Hmmm ... this doesn’t look like science.

/content

  • Yes, your pet might eat your corpse. That’s a problem for investigators
    https://www.science.org/content/article/yes-your-pet-might-eat-your-corpse-s-problem-investigators

    Researchers think hunger is usually the main motivation, though some pets may not wait until their tummy starts to grumble. “Everyone wants to think it’d be a while,” Rando says. But animals might become worried about their unresponsive special person—especially if the death is violent or sudden—and lick their owner’s face seeking comfort. That licking can quickly turn into feeding.

    Nearly everything that’s known about pet scavenging tends to come from individual case reports, however. Little research has been done quantifying how scavenging occurs or comparing damage across scenes.

    So anthropologists at the University of Bern collected dozens of published reports on corpse scrounging by cats, dogs, and even a hamster, which made a nest with pieces of its owner’s facial skin. (At this point, you probably know what you’re getting into if you click these links, but don’t say we didn’t warn you.)

  • If earthworms were a country, they’d be the world’s fourth largest producer of grain | Science | AAAS
    https://www.science.org/content/article/if-earthworms-were-country-they-d-be-world-s-fourth-largest-producer-grain

    Earthworms do many things to make soil more fertile. By feeding on dead plant matter, they release nutrients much faster than soil microbes would by themselves. They also improve the physical structure of soil. As worms digest plant matter, they excrete tiny, stable clumps of particles. Together with the earthworm burrows, these aggregates make soil more porous. This allows rainwater to soak in and enables roots to grow more easily.

    #sols #vers_de_terre #grains

  • Germany’s radioactive boars are a bristly reminder of nuclear fallout | Science | AAAS
    https://www.science.org/content/article/germany-s-radioactive-boars-are-bristly-reminder-nuclear-fallout

    What has tusks, bristly hair, and is contaminated with dangerous levels of radiation? Visit Germany’s Bavarian mountain towns and you just may find out. The wild boars (Sus scrofa) that snuffle through the region’s forests are so radioactive that the country has ruled them unsafe to eat—but why these animals are so contaminated has proved a puzzle. In a new study out today in Environmental Science & Technology, scientists report that at least some of the radioactive elements in their bodies are the result of fallout from atomic bombs that detonated in our atmosphere more than 60 years ago.

    […]

    Consumption of wild boar meat, which was long considered a delicacy in the region, has noticeably decreased in recent decades, Steinhauser says. There are ecological impacts, too, he adds. If no one wants to eat boar meat, hunters could be deterred from thinning their numbers, raising the possibility that populations could grow unmanageably large. This would threaten Bavarian forests, Steinhauser says, as too many boars can cause a lot of damage to forest vegetation and nearby farms.

  • Politicians, scientists spar over alleged NIH cover-up using #COVID-19_origin paper
    https://www.science.org/content/article/politicians-scientists-spar-over-alleged-nih-cover-up-using-covid-19-origin

    Two scientists who are co-authors of a 3-year-old article on the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic faced down Republican lawmakers today in what might be the most in-depth discussion ever of a scientific paper in the halls of the U.S. Congress. At a House subcommittee hearing, the Republicans asserted that top officials at the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) prompted the researchers to write the paper to try and “kill” the theory that SARS-CoV-2 leaked from a laboratory in Wuhan, China.

    [...]

    The paper, titled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2”, was published in Nature Medicine on 17 March 2020 and argued that SARS-CoV-2 had most likely evolved naturally, rather than being engineered by scientists. It has become central to the assertions of many lab-leak proponents that NIH funded risky coronavirus experiments, which, in turn, led to the pandemic. In this scenario, high-ranking agency officials, such as Anthony Fauci, then the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and Francis Collins, NIH’s director, tried to suppress any scientific discussion that could expose this.

    [...]

    The hearing held by the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic focused largely on how the two scientist witnesses over a short period of time went from thinking the virus appeared to be lab-made to ruling out that hypothesis. “We’re examining whether government officials, regardless of who they are, unfairly, perhaps biasedly, tipped the scales toward a preferred origin theory,” said subcommittee chair Representative Brad Wenstrup (R-OH) at the start of the hearing.

