/2023

  • asad abukhalil أسعد أبو خليل sur X : "أعوان إسرائيل في لبنان يظنّون أن أميركا اتت بأساطيلها لتحارب الحزب. كشفت "نيويورك تايمز" الان ان الحكومة الأميركيّة حثّت حكومة إسرائيل على عدم استفزاز الحزب لأنه "ما فيكم للحزب". بجدّ. قوة لبنان في قوته, لا في ضعفه, يا تغييريّين وكتائب وقوات." / X
    https://twitter.com/asadabukhalil/status/1715584278489342109

    Les agents israéliens au Liban pensent que l’Amérique a amené ses flottes pour combattre le Hezbollah. Le New York Times a révélé que le gouvernement américain a exhorté le gouvernement israélien à ne pas provoquer le parti parce que « ce qui est en vous est pour le parti ». sérieusement.

    Mauvaise traduction de Google concernant le passage « ce qui est en vous est pour le parti » ;

    "ما فيكم للحزب" peut être traduit par : « le Hezb est un trop gros morceau pour vous »

  • Carla Bley, Jazz Composer, Arranger and Provocateur, Dies at 87 - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/17/arts/music/carla-bley-dead.html

    j’ai adoré le premier « Liberation music orchestra » dont elle a écrit les arrangements. Bien sûr le grand délire 70’s de « Escalator Over The Hill », et surtout le disque grand public « Dinner Music » que j’ai régulièrement écouté depuis cinquante ans.
    Et j’ai eu la chance de voir Carla Bley avec Steve Swallow et Andy Sheppard au Théâtre de Caen. bye bye Madame.

    Ms. Bley’s influential body of work included delicate chamber miniatures and rugged, blaring fanfares, with a lot of varied terrain in between. She was branded an avant-gardist early in her career, but that term applied more to her slyly subversive attitude than to the formal character of her music, which always maintained a place for tonal harmony and standard rhythm.

    Within that given frame, Ms. Bley found plenty of room to confound expectations and harbor contradictions. In the 2011 biography “Carla Bley,” Amy C. Beal described her music as “vernacular yet sophisticated, appealing yet cryptic, joyous and mournful, silly and serious at the same time.”

    Certainly, few composers in Ms. Bley’s generation were as prolific or polymorphic in their output while projecting an identifiable point of view. She wrote elegant, drifting songs that became jazz standards, like “Ida Lupino” and “Lawns”; yearning, cinematic big-band pieces, like “Fleur Carnivore”; iconoclastic rearrangements of national anthems and classical fare; and unwieldy, uncategorizable projects like her jazz-rock opera “Escalator Over the Hill.”

    Originally issued on three LPs, “Escalator Over the Hill” was named album of the year by the weekly British publication Melody Maker in 1973, the same year it won a Grand Prix du Disque, France’s most prestigious award for musical recordings. With a surrealistic libretto by the poet Paul Haines, a cast including some of the era’s leading jazz renegades and vocals by Linda Ronstadt and Jack Bruce of the rock band Cream, it captured the woolly, insubordinate spirit of the age, just as it consolidated the elements of Ms. Bley’s style.

    Jazz was undergoing a creative revolution in the 1960s — and, partly by association, Ms. Bley found herself at the turbulent center of an emerging avant-garde. She was a founder of the Jazz Composers Guild, which sought better working conditions for musicians. Though short-lived, it yielded a productive institution: the Jazz Composer’s Orchestra, which Ms. Bley formed with the Austrian trumpeter Michael Mantler. After she divorced Mr. Bley in 1967, she and Mr. Mantler married.

    Ms. Bley is survived by a daughter from that marriage, the vocalist, pianist and composer Karen Mantler, and by Mr. Swallow, her partner of more than 30 years.

    Ms. Bley had more than fleeting contact with rock: In 1975 she joined a band with Mr. Bruce on bass and Mick Taylor of the Rolling Stones on guitar. And she wrote all the songs for “Nick Mason’s Fictitious Sports,” a 1981 album credited to Mr. Mason, the drummer in Pink Floyd, with lead vocals by Robert Wyatt, formerly of Soft Machine.

    During the 2010s, Ms. Bley focused a good deal of her energies on the Liberation Music Orchestra, preserving Charlie Haden’s musical vision as well as his commitment to left-leaning social activism: She included a new version of her late-’60s composition “Silent Spring” on the orchestra’s fifth album, “Time/Life,” released in 2016. As a performer she worked mainly with Mr. Sheppard and Mr. Swallow, touring internationally and releasing several albums for ECM.

    #Carla_Bley #Jazz #Liberation_Music_Orchestra

  • ChatGPT Can Now Respond With Spoken Words - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/25/technology/chatgpt-talk-digital-assistance.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_2023092

    ChatGPT has learned to talk.

    OpenAI, the San Francisco artificial intelligence start-up, released a version of its popular chatbot on Monday that can interact with people using spoken words. As with Amazon’s Alexa, Apple’s Siri, and other digital assistants, users can talk to ChatGPT and it will talk back.

    For the first time, ChatGPT can also respond to images. People can, for example, upload a photo of the inside of their refrigerator, and the chatbot can give them a list of dishes they could cook with the ingredients they have.

    “We’re looking to make ChatGPT easier to use — and more helpful,” said Peter Deng, OpenAI’s vice president of consumer and enterprise product.

    OpenAI has accelerated the release of its A.I tools in recent weeks. This month, it unveiled a version of its DALL-E image generator and folded the tool into ChatGPT.

    Alexa and Siri have long provided ways of interacting with smartphones, laptops and other devices through spoken words. But chatbots like ChatGPT and Google Bard have more powerful language skills and are able to instantly write emails, poetry and term papers, and riff on almost any topic tossed their way.

    OpenAI has essentially combined the two communication methods.

    The company sees talking as a more natural way of interacting with its chatbot. It argues that ChatGPT’s synthetic voices — people can choose from five different options, including male and females voices — are more convincing than others used with popular digital assistants.

    #Intelligence_artificielle #Voix #Dialogues_parlés

  • Elon Musk, Sam Altman and Mark Zuckerberg Discuss AI with Lawmakers in Washington - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/13/technology/silicon-valley-ai-washington-schumer.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20

    Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Mark Zuckerberg, Sundar Pichai and others discussed artificial intelligence with lawmakers, as tech companies strive to influence potential regulations.

    Elon Musk, left, of X, Tesla and SpaceX and Alex Karp of Palantir were among the tech leaders who met with lawmakers on Wednesday about artificial intelligence.
    Elon Musk, left, of X, Tesla and SpaceX and Alex Karp of Palantir were among the tech leaders who met with lawmakers on Wednesday about artificial intelligence.Credit...Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times
    Elon Musk, left, of X, Tesla and SpaceX and Alex Karp of Palantir were among the tech leaders who met with lawmakers on Wednesday about artificial intelligence.
    Cecilia Kang

    By Cecilia Kang

    Reporting from Washington
    Sept. 13, 2023

    Elon Musk warned of civilizational risks posed by artificial intelligence. Sundar Pichai of Google highlighted the technology’s potential to solve health and energy problems. And Mark Zuckerberg of Meta stressed the importance of open and transparent A.I. systems.

