/2026

  • U.S. Airstrikes Targeting Houthis Killed Scores of Civilians in Yemen - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/10/us/politics/us-airstrikes-houthis-civilian-deaths.html

    Comme criminel de guerre Trump n’a rien à envier à personne.

    U.S. airstrikes against Yemen’s Houthi militants from late 2023 to mid-2025 killed 213 civilians, according to a report released on Thursday by the Costs of War Project at Brown University.

    Most of the casualties — 208 deaths and 341 wounded — occurred during President Trump’s second term as his administration pursued the Iran-backed group.

  • Behind the Scenes, Vance Gathered Unvarnished Views of the Iran War - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/10/us/politics/vance-iran-war-trump-munitions.html

    Le vice-président JD Vance a pris la décision inhabituelle au cours du printemps et de l’été d’appeler directement les commandants militaires américains au Moyen-Orient, en Europe et en Asie, afin d’avoir leurs évaluations sans vernis de la guerre en Iran, selon des responsables actuels et anciens.

    […]

    Ils se sont montrés surtout préoccupés par l’épuisement de leurs stocks d’intercepteurs Patriot, l’épine dorsale de leurs défenses aériennes. À la fin du printemps, un des théâtres [de guerre] en conservait moins de 100. La guerre avait également épuisé les fournitures du théâtre des systèmes de missiles tactiques de l’armée, qui peuvent atteindre 190 miles, ainsi que des magasins de missiles de frappe de précision, qui étaient destinés à les remplacer. Les stocks de munitions critiques comme ceux-ci, ont-ils dit au vice-président, étaient les plus bas qu’ils aient jamais connus.

    […]

    Il y avait un gouffre entre les évaluations privées qui donnent à réfléchir que M. Vance a reçu et ce que les hauts responsables de l’administration, y compris le président et le vice-président, ont déclaré publiquement. Monsieur Trump a continué à prétendre faussement que les États-Unis ont déjà gagné la guerre, que l’armée iranienne a été démolie et qu’il n’y a pas de problèmes avec les fournitures d’armes américaines. Et M. Vance a récemment minimisé l’idée que les États-Unis étaient même engagés dans une guerre.

    […]

  • Clash Report sur X :
    https://x.com/clashreport/status/2097935005221605692

    C’est intéressant parce que le mot d’ordre chez al-jazeera (arabe et anglais) était d’annoncer depuis plusieurs jours l’écrasement total des Houthis par l’ « armée régulière yéménite ».

    À un certain moment le journaliste, interrogeant « l’expert » yéménite de la chaîne, a mis en avant une avancée des Houthis, ce dernier a répondu qu’elle n’avait aucune importance, sans expliquer pourquoi ; le journaliste s’en est contenté.

    Yemen’s Houthis have captured Mokha and swept roughly 2,600 km² of western Yemen in a rapid coastal offensive.

    The advance targeted the western Taiz and southern Al-Hudaydah governorates, cutting through multiple districts in what’s being described as one of the fastest territorial shifts in the war in years.

    Government and National Resistance Forces (Tariq Saleh’s units) withdrew or collapsed across a broad front, reportedly falling back toward Aden.

    Named locations taken include Hays, Al-Khawkhah, Al-Wazi’iyah, Mawza, and the strategically important Khalid ibn al-Walid military camp.

    The offensive culminated in seizing Mokha (Al-Makha), the main government-held port city on that stretch of the Red Sea coast.

    Why this is significant?

    Mokha sits roughly 60–75 km north of the Bab al-Mandab Strait, one of the world’s most critical shipping chokepoints.

    The city had been in government/coalition hands since early 2017 and served as a key hub for Tariq Saleh’s National Resistance Forces.

    Houthi control there puts them physically closer to the strait and international shipping lanes they’ve already been disrupting.

    It also removes the main government military and logistical anchor on the western coast.

  • Saudi Oil Exports Plunge as Spread of War Shuts Off Shipping Routes - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/09/business/saudi-arabia-houthis-red-sea-oil-shipping.html

    Whatever comfort shipping companies may have found using the Red Sea before the most recent escalation “has clearly soured,” said Peter Sand, a shipping analyst at Xeneta.

    A steady supply of Saudi oil is critical to keeping global energy prices stable, and the country’s exports are already squeezed. Its oil exports fell last month to 3.2 million barrels a day, the lowest in at least 13 years, according to data from Kpler, a maritime information company. In the past week only two Saudi Arabian cargoes passed through the Bab al-Mandab Strait to the Red Sea, the group found.

  • Travelers Face More Flight Delays After Major Air Traffic Disruption at UK Airports - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/09/world/europe/uk-air-traffic-control-flight-delays-london.html

    Bien sûr, cela pourrait faire réfléchir à l’externalisation des services majeurs de l’Etat (sécurité, continuité...).
    Mais le plus drôle dans l’article, c’est la réaction du plus néolibéral des néolibéraux, le patron de Rayan Air... qui demande avec insistance l’intervention du gouvernement. On croirait du Ayn Rand dans le texte, elle qui après avoir pesté toute sa vie contre les services publics a fini ses jour... à l’hôpital public.

