How China can safely open its borders as it recovers from the coronavirus pandemic | South China Morning Post
▻https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3136055/how-china-can-safely-open-its-borders-it-recovers-coronavirus
How China can safely open its borders as it recovers from the coronavirus pandemic ? As China moves to reopen its borders with the rest of the world, it faces a difficult choice. So far, the state narrative
has been focused on the eradication of Covid-19 as a key indicator of legitimacy. In terms of case/fatality ratios relative to its population size, China has been very successful indeed.The problem for China is that most of the world has not adopted a similar approach. Instead, most countries have developed a strategy of simply coping with the virus while trying to minimise the economic and social impact.
This means that, as China recovers from the pandemic, it will need to reopen its borders not just to trade and travel, but also to the virus. We are seeing a snapshot of this with the current outbreaks in Guangdong. So, how does China balance this equation? How does it open up and keep itself safe at the same time? The first element has to be the creation of a firewall against community transmission. While strategies such as quarantines
are useful, they are reactive policy instruments. They are what states use when the virus is already present.As China reopens, the need for such instruments should be reduced to a supporting role rather than a core platform. Put simply, China cannot afford to reopen to the world when all travel into China requires 14- or 21-day quarantine.
The only way this can be avoided is through a robust vaccination programme. China has already made a very strong start
with its inoculations, but it needs to deepen this across the entire country, especially in the outlying areas where people cross borders without official control and in rural communities where uptake is relatively lower. Vaccinations are essentially just individual firewalls against virus transmission.The more widespread the vaccination take-up rate, the harder incidental transmission becomes. It has the additional protective benefit that, if Chinese people are already vaccinated when they travel overseas, then not only are they safer abroad but, when they return home, they are less likely to be carrying the virus into the local population as well.
The pre-travel checks can fail or return false positives. There is significantly less risk if travellers are fully vaccinated before arrival in China. A common platform for recognition of vaccinations will be crucial if such conditions are to be met.China seeks recognition of its WeChat-based digital health certificates for overseas travel China seeks recognition of its WeChat-based digital health certificates for overseas travel It is here that vaccine passports
are emerging as the next major international policy challenge for governments. These are nothing new. In the past, international travellers had to carry a yellow card in their passports to show they were inoculated against yellow fever, cholera, typhus fever, and smallpox. As international travel resumes, a similar document for the Covid-19 virus will be necessary.
This is one area where China can leverage its standing as a major trading country, as well as one of the largest source countries for international travel, to set the best-practice standard for the rest of the world. This would also help to obviate the need for mandatory quarantine, except for arrivals from high-risk countries.
The third element necessitates that China increase its vaccine supplies. It is already doing so domestically, with 20 vaccine candidates currently undergoing trials. Now that the vaccines from Sinovac and Sinopharm have World Health Organization approval, there is also a greater capacity to support international efforts.Doing so not only helps affected countries, it also helps to provide greater health security to Chinese people when they travel overseas. As most of Chinese trade and travel activities are focused on the countries along its periphery, these are the logical focus for China’s vaccine diplomacy either multilaterally through the WHO’s Covax Facility
or bilaterally.
The final element requires China to move beyond a vaccine-led approach to its global public health leadership. All the public health data across countries shows that social and economic inequalities have the biggest impact on health. Moving forward, China will need to focus on these structural determinants of health in the countries where it provides health aid, to see a bigger impact from its efforts. In doing so, China will not only deliver more effective health aid to those recipient countries but the spillover from such activities will improve global-level resilience to future health threats.It is only by implementing an endgame strategy that incorporates all four elements that China can guarantee its long-term exit from the risks of the pandemic. To do otherwise would only invite greater social and economic risk with a return of the coronavirus, while restricting China’s ability to fully re-engage with the geopolitical economic order as it reopens its borders and lets the world back in.
Dr Nicholas Thomas coordinates the CLASS One Health research cluster at City University of Hong Kong. He has previously published on Sars, bird flu, health governance, and antimicrobial resistance. Dr Thomas is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Public Health
#Covid-19#migrant#migration#chine#sante#reouverturefrontiere#variant#passeportvaccinal#vaccination#circulation#diplomatiesanitaire