    The tech titans held forth on Wednesday in a three-hour meeting with lawmakers in Washington about A.I. and future regulations. The gathering, known as the A.I. Insight Forum, was part of a crash course for Congress on the technology and organized by the Senate leader, Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York.

    The meeting — also attended by Bill Gates, a founder of Microsoft; Sam Altman of OpenAI; Satya Nadella of Microsoft; and Jensen Huang of Nvidia — was a rare congregation of more than a dozen top tech executives in the same room. It amounted to one of the industry’s most proactive shows of force in the nation’s capital as companies race to be at the forefront of A.I. and to be seen to influence its direction.

    It was unclear if any concrete proposals would result from the meeting, the first of a series of such gatherings. But the tech executives took the opportunity to push for their agendas.

    Mr. Karp of Palantir said he was able to deliver his message that the government should support A.I. in the defense sector, which includes his company’s main customers. “There was striking unanimity that America be the leader on A.I.,” he said in an interview.

    Most of the executives agreed on the need for regulating A.I., which has been under scrutiny for its transformative and risky effects.

    But there was still disagreement, attendees said. Mr. Zuckerberg highlighted open-source research and development of A.I., which means that the source code of the underlying A.I. systems are available to the public.

    “Open source democratizes access to these tools, and that helps level the playing field and foster innovation for people and businesses,” he said.

    Others, like Jack Clark of the A.I. start-up Anthropic and Mr. Gates, raised concerns that open-source A.I. could lead to security risks, attendees said. Anthropic, Google and OpenAI have said open source can allow outsiders to get past safety guardrails and spread misinformation and other toxic material.

    Mr. Musk, who has called for a moratorium on the development of some A.I. systems even as he has pushed forward with his own A.I. initiatives, was among the most vocal about the risks. He painted an existential crisis posed by the technology.

    #Intelligence_artificielle #Régulation #Asilomar

  • Opinion | For the F.D.A., Cold Medicine That Doesn’t Work Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/29/opinion/cold-medicine-fda.html

    Nearly two decades ago, several pharmacists started calling into the University of Florida Drug Information and Pharmacy Resource Center hotline with the same query: Does phenylephrine, a common ingredient in cold medicine sold over the counter, actually work?

    One of us, Dr. Hatton, oversaw the call center, which was meant to train pharmacy students on how to respond to questions from health care professionals across the state. It was odd, Dr. Hatton thought, that so many providers in Florida believed the popular decongestant — found in Sudafed PE, some formulations of NyQuil and many other cold and flu treatments — wasn’t working as advertised.

    After searching the literature, he came across a paper published more than a decade earlier by Dr. Hendeles, the co-author of this essay, also at the University of Florida, suggesting that oral phenylephrine was ineffective.

    Our offices were just a short walk apart, and after meeting to discuss our suspicions, we began what has so far been a nearly 20-year collaboration to determine if phenylephrine was effective at the dosage available to consumers over the counter, and later, when we discovered it wasn’t, to petition the Food and Drug Administration to remove it from shelves. This included a Freedom of Information Act request for unpublished data on the drug and multiple studies that confirmed our skepticism.

    Recently, an advisory committee for the F.D.A. unanimously confirmed our findings. The agency must now decide whether products containing the ingredient should be removed from shelves and drug makers should use new formulations. Right now, phenylephrine is in hundreds of products, and Americans spent about $1.8 billion on those remedies last year.

    How can an ineffective drug discovered nearly 100 years ago and marketed since the 1930s still be on the market, despite decades of drug experts like us prodding the F.D.A. to do something? It boggles the mind, and worse than that, this is only the tip of the iceberg. This decongestant is like many drugs on the market that don’t really provide relief.

    Just ask your local pharmacist about over-the-counter drugs he or she suspects don’t work. It’s an open secret among many of us who study pharmaceuticals that several ingredients, including ones found in common treatments like Robitussin, Mucinex and certain cough syrups, probably don’t work as advertised. Some of these ingredients claim to help people cough up mucus or cough less or to help with asthma symptoms, but studies suggest they don’t work at the current F.D.A.-approved doses.

    While there have been legislative efforts to improve the regulation of ineffective drugs on store shelves, much of the process still moves too slowly and has not gone far enough.

    In 1938, Congress passed the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, which required that the federal government determine a drug is safe before it could be sold to Americans. More than two decades later, in 1962, breakthrough legislation — the Kefauver-Harris Drug Amendments — required that prescription and over-the-counter drugs must prove to be both safe and effective. As you might imagine, thousands of over-the-counter drugs were on the market before 1962. So the F.D.A. developed a system to review these drugs to make sure they worked, known as the O.T.C. monograph system.
    Editors’ Picks
    The Potty-Mouthed, Baby-Faced Japanese Racer Who Became a Cult Star
    It’s the Best Time of the Year to Run. Try a 5K or 10K.
    DogTV Is TV for Dogs. Except When It’s for People.

    The F.D.A. has generally relied on a risk-based approach, which prioritizes determining whether a drug is safe over how well it works. This has led to drug removals in the past. Another decongestant called phenylpropanolamine was removed from the market in the 2000s when it was shown to increase the risk of strokes when taken in high doses in over-the-counter weight loss drugs, for example.

    But these investigations and removals are not happening quickly. One major issue is that many of these drugs were first evaluated with data that doesn’t meet today’s standards. Though we first petitioned the F.D.A. to look into phenylephrine more than 15 years ago, it wasn’t until company-funded studies from Schering-Plough, later acquired by Merck, reported that oral phenylephrine was ineffective that we had definitive evidence.

    The companies deserve credit for publishing the negative results in peer-reviewed journals. But generally speaking, the pharmaceutical industry has no incentive to fund studies proving old ingredients are effective when sales bring in billions of dollars. Schering-Plough/Merck did its studies because it wanted to evaluate the effectiveness of a higher dose of phenylephrine, and the potential to develop an extended-release product.

    This is a problem for the F.D.A. because the agency doesn’t have the resources to do the enormous work of studying, evaluating and removing old and ineffective drugs, despite having the mandate to do so. There have been recent attempts to make this better: The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security, or CARES, Act of 2020 included the first major overhaul to the O.T.C. monograph process and provided the drug agency with more resources, including personnel. But so much more funding is needed.

    We need to get through the thicket of old drugs faster. Americans are wasting money on decongestant drugs that may not work. Even more is spent on other over-the-counter medications that are questionable, especially for coughs and colds. Dosages of many of these drugs for children are based on arbitrary age ranges without specific studies to confirm they work and are safe for different age groups. All of this doesn’t even include dietary supplements and homeopathic remedies that don’t require evidence of effectiveness or undergo any F.D.A. review.