    Cette question du respect et des missions des services publics est au cœur du livre de danah boyd « La fabrique des données ». Son terrain d’enquête est différent, mais cette tension entre les dangers pour la société de l’externalisation et la conscience des missions par les agents publics participe bien de la même problématique.

    Hundreds more flights were canceled in Britain on Wednesday, a day after an air traffic control failure that has disrupted more than 2,000 flights and upended the plans of tens of thousands of travelers, particularly at Heathrow Airport.

    National Air Traffic Services, a company that provides most of Britain’s air traffic control services, said on Tuesday that there was an issue with one of its flight management computer systems. Its engineers eventually resolved the technical failure, but passengers were warned that the widespread cancellations and delays would have residual effects.

    “Enough is enough, it’s time for the U.K. government to intervene,” Neal McMahon, Ryanair’s chief operations officer, said on social media.

    Heidi Alexander, the British minister responsible for transport, wrote on social media late Tuesday that she was “seeking assurances that lessons will be learned and systems that support aviation are up to the job.”

    NATS has experienced multiple high-profile technical issues in recent years. In August 2023, an air traffic control failure affected more than 700,000 passengers over several days, according to an estimate by Britain’s Civil Aviation Authority. In July 2025, some flights were briefly grounded because of an issue with a radar system.

    #Aviation #Contrôle-aérien #Externalisation #Panne_informatique

  • Canada’s Retaliatory Tariffs Set to Take Effect as Trump Threatens to Escalate - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/07/world/canada/tariffs-trade-war-carney-trump.html

    After more than two weeks of finger pointing, threats and patronizing insults between longtime trading partners, Canada’s latest retaliatory tariffs against the United States are set to take effect just after midnight Eastern time on Tuesday.

    Polls show that Canadians strongly back Prime Minister Mark Carney’s decision to end trade talks with Washington last month and to hit back with tariffs on about $20 billion in American products entering Canada. But there is also concern over what might happen next. President Trump has repeatedly threatened another round of American tariffs if Canada follows through on its plan.

    Some in Canadian industry say they are inclined to take Mr. Trump at his word, at least on this threat.

    People in the Trump administration “are willing to hurt themselves, their own sectors and industries, in pursuit of their goal, however misguided I think it is,” said Flavio Volpe, the president of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers’​ Association of Canada. “So they may escalate. I hope that we don’t end up in a tit-for-tat situation. We’re going to run out of runway.”

    Mr. Carney announced Canada’s new tariffs after he pulled Canadian negotiators out of talks in Washington last month — an ultimately unsuccessful attempt to stave off 50 percent American tariffs on $20 billion in Canadian exports and to reduce or eliminate tariffs of up to 50 percent on Canadian steel, aluminum and automobiles.

    The Trump administration said the tariffs it imposed last month were in part a response to retaliatory tariffs Canada placed last year on some U.S. imports, particularly autos. American officials have repeatedly noted that only China and Canada retaliated against the United States since Mr. Trump began upending global trade.

  • A More Confident Iran Emerges After Six Months of War With the U.S. - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/04/us/politics/iran-war-intelligence-reports.html

    Iran has emerged from months of the on-again, off-again war with a far better understanding of its military strengths and is more sure of its capabilities, according to officials briefed on the intelligence.

    The reports, some current and former officials said, suggest that any agreement to fully end the war will be hard to reach. There are few signs that Iran is ready to make any sort of deal with the United States, content to exacerbate President Trump’s political problems ahead of the U.S. midterm elections, according to some officials.

    Mr. Trump, for now, is not pursuing negotiations and has said he believes he can apply economic pressure on Iran that would force Tehran to make concessions on its control of the strait and perhaps, eventually, its nuclear program. But in the short term, U.S. economic sanctions are likely to continue to provoke escalation, according to officials who have read the intelligence reports.

  • Elon Musk justifie les craintes de Platon sur l’infinie cupidité des ultrariches
    https://www.courrierinternational.com/article/opinion-elon-musk-justifie-les-craintes-de-platon-sur-l-infin
    SOURCE : The New York Times


    Elon Musk, en février 2025, lors de la CPAC, le grand raout des conservateurs américains, à National Harbor, dans le Maryland.
    PHOTO NATHAN HOWARD/REUTERS

    Par sa fortune inimaginable, son avidité sans borne et son manque d’empathie, le magnat de la tech incarne la faillite morale que le philosophe grec associait à l’extrême richesse. Redoutant les effets délétères des inégalités, Platon voulait fixer des limites à l’accumulation d’argent. Sa préoccupation est plus que jamais d’actualité, écrit cet historien de la pensée politique.

    Depuis qu’Elon Musk est devenu la première personne au monde à amasser un patrimoine de 1 000 milliards de dollars, les gens cherchent à comprendre l’ampleur de son inimaginable fortune [du fait des variations boursières, celle-ci a un peu diminué. Au 30 août, elle se situait autour de 873 milliards de dollars].

