Despite Israeli leaks of drafts about their vision of a ceasefire with Lebanon, none of it has been agreed & the alleged draft as it stands which some Israeli media are circulating will be rejected.
Here is a translation of the stance of Hezbollah according to Al-Akhbar newspaper:
“Firstly, the party asserts that President Berri represents him in any negotiations on the dossier of war and ceasefire, that it is in constant coordination with Berri, & also has channels of communication with Prime Minister Najib Mikati & others in the State concerned with the dossier of negotiation
“Second, communication between Hezbollah & some external actors working on the negotiating line, from Egypt, Algeria, Qatar & France, has not ceased. The party reiterates before these parties its first & foremost basis that the complete cessation of aggression is a compulsory requirement for any research on what is supposed to happen later.
“Third: Hizbullah does not consider that what the enemy has done gives it any preference to impose any modification on the status of the 2006 aggression. Under no circumstances will Hizbullah accept any amendment either to the provisions of resolution 1701 or to the implementation mechanisms; it did not originally oppose the increase in the number of international forces or Lebanese Armed Forces as originally planned in the resolution 1701 But the party refuses to add any new country to the international forces, & it demands that Germany be permanently removed from the work of the international forces after becoming an enemy partner in the war.
“Fourth, the party does not bet on dramatic changes in the American position, so it deals quietly with everything the Americans leak, & believes that the enemy wants to continue the war for longer, which means that the resistance must prepare to face further Israeli strikes, prepare well to strike the occupying forces & thwart the targets of aggression.
“Fifth, Hizbullah continues to put in its military statements the words: “In support of our steadfast Palestinian people in Gaza” in addition to, “and in defense of Lebanon & its people.
It (Hezbollah) made no commitment, to any party in Lebanon or abroad, to accept the disengagement between the Lebanese Front & the Gaza Front. While Israel’s brutality in Gaza continues, the party does not consider it logical to leave Gaza, nor does such a position run counter to all its ideological structure & political thinking, & its close knowledge of the genuine interdependence of all fronts of resistance against the enemy.
« Sixth, the enemy’s insistence on negotiating under fire reflects the fact that Israel is betting that the resistance will break or weaken Hezbollah, & the party is acting on the basis that it may be prone to new assassinations, but the mechanisms of action within the party, especially in the jihadist body, have taken a path unaffected by any assassination of a party leader.
“The party does not deal tensely or emotionally with all internal reactions that have shown hatred against the resistance, or even those that appear to be partners with the enemy, & believes that maintaining civil peace is a central task, although it will not deal indifferently with any attempt to undermine its political presence or its social base.
“Eighth, Hezbollah believes that the government must fulfil its duties towards the citizens in terms of securing the requirements for their steadfastness & providing a supportive environment for the displaced, knowing that it is prepared to face any challenges in this regard, & when it promised the people reconstruction, it has all the financial & material capabilities to accomplish this as soon as possible after the cessation of the aggression.
“Finally, Hezbollah hopes that all Lebanese will understand that the resistance weapon will not be negotiated with anyone, & that after this war, the resistance is a compulsory option & Hezbollah will work with everything at its disposal to preserve it.”