• #UK and France’s small boats pact and doubling in drownings ‘directly linked’

    Report says greater police presence on French beaches and more attempts to stop dinghies increases risks to refugees

    The most recent illegal migration pact between the UK and France is “directly linked” to a doubling of the number of Channel drownings in the last year, a report has found.

    The increased police presence on French beaches – along with more dinghies being stopped from reaching the coast – is leading to more dangerous overcrowding and chaotic attempts to board the boats, the paper said.

    The lives lost in 2023 – when the deal was signed – were close to the French shore and to police patrols on the beaches, in contrast to earlier Channel drownings such as the mass drowning on 24 November 2021, where at least 27 people lost their lives after their boat got into difficulty in the middle of the Channel.

    “We directly link the recent increase in the number of deadly incidents to the agreement between the British and French governments to Stop The Boats,” the report states.

    It adds that the increased police presence and their attacks on some of the migrants trying to cross “create panicked and dangerous situations in which dinghies launch before they are fully inflated”. This scenario can increase the risk of drowning in shallow water.

    The paper, named the Deadly Consequences of the New Deal to Stop the Boats, condemns what it describes as increased police violence as the most visible consequence of last year’s deal.

    The report compares data in the year before the March 2023 deal with last year’s data after the deal was signed.

    The data was analysed by the organisation Alarmphone, which operates an emergency helpline for migrants crossing the seas who get into distress, and passes on location and other information to rescue services.

    In 2022, six lives were lost at sea in three separate incidents. In 2023, at least 13 lives were lost in six separate incidents.

    The most recent incident was on 14 January this year where five people lost their lives near the beach of Wimereux, north of Boulogne-sur-Mer, as more than 70 people tried to board a dinghy.

    The BBC reported that two of those who drowned were Obada Abd Rabbo, 14, and his older brother, Ayser, 24, who lost their lives a few metres from the French coast when people rushed into the sea to try to board the dinghy.

    Crossings reduced by a third in 2023 compared with 2022. But there are indications more migrants are turning to lorries and other methods of transport to reach the UK as the clampdown on sea crossings increases.

    Incidents last year in which people lost their lives close to the French shore include:

    - 12 August 2023: six Afghan men drowned in an overloaded dinghy which got intro trouble close to the French shore

    - 26 September 2023: Eritrean woman, 24, died in Blériot-Plage after being asphyxiated in a crush of 80 people trying to board one dinghy

    - 22 November 2023: three people drowned close to Équihen-Plage as the dinghy collapsed close to the shore. Fifty-seven survivors returned to the beach.

    The report concludes that the UK/French deal has further destabilised an already dangerous situation while police are still unable to prevent most crossings on a busy day. It identifies “victim blaming” of those trying to cross by politicians.

    A Home Office spokesperson said: “Fatal incidents in the Channel are the result of dangerous, illegal and unnecessary journeys in unseaworthy craft, facilitated by criminals in the pursuit of profit.

    “Asylum seekers should seek protection in the first country where it is reasonable for them to do so and we continue to take robust action to crackdown on criminal gangs, deter migrants from making dangerous crossings and intercept vessels.”

    The French interior ministry was approached for comment.

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/jan/29/uk-france-small-boats-pact-doubling-drownings-directly-linked

    #Calais #France #asile #migrations #réfugiés #mourir_aux_frontières #morts_aux_frontières #militarisation_des_frontières #rapport #létalité #risques #Manche #La_Manche #violences_policières #accord #Wimereux #Boulogne-sur-Mer #responsabilité #Angleterre

    • The deadly consequences of the new deal to ‘#Stop_the_Boats’

      There were more deadly incidents in the Channel in 2023 due to the new ’Stop the Boats’ deal. Increased funding for the French has meant more police, more violence on the beaches, and thus more of the dangerously overcrowded and chaotic embarkations in which people loose their lives.

      On 14 January 2024, around 2am CET, another five people were killed attempting to cross the Channel to the UK. Survivors report that their dinghy collapsed near the beach of Wimereux, north of Boulogne-sur-Mer, as more than 70 people tried to get onboard during the launch. The Préfecture maritime’s press release states the police forces present first tried rescuing the people returning to the beach, as rescue boats and a helicopter spotted four unconscious people in the sea. Later in the morning, a walker discovered a fifth body washed up on the beach. In addition to the five who died, one person was taken into intensive care in the Boulogne hospital due to severe hypothermia, and another 33 needed additional care ashore after the incident. The identities of those who died have not yet been officially published. Testimonies of survivors identify them as four Syrian nationals; two aged 14 and 16. The fifth person remains unidentified but is thought to be a man from the Middle East.

      This incident is the most recent in a disturbing trend we have observed develop over the latter part of 2023: an increase in the loss of life in the Channel very close to the French beaches and often in the presence of police.

      The increasing activities of French police since the newest Franco-British declaration in March 2023 have had two main consequences:

      - Fewer dinghies are reaching the French coast, causing dangerous overcrowding and chaotic embarkations;
      – More police attacks on the dinghies as they launch, provoking panic and further destabilising an already unsafe situation.

      The result has been not only more dangerous and deadly embarkations, but further injury and trauma for travellers at the hands of police, as well as the increased separation of families.

      In this report we show the evolution in state policy and practices which are responsible for this trend, while drawing attention to those who lost their lives as a result.
      More deadly incidents

      Since the start of 2023 there has been an alarming increase in the number of deadly incidents in the Channel compared with 2022. Of the 29 people1 known to have died at the Franco-British border last year according to Calais Migrant Solidarity, at least 13 lost their lives in six incidents related to sea crossings. This includes the shipwreck of 12 August in which six Afghan men drowned.2 This is significantly more than the six people known to have lost their lives in three events related to sea crossings in 2022.

      There is a common misperception that people most often die in the Channel far out to sea, when the search and rescue response is not properly initiated or help takes too long to arrive. This is understandable considering the shipwreck of 24 November 2021 where the UK and French coastguards refused to assist a group of more than 30 people, passing responsibility back and forth to one another. Only two people survived. The misperception may also have been bolstered by the shipwreck of 14 December, 2022 in which up to four people lost their lives, and more are still missing, despite the authorities being informed of their distress. See our analysis of what really happened here. However, as a result of their previous failures, the Coastguards have since improved their organisation, coordination, and resources for search and rescue missions on both sides of Channel. French boats routinely shadow dinghies as they make their way to the UK to be on hand to rescue if necessary, and the UK Border Force anticipate the arrivals and rescue people as they cross the borderline

      What we observed last year, however, is that the deadly incidents all happened despite the presence or near immediate intervention of French rescue boats, for example on 12 August, 15 December 2023 and 14 January 2024. Even more concerning is that they all occurred on or within sight of French shores. The cause in all of the cases seems to be the same; the dinghies being overcrowded and failing shortly after departure, or dangerous situations created by chaotic launches.
      2023 Deaths during sea crossing attempts
      12 August: 6 Afghan men drown after the sponson of their dinghy of around 65 people collapses off of Sangatte.

      36 survivors are taken to the port of Calais by the French coastguard, and 22 or 23 more are taken to Dover by the British coastguard. 2 people remain missing at sea.

      Survivors told us their dinghy was moving slowly because of the high number of people (65 or 66). One of the sponsons gave out suddenly and half of the travellers were thrown into the water. Some tried to swim to the shore as they reported they could still see Sangatte. The search and rescue operation included 5 French assets, 2 UK assets, a French helicopter and aeroplane. The search and rescue operation was not able to recover all the travellers because most of them were already in the water when the first vessel arrived on scene. Two survivors are in custody in France, accused of piloting the dinghy.
      26 September: A 24-year-old Eritrean woman dies in Blériot-Plage after being asphyxiated in a crush of 80 people trying to board one dinghy.

      Witnesses told us a group approached the dinghy at the last moment before it departed and attempted to get onboard too. The dinghy was already overcrowded and this intervention led to mass panic among travellers. We know of at least two Eritrean families who were separated as some were pushed out of the boat and others unable to leave due to physical pressure from the mass of people. Wudase, a 24 year old woman from Eritrea was unable to get out and died from asphyxiation, crushed underneath the other travellers. Her body was lowered from the boat and around 75 people continued their journey to arrive in the UK.
      8 October: A 23-year-old Eritrean man is found drowned in Merlimont, after 60 people in dinghy collapsed near the beach.

      Around 60 people tried to board a dinghy towards the UK but the craft was unable to take the weight of the people and collapsed. The travellers swam or waded back to the shore but one man, Meron, was unable to swim and drowned at the beach. The emergency services on scene were unable to resuscitate him.
      22 November: Three people drown off of Equihen-Plage as the dinghy collapsed in sight of the shore. 57 survivors return to the beach.

      Two bodies, one man, Aman and a woman, Mulu were recovered on scene. A third body, of Ezekiel, a man also from Ethiopia was found on the beach of Dannes on the 4th of December.
      15 December: One Kurdish man name Rawezh from Iraq drowns 8kms off the coast of Grand-Fort-Philippe after attempting to cross to the UK by sea. 66 other people are rescued.

      As a French Navy vessel military approached the dinghy at around 1am, the crew informed CROSS Gris-Nez that one of the dinghy’s tubes had deflated and that some people were in the water. Despite the fast response of the French, it was already too late to recover all of the people alive. Two young men Hiwa and Nima both Kurdish Iranian are still missing after the incident.
      15 December: A Sudanese man named Ahmed drowns.

      An overloaded boat struggled to leave from Sangatte’s beach amidst a cloud of tear gas launched by the French police. Some people fell into the water as the dinghy turned around due to a non-functioning engine. One young man from Sudan drowned, trapped under the collapsed dinghy, and died later from cardio-respiratory arrest in hospital.
      What changed?: dangerous deals

      We directly link the recent increase in the number of deadly incidents to agreements between the British and French governments to ‘Stop the Boats’. Since the introduction of juxtaposed border controls in the 1990s there has been intense cooperation between the French and British in attacking and harassing people on the move in Northern France to prevent and deter them from crossing to the UK. The UK gives huge sums of money to France to intensify its policing of the border in the North, and secure its ports. From 2014 to 2022 £319m was handed over according to the House of Commons Library. This included £150m in four deals between 2019 and 2022 focused on stopping boat crossings.

      This money paid for an increase of the numbers of gendarmes patrolling the coast under Operation Poseidon; more surveillance tech including night-vision goggles, drones, aeroplanes, and ANPR cameras on the roads; and several all-terrain vehicles for patrolling the beaches and dunes. This equipment has made the French police and gendarmes more effective at detecting stashed dinghies, engines, fuel and life-jackets as well as groups of people while they wait for several hours hidden in the dunes before a crossing. It also marginally increased their ability to disrupt departures on the beach, but they remained unable to prevent most on a busy crossing day. Additionally, the deals increased law enforcement cooperation and intelligence sharing between the French and British to dismantle the networks of those who organise the journeys, as well as disrupt their supply chains.

      Despite the vast sums put up by the British, previous deals were criticised for still not providing the French with enough resources to ‘Stop the Boats’. They also took place in a period of cooler relations between France and Britain in the post-Brexit period of Johnson’s premiership when the French may have been less enthusiastic about being Britain’s border police. Last March, however, both governments doubled-down and made a new declaration in which the UK promised £478m to the French over three years for 500 more police, a new detention centre, and more surveillance capacity ‘to enable swifter detection of crossing attempts’ and ‘monitor a larger area of northern France and prevent more crossings’. It is after this deal that we have really noticed an uptick in the numbers of police interventions to stop dinghies being delivered to the coast, violence on the beaches (and sometimes at sea) to stop them launching, and by consequence the number of deadly incidents occurring at or near the shores.
      Consequences of the new deal
      1: Dangerously overcrowded dinghies

      Despite the fewer overall number of people crossing in 2023 compared to 2022, each dinghy making the trip was more crowded than in any previous year.

      Illustrated in the graphs above, the 47 days with the highest average number of people per dinghy ever all took place in 2023. The highest, 26 September 2023, had an average over 70, and there were 27 days with 56 or more people per dinghy, with all except one being after June. By comparison, the highest average day in 2022 saw not-quite 53 people per dinghy. These averages do not show the actual figures of each dinghy which have recently been stretching to more than 70, and sometimes 80. Meanwhile the number of crossings on any given day has gone down.

      A key factor driving this overcrowding are the police operations against the logistical networks to organise the dinghies used for crossings, which stretch as far as Turkey and other European countries like Germany. The vehicles and drivers which do the deliveries to the French coast during periods of good weather are also targeted by police on the coastal roads. The UK government recently boasted that in 2023 246 people were arrested as ‘people smugglers’ and an international operation led to the seizure of 136 dinghies and 46 outboard motors.

      These attacks on the supply chain, however, do not reduce the overall demand. They simply mean there are fewer total vessels for the overall number of passengers. It has been observed that, with fewer boats reaching the shores on a crossing day, people who are expecting to travel try to force their way onto any dinghy that has been delivered and inflated. This had led to one person being crushed to death inside a dinghy as well as others being pushed out into the sea. It also means that the extremely overcrowded dinghies are failing close to the French shores, like in the case of 12 August 2023.
      2: Increased police violence

      Increased police violence on the French beaches is the most visible consequence of the new ‘Stop the Boats’ deal, and exacerbates the dangers of already overcrowded embarkations.

      In previous years, the fewer numbers of police patrolling the beaches were unable to deal with the large groups of people who gathered during a dinghy launch, and many times they chose to look on rather than intervene. They also had difficulties to cover the whole stretch of coastline between Belgium and Berck. Now with more aerial support, double the number of officers, and increased resources like dune buggies the police are more able to intervene at the moment of departure. Typically they will fire tear gas at the people to try and disperse them and then use knives to slice the dinghy. We have also been told about policing using ‘less-lethal’ grenades and wading into the sea to cut a dinghy as people try to board it and start the motor.

      The police’s presence and their attacks create panicked and dangerous situations in which dinghies launch before they are fully inflated and in which people have to scramble on board whilst in water up to their necks. During these moments people have drowned in the shallow water like on 8 October, and families have been separated like on 26 September 2023. The danger of the police attacks compounds that of overcrowding. It is now common to observe chaotic embarkations where more than 70 or even 80 people all try at once to get on an inflatable of just a few meters length while the police try to stop them. We have also been told that if the police do successfully destroy a dinghy as it launches the would-be travellers will look to get onboard another rather than give up, again increasing the risks of overcrowding.

      The British authorities have proudly acknowledged the increased violence, publicising a French police officer’s bodycam video where we see tear gas being used indiscriminately against a group of people which we know included those in a situation of vulnerability. In a statement celebrating the fact that two people shown in the video trying to hold the violence of the police at bay were arrested and jailed in the UK, the Home Office states:

      “Tension on French beaches is increasing due to the successful efforts of law enforcement in frustrating this organised criminal enterprise. Incidents like this highlight the complex and brave work of our French colleagues in the face of challenging conditions.”

      Despite the increased violence on the shore, for now, it still appears that the policy of the French is to not intervene to stop the boats once they are at sea and underway. This illustrates a clear contradiction between the apparent concern for safety of life while at sea, and creating extremely dangerous situations for people by attacking their dinghies as they launch.
      No borders, not ‘Stop the Boats’

      The hypocrisy of the French and British governments is that their increased border policing activities, which they sanctimoniously describe as protecting people who have to travel to the UK by boat, have only made their crossings more dangerous. Unfortunately it seems these policies will only continue over the coming years, evidenced by the three year funding agreement from March. We must then expect only more victim blaming and lies for each death in the coming years that will occur as a result. The people who continue to have to make this journey, denied access to the safe ferries and trains the rest of us are able to take, are being sacrificed for the sake of politicians’ electoral ambitions. What those politicians understand, but do not want to admit, is that it is impossible to ‘stop the boats’ so long as the border exists. Further militarisation and police intervention will only increase the number of people who die, as we have been seeing. How far the states will go in pursuing their policies of harm and death in the name of protecting their border remains to be seen. In the meantime we must continue doing all we can to not only present them the account of the consequences for their obstinance, but practically organise against it, together with those who already doing so.

      https://alarmphone.org/en/2024/01/28/the-deadly-consequences-of-the-new-deal-to-stop-the-boats
      #Alarmphone #Alarm_phone #bateaux #statistiques #chiffres

  • Group of 45 people stranded on an islet in the wider #Soufli - #Tychero area (22.07.2023)

    🆘 near #Lagyna, #Evros river, #Greece


    We are in contact with a group of 45 people stranded on an islet in the wider #Soufli - #Tychero area. They report being there 9 days already. @hellenicpolice
    are informed & claim to have searched for them but that they could not find them.

    #limbe #zone_frontalière #île #Evros #asile #migrations #réfugiés #frontières #fleuve_Evros #Turquie #Grèce #Thrace #îlots

    –-

    ajouté à la métaliste sur #métaliste sur des #réfugiés abandonnés sur des #îlots dans la région de l’#Evros, #frontière_terrestre entre la #Grèce et la #Turquie :
    https://seenthis.net/messages/953343

    • Même groupe ?
      (16.07.2023)

      🆘 in the #Evros region! 25 people are stranded on an islet near the town of #Soufli. They reported to be there since 10 days & seem currently under attack by #Greek authorities. Stop the violence & evacuate them from the islet!

      https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1680530020425424900

    • Evros: the brutal face of the European border regime

      A group has been stuck for over three weeks on a small islet of the Evros river. Their story includes countless distress-calls, physical attacks, sexual violence, non-assistance when immediate medical aid was needed, and the complete disregard for a European Court of Human Rights ruling, which granted the group interim measures and ordering the Greek state to provide them with assistance. It is another clear example of the brutal reality that people endure at the land border between Türkiye and Greece.

      On the 21st of July 2023, a group of people reached out to Alarm Phone. The 52 people – among them several children and elderly people with severe health conditions – told us how they were stuck on a small islet near the village of Lagyna on Greek territory in the middle of the Evros river, which borders Greece and Türkiye. When reaching out to Alarm Phone and calling for help, the people informed us they had already been stuck on the islet for eight days. At 14:19 CEST of the same day, Alarm Phone alerted Greek authorities, as well as Frontex, UNHCR and various NGOs via email about the people in distress, sharing their location and their request for immediate and urgent assistance.

      At this point, we did not know that this would be the start of an odyssey lasting over two weeks, with no end in sight, which would include countless emails and calls to authorities, public outcries via social media to mobilise for evacuation, an ignored decision of the European Court of Human rights and ongoing barbaric violence by Greek forces against the group.

      On the day after the alert, Greek authorities informed Alarm Phone about joint efforts, together with Frontex, to search for the group, “[…]we would like to inform you that after extensive searches by the Greek Authorities and Frontex join patrols in the location indicated by the coordinates area and also more widely, no human presence was found”. This would not be the last time that Greek authorities claimed to have been unable to find the group despite conducting “extensive searches” for them.

      Several days later, on July 26th, the people told us how they had heard car noises the previous day on the Greek side of the river, but that they were still waiting for urgently needed assistance. At the same time, their condition worsened with every day: they reported injuries and various health issues, as well, they told us how everyone’s mental health was rapidly deteriorating in light of the ongoing difficulties they were facing. The violent act of leaving people for days being stuck on an islet not only risks physical injuries, but is a mental torment in and of itself that traumatises people. Already by this point, the non-assistance from Greek authorities and Frontex was causing damage to the people calling for help – but the situation would continue to deteriorate over the coming days.

      On July 27th, 08:18 CEST, Greek authorities again claimed to have searched for the people: “[…]we would kindly like to inform you that after extensive searches by the Greek Authorities and Frontex patrol in the location indicated by the coordinates and also more widely, no human presence was found”. This is despite the Evros region being a highly militarized border area, where the EU has invested hundreds of millions of euros into fortifying the border. The technologies deployed in the area include sensors, thermal cameras and drones – but in spite of this, the Greek authorities and Frontex state they are unable to find a group with a clearly indicated location? How embarrassing. While it is clear that their statement is a blatant lie, it is remarkable that Greek authorities and Frontex have reached a point where such obvious untruths have become implicit to their operational activities. To have reached this point, these strategies have to be widely accepted within their ranks and as such demonstrate how the brutal means of deterrence used at the borders of Greece have become normalised, from overt and brutal violence to misinformation and non-assistance. This is particularly true in the Evros region, as demonstrated over the next days in the developments we witnessed for this case.

      A day later, on July 28th, the group told us again about activities on the Greek side of the river: the people had spotted a black car parked “on the Greek side” and a drone that was flying over them. Shortly after, they reported being attacked by police and what they described as “mercenaries”: “Police and mercenaries stormed us. They started to hit the world. And now we’re in the water”. They sent us several videos showing the cruel attack.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6L5M3Gwiqs&source_ve_path=Mjg2NjY&feature=emb_logo

      We immediately informed the authorities about the attack. It is clear: in this highly militarised and controlled border zone, no such attack could have happened without some level of coordination from the authorities – the very same authorities who had been claiming for days that they could not locate the group. After the attack, the people told us how they were shocked and devastated. However, this attack did not signal the end of their suffering. The group told us that after the attack, they were forced back to the same islet as before by Turkish authorities.

      Together with the Rule39 Initiative, an application for Interim Measures at the European Court of Human Rights was handed in on August 1st. By this point, we had been in contact with the people for 11 days. Throughout this entire period, the authorities had been aware of the group and their calls for assistance. Despite this, the group’s calls for assistance remained ignored. Moreover, instead of receiving help, the people were violently attacked.

      https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1684815225608949760

      During the morning of August 2nd, the response by the European Court of Human Rights arrived: the court had granted the Interim Measures and ordered Greece to provide food, water and medical assistance. We immediately informed authorities, including Frontex and UNHCR about the decision and reiterated the urgent need of assistance for the group.

      https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1686756260085936129

      During the morning of the 3rd of August, Greek authorities sent another email, claiming once again to have searched for, but not found, the people. At the same time, the people shared videos with us showing themselves loudly screaming for help. In desperation, the group decided to cross the river themselves. This is extremely dangerous – every year dozens of people die in the Evros river, which has strong undercurrents that can drown people. Luckily, they managed to cross the river and arrived safely on the Greek riverbank, which they documented with several videos that they sent to Alarm Phone. They reported talking to two people wearing shirts with “police” written on it. This is when an incredibly violent chapter of their journey started.

      https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1687059265427496961

      Following the news that the group were talking with “police”, Alarm Phone shift teams once again called various border guard and police stations, including the ones at Soufli, Alexandroupolis and Thrace. All our calls went unanswered. In the meantime, the people reported they were put into cars and told us that they feared they would be brought back to Türkiye. The position they shared showed them near Soufli:

      We continued to call the authorities, however, they either did not pick up, rejected responsibility – claiming it was outside of their jurisdiction, or refused to give any information.

      https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1687135993235750912

      Shortly after midnight on August 4th, the people reached out to Alarm Phone again. They were pushed back to Türkiye and severely beaten. A woman from the group explained what had happened to them after they were taken in the car:

      She told us how, after half an hour in the car, the young men and even some women were severely beaten. The attackers stripped the women of all their clothes and forced the young men’s eyes open to look the undressed women. They then beat the men badly. The woman said the group was worried that two among the attacked men were beaten to death. The attackers even beat the elderly women and told them to return to their country. The group was, again, forced back onto the islet, and reported that there were now several people missing, among them the two men who had been heavily beaten.

      The people told us how they were left severely shaken and outraged, desperate to know what happened to their friends who went missing who they fear died. They reported that amongst their group are three year old babies who are understandably extremely psychologically distressed and traumatised by the violent assault of the Greek police. “Please please can we help them. Turkey and Greece have left them in the middle. Do we know where the people who went missing are?”.

      https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1687373994909921281

      We want to know: what has happened to the missing? Who is responsible for the brutal attack and the sexual violence? And what was the role of Frontex in this whole story? How can orders of the European Court of Human Rights just be ignored? And why has help been repeated denied for people who are in urgent need of it?

      Not only have the attacks subjected people to overt violence, but the continuous non-assistance has led to many medical emergencies – this includes three elderly people with diabetes in need of medical assistance, an elderly person with circulatory problems in the leg, which were purple on both sides, a pregnant woman who suffered from contractions and was bleeding, and several children who were weak, mentally distressed and badly bitten by mosquitoes. It should also be noted that the group told us how they ran out of food and water days ago and are forced to drink water from the river, which carries with it a risk of poisoning.

      Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident, but instead sees the recurrence of an all too familiar pattern. The incredible level of violence used – which can only be understood as systematized forms of torture and brutalisation– against people on the move is abhorrent. It is illustrative of the dehumanisation implicit to the racist European migration regime. Furthermore, it demonstrates an obvious dysfunctionality of European institutions, where decisions of the European Court of Human Rights are easily ignored by Greece, without consequence. Instead of being forced to take action, Greek authorities merely responded to both Alarm Phone and the ECHR that the people could not be located. And once again, we see how Frontex is involved in a situation which resulted in a brutal pushback.

      On August 6th, the people were still stuck on the islet. There were also still in very distressed condition – and one that continues to deteriorate. They expressed their shock and disbelief that an ECHR decision obviously does not count in Greece. They themselves have called 112 over 50 times and written emails to Frontex and Greek authorities – but instead of receiving much needed assistance, have been subject to repeated and vicious attacks.

      https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1687425346285494273

      In the early hours of the morning on August 7th, the group reached out to us again to report another attack, telling us that “Mercenaries came upon us while we were asleep [on the islet], and we were sent back to Turkey”. They then told us how they were picked up by the Turkish army, who is forcing them back into Greece. The group was incredibly distressed, commenting that they have “become a football between Greek and Turkish army.” As the situation continues with no end in sight, and the people, who are in dire need of urgent medical assistance, are pushed back and forth across the river by Greek and Turkish forces, we again make it clear, these attacks must end and the people be given the help they so urgently need.

      We, along with the group currently stranded on the islet, are shocked and outraged – even though we witness such crimes and attacks against people on the move almost daily, and with increasing intensity. We will continue to fight against the normalisation of such violence and will never forgive the ones responsible for it. While Greece tries to cover up the mass murder of Pylos, for which the Hellenic Coast Guard is responsible, the real and merciless face of the Greek border regime remains clearly visible in the Evros region, as too does the complicity of the EU.

      https://alarmphone.org/en/2023/08/07/evros-the-brutal-face-of-the-european-border-regime/?post_type_release_type=post

  • #6_février 2023 - MIGRER EST UN DROIT !

    #Journée_mondiale_de_lutte_contre_le_régime_de_mort_aux_frontières et pour exiger la vérité, la justice et la réparation pour les victimes de la migration et leurs familles

    Nous sommes parents, amis et amies de personnes décédées, portées disparues et/ou victimes de disparitions forcées le long des frontières terrestres ou maritimes, en Europe, en Afrique, en Amérique.
    Nous sommes des personnes qui ont survécu à la tentative de traverser les frontières à la recherche d’un avenir meilleur.

    Nous sommes des citoyen.e.s solidaires qui aident les immigré.e.s durant leur voyage en fournissant une aide médicale, de la nourriture, des vêtements et un soutien lorsqu’ils se trouvent dans des situations dangereuses pour que leur voyage ait une bonne fin.
    Nous sommes des activistes qui ont recueilli les voix de ces immigrés et de ces immigrées avant leur disparition, qui s’efforcent d’identifier les corps anonymes dans les zones frontalières et qui leur donnent une sépulture digne.

    Nous sommes une grande famille qui n’a ni frontières ni nationalité, une grande famille qui lutte contre les régimes de mort imposés à toutes les frontières du monde et qui se bat pour affirmer le droit de migrer, la liberté de circulation et la justice globale pour tous et toutes.
    Année après année, nous assistons aux massacres en cours aux frontières et dans les lieux de détention conçus pour décourager les départs des personnes migrantes. Nous ne pouvons pas oublier ces victimes ! Nous ne voulons pas rester silencieux face à ce qui se passe !
    En février 2020, familles et militants se sont réunis à Oujda pour organiser le premier Grand CommémorAction. A cette occasion, nous avons choisi la date du 6 février, jour du massacre de Tarajal, comme date symbolique pour organiser des événements décentralisés dans tous les pays du monde contre la militarisation des frontières et pour la liberté de circulation.

    En septembre 2022, nous nous sommes réunis à Zarzis en Tunisie pour la deuxième Grand CommémorAction et à cette occasion nous avons réaffirmé notre volonté de continuer à construire la date du 6 février comme une journée pour unifier toutes les luttes que de nombreuses organisations mènent chaque jour pour dénoncer la violence mortelle des régimes frontaliers du monde et pour exiger vérité, justice et réparation pour les victimes de la migration et leurs familles.

    Nous demandons à toutes les organisations sociales et politiques, laïques et religieuses, aux groupes et collectifs des familles des victimes de la migration, aux citoyens et citoyennes de tous les pays du monde d’organiser des actions de protestation et de sensibilisation à cette situation le 6 février 2023.

    Nous vous invitons à utiliser le logo ci-dessus, ainsi que vos propres logos, comme élément pour souligner le lien entre toutes les différentes initiatives. Tous les événements qui auront lieu seront publiés sur la page Facebook Commemor-Action.

    Migrer pour vivre, pas pour mourir !
    Ce sont des personnes, pas des chiffres !
    Liberté de mouvement pour tous et toutes !

    Pour adhérer à l’appel, vous pouvez écrire à : globalcommemoraction@gmail.com

    https://migreurop.org/article3150.html?lang_article=fr

    #commémoraction #commémoration #migrations #asile #réfugiés #mourir_aux_frontières #décès

    • #CommemorAction

      Introduction

      On 6 February 2014, at least 15 people were killed when the Spanish Guardia Civil opened fire on a group attempting to reach Europe by swimming around the border fence at Ceuta. The killing became known as the Tarajal massacre. It was not the first mass killing by the authorities in an attempt to prevent people from moving across borders without permission from above. It was also far from the last. We, along with the affected communities, are still reeling from the mass killing on 24 June last year when Moroccan and Spanish forces murdered at least 37 people at the border fence of the Spanish enclave Melilla. Hundreds of people are missing, and an unknown number of bodies were buried anonymously by Moroccan state authorities. Instead of investigating and prosecuting those responsible for the killing or even just rethinking their inhumane border policies, the authorities have instead chosen to railroad 87 of the victims into prison on the pretence that they were responsible for the deaths.

      These high-profile mass killings are just some of the more notorious deaths at the border. They are by no means an aberration. The European Union has militarised and externalised its borders in an attempt to prevent those they consider unworthy of the right to free movement from coming to Europe. The people targeted are those deemed ‘the other’ in the imagination of Europe’s rulers. It is nothing but racism in its crudest form. Borders kill every day. Every time somebody chooses to embark for the Canaries in an overloaded, unsuitable boat in the hope of making a life for herself in Europe, a life is put at risk. It is put at risk because of the Spanish State and the European Union’s border policies. For European ‘leaders’, wealth can be and is extracted from your community, but you have no right to follow that wealth and build a life for yourself among the wealth plundered from your community and the communities of countless other people.

      The journey across the Atlantic is, perhaps, the most deadly route to Europe, but there are no safe routes for those who are systematically denied visas. These reports are now an ever-growing litany of death. Because of the Tarajal massacre, 6 February has become an international day of commemoration and action, commemorAction, for those who have been killed by the rich world’s border policies.

      CommemorAction is a ‘weapon of the weak’. It is a way of saying that these lives matter, these futures matter, each and every individual matters, and when she dies, we grieve. It is an attempt to intervene in the public space, to make the border and its murderous reality visible. Every time another life, another friend, is lost because of the border regime, people gather to commemorate that loss. Marking that death is important. This is also CommemorAction. Inspired in part by Chamseddine and the Cemetery of the Unknown in Zarzis, when an unknown body is washed up or is taken to the morgue, activists go to identify the body. If the person can be recognised, they notify the family. When that is not possible, the body is given a dignified burial. It is a practice that happens all around the region on both the European and African sides. This too is commemorAction.

      Though the core of our work is running a 24-hour hotline to bear witness to the sea border and to support people to insist that their rights are respected, our project itself is a piece of commemorAction. As the European authorities harden their hearts and ignore people’s cry for help, we become more and more a project that is documenting and commemorating each and every death. We do it so that when this border regime is over, no one can say that they did not know. More importantly, we do it because we already know. When confronted with injustice, you have to act. The bare minimum must be to commemorate the dead, demand that the perpetrators are held to account and action be taken to prevent the injustice from being repeated.

      The violence perpetrated by the border regime is a crime on a grand scale. We do not have the power to order the killing stopped. We do have the power to make it visible. Borders, as is well-known, are everywhere, but their effects are hidden. Borders are hidden not because they cannot be seen, but because there is a wilful refusal to engage with what is right in front of us. On 6 February, people gathered to bring the violence of the border into focus and commemorate the dead.

      In this report, we document what happened at some of the commemorActions across the Western Mediterranean and Atlantic region. We have also made space in the report for the voices of those who have seen their loved ones killed by the border. In this way, we hope to make this report a commemorAction. For now the pain is too often solely a private one; for things to change it must become a public one. May the memory of those who have died be for a blessing.

      A note on focus and terminology

      Alarm Phone is a network of volunteer activists. The bulk of Alarm Phone members in the Western Med and Atlantic region are West African or European in origin. As a consequence, we are much more embedded within the communities of people on the move from West African countries than we are from the Harraga communities of the Maghreb. This inevitably leads to the underrepresentation of the experiences of the latter group. The only way to rectify this problem is to expand what we do and work to build a truly transnational community of resistance. This is slow and laborious work, but we are committed to doing it.

      The language that we use is important. The words that we use also carry the weight of their history, and that is a history of power. We constantly struggle to view the world correctly and to find the right descripition of what we see. There is no single viewpoint that will encompass everything. To see the world correctly, we need a kaleidoscopic view. This report is a collective endeavour. Many of the authors are not writing in their first language, and most of the witness testimony is also given in a second or third language. We consider this a strength. We do not wish to regiment the language used in our descriptions of people and their backgrounds. Where someone might baulk at ‘sub-Saharan’ as implying inferiority and prefer ‘Black’ or ‘black African’, another might reject the racialisation implicit in the latter terms. Equally, some of us avoid talking of ‘migrants’ and prefer to emphasize personhood with ‘people on the move’, but for others of us this language is fussy and unnatural and we are proud to be migrants. We have left, as much as possible, the authors’ different choices of description, especially where the author is herself a person on the move.
      2 Commemoractions

      “6 February 2014 was truly a landmark day. Many people lost their lives, many families lost their children, many women lost their husbands, many children lost their fathers. This day was very important for all the migrants and all the people who make the crossing in very difficult circumstances, whether it is in the context of land borders, the fences, or the sea, be it the Mediterranean or the Atlantic. This day of 6 February has compelled people, migrants and activists all over the world, to make this day a historical monument for all missing migrants. We honor those who lost their lives. It is also important for all those who have lost brothers and sisters to remain strong, encouraged and motivated. Let’s continue in the same way, in the same struggles, hoping that one day, maybe things will change.” (local AP activist)

      The number of commemoractions that took place this year is really impressive, with more than 40 actions around the same date. To spread the idea, Alarm Phone released a powerful video that captures moments of previous commemoractions and is available with English, French or Spanish subtitles.
      2.1 CommemorActions on the Atlantic Route

      The Atlantic route is known as one of the most deadly routes for migration in the whole world. According to the official statistics of the IOM Missing Migrants Project, 559 people died or went missing on the Atlantic route in 2022, which amounts to 8% of all of the deaths recorded by the project worldwide . Yet, the Missing Migrant project reckons that the number of unreported deaths must be much higher. The NGO Caminando Fronteras counted 1,784 people dead or missing on the Atlantic route in 2022. In the second week of February 2023 alone, around 100 people lost their lives (see section 6: Dead and missing). Several boats that Alarm Phone supported in the last months resulted in horrific shipwrecks, for example a boat on 7 December 2022 and one on 7 February 2023. We commemorate all of these people; people whom we may have spoken to on the phone, or whom we may have passed once in a street, whom we did or did not know, whose faces we saw smiling in the pictures we received from their families. You are still with us. You will not be forgotten.

      In collaboration with two other associations, ADIPROS and ARSEREM, the Laayoune Alarm Phone team organised two commemorAction days on 4 and 5 February at the Caritas centre in the town. Many members of different communities came together to commemorate, pray and pay tribute to the many people missing and dead at sea on the Atlantic route and elsewhere. Family members were also present and gave testimony of their experiences and their pain. One person, for example, mourned for his wife whilst another person spoke of their five-year-old daughter lost en route to the Canaries.

      There were also political discussions about the lethal character of the Atlantic route, and a working group was put in place for research and identification of the missing and dead. Further debates were organised around the topic of safety at sea and how important it is to always check the weather forecast before travelling. The representives of the different communities once again highlighted how human rights are violated in the region. The commemorAction was a powerful call for human dignity and the need to stand together, to support one another in our grief and our fight.

      On the Canaries, for years now, some activists have made a practice of commemorAction and have been trying to support the families of the disappeared and the dead. On Fuerteventura, the association EntreMares organises a small commemorAction in a public square in Puerto del Rosario whenever there is a shipwreck on the Atlantic route. On Gran Canaria, there is a commemorative plaque that people sometimes gather around after a shipwreck. On Lanzarote, the Red de Solidaridad helps bury the dead in the small Muslim section of the Teguise cemetery. Activists and local people try to keep the inscriptions on the improvised tombstones visible and sometimes come to place flowers on the graves. Many of the dead could not be identified, their tombstones carry names like “Undocumented Number 3”. Other bodies were identified and buried under their names, notably the victims of three shipwrecks, one on 6 November 2019 (Caleta Caballo), one on 24 November 2020 and one on 17 June 2021 (Órzola).

      2.2 “Migrate to live not to die”: Dakar, Senegal

      On 6 February 2023, nearly 200 people gathered in the ocean-facing town of Thiaroye-sur-Mer, Senegal, to honour those who have gone missing or died along the migration routes, and to educate one another about the political actors who are responsible for the deaths.

      The event was organised by Boza Fii, an association of people who have returned to Senegal, and Alarm Phone Dakar in collaboration with Association des Jeunes Rapatriés de Thiaroye-sur-Mer (AJRAP) and Association Ben Thiaroye-sur-Mer. Among other associations, Migration Control, Énergie de Droits Humaine Senegal, Sama Chance, Village du Migrant, the Municipality of Thiaroye, Alarm Phone Marseille, the president of the Resau des Femmes de Thiaroye and journalists from CQFD Marseille attended and contributed in a spirit of building alliances against a lethal border regime.

      “It is important to expand these initiatives to make the population understand exactly what is happening” a participant stood up to say, saluting the work of Boza Fii and the fact that Senegalese youth are organising themselves to change the situation.

      “Many people in Senegal do not really understand what happens in the border regions”, Saliou, the President of Boza Fii, later explained. “It was really important to show the video reconstruction of what happened at the massacre at Melilla in June 2022”, noted Ibrahim, a core Boza Fii organiser.

      “It’s forced death. It’s organised”, the Boza Fii team explained. “It was emotional. They finally understood”, recounted Ibrahim. “It’s truly a massacre.”

      “Lots of people think, oh, it’s just that people take risks, it’s clandestine migration, it’s irregular migration, they should just stay in their countries”, explained Saliou. “That’s what many politicians say. But it’s that ideology we want to challenge.”

