

    #Zeynep_Tufekci #Vaccination

  • Amnesty International accuses Israeli forces of killing Palestinians in the West Bank with impunity. - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/02/06/world/israel-hamas-war-gaza-news/amnesty-international-accuses-israeli-forces-of-killing-palestinians-in-the

    Amnesty International said on Monday that Israeli forces were killing Palestinians in the West Bank with “near total impunity” as the world’s attention focused on Gaza, demanding in a new report that the International Criminal Court step up its investigation into Israel’s conduct in the Israeli-occupied area.

    In the West Bank, Israeli forces have used live fire to disperse Palestinian protests, attacked people trying to help the injured and carried out deadly arrest raids that have spread fear throughout Palestinian communities, Amnesty International said in its report. It said the Israeli forces’ actions added to the country’s “well-documented track record of using excessive and often lethal force to stifle dissent and enforce its system of apartheid against Palestinians.”

    The human rights organization said that Israel’s use of unlawful force in the West Bank had sharply escalated since Oct. 7, when a Hamas-led attack from Gaza killed more than 1,200 people in Israel, according to Israeli authorities. Israel’s retaliatory campaign has killed more than 27,000 Palestinians in Gaza, according to health officials there.

    The Israeli military has described its actions in the West Bank as counterterrorism efforts necessary to prevent further attacks. Israel has strongly denied prior accusations that it has committed the crime of apartheid.

    Israeli military operations have raised alarms from several human rights groups, including the United Nations human rights office, which called in December for Israel to “end unlawful killings” of Palestinians in the West Bank and to immediately stop the use of “military weapons and means during law enforcement operations.”

    Since Oct. 7, Israeli forces in the West Bank have killed at least 360 Palestinians and injured 4,270, the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said on Sunday. Last year was the deadliest for Palestinians in the West Bank since the office began recording casualties in 2005, and about 70 percent of those killings were reported during Israeli military operations, O.C.H.A. has said.

    Amnesty’s report detailed its investigations into four incidents that it said were emblematic of the recent escalation, and renewed its call for the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Karim Khan, to take action. In 2021, the I.C.C. opened an investigation into allegations of war crimes committed by Israel and Palestinian militant groups in Israeli-occupied areas, but many Palestinian groups have criticized the pace and focus of the inquiry.

    Amnesty’s director for global research and policy, Erika Guevara-Rosas, called for Mr. Khan to investigate the killings in the West Bank as possible war crimes, saying in the report that “an international justice system worth its salt must step in.”

    #Palestine #Cisjordanie #Amnesty_international

  • Opinion | Boeing Is Missing Much More Than Four Door Bolts - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/02/06/opinion/thepoint#boeing-door-bolts

    Cette affaire Boeing est un révbélateur de la manière dont le capitalisme néolibéral est devenu une manière de singer dans tous les domaines les pratiques du capitalisme numérique. Go fast and break things, soyez agiles, on apprend des erreurs... Une bascule radicale de la culture des ingénieurs vers les pratiques des auditeurs et des commerciaux.

    There it is, the probable answer to why the exit door plug on the Boeing 737 Max Alaska Airlines flight blew out in the air. A National Transportation Safety Board preliminary report on the incident, released today, says that four bolts on the door plug were missing.

    Those four bolts, which prevent the door from sliding up, are removed on purpose when mechanics have to take the door off for maintenance or inspection, as was done last September, according to the report. But somehow, when the installation was over, they weren’t there. No bolts — nothing to stop the door from sliding up and then off.

    Preliminary N.T.S.B. reports like this one focus on establishing facts rather than spelling out who was at fault, which will wait for the final report. But this plane was practically new, and the Boeing chief executive, David Calhoun, has already acknowledged that it was a “quality escape” that caused the blowout.

    Everything so far indicates that Boeing is a company plagued by shoddy quality control. Just yesterday, it disclosed that a supplier had found “two holes may not have been drilled exactly to our requirements” on about 50 unfinished Boeing 737 Max planes, requiring more work on the planes and delaying their delivery.

