Seenthis
•
 
Identifiants personnels
  • [mot de passe oublié ?]

  • https://www.npr.org
  • /2025

/04

  • ►/30
    • ►/nx-s1-5382383
      • ►/international-court-of-justice-israel-unrwa-palestinians-us
  • ►/15
    • ►/nx-s1-5355896
      • ►/doge-nlrb-elon-musk-spacex-security
  • ►/16
    • ►/g-s1-60696
      • ►/judge-probable-cause-to-hold-u-s-in-contempt-over-alien-enemies-act-deportations
  • ►/09
    • ►/g-s1-59149
      • ►/immigrants-social-media-antisemitism-dhs
  • @kassem
    Kassem @kassem CC BY-NC-SA 1/05/2025
    1
    @simplicissimus
    1

    U.S. backs Israeli ban on U.N. Palestinian aid group UNRWA at World Court : NPR
    ▻https://www.npr.org/2025/04/30/nx-s1-5382383/international-court-of-justice-israel-unrwa-palestinians-us

    https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims3/default/strip/false/crop/8640x4860+0+450/resize/1400/quality/100/format/jpeg/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F25%2F21%2F61349e9e47cca0b3d96bf1998216%2Fap25118326079984.jpg

    #génocidaires

    Kassem @kassem CC BY-NC-SA
    • @kassem
      Kassem @kassem CC BY-NC-SA 1/05/2025

      Itay Epshtain sur X :
      ▻https://x.com/EpshtainItay/status/1917836024434016270

      At the @CIJ_ICJ, the US @USUN and its Hungarian client-state, @HUNMissionToUN, undertook a joint effort to subvert the law of war and international adjudication:

      1/3. The US argued that the obligations of an occupying power with respect to humanitarian assistance should be met, “while advancing its own military and security interests.” However, the text of Art. Article 59 is explicit in that the occupying power must agree to and facilitate relief schemes on behalf of the occupied population, in their interest, not in its own, acting as a mere facilitator of offers of relief by impartial humanitarian organizations and states not party to the conflict. The US favours the militarization and politicization of aid, which the Court would have to outright reject.

      2/3 The US also reminded the Court that “only the Security Council can make (the threat determination that must precede such) binding decisions. In addition, such decisions require not only that at least nine Security Council members vote “yes”, but also that the five permanent members either vote yes or abstain.” The unnecessary reminder of US-imposed Security Council paralysis preceded an inappropriate cautioning of the Court that “novel legal interpretations will not bring an end to the ongoing conflict. They will not create a better tomorrow for Israelis, Palestinians, and the region. We encourage the international community to focus on [...] fresh thinking for a better future for Israelis and Palestinians alike.”

      3/3 Parroting the US in diswaying the Court from exercising its jurisdiction, Hungary argued that “proceeding brought before this esteemed Court may directly contribute to the escalation of the conflict. We are of the view that the present and the former requests for rendering an advisory opinion, as well as the procedure initiated by the Republic of South Africa against the State of Israel, may be considered as an interference in an ongoing conflict that does not contribute to the de-escalation and an eventual settlement.” It went so far as to sugesset that question posed by the request are “so targeted at Israel, that it proceeds on the assumption that Israel has failed to meet its obligations under international law, without any regard to Israel’s legitimate security interests and concerns, or to the obligations of the United Nations and third parties in relation to the very subject-matter of the question.” According to Hungary, humanitarians are at fault, not the occupying power, which besieges, starves, and displaces the civilian population under the guise of security.