      The team showed statements issued by the Spanish president immediately after the massacre and videos of subsequent public interventions made by certain African ambassadors, including the ambassadors of Chad and Cameroon in Morocco, who exonerated the Moroccan and Spanish authorities and placed the blame on the people who attempted the crossing. “We need to understand in our country how we are being represented abroad,” Saliou said. “It’s true we cannot do the work of the government. But we can denounce what they do so that in the future it will be better.”

      After lunch, the participants walked to the nearby beach. Aïda Thiam from Boza Fii read out the call for justice, truth and reparations issued in advance of a series of commemorAction events.

      Awa Ba, who lost her son Mamadou Ndiaye after he tried to make it to EUrope, explained how she went to the responsible authorities asking about what happened to her son. She called for the authorities to look for her son. Up to now the authorities have not found anything. She explained that she still goes to meetings to ask for information and to demand action. After that, everyone prayed in silence according to their own beliefs; then the participants threw flowers into the ocean together and watched the waves wash them away.

      “It wasn’t easy, the event”, reflected Ciré. “But we are already engaged. We cannot just drop it.” He summarised the sentiment of the closing discussion with the words: “We are already here. The struggle goes on.”

      2.3 Tangier, Morocco: Public Debate, Private Memorial

      On 5 February, the Tangier Alarm Phone team organised a public debate on the theme of CommemorAction in collaboration with the Moroccan association Chabaka and with the support of Conseil des Migrants Subsahariens au Maroc (CMSM), Pateras de la Vida Larache, and Association Marocaine des Droits Humains (AMDH) Nord.

      In opening the event, members of Alarm Phone and Chabaka highlighted how, in commemorating and seeking justice for the terrible events of 6 February 2014, we also have an opportunity to discuss border violence more generally, remember those we have lost, and debate how to respond. “The day has become a symbol”, a Moroccan comrade in the audience emphasised. “It was a day when the violence of border controls, often more hidden, was out in the open for all to see.”

      “Each day there is a tragedy”, noted a Cameroonian activist. “It is a very important day for me. I cannot forget”, added a participant visiting from Nador.

      Though the practice of marking 6 February 2014 only began as an international practice of CommemorAction in 2018, Boubker, a celebrated Moroccan activist and founder of Chabaka, situated it in a long history. He described earlier rounds of border violence and resistance, including the caravans Chabaka organised every year for nine years following the massacre of 2005 in Ceuta. “Today we [migrant solidarity movements] are very weak compared to then.”

      The conversation turned from honouring those we have already lost to a forward-facing struggle for justice, truth and reparations. “We need to work together”, Senegalese, Cameroonian and Moroccan comrades each repeated. They underlined how informal solidarity networks and officially registered organisations might usefully cooperate, to interface between mobile communities and state institutions.

      Families of the missing and dead were wary to participate in this public event – just as many are wary to submit official requests for information – out of fear of political recrimination, the emotional pain involved, or both. “It’s so important families know their rights”, insisted Hassane, the president of the Association Aides des Migrants en Situation Vulnérable AMSV Oujda Maroc. “Before, they didn’t have the right to make these demands, but now they do. So they must know.” He explained how his organisation also creates supportive spaces where families can simply socialise with one another and come to understand that they are not alone. Members of different sub-Saharan community associations reflected on how they do something similar.

      “Do you check the prisons from time to time?” a participant from Senegal raised her hand to ask. “Because when there’s someone in Tangier whom we no longer see, we often say they’re lost at sea. But they’re not in the water; they’re in prison.” An ex-detainee in the audience confirmed: “There are people [in prison] who live with… [a] false name – for one year, or ten years.” He reported how people were taken in straight from the boat, with no one to visit them. Only family members have the right to visit someone incarcerated by the Kingdom of Morocco, it was explained. This makes it difficult for people from other African countries imprisioned in Morocco, as there family members are unlikely to be able to obtain a visa for the country.

      Recognising faces from the pictures of the missing or dead displayed on the wall, an attendee from Cameroon emphasised the importance of the event and that even more people need to come in the future.

      2.4 Ceuta, a Spanish enclave: The March for Dignity

      On Saturday, 4 February, 200 people from around the world met in the Spanish enclave of Ceuta and marched to Tarajal beach, the site where in 2014 Spanish border guards shot rubber bullets and threw gas canisters at a group of around 200 people in the water, killing at least 14. The organisers of the X Marcha por la Dignidad collected signatures from more than 252 organisations calling for justice, truth and reparations. At the university, geopolitical analyst Sani Ladan, lawyer Patricia Vicens, journalist Youssef M. Ouled and Ceuta-based activist Soda Niasse debated the meaning of the deaths, racism, the response from the authorities and the notion of incremental genocide. In the sunlight, members chanted “justice” as they walked in a steady line. At the beach, they formed a circle and lit a candle for each of the individuals who died.

      2.5 In the region of Nador: Repression continues

      AP Nador/Berkane commemorated together with the association Mouvement Uplift Africa at the beach at Cap de l’eau with speeches, banners and flowers. Unfortunately, in this region not surprisingly, the activists were observed by the police and were taken to the local police station, where they had to endure an investigation for a few hours. Fortunately, all were released at the end of the day.

      2.6 CommemorAction in Oujda

      For the ninth CommemorAction of the tragedy of Tarajal in Oujda, the local AP team organised several activities in the presence of families of the disappeared, human rights activists, journalists and other members of NGOs and local associations.

      The first activity took place on Saturday, 4 February at the centre of the Democratic Confederation of Labour in Oujda under the title “From the massacre of Tarajal to the massacre of Melilla”. There were three axes of discussion. The first focused on the psychological suffering of the families of the disappeared and addressed the psychological disorders which affect the parents and other family members as well as the lack of psychological support in these cases. The second axis was about the massacre of Melilla on “Black Friday” and the suffering of the migrants during the intervention of the Moroccan gendarmerie. There was also a discussion of the arrests of some of the people who could neither cross nor flee. Finally, the third axis dealt with the role of the media in migration issues. After the discussions, the participants lit 50 candles in memory of the victims of the massacres at both Tarajal and Melilla.

      The second activity on 5 February consisted of a mixed discussion group, made up of young Moroccans and migrants of all genders, who discussed the issues of migration together and shared their opinions on the massacres at Tarajal and Melilla. They also spoke about racism in the city of Oujda.

      Sea Crossings and statistics

      According to UNHCR statistics, 6,554 people arrived in Spain between 1 November 2022 and 28 February 2023. In the same period, Alarm Phone was involved in 51 cases, of which 29 calls came from the Atlantic region, 11 from the Alboran Sea and 11 from the Algerian route. According to the people who alerted us to them, the boats were carrying at least 2,036 men, 233 women and 67 children, adding up to a total of 2,336 people.

      22 of the boats Alarm Phone was contacted about were rescued by Salvamento Marítimo, nine were intercepted by Marine Royale, four boats returned by themselves and at least three boats completed the journey on their own. As a relatively new development, in at least four cases merchant vessels were involved in rescue operations. They did not always abide by international agreements. One such example is the case of 12 February, in which the merchant vessel Santa Isabel of the Maersk Group brought 47 people in distress back to Western Sahara, thereby ignoring the requirement to disembark shipwrecked mariners in a port of safety and violating the Refugee Convention’s principle of not returning an asylum seeker to a place where she may be in danger. It is vital that SAR authorities and merchant vessels take into account people’s rights as refugees when allocating a port of disembarkation. Unfortunately, many people’s fate remains unclear. For example, 53 people left Tan-Tan at the beginning of December. They were lost at sea for two weeks. Three survivors were found on the cliffs of Tantan. The other 50 are still missing.

      We are sad and angry about the three shipwrecks Alarm Phone had to witness. These led to at least 100 deaths and 101 people who are still missing.

      These shipwrecks are just a fraction of the tragedies that are a more or less daily occurrence on the Western Mediterranean and Atlantic routes. The Missing Migrants Project of the IOM reckons that the Western Med and Atlantic routes in 2022 are so lethal that they account for just under 20% of all the deaths of people on the move worldwide. Caminando Fronteras puts the number of people who died last year on their way to Spain at 2,390, which means more than 6 deaths each day. With 1,784 people dead on the Atlantic route alone, this route remains one of the deadliest in the world.

      Our thoughts and solidarity go to the families and friends of all the people who have died during their journey or are still missing. We commemorate the dead and disappeared. We commemorate Chahira, Boudjrada, Belkada, Ayoub, Abdou, Reda, Rasim, Daimi, Anayis, Lotfi, Djalal, Lilia, Ryad, Laoulou, Islam, Benachir, Mohamed, Aiman, Hamid, Hanan, Abderramin, Ismail and all those whose names we don’t yet know.
      4 Updates from different regions
      4.1 Atlantic route

      The last two months of 2022 did not see as many people crossing towards the Canary Islands as happened in November and December of previous years. Altogether, 15,682 people arrived via the Atlantic route in 2022, while numbers were around 22,000 in 2020 and 2021. 1,649 people had already come to the Canaries by 19 February this year. The first week of February was particularly busy. To all of them, we say welcome to Europe!

      Although there are generally fewer boats that come from countries further away like Senegal or Mauritania, some people still try. A boat carrying people from The Gambia shipwrecked in December, resulting in 12 deaths. A boat which had left Mauritania was intercepted right after departure by the Mauritanian authorities. However, a large boat carrying 162 people made it to El Hierro, the most western of the Canary Islands, in late November. Another noteworthy story was the arrival of three people who braved the long journey from Nigeria on the rudder of a cargo ship and survived.

      A worrisome development in the region is a possible resumption of deportations from the Canary Islands to Senegal. A deportation flight from mainland Spain made a stopover in the Canaries to pick up more than 15 inmates from the Gran Canaria detention centre. They were deported to Dakar on 14 February. This came after a meeting on 26 January between the Ministers for Foreign Affairs of Senegal and Spain.
      4.2 Nador – Melilla

      Raids of makeshift migrant camps, arrests and arbitrary expulsions to the south continue to be the brutal reality in and around Nador.

      On 24 June, at least 40 people were killed by Moroccan and Spanish border guards in the attempt to cross the border towards Melilla at Barrio Chino. For further details, see e.g. our last report, a BBC documentary, a report by Amnesty International and a report by Caminando Fronteras.

      The trials against several groups of people, mainly from Chad, Sudan and South Sudan, who are being scapegoated and prosecuted for these events are still ongoing. On 17 November, the sentence for a group of 14 people previously sentenced to 8 months in prison was increased to 3 years of imprisonment by the Court of Appeal in Nador. On 9 January, the Court of Appeal also increased the prison sentence against 13 others (2 Chadian and 11 Sudanese nationals) from two and a half years to 3 years. On 6 February, the last appeal verdict was issued in the Nador court, with 3 detainees being sentenced to 4 years of imprisonment. Meanwhile, on the other ‘side’, the Spanish prosecutor’s office investigation into the real culprits “found no evidence that any wrongdoing was committed in the behaviour of the Spanish security forces”. Spanish Minister of the Interior Grande-Marlaska likewise denied that there were any deaths or any neglect of the wounded​​​​​​​ on the Spanish side of the border. Nevertheless, a detailed, forensic investigation by Lighthouse Reports uncovered multiple abuses by the Guardia Civil and Spanish authorities.

      Sudanese families are still contacting the human rights association AMDH Nador to look for their children missing since the tragedy (79 people are reportedly missing). AMDH Nador continue to publish pictures of the missing on their Facebook page, trying to reach out to the migrant communities to find any information on their fate.

      At least the good news is that the much hated and much resisted illegal detention centre in Arekmane was finally closed. AMDH Nador fought a long fight for its closure as detainees were held under unlawful conditions. The centre will now again be used for its primary purpose, as a sports and leisure centre for youth.

      Sea crossings by the Black African communities in Nador seem to have resumed. We saw the arrivals of two boats on 13 January. The first carried 45 people, including, according to the classification opf Emergencias Frontera Sur Motril, three children and two minors. The second boat had twelve people. It was made up of five children, four women and three men, according Helena Maleno’s classification. Both groups embarked in Nador and arrived in Motril. On Christmas eve, 30 Black Africans (16 women and 14 men) arrived on the Spanish island of Chafarinas off the coast of Nador. They were transferred to Melilla two days later. This is amazing news: In the past, arrivals on the Spanish islets have tended to result in illegal pushbacks to Morocco. Also on 5 February a boat carrying 36 passengers (24 men, 10 children and 2 women) arrived on the uninhabited island of Alborán. Like those who arrived on Chafarinas, these travellers were also taken to an inhabited part of the Spanish state (Source and classification: AP Nador). Boza! [Boza is the (Bambara) word that is used across all communities of departure to celebrate a successful arrival to EUrope].

      Moroccan nationals continued to cross, both to mainland Spain and to Melilla. The vast majority of Moroccan citizens, like those from south of the Sahara, now have to cross by boat or jump the fence to get to Melilla, as the official border crossing has been closed to them. The response of the Moroccan authorities has been one of severe repression. After an attempt by a group of Moroccan harraga to jump the fence on New Year’s Eve was thwarted, the authorities of Nador arrested about 40 young people. They were placed in detention, despite a lack of judicial authorisation, before they were forcibly relocated by bus to the interior of Morocco.
      4.3 Oujda and the Algerian border zone

      New deaths have been reported by the Moroccan Association for Human Rights (AMDH) Nador in the Algerian-Moroccan border area. On 14 December 2022, six (or in some accounts seven) lifeless bodies were found in the area of Ras Asfour, on the Moroccan side. The bodies were buried in the cemetery of the town of Jeralda so quickly that they could not be identified. AMDH asks:

      “How is it possible that six migrants all die at the same time in a place where it is cold, but a short distance from a Moroccan residential area and checkpoints of the Moroccan army? What was the rush to bury the bodies without allowing representatives of the Guinean and Chadian embassies to identify the bodies?”

      On 25 January 2023, two more bodies were found and buried in the same cemetery. In a Facebook post, AMDH Nador talks of “serial deaths”: eight people in less than 35 days. The organisation blames the Moroccan deportation policies. The public prosecutor opened an investigation at the end of January 2023.

      The methods used to keep this border closed endanger the lives of people on the move. Local AP activist Driss Elaoula explains that the area is very hostile for people on the move: difficult climatic conditions, but especially a border made manifest by a high iron fence made to hurt people who try to climb it. On the Algerian side, a dangerous pit was dug with holes 8 m deep and 4 m wide. In winter, these pits are often filled with water and people who try to climb the fence may fall in and freeze to death or drown.

      In Oujda, the association Aides Aux Migrants en Situations Vulnérable (AMSV) works to identify the dead and arrange a funeral. The group has identified and buried 49 people in the last five years.

      Regarding the situation of people on the move in Oujda, local AP activists report numerous arrivals in the city, mainly via the Algerian border. They usually leave directly to Nador. We are told by the same source that in the last months a lot of minors from Guinea arrived in Oujda and were forced to beg in the streets. ​​​​​​​

      https://alarmphone.org/en/2023/05/30/commemoraction

  • "Comme dans un #ping-pong" : 34 personnes coincées sur un îlot d’#Evros, à la frontière gréco-turque (à partir du 30.03.2022)

    Pendant plus de 48 heures, 34 migrants, dont des enfants, sont restés bloqués sur une petite île au milieu du fleuve d’Evros, à la frontière entre la Turquie et la Grèce, les deux pays se rejetant la responsabilité de leur prise en charge. C’est finalement une décision de la Cour Européenne des droits de l’Homme qui a poussé au lancement d’une évacuation ce vendredi. Ce type de situation se multiplie en raison de la « systématisation » des refoulements par les autorités grecques, selon les ONG.

    Depuis le 30 mars, 34 migrants étaient bloqués sur un îlot au milieu du fleuve Evros, qui marque la zone frontalière entre la Grèce et la Turquie. « Nous avons reçu de leur part des photos de voitures de police et de pompiers, vers midi : a priori, ils sont donc sur le point d’être évacués ou viennent de l’être... Mais nous n’avons pas encore reçu de confirmation », relate Lorenz, responsable du réseau d’activistes Alarm Phone, qui a donné l’alerte.

    Parmi ces personnes, on compte quatre femmes, dont une enceinte, et six enfants de moins de dix ans, signalent Alarm Phone et Border Violence Monitoring Network (BVMN), dans un communiqué commun paru le 31 mars.

    « Ils ont très froid la nuit et craignent que la pluie arrive. Ils nous rapportent que leurs réserves d’eau et de nourriture sont épuisées au point qu’ils les rationnent en ne les donnant qu’aux enfants », décrivaient les deux organisations.

    « Appel humanitaire : nous sommes coincés depuis deux jours sur une île grecque de la rivière d’Evros. Nous avons de jeunes enfants, des femmes et un vieil homme », précisait le groupe de 34 exilés dans un message d’alerte envoyé le 31 mars à diverses organisations internationales.

    « Une fois encore, Frontex reste inactif et met des vies en danger »

    Alarm Phone et BVMN assurent avoir prévenu, le 30 mars, les autorités grecques, l’agence Frontex, ainsi que le Haut-Commissariat aux réfugiés des Nations Unies (UNHCR). Mais aucune évacuation ni forme d’assistance n’avait été réalisée.

    Dans la foulée, Frontex a confirmé avoir reçu l’appel de détresse, mais « n’a fait que le transférer aux autorités grecques », pointent les deux organisations. À leurs yeux, « une fois encore, Frontex reste inactif et met des vies en danger ».

    Alarm Phone et BVMN ont également pu joindre au téléphone des officiers grecs. Ces derniers ont reconnu avoir connaissance de cette situation, « et ont assuré qu’ils ramèneraient les personnes en Grèce ». Mais sans mettre en oeuvre cette promesse. Une nuit de plus s’est donc écoulée.
    Déblocage de la situation grâce à la CEDH

    Le déblocage de la situation est venue de la Cour Européenne des droits de l’Homme (CEDH). Saisie en urgence de l’affaire, celle-ci a imposé des mesures provisoires de protection de ces 34 personnes. Elle a notifié l’État grec, au matin de ce 1er avril, de son obligation de fournir un abri et des vivres au groupe.

    « La décision de la CEDH est un argument fort, et un instrument puissant. Dans ce cas concret, elle a créé la pression dont nous avions besoin pour augmenter les possibilités d’évacuation des personnes », souligne Lorenz. De quoi « redonner un peu d’espoir, ce matin, au groupe avec lequel nous sommes resté en contact permanent ».

    Mais aux dernières nouvelles, les personnes demeuraient toujours « épuisées et très effrayées, car la situation reste très incertaine », insiste Lorenz. Et pour cause : la menace d’un refoulement vers la Turquie continue de planer.
    « Les deux autorités jouent avec la vie des gens comme dans un ping-pong »

    « On voit beaucoup de cas de personnes qui arrivent sur le territoire grec, se font repérer, et refouler par les autorités sur ces petites îles dans la rivière », affirme Lorenz. C’est là que commence le jeu géopolitique : « ces îles sont-elles sur le territoire grec, ou turc ? Ce n’est souvent pas clair. Les deux autorités jouent avec la vie des gens comme dans un ping-pong ».

    https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1509610524559953923

    « Nous sommes toujours en contact avec le groupe et ils viennent de nous dire qu’ils ont été attaqués par des hommes en tenue militaire », relayait Alarm Phone dans un tweet hier. Les 34 personnes témoignaient alors auprès des ONG avoir vu des « véhicules militaires et des voitures banalisées » rôdant sur la rive non loin de l’îlot, ainsi que des « drones » dans les alentours.

    « Nous souffrons du froid, mais nous ne pouvons pas allumer un feu pour nous réchauffer à cause de l’armée grecque (...) Les militaires grecques terrifient les enfants et les femmes avec leurs méthodes, ils veulent que nous nous rendions pour nous ramener en Turquie », écrivaient-elles dans leur message aux organisations internationales. Or, toutes ces personnes souhaitent demander l’asile en Grèce, indiquent les ONG.

    Les intimidations, et surtout les « pushback » (refoulements à chaud), sont ainsi monnaie courante dans la région de l’Evros. Ils sont documentés par les acteurs de terrain, ONG et enquêtes médiatiques, malgré le déni des autorités.

    Une situation qui se répète

    Pas plus tard qu’à la mi-mars 2022, un groupe de 30 Syriens était également resté bloqué sur un îlot pendant près de cinq jours. Selon leurs témoignages, les autorités grecques elles-mêmes les auraient refoulés sur ce bout de terre.

    Dans cette opération, un petit garçon de quatre ans, le fils de l’une des personnes du groupe, s’est noyé. Suite à la couverture médiatique et la mobilisation d’ONG autour de cette affaire, les autorités grecques avaient finalement porté assistance aux autres migrants du groupe, le 18 mars.

    En janvier également, 25 Syriens et 4 Turcs étaient restés coincés de la même façon. Comme le rapportait la presse grecque, Athènes refusait d’organiser leur sauvetage, leur intimant de retourner par leurs propres moyens en Turquie, en traversant l’Evros. « Les courants du fleuve sont forts en hiver. Il est impensable de laisser des personnes entrer dans l’eau », s’offusquait alors Nathalie Gruber, la porte-parole de l’association Josoor, auprès d’InfoMigrants.

    Ce type de situations, avec des groupes laissés sur des îlots sans pouvoir en repartir, a été documenté et médiatisé tout au long de l’année 2021 également. « Depuis 2020, craignant des représailles, les Grecs ne déposent plus toujours les migrants côté turc, ils ne s’approchent plus des rives voisines, ils laissent les exilés sur ces îles entre les deux pays », expliquait Natalie Gruber à InfoMigrants.
    Une pratique ancienne, mais qui se normalise

    « Les pushback ont toujours été une pratique constante de la violence aux frontières, depuis le milieu des années 90. Mais ces deux dernières années, on observe une normalisation de cette violence. Cela devient une pratique systématique », décrit Lorenz.

    « Ici, ça se fait très souvent. La zone frontalière est militarisée (interdite aux civils), ce n’est pas compliqué, personne ne nous surveille », confirmait un ex-policier grec dans un témoignage recueilli par InfoMigrants. Il agissait ainsi, d’après ses dires, depuis les années 90.

    Depuis de nombreuses années, les populations sur la route de l’exil traversent l’Evros depuis les rives turques pour entrer en Union européenne. Mais la crise migratoire de mars 2020, pendant laquelle des dizaines de milliers de migrants sont arrivés en Grèce via Kastanies après l’ouverture des frontières turques, a tout aggravé. « Nous avons aujourd’hui 850 militaires le long de l’Evros », avait déclaré un garde-frontière de la région à une équipe d’InfoMigrants sur place. « Frontex est présent avec nous ».

    https://www.infomigrants.net/fr/post/39597/comme-dans-un-pingpong--34-personnes-coincees-sur-un-ilot-devros-a-la-
    #limbe #zone_frontalière #île #Evros #asile #migrations #réfugiés #frontières #fleuve_Evros #Turquie #Grèce #Thrace #îlots

    –-

    ajouté à la métaliste sur #métaliste sur des #réfugiés abandonnés sur des #îlots dans la région de l’#Evros, #frontière_terrestre entre la #Grèce et la #Turquie :
    https://seenthis.net/messages/953343

    • NON-assistance for 34 people stuck on a Greek islet in the border river between Turkey and Greece

      Joint Statement by Alarm Phone & Border Violence Monitoring Network (BVMN)

      For almost two days, 34 people – including four women, one of whom is pregnant, six children under the age of 10 and 24 men – are stuck on a small islet of the Evros river at the land border between Turkey and Greece. The Greek authorities, as well as Frontex and the UNHCR, have been informed since mid-day yesterday, March 30. Since then, the group has reported that from the Greek side, military vehicles as well as unmarked cars have been visiting the Greek river bank next to the islet, and drones have reportedly spotted the area. The group still has not been evacuated. We urge the Greek authorities to rescue them off the islet immediately.

      They are freezing at night and are worried it will start raining soon. They report that their food and water supplies are so low that they are now rationing their supplies to the children only.

      Yesterday, the group sent this message to several organizations:

      “Humanitarian appeal: We have been stuck for two days on a Greek island in the Evros river. We have young children, women and an old man. We suffer from lack of food and two children are in poor health. We hope to help us reach the Cross or the Red Crescent. We cannot get out of here and our situation is tragic.

      Please help us. This is our situation for two days. We suffer from cold, but we cannot light a fire to warm up because of the Greek army and the children are suffering from cold in the middle of the island. Greek soldiers terrify children and women with their methods, they want us to surrender ourselves to take us back to Turkey.”

      At noon on March 30 Alarm Phone alerted Greek authorities, Frontex and UNHCR in order to assist the group in getting off the islet. On the phone, Greek officers first told Alarm Phone they did not find the group. They later acknowledged, however, knowing about the case and assured to bring the people to Greece. Despite their promises, the group remains stuck on the islet without any help ever since. Also, Frontex confirmed having received the distress call, however only forwarding it to the Greek authorities. Once again, Frontex stays inactive and puts people’s lives at risk.

      In a similar incident on March 18, a child drowned, as reported by ECRE. Any loss of life would be on the authorities who remained inactive despite knowing about the distress situation!

      The Border Violence Monitoring Network (BVMN) reached out to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and called to invoke Interim Measures on this case to push for their safe passage to Greece. The people are tired, desperate and need immediate assistance – they cannot stay another night on the island. We demand immediate intervention!

      https://alarmphone.org/en/2022/03/31/non-assistance-for-34-people

  • Adbusting: Killing people in a brand new uniform!

    Am 09. Mai ist der selbsternannte Europatag der Europäischen Union. Doch anlässlich dieser „Feierlichkeiten“ sah sich eine anonyme Aktionsgruppe gezwungen dies nicht unkommentiert zu lassen: heute morgen erschienen an mehreren Bushaltestellen in unmittelbarer Nähe zur CDU und SPD Parteizentrale in Berlin Werbeplakate im Namen der europäischen Grenzschutzagentur FRONTEX, die die neue, einheitliche Uniform präsentieren, die 1A zum illegalen pushbacken geeignet ist . Dabei ist die Aktionsgruppe dem Aufruf des Frontex Foto Wettbewerbs gefolgt und hat die Realität menschenverachtender Handlungen von Frontex deutlich gemacht. Auf den Plakaten wird die Realität an den europäischen Außengrenzen mit dem Spruch „Killing people in a brand new uniforms“ benannt.

    NGOs wie AlarmPhone, Sea-Watch und Border Violence Monitoring Network berichten regelmäßig von illegalen Pushbacks, die unter der Leitung von oder in Zusammenarbeit mit FRONTEX passieren. Menschen werden illegal nach Libyen zurückgebracht wo mitunter Folter und Tod auf sie warten, auf dem Mittelmeer zurückgedränkt oder beim Ertrinken im Stich gelassen. Auf europäischem Festland werden Menschen in nicht-EU Staaten deportiert und vorher misshandelt. Somit wird systematisch ihr Recht auf Asyl verwehrt.^1,2 Die EU betreibt dadurch eine konsequent menschenverachtende Abschottungspolitik, die das Sterben tausender Menschen zur Folge hat. Umgesetzt wird diese Politik maßgeblich durch FRONTEX.

    Diese Außenpolitik ist nichts Neues und wird auch nicht erst seit der sogenannten ‚Flüchtlingskrise‘ 2015 verfolgt. Die konsequente Abschottung war insbesondere Folge des Schengen-Abkommens, das zwar die innereuropäische Reisefreiheit ermöglichte, jedoch gleichzeitig zu einem verschärften Grenzschutz der Außengrenzen führte. Schon 1998 schlug die österreichische EU-Ratspräsident*innenschaft vor, die Außengrenzen Europas systematischer abzusichern und somit die Einreise von Nicht-EU Bürger*innen stärker zu kontrollieren und noch weiter einzuschränken. Die EU verfolgt ihre Abschottungs- und Aufrüstungspolitik systematisch und das schon seit langem.

    Regelmäßig werden von der EU Abkommen und Leitfäden festgelegt, die stärkere Grenzkontrollen fordern und umsetzten. So zum Beispiel die European Neighboorhood Policy, die stärkere Grenzkontrollen durch nicht-EU Nachbarstaaten festlegt. Gekoppelt sind solche Abkommen oft an sogenannte „Entwicklungshilfe“, die kooperierende Länder erhalten wenn sie sich am Grenzschutz beteiligen. Das ökonomische Ausbeutungsverhältnis zwischen den Ländern wird dabei gezielt als Druckmittel genutzt und zeigt erneut, wie die EU ökonomische Privilegien ausnutzt. Dass die Ressourcen sich aus kolonialer Vergangenheit und kapitalistischer Ausbeutungspraxis ergeben, spielt dabei keine Rolle: Stattdessen werden diese Maßnahmen von der EU als humanitär verkauft.

    FRONTEX hat angekündigt, die bisherige stehende Truppe von 1.500 Einsatzkräften bis 2027 auf 10.000 Kräfte aufzustocken. Die geplanten 3.000 Offiziere sind dabei direkt der Zentrale in Warschau unterstellt und sollen mit eigenen Waffen und Munition ausgestattet werden. Da es bis jetzt keine Rechtsgrundlage für eigene Schusswaffen gibt, konnte dieses Vorhaben bisher nicht umgesetzt werden – das Zeichen ist jedoch klar, FRONTEX will sich und soll weiter militarisiert und aufgerüstet werden.^3

    Diese Aufrüstung wird Flucht und Migration tödlicher und das Vorgehen von FRONTEX und anderen Grenzbehörden noch menschenverachtender machen. Gegen das Europäische Grenzregime, gegen FRONTEX und die Militarisierung der Außengrenzen! Freedom of movement is everybody’s right!

    Quellen und Verweise

    Link zum Frontex Fotowettbewerb (freuen sich bestimmt über Bilder ihrer tatsächlchen Arbeit) : https://frontex.europa.eu/media-centre/news/news-release/frontex-photo-c...

    Europatag 9.5 ?! Was es da zu feiern gebe ist unklar - am 9.Mai sich mit so einer scheiße befassen zu müssen statt den „Tag des Sieges“ zu feiern ist höchst ärgerlich

    Bisher tragen Einsatzkräfte, die im Rahmen von FRONTEX Operationen im Einsatz sind, die Uniformen ihrer Entsenderstaaten.

    1 https://alarmphone.org/en/2020/03/15/returned-to-war-and-torture
    2 https://www.borderviolence.eu/frontex-ignore-rights-violations-at-the-evros-border
    3 https://digit.site36.net/2020/09/22/frontexs-weapon-problem

    https://de.indymedia.org/node/148213

    #frontex #contre-campagne #affiches #Berlin #Allemagne #campagne #résistance

    ping @karine4 @isskein @_kg_

  • Sabotage, Delays and Non-Assistance: Another day in Malta’s SAR zone : AlarmPhone | AlarmPhone
    #Covid-19#Malte#Europe#migrant#migration#Mediterranee

    https://alarmphone.org/en/2020/05/03/sabotage-delays-and-non-assistance

    Alarm Phone reconstruction of the distress case where a boat with 66 people on board was allegedly sabotaged by the Armed Forces of Malta (8-10 April 2020)

  • Le Covid-19, nouveau danger pour les migrants en #Méditerranée

    Seul bateau humanitaire à opérer en ce moment, le « #Alan_Kurdi » cherche en vain un port pour débarquer 150 rescapés. Avec l’épidémie, l’Italie et Malte ont fermé leurs ports et disent n’être plus en mesure de mener des opérations de sauvetage.

    La scène est devenue d’une triste banalité. Depuis cinq jours, le bateau de sauvetage Alan Kurdi, de l’ONG allemande Sea-Eye, erre en Méditerranée entre Malte et l’île italienne de Lampedusa. Aucun des deux Etats n’est prêt à accueillir les 150 rescapés que le bateau a recueillis le 6 avril au large de la Libye. Avec l’épidémie de Covid-19 qui fait rage (plus de 18 000 morts en Italie, deux dans le petit archipel maltais), ils s’opposent même à un débarquement temporaire des migrants avant une relocalisation dans d’autres pays, alors que 150 villes allemandes se sont dites prêtes à accueillir des réfugiés, selon Sea-Eye. Rome aurait également refusé d’approvisionner le bateau en nourriture, médicaments et carburant.

    Le coronavirus et la fermeture du continent européen ont rendu les traversées de la Méditerranée plus risquées encore, et le travail des ONG plus difficile. Le Alan Kurdi est actuellement le seul navire humanitaire à patrouiller en Méditerranée centrale. Le bateau de l’ONG espagnole Open Arms est en réfection. Sea Watch et MSF ne sont pas retournés en mer après avoir été placés en quarantaine au large de l’Italie début mars.

    Fermeture des ports

    Après l’annonce du sauvetage effectué le 6 avril par le Alan Kurdi, et alors que le bateau demandait à l’Italie et à Malte une autorisation de débarquer, Rome et La Vallette ont choisi de fermer complètement leurs ports. Le 8 avril, le gouvernement italien annonçait que tant que l’état d’urgence sanitaire serait en vigueur, « les ports italiens ne pourraient être considérés comme "sûrs" pour le débarquement de navires battant pavillon étranger ». « A l’heure actuelle et en raison de l’épidémie de Covid-19, les ports ne présentent plus les conditions sanitaires nécessaires », a précisé le ministère des Transports.

    Malte a suivi le même chemin le 9 avril. « Il n’est actuellement pas possible d’assurer la disponibilité d’une zone sûre sur le territoire maltais sans mettre en danger l’efficacité des structures nationales de santé et de logistique », affirme le gouvernement, qui incite les migrants à ne pas tenter le voyage. « Il est de leur intérêt et de leur responsabilité de ne pas se mettre en danger en tentant un voyage risqué vers un pays qui n’est pas en mesure de leur offrir un abri sûr. »
    Selon l’agence européenne de surveillance des frontières, Frontex, les arrivées illégales en Europe ont diminué avec la pandémie, sans s’arrêter pour autant. Ainsi, 800 personnes ont quitté la Libye en mars, selon l’agence de l’ONU pour les réfugiés. De l’autre côté de la Méditerranée, 177 personnes ont débarqué en Italie entre le 2 et le 8 avril, selon l’OIM. « Nous avons constaté une augmentation des traversées cette semaine en Méditerranée centrale, probablement due à l’instabilité croissante en Libye et à un temps clément », précise une porte-parole d’Alarm Phone, ONG qui alerte les garde-côtes si elle repère des embarcations en détresse. Dans la nuit du 6 au 7 avril, 67 personnes ont ainsi réussi à atteindre Lampedusa par elles-mêmes après avoir dérivé plusieurs dizaines d’heures. Alertés, les garde-côtes italiens et maltais ne sont pas intervenus.

    Sabotage

    « Notre ligne d’urgence pour les personnes en détresse a constaté ces derniers jours un comportement de plus en plus irresponsable des garde-côtes européens. Les Maltais ou les Italiens n’interviennent pas toujours ou n’arrivent que très longtemps après les alertes », affirme Alarm Phone. L’ONG accuse les gardes-côtes de Malte d’avoir saboté le 9 avril un bateau transportant 70 personnes, qui se trouvait à 20 miles au sud-ouest de l’île. D’après un enregistrement consulté par le New York Times, les garde-côtes auraient coupé le câble d’alimentation du moteur. On y entend aussi l’un d’eux dire : « On va vous laisser mourir dans l’eau. Personne n’entre à Malte. » L’embarcation a finalement été secourue plusieurs heures plus tard.

    Avec la fermeture des ports, les garde-côtes devraient encore limiter leurs interventions. La Vallette a prévenu qu’elle ne serait plus en mesure de mener des missions de sauvetage. « Les personnes qui fuient la Libye devront rejoindre les points les plus méridionaux de Malte ou de l’Italie par elles-mêmes. C’est un pari extraordinairement risqué pour ces bateaux fragiles et trop chargés », s’inquiète Alarm Phone. « Malgré la pression que la pandémie fait peser sur tous les aspects de la société, nous sommes extrêmement préoccupés par ces décisions politiques qui, de fait, outrepassent le droit international.  Le débarquement des rescapés dans un lieu sûr est une obligation pour les capitaines de navire et les États ont la responsabilité juridique de coopérer à la désignation d’un lieu "sûr" approprié, rappelle une porte-parole de SOS Méditerranée.  Nous craignons que les gouvernements européens établissent une hiérarchie entre deux devoirs de priorité égale : sauver des vies à terre et sauver des vies en mer ».

    La situation est d’autant plus préoccupante que le nombre de traversées devrait repartir à la hausse, comme c’est habituellement le cas au printemps. Et pour la première fois, la marine libyenne pourrait refuser de pourchasser les migrants, là aussi en raison de la pandémie. Tripoli a suivi ses voisins du nord et déclaré ses propres ports « non sûrs ». Un bateau officiel des garde-côtes avec 280 rescapés à bord a été interdit d’aborder dans la capitale libyenne. Selon Sea-Eye, leurs collègues à terre exigent quant à eux des masques pour continuer les opérations d’interception.


    https://www.liberation.fr/planete/2020/04/10/le-covid-19-nouveau-danger-pour-les-migrants-en-mediterranee_1784859
    #ONG #sauvetage #Méditerranée #asile #migrations #réfugiés #Mer_Méditerranée #ports #ports_fermés #fermeture_des_ports #frontières #fermeture_des_frontières

    ping @thomas_lacroix

    • Les migrants abandonnés en Méditerranée

      Le navire humanitaire allemand Alan Kurdi est coincé en mer avec 150 personnes à bord, l’Italie et Malte ayant fermé leurs ports pour cause de coronavirus. En raison de la guerre qui sévit à Tripoli, la Libye refuse de faire débarquer sur son sol 280 migrants interceptés par les gardes-côtes libyens.
      Il n’y a plus de port en Méditerranée centrale prêt à accueillir les demandeurs d’asile sauvés en mer. Les bateaux humanitaires se trouvent pris en étau entre les ports italiens et maltais, fermés pour cause de coronavirus, et les ports libyens, qui se ferment également pour cause de guerre.

      L’Alan Kurdi, le bateau de l’ONG allemande Sea Eye, avait tout juste repris du service en mer depuis quelques heures, après plus d’un mois d’absence de navire humanitaire en Méditerranée, qu’il a été amené à secourir, lundi 6 avril au matin, 62 personnes qui avaient lancé un appel de détresse depuis leur embarcation de bois surchargée dans les eaux internationales au large de la Libye.

      L’ONG rapporte que pendant le sauvetage, un hors-bord battant pavillon libyen les a menacés en tirant des coups de feu en l’air. Pris de panique, la moitié des migrants se sont alors jetés à l’eau, mais ils ont pu être sauvés par l’équipage de l’Alan Kurdi.

      Les ports italiens décrétés « peu sûrs »

      Quelques heures plus tard, le bateau était amené à secourir une deuxième embarcation, avec 82 personnes à bord dont une femme enceinte. Selon l’ONG, le bateau italien de ravitaillement de plates-formes pétrolières Asso Ventinove, présent à proximité du bateau en détresse, avait refusé de procéder au sauvetage.