    Andersen and Garry spent much of their time explaining the scientific process to the committee. “I think it’s important that we take a step back and focus on what’s possible versus what is probable,” said Andersen, who decried that he and his co-authors were “pawns in a political game” staged by the subcommittee. “We concluded that the virus very likely emerged as the result of a zoonosis, that is, a spillover from an animal host. This remains the only scientifically supported theory for how the virus emerged. If convincing new evidence were to be discovered, suggesting otherwise, we would, of course, revise our conclusions. This is science.”

  • ‘Ridiculous,’ says Chinese scientist accused of being pandemic’s patient zero
    https://www.science.org/content/article/ridiculous-says-chinese-scientist-accused-being-pandemic-s-patient-zero

    A scientist at China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) who has recently faced media allegations that he was the first person with COVID-19 and his research on coronaviruses sparked the pandemic strongly denies that he was ill in late 2019 or that his work had any link to the emergence of SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, a newly released U.S. report of declassified information on COVID-19’s origin, from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), fails to name him or substantiate that any WIV scientists had the initial cases of COVID-19.

    “The recent news about so-called ‘patient zero’ in WIV are absolutely rumors and ridiculous,” Ben Hu emailed Science in his first public response to the charges, which have been attributed to anonymous former and current U.S. Department of State officials. A WIV colleague who has also been named as one of the first COVID-19 cases denies the accusation as well.

    [...] Public’s account came just before the 18 June deadline for a law enacted on 20 March that required ODNI to declassify documents about the origin of COVID-19 within 90 days. The law specifically asked for the names and other details of any sick WIV researchers before the Wuhan outbreak surfaced. The deadline passed without any response from ODNI but today it released its declassified information, hours after an initial version of this story was published. ODNI’s report does not substantiate Public or WSJ’s accounts in any major way. It says that some at WIV were ill in fall of 2019 with “symptoms consistent with but not diagnostic of COVID-19.” But it doesn’t identify the 3 scientists and it further states, “We have no indications that any of these researchers were hospitalized because of the symptoms consistent with COVID-19.”

    [...] Yet ODNI continues to assert the evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was modified by researchers is weak, challenging the many lab leak theories in which WIV scientists allegedly manipulated a precursor coronvirus to make it more dangerous. ODNI states “Almost all IC agencies assess that SARS-CoV-2 was not genetically engineered. Most agencies assess that SARS-CoV-2 was not laboratory-adapted; some are unable to make a determination. All IC agencies assess that SARS-CoV-2 was not developed as a biological weapon.”

    [...] As for Hu, he categorically denies having anything to do with the origin of SARS-CoV-2. “I did not get sick in autumn 2019, and did not have COVID-19-like symptoms at that time,” Hu wrote. “My colleagues and I tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibody in early March 2020 and we were all negative.”

    Yu emailed Science that the charges are “fake news” and similarly insisted there was no basis for the allegations. “In autumn 2019, I was neither sick nor had any symptoms related to COVID-19,” Yu wrote. Zhu did not reply to email requests for comment.

    Hu is an appealing suspect for lab-leak proponents because he was a lead author on a 2017 paper in PLOS Pathogens describing an experiment that created chimeric viruses by combining genes for surface proteins from bat coronaviruses that would not grow in cultures with the genome of one that did. This paper has received intense scrutiny because it was partially funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) and, lab-leak proponents insist, led to a gain of function in the cultured virus. NIH officials have strongly denied this and noted that the chimeric viruses created were not closely related to SARS-CoV-2. Hu says he never worked with live viruses in that experiment or any others done in Shi’s lab. “My work in the lab was mainly genome characterization and evolutionary analysis of viruses,” Hu wrote.

    Yu, who was not a co-author of the PLOS Pathogens study, also denied being involved with live virus experiments. “I like bioinformatics and I mainly engage in gene sequencing and data analysis in the laboratory,” she wrote.

