https://i.guim.co.uk

  • Uber broke laws, duped police and secretly lobbied governments, leak reveals | Uber | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/news/2022/jul/10/uber-files-leak-reveals-global-lobbying-campaign
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/5a11a2e3eb94b741de55e754f3b6b7f1f837293d/0_0_5816_3490/master/5816.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    Marx appelle ça « le capitalisme sauvage » : s’imposer par la violence, imposer des,situations de fait et obtenir l’aval des autorités pour faire son trou. Viendra ensuite le temps de la loi et de la négociation, quand les fondations seront assurées et que le capital pourra s’imposer malgré tout.

    More than 124,000 confidential documents leaked to the Guardian
    Files expose attempts to lobby Joe Biden, Olaf Scholz and George Osborne
    Emmanuel Macron secretly aided Uber lobbying in France, texts reveal
    Company used ‘kill switch’ during raids to stop police seeing data
    Former Uber CEO told executives ‘violence guarantees success’

    #Uber #Macron #Violence #Lobbyisme

  • « #Uber_Files » : révélations sur le « #deal » secret entre #Uber et Emmanuel #Macron à Bercy

    Des documents internes à l’entreprise, analysés par « Le Monde », montrent comment, entre 2014 et 2016, le ministre de l’économie a œuvré en coulisse pour la société de #VTC, qui tentait d’imposer une #dérégulation_du_marché et affrontait l’hostilité du gouvernement.

    Premier octobre 2014. Depuis minuit, la toute nouvelle loi Thévenoud est entrée en vigueur : elle encadre beaucoup plus sévèrement les conditions pour devenir chauffeur Uber, trois ans après l’arrivée de l’entreprise américaine en France, et interdit de facto UberPop, le service qui a provoqué un gigantesque mouvement de colère des taxis dans l’Hexagone en permettant à tout un chacun de devenir chauffeur occasionnel. Mais à 8 h 30, ce matin-là, c’est un véhicule Uber un peu particulier qui se gare devant le 145 de la rue de Bercy – l’entrée du ministère de l’économie par laquelle passent les invités d’Emmanuel Macron, nommé un mois plus tôt à ce poste.

    « Meeting méga top avec Emmanuel Macron ce matin. La France nous aime après tout » Message du lobbyiste d’Uber Mark MacGann à ses collègues

    A l’intérieur du van Mercedes Viano se trouvent quatre figures d’Uber : Pierre-Dimitri Gore-Coty, le directeur Europe de l’Ouest, aujourd’hui chargé d’Uber Eats ; Mark MacGann, le lobbyiste en chef pour la zone Europe, Afrique, Moyen-Orient ; David Plouffe, l’ancien conseiller de Barack Obama, fraîchement nommé vice-président d’Uber ; et le fondateur et PDG de l’entreprise en personne, Travis Kalanick. Une heure plus tard, l’équipe de lobbying de choc ressort abasourdie du bureau d’Emmanuel Macron. « En un mot : spectaculaire. Du jamais-vu, écrit Mark MacGann dans un bref compte rendu envoyé dans la foulée à ses collègues. Beaucoup de boulot à venir, mais on va bientôt danser ;) » « Meeting méga top avec Emmanuel Macron ce matin. La France nous aime après tout », écrira-t-il également.

    Cette rencontre restée confidentielle ne figurait pas à l’agenda d’Emmanuel Macron. Le Monde et ses partenaires du Consortium international des journalistes d’investigation (ICIJ) sont aujourd’hui en mesure d’en révéler l’existence grâce à l’analyse d’une vaste quantité de documents internes d’Uber, transmis au quotidien britannique The Guardian. Ces « Uber Files », des dizaines de milliers d’e-mails, de présentations, de tableurs et de documents PDF, écrits entre 2013 et 2017, jettent un éclairage particulièrement cru sur ces années folles, émaillées de violences durant les manifestations de taxis, pendant lesquelles l’entreprise américaine a usé de toutes les recettes du lobbying pour tenter d’obtenir une dérégulation du marché en France.

    Surtout, ces documents montrent à quel point Uber a trouvé une oreille attentive chez Emmanuel Macron, qui scellera quelques mois plus tard un « deal » secret avec l’entreprise californienne pour « faire en sorte que la France travaille pour Uber afin qu’Uber puisse travailler en et pour la France ».

    Gouvernement court-circuité

    Les dirigeants d’Uber sont d’autant plus ravis de l’accueil extrêmement cordial du ministre de l’économie que le reste du gouvernement leur est très hostile. Le président François Hollande a bien rencontré très discrètement Travis Kalanick en février 2014, mais personne au sein de l’exécutif ne semble prêt à défendre Uber. Arnaud Montebourg, le prédécesseur d’Emmanuel Macron à Bercy, accusait directement Uber de « détruire des entreprises » ; au ministère de l’intérieur, Bernard Cazeneuve – qui a la tutelle des taxis – ne cache pas son hostilité au service, qui opère en marge de la loi et est visé par au moins quatre enquêtes différentes. Manuel Valls, premier ministre, n’a guère plus de sympathie pour Uber, et Alain Vidalies, aux transports, se méfie de ce service qui n’offre aucune sécurité de l’emploi. Lorsqu’il reçoit M. Kalanick, M. Macron ne peut ignorer qu’il court-circuite ainsi les décisions de ses collègues du gouvernement et des députés socialistes.

    L’actuel président de la République n’a jamais caché sa sympathie pour Uber et son modèle, à même, selon lui, de créer énormément d’emplois, notamment pour les personnes peu qualifiées. « Je ne vais pas interdire Uber, ce serait renvoyer [les jeunes de banlieue sans qualifications] vendre de la drogue à Stains [Seine-Saint-Denis] », avait-il déclaré à Mediapart en novembre 2016. Fin 2014, Emmanuel Macron défend très publiquement le modèle d’Uber lors de la conférence Le Web, durant laquelle il se prononce contre l’interdiction d’Uber à Paris et explique que « [son] job n’est pas d’aider les entreprises établies mais de travailler pour les outsiders, les innovateurs ».

    Emmanuel Macron a été, à Bercy, plus qu’un soutien, quasiment un partenaire

    Mais les « Uber Files » montrent à quel point Emmanuel Macron a été, à Bercy, plus qu’un soutien, quasiment un partenaire. Un ministre qui suggère à Uber de transmettre des amendements « clés en main » à des députés amis ; un ministre qu’Uber France n’hésite pas à solliciter en cas de perquisition dans ses locaux ; un ministre qui, ce 1er octobre 2014, « s’excuse presque » de l’entrée en vigueur de la loi Thévenoud, d’après un compte rendu du rendez-vous écrit par le lobbyiste Mark MacGann pour ses collègues anglophones. D’après ce message, M. Macron aurait affirmé vouloir aider Uber à « travailler autour » de cette loi.

    La rencontre d’octobre 2014 à Bercy avec Travis Kalanick est la première d’une longue série d’échanges avec le très controversé fondateur et PDG d’Uber, qui a quitté le conseil d’administration de l’entreprise en 2017 après une série de scandales de harcèlement et de conflits avec ses actionnaires. Au moins dix-sept échanges significatifs (rendez-vous, appels, SMS) ont eu lieu entre Emmanuel Macron ou ses proches conseillers et les équipes d’Uber France dans les dix-huit mois qui ont suivi son arrivée au ministère, dont au moins quatre rencontres entre le ministre et Travis Kalanick. Soit un échange par mois en moyenne.

    Relation « gagnant-gagnant »

    Les cadres d’Uber France entrevoient rapidement comment ils peuvent, dans une forme de symbiose, établir une relation « gagnant-gagnant » avec Emmanuel Macron, en fournissant au ministre des occasions de se présenter comme le champion de l’innovation, tout en assurant à l’entreprise des retombées médiatiques et politiques positives. Fin 2014, l’actualité offre un moment idéal : le géant du transport Mory Ducros, en grave difficulté financière depuis plusieurs années, s’apprête à déposer le bilan. Le dossier intéresse beaucoup Uber, et Travis Kalanick l’évoque avec Emmanuel Macron. Plutôt que de laisser les 2 200 salariés que compte encore l’entreprise perdre leur travail, pourquoi ne pas leur proposer de devenir chauffeurs Uber ? L’entreprise fait face à une pénurie de « supply » – « ravitaillement », le mot utilisé en interne pour désigner les chauffeurs.

    En février 2015, quand Mory Ducros dépose finalement le bilan, les principaux cadres d’Uber France voient une occasion parfaite pour « pousser » leur proposition de simplifier les conditions d’accès à la licence de VTC (véhicule de transport avec chauffeur). « Cela pourrait être une sortie de crise pour le ministre [Emmanuel Macron], avec des milliers de chauffeurs de poids lourds qui deviendraient chauffeurs Uber », écrit Alexandre Molla, responsable du développement d’Uber en France. « On devrait en parler aussi vite que possible au cabinet de Macron (…) pour voir si ça l’intéresserait d’explorer cette idée avec Travis Kalanick », répond Maxime Drouineau, de l’équipe affaires publiques d’Uber.

    Le projet n’aboutira jamais. Pas plus que celui, pourtant très avancé, d’organiser une visite des locaux d’Uber France et une rencontre avec des chauffeurs. Emmanuel Macron avait également donné son accord pour un détour par le siège californien d’Uber à San Francisco, en marge de son déplacement au Consumer Electronics Show, le salon des technologies de Las Vegas, visite qui n’aura jamais lieu. Fin 2015, un porte-parole d’Uber France s’agacera d’ailleurs publiquement que les rencontres avec son PDG ne soient « jamais inscrites à l’agenda » de ses interlocuteurs politiques.

    Dès sa première rencontre avec Travis Kalanick, le ministre s’engage à aider Uber qui est dans le viseur des services de la répression des fraudes

    En coulisse, en tout cas, Emmanuel Macron et son cabinet se démènent pour aider l’entreprise américaine. Dès sa première rencontre avec Travis Kalanick, le ministre de l’économie s’est engagé à donner un coup de pouce à Uber sur un dossier bien précis : la DGCCRF. A l’époque, la direction générale de la concurrence, de la consommation et de la répression des fraudes, sous la tutelle de Bercy, enquête sur Uber et son modèle, considérant qu’UberPop se présente de manière mensongère comme un service de covoiturage. Les contrôles de chauffeurs se multiplient et, à Paris, les cadres de l’entreprise se doutent qu’une perquisition est imminente. Ce 1er octobre 2014, Emmanuel Macron les rassure : opposé à ce que les agents de la DGCCRF soient « trop conservateurs » dans leur interprétation des textes, il demande à son cabinet d’avoir « une discussion technique » avec eux, selon un compte rendu de la réunion écrit par Uber.

    Mais six semaines après cette rencontre, et d’autres échanges plus informels, deux agents de la DGCCRF se présentent dans les locaux d’Uber France à Lyon. Trois jours plus tard, c’est le siège à Paris qui est visé par une perquisition. Depuis les Etats-Unis, David Plouffe, vice-président d’Uber, fulmine : « [Ces agents] dépendent de Macron, n’est-ce pas ? » Trois jours plus tard, le sujet est évoqué dans une nouvelle réunion entre Thibaud Simphal, directeur général d’Uber France, et Emmanuel Lacresse, le directeur de cabinet adjoint d’Emmanuel Macron, aujourd’hui député (Renaissance) de Meurthe-et-Moselle. « Lacresse a précisé que les grandes administrations comme la DGCCRF (…) fonctionnent principalement en autonomie, relate un compte rendu. Mais il a reconnu qu’il était important qu’ils agissent en cohérence, et donc il a dit qu’il leur parlerait. »

    La DGCCRF a-t-elle subi des pressions ? Non, assure-t-elle aujourd’hui. Sollicités, plusieurs de ses hauts responsables de l’époque, dont la directrice Nathalie Homobono, n’ont pas souhaité répondre aux questions du Monde. Quant à Emmanuel Lacresse, il affirme de son côté qu’à aucun moment « des consignes n’ont été données à la DGCCRF ».

    Un décret sur mesure

    Une situation similaire se produit en octobre 2015 : le préfet de police de Marseille, Laurent Nuñez, prend un arrêté interdisant de facto Uber dans une large partie des Bouches-du-Rhône. « Monsieur le Ministre, nous sommes consternés par l’arrêté préfectoral à Marseille », écrit aussitôt Mark MacGann, le lobbyiste en chef d’Uber, à Emmanuel Macron. « Pourriez-vous demander à votre cabinet de nous aider à comprendre ce qui se passe ? » Emmanuel Macron répond par SMS qu’il va « regarder cela personnellement ». Trois jours plus tard, la préfecture de police « précise » les contours de son arrêté : l’interdiction disparaît au profit d’une menace de contrôles accrus pour les chauffeurs qui ne seraient pas en règle.

