World news and comment from the Guardian

/world

  • Fake US thinktank set up and funded by Israel sought to game AI for propaganda
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/aug/26/fake-thinktank-israel-ai-propaganda

    In effort to prime chatbots to make pro-Israel arguments the site published 124 reports, over 560,000 words in nine days, Guardian analysis shows

    A pro-Israel messaging website badged with the name of a thinktank that does not exist has published more than half a million words in nine days, built on a commercial platform that promises to optimize content so that AI chatbots will cite it.

    The site gives Israel’s position on subjects including the torture of Palestinian prisoners, Israeli war crimes and whether Israel has deliberately starved Palestinians in Gaza, all presented as neutral research.

    The New York media production company Piro Inc filed the site with the US justice department this month under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (Fara), a 1938 law that requires anyone working for a foreign government to formally disclose it, as material it distributes for the Israeli government.

    The site publishes in the name of the Hanover Institute for Public Policy, which apparently does not exist as a legal entity in any jurisdiction, has no physical address, and carries no named staff and no bylines on any of its reports. Its own terms of use are governed by the laws of “the state in which the Institute is established”, which they decline to name.

    The existence of the site was first reported on 14 August. Since then the institute has added a page headed funding, which states: “An earlier version of this page said the Institute operated without external funding, and that was true when it was written.”

    The site is one part of a broader effort, financed by tens of millions of dollars from the Israeli government and routed through third parties including the European advertising group Havas Media, to prime chatbots to make Israel’s arguments for it. A contract between Havas and another American firm working on the campaign commits it to the “deployment of websites and content to deliver GPT framing results on GPT conversations”.

    The Guardian contacted Piro Inc, Havas Media and the Israeli government advertising agency LaPam for comment. Comment was also sought via a contact email address published on the Hanover Institute website.

    It comes at a point when Israel’s standing in US public opinion has collapsed, and when Israeli officials have begun briefing media outlets that money spent on so-called “Hasbara” efforts at public diplomacy overseas has been wasted.
    The site

    According to a Guardian analysis, between 6 and 14 August the Hanover Institute published 124 reports totaling more than 560,000 words, an average of about 4,500 words each. On 12 and 13 August alone it produced 73 reports, amounting to almost 354,000 words in two days. Nothing has been published since the first reports about the Hanover Institute.

    All but one of the 124 headlines on the website opens with a question resembling one that a user might type into a chatbot, including “Is Anti-Zionism Antisemitism?”, “Did Israel Expel Palestinians From Their Land?”, “Is Israel Carrying Out a Genocide in Gaza?”

    The reports are presented in a quasi-academic manner and are punctiliously sourced, with citations including the World Bank, UN agencies, the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, Amnesty International and the text of the Genocide Convention.

    Nick Cleveland-Stout, a research associate at the Quincy Institute who has reported on the site, told the Guardian that his first impression was of something impressive. “It succeeds in masquerading as very academic – the website design, the logos, everything just looks good. But the more you read it, you’re able to realise that a lot of it makes no sense.”

    For example, the information the Hanover Institute site presents is persistently framed to blunt criticism of Israel. Where human rights organisations have concluded that Israel is committing genocide or apartheid, the reports reliably observe that no court has entered a verdict on the claim – a formulation that appears in 20 of the 124 reports according to the Guardian’s count.

    Casualty and aid figures are attributed to “a party to the events”, a caveat used in 55 reports and applied to Israel’s own counts as readily as to Palestinian ones. The reader is left with the impression that little about Gaza can be established.

    One study – a 2022 analysis of antisemitic comments on the Facebook pages of British, French and German media outlets – is cited 454 times across 88 of the 124 reports, including in pages on apparently unrelated topics including land registration in the occupied territories, Aipac’s influence on US media coverage, the Gaza death toll, the 1948 expulsions and the blockade of Gaza.

    Cleveland-Stout noted the cumulative effect of this inclusion. “Almost every article concludes with saying, well, just talking about this though could contribute to antisemitism,” he said. “And it’ll throw in the study about Facebook comments in Britain.”

    #havas #IA #AI #propaguande

  • Les Serbes visés par des logiciels espions dans le cadre de la « plus grande vague de surveillance jamais recensée » dans le pays

    Des étudiant·es manifestant·es figurent parmi les victimes de ces piratages, selon une association de défense des droits numériques, bien que le gouvernement d’Aleksandar Vučić nie toute activité d’espionnage

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/sep/03/serbians-targeted-with-advanced-spyware

    #serbie

  • These Generals Fought for Israel. Now They See ‘Jewish Terrorism’ as the Threat.
    A growing number of former Israeli generals, intelligence officials and prime ministers are accusing settlers in the West Bank of committing ethnic cleansing with government support. “Once a society behaves this way,” one said, “that society is doomed.”
    By Azam Ahmed, Natan Odenheimer and Ronen Bergman
    Photographs by Ivor Prickett
    Aug. 31, 2026
    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/31/world/middleeast/west-bank-israel.html
    Maj. Gen. Eyal Ben-Reuven spent his life fighting for Israel. He survived the Arab-Israeli war of 1973, when his platoon was nearly wiped out, then went on to command a division in the West Bank and lead Israel’s ground forces in the 2006 war against Hezbollah.

    But in recent months, he has returned to the Israeli-occupied West Bank, touring the territory with retired generals and former Israeli officials like himself. He has walked through the remains of a Palestinian school looted by Israeli settlers, and listened to Palestinian shepherds and farmers describe being tortured by settlers who seize their livestock and land.

    Now, General Ben-Reuven says he has an entirely different understanding of the risks facing Israel today.

    “This, what the settlers are doing here, is the real threat to Israel,” he said, his eyes welling with emotion. “This is more concerning to me than Iran, Gaza or Lebanon.”

    Other former high-ranking Israeli officials touring the West Bank with him shared the same indignation.

    “This is ethnic cleansing, to put it simply,” Ephraim Sneh, a retired brigadier general and former minister of health, said of Israeli settlers’ attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank.

    Asaf Agmon, a retired Air Force general, went even further, comparing it to what some Israelis’ forebears endured in the Holocaust — not in the scale of the violence, he explained, but in the effort to erase the Palestinian presence from much of the West Bank.

    “Once a society behaves this way,” he said, “that society is doomed.”

