Question intéressante soulevée par White dans un rapport sur médias et migrations (2015)...
Il donne des exemples de problématiques qui auraient pu être traitées par les médias, mais qui ne l’ont pas fait.
Voici une question autour du #tri, de la #catégorisation entre les #bons_réfugiés et les #mauvais_migrants :
A second question concerns the myth fuelled by European Union leaders, national politicians and media that all the refugees arriving in Europe are from Syria. The Council of the European Union on 22 September set the priority as being to recognise people from Syria, Iraq and Eritrea, thus seeking to exclude the second largest group of refugees – from
Afghanistan, which is far from being a stable country.
Other arrivals include people from Somalia, Libya, sub-Saharan Africa and Kurds from Syria and Iraq passing through Turkey.
So are the institutions seeing people from Syria, Iraq and Eritrea as “good refugees” to be relocated in the EU, and the rest as “economic migrants”, to be returned to their country of origin, and would this in the context of international law be mass “refoulement” (returning them to potentially threatening situations)?
Source : Moving Stories. International Review of How Media Cover Migration, ▻http://ethicaljournalismnetwork.org/assets/docs/054/198/8feb836-108e6c6.pdf
p.14
#réfugiés_syriens #migrants_économiques #réfugiés_afghans #presse #médias #journalisme
cc @reka