/2021

  • The short life and long journey of Artin, found dead on Norway beach | Refugees | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun/08/artins-journey-asylum-seeker-speaks-of-the-smuggling-trade-that-killed-


    L’article affiche ce graphique avec sa légende. Cette version brute représente l’itinéraire tragique de beaucoup dont le dernier point constitue sa qualité unique. La majorité des disparus restent sans sépulture.

    Friend of 15-month-old’s family reveals details of Channel smuggling trade that led to their deaths

    The authorities in Norway did not have much to go on when they found the body on the shore on New Year’s Day. But the baby boy was wearing a jacket – navy blue with white stitching.

    And that helped them solve the mystery of what had happened to 15-month-old Artin Iran Nezhad, who had last been seen weeks before and hundreds of miles away.

    The toddler had been photographed wearing the same coat in a refugee camp in Calais, not long before he and his family boarded an overcrowded boat to cross the Channel that then capsized.

    All five members of Artin’s Kurdish Iranian family were lost in the incident on 27 October 2020 – his mother, Shiva Mohammad Panahi, his father, Rasul Iran Nezhad, his sister, Anita, nine, and brother, Armin, six.

    But while the bodies of the others were recovered quite soon, Artin was not found. He was listed as missing, until a formal identification followed on Monday this week.

    The announcement by Norwegian police was the final chapter in a short life that had been marked by many long and difficult journeys – trips he had taken oblivious to government restrictions at borders and hostile environments for refugees across Europe.

    After crossing the Iranian border on 7 August 2020, from their home in Sardasht, the family moved through Turkey then went by boat to Italy before reaching the refugee camp in Calais.

    Tens of thousands of other refugees make similar high-risk journeys every year underlining the enormAfter crossing the Iranian border on 7 August 2020, from their home in Sardasht, the family moved through Turkey then went by boat to Italy before reaching the refugee camp in Calais.

    Tens of thousands of other refugees make similar high-risk journeys every year underlining the enormous risks people take to save their lives.

    An asylum seeker who crossed the Channel from Calais just a few weeks ago and is now accommodated in a hotel in London by the Home Office told the Guardian he knew the family well. He said he had lived alongside them in Calais in the days before they attempted the fateful crossing. He told how the family had come under extraordinary pressure from smugglers to cross the Channel.

    Had the family had money to pay a more expensive smuggler, he believes they might all still be alive today. “If you don’t have money you cannot save your life. You must die,” he said.ous risks people take to save their lives.

    An asylum seeker who crossed the Channel from Calais just a few weeks ago and is now accommodated in a hotel in London by the Home Office told the Guardian he knew the family well. He said he had lived alongside them in Calais in the days before they attempted the fateful crossing. He told how the family had come under extraordinary pressure from smugglers to cross the Channel.

    Had the family had money to pay a more expensive smuggler, he believes they might all still be alive today. “If you don’t have money you cannot save your life. You must die,” he said.

    The asylum seeker said that he had bonded with Artin and spent a lot of time with him in the camp. “I played with him every day. He was so sweet and lovely and playful. He particularly loved playing with a drinking water fountain in the camp and always wanted to go there so he could play with the water.”

    He said the family lived in poverty in Iran, where Kurds are a persecuted minority. Rasul Iran Nezhad sometimes worked carrying goods such as household appliances on his back across the mountainous border area where many Iranian Kurds live. The work was difficult and high risk. Those who are caught can face severe penalties.

    The family decided to leave in the hope of finding safety for themselves and their children. “They had a lot of hope about making a new life in the UK. Shiva had many beautiful dreams for the children,” he said. “She wanted them to get a good education at schools in the UK and then go on to university. Anita wanted to become an actress and had already passed some acting screen tests. Of course Artin did not understand about crossing the Channel and reaching the UK, but the two older children did.”

    The friend added: “They understood that since they had left their home city of Sardasht travelling through Turkey, Italy and France they had become homeless. They believed that if they could reach the UK they would no longer be in that situation.”

    He explained that the smugglers in northern France used different systems. He said that in Calais the majority of the smugglers were Kurdish Iranian, in nearby Dunkirk many were Kurdish Iraqi.

    Asylum seekers with greater financial resources can deposit their money in an informal, clandestine, money “exchange”, sometimes in a supermarket or small shop. It works as a kind of underground international money transfer system.

    If people arrive successfully to the UK they call the exchange and ask for money to be transferred to the smuggler organising the crossing. If the crossing fails the money is not transferred.

    Those with no money at all are forced to work for the smugglers, helping them with between three and 10 crossings before they have “earned” free passage in a flimsy boat.

    Those with some money but not enough for the “exchange” pay low-ranking smugglers slightly less money than the going rate to travel in a relatively good boat with a new engine motor that is not dangerously overcrowded.
    Four Iranians who died crossing Channel were part of same family
    Read more

    According to the asylum seeker, Artin’s family had originally approached a smuggler offering a relatively safe passage but that person had rejected them because they could not afford to pay him what he wanted.

    “They had very little money,” said the asylum seeker. “They begged family and friends to sell their gold so they could pay the smuggler and managed to raise €5,000 to pay for the whole family to cross. But the smuggler said this was not enough.”

    He said he had kept a voice message from Shiva saying the smuggler had rejected them for lack of funds. “The smugglers are very dishonest. They did not take us … They took some of our friends who had paid more money,” Shiva said in a flat, despairing tone in the voicemail message.

    “Shiva was hopeless and disappointed and they gave the money to another smuggler who was charging less,” said the asylum seeker. “But he forced them to cross when the weather was bad, in an overcrowded boat. He said the family needed to cross to help him because he was in debt to another smuggler he needed to repay.”

    He said some of the asylum seekers had a rule that they would not attempt to cross the Channel if the waves were higher than 10 to 20cm. “That night the waves were 70cm. Many smugglers were not doing crossings then because the weather was too bad.”

    He said the family was faced with an impossible choice. “The smuggler said to them, ‘if you don’t cross tonight just go away, you will not get your money back’.”

    The BBC reported that Shiva had sent a text shortly before their fateful final journey saying: “If we want to go with a lorry we might need more money that we don’t have.”

    The asylum seeker said a demand by the home secretary, Priti Patel, telling social media companies to remove online posts from smugglers about crossings, was pointless. With or without smugglers posting on social media desperate asylum seekers would contact them to cross the Channel.

    “If we as asylum seekers have no legal way to reach safety we have no choice but to use the illegal way. That is what the family who drowned were forced to do. I wish they can rest in peace in the next world.”

    Though Artin’s body was discovered on 1 January near Karmøy, in south-west Norway, it took the Norweigan authorities more than five months from that date to confirm his identity. The identification was made through retrieving and matching DNA, with the help of specialists from Oslo University hospital.

    “We didn’t have a missing baby reported in Norway, and no family had contacted the police,” said Camilla Tjelle Waage, the head of police investigations. “The blue overall wasn’t a Norwegian brand either [and] that indicated the baby was not from Norway.”

    Artin’s remaining family have reportedly been notified and his remains are to be flown back to Iran to be buried.

    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/1973b6e4a89ae233820f65a578aeab1799e963b2/16_19_883_530/master/883.jpg

    #frontières

  • The short life and long journey of Artin, found dead on Norway beach | Refugees | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun/08/artins-journey-asylum-seeker-speaks-of-the-smuggling-trade-that-killed-

    Friend of 15-month-old’s family reveals details of Channel smuggling trade that led to their deaths

    The authorities in Norway did not have much to go on when they found the body on the shore on New Year’s Day. But the baby boy was wearing a jacket – navy blue with white stitching.

    And that helped them solve the mystery of what had happened to 15-month-old Artin Iran Nezhad, who had last been seen weeks before and hundreds of miles away.

    The toddler had been photographed wearing the same coat in a refugee camp in Calais, not long before he and his family boarded an overcrowded boat to cross the Channel that then capsized.

    All five members of Artin’s Kurdish Iranian family were lost in the incident on 27 October 2020 – his mother, Shiva Mohammad Panahi, his father, Rasul Iran Nezhad, his sister, Anita, nine, and brother, Armin, six.

    But while the bodies of the others were recovered quite soon, Artin was not found. He was listed as missing, until a formal identification followed on Monday this week.

    The announcement by Norwegian police was the final chapter in a short life that had been marked by many long and difficult journeys – trips he had taken oblivious to government restrictions at borders and hostile environments for refugees across Europe.

    After crossing the Iranian border on 7 August 2020, from their home in Sardasht, the family moved through Turkey then went by boat to Italy before reaching the refugee camp in Calais.

    Tens of thousands of other refugees make similar high-risk journeys every year underlining the enormAfter crossing the Iranian border on 7 August 2020, from their home in Sardasht, the family moved through Turkey then went by boat to Italy before reaching the refugee camp in Calais.

    Tens of thousands of other refugees make similar high-risk journeys every year underlining the enormous risks people take to save their lives.

    An asylum seeker who crossed the Channel from Calais just a few weeks ago and is now accommodated in a hotel in London by the Home Office told the Guardian he knew the family well. He said he had lived alongside them in Calais in the days before they attempted the fateful crossing. He told how the family had come under extraordinary pressure from smugglers to cross the Channel.

    Had the family had money to pay a more expensive smuggler, he believes they might all still be alive today. “If you don’t have money you cannot save your life. You must die,” he said.ous risks people take to save their lives.

    An asylum seeker who crossed the Channel from Calais just a few weeks ago and is now accommodated in a hotel in London by the Home Office told the Guardian he knew the family well. He said he had lived alongside them in Calais in the days before they attempted the fateful crossing. He told how the family had come under extraordinary pressure from smugglers to cross the Channel.

    Had the family had money to pay a more expensive smuggler, he believes they might all still be alive today. “If you don’t have money you cannot save your life. You must die,” he said.

    The asylum seeker said that he had bonded with Artin and spent a lot of time with him in the camp. “I played with him every day. He was so sweet and lovely and playful. He particularly loved playing with a drinking water fountain in the camp and always wanted to go there so he could play with the water.”

    He said the family lived in poverty in Iran, where Kurds are a persecuted minority. Rasul Iran Nezhad sometimes worked carrying goods such as household appliances on his back across the mountainous border area where many Iranian Kurds live. The work was difficult and high risk. Those who are caught can face severe penalties.

    The family decided to leave in the hope of finding safety for themselves and their children. “They had a lot of hope about making a new life in the UK. Shiva had many beautiful dreams for the children,” he said. “She wanted them to get a good education at schools in the UK and then go on to university. Anita wanted to become an actress and had already passed some acting screen tests. Of course Artin did not understand about crossing the Channel and reaching the UK, but the two older children did.”

    The friend added: “They understood that since they had left their home city of Sardasht travelling through Turkey, Italy and France they had become homeless. They believed that if they could reach the UK they would no longer be in that situation.”

    He explained that the smugglers in northern France used different systems. He said that in Calais the majority of the smugglers were Kurdish Iranian, in nearby Dunkirk many were Kurdish Iraqi.

    Asylum seekers with greater financial resources can deposit their money in an informal, clandestine, money “exchange”, sometimes in a supermarket or small shop. It works as a kind of underground international money transfer system.

    If people arrive successfully to the UK they call the exchange and ask for money to be transferred to the smuggler organising the crossing. If the crossing fails the money is not transferred.

    Those with no money at all are forced to work for the smugglers, helping them with between three and 10 crossings before they have “earned” free passage in a flimsy boat.

    Those with some money but not enough for the “exchange” pay low-ranking smugglers slightly less money than the going rate to travel in a relatively good boat with a new engine motor that is not dangerously overcrowded.
    Four Iranians who died crossing Channel were part of same family
    Read more

    According to the asylum seeker, Artin’s family had originally approached a smuggler offering a relatively safe passage but that person had rejected them because they could not afford to pay him what he wanted.

    “They had very little money,” said the asylum seeker. “They begged family and friends to sell their gold so they could pay the smuggler and managed to raise €5,000 to pay for the whole family to cross. But the smuggler said this was not enough.”

    He said he had kept a voice message from Shiva saying the smuggler had rejected them for lack of funds. “The smugglers are very dishonest. They did not take us … They took some of our friends who had paid more money,” Shiva said in a flat, despairing tone in the voicemail message.

    “Shiva was hopeless and disappointed and they gave the money to another smuggler who was charging less,” said the asylum seeker. “But he forced them to cross when the weather was bad, in an overcrowded boat. He said the family needed to cross to help him because he was in debt to another smuggler he needed to repay.”

    He said some of the asylum seekers had a rule that they would not attempt to cross the Channel if the waves were higher than 10 to 20cm. “That night the waves were 70cm. Many smugglers were not doing crossings then because the weather was too bad.”

    He said the family was faced with an impossible choice. “The smuggler said to them, ‘if you don’t cross tonight just go away, you will not get your money back’.”

    The BBC reported that Shiva had sent a text shortly before their fateful final journey saying: “If we want to go with a lorry we might need more money that we don’t have.”

    The asylum seeker said a demand by the home secretary, Priti Patel, telling social media companies to remove online posts from smugglers about crossings, was pointless. With or without smugglers posting on social media desperate asylum seekers would contact them to cross the Channel.

    “If we as asylum seekers have no legal way to reach safety we have no choice but to use the illegal way. That is what the family who drowned were forced to do. I wish they can rest in peace in the next world.”

    Though Artin’s body was discovered on 1 January near Karmøy, in south-west Norway, it took the Norweigan authorities more than five months from that date to confirm his identity. The identification was made through retrieving and matching DNA, with the help of specialists from Oslo University hospital.

    “We didn’t have a missing baby reported in Norway, and no family had contacted the police,” said Camilla Tjelle Waage, the head of police investigations. “The blue overall wasn’t a Norwegian brand either [and] that indicated the baby was not from Norway.”

    Artin’s remaining family have reportedly been notified and his remains are to be flown back to Iran to be buried.

    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/1973b6e4a89ae233820f65a578aeab1799e963b2/16_19_883_530/master/883.jpg?width=620&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=175dc7af476c6d6262799d3

    #frontières

  • Popularity of far-right topics on France’s CNews sparks election concern | France | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/may/28/popularity-far-right-topics-france-cnews-election-concern

    Nedjar said a recent CSA poll for the channel found that 27% of its viewers identified with the left, 9% with the centre and 24% with the right, including 9% who identified with Le Pen’s far-right Rassemblement National party. A total of 40% of viewers either did not identify with a party or did not say.

  • Bélarus : un opposant arrêté après le détournement de son avion sur Minsk – Libération

    https://www.liberation.fr/international/europe/belarus-un-opposant-arrete-apres-le-detournement-de-son-avion-sur-minsk-2

    https://www.liberation.fr/resizer/SEXCFQYjH41zlRPVYMXXJA0FHCo=/1200x630/cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/liberation/J3ZNXNLX7BA3VCKFQAZ4NL47BA.JPG

    Un peu de cartographie radicale puisqu’on est en train d’en faire un livre à paraître dans pas longtemps. On me demande souvent ce qui peut être « radical » dans la cartographie, c’est une question à laquelle il est difficile de répondre tant ce domaine est complexe et multiparamétrique. Mais on pourrait dire que la cartographie qui illustre cette histoire est de la cartographie radicale, surtout si elle rend visible l’ensemble du paysage (l’espace) dans lequel cette affaire se déroule et montre qu’il y a un truc qui cloche

    Loukachenko détourne un vol de la Ryanair reliant Athènes à Vilnius et arrête un journaliste exilé.