    Laurent Nuñez, aujourd’hui coordonnateur national du renseignement à l’Elysée et proche conseiller d’Emmanuel Macron, assure n’avoir reçu aucune pression ni avoir eu aucun échange avec Bercy sur ce sujet ; d’anciens cadres d’Uber estiment que la préfecture se serait simplement rendu compte que son arrêté initial était illégal. M. Lacresse affirme de son côté que « le ministre n’est jamais intervenu auprès de la préfecture des Bouches-du-Rhône concernant la suspension du service UberX à Marseille, ni sur des procédures judiciaires quelles qu’elles soient concernant l’entreprise Uber ».

    La réaction agacée d’Uber face à l’arrêté marseillais est d’autant plus vive qu’à ce moment-là, l’entreprise est précisément en train de valider les contours précis d’un accord confidentiel avec Emmanuel Macron, proposé par le ministre. Le « deal », comme l’appellent les cadres d’Uber France, repose sur un échange simple : en contrepartie de la suspension d’UberPop, Emmanuel Macron leur fait miroiter une simplification drastique des conditions nécessaires pour obtenir une licence de VTC. Un accord « gagnant-gagnant » pour Uber, dont le service UberPop a déjà été jugé illégal à plusieurs reprises, et que l’entreprise réfléchit déjà à arrêter.

    Pour y parvenir, Emmanuel Macron et Uber s’accordent sur une stratégie commune. « Il veut que nous l’aidions en communiquant clairement et de manière agressive », écrit Thibaud Simphal, dans un compte rendu de réunion en janvier 2015. Première étape : Uber rédige directement des amendements parlementaires simplifiant les conditions d’accès à la licence de VTC, pour qu’ils soient proposés par des députés et discutés au cours de l’examen du projet de loi dite « Macron 1 » ; si leur adoption est peu probable à l’Assemblée, ils donneront plus de poids au ministre pour signer un décret qui n’aura pas besoin de passer par l’Assemblée.

    En janvier 2015, Uber France transmet donc des amendements « clés en main » au député socialiste Luc Belot, opposé à UberPop mais très favorable à Uber, avec qui ils sont déjà en contact. « Bon appel avec Luc Belot, député socialiste, soutien-clé des VTC et d’Uber, se félicite Thibaud Simphal, le 21 janvier. Il a fait allusion à Macron à plusieurs reprises, et aussi, de manière détournée, à notre rencontre [avec Macron] d’hier soir. Il veut que le dossier VTC avance. » M. Simphal retire de cet échange « l’impression » que le député « avait reçu un coup de fil de Julie Bonamy », la rapporteuse de la mission de Thomas Thévenoud sur les taxis et les VTC en 2014, voire « de Macron lui-même, étant donné le niveau de détail qu’il avait ». Sollicité par Le Monde, M. Belot reconnaît avoir déposé des amendements tels que rédigés par Uber ou légèrement modifiés, et explique avoir été en plein accord avec leur contenu, étant convaincu qu’Uber apportait des améliorations aux services de transport.

    Le plan se déroule sans accroc : les amendements présentés par Luc Belot sont rejetés ou retirés, mais Emmanuel Macron saisit l’occasion, à l’Assemblée, pour annoncer qu’un décret en reprendra les grandes lignes. Début 2016, le gouvernement réduit la durée de la formation nécessaire pour l’obtention d’une licence de VTC de deux cent cinquante à sept heures. Uber France conteste avoir obtenu une législation plus favorable à la suite de l’arrêt de Pop, et explique avoir stoppé ce service en raison du « niveau des violences visant nos utilisateurs, chauffeurs comme passagers, qui ne nous permettaient plus d’assurer leur sécurité », ainsi que par le placement en garde à vue de deux de ses cadres.

    Une forme de fascination

    Six mois plus tôt, le « deal » avait pourtant été entériné directement au plus haut niveau. Le 3 juillet 2015, Travis Kalanick envoie un SMS à Emmanuel Macron. Dans les jours précédents, le ministre de l’économie a discuté avec Bernard Cazeneuve et Manuel Valls pour leur présenter son « deal », et Uber a annoncé le matin même la suspension d’UberPop en France, mais Travis Kalanick, échaudé, se demande si l’intérieur est vraiment d’accord. « Pouvons-nous faire confiance à caz [Cazeneuve] ? », écrit M. Kalanick. « Nous avons eu une réunion hier avec le premier ministre, répond Emmanuel Macron. [Bernard] Cazeneuve s’assurera que les taxis restent calmes et je réunirai tout le monde la semaine prochaine pour préparer la réforme et corriger la loi. Caz a accepté le deal. Quand êtes-vous à Paris ? » A 20 heures, UberPop est définitivement mis hors ligne en France. M. Cazeneuve assure au Monde ne jamais avoir été consulté ou tenu au courant d’un accord de ce type.

    Conclu, le « deal » est rapidement mis à rude épreuve. Trois jours après cet échange, juste avant 8 heures, une vingtaine d’agents débarquent au siège d’Uber à Paris pour une perquisition. Très agacé par ce qu’il perçoit comme une trahison, Mark MacGann demande en parallèle à ses collègues de lui passer les enquêteurs au téléphone pour « brandir Macron, Caze, etc. », dans l’idée de se prévaloir de leur soutien.

    L’enquête, portant sur des soupçons d’évasion fiscale, est du ressort des services du ministère du budget, et non de ceux d’Emmanuel Macron. Mais cela n’empêche pas Mark MacGann d’envoyer immédiatement un SMS au ministre de l’économie, resté sans réponse : « Désolé de vous embêter, mais descente en ce moment d’une vingtaine de fonctionnaires de la direction des finances publiques. Ils disent qu’ils vont mettre [nos] dirigeants en garde à vue. (…) Nous avions l’espoir de pouvoir atteindre le fameux climat d’apaisement dès ce week-end. Pouvez-vous demander à vos services de nous conseiller ? »

    Quelle était la motivation d’Emmanuel Macron pour s’impliquer, avec tant d’énergie, aux côtés d’une multinationale américaine à la réputation sulfureuse ? Une convergence de vues politique, d’abord, en faveur d’une dérégulation rapide. Mais aussi une certaine fascination pour Travis Kalanick. Dans le très controversé fondateur d’une des entreprises les plus « disruptives » de la dernière décennie, le futur président voyait, semble-t-il, une sorte de double. A la veille de leur première rencontre, une collaboratrice d’Uber relatait ainsi une discussion avec son cabinet : « Emmanuel Macron est très intéressé par l’histoire de Travis, miroir de la sienne – moins de 40 ans et réussite impressionnante. »

    Sollicité, l’Elysée affirme que l’action de l’ancien ministre de l’économie rentrait dans le cadre classique des fonctions d’un ministre qui était « naturellement amené à échanger avec de nombreuses entreprises engagées dans la mutation profonde des services advenue au cours des années évoquées, qu’il convenait de faciliter en dénouant certains verrous administratifs ou réglementaires ».

    Ces bonnes relations se sont-elles poursuivies après le départ d’Emmanuel Macron de Bercy, et son arrivée à l’Elysée ? D’après le registre de la Haute Autorité pour la transparence de la vie publique, des représentants d’Uber ont rencontré des collaborateurs du président Macron à huit reprises entre 2017 et 2022. En 2018, Dara Khosrowshahi, le bien plus fréquentable remplaçant de Travis Kalanick, faisait partie des invités de marque du sommet Tech for Good, voulu et organisé par le président de la République. Une rencontre publique, et en grande pompe, cette fois.

    https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2022/07/10/uber-files-revelations-sur-le-deal-secret-entre-uber-et-macron-a-bercy_61342

    #Emmanuel_Macron #loi_Thévenoud #UberPop #Mark_MacGann #Pierre-Dimitri_Gore-Coty #David_Plouffe #Travis_Kalanick #Uber_France #DGCCRF #lobbying #lobby #justice #kill_switch #perquisition #obstruction_à_la_justice #optimisation_fiscale

    • « Macron a aidé Uber à piétiner la justice française.
      Ce n’est pas un bilan, c’est un vol en bande organisée… »

      « Macron a aidé Uber à installer son système illégal en France quand il était ministre de l’économie.
      Son bilan, c’est une immense affaire judiciaire… »

      https://twitter.com/realmarcel1/status/1546166083429830656?cxt=HHwWgMC86Yz3ivUqAAAA
      #UberFiles

      Jamais il ne représentera autre chose que les intérêts des lobbies.

      Honteux depuis 5 ans, et 5 ans de plus !

      Scandale #UberFiles. Commentaires des économistes et des journalistes macronisés, commentaires des Renaissants macronistes : banaliser le rôle des économistes libéraux, banaliser le #lobbying, banaliser le statut des ubérisés, banaliser le comportement de Sa Majesté Macron.

      https://twitter.com/HMaler/status/1546406962707005445?cxt=HHwWioC8pY-8-PUqAAAA

    • https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1546274785595998208/pu/vid/430x236/8wpmPfM6NKTHu6TF.mp4?tag=12


      Ça fait mal, les archives … 2017 (Rue 89)

      Un peu plus tard les députés godillots vote la charte de la transparence de la vie publique...

      Permettez que je pose un extrait de la charte signée par les députés en marche.
      Allez, je file, j’ai mon Uber qui m’attend.

    • « Nous avons vendu un mensonge à tout le monde » : Mark MacGann, le lanceur d’alerte des « Uber Files », se dévoile
      https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2022/07/11/nous-avons-vendu-un-mensonge-a-tout-le-monde-mark-macgann-le-lanceur-d-alert

      Le lobbyiste irlandais a été, durant deux ans, l’un des principaux responsables des affaires publiques d’Uber. C’est lui qui a transmis au « Guardian » les 124 000 documents qui constituent les « Uber Files ».

    • The Uber whistleblower: I’m exposing a system that sold people a lie | Uber | The Guardian
      https://www.theguardian.com/news/2022/jul/11/uber-files-whistleblower-lobbyist-mark-macgann
      https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/749495115679b5c78076050372922d703c8f291f/0_0_5000_3000/master/5000.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

      Exclusive: Mark MacGann says he has decided to speak out about firm to ‘right some fundamental wrongs’
      by Paul Lewis, Harry Davies, Lisa O’Carroll, Simon Goodley and Felicity Lawrence
      Mon 11 Jul 2022 16.55 BST
      Last modified on Mon 11 Jul 2022 16.56 BST

      Mark MacGann, a career lobbyist who led Uber’s efforts to win over governments across Europe, the Middle East and Africa, has come forward to identify himself as the source who leaked more than 124,000 company files to the Guardian.

      MacGann decided to speak out, he says, because he believes Uber knowingly flouted laws in dozens of countries and misled people about the benefits to drivers of the company’s gig-economy model.

      The 52-year-old acknowledges he was part of Uber’s top team at the time – and is not without blame for the conduct he describes. In an exclusive interview with the Guardian, he said he was partly motivated by remorse.

      “I am partly responsible,” he said. “I was the one talking to governments, I was the one pushing this with the media, I was the one telling people that they should change the rules because drivers were going to benefit and people were going to get so much economic opportunity.

      Q&A
      What are the Uber files?

      The Uber files is a global investigation based on a trove of 124,000 documents that were leaked to the Guardian by Mark MacGann, Uber’s former chief lobbyist in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. The data consist of emails, iMessages and WhatsApp exchanges between the Silicon Valley giant’s most senior executives, as well as memos, presentations, notebooks, briefing papers and invoices.

      The leaked records cover 40 countries and span 2013 to 2017, the period in which Uber was aggressively expanding across the world. They reveal how the company broke the law, duped police and regulators, exploited violence against drivers and secretly lobbied governments across the world.

      To facilitate a global investigation in the public interest, the Guardian shared the data with 180 journalists in 29 countries via the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ). The investigation was managed and led by the Guardian with the ICIJ.

      In a statement, Uber said: “We have not and will not make excuses for past behaviour that is clearly not in line with our present values. Instead, we ask the public to judge us by what we’ve done over the last five years and what we will do in the years to come.”

      “When that turned out not to be the case – we had actually sold people a lie – how can you have a clear conscience if you don’t stand up and own your contribution to how people are being treated today?”

      The senior role MacGann held at Uber between 2014 and 2016 put him at the heart of decisions taken at the highest levels of the company during the period in which it was forcing its way into markets in violation of taxi-licensing laws. He oversaw Uber’s attempts to persuade governments to change taxi regulations and create a more favourable business environment in more than 40 countries.

      He said the ease with which Uber penetrated the highest echelons of power in countries such as the UK, France and Russia was “intoxicating” but also “deeply unfair” and “anti-democratic”.