      En raison de la pandémie de Covid-19, les autorités italiennes et maltaises ont informé l’Allemagne qu’elles refusaient tout débarquement sur leurs côtes, même si une répartition des personnes sauvées entre les États européens était organisée. Le 7 avril, le gouvernement italien a publié un décret déclarant ses ports « peu sûrs » tant que durera l’urgence de santé publique.

      Depuis, l’Alan Kurdi reste en mer avec, à son bord, les 150 personnes secourues. Une nouvelle errance en Méditerranée qui rappelle la crise de l’été dernier, lorsque sous, l’impulsion de son ministre de l’intérieur d’extrême droite, Matteo Salvini, l’Italie avait fermé ses ports.

      Gorden Isler, président de Sea-Eye, veut croire que l’Allemagne saura leur venir en aide. « Le gouvernement fédéral a réussi à rapatrier 200 000 de ses propres citoyens de l’étranger dans un effort immense. Il doit être imaginable et humainement possible d’envoyer un avion pour 150 personnes en quête de sécurité en Europe du Sud », a-t-il plaidé.

      Une situation « tragique » à Tripoli

      De l’autre côté de la Méditerranée, la guerre bat son plein. Un an après le lancement, le 4 avril 2019, de l’offensive sur Tripoli par le maréchal Haftar et ses troupes de l’est libyen, le conflit a « dégénéré en une dangereuse et potentiellement interminable guerre par procuration alimentée par des puissances étrangères cyniques »,dénonçait la mission des Nations unies en avril dernier.

      Selon elle, 150 000 personnes ont été forcées de fuir leurs foyers, et près de 350 000 civils restent dans les zones de la ligne de front, sans compter 750 000 autres qui vivent dans les zones touchées par les affrontements. Pour la troisième fois de la semaine, l’hôpital Al-Khadra de Tripoli a été bombardé. « Des éclats d’obus ont touché une salle d’opération et un chirurgien en train d’opérer un patient », précise le journal The Libya observer.

      280 migrants bloqués au large de Tripoli

      En raison de l’intensification des bombardements, y compris sur le port de Tripoli, les autorités libyennes ont refusé, le 9 avril, de laisser débarquer 280 migrants interceptés par les gardes-côtes libyens contraints de rester à bord du bateau, a alerté l’Organisation internationale pour les migrations (OIM). L’OIM, présent au point de débarquement pour fournir une aide d’urgence, a jugé la situation « tragique ».

      Selon elle, au moins 500 migrants à bord de six bateaux ont quitté la Libye en une semaine en raison de l’intensification du conflit et de l’amélioration des conditions météorologiques. 150 d’entre eux se trouvent à bord de l’Alan Kurdi, et 177 sont arrivés en Italie (soit près de 3 000 depuis le début de l’année).

      « Le droit maritime international et les obligations en matière de droits de l’homme doivent être respectés pendant l’urgence Covid-19 », revendique l’OIM. « Le statu quo ne peut pas continuer », dénonce-t-elle, en réclamant « une approche globale de la situation en Méditerranée centrale ».

      https://www.la-croix.com/Monde/migrants-abandonnes-Mediterranee-2020-04-10-1201088875
      #port_sûr #ports_sûrs

    • L’Italie - par un décret signé par 4 ministres - annonce le 7 avril que l’Italie ne peut plus être considéré un #POS (#place_of_safety) pour les migrants interceptés par des bateaux battant pavillon étranger hors des eaux nationales.

      https://www.avvenire.it/c/attualita/Documents/M_INFR.GABINETTO.REG_DECRETI(R).0000150.07-04-2020%20(3).pdf

      Nombreuses les réaction de dénonciation de cette décision par la société civile

      –> l’appel du Tavolo Asilo (circulé hier sur la liste)
      –> l’appel des ong de sauvetage en mer https://mediterranearescue.org/news/ong-decreto-porto-sicuro

      –> un appel signé par parlementaires, sénateurs, conseillers régionaux et parlementaires européennes (de majorité gouvernementale)

      Hier Malte annonce aussi la fermeture de ses ports

      https://timesofmalta.com/articles/view/malta-says-it-cannot-guarantee-migrant-rescues.784571
      pour ensuite décider - hier à 22:30 - de laisser débarquer un bateau avec à bord 61 migrant(e)s 41 heures après avoir lancé un sos (source : alarm phone) https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1248503658188140545

      Tripoli se déclare aussi un port non sure et refoulé un de ses propres motovedettes avec à bord 280 migrant(e)s, dont semblerait aussi femmes et enfants

      https://www.avvenire.it/amp/attualita/pagine/tripoli-si-dichiara-porto-non-sicuro-e-respinge-una-propria-motovedetta-con
      Selon l’OIM la Libye se déclare port non sures à cause de l’intensification du conflit qui toucherait aussi le port de Tripoli-
      Le Gouvernement de Al Serraj déclarait de ne avoir presque plus le control du port de Tripoli.

      Cette semaine serait autour de 500 les migrants partis des cotes libyennes. 67 ont pu arriver par leur moyen à Lampedusa, 150 sont toujours à bord du bateau Alan Kurdi (sans pouvoir trouver un port de débarquement) et les autres ont été interceptés par les « Gardes Cotes Libyennes ». 280 sont à bord d’une motovodette libyenne au large de Tripoli après etre en mer depuis 72heures.

      –-> Message de Sara Prestianni, reçu via la mailing-list Migreurop, le 10.04.2020

      #Malte #Libye

    • Migrants trapped on boat in Tripoli due to shelling

      The plight of 280 migrants trapped on a boat in Tripoli harbour due to shelling has shown that EU states and other regional powers needed “a comprehensive approach to the situation in the central Mediterranean,” the International Organisation for Migration, a UN agency, has said. The Libyan coast guard intercepted the migrants en route to Europe, but port authorities refused to let them disembark due to the intensity of fighting.

      https://euobserver.com/tickers/148047

    • The Covid-19 Excuse: Non-Assistance in the Central Mediterranean becomes the Norm

      The Covid-19 pandemic has allowed states to enact emergency measures which curtail the right and freedom to move, within Europe and beyond. While some measures seem justified in order to contain the spread of a dangerous virus, European authorities have used this health crisis to normalise the already existing practice of non-assistance at sea. In the central Mediterranean, the consequences are particularly devastating. These measures, implemented in the name of ‘saving lives’, have the opposite effect: people are left at serious risk of dying in distress at sea. Under the veil of the health crisis, European authorities are carrying out racist border security policies that make sea crossings even more dangerous and deadly.
      Over 1,000 people try to escape Libya in one week

      In only one week, 5-11 April 2020, over 1,000 people on more than 20 boats have left the Libyan shore. The Alarm Phone was alerted to 10 boats in total, two of which were rescued by Alan Kurdi on 6 April. Over 500 people are reported to have been returned to Libya within merely three days. Some of the survivors have informed us that six people drowned. Many of those returned were kept imprisoned on a ship at Tripoli harbour. Moreover, the fate of some boats remains unclear. At the same time, we have also learned of several other boats that reached Italy autonomously, arriving in Lampedusa, Sicily, Linosa and Pantelleria.

      At the time of writing, 14.30h CEST on 11 April, four boats are still in severe distress at sea. The Armed Forces of Malta refuse to rescue a boat in the Maltese Search and Rescue (SAR) zone. The people on board tell us: “People are without water, the pregnant woman is so tired, the child is crying, so thirsty. Please if you don’t want to save us give us at least water.”
      Creating a deadly Rescue Gap

      In the central Mediterranean, a dangerous rescue gap is actively being created. European coastguards and navies, as well as the so-called Libyan coastguards are stating that they will not engage in SAR activities. One civil rescue boat, the Alan Kurdi, was able to rescue two boats in the current good weather period. However, with 150 people now on board, they are searching for a Port of Safety and cannot carry out further operations. All other rescue NGOs are not allowed or unable to carry out SAR operations.

      For the Alarm Phone, the greatest challenge is the systematic withdrawal of European authorities from the central Mediterranean area. We have documented several scandalous delays and even acts of sabotage at sea. One of the boats that reached out to us was rescued by Italian authorities to Lampedusa only after it had fully crossed the Maltese SAR zone, with the Armed Forces of Malta refusing to intervene. Another boat already in the Maltese SAR zone with 66 people on board was rescued only after about 40 hours. The people on board told us that the Armed Forces of Malta tried to cut the cable of the engine, telling them: “I leave you to die in the water. Nobody will come to Malta.”

      We have experienced irresponsible behaviour by European authorities in all distress cases that have reached the Alarm Phone. Routinely, the so-called “Rescue Coordination Centres” hang up the phone, refuse to take down new information, or are not reachable for hours.
      “Libya is worse than the Corona virus”

      We call on all European authorities to cease endangering the lives of people who seek to escape torture, rape, and war in Libya. Despite the Covid-19 crisis, Europe is still safe compared to Libya and has the resources to carry out vital SAR operations. People trying to flee from Libya are aware of the danger of crossing the sea and the spread of Covid-19 within Europe. Still, as they tell Alarm Phone: “Libya is worse than the Corona virus.”

      https://alarmphone.org/en/2020/04/11/the-covid-19-excuse/?post_type_release_type=post

  • Struggles of women on the move*

    –------

    Introduction

    When the crowd gathered for the Women’s Day demonstration on March 8, 2020 at 10am in front of Cinema Riff at Grand Socco in Tangier, Moroccan feminists, Sub-Saharan women for freedom of movement, single mothers, and a few Europeans came together. The women of our local Alarm Phone team, all from Sub-Saharan Africa, would sit together afterwards with some of their friends from Europe and start to write down their experiences for this report.


    At the same time, on the Greek island of Lesvos women from Alarm Phone teams interviewed women in and around the hot-spot of Moria, who spoke out about the suffering they had gone through on the most Eastern flight route towards Europe. They reported how on 30 January a crowd started moving from the overcrowded hot-spot Moria towards the city of Mytilene, which is still on Lesvos. „All women against Moria“, „Women in solidarity“, „Moria is a women’s hell“ and „Stop all violence against women“ was written on some of the many signs while the crowd chanted „Azadi“ (farsi: freedom) with raised fists.

    Shortly afterwards an Alarm Phone activist met with a young woman from Somalia, who had made the crossing from Libya to Italy last September and who wants to encourage the rescue groups to continue their amazing work.

    Another woman sat down and wrote a beautiful solidarity letter to one of the women active in Search and Rescue: “When I hear her voice on the phone, saying ‘my boat will head to the target with full speed,’ I picture her behind the wheel of this massive boat carrying 400 people, flying above the sea as if it was weightless.”

    There are some who write in a brave way about the suffering women had to go through: The pain they feel and the suffering that the simple fact of having to pee means for women in Moria. Or the struggles with the Boumla (Wolof for police) deporting them within Morocco towards the deserts, exposing them to greater dangers. Or the death of a young Moroccon student.

    There are others who decided not to remember the suffering in detail, but to point out their strategies, their struggles and the thankfulness about the solidarity created among us.

    In this report we tried to write about the manifold experiences of women and LGBTQII+, who cross the sea to reach a place of safety or who are stuck in transit, and about the experiences of women active in Search and Rescue who are trying to support these struggles. Women are on the move for their own freedom of movement in all three regions of the sea: in the East between Turkey and Greece in the Aegean, in the Central Mediterranean from Libya and Tunisia towards Italy and Malta, and in the West from Morocco towards Spain. Everywhere we meet more women in the frontlines of these struggles than we used to in the past. In the East, the percentage of adult men among those arriving even fell below 50 percent after 2015, which creates a completely different situation. While all of them face intersecting forms of visible and invisible violence making border crossing even more dangerous and lethal for women, we know that women on the move are more than what they are reduced to, and that they bear a power and a strength that no border is able to defeat.

    Also, more and more women are active in the Search and Rescue initiatives as well as in our Alarm Phone team. In the Alarm Phone we are even a majority. We decided to write in a very subjective way and what we ended up with is a patch-work of different stories in various styles and tones. We hope that this report empowers others to raise their voices as well and to become more visible with all their great expertise.

    We dedicate this report to all women and LGBTQI+ who are struggling for their survival in the refugee camps all around the world in times of the Coronavirus under life-threatening conditions. The only option to end this suffering is freedom of movement as a basic global right for all. We will continue this struggle.

    In March 2018, the Alarm Phone published the last report that was dedicated to the specific situation of women at sea.

    From now on, we will try to publish a report every year about the special situation of women and LGBTQI+ on the move.
    Daily struggles of women on the move in the Western Mediterranean. Alarm Phone activists report
    March 8, 2020 in Tangier

    The Women’s Day demonstration gather on March 8, 2020 at 10am in front of Cinema Riff at Grand Socco in Tangier. Moroccan feminists, Sub-Saharan women for freedom of movement, single mothers, and a few Europeans come together. A Samba group is drumming, there is a lively exchange between the different groups, purple-coloured cloths – the symbolic colour of March 8 – are handed out, banners are rolled out, contacts are exchanged – the atmosphere is great. About 800 women come together. This makes an impression in the northern Moroccan metropolis, because the voices are loud and determined with slogans like ‘Solidarité avec les femmes du monde entier!’ ‘Raise your voice, seize your rights’ in Arabic and French starts the demonstration and runs along the big boulevard to the Place de Nación. Passers-by and journalists follow with interest. One thing is already clear at this early hour: the march is empowering, and this in a place that has been marked by the worst police repression for several months.

    Julia and Pauline* participated during this march with the women’s group of Alarm Phone.

    Julia: “Sub-Saharan women are too tired, we suffer all kinds of violence, violence through the Moroccan security, through the Moroccan compatriot. Even Moroccan women have their difficulties. In their households, in their homes, in their surroundings. There are too many cases and there is evidence too. Women do not have a loud voice towards the men in uniform. They don’t open the doors and they don’t listen to us, we’re always there in moments of distress. That’s why we raised our angry shouts. I hope that our message is sent to the Moroccan authorities. We want peace and we have the right to live.”

    Pauline: “We women are brutalised in the house and we have no right to express ourselves. But we as women have to express ourselves, also in the media, so that the people through us understand what is really going on in the field. This is violence in everyday life. But we women want equality.
    March 8 was an opportunity to express ourselves. Because as we walked, there were many people who followed us. We fought, we sent messages. We gave ourselves the right to speak out and we said no to violence against women. We demanded our right to free expression and free movement!”

    Here Pauline’s speech, which unfortunately could not be presented on Women’s Day:

    Me, I am Pauline.

    I am an activist who is concerned about the rights of migrants in Morocco, especially in Tangier, but this struggle is not easy with the new policy of the Moroccan authorities, because we suffer repression by the police and deportation to southern cities and sometimes to the Algerian border. So, we as activists, we are calling for our rights and the rights of migrants.

    As Morocco has signed international conventions on the right of asylum and freedom of movement, the Moroccan authorities are asked to respect international law and not to be the gendarmes of the European Union. It is a bad policy to block migrants in Morocco, neither work nor residence permit, and to prevent migrants from their liberty in order to avoid illegal immigration. But Morocco must try to review its state policies and open the borders so that people can move freely. So that Sub-Saharan migrants can also go to earn a living in Europe as the Europeans can come here and earn their living in Africa. So we simply ask for freedom of movement for everyone and their well-being.

    Thank you very much.

    Stories of Struggles with the Boumla

    After the demonstration, we are together, the friends of the Alarm Phone: Pauline, Carla, Fatou, Co and Julia in Tangier. We tell and listen to each other’s stories about the Boumla (Wolof: police). As Alarm Phone has often reported, persecution, racism, violence and deportations are part of the daily life of black communities in Morocco, especially in the Tangier region. The women describe how they face discrimination on a daily basis and what strategies they have developed against repression.

    Fatou: We stopped the deportation in Rabat

    “Me and Pauline were with friends. We saw the police and we knew they’d take us even though we had papers.

    I said: ‘No, I’m not leaving, I have my passport and I have my residence permit.’ They slapped me and took me to the police station. They told us they’d take us to Tiznit. When we got to Rabat, we told ourselves we had to do something. If not, we’ll end up in Tiznit and it’s far from Tangier. So we revolted together to annoy them. We started to shout, shout with force. The Moroccans, they started to get irritated. And we shouted shouted shouted shouted… and they said “safi, safi safi safi safi” (Arabic: enough). We stopped and we got out in Rabat.”

    Pauline: I didn’t accept it

    “I wanted to talk about the violence I suffered as a woman in Morocco. The police came many times to catch me and take me south. I didn’t accept it, because I don’t know anyone there. At that time, I had my own restaurant in the Medina (Arabic: city). The police sent me to the police station. When I left there, I saw a lot of people and I told myself that if I didn’t do something, they would send me south, to Tiznit. I told the officer that I was sick. He said, ‘No, you’re not sick, you’re going to go out to the bus with the others.’ The bus was already there in front of the door. I was afraid of being deported to Tiznit, because I couldn’t afford to go back to Tangier.

    So, I went to the toilet. I had the second day of my period, so I took off the cotton. I threw it away and went out. There was a lot of blood coming out, it got on my pants, everything was spoiled. I said to the Chief of Police, ‘Look, I’m sick.’ But he said, ‘No, you’re not, get in line…’ That was when I opened my legs. He was surprised and said: ‘Okay, okay, okay.’ He gave me a ride home. So, I went back to work.”

    Julia: The hospital instead of the deportation to Tiznit

    “The last attempt to deport me was in 2019. The Moroccan police came to our house very early in the morning. They wore Kagouls outfits as if we were criminals in our own house. I had lost my residence permit, because I couldn’t renew it. They took us to Tiznit. We couldn’t resist. We were on the road from 8 in the morning until 11 in the evening, without food, water or anything. 2km before reaching to Marrakech I told myself that I had to find a possibility to go down there, because at least it was a city I knew. Just before I got there, I made a lot of noises and had a crisis, they got scared and called an ambulance to pick me up. I really wasn’t sick, I had nothing, it was just a trick so they could release me. So I made gestures, I stopped breathing. In the ambulance they gave me an oxygen mask. When I got to the hospital, they put me on a bench with a mask, by the time they went to find a doctor I took off everything and I ran away…”
    Aurore Boréale, based in Rabat: Only by fighting together can we can have real progress

    Since the dawn of time, human beings have been on the move, looking for green pastures, a milder sky, a better elsewhere or simply out of curiosity. That leads us to the conclusion, that the desire to see what’s on the other side has always been there, and, which leads us to conclude that migration is a phenomenon inherent to living beings. I would even say vital.

    The most shocking thing today is to see how migration has become demonised and criminalised everywhere. Leaving has become anathema, to the point where barriers are being erected everywhere. Means that are being used to hinder freedom of movement, are becoming more and more dramatic every day are being used to hinder freedom of movement, to sort out who is eligible or not. Let us take the case of Morocco: on the one hand, due to its geographical location it is considered the gateway to the Eldorado by many Africans, and also Syrians, Bangladeshis and Filipinos rush to Morocco hoping to live a better life on the other side of the Mediterranean, or perhaps simply to settle there.

    On the other hand, however, while non-dark-skinned migrant communities may enjoy more tranquillity and are not often subject to the most blatant forms of discrimination, the same does not hold true for the black African migrant community in Morocco. The case that interests our report is that of women.

    If yesterday it was rare to see women taking to the migration routes, today that is no longer the case and women migrate as much as men. Today, more women take the routes, swallowing the fear that arises, facing cold, hunger, danger, and closing their ears to not hear about all kinds of violence.

    Today the women are leaving too. But what about the daily life of these women once they have settled in Morocco? A country which, despite progress and openness in terms of women’s rights, remains a country where women do not enjoy practically any of the rights granted to them by law or the constitution. A country where women still remain the inferiors, the subordinates, or simply things belonging to men, to satisfy their impulses or their egos. Basically, I would say, a country where women are not truly free to be who they want to be.

    Migrant women in Morocco have to deal with all this, and additionally with the fact that they are black women. Thus, they are perceived in the collective consciousness of Moroccans as women of little value, of light morals, prostitutes, or beggars: The black woman at the bottom of the ladder that people with an atrophied mentality have decided to create. For some of the migrant brothers or for some chairman’s prey single migrant women’s bodies are there to be exploited when promising them the journey to the Eldorado.

    And they are left to their fate as soon as these men have found more attractive prey. Thus, many women find themselves single mothers, with children whose fathers don’t give a damn, or don’t even want to know. Because of the hard reality, some women find themselves in a relationship and move in with the first one who could offer her a roof over her head, food on her plate, in order to reach the basic comforts. Sometimes it turns out well, sometimes it turns out very problematic. Migrant women who work in private homes are also subject to exploitation, even physical abuse, non-payment of wages that are insignificant compared to the work they do. We can also talk about the difficulty to be respected in public health centres, complications, late care or lack of care on discriminatory and racist grounds. They remain on the margins.

    What I find most appalling is that even in some militant associations, where women are under-represented, they are given less responsibility and no real decision-making power. They are infantilised, or just given a place to serve as a showcase to obtain grants from organisations that take the status of women seriously. Once the grant is awarded, these women are side-lined, without any decision-making power, bullied and subjected to everything that men have decided without them having a say.

    There are organisations, such as UNHCR., Caritas, and CEI (Comité d’Entraide Internationale), which provide assistance to migrant women. But here again, there is the eternal question of eligibility, the unhealthy hierarchy of suffering, the categorisation of migrants. They are classified according to their suffering, according to how they arrived in Morocco, and the migrant who arrives by plane is often not entitled to this little help: “You can’t help everyone”, unless you have a story that holds up, a lie that is worth telling, or if you pretend to be someone you are not.

    I have seen people who really needed help but were not given it, because they did not meet the criteria for it. I know people who died as a result. And even when help is given to these women, it is not free. In one way or another, they remain like prisoners of the organisations, spied upon even on their most intimate affairs. That is the price that has to be paid.

    There are a few women’s associations such as La voix des femmes de Hélène Yalta, the Collective of Migrant Women in Morocco (COFMIMA) and ARCOM, which try as best they can to fight for the status of migrant women in Morocco. But a real struggle for the rights of migrant women, for women’s empowerment, is almost non-existent. The urgency, the need, the survival cries out too loud… It is in dispersed groups, individually that the great majority of women fight. Can we hope for real progress or evolution by fighting in dispersed groups? No, not at all.

    With your courage you can do this work
    Interview with Leonie

    Although the situation in Tangier is becoming more and more difficult for Sub-Saharan travellers, a group of women has been formed, who are active with the Alarm Phone there. We spoke with Leonie, who is new to the group. She has been living in Morocco for 5 years.

    Leonie, why do you take part in the Alarm Phone?

    L: It was a good brother who introduced me to the group. He told me that there is a network of activists, and he said: “I see that you with your courage, you can do this work.”

    Have you already worked here in Morocco in solidarity activities?

    L: I am in almost all the associations in Tangier that bring together migrants. When there is a meeting or a small activity, they invite me. I am almost always present.

    Alarm Phone is a network of activists who help migrants who are already on the water, so that they don’t lose their lives in the water. In case of distress we guide them.

    Can you explain the situation of migrants here in Morocco?

    L: In Morocco it is not easy for migrants. Whether you are regularised or not. It’s very tense. Life is no sugar for us. I myself have suffered the consequences. They’ re breaking your door down. At two o’clock in the morning the soldiers are here, they don’t warn you, they don’t ask if you have papers or not. To your surprise you jump out of your sleep and they break your door down.

    They come home like thieves. They don’t even try to find out if you have papers. You are supposed to say, ‘But sir, I have papers’.

    Once they arrived at my house, I was washing myself around 3am, last summer, so in 2019. The man opened the bathroom and I said, ‘But sir, I’m showering.’ He said: ‘That’s not my problem.’ I said: ‘When you came in, did you ask me if I’m legal or not? You come in my house, but I have my house contract, I have my papers. You want to come in the shower? If you put your head in the bathroom again, I’ll throw the water on you!’ And that’s how he left the toilet.

    It hurts, it’s frustrating. Every year like this, they treat us like animals as if we’re not human. Really, it’s disgusting.

    And as women you don’t have the right to speak up, especially in front of the authorities, they don’t consider you. It hurts you, it stays in your heart. And morally, you don’t have the right to express yourself! That’s the suffering of women here. We’re trying to talk to human rights and women’s rights associations.

    In the work of Alarm Phone – What are the demands?

    L: Alarm Phone demands that borders are open. If someone wants to go out of a country that the person passes freely without being caught and without being violated. This is the demand of Alarm Phone: Freedom of movement!
    Hayat, killed at the border by the Moroccan Navy in September 2017

    In order to prevent the young people from setting out at all, armed force is used in Morocco: On September 25th 2017, the Navy shot and

    killed 19-year-old student Hayat Belkacem from Tétouan. Three men were injured, some of them seriously.

    The four of them, along with 21 other young Moroccans*, had set off from Martil Beach in a “Go-Fast” (speedboat) in the direction of Spain. The Navy wanted to stop the travellers; when the boat started, they opened fire. The hashtag 126102877 #Quiadonnélordre: Who gave the order? went viral afterwards and contradicted the version of the Navy, which allegedly only fired warning shots.

    For days, before Hayat’s death, hundreds of young people had been flocking to the beaches in the north after Spanish videos of successful arrivals in Spain were posted on the Internet. Moroccan security forces had blocked the young Moroccans* from accessing the beaches of northern Morocco. In response, hundreds of young Moroccans* demonstrated in Martil and demanded ‘l’harga fabor’ – their right to free passage: https://youtu.be/ICahwzMzbdM

    After the death of Hayat, people in many cities, including many Ultras, took their anger to the streets. In Tétouan, the people chanted ‘We will avenge you, Hayat!’ as well as ‘We will renounce the Moroccan passport!’ and ‘Viva España’: https://youtu.be/EyXfV-fMoBg

    A student was subsequently sentenced to two years in prison, claiming that his call for protest via Facebook had allegedly insulted the nation of Morocco and called for an uprising. Other young people have also been accused, many of whom are still minors.
    Central Mediterranean: Women on the move
    The invisible struggles

    It is difficult to write about women who cross the Central Mediterranean. It is difficult because, in first place, we don’t want to write ‘about’ women on the move. We would love to write ‘with’ them about their experiences, to use this platform to make their voices heard. However, their stories are often kept invisible, as is the violence they experience on a daily basis. Too often, women crossing the Central Mediterranean route just appear to us as a number communicated by the person who speaks on the phone. A number that we try to clarify several times, to then quickly report it into an email to the authorities or into a tweet: “We were called by a boat in distress, on board there are 60 people fleeing from Libya including 3 children and 8 women, two of them are pregnant”. We rarely hear their voices. Communication with people in distress in the Central Mediterranean is brief and fragmented: it starts with a distress call through a satellite phone, it ends with a satellite phone being thrown into the water. And then silence. A silence that can mean many things, but that too often does not carry good news. This communication through an unstable connection does not allow us to get in touch again, to ask for details, to ask for their names and testimonies once they make it to Europe or when they are returned to violence and war in Libya. And this is how, painfully, the powerful voices of women on the move get lost, and their presence remains fixed in a dry and uncertain number.

    Of course, we often know what is beneath those numbers, and here we could write stories of violence, slavery and torture in Libya. We also know that many women are fleeing not only war or poverty, but also gendered-based violence, forced marriages, harassment due to their sexuality. We could write about their pregnancies, and about the rapes behind them. We could write about what it means to be a mother and to embark on a precarious rubber dinghy holding your child’s hand in the hope that the sea will be less violent than the Libyan camp or the homes they left behind.

    The borders of Europe amplify the violence women flee from, but security measures, surveillance and criminalisation of people’s movement are often legitimised under the flag of combatting human trafficking. With one hand Europe pretends to give protection: it portrays border controls as humanitarian acts to protect ‘vulnerable women’ from ‘bloodthirsty’ traffickers. With the other hand Europe pours money and resources into creating stronger borders, organises trainings and signs deals and agreements to limit freedom of movement, thus fuelling border violence.

    Depicted as vulnerable victims in need of protection, discourses of women’s protection and vulnerability are often used by European member states to put a humanitarian face to the violence they inflict through their border policies.

    While all these intersecting forms of visible and invisible violence make border crossing even more dangerous and lethal for women, we know that women on the move are more than what they are reduced to, and that they bear a power and a strength that no border is able to defeat. This is what we would love to write about, and this is what we learn from the testimonies and experiences collected here.
    Women on the phone

    In a few situations, we talked to women in distress who called the Alarm Phone, and since then, when the communication is difficult, we ask the people on the phone to let us talk to a woman on board.

    As Alarm Phone, we talk to people during their journey. For us they are voices in distress that we try to comfort, with difficulty. We ask for their GPS coordinates and they try to read us numbers. It’s hard to be on the phone with people who could drown any moment and to ask them to read numbers. They just want to tell you that the sea is too big and the boat is too small. They want to tell you that they don’t want to go back to Libya, that they’d rather die at sea. They ask us to help. They tell us that they’re sick, that they won’t make it, that there’s water in the boat, lots of water, too much water. They ask why we haven’t arrived yet, and why we keep asking for numbers. And how do you explain that you’re not at sea, but in England, or France, or Germany? How to explain that you called for help but that European authorities aren’t answering your requests, and are letting them die at sea? How do you explain that the only thing we can do is to write down these numbers, and that because of these numbers their lives might be rescued?

    More than once, a chaotic situation where communication seemed impossible and where we feel that we will never be able to clarify the GPS coordinates of the boat, was solved by simply talking to a woman, as it was reported by a shift team: “they passed the phone to a woman, she speaks clearly, she is calm. She listens carefully and she understands how to find the GPS coordinates on the phone. She spells out the numbers: ‘North, 34 degrees, 22 minutes…’ She is confident and she explains the situation. She said that there are sick people on the boat and that there is little fuel left. We keep regular contact, she knows what she has to do and how to continue.”

    It is in these volatile moments, in these few exchanges and in the courage that we hear in their voices, that the invisible struggles of women on the move in the Central Mediterranean become visible. Their voices become weapons against the brutal border regimes, a weapon, on which the lives of 100 fellow travellers depend. We wish we could hear more of these voices, and that we could talk to them and hear their voices beyond distress situations, as we did with Daniella and Abeni, who are still in Tunisia, or as we did with Kobra, who managed to reach Germany.

    Trapped by the UNHCR
    Speaking to Daniella, Tunisia

    Daniella comes from the English-speaking part of Cameroon. The war has been escalating since 2016. Her husband has been murdered and she also lost her mother in that war. She belongs to a politically marked family as part of the opposition. She left the country in October 2017. Since she left, she didn’t hear from the rest of her family.

    She crossed Nigeria, Niger, Algeria and Libya before crossing the border to Tunisia. She was arrested at Ben Guerdane, where her fingerprints were collected. She was in facilities of the Red Crescent and the UNHCR in Medenine, and then taken to the Ibn Khaldun centre in August 2018. She was registered with UNHCR and underwent 4 interviews, in which she was asked the same questions, trying to ‘trap her’ on dates. Her request was denied. She was told she could very well go back to the English-speaking part of Cameroon: “But if you go to this area as a francophone, you are in danger because people will think you’re a spy.”

    During her stay at the centre, Daniella often organised sports activities such as football games, which did not please the UNHCR. She was also very active, taking part in the various demonstrations organised by the refugees and asylum seekers of the centre to protest against their living conditions and to denounce the practices of the UNHCR.

    Since UNHCR rejected her asylum application, she no longer receives food coupons. She decided to leave the centre after being pressured by UNHCR to make room for others. “It’s their strategy, they embarrass you to make you go away”. Today she lives in a small apartment with two other people. She says she doesn’t have the courage to appeal UNHCR’s decision. It has been 11 months since she left the centre.

    The crossing from Tunisia costs about 1000 Euros. She intends to attempt the crossing. Their group of 14 people is ready. The smuggler asked them to wait until the weather improves, saying it’s only a matter of a couple of days. It’s already been two weeks that they’re waiting for the weather to get better to cross the border. A month ago, migrants have been intercepted. They are not imprisoned unless they are found to be smugglers.

    She also crossed the ditch; it is about three metres deep. There was no water at the bottom, but there was mud. To climb, some men helped her, braiding clothes to hoist her up. The desert is full of aggressive dogs. She had to walk for a long time with her baby and a friend from the Ivory Coast before she came across the military. The military knew their number, they had to identify their group well in advance (they asked where the men were, looking for a group of 18 people). The soldiers were equipped with huge searchlights sweeping across the desert. After you cross the ditch, there’s a barbed-wire fence three meters high. Crossing this border costs about 300 Euros.
    Intercepted to Tunisia
    Interview with Abeni, Tunsia

    Abeni left Nigeria in 2017. She lived in a southern province. Her husband’s father was killed and her husband was threatened, so the family had to flee the country.

    She arrived in Tunisia in May 2017 while she was 6 months pregnant with her first child. Her boat ran out of petrol and was rescued by the Tunisian authorities and handed over to IOM. They were taken to Medenine by bus to an IOM shelter that shut down in March 2019. She remained in this centre for one year and asked to see UNHCR, but for one year she was only offered the voluntary return. It wasn’t until a year later that she was able to go to a UNHCR centre.

    She went to Zarzis with her husband for the UNHCR interview. Her husband, who only speaks Ikâ, was given a translation by phone. A few months later they received a negative response from UNHCR, telling them that the events that they had raised could not be verified on the net, and that it was a family problem.

    She says that few Nigeriens are accepted, with the exception of single women with children (one of whom has been relocated). They appealed against this decision by filling out a form, without an interview, but were again given a rejection. The UNHCR gave them three days to leave the centre, along with her two daughters, aged two years and six months. This happened one year ago. They refused, were able to stay but they no longer have food coupons and no more help from the UNHCR.

    When she talks to the staff, they pretend to ignore her. UNHCR has not renewed their cards. They have stopped paying for medical expenses, while the baby has to go to hospital regularly. The Doctor said it was because he was suffering from the cold. Her husband tries to work but there are no opportunities in Medenine. He went to Sfax but he got himself arrested and imprisoned for two days for not having papers. Without documents, they have no freedom of movement. The second baby wasn’t registered in Tunisia. UNHCR refused to accompany them.

    Her husband wants to go back to Libya to attempt the crossing, but she doesn’t want to and stayed in Tunisia. The UNHCR still wants to kick the family out of the shelter but can’t do it due to the current coronavirus pandemic.
    We felt welcome
    Kobra’s testimony, rescued by the Ocean Viking in September 2019

    My name is Kobra. I am 18 years old and I come from Somalia. I want to tell you the story of my rescue in the Mediterranean Sea on September 2019. I don’t know how to find the words to describe the suffering I went through, and I don’t want to remember what happened before I left Libya. I also never want to forget the moment, after nearly two days at sea, when we finally saw a small sailing-boat on the horizon that ended our suffering.

    We were full of fear, because finally our phone, our only connection to the world, had stopped functioning and water was rapidly entering the boat. It was a miracle when we finally found this sail-boat. We were about 45-50 people in a blue rubber boat, and seven of us onboard were coming from Somalia. One pregnant woman was traveling with her 1-year-old child and her husband. She is now doing well because she was transferred to Germany after the rescue.

    I never learned how to swim, so the idea of the boat flooding was a possible death sentence to me.

    I have a video a friend took on the boat and you can see the expressions of relief and happiness in everyone’s faces when we spotted the sailboat. There are no words to describe how you feel when you realize that your journey across the sea is over. It was a German sailboat, which was too small to take us on board. They came to us and asked us, if we could speak English. They then told us that they would call for the OCEAN VIKING a big rescue ship to come and take us on board. They gave us jackets and life-vests, because the weather was getting rougher and colder.

    Later, when it was dark, it started raining and the waves got bigger. The small German boat took us to OCEAN VIKING which took us aboard. There were already other people with them who had been rescued earlier that day. Even the rescuers seemed so happy that we were all safe. They had doctors on board and they gave us medical treatment, since my pregnant friend and I had had vomited a lot. I had a heavy allergic reaction on my skin as well because the sea irritated my skin condition after being exposed to the salt for so long.

    On the OCEAN VIKING we found another pregnant woman, whom I think was from Nigeria. She was brought by a helicopter to Malta because she was very close to delivering her baby. The crew later made an announcement to tell us when the baby was born in Malta.

    We were on the OCEAN VIKING for one week because no country wanted to take us in. This time was difficult, but it was much better than what we experienced before. The crew was always with us and they tried to support us however they could. We had enough food. We had a doctor whenever we felt sick. They even gave us clothing. We felt welcome.

    Finally, Lampedusa decided to take us in. When we finally left the boat after such a long time at sea it was not as warm of a welcome. We received food only after being forced to give our fingerprints and we were brought to a dirty place with barbed wire. I could not stay in Italy; the conditions were so poor. Today I struggle to live in Germany with the fear of my fingerprints on record and that I will be deported back to Italy.

    I will never forget the good people on these ships, who welcomed me before I arrived in Europe. They will stay in my memory. Maybe, one day I will meet them again. Until then I want to encourage them to continue what they are doing and I send them all my greetings.

    SAR Solidarity
    Letter from an Alarm Phone activist to an amazing woman of the SAR world in January 2020

    The past 5 days were crazy, my dear friend. We never met, but I have read the stories that you wrote on board of the rescue ship. Nine boats in distress fleeing from Libya called the Alarm Phone, and for the first time in a long time, all the boats that called Alarm Phone from the Central Mediterranean where rescued to Europe, more than 650 people in 5 days. This was not just about luck. It was about the incredible efforts of the people out there doing everything they could to rescue these boats, despite European authorities’ efforts to let them sink without trace. These were efforts mostly by women. Wonderful, fierce, kind, fearless women like you. In the past, I have mostly have dealt with men at sea and it was difficult. These 5 days were joyful instead.

    L., she crossed the Mediterranean up and down 3 times in 72 hours without ever sleeping, just following the GPS coordinates that we had received from the people in distress, which we also forwarded to the authorities and to the rescue ships. After sending an email, I would call the bridge. Again and again, for 72 hours. I would call the bridge telling her, “L.! There is a boat in distress again you need to be quick”. I never heard moment of discomfort in her voice. Even under that pressure, she was trying to create little cracks of softness, of love, of solidarity, of laughter. When I hear her voice on the phone, saying “my boat will head to the target with full speed”, I picture her behind the wheel of this massive boat carrying 400 people, flying above the sea as if it was weightless. I cannot find the words to describe the love and respect I feel towards her when I read her emails to the authorities, defying their orders, placing herself and ‘her boat’ against the orders given by some Colonel of the Armed Forced of Malta, or of some Commander of the Libyan Navy. I think there are no words in this world to express the magnitude of certain actions.

    On the phone, we tell the people in distress that they have to stay strong and keep calm, that they have to trust us, that they cannot give up. We tell them “rescue is coming for you my friend, don’t worry”. When you’re out at sea, lost in the darkness.

    Then Luisa and ‘her boat’ arrive, to the rescue, after hours of darkness and uncertainty. After hours when they thought they had been abandoned by everyone, and that they had been forgotten in a sea that is too big, on a boat that is too small. After so many hours of exhaustion, there is certain magic in the moment when we can tell them “make light, with a telephone, don’t use flames – make yourself visible.” There is magic in the few words spoken by voices broken by panic and excitement “we see a boat, it’s red”, and in an email of few words from the rescue ship we read “we see an intermittent light coming from the sea, we believe it is the rubber boat”. I imagine this little light shining above a sea that is a cold, dark, liquid cemetery. A sign of life, of resistance, of struggle. Not just of despair.