    Qui nous explique pourquoi - alors que les biélorusses ont leurré le pilote en prétextant une menace (une bombe ?) à bord - l’avion est contraint d’atterrir sur un aéroport qui est à presque trois fois la distance du plus proche qu’il est supposé choisir ? et qui parcourt quatre fois la distance de vol qu’il aurait eu à faire si il avait poursuivi sa route jusqu’à Vilnius ?

    Bélarus : un opposant arrêté après le détournement de son avion sur Minsk

    Un vol Ryanair entre Athènes et Vilnius a été intercepté par des avions de chasse qui l’ont contraint à se détourner pour atterrir sur l’aéroport de Minsk au Bélarus, où un journaliste opposant au régime d’Alexandre Loukachenko qui se trouvait à bord a été arrêté

  • En Belgique, la police traque un militaire, sympathisant de l’ultra-droite et en guerre contre « le régime »
    https://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2021/05/20/la-police-belge-traque-un-militaire-en-guerre-contre-le-regime_6080913_3210.

    La Belgique n’avait plus connu une telle mobilisation policière depuis mars 2016 et l’arrestation de Salah Abdeslam, impliqué dans les attentats du 13 novembre 2015 à Paris et Saint-Denis. Quelque 250 policiers, une centaine de militaires, des membres des forces spéciales, tous lourdement armés et appuyés par des véhicules blindés, étaient massés, jeudi 20 mai, autour du parc national de la Haute Campine, dans la province de Limbourg.

    C’est dans cette vaste zone de 12 000 hectares de forêts et de landes, survolée par un hélicoptère et fermée aux promeneurs, que les forces de l’ordre traquaient Jürgen Conings, un militaire de 46 ans, tireur d’élite fiché depuis 2020 comme sympathisant de l’ultra-droite.

  • UK travellers to France may be asked proof of accommodation as part of post-Brexit changes
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/may/20/uk-travellers-to-france-may-be-asked-proof-of-accommodation-as-part-of-

    Post-Brexit British visitors to France may be asked to show proof of their accommodation, including an official certificate obtained in advance if they are staying with friends or family, once Covid-related travel restrictions are lifted. The rule, which has applied to British travellers since the UK left the EU, requires anyone in France hosting non-EU nationals to complete an attestation d’accueil form and submit it for approval to their town hall, a process that can take up to a month. Source: The Guardian

  • Revealed: 2,000 refugee deaths linked to illegal EU pushbacks

    A Guardian analysis finds EU countries used brutal tactics to stop nearly 40,000 asylum seekers crossing borders

    EU member states have used illegal operations to push back at least 40,000 asylum seekers from Europe’s borders during the pandemic, methods being linked to the death of more than 2,000 people, the Guardian can reveal.

    In one of the biggest mass expulsions in decades, European countries, supported by EU’s border agency #Frontex, has systematically pushed back refugees, including children fleeing from wars, in their thousands, using illegal tactics ranging from assault to brutality during detention or transportation.

    The Guardian’s analysis is based on reports released by UN agencies, combined with a database of incidents collected by non-governmental organisations. According to charities, with the onset of Covid-19, the regularity and brutality of pushback practices has grown.

    “Recent reports suggest an increase of deaths of migrants attempting to reach Europe and, at the same time, an increase of the collaboration between EU countries with non-EU countries such as Libya, which has led to the failure of several rescue operations,’’ said one of Italy’s leading human rights and immigration experts, Fulvio Vassallo Paleologo, professor of asylum law at the University of Palermo. ‘’In this context, deaths at sea since the beginning of the pandemic are directly or indirectly linked to the EU approach aimed at closing all doors to Europe and the increasing externalisation of migration control to countries such as Libya.’’

    The findings come as the EU’s anti-fraud watchdog, Olaf, has launched an investigation into Frontex (https://www.euronews.com/2021/01/20/eu-migration-chief-urges-frontex-to-clarify-pushback-allegations) over allegations of harassment, misconduct and unlawful operations aimed at stopping asylum seekers from reaching EU shores.

    According to the International Organization for Migration (https://migration.iom.int/europe?type=arrivals), in 2020 almost 100,000 immigrants arrived in Europe by sea and by land compared with nearly 130,000 in 2019 and 190,000 in 2017.

    Since January 2020, despite the drop in numbers, Italy, Malta, Greece, Croatia and Spain have accelerated their hardline migration agenda. Since the introduction of partial or complete border closures to halt the outbreak of coronavirus, these countries have paid non-EU states and enlisted private vessels to intercept boats in distress at sea and push back passengers into detention centres. There have been repeated reports of people being beaten, robbed, stripped naked at frontiers or left at sea.

    In 2020 Croatia, whose police patrol the EU’s longest external border, have intensified systemic violence and pushbacks of migrants to Bosnia. The Danish Refugee Council (DRC) recorded nearly 18,000 migrants pushed back by Croatia since the start of the pandemic. Over the last year and a half, the Guardian has collected testimonies of migrants who have allegedly been whipped, robbed, sexually abused and stripped naked (https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/oct/21/croatian-police-accused-of-sickening-assaults-on-migrants-on-balkans-tr) by members of the Croatian police. Some migrants said they were spray-painted with red crosses on their heads by officers who said the treatment was the “cure against coronavirus” (https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/may/28/they-made-crosses-on-our-heads-refugees-report-abuse-by-croatian-police).

    According to an annual report released on Tuesday by the Border Violence Monitoring Network (BVMN) (https://www.borderviolence.eu/annual-torture-report-2020), a coalition of 13 NGOs documenting illegal pushbacks in the western Balkans, abuse and disproportionate force was present in nearly 90% of testimonies in 2020 collected from Croatia, a 10% increase on 2019.

    In April, the Guardian revealed how a woman from Afghanistan was allegedly sexually abused (https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/apr/07/croatian-border-police-accused-of-sexually-assaulting-afghan-migrant) and held at knifepoint by a Croatian border police officer during a search of migrants on the border with Bosnia.

    “Despite the European Commission’s engagement with Croatian authorities in recent months, we have seen virtually no progress, neither on investigations of the actual reports, nor on the development of independent border monitoring mechanisms,” said Nicola Bay, DRC country director for Bosnia. “Every single pushback represents a violation of international and EU law – whether it involves violence or not.”

    Since January 2020, Greece has pushed back about 6,230 asylum seekers from its shores, according to data from BVMN. The report stated that in 89% of the pushbacks, “BVMN has observed the disproportionate and excessive use of force. This alarming number shows that the use of force in an abusive, and therefore illicit, way has become a normality […]

    “Extremely cruel examples of police violence documented in 2020 included prolonged excessive beatings (often on naked bodies), water immersion, the physical abuse of women and children, the use of metal rods to inflict injury.”

    In testimonies, people described how their hands were tied to the bars of cells and helmets put on their heads before beatings to avoid visible bruising.

    A lawsuit filed against the Greek state in April at the European court of human rights (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/26/greece-accused-of-shocking-pushback-against-refugees-at-sea) accused Athens of abandoning dozens of migrants in life rafts at sea, after some had been beaten. The case claims that Greek patrol boats towed migrants back to Turkish waters and abandoned them at sea without food, water, lifejackets or any means to call for help.

    BVMN said: “Whether it be using the Covid-19 pandemic and the national lockdown to serve as a cover for pushbacks, fashioning open-air prisons, or preventing boats from entering Greek waters by firing warning shots toward boats, the evidence indicates the persistent refusal to uphold democratic values, human rights and international and European law.”

    According to UNHCR data, since the start of the pandemic, Libyan authorities – with Italian support since 2017, when Rome ceded responsibility (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jul/23/mother-and-child-drown-after-being-abandoned-off-libya-says-ngo) for overseeing Mediterranean rescue operations to Libya – intercepted and pushed back to Tripoli about 15,500 asylum seekers. The controversial strategy has caused the forced return of thousands to Libyan detention centres where, according to first hand reports, they face torture. Hundreds have drowned when neither Libya nor Italy intervened.

    “In 2020 this practice continued, with an increasingly important role being played by Frontex planes, sighting boats at sea and communicating their position to the Libyan coastguard,” said Matteo de Bellis, migration researcher at Amnesty International. “So, while Italy at some point even used the pandemic as an excuse to declare that its ports were not safe for the disembarkation of people rescued at sea, it had no problem with the Libyan coastguard returning people to Tripoli. Even when this was under shelling or when hundreds were forcibly disappeared immediately after disembarkation.”

    In April, Italy and Libya were accused of deliberately ignoring a mayday call (https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/apr/25/a-mayday-call-a-dash-across-the-ocean-and-130-souls-lost-at-sea) from a migrant boat in distress in Libyan waters, as waves reached six metres. A few hours later, an NGO rescue boat discovered dozens of bodies (https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/apr/25/a-mayday-call-a-dash-across-the-ocean-and-130-souls-lost-at-sea) floating in the waves. That day 130 migrants were lost at sea.

    In April, in a joint investigation with the Italian Rai News and the newspaper Domani, the Guardian saw documents from Italian prosecutors detailing conversations between two commanders of the Libyan coastguard and an Italian coastguard officer in Rome. The transcripts appeared to expose the non-responsive behaviour (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/16/wiretaps-migrant-boats-italy-libya-coastguard-mediterranean) of the Libyan officers and their struggling to answer the distress calls which resulted in hundreds of deaths. At least five NGO boats remain blocked in Italian ports as authorities claim administrative reasons for holding them.

    “Push- and pull-back operations have become routine, as have forms of maritime abandonment where hundreds were left to drown,’’ said a spokesperson at Alarm Phone, a hotline service for migrants in distress at sea. ‘’We have documented so many shipwrecks that were never officially accounted for, and so we know that the real death toll is much higher. In many of the cases, European coastguards have refused to respond – they rather chose to let people drown or to intercept them back to the place they had risked their lives to escape from. Even if all European authorities try to reject responsibility, we know that the mass dying is a direct result of both their actions and inactions. These deaths are on Europe.’’

    Malta, which declared its ports closed early last year, citing the pandemic, has continued to push back hundreds of migrants using two strategies: enlisting private vessels to intercept asylum seekers and force them back to Libya or turning them away with directions to Italy (https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/may/20/we-give-you-30-minutes-malta-turns-migrant-boat-away-with-directions-to).

    “Between 2014 and 2017, Malta was able to count on Italy to take responsibility for coordinating rescues and allowing disembarkations,” said De Bellis. “But when Italy and the EU withdrew their ships from the central Mediterranean, to leave it in Libya’s hands, they left Malta more exposed. In response, from early 2020 the Maltese government used tactics to avoid assisting refugees and migrants in danger at sea, including arranging unlawful pushbacks to Libya by private fishing boats, diverting boats rather than rescuing them, illegally detaining hundreds of people on ill-equipped ferries off Malta’s waters, and signing a new agreement with Libya to prevent people from reaching Malta.”

    Last May, a series of voice messages obtained by the Guardian (https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/may/19/exclusive-12-die-as-malta-uses-private-ships-to-push-migrants-back-to-l) confirmed the Maltese government’s strategy to use private vessels, acting at the behest of its armed forces, to intercept crossings and return refugees to Libyan detention centres.

    In February 2020, the European court of human rights was accused of “completely ignoring the reality” after it ruled Spain did not violate the prohibition of collective expulsion (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/13/european-court-under-fire-backing-spain-express-deportations), as asylum applications could be made at the official border crossing point. Relying on this judgment, Spain’s constitutional court upheld “border rejections” provided certain safeguards apply.

    Last week, the bodies of 24 migrants from sub-Saharan Africa were found by Spain’s maritime rescue (https://apnews.com/article/atlantic-ocean-canary-islands-coronavirus-pandemic-africa-migration-5ab68371. They are believed to have died of dehydration while attempting to reach the Canary Islands. In 2020, according to the UNHCR, 788 migrants died trying to reach Spain (https://data2.unhcr.org/en/country/esp).

    Frontex said they couldn’t comment on the total figures without knowing the details of each case, but said various authorities took action to respond to the dinghy that sunk off the coast of Libya (https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/apr/25/a-mayday-call-a-dash-across-the-ocean-and-130-souls-lost-at-sea) in April, resulting in the deaths of 130 people.

    “The Italian rescue centre asked Frontex to fly over the area. It’s easy to forget, but the central Mediterranean is massive and it’s not easy or fast to get from one place to another, especially in poor weather. After reaching the area where the boat was suspected to be, they located it after some time and alerted all of the Maritime Rescue and Coordination Centres (MRCCs) in the area. They also issued a mayday call to all boats in the area (Ocean Viking was too far away to receive it).”

    He said the Italian MRCC, asked by the Libyan MRCC, dispatched three merchant vessels in the area to assist. Poor weather made this difficult. “In the meantime, the Frontex plane was running out of fuel and had to return to base. Another plane took off the next morning when the weather allowed, again with the same worries about the safety of the crew.

    “All authorities, certainly Frontex, did all that was humanly possible under the circumstances.”

    He added that, according to media reports, there was a Libyan coast guard vessel in the area, but it was engaged in another rescue operation.

    https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/may/05/revealed-2000-refugee-deaths-linked-to-eu-pushbacks

    #push-backs #refoulements #push-back #mourir_aux_frontières #morts_aux_frontières #décès #morts #asile #migrations #réfugiés #frontières #responsabilité #Croatie #viols #Grèce #Italie #Libye

    ping @isskein

  • Humans already have the tools to combat climate change but we lack leadership | New Zealand | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/may/10/humans-already-have-the-tools-to-combat-climate-change-but-we-lack-lead

    In this extract, top atmospheric scientist Dave Lowe explains why despite political inaction he believes we can build a sustainable future

    When it comes to the political will and leadership needed to drive the world towards a sustainable future, I’m a pessimist. Time and time again, I’ve heard rhetoric from politicians focusing on short-term goals at the expense of planning for the future. In 2021, the mainstream media promote responsible journalism and take a hard line with climate deniers. Many journalists hold governments to account over climate change goals. However, hard scientific data is often still manipulated and cherrypicked by politicians. I’ve spoken to many and liken the experience to walking through treacle.

    Does their bland decision-making have to do with the structure of democracy itself, with its short electoral terms and lack of incentives for incumbent politicians to make hard and binding decisions for the decades ahead?

    As I look around and see New Zealand’s highways, jammed with huge diesel trucks and ever-increasing numbers of petrol-powered SUVs and cars, I feel dread. It doesn’t have to be this way. What is it about living on a finite planet that humans either don’t or won’t understand, after all the studies and warnings show that continuing in this way leads to the inevitable collapse of the planet’s ecosystems?

    When you look at the true cost of the damage to the atmosphere, politicians’ claims that action on carbon reduction is too expensive become bizarre. When we burn fossil fuels, we’ve never factored in the ultimate cost of the damage to the atmosphere caused by excess CO2. In many countries, if you pollute a waterway, you have to clean it up or pay a substantial fee for the damage – that cost has to be factored in to the cost of running your business. In the case of emitting CO2 into the atmosphere, you can do that for little or no upfront and immediate cost. Are we offended by people polluting waterways because it is literally in your face whereas CO2 is a transparent gas?