    Since the Hamas-led terrorist attacks of Oct. 7, 2023, when as many as 1,200 Israelis were killed, war has consumed Israel: first with Hamas, leaving Gaza in ruins and tens of thousands dead. Two rounds of fighting with Hezbollah in Lebanon. Two campaigns against Iran.

    But in the shadows of those conflicts, a quieter front has emerged in the West Bank. Armed Israeli settlers, emboldened by the most right-wing government in the nation’s history, raid and torch Palestinian homes, mosques and villages with seeming impunity, openly trying to drive them out of the territory.

    Israel’s top military commander in the West Bank has warned that the violence risked setting the territory ablaze. Settlers have waged thousands of attacks in the West Bank since Oct. 7, 2023, injuring thousands of Palestinians, according to the United Nations. More than 3,200 Palestinians have been displaced by settler attacks this year alone — double the rate of last year.

    As the pace of violence climbs, the U.N. says, the number of Palestinians injured in settler attacks has risen from an average of one every three days in 2020 to more than three per day in 2026.

    The retired generals condemning this violence are part of a small but rapidly expanding array of influential Israelis, including many from the upper echelons of the military and intelligence apparatus, who are publicly declaring the lawlessness in the West Bank a threat to Israel’s existence as a democracy.

    More than 200 prominent Israelis signed a letter in June demanding that the government stop the attacks against Palestinian civilians in the West Bank. The signatories included two former prime ministers, more than three dozen retired Army and Air Force generals, the former heads of the nation’s foreign and domestic intelligence services, as well as rabbis, a Nobel laureate and one of Israel’s most revered novelists.

    The retired officials come from across the political landscape, including from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s own party, and many were considered security hawks.

    In their letter, they called for an end to “Jewish terrorism” and the “ethnic cleansing” underway in the West Bank. And they accused Mr. Netanyahu’s government not just of being negligent in failing to stop it, but of pursuing “a deliberate government policy in which the entire security establishment — including the military, Shin Bet and the police — is knowingly complicit.”

    The signatories cited tens of millions of dollars in government spending on illegal Israeli outposts and farms, and demanded a full accounting of all public money spent on roads, water, electricity, vehicles and weapons to support them.

    They also accused the military of being complicit in the violence, saying soldiers stand by and watch as Palestinians are attacked, or sometimes even join settlers to assault Palestinian villages together.

    The public denunciation, given whom it is coming from, is staggering. Activists have often asserted that Israel commits atrocities in the West Bank. But accusations of ethnic cleansing from such a large group of former prime ministers, generals and other top Israeli officials — the same people who once led their nation’s security forces — are virtually unheard of.

    Many of the Israeli critics took part in extreme violence during their own military careers, ordering targeted killings, deadly airstrikes, raids and other attacks on Palestinians, including in the West Bank. But they say they were acting in the interest of Israeli security, under a chain of command and legal oversight.

    Want to stay updated on what’s happening in Israel and the West Bank and Gaza Strip? , and we’ll send our latest coverage to your inbox.
    The difference now, they say, is that the violence is unchecked, indiscriminate and targets innocent civilians, with the intent of clearing large stretches of the West Bank so that Israelis can take it for themselves and stamp out any prospect of a Palestinian state.

    The injustice today, they contend, has crossed a moral red line in which the state is allowing, and sometimes helping, Israeli civilians beat, stab and shoot others with almost no consequences.

    Azriel Nevo, who served as military secretary to four prime ministers, argued that other prime ministers he worked for “would have never allowed this to occur.”

    “Shocking,” is how he described what he saw on the tour.

    Some of the retired officials contend that the campaign against Palestinians in the West Bank is reminiscent of Nazism — an extraordinarily contentious assertion, especially in Israel, where many Jews found sanctuary after their families were eradicated in Europe.

    Moshe Ya’alon, the former army chief of staff who served as defense minister under Mr. Netanyahu until 2016, recently likened the ideology of extremist Israeli settlers in the West Bank to that of World War II Germany.

    “What is Jewish supremacy?” Mr. Ya’alon, long considered a security hawk, recently said on Ynet, an Israeli news site. “Eighty years after the Holocaust, ‘Mein Kampf’ in reverse. The master race is us.”

    The prime minister’s office declined to answer questions about the growing accusations from former generals and other officials, and the government did not respond to multiple requests for data on settler attacks in the West Bank.

    In the past, Mr. Netanyahu has dismissed settler violence as the unlawful acts of “a handful of kids,” while some ministers in his government have said there is no such thing as Jewish terrorism.

    But as the condemnation of settler violence grows, including from the United States, pressure is building on Mr. Netanyahu to respond more forcefully. Settlers recently besieged several Palestinian homes, one of which belonged to an American citizen. In a rare statement over the weekend, Mr. Netanyahu said such “criminal acts” cause “immense harm” to the law-abiding settlers and “damage Israel’s standing in the world.”

    The Israel military rejects any suggestion that it supports “the actions of violent groups” in the West Bank. It says its mission is to “protect all residents,” and that any soldier who takes part in settler attacks or stands by while they occur is “acting in complete disregard” of their orders.

    Religious leaders who support Israeli settlements in the West Bank have applauded the military and government for backing a record number of new outposts and farms, which the retired generals say fuel settler violence in the West Bank.

    But Rabbi Elyakim Levanon, who oversees a religious council in the West Bank, recently cautioned supporters to avoid violence, saying critics were using it as justification to harm the settler movement’s “reputation both in Israel, the U.S. and worldwide.”

    The settler attacks are unfolding at the same time the Israeli military is acting much more aggressively in the West Bank.

    Since the Oct. 7 attacks almost three years ago, more than 1,100 Palestinians, some of them combatants, have been killed in the territory, the vast majority of them at the hands of Israeli forces. That is roughly the same number of Palestinians killed in the West Bank from 2005 through 2022, according to the United Nations. Since 2023, 67 Israelis have been killed by Palestinians in the West Bank.

    As the violence mounts — and killings, burnings and lootings go unpunished — even some who once defended the occupation are sounding the alarm.

    “If I had to, I could make a legal defense of what the Israel Defense Forces have done in Gaza,” said Gal Levertov, the former head of the international division at the Ministry of Justice, who represented Israel before the International Criminal Court in The Hague.

    “But what is happening today in the West Bank?” he added. “It’s indefensible.”