      In his wide-ranging interview, MacGann detailed the personal journey that led him to leak the data years after leaving Uber.

      “I regret being part of a group of people which massaged the facts to earn the trust of drivers, of consumers and of political elites,” he said. “I should have shown more common sense and pushed harder to stop the craziness. It is my duty to [now] speak up and help governments and parliamentarians right some fundamental wrongs. Morally, I had no choice in the matter.”

      The Guardian led a global investigation into the leaked Uber files, sharing the data with media organisations around the world via the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ).
      What are the Uber files? A guide to cab-hailing firm’s ruthless expansion tactics
      Read more

      Responding to the investigation, Uber acknowledged past failings but insisted the company had transformed since 2017 under the leadership of its new chief executive, Dara Khosrowshahi. “We have not and will not make excuses for past behaviour that is clearly not in line with our present values,” a spokesperson said.

      The Uber files consists of confidential company data that MacGann had access to at Uber. It includes company presentations, briefing notes, security reports and tens of thousands of emails and WhatsApp, iMessage and chat exchanges between the company’s most senior staff at the time.

      They include Travis Kalanick, Uber’s combative co-founder and then chief executive, David Plouffe, a former Barack Obama campaign aide who became a senior vice-president at Uber, and Rachel Whetstone, a British PR executive who has also held senior roles at Google, Facebook and now Netflix.

      When MacGann departed Uber in 2016, Whetstone described him as “a wonderful leader”. Plouffe called him a “talented public policy professional” and “terrific advocate for Uber”.

      The one-time cheerleader-in-chief for Uber in Europe, MacGann now looks set to become one of its sharpest critics.

      His profile as a senior executive and political insider make him an unusual whistleblower. So, too, does the fact he actively participated in some of the wrongdoing he is seeking to expose – and the fact it took him more than five years after leaving the company to speak out.

      The process through which he came to re-evaluate what he witnessed at Uber was a gradual one, he says. “When I decided I had an obligation to speak up, I then went about finding the most effective, impactful way in which to do that. Doing what I am doing isn’t easy, and I hesitated. That said, there’s no statute of limitations on doing the right thing.”

      MacGann is understood to have recently reached an out-of-court settlement with Uber after a legal dispute relating to his remuneration. He said he was prohibited from discussing his legal dispute but acknowledged he had had personal grievances with the company, which he alleges undervalued his role as an interlocutor with government and failed in its duty of care to him.

      He accuses Uber under Kalanick’s leadership of adopting a confrontational strategy with opponents in taxi industries, that left him personally exposed. As a public face of Uber in Europe, MacGann bore the brunt of what became a fierce backlash against the company in countries including France, Belgium, Italy and Spain.

      Amid threats to his life, he was given bodyguard protection. His experience of working at Uber, he says, took a mental toll and contributed to a subsequent diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
      Brazenly breaking the law

      A Brussels insider, MacGann was an obvious pick to lead Uber’s government relations in the Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) region in 2014. Born in Ireland, he speaks several languages and possessed an impressive contacts book built up over two decades in lobbying and public affairs.

      MacGann had worked at established public policy firms such as Weber Shandwick and Brunswick, and had run DigitalEurope, a trade association that advocated for companies such as Apple, Microsoft and Sony. His most recent job had been as senior vice-president at the New York Stock Exchange on a salary of $750,000 a year.

      MacGann took a significant salary cut to work at Uber for €160,000. But like all senior executives joining the company back then, the financial reward was in the promise of stock options that could be worth millions if Uber realised its global ambitions.

      Uber and its investors were eyeing vast returns if the tech company succeeded in its mission to deregulate markets, monopolise cities, transform transit systems and one day even replace drivers with autonomous vehicles. The plan, MacGann acknowledges, required Uber to flout the law in cities in which regulated taxi markets required hard-to-get licences to drive a cab.

      “The company approach in these places was essentially to break the law, show how amazing Uber’s service was, and then change the law. My job was to go above the heads of city officials, build relations with the top level of government, and negotiate. It was also to deal with the fallout.”

      MacGann started work for Uber around the summer of 2014, when he worked on contract for a European lobbying consultancy that Uber had hired to oversee government relations outside the US. In October 2014, Uber brought him in-house and put him in charge of public policy for the EMEA region.

      On his first day on staff, MacGann was in an Uber from London City airport when he got his first taste of the startup’s laissez-faire approach to privacy. After emailing a senior executive to tell them he was in traffic, MacGann received the reply: “I’m watching you on Heaven – already saw the ETA!”

      “Heaven”, otherwise known as “God View”, was the codeword Uber employees used at the time for a tool that allowed staff to surreptitiously use the app’s backend technology to surveil the real-time movements of any user in the world.

      “It felt like children playing around with powerful surveillance technology,” said MacGann. “Even back then it was dawning on me this was a rogue company.”

      In its statement, Uber said tools such as God View, which it stopped using in 2017, “should never have been used”. A spokesperson for Kalanick said it would be false to suggest he ever “directed illegal or improper conduct”.

      The Uber files contain some instances in which MacGann pushes back at the company’s operations and decisions. But, for the most part, the documents show him expressing little dissent over the company’s hardball tactics, and on some occasions he appears directly involved in wrongdoing.

      He describes himself as having been “drunk on the Kool-Aid” at Uber, a company he alleges did not encourage dissent or criticism. But he does not dispute he was at the heart of many of the controversies that have been revealed by his data leak.

      “I believed in the dream we were pushing, and I overdosed on the enthusiasm,” he said. “I was working 20 hours a day, seven days a week, constantly on planes, in meetings, on video conference calls. I didn’t stop to take a step back.”

      His whirlwind stint at the company involved meetings with prime ministers, presidents, transport and economy ministers, EU commissioners, mayors and city regulators.

      MacGann said most senior politicians were instinctively supportive of Uber, viewing the tech company as offering an innovative new platform that could allow for flexible working and help reboot economies after the financial crisis.

      However, it was a more mixed story in France, where Uber’s unlicensed service prompted taxi driver riots and divided the cabinet of the then president, François Hollande.

      On one side was Bernard Cazeneuve, the minister of the interior, who according to MacGann once summoned him to his office and threatened him with jail, saying: “I will hold you personally and criminally responsible if you do not shut it down by the end of the week.”

      On the opposing side of the debate was Emmanuel Macron, the pro-tech, pro-business economy minister who, the leak reveals, became something of a secret weapon for Uber.

      The data includes text message exchanges between MacGann and Macron, who was working behind the scenes to assist the US tech company. In one exchange, MacGann asks for Macron’s help in the midst of a raid on the company’s offices. In another he complains about an apparent ban on its services in Marseille.

      Macron told MacGann he would “personally” look into the matter. “At this point, let’s stay calm,” the minister said.

      MacGann recalls Macron as being “the only person who gave us the time of day … So he was a massive breath of fresh air.”

      Macron did not respond to detailed questions about his relationship with Uber. A spokesperson said his ministerial duties at the time “naturally led him to meet and interact with many companies” engaged in the service sector.

      After leaving Uber, MacGann maintained relations with Macron and helped raise funds for his La République En Marche party in 2016. He says his political support for the French president was a personal decision and had “absolutely nothing to do with Uber”. They continued to exchange text messages with one another up to as recently as April this year.

      ‘Speed dating for elites’

      The French president is not the only political figure who knows MacGann. He is on first-name terms with two former EU commissioners, Neelie Kroes and Peter Mandelson. After leaving Uber, MacGann maintained a business relationship Lord Mandelson, a former Labour cabinet minister.

      MacGann is also a familiar face among VIPs who attend the World Economic Forum in Davos, which he describes as “speed dating for elites”. He recalls persuading an initially reluctant Kalanick to attend the gathering in the Swiss Alps in 2016.

      “For a lobbyist, Davos is a wonderful competitive advantage that only money can buy,” he said. “Politicians don’t have a retinue of advisers and civil servants hanging around taking notes.”

      Uber’s executives met with the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, the Irish taoiseach, Enda Kenny, and the UK chancellor, George Osborne. Securing those meetings, MacGann said, was “a piece of cake”. “Uber was considered hot property.” So much so that when Kalanick met Joe Biden at the Swiss resort it was at the US vice-president’s request.

      The Uber files reveal that Kalanick fumed when he was kept waiting by Biden, texting other Uber executives: “I’ve had my people let him know that every minute late he is, is one less minute he will have with me.”

      However, it was another Kalanick text in the leak – in which the former CEO appears to advocate sending Uber drivers to a protest in France, despite the risk of violence – that has sparked headlines across the world.

      Warned by MacGann and Whetstone that encouraging Uber drivers to protest amid violent taxi strikes in Paris risked putting them at risk, Kalanick replied: “I think it’s worth it. Violence guarantee[s] success.”

      MacGann called Kalanick’s instruction to stage an act of civil disobedience with French Uber drivers, despite the risks, as a “dangerous” and “selfish” tactic. “He was not the guy on the street who was being threatened, who was being attacked, who was being beaten up.”

      Kalanick’s spokesperson said he “never suggested that Uber should take advantage of violence at the expense of driver safety” and any suggestion he was involved in such activity would be completely false. Uber acknowledged past mistakes, but said no one at the company, including Kalanick, wanted violence against Uber drivers.

      MacGann insists that Uber drivers were seen by some at the company as pawns who could be used to put pressure on governments. “And if that meant Uber drivers going on strike, Uber drivers doing a demo in the streets, Uber drivers blocking Barcelona, blocking Berlin, blocking Paris, then that was the way to go,” he said. “In a sense, it was considered beneficial to weaponise Uber drivers in this way.”

      The files show MacGann’s fingerprints on this strategy, too. In one email, he praised staffers in Amsterdam who leaked stories to the press about attacks on drivers to “keep the violence narrative” and pressure the Dutch government.

      Looking back, MacGann said: “I am disgusted and ashamed that I was a party to the trivialisation of such violence.”

      A parting of ways

      One of the worst flashpoints in Europe was at Brussels Midi train station, where Uber drivers lingered to pick up passengers who would otherwise be queueing at a regulated taxi rank. MacGann was first recognised there on 27 April 2015.

      “Got spotted by a bunch of taxi drivers at the train station arriving from London,” he emailed a colleague that day. “Seven of them followed me as I went to get my Uber, hurling insults and spitting … One of them ran after me for a while, intending to hurt my driver.”

      The colleague replied: “Thank God you made it … This weekend Uber driver and taxi driver got into a fistfight. Getting intense in Brussels.”

      The threats intensified over subsequent weeks. Emails show alarm at the company after a taxi driver trailed MacGann’s limousine to his apartment in Brussels and posted his home address on a “stop Uber” Facebook group in Belgium. Taxi drivers snapped surveillance-style photos of MacGann outside a hotel with friends and uploaded them to the internet.

      In August that year, a security report commissioned by Uber mentioned rumours that MacGann and another Uber executive were going to be “taken off the streets by a core group of taxi drivers”.

      Uber gave MacGann a personal team of bodyguards. An email states that between September and November 2015, the security team spent 619 hours shepherding him in Belgium alone, while Uber also beefed up security for foreign trips.

      During a protest in Brussels, about 100 taxi drivers gathered outside MacGann’s office in the city and blocked the road. An Uber security report described how an initially relaxed atmosphere became “more grim”. Fireworks were let off and riot police charged protesters.

      Taxi drivers at the protest attached “wanted” posters on the sides of their cars. They displayed photos of MacGann and two other Uber executives. The caption read: “International criminals.”

      In October 2015, MacGann emailed a colleague: “I have had bodyguards full-time now for five months and it is becoming very stressful.” A week later, he told Plouffe and Whetstone of his intention to resign. He officially departed four months later, on 12 February 2016.

      It seemed an amicable split. Publicly, he expressed no regrets and used his Facebook page to lavish praise on Kalanick.

      “Toughest boss I ever had and I’m a stronger leader for it,” he said, adding there was “no thing” he would change about his time at Uber. “Forget the hyperbole in the media; forget the intrigue; think about how pushing a button and getting a ride makes your life better.”

      Uber publicly commended MacGann’s work and asked him to stay on as a consultant.

      He was given a new job title – senior board adviser – and retained his Uber-provided emails, laptops and phones.

      That role ended in August 2016, after which MacGann took on a new job at a telecoms company and started his own business venture. It was a full year after leaving Uber that, MacGann says, he experienced his most “terrifying” ordeal as a perceived representative of the cab-hailing firm.
      ‘MacGann, we will get you’

      The incident outside Brussels Midi station was recorded in a police report, Uber emails and media reports. It took place between 11.45am and 12.15pm on 19 September 2017, shortly after MacGann arrived at the station.