    [...] The bill that led to the law to declassify ODNI documents was crafted by Senator Josh Hawley (R–MO), who in 2020 introduced a different bill, the Justice for Victims of Coronavirus Act, that would allow Americans to sue the Chinese government, which he asserted was guilty of “waging a global propaganda offensive to deflect attention away from its mishandling of the COVID-19 outbreak and create unfounded accounts of the origins of the virus.” That bill died without getting to a full vote in the Democrat-controlled Senate, but Republicans in the House of Representatives continue to hold hearings focused on the lab-leak theory and whether NIH helped fund research that led to COVID-19.

    • Report on Potential Links Between the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Origins of COVID-19 (ODNI, June 2023)
      https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Report-on-Potential-Links-Between-the-Wuhan-Institute-of-Virology-and-the-Origi

      Several WIV researchers were ill in Fall 2019 with symptoms; some of their symptoms were consistent with but not diagnostic of COVID-19. The IC continues to assess that this information neither supports nor refutes either hypothesis of the pandemic’s origins because the researchers’ symptoms could have been caused by a number of diseases and some of the symptoms were not consistent with COVID-19. Consistent with standard practices, those researchers likely completed annual health exams as part of their duties in a highcontainment biosafety laboratory. The IC assesses that the WIV maintains blood samples and health records of all of their laboratory personnel—which are standard procedures in highcontainment laboratories.

      • We have no indications that any of these researchers were hospitalized because of the symptoms consistent with COVID-19. One researcher may have been hospitalized in this timeframe for treatment of a non-respiratory medical condition.

      • China’s National Security Commission investigated the WIV in early 2020 and took blood samples from WIV researchers. According to the World Health Organization’s March 2021 public report, WIV officials including Shi Zhengli—who leads the WIV laboratory group that conducts coronavirus research—stated lab employee samples all tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

      While several WIV researchers fell mildly ill in Fall 2019, they experienced a range of symptoms consistent with colds or allergies with accompanying symptoms typically not associated with COVID-19, and some of them were confirmed to have been sick with other illnesses unrelated to COVID-19. While some of these researchers had historically conducted research into animal respiratory viruses, we are unable to confirm if any of them handled live viruses in the work they performed prior to falling ill.

    • Les fuites dans la presse ayant précédé la divulgation du rapport du renseignement US (qui contredit le contenu des fuites) sont sûrement/peut-être une manoeuvre visant à jeter le doute sur le rapport, de la part d’anciens haut placés trumpistes.

      And, of course, the new ODNI report blows up the entire “sick lab workers” story — a story that has been in circulation since national security reporter (and former Iraq WMD rumormonger) Michael Gordon put it in the WSJ in May 2021. It’s worth noting here that the sources of that story almost certainly included David Asher, a former Bush and Trump State Department official and longtime hawk on Iran, North Korea, and China; he was identified as such by Sharri Markson, a Murdoch apparatchik from Australia who pushed the lab-leak theory in a book. It seems likely that Asher was also the source of the now-discredited Taibbi/Shellengberger/Gutentag story [du 13 juin 2023 dans Public]. If so, I have to wonder if he (or whoever talked to them) did so because he knew the latest version of “sick workers” story was about to be discredited by the rest of the intelligence community, and was hoping to get it out there anyway. If that was the plan, I guess it worked.

      https://theracket.news/p/spies-just-killed-the-lab-leak-theory

  • Unearthed genetic sequences from China market may point to animal origin of COVID-19
    https://www.science.org/content/article/covid-19-origins-missing-sequences

    Gao’s team used swabs to collect environmental samples from many of the stalls of the #Huanan market between 1 January 2020, the day it was shut down, and 2 March 2020. The group reported last year that some of the samples that tested positive for #SARS-CoV-2 also had human genetic material, but no DNA from other animals. The team concluded in a preprint posted on Research Square on 25 February 2022 that this “highly suggests” humans brought the virus to the market; Gao and his co-authors said this meant the marketplace was not the origin of the pandemic but simply amplified early spread of SARS-CoV-2.

    To some Chinese researchers and officials, that scenario suggested the virus originated outside China and somehow found its way to #Wuhan. To lab-leak supporters, it implied the pandemic might have started at the Wuhan lab.