    Certains ont remarqué que, sous la forme de billets de 100 dollars, 1 000 milliards de dollars formeraient une pile de quasi 1 100 kilomètres de haut. L’économiste Steven Durlauf a observé qu’un temps, le patrimoine de John D. Rockefeller équivalait à environ 1,5 % du PIB des États-Unis, contre plus de 3 % pour celui de Musk aujourd’hui. Les supporteurs des Knicks à New York auront peut-être remarqué que même leur basketteur vedette, Jalen Brunson, qui gagne 39 millions de dollars par an, devrait jouer plus de 25 000 saisons pour accumuler autant d’argent.

    De tous les chiffres que j’ai vus, celui qui m’a le plus frappé est le calcul du New York Times selon lequel la fortune de Musk équivaut à cinq millions de fois celle d’une famille moyenne aux États-Unis.

    La proposition radicale de Platon
    Moi qui suis historien de la pensée politique, j’ai immédiatement pensé à Platon, premier philosophe occidental à réellement réfléchir aux inégalités économiques. Dans Les Lois, […]

    lire l’article original : https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/21/opinion/elon-musk-trillionaire-wealth-plato.html

  • Bessent Blames Ukraine for High Energy Prices - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/03/business/bessent-energy-prices-ukraine.html

    Anton Gerashchenko, a former adviser to Ukraine’s internal affairs minister, said that the war in Iran was the main reason oil prices were elevated.

    “The war in Iran has had significantly more impact on the global energy market than Ukrainian strikes diminishing Russia’s capacity to wage a war of aggression against Ukraine,” Mr. Gerashchenko said in a social media post.

  • These Generals Fought for Israel. Now They See ‘Jewish Terrorism’ as the Threat.
    A growing number of former Israeli generals, intelligence officials and prime ministers are accusing settlers in the West Bank of committing ethnic cleansing with government support. “Once a society behaves this way,” one said, “that society is doomed.”
    By Azam Ahmed, Natan Odenheimer and Ronen Bergman
    Photographs by Ivor Prickett
    Aug. 31, 2026
    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/31/world/middleeast/west-bank-israel.html
    Maj. Gen. Eyal Ben-Reuven spent his life fighting for Israel. He survived the Arab-Israeli war of 1973, when his platoon was nearly wiped out, then went on to command a division in the West Bank and lead Israel’s ground forces in the 2006 war against Hezbollah.

    But in recent months, he has returned to the Israeli-occupied West Bank, touring the territory with retired generals and former Israeli officials like himself. He has walked through the remains of a Palestinian school looted by Israeli settlers, and listened to Palestinian shepherds and farmers describe being tortured by settlers who seize their livestock and land.

    Now, General Ben-Reuven says he has an entirely different understanding of the risks facing Israel today.

    “This, what the settlers are doing here, is the real threat to Israel,” he said, his eyes welling with emotion. “This is more concerning to me than Iran, Gaza or Lebanon.”

    Other former high-ranking Israeli officials touring the West Bank with him shared the same indignation.

    “This is ethnic cleansing, to put it simply,” Ephraim Sneh, a retired brigadier general and former minister of health, said of Israeli settlers’ attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank.

    Asaf Agmon, a retired Air Force general, went even further, comparing it to what some Israelis’ forebears endured in the Holocaust — not in the scale of the violence, he explained, but in the effort to erase the Palestinian presence from much of the West Bank.

    “Once a society behaves this way,” he said, “that society is doomed.”

    Since the Hamas-led terrorist attacks of Oct. 7, 2023, when as many as 1,200 Israelis were killed, war has consumed Israel: first with Hamas, leaving Gaza in ruins and tens of thousands dead. Two rounds of fighting with Hezbollah in Lebanon. Two campaigns against Iran.

    But in the shadows of those conflicts, a quieter front has emerged in the West Bank. Armed Israeli settlers, emboldened by the most right-wing government in the nation’s history, raid and torch Palestinian homes, mosques and villages with seeming impunity, openly trying to drive them out of the territory.

    Israel’s top military commander in the West Bank has warned that the violence risked setting the territory ablaze. Settlers have waged thousands of attacks in the West Bank since Oct. 7, 2023, injuring thousands of Palestinians, according to the United Nations. More than 3,200 Palestinians have been displaced by settler attacks this year alone — double the rate of last year.

    As the pace of violence climbs, the U.N. says, the number of Palestinians injured in settler attacks has risen from an average of one every three days in 2020 to more than three per day in 2026.

    The retired generals condemning this violence are part of a small but rapidly expanding array of influential Israelis, including many from the upper echelons of the military and intelligence apparatus, who are publicly declaring the lawlessness in the West Bank a threat to Israel’s existence as a democracy.

    More than 200 prominent Israelis signed a letter in June demanding that the government stop the attacks against Palestinian civilians in the West Bank. The signatories included two former prime ministers, more than three dozen retired Army and Air Force generals, the former heads of the nation’s foreign and domestic intelligence services, as well as rabbis, a Nobel laureate and one of Israel’s most revered novelists.

    The retired officials come from across the political landscape, including from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s own party, and many were considered security hawks.

    In their letter, they called for an end to “Jewish terrorism” and the “ethnic cleansing” underway in the West Bank. And they accused Mr. Netanyahu’s government not just of being negligent in failing to stop it, but of pursuing “a deliberate government policy in which the entire security establishment — including the military, Shin Bet and the police — is knowingly complicit.”

