Israeli police violence at Al Jazeera journalist’s funeral reveals a
The decisions of Israeli police at events like journalist Shireen Abu Akleh’s funeral display their inability to see the humanity and pain of the Palestinian people
Police, dressed in black, wearing helmets and protective gear, using their batons to assault people carrying a coffin at a funeral procession. They strike their legs until the coffin slips, almost hitting the ground. This is what most of the world saw – and this is what most of the world will remember from the funeral of Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, which took place in Jerusalem on Friday.
Many have spoken in Israel over the last 24 hours. The situation is problematic, they’re saying, so much so that it nearly constitutes a public relations disaster. But the real problem lies not in the way this incident is perceived by the world, but in the unjustified use of violence by the police. This was one of the most extreme visual expressions of the occupation and the humiliation the Palestinian people experience: A senior Palestinian journalist, well-known around the Arab world, has covered the violence and wrongdoings of the Israeli occupation for decades. She dies in an exchange of gunfire, and Israeli soldiers are considered the main suspects. Upon her death, she is a Palestinian icon, her funeral a national event. Precisely at this moment – at the height of mourning – club wielding Israeli police officers arrive at the scene.
The police rushed to publish a video clip recorded from a drone at the funeral showing two young men throwing what appears to be a water bottle at the police officers, before they charge at him. Yet this is a flimsy excuse for such conduct, at an event that should have been managed with the utmost sensitivity. Police Commissioner Kobi Shabtai has ordered an investigation into police conduct at the funeral. Though this incident is just one of many in which Israeli police behaved unacceptably, thereby exacerbating the situation at hand and deepening the humiliation of the victims.
On the day Abu Akleh died, police officers went to her grieving family and asked them to remove the Palestinian flags flying outside their home, evacuate the street, and lower the music playing outside. On the day of the funeral, shortly after the procession, the police were documented tearing Palestinian flags off cars. We’ll never know what was going through the minds of whoever sent policemen to the family’s home, or those who tore down the flags. How did they think the grieving family or funeral attendees would react?
If that weren’t enough, a young Palestinian, Walid a-Sharif – who threw stones at police on the Temple Mount three weeks ago and sustained grave head injuries – died at Hadassah Medical Center on Saturday morning. The police claimed his injuries were caused by a fall, but provided no evidence for their claim. It’s hard to believe the cosmic coincidence that a 21-year-old man dies from falling and hitting his head at precisely the same moment sponge-tipped bullets are being fired at him. Upon his death, a-Sharif became an “Al-Aqsa martyr,” the first fatality at the Temple Mount since 2017, when two armed terrorists were killed after shooting and killing two police officers. This time it was a young man throwing stones. From a Palestinian perspective, this is a much graver case.
Here too, the problem lies not in the way Palestinians or the world perceive the event, or in the risk that his death or funeral will spark a new wave of terror in Jerusalem or the West Bank – but in the death itself. The idea that a stone can in fact kill may be true when referring to a stone thrown at an unprotected car on the highway – but the chance that a policeman wearing a helmet and protective vest will die from a stone is miniscule. The police were not at risk of dying when a-Sharif threw stones at them, and shooting at his upper body was an unjustified breach of the rules of engagement.
A-Sharif was hit by a black sponge-tipped bullet. This 40 mm bullet is meant to cause intense pain, and is the main non-lethal weapon used by the police. But since 2014, when the police switched from blue, lighter weight bullets to black, heavier ones – the instances in which this ’non-lethal’ weapon has caused serious injuries and even death has increased. In East Jerusalem, there are dozens of young men, children, and adults who are suffering as a result of injuries sustained from these bullets, some of them having lost an eye or gone completely blind. At least in one prior instance, a young man named Mohammed Sinokrot was killed after a sponge-tipped bullet hit in him in the temple.
In the early hours of Saturday, a new crisis unfolded. The police refused to transfer a-Sharif’s body to his family for burial, despite the fact that he wasn’t under arrest while he was hospitalized over the last three weeks. The Jerusalem’s Magistrate’s Court was expected to handle the police request to carry out a postmortem on Saturday evening.
The Israeli police were recently praised for their handling of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan in Jerusalem in comparison to previous years. This time around, in an effort to provide Palestinians with freedom of worship and a festive atmosphere, police refrained from erecting barriers at Damascus Gate and minimized the use of crowd dispersal methods – such as the “skunk” water cannon, stun grenades, and tear gas – all of which constitute collective punishment.
This policy proved to be fruitful: compared to last year, violent clashes were limited to the southern part of the Temple Mount and did not spread to Damascus Gate and other Palestinian neighborhoods. Most Jerusalemites, Israelis and Palestinians alike, celebrated their holidays undisturbed, and hospitals were not filled with those injured in clashes. The police’s Jerusalem District Commander, Maj. Gen. Doron Turgeman, who before Ramadan said, “This is not a war, but a holy month,” proved that indeed, things could be different.
Nevertheless, the devil is in the details, and when it comes to the police, their failure lies in the actions of officers on the ground, their commanders, and their decisions. From using police batons on funeral attendees carrying a coffin, to sending policemen to the home of a grieving family to tear down flags, to raising the barrel of a gun towards someone’s upper body. There is evidently a problem within the police force. Perhaps one could claim it lies with command and control issues, or in police training and recruitment methods. But in reality, it runs much deeper than that. It lies in the fact that police officers do not view the Palestinians they face as human beings, nor do they feel a need to respect them or their pain. This is a terrible truth – and not just for the Palestinians.