    Then silence. One second you are head and body in the Mediterranean, the next you are in silence and you realise that hours have passed. From this side of the phone we do not know what happens in this silence. It’s a feeling that makes you feel completely detached from reality.

    Waking up reading the stories you write about these rescues, my dear friend, I always cry. Reading your descriptions of the rescue, reading the stories of the people who were on board, it makes it all real, it fills the void of these silences.

    Reading your stories makes me think of all the witches of the sea like you, like L., like the women of Alarm Phone and the women crossing the Mediterranean, who relentlessly struggle together in this hostile sea. The Morganas of the sea, the few little lights in this darkness, sparks that are reflected by the waves, as magic as fairies and as fierce as witches.

    I cannot stop being inspired by all these women, who cannot be stopped, contained, tamed. So yes, it is hard work also for all of us, and many people think we are crazy for doing this work, but we know that we are not the crazy ones, and that we are part of a brigade of amazing witches who believe that the real craziness is looking away. Thank you.
    From the crossing of the Aegean Sea to the struggle for women rights. Women on Lesvos
    All women against Moria

    Most women have already endured hardship even before they get into a boat to cross the Mediterranean Sea. But the journey is far from being over once they reach the shore. Many of them find themselves in overcrowded refugee camps, such as Moria on the Greek island of Lesvos, where the authorities are overwhelmed with numbers and unable or unwilling to provide the most basic needs such as clean water, electricity, shelter, medical care and security. It is a harsh environment where the strongest rules and violence is part of everyday life which leads to an existence dictated by constant fear. In this rough environment, solidarity is a vital tool for survival, especially among women.

    On January 30th 2020, approximately 450 women and children gathered in Mytilene, the capital of Lesvos, to protest the horrific living conditions in the camp and the dramatic increase of violence– including several fatal stabbings that had taken place within the previous weeks. The protest was organized by a group of about 15 Afghan women, and their goal was to draw attention to the dire situation. It was both a cry of despair as well as a powerful and loud manifestation of female solidarity when women of all ages and different nationalities took to the streets and blocked the traffic for several hours.

    “All women against Moria“, “Women in solidarity“, “Moria is a women’s hell“ and “Stop all violence against women“ was written on some of the many signs. The crowd chanted “Assadi“ (farsi: freedom) with raised fists. Several women said that it was the first time they had participated in a demonstration, but they showed great confidence during negotiations with the police or when giving media interviews. An elderly Afghan woman explained that she had focussed on caring for her family all her life but the hellish situation in Moria had given her no choice but to join the demonstration.

    Many women kept their faces hidden behind hijabs, voluminous scarves, and surgical face masks to conceal their identity. In the past, well placed rumours had been circulating that political involvement and contact with the press would lead to immediate deportation and repression by the Greek authorities. Taking this into account, 450 protesters is an astonishing number. Even more so considering the difficulties a trip from Moria to the islands capital, Mytilene, includes. For example, people have to cue for several hours to be able to get into one of the few busses. It has been reported that bus drivers had to push people away with sticks to be able to close the door. If you did make it onto the bus, you would miss your meals for that day as you weren’t able to stand in the food line. We also heard reports that a larger number of women were prevented from leaving the camp to join the demonstration by the authorities and police forces.

    No flyers, no Facebook group, no official announcement. News of the women-only-protest was spread by word of mouth. The success of the demonstration was a surprise to many, especially the police, who initially showed up with only 10 riot-cops. After the protest, 9 female volunteers were taken to the police station, where their identity cards were checked. Their sneaking suspicion is that they were the ones organising the women’s protest. The officials seemed to be unable to grasp the idea that women from Moria could organise efficiently. The women’s role in the camps traditionally has been to calm the male-dominated unrests rather than taking part in them or even initiating them. But times are desperate and increasingly women are discovering their political voice. They are finding strength in female cooperation. There had been an all-women sit-in last October after the tragic death of a woman in a gas explosion in the camp. Assemblies, empowerment workshops, networking and practical support are less visible and yet essential aspects of the politicisation of women.

    Experiences of crossings and life in Moria

    Again this year, with the increase in the number of people arriving on the island and the non-reaction of the Greek and European authorities, the conditions in Moria have only gotten worse and worse. When you talk with the women living there, their daily life comprises of fear, no rest, long lines, attacks, power cuts… but also solidarity amongst each other, survival strategies and the struggle to be able to decide about their own lives. There are the stories of three women, F, N, and J.

    F left Iran: “Unfortunately, in Iran members of my family did not have identity cards. We couldn’t go to school. We just had to work. My older sister and I worked as tailors in a basement. I started working when I was 12 years old. I have a passion for education. Finally, this year my sister and I decided on leaving in search of something better. Finally, my parents accepted. So, we started our travels. During our journey we tolerated several difficulties. Upon arrival to Lesvos, we slept two nights on the streets because we had to wait until Monday for when the offices of Moria opened. Finally, we could get a tent.”

    N and J arrived on the island of Lesvos by boat last December crossing over from Turkey. Both are living in Moria today. For J “each person has their own way to experience and to bear the crossing of the Mediterranean Sea”. She had to pay 450 USD to the person who organised the crossing and was told: ‘In 4 days we will come to pick you up at 23 o’clock at the hostel.’

    She tells us her story: “…they put us in a covered pick-up truck, we were a lot and really squeezed together. Four hours later we arrived in a very dark place. They put us in an abandoned house without any water or food all day long until 7 pm. Then we walked 5 hours up and down in the Turkish hills. Finally, we arrived on the shoreline. They inflated the dinghy in front of us. We left close to midnight. 1.5 hours later the Turkish coastguards stopped us on the sea and they brought us back to Turkey. We were 29 people on board. When they released us we went back to Izmir. I didn’t have any strength anymore. The smugglers told me ‘you have to leave.’ Two days later we tried again. Same group, same way. Five hours of walking again. And again, we couldn’t reach Greece. The big boats came close to our rubber boat to make big waves and they were yelling at us to leave and go back to Turkey. This time we spent one week in the police station. The third time, we arrived in Greek waters and called the Greek Coastguard, that came to pick us up. But we had to throw away our personal belongings because the boat was filling up with water. There was complete disorder on board, no organisation. After we had called them for the first time, we still waited three hours until they came to pick us up.”

    N spoke about how “the fear comes when you’re at sea. You didn’t know who your neighbour was, but you held their hand. We started to pray. On the open sea the water was coming inside the boat. Each one was calling for God in his own way. I didn’t want to go on the boat, but they pushed me. The kids were in the middle. Me as well. I closed my eyes. We landed without any police, only fishermen. It was raining. I was wet and we had to wait 15 minutes more for the bus. What gave us our hope back, was this woman, who gave us chips and sent her kids to say hello to us. They let us on the bus and we sat there until the morning without giving us anything”

    J described her situation after being registered in Moria: “I didn’t have any tent in which to sleep. I slept from tent to tent. They kick you out of the tent when you cough too much. The few that we had, they would steal it. I was scared to be stabbed, mainly during the night and someone would do it just to take your phone. The worst is that the authorities don’t let us leave the island.”

    https://alarmphone.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/25/2020/04/aegean2-1-768x1024.jpeg

    Your whole life is waiting in line

    For the refugees, lines are running a big part of their daily and social lives. As N and I were talking over some tea, N had to leave us to go stand in line for food. Very often they have to miss a workshop, a class, a commitment, or a friends-gathering to go stand in line for a basic necessity. Sometimes it gets so late that people have to return to their tents in Moria, even if they did not receive what they had been standing in line for all day. And the day is done. J told us that: “In the morning, when you wake up, the first thing that you have to do is line-up. We line-up for every basic need. We pee in buckets since the toilets are too far away and we have to wait in line to use them. It’s infernal to wait and the belly burns. During the night especially, the toilets are too far to reach. And the toilets are dirty, so you easily get itchy. The Moria medical tent usually gives paracetamol to calm the itchiness down… To take a shower is the same. You wait in the cold, and sometimes when you arrive the shower is clogged”. N added: “You have to stand in line, but you know that someone can come and stab you for your phone while you wait. It has happened a few times since I have been here, and people have died just waiting. I am scared when I have to go stand in line. One time, they didn’t clean the floor and we had to line up standing on the blood of a guy who was stabbed. I was so scared, it was horrible.”

    F also described the situation in a letter: “When you get up you must stand in a line for breakfast, lunch, diner, toilet, shower: for everything! You wait about 2.5 hours in each line. Your whole life is waiting in a line. We have only two places for doctor’s visits, which is not enough for thousands of people. Again, you have to wait in a line. Only the people that go at 4 o’clock in the morning have the opportunity to be checked. If you have a cold, standing in a line outside is bad for your health. You will get worse. If you have a headache, cold, flu or pain in your back or leg… it doesn’t matter. Doctors just give you painkillers and tell you to drink water.”

    Z, is an underaged Afghan girl, who lives in the jungle of Moria with her family. She wrote the following in a letter: “There is a toilet but at night it’s so hard to go to the toilet because we have to cross a small bridge and we can’t’ see anything because there is no light. I am under 18 and they don’t give me food because my mother is not here and when my father got sick, I was given the task to wait in line for food for the family but they didn’t give it to me because I am a minor. Life here is so hard: washing clothes, caring for my little sister, my brother and father. It’s so hard for me. I miss my mum.”

    Living in Moria is like living in jail. You are constantly living in fear. “Inactivity makes people go crazy. You will pass 6 months here without realising it”. You have nothing to do, nothing that you can do to be a part of civil society. The lines are dehumanising. People become a ticket, a plate, a bottle of milk, a croissant or a bag of clothes,” J explained.
    Self-organisation and a daily life strategy

    For N solidarity is important: “We also have to accept each other and the situation. I cannot eat too late, but when the electricity comes back at 2 am, I cannot prevent the others to talk, to eat and to cook. So, I put my earphones on and cover my eyes. In any case, I don’t sleep well. I refuse to take the medication that they give me to sleep, because we know that boys spend the nights in the alleys. With the canvas walls of the tents, you can feel the people passing by close to you and your head, and I want to be awake in case something happens. To eat warm and cooked food, we have to prepare the food before the electricity comes on. The last time, my tent’s mates put the potatoes in the pan and everything was ready, but they had only 10 minutes of electricity. So they had to wait, but when the power came back the food was not good anymore. As they were hungry, they added some milk. I don’t know how they ate it.”

    N continues: “In my tent we are 7 people plus a little girl. We sleep on the floor and each one puts their stuff around their sleeping place. We keep the middle of the tent open to cook and sit, and eat together. It is important to show solidarity, so I said to the women that we have to protect each other and when one of us has to go stand in line early in the morning, some of us go with her until daylight comes. Also, the women in my tent dance and sing, do braids, and find time to do what they want, and that’s strengthening for me.”

    J talked about solidarity concerning food: “The food in Moria is disgusting and gives you diarrhoea, meaning you then have to go stand in line for the toilets. Can you imagine! We collect money, around one euro per person, and we give it to the person, who cooks for the day. Every day it is a new person.”

    When women cross the sea, and even before then along the journey, they often have different experiences than men and are exposed to greater danger. Being on the move is a difficult situation, but being on the move and being a woman puts you in an even more vulnerable position. Specific issues related to gender discrimination and racism are being reported by the women on Lesbos that we were talking to:

    The women that we talked to speak about racism against black people within the hotspot, but also in the city. For example, a woman told us that in one supermarket, whenever a black person enters, a guard will follow that person around. She also told us that black women are often offered money in the street for sexual services. Prostitution is undoubtedly happening a lot, there lacks public information or data about this invisible side of this kind of unbearable situation on the island. It is clear, however, that human traffickers take advantage of the overcrowded and unsafe situation in Moria and that people are doing business with women and kids. And since the administration is overwhelmed, people can wait up to three months to be registered and to be able to benefit from the “cash programme for refugees”. Three months without any money.

    As we are writing this report, and just a few weeks before the international women’s day, there are five women locked-up in different police stations on Lesbos. They were arrested after trying to leave the island without proper papers. They have been arrested as part of a pilot project to see if this idea for a new law can be implemented: The new law indicates that a person who has been arrested must stay detained until the end of the asylum application. This would mean that all asylum seekers, who can be arrested for any illegitimate reason, would have to wait in detention.

    Having daily contact with women living in Moria, you can see how solidarity starts with their everyday basic needs and continues with the provision of psychosocial human support in an effort to protect each other’s security, rights, and sanity in the face of the dire situations they face every day.
    LGBTQI+ people on the move

    We don’t want to overlook women’s experiences of discrimination and the needs of different vulnerable groups, but considering this report is about gender-based discrimination and violence, the situation of LGBTQI+ people on the move has to also be mentioned.

    This report uses the acronym LGBTQI +: it is used to refer to people who identify as lesbian (L), gay (G), bisexual (B), trans (T), intersex (I), queer (Q) and + for all the different expressions and intimate relation with (no)gender identity and sexual definition: non-binary, asexual, aromantic, etc.

    Those who are LGBTQI+ face an even more difficult reality because they cannot always count on the national solidarity networks. And even when these resources are mobilized, it is often at the cost of important precautions so as not to be identified as LGBTQI+. Housing in camps and collectives of LGBTQI + people with other non-LGBTQI+ in asylum accommodations can cause anxieties regarding being mis-identified or ‘outed’ unwillingly (for their sexual orientation or gender identities). This is especially the case for trans people in accommodation facilities who find themselves living in single-sex housing that does not correspond to their gender identity. Because most of the time the authorities mis-gender trans persons, using the sex that is written on their official papers. Later on, when it comes to the asylum request, LGBTQI+ people fear that information about their sexual orientation or gender identity might start to circulate within the communities. This produces a lot of hesitations concerning what to say in front of the court, causing sorrow and fear because a large part of the LGBTQI+ people particularly pay attention not to reveal the reasons for their presence in Europe.

    From the perspective of Alarm Phone, writing about LGBTQI+ people on the move during the situations they encounter while the crossing on sea is difficult, because of course people also try and hide their identity in situations of close confinement, because it is a risk of discrimination and violence is very high. We can hardly provide a general analysis about people on the move because there is only partial knowledge available. Statistics are often binary and queer people are not mentioned.
    Lesvos LGBTQI+ refugee solidarity

    This is taken from a text that was published by members of the group in 2019

    As another deadly winter sets in, Moria prison camp on Lesvos is over its capacity by the thousands and growing fuller every day. In these conditions, LGBTQI+ refugees are particularly at risk of exposure, violence, and death.

    With homosexuality still illegal in 72 countries, it is obvious why many LGBTQI+ people became refugees. Many of us fled from home because we had to hide our gender identities. When we arrive on Lesvos, expecting safety, we are shocked to find the same issues continue for us here. Homophobic harassment and violent attacks are frequent and severe: by fellow residents as well as by the police and camp guards.

    We know some LGBTQI+ people that have been beaten and even hospitalised from homophobic and transphobic attacks. All have had to repress their identity, living cheek by jowl among communities which replicate the persecution they fled in the first place.

    “When I was in the boat, a beautiful cry came. We’re starting a new life. We were just throwing all our troubles into the sea. I wasn’t scared. I just read the Qur‘an and cried. I sat in the boat, my hand was in the sea along the way.”

    “I left Morocco because for 30 years I was insulted, persecuted and beaten by the community, the police and my family, but on Lesvos I found the same thing.”

    “In the early days in Moria, I was systematically raped. I‘ve seen the most difficult conditions, but I‘ve never seen such a horrible place.”

    “These people are looking at you like you’re rubbish. Like you smell. On the street, on the bus. I don’t know how to explain this. Even when you are on the street, you feel ashamed, like there is shit on you.”

    “If we can’t dress up the way we want, if we can’t do our make-up, why come to Europe?“

    “And together we will change the world, so that people will never have to come out again!”

    We did not flee our homes only to continue to hide and live in fear. We won’t be silenced. We won’t be ignored. We will shout it from the rooftops: we are gay, we are lesbian, we are women, we are men. We are here. We are all migrants. We want our freedom we won’t wait ‘till it‘s given to us. We ask those that hear us to fight alongside us, wherever you are.

    Queer solidarity smashes borders!

    https://alarmphone.org/en/2020/04/08/struggles-of-women-on-the-move
    #femmes #résistance #migrations #réfugiés #asile #lutte #luttes #femmes_migrantes #Tanger #Maroc #solidarité #Rabat #invisibilité #Tunisie #Méditerranée_centrale #Ocean_Viking #Mer_Egée #Moria #Lesbos #Grèce #attente #LGBT #genre

    ping @karine4 @isskein @_kg_

  • 5 Years Alarmphone

    For our anniversary, we are publishing a booklet, reflecting on our activities and experiences supporting thousands of travellers in the Mediterranean. It is available in three languages (English, German, French) and can be downloaded for free:

    https://alarmphone.org/en/publications/anniversary-booklets

    #alarm_phone #rapport #booklet #migration #méditerranée #sauvetage

  • From Palermo and Barcelona to Naples: For the Right to Mobility and the Right to Rescue!
    Naples, Italy, 22 June 2019

    Humanitarian rescue NGOs, civil society organisations, and activist groups, including Sea-Watch, Alarm Phone, Mediterranea, Seebrücke, Aita Mari, Jugend Rettet, Borderline Europe, Inura, Open Arms, and Welcome to Europe, as well as representatives of several European cities and municipalities, including Naples and Barcelona, have come together to work toward a collective European and Mediterranean initiative. Our movement was born in Palermo in 2018 and in the spirit of the Charter of Palermo, with its central demand for the right of mobility. Our slogan is: “From the Sea to the Cities!”

    After our meetings in Palermo and Barcelona, we were hosted by the Municipality of Naples on 20-21 June 2019. Naples is a city that has declared its port a safe harbour in light of the restrictive and anti-migrant measures of the current Italian government, especially its interior minister. Over the past two days we have strengthened the collaboration between humanitarian rescue NGOs, civil society organisations, activist groups and city administrators. Our main aim is to join together in the struggle against the mass dying in the Mediterranean Sea. Those rescued at sea must be brought to safe harbours and be allowed to live freely and in dignity in European cities.

    We declare our solidarity with the 43 survivors, including unaccompanied minors, who were rescued by Sea-Watch 3 but who are still today, 10 days after their rescue, stuck on the rescue boat. We condemn the refusal to allow Sea-Watch 3 and its guests to land at a safe harbour. Together with the survivors we demand from the Italian government as well as the European institutions and community to immediate guarantee their disembarkation.

    https://alarmphone.org/en/2019/06/22/from-palermo-and-barcelona-to-naples-for-the-right-to-mobility-and-the-right-to-rescue/?post_type_release_type=post

    #asile #migrations #réfugiés #droit_à_la_mobilité #droit_au_sauvetage #Palerme #Barcelone #Naples

    ajouté à la métaliste:
    https://seenthis.net/messages/759145

  • And Yet We Move - 2018, a Contested Year

    Alarm Phone 6 Week Report, 12 November - 23 December 2018

    311 people escaping from Libya rescued through a chain of solidarity +++ About 113,000 sea arrivals and over 2,240 counted fatalities in the Mediterranean this year +++ 666 Alarm Phone distress cases in 2018 +++ Developments in all three Mediterranean regions +++ Summaries of 38 Alarm Phone distress cases

    Introduction

    “There are no words big enough to describe the value of the work you are doing. It is a deeply human act and it will never be forgotten. The whole of your team should know that we wish all of you health and a long life and the best wishes in all the colours of the world.” These are the words that the Alarm Phone received a few days ago from a man who had been on a boat in the Western Mediterranean Sea and with whom our shift teams had stayed in touch throughout the night until they were finally rescued to Spain. He was able to support the other travellers by continuously and calmly reassuring them, and thereby averted panic on the boat. His message motivates us to continue also in 2019 to do everything we can to assist people who have taken to the sea because Europe’s border regime has closed safe and legal routes, leaving only the most dangerous paths slightly open. On these paths, over 2,240 people have lost their lives this year.

    While we write this report, 311 people are heading toward Spain on the rescue boat of the NGO Proactiva Open Arms. The travellers called the Alarm Phone when they were on a boat-convoy that had left from Libya. Based on the indications of their location, Al-Khums, the civil reconnaissance aircraft Colibri launched a search operation in the morning of the 21st of December and was able to spot the convoy of three boats which were then rescued by Proactiva. Italy and Malta closed their harbours to them, prolonging their suffering. Over the Christmas days they headed toward their final destination in Spain. The successful rescue operation of the 313 people (one mother and her infant child were flown out by a helicopter after rescue) highlights the chain of solidarity that activists and NGOs have created in the Central Mediterranean Sea. It is a fragile chain that the EU and its member states seek to criminalise and tear apart wherever they can.

    Throughout the year of 2018, we have witnessed and assisted contested movements across the Mediterranean Sea. Despite violent deterrence policies and practices, about 113,000 people succeeded in subverting maritime borders and have arrived in Europe by boat. We were alerted to 666 distress situations at sea (until December 23rd), and our shift teams have done their best to assist the many thousands of people who saw no other option to realise their hope for a better future than by risking their lives at sea. Many of them lost their lives in the moment of enacting their freedom of movement. Over 2,240 women, men, and children from the Global South – and probably many more who were never counted – are not with us anymore because of the violence inscribed in the Global North’s hegemonic and brutal borders. They were not able to get a visa. They could not board a much cheaper plane, bus, or ferry to reach a place of safety and freedom. Many travelled for months, even years, to get anywhere near the Mediterranean border – and on their journeys they have lived through hardships unimaginable for most of us. But they struggled on and reached the coasts of Northern Africa and Turkey, where they got onto overcrowded boats. That they are no longer with us is a consequence of Europe’s racist system of segregation that illegalises and criminalises migration, a system that also seeks to illegalise and criminalise solidarity. Many of these 2,240 people would be alive if the civil rescuers were not prevented from doing their work. All of them would be alive, if they could travel and cross borders freely.

    In the different regions of the Mediterranean Sea, the situation has further evolved over the course of 2018, and the Alarm Phone witnessed the changing patterns of boat migration first hand. Most of the boats we assisted were somewhere between Morocco and Spain (480), a considerable number between Turkey and Greece (159), but comparatively few between Libya and Italy (27). This, of course, speaks to the changing dynamics of migratory escape and its control in the different regions:

    Morocco-Spain: Thousands of boats made it across the Strait of Gibraltar, the Alboran Sea, or the Atlantic and have turned Spain into the ‘front-runner’ this year with about 56,000 arrivals by sea. In 2017, 22,103 people had landed in Spain, 8,162 in 2016. In the Western Mediterranean, crossings are organised in a rather self-organised way and the number of arrivals speaks to a migratory dynamism not experienced for over a decade in this region. Solidarity structures have multiplied both in Morocco and Spain and they will not be eradicated despite the wave of repression that has followed the peak in crossings over the summer. Several Alarm Phone members experienced the consequences of EU pressure on the Moroccan authorities to repress cross-border movements first hand when they were violently deported to the south of Morocco, as were several thousand others.

    Turkey-Greece: With about 32,000 people reaching the Greek islands by boat, more people have arrived in Greece than in 2017, when 29,718 people did so. After arrival via the sea, many are confined in inhumane conditions on the islands and the EU hotspots have turned into rather permanent prisons. This desperate situation has prompted renewed movements across the Turkish-Greek land border in the north. Overall, the number of illegalised crossings into Greece has risen due to more than 20,000 people crossing the land border. Several cases of people experiencing illegal push-back operations there reached the Alarm Phone over the year.

    Libya-Italy/Malta: Merely about 23,000[1] people have succeeded in fleeing Libya via the sea in 2018. The decrease is dramatic, from 119,369 in 2017, and even 181,436 in 2016. This decrease gives testament to the ruthlessness of EU deterrence policies that have produced the highest death rate in the Central Mediterranean and unspeakable suffering among migrant communities in Libya. Libyan militias are funded, trained, and legitimated by their EU allies to imprison thousands of people in camps and to abduct those who made it onto boats back into these conditions. Due to the criminalisation of civil rescuers, a lethal rescue gap was produced, with no NGO able to carry out their work for many months of the year. Fortunately, three of them have now been able to return to the deadliest area of the Mediterranean.

    These snapshots of the developments in the three Mediterranean regions, elaborated on in greater detail below, give an idea of the struggles ahead of us. They show how the EU and its member states not only created dangerous maritime paths in the first place but then reinforced its migrant deterrence regime at any cost. They show, however, also how thousands could not be deterred from enacting their freedom of movement and how solidarity structures have evolved to assist their precarious movements. We go into 2019 with the promise and call that the United4Med alliance of sea rescuers has outlined: “We will prove how civil society in action is not only willing but also able to bring about a new Europe; saving lives at sea and creating a just reception system on land. Ours is a call to action to European cities, mayors, citizens, societies, movements, organisations and whoever believes in our mission, to join us. Join our civil alliance and let us stand up together, boldly claiming a future of respect and equality. We will stand united for the right to stay and for the right to go.”[2] Also in the new year, the Alarm Phone will directly engage in this struggle and we call on others to join. It can only be a collective fight, as the odds are stacked against us.

    Developments in the Central Mediterranean

    In December 2018, merely a few hundred people were able to escape Libya by boat. It cannot be stressed enough how dramatic the decrease in crossings along this route is – a year before, 2,327 people escaped in December, in 2016 even 8,428. 2018 is the year when Europe’s border regime ‘succeeded’ in largely shutting down the Central Mediterranean route. It required a combination of efforts – the criminalisation of civil search and rescue organisations, the selective presence of EU military assets that were frequently nowhere to be found when boats were in distress, the closure of Italian harbours and the unwillingness of other EU member states to welcome the rescued, and, most importantly, the EU’s sustained support for the so-called Libyan coastguards and other Libyan security forces. Europe has not only paid but also trained, funded and politically legitimised Libyan militias whose only job is to contain outward migratory movements, which means capturing and abducting people seeking to flee to Europe both at sea and on land. Without these brutal allies, it would not have been possible to reduce the numbers of crossings that dramatically.

    The ‘Nivin case’ of November 7th exemplifies this European-Libyan alliance. On that day, a group of 95 travellers reached out to the Alarm Phone from a boat in distress off the coast of Libya. Among them were people from Ethiopia, Somalia, South Sudan, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Eritrea. Italy refused to conduct a rescue operation and eventually they were rescued by the cargo vessel Nivin. Despite telling the rescued that they would be brought to a European harbour, the crew of the Nivin returned them to Libya on November 10th. At the harbour of Misrata, most of the rescued refused to disembark, stating that they would not want to be returned into conditions of confinement and torture. The people, accused by some to be ‘pirates’, fought bravely against forced disembarkation for ten days but on the 20th of November they could resist no longer when Libyan security forces stormed the boat and violently removed them, using tear gas and rubber bullets in the process. Several of the protestors were injured and needed treatment in hospital while others were returned into inhumane detention camps.[3]

    Also over the past 6 weeks, the period covered in this report, the criminalisation of civil rescue organisations continued. The day that the protestors on the Nivin were violently removed, Italy ordered the seizure of the Aquarius, the large rescue asset operated by SOS Méditerranée and Médecins Sans Frontières that had already been at the docs in France for some time, uncertain about its future mission. According to the Italian authorities, the crew had falsely labelled the clothes rescued migrants had left on the Aquarius as ‘special’ rather than ‘toxic’ waste.[4] The absurdity of the accusation highlights the fact that Italy’s authorities seek out any means to prevent rescues from taking place, a “disproportionate and unfounded measure, purely aimed at further criminalising lifesaving medical-humanitarian action at sea”, as MSF noted.[5] Unfortunately, these sustained attacks showed effect. On the 6th of December, SOS Med and MSF announced the termination of its mission: “European policies and obstruction tactics have forced [us] to terminate the lifesaving operations carried out by the search and rescue vessel Aquarius.” As the MSF general director said: “This is a dark day. Not only has Europe failed to provide search and rescue capacity, it has also actively sabotaged others’ attempts to save lives. The end of Aquarius means more deaths at sea, and more needless deaths that will go unwitnessed.”[6]

    And yet, despite this ongoing sabotage of civil rescue from the EU and its member states, three vessels of the Spanish, German, and Italian organisations Open Arms, Sea-Watch and Mediterranea returned to the deadliest area of the Mediterranean in late November.[7] This return is also significance for Alarm Phone work in the Central Mediterranean: once again we have non-governmental allies at sea who will not only document what is going on along the deadliest border of the world but actively intervene to counter Europe’s border ‘protection’ measures. Shortly after returning, one of the NGOs was called to assist. Fishermen had rescued a group of travellers off the coast of Libya onto their fishing vessel, after they had been abandoned in the water by a Libyan patrol boat, as the fishermen claimed. Rather than ordering their rapid transfer to a European harbour, Italy, Malta and Spain sought out ways to return the 12 people to Libya. The fishing boat, the Nuestra Madre de Loreto, was ill-equipped to care for the people who were weak and needed medical attention. However, they were assisted only by Proactiva Open Arms, and for over a week, the people had to stay on the fishing boat. One of them developed a medical emergency and was eventually brought away in a helicopter. Finally, in early December, they were brought to Malta.[8]

    Around the same time, something rare and remarkable happened. A boat with over 200 people on board reached the Italian harbour of Pozzallo independently, on the 24th of November. Even when they were at the harbour, the authorities refused to allow them to quickly disembark – a irresponsible decision given that the boat was at risk of capsizing. After several hours, all of the people were finally allowed to get off the boat. Italy’s minister of the interior Salvini accused the Maltese authorities of allowing migrant boats to move toward Italian territory.[9] Despite their hardship, the people on the Nuestra Madre de Loreto and the 200 people from this boat, survived. Also the 33 people rescued by the NGO Sea-Watch on the 22nd of December survived. Others, however, did not. In mid-November, a boat left from Algeria with 13 young people on board, intending to reach Sardinia. On the 16th of November, the first body was found, the second a day later. Three survived and stated later that the 10 others had tried to swim to what they believed to be the shore when they saw a light in the distance.[10] In early December, a boat with 25 people on board left from Sabratha/Libya, and 15 of them did not survive. As a survivor reported, they had been at sea for 12 days without food and water.[11]

    Despite the overall decrease in crossings, what has been remarkable in this region is that the people escaping have more frequently informed the Alarm Phone directly than before. The case mentioned earlier, from the 20th of December, when people from a convoy of 3 boats carrying 313 people in total reached out to us, exemplifies this. Detected by the Colibri reconnaissance aircraft and rescued by Proactiva, this case demonstrates powerfully what international solidarity can achieve, despite all attempts by EU member states and institutions to create a zone of death in the Central Mediterranean Sea.
    Developments in the Western Mediterranean Sea

    Over the past six weeks covered by this report, the Alarm Phone witnessed several times what happens when Spanish and Moroccan authorities shift responsibilities and fail to respond quickly to boats in distress situations. Repeatedly we had to pressurise the Spanish authorities publicly before they launched a Search and Rescue (SAR) operation. And still, many lives were lost at sea. On Moroccan land, the repression campaign against Sub-Saharan travellers and residents continues. On the 30th of November, an Alarm Phone member was, yet again, arrested and deported towards the South of Morocco, to Tiznit, along with many other people. (h https://alarmphone.org/en/2018/12/04/alarm-phone-member-arrested-and-deported-in-morocco/?post_type_release_type=post). Other friends in Morocco have informed us about the deportation of large groups from Nador to Tiznit. Around the 16th of December, 400 people were forcibly removed, and on the 17th of December, another 300 people were deported to Morocco’s south. This repression against black residents and travellers in Morocco is one of the reasons for many to decide to leave via the sea. This has meant that also during the winter, cross-Mediterranean movements remain high. On just one weekend, the 8th-9th of December, 535 people reached Andalusia/Spain.[12]

    Whilst people are constantly resisting the border regime by acts of disobedience when they cross the borders clandestinely, acts of resistance take place also on the ground in Morocco, where associations and individuals are continuously struggling for the freedom of movement for all. In early December, an Alarm Phone delegation participated at an international conference in Rabat/Morocco, in order to discuss with members of other associations and collectives from Africa and Europe about the effects of the outsourcing and militarisation of European borders in the desire to further criminalise and prevent migration movements. We were among 400 people and were impressed by the many contributions from people who live and struggle in very precarious situations, by the uplifting atmosphere, and by the many accounts and expressions of solidarity. Days later, during the international meeting in Marrakesh on the ‘Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration’, the Alarm Phone was part of a counter-summit, protesting the international pact on migration which is not meant to reduce borders between states, but to curtail the freedom of movement of the many in the name of ‘legal’ and ‘regulated’ migration. The Alarm Phone delegation was composed of 20 activists from the cities of Tangier, Oujda, Berkane, Nador and Fes. One of our colleagues sums up the event: “We have expressed our ideas and commitments as Alarm Phone, solemnly and strongly in front of the other organisations represented. We have espoused the vision of freedom of movement, a vision without precedent. A vision which claims symbolically all human rights and which has the power to help migrants on all continents to feel protected.” In light of the Marrakesh pact, several African organisations joined together and published a statement rejecting “…the wish to confine Africans within their countries by strengthening border controls, in the deserts, at sea and in airports.”[13]

    Shortly after the international meeting in Marrakesh, the EU pledged €148 million to support Morocco’s policy of migrant containment, thus taking steps towards making it even more difficult, and therefore more dangerous for many people on the African continent to exercise their right to move freely, under the pretext of “combating smuggling”. Making the journeys across the Mediterranean more difficult does not have the desired effect of ending illegalised migration. As the routes to Spain from the north of Morocco have become more militarised following a summer of many successful crossings, more southern routes have come into use again. These routes, leading to the Spanish Canary Islands, force travellers to overcome much longer distances in the Atlantic Ocean, a space without phone coverage and with a heightened risk to lose one’s orientation. On the 18th of November, 22 people lost their lives at sea, on their way from Tiznit to the Canary Islands.[14] Following a Spanish-Frontex collaboration launched in 2006, this route to the Canary Islands has not been used very frequently, but numbers have increased this year, with Moroccan nationals being the largest group of arrivals.[15]
    Developments in the Aegean Sea

    Over the final weeks of 2018, between the 12th of November and the 23rd of December, 78 boats arrived on the Greek islands while 116 boats were stopped by the Turkish coastguards and returned to Turkey. This means that there were nearly 200 attempts to cross into Europe by boat over five weeks, and about 40 percent of them were successful.[16] Over the past six weeks, the Alarm Phone was involved in a total of 19 cases in this region. 6 of the boats arrived in Samos, 3 of them in Chios, and one each on Lesvos, Agathonisi, Farmkonisi, and Symi. 4 boats were returned to Turkey (3 of them rescued, 1 intercepted by the Turkish coastguards). In one distress situation, a man lost his life and another man had to be brought to the hospital due to hypothermia. Moreover, the Alarm Phone was alerted to 2 cases along the Turkish-Greek land border. While in one case their fate remains uncertain, the other group of people were forcibly pushed-back to Turkey.

    Thousands of people still suffering in inhuman conditions in hotspots: When we assist boats crossing the Aegean Sea, the people are usually relieved and happy when arriving on the islands, at least they have survived. However, this moment of happiness often turns into a state of shock when they enter the so-called ‘hotspots’. Over 12,500 people remain incarcerated there, often living in tents and containers unsuitable for winter in the five EU-sponsored camps on Lesvos, Samos, Chios, Kos, and Leros. In addition to serious overcrowding, asylum seekers continue to face unsanitary and unhygienic conditions and physical violence, including gender-based violence. Doctors without Borders has reported on a measles outbreak in Greek camps and conducted a vaccination campaign.[17] Amnesty International and 20 other organizations have published a collective call: “As winter approaches all asylum seekers on the Aegean islands must be transferred to suitable accommodation on the mainland or relocated to other EU countries. […] The EU-Turkey deal containment policy imposes unjustified and unnecessary suffering on asylum seekers, while unduly limiting their rights.”

    The ‘humanitarian’ crisis in the hotspots is the result of Greece’s EU-backed policy of containing asylum seekers on the Aegean islands until their asylum claims are adjudicated or until it is determined that they fall into one of the ‘vulnerable’ categories listed under Greek law. But as of late November, an estimated 2,200 people identified as eligible for transfer are still waiting as accommodation facilities on the mainland are also severely overcrowded. Those who are actually transferred from the hotspot on Lesvos to the Greek mainland are brought to far away camps or empty holiday resorts without infrastructure and without a sufficient number of aid workers.

    Criminalisation along Europe’s Eastern Sea Border: A lot has been written about the many attempts to criminalise NGOs and activists carrying out Search and Rescue operations in the Mediterranean. Much less publicly acknowledged are the many cases in which migrant travellers themselves become criminalised for their activist involvement, often for protesting against the inhuman living conditions and the long waiting times for the asylum-interviews. The case of the ‘Moria 35’ on Lesvos was a case in point, highlighting how a few individual protesters were randomly selected by authorities to scare others into silence and obedience. The Legal Centre Lesvos followed this case closely until the last person of the 35 was released and they shared their enquiries with “a 15-month timeline of injustice and impunity” on their website: “On Thursday 18th October, the last of the Moria 35 were released from detention. Their release comes one year and three months – to the day – after the 35 men were arbitrarily arrested and subject to brutal police violence in a raid of Moria camp following peaceful protests, on July 18th 2017.” While the Legal Centre Lesbos welcomes the fact that all 35 men were finally released, they should never have been imprisoned in the first place. They will not get back the 10 to 15 months they spent in prison. Moreover, even after release, most of the 35 men remain in a legally precarious situation. While 6 were granted asylum in Greece, the majority struggles against rejected asylum claims. Three were already deported. One individual was illegally deported without having exhausted his legal remedies in Greece while another individual, having spent 9 months in pre-trial detention, signed up for so-called ‘voluntary’ deportation.[18] In the meantime, others remain in prison to await their trials that will take place with hardly any attention of the media.

    Humanitarian activists involved in spotting and rescue released after 3 months: The four activists, Sarah Mardini, Nassos Karakitsos, Panos Moraitis and Sean Binder, were released on the 6th of December 2018 after having been imprisoned for three months. They had been held in prolonged pre-trial detention for their work with the non-profit organization Emergency Response Center International (ERCI), founded by Moraitis. The charges misrepresented the group as a smuggling crime ring, and its legitimate fundraising activities as money laundering. The arrests forced the group to cease its operations, including maritime search and rescue, the provision of medical care, and non-formal education to asylum seekers. They are free without geographical restrictions but the case is not yet over. Mardini and Binder still face criminal charges possibly leading to decades in prison.[19] Until 15 February the group ‘Solidarity now!’ is collecting as many signatures as possible to ensure that the Greek authorities drop the case.[20]

    Violent Pushbacks at the Land Border: During the last six weeks, the Alarm Phone was alerted to two groups at the land border separating Turkey and Greece. In both situations, the travellers had already reached Greek soil, but ended up on Turkish territory. Human Right Watch (HRW) published another report on the 18th of December about violent push-backs in the Evros region: “Greek law enforcement officers at the land border with Turkey in the northeastern Evros region routinely summarily return asylum seekers and migrants […]. The officers in some cases use violence and often confiscate and destroy the migrants’ belongings.”[21] Regularly, migrants were stripped off their phones, money and clothes. According to HRW, most of these incidents happened between April and November 2018.[22] The UNHCR and the Council of Europe’s Committee for Prevention of Torture have published similar reports about violent push backs along the Evros borders.[23]
    CASE REPORTS

    Over the past 6 weeks, the WatchTheMed Alarm Phone was engaged in 38 distress cases, of which 15 took place in the Western Mediterranean, 19 in the Aegean Sea, and 4 in the Central Mediterranean. You can find short summaries and links to the individual reports below.
    Western Mediterranean

    On Tuesday the 13th of November at 6.17pm, the Alarm Phone was alerted by a relative to a group of travellers who had left two days earlier from around Orán heading towards Murcia. They were around nine people, including women and children, and the relative had lost contact to the boat. We were also never able to reach the travellers. At 6.46pm we alerted the Spanish search and rescue organization Salvamento Maritimo (SM) to the distress of the travellers. For several days we tried to reach the travellers and were in contact with SM about the ongoing rescue operation. We were never able to reach the travellers or get any news from the relative. Thus, we are still unsure if the group managed to reach land somewhere on their own, or if they will add to the devastating number of people having lost their lives at sea (see: http://www.watchthemed.net/reports/view/1085).