    The signatories cited tens of millions of dollars in government spending on illegal Israeli outposts and farms, and demanded a full accounting of all public money spent on roads, water, electricity, vehicles and weapons to support them.

    They also accused the military of being complicit in the violence, saying soldiers stand by and watch as Palestinians are attacked, or sometimes even join settlers to assault Palestinian villages together.

    The public denunciation, given whom it is coming from, is staggering. Activists have often asserted that Israel commits atrocities in the West Bank. But accusations of ethnic cleansing from such a large group of former prime ministers, generals and other top Israeli officials — the same people who once led their nation’s security forces — are virtually unheard of.

    Many of the Israeli critics took part in extreme violence during their own military careers, ordering targeted killings, deadly airstrikes, raids and other attacks on Palestinians, including in the West Bank. But they say they were acting in the interest of Israeli security, under a chain of command and legal oversight.

    Want to stay updated on what’s happening in Israel and the West Bank and Gaza Strip? , and we’ll send our latest coverage to your inbox.
    The difference now, they say, is that the violence is unchecked, indiscriminate and targets innocent civilians, with the intent of clearing large stretches of the West Bank so that Israelis can take it for themselves and stamp out any prospect of a Palestinian state.

    The injustice today, they contend, has crossed a moral red line in which the state is allowing, and sometimes helping, Israeli civilians beat, stab and shoot others with almost no consequences.

    Azriel Nevo, who served as military secretary to four prime ministers, argued that other prime ministers he worked for “would have never allowed this to occur.”

    “Shocking,” is how he described what he saw on the tour.

    Some of the retired officials contend that the campaign against Palestinians in the West Bank is reminiscent of Nazism — an extraordinarily contentious assertion, especially in Israel, where many Jews found sanctuary after their families were eradicated in Europe.

    Moshe Ya’alon, the former army chief of staff who served as defense minister under Mr. Netanyahu until 2016, recently likened the ideology of extremist Israeli settlers in the West Bank to that of World War II Germany.

    “What is Jewish supremacy?” Mr. Ya’alon, long considered a security hawk, recently said on Ynet, an Israeli news site. “Eighty years after the Holocaust, ‘Mein Kampf’ in reverse. The master race is us.”

    The prime minister’s office declined to answer questions about the growing accusations from former generals and other officials, and the government did not respond to multiple requests for data on settler attacks in the West Bank.

    In the past, Mr. Netanyahu has dismissed settler violence as the unlawful acts of “a handful of kids,” while some ministers in his government have said there is no such thing as Jewish terrorism.

    But as the condemnation of settler violence grows, including from the United States, pressure is building on Mr. Netanyahu to respond more forcefully. Settlers recently besieged several Palestinian homes, one of which belonged to an American citizen. In a rare statement over the weekend, Mr. Netanyahu said such “criminal acts” cause “immense harm” to the law-abiding settlers and “damage Israel’s standing in the world.”

    The Israel military rejects any suggestion that it supports “the actions of violent groups” in the West Bank. It says its mission is to “protect all residents,” and that any soldier who takes part in settler attacks or stands by while they occur is “acting in complete disregard” of their orders.

    Religious leaders who support Israeli settlements in the West Bank have applauded the military and government for backing a record number of new outposts and farms, which the retired generals say fuel settler violence in the West Bank.

    But Rabbi Elyakim Levanon, who oversees a religious council in the West Bank, recently cautioned supporters to avoid violence, saying critics were using it as justification to harm the settler movement’s “reputation both in Israel, the U.S. and worldwide.”

    The settler attacks are unfolding at the same time the Israeli military is acting much more aggressively in the West Bank.

    Since the Oct. 7 attacks almost three years ago, more than 1,100 Palestinians, some of them combatants, have been killed in the territory, the vast majority of them at the hands of Israeli forces. That is roughly the same number of Palestinians killed in the West Bank from 2005 through 2022, according to the United Nations. Since 2023, 67 Israelis have been killed by Palestinians in the West Bank.

    As the violence mounts — and killings, burnings and lootings go unpunished — even some who once defended the occupation are sounding the alarm.

    “If I had to, I could make a legal defense of what the Israel Defense Forces have done in Gaza,” said Gal Levertov, the former head of the international division at the Ministry of Justice, who represented Israel before the International Criminal Court in The Hague.

    “But what is happening today in the West Bank?” he added. “It’s indefensible.”

    The Tour
    The retired Israeli generals came to the West Bank on a trip organized by Yaakov Or, himself a retired general who spent much of his career in the West Bank.

    Outraged by the escalating settler violence and what he views as the state’s involvement in it, Mr. Or has made it his mission to bring as many Israeli notables as he can to the West Bank to see for themselves.

    He often begins with a warning.

    “When I take you to see what is happening in the West Bank, you will have two choices,” he said to a group in June. “You can stay silent, and be complicit,” he told them, “or you can speak out, and tell everyone you know about what is happening.”

    He then invited anyone who preferred not to be put in that position to leave.