    The Tour
    The retired Israeli generals came to the West Bank on a trip organized by Yaakov Or, himself a retired general who spent much of his career in the West Bank.

    Outraged by the escalating settler violence and what he views as the state’s involvement in it, Mr. Or has made it his mission to bring as many Israeli notables as he can to the West Bank to see for themselves.

    He often begins with a warning.

    “When I take you to see what is happening in the West Bank, you will have two choices,” he said to a group in June. “You can stay silent, and be complicit,” he told them, “or you can speak out, and tell everyone you know about what is happening.”

    He then invited anyone who preferred not to be put in that position to leave.

    Mr. Or, 79, began his military career fighting for Israel in the Arab-Israeli war of 1967, which ended with the Israeli occupation of the West Bank. He went on to oversee civilian and security affairs in the territory, before retiring from the state comptroller’s office, where he was responsible for investigating the Israeli defense establishment.

    Since he began organizing the tours a little over a year ago, more than 250 participants — former military brass, high-ranking intelligence officials, prominent lawyers, economists and diplomats — have joined.

    The New York Times accompanied him in June as he led several former officials including generals, a cabinet minister, a military aide to four prime ministers, an intelligence official, a state prosecutor and an ambassador on an arc through multiple villages in the middle of the West Bank. Along the way, highways were lined with Israeli flags, equally spaced, kilometer after kilometer.

    Mr. Or asked the visitors to note the miles of new fences erected by settlers to hem in Palestinian villagers and keep them from accessing their own land.

    And he urged participants to look for the prevalence of settler outposts, the makeshift frontier encampments placed on hilltops throughout the territory.

    “It is showing us the overall concept — how to widen areas of control and narrow the places where Palestinian communities can live,” he told them.

    ‘They Want to Take My House’
    In the village of Burin, Bashar Eid, a Palestinian farmer, took the visitors to his roof, limping behind them with a cane, the result of a settler attack that left him permanently impaired, he said.

    He told them about the constant attacks from settler outposts, which were visible from the roof, positioned along the hillsides surrounding him. The settlers enter the village every day, he said, even during the Sabbath.

    One recent morning, he said, he spotted a young settler boy walking on his land. When he asked him what he was doing, the boy told him to shut up or they would break his other leg.
    “A kid told me that,” he said, shaking his head.

    He could no longer farm his land, he said, because settlers attack him when he tries. His days have been reduced to sitting on his roof, watching for settler incursions.

    “I don’t know what to do,” he said. “They want to take my house.”

    The participants took notes as the heat bore down from above. The scent of sunscreen filled the air.

    A former chief state attorney raised his hand. “It is absurd that Israeli forces are not doing their duty to protect them — it is embarrassing to even ask, but why don’t the Palestinians defend themselves?” he asked.

    “I’m afraid if I defend myself, it will be even worse for us,” Mr. Eid said.

    Mr. Or agreed: Any violent response from the Palestinians would invite retribution, which would be much more severe and likely include the Israeli military, he said. Retaliation against the settlers would be deemed terrorism, prompting more crackdowns, he said.

    Raphael Schutz, a former Israeli ambassador to Spain, Norway and the Holy See, mopped sweat from his brow as he processed what he had heard.

    He thought of his mother, who had fled Nazi Germany as a 9-year-old with her parents and siblings, he said.

    Today, he said, when she watches videos of settlers setting cars ablaze and shooting innocent farmers, she feels shame.

    “To her,” said Mr. Schutz, 68, “it is inconceivable that Jews can behave this way.”

    “I’m glad I left the foreign service,” he added. “It would be impossible for me to explain this.”

    A Community Erased
    The Jordan Valley runs north to south along the banks of the Jordan River, a fertile plain that marks the eastern border of the occupied West Bank.

    In the last few years, settler violence has displaced several Palestinian communities from the area, largely Bedouin encampments like Hamamat al-Maleh.

    Just a few months ago, during a separate visit to the community by The Times, a few families were still holding on. Violent incursions in the middle of the night had already forced most to flee. But when we visited in February, we came across a couple of Palestinian families holed up in a stone edifice from Ottoman times, clustered together on mattresses on the bare floor.

    “We don’t even sleep an hour,” said Mohammad Khalil, 37, who was born in the community, as his father had been. “If they come and you’re asleep, you won’t survive it.”

    At the time, a school constructed with donor funds sat empty. The last of the students had fled a few days earlier. By March, after a series of settler raids, thefts and attacks, Mr. Khalil and the other holdouts gave up and left, too.

    Not long after, residents and activists said, settlers came with a bulldozer and leveled the school. Settlers shared a video of themselves celebrating Passover amid the ruins.

    By the time the retired Israeli generals and other dignitaries arrived in late June, the Palestinian residents were long gone. Mr. Or wanted to show them what an erased community looked like.

    The group walked past the broken school structure, where loose strands of rebar poked through the rubble like unkempt hair. A roll of artificial grass lay in dirty folds. A broken concrete wall betrayed traces of a destroyed mural.

    Within the old Ottoman structure, an office was upended. Desks in disarray, a door torn from its hinges lying on the floor.

    Elie Avidor, an activist who helps organize Israeli volunteers to protect Palestinians from settler attacks, said he was in the village not long after the school was destroyed and took video, which he later shared, of settler women and children looting notebooks and markers from the office.

    Left behind were piles of academic detritus, smashed cabinets, shards of glass and scattered papers.

    “When you are burning books, when you are destroying knowledge and attacking children, you’re like the Germans,” said Nehemia Dagan, 86, a retired Air Force general who helped build Israel’s helicopter capabilities and also served as the chief education officer of the Israel military.

    “We have lost ourselves, and we have lost this fight,” he said, shaking with rage.

    “We must separate,” he added, referring to the two-state solution, which would establish an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel. “Not for their sake, but for our own.”

    ‘It’s Like a Jail’
    On the last stop, in a barren valley in the northern Jordan Valley, a young Palestinian farmer stood before the ranks of Israeli visitors and pointed.

    Behind him, a settler outpost had been scraped into the side of a hill, the Israeli flag flying over it. In front of him, a few hundred feet away, stood a long line of Israeli flags, planted one after the next, as if lining a parade route.

    Nearby, settlers had erected a fence, turning his farm into something of a holding pen.