    On Thursday the 22nd of November, at 5.58pm CET, the Alarm Phone received news about a boat of 11 people that had left Nador 8 hours prior. The shift team was unable to immediately enter into contact with the boat, but called Salvamento Maritimo to convey all available information. At 11.48am the following day, the shift team received word from a traveler on the boat that they were safe (see: http://www.watchthemed.net/reports/view/1088).

    At 7.25am CET on November 24, 2018, the Alarm Phone shift team was alerted to a boat of 70 people (including 8 women and 1 child) that had departed from Nador 3 days prior. The shift team was able to reach the boat at 7.50am and learned that their motor had stopped working. The shift team called Salvamento Maritimo, who had handed the case over to the Moroccan authorities. The shift team contacted the MRCC, who said they knew about the boat but could not find them, so the shift team mobilized their contacts to find the latest position and sent it to the coast guard at 8.55am. Rescue operations stalled for several hours. At around 2pm, the shift team received news that rescue operations were underway by the Marine Royale. The shift team remained in contact with several people and coast guards until the next day, when it was confirmed that the boat had finally been rescued and that there were at least 15 fatalities (see: http://www.watchthemed.net/reports/view/1087).

    On Friday the 7th of December 2018, we were alerted to two boats in distress in the Western Mediterranean Sea. One boat was brought to Algeria, the second boat rescued by Moroccan fishermen and returned to Morocco (see for full report: http://watchthemed.net/reports/view/1098).

    On Saturday, the 8th of December 2018, we were informed by a contact person at 3.25pm CET to a boat in distress that had left from Nador/Morocco during the night, at about 1am. There were 57 people on the boat, including 8 women and a child. We tried to establish contact to the boat but were unable to reach them. At 4.50pm, the Spanish search and rescue organisation Salvamento Maritimo (SM) informed us that they were already searching for this boat. At 8.34pm, SM stated that this boat had been rescued. Some time later, also our contact person confirmed that the boat had been found and rescued to Spain (see: http://watchthemed.net/reports/view/1099).

    On Monday the 10th of December, the Alarm Phone shift team was alerted to three boats in the Western Med. Two had left from around Nador, and one from Algeria. One boat was rescued by the Spanish search and rescue organisation Salvamento Maritimo, one group of travellers returned back to Nador on their own, and the boat from Algeria returned to Algeria (see: http://www.watchthemed.net/reports/view/1101).

    On Wednesday the 12th of December the Alarm Phone shift team was alerted two boats in the Western Med, one carrying seven people, the other carrying 12 people. The first boat was rescued by the Spanish search and rescue organization Salvamento Maritimo (SM), whilst the second boat was intercepted by the Moroccan Navy and brought back to Morocco, where we were informed that the travellers were held imprisoned (see: http://www.watchthemed.net/reports/view/1102).

    On December 21st, 2018, we were informed of two boats in distress in the Western Mediterranean Sea. The first had left from Algeria and was probably rescued to Spain. The other one had departed from Tangier and was rescued by the Marine Royale and brought back to Morocco (for full report, see: http://watchthemed.net/index.php/reports/view/1110).

    On the 22nd of December, at 5.58pm CET, the Alarm Phone shift team was alerted to a boat of 81 people (including 7 women) that had left the previous day from Nador. The motor was not working properly. They informed that they were in touch with Salvamiento Maritimo but as they were still in Moroccan waters, Salvamiento Maritimo said they were unable to perform rescue operations. The shift team had difficulty maintaining contact with the boat over the course of the next few hours. The shift team also contacted Salvamiento Maritimo who confirmed that they knew about the case. At 7.50pm, Salvamiento Maritimo informed the shift team that they would perform the rescue operations and confirmed the operation at 8.15pm. We later got the confirmation by a contact person that the people were rescued to Spain (see: http://watchthemed.net/index.php/reports/view/1111).

    On the 23rd of December 2018, at 1.14am CET, the Alarm Phone received an alert of a boat with 11 men and 1 woman who left from Cap Spartel at Saturday the 22nd of December. The Alarm Phone shift team was alerted to this rubber boat in the early hours of Sunday the 23rd of December. The shift team informed the Spanish Search and Rescue organisation Salvamento Maritimo (SM) at 4:50am CET about the situation and provided them with GPS coordinates of the boat. SM, however, rejected responsibility and shifted it to the Moroccan authorities but also the Moroccan Navy did not rescue the people. Several days later, the boat remains missing (see for full report: http://watchthemed.net/reports/view/1112).
    Aegean Sea

    On Saturday the 17th of November the Alarm Phone shift team was alerted to two boats in the Aegean Sea. The first boat returned back to Turkey, whilst the second boat reached Samos on their own (see: http://www.watchthemed.net/reports/view/1086).

    On the 19th of November at 8.40pm CET the shift team was alerted to a boat of 11 travelers in distress near the Turkish coast on its way to Kos. The shift team called the Turkish Coastguard to inform them of the situation. At 9.00pm, the Coastguard called back to confirm they found the boat and would rescue the people. The shift team lost contact with the travelers. At 9.35pm, the Turkish coast guard informed the shift team that the boat was sunk, one man died and one person had hypothermia and would be brought to the hospital. The other 9 people were safe and brought back to Turkey (see: http://www.watchthemed.net/index.php/reports/view/1090).

    On the 20th of November at 4.07am CET, the shift team was alerted to a boat with about 50 travelers heading to Samos. The shift team contacted the travelers but the contact was broken for both language and technological reasons. The Alarm Phone contacted the Greek Coastguard about rescue operations. At 7.02am, the shift team was told that a boat of 50 people had been rescued, and the news was confirmed later on, although the shift team could not obtain direct confirmation from the travelers themselves (see:http://www.watchthemed.net/reports/view/1089).

    On the 23rd of November at 7.45pm CET, the Alarm Phone was contacted regarding a group of 19 people, (including 2 women, 1 of whom was pregnant, and a child) who had crossed the river Evros/ Meric and the Turkish-Greek landborder 3 days prior. The shift team first contacted numerous rescue and protection agencies, including UNHCR and the Greek Police, noting that the people were already in Greece and wished to apply for asylum. Until today we remained unable to find out what happened to the people (see: http://www.watchthemed.net/reports/view/1091).

    On the 26th of November at 6:54am CET the Alarm Phone shift team was alerted to a group of 30 people (among them 7 children and a pregnant woman) who were stranded on the shore in southern Turkey, close to Kas. They wanted us to call the Turkish coastguard so at 7:35am we provided the coastguard with the information we had. At 8:41am we received a photograph from our contact person showing rescue by the Turkish coastguard (see: http://watchthemed.net/index.php/reports/view/1092).

    On the 29th of November at 4am CET the Alarm Phone shift team was alerted to a boat carrying 44 people (among them 19 children and some pregnant women) heading towards the Greek island of Samos. Shortly afterwards the travellers landed on Samos and because of their difficulties orienting themselves we alerted the local authorities. At 9:53am the port police told us that they had rescued 44 people. They were taken to the refugee camp (see: http://watchthemed.net/index.php/reports/view/1093).

    On Monday, the 3rd of December 2018, the Alarm Phone was alerted at 5.30am CET to a boat in distress south of Chios, with 43 people on board, among them 14 children. We were able to reach the boat at 5.35am. When we received their position, we informed the Greek coastguards at 7.30am and forwarded an updated GPS position to them ten minutes later. At 8.52am, the coastguards confirmed the rescue of the boat. The people were brought to Chios Island. On the next day, the people themselves confirmed that they had all safely reached Greece (see: http://watchthemed.net/reports/view/1095).

    On Tuesday the 4th of December 2018, at 6.20am CET, the Alarm Phone was alerted to a boat in distress near Agathonisi Island. There were about 40 people on board. We established contact to the boat at 6.38am. At 6.45am, we alerted the Greek coastguards. The situation was dangerous as the people on board reported of high waves. At 9.02am, the Greek coastguards confirmed that they had just rescued the boat. The people were brought to Agathonisi (see for full report: http://watchthemed.net/reports/view/1096).

    On Wednesday the 5th of December 2018, at 00:08am CET, the Alarm Phone was alerted by a contact person to a boat in distress near Chios Island, carrying about 50 people. We received their GPS position at 00.17am and informed the Greek coastguards to the case at 00.30am. At 00.46am, we learned from the contact person that a boat had just been rescued. The Greek authorities confirmed this when we called them at 00.49am. At around 1pm, the people from the boat confirmed that they had been rescued (see: http://watchthemed.net/reports/view/1097).

    On Friday the 7th of December 2018, the Alarm Phone was contacted at 5.53am CET by a contact person and informed about a group of 19 people who had crossed the Evros river to Greece and needed assistance. We assisted them for days, but at some point contact was lost. We know that they were returned to Turkey and thus suspect an illegal push-back operation (see for full report: http://watchthemed.net/index.php/reports/view/1109).

    On Thursday the 13th of December the Alarm Phone shift team was alerted to two boats in the Aegean sea. In both cases we were not able to reach the travellers, but we were in contact with both the Turkish and Greek coast guard and were in the end able to confirm that one boat had arrived to Lesvos on their own, whilst the others had been rescued by Turkish fishermen (see: http://www.watchthemed.net/reports/view/1100).

    On the 17th of December, 2018, at 6.39am, the Alarm Phone shift team was alerted to a boat of 60 travellers. Water was entering the boat, and so the travelers were in distress. Though the shift team had a difficult time remaining in contact with the boat, they contacted the Greek Coastguard to inform them of the situation and the position of the boat. Although the team was not able to remain in contact with the travelers, they received confirmation at 8.18am that the boat had been brought to Greece (see: http://watchthemed.net/reports/view/1103).

    On the 18th of December at 2.11am CET, the Alarm Phone was alerted to two boats. The first, of 29 travellers, had landed on the island of Symi and needed help to exit the place of landing. The second was a boat of 54 travellers (including 16 children, and 15 women) that was rescued by the Greek Coastguard later (see: http://watchthemed.net/reports/view/1104).

    On the 21st of December, our shift teams were alerted to 2 boats on the Aegean. The first boat was directed to Chios Island and was likely rescued by the Greek Coastguard. The second boat was in immediate distress and after the shift team contacted the Greek Coastguard they rescued the boat (see: http://watchthemed.net/reports/view/1105).

    On the 23rd of December 2018 at 6am CET, the Alarm Phone received information about a boat in distress heading to Samos with around 60 travellers (including 30 children and 8 women, 4 pregnant). The shift team made contact with the boat and was informed that one of the women was close to giving birth and so the situation was very urgent. The shift team then called the Greek Coast Guard. At 8.07am, the shift team received confirmation that the boat had been rescued (see: http://watchthemed.net/reports/view/1106).
    Central Mediterranean

    On Monday the 12th of November at 6.57pm, the Alarm Phone was called by a relative, asking for help to find out what had happened to his son, who had been on a boat from Algeria towards Sardinia, with around 11 travellers on the 8t of November. Following this, the Alarm Phone was contacted by several relatives informing us about missing people from this boat. Our shift teams tried to gain an understanding of the situation, and for days we stayed in contact with the relatives and tried to support them, but it was not possible to obtain information about what had happened to the travellers (see: http://www.watchthemed.net/index.php/reports/view/1094).

    On November 23rd at 1.24pm CET, the Alarm Phone shift team was called by a boat of 120 travelers that was in distress and had left the Libyan coast the night before. The shift team remained in touch with the boat for several hours, and helped recharge their phone credit when it expired. As the boat was in distress, and there were no available NGO operations near the boat, the shift team had no choice but to contact the Italian Coast Guard, but they refused to engage in Search and Rescue (SAR) activities, and instead told the Libyan Coastguard. The boat was intercepted and returned to Libya (see: http://watchthemed.net/reports/view/1107).

    On December 20th, 2018, the Alarm Phone shift team was alerted to two cases in the Central Mediterranean Sea. The first was a boat of 20 people that was intercepted and brought back to Libya. The second concerned 3 boats with 300 people in total, that were rescued by Open Arms and brought to Spain (for full report see: http://watchthemed.net/reports/view/1108).

    https://alarmphone.org/en/2018/12/27/and-yet-we-move-2018-a-contested-year/?post_type_release_type=post

  • Autour des #gardes-côtes_libyens... et de #refoulements en #Libye...

    Je copie-colle ici des articles que j’avais mis en bas de cette compilation (qu’il faudrait un peu mettre en ordre, peut-être avec l’aide de @isskein ?) :
    https://seenthis.net/messages/705401

    Les articles ci-dessous traitent de :
    #asile #migrations #réfugiés #Méditerranée #push-back #refoulement #externalisation #frontières

    • Pour la première fois depuis 2009, un navire italien ramène des migrants en Libye

      Une embarcation de migrants secourue par un navire de ravitaillement italien a été renvoyée en Libye lundi 30 juillet. Le HCR a annoncé mardi l’ouverture d’une enquête et s’inquiète d’une violation du droit international.

      Lundi 30 juillet, un navire battant pavillon italien, l’Asso Ventotto, a ramené des migrants en Libye après les avoir secourus dans les eaux internationales – en 2012 déjà l’Italie a été condamnée par la Cour européenne des droits de l’Homme pour avoir reconduit en Libye des migrants secourus en pleine mer en 2009.

      L’information a été donnée lundi soir sur Twitter par Oscar Camps, le fondateur de l’ONG espagnole Proactiva Open Arms, avant d’être reprise par Nicola Fratoianni, un député de la gauche italienne qui est actuellement à bord du bateau humanitaire espagnol qui sillonne en ce moment les côtes libyennes.

      Selon le quotidien italien La Repubblica, 108 migrants à bord d’une embarcation de fortune ont été pris en charge en mer Méditerranée par l’Asso Ventotto lundi 30 juillet. L’équipage du navire de ravitaillement italien a alors contacté le MRCC à Rome - centre de coordination des secours maritimes – qui les a orienté vers le centre de commandement maritime libyen. La Libye leur a ensuite donné l’instruction de ramener les migrants au port de Tripoli.

      En effet depuis le 28 juin, sur décision européenne, la gestion des secours des migrants en mer Méditerranée dépend des autorités libyennes et non plus de l’Italie. Concrètement, cela signifie que les opérations de sauvetage menées dans la « SAR zone » - zone de recherche et de sauvetage au large de la Libye - sont désormais coordonnées par les Libyens, depuis Tripoli. Mais le porte-parole du Conseil de l’Europe a réaffirmé ces dernières semaines qu’"aucun navire européen ne peut ramener des migrants en Libye car cela serait contraire à nos principes".

      Violation du droit international

      La Libye ne peut être considérée comme un « port sûr » pour le débarquement des migrants. « C’est une violation du droit international qui stipule que les personnes sauvées en mer doivent être amenées dans un ‘port sûr’. Malgré ce que dit le gouvernement italien, les ports libyens ne peuvent être considérés comme tels », a déclaré sur Twitter le député Nicola Fratoianni. « Les migrants se sont vus refuser la possibilité de demander l’asile, ce qui constitue une violation des accords de Genève sur les sauvetages en mer », dit-il encore dans le quotidien italien La Stampa.

      Sur Facebook, le ministre italien de l’Intérieur, Matteo Salvini, nie toutes entraves au droit international. « La garde-côtière italienne n’a ni coordonné, ni participé à cette opération, comme l’a faussement déclarée une ONG et un député de gauche mal informé ».

      Le Haut-Commissariat des Nations unies pour les réfugiés (HCR) a de son côté annoncé mardi 31 juillet l’ouverture d’une enquête. « Nous recueillons toutes les informations nécessaires sur le cas du remorqueur italien Asso Ventotto qui aurait ramené en Libye 108 personnes sauvées en Méditerranée. La Libye n’est pas un ‘port sûr’ et cet acte pourrait constituer une violation du droit international », dit l’agence onusienne sur Twitter.

      http://www.infomigrants.net/fr/post/10995/pour-la-premiere-fois-depuis-2009-un-navire-italien-ramene-des-migrant

    • Nave italiana soccorre e riporta in Libia 108 migranti. Salvini: «Nostra Guardia costiera non coinvolta»

      L’atto in violazione della legislazione internazionale che garantisce il diritto d’asilo e che non riconosce la Libia come un porto sicuro. Il vicepremier: «Nostre navi non sono intervenute nelle operazioni». Fratoianni (LeU): «Ci sono le prove della violazione»

      http://www.repubblica.it/cronaca/2018/07/31/news/migranti_nave_italiana_libia-203026448/?ref=RHPPLF-BH-I0-C8-P1-S1.8-T1
      #vos_thalassa #asso_28

      Commentaire de Sara Prestianni, via la mailing-list de Migreurop:

      Le navire commerciale qui opere autour des plateformes de pétrole, battant pavillon italien - ASSO 28 - a ramené 108 migrants vers le port de Tripoli suite à une opération de sauvetage- Les premiers reconstructions faites par Open Arms et le parlementaire Fratoianni qui se trouve à bord de Open Arms parlent d’une interception en eaux internationales à la quelle a suivi le refoulement. Le journal La Repubblica dit que les Gardes Cotes Italiennes auraient invité Asso28 à se coordonner avec les Gardes Cotes Libyennes (comme font habituellement dans les derniers mois. Invitation déclinés justement par les ong qui opèrent en mer afin de éviter de proceder à un refoulement interdit par loi). Le Ministre de l’Interieur nie une implication des Gardes Cotes Italiens et cyniquement twitte “Le Garde cotes libyenne dans les derniers heures ont sauvé et ramené à terre 611 migrants. Les Ong protestent les passeurs font des affaires ? C’est bien. Nous continuons ainsi”

    • Départs de migrants depuis la Libye :

      Libya : outcomes of the sea journey

      Migrants intercepted /rescued by the Libyan coast guard

      Lieux de désembarquement :


      #Italie #Espagne #Malte

      –-> Graphiques de #Matteo_Villa, posté sur twitter :
      source : https://twitter.com/emmevilla/status/1036892919964286976

      #statistiques #chiffres #2016 #2017 #2018

      cc @simplicissimus

    • Libyan Coast Guard Takes 611 Migrants Back to Africa

      Between Monday and Tuesday, the Libyan Coast Guard reportedly rescued 611 migrants aboard several dinghies off the coast and took them back to the African mainland.

      Along with the Libyan search and rescue operation, an Italian vessel, following indications from the Libyan Coast Guard, rescued 108 migrants aboard a rubber dinghy and delivered them back to the port of Tripoli. The vessel, called La Asso 28, was a support boat for an oil platform.

      Italian mainstream media have echoed complaints of NGOs claiming that in taking migrants back to Libya the Italian vessel would have violated international law that guarantees the right to asylum and does not recognize Libya as a safe haven.

      In recent weeks, a spokesman for the Council of Europe had stated that “no European ship can bring migrants back to Libya because it is contrary to our principles.”

      Twenty days ago, another ship supporting an oil rig, the Vos Thalassa, after rescuing a group of migrants, was preparing to deliver them to a Libyan patrol boat when an attempt to revolt among the migrants convinced the commander to reverse the route and ask the help of the Italian Coast Guard. The migrants were loaded aboard the ship Diciotti and taken to Trapani, Sicily, after the intervention of the President of the Republic Sergio Mattarella.

      On the contrary, Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini has declared Tuesday’s operation to be a victory for efforts to curb illegal immigration. The decision to take migrants back to Africa rather than transporting them to Europe reflects an accord between Italy and Libya that has greatly reduced the numbers of African migrants reaching Italian shores.

      Commenting on the news, Mr. Salvini tweeted: “The Libyan Coast Guard has rescued and taken back to land 611 immigrants in recent hours. The NGOs protest and the traffickers lose their business? Great, this is how we make progress,” followed by hashtags announcing “closed ports” and “open hearts.”

      Parliamentarian Nicola Fratoianni of the left-wing Liberi and Uguali (Free and Equal) party and secretary of the Italian Left, presently aboard the Spanish NGO ship Open Arms, denounced the move.

      “We do not yet know whether this operation was carried out on the instructions of the Italian Coast Guard, but if so it would be a very serious precedent, a real collective rejection for which Italy and the ship’s captain will answer before a court,” he said.

      “International law requires that people rescued at sea must be taken to a safe haven and the Libyan ports, despite the mystification of reality by the Italian government, cannot be considered as such,” he added.

      The United Nations immigration office (UNHCR) has threatened Italy for the incident involving the 108 migrants taken to Tripoli, insisting that Libya is not a safe port and that the episode could represent a breach of international law.

      “We are collecting all the necessary information,” UNHCR tweeted.

      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/santiago-anti-abortion-women-stabbed-chile-protest-a8469786.html
      #refoulements #push-back

    • Libya rescued 10,000 migrants this year, says Germany

      Libyan coast guards have saved some 10,000 migrants at sea since the start of this year, according to German authorities. The figure was provided by the foreign ministry during a debate in parliament over what the Left party said were “inhumane conditions” of returns of migrants to Libya. Libyan coast guards are trained by the EU to stop migrants crossing to Europe.

      https://euobserver.com/tickers/142821

    • UNHCR Flash Update Libya (9 - 15 November 2018) [EN/AR]

      As of 14 November, the Libyan Coast Guard (LCG) has rescued/intercepted 14,595 refugees and migrants (10,184 men, 2,147 women and 1,408 children) at sea. On 10 November, a commercial vessel reached the port of Misrata (187 km east of Tripoli) carrying 95 refugees and migrants who refused to disembark the boat. The individuals on board comprise of Ethiopian, Eritrean, South Sudanese, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and Somali nationals. UNHCR is closely following-up on the situation of the 14 individuals who have already disembarked and ensuring the necessary assistance is provided and screening is conducted for solutions. Since the onset, UNHCR has advocated for a peaceful resolution of the situation and provided food, water and core relief items (CRIs) to alleviate the suffering of individuals onboard the vessel.

      https://reliefweb.int/report/libya/unhcr-flash-update-libya-9-15-november-2018-enar
      #statistiques #2018 #chiffres

    • Rescued at sea, locked up, then sold to smugglers

      In Libya, refugees returned by EU-funded ships are thrust back into a world of exploitation.

      The Souq al Khamis detention centre in Khoms, Libya, is so close to the sea that migrants and refugees can hear waves crashing on the shore. Its detainees – hundreds of men, women and children – were among 15,000 people caught trying to cross the Mediterranean in flimsy boats in 2018, after attempting to reach Italy and the safety of Europe.

      They’re now locked in rooms covered in graffiti, including warnings that refugees may be sold to smugglers by the guards that watch them.


      This detention centre is run by the UN-backed Libyan government’s department for combatting illegal migration (DCIM). Events here over the last few weeks show how a hardening of European migration policy is leaving desperate refugees with little room to escape from networks ready to exploit them.

      Since 2014, the EU has allocated more than €300 million to Libya with the aim of stopping migration. Funnelled through the Trust Fund for Africa, this includes roughly €40 million for the Libyan coast guard, which intercepts boats in the Mediterranean. Ireland’s contribution to the trust fund will be €15 million between 2016 and 2020.

      Scabies

      One of the last 2018 sea interceptions happened on December 29th, when, the UN says, 286 people were returned to Khoms. According to two current detainees, who message using hidden phones, the returned migrants arrived at Souq al Khamis with scabies and other health problems, and were desperate for medical attention.


      On New Year’s Eve, a detainee messaged to say the guards in the centre had tried to force an Eritrean man to return to smugglers, but others managed to break down the door and save him.

      On Sunday, January 5th, detainees said, the Libyan guards were pressurising the still-unregistered arrivals to leave by beating them with guns. “The leaders are trying to push them [to] get out every day,” one said.

      https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/rescued-at-sea-locked-up-then-sold-to-smugglers-1.3759181

    • Migranti, 100 persone trasferite su cargo e riportate in Libia. Alarm Phone: “Sono sotto choc, credevano di andare in Italia”

      Dopo l’allarme delle scorse ore e la chiamata del premier Conte a Tripoli, le persone (tra cui venti donne e dodici bambini, uno dei quali potrebbe essere morto di stenti) sono state trasferite sull’imbarcazione che batte bandiera della Sierra Leone in direzione Misurata. Ma stando alle ultime informazioni, le tensioni a bordo rendono difficoltoso lo sbarco. Intanto l’ong Sea Watch ha salvato 47 persone e chiede un porto dove attraccare

      https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2019/01/21/migranti-100-persone-trasferite-su-cargo-e-riportate-in-libia-alarm-phone-sono-sotto-choc-credevano-di-andare-in-italia/4911794

    • Migrants calling us in distress from the Mediterranean returned to Libya by deadly ‘refoulement’ industry

      When they called us from the sea, the 106 precarious travellers referred to their boat as a white balloon. This balloon, or rubber dinghy, was meant to carry them all the way to safety in Europe. The people on board – many men, about 20 women, and 12 children from central, west and north Africa – had left Khoms in Libya a day earlier, on the evening of January 19.

      Though they survived the night at sea, many of passengers on the boat were unwell, seasick and freezing. They decided to call for help and used their satellite phone at approximately 11am the next day. They reached out to the Alarm Phone, a hotline operated by international activists situated in Europe and Africa, that can be called by migrants in distress at sea. Alongside my work as a researcher on migration and borders, I am also a member of this activist network, and on that day I supported our shift team who received and documented the direct calls from the people on the boat in distress.

      The boat had been trying to get as far away as possible from the Libyan coast. Only then would the passengers stand a chance of escaping Libya’s coastguard. The European Union and Italy struck a deal in 2017 to train the Libyan coastguard in return for them stopping migrants reaching European shores. But a 2017 report by Amnesty International highlighted how the Libyan authorities operate in collusion with smuggling networks. Time and again, media reports suggest they have drastically violated the human rights of escaping migrants as well as the laws of the sea.

      The migrant travellers knew that if they were detected and caught, they would be abducted back to Libya, or illegally “refouled”. But Libya is a dangerous place for migrants in transit – as well as for Libyan nationals – given the ongoing civil conflict between several warring factions. In all likelihood, being sent back to Libya would mean being sent to detention centres described as “concentration-camp like” by German diplomats.

      The odds of reaching Europe were stacked against the people on the boat. Over the past year, the European-Libyan collaboration in containing migrants in North Africa, a research focus of mine, has resulted in a decrease of sea arrivals in Italy – from about 119,000 in 2017 to 23,000 in 2018. Precisely how many people were intercepted by the Libyan coastguards last year is unclear but the Libyan authorities have put the figure at around 15,000. The fact that this refoulement industry has led to a decrease in the number of migrant crossings in the central Mediterranean means that fewer people have been able to escape grave human rights violations and reach a place of safety.
      Shifting responsibility

      In repeated conversations, the 106 people on the boat made clear to the Alarm Phone activists that they would rather move on and endanger their lives by continuing to Europe than be returned by the Libyan coastguards. The activists stayed in touch with them, and for transparency reasons, the distress situation was made public via Twitter.

      Around noon, the situation on board deteriorated markedly and anxiety spread. With weather conditions worsening and after a boy had fallen unconscious, the people on the boat expressed for the first time their immediate fear of dying at sea and demanded Alarm Phone to alert all available authorities.

      The activists swiftly notified the Italian coastguards. But both the Italian Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre, and in turn the Maltese authorities, suggested it was the Libyan coastguard’s responsibility to handle the distress call. And yet, eight different phone numbers of the Libyan coastguards could not be reached by the activists.

      In the afternoon, the situation had come across the radar of the Italian media. When the Alarm Phone activists informed the people on board that the public had also been made aware of the situation by the media one person succinctly responded: “I don’t need to be on the news, I need to be rescued.”

      And yet media attention catapulted the story into the highest political spheres in Italy. According to a report in the Italian national newspaper Corriere della Sera, the prime minister, Giuseppe Conte, took charge of the situation, stating that the fate of the migrant boat could not be left to Alarm Phone activists. Conte instructed the Italian foreign intelligence service to launch rapid negotiations with the Libyan coastguards. It took some time to persuade them, but eventually, the Libyans were convinced to take action.

      In the meantime, the precarious passengers on the boat reported of water leaking into their boat, of the freezing cold, and their fear of drowning. The last time the Alarm Phone reached them, around 8pm, they could see a plane in the distance but were unable to forward their GPS coordinates to the Alarm Phone due to the failing battery of their satellite phone.
      Sent back to Libya

      About three hours later, the Italian coastguards issued a press release: the Libyans had assumed responsibility and co-ordinated the rescue of several boats. According to the press release, a merchant vessel had rescued the boat and the 106 people would be returned to Libya.

      According to the survivors and Médecins Sans Frontières who treated them on arrival, at least six people appeared to have drowned during the voyage – presumably after the Alarm Phone lost contact with them. Another boy died after disembarkation.

      A day later, on January 21, members of a second group of 144 people called the Alarm Phone from another merchant vessel. Just like the first group, they had been refouled to Libya, but they were still on board. Some still believed that they would be brought to Europe.

      Speaking on the phone with the activists, they could see land but it was not European but Libyan land. Recognising they’d been returned to their place of torment, they panicked, cried and threatened collective suicide. The women were separated from the men – Alarm Phone activists could hear them shout in the background. In the evening, contact with this second group of migrants was lost.

      During the evening of January 23, several of the women of the group reached out to the activists. They said that during the night, Libyan security forces boarded the merchant vessel and transported small groups into the harbour of Misrata, where they were taken to a detention centre. They said they’d been beaten when refusing to disembark. One of them, bleeding, feared that she had already lost her unborn child.

      On the next day, the situation worsened further. The women told the activists that Libyan forces entered their cell in the morning, pointing guns at them, after some of the imprisoned had tried to escape. Reportedly, every man was beaten. The pictures they sent to the Alarm Phone made it into Italian news, showing unhygienic conditions, overcrowded cells, and bodies with torture marks.

      Just like the 106 travellers on the “white balloon”, this second group of 144 people had risked their lives but were now back in their hell.
      Profiteering

      It’s more than likely that for some of these migrant travellers, this was not their first attempt to escape Libya. The tens of thousands captured at sea and returned over the past years have found themselves entangled in the European-Libyan refoulement “industry”. Due to European promises of financial support or border technologies, regimes with often questionable human rights records have wilfully taken on the role as Europe’s frontier guards. In the Mediterranean, the Libyan coastguards are left to do the dirty work while European agencies – such as Frontex, Eunavfor Med as well as the Italian and Maltese coastguards – have withdrawn from the most contentious and deadly areas of the sea.

      It’s sadly not surprising that flagrant human rights violations have become the norm rather than the exception. Quite cynically, several factions of the Libyan coastguards have profited not merely from Europe’s financial support but also from playing a “double game” in which they continue to be involved in human smuggling while, disguised as coastguards, clampdown on the trade of rival smuggling networks. This means that the Libyan coastguards profit often from both letting migrant boats leave and from subsequently recapturing them.

      The detention camps in Libya, where torture and rape are everyday phenomena, are not merely containment zones of captured migrants – they form crucial extortion zones in this refoulement industry. Migrants are turned into “cash cows” and are repeatedly subjected to violent forms of extortion, often forced to call relatives at home and beg for their ransom.

      Despite this systematic abuse, migrant voices cannot be completely drowned out. They continue to appear, rebelliously, from detention and even from the middle of the sea, reminding us all about Europe’s complicity in the production of their suffering.

      https://theconversation.com/migrants-calling-us-in-distress-from-the-mediterranean-returned-to-

    • Libya coast guard detains 113 migrants during lull in fighting

      The Libyan coast guard has stopped 113 migrants trying to reach Italy over the past two days, the United Nations said on Wednesday, as boat departures resume following a lull in fighting between rival forces in Libya.

      The western Libyan coast is a major departure point for mainly African migrants fleeing conflict and poverty and trying to reach Italy across the Mediterranean Sea with the help of human traffickers.

      Smuggling activity had slowed when forces loyal to military commander Khalifa Haftar launched an offensive to take the capital Tripoli, home to Libya’s internationally recognized government.

      But clashes eased on Tuesday after a push by Haftar’s Libyan National Army (LNA) back by artillery failed to make inroads toward the center.

      Shelling audible in central Tripoli was less intense on Wednesday than on previous days. Three weeks of clashes had killed 376 as of Tuesday, the World Health Organization said.

      The Libyan coast guard stopped two boats on Tuesday and one on Wednesday, carrying 113 migrants in all, and returned them to two western towns away from the Tripoli frontline, where they were put into detention centers, U.N. migration agency IOM said.

      A coast guard spokesman said the migrants were from Arab and sub-Saharan African countries as well as Bangladesh.

      Human rights groups have accused armed groups and members of the coast guard of being involved in human trafficking.

      Officials have been accused in the past of mistreating detainees, who are being held in their thousands as part of European-backed efforts to curb smuggling. A U.N. report in December referred to a “terrible litany” of violations including unlawful killings, torture, gang rape and slavery.

      Rights groups have also accused the European Union of complicity in the abuse as Italy and France have provided boats for the coast guard to step up patrols. That move has helped to reduce migrant departures.

      https://www.reuters.com/article/us-libya-security/libya-coast-guard-detains-113-migrants-during-lull-in-fighting-idUSKCN1S73R

    • Judgement in Italy recognizes that people rescued by #Vos_Thalassa acted lawfully when opposed disembarkation in #Libya. Two men spent months in prison, as Italian government had wished, till a judge established that they had acted in legitimate defence.
      Also interesting that judge argues that Italy-Libya Bilateral agreement on migration control must be considered illegitimate as in breach of international, EU and domestic law.

      https://dirittopenaleuomo.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/GIP-Trapani.pdf

      Reçu via FB par @isskein :
      https://www.facebook.com/isabelle.saintsaens/posts/10218154173470834?comment_id=10218154180551011&notif_id=1560196520660275&n
      #justice

    • The Commission and Italy tie themselves up in knots over Libya

      http://www.statewatch.org/analyses/no-344-Commission-and-Italy-tie-themselves-up-in-knots-over-libya.pdf

      –-> analyse de #Yasha_Maccanico sur la polémique entre Salvini et la Commission quand il a déclaré en mars que la Commission était tout a fait d’accord avec son approche (le retour des migrants aux champs logiques), la Commission l’a démenti et puis a sorti la lettre de Mme. Michou (JAI Commission) de laquelle provenaient les justifications utilisées par le ministre, qui disait à Leggeri que la collaboration avec la garde côtière libyenne des avions européennes était legale. Dans la lettre, elle admit que les italiens et la mission de Frontex font des activités qui devrait être capable de faire la Libye, si sa zone SAR fuisse authentique et pas une manière pour l’UE de se débarrasser de ses obligations légales et humanitaires. C’est un acte de auto-inculpation pour l’UE et pour l’Italie.

    • Returned to War and Torture: Malta and Frontex coordinate push-back to Libya

      On Saturday, 14 March 2020, RCC Malta coordinated a push-back operation from the Maltese Search and Rescue (SAR) zone to Libya in cooperation with the EU border agency Frontex and the so-called Libyan coastguards.[1] Similar to the events we documented on 18 October 2019, the Maltese authorities instructed the so-called Libyan coastguards to enter a European SAR zone in order to abduct about 49 people and force them back to Libya.[2] Instead of complying with refugee and human rights conventions, the Maltese authorities coordinated a grave violation of international law and of the principle of non-refoulment, as the rescued must be disembarked in a safe harbour.[3] Clearly, Libya is not a safe harbour but a place of war and systemic human rights abuses. Every week, the Alarm Phone receives testimonies of torture, rape and other forms of violence against migrants detained in Libyan camps and prisons.

      On the same day, we alerted the Armed Forces of Malta to a second boat in distress in the Maltese SAR zone with 112 people on board.[4] Before their eventual rescue, the people spent about 48 hours at sea. Malta delayed the rescue for more than 18 hours, putting 112 lives at severe risk. Non-assistance, delays, and pushbacks are becoming the norm in the Central Mediterranean, causing trauma in survivors, disappearances and deaths, both at sea and in Libya.

      Europe continues to delegate border enforcement to the Libyan authorities to evade their responsibility to rescue the distressed to Europe. We hold Europe accountable for the abuses and suffering inflicted on migrants at sea and in Libya. We condemn the role of European institutions and member states, including Malta and Italy, in these human rights violations through bilateral agreements as well as the financing, equipping, and training of the so-called Libyan coastguards.

      Summary of the push-back by proxy case:

      On Saturday 14 March 2020, at 15:33h CET, the Alarm Phone received a distress call from 49 people, including one pregnant woman and three children, who were trying to escape from the war in Libya. They had left Tripoli the evening before on a white fiberglass boat. They shared their GPS position with us, which clearly showed them within the Maltese SAR zone (34° 26′ 39 ” N, 14° 07′ 86″ E, at 15:33h). The people on board told us that they had lost their engine and that water was entering the boat. We immediately informed RCC Malta and the Italian coastguard via email. We received updated GPS positions from the people in distress at 16:22h (34° 26 81′ N, 014° 08′ 56″ E) and at 17:07h (N 34° 27′ 12″, E 014° 09′ 37″), both confirming once more that they were drifting within the Maltese SAR zone.

      At 17:42h, RCC Malta confirmed via phone that they had sent two patrol boats for the two SAR events in the Maltese SAR zone to which we had alerted them: one for the boat of 49 people and another one for the rubber boat with 112 people on board. Soon after, at 17:45h, we talked to the 49 people on the boat who told us that they could see a boat heading in their direction. Unfortunately, the conversation broke off and we were not able to clarify further details. This was our last contact to the people in distress after which we could not reach them any longer. Since then, we have tried to obtain further details from RCC Malta, but they claim to not have any information.

      However, confidential sources have informed us that a Frontex aerial asset had spotted the migrant boat already at 6:00h when it was still in the contested Libyan SAR zone. At 18.04h, the Libyan coastguard vessel Ras Al Jadar intercepted the boat in the Maltese SAR zone at the position N34° 26’, E 14° 07’. This means that the European border agency Frontex, MRCC Rome as well as RCC Malta were all aware of this boat in distress and colluded with the Libyan authorities to enter Maltese SAR and intercept the migrant boat.