    Mr. Or, 79, began his military career fighting for Israel in the Arab-Israeli war of 1967, which ended with the Israeli occupation of the West Bank. He went on to oversee civilian and security affairs in the territory, before retiring from the state comptroller’s office, where he was responsible for investigating the Israeli defense establishment.

    Since he began organizing the tours a little over a year ago, more than 250 participants — former military brass, high-ranking intelligence officials, prominent lawyers, economists and diplomats — have joined.

    The New York Times accompanied him in June as he led several former officials including generals, a cabinet minister, a military aide to four prime ministers, an intelligence official, a state prosecutor and an ambassador on an arc through multiple villages in the middle of the West Bank. Along the way, highways were lined with Israeli flags, equally spaced, kilometer after kilometer.

    Mr. Or asked the visitors to note the miles of new fences erected by settlers to hem in Palestinian villagers and keep them from accessing their own land.

    And he urged participants to look for the prevalence of settler outposts, the makeshift frontier encampments placed on hilltops throughout the territory.

    “It is showing us the overall concept — how to widen areas of control and narrow the places where Palestinian communities can live,” he told them.

    ‘They Want to Take My House’
    In the village of Burin, Bashar Eid, a Palestinian farmer, took the visitors to his roof, limping behind them with a cane, the result of a settler attack that left him permanently impaired, he said.

    He told them about the constant attacks from settler outposts, which were visible from the roof, positioned along the hillsides surrounding him. The settlers enter the village every day, he said, even during the Sabbath.

    One recent morning, he said, he spotted a young settler boy walking on his land. When he asked him what he was doing, the boy told him to shut up or they would break his other leg.
    “A kid told me that,” he said, shaking his head.

    He could no longer farm his land, he said, because settlers attack him when he tries. His days have been reduced to sitting on his roof, watching for settler incursions.

    “I don’t know what to do,” he said. “They want to take my house.”

    The participants took notes as the heat bore down from above. The scent of sunscreen filled the air.

    A former chief state attorney raised his hand. “It is absurd that Israeli forces are not doing their duty to protect them — it is embarrassing to even ask, but why don’t the Palestinians defend themselves?” he asked.

    “I’m afraid if I defend myself, it will be even worse for us,” Mr. Eid said.

    Mr. Or agreed: Any violent response from the Palestinians would invite retribution, which would be much more severe and likely include the Israeli military, he said. Retaliation against the settlers would be deemed terrorism, prompting more crackdowns, he said.

    Raphael Schutz, a former Israeli ambassador to Spain, Norway and the Holy See, mopped sweat from his brow as he processed what he had heard.

    He thought of his mother, who had fled Nazi Germany as a 9-year-old with her parents and siblings, he said.

    Today, he said, when she watches videos of settlers setting cars ablaze and shooting innocent farmers, she feels shame.

    “To her,” said Mr. Schutz, 68, “it is inconceivable that Jews can behave this way.”

    “I’m glad I left the foreign service,” he added. “It would be impossible for me to explain this.”

    A Community Erased
    The Jordan Valley runs north to south along the banks of the Jordan River, a fertile plain that marks the eastern border of the occupied West Bank.

    In the last few years, settler violence has displaced several Palestinian communities from the area, largely Bedouin encampments like Hamamat al-Maleh.

    Just a few months ago, during a separate visit to the community by The Times, a few families were still holding on. Violent incursions in the middle of the night had already forced most to flee. But when we visited in February, we came across a couple of Palestinian families holed up in a stone edifice from Ottoman times, clustered together on mattresses on the bare floor.

    “We don’t even sleep an hour,” said Mohammad Khalil, 37, who was born in the community, as his father had been. “If they come and you’re asleep, you won’t survive it.”

    At the time, a school constructed with donor funds sat empty. The last of the students had fled a few days earlier. By March, after a series of settler raids, thefts and attacks, Mr. Khalil and the other holdouts gave up and left, too.

    Not long after, residents and activists said, settlers came with a bulldozer and leveled the school. Settlers shared a video of themselves celebrating Passover amid the ruins.

    By the time the retired Israeli generals and other dignitaries arrived in late June, the Palestinian residents were long gone. Mr. Or wanted to show them what an erased community looked like.

    The group walked past the broken school structure, where loose strands of rebar poked through the rubble like unkempt hair. A roll of artificial grass lay in dirty folds. A broken concrete wall betrayed traces of a destroyed mural.

    Within the old Ottoman structure, an office was upended. Desks in disarray, a door torn from its hinges lying on the floor.

    Elie Avidor, an activist who helps organize Israeli volunteers to protect Palestinians from settler attacks, said he was in the village not long after the school was destroyed and took video, which he later shared, of settler women and children looting notebooks and markers from the office.

    Left behind were piles of academic detritus, smashed cabinets, shards of glass and scattered papers.

    “When you are burning books, when you are destroying knowledge and attacking children, you’re like the Germans,” said Nehemia Dagan, 86, a retired Air Force general who helped build Israel’s helicopter capabilities and also served as the chief education officer of the Israel military.

    “We have lost ourselves, and we have lost this fight,” he said, shaking with rage.

    “We must separate,” he added, referring to the two-state solution, which would establish an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel. “Not for their sake, but for our own.”