    How could all this happen?

    This morning, before heading to Capitol Hill to testify before the House Transportation Committee, the F.A.A. administrator Mike Whitaker stopped by CNBC to discuss everything the agency has done to try to get ahead of this: slowing Boeing production lines, revoking certain exemptions, getting more inspectors on the ground, etc.

    But he also said something that really goes to the heart of the matter. Pressed by the host about the root causes, Whitaker said, “The system is designed really as an audit system, and I think that hasn’t worked well enough.”

    Our airline safety system assumes that airplane manufacturers are also deeply invested in upholding safety standards, so the F.A.A. oversight focuses on identifying new problems, improving existing systems and auditing to make sure existing standards are properly upheld.

    What happens if a company instead focuses more on what it could get away with in terms of cost-cutting?

    That’s how we get to a world where audits alone will not have “worked well enough.” The missing bolts may have caused the door to blow out, but it’s the missing corporate ethos that we should examine to understand the root cause.

    #Boeing #Zeynep_Tufekci

  • Conversations and insights about the moment. - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/01/30/opinion/thepoint#tech-hearings-transparency

    Zeynep Tufekci
    Feb. 1, 2024, 1:02 p.m. ETFeb. 1, 2024
    Feb. 1, 2024

    Zeynep Tufekci

    Opinion Columnist
    We Need Information, Not Apologies, From Tech Companies

    At the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on Wednesday on online child sexual exploitation, perhaps the most dramatic moment came when Mark Zuckerberg, the C.E.O. of the company that owns Facebook and Instagram, turned around and stood up to face parents holding up photos of their children who had died by suicide after sexual abuse or extortion via a social media platform.

    “I’m sorry for everything you have all been through,” Zuckerberg said to them.

    Here, reasonable voices might intervene. An unbearable tragedy, certainly, they might say, but such tragedies have occurred before social media came along. Let’s not lose proper historical and individual context when talking about the mental health and well-being of children, they might point out.

    All of that is technically correct, but fundamentally wrong. And one senator got to the heart of it.

    “Platforms need to hand over more content about how the algorithms work, what the content does and what the consequences are, not at the aggregate, not at the population level, but the actual numbers of cases so we can understand the content,” said Senator Chris Coons, Democrat of Delaware. He said he was sponsoring a bill with that requirement, setting new standards for disclosure and transparency, and posed the question forthrightly for Zuckerberg and the C.E.O.s of TikTok, Snap, X and Discord:

    “Is there any one of you willing to say now that you support this bill?”

    The answer was … silence. Crickets. Not one C.E.O. would commit. “Mr. Chairman, let the record reflect a yawning silence from the leaders of the social media platforms,” Coons noted, with resignation.

    The platforms have nearly absolute immunity as an industry. Thanks to Section 230, they generally cannot be sued and held liable for tragic events even if they were facilitated by their product; they get to keep all the profits made from these products. And yet when the public asks for meaningful transparency and data — so that it’s not just an appeal to emotion that results in legislation — the public is told, basically, to pound sand.

    We wouldn’t accept this from any other industry, and we should not accept it from technology companies. And that’s the most important point anyone should make until legislators start passing bipartisan bills that force meaningful transparency on these companies, which could finally allow proper accountability and reasonable oversight.

    #Zeynep_Tufekci #Facebook #Enfants

  • Laissez nous le temps de fabriquer des preuves.

    Israeli Army Searches Gaza’s Al-Shifa Hospital for 2nd Day : Israel-Hamas War Live Updates - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/11/16/world/israel-hamas-gaza-war-news

    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/11/16/world/israel-hamas-gaza-war-news/israeli-forces-search-al-shifas-grounds-which-it-says-hid-a-secret-hamas-fa

    By Thursday afternoon in Gaza, the only evidence that the Israeli military had so far provided publicly of Al-Shifa’s purported dual use was video showing some weapons and equipment — about a dozen guns, a grenade, protective vests and military uniforms — that it said soldiers found within an M.R.I. unit at the hospital. The New York Times has been unable to verify the provenance of the weapons.