    [...] The analysis presented to the WHO panel this week now suggests some coronavirus-positive samples collected contained DNA or RNA from raccoon dogs, civets, and other mammals now known to be highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2.

    [Florence] Débarre says on 4 March she “randomly” came across the previously unknown sequence data while doing other research on GISAID. It took her 5 days to recognize the extent of data available and its potential importance.

    Débarre quickly reached out to Andersen and other co-authors of two preprints posted in February 2022 that supported the marketplace origin theory, papers she says helped shift her away from the lab-leak origin to thinking the virus likely came from animals at the Huanan seafood market. Michael Worobey, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Arizona who was a lead author of one of the papers, says he and his collaborators are still analyzing the new genetic information, but it has so far solidified his own view that SARS-CoV-2 had a zoonotic origin.

    • Le rapport analysant les données trouvées par Débarre est sorti.
      A new pandemic origin report is stirring controversy. Here are key takeaways
      https://www.science.org/content/article/covid-origin-report-controversy

      The mtDNA of the SARS-CoV-2 susceptible mammals was found in the southwest corner of the market that also had the “highest density” of SARS-CoV-2 positive samples. “We can now show that plausible animal hosts of SARS-CoV-2 were indeed right where we thought they were, in the small quadrant with the highest concentration of surfaces found to be positive for the virus and a hot spot for live mammal sales,” says report co-author Michael Worobey, an evolutionary biologist the University of Arizona. Human mtDNA was most abundant in other parts of the market. This raises the possibility that the animals transmitted the virus to the humans in the southwest corner of the market several weeks before the samples were taken, and those people had since recovered from their infections. The other infected people at the market, in this scenario, likely were infected by human-to-human transmission.

  • David Sabatini, biologist fired for sexual misconduct, lands millions from private donors to start new lab | Science | AAAS
    https://www.science.org/content/article/sabatini-biologist-fired-sexual-misconduct-lands-millions-private-donors-st

    (extrait)

    Sabatini’s critics say the funding is a kick in the teeth to women and others in science who have experienced or are experiencing harassment by senior scientists on whom their careers depend. “Just think of all the good that could have been done with that money. There are so many excellent young scientists who could replace and outperform Sabatini. Instead, it’s been put into the hands of a failed leader,” says cognitive neuroscientist Jessica Cantlon, who is now at Carnegie Mellon University but was involved in another sexual harassment furor at Rochester University. “It’s part of a common pattern where powerful men find it very easy to sympathize with other powerful men who are accused of sexual harassment but not with the women who are the victims of it.”

  • The final puff ?
    https://www.science.org/content/article/final-puff-can-new-zealand-quit-smoking-good
    https://www.science.org/do/10.1126/science.adg2115/files/_20221209_nf_nzsmoking3_1600px.jpg

    As New Zealand’s associate minister for health, [Ayesha Verrall] has led the development of the Smokefree Aotearoa 2025 Action Plan, which could make New Zealand the first country in the world to achieve smoke-free status—typically defined as an adult smoking rate of no more than 5%.

    [...] Unveiled in December 2021, the plan features three radical interventions. One, called the smoke-free generation strategy, will make it illegal to ever sell combustible tobacco products to those born in 2009 or later. The goal is to create an ever-growing cohort that never picks up the smoking habit. A second provision calls for reducing the number of tobacco retailers by as much as 95%, to make cigarettes harder to get. The boldest proposal in the eyes of experts is reducing cigarettes’ nicotine content to below addictive levels. This “cuts right at the heart of why people smoke in the first place,” says Geoffrey Fong, head of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project at the University of Waterloo. It’s potentially a “true game changer in the battle against smoking.”

    #Nouvelle-Zélande #santé #tabac #cigarette #Maori

  • ‘The door is open’ : Iranian astronomers seek collaborations for their new, world-class telescope | Science | AAAS
    https://www.science.org/content/article/door-open-iranian-astronomers-seek-collaborations-their-new-world-class-tel
    https://www.science.org/do/10.1126/science.adf4145/abs/_10221018_on_iran_telescope.jpg

    In a major milestone for Iran’s scientific community, astronomers announced today in Tehran that the Iranian National Observatory (INO) has seen “first light”: The world-class, 3.4-meter optical telescope, whose future appeared cloudy just last year, is operational and has acquired its debut images.