    Congress needs to develop a way of better funding the F.D.A. review process. Perhaps a small excise tax could be levied on over-the-counter sales or fees assessed to makers of over-the-counter drugs to fund the F.D.A. review process or to fund studies into drugs that went on the market before 1962. Leaders need to suggest more options. There should also be a way to prioritize which drugs to look at first. The agency should review old drugs for which there are already many complaints about lack of effectiveness in the manner it did recently for phenylephrine.

    Right now, Americans spend billions on drugs that contain ingredients that will not help them. That’s not just a waste of money — it could mean they are delaying appropriate treatment, which can lead to more severe illnesses. This is risky not only for health but also for trust. The public deserves medicines that do what they are advertised to do. And Americans should demand that from their leaders.

    #Médicaments #Evaluation #Big_pharma #Economie_médicament #Santé_publique

  • Nothing’s the Matter With Antimatter, New Experiment Confirms - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/27/science/physics-universe-antimatter.html?smtyp=cur


    C’est vraiment très décevant.

    Antimatter just lost a little more pizazz.

    Physicists know that for every fundamental particle in nature there is an antiparticle — an evil twin of identical mass but endowed with equal and opposite characteristics like charge and spin. When these twins meet, they obliterate each other, releasing a flash of energy on contact.

    In science fiction, antiparticles provide the power for warp drives. Some physicists have speculated that antiparticles are being repelled by gravity or even traveling backward in time.

    A new experiment at CERN, the European Center for Nuclear Research, brings some of that speculation back down to Earth. In a gravitational field, it turns out, antiparticles fall just like the rest of us. “The bottom line is that there’s no free lunch, and we’re not going to be able to levitate using antimatter,” said Joel Fajans of the University of California, Berkeley.

    Dr. Fajans was part of an international team known as ALPHA, the Antihydrogen Laser Physics Apparatus collaboration, which is based at CERN and led by Jeffrey Hangst, a particle physicist at Aarhus University in Denmark. Dr. Fajans and his colleagues assembled about 100 hundred anti-atoms of hydrogen and suspended them in a magnetic field. When the field was slowly ramped down, the anti-hydrogen atoms drifted down like maple leaves in October and at the same rate of downward acceleration, or g force, as regular atoms: about 32 feet per second per second. They published their result on Wednesday in the journal Nature.

  • En #Tunisie, l’#UE refait la même erreur, toujours aussi dangereuse

    Alors que les représentant·e·s de la « Team Europe [2] » serraient la main du président tunisien Kaïs Saïed en juillet dernier, des centaines de réfugié·e·s et de migrant·e·s bloqués aux frontières terrestres désertiques du pays avec la Libye ont été rassemblés par ses forces de sécurité et abandonnés là, sans accès à de la nourriture ni à de l’eau, sans abri.

    Le président du Parti populaire européen (PPE) Manfred Weber a par la suite évoqué ces informations, y compris les multiples décès près de la frontière, en parlant de « vidéos prises dans le désert ou quelque chose comme ça [3] ».

    Les leaders européens se sont rendus en Tunisie pour signer un protocole d’accord visant à freiner l’immigration vers l’Europe. En échange, ils lui offrent environ 100 millions d’euros pour la « gestion des frontières » et près d’un milliard en prêts supplémentaires et soutien financier, dans le contexte de la crise économique sans précédent que traverse le pays.

    Cependant, pendant que la Tunisie et l’Union européenne débattent de la manière de mettre en place ce protocole d’accord, ses coûts humains sont déjà évidents. Tandis que l’Europe ferme les yeux sur la répression croissante des droits humains en Tunisie, la population, y compris les personnes demandeuses d’asile, réfugiées et migrantes, paient le prix fort.
    Les leaders de l’Europe et de l’Union européenne doivent tout de suite changer de cap.

    Tout d’abord, même une fois l’accord conclu, les autorités tunisiennes ont continué d’amener de force les migrant·e·s à la frontière libyenne, où beaucoup ont déjà besoin d’une aide humanitaire d’urgence, les médias internationaux [4] faisant état de nombreux morts. Fait choquant, les leaders de l’UE n’ont pas encore condamné publiquement ces violations.

    En revanche, la Commission européenne s’est engagée à coopérer avec les autorités tunisiennes pour empêcher les personnes demandeuses d’asile, réfugiées et migrantes d’atteindre l’Europe, sachant pertinemment que les mêmes violations se reproduiront – piégeant ces personnes dans des situations de violence et contribuant à l’hostilité qu’elles subissent en Tunisie.

    Plus inquiétant, cet accord a été signé sans aucune condition relative aux droits humains, sans évaluation ni suivi de son impact sur les droits, et en l’absence de mécanisme permettant de suspendre la coopération en cas d’abus. La médiatrice européenne a annoncé la semaine dernière [5] avoir demandé à la Commission européenne de clarifier [6] comment elle veillera à ce que la Tunisie respecte les droits humains.

    Il semble que personne n’ait tiré les leçons de la coopération de l’UE avec la Libye [7] : le soutien du bloc apporté aux forces de sécurité libyennes l’a rendu complice d’une infrastructure de violations infligées aux réfugié·e·s et migrant·e·s – actes de torture, viols, disparitions forcées, homicides illégaux et détentions arbitraires. Une récente enquête de l’ONU [8] a conclu que ces actes pouvaient s’apparenter à des crimes contre l’humanité.

    Les accords visant à contenir les personnes dans des pays ne faisant pas partie de l’UE ne sauvent pas des vies et ne les empêchent pas d’emprunter des itinéraires clandestins. Au contraire, les personnes en mouvement sont contraintes d’entreprendre des périples encore plus dangereux afin de ne pas se faire intercepter par les autorités, tandis que les passeurs en profitent puisqu’elles dépendent encore plus de leurs services. En outre, ces accords ne résolvent en rien les problèmes qui poussent les gens à émigrer en quête de sécurité, et qui vont de toute façon perdurer. Aussi est-il décevant que, dans son « Plan en 10 points pour Lampedusa [9] », la présidente Ursula Von der Leyen renforce l’accord avec la Tunisie.

    L’accord de l’UE avec la Tunisie risque aussi de légitimer l’attaque du président Kaïs Saïed contre l’état de droit et sa répression toujours plus forte de la dissidence. En amont de l’accord, le silence des leaders européens s’est épaissi tandis qu’il démantelait quasiment tous les contrôles institutionnels du pouvoir exécutif, publiait des décrets restreignant la liberté d’expression et s’octroyait des pouvoirs sur le système judiciaire. De très nombreux détracteurs, opposant·e·s, avocat·e·s, journalistes et juges ont fait l’objet de poursuites pénales arbitraires et de mesures restrictives, allant jusqu’à l’incarcération.

    La Tunisie a récemment refusé l’entrée à cinq députés européens qui devaient se rendre dans le pays dans le cadre d’une visite officielle. Parmi eux se trouvaient les eurodéputés Mounir Satouri et Michael Gahler qui avaient auparavant critiqué l’accord [10] en raison de la répression en Tunisie. Le refus de les laisser entrer sur le territoire a été largement perçu comme une mesure de représailles.