    Mr. Hamdan, the Hamas spokesman, called the video “a weak and ridiculous narration,” at a news conference in Beirut. “The occupation resorted to this farce to cover up the fall of its alleged story,” he added.

    He said Israeli troops had “terrorized the patients and detained them in a barbaric manner,” and accused them of “destroying the medicine warehouse and disabling the M.R.I. machine.”

    On Oct. 27, the day that its forces invaded Gaza, the Israeli military published a map of the site that suggested Hamas was operating four underground complexes beneath the hospital’s internal medicine department, its chest and dialysis department, its M.R.I. department and a rest area at its western edge. The map also suggested that Hamas ran a command center at or near the hospital’s outpatient clinic.

    The army has not yet presented evidence publicly that any of those five sites exist. It did say in a statement that soldiers had found an aboveground command center in the M.R.I. unit, without providing further evidence. Hamas dismissed the assertion as “a fabricated story that no one would believe.”

    A spokesman for the Israeli military, Maj. Nir Dinar, said that Israel needed more time to find and present evidence.

    “It takes time because Hamas knew we were coming, and they’ve tried to hide evidence of their war crimes,” Major Dinar said. “They’ve messed up the scene, they’ve brought in sand to cover some of the floors, and they’ve created double walls.”

  • Nouveau grand moment de la propagande israélienne (posté sur le compte du porte-parole de l’armée israélienne) :

    And now we show you more evidence. In this room, there is a list. This list, in arabic, says, “We’re in operation, operation against Israel, started on the 7th of october.” This is a guardians list: where every terrorist writes its name, and every terrorist has it’s own shift.
    https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1724163901745414144/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/hO9zDPl3Q_Ab8r5M.mp4

    J’ai fait vérifier par madame, et effectivement les terroristes qui se succèdent sur ce calendrier se nomment Lundi, Mardi, Mercredi, Jeudi, Vendredi, Samedi et Dimanche. Et au bout d’une semaine, les choses sont bien faites, c’est à nouveau terroriste nommé Lundi, suivi du terroriste Mardi, etc. Et ainsi de suite jusqu’au bas de la page.

    Pour être bien clair : ce que Gugusse présente comme les « noms » des terroristes, ce sont juste les jours de la semaine.

    Ça devrait suffire à convaincre Joffrin.

    • ils s’en foutent que ça soit du pipo, même « facile » à debunk ; leur propagande est passée, ils remplissent les tuyaux de merde, c’est plus cher à nettoyer qu’à faire (et je retrouve pas le nom de ce "principe" de coût/bénéfice qui avantage la désinformation)

    • Gaza : Israël affirme avoir des indices de l’utilisation d’un hôpital par les combattants du Hamas
      https://www.huffingtonpost.fr/international/video/gaza-israel-affirme-avoir-des-indices-de-l-utilisation-d-un-hopital-p

      Sur une photo publiée par le compte X (ex-Twitter) d’un lieutenant-colonel de Tsahal, un document placardé sur un mur du « sous-sol de l’hôpital al-Rantissi » semble attribuer différentes tâches aux terroristes avant, pendant et après les attaques du 7 octobre, note BFMTV.

      Alors on passe d’un calendrier parfaitement lisible à l’écran, qui ne contient littéralement que le nom des jours de la semaine, à « une liste des gardiens des otages » selon le porte-parole de l’armée israélienne, mais maintenant selon « Le HuffPost avec AFP » citant BFMTV, c’est « un document qui attribue différentes tâches aux terroristes avant, pendant et après les attaques du 7 octobre ».

      Donc on a totalement lâché l’affaire, hein. On s’en cogne de raconter strictement n’importe quoi, en fait.