      Kassem @kassem CC BY-NC-SA
    • @kassem
      Kassem @kassem CC BY-NC-SA 1/05/2025

      Blocus humanitaire à Gaza : l’ONU dénonce une politique « délibérément » cruelle | ONU Info
      ▻https://seenthis.net/messages/1112536

      https://seenthis.net/local/cache-vignettes/L600xH328/image770x420fe2a-64d2f.jpg

      Kassem @kassem CC BY-NC-SA
    Écrire un commentaire
  • @simplicissimus
    Simplicissimus @simplicissimus 18/04/2025
    2
    @02myseenthis01
    @arno
    2

    Science Bob McGwier / X
    ▻https://x.com/BobMcGwier_N4HY/status/1913255203437953380

    THREAD: A federal whistleblower just dropped one of the most disturbing cybersecurity disclosures I’ve ever read.

    He’s saying DOGE came in, data went out, and Russians started attempting logins with new valid DOGE passwords

    Media’s coverage wasn’t detailed enough so I dug into his testimony:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GoxsSYjWwAAscQk?format=jpg&name=medium#.jpg

    Thread by mattjay – Thread Reader App
    ▻https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1913023007263543565.html

    https://threadreaderapp.com/images/screenshots/thread/1913023007263543565.jpg

    Simplicissimus @simplicissimus
    • @simplicissimus
      Simplicissimus @simplicissimus 18/04/2025

      Whistleblower details how DOGE may have taken sensitive NLRB data : NPR
      ▻https://www.npr.org/2025/04/15/nx-s1-5355896/doge-nlrb-elon-musk-spacex-security
      l’article sur lequel s’appuie le fil ci-dessus, complété par de nombreux documents.

      Les derniers paragraphes de l’article :

      Berulis had a simple request for the DOGE engineers: “Be transparent. If you have nothing to hide, don’t delete logs, don’t be covert. ... Be open, because that’s what efficiency is really about. If this is all a huge misunderstanding, then just prove it. Put it out there. That’s all I’m asking.”

      But ultimately, if the systems that DOGE accesses are left insecure, it might not matter if its intentions are honorable, he concluded.

      “This could just be the start of the operation. ... They still haven’t crossed that boundary where they’re plugged into every federal system out there,” he continued. “So maybe there is still time.”

      Simplicissimus @simplicissimus
    • @simplicissimus
      Simplicissimus @simplicissimus 21/04/2025

      cf. ▻https://seenthis.net/messages/1110705

      Simplicissimus @simplicissimus
    Écrire un commentaire
  • @arno
    ARNO* @arno ART LIBRE 16/04/2025
    1
    @gao_tumbuktu
    1

    Judge: ’Probable cause’ to hold U.S. in contempt over Alien Enemies Act deportations
    ▻https://www.npr.org/2025/04/16/g-s1-60696/judge-probable-cause-to-hold-u-s-in-contempt-over-alien-enemies-act-deportation

    Judge James Boasberg of the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia ruled Wednesday that there is “probable cause” to find the Trump administration in criminal contempt of court after he said it violated his order last month to immediately pause any deportations under the Alien Enemies Act.

    ARNO* @arno ART LIBRE
    Écrire un commentaire
  • @arno
    ARNO* @arno ART LIBRE 9/04/2025
    2
    @gao_tumbuktu
    @kassem
    2

    U.S. says it is now monitoring immigrants’ social media for antisemitism
    ▻https://www.npr.org/2025/04/09/g-s1-59149/immigrants-social-media-antisemitism-dhs

    U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has announced it will begin screening immigrants’ social media for evidence of antisemitic activity as grounds for denying immigration benefit requests. The screenings will affect people applying for permanent residence status as well as foreigners affiliated with educational institutions. The policy will go into effect immediately.

    In a statement issued Wednesday morning, the Department of Homeland Security said it will “protect the homeland from extremists and terrorist aliens, including those who support antisemitic terrorism, violent antisemitic ideologies and antisemitic terrorist organizations such as Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, or [the Houthis].”

    ARNO* @arno ART LIBRE
    • @gao_tumbuktu
      GAO TUMBUKTU @gao_tumbuktu 9/04/2025

      horrifying!!!

      GAO TUMBUKTU @gao_tumbuktu
    Écrire un commentaire