    Jadis saluée comme la réussite du mouvement du Printemps arabe et comme un refuge pour les défenseur·e·s des droits humains de toute l’Afrique du Nord, la Tunisie risque aujourd’hui d’emboîter le pas à l’Égypte, qui a vu son président Abdelfattah al Sissi transformer son pays en une prison à ciel ouvert, tout en supervisant l’appauvrissement de millions d’Égyptiens. Les leaders de l’UE ont majoritairement gardé le silence face à cette répression brutale, lorsqu’Abdelfattah al Sissi a bloqué les routes migratoires depuis l’Égypte vers l’Europe, forçant des milliers de personnes à emprunter l’itinéraire meurtrier via la Libye.

    Enfin, tout en sachant sans doute que l’accord augmenterait le risque de violations des droits humains à l’encontre des personnes migrantes et réfugiées, la Commission a choisi de négocier le protocole d’accord en secret. Les négociations se sont déroulées sans le regard aiguisé du Parlement européen et des Parlements nationaux, et loin de toute implication de la société civile.
    Ce manque de transparence sape la légitimité de la politique migratoire de l’UE.

    Pour éviter que l’UE ne se rende complice d’atteintes aux droits et de répression, son engagement avec des partenaires concernant la migration doit s’accompagner de conditions strictes, d’évaluations d’impact et de suivi en matière de droits humains. Nous avons besoin d’une approche équilibrée qui déploie un plus grand nombre d’itinéraires migratoires sûrs et s’attache à protéger plutôt que contenir.

    L’accord avec la Tunisie ne respecte aucune de ces conditions et doit donc être suspendu.
    L’UE doit promouvoir l’indépendance de la justice, la liberté de la presse et une société civile dynamique dans le pays.

    Notes

    [1] https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-lawmakers-parliament-fumed-by-the-european-commission-tunisia-migration-

    [2] https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-lawmakers-parliament-fumed-by-the-european-commission-tunisia-migration-

    [3] https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/brussels-playbook/weber-calls-on-tunisia-to-bring-down-migrant-numbers

    [4] https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/20/world/africa/tunisia-african-migrants.html

    [5] https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-ethics-watchdog-ombudsman-question-commission-tunisia-migrant-deal

    [6] https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/opening-summary/en/175102

    [7] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/29/video-woman-dead-floor-migrant-detention-centre-libya

    [8] https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/03/libya-urgent-action-needed-remedy-deteriorating-human-rights-situation-un

    [9] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/fr/ip_23_4503

    [10] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/12/tunisia-should-not-get-1bn-on-a-silver-plate-in-migration-deal-says-mep

    https://www.amnesty.be/infos/blogs/blog-paroles-chercheurs-defenseurs-victimes/article/tunisie-refait-erreur-dangereuse

    ping @_kg_

    #Europe #Union_européenne #EU #externalisation #asile #migrations #réfugiés #accord #gestion_des_frontières #aide_financière #protocole_d'accord #politique_migratoire

    • Immigrazione: gli effetti degli accordi con la Tunisia

      l’Italia e l’Ue, all’aumento degli arrivi via mare dalla Tunisia, hanno risposto chiedendo maggiori controlli e promuovendo l’accordo del 16 luglio scorso tra Tunisia e Ue. I risultati, finora, sono una serie di violenze generalizzate contro i sub-Sahariani in Tunisia e l’ulteriore aumento degli arrivi sulle coste italiane.

      Il 16 luglio scorso la Tunisia e l’Unione europea hanno firmato un memorandum d’intesa che riguarda la cooperazione su diversi fronti ma che è stato motivato in particolare dal desiderio dei governi europei di limitare i crescenti arrivi non autorizzati sulle coste italiane di persone imbarcatesi dal territorio tunisino: cittadini tunisini ma anche – e in misura crescente – cittadini di altri paesi (in particolare sub-Sahariani). A distanza di due mesi l’intesa non sembra avere avuto l’effetto sperato dai suoi principali promotori, i capi di governo dei Paesi bassi Rutte e dell’Italia Meloni, i quali hanno accompagnato la presidente della Commissione europea von der Leyen a Tunisi nella missione preparatoria di giugno e in quella finale della firma.
      Tunisia, paese di imbarco

      La Tunisia era stato il principale paese nordafricano di imbarco verso l’Italia fino al 2004. Quell’anno, in seguito al nuovo accordo tra Italia e Tunisia del dicembre 2003, il regime di Ben Alì aveva adottato una serie di misure volte a limitare le partenze, e la Tunisia era stata superata dalla Libia come principale paese di imbarco. Il primato libico non era più stato messo in discussione per molto tempo: gli stessi tunisini preferivano spesso spostarsi nel paese vicino per partire da lì anziché rischiare l’imbarco dalle proprie coste. Unica eccezione: i primi mesi del 2011, coincidenti con la rivoluzione, quando il vuoto di potere aveva fatto venire meno i controlli lungo le coste tunisine, consentendo la fuga verso l’Italia di oltre 25.000 persone. Poi l’accordo del 5 aprile 2011 tra i due governi aveva pressoché azzerato le partenze.

      Solo la crisi economica e politica degli ultimi anni ha fatto riprendere in modo sensibile gli imbarchi dalla Tunisia, dal 2017 e soprattutto dal 2020, nonostante la conclusione della Mobility Partnership tra Unione europea e Tunisia nel 2014 e ulteriori accordi tra Tunisia e Italia nel 2017 e nel 2020. Nel 2022, in un contesto di aumento generalizzato degli arrivi in Italia via mare, continua a crescere non solo il numero delle partenze dalla Tunisia ma anche la componente dei cittadini stranieri sul totale dei viaggiatori – anche questa una tendenza visibile già da un paio d’anni (Tabella 1).

      Il 18 gennaio 2023 i ministri italiani dell’interno, Piantedosi, e degli esteri, Tajani, si recano a Tunisi per chiedere maggiore impegno nei controlli e maggiore collaborazione nelle riammissioni ma il risultato non è quello sperato. Il 21 febbraio il presidente tunisino Saïed, che tra il 2021 e il 2022 ha svuotato di sostanza la giovane democrazia tunisina sospendendo il parlamento, cambiando la costituzione, arrestando gli oppositori, limitando la libertà di stampa e assicurandosi un potere quasi illimitato, trae ispirazione dalle richieste europee per dichiarare pubblicamente la propria ostilità nei confronti degli immigrati sub-Sahariani. Saïed li definisce ‘orde’ che mirano a cambiare la composizione demografica della Tunisia. Seguono non solo arresti e deportazioni di massa operati dalle autorità, ma anche aggressioni, licenziamenti e sfratti indiscriminati operati da privati cittadini contagiati dalla deriva razzista.