    “Six months ago, this was our land,” he said. “Now, it’s like a jail.”

    As recently as January, life in his village had been relatively normal, he said. They farmed, grazed their sheep, and came and went as they pleased.

    That ended abruptly with the arrival of the first settlers, who stationed themselves on the hillside, he said. Now, the farmer and his family could no longer use his farmland or harvest his crops.

    He was forbidden from accessing it, he told the assembled visitors, and every time he tried, settlers called the police. He had already been arrested four times, he said, though he was always released.

    But whenever he called the police to report harassment, or vandalism of his water tanks, “they never answer,” he said. The Israeli national police said they “investigate every complaint or incident involving suspected criminal activity, impartially.”

    The Palestinian farmer said he decided to sell his sheep, rather than lose them to settlers or starvation because he could no longer go out and graze them.

    “They should see this reality, and not accept it,” the farmer said, referring to the Israeli generals.

    Many of the men assembled had played their own roles in violence against Palestinians — authorizing killings and striking locations, knowing that children might die in some cases — because they believed it helped ensure Israel’s security.

    But the settler attacks in the West Bank were not making Israel safer, several of the retired generals said. Instead, the violence and intimidation were having the opposite effect, they argued.
    “When you ruin the image of Israel, the diplomatic value of Israel and the core values that hold the military together, you achieve nothing,” said Mr. Agmon, the retired Air Force general.
    “I’ve earned the right to speak,” added Mr. Agmon, 78, whose grandson, an Israeli soldier, was killed in Lebanon last year. “My family and I paid the highest price for this country.”
    “I am ashamed of what our people are doing here,” he said.

    Azam Ahmed is international investigative correspondent for The Times. He has reported on Wall Street scandals, the War in Afghanistan and violence and corruption in Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean.
    Natan Odenheimer is a Times reporter in Jerusalem, covering Israeli and Palestinian affairs.
    Ronen Bergman is a staff writer for The New York Times Magazine, based in Tel Aviv.
    Ivor Prickett is a photographer based in Istanbul. He covered the rise and fall of ISIS in Iraq and Syria while on assignment for The Times. More recently he has been working on stories related to the war in Ukraine.

  • Un faux groupe de réflexion américain, créé et financé par Israël, cherchait à manipuler l’IA à des fins de propagande
    Jason Wilson | Mercredi 26 août 2026, 13 h 00 CEST| The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/aug/26/fake-thinktank-israel-ai-propaganda

    Dans le but de conditionner des chatbots à présenter des arguments pro-israéliens, le site a publié 124 rapports, soit plus de 560 000 mots en neuf jours, comme le révèle une analyse du Guardian

    Un site web de diffusion de messages pro-israéliens, arborant le nom d’un groupe de réflexion qui n’existe pas, a publié plus d’un demi-million de mots en neuf jours, en s’appuyant sur une plateforme commerciale qui promet d’optimiser le contenu afin que les chatbots basés sur l’IA le citent.

    Le site présente la position d’Israël sur des sujets tels que la torture des prisonniers palestiniens, les crimes de guerre israéliens et la question de savoir si Israël a délibérément affamé les Palestiniens de Gaza, le tout présenté comme une recherche neutre.

    La société de production médiatique new-yorkaise Piro Inc a déclaré ce site auprès du ministère américain de la Justice ce mois-ci en vertu du Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), une loi de 1938 qui oblige toute personne travaillant pour un gouvernement étranger à le déclarer officiellement, en tant que contenu diffusé pour le compte du gouvernement israélien.

    Le site publie au nom de l’Hanover Institute for Public Policy, qui n’existe apparemment pas en tant qu’entité juridique dans aucune juridiction, ne dispose d’aucune adresse physique et ne mentionne aucun membre du personnel ni aucune signature sur aucun de ses rapports. Ses propres conditions d’utilisation sont régies par les lois de « l’État dans lequel l’Institut est établi », dont il refuse de révéler le nom.

    L’existence du site a été signalée pour la première fois le 14 août. Depuis lors, l’institut a ajouté une page intitulée « Financement », qui précise : « Une version antérieure de cette page indiquait que l’institut fonctionnait sans financement externe, ce qui était vrai au moment de sa rédaction. »

    Ce site s’inscrit dans le cadre d’une initiative plus large, financée par des dizaines de millions de dollars provenant du gouvernement israélien et acheminés par l’intermédiaire de tiers, notamment le groupe publicitaire européen Havas Media, visant à programmer des chatbots pour qu’ils défendent la cause d’Israël. Un contrat entre Havas et une autre entreprise américaine travaillant sur cette campagne prévoit le « déploiement de sites web et de contenus destinés à produire des résultats de cadrage GPT lors de conversations GPT ».

    Le Guardian a contacté Piro Inc, Havas Media et l’agence de publicité du gouvernement israélien LaPam pour obtenir leurs commentaires. Des commentaires ont également été sollicités via une adresse e-mail de contact publiée sur le site web de l’Institut Hanover.

    Cela intervient à un moment où l’image d’Israël auprès de l’opinion publique américaine s’est effondrée, et où les responsables israéliens ont commencé à faire savoir aux médias que l’argent dépensé pour les efforts dits de « Hasbara » en matière de diplomatie publique à l’étranger avait été gaspillé. (...)

    #Hasbara

  • Mark Zuckerberg buys 440-acre Strancally castle estate in Ireland | Ireland | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/aug/20/mark-zuckerberg-buys-440-acre-strancally-castle-estate-in-ireland

    It stretches the definition of pied-à-terre but Mark Zuckerberg now has a pad in Ireland: Strancally castle.

    The Meta chief executive and his wife, Priscilla Chan, have bought the gothic-style mansion and its 178-hectare (440-acre) estate in county Waterford to use as a base during visits to Ireland.

    “Mark and his family are excited to continue caring for this historic home and look forward to spending time in Ireland, where Meta maintains its international headquarters,” a spokesperson said on Thursday.

    The price paid in the off-market deal is not known but the Irish Times, which first reported the sale, estimated a value between €20m (£17m) and €30m: approximately 10% of the cost of his 387ft superyacht.

    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/26ee45c61aa55d1ceecdf1b75f0cac2a15cf2a15/439_498_3128_2502/master/3128.jpg

  • British widow, 78, told to leave Sweden under Brexit rules after living there for 21 years
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/aug/10/british-widow-78-told-to-leave-sweden-under-brexit-rules-after-living-t

    A 78-year-old British widow who has lived in Sweden for 21 years is fighting deportation from the country after authorities told her a post-Brexit application to stay had been submitted too late.