    “We’ve been waiting for this moment for so long,” says INO Project Director Habib Khosroshahi, an astronomer at the Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM) in Tehran.

    First light for the $25 million observatory “comes at a turbulent time,” Khosroshahi acknowledges. Iran has been roiled by protests since last month’s death in police custody of a young woman who’d been arrested for not wearing her hijab properly. “We’re anxious about how our announcement will be interpreted,” Khosroshahi says. “But we want to emphasize that INO is for all the people of Iran. We couldn’t keep this news to ourselves anymore.”

    INO’s scientific odyssey began 2 decades ago—and faced long odds. “When they started this project, it was just a dream. No one in Iran had attempted anything on this scale before,” says Gerry Gilmore, an astronomer at the University of Cambridge and chair of INO’s international advisory board.

    (Admirez au passage comment la revue Science se fait pardonner de publier cette information favorable à l’Iran en évoquant, sans guère de pertinence pour le sujet, les troubles dans le pays.)

    #iran #science

  • Covid Long – Tania Louis @SciTania sur Twitter 🔽 (fil à dérouler)
    https://twitter.com/SciTania/status/1560015082276405248

    Il est tard, on est en plein mois d’août, ça m’a l’air d’être le bon moment pour faire un thread sur un sujet important, qui me concerne directement et qui a repointé son museau sur YouTube récemment : le covid long.
    #CovidLong

    https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1560015082276405248.html

    Il est tard, on est en plein mois d’août, ça m’a l’air d’être le bon moment pour faire un thread sur un sujet important, qui me concerne directement et qui a repointé son museau sur YouTube récemment : le covid long.
    #CovidLong
    🔽
    (Je ne vais pas m’étaler sur mon propre covid long, parce qu’il provoque principalement de la fatigue et des difficultés de concentration... Ce qui m’a bien appris à économiser mon énergie, par exemple en évitant les digressions 😅)
    Ce qui m’a donné envie d’aborder le sujet c’est cette vidéo de @FantineEtHippo : ...
    https://youtu.be/Dv65AbWZ4B0

    Qui est une réaction à une vidéo de @TatianaVentose où elle évoque un traitement qui lui aurait permis de guérir de son covid long.

    Ce que j’ai à dire se résume en : le covid long c’est pénible, ça donne très envie de trouver des solutions mais la vérité c’est qu’aujourd’hui aucune cause n’a été identifiée et qu’on n’a prouvé l’efficacité d’aucun traitement.
    C’est pas facile à vivre mais c’est comme ça.
    Si vous voulez des informations fiables sur le sujet, à la pointe des recherches en cours, LA personne à suivre c’est @VirusesImmunity. Si vous ne parlez pas anglais, passez ses tweets ou les contenus qu’elle partage dans un outil de traduction, ça restera la meilleure source.
    Maintenant, si on développe un poil, qu’est-ce qu’on sait sur le covid long ?
    1/ Il n’y a pas de définition consensuelle de la maladie parce que ça peut correspondre à toute une gamme de symptômes pas vraiment spécifiques, apparus dans une période globalement anxiogène.
    Fatigue, brouillard cérébral, difficultés respiratoires, douleurs articulaires, troubles digestifs, palpitations cardiaques.. Ça peut toucher différents organes, être + ou - intense, durer + ou - longtemps. Ça rappelle d’autres syndromes post-infectieux et ça dépend des patients.
    2/ Entre ça et les différences selon le variant et l’état vaccinal, c’est compliqué d’évaluer la fréquence vraiment due à des infections covid, les chiffres tournent entre 5 et 30% des personnes infectées (une valeur réelle autour de 10% serait pas déconnante, pour les experts).
    3/ On ne sait pas d’où ça vient mais il y a 4 hypothèses principales :
    Image


    – une persistance virale planquée à un endroit où on ne la repère pas
    – un dérèglement immunitaire
    – un dérèglement du microbiote
    – des lésions non réparées suite à l’infection

    Ces hypothèses pourraient très bien se combiner en pratique et l’origine pourrait varier selon les patients, avec en fait différents types de covids longs dont les symptômes se ressemblent parce que, dans tous les cas, ça conduit à de l’inflammation qui fout le bordel.
    Il y a des chercheurs qui bossent là-dessus, dont @VirusesImmunity. De nouvelles données arrivent régulièrement (science.org/content/articl…) mais c’est de la recherche sur un sujet compliqué (de l’immuno humaine) : c’est sans doute multifactoriel et il faut du temps.