      As he walked towards his waiting Uber, taxi drivers approached him and ordered him not to get into the car. One grabbed him by the arms to stop him from putting his bags in. Concerned for his safety, MacGann asked the Uber driver to lock the doors when he was in the car.

      Several more taxi drivers joined the fray, surrounding the car. MacGann called the police. A security report commissioned by Uber questioned whether the taxi drivers had recognised him. But he recalls the drivers yelling: “MacGann, we will get you, we know where you live.”

      He recalls them thumping on the windows and rocking the car from side to side. Three taxi drivers were taken to the police station, but no further action was taken.

      MacGann said he was left fearing for his life – and that of his Uber driver, who “was shaking and in tears, scared for his life”. “These taxi drivers had his licence number, they could come after him again. It just seemed to me that Uber viewed this guy as expendable supply – not an employee with rights.”

      Shortly afterwards, MacGann received an anonymous threat on Twitter: “One day police won’t be there and you’ll be alone. And we will see if money will help you.”

      MacGann held his former employer responsible. “I felt that Uber had caused this, by its ‘success at all costs approach’ that encouraged confrontations between Uber and taxi drivers … I started to feel it was indicative of Uber’s wider relationship with drivers, putting them in harm’s way for their own financial interests.”

      By mid-2018, MacGann said, the death of a close friend contributed to a deterioration in his mental health. A medical report from March 2019 said a subsequent diagnosis of PTSD was “evidently linked and impacted by the professional stress he had to endure” during his time at Uber.

      MacGann said that months of treatment and therapy between 2018 and 2019 – and an enforced period of personal reflection – led him to reassess his time at Uber. “I’d stepped off the corporate hamster wheel for the first time in decades. I emerged with a new sense of clarity about everything at Uber.”

      No longer living the fast-paced life of a corporate executive, MacGann had time to listen more carefully to the stories of Uber drivers who were ferrying him around. He credits those conversations with changing his understanding of what the company used to call “driver economics”.

      In its statement, Uber’s spokesperson said “driver earnings globally are at or near all-time highs today” and that Uber’s interests were “aligned with drivers, ensuring they have a positive experience earning on the platform”. If drivers were dissatisfied with its platform, she added, “they can and do choose to earn somewhere else”.

      Sharing secrets

      In February 2020, MacGann, increasingly angered by what he viewed as the mistreatment of drivers, tried to take action. Uber was appealing against a decision by Transport for London (TfL) to refuse the company a licence in the capital, on the grounds it failed to meet the “fit and proper” test.

      Emailing the mayor’s office, MacGann explained he was a former Uber executive with information to share in a “private and non-sensationalist manner, given my intimate knowledge of the company”. MacGann said he felt “frustrated” when his attempt to formally raise concerns about Uber did not receive a reply.

      In February 2021, MacGann went a step further. After reading about a French lawyer who was bringing a class action lawsuit against Uber on behalf of drivers, MacGann got in touch and offered to provide information to help their case. The lawyer visited him at his home and MacGann allowed him to take photographs of a small sample of Uber documents he had stored on his old computer.

      His relationship with the French lawyer turned out to be short-lived. But the dam had been broken. MacGann realised quite how many of Uber’s secrets he was sitting on.

      In January 2022, Uber’s former top lobbyist travelled to Geneva and met with reporters from the Guardian.

      He opened two suitcases and pulled out laptops, hard drives, iPhones and bundles of paper. He warned it would take a few days, at best, to explain everything he knew. “I’ve seen some really shady shit, to use one of the Silicon Valley expressions.”

      #Uber_Files #Mark_MacGann #Pierre-Dimitri_Gore-Coty #David_Plouffe #Emmanuel_Macron #Travis_Kalanick #Uber_France #DGCCRF #lobbying #lobby #justice #kill_switch #perquisition #obstruction_à_la_justice #optimisation_fiscale

    • non @sombre, Bouzou c’est celui-ci :
      https://seenthis.net/messages/927171#message927218

      Le 10 juillet 2022, l’enquête du Monde consacrée aux Uber Files montre que Bouzou, qui travaille avec plusieurs agences de lobbying à Paris, a rédigé au printemps 2015 pour la multinationale Uber, en échange d’une rémunération de 10 000 € hors taxe, une étude sur l’intérêt du service de voiture de transport avec chauffeur (VTC), « assortie d’un service après-vente auprès de la presse et des parlementaires »

      https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolas_Bouzou

    • J’ai découvert que cette vidéo capturée chez Twitter était dans ce tweet : https://twitter.com/MathildePanot/status/1546268571357089792

      Mais je ne vois pas trop d’où provient le passage mis en citation sous la vidéo. Erreur de mise en page de @marielle ?

      {Edit] A propos du mec de la vidéo, je suis sur une piste !!!

      L’article mentionné par le syndicaliste @SayahBaaroun
      ne donne plus accès à la vidéo du déjeuner entre lobbyistes d’Uber, députés et membres du cabinet Macron.

      On a retrouvé la vidéo !

      Il est maintenant temps de chercher qui est à la table (1:16). #UberFiles

      Source : https://twitter.com/Action_Insoumis/status/1546263495846551553

      Du coup : « On a les noms, on a la liste …on a les preuves …alors on va devant le juge ! »

  • Growing numbers of young Africans want to move abroad, survey suggests | Africa | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/13/young-africans-want-to-move-abroad-survey-suggests
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/feb0ab5767dd60d89a0216a08817b74e2f802853/0_25_4000_2400/master/4000.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    Growing numbers of young Africans want to move abroad, survey suggests
    Covid, climate, stability and violence contributing to young people feeling pessimistic about future, survey of 15 countries suggests
    Kaamil Ahmed
    Mon 13 Jun 2022 07.00 BST
    African youth have lost confidence in their own countries and the continent as a whole to meet their aspirations and a rising number are considering moving abroad, according to a survey of young people from 15 countries.
    The pandemic, climate crisis, political instability and violence have all contributed to making young people “jittery” about their futures since the Covid pandemic began, according to the African Youth Survey published on Monday.Only 32% of the 4,500 young people interviewed, aged 18-24, were optimistic about Africa’s prospects, according to the survey – a drop of 11% since the last survey of its kind published in early 2020.Many of them had their schooling suspended and they or their families had lost incomes because of the pandemic, said Ivor Ichikowitz, whose South African family foundation commissioned the report.“In many countries in Africa, it’s an election year or a year just before elections, and it’s kind of logical that people will see instability as a concern,” said Ichikowitz.“But marry that with lack of access to water, marry that with a major concern around terrorism, and you’ve now got a demographic a group of people that are very jittery about the future of the continent,” he said.“And the real bombshell out of the survey is that a very high percentage of the people in the response group are thinking about migration.”About 60% of Africa’s population is younger than 25, and more than a third is aged between 15–34 years old. By 2100, Africa will have the world’s youngest population with a median age of 35.

    #Covid-19#migrant#migration#afrique#sante#pandemie#jeunesse#emigration#education

  • Huge scale and impact of Israeli incursions over Lebanon skies revealed | Lebanon | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/09/huge-scale-and-impact-of-israeli-incursions-over-lebanon-skies-revealed
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/401f82c696b169575b6a60d550e7d3021e5a0d8b/516_11_2783_1671/master/2783.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    Perhaps less understood is the psychological effect of foreign warplanes dominating the skies above a civilian population. They often fly at low altitudes that cause alarm and panic.

    #Liban

  • Japan to reopen to foreign tourists after two-year pandemic closure | Japan | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/27/japan-to-reopen-to-foreign-tourists-after-two-year-pandemic-closure
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/888cb8f738988e79f918af974dab020b5fa2069d/506_78_5248_3149/master/5248.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    Japan to reopen to foreign tourists after two-year pandemic closure
    Government to allow in tourists from 98 countries and regions next month – but only as part of tour groups
    Agence France-Presse
    Fri 27 May 2022 04.20 BST
    Japan has announced it will end a two-year pandemic closure and reopen to tourists from 98 countries and regions next month, but travellers will only be allowed in as part of tour groups.The decision comes after the government last week said it would test allowing small group tours with visitors from the US, Australia, Thailand and Singapore from this month.
    On Thursday, the government revised border controls to resume accepting package tours from the 98 countries and regions – including Britain, the US, France, Spain, Canada and Malaysia – starting on 10 June.Japan will also expand the number of airports that accept international flights to seven, adding Naha in its southern Okinawa prefecture and New Chitose near Sapporo in northern Hokkaido.
    Japanese tourists at the entrance to Kiyomizu-dera temple in Kyoto
    Covid robbed Kyoto of foreign tourists – now it is not sure it wants them back. For most of the pandemic Japan has barred all tourists and allowed only citizens and foreign residents entry, though even the latter have periodically been shut out.All arrivals have to test negative to Covid before travel to Japan and many must be tested again on arrival, though triple-vaccinated people coming from certain countries can skip the additional test as well as a three-day quarantine required for others.Tour groups are expected to take responsibility for ensuring visitors respect Japan’s near-universal mask-wearing and other measures that have helped keep the toll from Covid comparatively low.Just how many people will be able to take advantage of the careful reopening is unclear as Japan is planning to double a daily entry cap, but only to 20,000.The prime minister, Fumio Kishida, has said he wants to ease border control measures, but moves are expected to proceed slowly, with strong public support for the current restrictions.Japan welcomed a record 31.9 million foreign visitors in 2019 and had been on track to achieve its goal of 40 million in 2020 before the pandemic hit.

    #Covid-19#migrant#migration#japon#sante#pandemie#tourisme#frontiere#economie#circulation

  • The international community must prevent the forcible transfer of Masafer Yatta communities, approved by Israel’s High court of Justice
    05 mai 2022 | B’Tselem
    http://www.btselem.org/press_release/20220505_international_community_must_prevent_the_forcible_transfer_of_masa
    https://www.btselem.org/sites/default/files/styles/1200x440/public/2022-05/khirbat_al_markaz.jpg?itok=uKhOKYgi.jpg

    After more than 20 years of legal proceedings, Israel’s High Court of Justice ruled yesterday (May 4) that the forcible transfer of hundreds of Palestinians from their homes and the destruction of their communities – for the clear purpose of taking over their lands in the service of Jewish interests – is legal. The justices have thus proved once again that the occupied cannot expect justice from the occupier’s court.

    The decision, weaving baseless legal interpretation with decontextualized facts, makes it clear that there is no crime which the high court justices will not find a way to legitimize. Employing sugarcoated language, hypocrisy, and lies, the justices once again fulfilled their role in Israel’s regime of Jewish supremacy and paved the way for the crime of forcible transfer to be committed, while reversing reality: the ruling cast Palestinian victims as the “unlawful” offenders, while portraying the apartheid regime as the victim.

    The international community must prevent Israel from forcibly transferring the Masafer Yatta communities and make sure, should this crime be committed, that those responsible for it – including government ministers, the military top echelons, and the supreme court justices – will be held accountable.

    #colonialisme_de_peuplement

    • Israeli court paves way for eviction of 1,000 Palestinians from West Bank area | Palestinian territories
      Bethan McKernan in Jerusalem | Thu 5 May 2022| The Guardian
      https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/05/israeli-court-evict-1000-palestinians-west-bank-area
      https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/7245e63f1d05567cc1b6412e1fa97a9588603088/0_233_5904_3543/master/5904.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

      After a two-decade legal battle, Israel’s high court has ruled that about 1,000 Palestinians can be evicted from an area of the West Bank and the land repurposed for Israeli military use, in one of the single biggest expulsion decisions since the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories began in 1967.

      About 3,000 hectares of Masafer Yatta, a rural area of the south Hebron hills under full Israeli control and home to several small Palestinian villages, was designated as a “firing zone” by the Israeli state in the 1980s, to be used for military exercises, in which the presence of civilians is prohibited.

      According to the Geneva conventions pertaining to humanitarian treatment in war, it is illegal to expropriate occupied land for purposes that do not benefit the people living there, or to forcibly transfer the local population. (...)

    • La justice israélienne donne le feu vert pour l’expulsion d’environ 1000 Palestiniens
      RFI - 5 mai 2022 - Avec notre correspondante à Ramallah, Alice Froussard
      https://www.rfi.fr/fr/moyen-orient/20220505-la-justice-isra%C3%A9lienne-donne-le-feu-vert-pour-l-expulsion-d-enviro

      Une délégation de l’Union européenne en visite avec l’ONG Breaking the Silence à Masafer Yatta, en octobre 2020. AFP - HAZEM BADER

      À Masafer Yatta, au sud de la Cisjordanie occupée, dans les collines à proximité d’Hébron, une douzaine de villages palestiniens et environ un millier de personnes peuvent être expulsés à tout moment, pour que les terres soient réservées à l’entraînement de l’armée israélienne. La Cour suprême l’a approuvé dans la nuit de mercredi au jeudi 5 mai, après vingt-trois ans de bataille judiciaire entre l’État hébreu et les habitants palestiniens.