      Per sottrarsi alle violenze c’è chi torna nel proprio paese, ma tanti altri fuggono in Europa. E così, se fino al 19 febbraio, prima del discorso di Saïed, le persone arrivate in Italia dalla Tunisia erano 6.529, di cui un migliaio tunisini, il loro numero al 30 aprile del 2023 è già arrivato a 24.379, di cui meno di tremila tunisini. Molti tra coloro che partono sono sub-Sahariani che risiedevano da anni in Tunisia e non avrebbero lasciato il paese se non fossero stati costretti a farlo dalle violenze generalizzate.
      Il memorandum d’intesa UE-Tunisia

      L’Europa persegue allora la strada dell’accordo, che sarà siglato il 16 luglio 2023. La firma è preceduta da una nuova e cruenta ondata di deportazioni verso i confini desertici con Algeria e Libia, che provoca morte e sofferenza.

      L’intesa delude le aspettative europee. In primo luogo, essa non prevede la riammissione in Tunisia dei cittadini di paesi terzi giunti in Europa dal paese nordafricano, che era uno degli obiettivi principali. In secondo luogo, il numero degli arrivi dalla Tunisia non diminuisce ma aumenta (tabella 2).

      Se nelle sei settimane precedenti la firma dell’accordo tale numero è pari a 17.596, esso sale a 29.676 (+ 168,65%) nelle sei settimane successive. Alla fine del secondo quadrimestre del 2023 il numero delle persone arrivate dalla Tunisia risulta più che triplicato (73.827 al 27 agosto) rispetto alle 24.379 del primo quadrimestre. Nei soli primi otto mesi del 2023 sono arrivate più del doppio delle persone contate nell’intero anno precedente.

      Le politiche europee volte a esternalizzare verso i territori di paesi terzi i controlli delle frontiere raggiungono solo raramente – e mai definitivamente – l’obiettivo di ridurre l’immigrazione. Più spesso esse finiscono per sostenere regimi autoritari e alimentare nei paesi vicini sentimenti razzisti, politiche discriminatorie e pratiche violente e disumane. La Tunisia ne è l’ennesima dimostrazione.

      https://www.neodemos.info/2023/09/26/immigrazione-gli-effetti-degli-accordi-con-la-tunisia

  • Google Connects A.I. Chatbot Bard to YouTube, Gmail and More Facts - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/19/technology/google-bard-ai-chatbot-youtube-gmail.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20

    With the latest updates, Google will try to replicate some of the capabilities of its search engine, by incorporating Flights, Hotels and Maps, so users can research travel and transportation. And Bard may come closer to being more of a personalized assistant for users, allowing them to ask which emails it missed and what the most important points of a document are.

    A.I. chatbots are widely known to offer not only correct information but also falsehoods, in a phenomenon known as “hallucinations.” Users are left with no way to tell what is true and what is not.

    Google believes it has taken a step toward addressing those issues by revamping the “Google It” button featured on Bard’s website, which had allowed users to run Google searches on the queries they had asked the chatbot.

    Now, the button will double-check Bard’s answers. When Google has high confidence in a claim and can support it with evidence, it will highlight the text in green and link to another webpage that backs up the information. When Google cannot find facts to bolster a claim, the text is instead highlighted in orange.

    #Bard #Intelligence_artificielle

  • Opinion | Iron Dust Could Reverse the Course of Climate Change - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/14/opinion/geoengineering-climate-change-ocean.html

    As crazy as it might sound, geoengineering the oceans by adding iron — in effect, fertilizing them — may offer the best, most effective and most affordable way not just to slow the march of global warming but to reverse its course by directly drawing carbon out of the atmosphere. The U.S. government needs to start testing it now, before the climate system spins off into an even more disastrous state.

    C’est un billet d’opinion... certes. Mais c’est le NYT.

  • Opinion | One Thing Not to Fear at Burning Man - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/03/opinion/columnists/one-thing-not-to-fear-at-burning-man.html

    Sept. 3, 2023
    Two people walk through gray mud at a flooded campground with recreational vehicles.
    Credit...Trevor Hughes/USA Today Network, via Reuters
    Two people walk through gray mud at a flooded campground with recreational vehicles.

    By Zeynep Tufekci

    Opinion Columnist

    The news that thousands of Burning Man festival goers were told to conserve food and water after torrential rains left them trapped by impassable mud in the Nevada desert led some to chortle about a “Lord of the Flies” scenario for the annual gathering popular with tech lords and moguls.

    Alas, I have to spoil the hate-the-tech-rich revelries. No matter how this mess is resolved — and many there seem to be coping — the common belief that civilization is but a thin veneer that will fall apart when authority disappears is not only false, the false belief itself is harmful.

    Rutger Bregman, who wrote a book called “Humankind: A Hopeful History,” had read “Lord of the Flies” as a teenager like many, and didn’t doubt its terrible implication about human nature. However, Bregman got curious about whether there were any real-life cases of boys of that age getting stranded on an island.

    Bregman learned of one that played out very differently,

    In 1965, six boys from 13 to 16, bored in their school in Tonga, in Polynesia, impulsively stole a boat and sailed out, but became helplessly adrift after their sail and rudder broke. They were stranded on an island for more than a year. Instead of descending into cruel anarchy, though, they stayed alive through cooperation. When one of them broke his leg, they took care of him.

    Some of the most memorable weeks of my life were spent helping out with rescues and aid in the aftermath of the 1999 earthquake in Turkey that killed thousands of people. The epicenter was my childhood hometown, so I was very familiar with the place, and I rushed to help, unsure of what I would find. Instead of the chaos and looting that was rumored, the people had been mostly sharing everything with one another. Intrigued, I dived into the sociology of disasters and found that this was the common trajectory after similar misfortune.

    Rebecca Solnit’s book “A Paradise Built in Hell: The Extraordinary Communities That Arise in Disaster” documents many such experiences — people altruistically cooperating in the aftermath of earthquakes, hurricanes and other catastrophes — and how the authorities often assume the opposite, and go in to restore law-and-order, but end up doing real harm.

    One of the most egregious recent examples of this involved rumors of conditions after Hurricane Katrina in the Superdome in New Orleans — where tens of thousands of people unable to evacuate earlier had gathered. The police chief told Oprah Winfrey that babies were being raped. The mayor said, “They have people standing out there, have been in that frickin’ Superdome for five days watching dead bodies, watching hooligans killing people, raping people.” There were reports that rescue helicopters were being shot at.

    The reality was that even as the situation deteriorated in the Superdome, as Rebecca Solnit’s book documents, many people kept each other alive, especially taking care of the elderly and the frail under very stressful conditions.

    But the demonization of the overwhelmingly Black population of New Orleans fueled true ugliness: Some aid was delayed and resources diverted to prevent “looting,” and refugees from the city trying to escape on foot were shot at by residents in the mostly white suburbs.

    What about the terrible side of humanity: the wars, the genocides? And what about survival of the fittest?

    In his book “Blueprint: The Evolutionary Origins of a Good Society,” Nicholas Christakis, a sociologist as well as a physician, explains that people are cooperative and social animals, not lone wolves. Humans have survived not because they were the animals with the sharpest claws and strongest muscles, but because they had smarts and they had one another.