      On Sunday 15 March 2020, at 7:00h, we were called by relatives of the people on board who told us that the people in distress had just informed them that they had been abducted by a Libyan vessel from within the Maltese SAR zone and returned to Libya, where, according to their testimonies, they were imprisoned and battered. In the afternoon, we were called by the people who were on the boat, and they testified that before the push-back occurred they saw a helicopter circling above them. About 30 minutes later, according to their testimonies, a vessel of the so-called Libyan coastguard arrived on scene. The people stated that the Libyan officers behaved brutally toward them, beating them repeatedly. They also stated that they were prevented from filming and documenting these abuses as their phones were confiscated. Moreover, the people reported that they had travelled together with another boat, a white rubber boat with around 60 people on board (including 7 women and 1 woman with a nine-month-old infant). Also this second boat[5] was intercepted and returned to Libya and its passengers experienced similar forms of violence and abuse.

      https://alarmphone.org/en/2020/03/15/returned-to-war-and-torture/?post_type_release_type=post

  • 08/07: 19 travellers at Turkish-Greek landborder, pushed-back to Turkey

    Watch The Med Alarm Phone Investigations – 8th of July 2018

    Case name: 2018_07_08-AEG406
    Situation: 19 travellers at Turkish-Greek landborder, pushed-back to Turkey
    Status of WTM Investigation: Concluded

    Place of Incident: Aegean Sea

    Summary of the Case:

    On Sunday, 8th of July, at 11:14pm CEST, we were alerted to a group of travellers stuck near #Tichero, Greece, close to the Turkish landborder. The group consisted of 19 people, among them a 1-year-old child, a pregnant lady and a man that had a broken leg. At 12:11pm we managed to establish contact to the travellers. They were afraid of being pushed-back to Turkey by the police and asked for medical aid and the possibility to seek asylum in Greece. We asked them for a list of their names and birth dates in order to alert UNHCR. At 1:02am we received the list. We couldn’t get back in contact until 1:47am. The group decided not to move further and to wait until the morning for the UNHCR office to open so they could call there.
    At 8:30am we called UNHCR and asked for assistance. At 8:45am we also called the local police station but the operator refused to speak to us in English. We told the group to call 112 themselves for assistance. Until 9:30am we couldn’t reach any local police station. At 9:50am we sent an email to the local authorities and UNHCR to inform them about the people. Afterwards we continuously tried again to get in touch with the authorities and the group, but couldn’t establish a connection any more. At 2pm we reached the police in Alexandropolis. They informed us that they were searching since one hour but hadn’t found the travellers. During the afternoon, we couldn’t get any news and didn’t reach the travellers anymore. At 6:53pm the police informed us that they had not found the group yet. The next day at 11:02am we were informed by a contact person that the group had been found and that they had been allegedly violently pushed-back to Turkey. At 12:45am we managed to reach the group itself. They told us that the police had found them at 5:00pm the day before and put them in „a prison“. At 10:00pm the police had told the group that they were being moved to a camp to apply for international protection. However, the police instead brought them back to the river and handed them to officers discribed as „military“, who forced them onto a boat and across Evros border river back to Turkey. The police officers before had confiscated personal belongings of the refugees, including mobile phones, money, passports and the food for the baby.

    http://watchthemed.net/reports/view/943

    #Evros #Grèce #frontières #Turquie #push-back #refoulement #asile #migrations #réfugiés

    • WSJ: Turks fleeing Erdogan fuel new influx of refugees to Greece

      Thousands of Turks flee Turkey due to a massive witch-hunt launched by the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government against the Kurds and the Gülen Group in the wake of a failed coup attempt on July 15, 2016.
      Around 14,000 people crossed the Evros frontier from January through September of this year, more than double the number for the whole of last year, according to the Greek police. Around half of them were Turkish citizens, according to estimates from Frontex, the European Union’s border agency. Many are judges, military personnel, civil servants or business people who have fallen under Turkish authorities’ suspicion, had their passports canceled and chosen an illegal route out.
      Nearly 4,000 Turks have applied for asylum in Greece so far this year. But most Turkish arrivals don’t register their presence in Greece, planning instead to head deeper into Europe and further from Turkey.

      About 30 Turks have been arriving on a daily basis since the failed coup, according to Kathimerini, there were zero arrivals from Turkey in 2015. However, thousands of Turkish citizens have started claiming asylum in Greece since “Erdogan stepped up his crackdown against his opponents since the failed coup attempt.”

      The Wall Street Journal interviewed some of the purge-victim families in Greece:

      “In the dead of night, Yunuz Cagar and his wife Cansu gave their baby some herbal tea to help her sleep, donned backpacks and followed smugglers on a muddy path along the Evros river, evading fences and border guards until they reached Greece.

      Mr. Cagar, a 29-year-old court clerk, was living a quiet life with his family in a provincial town near Istanbul until Turkey’s crackdown after a failed military coup in 2016 turned their world upside down. Judges, colleagues and friends were arrested. He lost his job and had to move the family into his parents’ attic. Mr. Cagar was arrested and spent four months in prison. His crime, he says, was downloading a messaging app, an act he says the state treated as evidence of supporting terrorism.
      The flow of asylum seekers crossing the Greek-Turkish border along the Evros river is rising for the first time since the peak of Europe’s migration crisis in 2015. This time, though, the increase is mainly due to Turks fleeing President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his dragnet against real or imagined followers of the U.S.-based cleric Fethullah Gulen. Turkey accuses Mr. Gulen, an ex-ally turned enemy of Mr. Erdogan, of orchestrating the coup attempt.

      “We didn’t say goodbye to anyone before leaving,” said Mr. Cagar, who is now in Athens trying to find some way to get to Germany. His wife and child already made it there with the help of smugglers who have demanded a hefty price. “We began our journey with €13,000 ($14,700) and I have €1,500 left,” he said.

      Ahmed, a 30-year-old former F-16 pilot in the Turkish air force, spends his days talking to smugglers and trying to find a way out. “My dream is Canada, but the reality is Omonoia,” he said, referring to the gritty square in downtown Athens where migrants and smugglers mingle.

      A few months after the coup attempt, Ahmed said, he was dismissed, accused of Gulenist links, arrested and beaten, after another officer denounced him. He said he has no connections with Mr. Gulen’s network. He was released pending trial, but decided to flee when a prison term appeared unavoidable.

      Yilmaz Bilir, his wife Ozlem and their four children were on vacation when the coup attempt happened. Mr. Bilir, who worked at the information-technology department of Turkey’s foreign ministry, found out months later that he was suspected of Gulenist links, which he denies. The family went into hiding, staying with relatives and friends. Mr. Bilir was arrested when he briefly visited his own home and neighbors called the police. When he was released pending trial, the family decided to leave Turkey.

      Mr. Bilir made it to Germany using a forged passport and has applied for asylum there. His wife and children have applied to join him.

      Mrs. Bilir, stuck for now in Athens, remembers how happy the family was when they crossed the river Evros one summer night. “It was an endless walk, but we were happy, because we were away together,” she said. “I was so stressed in Turkey that I couldn’t sleep well for months, but that first night in detention in Greece, I finally slept.”

      After the coup, Meral Budak was suspended from her job as a teacher. Her husband was a journalist at Zaman, a major Turkish newspaper linked to Mr. Gulen’s movement. He had a valid U.S. visa and was able to travel to Canada, where he now works as an Uber driver. His 18-year-old son joined him a few months later.

      Mrs. Budak and the couple’s 15-year-old son Ali remained in Turkey and soon had their passports revoked. They went into hiding for a year. “The most traumatic memory was when I burned hundreds of books,” she said. “Even my children’s school books could be considered evidence, since the publishing companies were funded by Gulen.”
      On Jan. 1 of this year, Mrs. Budak and Ali undertook the long walk across the Evros and into Greece, where they now wait to join the rest of the family in Canada.

      “When I was walking through Greek villages, I realized my life was never going to be the same,” Mrs. Budak said. “I was walking into the unknown.”
      Read the full report on: https://www.wsj.com/articles/turks-fleeing-erdogan-fuel-new-influx-of-refugees-to-greece-1543672801

      https://turkeypurge.com/wsj-turks-fleeing-erdogan-fuel-new-influx-of-refugees-to-greece
      #réfugiés_turcs

    • Fourth migrant found dead near border, Greek ’pushback’ suspected

      Bodies of migrants keep piling up on Turkey’s border with Greece, while Greece denies it is involved in illegal “pushback” practices. Villagers in Adasarhanlı, where the body of another migrant was found earlier this week, alerted authorities after they discovered a body in a rice field, a short distance from the Turkish-Greek border, late Wednesday. The man is believed to be an illegal migrant forced to walk back to Turkey in freezing temperatures by Greek police as part of their controversial pushback practice.

      An initial investigation shows the man froze to death three days ago, and there were lesions on his body stemming from prolonged exposure to water.

      İbrahim Dalkıran, the leader of the village, said they have seen a large number of migrants recently in the area, and many took shelter, in wet clothes or half naked, in Adasarhanlı. “This is a humanitarian situation. Greece sends back migrants almost every three or four days. Some arrive injured, and we call a doctor. It is sad to see them in such a state,” Dalkıran told reporters.

      Olga Gerovasili, Greece’s minister for citizen protection whose ministry oversees border security, has denied previous allegations of pushback and told Anadolu Agency (AA) that Greece is not involved in such incidents. Yet, figures provided to AA by Turkish security sources show many illegal migrants were forced to go back to Turkey by Greek officials, with some 2,490 migrants being pushed back in November alone. The agency reports that some 300 of them were subjected to mistreatment by Greek security forces, ranging from beatings to being forced to go back half naked to the Turkish side of the border.

      Three bodies, believed to be Afghan or Pakistani migrants, were found in three villages in Edirne, the Turkish province that borders Greece. More than 70,000 illegal migrants were intercepted in Edirne between January and November, a high number compared to the 47,731 stopped last year as they tried to cross into Greece despite an increase in pushback reports.

      Under international laws and conventions, Greece is obliged to register any illegal migrants entering its territory; yet, this is not the case for some migrants. Security sources say that accounts of migrants interviewed by Turkish migration authority staff and social workers show that they are forced to return to Turkey, where they arrived from their homelands with the hope of reaching Europe.

      Pırıl Erçoban, a coordinator for the Association for Solidarity with Refugees (Mülteci-Der), says pushback constitutes a serious crime. She said it was “sad and unacceptable” that three migrants died, the number of deaths illustrates a serious problem. “It sheds light on the fact that pushback is being applied. It is still a crime to send those people back, even if they can make it back to Turkey alive,” Erçoban told AA. She says pushback was also taking place on migrant sea journeys, but has stopped, although the practice has continued on land. “Both Greece and Bulgaria are involved in this practice. Our figures show some 11,000 [illegal migrants] entered Turkey from Greece and Bulgaria, though not all of them were forced; we believe a substantial portion of returns are the result of pushback,” she said, adding returns were mostly via Greece. Erçoban said taking legal action to help migrants forced to return was difficult, as they could not reach the victims. “There should be administrative and criminal sanctions, and the culprits should be found. Turkey should take steps against pushback if [Greece] adopted it as a state policy. We hear that they are being beaten with iron bars and sent back without their clothes. This is a crime,” she added.

      Every year, hundreds of thousands of migrants flee civil conflict or economic hardship in their home countries in hope of reaching Europe. Edirne is a primary migration route. Turkish Directorate General of Migration Management data reveals that most of the migrants come from Pakistan, Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. The numbers increase in late summer and autumn before dropping in the winter months.

      Temperatures hover near minus zero degrees Celsius in Edirne and other provinces at the border, which also saw heavy rainfall last week. Migrants usually take boats on the Meriç River, while some try to swim across to the other side. Early yesterday, police stopped 17 Pakistani migrants who were walking on train tracks near the border.

      https://www.dailysabah.com/investigations/2018/12/07/fourth-migrant-found-dead-near-border-greek-pushback-suspected/amp?__twitter_impression=true
      #mourir_aux_frontières #décès #morts

    • Greece accused of migrant ’pushbacks’ at Turkey border

      Hundreds of migrants including children and families have been illegally returned from Greece to Turkey despite Greek authorities being repeatedly warned about the practice, three non-governmental organizations said Wednesday.

      Migrants being forced back over the border, in violation of international law, has become the “new normality” at the border crossing with Turkey in Greece’s northeast Evros region, the three Greek organizations said.

      The testimonies of 39 people who attempted to cross the border to Europe, collected in detention centers near the border since the spring, were published in a report by the Greek Council for Refugees, ARSIS and HumanRights360.

      In their testimonies, the migrants describe being intercepted and detained by people wearing police or military uniforms, sometimes with a hood covering their face, who then forced them onto a boat to cross the Evros River back to Turkey.

      Some migrants described being physically abused or robbed by the individuals, who mostly spoke Greek.

      The report “constitutes evidence of the practice of pushbacks being used extensively and not decreasing, regardless of the silence and denial by the responsible public bodies and authorities,” the NGOs said.

      The “particularly wide-spread practice” leaves the “state exposed and posing a threat for the rule of law in the country,” they added.

      The Greek office of the U.N. refugee agency also said it had recorded a “significant number of testimonies on informal forced returns” through the Evros border.

      “On many occasions, we have addressed those concerns to the Greek authorities requesting the investigation of incidents,” the UNHCR office said.

      “The state’s response so far to these practices has not produced the results required for an effective access to asylum.”

      Greek authorities have denied involvement in the migrant returns and have announced investigations into potential militia action, without result so far.

      The flow of migrants across the Greek-Turkish land border has almost tripled this year, according to Greece’s migration ministry, with 14,000 people intercepted so far compared to 5,400 in 2017.


      http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2018/Dec-12/471620-greece-accused-of-migrant-pushbacks-at-turkey-border.ashx

    • Greece: Violent Pushbacks at Turkey Border

      Greek law enforcement officers at the land border with Turkey in the northeastern Evros region routinely summarily return asylum seekers and migrants, Human Rights Watch said today. The officers in some cases use violence and often confiscate and destroy the migrants’ belongings.

      “People who have not committed a crime are detained, beaten, and thrown out of Greece without any consideration for their rights or safety,” said Todor Gardos, Europe researcher at Human Rights Watch. “The Greek authorities should immediately investigate the repeated allegations of illegal pushbacks.”

      Human Rights Watch interviewed 26 asylum seekers and other migrants in Greece in May, and in October and November in Turkey. They are from Afghanistan, Iraq, Morocco, Pakistan, Syria, Tunisia, and Yemen, and include families traveling with children. They described 24 incidents of pushbacks across the Evros River from Greece to Turkey.

      Most incidents took place between April and November. All of those interviewed reported hostile or violent behavior by Greek police and unidentified forces wearing uniforms and masks without recognizable insignia. Twelve said police or these unidentified forces accompanying the police stripped them of their possessions, including their money and personal identification, which were often destroyed. Seven said police or unidentified forces took their clothes or shoes and forced them back to Turkey in their underwear, sometimes at night in freezing temperatures.

      Abuse included beatings with hands and batons, kicking, and, in one case, the use of what appeared to be a stun gun. In another case, a Moroccan man said a masked man dragged him by his hair, forced him to kneel on the ground, held a knife to his throat, and subjected him to a mock execution. Others pushed back include a pregnant 19-year-old woman from Afrin, Syria, and a woman from Afghanistan who said Greek authorities took away her two young children’s shoes.

      Increasing numbers of migrants, including asylum seekers, have attempted to cross the Evros River, which forms a natural border between Greece and Turkey, since April. By the end of September, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) had registered 13,784 arrivals by land, a nearly fourfold increase over the same period last year.

      In early June, Turkey unilaterally suspended all returns under a bilateral readmission agreement, stopping coordinated returns over the land border. In a July letter to Human Rights Watch, Hellenic Police Director Georgios Kossioris acknowledged an “acute problem” related to new arrivals and migrants arrested in the region, causing the overcrowding in some facilities, and inhumane conditions in police stations and registration and identification centers Human Rights Watch had documented.

      Accounts gathered by Human Rights Watch are consistent with the findings of other nongovernmental groups, intergovernmental agencies, and media reports. UNHCR, the United Nations Refugee Agency, has raised similar concerns. In a June report, the Council of Europe’s (CoE) Committee for the Prevention of Torture said it has received “several consistent and credible allegations of pushbacks by boat from Greece to Turkey at the Evros River border by masked Greek police and border guards or (para-)military commandos.” In November, the CoE human rights commissioner called on Greece to investigate allegations, in light of information pointing to “an established practice.”

      Human Rights Watch wrote to the head of border protection of the Hellenic Police on December 6, 2018, informing them of its findings. In his reply, Police Director Kossioris categorically denied that Hellenic Police carry out forced summary returns. He said all procedures for the detention and identification of migrants entering Greece were carried out in line with relevant legislation, and that they “thoroughly investigate” any incidents of misconduct or violation of migrants’ and asylum seekers’ rights. Greek authorities have consistently denied pushback practices, including a high-ranking Greek police official in a June meeting with Human Rights Watch. For a decade, Human Rights Watch has documented systematic pushbacks by Greek law enforcement officials at its land border with Turkey.

      Greek authorities should promptly investigate in a transparent, thorough, and impartial manner repeated allegations that Greek police and border guards are involved in collective and extrajudicial expulsions at the Evros region. Authorities should investigate allegations of violence and excessive use of force. Any officer engaged in such illegal acts, as well as their commanding officers, should be subject to disciplinary sanction and, as appropriate, criminal prosecution. Anyone seeking international protection should have the opportunity to apply for asylum, and returns should follow a procedure that provides access to effective remedies and safeguards against refoulement – return to a country where they are likely to face persecution, and ill-treatment.

      The European Commission, which provides financial support to the Greek government for migration control, including in the Evros region, should urge Greece to end all summary returns of asylum seekers to Turkey, press the authorities to investigate allegations of violence, and open legal proceedings against Greece for violating European Union laws.

      “Despite government denials, it appears that Greece is intentionally, and with complete impunity, closing the door on many people who seek to reach the European Union through the Evros border,” Gardos said. “Greece should cease forced summary returns immediately and treat everyone with dignity and respect for their basic rights.”

      For detailed accounts from asylum seekers and migrants, please see below. Please note that all names have been changed.

      Human Rights Watch interviewed 26 people from Afghanistan, Iraq, Morocco, Pakistan, Syria, Tunisia, and Yemen, including seven women, two of whom were pregnant at the time they were summarily returned to Turkey across the Evros River. In seven cases, families were pushed back, including children.

      In Greece, Human Rights Watch interviewed people who managed to re-enter Greek territory following a pushback, in the Fylakio pre-removal detention center and in the Fylakio reception and identification center, as well as in the Diavata camp for asylum seekers in Thessaloniki. In Turkey, those interviewed were in the Edirne removal center and in urban locations in Istanbul.

      All names of interviewees have been changed to protect their privacy and security. Interviews were carried out privately and confidentially, in the interviewees’ first language, or a language they spoke fluently, through interpreters. Interviewees shared their accounts voluntarily, and without remuneration, and have consented to Human Rights Watch collecting and publishing their accounts.

      Pushbacks in Evros

      The 24 incidents described demonstrate a pattern that points to an established and well-coordinated practice of pushbacks. Most of the incidents share three key features: initial capture by local police patrols, detention in police stations or informal locations close to the border with Turkey, and handover from identifiable law enforcement bodies to unidentifiable paramilitaries who would carry out the pushback to Turkey across the Evros River, at times violently. In nine cases, migrants said uniformed police physically mistreated them before or during the pushback.

      The accounts suggest close and consistent coordination between police with unidentified, often masked, men who may or may not be law enforcement officers. In a May interview with Human Rights Watch, Second Lieutenant Sofia Lazopoulou at the border police station of Neo Cheimonio said that police officers wearing dark blue uniforms were in charge of services at the police station and that those who wear military camouflage uniforms were patrolling officers, in charge of prevention and deterrence of irregular migrants crossing into Greece.

      Interviewees said that people who looked like police officers or soldiers, as well as some of the unidentified masked men, carried equipment such as handguns, handcuffs, radios, spray cans, and batons, while others carried tactical gear such as armored gloves, binoculars, and knives and military grade weapons, such as rifles.

      The repeated nature of the pushbacks and the fact that those officers who conduct them were clearly on official duty, indicates that commanding officers knew, or ought to have known, what was happening.

      Ferhat G., a Syrian Kurdish man in his forties, said two police officers detained him, his wife, and three children, ages 12, 15, and 19, at an abandoned train station on September 19. They were held in a large caged area in the backyard of a police station with dozens of other people for five hours. Ferhat could not say where the train station or police station were:

      We were all put in a van, 60 to 70 people. Commandos all in black, wearing face masks, drove us back to the river. We were very afraid… I saw other people there, mainly youths with just shorts, no other clothes. Our blood froze out of fear. When they opened the van, we started going out. “Stand in one line, one-by-one,” they said and hit someone. Ten by 10, they put us in a small boat, driven by a Greek soldier. I cried because of the humiliation.

      The modus operandi was largely replicated, with some variations, in the other cases Human Rights Watch documented.

      Capture

      Twenty-one of those interviewed said local police patrols detained them in towns and villages near the border or in open farmland. Two said that the police took them off a bus or a train shortly after its departure. Three said they could not identify the men who detained them and took them directly back to the border. People said they were then transported in police cars, pick-up trucks, white vans without windows or signs, or larger trucks painted in green or camouflage that appeared to be military trucks.

      Karim L., 25, from Morocco, said that police officers removed him from a train to Alexandropouli on November 8. Shortly after its scheduled departure from Orestiada, at 12:37 p.m., police officers began asking passengers who looked foreign to show their passports and took Karim and five or six others off the train. The police took him to a nearby police station and kept him there for two nights. Then four men wearing police uniforms and black masks took him to the border in a van. He said they subjected him to physical violence and a mock execution, then pushed him back to Turkey. He was not photographed, fingerprinted, or given any paper to read or sign, or otherwise informed of the reasons for his arrest. He said that other people, including families with children, were also detained in the station’s three cells.

      Mahsa N., an Afghan woman, said uniformed police officers removed her, her husband, their three children, ages 5, 9, and 11, and two unrelated Afghan men from a bus 15 minutes after it left Alexandropouli in mid-September, during their third attempt to enter Greece. They were pushed back to Turkey the same day, with the police who had detained them taking them all the way to the Evros River, where others were already being held so they could be returned on a boat.

      Dila E., a 25-year-old Syrian woman, described her experience shortly after crossing the Evros River in late April. She said she was with seven other people, including four children, when masked men she could not identify pushed them back to Turkey as they were walking in a small town near the border:

      They came with a car and took us. They put us in a white van. You couldn’t see anything from the inside. They took us directly to the river and made us cross the river with a rubber boat. They took everyone’s mobile phones, set of clothes, and even the money from some.

      Malik N., a 26-year-old Moroccan man, said uniformed police stopped him along with three other men on November 13 near a gas station in Didymoteicho, a town two kilometers from the border. He said that one of the policemen made a phone call, and a white van arrived 15 minutes later. Two men he could not identify took him and two of his group to a location that he described as barracks: “They put us in the car, which was very well made, dark inside, and without seats. There were no signs on it. … There was a terrible smell [in the barracks], and officials had their masks on… There were 30 people there.”

      Masked men took him to the border the next evening:

      After the masked people came, they started to shout at us, and hit us one by one with batons at the door. There were around eight people outside the barracks, each with a thick plastic baton. They would hit you as you walked to the car. They would shout “Fuck Islam.” They put 30 of us in the van. [There were] no chairs. I felt like I was suffocating, there was no air. When we arrived at the river, they ordered people to strip to shorts only. They took my phones, my money, €1,500, and my glasses, and broke them.

      Sardar T., 18, from Afghanistan, said that uniformed police caught him and the group of people he was traveling with at the Didymoteicho bus station on April 23. He said the police came with a white van but later brought a big car, similar to a military truck with green camouflage. Human Rights Watch researchers saw a vehicle matching Sardar’s description parked in the yard of the border police station of Neo Cheimonio, as well as numerous white vans, without police signs. Sardar said that the officers who pushed them back to Turkey were wearing police uniforms and that masks concealed their faces except for their eyes.

      Detention

      Thirteen of those interviewed reported that they were detained in formal and informal locations close to the border, for periods ranging from a few hours to five days. Five said they were taken to a police station, while eight described buildings on the outskirts of nearby villages and towns, or on farmland that they said were used as drop-off points for detained migrants. None of the interviewees, even those held at police stations, were duly identified and registered, and their detention appears to have been arbitrary and incommunicado.

      A few dozen to one hundred people were detained at a time, without food, water, and sanitation, and then taken to the Evros River and returned to Turkey. Interviewees described the rooms in the unidentified buildings as “prison-like” and “like a storage room,” with a few mattresses and a single, filthy toilet. They said women and families with children were either held together with unrelated men, or sometimes in adjacent rooms.

      Mahsa, the Afghan woman who was summarily returned to Turkey three times, said she and her family were kept for five days, along with unrelated men who were also detained, in a dark room with no beds or heat before the second pushback, in late August. They were not given any food. Their belongings, including winter coats for her young children, and a cherished backpack and doll, were never returned. Up to 10 guards, wearing belts with what appeared to be handguns, batons, and pepper spray, would check on people and lock the door but not provide any information. She saw guards beating men staying in the same room: “They had a blue uniform with writing on it in Greek on the back, with big letters. They called us dirt.”

      Azadeh B., a 22-year-old Afghan woman traveling with her husband and two children, ages 2 and 4, said they were pushed back twice from Greece – and had spent five days in detention before being returned the second time, in early October. She said they were taken to a room in a structure located in the middle of farmland:

      We could not see or hear anything. We were not asked to sign anything or told anything. The guards closed the door and locked it. When families asked for water, they filled dirty bottles and threw them inside the room through the door. They took everything from us, even the Quran. We asked them to give back our kids’ shoes, but they didn’t. They do this because they don’t want us to come back. If it’s something of value, they keep it, something they don’t like, they put it in the bin.

      She said only the children were given some biscuits while detained in a room that was about 40 square meters and shared by about 80 people whom she believed were also all migrants.

      Hassan I., a Tunisian man in his thirties, said that before being violently pushed back along with four friends in early August, they spent a day in detention. He said the location resembled a military base because they saw military vehicles, including trucks and tanks, parked near the room in which they were held. It was a 15-minute drive from the town of Orestiada, where they had been stopped and picked up in the morning by two police officers in blue uniforms in a civilian car.

      The policemen drove them to the location, where guards violently pushed them against a wall, searched them, and hit them. “First, they asked for phones, then for money,” Hassan said. They were shouting ‘malaka’ [a Greek insult meaning ‘asshole’]. I was shocked. I felt humiliated. When we tried to ask for anything, like our sim cards, memory cards, they hit us immediately.” Hassan and his friends were put in a room that looked like a storage room. In an adjacent room, they could hear the voices of families with children. Hassan estimated that by 9 p.m., when they were taken to the border in trucks, about 80 men were in his room of about 24 square meters, in which there were only a few chairs, a toilet, and a water tap.

      Zara Z., 19 and four-months pregnant, from Afrin, Syria, said that in mid-May, men wearing camouflage uniforms stopped her and her husband and detained them overnight in a room without bedding or furniture, together with other migrant families, and without any food or water. The next day they were transferred in a van to the Evros River, put on a boat, and pushed back to Turkey.

      Pushbacks across the Evros River

      All those interviewed said they were transported to the border with Turkey in groups of 60 to 80, in military trucks or unmarked vans. In all but three cases, the agents wore face masks, black pants, or camouflage, making it impossible to recognize or identify them. In the three other cases, interviewees said police in regular blue and camouflage uniforms transported them to the river. Ten out of 26 interviewees said they were physically abused or witnessed others being ill-treated during the pushback operation.

      Karim, a 25-year-old Moroccan man, said Greek police handed him over to masked men wearing police uniforms after they caught him in Greece on November 10 and that he was violently pushed back to Turkey. After ordering him to take off his clothes and shoes, two of the masked officers kicked him to the ground and hit him with a baton, then one of them subjected him to a mock execution. They dragged him by his hair and forced him to kneel on the ground, while the masked officer held a knife to his throat and said in broken English, “Whoever returns to Greece, they will die.” Karim said he could not sleep at night and was experiencing recurrent nightmares.

      Hassan, the Tunisian who was pushed back with his four friends on August 10 or 11, said that masked men wearing black clothes ill-treated them after taking them to the border in a truck. One of the men used a stun gun on Hassan’s lower back, causing burns that were still visible over two months later. He provided video footage of the group’s injuries, which he said was recorded the day after the incident and was first posted on social media on August 12, showing several bruises he said resulted from blows to their upper and lower backs and limbs. “Next time I will see you,” one of the masked men told him in English, “I will kill you.” At the time of the interview, Hassan had been sleeping in parks in Istanbul, after all his belongings were confiscated in Greece.

      Amir B., a Tunisian man in his twenties, was pushed back to Turkey at the end of September after entering Greece and hiding for six days. He said he was returned from near Alexandropouli to the border in one of two military trucks, which together took around 80 people to the border, including about 30 women and a few children. Amir said masked men pushed people around as they got off the trucks, and then pushed them toward the river, ordering them to remain silent. The agents then split the group into smaller groups of 10 and ordered them to take off their shoes. Women had to give up their coats, while some men had to strip to underwear. Amir’s jeans, where he also kept his money, were set on fire. When a black pick-up truck arrived with a small boat, the guards checked the other side of the river with binoculars, and then used the small boat to take the groups of 10 in turn across the water.

      https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/12/18/greece-violent-pushbacks-turkey-border

      #vidéo:
      Greek Authorities Beat, Push Back Migrants into Turkey
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2olpuc_tqA

    • El oscuro secreto de la frontera oriental de Europa

      Grecia deporta ilegalmente a los refugiados que llegan a su territorio, en algunos casos incluso secuestrándolos lejos de la frontera, según denuncian ONG y Acnur.

      Firas debería estar en Grecia. Es más, oficialmente, según los registros del Gobierno heleno y del Alto Comisionado de Naciones Unidas para los Refugiados (ACNUR), reside en Grecia. Pero no. Este sirio, de 17 años, malvive amedrentado, sin dinero y sin papeles en un pequeño apartamento de Estambul que comparte con otros refugiados, después de haber sido deportado ilegalmente por la policía griega a Turquía en tres ocasiones. Una práctica prohibida por las leyes internacionales, pero que, según las organizaciones de derechos humanos, se está convirtiendo en “sistemática” a medida que la ruta migratoria de entrada a la Unión Europea se desvía hacia la frontera del río Evros. Acnur ha recabado unos 300 casos de devoluciones en caliente de personas que intentan llegar a la UE desde Turquía solo en 2018.

      “En los últimos años hemos recabado un número significante de casos de pushback [término en inglés para referirse a esta práctica ilegal]”, explica Margaritis Petritzikis, representante de Acnur en el campo de detención de Fylakio, en Grecia, junto al Evros. “Los testimonios describen a quienes practican las detenciones vistiendo uniformes de diferentes colores, muchas veces sin distintivos, y con la cara cubierta, por lo que no sabemos a qué cuerpo pertenecen. La jurisdicción del control fronterizo es de la policía griega, pero el área que rodea el río es zona militarizada”, añade Petritzikis.

      Los detenidos aseguran que, una vez detenidos y antes de ser devueltos en barcas al otro lado de la frontera, son llevados a almacenes, instalaciones militares o comisarías de policía, transportados con furgonetas sin identificar, supuestamente de las fuerzas de seguridad, según los testimonios recogidos en informes de diversas ONG, entre ellas Human Rights Watch y el Greek Council for Refugees (GCR).

      El Evros, también llamado Maritsa, hace de barrera natural a lo largo de 194 de los 206 kilómetros de frontera terrestre entre Turquía y Grecia; el resto lo cubre una valla levantada en 2012. Para aquellos migrantes y refugiados que, desde suelo turco, sueñan con alcanzar territorio europeo, son apenas 100 o 200 metros que cubrir en un bote hinchable, un trayecto mucho más corto que el que separa la costa turca de las islas griegas del mar Egeo. Además, aquí no está vigente el acuerdo firmado entre la UE y Turquía en 2016, que permite la devolución de aquellos migrantes llegados de manera irregular por vía marítima. En la zona del Evros regía otro acuerdo bilateral de devolución firmado entre Turquía y Grecia, aunque Ankara lo canceló el pasado año. Por ello, en los últimos años, se ha incrementado el número de llegadas a través de esta ruta (en 2018 fueron 18.014, un 35% del total de refugiados y migrantes que arribaron a Grecia, según los datos de Acnur). La mayor parte de los que llegan son sirios, afganos y turcos.

      Sus aguas aparentemente tranquilas son un espejismo engañoso. Es un río caudaloso, de habituales inundaciones y fuertes corrientes: durante el pasado año, medio centenar de personas murieron en esta ruta, la mayoría ahogadas o por hipotermia. “El río es pequeño, pero peligroso. Sobre todo porque los botes son para cinco personas y cruzamos 30 a la vez”, explica un joven bangladesí detenido en el campo de Fylakio.

      Un residente de Edirne, en la orilla turca del río, explica que las tarifas que exigen los traficantes por pasar al otro lado van de 1.000 a 5.000 euros. Aquellos que pagan más “reciben un servicio vip”, y en la orilla griega les esperan otros traficantes que los llevan en coche hasta Salónica o Atenas: “A estos no los suele detener nunca la policía”. A los que no disponen de ese dinero, después de superar el peligro de las aguas les aguarda una nueva barrera.
      Práctica ilegal

      Dos y media de la madrugada. Se escuchan pasos entre la maleza, en la zona boscosa que rodea el Evros. Hay cuchicheos. Los pasos se detienen al escuchar el vehículo en el que viaja este periodista. Poco después, se alejan.

      Anteriormente, en cuanto veían a cualquier persona en la orilla griega, los refugiados se identificaban como tales y pedían que se avisase a la policía. Sabían que habían llegado a territorio seguro. Ya no. Entre los refugiados es sabido que, si son apresados en esta zona, corren el riesgo de ser devueltos al otro lado. Las devoluciones en caliente están prohibidas por la ley: la normativa exige que sean primero identificados y, si es el caso, se les permita presentar una petición de asilo. Firas (que no es su nombre real) cuenta que pasó por ello dos veces durante el año pasado. En la primera ocasión, durante el verano, explica que fue detenido nada más cruzar el río, llevado a una comisaría y devuelto a Turquía al cabo de unas seis horas. “En la comisaría nos pegaron a todos los hombres, nos quitaron nuestras pertenencias y destrozaron los móviles”, asegura.

      La segunda fue aún peor: una vez capturados, Firas explica que los agentes de policía llamaron a otros agentes con uniforme militar y la cara cubierta y les propinaron una paliza. Esta vez les quitaron hasta la ropa y los devolvieron a Turquía en calzoncillos. Su historia es similar a las decenas de testimonios recabados por diferentes ONG, que consideran que puede haber un patrón de actuación de las fuerzas de seguridad helenas.

      En algunos casos no se trata ni siquiera de devoluciones «en caliente», es decir, al ser detenidos en el borde mismo de la frontera, sino desde bastante más adentro en el territorio griego y pasado bastante tiempo desde que los refugiados entraron al país. A. A., un sirio que residía en Alemania de manera legal, llegó en agosto de 2017 a la ciudad griega de Alejandrópolis para encontrarse con su mujer, que había cruzado recientemente la frontera. Pero, según manifestó al GCR, fue detenido por agentes de la policía que, haciendo caso omiso a sus documentos, lo encapucharon y lo enviaron a Turquía en un bote junto a otros refugiados.

      Similar es el caso de Firas. La tercera vez que intentó cruzar a Grecia, a mediados de noviembre, explica que lo logró. Y fue enviado al centro de detención de Fylakio. A inicios de enero, salió de él con los documentos que lo acreditaban como solicitante de asilo. Tomó un autobús hacia Salónica, pero cuenta que, cuando llevaba 15 minutos de viaje, la policía le ordenó bajar junto a otros cinco sirios. “Tenía los papeles de la policía griega y de Acnur, pero los destrozaron delante de mí”, relata. “Nos llevaron a un calabozo y agentes con pasamontañas nos desnudaron y nos pegaron. No nos dieron agua ni comida. El segundo día, vinieron otros agentes y nos pegaron con tubos de cañería. Luego nos llevaron al río junto a varias familias con niños y nos devolvieron a Turquía”.

      La respuesta del Gobierno griego es siempre la misma: “No existen estas prácticas”. Así lo han dicho públicamente los ministerios de Orden Público y Migraciones ante las quejas formales de ACNUR y el Consejo de Europa. La comandancia regional en Tracia de la policía griega, preguntada por la situación, redirigió a este periodista al comisario de Orestíada, Pascalis Siritudis, quien respondió al teléfono —un día después de haberse negado a recibirlo— con gran enfado: "La policía griega respeta siempre la ley y las normas internacionales. No olvide que esta es la frontera de la Unión Europea, no solo de Grecia”. Desde el Ministerio de Orden Público, la contestación fue similar: «La policía griega cumple con los derechos humanos».

      Hay varias investigaciones en marcha. Una, sobre la devolución de varios turcos en mayo de 2017, ha alcanzado el Tribunal Supremo de Grecia. También el Defensor del Pueblo y la Fiscalía de Orestíada han iniciado un proceso judicial tras la denuncia de un ciudadano sudanés deportado ilegalmente a Turquía. Pero, hasta ahora, nadie ha sido condenado. Dimitris Koros, abogado del GCR, admite que es difícil armar estos casos: “La mayoría de los refugiados devueltos no tienen tiempo ni medios para iniciar un proceso judicial y, además, es casi imposible identificar a quienes participan en las devoluciones ya que van con la cara cubierta y sin identificaciones, y se suelen producir de noche”.

      Entretanto Firas continúa en Estambul, temeroso de que un día lo detengan las autoridades turcas y lo deporten a la misma Siria de la que escapó huyendo de la guerra. Y se sigue preguntando por qué lo echaron de Grecia si tenía derecho a quedarse. “Me sorprendió mucho el nivel de brutalidad que emplearon conmigo. Siempre habíamos escuchado que la Unión Europea era un lugar donde no había violencia y se respetaban los derechos humanos”, se queja.

      https://elpais.com/internacional/2019/03/03/actualidad/1551607634_105978.html

    • Turkish computer science student missing in Evros following failed attempt to escape to Greece

      21-year-old university student #Mahir_Mete_Kul has been missing since the boat he used to cross Evros river between Greece and Turkey capsized on March 24.

      A computer science student at Istanbul’s Beykent University, Kul spent 10 months in prison on charges of membership to the leftist group, Liseli Dev-Genc, and was released 5 months ago with judicial control, media reported. As the court in charge put an overseas travel ban on his passport, Kul embarked on the risky journey to escape Turkey the same way thousands of others have tried over the past two years: crossing the Evros river along Turkey-Greece border in a bid to seek asylum abroad.

      “My son was a pretty young university student. They sent him up to prison. Following his release, they prevented him from going back to the school. As he had a travel ban on his passport, he chose this way [to escape],” Mahir’s mother Araz Kul spoke to Gazete Karinca. Five months ago, the mother left Turkey to Greece due to political reasons too, media said.

      Thousands of people have fled Turkey due to a massive witch-hunt launched by the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government against all kinds of opposition.

      More than 510,000 people have been detained and some 100,000 including academics, judges, doctors, teachers, lawyers, students, policemen and many from different backgrounds have been put in pre-trial detention since last summer.