    For most of the last few decades I have been disappointed with the lack of action on carbon emissions reductions by politicians. But on the other hand, I’m very optimistic when it comes to the extraordinary ingenuity of human beings. We already have the tools to combat climate change. The last two decades have seen massive advances in renewable energy electricity generation to the point where these sources are now cheaper than equivalent coal-burning power plants, even before the cost of damage to the atmosphere is taken into account. The International Energy Agency (IEA) reported that, in 2019, almost 30% of OECD electricity was met by renewable sources including hydro, solar, wind, biomass and geothermal.

    Crucial to the urgent transition towards a low carbon future will be the skills and experience of engineers. Over the years I’ve spoken to many groups of engineers, including oil and gas engineers, about climate change. You’d think that a climate scientist talking to a gas engineer would lead to an argument, but that has not been my experience.

    Those same gas and other engineers who have been so maligned by the green movement have the vital skills needed in a new sustainable economy.

    Their skills are transferable to an economy making widescale use of “green hydrogen”, for example. Green hydrogen, produced by electrolysis of water using excess electricity derived from wind and other renewable energy sources, is already being used in steelmaking, energy storage and transport in Germany and a number of other countries.

    When I talk to people about this technology and its possibilities, they are astonished. They wonder why they have never heard of it. Hydrogen fuel cell technology has been around a long time – I remember first seeing it decades ago. Why hasn’t it been used? Several reasons come to mind, including conspiracy theories about the oil companies, but to me there is a simple answer. It’s because products made from fossil fuels appear to be so much cheaper than sustainable alternatives; the true cost of the climate emergency is never factored in when the products are sold to customers.

    So what is the true cost of the damage to the atmosphere when you emit a couple of tonnes of CO2 into it, perhaps during a longhaul flight between Auckland and London or by running a diesel-powered SUV for a year? There are a lot of different answers to that question depending on whether you ask an economist, politician, engineer or a climate scientist.

    If you ask a chemist how, and how much it would cost, to remove a tonne of CO2 from the atmosphere, they would probably throw up their hands in horror, come up with a figure of NZ$1,000 per tonne and a very complex apparatus. A climate scientist would reply to the question with another, like, “How much do you think the 2020 wildfires in Australia, California, Colorado, Siberia and the Arctic cost?” And a New Zealand economist would quote the current carbon price on the New Zealand emissions trading scheme site, which in early 2021 was about NZ$37 per tonne. To me that sounds ridiculously cheap, measuring in crude economic terms the cost of the damage by carbon emissions into our only atmosphere.

    We’ve been blinkered into thinking that there are no alternatives to fossil fuels for running an economy and society. But engineers and economists can point to several alternatives, and we need to adopt the ones that provide a sustainable future in this decade. A new field has emerged which has come to be known as “transition engineering”, where engineering and scientific principles are used to provide systems which do not compromise the ecological, societal and economic systems that future generations will depend on.

    Engineering solutions will be especially valuable in tackling the rapidly growing emissions from transport. Worldwide, liquid fuels like petrol and diesel for cars and trucks, jet fuel for aviation and bunker fuels for shipping accounted for more than 20% of total CO2 emissions in 2016. Growing at a faster rate than any other sector, transport poses a major challenge to reducing emissions in line with the Paris Agreement. To keep global temperature rise within a range that averts the worst climate impacts, IPCC and other climate modelling show transport emissions must decline. Transitioning to zero-emission transport is crucial. Solutions include clean fuels, improved vehicle efficiency, changes to how we move people and goods, and building sustainable cities.

    Electrification eliminates tailpipe emissions of CO2 and particles that damage our lungs. It harnesses the potential to decarbonise the power grid.

    There is no doubt that reducing carbon emissions to avert disastrous impacts of climate change will be a gigantic undertaking. No single solution to this problem exists. It will require concerted effort from all parts of society, above all governments, but also engineers, scientists, economists, teachers and farmers. We can feel optimistic of the rapidly emerging technologies available to help reduce carbon emissions, among them hydrogen generation and storage from surplus electricity, synthesis of sugars from CO2 and water, information and nanotechnology, bioengineering and educational science to name a few. The challenges ahead are formidable but I truly believe that, given the will and with concerted action, human beings are more than capable of building a sustainable future.

  • Spreading faster, hitting harder – why young Brazilians are dying of Covid | Coronavirus | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/16/spreading-faster-hitting-harder-why-young-brazilians-are-dying-of-covid
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/248d01b68f9d9c9c0fb18beff820df37904dec47/0_48_4674_2805/master/4674.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    “I saw everything in there. Children, adults, young people, bodybuilders – the lot. All of them going through the same thing,” Castro recalled, rubbishing the idea that only elderly people were in danger. “If you’re a human being you’re at risk,” he said. “This disease is a total game of Russian roulette.”

    When Covid first hit Brazil last February it was, as elsewhere, considered mainly a threat to the ageing or infirm. A year later, as Brazil grapples with by far the most traumatic phase of its epidemic, a troubling trend has emerged, as intensive care units fill with younger patients such as Castro, some seemingly battling more severe forms of the disease. An unusually high number of infant fatalities has also been reported with more than 1,000 Brazilian babies dying last year compared with 43 in the US.

    Brazilians have been particularly shocked by the case of Paulo Gustavo, a 42-year-old television star who has spent the past month fighting for his life in a Rio ICU despite being previously fit and healthy. Last week, the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care Medicine said that for the first time, most Covid patients in ICU were under 40 – a finding echoed by frontline doctors.

    • Boulos said the vaccination of older Brazilians partly explained the increasing proportion of younger patients in ICU. “But there’s no doubt young people are being [physically] more affected by this new variant. It’s unquestionable.”

      “Sometimes … these young people will die after just a few hours or days with very acute, severe illnesses – and you won’t find any comorbidity or factor to explain why. It’s dramatic,” added Boulos, pointing to similar suspicions that the South African variant might be affecting the young more.

      Bressan suspected behavioural factors were also at play, with younger Brazilians more likely to be frequenting places where they might be exposed to greater doses of the virus, more often. “It’s younger people who are going out to work, to parties, restaurants and nightclubs,” said Bressan, adding that many of the patients she was now seeing in their 40s were domestic workers, cleaners, retail workers and waiters. “People who absolutely have to leave home to work.”

  • Turkey’s economic turmoil drives Bitcoin frenzy | Turkey | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/13/turkeys-economic-turmoil-drives-bitcoin-frenzy

    The Turkish lira slumped dramatically last month after President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s shock decision to fire the central bank governor, Naci Ağbal. The reserve is now on its fourth governor in less than two years, and the lira has lost half its value since a 2018 currency crisis.

    Inflation reached a six-month high in March of 16.19%, well above a 5% target, and unemployment remains high, at 13.4%.

    The latest economic turmoil has led to a surge in cryptocurrency trading in the country, with investors hoping to gain from bitcoin’s recent rally and shelter against inflation.

    Data from the US researcher Chainalysis analysed by Reuters showed that trading volumes between the start of February and 24 March hit 218bn lira (£19bn) with a spike on the weekend Ağbal was sacked, up from just over 7bn lira in the same period a year earlier. Cryptocurrency worth 23bn lira was traded in the first few days after the shock announcement, the data showed, versus 1bn lira in the same timespan in 2020.

  • ‘A system of #global_apartheid’ : author #Harsha_Walia on why the border crisis is a myth

    The Canadian organizer says the actual crises are capitalism, war and the climate emergency, which drive mass migration.

    The rising number of migrant children and families seeking to cross the US border with Mexico is emerging as one of the most serious political challenges for Joe Biden’s new administration.

    That’s exactly what Donald Trump wants: he and other Republicans believe that Americans’ concerns about a supposed “border crisis” will help Republicans win back political power.

    But Harsha Walia, the author of two books about border politics, argues that there is no “border crisis,” in the United States or anywhere else. Instead, there are the “actual crises” that drive mass migration – such as capitalism, war and the climate emergency – and “imagined crises” at political borders, which are used to justify further border securitization and violence.

    Walia, a Canadian organizer who helped found No One Is Illegal, which advocates for migrants, refugees and undocumented people, talked to the Guardian about Border and Rule, her new book on global migration, border politics and the rise of what she calls “racist nationalism.” The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

    Last month, a young white gunman was charged with murdering eight people, most of them Asian women, at several spas around Atlanta, Georgia. Around the same time, there was increasing political attention to the higher numbers of migrants and refugees showing up at the US-Mexico border. Do you see any connection between these different events?

    I think they are deeply connected. The newest invocation of a “border surge” and a “border crisis” is again creating the spectre of immigrants and refugees “taking over.” This seemingly race neutral language – we are told there’s nothing inherently racist about saying “border surge”– is actually deeply racially coded. It invokes a flood of black and brown people taking over a so-called white man’s country. That is the basis of historic immigrant exclusion, both anti-Asian exclusion in the 19th century, which very explicitly excluded Chinese laborers and especially Chinese women presumed to be sex workers, and anti-Latinx exclusion. If we were to think about one situation as anti-Asian racism and one as anti-Latinx racism, they might seem disconnected. But both forms of racism are fundamentally anti-immigrant. Racial violence is connected to the idea of who belongs and who doesn’t. Whose humanity is questioned in a moment of crisis. Who is scapegoated in a moment of crisis.

    How do you understand the rise of white supremacist violence, particularly anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim violence, that we are seeing around the world?

    The rise in white supremacy is a feedback loop between individual rightwing vigilantes and state rhetoric and state policy. When it comes to the Georgia shootings, we can’t ignore the fact that the criminalization of sex work makes sex workers targets. It’s not sex work itself, it’s the social condition of criminalization that creates that vulnerability. It’s similar to the ways in which border vigilantes have targeted immigrants: the Minutemen who show up at the border and harass migrants, or the kidnapping of migrants by the United Constitutional Patriots at gunpoint. We can’t dissociate that kind of violence from state policies that vilify migrants and refugees, or newspapers that continue to use the word “illegal alien”.

    National borders are often described as protecting citizens, or as protecting workers at home from lower-paid workers in other countries. You argue that borders actually serve a very different purpose.

    Borders maintain a massive system of global apartheid. They are preventing, on a scale we’ve never seen before, the free movement of people who are trying to search for a better life.

    There’s been a lot of emphasis on the ways in which Donald Trump was enacting very exclusionary immigration policies. But border securitization and border controls have been bipartisan practices in the United States. We saw the first policies of militarization at the border with Mexico under Bill Clinton in the late 90s.

    In the European context, the death of [three-year-old Syrian toddler] Alan Kurdi, all of these images of migrants drowning in the Mediterranean, didn’t actually lead to an immigration policy that was more welcoming. Billions of euros are going to drones in the Mediterranean, war ships in the Mediterranean. We’re seeing the EU making trade and aid agreements it has with countries in the Sahel region of Africa and the Middle East contingent on migration control. They are relying on countries in the global south as the frontiers of border militarization. All of this is really a crisis of immobility. The whole world is increasingly becoming fortified.

    What are the root causes of these ‘migration crises’? Why is this happening?

    What we need to understand is that migration is a form of reparations. Migration is an accounting for global violence. It’s not a coincidence that the vast number of people who are migrants and refugees in the world today are black and brown people from poor countries that have been made poor because of centuries of imperialism, of empire, of exploitation and deliberate underdevelopment. It’s those same fault lines of plunder around the world that are the fault lines of migration. More and more people are being forced out of their land because of trade agreements, mining extraction, deforestation, climate change. Iraq and Afghanistan have been for decades on the top of the UN list for displaced people and that has been linked to the US and Nato’s occupations of those countries.

    Why would governments have any interest in violence at borders? Why spend so much money on security and militarization?

    The border does not only serve to exclude immigrants and refugees, but also to create conditions of hyper exploitation, where some immigrants and refugees do enter, but in a situation of extreme precarity. If you’re undocumented, you will work for less than minimum wage. If you attempt to unionize, you will face the threat of deportation. You will not feel you can access public services, or in some cases you will be denied public services. Borders maintain racial citizenship and create a pool of hyper-exploitable cheapened labor. People who are never a full part of the community, always living in fear, constantly on guard.

    Why do you choose to put your focus on governments and their policies, rather than narratives of migrants themselves?

    Border deaths are presented as passive occurrences, as if people just happen to die, as if there’s something inherently dangerous about being on the move, which we know is not the case. Many people move with immense privilege, even luxury. It’s more accurate to call what is happening to migrants and refugees around the world as border killings. People are being killed by policies that are intended to kill. Literally, governments are hoping people will die, are deliberating creating conditions of death, in order to create deterrence.

    It is very important to hold the states accountable, instead of narratives where migrants are blamed for their own deaths: ‘They knew it was going to be dangerous, why did they move?’ Which to me mimics the very horrible tropes of survivors in rape culture.

    You live in Canada. Especially in the United States, many people think of Canada as this inherently nice place. Less racist, less violent, more supportive of refugees and immigrants. Is that the reality?

    It’s totally false. Part of the incentive of writing this second book was being on a book tour in the US and constantly hearing, ‘At least in Canada it can’t be as bad as in the US.’ ‘Your prime minister says refugees are welcome.’ That masks the violence of how unfree the conditions of migration are, with the temporary foreign worker program, which is a form of indentureship. Workers are forced to live in the home of their employer, if you’re a domestic worker, or forced to live in a labor camp, crammed with hundreds of people. When your labor is no longer needed, you’re deported, often with your wages unpaid. There is nothing nice about it. It just means Canada has perfected a model of exploitation. The US and other countries in Europe are increasingly looking to this model, because it works perfectly to serve both the state and capital interests. Capital wants cheapened labor and the state doesn’t want people with full citizenship rights.

    You wrote recently that ‘Escalating white supremacy cannot be dealt with through anti-terror or hate crime laws.’ Why?

    Terrorism is not a colorblind phenomena. The global war on terror for the past 20 years was predicated around deeply Islamophobic rhetoric that has had devastating impact on Black and Brown Muslims and Muslim-majority countries around the world. I think it is implausible and naive to assume that the national security infrastructure, or the criminal legal system, which is also built on racialized logics, especially anti-black racism – that we can somehow subvert these systems to protect racialized communities. It’s not going to work.

    One of the things that happened when the Proud Boys were designated as a terrorist organization in Canada is that it provided cover to expand this terror list that communities have been fighting against for decades. On the day the Proud Boys were listed, a number of other organizations were added which were part of the Muslim community. That was the concern that many of us had: will this just become an excuse to expand the terrorist list rather than dismantle it? In the long run, what’s going to happen? Even if in some miraculous world the Proud Boys and its members are dismantled, what’s going to happen to all the other organizations on the list? They’re still being criminalized, they’re still being terrorized, they’re still being surveilled.

    So if you don’t think the logics of national security or criminal justice will work, what do you think should be done about escalating white supremacist violence?

    I think that’s the question: what do we need to be doing? It’s not about one arm of the state, it’s about all of us. What’s happening in our neighborhoods, in our school systems, in the media? There’s not one simple fix. We need to keep each other safe. We need to make sure we’re intervening whenever we see racial violence, everything from not letting racist jokes off the hook to fighting for systemic change. Anti-war work is racial justice work. Anti-capitalist work is racial justice work.

    You advocate for ending border imperialism, and ending racial capitalism. Those are big goals. How do you break that down into things that one person can actually do?