      Pour les habitants, des bergers ou des agriculteurs palestiniens pour la plupart, c’est une zone rurale, pauvre, aride, de 3 000 hectares, avec des airs de paysages lunaires. Mais pour l’armée israélienne, cette étendue de terre a un autre nom : la zone de tir 918.

      Souvent, les soldats viennent s’entraîner, parcourent les champs en blindés et leurs hélicoptères volent tout près des maisons. Parfois, certaines d’entre elles sont détruites, au détriment de la communauté locale. La bataille judiciaire a duré vingt-trois ans. Dans la nuit de mercredi à jeudi, la Cour suprême a rendu sa décision, donnant le feu vert à l’expulsion et au transfert forcé d’environ 1 000 Palestiniens. Il s’agit d’une des plus importantes décisions d’expulsions depuis l’occupation israélienne des territoires palestiniens en 1967. (...)

  • Songs, tears and reunions: New Zealand welcomes back visitors as border reopens after two years | New Zealand | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/02/songs-tears-and-reunions-new-zealand-welcomes-back-tourists-as-border-r
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/9afee430ab09d0e72c4d2519ce6367e877a10d1a/116_58_4741_2845/master/4741.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    Songs, tears and reunions: New Zealand welcomes back visitors as border reopens after two years
    Vaccinated people from about 60 visa-waiver countries now able to enter as part of pandemic reopening plan
    Eva Corlett in Wellington
    @evacorlett
    Mon 2 May 2022 01.46 BST
    Last modified on Mon 2 May 2022 04.09 BST
    Māori songs, tearful embraces and a beloved New Zealand chocolate bar awaited international visitors arriving in New Zealand on Monday – the first foreign guests, other than Australians, to set foot in Aotearoa in more than two years.Since March 2020, the arrival terminals at New Zealand’s international airports have been desolate as the country swiftly closed the border to prevent the arrival of Covid-19.On Monday morning, the border reopened to vaccinated visitors from about 60 visa-waiver countries as part of the government’s phased reopening plan.The first travellers and returning New Zealanders touched down just after 6am at Auckland international airport from Los Angeles, with another flight from San Francisco arriving shortly after.
    (...) Vaccinated international visitors can enter New Zealand if they have had a negative pre-departure Covid test. On arrival, they must self-test for coronavirus, and unless it comes back positive there is no requirement quarantine or self-isolate. All other international visitors will be allowed to enter New Zealand from October, unless the government decides it is safe to do so earlier.
    The tourism minister, Stuart Nash, who greeted arrivals at the gate with a Whittaker’s Peanut Slab chocolate bar, told 1News the reunions “almost bring a tear to the eye”.“People haven’t seen each other for a long, long time – family and friends,” he said. “We have also, of course, got international business people [who] are able to reconnect and they are coming back.”Nash said that while the country is not yet quite back to normal, the reopening was another step towards it.“This has been a long time [coming] – this sends a signal we are now open for business … it is fantastic to see,” Nash said.“Today marks a milestone for visitors from our key northern hemisphere markets in the USA, UK, Germany, South Korea, Japan, Singapore, Malaysia, Canada and others, who can now jump on a plane to come here.”More than 30,000 people are arriving into the country each week – an increase on numbers throughout the pandemic, but well below pre-Covid levels, which were close to 25,000 people each day.
    Nash said international flight searches to New Zealand were running 19% higher than in pre-Covid times.Auckland airport’s chief executive Carrie Hurihanganui said 9,000 passengers would be arriving and departing on 43 international flights on Monday – three times the number in March. The airport has boosted its staff by 40 people, and will continue to do so in the coming months, she said.Hurihanganui said the reunions were giving her “goosebump moments”.“It’s been a pleasure to be here today, and the fact we can play a role in welcoming people back to Aotearoa is fantastic,” she told 1News outside the arrivals gate.

    #Covid-19#migrant#migration#nouvellezelande#frontiere#sante#ouverture#pandemie#vaccination#tourisme

  • "Friends no longer, Ukraine removes Russian statues and street names

    The Guardian, Thu 28 Apr 2022
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/28/friends-no-longer-ukraine-removes-russian-statues-and-street-names
    Lorenzo Tondo and Isobel Koshiw in Kyiv

    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/b943ced71bdf9e9b763415100afef017b85a7995/0_185_6720_4032/master/6720.jpg?width=620&quality=45&auto=format&fit=max&dpr=2&s=c2f023bbe029f4b7
    The head of a Russian worker, accidentally decapitated while the monument to friendship was pulled down in Kyiv on Tuesday. Photograph: Alessio Mamo/The Guardia n

    At 5.36 pm on Tuesday in the historic Kyiv district of Pecherskyi, an imposing Soviet-era bronze monument symbolising the friendship between Russia and Ukraine was accidentally decapitated and then deliberately dismantled to the applause of hundreds of people.

    As local officials explained, when one country invades and bombs another, killing its people, their friendship is over.

    The 40-year-old statue, depicting a Ukrainian and a Russian worker on a plinth, was pulled down on the order of local authorities in Kyiv. It is one of the first steps of a plan to demolish about 60 monuments and to rename dozens of streets associated with the Soviet Union, Russia and Russian figures, including the writers Tolstoy, Dostoevsky and Pushkin, as a result of the war between the two countries.

    Serhii Myrhorodskyi, 86, an architect from Kyiv, watched excitedly as the head of the Russian worker accidentally broke off from its body and tumbled to the ground during the removal. He did not appear bothered, despite the fact it was he who had designed the monument, erected in 1982 as a gift from the Soviet regime to the Ukrainian government.

    “It is the right thing to do,” he told the Guardian. “There is no friendship with Russia and there will not be any friendship for a long time while Putin and his gang are in this world. After they drop dead, maybe in 30 years, something will change.

    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/4366bbcd773dbe1e4088bac487e5e4ddef7e7d68/0_352_6720_4032/master/6720.jpg?width=620&quality=45&auto=format&fit=max&dpr=2&s=22ef27d033e70720
    The dismantling of the Soviet-era bronze monument
    A woman cheers as the Soviet-era monument in Kyiv symbolising the former friendship between Russia and Ukraine is dismantled. Photograph: Alessio Mamo/The Guardian

    “The presence of the monument that represents a friendship with Russia is a sin. Removing it is the only right decision. And we could use that bronze of which the monument is made. We could melt it down and sculpt a new monument dedicated to Ukraine the motherland, which would symbolise the unity of all Ukrainian lands.”

    “As for my emotions,” he added, “I am just happy to see that people are glad this whole thing is being taken away.”

    As the monument began to fall, the crowd chanted: “Glory to Ukraine, glory to the heroes, glory to the nation of Ukraine.”

    The mayor of Kyiv, Vitali Klitschko, who presided over the dismantling, said the removal of Russian symbols from the city was now under way. “You don’t kill your brother. You don’t rape your sister. You don’t destroy your friend’s country. That’s why, today, we have dismantled this monument, once created as a sign of friendship between Ukraine and Russia,” he said.

    Other cities in Ukraine have in recent days begun to rename streets associated with Russian figures or to dismantle monuments related to the Soviet Union.

    Memorial plaques for Soviet cities replaced with the names of Ukrainian cities
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/6425d68f27a2373c04d056471e66dafcdd359eec/0_399_6720_4032/master/6720.jpg?width=620&quality=45&auto=format&fit=max&dpr=2&s=390ab3b0aa45bc86 plaques for Soviet ‘hero cities’ that resisted the Nazis have been replaced with the names of Ukrainian cities under Russian occupation or attack. Photograph: Alessio Mamo/The Guardian

    The city of Ternopil, in western Ukraine, has renamed a street dedicated to the Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, the first man in space, and removed a Soviet tank and aircraft. The aircraft is to be replaced with a “heroes of Ukraine” monument.

    Fontanka, a village near Odesa, decided to turn a street dedicated to the poet Vladimir Mayakovsky into Boris Johnson Street, after the UK promised to send a £100m weapons package to Ukraine.
    Advertisement

    And the mayor of Dnipro, Borys Filatov, said streets named after Russian towns would be rededicated to Ukrainian cities and symbols: Abkhazia Street became Irpin, while the street of the 30th Irkutsk Division is now called Ukrainian Soldiers.

    Officials in Kyiv are to approve a law to rename 60 streets, meaning Russian writers and Ukrainians who wrote in Russian – or even assumed a Russian identity – are among those who may be written out of public life in the city. A metro station named after Tolstoy is on the list.

    The entrance to Leo Tolstoy Square metro station in central Kyiv
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/c4801ae1d3fc91c9c6399b2c80e53ccaa3915470/0_152_6720_4032/master/6720.jpg?width=620&quality=45&auto=format&fit=max&dpr=2&s=8812fbc7fa4e362e
    The entrance to Leo Tolstoy Square metro station in central Kyiv. Photograph: Alessio Mamo/The Guardian

    “The war changed everything and things have accelerated the times,” Alina Mykhailova, one of the two Kyiv city deputies who put forward the law, wrote on Facebook. “Finally, there is an understanding that [our] colonial heritage must be destroyed.”
    Advertisement

    Mykhailova and her colleague Ksenia Semenova campaigned for the removal of the People’s Friendship monument that was dismantled on Tuesday. There had been plans to remove the statue under Ukraine’s decommunisation laws passed in 2015, but at the time they received pushback from other members of the Kyiv city council, Mykhailova wrote.

    The Ukrainian language and Ukrainian national identity were suppressed by tsarist Russia and its Soviet successor. Russian was considered the language of high culture and official business, and many Ukrainians, particularly peasants who moved to the big cities after the second world war, adopted Russian to distance themselves from their rural origins.

    Perhaps more controversially, the de-Russification list includes Ukrainian-born writers such as Mikhail – or Mykhailo, in Ukrainian – Bulgakov, who was born in Ukraine, wrote about Kyiv, but had derogatory views about the Ukrainian language and Ukrainian national identity. His statue sits next to his former house on one of Kyiv’s most famous streets, which is now the Bulgakov Museum and is popular with tourists.

    “Only idiots could do this because Leo Tolstoy is a world-famous writer, not just Russian or Ukrainian,” said Ihor Serhiivych, a Kyiv resident, inside Leo Tolstoy Square metro station.

    “There are lots of [ethnic] Russians who live in Kyiv and they are probably doing more right now to protect Ukraine than those western Ukrainians who think of themselves as the elite,” Serhiivych said. He said there was a gulf in understanding between those Ukrainians who lived for a significant period under Soviet and tsarist rule and those in western Ukraine who did not.

    “If it was a Putin statue I would understand, but you have to differentiate between enemies and world-famous literature.”
    A Soviet monument to the tank divisions that fought against Nazi Germany is adorned with a Ukrainian flag
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/50410a1b3a1b5d094ffca715a89e8b31b4b0a96d/0_381_6720_4032/master/6720.jpg?width=620&quality=45&auto=format&fit=max&dpr=2&s=eb30be57f704533c
    A Soviet monument to the tank divisions that fought against Nazi Germany is adorned with a Ukrainian flag. Photograph: Alessio Mamo/The Guardian

    Another person at the station, Valetyna Hryhoryvycha, said: “I think people need to think about it a bit more. I don’t see how they relate to what’s happening now. It is part of our history.”

    Ivan Andreiev, who works near Bulgakov Museum, said: “I’m for the removal of the friendship monument because there can’t be friendship between enemies. But I think it’s a fake that they’re planning on taking down Bulgakov’s monument. What Russian or Ukrainian would vote for such a thing? It’s just history.”

    While Ukrainian authorities are working hard to disassemble the Russian monuments in their country, Moscow is doing the opposite in Ukrainian territories it has occupied, restoring statues and symbols of the Soviet era.

    Two weeks ago in the seaside town of Henichesk, in the Kherson region, which is occupied by the Russian troops, a familiar figure returned to the main square. A statue of the Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin, sporting his familiar goatee and moustache, was back on his pedestal, erected by Russian soldiers."

