• Très discrètement le CDC étasunien vient de renoncer à tester les sujets contacts, sans même donner de consignes de mise en quarantaine.

    Carl T. Bergstrom sur Twitter : “Without explanation, the CDCGov made remarkable and troubling changes to their guidelines on coronavirus testing this week. They’ve gone from indicating testing for all close contacts to suggesting that testing is not necessary for close contacts of known cases.” / Twitter
    https://twitter.com/CT_Bergstrom/status/1298432375219580928

  • Coronavirus immunity offers perils and promise - CNN
    https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/21/health/coronavirus-immunity-frieden-opinion/index.html

    L’auteur de l’article est un ancien directeur du CDC étasunien ,

    Our schools and universities need to be extraordinarily careful. In most of the country, we need to keep our bars closed, indoor dining closed, and avoid closed indoor spaces with lots of people present. There may be light at the end of the tunnel, but immunity is definitely not just around the corner!

  • L’ONU rejette la résolution américaine visant à prolonger l’embargo sur les armes en Iran
    https://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2020/08/15/l-onu-rejette-la-resolution-americaine-visant-a-prolonger-l-embargo-sur-les-

    Les Etats-Unis, qui font pression pour isoler l’Iran, ont dénoncé un vote « inexcusable ». De son côté, Téhéran a salué ce vote, estimant que Washington n’a « jamais été si isolé ».

    Washington ne se faisait pas d’illusion mais espérait paraître moins seul dans sa stratégie de lutte contre le nucléaire iranien. Ça n’a pas marché. Le Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies (ONU) a rejeté, vendredi 14 août, une résolution américaine visant à prolonger l’embargo sur les ventes d’armes à l’Iran qui expire en octobre, suscitant la colère des Etats-Unis qui ont dénoncé un vote « inexcusable ».

    Le projet de Washington n’a été approuvé que par deux pays, a annoncé l’Indonésie, qui préside actuellement cette instance. Deux autres, la Russie et la Chine, ont voté contre et les onze membres restants du Conseil se sont abstenus, parmi lesquels la France, le Royaume-Uni et l’Allemagne, alliés européens des Etats-Unis.

    Seul soutien : la République Dominicaine
    Abstentions : France, Royaume-Uni, Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Belgique, Estonie, Indonésie, Niger, Saint-Vincent et les Grenadines, Tunisie, Vietnam

    • UN Security Council rejects US proposal to extend Iran arms embargo - CNNPolitics
      https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/14/politics/us-un-proposal-iran-conventional-weapons-rejected/index.html

      US Ambassador to the UN Kelly Craft said in a statement Friday the US “has every right to initiate snapback of provisions of previous Security Council resolutions” and “in the coming days, the United States will follow through on that promise to stop at nothing to extend the arms embargo.

      The US only drew support for the proposal from the Dominican Republic. Russia and China were opposed while Germany, France, the United Kingdom and eight others abstained.

      The United Nations Security Council is charged with the responsibility of maintaining international peace and security. It failed today to uphold its fundamental mission set,” US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a statement Friday.

      Under the terms of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the conventional weapons ban on Iran is legally set to expire in mid-October. For months, the Trump administration has sought to extend the embargo despite having exited the deal — a campaign that was predicted to fail.

      ’Inexcusable’
      This week, the US tabled a resolution in the UN Security Council that would rollover the existing embargo indefinitely. US Special Representative for Iran Brian Hook argued it was a “a compromise text.

      We listened to the Security Council members and created a new text that is both reasonable and necessary,” he told reporters Thursday.
      […]
      Trump administration officials have argued that the US has the legal authority to re-impose sanctions on Iran under UN Security Council Resolution 2231.

      Resolution 2231 establishes a fixed term, ’JCPOA participants,’” Hook told reporters Thursday. “That expressly includes the United States in its definition. Resolution 2231 places no other conditions on the eligibility of states that are among the named JCPOA participants. Developments beyond the four corners of Resolution 2231 did not and could not change the United States’ right to initiate snapback.
      Hook said the US circulated a six-page legal memo on the matter to UN Security Council members Thursday.

      The US position had raised eyebrows and scorn among diplomats.
      European allies agreed that the potential of weapons flowing in and out of Iran poses a threat, but were furious that the US withdrew from the nuclear agreement but still claimed to be a participant and have the ability to snapback sanctions.

      You can’t have your cake and eat it too,” said one Security Council diplomat.

      en termes diplomatiques (mais anonyme, quand même) :
      Les É.-U. voudraient avoir #le_beurre_et_l'argent_du_beurre

  • US defense officials contradict Trump : No indication yet of attack in Beirut
    https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/04/politics/defense-officials-contradict-trump-beirut/index.html

    Three US Defense Department officials told CNN that as of Tuesday night there was no indication that the massive explosion that rocked Beirut on Tuesday were an “attack,” contradicting an earlier claim from President Donald Trump.

    […]

    But the defense officials, who declined to be identified so they could speak freely, said they didn’t know what the President was talking about.

    One official said that if there were indications anyone in the region pulled something off of this scale, it would trigger automatic increases in force protection for US troops and assets in the region — if for no other reason than worry about retribution attacks.

    That official noted that none of that has happened so far.