    Christakis looked at shipwrecks from 1500 to 1900 and found that survivors often managed by cooperation and that violence and ugliness was far from the norm.

    This is not a rosy-eyed view that ignores the terrible aspects of human behavior. Groups can also be organized politically and socially against each other. That’s the basis of wars and genocides. But far from being elements of true human nature that are revealed once the thin veneer of civilization is worn off, such atrocities are organized through the institutions of civilization: through politics and culture and militaries and sustained political campaigns of dehumanization.

    The institutions of civilization can also be enlisted to resist this dehumanization. The European Union may not be perfect, but it has helped to largely suppress the sorts of conflicts that wracked the continent for centuries.

    I would venture that many of the thousands trapped in the Nevada mud are mostly banding together, sharing shelter, food and water.

    If tech luminaries and rich folks are among those suffering in the mire, instead of gloating about their travail, let’s hope this experience reinforces for them the importance of pulling together as a society.

    We can help them along by passing laws that make tax havens illegal, create a more equitable tax structure and a strong international framework for stopping the laundering of gains of corruption, force technology and other companies to deal with the harms of their inventions and overcome the current situation where profits are private but the fallout can be societal.

    Human nature isn’t an obstacle to a good society, but it needs help from laws and institutions, not thick mud, to let the better angels have a chance.

    #Burning_Man #Zeynep_Tufekci #Communs #Solidarité

  • Opinion | A Creator (Me) Made a Masterpiece With A.I. - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/25/opinion/ai-art-intellectual-property.html

    I’ve got 99 problems with A.I., but intellectual property ain’t one.

    Media and entertainment industries have lately been consumed with questions about how content generated by artificial intelligence systems should be considered under intellectual property law. Last week a federal judge ruled against an attempt to copyright art produced by a machine. In July another federal judge suggested in a hearing that he would most likely dismiss a copyright infringement lawsuit brought by artists against several artificial intelligence art generators. How A.I. might alter the economics of the movie and TV business has become one of the primary issues in the strike by writers and actors in Hollywood. And major news companies — including The Times — are weighing steps to guard the intellectual property that flows from their journalism.

    In the face of all the possible actions against A.I. and its makers, I’d suggest caution. I’ve been thinking a lot about whether musicians, painters, photographers, writers, filmmakers and other producers of creative work — including, on good days, myself — should fear that machines might damage their livelihoods. After extensive research and consultation with experts, I’ve arrived at a carefully considered, nuanced position: meh.

    Controversies over A.I. are going to put a lot of copyright lawyers’ kids through college. But the more I use ChatGPT, Midjourney and other A.I. tools, the more I suspect that many of the intellectual property questions they prompt will prove less significant than we sometimes assume. That’s because computers by themselves cannot yet and might never be able to produce truly groundbreaking creative work.

    History offers one clue: Technologies that made art easier to produce have rarely ended up stifling human creativity. Electronic synthesizers didn’t eliminate the need for people who play musical instruments. Auto-Tune didn’t make singing on pitch obsolete. Photography didn’t kill painting, and its digitization didn’t obviate the need for professional photographers.

    Then there’s the content I’ve seen A.I. produce: Unless it’s been heavily worked over by human beings, a lot of the music, images, jokes and stories that A.I. has given us so far have felt more like great mimicry than great art. Sure, it’s impressive that ChatGPT can write a pop song in the style of Taylor Swift. But the ditties still smack of soulless imitation. They’re not going to go platinum or sell out stadiums. A.I. might undermine some of the more high-volume corners of photography — stock photos, for instance — but will you use it to capture your wedding or to document a war? Nope.

    Lemley is one of the lawyers representing the A.I. firm Stability AI in a copyright infringement lawsuit brought by artists. At the heart of that suit is the issue of how A.I. systems are trained. Most gain their smarts by analyzing enormous amounts of digital content, including lots of copyrighted work. Which prompts the question: Should the artists be compensated for their contributions, and if so, how?

    To me, the answer is no. When a machine is trained to understand language and culture by poring over a lot of stuff online, it is acting, philosophically at least, just like a human being who draws inspiration from existing work. I don’t mind if human readers are informed or inspired by reading my work — that’s why I do it! — so why should I fret that computers will be?

    Of course, one reason I might mind is if the machine uses what it learns from reading my work to produce work that could substitute for my own. But at the risk of hubris, I don’t think that’s likely in the foreseeable future. For me, a human creator’s very humanity feels like the ultimate trump card over the machines: Who cares about a computer’s opinion on anything?

    #Intelligence_artificielle #Droit_auteur

  • Howard S. Becker, Who Looked at Society With a Fresh Eye, Dies at 95 - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/21/books/howard-s-becker-dead.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20230823

    By Elsa Dixler
    Aug. 21, 2023

    Howard S. Becker, an eminent American sociologist who brought his wide-ranging curiosity, sharp observation and dry wit to subjects as diverse as the art world, marijuana use and the meaning of deviance, died on Wednesday at his home in San Francisco. He was 95.

    The death was confirmed by his wife, Dianne Hagaman.

    Dr. Becker was probably best known for “Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance,” a groundbreaking book published in 1963. “The central fact about deviance: It is created by society,” he wrote, arguing that “deviance” is inherent not in certain behaviors but in the way those behaviors are viewed by others.

    The book presents two “deviant” groups, marijuana smokers and dance musicians, and examines their cultures and careers. It is rich with the language of its subjects. The notion that deviance is a label applied by the larger society gave rise to what is called “labeling theory.” Dr. Becker was one of its pioneers, and the book’s perspective was especially innovative, appearing at the end of the conformist and moralistic 1950s.

    Profiling Dr. Becker in The New Yorker in 2015, Adam Gopnik was fascinated by the “strange second act” of Dr. Becker’s career: renown in France. “Outsiders” became a staple of the French social science curriculum, and he became a force in French sociology. He spent several months a year in France, and Alain Pessin wrote two biographies and a sociological work about him (translated into English as “The Sociology of Howard Becker,” published in 2017). Collections of Dr. Becker’s articles were also published there.

    Mr. Gopnick attributed Dr. Becker’s appeal as an intellectual hero in France to “three highly American elements — jazz, Chicago and the exotic beauties of empiricism.” (Dr. Becker had been a jazz piano player since his teens; “Paroles et Musique,” a collection of his papers about art and related subjects, included a CD of his duets with a French bass player.)

    #Howard_Becker #Sociologie

  • Opinion | Mary Gabriel : Happy Birthday, Madonna - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/15/opinion/madonna-career.html

    Un beau papier pour fêter les 65 ans de Madonna.

    At that crucial moment, she forced mainstream society — globally — to see gay men as she did, with admiration, not scorn. Madonna also helped gay men view themselves differently, with pride. In the years since, her embrace of and by the queer community is undiminished. As the journalist Anderson Cooper said in 2019: “No single ally has been a better friend or had a bigger impact on acceptance for the L.G.B.T.Q. community than Madonna. It’s that simple.”