    Her case is the latest of 2,500 British people ordered to leave the country after Brexit in what campaigners and the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) have said is an inexplicably hardline approach taken by the Swedish authorities. It comes two years after Sweden threatened to deport a British woman with dementia in a care home shortly before she died.

  • ‘It’s truly hell here’: airstrikes, repression and water shortages become ‘new normal’ for Iranians
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jul/22/its-truly-hell-here-airstrikes-repression-and-water-shortages-become-ne

    Moein*, a resident of Jask, said that although the water supply had been restored, residents were in panic and scrambling to prepare for a long-running war.

    “That’s just it. The heat is rising and if we lack water supply due to these attacks, we will die of heat exhaustion and thirst. Supply is back now, but we are now making sure to prepare for future attacks and we have to save as much water as we can.”

    A strike in June on water facilities in the coastal city of Sirik also reportedly left thousands of residents rationing water and struggling with daily chores.

    Nik Kowsar, a US-based Iranian journalist and water issues analyst, said the war was having a severe impact on civilians – and such concerns did not equate to support for the country’s rulers. “Iranians can despise the regime and want the IRGC [Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps] dismantled while still being horrified by attacks that leave ordinary families without water, electricity, medicine or income,” he said.

    #Iran

  • Les réseaux sociaux interdits aux moins de 15 ans dès septembre en France, après le vote définitif du Parlement
    https://www.leparisien.fr/politique/linterdiction-des-reseaux-sociaux-aux-moins-de-15-ans-definitivement-adop

    Le Parlement, après un vote au Sénat et à l’Assemblée nationale, a approuvé définitivement ce mardi 21 juillet la proposition de loi interdisant les réseaux sociaux aux moins de 15 ans.

    Entre deux lois scélérates, l’une pour te faire bouffer des produits phytosanitaires, et l’autre pour autoriser les flics à se faire justice, tu en as évidemment une troisième, celle pour imposer le contrôle d’identité de tous les utilisateurs de réseaux sociaux afin d’interdire aux enfants d’y participer.

    https://seenthis.net/messages/1182997

    • Oui, l’aide à mourir, ce n’est pas que je l’avais oublié, mais c’est que la liste n’en finit pas... Ce mois de juillet est tout de même particulièrement dégueulasse. Et on te dit qu’avec le RN ça sera encore pire ? Même pas certain. Car avec le RN au pouvoir les forces dites centristes se sentiront parfois obligées de faire de la résistance, contrairement à ce moment particulier que nous vivons, où elles sont aux commandes, et profitent des voix du RN pour pousser leur agenda moisi.

    • France becomes first EU country to ban social media access for under-15s
      https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jul/21/france-ban-social-media-access-under-15s

      France’s parliament has approved a bill banning social media access for children under 15, making it the first EU country to bar children from apps such as TikTok.

      The president, Emmanuel Macron, has championed the ban as a key reform of his final term in office and pledged to enforce it by September.

      “France is leading the way in Europe when it comes to protecting our children and teenagers,” Macron said in a video posted on social media, hailing “a major step forward”.

      On est les premiers en Europe, tu vois, derrière la Chine, la Turquie et quelques autres états progressistes.

      #age_verification #age_checking

    • D’après l’article du Guardian

      Exceptions to the ban are provided for sites such as online encyclopedias and educational platforms, and the text does not provide for any penalties for children or parents.

      Donc ici pas de problème. On est bien une « encyclopédie en ligne », hein ...

    • Bon, je crains que SeenThis ne soit lui aussi, en tant que réseau social, concerné par les opérations de vérification de l’âge.

      Protéger les mineurs des risques auxquels les expose l’utilisation des réseaux sociaux - Dossiers législatifs - 17e législature - Assemblée nationale
      https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/dossiers/proteger_mineurs_reseaux_sociaux_17e

      Texte adopté ✅
      Mardi 21 juillet 2026
      Proposition de loi, adoptée par l’Assemblée nationale, dans les conditions prévues à l’article 45, alinéa 3, de la Constitution, visant à protéger les mineurs des risques auxquels les expose l’utilisation des réseaux sociaux le 21 juillet 2026, T.A. n° 339

      Texte adopté provisoire
      https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/textes/l17t0339_texte-adopte-provisoire.pdf

      « Section 3 bis
      « Protection des mineurs en ligne
      « Art. 6-9. – I. – L’accès à un service de réseaux sociaux en ligne fourni
      par une plateforme en ligne est interdit aux mineurs de quinze ans.
      « Pour l’application du présent article, une plateforme en ligne et un
      service de réseaux sociaux en ligne s’entendent au sens de l’article 6.

      Loi n° 2004-575 du 21 juin 2004 pour la confiance dans l’économie numérique (1). - Légifrance
      https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000000801164

      Article 6

      Version en vigueur depuis le 17 février 2024

      Modifié par LOI n°2024-449 du 21 mai 2024 - art. 48

      (...)

      5. On entend par “ service de réseaux sociaux en ligne ” un service défini au paragraphe 7 de l’article 2 du règlement (UE) 2022/1925 du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 14 septembre 2022 relatif aux marchés contestables et équitables dans le secteur numérique et modifiant les directives (UE) 2019/1937 et (UE) 2020/1828 (règlement sur les marchés numériques).

      Règlement - 2022/1925 - EN - EUR-Lex
      https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj/eng

      Article 2

      Définitions

      Aux fins du présent règlement, on entend par :

      (...)

      7) « service de réseaux sociaux en ligne » : une plateforme permettant aux utilisateurs finaux de se connecter ainsi que de communiquer entre eux, de partager des contenus et de découvrir d’autres utilisateurs et d’autres contenus, sur plusieurs appareils et, en particulier, au moyen de conversations en ligne (chats), de publications (posts), de vidéos et de recommandations ;

    • Je n’oublie pas que rapidement après le 7 Octobre, toute une frange de la propagande négationniste pro-israélienne s’est focalisée sur l’influence néfaste que Tiktok avait sur la jeunesse occidentale. Voir Greenblatt et Hillary, qui en ont fait une priorité.