    I actually found it harder before, because I would try things that I thought were simple and would change the world, and they wouldn’t. For me, understanding how violences are connected, and really understanding the immensity of the problem, was less overwhelming. It motivated me to think in bigger ways, to organize with other people. To understand this is fundamentally about radical, massive collective action. It can’t rely on one person or even one place.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/07/us-border-immigration-harsha-walia
    #apartheid #inégalités #monde #migrations #frontières #réfugiés #capitalisme #guerres #conflits #climat #changement_climatique #crises #crise #fermeture_des_frontières #crises_frontalières #violence #racisme #discriminations #exclusion #anti-migrants #violence_raciale #suprématisme_blanc #prostitution #criminalisation #vulnérabilité #minutemen #militarisation_des_frontières #USA #Mexique #Etats-Unis #politique_migratoire #politiques_migratoires #Kurdi #Aylan_Kurdi #Alan_Kurdi #impérialisme #colonialisme #colonisation #mourir_aux_frontières #décès #morts

    ping @isskein @karine4

  • Global rollout of vaccines is no longer a guarantee of victory over Covid-19 | Coronavirus | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/06/global-rollout-of-vaccines-is-no-longer-a-guarantee-of-victory-over-cov
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/71e1522fa5cbac44972ffbca4f687b12a77b7822/0_0_4482_2689/master/4482.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    At the end of 2020, there was a strong hope that high levels of vaccination would see humanity finally gain the upper hand over Sars-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19. In an ideal scenario, the virus would then be contained at very low levels without further societal disruption or significant numbers of deaths.

    But since then, new “variants of concern” have emerged and spread worldwide, putting current pandemic control efforts, including vaccination, at risk of being derailed.

    Put simply, the game has changed, and a successful global rollout of current vaccines by itself is no longer a guarantee of victory.

    No one is truly safe from Covid-19 until everyone is safe. We are in a race against time to get global transmission rates low enough to prevent the emergence and spread of new variants. The danger is that variants will arise that can overcome the immunity conferred by vaccinations or prior infection.

  • Covid certificates on the cards for use in England since December | World news | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/04/covid-certificates-on-the-cards-for-use-in-england-since-december
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/ea4b3b850c3869c32ef749807cc850e32245878b/0_184_5300_3181/master/5300.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    Covid certificates on the cards for use in England since December.Report shows government was considering plan months before ministers went public. A government-commissioned report in December examined how Covid certificates could be used to decide whether people should be allowed into sports events, pubs and other crowded spaces, months before ministers publicly confirmed the plan.A document prepared for NHS test and trace and seen by the Guardian shows that the research also looked into whether certificates could be made a condition of entry for family events such as weddings or even small casual gatherings.The report, dated 17 December, was prepared by staff working for Zühlke Engineering, a Swiss-based consultancy that has worked closely on the UK’s Covid contact-tracing app, and has a number of staff embedded within the test-and-trace team. It details research into possible public attitudes to a Covid certificate, sometimes called a domestic Covid passport. This would use vaccination status, a recent negative Covid test or proof of coronavirus antibodies to allow people into potentially packed places when the country opens up.
    The document includes mock-up pictures of how an app-based Covid certificate might work, using scannable QR codes. One shows this on the main NHS app, with a countdown showing when the pass expires. Another shows the certificate attached to the NHS test and trace app. This option is seen as unlikely, because the test and trace app is anonymous while the certificate involves personal information. Covid certificates are enormously controversial. At least 40 Conservative backbenchers are among 70-plus MPs who announced last week that they would oppose them.There has been considerable speculation about the use of such certificates, but as recently as February the vaccines minister, Nadhim Zahawi, said the government was “not looking at a vaccine passport for our domestic economy”.
    Boris Johnson is expected to announce the initial findings of a review into the subject on Monday, but not to say categorically whether or not they will be introduced.The December document uses focus group research to highlight public attitudes towards the idea. It found that people considered them potentially useful for events such as football matches and even weddings, but not for smaller family gatherings.If you have been affected or have any information, we’d like to hear from you. You can get in touch by filling in the form below, anonymously if you wish or contact us via WhatsApp by clicking here or adding the contact +44(0)7867825056. Only the Guardian can see your contributions and one of our journalists may contact you to discuss further. Concerns raised included the amount of planning needed, whether test results would arrive on time and worries that people might act more recklessly if they had a certificate.Civil liberties groups have spoken out against the idea of Covid certificates. Silkie Carlo, the director of Big Brother Watch, said they would be “the first attempt at a segregation policy in Britain for decades”. She said: “They would exclude and disadvantage the most marginalised people in our country, dividing communities without reducing risks.”

    #Covid-19#migrant#migration#grandebretagne#sante#passeportvaccinal#circulation#droit#liberte#discrimination

  • Seeing stones: pandemic reveals Palantir’s troubling reach in Europe, Daniel Howden, Apostolis Fotiadis, Ludek Stavinoha, Ben Holst, 2 Apr 2021, The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/02/seeing-stones-pandemic-reveals-palantirs-troubling-reach-in-europe

    serious questions over the way public agencies work with Palantir and whether its software can work within the bounds of European laws in the sensitive areas where it is being used, or perform in the way the company promises.

    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/f0958e27ccc9fd0c36296651025b6ba5601a4bdf/0_116_3500_2101/master/3500.jpg?width=620&quality=45&auto=format&fit=max&dpr=2&s=15e590ed344a5917

  • 5,000 attend rock concert in Barcelona after Covid screening | World news | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/28/5000-attend-rock-concert-in-barcelona-after-covid-19-screening
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/a258bbb2a4091543a2944a168012cc59ce29343b/0_160_3193_1916/master/3193.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    Five thousand rock fans enjoyed a real-as-can-be concert after passing a same-day coronavirus screening to test its effectiveness in preventing outbreaks of the virus at large cultural events.

    The only rule inside the show was the strict use of the high-quality face masks provided by the concert organisers.

    “We were able to evade reality for a while,” said Jose Parejo, 40. “We were inside our small concert bubble. And we were even able to remember back in time when things like this one were normal. Things that nowadays aren’t that normal, sadly.”

    cc @rastapopoulos

  • Mexico Covid death toll leaps 60% to reach 321,000 | Coronavirus | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/28/mexico-covid-death-toll-rise-60-percent?CMP=twt_a-world_b-gdnworld
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/dd417447ee66a8fb541150cd45dbfa57d8f96281/0_240_6048_3628/master/6048.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    The higher toll would exceed that of Brazil, which has the world’s second-highest number of deaths after the US.

    The Johns Hopkins coronavirus tracker puts Brazil’s toll at about 307,000 and the United States’ at 548,000, but Mexico’s population of 126 million is far smaller than either of those countries.

    The new report also confirms just how deadly Mexico’s second wave in January was. At the end of December, excess death estimates suggested a total of about 220,000 deaths related to Covid-19 in Mexico. That number jumped by around 75,000 in just a month and a half.

    Also suggestive were the overall number of “excess deaths” since the pandemic began, around 417,000. Excess deaths are determined by comparing the deaths in a given year to those that would be expected based on data from previous years.

  • Bronze age burial site in Spain suggests women were among rulers | World news | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/11/bronze-age-burial-site-in-spain-suggests-women-were-among-rulers

    Research published on Thursday in the journal Antiquity has documented one of the site’s most tantalising finds: a man and a woman buried in a large ceramic jar, both of whom died close together in the mid-17th century BC.
    The remains of a man and a woman in a large ceramic jar have been found at La Almoloya/
    The remains of a man and a woman in a large ceramic jar have been found at La Almoloya. Photograph: Cambridge University Press

    Buried with them were 29 valuable objects, nearly all of them belonging to the female, believed to be between 25 and 30 years of age. “It’s like everything she touched had silver on it,” said Cristina Rihuete of the Autonomous University of Barcelona.

    Among the exquisitely crafted items were bracelets, rings and a rare type of crown, known as a diadem. In total 230 grams of silver were found at the burial site – an amount that at the time would have been worth the equivalent of 938 daily wages.

    The prominent role women may have played in the society is echoed in other finds at El Argar; similar diadems were found at four other female burial sites while gravesites of women were later used for the burials of elite warriors, suggesting these sites were viewed as places of high status.

    What made this most recent find unique was its location beneath what could be the first bronze age palace unearthed in the region. As the building would have been used for political purposes, it could be that the woman’s power stemmed from politics, said Rihuete.

    Men were probably the warriors of society, as suggested by the swords found at several male burial sites, said Roberto Risch of Autonomous University of Barcelona. “Clearly they control the means of violence and they are probably behind the expansion of El Argar.”
    Islamic 12th-century bathhouse uncovered in Seville tapas bar
    Read more

    The society, which thrived from 2200BC onwards, was highly organised with a wealthy elite that was probably sustained by some sort of tax system. “In western Europe there was nothing of the like,” said Risch, pointing to the rest of Spain where people at the time were living in self-sufficient communities of 50 to 100 people.

    By the 16th century BC, all of El Argar’s settlements were abandoned, believed to have been racked by internal uprisings. “Shortly after the woman dies, the whole settlement is burned down,” said Risch. “And not until the Greeks and Phoenicians arrive on the Iberian peninsula did we see anything similar, either in architecture or in political dimension.”

  • Denmark declares parts of Syria safe, pressuring refugees to return

    Denmark has stripped 94 Syrian refugees of their residency permits after declaring that Damascus and the surrounding area were safe. The Scandinavian nation is the first EU country to say that law-abiding refugees can be sent back to Syria.

    In Denmark, 94 Syrian refugees were stripped of their temporary residence permits, various British media reported this week. The move comes after the Danish government decided to extend the area of Syria it considers safe to include the Rif Dimashq Governorate – an area that includes the capital Damascus.

    According to the news platform Arab News, the Danish government said the 94 people will be sent to Danish deportation camps, but will not be forced to leave. Human rights groups however fear that the refugees will feel pressured to leave, even though their return is voluntary.

    The Danish immigration minister, Mattias Tesfaye, insisted last month that the Scandinavian country had been “open and honest from the start” about the situation of Syrian refugees, according to the British daily The Telegraph. “We have made it clear to the Syrian refugees that their residence permit is temporary. It can be withdrawn if protection is no longer needed,” the newspaper quoted Tesfaye as saying.

    The minister highlighted that Denmark would offer protection as long as needed but that “when conditions in the home country improve, a former refugee should return home and re-establish a life there.”
    ’Wreckless violation of duty’

    Last December, Germany’s deportation ban to Syria expired – but the only people now eligible for deportation are Syrian nationals who committed criminal offences or those deemed to pose a serious risk to public security. Denmark is the first European Union member to say that law-abiding refugees can be sent back to Syria.

    Human rights groups have strongly criticized the new Danish policy.

    “That the Danish government is seeking to force people back into the hands of this brutal regime is an appalling affront to refugee law and people’s right to be safe from persecution,” Steve Valdez-Symonds, refugee and migrant rights director at Amnesty International UK, told The Independent.

    “This reckless violation of Denmark’s duty to provide asylum also risks increasing incentives for other countries to abandon their own obligations to Syrian refugees,” he said.

    The organization Doctors without Borders (Médecins Sans Frontières, MSF) told The Independent that they assume people sent back to the Rif Dimashq Governorate would face similar challenges to the ones that people in northern Syria are facing, “given the scale and duration of the Syrian conflict ​and the impact of the war on infrastructure and the health system.”

    A member from the rights group Refugees Welcome in Denmark told The Telegraph that the 94 Syrians who had their residency permits revoked are facing years of limbo. “The government hopes that they will go voluntarily, that they will just give up and go on their own,” Michala Bendixen said. She said Syrian refugees now face a “very, very tragic situation,” and will be forced from their homes, jobs and studies and into Danish deportation camps.
    Denmark’s anti-migrant stance

    About 900 Syrian refugees from the Damascus area had their temporary protection permits reassessed in Denmark last year, according the The Independent. The latest decision to declare the Rif Dimashq area as safe will mean that a further 350 Syrian nationals (of 1,250 Syrians in the country) will have to undergo reassessment which could lead to a revocation of their protection status and residency permits.

    The ruling center-left Social Democratic Party in Denmark has taken a strong anti-migration stance since coming into office in 2019. Recently, Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said she wants to aim for “zero” asylum seekers applying to live in Denmark.

    Denmark last year saw the lowest number of asylum seekers since 1998, with 1,547 people applying.

    https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/30650/denmark-declares-parts-of-syria-safe-pressuring-refugees-to-return

    #safe_zones #zones_sures #zone_sure #retour_au_pays #renvois #expulsions #réfugié_syriens #Danemark

    –---

    voir aussi cette métaliste sur le retour ("volontaire" ou non) des réfugiés syriens en Syrie :
    https://seenthis.net/messages/904710

    • Denmark has gone far-right on refugees

      Copenhagen claims Damascus is safe enough to send nearly 100 Syrians back.

      What has happened to Denmark? Once renowned as a liberal, tolerant, open-minded society with respect for human rights and a strong and humane welfare state, we have now become the first country in Europe to revoke residence permits for Syrian refugees.

      Last week, Danish authorities ruled that the security situation around Damascus has improved, despite evidence of dire living conditions and continued persecution by Bashar al-Assad’s regime. As a result, they stripped 94 refugees of their right to stay in the country. Another recently introduced proposal would move all asylum applicants outside Denmark.

      In other words, Denmark — the first country to sign the U.N. Refugee Convention in 1951 — has now adopted an asylum policy that’s less like that of its Scandinavian neighbors than of nationalist countries like Austria or Hungary.

      Thankfully, nobody is being sent back to Syria anytime soon. Under the new system, refugees have to have lived in Denmark for at least 10 years for their attachment to the country to be considered strong enough for continued residence, no matter how hard they have worked or studied. However, it’s currently impossible to deport anyone back to Syria — Denmark won’t negotiate with Assad — and very few Syrians are willing to return voluntarily. So those who lose their residency permits will likely end up in Danish camps awaiting deportation or in other European countries.

      But the fact remains that Denmark is now passing laws with obviously discriminatory purposes, with politicians on both the left and right speaking about ethnic minorities and Muslims in terms that would be unimaginable in neighboring countries. Indeed, had this law been pushed forward by a hard-right government it might not have been surprising. But Denmark is currently governed by a left-wing coalition led by the Social Democrats. What, indeed, has happened to our country?

      The answer lies in a tug of war between the Social Democrats and the far-right Danish People’s Party. Though the Danish People’s Party has never been part of a government, its representatives have spent the past two decades using their mandates for a single purpose: They only vote for bills concerning other issues if they get restrictions on foreigners in return. Step by step, the Danish People’s Party has dragged all the other parties in their direction — none more so than the Social Democrats with whom they compete for working-class voters.

      In 2001, a right-wing government made the first radical restrictions for refugees and foreigners. And while the Social Democrats first opposed it, they soon changed their strategy to fend off the challenge from the Danish People’s Party. At first, not all Social Democrats agreed to the new hard-line policy, but the party gradually came to embrace it, along with the vast majority of their voters. Today the Danish People’s Party has become almost redundant. Their policies, once denounced as racist and extreme, have now become mainstream.