    Science | AAAS
    https://www.science.org/content/article/blood-abnormalities-found-people-long-covid

    4/ Du coup, on n’a pas non plus de traitement. Il y a moyen de soulager certains symptômes et des pistes qui correspondent aux différentes hypothèses sur les origines possibles du covid long, mais rien de démontré. Il y a des essais cliniques en cours, il faut attendre.
    5/ On se sent vachement impuissant quand on a un covid long en France.
    Pas d’explication et pas de traitement, pour un problème aussi récent et complexe, c’est une chose. Mais on n’a pas non plus de reconnaissance, les médecins généralistes sont mal (in)formés...
    ... Il n’y a pas d’essai clinique auquel participer (à ma connaissance) et, globalement, tout le monde a l’air de se foutre de la circulation du virus qui a plus ou moins violemment défoncé notre quotidien.
    Je comprends le besoin de chercher n’importe quelle solution.

    De mon côté je prends mon mal en patience et je surveille ce qu’en dit la communauté des spécialistes (pas une personne seule dans son coin qu’aucun autre expert ne relaie)... mais de loin, parce que je n’ai pas envie de renforcer mon effet nocebo.
    Et comme il n’y a pas grand chose à dire du #covidlong sur le plan scientifique à part « on sait pas encore », je n’en dis pas grand chose.
    Ce soir, en regardant la vidéo de @FantineEtHippo, j’ai réalisé que ça contribuait à laisser le champ libre à des contenus erronés.
    Du coup pouf, vous avez gagné un thread à un horaire improbable.
    Si le sujet vous intéresse, creusez-le chez @VirusesImmunity. J’en reparlerai le jour où il y aura vraiment du nouveau, mais ça risque de prendre un moment.

    Bonne nuit.

    (Merci à @2Linasa pour le GIF final.)
    • • •

  • As #Omicron rages on, scientists have no idea what comes next | Science | AAAS
    https://www.science.org/content/article/omicron-rages-scientists-have-no-idea-what-comes-next

    Many virologists acknowledge that SARS-CoV-2’s evolution has caught them by surprise again and again. “It was really in part a failure of imagination,” Grubaugh says. But whatever scenario researchers can imagine, Bloom acknowledges the virus will chart its own course: “I think in the end, we just kind of have to wait and see what happens.”

    • [Van Kerkhove] : the surveillance efforts that allowed researchers to spot Omicron and other new variants early on are scaling back or winding down. “Those systems are being dismantled, they are being defunded, people are being fired,” she says.

  • #Paxlovid #Resistance : Is It Just a Matter of Time Now ? | Science | AAAS
    https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/paxlovid-resistance-it-just-matter-time-now

    We do not know if there are reproductively fit #mutations that are Paxlovid-resistant that are current spreading in the human population, for example. The evidence isn’t there, or perhaps isn’t quite there yet? But we absolutely should expect that this could happen. Could be happening now, could have already happened. We shall see.

    #covid-19

  • Monkeypox outbreak questions intensify as cases soar
    https://www.science.org/content/article/monkeypox-outbreak-questions-intensify-cases-soar

    The sudden appearance of #monkeypox in 13 countries on four continents has jolted the public health community into action. A much milder cousin of smallpox that sporadically causes small outbreaks in Africa, monkeypox is thought to spread slowly and is unlikely to be a pandemic in the making. But scientists worry about the spread among men who have sex with men (MSM), who make up a disproportionate number of the cases so far. The outbreak is a strange and unsettling return to the spotlight for poxviruses, a largely forgotten threat since the World Health Organization (WHO) declared smallpox eradicated in 1980.