      Many tried to escape Turkey via illegal ways as the government cancelled their passports like thousands of others.


      https://turkeypurge.com/turkish-computer-science-student-missing-in-evros-following-failed-atte
      #mourir_aux_frontières #morts #décès #mourir_dans_l'Evros

      L’appel de la mère :
      https://twitter.com/TurkeyPurge/status/1110989355445678080
      https://twitter.com/TurkeyPurge/status/1110990512381530113

      #réfugiés_turcs

    • À la frontière gréco-turque. Empêcher les migrants d’entrer en Europe, sauver ceux qui y parviennent

      Je copie-colle ici la partie dédiée à la région de l’Evros :

      L’Evros, région délaissée par les garde-frontières

      La gare de Marasia semble aussi abandonnée que le village éponyme. Derrière un panneau jaune et rouge signalant le passage de trains à vapeurs, un cours d’eau ruisselle dans le calme. L’Evros, large d’une dizaine de mètres à peine à cet endroit, est la plus longue rivière des Balkans, prenant sa source en Bulgarie pour se jeter dans la mer Égée, près d’Alexandroupoli. Depuis l’accord entre l’Union européenne et la Turquie et la fermeture de la route des Balkans, la pression migratoire sur la Grèce, qui se concentrait ces dernières années sur les îles en mer Égée, se déporte vers l’Evros, frontière naturelle entre la Grèce et la Turquie. “Aujourd’hui, le problème n’est plus à la barrière mais dans la rivière”, atteste Paschalis Siritoudis, le directeur de la police du département d’Orestiada.

      Un effet de vases communicants

      Cette affluence ne l’inquiète pas plus que ça. “De plus en plus de migrants arrivent ces dernières années mais c’est un vieux problème auquel la région est confrontée depuis une vingtaine d’années. Avant la construction de la barrière avec la Turquie (celle-ci longe la frontière sur 12 kilomètres dans une zone militarisée, NdlR), 30 000 migrants passaient chaque année. En 2012, nous avons lancé une opération de surveillance à la frontière, du personnel a été recruté. Les années suivantes, ce nombre est tombé entre 1 000 et 3 000 personnes. En 2018, environ 7 000 ont franchi la frontière. Ces chiffres, même s’ils sont moindres, montrent qu’il y a toujours un problème migratoire ici. Mais le flux est sous contrôle, il n’y a aucune comparaison possible avec la situation avant 2012”, martèle le colonel, d’une voix tonitruante.

      Les chiffres du Haut-Commissariat des Nations unies (UNHCR) vont bien au-delà de ceux du directorat de police : en 2018, 18 014 personnes sont entrées en Grèce via l’Evros. Presque trois fois plus de personnes (dont une majorité de ressortissants turcs) que l’année précédente.

      Dès qu’une porte se ferme dans la région d’Evros, une fenêtre s’ouvre ailleurs. Et vice-versa. Quand, en juillet 2012, l’opération Aspida (“bouclier” en grec) est lancée, le nombre d’entrées à la frontière gréco-turque chute de manière vertigineuse. La première semaine du mois d’août, 2 000 migrants y sont appréhendés. Quelques mois plus tard, en octobre, moins de 10 personnes sont arrêtées par semaine.

      Les autorités compétentes et Frontex se félicitent du succès de cette opération. Les réjouissances sont cependant de courte durée : face au renforcement des contrôles à la frontière terrestre, les départs en mer se multiplient. “Immédiatement après le déploiement de l’opération Aspida, le nombre de détections de traversées illégales a augmenté, à la fois à la frontière maritime entre la Grèce et la Turquie et à la frontière terrestre avec la Bulgarie”, reconnaît Frontex dans son rapport annuel 2012, d’où sont issus les chiffres précités.

      Sur les 206 km de frontière fluviale entre la Grèce et la Turquie, seuls 12,5 kms sont terrestres et forment ce qu’on appelle le triangle de Karaağaç. C’est sur ce territoire qu’est érigée la barrière. (en rouge sur la carte)

      “Les barrières et les murs sont des solutions court-termistes à des mesures qui ne règlent pas le problème. L’Union européenne ne finane et ne financera pas cette barrière. Ça ne sert à rien.”
      Cecilia Malmström, ex-Commissaire européenne aux Affaires intérieures, février 2011.

      “Le problème n’est plus à la barrière mais dans la rivière” Paschalis Siritoudis, directeur de la police du département d’Orestiada

      Sept ans plus tard, l’opération Aspida est toujours en cours et semble faire la fierté de Paschalis Siritoudis. “Elle est connue dans toute la Grèce, dans toute l’Europe même ! Elle est effectuée avec le support de Frontex”, se félicite-t-il.

      Les officiers de Frontex déployés près d’Orestiada en 2010 (surtout pour identifier les migrants) pour prêter main forte aux Grecs sont partis. Aujourd’hui, l’agence européenne n’est que peu impliquée dans la région : quelques agents travaillent aux check-points et patrouillent avec des policiers et des militaires le long de la barrière de barbelés. “Nous avons parlé avec les autorités grecques pour augmenter notre présence mais la décision leur revient. Nous sommes prêts à intervenir s’ils en ressentent le besoin”, explique Eva Moncure, porte-parole de l’agence.

      À entendre Paschalis Siritoudis, ce n’est pas le cas. “Les officiers grecs qui effectuent l’enregistrement des migrants irréguliers, prennent leurs empreintes digitales et font le débriefing sont plus expérimentés que quiconque en Europe. Ils ont eu affaire à des dizaines de milliers de migrants et leur expertise est reconnue par tous”, s’exclame-t-il, assis derrière son bureau dans le commissariat d’Orestiada.

      De son côté, Frontex fait grand cas de ses compétences. “L’agence mutualise les ressources et fait appel aux États membres pour lui fournir du personnel. Il y a donc un turn-over important dans toutes les missions. Au fil des ans, nous avons toutefois développé une expertise, notamment au niveau de l’examen des documents. Avec quel genre de papiers voyagent les migrants ? Sont-ils faux ? Sont-ils vrais ? Où ont-ils été fabriqués ?”, explique Eva Moncure.

      Soumise à la bonne volonté des États membres, Frontex insiste pour pouvoir déployer ses guest officers. Ne serait-ce que pour partager les informations recueillies aux frontières avec une floppée d’institutions. Du point de vue de l’agence, plus celles-ci circulent, mieux les frontières sont protégées. Ainsi, depuis 2016, date du dernier élargissement du mandat de l’agence, Frontex est habilitée à mener des interviews sur le trafic d’êtres humains et à partager les informations récoltées avec Europol. “Nous n’enquêtons pas. Nous ne faisons que récolter des informations et les transmettons à qui de droit. Comme nous sommes en première ligne, nous pouvons obtenir ces informations plus aisément”, indique Eva Moncure. “Quand on parle de Frontex, tout le monde parle toujours des migrants mais personne ne parle des trafiquants d’êtres humains. Pour résumer, notre boulot est de surveiller les frontières, de venir en aide aux migrants s’ils sont en danger et de les renvoyer dans leur pays s’ils n’ont pas le droit d’asile en Europe. Un autre volet important, c’est de recueillir des informations sur les passeurs, les routes qu’ils utilisent, les connexions qu’ils ont, etc. Il ne faut pas oublier que les personnes qui font monter les migrants dans des bateaux ou qui leur font traverser une rivière ne sont pas des enfants de chœur. Le trafic d’êtres humains rapporte énormément d’argent, bien plus que le trafic de drogues. Le problème, c’est que pour l’instant, la justice arrête les petites mains pendant que les chefs des réseaux se la coulent douce à Dubaï en comptant leurs billets”, poursuit-elle.

      Pour rappel, les officiers ont un pouvoir exécutif lorsqu’ils sont impliqués dans l’enregistrement des migrants : prise d’empreintes digitales, screening (pour établir nationalité des migrants) et vérification des documents d’identité. En outre, ils ne peuvent délivrer de décisions relatives à l’asile puisqu’il s’agit d’un pouvoir régalien.

      Renvoyés en Turquie sur des bateaux

      Dans la région d’Evros, contrairement aux îles grecques, les agents de Frontex ne sont pas en contact avec les migrants et donc pas habilités à collecter des informations sur le trafic d’êtres humains. Laissé entre les mains des autorités grecques, l’enregistrement (et partant, le screening et l’interview) des migrants qui parviennent à entrer dans l’espace Schengen n’y semble pas garanti.

      À ce sujet, deux rapports, publiés en décembre 2018 - l’un par Humans Rights Watch et l’autre par le Greek Council for Refugees (GCR), Human Rights 360 et l’Association for the Social Support of Youth - sont glaçants. Confiscation de biens (“ils jettent nos téléphones dans la rivière”, “ils ont confisqué le lait artificiel pour notre bébé”, “il a déchiré mon certificat de naissance devant moi”) et de vêtements, privation de nourriture et parfois d’eau, fouilles corporelles, violences physiques et verbales… Comble du comble : les migrants seraient reconduits de l’autre côté de la rivière Evros dans des embarcations pneumatiques.

      Ces documents font état d’une pratique courante près de la rivière : le push-back, c’est-à-dire le refoulement des personnes qui franchissent la frontière. Ces expulsions collectives (et illégales) obéissent à un modus operandi bien rôdé, à lire les nombreux témoignages récoltés par ces ONG. “La plupart des incidents partagent trois caractéristiques principales : arrestation par une patrouille de police locale, détention dans des commissariats ou des emplacements informels (entrepôts, gares abandonnées, etc.) proches de la frontière avec la Turquie et remise des migrants par les forces de l’ordre à du personnel non-identifié (dont le visage serait le plus souvent caché par une cagoule, NdlR) qui procède au push-back via la rivière Evros, parfois de manière violente”, décrit Human Rights Watch. Certaines personnes interrogées ont subi plusieurs push-backs avant d’être finalement enregistrées selon la procédure légale.

      Les migrants ne sont pas photographiés, leurs empreintes digitales ne sont pas prises et les raisons de leur arrestation ne leur sont pas expliquées. Sans enregistrement, leur présence dans l’espace Schengen n’est pas attestée et il est donc impossible d’introduire une demande d’asile. Il est en revanche possible d’assurer qu’ils n’ont jamais un pied sur le sol européen.

      Ces allégations sont remontées jusqu’au Commissaire aux droits de l’homme du Conseil de l’Europe et au Comité européen pour la prévention de la torture qui les ont jugées crédibles. Après une visite en Grèce en avril 2018, le Commissaire a par ailleurs souligné l’absence d’enquêtes sur ce genre de pratiques de la part des autorités grecques.

      Des bateaux et des chaussures d’enfants

      À Marasia, derrière le panneau jaune et rouge signalant le passage de trains à vapeur, un chemin de terre longe une forêt, qui borde l’Evros. Avec l’arrivée du printemps, des fleurs jaunes tapissent ses berges.

      Il ne faut pas marcher bien loin pour découvrir les traces d’un spectacle qui suscite malaise et interrogations. À cent mètres de la gare, une paire de rames a été abandonnée.

      Un peu plus loin, au bord de l’eau, un bateau gris et bleu est recouvert de feuilles mortes. L’inscription “Excursion 5” est écrite dessus en lettres capitales. Cinquante mètres après, un autre bateau jaune et vert se confond avec la couleur des fleurs.

      De retour sur le chemin de terre, des taches de couleur attirent le regard. Ce sont des chaussures. En daim, celles d’un adulte, à côté d’un soutien-gorge et d’un jeans délavé. À côté, deux paires de basket appartiennent à des enfants. Les plus petites, bleues, sont une pointure 26. Leur ancien propriétaire doit avoir entre trois et cinq ans. Que lui est-il arrivé ? A-t-il été reconduit en Turquie ? Ses compagnons de route ont-ils été interrogés sur le trafic d’êtres humains dont ils ont été victimes ?

      Confronté aux accusations de push-backs menés dans la région, le chef de la police élude d’abord la question et jure que les migrants interceptés sont pris en charge. Avant de finir par admettre que “nous avons reçu des informations sur les push-backs de la part des ONG”.

      Pas suffisamment pour enquêter, comme recommandé par le Commissaire européen aux droits de l’homme et le Comité européen pour la prévention de la torture.

      https://dossiers.lalibre.be/greco-turque/login.php

    • Οργανωμένο σχέδιο ανομίας στον Έβρο καταγγέλλει η « Καμπάνια για το Άσυλο »

      Την κατεπείγουσα διερεύνηση των συνεχιζόμενων καταγγελιών για τις άτυπες επιχειρήσεις επαναπροώθησης προσφύγων στον Έβρο και τον έλεγχο των εμπλεκομένων ζητούν από τους υπουργούς Προστασίας του Πολίτη, Όλγα Γεροβασίλη, Μεταναστευτικής Πολιτικής, Δημήτρη Βίτσα, και Δικαιοσύνης, Μιχάλη Καλογήρου, δέκα οργανώσεις που συμμετέχουν στην « Καμπάνια για το Άσυλο ».

      Σημειώνουν ότι οι υπουργοί είναι υπόλογοι για κάθε καθυστέρηση, η οποία εντείνει την πεποίθηση ότι τα σύνορα στον Έβρο αποτελούν ένα πεδίο εκτός δικαίου και εκτός νόμου και έναν τόπο μαρτυρίου για τους πρόσφυγες.

      Υπογραμμίζουν ότι ο συστηματικός τρόπος και οι ομοιότητες της κακομεταχείρισης παραπέμπουν σε οργανωμένο σχέδιο αποτροπής, στο πλαίσιο του οποίου αναπτύσσονται γενικευμένες πρακτικές, οι οποίες έγιναν πιο εκτεταμένες, συστηματικές και σκληρές μετά την υπογραφή της ευρωτουρκικής συμφωνίας το Μάρτιο του 2016. Και αναφέρουν ότι οι πρακτικές αυτές εμπίπτουν στην αρμοδιότητα της ποινικής δικαιοσύνης και στοιχειοθετούν κατά περίπτωση κακουργήματα (βασανισμός, ληστεία, έκθεση ζωής σε κίνδυνο...).

      Οι οργανώσεις (ΑΡΣΙΣ, Δίκτυο Κοινωνικής Υποστήριξης Προσφύγων και Μεταναστών, ΕΠΣΕ, Ελληνικό Φόρουμ Προσφύγων, Κίνηση για τα Ανθρώπινα Δικαιώματα – Αλληλεγγύη στους Πρόσφυγες Σάμος, Κόσμος χωρίς Πολέμους και Βία, ΛΑΘΡΑ, PRAKSIS, Πρωτοβουλία για τα Δικαιώματα των Κρατουμένων, Υποστήριξη Προσφύγων στο Αιγαίο) κάνουν λόγο για επιδεικτική βαρβαρότητα ένστολων ή μη στην περιοχή και παράνομες ενέργειες οι οποίες αποτελούν αντικείμενο συγκεκριμένων οδηγιών και εντολών. Σημειώνουν ότι το οργανωμένο σχέδιο περιλαμβάνει επίσης τη συγκάλυψη και νομιμοποίηση των εγκληματικών μεθόδων που χρησιμοποιούνται.

      Ολόκληρη η ανακοίνωση της « Καμπάνιας για το Άσυλο » έχει ως εξής :

      Απαξίωση της ανθρώπινης ζωής και της νομιμότητας οι επαναπροωθήσεις στον Έβρο

      Αθήνα, 2 Μαΐου 2019

      Τα σύνορα της χώρας στον Έβρο τείνουν να καταστούν ένας εκτός δικαίου και εκτός νόμου τόπος μαρτυρίου για τους πρόσφυγες που επιχειρούν απελπισμένα να περάσουν στο ευρωπαϊκό έδαφος, στιγματίζοντας τη χώρα μας και τους υπευθύνους για τη διαχείρισή τους.

      Ενώ παρακολουθούμε τους αυξανόμενους πνιγμούς στα σύνορα, οι καταγγελίες προσφύγων για βάρβαρες πρακτικές επαναπροώθησης συνεχίζονται. Εκτός από τον αποτροπιασμό που προκαλούν, δείχνουν επίσης ότι η άσκηση βίας και οι συστηματικές παραβιάσεις δεν αποτελούν μεμονωμένες ατομικές επιλογές, αλλά γενικευμένες πρακτικές που αναπτύσσονται στα πλαίσια ενός σχεδίου αποτροπής και προσπάθειας ενίσχυσης του « μηνύματος » αποθάρρυνσης, που « πρέπει να σταλεί » για την ανάσχεση των προσφυγικών ρευμάτων.

      Όσα εκτενώς καταγράφονται στην κοινή έκθεση του Ελληνικού Συμβούλιου για τους Πρόσφυγες, της ΑΡΣΙΣ και της HumanRights360, που δημοσιεύτηκε πρόσφατα (1), δεν αφήνουν αμφιβολία για την αλήθεια των καταγγελλόμενων. Ο συστηματικός τρόπος και οι ομοιότητες της κακομεταχείρισης παραπέμπουν σε ένα οργανωμένο σχέδιο, η εφαρμογή του οποίου επιτρέπει -αν δεν προτρέπει- παράνομες συμπεριφορές. Οι περίπολοι ενόπλων με ή χωρίς αστυνομικές και στρατιωτικές στολές, μάσκες ή κουκούλες, που μιλούν εκτός από τα ελληνικά και άλλη ευρωπαϊκή γλώσσα (συχνά αναφερόμενη η γερμανική), που δρουν με επιδεικτική βαρβαρότητα ακόμα και μπροστά σε μικρά παιδιά και οικογένειες, βία και κακοποιήσεις, αφαίρεση προσωπικών ειδών και χρημάτων, ρούχων κατά περίπτωση και συχνά υποδημάτων, αφαίρεση ή καταστροφή κινητών τηλεφώνων (για να μην καταγράφεται η παράνομη δράση), μεταφορά σε εγκαταλειμμένες αποθήκες που χρησιμεύουν ως άτυπα κρατητήρια χωρίς τροφή και νερό και χρήση φουσκωτών για την επαναπροώθηση στην Τουρκία, παραπέμπουν σε εκτέλεση συγκεκριμένων οδηγιών και εντολών, που εφαρμόζονται επιλεκτικά σε εφαρμογή προαποφασισμένου σχεδίου, που περιλαμβάνει και τη συγκάλυψη -και κατά συνέπεια νομιμοποίηση- των εγκληματικών μεθόδων που χρησιμοποιούνται κατ’ αυτές.

      Η Καμπάνια για την Πρόσβαση στο Άσυλο καταγγέλλει για ακόμα μια φορά την εφαρμογή των πρακτικών άτυπης επαναπροώθησης που έχουν επεκταθεί και καταστεί σκληρότερες και συστηματικότερες μετά την Κοινή Δήλωση αρχηγών κρατών και κυβερνήσεων ΕΕ-Τουρκίας της 18ης Μαρτίου 2016 και επισημαίνει ότι δεν αποτελούν μόνο σοβαρή παραβίαση των διεθνών υποχρεώσεων της χώρας, αλλά εμπίπτουν στην αρμοδιότητα της ποινικής δικαιοσύνης και στοιχειοθετούν κατά περίπτωση κακουργήματα (βασανισμοί, ληστείες, έκθεση σε κίνδυνο ζωής κ.ά.)

      Ζητάμε να δοθούν απαντήσεις από τις αρχές :

      Ποια σώματα ενεργούν στα σύνορα για την αποτροπή παράτυπων εισόδων.
      Υπάρχει πλαίσιο συγκεκριμένων εντολών για την περίπτωση εντοπισμού, σύλληψης και μεταχείρισης των παράτυπα εισερχόμενων και έλεγχος για τον τρόπο εφαρμογής του από τις περιπόλους ;
      Υπάρχει υποχρέωση καταγραφής των περιπόλων που ενεργούν κατά μήκος του Έβρου και υποχρεωτική αναφορά σχετικά με την πορεία που ακολουθούν καθώς και τις ενέργειες τους ;
      Ελέγχεται από την εκάστοτε προϊσταμένη αρχή η νομιμότητα των ενεργειών αυτών των περιπόλων και η τήρηση των υποχρεώσεων που επιβάλει το διεθνές δίκαιο για την προστασία των προσφύγων ;

      Η Καμπάνια για την Πρόσβαση στο Άσυλο επισημαίνει ότι τα αρμόδια και εμπλεκόμενα Υπουργεία (Προστασίας του Πολίτη, Άμυνας και Μεταναστευτικής Πολιτικής) αλλά και ο Υπουργός Δικαιοσύνης οφείλουν να προβούν με διαδικασίες κατεπείγοντος στη διερεύνηση των καταγγελιών και τον έλεγχο των εμπλεκόμενων σε επιχειρήσεις αποτροπής και είναι υπόλογοι για κάθε καθυστέρηση, καθώς οι συνεχιζόμενες παραβιάσεις, όσο εκφεύγουν από κάθε μορφής έλεγχο, λογοδοσία και τιμωρία, επιβεβαιώνουν την πεποίθηση ότι ο Έβρος είναι ένα εκτεταμένο πεδίο εκτός δικαίου και εκτός νόμου όπου οι πρόσφυγες είτε σπρώχνονται στο θάνατο είτε στα χέρια εγκληματικών οργανώσεων, όπου μπορεί να αναπτύσσεται ανεμπόδιστα το οργανωμένο έγκλημα και όπου η ανθρώπινη ζωή είναι εξαιρετικά φτηνή ακόμη και γι’ αυτούς που είναι υπεύθυνοι να την προστατεύουν.

      https://www.efsyn.gr/node/193572

      Reçu via la mailing-list Migreurop avec ce commentaire :

      10 ONG et associations solidaires somment les Ministres de l’ordre public, de la Politique Migratoire et de la Justice d’ouvrir en toute urgence une enquête concernant les dénonciations répétées d’opérations illégales de refoulement de réfugiés à Evros (frontière fluviale gréco-turque au Nord de la Grèce) ; elles réclament aussi que tous les agents de l’état impliqués dans des telles actions fassent l’objet d’un contrôle.

      Les dix ONG qui font partie de celles ayant lancé la Campagne pour l’accès à l’asile (http://asylum-campaign.blogspot.com) font remarquer que les ministres seront tenus pour responsable de tout empêchement ou retard dans l’enquête, qui renforcerait la conviction que la frontière d’Evros est une zone de non-droit et un haut-lieu de torture pour les réfugiés (tortures, mauvais traitements, vols avec violence, mise en danger de la vie d’autrui).

      Elles soulignent que le mode opératoire quasi-identique de plusieurs opérations de refoulement et les ressemblances dans les mauvais traitements subis par les réfugiés renvoient à un plan organisé et concerté de dissuasion, dans le cadre duquel se déploient de pratiques généralisées qui sont devenus plus fréquentes, plus systématiques et encore plus dures après l’accord UE-Turquie en mars 2016.

      Les organisations Arsis , Réseau de soutien social de réfugiés et de migrants (Diktyo) Observatoire grec pour les accords d’Helsinki (Greek Helsinki Monitor ), Forum grec des réfugiés (Greek Forum of Refugees), Mouvement pour les Droits de l’Homme-Solidarité avec les Réfugiés Samos, Monde sans guerres et violence , « LATHRA » -Comité de Solidarité avec les Réfugiés de Chios, PRAKSIS , Initiative pour les droits de détenus ,

      Soutien aux Réfugiés en Egée (Refugees Support Aegean) parlent de brutalité ostentatoire de la part des policiers et de groupes paramilitaires et d’actions illégales qui ne pourraient être que le fruit de consignes précises et d’ ordres venant d’en haut. Pour les ONG, le recouvrement et la légalisation implicite de méthodes criminelles employées est partie intégrante du plan organisé de push-back.

    • “We were beaten and pushed back by masked men at Turkish-Greek border” – Turkish journalist and asylum seeker

      A group of Turkish political asylum seekers claims that, following their attempt to cross the Turkish border via Evros River in the northeast of Greece on Friday evening, they were pushed back after being beaten by masked men with batons.

      Tugba Ozkan, a journalist in the group, told IPA News on the phone that the group of 15 people fleeing persecution in Turkey crossed the Turkish-Greek border on Friday at 9 pm near Soufli, a town at Evros Regional Unit.

      When they stepped on Greek soil, however, she said a group of masked men beat them and pushed them back across the river to Turkish land, where a post-coup crackdown has persecuted tens of thousands of Turkish nationals since the abortive coup in 2016.

      A family of four from the group, including two children, disappeared after the alleged push-back. Turkish soldiers reportedly arrested the four Turkish nationals, Alpay Akinci (42), Meral Akinci (40), Okan Selim Akinci (11), and Ayse Hilal Akinci (8).

      Trying to hide from Turkish security officers, 11 people, including Ozkan, were attempting to cross the border for the second time.

      “Masked men beat us with batons. We are in a very dire situation. We are afraid to be pushed back again. We need help,” a desperate Ozkan said in dismay.

      The group of asylum seekers managed to cross the Evros safely in their second attempt, she said, and the group was attempting to hide when two Greek police cars found them.

      Greek Police detained the group at around 2 pm on Saturday near the border and took them into custody, according to the Greek Council for Refugees (GCR), a non-governmental organization defending human rights and fighting against illegal push-backs in the region.

      The group applied for asylum in Greece and are expected to be released in a few days after the official registration is done, according to GCR lawyers.
      Push-back: Infamous buzzword of immigration debate glossary

      The practice that notoriously became known as “push-back,” can be defined as ‘the use of force to stop asylum seekers at borders and to return them to the country from which they came.’

      According to official numbers of the United Nations, thousands of asylum seekers and refugees from various nations cross the Turkish-Greek border illegally every year in an attempt to reach Europe to take refuge.

      Many reported push-back incidents have occurred in recent years, but no accurate figures have been revealed yet.

      One of those incidents was the case of Murat Capan, a Turkish journalist who worked for the critical Nokta magazine. According to the narrative of Hellenic League for Human Rights, Capan and a Turkish family with three children crossed the Evros river in May 2017, escaping persecution.

      The Greek police took them into custody where they asked to apply for asylum. Subsequently, they were taken to a UN facility in a van.

      According to the information put forth by Hellenic League, the van met with a car along the road and five masked men dressed in camouflage bound the hands of the Turkish nationals. Two of the masked men then escorted them back to the Turkish side of the border where they were handed over to Turkish soldiers.

      Turkish authorities had already sentenced Capan in absentia to twenty-two and a half years in prison. Following the push-back incident, the security forces sent Capan to prison to serve his term.

      Another incident included 6 Turkish asylum seekers and took place in September 2018. Two Turkish families entered Greece via Evros and as reported by a Turkish journalist in exile, Cevheri Guven, their presence in Greece can be backed by solid evidence.

      One family had their two kids with them and took their photo on a roadside cafe in Alexandroupolis.

      Guven shares the location and picture of the coffee where the photo above had been taken to display that the families were indeed in Greece.

      The families were escorted back to Turkey after appealing for asylum by the Greek police and thrown into the water by the Turkish side, according to Guven. Turkish gendarmerie caught them after hours of walking along the road and 3 adults out of 4 in the group faced arrest.

      The cases of Capan and the Yildiz family crystalize the consequences of the push-back practice, which is a widespread method apparently enforced by Greek security forces working alongside Greece’s border with Turkey, according to the work of several NGOs.

      Greek NGOs, including GCR, HumanRights360, and ARSIS, released a report on the push-back practice in December 2018.

      The report, dubbed “The new normality: Continuous push-backs of third-country nationals on the Evros river,” includes testimonies of 39 people who tried to cross the Evros river to enter Greece, but who were pushed back to Turkey, often violently.

      The report of the NGOs concludes that “the practice of push-backs constitutes a particularly wide-spread practice, often employing violence in the process.”

      GCR, HumanRights360, and ARSIS have urged authorities to take action against the practice, which they label as “a threat to the rule of law” in Greece.

      According to a 2012 ruling of the European Court of Human Rights, push-back policy breaches international law, including the Geneva Convention and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

      International laws are clear on peoples’ rights to seek protection from persecution in other countries, and the latter is obliged to process these requests in order to avoid the risk of endangering people who have a legitimate claim to protection.

      https://ipa.news/2019/04/28/we-were-beaten-and-pushed-back-by-masked-men-at-turkish-greek-border-turkish-j

    • Three Kurdish children drown as more refugees try to make their way into Greece

      THREE KURDISH have perished while trying to cross from Turkey into Greece when the boat they were in capsized.

      The children were from the Iraqi Kurdistan capital of Erbil and drowned in Maritsa River.

      “In the early hours of today, around 3 am, a boat carrying thirteen immigrants who wanted to cross from Turkey to Greece through the Evros River overturned and two children drowned. One child died due to the cold weather,” said Ari Jalal, a representative of Federation of Iraqi Refugees in Kurdistan, in an interview with Kurdish Rudaw.

      Jalal further said the body of one child is yet to be found. “The search continues. We are in contact with the consulates of Iraq, Turkey and Greece after the tragic boat incident. The other immigrants were rescued by Greek police,” Jalal said.

      Turkey is used as a key and main route by thousands of refugees who want to cross into Europe through Greece, especially since 2011, when the Syrian civil war began.

      According to Greece police, the number of migrants registered and arrested after crossing the border was 3,543 by last October, an 82% increase over the same month in the preceding year.


      https://ipa.news/2019/02/04/three-kurdish-children-drown-as-more-refugees-try-to-make-their-way-into-greec
      #décès #morts

    • The new normality: Continuous push-backs of third country nationals on the Evros river

      The Greek Council for Refugees, ARSIS-Association for the Social Support of Youth and HumanRights360 publish this report containing 39 testimonies of people who attempted to enter Greece from the Evros border with Turkey, in order to draw the attention of the responsible authorities and public bodies to the frequent practice of push-backs that take place in violation of national, EU law and international law.

      The frequency and repeated nature of the testimonies that come to our attention by people in detention centres, under protective custody, and in reception and identification centres, constitutes evidence of the practice of pushbacks being used extensively and not decreasing, regardless of the silence and denial by the responsible public bodies and authorities, and despite reports and complaints denouncements that have come to light in the recent past.
      The testimonies that follow substantiate a continuous and uninterrupted use of the illegal practice of push-backs. They also reveal an even more alarming array of practices and patterns calling for further investigation; it is particularly alarming that the persons involved in implementing the practice of push-backs speak Greek, as well as other languages, while reportedly wearing either police or military clothing. In short, we observe that the practice of push-backs constitutes a particularly wide-spread practice, often employing violence in the process, leaving the State exposed and posing a threat for the rule of law in the country.
      Τhe organizations signing this report urge the competent authorities to investigate the incidents described, and to refrain from engaging in any similar action that violates Greek, EU law, and International law.

      https://www.gcr.gr/en/news/press-releases-announcements/item/1028-the-new-normality-continuous-push-backs-of-third-country-nationals-on-the-e

      Pour télécharger le #rapport:


      https://www.gcr.gr/en/news/press-releases-announcements/item/download/492_22e904e22458d13aa76e3dce82d4dd23

    • Απάντηση Γεροβασίλη για τις επαναπροωθήσεις

      Επιστολή στον επικεφαλής της Υπατης Αρμοστείας στην Ελλάδα, Φιλίπ Λεκλέρκ, έστειλε η Όλγα Γεροβασίλη απαντώντας στη δική του στην όποια, όπως αναφέρει υπουργός Προστασίας του Πολίτη, « παρατίθενται περιγραφές και μαρτυρίες μεταναστών για περιστατικά και πρακτικές προσώπων, που φέρονται να ανήκουν σε Σώματα Ασφαλείας, στην περιοχή του Έβρου.

       »Συγκεκριμένα, οι αναφορές αφορούν σε άτυπες αναγκαστικές επιστροφές στην Τουρκία, χωρίς την τήρηση των νόμιμων διαδικασιών, σε περιστατικά βίας και σοβαρών παραβιάσεων των ανθρωπίνων δικαιωμάτων, καθώς και σε περιστατικά σύμφωνα με τα οποία δεν επετράπη η πρόσβαση προσφύγων και μεταναστών στο μηχανισμό του ασύλου.

      Η κ. Γεροβασίλη υποστηρίζει πως « οι καταγγελλόμενες συμπεριφορές και πρακτικές ουδόλως υφίστανται ως επιχειρησιακή δραστηριότητα και πρακτική του προσωπικού των Υπηρεσιών Συνοριακής Φύλαξης, το οποίο κυρίως εμπλέκεται σε δράσεις για την αντιμετώπιση του φαινομένου της παράνομης μετανάστευσης στα ελληνοτουρκικά σύνορα. Από την διερεύνηση των μέχρι σήμερα καταγγελλομένων περιστατικών και από τις εσωτερικές έρευνες που έχουν πραγματοποιηθεί από τις αρμόδιες Υπηρεσίες, προκύπτει το συμπέρασμα ότι αυτά δεν δύνανται να επιβεβαιωθούν ».

      Ισχυρίζεται δε ότι « η εμπειρία, ο επαγγελματισμός και το ήθος του αστυνομικού προσωπικού των Υπηρεσιών Συνοριακής Φύλαξης, δεν αφήνουν ουδεμία αμφιβολία ότι το έργο της διαχείρισης συνόρων επιτελείται με υψηλό αίσθημα ευθύνης και ανθρωπισμού. Προς επίρρωση αυτού, σημειώνεται ότι, στον ποταμό Έβρο έχουν λάβει χώρα, πολλές φορές υπό άκρως αντίξοες συνθήκες, επιχειρήσεις διάσωσης μεταναστών που κινδύνευαν από πνιγμό, από το αστυνομικό προσωπικό, το οποίο και με κίνδυνο της ζωής του επιδιώκει την προστασία της ζωής των μεταναστών όταν εγκλωβίζονται σε επικίνδυνα σημεία του ποταμού Έβρου, αποσπώντας θετικά σχόλια από την κοινή γνώμη.

      Επίσης, η υπουργός σημειώνει πως « οι Έλληνες αστυνομικοί που πραγματοποιούν εθνικές επιχειρησιακές δράσεις επιτήρησης συνόρων στην περιοχή του Έβρου, τα τελευταία έτη, υποστηρίζονται από Φιλοξενούμενους Αξιωματούχους διαφόρων ειδικοτήτων, στο πλαίσιο Κοινών Επιχειρήσεων του Frontex που υλοποιούνται στην περιοχή. Ο εν λόγω Ευρωπαϊκός Οργανισμός ενισχύει την επίγνωση της κατάστασης και την επιχειρησιακή ανταπόκριση στα ελληνοτουρκικά χερσαία σύνορα. Σε αυτό το πλαίσιο, ουδέποτε έγινε αναφορά από ξένους Φιλοξενούμενους Αξιωματούχους του Frontex, περιστατικού παράτυπης επαναπροώθησης ή παραβίασης δικαιώματος μεταναστών, με εμπλοκή ελλήνων αστυνομικών ».

      Στην επιστολή επισημαίνεται πως « τόσο σε κεντρικό όσο και σε περιφερειακό επίπεδο, το αστυνομικό προσωπικό λαμβάνει ειδικότερες οδηγίες και διαταγές, ενώ παρακολουθεί και εκπαιδευτικά προγράμματα, σχετικά με την προστασία των θεμελιωδών δικαιωμάτων των μεταναστών, με ιδιαίτερη έμφαση στις ευάλωτες ομάδες. Οι οδηγίες εστιάζουν στην προστασία της ανθρώπινης ζωής και αξιοπρέπειας, την αποφυγή των διακρίσεων, την νόμιμη χρήση βίας και την αρχή της μη-επαναπροώθησης. Σε αυτό το πλαίσιο, το αστυνομικό προσωπικό εποπτεύεται και αξιολογείται σε μόνιμη βάση, από την ιεραρχία του σώματος.

      Τέλος, η κ. Γεροβασίλη υπενθυμίζει ότι « η Ελλάδα έχει διαχειρισθεί αποτελεσματικά, από το 2015 μέχρι και σήμερα, περισσότερους από 1.350.000 πρόσφυγες/μετανάστες, έχοντας ως γνώμονα την προστασία της ανθρώπινης ζωής και αξιοπρέπειας. Ειδικότερα, επισημαίνεται πώς, κατά το πρώτο 4μηνο του 2019 στην περιοχή δικαιοδοσίας των Δ.Α. Ορεστιάδας και Αλεξανδρούπολης έχουν πραγματοποιηθεί 3.130 συλλήψεις υπηκόων τρίτων χωρών, γεγονός που έρχεται σε αντίθεση με τις καταγγελίες περί επαναπροωθήσεων. Επιπλέον και κατά το συγκεκριμένο χρονικό διάστημα που αναφέρεται στις καταγγελίες (25-29.04.2019), πραγματοποιήθηκαν στην συγκεκριμένη περιοχή 101 συλλήψεις υπηκόων τρίτων χωρών ».

      https://www.efsyn.gr/node/193868

      Traduction de Vicky Skoumbi via la mailing-list Migreurop :

      La ministre grecque de Protection du Citoyen (euphémisme pour l’Ordre Public) Olga Gerovassili a démenti les accusations de refoulements illégaux à Evros –frontière nord-est de la Grèce avec la Turquie. En réponse à la lettre que lui avait adressée Philippe Leclerc, représentant de l’UNHCR en Grèce, où celui-ci évoque des témoignages des migrants concernant des mauvais traitements et des refoulements effectués par des forces de sécurité de la région d’Evros, la ministre a tout nié en bloc.

      Philippe Leclerc faisait état des témoignages qui dénoncent d’une part des renvois forcés vers la Turquie, sans que les procédures légales soient respectées, et d’autre part des violences et des violations graves des droits humains, ainsi que des cas où on a interdit aux réfugiés et aux migrants l’accès au mécanisme de l’asile.

      Mme Gerovassili soutient que « les comportements et les pratiques dénoncées ne font nullement partie des modes opératoires et des pratiques du personnel de la Garde-Frontière, qui est surtout impliqué à des actions de contrôle du phénomène d’immigration illégale aux frontières gréco-turques. L’investigation des incidents dénoncés jusqu’à aujourd’hui et les enquêtes internes réalisées par les services compétents ont conduit à la conclusion que ces incidents ne peuvent pas être confirmés ».

      La ministre prétend que « l’expérience, le professionnalisme et l’éthos du personnel policier de la Garde-Frontière, ne laissent aucun doute sur le fait qu’ils opèrent avec un très haut sens de responsabilité et d’humanisme. Pour corroborer ce fait, elle souligne le fait qu’à Evros des opérations de sauvetage ont eu lieu plusieurs fois sous de conditions extrêmement dangereuses : les policiers opèrent au péril de leur propre vie pour la protection de la vie des migrants, lorsque ceux-ci sont bloqués à des endroits dangereux du fleuve Evros.

      La ministre ajoute que les officiers de Frontex qui sont impliqués dans des opérations conjointes avec les policiers grecs n’ont jamais dénoncé des cas de refoulement illégal ou de violation de droit de migrants de la part des agents grecs.

      Dans la lettre que la ministre a adressée à Philippe Leclerc, il est dit que le personnel policier agit sous des consignes et ordres spécifiques, tandis qu’il est souvent amené à suivre des programmes de formation spécifiques à la protection des droits fondamentaux de migrants. D’après la ministre, les consignes données mettent en avant la nécessité de protéger la vie et la dignité humaine, d’éviter toute discrimination, de s’en tenir à l’usage légal de la violence et au principe du non-refoulement. « Dans ce cadre, les agents de police sont contrôlés et évalués en continu, par leurs supérieurs hiérarchiques », dit la ministre.