      Two years ago, the government passed legislation turning the concept of refugee protection upside down: It replaced efforts at long-term integration and equal rights with temporary stays, limited rights and a focus on deportation at the earliest possibility. Paradoxically, this came at a time when Denmark received the lowest number of refugees in 30 years, and integration had been going better than ever in terms of employment, education and language skills.

      Meanwhile, the Danish Refugee Appeals Board has been stripped of its experts and cut down to only three members including an employee from the ministry of immigration, thus making it not quite as independent as the government claims, but more in line with Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen who is pursuing a goal of having “zero asylum seekers.”

      Currently, Danish politicians are discussing a bill that is even more extreme than its predecessors: a loose and imprecise plan for a contract to transfer asylum seekers who arrive in Denmark to a non-European country (most likely in Africa), where their cases will be processed. If they are granted asylum, they will stay in that third country.

      The minister says it would make the asylum system more “humane and fair,” but Danish human rights organizations and the UNHCR say it will do precisely the opposite. The plan is essentially a new form of colonialism, paying others to take care of “unwanted” persons far away from Denmark, and not accepting even a small portion of the millions of refugees in the world.

      Fortunately, it seems like the right wing is so offended by the Social Democrats co-opting and expanding their policies that they will vote against it. But if it passes, the policy could have terrible consequences for collaboration within the European Union and on the international level.

      This game has gone too far. Most Danes are not racist or against human rights and solidarity. But it’s getting hard to see how we can find our way back.

      https://www.politico.eu/article/denmark-has-gone-far-right-on-refugees
      #Damas

    • ECRE | Danemark : élargissement des lieux considérés comme “sûrs” en Syrie

      La Commission danoise de recours des réfugiés a déclaré que la situation dans le Grand Damas était assez sûr pour pouvoir penser à un retour des personnes ayant fui le pays. 350 cas de ressortissant·es de cette région vont être réévalués.

      Nous publions l’article, originellement écrit en anglais et traduit par nos soins, paru le 5 mars 2021 sur le site du Conseil européen sur les réfugiés et les exilés (ECRE) : https://www.ecre.org/denmark-authorities-widen-the-areas-of-syria-considered-safe-for-return-to-inc. Sur le même sujet, retrouvez l’article “Denmark declares part of Syria safe, pressuring refugees to return” publié le 4 mars 2021 sur Infomigrants.net : https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/30650/denmark-declares-parts-of-syria-safe-pressuring-refugees-to-return

      –—

      Danemark : Les autorités élargissent les zones de Syrie considérées comme sûres pour les retours

      À travers trois décisions, la Commission danoise de recours des réfugiés (Flygtningenaevnet) a déclaré que la situation dans le gouvernorat de Rif Damas (le Grand Damas) était suffisamment sûre pour un retour, élargissant, ainsi, la zone géographique considérée comme étant en sécurité par les autorités danoises. En conséquence, la portée géographique des réévaluations des cas de ressortissants syriens a été élargie pour inclure les cas du grand Damas. Des centaines de cas doivent être réévalués par la Commission de recours en 2021.

      En décembre 2019, la Commission d’appel des réfugiés a confirmé les décisions de première instance du Service danois de l’immigration de rejeter les besoins de protection de trois femmes demandeuses d’asile originaires de Syrie. Ce rejet était fondé sur une prétendue amélioration de la situation générale en matière de sécurité dans la région de Damas depuis mai 2018, date à laquelle le régime d’Assad a repris le contrôle total de la région. Depuis lors, un certain nombre de dossiers ont été traités par le Service danois de l’immigration et la Commission de recours des réfugiés, aboutissant à la révocation ou à la non prolongation des permis de séjour. En février 2020, le gouvernement social-démocrate danois a confirmé au Parlement qu’en dépit de la prétendue amélioration de la situation sécuritaire à Damas, aucun retour forcé ne serait effectué car cela impliquerait une coopération directe avec le régime. Cependant, malgré l’absence de possibilité pratique de retour forcé, le ministre de l’immigration, Mattias Tesfaye, a demandé en juin 2020 une accélération des réévaluations des cas de centaines de ressortissants syriens de la région de Damas, soit sur le controversé statut de protection subsidiaire temporaire (section 7.3 de la loi danoise sur les étrangers), soit sur le statut de protection subsidiaire (section 7.2 de la loi danoise sur les étrangers).

      Les dernières décisions de la Commission d’appel de refuser l’extension de la protection dans deux cas et de rejeter l’asile dans un cas, représentent une expansion des zones considérées comme sûres pour le retour par les autorités danoises, incluant déjà Damas mais maintenant aussi le gouvernorat environnant. Il s’agit d’une zone qui est passée sous le contrôle du régime d’Assad en mars 2020. Le Conseil danois pour les réfugiés (DRC), membre de l’ECRE, qui fournit une assistance juridique aux demandeurs d’asile au Danemark et une aide humanitaire en Syrie, note que la Commission d’appel a pris une décision partagée, avec des avis divergents sur la durabilité de la prétendue amélioration de la situation sécuritaire. En outre, l’organisation note que les décisions ignorent les risques évidents liés aux retours forcés : “Les risques de persécution et d’abus sont grands pour les individus s’ils sont arrêtés par la police ou rencontrés par les autorités, d’innombrables rapports révèlent de graves violations des droits de l’homme sur la population civile. En particulier les personnes considérées comme suspectes en raison de leurs relations familiales ou de leurs affiliations politiques, mais même des choses aussi aléatoires qu’une erreur sur votre nom de famille à un point de contrôle peuvent vous conduire en prison”, déclare Eva Singer, responsable de l’asile à DRC. En même temps, le DRC souligne le fait qu’en raison du manque de coopération pratique entre les autorités syriennes et danoises concernant les retours forcés, il n’est pas possible pour les autorités danoises de renvoyer les Syriens – et donc les décisions ne peuvent être exécutées. Cela met en veilleuse la vie d’un groupe de personnes bien portantes travaillant au Danemark et de familles ayant des enfants dans des écoles danoises.

      Sur la base des décisions de la Commission d’appel, le service danois de l’immigration va maintenant réévaluer jusqu’à 350 cas concernant des ressortissants syriens de la campagne de Damas. Selon la Commission d’appel des réfugiés, 600 à 700 cas concernant l’ensemble de la région de Damas devraient être réévalués en 2021.

      Pour plus d’informations :

      – ECRE, Denmark : No Forced Returns to Syria, February 2020 : https://www.ecre.org/denmark-no-forced-returns-to-syria
      – ECRE : Denmark : Appeal Board Confirms Rejection of Protection for Three Syrian Nationals, December 2019 : https://www.ecre.org/denmark-appeal-board-confirms-rejection-of-protection-for-three-syrian-nationa
      – ECRE, Denmark : Appeal Board Overturns Withdrawals of Protection Status for Syrians, June 2019 : https://www.ecre.org/denmark-appeal-board-overturns-withdrawals-of-protection-status-for-syrians

      https://asile.ch/2021/03/12/ecre-danemark-elargissement-des-lieux-consideres-comme-surs-en-syrie

    • ’Tragic Situation’ : Syrian Refugees in Denmark Are Losing Their Residencies in Bulk

      A new Danish policy has come into effect as the government of Denmark has declared its intent to deport at least 94 Syrian refugees back to their home country, saying that the decision stems from the government’s belief that certain areas in Syria are no longer dangerous to live in.

      Despite stirring strong criticism from human rights groups and organization, the Danish government has defended its decision to deport Syrian refugees who hail from the Syrian capital and its surrounding areas, saying that “an asylum seeker loses their legal status once it is no longer risky for them to be back.”

      The backlash against statements made by the Danish Minister for Integration, Mattias Tesfaye, attacked the policy saying that most refugees have already been starting to integrate into the Danish society for years, they have acquired education, learned the language, and took decent jobs, and that the decision to send them back to Syria to live under the same political regime that persecuted them during the first years of the civil war is only going to leave them in limbo.

      Online people have also been posting photos of refugees who have received revocation letters along with personal stories, many of which show how successful they have been starting their lives in Denmark.

      Additionally, social media users have widely shared the story of Akram Bathiesh, a refugee who has died of a heart attack shortly after receiving the notification of his residency being canceled. According to his family and friends, Bathiesh was terrified of going back to Syria where he had been in prison for his political stances.

      Denmark is the first EU nation to decide to send Syrian refugees home alleging better circumstances for them in Syria. Previously, Germany had decided to send back Syrian refugees with criminal records in Germany.

      According to official records released in 2017, more than 40k Syrians were living legally in Denmark, including ones with temporary residency permits.

      https://www.albawaba.com/node/syrian-refugees-denmark

      #résidence #permis_de_séjour

    • Denmark strips Syrian refugees of residency permits and says it is safe to go home

      Government denies renewal of temporary residency status from about 189 Syrians

      Denmark has become the first European nation to revoke the residency permits of Syrian refugees, insisting that some parts of the war-torn country are safe to return to.

      At least 189 Syrians have had applications for renewal of temporary residency status denied since last summer, a move the Danish authorities said was justified because of a report that found the security situation in some parts of Syria had “improved significantly”.

      About 500 people originally from Damascus and surrounding areas were being re-evaluated.

      The issue has attracted widespread attention since 19-year-old Aya Abu-Daher, from Nyborg, pleaded her family’s case on television earlier this month, moving viewers as she asked, holding back tears, what she had “done wrong”.

      Charlotte Slente, secretary general of the Danish Refugee Council, said that Denmark’s new rules for Syrians amount to “undignified treatment”.

      “The Danish Refugee Council disagrees with the decision to deem the Damascus area or any area in Syria safe for refugees to return to – the absence of fighting in some areas does not mean that people can safely go back. Neither the UN nor other countries deem Damascus as safe.”

      After 10 years of war, Bashar al-Assad is back in control of most of Syria, and frontline fighting is limited to the north of the country. However, one of the main reasons people rose up during the Arab spring remains: his secret police.

      Regime intelligence branches have detained, tortured and “disappeared” more than 100,000 people since the war broke out in 2011. Arbitrary detentions are widespread in formerly rebel-held areas that have signed reconciliation agreements with Damascus, according to Human Rights Watch.

      Areas under the regime are unstable. There has been next to no rebuilding, services such as water and electricity are scarce, and last year’s collapse of the Syrian pound has sent food prices rocketing by 230%.

      Hiba al-Khalil, 28, who left home on the refugee trail through Turkey and Greece before settling in Denmark in 2015, said: “I told the interviewer, just being outside Syria for as long as I have is enough to make you look suspicious to the regime. Just because your city isn’t being bombed with chemicals anymore doesn’t make it safe … Anyone can be arrested.”

      The trainee journalist added: “I was so happy to get to Denmark. I came here to work and study and make a new life. I’ve learned the language very well. Now I am confused and shocked it was not enough.”

      Khalil had been called back for a second immigration interview this week, and was not sure what would happen next or how she would afford a lawyer to appeal if her application renewal were rejected.

      According to Refugees Welcome Denmark, 30 Syrians have already lost their appeals – but since Copenhagen does not have diplomatic relations with Damascus it cannot directly deport people to Syria.

      At least some of the rejected applicants have been placed in a detention centre, which campaigners said amounted to a prison where residents could not work, study or get proper healthcare.

      Syrian men are generally exempt from the new policy because the authorities recognise they are at risk of being drafted into the Syrian military or punished for evading conscription. The majority of affected people appear to be women and older people, many of whom face being separated from their children.

      The parents of Mahmoud al-Muhammed, 19, both in their late 60s, had their appeal to stay in Denmark rejected, despite the fact Muhammed’s father retired from the Syrian military in 2006 and threats were made against him when the family left the country.

      “They want to put my parents in a detention centre for maybe 10 years, before Assad is gone,” he said. “They both have health problems. This policy is cruel. It is designed to make us so desperate we have to leave.”

      Denmark is home to 5.8 million people, of which 500,000 are immigrants and 35,000 are Syrian.

      The Scandinavian country’s reputation for tolerance and openness has suffered in recent years with the rise of the far-right Danish People’s party. The centre-left coalition in government, led by the Social Democrats, is in competition with the right for working-class votes.

      The new stance on Syrian refugees stands in stark contrast to neighbouring Germany and Sweden, where it is much easier for the larger Syrian populations to gain permanent residency and eventually citizenship.

      As well as stripping Syrians of their residency permits, the Danish government has also offered funding of about £22,000 per person for voluntary returnees. However, worried for their safety, in 2020 just 137 refugees took up the offer.

      Danish authorities have so far dismissed growing international criticism of the new policies from the UN and rights groups.

      The immigration minister, Mattias Tesfaye, told Agence France-Presse: “The government’s policy is working and I won’t back down, it won’t happen. We have made it clear to the Syrian refugees that their residence permit is temporary and that the permit can be revoked if the need for protection ceases to exist.”

      “It is pointless to remove people from the life they are trying to build in Denmark and put them in a waiting position without an end date,” Slente of the Danish Refugee Council said. “It is also difficult to understand why decisions are taken that cannot be implemented.”

      https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/14/denmark-revokes-syrian-refugee-permits-under-new-policy

    • ‘Zero asylum seekers’: Denmark forces refugees to return to Syria

      Under a more hostile immigration system, young volunteers fight to help fellow refugees stay – but their work is never done

      Maryam Awad is 22 and cannot remember the last time she had a good night’s sleep. It was probably before her application to renew her residency permit as a refugee in Denmark was rejected two years ago, she says.

      Before 2015, Awad’s family lived in a small town outside Damascus, but fled to Denmark after her older brother was detained by the regime. The family have been living in Aarhus, a port city in northern Denmark, for eight years.

      Awad and her younger sister are the only family members facing deportation. Their situation is far from unique. In 2019, the Danish government notified about 1,200 refugees from the Damascus region that their residency permits would not be renewed.

      Unlike the United Nations and EU, Denmark judged the region to be safe for refugees to return. However, as men could be drafted into the army and older women often have children enrolled in Danish schools, the new policy predominantly affects young women and elderly people.

      Lisa Blinkenberg, of Amnesty International Denmark, said: “In 2015, we have seen a legislative change which means that the residency permit of refugees can be withdrawn due to changes in their home country, but the change does not have to be fundamental. Then in 2019 the Danish immigration services decided that the violence in Damascus has stopped and that Syrians could be returned there.”

      Blinkenberg says Denmark’s policy towards asylum seekers and refugees has become notably more hostile in recent years. “In 2019, the Danish prime minister declared that Denmark wanted ‘zero asylum seekers’. That was a really strong signal,” she says.

      “Like in other European countries, there has been a lot of support for rightwing parties in Denmark. This has sent a strong signal for the government to say: ‘OK, Denmark will not be a welcoming country for refugees or asylum seekers.’”

      Awad smiles, briefly, for the first time when she receives a phone call from her lawyer. He tells her there is now a date set for her appeal with the refugee board. It will be her last chance to prolong her residency permit.

      She had been waiting for this phone call since February. “I am really nervous, but happy that it is happening,” she says. “I am glad that I had the support from friends who put me in touch with volunteers. If it wasn’t for them, I wouldn’t know what to do.”

      One of the volunteers Awad has received help from is Rahima Abdullah, 21, a fellow Syrian refugee and leader of the Danish Refugee Youth Council. Over the past two years Abdullah had almost single-handedly built a network of opposition to deportations targeting Syrians.

      “I have lost count of how many cases I worked on. Definitely over 100, maybe even 200,” Abdullah says.