    #Contestedmonuments #Ukraine #Russie #Stalin #Marx #monuments #statue #soviet

  • Shanghai lockdown: some parents allowed to stay with Covid-positive children after backlash | China | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/07/shanghai-lockdown-some-parents-allowed-to-stay-with-covid-positive-chil
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/afcacc667f64f6e84fb3a4e5381b268dd005f536/0_171_3851_2310/master/3851.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    Shanghai lockdown: some parents allowed to stay with Covid-positive children after backlash
    Sanitation workers wearing PPE conduct disinfection work in Shanghai.
    Shanghai is allowing some parents to stay with their Covid-infected children during lockdown after a public backlash. Photograph: VCG/Getty Images
    Associated Press
    Shanghai is allowing at least some parents to stay with children infected with Covid-19, making an exception to a policy of isolating anyone who tests positive after a public outcry.The announcement came as China’s largest city remained in lockdown and conducted more mass testing on Wednesday following another jump in new cases.A top city health official said at a news conference that parents could apply to stay with children with “special needs” and accompany them if they fully comprehend the health risks and sign an agreement.
    The parents must wear masks, dine at a different time than their children, avoid sharing items with them and strictly follow all regulations, said Wu Qianyu of the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission. She did not define what qualified as “special needs.”Her announcement followed Chinese state media reports a day earlier that an isolation site set up at the Shanghai New International Expo Center was accepting children with parents. The city has opened sprawling isolation centres for tens of thousands of people to isolate the growing number of positive cases.Reports that parents were being separated from their infected children had sparked a wave of protest online last weekend, fuelled by photos showing several children in cots at a quarantine site with no parents in sight.Footage of a pet corgi being beaten to death on the streets of Shanghai over fears it may have the virus has also sparked outrage and frustration with China’s zero-Covid policy.
    “There is no humanity, and while the whole world is living a normal and orderly life, there are still ‘volunteers’ who have lost their humanity. Happening in China in 2022. Very sad,” one person wrote on Weibo.Last November, the death of another corgi – killed in its apartment while its owner was serving mandatory hotel quarantine in Jiangxi province – sparked a similar outcry.Shanghai reported 17,077 new cases detected over the previous day, all but 311 of them in people who showed no symptoms. Under China’s zero-Covid approach, the city requires all those who test positive to be held in designated locations for observation, along with their close contacts.The latest cases bring Shanghai’s total to about 90,000 in an outbreak that began last month. No deaths have been ascribed to the outbreak driven by the Omicron BA.2 variant, which is much more infectious but also less lethal than the previous Delta strain. Two deaths have been reported in another ongoing outbreak in Jilin province in China’s northeast.
    An official from the EU Chamber of Commerce in China joined a growing chorus of criticism of the Shanghai lockdown, which has disrupted daily life and commerce in a major financial and business centre.
    “Another really big fear is ending up in one of those mass central quarantine sites,” Schoen-Behanzin said in an online event for member companies and journalists.Others complained earlier about shortages of medical workers, volunteers and beds in the isolation wards. More than 38,000 health workers from 15 provinces have been sent to Shanghai to help with mass testing and other needs.Beijing is also tightening measures after 11 cases were detected in the Chinese capital in recent days. Authorities closed down a shopping and office centre in the busy Wangjing district and are requiring those arriving in the city to report to their place of work or residence within 12 hours and undergo a Covid-19 test within 72 hours. They must undergo another test within 48 hours of returning to their place of work.Despite growing public frustration and concerns about the economic effects, China says it is sticking to its hard-line “zero-tolerance” approach mandating lockdowns, mass testing and the compulsory isolation of all suspected cases and close contacts. While China’s vaccination rate hovers about 90%, its domestically produced inactivated virus vaccines are seen as weaker than the mRNA vaccines such as those produced by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna that are used abroad, as well as in the Chinese territories of Hong Kong and Macau. Vaccination rates among elderly people are also much lower than the population at large, with only around half of those over 80 fully vaccinated.

    #Covid-19#migrant#migration#chine#shangai#sante#confinement#isolement#zerocovid#vaccination#restrictionsanitaire#hongkong#macau

  • Shanghai lockdown: some parents allowed to stay with Covid-positive children after backlash | China | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/07/shanghai-lockdown-some-parents-allowed-to-stay-with-covid-positive-chil
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/afcacc667f64f6e84fb3a4e5381b268dd005f536/0_171_3851_2310/master/3851.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    Shanghai lockdown: some parents allowed to stay with Covid-positive children after backlash
    Sanitation workers wearing PPE conduct disinfection work in Shanghai.
    Shanghai is allowing some parents to stay with their Covid-infected children during lockdown after a public backlash. Photograph: VCG/Getty Images
    Associated Press
    Shanghai is allowing at least some parents to stay with children infected with Covid-19, making an exception to a policy of isolating anyone who tests positive after a public outcry.The announcement came as China’s largest city remained in lockdown and conducted more mass testing on Wednesday following another jump in new cases.A top city health official said at a news conference that parents could apply to stay with children with “special needs” and accompany them if they fully comprehend the health risks and sign an agreement.
    The parents must wear masks, dine at a different time than their children, avoid sharing items with them and strictly follow all regulations, said Wu Qianyu of the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission. She did not define what qualified as “special needs.”Her announcement followed Chinese state media reports a day earlier that an isolation site set up at the Shanghai New International Expo Center was accepting children with parents. The city has opened sprawling isolation centres for tens of thousands of people to isolate the growing number of positive cases.Reports that parents were being separated from their infected children had sparked a wave of protest online last weekend, fuelled by photos showing several children in cots at a quarantine site with no parents in sight.Footage of a pet corgi being beaten to death on the streets of Shanghai over fears it may have the virus has also sparked outrage and frustration with China’s zero-Covid policy.
    “There is no humanity, and while the whole world is living a normal and orderly life, there are still ‘volunteers’ who have lost their humanity. Happening in China in 2022. Very sad,” one person wrote on Weibo.Last November, the death of another corgi – killed in its apartment while its owner was serving mandatory hotel quarantine in Jiangxi province – sparked a similar outcry.Shanghai reported 17,077 new cases detected over the previous day, all but 311 of them in people who showed no symptoms. Under China’s zero-Covid approach, the city requires all those who test positive to be held in designated locations for observation, along with their close contacts.The latest cases bring Shanghai’s total to about 90,000 in an outbreak that began last month. No deaths have been ascribed to the outbreak driven by the Omicron BA.2 variant, which is much more infectious but also less lethal than the previous Delta strain. Two deaths have been reported in another ongoing outbreak in Jilin province in China’s northeast.
    An official from the EU Chamber of Commerce in China joined a growing chorus of criticism of the Shanghai lockdown, which has disrupted daily life and commerce in a major financial and business centre.
    “Another really big fear is ending up in one of those mass central quarantine sites,” Schoen-Behanzin said in an online event for member companies and journalists.Others complained earlier about shortages of medical workers, volunteers and beds in the isolation wards. More than 38,000 health workers from 15 provinces have been sent to Shanghai to help with mass testing and other needs.Beijing is also tightening measures after 11 cases were detected in the Chinese capital in recent days. Authorities closed down a shopping and office centre in the busy Wangjing district and are requiring those arriving in the city to report to their place of work or residence within 12 hours and undergo a Covid-19 test within 72 hours. They must undergo another test within 48 hours of returning to their place of work.Despite growing public frustration and concerns about the economic effects, China says it is sticking to its hard-line “zero-tolerance” approach mandating lockdowns, mass testing and the compulsory isolation of all suspected cases and close contacts. While China’s vaccination rate hovers about 90%, its domestically produced inactivated virus vaccines are seen as weaker than the mRNA vaccines such as those produced by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna that are used abroad, as well as in the Chinese territories of Hong Kong and Macau. Vaccination rates among elderly people are also much lower than the population at large, with only around half of those over 80 fully vaccinated.

    #Covid-19#migrant#migration#chine#shangai#sante#confinement#isolement#zerocovid#vaccination#restrictionsanitaire#hongkong#macau

  • Pour rappel, la France contemporaine a connu sa propre controverse sur le “rôle positif de la colonisation”, en particulier au moment de l’adoption de la loi du 23 février 2005 https://www.jeuneafrique.com/67587/archives-thematique/histoire-d-un-fiasco

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/apr/04/pupils-benefits-empire-ignorance-royals-caribbean-windrush
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/0e709d2cf9c1d0afd227c11d99e07a8015d4ebf2/0_13_3500_2100/master/3500.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    Teaching the ‘benefits’ of the British empire is just another attempt to stoke the culture war
    Kojo Koram, 4 April 2022

    The legacy of empire still shapes the world. But Kemi Badenoch’s plan will ensure that ignorance reigns over this.

    If the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge need some comfort reading after their awkward Caribbean tour, they could do worse than turn to Tony Blair’s autobiography. In 1997, Britain’s new prime minister travelled to Hong Kong to oversee its handover to China. Years later, Blair described how he had struggled through a conversation with the Chinese president, Jiang Zemin, on a subject of UK-China history, because, in his own words, Blair had “only a fairly dim and sketchy understanding of what that past was”. The history being discussed was the opium wars, the very reason why Hong Kong had become British in the first place. Yet here was a boarding school and Oxbridge-educated prime minister who had next to no knowledge of the history that produced the very event he had travelled to oversee.

    The impression many ministers give today is that students in British classrooms are being bludgeoned with never-ending tales of Britain’s imperial crimes. This is why the government is now looking to rebalance the scales with a new curriculum that highlights the “benefits” of the British empire, as well as its negatives. Building on last year’s controversial Sewell report, the plans promoted by the equalities minister Kemi Badenoch are part of a wider campaign to move the teaching of empire away from what the government fears is a culture of victimisation and identity politics in schools, instead framing the legacy of empire as a debate of pros and cons. Was the empire wrong? Was it right? Which bits of the empire were naughty or nice?
    (...)

    #Grande_Bretagne #empire_britannique #postcolonialisme #enseignement

  • Fertility myths put millions off contraception, UN report warns | Global health | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2022/mar/30/contraception-myths-mean-nearly-half-of-pregnancies-worldwide-unintende
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/f850258c94ac2a37410e81f1ffc7b9216ce3d492/0_371_5568_3341/master/5568.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    Myths and misinformation surrounding the use of contraception are putting women off using modern family planning methods, the UN population fund has warned, as figures showed that nearly half of all pregnancies worldwide are unintended.

    More than half of all pregnancies—~121 million—are unintended. But lack of access to family planning isn’t the issue—myths, stigma, and misinformation are to blame, says UNFPA, according to a recent UNFPA report, The Guardian reports.

    ~250 million+ women aren’t using effective contraception, despite wanting to avoid getting pregnant

    +60% of unintended pregnancies end in abortion; ~45% of all abortions are unsafe

    Women from around the world in a small survey cited the rumors they’d heard, that contraceptives make people grow fat, or cause infertility and cancer.

    Shame stigma, fear, poverty, gender inequality and many other factors undermine women and girls’ ability to choose, writes UNFPA executive director Natalia Kanem in the report’s foreword—raising “provocative and unsettling questions about how much the world values women and girls beyond their reproductive capacities.”

    A solution: The report calls for governments to deliver comprehensive sexuality education to combat myths—and promote communication, consent, and respect.

    The Quote: “For the women affected, the most life-altering reproductive choice – whether or not to become pregnant – is no choice at all,” Kanem told The Guardian.

    #Contraception #Avortement #Grossesse #Féminisme

  • The CDC is beholden to corporations and lost our trust. We need to start our own | The People’s CDC | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/apr/03/peoples-cdc-covid-guidelines
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/c67201f8766f20632a0d6fa5a6ef7bcdc02dc831/0_73_3000_1800/master/3000.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    Released four days before the State of the Union, the new CDC measures and the narrative they created let President Biden claim victory over the virus via sleight of hand: a switch from standard reporting of community transmissions to measures of risk based largely on contentious hospital-based metrics. The previous guidelines called anything over 50 cases per 100,000 people “substantial or high.” Now, they say 200 cases per 100,000 is “low” as long as hospitalizations are also low.

    The resulting shift from a red map to a green one reflected no real reduction in transmission risk. It was a resort to rhetoric: an effort to craft a success story that would explain away hundreds of thousands of preventable deaths and the continued threat the virus poses.

    The desires of corporate America have been prioritized over the health needs of our people – especially our most vulnerable

    These new guidelines are at odds with evidence-based and equitable public health practice in three fundamental ways.

    First, they do not intend to prevent disease spread. By minimizing the importance of new cases, and focusing instead on hospitalizations–a lagging indicator–the revamped warning system delays action until surges are well underway and the consequences of severe disease and death are already in motion. Making matters worse, at-home tests are not recorded in the US, so the only “early indicator” in the risk level calculation grossly undercounts the true number of cases.

    Thirdly, the guidelines are blatantly political. The new recommendations aim to convince the public that this pandemic is over when it is not. They suggest we tolerate the nearly one million US dead, and too-quickly abandon measures that would keep that number from growing. They suggest we continue to isolate those with chronic illness and disability while the rest return to “normal” life. They suggest Long Covid isn’t the rapidly growing crisis that it is, especially for those fully vaccinated, despite documented risks of ongoing and sometimes disabling symptoms. They dismiss the near-inevitable emergence of new variants. They dismiss the urgency to vaccinate the rest of the world.