    ‘It’s Like a Jail’
    On the last stop, in a barren valley in the northern Jordan Valley, a young Palestinian farmer stood before the ranks of Israeli visitors and pointed.

    Behind him, a settler outpost had been scraped into the side of a hill, the Israeli flag flying over it. In front of him, a few hundred feet away, stood a long line of Israeli flags, planted one after the next, as if lining a parade route.

    Nearby, settlers had erected a fence, turning his farm into something of a holding pen.

    “Six months ago, this was our land,” he said. “Now, it’s like a jail.”

    As recently as January, life in his village had been relatively normal, he said. They farmed, grazed their sheep, and came and went as they pleased.

    That ended abruptly with the arrival of the first settlers, who stationed themselves on the hillside, he said. Now, the farmer and his family could no longer use his farmland or harvest his crops.

    He was forbidden from accessing it, he told the assembled visitors, and every time he tried, settlers called the police. He had already been arrested four times, he said, though he was always released.

    But whenever he called the police to report harassment, or vandalism of his water tanks, “they never answer,” he said. The Israeli national police said they “investigate every complaint or incident involving suspected criminal activity, impartially.”

    The Palestinian farmer said he decided to sell his sheep, rather than lose them to settlers or starvation because he could no longer go out and graze them.

    “They should see this reality, and not accept it,” the farmer said, referring to the Israeli generals.

    Many of the men assembled had played their own roles in violence against Palestinians — authorizing killings and striking locations, knowing that children might die in some cases — because they believed it helped ensure Israel’s security.

    But the settler attacks in the West Bank were not making Israel safer, several of the retired generals said. Instead, the violence and intimidation were having the opposite effect, they argued.
    “When you ruin the image of Israel, the diplomatic value of Israel and the core values that hold the military together, you achieve nothing,” said Mr. Agmon, the retired Air Force general.
    “I’ve earned the right to speak,” added Mr. Agmon, 78, whose grandson, an Israeli soldier, was killed in Lebanon last year. “My family and I paid the highest price for this country.”
    “I am ashamed of what our people are doing here,” he said.

    Azam Ahmed is international investigative correspondent for The Times. He has reported on Wall Street scandals, the War in Afghanistan and violence and corruption in Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean.
    Natan Odenheimer is a Times reporter in Jerusalem, covering Israeli and Palestinian affairs.
    Ronen Bergman is a staff writer for The New York Times Magazine, based in Tel Aviv.
    Ivor Prickett is a photographer based in Istanbul. He covered the rise and fall of ISIS in Iraq and Syria while on assignment for The Times. More recently he has been working on stories related to the war in Ukraine.

  • Les États-Unis accusés d’avoir bombardé un mariage en Iran : ce que montrent les images - France 24
    https://www.france24.com/fr/moyen-orient/20260902-frappe-americaine-mariage-iran-images

    Des images montrent un bâtiment impacté à plus de 130 mètres d’une tour de communication, cible qui était probablement visée. Cinq personnes, dont un enfant, sont mortes.

  • Why the United States Can’t Quit Its Wars - The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/30/us/politics/us-wars-iran-afghanistan.html

    https://archive.ph/2026.08.31-003336/https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/30/us/politics/us-wars-iran-afghanistan.html

    Le nyt reconnaît que les guerres étasuniennes ne sont pas des guerres existentielles mais seulement en affirmant, #sans_vergogne :

    In most instances, U.S. troops have gone to war to impose order on an unruly world, or to defend American values. “We’re not fighting existential conflicts,” Mr. Hoehn said.

    Et le nyt compare l’agression (« la guerre ») contre l’Iran à celle contre l’Afghanistan (qualifiée sans ambiguïté de défaite) mais ne peut s’empêcher d’affirmer qu’elle est gagnable, probablement comme elle l’avait affirmé à l’époque pour l’Afghanistan :

    The challenge for the U.S. military resembles the one that it faced in Afghanistan. The Taliban insurgents were fighting for their survival. So too are Iran’s leaders.

    For the United States, the stakes are much lower, and so too are the costs of quitting.

    The U.S. military likely could open the Strait of Hormuz, which was open before the war started. “It is a doable task,” said Thomas G. Mahnken, who served as a senior Pentagon official under President George W. Bush. “But it would take some effort on the ground, just because the Iranians have spent decades building and fortifying positions.”

  • Opinion | This Is What It Feels Like to Live Through a Political Revolution - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/07/opinion/politics-revolution-trump-change.html

    (Le titre change)

    Milan Kundera has observed that vertigo is “something other than the fear of falling” — “it is the desire to fall, against which, terrified, we defend ourselves.” This is what I feel when we talk about political time in both Europe and America. Politics has become very fast. It reminds me of the early 1990s in Eastern Europe. On Friday you cannot believe what you were thinking on Monday. The speed of change is mind-blowing. It feels you are living in revolutionary time — but if this is a revolution, it is a revolution without a project.

    Normally revolutions are obsessed with the future, while one of the distinctive characteristics of our time is the negation of the future as something we are ready to make sacrifices for.

