Seenthis
•
 
Identifiants personnels
  • [mot de passe oublié ?]

https://tante.cc

  • ►/2026
    • ►/02
      • ►/14
        • ►/diffusion-of-responsibility
    • ►/01
      • ►/25
        • ►/winning-the-wrong-game
  • ►/2025
    • ►/03
      • ►/16
        • ►/its-all-hallucinations
  • ►/wp-content
    • ►/uploads
      • ►/2026
        • ►/02
          • ►/bfaamvcm5kc.jpg
      • ►/2025
        • ►/03
          • ►/DP808068-1200x1502.jpg
  • ►/2015
    • ►/09
      • ►/08
        • ►/why-we-cant-have-nice-things-lessig2016-edition
  • @monolecte
    Monolecte 😷🤬 @monolecte CC BY-NC-SA 14/02/2026
    4
    @biggrizzly
    @rezo
    @b_b
    @colporteur
    4

    Diffusion of Responsibility
    ▻https://tante.cc/2026/02/14/diffusion-of-responsibility

    https://tante.cc/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/bfaamvcm5kc.jpg

    But now we have “AI” and everyone can generate some code. That might work. Or might mine some crypto or give your laptop an STI. Decades of collective work proving that “open source” is not less but at least as secure as commercial offerings now slowing going down the drain. Because a bunch of men – and it is always all men – just don’t want to be responsible for their actions. Which is fine if you are 5. But after 18 it gets old really fucking fast.

    We deserve good software in a world where participation is often connected to having access to a computer, to software, etc. We should push towards more reliable software, more secure software, software that is accessible, that protects people against misuse and allows them to be as safe as possible in doing what they want to do.

    What do we get? Slop. Slop generated by guys who – when called out for their irresponsible behavior – just start crying about how they only wanted to “share” or “inspire” or “educate” while handing out running chainsaws to kids.

    And that was what makes me fucking furious. Not just these dudes being spineless but the disrespect to those who have run serious projects for decades to build a more humane stack.

    And it reminds me that “Open Source” is not enough. Open source code can still be harmful to you and your digital existence, can put you in danger without you realizing it. We need something better. Something more.

    We need to be willing to take responsibility for and care of one another. “AI” generated software is the opposite of that.

    Coda: Never forget. Nothing only men like is cool.

    #IA

    Monolecte 😷🤬 @monolecte CC BY-NC-SA
    • @b_b
      b_b @b_b PUBLIC DOMAIN 16/02/2026

      (Sidenote: It should be the law that when you offer or run an “AI” you are 100% liable for everything it does. Sure, that would kill the whole industry but who gives a shit?)

      But this is a pattern that the whole “AI” acceptance movement is establishing that preys on our experience of being able to rely on open source projects who take their product, their work and their users’ safety seriously and invalidates decades of hard work establishing that kind of trust .

      b_b @b_b PUBLIC DOMAIN
    • @b_b
      b_b @b_b PUBLIC DOMAIN 16/02/2026

      Peter Steinberger rejoint OpenAI et promet qu’OpenClaw restera open source

      ▻https://next.ink/brief_article/peter-steinberger-rejoint-openai-et-promet-quopenclaw-restera-open-source

      b_b @b_b PUBLIC DOMAIN
    Écrire un commentaire
  • @biggrizzly
    BigGrizzly @biggrizzly CC BY-NC-SA 26/01/2026
    3
    @chankalan
    @ericw
    @simplicissimus
    3

    Winning the wrong game
    ▻https://tante.cc/2026/01/25/winning-the-wrong-game

    With #studies upon studies showing that actual measurable #productivity gains through “#AI” (which these days basically means chatbots) are really hard to come by and that “#workslop” (meaning the extra work created for the rest of the organization by one person using “AI” lowering their work quality) eats up a lot of what might have been productivity #gains many critics feel somewhat relieved: When the main narrative of “AI” (massively increased productivity) fails, this surely marks the end of this bubble and we might be able to get back to talking about actual problems.

    BigGrizzly @biggrizzly CC BY-NC-SA
    Écrire un commentaire
  • @valnum
    valnum @valnum 17/03/2025

    It’s all hallucinations

    ▻https://tante.cc/2025/03/16/its-all-hallucinations

    > But I think that this discourse misses an important thing : Anything an LLM generates is a hallucination.

    https://tante.cc/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/DP808068-1200x1502.jpg

    On parle d’hallucinations quand une intelligence artificielle générative produit une phrase contenant de fausses informations.

    Or, la machine n’ayant aucune notion de vrai ou de faux, la vérité est qu’elle ne produit que des hallucinations, dont certaines s’avèrent être accidentellement vraies.

    valnum @valnum
    Écrire un commentaire
  • @archiloque
    Archiloque @archiloque CC BY 8/09/2015

    Why we can’t have nice things, #lessig2016 edition
    ▻https://tante.cc/2015/09/08/why-we-cant-have-nice-things-lessig2016-edition

    Archiloque @archiloque CC BY
    Écrire un commentaire