      À quoi ça sert d’avoir le réseau ultra-réactionnaire de Musk si de l’autre côté on a des réseaux où les jeunes (y compris les jeunes juifs américains) se font influencer, au point de croire qu’il y a un génocide à Gaza…

      Ce qui va dans ce sens, c’est qu’à chaque fois que Laure Miller a défendu sa loi dans les médias, elle n’a parlé que de Tiktok. Y compris pour reprocher au festival de Cannes sont partenariat avec TikTok (« une plateforme de toute évidence problématique »). Alors que le jour même de l’adoption de la loi, Macron s’empresse de l’annoncer sur un seul réseau social, le très nazi-compatible réseau X, qui ne semble donc, lui, pas assez évidemment problématique.

      –---

      [edit] La Quadrature rappelle d’autres postures rappelant que l’obsession du pouvoir réactionnaire est de contrôler l’expression politique qui rend la jeunesse indocile :
      https://www.laquadrature.net/2026/07/22/le-parlement-vote-linterdiction-des-reseaux-sociaux-aux-jeunes-de-moin

      En privilégiant une interdiction autoritaire au détriment d’une remise profonde du modèle économique basé sur la publicité, cette loi démontre qu’elle n’est qu’une énième mesure de défiance envers les jeunes. Et ce n’est pas la première fois. En 2023 déjà, lors des révoltes suite au meurtre de Nahel Merzouk, les réseaux sociaux avaient été désignés comme les responsables, permettant aux pouvoirs publics d’ignorer les causes réelles du malaise de la jeunesse. Emmanuel Macron pointait du doigt les réseaux sociaux utilisés par la jeunesse et appelait déjà à leur censure. Son gouvernement n’a pas hésité à mettre la pression sur certaines plateformes en les « convoquant » pour qu’elles retirent des contenus parfaitement légaux, en dehors de toute procédure encadrée par la loi. Puis, en 2024, lors des révoltes en Nouvelle-Calédonie-Kanaky, le gouvernement de Gabriel Attal a fait censurer Tiktok en prétextant que se trouvaient sur cette plateforme des contenus illicites. Ceux-ci sont pourtant toujours restés introuvables, et la véritable raison était que la jeunesse s’informait et s’organisait (légalement) dessus.

    • Sinon, en janvier on lisait ceci dans Médiapart :
      https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/france/250126/le-parcours-deja-mouvemente-de-la-loi-pour-interdire-les-reseaux-sociaux-a

      Une refonte substantielle de l’article principal a aussi été actée par Laure Miller. Là où le texte initial indiquait que les plateformes devaient refuser « l’inscription à leurs services des mineurs de 15 ans », la logique a été inversée : la version modifiée vise directement les particuliers et particulières et interdit aux moins de 15 ans de s’inscrire, sans rien imposer explicitement aux plateformes.

      Le Conseil d’État estime en effet que la première formulation pourrait soulever « des difficultés au regard du règlement sur les services numériques » adopté par la Commission européenne (le Digital Services Act, DSA), qui ne permet pas aux États membres d’imposer seuls de nouvelles obligations aux plateformes.

      Auquel cas pour l’instant on serait certes concernés par l’interdiction (au sens où un moins de 15 ans n’aurait pas le droit de s’inscrire), mais sans nous imposer aucune obligation, même pas de moyen, de notre côté.

    • Qu’est-ce qu’il se dit, d’ailleurs, dans les instances Mastodon (qui ont en gros le même type de souci que nous : être concerné par un loi qu’on n’aurait aucun moyen d’appliquer si on exigeait des réseaux sociaux de mettre en place elles-mêmes la vérification d’âge.) ?

    • On a quand même un gros conflit avec la Convention internationale des Droits de l’Enfant :

      Article 12
      1 l Les États parties garantissent à l’enfant qui est capable de discernement le droit d’exprimer librement son opinion sur toute question l’intéressant, les opinions de l’enfant étant dûment prises en considération eu égard à son âge et à son degré de maturité.
      2| A cette fin, on donnera notamment à l’enfant la possibilité d’être entendu dans toute procédure judiciaire ou administrative l’intéressant, soit directement, soit par l’intermédiaire d’un représentant ou d’un organisme approprié, de façon compatible avec les règles de procédure de la législation nationale.

      Article 13
      1l L’enfant a droit à la liberté d’expression. Ce droit comprend la liberté de rechercher, de recevoir et de répandre des informations et des idées de toute espèce, sans considération de frontières, sous une forme orale, écrite, imprimée ou artistique, ou par tout autre moyen du choix de l’enfant.
      2l L’exercice de ce droit ne peut faire l’objet que des seules restrictions qui sont prescrites par la loi et qui sont nécessaires :
      a - au respect des droits ou de la réputation d’autrui ; ou
      b - à la sauvegarde de la sécurité nationale, de l’ordre public, de la santé ou de la moralité publiques.

      Et surtout l’article 11 de notre Déclaration des Droits de l’Homme et du Citoyen.

      Ce qui explique, à mon avis, l’insistance des macronistes à agiter l’argument de la santé mentale des enfants. Mais la démesure de la loi (interdiction pure et simple) me semble difficile à défendre si ça monte de plusieurs crans dans les tribunaux.

      Par exemple : la loi interdit explicitement à un mineur de moins de 15 ans de s’inscrire au réseau Seenthis, même avec une autorisation parentale. Au motif de la protection de la santé mentale de l’enfant. Mais à quel moment un réseau comme Seenthis aurait des mécanismes provoquant l’addiction (il n’y a pas d’algorithmes de suggestion de contenus) et mettrait en danger la santé de l’enfant.