    Simply changing the metrics gave jurisdictions across the US a false sense of security

    Before the new CDC guidelines, the vulnerable were moderately protected by local mask mandates, passing shelter-in-place recommendations, and general support for public health interventions aimed at collective well-being. There was at least some urgency around vaccination campaigns and occupational protections against the virus. There was recognition that Covid was still a threat.

    Changing the metrics alone permitted jurisdictions across the US to retire mask mandates and people to retire their masks. As successful health campaigns are interrelated, efforts to vaccinate against Covid and improve ventilation in schools and at work have also lost steam. The shift from red to green reflects both major US parties turning the page on the virus as a political problem rather than a change in the reality of the pandemic. And the red to green shift also paved the way for the political class to wash their hands of would-be fights over Covid funding.

    We need a CDC that prioritizes the health of the people, not the health of big business. We need a People’s CDC. And so we formed one.

    We’re epidemiologists and physicians, artists and biologists. We’re children, parents, and grandparents. We’re living with Long Covid and losses of loved ones. We’ve come together with a common anger at our government’s disregard for social and public health responsibilities. Though many of us have just met, we inherit hundreds of years of resistance traditions.

    We greet this work with humility, recognizing there are still many uncertainties about new variants, Long Covid, and the future of therapeutics. Yet we know enough to reject, with certainty, ineffectual public health policies based on individualistic approaches. And we are certain that there is another way - that collective action has always and can now create a new way forward in responding to Covid and other deadly pathogens.

    We’ve already put out a statement and recommendations about BA 2, a statement regarding the CDC’s new recommendations and we brought together a coalition of groups to create an equity-focused toolkit to help parents and teachers demand the best Covid protections in schools. We are in the midst of developing COVID “weather reports” on the state of the pandemic based on epidemiological data rather than what corporate America demands.

    The People’s CDC is a collective of public health practitioners, scientists, healthcare workers, educators, advocates and people from all walks of life who care about reducing the harmful impacts of Covid-19. The People’s CDC is volunteer-run and independent of partisan political and corporate interests. A copy of the People’s CDC report on the change in the CDC’s Covid-19 guidelines can be found at peoplescdc.org.

    #Covid #Politique #Santé_publique #USA #CDC

  • De la Syrie à l’Ukraine, les similitudes des guerres menées par la Russie
    https://www.francetvinfo.fr/monde/europe/manifestations-en-ukraine/de-la-syrie-a-l-ukraine-les-similitudes-des-guerres-menees-par-la-russi

    Le siège de la ville de Marioupol rappelle celui d’Alep. Dans les deux pays, l’armée russe déploie une stratégie parfois comparable.

    C’était aussi l’armée Russe qui pilotait la stratégie en Irak, à Falloujah. Et l’armée Russe au Liban et à Gaza. Et Mogadiscio aussi. On ne parle pas assez de la façon dont la stratégie russe est spécifique quand il s’agit d’utiliser des bombes et de détruire des villes.

    • Même impression hier en écoutant la radio : ça commentait doctement sur l’usage des bombardements massifs destinés à terroriser, et la destruction des infrastructures, décrites assez explicitement comme un truc qui caractériserait Poutine. Et tout le long je me disais que ces gens n’avaient jamais entendu parler de la doctrine Shock and Awe, pourtant parfaitement officielle, appliquée par les Américains.
      https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choc_et_effroi

      Le choc et l’effroi sont le plus souvent définis par Ullman et Wade comme l’effet obtenu par la domination rapide d’un adversaire. C’est l’état désiré d’un sentiment d’impuissance et de perte de volonté. Selon eux, il peut être obtenu par la destruction des centres de commandement ennemis, une suppression sélective des informations diffusées et la propagation de désinformation, le débordement des forces adverses, et la rapidité d’action.

      […]

      Bien qu’Ullman et Wade affirment que « la réduction des pertes civiles, des morts, et des dégâts collatéraux a un sens politique qui aurait besoin d’être compris sur le front », leur doctrine requiert pourtant l’interruption de tous les moyens de communication, de transports, de production alimentaire, de distribution d’eau, et toutes les autres infrastructures6, et, en pratique,« l’usage approprié du Choc et de l’effroi doivent provoquer […] un sentiment de menace et de peur d’agir, qui peuvent abattre totalement ou en partie la société adverse, ou réduire considérablement ses capacités de combattre par la destruction des moyens matériels »7.

      Les auteurs imaginent l’exemple d’une invasion de l’Irak vingt ans après l’opération Tempête du désert : ils affirment qu’« abattre le pays nécessiterait d’une part la destruction physique d’infrastructures ciblées, et d’autre part l’interruption et le contrôle de tous les flux d’informations et commerciaux importants, et ce de façon si rapide qu’on puisse obtenir un choc comparable à celui obtenu par les bombardements nucléaires d’Hiroshima et de Nagasaki sur les Japonais »8.

      Commentateurs qui semblent aussi ignorer comment les Israéliens mènent leurs guerres : Doctrine Dahiya
      https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctrine_Dahiya

      La Doctrine Dahiya est une doctrine militaire formulée par le général israélien Gadi Eizenkot qui se rapporte au contexte de guerre asymétrique en milieu urbain, et prône un usage de la force « disproportionné » au cours de représailles contre des zones civiles servant de base à des attaques, dans un but de dissuasion. Il s’agit, en dépit du principe de base du droit de la guerre, de ne plus faire de distinction entre cibles civiles et militaires1.

      Cette doctrine porte le nom du quartier chiite d’habitations de Beyrouth qui abritait un bastion du Hezbollah avant d’être rasé par l’aviation israélienne au cours du conflit israélo-libanais de 2006.

      Quelques jours plus tôt, j’avais l’impression qu’on expliquait que le recours à des mercenaires était une innovation de Poutine, et que c’était d’ailleurs bien la preuve de la faiblesse et du manque de motivation de son armée. Ces gens n’avaient jamais entendu parler de Blackwater en Irak, apparemment.

      https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Société_militaire_privée

      Les Anglo-Saxons, notamment les Américains, disposent des plus grosses ESSD. Aujourd’hui CONSTELLIS group regroupe Triple canopy, Olive Group et Academi (ex Blackwater / XE). Gardaworld vient de racheter la société AEGIS fondée par l’ex-colonel britannique Tim Spicer.

    • Et ça c’est Beyrouth, que les progressistes du Guardian décrivent ainsi : « A Hezbollah stronghold in a Beirut suburb reduced to rubble by Israeli air strikes in August 2006 »
      https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/08/hezbollah-rearms-against-israel
      https://i.guim.co.uk/img/static/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2009/11/8/1257682433674/The-rubble-of-buildings-h-001.jpg?width=620&quality=45&auto=format&fit=max

      La différence semble donc que Poutine cible spécifiquement les civils, alors que notre camp du bien et du bon goût cible spécifiquement des « places fortes ».

    • C’est d’ailleurs un des aspects insupportables de tous ces textes adressés « à nos amis naïfs des gauches occidentales » à chaque nouvelle guerre : en prétendant à chaque fois que cette guerre-là est totalement nouvelle, que la situation n’a rien à voir avec les précédentes… ça impose l’amnésie et autorise les gens à proférer des phrases comme celle-ci dans l’article que tu cites :

      « d’une brutalité classique dans l’histoire militaire russe »

    • C’est toujours (très) délicat à commenter, les destructions d’une armée d’occupation. Mais cela fait 3 semaines que les superlatifs pour décrire les destructions en Ukraine tentent de répondre aux images qui arrivent de là bas. Et c’est à chaque fois poussif, mais poussif. L’autre fois, c’était un téléphone qui filmait, et qui passait dans une rue. Un immeuble avait visiblement pris feu. Mais il n’était pas écroulé. Et les immeubles autour étaient intacts. Je ne dis pas qu’il n’y a pas de destructions. Je dis que pour le moment, c’est bien moins impressionnant que les quelques exemples cités au Moyen Orient en particulier. Je trouve, à vrai dire, l’armée russe très précautionneuse, pour ce que les images nous montrent. Ce qui fera dire à certains qu’ils (les russes) n’étaient pas prêts et qu’ils ont déjà perdu. Et ça ne fait que depuis le début qu’ils tiennent ce discours.

  • How Covid helped China tighten its hold on Hong Kong | Hong Kong | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/28/covid-china-hong-kong
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/74eace71692be6d33cfb0f3ce882530bafac3827/0_107_3275_1964/master/3275.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    How Covid helped China tighten its hold on Hong Kong
    Doctors from the mainland are treating patients and Chinese workers are building hospitals as Beijing’s presence is felt like never before
    Traffic is busier than usual in Lok Ma Chau, a village on Hong Kong’s northern border. Heavy-duty trucks shuttle mainland Chinese workers to and from the wetland district, where they are building a makeshift hospital to treat Covid-19 patients.The hubbub would have been unimaginable a year or even a month ago. The Asian financial capital is separated from the southern Chinese city of Shenzhen by a winding river. But in early March, a makeshift bridge linking the two cities was erected. Satellite images show the foundations of the structure being laid days before the Hong Kong government announced the project.
    Since its opening, the two-lane crossing in Hong Kong’s northernmost district has emerged as a physical manifestation of the shrinking space between Beijing and the semi-autonomous territory, and that gap has closed faster than ever during the pandemic.A former British colony, Hong Kong was returned to China in 1997 under the “one country, two systems” arrangement negotiated with Britain. The framework allowed the city to preserve rights and freedoms not afforded across the border for 50 years, enabling its rise as a global, freewheeling hub in the heart of Asia.
    Government workers in protective gear on a Hong Kong street this year
    Hong Kong Covid crisis: why is the death rate so high?Yet Beijing has attempted to bring the territory under its wing since then.A visitation scheme introduced in 2003 made it easier for mainland Chinese travellers to come to Hong Kong. In 2012, with Beijing’s support, Hong Kong proposed a patriotic education curriculum, which triggered citywide protests.Then in 2020, the national security law, a response to large-scale demonstrations that broke out in 2019, was passed by Beijing’s top legislature and enacted in Hong Kong a year later without being reviewed by local lawmakers. Scores of veteran pro-democracy activists have been arrested under the law.But it took a pandemic – specifically, Covid-19’s highly transmissible Omicron variant – for Beijing’s presence in Hong Kong to be felt in ways like never before.
    In late February, Hong Kong announced that it would invoke an emergency ordinance so the city could “draw on [the] mainland’s support” and “undertake key anti-epidemic projects at full speed”, a press release read.
    At a treatment facility set up in the cavernous AsiaWorld-Expo convention centre, elderly patients are now being tended to by mainland Chinese doctors and nurses. Under the emergency laws, the medical staff were able to bypass licensing exams and registration procedures normally required for staff who aren’t trained locally. Authorities said computers for recording patient information had been changed from English to Chinese to accommodate them.Hong Kong’s chief executive Carrie Lam has said the territory ‘cannot let existing laws stop us from doing what we should do’ during Covid.Hong Kong’s chief executive Carrie Lam has said the territory ‘cannot let existing laws stop us from doing what we should do’ during Covid. Meanwhile, Hong Kong’s chief executive, Carrie Lam, announced during a coronavirus press briefing on Friday that the city would be distributing rapid test kits, face masks and a traditional Chinese medication – Lianhua Qingwen – to households, donated by the mainland.
    The medication, which has been registered with the city’s pharmaceutical board, has been flagged by health authorities in Singapore and the US for being advertised with unsupported claims.“Beijing has been trying to mould Hong Kong into another [Chinese] city,” says Lynette Ong, a political science professor at the University of Toronto. “The Covid crisis gives them a legitimate reason to do so.”Besides the construction of a Covid-19 hospital in Lok Ma Chau, mainland China has already assisted Hong Kong with the building of five other isolation facilities for patients with mild or no symptoms. China and Hong Kong are among the last places in the world that still isolate or hospitalise Covid patients who are in a stable condition.
    Infrastructure projects in Hong Kong typically involve construction firms submitting tenders to compete for billion-dollar contracts. But all of the facilities being built with mainland aid have been handed over to Chinese State Construction Engineering, a state-owned company.At an opening ceremony for the newest centre in the northern district of Yuen Long, top Hong Kong officials stood at attention as a video of toiling construction workers, portrayed as worked-to-the-bone heroes, played before them. A song in Mandarin, instead of the Cantonese language spoken in Hong Kong, played in the background.“The scale and speed at which these projects were finished is unprecedented,” Hong Kong’s leader Lam said at the Thursday ceremony. “This will go down in the history of Hong Kong’s Covid-19 fight.”
    Lam is used to talking about the crisis in terms of conflict. “In an environment as urgent as this, we cannot let existing laws stop us from doing what we should do … this is not the mentality for fighting a war,” she said in February.Jeffrey Wasserstrom, a history professor at the University of California, Irvine, says “there was once a chasm separating what takes place in Hong Kong from what takes place across the mainland border”. That chasm is getting smaller.
    Under the national security law, spaces like independent newsrooms, universities and civil society groups have felt a chill as Beijing seeks to integrate Hong Kong further into its fold.And as Hong Kong prepares to welcome a batch of traditional Chinese medicine practitioners to staff treatment facilities and open more isolation camps built by mainland workers, the assimilation is now playing out more publicly than ever.
    “The way that Covid has been handled by the Hong Kong authorities has demonstrated that the ‘one country, two systems’ concept is a pale shadow of what it once was,” Wasserstrom says.