    In the 1980s, when Madonna was in her late 20s, the press began musing aloud about when she might retire. Women in pop music had a use-by date, and hers was seen as fast approaching. With each decade, the same question persisted with varying degrees of cruelty. During a 2017 interview with the writer Roxane Gay (now a contributing Opinion writer for The Times), Madonna called it out for what it is: sexist. “Does somebody ask Steven Spielberg why he’s still making movies? Hasn’t he had enough success?” she said. She added: “Did somebody go to Pablo Picasso and say, ‘OK, you’re 80 years old. Haven’t you painted enough paintings?’ No.”

    Madonna isn’t finished. The battle against bigotry that she has fought throughout her career is far from over, and she has something to say about it. As she prepares to begin her “Celebration” tour in October, that’s great news for us. If her past is any indication, we can expect to be shocked, inspired, challenged and entertained. We will also be enlightened.

    So happy birthday, Madonna, and thank you.

    #Madonna #Pop_culture #Musique #Sida

  • Book Review: ‘Birth Control,’ by Allison Yarrow - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/19/books/review/birth-control-allison-yarrow.html?smtyp=cur

    Yarrow systemically makes the case that the dominant methods of childbirth in America are the clumsy evolution of earlier medical practices that were designed to protect the privilege, status and convenience of 20th-century male doctors. Labor can be a tedious waiting game, but modern medical interventions like pitocin, a synthetic oxytocin that triggers uterine contractions to help induce labor, are often followed by a cascade of further interventions that might not have been needed otherwise. And although supine deliveries, Yarrow writes, “are associated with more perineal trauma and difficulty birthing than upright positions” (such as squatting), more than 90 percent of hospital deliveries are performed on the patient’s back, a position that “allows doctors visibility, makes it easier for them to catch babies.” She also calls out examples of some common but outrageous obstetric violations — internal rummaging and surreptitious snippings performed unnecessarily and without consent — that can haunt their patients for years to come. Yarrow convincingly recasts this country’s maternal health care system as needlessly dehumanizing, prioritizing expediency and profit over the best interests of a population of women rendered vulnerable.

  • Opinion | Our Economy Thrives on Bad Feelings - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/18/opinion/inequality-insecurity-economic-wealth.html

    As the British political theorist Mark Neocleous has noted, the modern word “insecurity” entered the English lexicon in the 17th century, just as our market-driven society was coming into being. Capitalism thrives on bad feelings. Discontented people buy more stuff — an insight the old American trade magazine “Printers’ Ink” stated bluntly in 1930: “Satisfied customers are not as profitable as discontented ones.” It’s hard to imagine any advertising or marketing department telling us that we’re actually OK, and that it is the world, not us, that needs changing. All the while, manufactured insecurity encourages us to amass money and objects as surrogates for the kinds of security that cannot actually be commodified — connection, meaning, purpose, contentment, safety, self-esteem, dignity and respect — but which can only truly be found in community with others.

    #capitalisme #insécurité

  • Something Has Changed on City Streets, and Amazon Is to Blame
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/17/opinion/amazon-delivery-trucks-urban-planning.html

    Bikes are another example. Based on fleeting declines in car traffic during the Covid lockdowns, many zealous city councils made a big bet on bike lanes. To put it less delicately, they cynically transferred the benefit of lots of public property from car commuters and small retail businesses to bike-riding elites and corporate e-businesses.

    Ça va, les « bike-riding elites », bien privilégiés sur vos vélos, vous avez pas l’impression de déranger les pauvres automobilistes ?

  • Judge Rules in Favor of Montana Youths in a Landmark Climate Case
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/14/us/montana-youth-climate-ruling.html?unlocked_article_code=erJqxS2QJGDGDp0zoB8

    A group of young people in Montana won a landmark lawsuit on Monday when a judge ruled that the state’s failure to consider climate change when approving fossil fuel projects was unconstitutional.

    [...] The ruling means that Montana, a major coal and gas producing state that gets one-third of its energy by burning coal, must consider climate change when deciding whether to approve or renew fossil fuel projects.

    The Montana attorney general’s office said the state would appeal, which would send the case to the state Supreme Court.

    [...] The Montana case revolved around language in the state Constitution that guarantees residents “the right to a clean and healthful environment,” and stipulates that the state and individuals are responsible for maintaining and improving the environment “for present and future generations.”

    A handful of other states have similar guarantees, and young people in Hawaii, Utah and Virginia have filed lawsuits that are slowly winding their way through courts. A federal case brought by young people, which had been stalled for years, is once again moving, heading toward a June trial in Oregon.

    [...] Montana has 5,000 gas wells, 4,000 oil wells, four oil refineries and six coal mines. The state is a “major emitter of greenhouse gas emissions in the world, in absolute terms, in per person terms, and historically,” Judge Kathy Seeley of Montana District Court wrote. Adding up the amount of fossil fuels extracted, burned, processed and exported by the state, the court found that Montana is responsible for as much carbon dioxide as produced by Argentina, the Netherlands or Pakistan.

    In her ruling, the judge found that the state’s emissions “have been proven to be a substantial factor” in affecting the climate. Laws that limited the ability of regulators to consider climate effects were unconstitutional, she ruled.

    She added that Montanans “have a fundamental constitutional right to a clean and healthful environment, which includes climate as part of the environmental life-support system.”

    The trial, which took place in June, involved testimony from climate scientists who detailed how increases in greenhouse gas emissions as a result of human activity were already causing health and environmental damage, and how those effects were likely to accelerate unless action was taken.

    #Montana #procès #climat #pétrole #charbon #environnement

  • Supreme Court Pauses Purdue Pharma Opioid Settlement Pending Review - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/10/us/supreme-court-purdue-pharma-opioid-settlement.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=e

    The Supreme Court on Thursday temporarily blocked a bankruptcy deal for Purdue Pharma that would have shielded members of the billionaire Sackler family, which once controlled the company, from additional civil lawsuits over the opioid epidemic and that capped the Sacklers’ personal liability at $6 billion.

    The order is likely to delay any payments to the thousands of plaintiffs who have sued the Sacklers and Purdue, the maker of the prescription painkiller OxyContin, which is widely blamed for igniting the opioid crisis. Under the deal, the Sacklers had agreed to pay billions to plaintiffs in exchange for full immunity from all civil legal disputes.

    That is because the Purdue agreement involves a popular but controversial practice: resolving lawsuits about mass injuries through bankruptcy courts, rather than allowing the cases to make their way through the traditional court system. In many of these agreements, third parties — in this instance, the Sacklers — are shielded from liability without being required to declare bankruptcy.

    “What are the Sacklers getting out of this?” said Lindsey Simon, an associate professor at Emory University School of Law and a bankruptcy expert. “They’re getting one deal to be done. Whereas if they didn’t get it, individuals could still sue them forever.”

    Put simply, Ms. Simon said, “they get all the benefit with none of the costs.”