      Abdullah, who grew up in a Kurdish family in Aleppo, first became politically active at 16 after her family sought refuge in Denmark. She has been regularly publishing opinion pieces in Danish newspapers and built a profile as a refugee activist.

      “The image of immigration in Danish media was very negative. I could see everyone talking about it but felt as if I didn’t have a voice. That’s why I decided to become an activist,” she says.

      In 2019, Abudullah and a classmate, Aya Daher, were propelled to the front pages of Danish media, after Daher found herself among hundreds of Syrians threatened with deportation.

      “Aya called me up, scared, crying that her application was rejected. Before we were thinking about finishing school, about exams and parties, but suddenly we were only concentrating on Aya’s future and her safety,” Abdullah recalls.

      “I posted her story on Facebook and I sent it to two journalists and went to sleep. In the morning I found that it was shared 4,000 times.”

      The story was picked up by local and international media, sparking a public outcry. Following her appeal to the Danish Refugee Board, Daher’s residency was extended for an additional two years on the grounds that her public profile would put her in danger from the Assad regime.

      “They gave me a residency permit because I was in the media. They did not believe in what I said about my situation and the dangers I would face in Syria. That really hurt,” Daher says. “I hope I don’t have to go through this process again.”

      “Aya can get on with her life now, but I am still doing the same work for other people in the same position,” Abdullah says. “Her case showed refugees that, if you get media attention and support from society, you can stay in Denmark.”

      Abdullah gets up to five messages a day from refugees hoping she can help them catch the attention of the media. “I have to choose who to help – sometimes I pass people on to other activists. There are two or three people helping me,” she says. “It gets hard to be a young person with school and a social life, with all that work.”

      But not everyone is as appealing to the media as Daher. The people whose stories pass unnoticed keep Abdullah up at night.

      “I worked with one family, a couple with young children. I managed to get them one press interview in Sweden, but it wasn’t enough,” Abudullah says. “The husband is now in Germany with two of the children trying to get asylum there. The wife stayed here with one child. She messaged me on Facebook and said: ‘You did not help us, you destroyed our life.’ I can’t be angry at her – I can’t imagine how she feels.

      “Aya’s story was the first of its kind at the time. Additionally, Danish media like to see an outspoken young woman from the Middle East, who is integrated into society, gets an education, and speaks Danish,” Abdullah says. “And this was just an ordinary Syrian family. The woman didn’t speak good Danish and the children were quite young.

      “Aya also doesn’t wear a hijab, which I think made some people more sympathetic towards her,” Abdullah adds. “There are people in Denmark who think that if you wear the hijab you’re not integrated into society. This makes me sad and angry – it shouldn’t be this way.”

      Daher, who became the face of young Syrian refugees in Denmark, says: “It was very difficult to suddenly be in the media, and be someone that many people recognise. I felt like I was responsible for a lot of people.

      “I had a lot of positive reactions from people and from my classmates, but there have also been negative comments.” she says. “One man came up to me on the street and said ‘go back to your country, you Muslim. You’re stealing our money.’

      “I respect that some people don’t want me to be here. There’s nothing more I can do about that,” Daher says. “They have not been in Syria and they have not been in the war – I can’t explain it to them.”

      Awad hopes she can return to the life she had to put on hold two years ago. “I don’t know how to prepare for the appeal. All I can do is say the truth,” she says. “If I go back to Syria they will detain me.” She hopes this will be enough to persuade the board to allow her appeal.

      “I planned to study medicine in Copenhagen before my residency application was rejected. I wanted to be a doctor ever since I came to Denmark,” she says. The uncertainty prompted her to get a qualification as a health assistant by working in a care home. “I just want my life back.”

      https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2022/may/25/zero-asylum-seekers-denmark-forces-refugees-to-return-to-syria?CMP=Shar

  • La France 🇫🇷, la COVID et les écoles... Une triade que le monde regarde quelque peu interloqué !

    Long thread un peu beaucoup agacé ! 😤
    https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1369386629392175113.html

    2/n
    Depuis 1 an, le discours officiel = "la pandémie de COVID ne concerne pas les enfants, peu contaminés et peu contaminants".
    Le binôme JMB et la Société Française de Pédiatrie étant restés solidaires et inébranlables dans ce déni que seul un autre pays maintient, la Suède 🇸🇪.
    3/n
    Pourtant, les données internationales montrent depuis le début de la pandémie que :
    1) l’infection est possible, et avec la même fréquence, à tous les âges (voire désormais plus fréquente chez les enfants avec le variant B.1.1.7 🇬🇧)...
    4/n
    2) charge virale similaire à tout âge ;
    3) enfants contaminés et au moins aussi contaminants que les adultes.
    Comme disait François BOURDILLON (ancien directeur de Santé Publique France), "il existe en France un déni du risque de l’épidémie à l’école"
    Covid-19 : « Il existe en France un déni du risque de l’épidémie à l’école »
    TRIBUNE. Malgré les données scientifiques démontrant le rôle des écoles dans la diffusion du virus, le gouvernement a choisi de les maintenir ouvertes. Or cette décision ne s’accompagne pas d’une stra…
    https://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2021/02/24/en-france-il-existe-un-deni-du-risque-de-l-epidemie-a-l-ecole_6070995_3232.h
    5/n
    On sait également que les enfants ne sont pas à l’abri de COVID sévères et/ou de séquelles :
    – Syndromes inflammatoires multisystémiques pédiatriques (MIS-C ou PIMS) :

    https://twitter.com/itosettiMD_MBA/status/1357770377049604099?s=20

    – Séquelles cardiovasculaires au long cours : news.uthscsa.edu/post-covid-syn… ...
    Post-COVID syndrome severely damages children’s hearts ; ’immense inflammation’ causing cardiac blood vessel dilation - UT Health San Antonio
    Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), believed to be linked to COVID-19, damages the heart to such an extent that some children will need lifelong monitoring and interventions, said t…
    https://news.uthscsa.edu/post-covid-syndrome-severely-damages-childrens-hearts-immense-inflamma
    6/n
    – COVID longues pédiatriques :
    Unroll available on Thread Reader

    https://twitter.com/chrischirp/status/1363473889951637504?s=20

    – Diabète auto-immun induit par la COVID :

    https://twitter.com/yoncabulutmd/status/1359364725549785089?s=20

    7/n
    En limitant le recours aux tests de dépistage et en modifiant les définitions des cas contacts dans le cadre scolaire par rapport à la population générale, la France a ainsi pu masquer la circulation virale dans les établissements scolaires et chez les plus jeunes
    8/n
    Pourtant, à chaque vague, on a clairement pu noter l’impact épidémique favorable de la fermeture des établissements scolaires ; ce que les autorités mettent d’ailleurs à profit pour leur stratégie de Slow Burn avec un cycle de 6 à 8 semaines imposé par les vacances scolaires
    9/n
    Les données de l’ONS (institut national de statistiques 🇬🇧) rappellent encore l’ampleur de la diffusion virale dans les écoles à partir des taux de séroprévalence :
    – 15% des enseignants
    – 8% des enfants du primaire
    – 11% des enfants du secondaire
    ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
    10/n
    Les enseignants sont également au 4ème rang des professions les plus exposées à un surrisque d’infection par SARS-CoV-2 ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
    11/n
    La semaine dernière, le Pr. FONTANET a publié un éditorial dans le BMJ offrant une porte de sortie au gouvernement pour opérer un revirement sémantique digne du plus beau salto arrière de la patineuse Surya Bonaly !!!
    bmj.com/content/bmj/37…
    12/n
    Dans cet éditorial, on peut apprendre, sources à l’appui, que le virus circule dans les écoles exactement comme dans le reste de la population !!!
    Ainsi, le Pr. FONTANET réduit à néant le discours de la Société Française de Pédiatrie et de Jean-Michel BLANQUER...
    13/n
    Cependant, il offre un "sauf-conduit" de communication largement repris dans les médias : "les écoles ne jouent pas le rôle d’amplificateur de l’épidémie" 🤡😉
    Les écoles "ne jouent pas le rôle d’amplificateur" de l’épidémie, selon une étude française
    Si l’on ne peut nier la présence du virus dans les écoles, est-ce pour autant un lieu de super contamination ? Pas plus que dans le reste de la société, nous dit une étude française, qui se veut égale…
    https://www.franceinter.fr/les-ecoles-ne-jouent-pas-le-role-d-amplificateur-de-l-epidemie-selon-une
    14/n
    On passe donc d’un déni délirant ("la COVID ne concerne pas les écoles") à une rhétorique bien plus sibylline ("les écoles n’amplifient pas l’épidémie") 😅
    15/n
    Le Pr. FONTANET représente une ligne désormais décriée au sein du conseil scientifique, puisqu’il est partisan d’une stratégie de suppression virale et d’un contrôle strict des écoles à défaut de pouvoir les fermer...
    16/n
    La stratégie de suppression virale était clairement recommandée dans les avis du conseil scientifique (même si elle n’a jamais été instaurée par le gouvernement)...
    17/n
    Du moins, jusqu’à ce que l’équipe DELFRAISSY/LINA ne bascule du côté de la déclaration de Great Barrington et ne recommande l’isolement ciblé des plus âgés pour laisser le virus circuler dans le reste de la population.
    18/n
    Comme le disait le Pr. FONTANET lors d’une conférence internationale d’épidémiologistes, il faudrait fermer les écoles mais "notre Ministre de l’éducation a dit qu’il faudrait d’abord lui passer sur le corps".

    https://twitter.com/vincentglad/status/1355657246915616772?s=20

    19/n
    Dignes de la Pravda, les médias français reprennent donc uniquement 1 phrase de l’éditorial pour servir le discours politique : "les écoles ne jouent pas le rôle d’amplificateur de l’épidémie"...
    20/n
    Un peu comme la HAS qui recommande tjs à point ce dont le gouvernement a besoin pour mener sa politique ! 😉 :
    – décalage de la 2ème dose, au mépris des données immuno et recos internationales,
    – extension du vaccin AZ aux >65 ans pour combler l’angle-mort des 65-74 ans...
    21/n
    Pourtant, cet éditorial paru dans le BMJ insiste sur un point crucial : à défaut de fermer les écoles, il faut impérativement y implémenter des mesures sanitaires renforcées.
    Pourquoi ? L’éditorial répond :...
    22/n
    A) les écoles contribuent à la transmission communautaire du virus ;
    B) les enfants constituent une voie majeure d’importation du virus dans le foyer familial.
    23/n
    Pour rappel, les autorités sanitaires britanniques ont identifié depuis des mois les enfants comme étant la principale source d’importation du virus dans les foyers familiaux
    TFC : Children and transmission - update paper, 17 December 2020
    Update paper prepared by the Children’s Task and Finish Group (TFC) on children, schools and transmission.
    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tfc-children-and-transmission-update-paper-17-december-2020
    24/n
    Ces données montrent que la probabilité d’être le cas index du foyer (« relative external exposure ») est :
    – 7x plus élevée pour la tranche 12 – 16 ans
    – 3x plus élevée pour la tranche <12 ans
    (la comparaison est faite avec les adultes : >17 ans)... Image
    25/n
    ... La suite du thread arrive...
    26/n
    La capacité à transmettre le virus aux autres (« relative transmissability ») est aussi ↗️ chez les enfants (3x plus que chez l’adulte).
    Mais les enfants restent plus souvent asympto, ce qui complique la surveillance épidémio en l’absence de dépistage systématique à l’école
    27/n
    Une étude danoise montre le même surrisque d’infection par SARS-CoV-2 chez les adultes d’un foyer familial s’ils ont des enfants scolarisés
    Le surrisque varie de +13% à +54% selon le nombre et l’âge des enfants.
    SARS-CoV-2 infection in households with and without young children : Nationwide cohort study
    Background Infections with seasonally spreading human coronaviruses (HCoVs) are common among young children during winter months in the northern hemisphere, with immunological response lasting around …
    https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.28.21250921v1
    28/n
    Ce surrisque d’importation virale depuis les écoles pourrait pourtant être maîtrisé à condition d’appliquer des mesures sanitaires strictes dans les écoles...
    29/n
    Une étude épidémio 🇺🇸 montre que le surrisque d’importation virale dans le foyer familial, via les enfants scolarisés, peut-être ↘️ au niveau de la pop générale à partir de 7 à 9 mesures appliquées dans les écoles (incluant dépistage régulier, enseignement en extérieur...).
    30/n
    Les propositions de la communauté scientifique ne manquent pas, exemples :
    A)