    #Covid-19#migration#migrant#chine#hongkong#sante#zerocovid#securite#politique#frontiere#chinecontinentale#medecinechinoise#circulationtherapeutique

  • ADL leaders debated ending police delegations to Israel, memo reveals | US policing
    Sam Levin and Alex Kane | Thu 17 Mar 2022 | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/mar/17/adl-police-delegations-israel
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/41714b6a8d7342c28becf6fdc13fea5f6edcd58e/0_214_4032_2419/master/4032.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    Senior leaders of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the US-based non-profit organization known for combatting antisemitism and tracking extremism, debated whether to end a controversial program that connects American law enforcement officers with police leaders and members of the military in Israel, a 2020 internal document reveals.
    (...)
    The draft document said termination of the program was the “best approach” since it would “eliminate a program with limited impact and high controversy”. (...)

    #violences_policières

  • They are ‘civilised’ and ‘look like us’: the racist coverage of Ukraine | Moustafa Bayoumi | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/mar/02/civilised-european-look-like-us-racist-coverage-ukraine
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/0d0e08359c7bba730b13cce27e148aff0dbc14d8/0_440_4007_2405/master/4007.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    They are ‘civilised’ and ‘look like us’: the racist coverage of Ukraine
    Moustafa Bayoumi
    Moustafa Bayoumi

    Are Ukrainians more deserving of sympathy than Afghans and Iraqis? Many seem to think so
    Wed 2 Mar 2022 15.35 GMT

    While on air, CBS News senior foreign correspondent Charlie D’Agata stated last week that Ukraine “isn’t a place, with all due respect, like Iraq or Afghanistan, that has seen conflict raging for decades. This is a relatively civilized, relatively European – I have to choose those words carefully, too – city, one where you wouldn’t expect that, or hope that it’s going to happen”.

    If this is D’Agata choosing his words carefully, I shudder to think about his impromptu utterances. After all, by describing Ukraine as “civilized”, isn’t he really telling us that Ukrainians, unlike Afghans and Iraqis, are more deserving of our sympathy than Iraqis or Afghans?

    Righteous outrage immediately mounted online, as it should have in this case, and the veteran correspondent quickly apologized, but since Russia began its large-scale invasion on 24 February, D’Agata has hardly been the only journalist to see the plight of Ukrainians in decidedly chauvinistic terms.
    Advertisement

    The BBC interviewed a former deputy prosecutor general of Ukraine, who told the network: “It’s very emotional for me because I see European people with blue eyes and blond hair … being killed every day.” Rather than question or challenge the comment, the BBC host flatly replied, “I understand and respect the emotion.” On France’s BFM TV, journalist Phillipe Corbé stated this about Ukraine: “We’re not talking here about Syrians fleeing the bombing of the Syrian regime backed by Putin. We’re talking about Europeans leaving in cars that look like ours to save their lives.”

    In other words, not only do Ukrainians look like “us”; even their cars look like “our” cars. And that trite observation is seriously being trotted out as a reason for why we should care about Ukrainians.

    There’s more, unfortunately. An ITV journalist reporting from Poland said: “Now the unthinkable has happened to them. And this is not a developing, third world nation. This is Europe!” As if war is always and forever an ordinary routine limited to developing, third world nations. (By the way, there’s also been a hot war in Ukraine since 2014. Also, the first world war and second world war.) Referring to refugee seekers, an Al Jazeera anchor chimed in with this: “Looking at them, the way they are dressed, these are prosperous … I’m loath to use the expression … middle-class people. These are not obviously refugees looking to get away from areas in the Middle East that are still in a big state of war. These are not people trying to get away from areas in North Africa. They look like any.” Apparently looking “middle class” equals “the European family living next door”.

    And writing in the Telegraph, Daniel Hannan explained: “They seem so like us. That is what makes it so shocking. Ukraine is a European country. Its people watch Netflix and have Instagram accounts, vote in free elections and read uncensored newspapers. War is no longer something visited upon impoverished and remote populations.”
    Advertisement

    What all these petty, superficial differences – from owning cars and clothes to having Netflix and Instagram accounts – add up to is not real human solidarity for an oppressed people. In fact, it’s the opposite. It’s tribalism. These comments point to a pernicious racism that permeates today’s war coverage and seeps into its fabric like a stain that won’t go away. The implication is clear: war is a natural state for people of color, while white people naturally gravitate toward peace.

    It’s not just me who found these clips disturbing. The US-based Arab and Middle Eastern Journalists Association was also deeply troubled by the coverage, recently issuing a statement on the matter: “Ameja condemns and categorically rejects orientalist and racist implications that any population or country is ‘uncivilized’ or bears economic factors that make it worthy of conflict,” reads the statement. “This type of commentary reflects the pervasive mentality in western journalism of normalizing tragedy in parts of the world such as the Middle East, Africa, south Asia, and Latin America.” Such coverage, the report correctly noted, “dehumanizes and renders their experience with war as somehow normal and expected”.

    More troubling still is that this kind of slanted and racist media coverage extends beyond our screens and newspapers and easily bleeds and blends into our politics. Consider how Ukraine’s neighbors are now opening their doors to refugee flows, after demonizing and abusing refugees, especially Muslim and African refugees, for years. “Anyone fleeing from bombs, from Russian rifles, can count on the support of the Polish state,” the Polish interior minister, Mariusz Kaminski, recently stated. Meanwhile, however, Nigeria has complained that African students are being obstructed within Ukraine from reaching Polish border crossings; some have also encountered problems on the Polish side of the frontier.

    In Austria, Chancellor Karl Nehammer stated that “of course we will take in refugees, if necessary”. Meanwhile, just last fall and in his then-role as interior minister, Nehammer was known as a hardliner against resettling Afghan refugees in Austria and as a politician who insisted on Austria’s right to forcibly deport rejected Afghan asylum seekers, even if that meant returning them to the Taliban. “It’s different in Ukraine than in countries like Afghanistan,” he told Austrian TV. “We’re talking about neighborhood help.”

    Yes, that makes sense, you might say. Neighbor helping neighbor. But what these journalists and politicians all seem to want to miss is that the very concept of providing refuge is not and should not be based on factors such as physical proximity or skin color, and for a very good reason. If our sympathy is activated only for welcoming people who look like us or pray like us, then we are doomed to replicate the very sort of narrow, ignorant nationalism that war promotes in the first place.
    Advertisement

    The idea of granting asylum, of providing someone with a life free from political persecution, must never be founded on anything but helping innocent people who need protection. That’s where the core principle of asylum is located. Today, Ukrainians are living under a credible threat of violence and death coming directly from Russia’s criminal invasion, and we absolutely should be providing Ukrainians with life-saving security wherever and whenever we can. (Though let’s also recognize that it’s always easier to provide asylum to people who are victims of another’s aggression rather than of our own policies.)

    But if we decide to help Ukrainians in their desperate time of need because they happen to look like “us” or dress like “us” or pray like “us,” or if we reserve our help exclusively for them while denying the same help to others, then we have not only chosen the wrong reasons to support another human being. We have also, and I’m choosing these words carefully, shown ourselves as giving up on civilization and opting for barbarism instead.

    Moustafa Bayoumi is the author of the award-winning books How Does It Feel To Be a Problem?: Being Young and Arab in America and This Muslim American Life: Dispatches from the War on Terror. He is professor of English at Brooklyn College, City University of New York. He is a contributing opinion writer at Guardian US

    #Ukraine #racism #orientalisme

  • Patrick Radden Keefe on exposing the Sackler family’s links to the opioid crisis | Opioids crisis | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/feb/27/empire-of-pain-patrick-radden-keefe-sackler-opioid-crisis-oxycontin

    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/cf7748e0504c704d45a29d51b325ff6789a6f86d/0_27_8192_4918/master/8192.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    Très intéressant portrait de Patrick Radden Keefe.

    In the afterword to Say Nothing, he describes his approach as “narrative non-fiction”. How would he define the term? He thinks for a moment. “I worked as a research assistant for thehistorian Simon Schama at Columbia and he would always talk about narrative history – that he was not just writing for other historians. In my own way, I want to write something that is sophisticated and rigorous but approachable by anyone. You don’t have to have an interest in big pharma or the Troubles, because hopefully the characters and their dynamics will be rich and intriguing enough that I can pull you into their world.”

    His books, I say, are often as suspenseful and as tightly structured as crime fiction. “Well, that’s good to hear… I do use certain devices that may be more familiar from fiction. I’m thinking about a person reading my book on the subway. You don’t take that reader for granted, so you cannot be shy about thinking about character and suspense and editing in a way that’s compelling for the reader.”

    For Say Nothing, which explores the darkest aspects of the Troubles through a single killing, Keefe drew on long interviews given to others – including the veteran Irish journalist and author Ed Moloney – by former IRA members. One of them was with Dolours Price, who before her death admitted that she had driven McConville across the border into County Louth, where she was executed. I wondered if Keefe’s interest in the dark dramas of the Troubles emerged from his Irish-American upbringing.

    “People see my name and know I come from Boston, so they often assume I must have some personal connection, which is not true. I’d never heard of Dolours Price until I read her obituary in 2013, but she was so fascinating on so many levels. This was someone who took people across the River Styx, but, in middle age, she was having misgivings. The collision between her beliefs and her humanity was right there on the surface.”

    Is the saga of the Sacklers is a quintessentially American tale, I wonder. He mulls this over for a long moment. “On one level, yes, because it illustrates the belief that many immigrants have that you can come to America, and in the space of one lifetime, completely transform the fortunes of your family, rise to the pinnacle of society and leave your mark on your new country. But it is also a story about corporate impunity and impunity for the super-rich. The whole last third of the book is about the bad guy getting away with it in the end. To me, that’s a story I could just as readily see taking place in London, as indeed it has – because many of the Sacklers are based there. You have to remember that OxyContin generated upwards of $35bn. That buys a level of influence that is hard to fathom.”

    #Patrick_Radden_Keefe

  • ‘Today we rejoined the world’: hugs, tears and Vegemite as Australia reopens international borders | Australia news | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/feb/21/today-we-rejoined-the-world-hugs-tears-and-vegemite-as-australia-reopen
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/cdc2546686ee1a7199bfe99db7bc413b6b89819b/0_195_8192_4918/master/8192.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    ‘Today we rejoined the world’: hugs, tears and Vegemite as Australia reopens international borders; There were tears, DJs, Vegemite and drag queens as families, friends and lovers reunited at Sydney airport after the resumption of all international travel to Australia.While a number of expert bodies including the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the European Council have warned against travel to Australia due to soaring Covid-19 case numbers over summer, the federal government has vowed to keep the borders open.The federal minister for trade, tourism and industry, Dan Tehan, who was at the airport on Monday morning, said it was a “great day” for Australia’s tourism industry – battered by years of shutdowns.
    “It’s been a party out here at Sydney airport,” Tehan said, a bright blue T-shirt emblazoned with the words “Welcome back” visible underneath his suit jacket.“To see the way people have been united – the hugs, the tears – has been wonderful. The future is looking very, very bright.“I’ll do everything possible to keep the border open.”
    At 6.20am, a Qantas flight from Los Angeles was the first to touch down at Sydney airport, marking the end of 704 days of restrictions on international travel.Fifty-six flights were expected to arrive in Australia on Monday, more than half of them landing in Sydney.The New South Wales premier, Dominic Perrottet, said there was a “buzz and excitement” in the air as the state rejoined the world.“It’s been a long journey, a long journey through Covid,” he said.“But having our borders open, not just here, but around our country will make a real difference in people’s lives; we’re seeing families being reunited … international students return.“Today we rejoined the world, and what a positive thing it is.”At the arrivals hall, travellers were greeted with koala and kangaroo toys, Vegemite and eucalyptus sprigs, while a DJ atop a bus played Australian hits such as Men at Work’s Down Under and Yothu Yindi’s Treaty.(...)

    #Covid-19#migrant#migration#australie#sante#pandemie#retour#tourisme#frontiere#circulation#famille#vaccination#zerocovid