  • Opinion | What That $20 Burrito Says About the Psychology of Inflation - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/17/opinion/inflation-affordability-prices-burrito.html

    The burrito discussion is helpful because it reduces the economy to something you can get your hand around and taste. You can see the aluminum foil wrapper, subject to a 50 percent tariff. You can taste the Mexican tomatoes, carrying their own 17 percent tariff. You might be chewing on Aussie beef, which has been tariffed, untariffed, threatened with another tariff and then exempted. The avocados for our guac come tariff-free from Mexico because of a U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement exemption, and those exemptions appear to be at risk. The cheese and sour cream come from American farms, which are struggling with worker shortages after Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. And I would pass on the lettuce until food safety is improved.

    No wonder people aren’t happy about the price.

  • Ukraine’s Most Potent Weapon : The Software Orchestrating Its Drone Army - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/26/world/europe/ukraine-delta-battlefield-management.html

    La guerre des drones se joue dans la capacité à fusionner les données et à les proposer aux opérateurs le plus vite possible. Avec l’aide de l’IA, d’une interface utilisable, et de la capacité à orchestrer les différents outils disponibles (drones, artillerie).
    La guerre informatique est aussi une guerre d’innovation... jusqu’où nous mènera-t-elle ? Comme toujours, les guerres servent de banc d’essai pour toute une série de nouvelles approches guidées par le besoin d’un succès immédiat, indépendamment du recul éthique ou philosophique, ou démocratique. Quand on lit, cela, ça craint pour demain...

    The Delta system pulls together battlefield data to identify targets, creating a miles-wide “kill zone.” The technology is credited with helping to cut Russian advances to a near standstill.

    #Guerre #Drones #Informatique #Ukraine

  • How the U.S. Navy Is Helping Get Oil Through the Strait of Hormuz - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/19/business/iran-hormuz-oman-us-navy.html

    since May, the U.S. military has played a crucial role in getting millions of barrels of oil through the strait, helping to keep oil prices from rising further.

    The operation stealthily shepherds tankers through the southern part of the strait on routes close to Oman. Iran effectively controls which ships go through its side of the strait, opposite Oman.

    Before the war, about 15 million barrels of crude oil a day went through the Strait of Hormuz. In July, tankers using U.S. protected routes transported around five million barrels of oil daily out of the Persian Gulf, according to analysts.

    “It’s one of the surprising successes,” said Michelle Wiese Bockmann, a shipping analyst at Windward, a maritime analysis firm. “They have been extraordinarily effective in keeping that southern corridor operating, despite the attacks.”

    But the U.S. effort, which Iran opposes, has come at a cost.

    The U.S. military is deploying significant resources to get a limited amount of oil through the strait — something it did not have to do before the war, when tankers sailed freely through the waterway.

    […]

    The Navy has said it has about 20 warships in the Gulf of Oman, including the aircraft carriers Abraham Lincoln and George H.W. Bush, the destroyers escorting them, and even more destroyers enforcing President Trump’s renewed blockade of Iranian ports.

    How the Navy intends to keep such a large force of warships in the Middle East into the future is unclear, as all of the nearby ports in the region are within range of Iranian missiles. And although the service has more than 70 destroyers in the fleet, it has just 11 carriers. Not all of them are available to serve in the war, as some are undergoing maintenance in shipyards and one is scheduled for decommissioning next year.

    […]

    Given that Iran has regularly struck ships using the southern route, the U.S. protection has not been impregnable. But Capt. Tim Hawkins, a spokesman for Central Command, said: “It doesn’t mean the defense is ineffective. As you can see in the grand scheme, more ships are moving through than before.”

  • Trump’s ‘Economic D-Day’ for Iran Must Overcome a Troubled History - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/24/us/politics/trump-bessent-iran-economic-d-day.html

    But the effort raises a series of questions that the White House has not answered. First among them is why, if sanctions as airtight as these are possible, they were not employed before Mr. Trump ordered the U.S. military into battle, exposing shortages of key munitions and the limits of American military power? And now that the military has, in Mr. Bessent’s words, “laid the groundwork” for success, what about China — which purchased more than 80 percent of Iran’s oil exports in 2025? Is the administration willing to risk another direct confrontation with Beijing, with which it is already at odds over artificial intelligence, Taiwan, a rapid nuclear expansion and a huge production overhang that threatens the global economy?

    The original D-Day, on the shores of Normandy, did not require Chinese participation. This economic D-Day does, and there is no indication so far that it is forthcoming, a month before President Xi Jinping is scheduled to arrive in Washington for his first state visit in more than a decade.

    “This will be tricky,” Peter Harrell, a visiting scholar at Georgetown Law School who has written extensively on the limits of economic sanctions, said on Monday.

    […]

    Mr. Bessent threatened what are called “secondary sanctions” on all nations that continued to do business with Iran.
    But in an opinion article for The Financial Times over the weekend and at his news conference on Monday, Mr. Bessent never uttered the word “China.” He was going out of his way to avoid angering the world’s second-largest economy, and the one nation that may well determine whether this new White House strategy has a chance.

    […]

    […] one of the more curious elements of Mr. Bessent’s speech on Monday came when he returned to a promise made by Mr. Trump nearly six months ago: that he would establish the conditions for regime change.