    • pas impossible aussi que France Q exécute les ordres du chef et serve la soupe, sans réfléchir paske, même s’ils ont un gros doute sur la teneur des infos qu’on leur demande de relayer, il vaut mieux exécuter les ordres ; sans réfléchir ; et puis bon, c’est que de l’actualité hein, ça sera vite oublié :-)

      Et #merci @arno pour Brandolino

    • La version du New York Times dit ceci :

      The Gazan Health Ministry said in a statement that the paper, including days and dates, was nothing more than “a regular work shift timetable, a standard administrative practice in hospitals.”

      The ministry, however, failed to address one key detail: The calendar begins on Oct. 7, the day of the Hamas terrorist attack on Israel, and *an Arabic title written at the top uses the militants’ name for the assault: “Al Aqsa Flood Battle, 7/10/2023.”*

      les pros du calendrier, vous confirmez ?

      (source : https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/11/14/world/israel-hamas-gaza-war-news)

    • Oui : « Opération Al-Aqsa Flood (7/10/2023) ». Mais « key detail » et « the militant’s name for the assault », ce sont des avis du NY Times. J’ignore comment des Palestiniens de Gaza appellent l’attaque du 7 octobre et la guerre qui s’ensuit, mais je ne vois pas pourquoi ils ne l’appèleraient pas ainsi. Et le détail devient « vital » après que les médias occidentaux, reprenant la présentation israélienne, aient raconté n’importe quoi sur le reste du calendrier.

    • C’est juste, mais depuis le 7 octobre cette date est devenue iconique et cadence toutes nos actions, qu’on soit résistants ou non.
      Et puis je ne vois pas pourquoi ce calendrier est dramatique même s’il contient des noms de résistants ! Rien ne justifie le bombardement d’hôpitaux.

    • On peut même élargir le propos : la focalisation sur les hôpitaux est intéressante pour les deux « camps ». Pour les Palestiniens, elle permettrait de démontrer l’inhumanité des bombardements israéliens (qui attaquent « même » les hôpitaux), ainsi que le deux-poids-deux-mesures occidental (qui condamne en Ukraine mais justifie en Palestine). Pour les Israéliens, l’enjeu est de démontrer que le Hamas utilise la population comme boucliers humains.

      Mais dans les deux cas c’est une guerre de symboles qui passe à côté de l’enormité du massacre. Parce que les plus de 11000 personnes tuées, donc presque la moitié d’enfants, dans les bombardements israéliens, à quelques exceptions près, ne sont pas morts dans des attaques sur les hôpitaux. Ils sont morts dans des bombardements massifs sur des zones d’habitation.

      On se fait facilement balader par les éléments de langage israéliens. Il y a quelques jours encore, ça ne parlait pas de justifier les bombardements sur les hôpitaux : tout le commentariat nous parlait de Dresde pour justifier qu’on rase complètement une ville. Le temps qu’on démonte ce discours dégueulasse, hop on passe à autre chose, et maintenant on se demande si c’est acceptable de bombarder des hôpitaux. Dans quelques jours on sera à discuter du nouvel élément de langage imposé par la propagande israélienne (en ce moment, je vois venir un assez joli « on leur apporte de l’eau, on leur apporte du fuel, mais comme le Hamas est vraiment très méchant, les gens refusent et continuent de mourir de leur plein gré »).

    • La mort de la journaliste d’Al-Jazira, Shireen Abu Akleh, place Israël face à ses responsabilités d’occupant (12 mai 2022)

      https://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2022/05/12/la-mort-de-la-journaliste-d-al-jazira-shireen-abu-akleh-place-israel-face-a-

      Mais à cette heure, le bureau de M. Bennett ne se préoccupe pas d’exprimer une vérité assurée, ce qui aurait nécessité du temps et de l’humilité. Ce qui compte, c’est que ces images instillent le doute. Elles entretiennent une autre version des faits, qui s’oppose aux accusations convergentes des confrères de Shireen Abu Akleh. C’est un pauvre mensonge par omission, à mèche courte, valable pour quelques heures à peine.