    “They’re taking on a question that’s literally the basis for billions of dollars in mass torts, from cases involving not just opioids, but the Boy Scouts, wildfires and allegations of sexual abuse in the church diocese — where third parties get a benefit from a bankruptcy they themselves aren’t going through,” said Adam Zimmerman, a law professor at the University of Southern California.

    Experts cited Johnson & Johnson, which has sought to use bankruptcy court to resolve mass claims about its talcum-based baby powder.

    The company faces about 40,000 lawsuits that have been on hold since 2021 over allegations that the powder contained asbestos and caused ovarian cancer. The company denies those allegations, and has said it needs the bankruptcy process to resolve current and future lawsuits.

    Although companies routinely seek bankruptcy protection to be shielded from legal claims, this particular agreement was unusual because it extended liability protection to the company’s owners. Sackler family members have said they would not sign on to a settlement without an agreement protecting them from lawsuits.

    The Supreme Court has been skeptical of some aggressive litigation tactics, notably in cases involving class actions and patents, suggesting that it may be wary of allowing bankruptcy courts to provide legal immunity to rich and powerful people accused of grave wrongdoing who have not themselves declared bankruptcy.

    #Opioides #Sackler #Responsabilité

  • Ouragan sec. L’archipel d’Hawaï en proie à de violents incendies, des évacuations sont en cours
    https://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2023/08/09/l-archipel-d-hawai-en-proie-a-de-violents-incendies-des-evacuations-sont-en-


    Un incendie à Lahaina, sur l’île de Maui, mardi 8 août 2023. ALAN DICKAR / AP

    Le réseau hospitalier à Maui était « dépassé » par les patients souffrant de brûlures ou ayant inhalé de la fumée, selon la vice-gouverneure de l’archipel, et le service d’appel d’urgence 911 ne fonctionne pas dans certaines régions.

    Des habitants sautant dans l’océan pour échapper aux feux, d’autres observant, terrifiés, les flammes entourer le véhicule à bord duquel ils fuyaient : des incendies brûlent mercredi 9 août l’archipel américain d’Hawaï, où l’état d’urgence a été déclaré et des évacuations ont été ordonnées. Alimentés par des vents violents, les incendies sur les îles de Maui et Hawaï ont dévoré des maisons et des commerces, notamment dans la ville touristique de Lahaina (...)

    Les garde-côtes ont déclaré avoir secouru douze personnes dans les eaux au large de Lahaina et qu’ils envoyaient des navires vers Maui. Une témoin interrogée par Hawaii News Now a affirmé que « tous les bateaux dans le port de Lahaina [avaient] brûlé ». « On dirait un film, un film de guerre », a-t-il encore dit.

    Selon la vice-gouverneure, le fait que les #incendies aient été indirectement alimentés par de forts vents exacerbés par l’#ouragan Dora est « sans précédent », car ces phénomènes météorologiques apportent d’ordinaire pluies et inondations à Hawaï, a-t-elle expliqué. Presque 15 000 foyers et commerces étaient sans électricité dans l’archipel, selon le site PowerOutage.

    comme pour Rhodes récemment, on entendra probablement davantage parler des touristes que des habitants, pourtant Américains.

    edit et pendant ce temps des cactus centenaires meurent en Arizona, non pas à cause du manque d’eau, mais de la chaleur nocturne.

    #climat #tourisme
    édit vu ce qui suit sur « l’incendie de forêt le plus meurtrier aux États-Unis depuis plus de 100 ans. »
    #pompiers #eau #alimentation_en_eau #hélicoptères_cloués_au_sol

    • As Inferno Grew, Lahaina’s Water System Collapsed
      https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/13/us/lahaina-water-failure.html?unlocked_article_code=qmglgT13kDY2zss8WEThu7iDu6

      The collapse of the town’s water system, described to The New York Times by several people on scene, is yet another disastrous factor in a confluence that ended up producing what is now the deadliest U.S. wildfire in more than 100 years. The lack of water forced firefighters into an extraordinary rush to save lives by risking their own, and it has left people searching for answers about how the community can better prepare for a world of fiercer winds and drier lands.

      [...] The water system in Lahaina relies on both surface water from a creek and groundwater pumped from wells. Persistent drought conditions combined with population growth have already led officials at the state and local level to explore ways to shore up water supplies, and they broke ground on a new well two months ago to increase capacity.

      On the day the fire tore through Lahaina, the fight was complicated by winds in excess of 70 miles per hour, stoked by a hurricane offshore. Not only did the wind fuel the blaze, it made it impossible during much of the day to launch helicopters that could have carried in and dropped water from the ocean.

      Early that day, as winds knocked out power to thousands of people, county officials urged people to conserve water, saying that “power outages are impacting the ability to pump water.”

      John Stufflebean, the county’s director of water supply, said backup generators allowed the system to maintain sufficient overall supply throughout the fire. But he said that as the fire began moving down the hillside, turning homes into rubble, many properties were damaged so badly that water was spewing out of their melting pipes, depressurizing the network that also supplies the hydrants.

      “The water was leaking out of the system,” he said.

      [...] Mr. Ho said downed power lines made navigation treacherous. The wind was so intense that firefighters found themselves crawling at times. Thick smoke made it difficult to breathe, but they often had to remove their masks to communicate evacuation orders to people still in the area.

      In the end, the fire stopped only when it ran out of fuel at the ocean. The extent of the damage is still coming into focus, but it is already huge: some 1,500 residential buildings destroyed, thousands of people displaced, nearly 100 found dead so far, and the heart of a community that has long been a gem of Hawaiian history is reduced to ashes.

      The state attorney general has begun a review of how previous decision-making and policies might have affected the fire and the county’s ability to fight it. The problems with water availability were compounded by others, as many residents said they were never given evacuation orders, and sirens set up to warn of such emergencies never sounded an alarm.

    • Lahaina used to be a wetland
      https://heated.world/p/lahaina-used-to-be-wetland

      It was only because of colonization and climate change that it became a tinderbox.

      #Lahaina wasn’t always a dry, fire-prone region. It was very wet and lush, historically. Boats would circle the famous Waiola Church. Lahaina was also the breeding place of aquaculture. It had some of the world’s first and most innovative systems of fish ponds.

      ”But at the dawn of the 18th century, sugar barons arrived and illicitly diverted the water to irrigate the lands they had stolen. (Note: 18th century European sugar and pineapple barons also brought invasive grasses, Wired reports, which now cover 26 percent of Hawaii and become “explosive” fuel for wildfires.)

      “Today, descendants from those same barons amass fast profits from controlling our irrigation, our land use, and political influence. Alexander and Baldwin are two big missionary families of the original oligarchs, and they’re currently the largest landowners on Maui. That’s the name of their corporation and they’re one of the top political donors here today.

      “So on one hand, the climate emergency caused this. On the other, it’s also that history of colonial greed that made Lahaina the dry place that it is."

      #Hawaï #eau #feu #pyrocène #colonialisme