Artificial intelligence versus clinicians : systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies | The BMJ
▻https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m689
Few prospective deep learning studies and randomised trials exist in medical imaging. Most non-randomised trials are not prospective, are at high risk of bias, and deviate from existing reporting standards. Data and code availability are lacking in most studies, and human comparator groups are often small. Future studies should diminish risk of bias, enhance real world clinical relevance, improve reporting and transparency, and appropriately temper conclusions.
Casilli sur Twitter : "Depuis dix ans, on assiste à la prolifération d’études affirmant que « l’IA est plus performante que les médecins dans [ajouter un domaine médical] ». Selon cette méta-analyse ces allégations sont exagérées et représentent un risque pour les patients.
▻https://twitter.com/AntonioCasilli/status/1575773730642460673