      Par contre, arguer que Seenthis ressort de la liberté d’expression et d’accès à l’information des mineurs, ça se défend tout de même assez facilement. En 2009, le Conseil constitutionnel censurait une partie de la loi HAPODI, reconnaissant que l’accès aux services en ligne relevaient bien de l’article 11 de la Déclaration des Droits de l’Homme, et qu’il fallait donc l’intervention d’un juge pour évaluer la proportionnalité d’une décision de coupure d’accès :
      https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/decision/2009/2009580DC.htm

    • Réseaux sociaux : pourquoi l’interdiction aux moins de 15 ans ne pourra pas s’appliquer à la rentrée
      https://www.leclubdesjuristes.com/opinion/reseaux-sociaux-pourquoi-linterdiction-aux-moins-de-15-ans-ne-pou

      L’enjeu pour le texte français était en réalité de parvenir à trouver une réponse à une question par essence insoluble : comment organiser l’interdiction des réseaux sociaux aux mineurs si les modalités de mise en œuvre de cette interdiction ne peuvent relever du droit national ? Le législateur, mué en Don Quichotte, se battait contre des moulins à vent : le droit national peut formuler l’interdiction, mais toute obligation créée à la charge d’une plateforme empièterait de facto sur la compétence européenne. En d’autres termes, le législateur peut affirmer la fin, mais ne peut proposer aucun moyen pour atteindre celle-ci. Le texte du 21 juillet, qui se borne à affirmer que « L’accès à un service de réseaux sociaux en ligne fourni par une plateforme en ligne est interdit aux mineurs de quinze ans », traduit malheureusement cette situation inextricable. Dépouillé de tout ce qui faisait son essence, il est réduit à une affirmation de principe qui demeure sans portée pratique, faute de mécanisme adossé. L’écho de la loi Marcangeli, qui posait la majorité numérique et qui est restée lettre morte pour les mêmes raisons, résonne incontestablement ici. Même la saisine du Conseil constitutionnel, annoncée par des parlementaires, ne présente plus les enjeux qu’elle présentait hier : si une telle saisine aura certes pour effet de retarder l’entrée en vigueur du texte, la réponse apportée par le Conseil sera de toute façon dépourvue de véritable effet à court terme, puisque celle-ci est dépourvue de tout élément permettant sa mise en œuvre effective. En d’autres termes, soit le Conseil conclut à l’inconstitutionnalité et la disposition ne pourra pas entrer en vigueur, soit il conclut à sa constitutionnalité, et c’est en tout état de cause une disposition sans effet sur le plan du droit qui sera consacrée. Pour le comprendre, il suffit de se poser une question simple : que faire, à compter du 1er septembre, si un mineur de quinze ans accède à un réseau social ? La loi telle qu’adoptée, est désormais muette sur ce point crucial. À cet égard, le communiqué de presse du Sénat, dont il faut saluer l’honnêteté et la clarté, vient conforter l’analyse que nous avions proposée, en énonçant que « l’interdiction concerne les mineurs eux-mêmes, sans sanction à leur encontre ». On ne saurait être plus clair.

    • En l’état des réflexions, il sera intéressant de voir la réaction des plateformes internationales. Si elles font du zèle, en imposant la vérification d’identité, elles alimenteront le narratif selon quoi ce mouvement international pour la vérification de l’âge n’est qu’un prétexte pour imposer aux utilisateurs de donner leurs données personnelles et favoriser le profilage et la surveillance.

      À suivre...

    • Qui dit vérification de l’âge dit vérification de l’identité. Quel genre de documents faudra-t-il fournir comme preuve de l’âge ? Cela aura-t-il un effet rétro-actif, c’est à dire que les déjà inscrit·es devront elleux aussi fournir une preuve ? Ce qui entraînerait de fait la fin de l’anonymat en ligne. Ceci dit, avec l’adresse IP du terminal qu’on utilise, l’anonymat n’existe pas.

    • Éléments de réponse :

      Un danger illégal pour l’internet décentralisé

      Parce que c’est sur les réseaux sociaux que reposera la charge d’empêcher les jeunes d’accéder à leurs services, cette loi va transformer encore plus les plateformes en auxiliaires de police. Elle met en cela en danger l’internet décentralisé, auto-hébergé, géré par des petits collectifs avec peu de moyens. Puisque les réseaux sociaux alternatifs et non-commerciaux comme les instances Mastodon ou Peertube sont concernés par cette obligation d’empêcher les jeunes de moins de 15 ans d’accéder à leurs services, ils devront eux aussi s’équiper de ces lourdes infrastructures de surveillance (se connecter aux services de l’État pour permettre une authentification par identité numérique, ou payer un prestataire de vérification des papiers ou d’estimation d’âge). Au risque de disparaître tant cela est incompatible avec le modèle économique, souvent basé sur le don, de ces réseaux alternatifs.

      https://www.laquadrature.net/2026/07/22/le-parlement-vote-linterdiction-des-reseaux-sociaux-aux-jeunes-de-moin

  • Israel threatens to seize ancient water reservoirs near Bethlehem | West Bank | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jul/19/israel-threatens-to-seize-ancient-water-reservoirs-near-bethlehem

    Israel is threatening to seize ancient water reservoirs near Bethlehem, in what would be a significant escalation in an intensifying campaign for control of West Bank land and the Middle East’s historical narrative.

    Since Israel’s extremist finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, made an explicit threat in May to “erase” the agreements that confirmed Palestinian ownership of Solomon’s Pools more than 30 years ago, Israeli settlers and troops have stepped up their presence around the spectacular site.

    The pools date back as far as the second century BCE, though the main construction was carried out by the Romans a century later as part of a vast engineering project of two reservoirs, aqueducts and tunnels to supply water to Jerusalem 8 miles (13km) away.

    A third monumental basin was added under Ottoman rule, when a fort was also built to safeguard the water supply. During the Mandate period from 1923 to 1948, the British authorities modernised the system with metal pipes and pumps.

    The pale stone Mandate-era pumping station now stands abandoned in the wooded hills of the area and the pools, more than 10 metres deep in places, no longer funnel water to Jerusalem, but have become the main source of recreation in the area.

  • UK charity funding school at heart of illegal Israeli settlement expansion
    Mon 6 Jul 2026 23.37 CEST |Emma Graham-Harrison in Jerusalem and Haroon Siddique | West Bank | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jul/06/british-charity-friends-of-yeshivat-shavei-illegal-settlement-hebron

    A British charity is funding a religious school at the heart of expansion plans for the illegal Israeli settlement in the Palestinian city of Hebron.

    Friends of Yeshivat Shavei Hevron sent nearly £200,000 to the school between 2019 and 2024, the last year for which accounts are publicly available on the website of the Charity Commission, the charity regulator for England and Wales.

    Construction of a new dormitory for the school was approved in June, after the far-right finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, unilaterally broke a decades-old international agreement on control of Hebron to give Israel planning authority.

    The expansion will increase the population of one of the most extreme Israeli communities in the occupied West Bank, and the only one built in the heart of a Palestinian city.