    At the time, Mr. Trump thought the military battle would last a few days or weeks, before Iran offered what the president called “unconditional surrender.” He urged the Iranian people to rise up, and take over their government, after the smoke of the American bombing cleared. Mr. Trump soon abandoned that effort, acknowledging in an interview with The New York Times in June that the Iranian people simply did not have the guns or organization to make that happen.

    Mr. Bessent tried a slightly different approach on Monday.

    “To the ordinary soldiers supporting this regime,” Mr. Bessent said, “as more and more of your paychecks stop or are supposedly just delayed, ask whether your commanders are leading your country to triumph or to ruin, and recall that the Berlin Wall fell when ordinary soldiers decided not to shoot at their own people.”

    […]

    Yet that is Mr. Trump’s big bet right now. His decision in February to forgo the kind of sanctions announced on Monday, and to move right to military force, was in some ways an acknowledgment that economic sanctions move slowly, and that history suggests they often fail to work.

    Today, he is back to that plan, for absence of many other viable choices.

  • The U.S. Start-Up Making Low-Cost Interceptors for the Iran War - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/23/business/powerus-counter-drone-iran-war.html

    In a small warehouse in the United Arab Emirates, workers spend up to 12 hours a day snapping together 3-D printed components to make interceptors capable of knocking Iranian drones out of the sky at speeds of up to 200 miles per hour.

    The facility, which came online last month, is being used by Powerus, a start-up in West Palm Beach, Fla., to make inexpensive interceptors.

    The factory is the company’s first foray into the Middle East, and part of its plan to become a global supplier. Factories affiliated with Powerus make roughly 3,000 drone interceptors a month, a spokesman said, and the company is trying to establish a network of factories that will increase production to 15,000 a month worldwide by mid-2027. It would not publicly disclose the identities of its customers or contract manufacturer in the Emirates.

    Achieving those numbers requires a complete shift in the way business is done in a defense industry known for being slow, bureaucratic and expensive. To meet the urgent demands of U.S.-allied countries that are under threat, Powerus has teamed up with local manufacturers in regions where the interceptors are needed. This allows the company to make them quickly in existing factories, rather than build new plants in the United States and export the weapons.

    The Iran war has accelerated longstanding plans by the Emirates and other nations to make more weapons within their own borders. The civilian infrastructure of the Emirates was the most heavily targeted after the war started in February, as Iran sought to show its leverage over a symbol of global prosperity in the region. Now the need for more interceptors is critical as American-made stockpiles dwindle. More than 500 ballistic missiles and over 2,200 Iranian drones have been fired at targets in the Emirates. The attacks killed at least 15 people, injured hundreds, shut down an oil refinery and destroyed two Amazon data centers.

    Interceptors are like small missiles, designed to crash into and destroy airborne threats before they reach their targets. The interceptor that Powerus developed, called Guardian, costs about $5,000 and is based on a Ukrainian design that was effective against Russian Shahed drones.

  • How Big Tech Captured American Schools - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/23/business/schools-big-tech-google-microsoft.html

    As a journalist covering technology in schools, […] I was struck by how similar the sessions were to training I’d seen years earlier, while reporting on the health care industry: seminars for doctors, organized by pharmaceutical companies, that aimed to get physicians to prescribe the latest brand-name drugs.

    “Industry funds what helps industry,” Dr. Adriane Fugh-Berman, a pharmacology professor at Georgetown University Medical Center who studies drug industry influence on medicine, told me recently, as I was reporting a book about A.I. and computer science education in schools.

    These workshops have upsides. Big Pharma seminars can be useful for keeping physicians up-to-date on the latest patient remedies, and Big Tech workshops can similarly help educators keep current on the newest software tools. But Silicon Valley’s efforts to capture the attention of education professionals and provide student training materials can also double as marketing or indoctrination. They enable some of the most powerful corporations on the planet to spin rosy technology stories for administrators, teachers and students, giving them a sanitized view of industry practices and product risks.

    Many parents would likely object if, say, Exxon Mobil wrote their children’s environmental science curriculum. Or if Purdue Pharma trained their children’s biology teachers. Yet, over the last decade, schools have often embraced the technology industry in similar ways with few questions asked.

    […]

    The day after the Microsoft-led workshop in Manhattan, the American Federation of Teachers [A.F.T.], a national union with 1.8 million members, made a major announcement. The union was starting an ambitious program to train teachers nationwide on A.I., with $23 million in funding from Microsoft, OpenAI and Anthropic.

    […]

    After Ms. [Randi] Weingarten [the A.F.T. president] announced her union’s deal with Big Tech companies, a few teachers and professors publicly warned that the spread of A.I. chatbots could undermine their profession, by outsourcing and automating core tasks like giving students feedback on their work. One of the more forceful educators was Lois Weiner, an education professor emerita at New Jersey City University and a retiree member of the U.F.T., who argued on Bluesky that the national union was selling out to corporate interests.

    “This isn’t an alliance,” Ms. Weiner told me. “We aren’t sitting at the table. We’re the meal.”

    #IA #silicon_valley #éducation #écoles #corruption #syndicats #états-unis