    https://twitter.com/dgurdasani1/status/1368137796058284032?s=20

    B) ducotedelascience.org/ressources-pou…
    C)
    Covid data show sewage monitoring could be vital in infection control
    A pilot study’s analysis of schools’ wastewater shows it could be an early warning system for public health teams
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/07/covid-data-show-sewage-monitoring-could-be-vital-in-infection-control
    Ressources pour écoles, collèges, lycées - Du Côté de la Science
    Voici des propositions élaborées par le collectif Du Côté de la Science, pour aider les établissements scolaires à faire face aux défis posés par la pandémie de COVID-19. Cette page propose aussi des …
    https://ducotedelascience.org/ressources-pour-les-etablissements-scolaires
    31/n
    Le Pr. FONTANET fait preuve de bcp de finesse dans son édito, car tout en offrant une porte de sortie aux autorités ("pas de rôle amplificateur"), il réaffirme sa position et le consensus international sur le lien écoles/COVID = voie MAJEURE de propagation du virus
    32/n
    En effet, il rappelle clairement, sources à l’appui, que le virus circule activement dans les établissements scolaires, aussi bien entre enfants, qu’entre personnels éducatifs, ou qu’entre enfants et personnels...
    33/n
    Or, comme il le rappelle aussi, les mesures actuelles sont insuffisantes et nécessitent d’être largement renforcées (c’est d’ailleurs l’objet de cet éditorial co-signé par le Pr. Devi Sridhar qui milite activement depuis des mois pour une sécurisation des écoles 🇬🇧)...
    34/n
    Les mesures barrières ne sont pour l’instant pas assurées dans les écoles, tjs pas d’effectifs réduits en classe, tjs pas de contrôle de transmission par aérosols via gestion de l’aération des lieux clos, tjs pas de port du masque strict pour tous à tout âge...
    35/n
    JMB promettait le déploiement de tests salivaires dans les écoles. Outre une sous-dotation massive par rapport au nombre d’élèves en France, ne permettant pas un dépistage répété de tous les élèves, les 1ers objectifs sont déjà revus à la baisse ! 😅
    Tests salivaires : comment Jean-Michel Blanquer est passé de 50 000 à 3 000 tests en 24 heures
    Les tests salivaires dans les écoles, présentés comme l’ultime recours pour ne pas fermer les établissements scolaires, peinent à démarrer. Mardi, sur France Inter, le ministre de l’Education national…
    https://www.franceinter.fr/tests-salivaires-comment-jean-michel-blanquer-est-passe-de-50-000-a-3-00
    36/n
    Pour comparaison, l’Autriche a rouvert ses écoles malgré une épidémie très active, mais avec des tests salivaires obligatoires pour tous les élèves chaque lundi thelocal.at/20210112/coron…
    37/n
    Idem au Royaume-Uni, qui annonce la réouverture de ses écoles le 8 mars, mais là encore avec un dépistage obligatoire 2 fois par semaine dès le secondaire
    All households with children of school age to get 2 rapid COVID-19 tests per person per week
    Whole families and households with primary school, secondary school and college age children, including childcare and support bubbles, will be able to test themselves twice every week from home as sch…
    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/all-households-with-children-of-school-aged-to-get-rapid-covid-19-tests-per-pers
    38/n
    En France, on ne vise que quelques milliers de tests chaque semaine, en gros pour évaluer très partiellement la circulation virale dans des écoles sélectionnées dans un panel, sans aucun objectif de contrôle épidémique... Bref, encore un énième affichage sans intérêt.
    39/n
    Ainsi, on comprend comment l’épidémie se propage principalement via les écoles :
    chez les adultes, les mesures barrières sont imposées au quotidien, via les fermetures d’activités/commerces non-essentiels, télétravail, protocoles sanitaires dans les commerces avec jauges...
    40/n
    couvre-feux... Tout ceci est présenté comme efficace (au moins partiellement) pour freiner la propagation virale.
    Chez les enfants, ces mesures ne sont pas appliquées, l’enseignement reste présentiel sans mesures sanitaires renforcées ni surveillance virologique stricte...
    41/n
    Ainsi le virus diffuse facilement parmi les enfants et VIA les enfants vers les foyers familiaux.
    On comprend alors que les écoles constituent la voie MAJEURE de propagation du virus ENTRE foyers familiaux.
    42/n
    L’éditorial évoque l’argument de la souffrance psychologique, hausse des suicides. Ceci est présenté comme étant associé aux effets des confinements et des la fermeture des écoles...
    43/n
    Pourtant l’introduction du même éditorial rappelle que la France ou la Norvège comptent parmi les pays qui ont le moins recouru à la fermeture des écoles ; et la France a recouru moins fréquemment et moins strictement aux confinements que ses voisins européens !...
    44/n
    Les écoles sont restées fermées depuis des moins dans la très grande majorité des pays (cf. carte synthétique UNESCO), et dans les pays qui ont connu les confinements les plus stricts et les plus longs (Australie et Nouvelle-Zélande), les taux de suicide ont chuté !
    45/n
    On découvre donc une victime inattendue de cette pandémie : la crédibilité de la communauté médico-scientifique sortie du discours logique et scientifique, mais dans un discours auto-censuré, politique, incompatible avec l’objectivité nécessaire à l’exercice de la science...
    46/n
    Ce n’est pas au conseil scientifique de dire si les écoles doivent ouvrir/fermer. Il doit simplement présenter les données épidémio objectives afin que les autorités politiques fassent le choix de les ouvrir/fermer selon des considérations sanitaires, éco, sociologiques...
    47/n
    J’évoquais plus tôt un autre pays noyé dans le déni sur le rôle des écoles dans la propagation de l’épidémie = la Suède 🇸🇪.
    Récemment, le Pr. CASALINO (directeur médical à l’AP-HP) évoquait une étude épidémio 🇸🇪 à paraître début mars...
    48/n
    Cette étude était censée être une nouvelle preuve que les écoles n’interviennent pas dans l’épidémie de COVID !
    Outre la proximité idéologique toujours aussi forte entre modèle français et modèle suédois, il est important de souligner ce que cette étude a provoqué !!!...
    49/n
    Tout simplement un scandale international !!!
    Oscillant entre falsification de données, idéologie nauséabonde, interférence politique dans les travaux scientifiques...
    50/n
    La suite du thread arrive...
    51/n
    L’auteur principal, le Dr. Jonas Ludvigsson (pédiatre et épidémio), semble avoir caché des données liées aux COVID sévères et décès chez les enfants et enseignants, afin de construire cette étude visant à soutenir la politique d’immunité collective suivie par la 🇸🇪 :...
    52/n
    Unroll available on Thread Reader

    https://twitter.com/DrEricDing/status/1366879139341492226?s=20

    Critics slam letter in prestigious journal that downplayed COVID-19 risks to Swedish schoolchildren
    Researchers omitted data suggesting child mortality went up in the spring of 2020
    https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/03/critics-slam-letter-prestigious-journal-downplayed-covid-19-risks-swedis
    53/n
    Pourtant, en juillet 2020, des emails échangés entre ce même Dr. Ludvigsson et le Pr. Tegnell (épidémiologiste en chef suédois), soulignaient la surmortalité des enfants âgés de 7 à 16 ans et scolarisés
    Unroll available on Thread Reader

    https://twitter.com/DGBassani/status/1366918905411874817?s=20

    54/n
    On se rappelle également des emails impliquant le Pr. Tegnell et évoquant ouvertement la nécessité de maintenir à tout prix les écoles ouvertes afin d’entretenir la circulation active du virus dans la population pour favoriser l’immunité collective !
    thelocal.se/20200813/revea…
    55/n
    La falsification n’est pas inédite ! Exemple récent et marquant ave l’analyste américaine Rebekah Jones, licenciée après avoir alerté et refusé de falsifier les données de mortalité par COVID en la Floride. Elle est désormais emprisonnée.

    https://twitter.com/afao94/status/1368477950459383809?s=20

    56/n
    Pour mieux comprendre le scandale suédois, il faut souligner que le Dr. Ludvigsson est un des signataires de la déclaration de Great Barrington, tribune polémique soutenue par l’extrême-droite américaine, les milieux climatoseptiques...
    57/n
    Elle vise à inciter à l’isolement ciblé des plus vulnérables pour permettre une circulation active du virus dans le reste de la population, en s’appuyant sur la chimère de l’immunité collective...
    58/n
    Outre la polémique française autour des avis de la Société Française de Pédiatrie, on note les mêmes prises de positions proches de la déclaration de Great Barrington chez les pédiatres québécois !
    Des pédiatres mènent un combat d’arrière-garde contre les mesures de prévention sanitaire | Ricochet
    Depuis le début de la pandémie, des pédiatres québécois mènent une lutte d’arrière-garde contre les mesures sanitaires visant à endiguer le coronavirus. Certains d’entre eux flirtent avec la stratégie…
    https://ricochet.media/fr/3338/des-pediatres-menent-un-combat-darriere-garde-contre-les-mesures-de-prev
    59/n
    Que de telles idéologies s’observent en Suède, ce n’est pas surprenant. L’Histoire nous rappelle que ce pays déclaré "neutre" durant la seconde guerre mondiale, aurait vendu de l’acier au régime nazi...
    60/60
    La 🇸🇪 aurait aussi pratiqué des stérilisations forcées jusqu’en 1996 au nom d’un eugénisme inscrit dans sa constitution (fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/St%C3%A9r…).
    Par contre, voire un rapprochement avec le modèle suédois dans la francophonie est bien attristant !
    Stérilisation contrainte
    https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/St%C3%A9rilisation_contrainte

    • • •

    • Covid à l’école : « Il n’y a plus de protocole, il est à la fois insuffisant et inapplicable »

      Mara-Lisa a 35 ans. Elle est professeure de français depuis une dizaine d’années, tutrice pour les « apprentis » profs. A tort ou à raison, elle a longtemps considéré son métier comme un engagement, et a agi en petit soldat, tant qu’elle a eu l’impression que sa mission était noble.

      « Je suis une enseignante passionnée, j’adore mes élèves, j’aime enseigner, j’aime travailler en équipe avec mes collègues, me lever sans savoir exactement ce qu’il va se passer dans ma journée. Mais voilà, lundi, je crois que je n’irai pas. Nous sommes en guerre, disait Macron.

      « Résultats catastrophiques »

      « En septembre, j’ai bataillé pour le masque, expliqué sa nécessité auprès des élèves. Quand j’ai parlé à ma cheffe de la contamination par aérosol, elle m’a répondu qu’il fallait arrêter de regarder BFM, et ne pas rentrer dans des débats scientifiques.

      « En octobre, j’ai testé le taux de CO2 de beaucoup de salles de cours, la salle des profs, la cantine. Les résultats sont pour la plupart catastrophiques. Un collègue m’a demandé si mon appareil mesurait aussi le méthane émis par les pets des élèves.

      « En novembre, la moitié de mes collègues et moi-même nous sommes mobilisés : nous avons fait grève pour alerter la presse de la situation sanitaire de l’établissement, pour demander en vain des capteurs, des agents d’entretien et des surveillants supplémentaires, le changement des fenêtres.

      « En décembre, nos cours et nos évaluations ont été bousillés à la dernière minute : nous avons appris quatre jours avant les vacances que les deux dernières journées étaient facultatives pour les élèves afin de permettre aux familles un Noël plus en sécurité.

      « Conflit ouvert avec les élèves »

      « En janvier, je rentre pour la première fois de ma carrière en conflit ouvert avec une classe dont six ou sept élèves refusent sciemment de porter correctement le masque. Ils répètent que ce que je fais ne sert à rien, puisqu’ils se contamineront dans les autres cours. Ils font un scandale dès que j’ouvre une fenêtre. Ils s’insurgent car je suis « la seule à les chercher ». Ils murmurent que je serais complètement « flippée ».

      « Les surveillants sont à bout de souffle, et une AESH [Accompagnant des élèves en situation de handicap, ndlr] qui s’inquiétait de contaminer son mari à risque a disparu des radars. Mes collègues m’avouent qu’ils ont rendu les armes avec le masque : ils veulent pouvoir enseigner. Les uns avalent rapidement leur ration, seuls dans leur bagnole. D’autres mangent ensemble à la cantine ou en salle des profs. Fracture. On se déchire pour savoir si on revient à une salle par prof.

      « En ce début mars, dans ce banal collège de banlieue, avec un taux d’incidence local supérieur à 250 pour 100 000, 600 élèves se croiseront dans des tranchées couvertes de moins de deux mètres de large, à chaque heure de cours. La désinfection des tables est prévue à chaque cours, mais je ne sais pas si c’est à moi de la faire. Je suppose que oui. J’espère qu’on aura assez de lingettes désinfectantes car on nous a retiré le spray : après deux mois d’utilisation, la fiche technique nous a appris qu’il fallait pour le manipuler des gants et des lunettes de protection.

      « Et un bruit de fond qui s’installe, pourquoi s’embêter avec le masque puisque à la cantine il n’y en a pas ? Et pourquoi s’embêter avec la distanciation puisque dans la cour il n’y en a pas ? Et pourquoi pas de brassage, puisque tout le monde se croise dans les couloirs ? Il n’y a plus de protocole : sa seule performance est d’être à la fois insuffisant et inapplicable. Je ne sais pas qui il protège. Ma seule armure, c’est le masque FFP2 que mon employeur ne me fournit pas.

      « Leur mépris pour nous me déchire »

      « Mes collègues pour certains font les autruches. La tête dans le sable, ils s’adressent parfois de manière condescendante à ceux qui s’insurgent ou qui ont peur. D’autres courbent juste l’échine. D’autres encore pleurent, parfois à 8 h 24 en salle des profs. On essuie les larmes et on y va.

      « Moi, je sais que le virus est aéroporté, je sais que les Covid longs, y compris pédiatriques, existent. Je dois regarder mes élèves dans les yeux, et je pense à cette mère d’élève décédée au printemps dernier. Parce que ce sont les ordres, je participe à ce qui est au mieux une mascarade, au pire un crime. Et à chaque seconde où se déploie devant moi ce terrible spectacle de résignation collective ou de simple désinvolture, je pense à mes propres enfants que je ne protège pas non plus, eux aussi dans leur classe, eux aussi avec des enseignants broyés.

      « Alors, si je n’y vais pas lundi, n’y voyez pas un acte de résistance politique ; n’y voyez même pas l’envie de me dorer la pilule. Ce n’est qu’un effondrement personnel. J’aime mes élèves, j’aime mes enfants, je crois en mon métier, leur mépris pour nous me déchire chaque jour. Ce qu’on me demande d’accepter, c’est que ma santé, celle de mes élèves, celle de leur famille, celle de mes enfants, ne compte pas. Ce qu’on me demande, c’est de participer à un #mensonge_d’Etat.

      « Aujourd’hui, je suis le soldat sans arme qui pleure, prostré, quand sonne l’heure de l’assaut, car je ne peux plus. Je déserte, vous n’aurez qu’à me fusiller. Courage à ceux qui restent. »

      Journal d’épidémie, par Christian Lehmann

      Christian Lehmann est écrivain et médecin dans les Yvelines. Pour « Libération », il tient la chronique d’une société suspendue à l’évolution du coronavirus. Aujourd’hui, le témoignage d’une enseignante désespérée au point de déserter.

    • sur les enseignants à risques, l’étude mentionnée semble en fait être https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/bulletins/coronaviruscovid19relateddeathsbyoccupationenglandandwales/deathsregisteredbetween9marchand28december2020#deaths-involving-covid-19-in- mais ce qu’on y lit est assez différent This analysis did not find statistical evidence of a difference in the positivity rate between primary and secondary school teachers, other key workers and other professions.

  • Garantir une #liberté_académique effective

    Ce billet est consacré à la notion de liberté académique. Auparavant, nous traitons succinctement de trois sujets d’actualité.

    #Maccarthysme — Depuis le 16 février, nous vivons une de ces séquences maccarthystes qui ont fait le quotidien des Bolsonaro, Trump, Johnson et autres Orbán [1], et qui se répètent désormais dans le nôtre. L’attaque de l’exécutif contre les scientifiques a été déclenchée à l’approche des élections régionales par Mme #Vidal, possiblement tête de liste à Nice. Cet épisode politicien consternant ouvre la campagne des présidentielles pour le chef de l’État ainsi que pour les autres ministres chargés de chasser sur les terres lexicales de l’#extrême_droite. La charge consiste à désigner comme non scientifiques certains domaines de la #recherche et à les associer au #terrorisme, par un nom chimérique construit sur le modèle de l’adjectif « #judéo-bolchévique », de sinistre mémoire. La #menace est réelle. Mais elle ne vient pas des travaux insufflés par une libido politique, qui innervent aujourd’hui un grand nombre de disciplines des sciences dures et humaines, elle vient de la #stratégie_politique qui accuse la recherche et l’#Université d’être politisées tout en leur enjoignant ailleurs de légitimer les choix « sociétaux » des politiques [2] ou de répondre dans l’urgence à une crise par des appels à projet [3]. Elle s’entend dans ce lexique confusionniste et moraliste qui prétend dire ce qu’est la #science sans en passer par la #méthode_scientifique. Elle se reconnaît à la fiction du débat qui occupe l’#espace_médiatique par #tribunes de #presse et, bien pire, sur les plateaux des chaînes de #télévision singeant le modèle de Fox News et des médias ultraconservateurs états-uniens.

    La menace nous appelle donc à forger de solides réseaux de #solidarité pour les affronter et à nous réarmer intellectuellement, pour réinstituer l’Université.

    #Zéro_Covid — Nous avons à nouveau demandé au Président de la République, au Premier Ministre et au Ministre de la santé de recevoir une délégation de chercheurs pour proposer une série de mesures de sécurisation sanitaire composant une stratégie globale Zéro Covid (https://rogueesr.fr/zero-covid), conformément à la tribune (https://rogueesr.fr/zero-covid) signée, déjà, par plus de mille chercheuses et chercheurs.