  • Mopping can create air pollution that rivals city streets | Science | AAAS
    https://www.science.org/content/article/mopping-can-create-air-pollution-rivals-city-streets

    Cleanliness may be next to godliness, but a new study suggests it could have an unexpected downside: A few minutes of mopping indoors with a fresh-scented cleaning product can generate as many airborne particles as vehicles on a busy city street. The finding suggests custodians and professional cleaners may be at risk of health effects from frequent exposure to these suspended tiny particles, known as #aerosols.

    #chimie #pollution #santé

  • #COVID-19 patients face higher risk of brain fog and depression, even 1 year after infection
    https://www.science.org/content/article/covid-19-patients-face-higher-risk-brain-fog-and-depression-even-1-year-aft

    Now, a giant new study shows people who contracted COVID-19 faced substantially higher risks of neuropsychiatric ailments 1 year later, including #brain_fog, depression, and substance use disorders. The report, based on millions of people who used the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health system early in the pandemic, is published today in The BMJ.

    [...] In the current analysis, the researchers found that 1 year later, survivors of COVID-19 were 46% more likely than pandemic-era controls to have been diagnosed with any of 14 neuropsychiatric disorders. These included depression, suicidal thoughts, anxiety, sleep disturbance, opioid use disorder, and neurocognitive decline or “brain fog.” The risk of brain fog was 80% higher than in controls, which translates to 10.75 more cases for every 1000 infected people. People hospitalized with coronavirus infections had the highest risk of developing any of the disorders—343% more than controls. Outpatients faced a 40% higher risk of developing an ailment.

    Infected veterans were also 86% more likely to have received a prescription for an opioid, a benzodiazepine such as Valium, an antidepressant, or another neuropsychiatric drug.

    #covid_long

  • Transgenic glowing fish invades Brazilian streams | Science | AAAS
    https://www.science.org/content/article/transgenic-glowing-fish-invades-brazilian-streams

    Fish genetically engineered to glow blue, green, or red under blacklight have been a big hit among aquarium lovers for years. But the fluorescent pet is not restricted to glass displays anymore. The red- and green-glowing versions of the modified zebrafish have escaped fish farms in southeastern Brazil and are multiplying in creeks in the Atlantic Forest, a new study shows. It is a rare example of a transgenic animal accidentally becoming established in nature, and a concern for biologists, who worry the exotic fish could threaten the local fauna in one of the most biodiverse spots on the planet.

    “This is serious,” says ecologist Jean Vitule at the Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba. Vitule, who was not part of the research, says the ecological impacts are unpredictable. He worries, for example, that the fluorescence-endowing genes from the escapees could end up being introduced in native fish with detrimental effects, perhaps making them more visible to predators. “It’s like a shot in the dark,” he says.

    The unwelcome visitors are well known to scientists who have used zebrafish (Danio rerio) for developmental and genetic studies for decades. Native to Southeast Asia, the match-size freshwater fish are brightly colored naturally. But the animals were engineered to glow for research purposes in the late 1990s by endowing them with genes from fluorescent jellyfish (for blue and green colors) and coral (for red). In the 2000s, companies saw the potential of the neon fish as pets. Trademarked as Glofish, they became the world’s first genetically engineered species to be commercially available.

    Now, they are one of the first to escape and thrive in nature. Early on, environmentalists worried about the possibility, and Glofish sales were banned in some U.S. states such as California and several countries—including Brazil.

    In 2014, a single Glofish was spotted in canals near ornamental fish farms in the Tampa Bay region of Florida. But it had not multiplied, probably because native predators such as the eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) and the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) ate the interloper, says the biologist who spotted the transgenic animal, Quenton Tuckett of the University of Florida.

    Brazil is proving more hospitable. André Magalhães, a biologist at the Federal University of São João del-Rei’s main campus, first spotted groups of glowing zebrafish swimming in the Paraíba do Sul River Basin in 2015, in slow-moving creeks. The waters border the largest ornamental aquaculture center of Latin America, in Muriaé, and Magalhães says the fish probably escaped some of the center’s 4500 ponds, which release water into the streams.

