Aleppo under siege | European Council on Foreign Relations

/commentary_aleppo_under_siege5092

  • Devant les avancées du régime au nord la Turquie a fourni (avant les accords de cessation des hostilités à Munich) aux groupes qu’elle soutient des missiles Sol-sol d’une portée de 20 kms. Certes ce n’est pas encore la livraison de missiles sol-air portatifs (option afghane Stinger) mais c’est une nouvelle étape dans l’escalade militaire internationale en Syrie :
    http://news.yahoo.com/syrian-rebels-missiles-confront-offensive-191050845.html

    BEIRUT (Reuters) - Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s foreign enemies have sent rebels new supplies of ground-to-ground missiles to confront a Russian-backed offensive by the government near Aleppo, stepping up support in response to the attack, two rebel commanders said.

    The commanders told Reuters the missiles with a range of 20 km (12 miles) had been provided in “excellent quantities” in response to the attack that has cut rebel supply lines from the Turkish border to opposition-held parts of the city of Aleppo.
    Facing one of the biggest defeats of the five-year-long war, rebels have been complaining that foreign states such as Saudi Arabia and Turkey have let them down by not providing them with more powerful weapons, including anti-aircraft missiles.
    “It is excellent additional fire power for us,” said one of the commanders, who declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. The second rebel commander said the missiles were being used to hit army positions beyond the front line. “They give the factions longer reach,” he said.

    • Aleppo under siege
      http://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_aleppo_under_siege5092

      For the United States, increased weapons flows are a more palatable alternative than direct intervention. These new weapons will be aimed not so much at securing decisive victories, but at keeping the opposition alive as a viable fighting force, preventing the fall of Aleppo and making Russia pay a higher price for their ongoing support. Of course, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are also very focused on the fact that 2017 will usher in a new US president and hope that the new office holder will be willing to up US intervention in the conflict, something that is distinctly possible given US political dynamics and the expected desire of a new president to project assertiveness as a mark of contrast with Obama’s perceived timidity. Keeping the rebels ready for this moment is likely to have already emerged as a critical strategy of the opposition and its backers.

    • @kassem : intéressant de lire cette analyse dans ce think tank atlantiste. Le passage que vous citez rend plausible l’accusation d’Angry arab - de toute manière les TOW américains, selon les contrats d’armement américains me semble-t-il, ne sauraient être vendus ou céder sans en référer aux USA et obtenir leur accord. A minima cette intensification de l’armement de Jaysh al-Fatah suppose la non-opposition de Washington.
      Le reste de l’article plaide, étonnamment, pour prendre un peu plus en compte, dans la définition des politiques occidentales en Syrie, les besoins immédiats des civils syriens plutôt que les intérêts de tel camp ou les questions dites « morales ». Un ton un peu plus raisonnable que celui auquel on est habitué...