    #Hcéres — Dans ce contexte, il peut être pertinent de revenir sur le fonctionnement du Hcéres, instance symptomatique s’il en est des menaces institutionnelles qui pèsent sur la liberté académique. Le collège du Hcéres réuni le 1er mars a entériné le recrutement de M. #Larrouturou comme directeur du département d’évaluation des organismes nationaux de recherche. M. Larrouturou était, avant sa démission le soir de l’adoption de la LPR, à la tête de la Direction générale de la recherche et de l’innovation (DGRI). À ce titre, il a organisé la nomination de M. #Coulhon à la présidence du collège du Hcéres. À qui en douterait encore, ce renvoi d’ascenseur confirme l’imbrication des différentes bureaucraties de la recherche et leur entre-soi conduisant au #conflit_d’intérêt permanent.

    Certains militants d’une fausse liberté académique, dans une tribune récemment publiée, ont par ailleurs présenté le département d’évaluation de la recherche comme l’instance légitime pour une mission de contrôle politique des facultés. Il est donc intéressant de relever que ce département demeurera dirigé par un conférencier occasionnel de l’#Action_Française, le mouvement de #Charles_Maurras à qui l’on doit le mythe de l’Université inféodée aux quatre États confédérés (Juifs, Protestants, Francs-Maçons, « Métèques ») [4].

    Enfin, trois membres d’instances nationales de La République en Marche apparaissent dorénavant dans l’organigramme du Hcéres, confortant les craintes de constitution d’un ministère Bis en charge de la reprise en main de la recherche.

    Garantir une liberté académique effective — Vous trouverez ici la première partie de notre synthèse : Réinstituer la liberté académique : https://rogueesr.fr/liberte-academique.

    –---

    [1] À ce sujet, on pourra lire l’actualité récente en Angleterre, frappante de similitude :

    - Government to appoint “free-speech champion” for English universities : https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/14/government-to-appoint-free-speech-champion-for-universities-heritage-hi
    - A political scientist defends white identity policies : https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/a-political-scientist-defends-white-identity-politics-eric-kaufmann-white
    - Gavin Williamson using “misleading” research to justify campus free-speech law : https://www.theguardian.com/education/2021/feb/27/gavin-williamson-using-misleading-research-to-justify-campus-free-speec

    [2] Le CNRS célèbre ses 80 ans : http://www.cnrs.fr/fr/cnrsinfo/le-cnrs-celebre-ses-80-ans

    [3] Face aux attentats : un an de mobilisation au CNRS : https://www.cnrs.fr/fr/face-aux-attentats-un-de-mobilisation-au-cnrs

    [4] Les convictions politiques de la personne en question n’auraient pas vocation à apparaître sur la place publique s’il n’était pas précisément question de lui confier une mission de contrôle politique des universités. D’autre part, nous nous refusons à mentionner des liens vers des pages pointant vers des sites d’extrême-droite. Les lecteurs soucieux de vérification les trouveront sans peine.

    https://rogueesr.fr/2021/03/03
    #libertés_académiques

    –—

    ajouté au fil de discussion autour des propos tenus par Vidal :
    https://seenthis.net/messages/902062

    • La #résistance s’organise à #Sorbonne_Univresité

      Les paniques identitaires n’ont pas leur place à @Sorbonne_Univ_ !

      Le 07 et 08 Janvier se tiendra en Sorbonne le colloque « Après la déconstruction : reconstruire les sciences et la culture ».
      Nous nous opposons à l’accueil des idées réactionnaires au sein de notre université

      Avec Solidaires Étu SU, l’ASU, la BAFFE et le NPA Jussieu-ENS, nous dénonçons l’accueil de ce pseudo colloque portant sur la "cancel culture" et la lutte contre les discriminations qui menacerait "le monde éducatif, où elle y a déjà causé quelques dégâts" d’après sa description.

      Nous demandons à ce que @Sorbonne_Univ_ se désolidarise de la tenue d’un tel colloque dans l’un de ses campus !
      Nous soulignons également la présence du ministre Blanquer qui préfère à l’éducation nationale crédibiliser les fantasmes identitaires !

      https://twitter.com/UNEFsorbonneU/status/1479104625533804551

      #résistance

    • Ceci n’est pas un colloque universitaire - communiqué

      Du 7 au 8 Janvier, l’association loi 1901 "Le Collège de Philosophie" présidé par l’un de nos collègues de la Faculté des Lettres (Pierre-Henri Tavoillot) organise un colloque intitulé « Après la déconstruction : reconstruire les sciences et la culture ». Utilisant pernicieusement le crédit de l’université qui l’héberge - l’université est un lieu de liberté d’expression, cette réunion partisane se présente comme un colloque "d’échanges scientifiques" visant à « étudier les tenants et aboutissants de la pensée décoloniale, "wokisme", ou "cancel culture" et comment elle s’introduit dans le système éducatif pour y imposer une morale au détriment de l’esprit critique » (sic). Les conclusions de ce "colloque" sont déjà connues, puisqu’elles sont dans son titre : la "cancel culture" (terme utilisé par les conservateurs américains et amalgamé ici avec la pensée décoloniale, courant intellectuel anti-raciste) venue des États-Unis aurait détruit les sciences et la culture, et il faudrait les reconstruire. Par un grossier retournement de la réalité, ce pseudo-colloque universitaire implémente exactement ce qu’il entend dénoncer : le camouflage d’une idéologie sous couvert de recherche universitaire, aidé par la localisation de cette réunion politique dans une université !

      La liberté d’expression est la règle à l’université, et il est donc possible d’y organiser des réunions politiques. Une réunion de La France Insoumise ou d’En Marche qui y aurait lieu n’entraînerait aucun doute sur l’absence de caractère universitaire d’une telle réunion. Par contre, un "colloque" organisé par "le Collège de Philosophie" (qui n’a aucune reconnaissance universitaire) utilise la tutelle du lieu pour déguiser des propos idéologiques en "recherche" ou "échanges scientifiques".

      SUD Éducation appelle les collègues de toute catégorie professionnelle et les étudiant.e.s à ne pas tomber dans le panneau de ce colloque idéologique pseudo-scientifique
      1. Un parti pris idéologique revendiqué, indigne d’un vrai colloque scientifique

      Sans prendre en compte la réalité du racisme, du sexisme, des oppressions coloniales, ce colloque s’oppose à leur étude sociologique ou historique. Le constat est fait dès la présentation du colloque : un "ordre moral" serait introduit (comment ? par qui ?) qui serait "incompatible" avec le système éducatif. On parle d’ailleurs de "wokisme" ou de "cancel culture" dont les définitions sont absentes, ce qui peut laisser penser que les organisateurs et organisatrices ne les connaissent pas elles-mêmes ou choisissent délibérément de les garder dans le flou (rendant ainsi plus facile leur caricature et leur condamnation). On peut remarquer que le terme "pensée décoloniale", présenté comme synonyme de ces termes, est au contraire revendiqué par des courants anti-racistes, ce qui confirme la connaissance rigoureuse que les organisateurs du colloque semblent avoir des courants de pensée dont ils entendent discuter.
      Et surtout, dans ce "colloque", aucune trace de la disputatio, une des règles de base de la recherche et de son intégrité. Aucun-e représentant-e des études décoloniales n’intervient dans cet évènement. Ceci n’est donc pas un colloque universitaire mais un colloque politique et idéologique.

      2. Une réunion politique et publicitaire

      Les intervenant.e.s de ce colloque ne sont pas neutres. Une discussion sérieuse autour de questions scientifiques impliquerait la présence d’intervenant.e.s varié.e.s et la possibilité d’un débat contradictoire. Toutefois, beaucoup des intervenant.e.s invité.e.s sont connu.e.s plutôt pour leur opposition médiatique aux questions de l’antiracisme et du féminisme, que pour leur travaux de recherche sur ces questions : Mathieu Bock-Côté et ses aspirations identitaires décrites dans "L’empire du politiquement correct", qui remplace désormais Éric Zemmour sur CNEWS, Jacques Julliard qui ironise sur une gauche qui aurait abandonné la nation et l’identité nationale au profit de la diversité (voir les conclusions "L’esprit du peuple"), Nathalie Heinich dont on peut supposer qu’elle parlera "des enjeux épistémologiques de la post-vérité" plutôt en tant que signataire de la tribune "Non au séparatisme islamiste" du Figaro (mars 2018) qu’en tant que sociologue de l’art, pour prendre des exemples connus... De plus que vient faire une table ronde de "témoins" du "néoracisme", invitant entre autres Pascal Bruckner, essayiste, dans un colloque universitaire ? La présence du romancier fait résonner ses propos manichéen sur la lutte contre l’islamophobie, la comparant à une "chasse aux sorcières", ou ses accusations contre Rokhaya Diallo, mettant en cause son militantisme comme ayant entraîné les attentats meurtriers contre Charlie Hebdo en 2015. Face à des intervenant.e.s aussi politisé.e.s et venu.e.s défendre leurs écrits politiques au regard du programme, où est la contradiction ? Remarquons que le ministre de l’Éducation Nationale semble avoir le temps de sonner le départ de ces deux jours de réunion, alors que la situation des établissements scolaires est catastrophique.

      3. Un évènement de propagande de la "pensée" réactionnaire

      En conséquence, nous appelons nos collègues et les étudiant.e.s de Sorbonne Université a être vigilant.e.s vis-à-vis du déguisement universitaire d’une idéologie réactionnaire en vogue actuellement. Ce "colloque" ne peut être considéré comme indépendant des attaques médiatiques et politiciennes envers des collègues, accusé.e.s d’"islamogauchisme" par les ministres de l’ESR et de l’Éducation Nationale, ainsi que des personnalités politiques dans la droite ligne de l’extrême-droite qui en d’autres temps accusait l’Université d’être sous l’emprise judéo-maçonnique (voir la Une de Paris Soir du samedi 31 Novembre 1940). Nous pensons que ce colloque pseudo-scientifique vise à légitimer ces attaques, et à censurer toute pensée universitaire critique des dominations. Dans le respect des traditions universitaires, nous appelons au contraire à défendre les libertés pédagogiques et de recherche et l’indépendance de nos collègues face à l’ingérence des tutelles politiques nationales ou régionales. Ce n’est que dans de telles conditions que la recherche et les idées nouvelles peuvent s’épanouir !

      https://sud-su.fr/spip.php?article36

    • Communiqué FERC Sup Sorbonne Université - Ceci est-il un colloque universitaire ?

      Les 7 et 8 janvier 2022 se tiendra dans un amphithéâtre de la Sorbonne un événement intitulé « Après la déconstruction : reconstruire les sciences et la culture ».

      Cette réunion se présente comme un colloque "d’échanges scientifiques" visant à "étudier les tenants et aboutissants de la pensée décoloniale, "wokisme", ou "cancel culture" et comment elle s’introduit dans le système éducatif pour y imposer une morale au détriment de l’esprit critique".

      Ce colloque va être ouvert par Blanquer le ministre de l’Éducation nationale qui affirmait il y a un an, sans jamais être revenu sur ses dires que « Notre société a été beaucoup trop perméable à des courants de pensée « Ce qu’on appelle l’islamo-gauchisme fait des ravages », « Il fait des ravages à l’université, il fait des ravages quand l’UNEF cède à ce type de chose, il fait des ravages quand dans les rangs de la France Insoumise, vous avez des gens qui sont de ce courant-là et s’affichent comme tels. Ces gens-là favorisent une idéologie qui ensuite, de loin en loin, mène au pire ».

      Ce colloque pourrait-il être instrumentalisé en meeting politique qui s’inscrirait dans la droite ligne des discours de Blanquer et Vidal ? Blanquer, comme Vidal, prétendent que l’islamogauchisme (terme maintenant remplacé par celui de wokisme) « gangrène l’université ». Or, cette parole ministérielle, pendant une année de campagne présidentielle, et en pleine pandémie qui étouffe encore un peu plus les personnels de l’éducation nationale et l’hôpital, dans un colloque universitaire soulève des questions bien légitimes.

      En outre, cet événement est organisé sur le site de Sorbonne Université. Dès lors, la responsabilité et l’image de notre université sont engagées.

      La plupart des intervenants de cette manifestation sont signataires du « manifeste des 100 » qui appelait à la dénonciation des "islamo-gauchistes". Un certain nombre sont également membres de l’« Observatoire du décolonialisme », dont l’activité principale semble aussi être de dénoncer des collègues sur internet. Cet événement qui aura lieu les 7 et 8 janvier reprend les mêmes thèmes, en évitant soigneusement le terme d’« islamo-gauchisme » (devenu trop sulfureux ?) mais en ciblant les études décoloniales, sans laisser place au débat contradictoire. Ainsi, le colloque annoncé pourrait paraître comme une opération politique à laquelle participeront des personnes qui appellent régulièrement à la dénonciation et à la censure de collègues sur le site de l’« Observatoire du décolonialisme ».

      Il y a pourtant moins d’un an, l’ancien président de Sorbonne Université, Jean Chambaz avait pris position très clairement au sujet de l’"islamo-gauchisme", à contre-courant des déclarations de la ministre Mme Vidal : "Il y a une orientation de ce gouvernement qui va draguer des secteurs de l’opinion publique dans des endroits assez nauséabonds" "L’islamo-gauchisme est un terme absolument peu précis, issu des milieux de la droite extrême, repris par certains députés LR qui voudraient interdire l’enseignement de certaines disciplines à l’université. On se croirait dans l’ancienne Union soviétique. Ça me fait davantage penser aux slogans du 20e siècle dénonçant le judéo-bolchévisme." Selon l’ancien président de Sorbonne Université, le mal qui "gangrène" la société n’est pas cet "islamo-gauchisme" mal défini et qui est agité, selon lui, comme un chiffon rouge. "On accole deux mots qui font peur pour ne pas définir une réalité. Mais qu’est-ce que ça veut dire ? martèle-t-il. Qu’est-ce qui gangrène la société ? C’est la discrimination, c’est la ghettoïsation, c’est l’inégalité sociale dans l’accès au travail, dans l’accès à l’éducation, à la culture, et l’échec des politiques publiques dans ce domaine depuis cinquante ans.".

      Nous ne demandons pas l’annulation de cette manifestation qui doit être reconnue comme telle. Mais il ne peut y avoir d’appel à la délation et de chasse à certains collègues. Ce que nous attendons de la nouvelle présidente de l’université, c’est un engagement lié à votre fonction qui vous charge d’une mission de protection des personnels de l’université.

      Pour mémoire, début 2021, comme 2000 personnes qui avaient signé cette réponse au manifeste des 100, votre prédécesseur M.Chambaz avait accordé la protection fonctionnelle aux collègues qui en avaient fait la demande après avoir été mis en cause publiquement dans cette chasse aux sorcières.

      Ce que nous attendons donc de la présidence de l’université, c’est qu’elle donne l’assurance à nos collègues :

      - qu’il sera accordé systématiquement le bénéfice de la protection fonctionnelle à toutes celles et tous ceux qui seront mis-es en cause publiquement dans l’exercice de leurs missions d’enseignement et de recherche,
      - et qu’il sera donné pour consigne à la direction des affaires juridiques de l’université d’effectuer un signalement auprès du ministère de l’intérieur pour toute dénonciation calomnieuse publiée sur internet ou ailleurs, sur simple demande de la personne concernée.

      https://www.ferc-cgt.org/communqiue-ferc-sup-sorbonne-universite-ceci-est-il-un-colloque-universita