    “We want British charities to fund peace, not to fund obstacles for peace. This is very wrong,” said Issa Amro, a Palestinian human rights defender from Hebron and co-founder of Youth Against Settlements. “The students at this yeshiva are very aggressive. A new building will mean more violence towards Palestinians, more restrictions, more Israeli military presence.”

    Israel has built extensive systems of militarised separation to isolate several hundred settlers inside Hebron from the city they moved into. Palestinians are barred entirely from some streets, and walls and gates divide Palestinians who live in areas under Israeli military control from most of the 230,000 population.

    “For this yeshiva to exist, thousands of Palestinians have already lost their shops, their housing and their daily livelihood in the heart of a Palestinian city,” said Hagit Ofran, from the Israeli advocacy group Peace Now. “The new dormitory is a significant development because they are adding more settlers in Hebron, the most extreme settlement, where apartheid is everywhere.” (...)

    #IsraelRU

  • Israeli command system identified 850,000 targets in Gaza and Lebanon wars, says supplier | Israel | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jul/06/israel-command-system-identified-850000-targets-gaza-lebanon-war-suppli

    Wes Bryant, a former senior targeting adviser and policy analyst at the US Pentagon who specialised in civilian harm assessments, said he believed the 850,000 figure was highly concerning.

    […]

    Bryant said it was impossible for soldiers in any military to adequately assess each piece of information to conclude if the threat was real and the target legal at the volumes indicated.

    “I will say, definitively, that there is no way each and every one of the 1,000 targets a day – let alone 850,000 targets in aggregate – are thoroughly and effectively characterised in terms of collateral damage analysis and assessed risk to civilian populations. Even characterising 50 a day is hard enough (but possible),” the former US military officer said.

  • ‘Give him any award, and he’ll come running’: Narendra Modi racks up honours on overseas trips | Narendra Modi | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jul/03/narendra-modi-awards-honours-overseas-trips

    As critics have pointed out, Modi has shown a notable penchant for receiving awards, at home and abroad, over his 12 years in power.

    Last month, days before Modi’s visit to Israel, the Israeli parliament quickly created what it claimed to be one of the country’s highest honours, the medal of the Knesset, which was bestowed on Modi when he landed. Again, he is the only recipient to date.

  • US-Iran talks in Switzerland abruptly called off
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jun/19/us-iran-talks-in-switzerland-cancelled

    But before the talks were cancelled, Iran’s semi-official Tasnim news agency said that Iranian negotiators needed ⁠to see signs of implementation of the interim agreement from the US before the next rounds of peace talks could begin, and that there was no confirmation that its delegation would travel to Geneva.

    The cancellation of the talks came after a report from Al-Mayadeen, an Arabic language network that is politically allied with the Iranian-backed Lebanese militant group Hezbollah, that said Tehran was delaying sending its delegation to Switzerland due to Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Lebanon.

    Israel, which was not included in the peace talks and has distanced itself from the US-Iran agreement, has continued its fighting in Lebanon and launched fresh ​airstrikes early on Friday, accusing Hezbollah of violating the ceasefire.

  • Canada to order military plane fleet from Sweden in shift from US s...
    https://diaspora.psyco.fr/p/12496540

    Canada to order military plane fleet from Sweden in shift from US suppliers | Canada | The Guardian

    #geopolitics

    Good move, Donald.

    Canada has announced plans to buy a fleet of early warning planes from Sweden’s Saab rather than a competing option from Boeing, as the country seeks to reduce reliance on US defense firms.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/27/canada-sweden-saab-globaleye-aircraft

  • Middle East crisis: Iran’s foreign ministry says US broke ceasefire with overnight strikes – as it happened | US-Israel war on Iran | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2026/may/26/iran-war-live-updates-us-attacks-iran-missile-sites-self-defence-during

    Donald Trump has found time to attack the US media again

    In a post on his Truth Social platform the US president said:

    « If Iran surrenders, admits their Navy is gone and resting at the bottom of the sea, and their Air Force is no longer with us, and if their entire Military walks out of Tehran, weapons dropped and hands held high, each shouting “I surrender, I surrender” while wildly waving the representative White Flag, and if their entire remaining Leadership signs all necessary “Documents of Surrender,” and admit their defeat to the great power and force of the magnificent U.S.A., The Failing New York Times, The China Street Journal (WSJ!), Corrupt and now Irrelevant CNN, and all other members of the Fake News Media, will headline that Iran had a Masterful and Brilliant Victory over The United States of America, it wasn’t even close.

    The Dumacrats and Media have totally lost their way.

    They have gone absolutely CRAZY!!! »

    President DJT

  • ‘It’s like stealing’: Palestinian family’s seized property listed on Booking.com | West Bank | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/14/palestinian-family-seized-property-listed-on-booking-com

    A new report by Ekō, a US-based advocacy group focused on corporate accountability, lists 41 #Booking.com listings in 14 illegal Israeli settlements across the occupied West Bank in two main clusters, along the Jordan valley including the Dead Sea, and in the settlement ring that has been built around East Jerusalem, including two inside Jerusalem’s old city, on territory captured by Israel in 1967 and annexed in 1980.

    The settlements involve the transfer of a civilian population into occupied territory, which is a violation of the fourth Geneva convention, and the Rome statute (the founding document of the international criminal court) which deems such colonisation a war crime.

    The main operating arm of Booking.com is headquartered in the Netherlands, where a criminal complaint by the European Legal Support Center, a pressure group supporting Palestinian rights, is under review by Dutch prosecutors.

    […]

    #Airbnb, a US firm, also lists properties for rent in the settlements. A Guardian investigation in February 2025 found 760 rooms in hotels, apartments and houses listed by the two companies. Airbnb said it would stop advertising rentals in settlements in 2018, but reversed the decision a few months later after a legal challenge from hosts, potential hosts and guests.

    #banditisme (civilisé)

  • Benjamin Netanyahu made secret trip to UAE at height of the Iran war | Israel | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/13/benjamin-netanyahu-made-secret-trip-to-uae-at-height-of-the-iran-war

    Trèèès difficile de savoir lequel de ce deux menteurs (et criminels) professionnels ment

    But the United Arab Emirates’ foreign ministry denied the reports of Netanyahu’s visit to the country, adding that such claims were “baseless”.