    Unlike Florida, the Brazilian creeks don’t have any local predators for zebrafish, and Magalhães believes they are now thriving. In 2017 he and colleagues began to survey five creeks in three municipalities, finding transgenic zebrafish in all of them. Every 2 months over 1 year, they collected and measured the animals and their eggs and analyzed their stomach content to see what they were eating.

    The fish are reproducing all year round, with a peak during the rainy season—just as native zebrafish do in Asia. But the transgenic fish seem to achieve sexual maturity earlier than their forebears, which allows them to reproduce more and spread faster. The invaders are also eating well: a diversified diet of native insects, algae, and zooplankton, the researchers reported this week in Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment.

    “They are in the first stages of invasion with potential to keep going,” Magalhães says. Before long, he says, the fish could become plentiful enough to directly affect local species by competing for food or preying on them.

    Despite Brazil’s ban on sales of the fish, local farms keep breeding them, and stores all over the country sell them as pets. They may soon colonize other parts of the country: Isolated Glofish individuals were spotted in ponds and streams in south and northeast Brazil in 2020.

    Tuckett, whose lab in Florida is close to U.S. farms that grow hundreds of thousands of glowing fish, says the Brazilian detection “should be a wake-up call” for fish producers and natural resource managers in Brazil. But he is not terribly worried about impacts. He suspects the transgenic fish will encounter predators as they move to larger bodies of water. And the animals’ bright colors will make them vulnerable.

    For now, the glowing fish “could be considered little weeds growing up out of the concrete,” Tuckett says. Magalhães likes the metaphor, but points out that even little weeds can grow to cause a lot of damage.

  • Long-term cardiovascular outcomes of #COVID-19 | Nature Medicine
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-022-01689-3

    Here we used national healthcare databases from the US Department of Veterans Affairs to build a cohort of 153,760 individuals with COVID-19, as well as two sets of control cohorts with 5,637,647 (contemporary controls) and 5,859,411 (historical controls) individuals, to estimate risks and 1-year burdens of a set of pre-specified incident cardiovascular outcomes. We show that, beyond the first 30 d after infection, individuals with COVID-19 are at increased risk of incident cardiovascular disease spanning several categories, including cerebrovascular disorders, dysrhythmias, ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease, pericarditis, myocarditis, heart failure and thromboembolic disease. These risks and burdens were evident even among individuals who were not hospitalized during the acute phase of the infection and increased in a graded fashion according to the care setting during the acute phase (non-hospitalized, hospitalized and admitted to intensive care).

    Our results provide evidence that the risk and 1-year burden of cardiovascular disease in survivors of acute COVID-19 are substantial.

    #post-covid

  • Scientists deliberately infected people with coronavirus. Here’s what happened [à propos d’une étude en preprint dans Nature]
    https://www.science.org/content/article/scientists-deliberately-infected-people-coronavirus-here-s-what-happened
    34 volontaires jeunes (<29 ans) et en bonne santé ont reçu du virus dans le nez, même quantité, même endroit.
    Sur les 34 : 18 ont été infectés et 16 non.

    the findings open a door to studying why and how some people manage to resist infection.

    uninfected volunteers did not develop SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in their blood. That’s in contrast to flu challenge studies—which Memoli has run for 10 years—in which exposed but uninfected people do develop antibodies. Memoli suspects the difference may be because specialized mucosal antibodies shut down SARS-CoV-2 in the noses of the current study’s uninfected volunteers.

    Sur les 18 infectés : 2 complètement asymptomatiques et 16 ont eu des symptômes mild-moderate.

    Notably, the viral loads in the two volunteers who became infected but had no symptoms were not lower than in their sick colleagues. “Even if people had no symptoms at all … they all generated extremely large amounts of virus, which really speaks to the infectivity [of the virus] and explains how the pandemic has spread so rapidly,” says Chris Chiu

    Chez les 16 symptomatiques : les symptômes commencent 2 jours après l’exposition, piquent à 5 jours, et le virus n’est plus isolé dans le nez à 10 jours.
    #covid-19 #human_challenge