      Enfin Mme Gerovassili met en avant le fait que 3.130 arrestations de ressortissants de pays tiers ont été effectuées pendant les quatre premiers mois de 2019 dans les régions d’Orestiada et d’Alexandroupolis- proches d’Evros- ce qui, d’après la ministre, contredit les accusations de refoulements illégaux. « Qui plus est, pendant la période précise où les faits dénoncés auraient pu avoir lieu (25-29.04.2019), 101 arrestations de ressortissants de pays tiers ont eu lieu dans cette région ».

      Avec ce commentaire :

      N’en déplaise à la ministre, les faits sont têtus et aucun démenti ne saurait entamer la crédibilité de rapports des ONG et des témoignages comme ceux par ex. rapportés par le Conseil Grec pour les Réfugiés

      https://www.gcr.gr/en/news/press-releases-announcements/item/1067-gcr-and-cear-publish-a-joint-video-documenting-the-harsh-reality-of-pushbac

    • Εvros Pushbacks

      The Greek Council for Refugees and CEAR (C​omisión Española de Ayuda al Refugiado), with the support of the Municipality of Madrid, publish together a video on pushbacks in Evros, today, March 20, three years since the implementation of the EU-Turkey Joint Statement, of which the consequences are obvious in Greece’s northern border, as well as on the Eastern Aegean islands. The shattering testimonies of people who attempted to enter Greece from the Turkish border and were violently pushed back to Turkey, without ever being given the opportunity to apply for asylum, reveal the systematic nature of the pushbacks practice, in direct violation of Greek, EU and international law.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAyuOlohOss


      #routes_migratoires #accord_UE-Turquie #parcours_migratoires #Pavlos_Pavlidis #identification #corps

      Le #cimetière :


      ... qui ne semble plus être le même que celui qu’on avait visité en 2012 :

    • Ces migrants mystérieusement refoulés de Grèce en Turquie

      C’est un sujet qui, régulièrement, vient mettre en porte-à-faux les autorités grecques : l’accueil des migrants qui traversent le fleuve Evros. Frontière entre la Turquie et la Grèce, ce fleuve sert de point d’entrée en Europe pour les migrants venus d’Asie, d’Afrique ou tout simplement de Turquie.

      Et si la traversée du fleuve n’est pas insurmontable, en revanche, les conditions d’accueil sont sujettes à critique par les ONG et même par les migrants.

      L’équipe d’euronews à Athènes en a rencontrés. Ils racontent comment les policiers grecs ont pour habitude de les refouler, sans ménagement.

      Mikail est turc, demandeur d’asile en Grèce. Il explique qu’il a traversé le fleuve avec un groupe de 11 personnes. Lorsqu’ils sont arrivés sur le sol grec, des policiers les ont arrêtés. « Les types portaient des tenues militaires, raconte-t-il. Et ils avaient des matraques. On aurait dit qu’ils partaient en guerre. Nous, on a essayé de comprendre pourquoi ils se comportaient ainsi. Ils nous ont simplement dit : "On va vous renvoyer chez vous". »

      « Mes enfants étaient à côté de moi, ajoute Gulay, réfugiée turque_. Ils m’ont dit : "Maman, y vont nous tuer ?" Je leur ai dit : "Non, ils ne vont pas nous tuer. Ils veulent juste nous renvoyer en Turquie"._ »

      Le groupe de ces 11 migrants parviendra malgré tout à rester en Grèce. D’autres n’ont pas eu cette chance.

      Le 4 mai, trois personnes, deux hommes et une jeune femme, ont traversé le fleuve. Craignant d’être refoulés, ils ont prévenu un proche vivant déjà en Grèce ainsi qu’un avocat. Ils ont envoyé une photo prise dans la ville de #Nea_Vyssa.


      https://twitter.com/zubeyirkoculu/status/1124764045024821249?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed&ref_url=https

      Ils ont ensuite été emmenés dans un commissariat de police à Neo Xeimonio. Et là, on a perdu leur trace. On a appris plus tard qu’ils avaient été renvoyés en Turquie, et qu’ils étaient désormais emprisonnés dans la ville turque d’Edirne.

      Ishan, le frère de la jeune femme raconte qu’il est allé au commissariat de police pour savoir ce qui était advenue de sa sœur. « Je leur ai dit : "je sais que ma sœur a été arrêtée et qu’elle était ici". Ils m’ont juste dit : "On n’est au courant de rien". »

      « Nous avons sollicité les autorités grecques pour en savoir davantage sur cette affaire, ajoute Michalis Arampatzoglou, journaliste d’euronews . Le ministère de la Protection civile a dit n’avoir aucune information sur cet incident. Pour autant, des cas comme celui-là, il y en a de plus en plus. Les avocats des victimes comptent engager des poursuites judiciaires, pour que enquêtes soient menées et que la lumière soit faite. »

      https://fr.euronews.com/2019/05/16/ces-migrants-mysterieusement-refoules-de-grece-en-turquie


    • https://twitter.com/zubeyirkoculu/status/1124764045024821249?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed&ref_url=https

      Je copie-colle ici le thread twitter:

      Breaking: 3 Turkish nationals, Kamil Y, Ayse E, Talip N, have crossed the Turkish-Greek border through Evros on May 4 at 5 am, they were taken into custody at #Xeimonio police station. A family member and a lawyer in the region, however, were told by the Police they are absent.
      Ms. Ayse E. sent her location at Xeimonio before they were detained, she also shared a video urging Greek authorities to stop any possible push-back.
      We are Turkish political asylum seekers. We fled persecution back in Turkey and crossed Evros on May 4 at 5 am. We are hiding near Nea Vyssa in fear of push-back. We urge the United Nations and Greek authorities to protect us from being pushed back."

      The latest live location Ms. Ayse shared with me was from #Xeimonia Police station which proves 3 Turkish asylum seekers taken into custody. The Greek police currently inform their lawyer that there are no such persons in the custody which might mean another push-back on the way.

    • ’Masked men beat us with batons’: Greece accused of violent asylum seeker pushbacks

      Scores of Turkish asylum seekers have been pushed back — sometimes violently — from Greece in the last three weeks, lawyers and family members told Euronews.

      Witnesses claim various groups of masked men in military uniform, as well as those in plain clothes collaborating with the police, used physical force against those who resisted.

      There have been 82 people from Turkey, including children, that have sought political asylum in neighbouring Greece and been sent back since April 23.

      Around half have been detained or arrested by Turkish authorities upon their return to their home country on terrorism charges.

      They have been linked to the Gulen Movement, which Ankara blames for the failed 2016 coup, or the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), who have been involved in an armed struggle with the Turkish state over independence.

      The European Commission has urged Greece to follow up on the allegations that Euronews has detailed in this article.

      ’Violently pushed back’

      “We are Turkish political asylum seekers,” began Ayse Erdogan in a video she sent to a family member.

      “We fled persecution in Turkey and crossed [at] Evros on May 4, at 5 am. We are hiding near Nea Vyssa [on the Greek-Turkey land border] in fear of a push back. We urge the United Nations and Greek authorities to protect us from being pushed back.”

      Ayse, who had crossed the border with friends Kamil and Talip, was picked up by Greek police and taken into custody at a police station in the village of Nea Cheimonio. Hours later, Ayse would be part of a group of migrants that were allegedly violently pushed back to Turkey by Greek police.

      Nea Cheimonio was the last place that Ayse’s family was able to pick up a location signal from her phone.

      The same day, accompanied by a lawyer, Ayse’s twin brother, Ihsan Erdogan, who is a registered asylum seeker in Greece, went to the police station in Nea Cheimonio, based on her last location information. He was told his sister and her friends had never been held there.

      On May 5, Ihsan received a phone call from a family member saying his sister had been imprisoned by a court in the northwestern province of Edirne, over the border in Turkey.

      The relative had spoken to Ayse, who said her Turkish group, along with a number of Syrians, had been handed over to a group of masked men soon after they left the police station in Nea Cheimonio. Greek police, she claimed, seized their belongings including her phone.

      Ihsan rues that his sister was seemingly sent back just before he arrived in Nea Cheimonio. “I urge Greek authorities not to send others like my sister back to prison,” he told Euronews.
      ’Masked men beat us with batons’

      Freshly-graduated as a mathematics teacher, Ayse had spent 28 months in prison over alleged affiliation with the Gulen Movement, an organisation Turkish authorities have outlawed.

      Hundreds of people were arrested in the aftermath of the failed putsch in 2016 and accused of links to US-based Muslim cleric Fethullah Gulen.

      Ayse was not the only political asylum seeker allegedly sent back to Turkey in what appears to be a violation of international asylum law.

      On April 26 this year, at Soufli, a border town near Evros River, a group of 11 people — including three children, a pregnant woman and another one that was disabled — was sent back by masked men after being beaten violently, according to a journalist in the group.

      “Masked men beat us with batons,” said Tugba Ozkan, who is 28 and pregnant. "We are in a very dire situation. We are afraid to be pushed back again. We need help.

      “I had forgotten about my pregnancy,” she added. “I tried to stop Greek police by moving ahead but they pushed me, too. It was unbelievable and unforgettable to see my husband beaten in front of my eyes.”
      No acknowledgement from Athens

      According to the account of the group, the police cooperated with a group of masked men who forced them to return to Turkey. The group managed to cross the border again the next day, only to be detained officially and come face-to-face with a police officer who had pushed them back at Soufli. They were released under the protection of a UNHCR officer on April 30.

      Greek NGOs published reports last year with testimonies from people from various nationalities who were allegedly sent back to Turkey via Evros after being beaten by masked men.

      The UN’s refugee agency (UNHCR) and the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe urged Greek authorities to investigate those reports.

      The claims of violent push back operations at Evros river, however, have never ended. None have been officially acknowledged by Athens.

      Greece police declined to comment after requests by Euronews regarding the latest push back allegations.

      A European Commission spokesman, speaking to Euronews, said that they were aware of the recent push back claims.

      “The Commission expects that the Greek authorities will follow up on the specific allegations and will continue to closely monitor the situation,” he said.

      https://www.euronews.com/2019/05/11/masked-men-beat-us-with-batons-greece-accused-of-violent-asylum-seeker-pus

    • Migrants tortured by Greek police, illegally pushed back to Turkey

      Three migrants allegedly tortured by Greek security forces and illegally pushed back to neighboring Turkey were found by Turkish border units and are being provided medical treatment in northwestern Edirne province.

      Iraqi national Ibrahim Khidir (35) and Egyptian nationals Hassan Mahmoud (18) and Ahmed Samir (26) were found in a rural area, half-naked and exhausted with deep marks from plastic bullets and battering on their bodies. They were taken under protection by soldiers, who gave first aid to the migrants before handing them over to the provincial migration management directorate.

      The migrants told reporters that they crossed into Greece with a group of seven other illegal migrants after making arrangements with human smugglers in Istanbul’s Esenyurt district. They were held by the Greek police at the coach station in the border district of Didymoteicho while trying to travel to Thessaloniki. They were then taken to a local police station, where they spent two days along with 35 other illegal migrants and were denied any food.

      The migrants said they were divided into groups of 10 and boarded boats with two Greek police officers accompanying each and six officers watching guard. They were pushed back to Turkey through the Maritsa River (Meriç in Turkish, or Evros in Greek) forming the border with Greece.

      The violence that began at the police station, which included battering with truncheons, shooting with plastic bullets and electroshocks, continued at the riverside and on the boats.

      Khidir told reporters that Greek security forces captured him in Didymoteicho and tortured him with electroshocks, rear-handcuffing and plastic bullets fired at his body. His clothes and money were taken when he was detained.

      Turkish soldiers treated them very well and took care that they received treatment, according Khidir.

      Mahmoud and Samir also said that they were pushed back to Turkey after being stripped of their clothes and beaten up.

      Under international laws and conventions, Greece is obliged to register any illegal migrants entering its territory; yet, this is not the case for thousands of migrants were forcibly returned to Turkey especially since the beginning of refugee influx into Europe in 2015. Security sources say that accounts of migrants interviewed by Turkish migration authority staff and social workers show that they were subjected to torture, theft and other human rights abuses. Several migrants were also found frozen to death after being left in desolate areas.

      Similar incidents have also taken place on the Aegean, in which migrants and Turkish locals accused the Greek coast guard of deflating their boats or re-routing them back to Turkish territorial waters.

      Turkey and the European Union signed a deal in 2016 to curb illegal immigration through the dangerous Aegean Sea route from Turkey to Greece. Under the deal, Greece sends back migrants held in the Aegean islands they crossed to from nearby Turkish shores and in return, EU countries receive a number of Syrian migrants legally. The deal, reinforced with an escalated crackdown on human smugglers and more patrols in the Aegean, significantly decreased the number of illegal crossings.

      Bulgarian border authorities were also accused of abuses targeting migrants and pushing them back to Turkey in several incidents.

      However, some desperate migrants still take the route across the better-policed land border between Turkey, Greece and Bulgaria, especially in winter months when a safe journey through the Aegean is nearly impossible aboard dinghies.

      https://www.dailysabah.com/turkey/2019/05/30/migrants-tortured-by-greek-police-illegally-pushed-back-to-turkey/amp
      #torture

    • Greece continues to push asylum seekers back to Turkey

      Greek border forces along the Evros River pushed 59 migrants back into Turkey on Friday morning, signaling the continuation of a policy that started before the arrival of the new government.

      The pushback was reported by Zübeyir Koçulu, an Athens-based Turkish journalist who tweeted, “It seems nothing has changed on the Evros regarding pushbacks following a recent government change in Greece.”

      A total of 59 asylum seekers, nine of them Turkish and the remainder Afghans, Syrians and Somalis, were illegally sent back to Turkey, according to Koçulu.

      “The Greek police collected the group soon after their arrival and held them in custody at the Tychero police station for four hours,” he said. “After seizing their phones, security officers pushed the 59 people through the river near Soufli by force, perpetrating violence, according to witnesses.”

      He further claimed that Turkish political asylum seekers in the group were detained by Turkish security forces soon after the pushback. Three children in the group were delivered to their relatives.

      The Evros River, which forms most of the land border between the two countries, was one of the main routes used by Turkish asylum seekers fleeing government persecution as well as migrants of other nationalities until a series of violent pushback operations a few months ago stopped the flow.

      “Ironically, Kyriakos Mitsotakis, the new PM of Greece, fled with his parents into exile in Turkey when he was a year old in 1968 during the Greek junta,” Koçulu said. “He knows what it is to be a migrant from his own experience.”

      https://www.turkishminute.com/2019/07/21/greece-continues-to-push-asylum-seekers-back-to-turkey

    • What is happening on the Greece-Turkey border?

      While migrant camps on the Aegean islands have reached breaking point, and with Turkey threatening to ’open the gates’, migrants continue to arrive in Greece in the hundreds every week. Most come by sea, but in recent months, growing numbers have crossed via the land route across the Evros River. Many claim they are subjected to violent and illegal treatment by authorities at the border.
      Since the deaths of 39 Vietnamese migrants smuggled by lorry into the UK, there have been many more reports of migrants stowing away in trucks and vans. The latest group of 41 people hiding in a truck crossing from Turkey into northern Greece were reportedly mostly Afghan men between the ages of 20 and 30. Some reports said they were in danger of suffocation when they were discovered.

      On the Greek-Turkish border, smugglers are regularly caught transporting migrants in minibuses or trucks. There are mixed reports about how many people cross via this border. According to the UN migration agency, IOM, the number has risen steadily in recent months – from 255 arrivals in May to 1,233 in September.

      While the focus remains on the overcrowded migrant camps on the Aegean islands, which have seen a much bigger surge in arrivals during the same period, there has been less attention given to what is happening on the land border.

      ’Brutal treatment’

      There have been reports of violence and illegal activities by some Greek authorities against migrants crossing the Evros river since as early as mid-2017. These have included claims that migrants have been arrested, beaten up, robbed, detained, and forcibly returned or “pushed back” into Turkey.

      Dorothee Vakalis from Naomi, a refugee aid organization in Thessaloniki, says migrants continue to be subjected to “brutal treatment” by authorities at the border. “Everything gets taken away from them, phones, money, sometimes clothing as well. They are sent back to the other side practically naked,” she said on German radio on Tuesday. “We hear from relatives about families with small children, pregnant women being pushed back,” Vakalis said.

      Beaten by masked men

      According to an account of a case in April reported in Euronews, men wearing masks beat several migrants with batons before sending them back. In the group was a 28-year-old pregnant woman, Tugba Ozkan. “I had forgotten about my pregnancy,” Ozkan told Euronews. “I tried to stop Greek police by moving ahead but they pushed me, too. It was unbelievable and unforgettable to see my husband beaten in front of my eyes.”

      InfoMigrants was also in contact last year with a Kurdish couple who said they were locked in a small dark room with many others before being taken by masked commandos back across the border into Turkey.

      It is not clear who is carrying out the push backs, because they often wear masks and cannot be easily identified. The Hellenic League for Human Rights (HLHR) and Human Rights Watch describe them as paramilitaries. Eyewitnesses interviewed by Human Rights Watch said people who “looked like police officers or soldiers, as well as some unidentified masked men, carried handguns, handcuffs, radios, spray cans, and batons,” and others carried gear such as “armored gloves, binoculars and knives and military-grade weapons such as rifles.”

      The HLHR has suggested that the Greek police are either unaware of the existence of these paramilitaries or they turn a blind eye to them. According to Human Rights Watch, accounts suggest "close and consistent coordination “between police and unidentified men.” ..."Commanding officers knew, or ought to have known, what was happening," HRW’s report claims.

      Calls for investigation

      The Greek Refugee Council and other NGOs published a report in 2018 containing testimonies from people who said they had been beaten, sometimes by masked men, and sent back to Turkey. The UNHCR and the European Human Rights Commissioner have called on Greece to investigate the claims. Late last year another report by Human Rights Watch also based on testimonies of migrants, said that violent push backs were continuing.

      Turkey has also urged Greece to stop the practice of push backs. The Turkish foreign ministry recently claimed that a total of 25,404 irregular migrants were pushed back to Turkey in the first month of this year, according to the IPA news service. Turkey says it has evidence that the push backs are occurring and has invited the Greek government to “work on correcting the policy.” Greece has not acknowledged that violent push backs are occurring.

      According to some of the testimonies in the report by the Greek Refugee Council, Turkey is also responsible for carrying out push backs of Syrian and Iraqi single men.

      I believe these illegal push backs are not even known about or discussed in Europe or in Germany.
      _ Dorothee Vakalis, humanitarian worker with ’Naomi’ in Thessaloniki

      The European Commission spokesperson Natasha Bertaud has confirmed that the Commission contacted Greek authorities about reports of alleged push backs earlier this year. “The Commission expects that Greek authorities will follow up on the specific allegations and will continue to monitor the situation closely,” Bertaud said.

      Legal returns and illegal push backs

      The Evros River runs along 194 km of the 206 km of land border between the EU and Turkey. This border is not covered by the so-called EU-Turkey Statement, the agreement signed between Turkey and Europe in 2016 which allows the return to Turkey of Syrian migrants who arrive irregularly in Greece by sea.

      The land border was covered by a separate bilateral migrant readmission deal between Turkey and Greece. Turkey canceled that agreement last June because Greece refused to hand over several Turkish officers who escaped to Greece after Turkey‘s failed military coup in 2016.

      Push backs are prohibited by Greek and EU law, as well as international treaties and agreements, including the Geneva Convention on Refugees, which guarantees the right to seek protection. They go against the principle of non-refoulement, which means the forcible return of a person to a country where they are liable to be subject to persecution.

      https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/20626/what-is-happening-on-the-greece-turkey-border
      #statistiques #chiffres

    • Griechenland soll 60.000 Migranten illegal abgeschoben haben

      Menschenrechtler und die Türkei beschuldigen Griechenland, Migranten und Flüchtlinge illegal abzuschieben. Türkische Dokumente, die dem SPIEGEL vorliegen, sollen die Anschuldigungen belegen.

      Am 3. November 2019 greift die die türkische Polizei 252 Migranten in der Nähe des Grenzübergangs Kapikule auf. Danach wird sie einen brisanten Aktenvermerk anfertigen: Die Migranten hätten es über die Grenze nach Griechenland geschafft, schreiben die türkischen Beamten später in ihrem Bericht. Aber dann seien sie gegen ihren Willen zurückgebracht worden, ohne Chance auf einen Asylantrag.

      „Push-Backs“ nennen sich diese illegalen Rückführungen von Migranten und Flüchtlingen. Sie sind nach europäischem und internationalem Recht verboten. Dieses schreibt den Staaten vor, potenziellen Asylbewerbern den Zugang zu einem effektiven Asylverfahren zu gewähren.

      Seit Jahren beschuldigen Menschenrechtsorganisationen und Anwälte griechische Behörden, Migranten am Grenzfluss Evros illegal in die Türkei abzuschieben. Der SPIEGEL hat nun türkische Dokumente erhalten, darunter auch die Aufzeichnungen der Polizisten über den Vorfall am 3. November. Diese legen nahe, dass Griechenland im großen Stil illegale Push-Backs an der Grenze zur Türkei durchführt.

      Harte Anschuldigungen gegen Griechenland

      In der Migrationspolitik liegen die Türkei und Griechenland schon lange im Clinch, Anfang November erreichte der Konflikt zwischen den Erzrivalen einen neuen Höhepunkt: Das türkische Außenministerium beschuldigte die griechischen Behörden, Flüchtlinge verhaftet, sie geschlagen, ihre Kleider geraubt, Habseligkeiten beschlagnahmt und sie dann in die Türkei zurückgeschickt zu haben. „Wir haben Fotos und Dokumente“, fügte das Ministerium hinzu.

      Der griechische Premierminister Kyriakos Mitsotakis reagierte knapp. „Diejenigen, die die Flüchtlingskrise ausgenutzt haben, indem sie die Verfolgten als Spielball für ihre eigenen geopolitischen Ziele benutzt haben, sollten vorsichtiger sein, wenn sie sich auf Griechenland beziehen.“

      Mehr als 58.000 Push-Backs in einem Jahr

      Das türkische Material umfasst Fallberichte und Interviewprotokolle. Zudem Fotos, die angeblich Migranten zeigen sollen, die von griechischen Behörden misshandelt wurden. Dazu enthält es bisher unveröffentlichte Daten, die vom türkischen Innenministerium zusammengestellt wurden.

      Diesen Daten zufolge hat Griechenland in den zwölf Monaten vor dem 1. November 2019 insgesamt 58.283 Migranten zurückgeschafft. Die meisten registrierten Fälle betrafen pakistanische Staatsangehörige (16.435), gefolgt von Afghanen, Somaliern, Bangladeschern und Algeriern. Dazu kommen mehr als 4.500 Syrer.

      Dem Dokument nach lag die Zahl der gemeldeten Push-Backs allein im Oktober bei mehr als 6.500. Ein endgültiger Beweis sind die Dokumente nicht, die Anschuldigungen der Migranten lassen sich nicht unabhängig verifizieren. Und Griechenland bestreitet die Vorwürfe. Allerdings stimmen sie mit ähnlichen Berichten von Menschenrechtsorganisationen überein. Die Menge der Zeugenaussagen verschärft die Zweifel an den griechischen Unschuldsbeteuerungen.

      Die am 3. November festgenommenen Asylbewerber wurden nach türkischen Angaben später von der türkischen Polizei befragt und in ein Abschiebezentrum in Edirne gebracht, die Stadt liegt etwa 10 Kilometer von der Grenze entfernt. Alle bis auf die Syrer würden in ihre Herkunftsländer zurückgeschickt, erklärte ein türkischer Beamter. Die Syrer würden an den türkischen Ort zurückgebracht, an dem sie sich zuerst registriert hätten.

      Beraubt, eingesperrt, zurückgebracht: Die Geschichte eines Syrers

      Einer der acht Syrer, die am 3. November von der türkischen Polizei verhaftet worden sind, gibt an, mit seiner Frau vier Jahre zuvor aus Aleppo geflohen zu sein. So geht es aus der Abschrift des Interviews hervor. Zunächst habe der studierte Jurist demnach als Kassierer in Istanbul gearbeitet. Dann habe er „aus wirtschaftlichen Gründen“ beschlossen, nach Griechenland zu gehen.

      Mit einem Schmuggler überquerte der Syrer die Grenze, in der griechischen Stadt Alexandroupolis schließlich stellten er und seine Frau sich der Polizei, um Asyl zu beantragen. Stattdessen seien allerdings ihre Besitztümer beschlagnahmt, sie selbst in eine Zelle gesteckt worden. Laut Interviewabschrift wurden die beiden Syrer zwei Tage später von der griechischen Polizei zusammen mit anderen Migranten zurückgebracht.

      14 Polizisten sollen die Gruppe zum Fluss Evros begleitet haben, auf 150 Kilometern markiert er die natürliche Grenze zwischen den beiden Ländern. Anschließend hätten zwei Polizisten das Paar in einem Boot zurück auf die türkische Seite befördert.

      Griechisch-türkisches Grenzgebiet

      In letzter Zeit würden vermehrt Migranten zurückgebracht, nachdem sie mit Booten den Evros überquert hätten, heißt es in dem Bericht der türkischen Behörden. So gibt der Gouverneur von Edirne in einem Schreiben vom 29. Oktober an das türkische Innenministerium an, dass zwischen Anfang Januar und Ende September insgesamt 91.681 illegale Migranten in seiner Provinz aufgegriffen worden seien.

      Dies sei ein dramatischer Anstieg im Vergleich zu den knapp 30.000 Festgenommenen im Jahr 2016. Laut türkischen Behörden gaben mehr als 55 Prozent der festgenommenen Migranten an, es nach Griechenland geschafft zu haben, aber trotzdem zurückgebracht worden zu sein.

      Die Zahl spiegelt den erhöhten Druck an den Außengrenzen Europas wider. Seit dem Frühsommer steigt die Zahl der Migranten, die auf den griechischen Inseln in der Ägäis ankommen. In den vergangenen Monaten versuchen auch wieder deutlich mehr Migranten, den Evros auf illegalem Weg zu überqueren. Nach den Daten des UNHCR kamen 2018 über den Evros mehr als 18.000 Migranten in die EU - ein Anstieg von 173 Prozent gegenüber 2017.

      Die Überquerung des reißenden Grenzflusses ist gefährlich, immer wieder endet sie tödlich. Die Route hat aber auch Vorteile: Wer es unerkannt über den Fluss schafft, wird nicht wie auf den griechischen Ägäis-Inseln unter unmenschlichen Bedingungen in ein Lager gepfercht. Zudem liegt die Region viel näher an der Balkan-Route, die von Nordgriechenland nach Mittel- und Nordeuropa führt und wieder verstärkt genutzt wird.

      Die griechischen Behörden weisen die türkischen Vorwürfe zurück. Es gebe keine Push-Backs, teilte ein Sprecher des griechischen Ministeriums für Bürgerschutz auf Anfrage mit. Bisher haben griechische Behörden nur wenige der Beschwerden überprüft - und fanden demnach keine Beweise für Fehlverhalten.

      Nicht nur türkische Behörden sprechen allerdings von systematischen illegalen Abschiebungen: Menschenrechtler werfen Griechenland und anderen europäischen Staaten an der Außengrenze schon seit Jahren Push-Backs vor und dokumentieren diese. Auch in der griechischen und internationalen Presse wird immer wieder über einzelne Vorfälle berichtet (lesen Sie hier einen SPIEGEL-Bericht). Der Europarat spricht von „glaubwürdigen Anschuldigungen“, und auch das Flüchtlingshilfswerk der Uno zeigte sich bereits besorgt.

      Die Menschenrechtskommissarin des Europarates, Dunja Mijatovic, erklärte auf SPIEGEL-Anfrage, dass in den letzten Jahren sowohl in der Türkei als auch in Griechenland illegale Abschiebungen dokumentiert worden seien - und mahnte eine menschlichere Migrationspolitik an.

      https://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/griechenland-soll-zehntausende-migranten-illegal-in-die-tuerkei-abgeschoben-

      #renvois #expulsions #réfugiés #asile #migrations #Turquie #Grèce #push-back #refoulement #refoulements

    • Greece illegally deported 60,000 migrants to Turkey: report

      Greece illegally deported 60,000 migrants to Turkey, documents released by Turkey reportedly show. The process involves returning asylum seekers without assessing their status.

      Greece illegally deported about 60,000 migrants to Turkey between 2017 and 2018, according to a report on the online news portal of weekly German magazine Spiegel, published on Wednesday evening.

      Turkey is accusing Greece of not properly dealing with the asylum status of migrants. Instead, Turkish Interior Ministry files claim that Greece illegally transported 58,283 people to Turkey in the 12 month period leading up to November 1, 2018.

      Greece is disputing the accusations, with Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsokasis saying Ankara was playing games: “Those people who have used the refugee crisis to their own ends should be more careful when dealing with Greece.”

      A Greek Foreign Ministry spokesman told German news agency dpa that Athens had denied similar accusations “many times” already.

      This so-called “push back” of asylum seekers is illegal under European and international law. The state is obliged to assess the asylum status of new migrants rather than sending them to another country.

      Where were the migrants from?

      According to the Turkish documents, the largest proportion of migrants sent away from Greece were Pakistani, with large numbers from Somalia, Algeria and Bangladesh. 4,500 were Syrians.

      Turkish officials said they sent back most of the people back to their countries of origin except for the Syrians, who were sent back to the Turkish town where they originally registered as refugees.

      The governor of the Turkish-Greek border region of Edirne reported that over 90,000 migrants were arrested between January and September 2019, a big increase from the 30,000 arrested in the same region in 2016.

      https://www.dw.com/en/greece-illegally-deported-60000-migrants-to-turkey-report/a-51234698?maca=en-Twitter-sharing

    • Thousands of ’illegal’ Syrians and other migrants ejected from Istanbul

      Turkey says it has expelled nearly 50,000 migrants from Istanbul, including more than 6,000 Syrians. The government says the migrants were in the city illegally and will be made to leave Turkey.
      The Istanbul governor’s office said on Friday that 42,888 “illegal” migrants had been arrested and sent to repatriation centers, to be removed later from Turkey. It said 6,416 Syrians had been placed in “temporary refugee centers.”

      A campaign from July through to the end of October was aimed at reducing the number of unregistered refugees in Turkey’s biggest city. The country hosts about 3.6 million Syrians — more than any other country.

      Syrians who are registered in Turkey are given “temporary protection”, as the Turkish government does not offer them formal refugee status. Under the system, the Syrians have to stay in the province to which they were initially assigned, and can only visit other cities with short-term passes.

      In July, officials said that 547,000 Syrians were officially registered in Istanbul, and that no new registrations were being accepted. Interior Minister Suleyman Soylu said at the time that the aim was to expel 80,000 undocumented migrants by the end of the year.

      •••• ➤ Watch: Syrian refugees not ready to go home

      Public sentiment in Turkey towards Syrian refugees has worsened in recent years. The Turkish government wants to settle some of them in an area it now controls in northeast Syria, after it launched an offensive last month against the Kurdish YPG militia.

      Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch last month published reports saying Turkey was forcibly sending Syrian refugees to northern Syria. Turkey’s foreign ministry called the claims in the reports “false and imaginary.”

      https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/20903/thousands-of-illegal-syrians-and-other-migrants-ejected-from-istanbul

    • Refugees ‘tortured and beaten by Greek soldiers’ before being sent back to Turkey

      Bruised and bandaged, a group of refugees show off the injuries they claim were caused by Greek soldiers. One says he was blindfolded and burnt with a cigarette while another said his foot ended up broken in several places. A third migrant claims the authorities confiscated his money and clothes while others say they have been hit over the head with sticks. Their allegations form part of a growing number of complaints made against Greek soldiers at the border with Turkey. In the past year, hundreds of people claim to have been tortured and abused before being physically pushed back over the border.

      Under international law, Greece is obliged to register any illegal immigrant that enters its territory. But Turkey claims they forcibly reject them and this year alone they allege Greece returned some 25,404 undocumented migrants. That figure has not been independently verified but there are allegations of severe abuse, which includes withholding food and water. Musaddiq Javed from Pakistan was one of 30 men who entered Greece last week on foot. He said the group were arrested as they walked towards #Xanthi but the police handed them over to Greek soldiers who allegedly ripped the Turkish liras they found on them. He recalled: ‘The soldiers brought me in a room and blindfolded me. They then burned my hand with a cigarette and kicked my feet.’

      Muhammad Nainiya from Morocco added: ‘They brought us near a river and put us on a boat and hit our heads with sticks.’ He said they were made to walk back into Turkey and eventually reached a village where local residents gave them clothes. Muhammed added: ‘The doctor told me that I had three broken bones on my foot and that it would need surgery. I had the surgery and stayed in the hospital for a week.’ The men are now staying at a refugee centre in Turkey after receiving medical treatment while the Greek authorities have yet to comment on the claims.

      Greece is struggling with the number of refugees on both the mainland and the islands. It has camps on five Aegean islands (Lesbos, Chios, Samos, Kos and Leros) with an official capacity of 6,178 people. Two days ago it was holding 35,590 men, women and children in unsanitary and dangerous conditions. The Greek government has pledged a crackdown and plans to convert the refugee camps into detention centres. Human rights groups say it would make it easier for Greece to detain asylum seekers for longer and scrap protections for already vulnerable people. Turkey and the EU signed a refugee deal in March 2016 which aimed to discourage irregular migration through the Aegean Sea. People arriving by boat to the Greek islands were to be returned to Turkey in exchange for EU nations to take Syrian refugees from Turkey.

      https://metro.co.uk/2019/11/26/refugees-tortured-beaten-greek-soldiers-sent-back-turkey-11223565/?ito=article.desktop.share.top.twitter

    • Illegal push-backs in Evros. Evidence of human rights abuses at the Greece/Turkey border


      https://static1.squarespace.com/static/597473fe9de4bb2cc35c376a/t/5dcd1da2fefabc596320f228/1573723568483/Illegal+Evros+pushbacks+Report_Mobile+Info+Team_final.pdf
      #Mobile_Info_Team

      Résumé ici:

      Mobile Info Team have published a new report on pushbacks from Greece to Turkey in the Evros region. They have been gathering data since August 2018 and have brought together 27 testimonies from people who have experienced this illegal practice.

      The procedure is similar in all cases. Firstly, arrest and capture by Greek police inside Greek territory, then detention and confiscation of personal property, followed by coordinated handoffs/transfers to authorities and finally, collective expulsion across the Evros River in small boats.

      The violent practices of Greek police are of critical concern. Established legal procedures stipulate that Greek police would meet asylum seekers on Greek land, escort them to police stations, take their personal data and register their requests for asylum. Their reported actions however ranged from complicit handovers to unidentified ‘commando’ groups, to perpetrating acts of violence and theft themselves.

      Many of the testimonies are deeply disturbing, although all pushbacks are illegal regardless of whether an individual or group is subjected to violence. Often people reported the deprivation of food and water, theft of property, detention in dirty and cramped spaces, unprovoked violent beatings and even electric shocks.

      https://medium.com/are-you-syrious/ays-daily-digest-27-11-19-evros-pushbacks-report-human-rights-abuses-at-gree

    • Έξι Μετανάστες Πέθαναν Από το Κρύο στον Έβρο

      Μια νέα θανάσιμη διαδρομή ανησυχεί τις Αρχές, ενώ οι ροές στον Έβρο αυξάνονται.

      Έξι μετανάστες βρέθηκαν νεκροί από το κρύο στον Έβρο, σε διάστημα 48 ωρών. Είναι η πρώτη φορά που καταγράφεται αντίστοιχος αριθμός θανάτων από υποθερμία, σε τόσο μικρό διάστημα. Επιπλέον, τα σημεία όπου εντοπίστηκαν τα τέσσερα από τα έξι θύματα, μαρτυρά ότι οι άνθρωποι που περνούν τον Έβρο και κατευθύνονται προς την ενδοχώρα επιλέγουν μια νέα διαδρομή, που ακολουθεί παράλληλα τα ελληνο-βουλγαρικά σύνορα και αποδεικνύεται θανάσιμη λόγω του άγριου εδάφους και των εξαιρετικά χαμηλών θερμοκρασιών.

      Το VICE πληροφορείται ότι οι έξι νεκροί μετανάστες βρέθηκαν στη διάρκεια του Σαββατοκύριακου, σε διαφορετικά σημεία. Πρόκειται για τέσσερις άντρες και δύο γυναίκες. Δεν υπάρχει κανένα στοιχείο για την ταυτότητά τους, καθώς δεν είχαν έγγραφα. Οι δύο γυναίκες είναι αφρικανικής καταγωγής, ενώ η ηλικία των θυμάτων εκτιμάται μεταξύ 18 και 30 ετών.

      Τα δύο πρώτα θύματα βρέθηκαν κοντά στο ποτάμι, σε χωράφι έξω από το χωριό Γεμιστή. Οι υπόλοιποι τέσσερις άνθρωποι, όμως, εντοπίστηκαν πολύ μακριά από τον Έβρο. Πιο ειδικά, δύο στο 17ο χιλιόμετρο της επαρχιακής οδού Μεγάλου Δέρειου-Σαπών και δύο έξω από το χωριό Κόρυμβος. Οι Αρχές προσπαθούν να διαπιστώσουν αν οι τέσσερις νεκροί στον ορεινό όγκο ήταν στην ίδια ομάδα που είχε περάσει τον Έβρο.

      Οι τελευταίοι θάνατοι, αλλά και μαρτυρίες ανθρώπων που κατάφεραν να φθάσουν στη Θεσσαλονίκη, αποκαλύπτουν ότι υπάρχει μια νέα διαδρομή μεταναστών. Προσπαθώντας να αποφύγουν την Εγνατία Οδό και τους ελέγχους της Αστυνομίας, οι μετανάστες περνούν το ποτάμι και κατευθύνονται στον ορεινό όγκο πίσω από το Σουφλί. Έπειτα, περπατούν κατά μήκος των ελληνο-βουλγαρικών συνόρων, ακολουθώντας χωμάτινους δρόμους και τις οδηγίες διακινητών που λαμβάνουν μέσω στιγμάτων στο GPS. Εκτός από τις οδηγίες, δεν έχει διαπιστωθεί φυσική παρουσία διακινητών κατά μήκος της διαδρομής, αναφέρουν πηγές.

      Οι μετανάστες θέλουν να φθάσουν στην Κομοτηνή και από εκεί να πάρουν το λεωφορείο για τη Θεσσαλονίκη. Το ταξίδι με τα πόδια από τον Έβρο ως την Κομοτηνή, μπορεί να διαρκέσει ως και επτά μέρες, ανάλογα με τις καιρικές συνθήκες. Η απότομη αλλαγή του καιρού και η σφοδρή κακοκαιρία που έπληξε την περιοχή, φαίνεται ότι ευθύνονται για τους μαζικούς θανάτους των τελευταίων ημερών, σε συνδυασμό με το γεγονός ότι στο βουνό δεν υπάρχουν σημάδια για να ακολουθήσουν.

      Όσοι μετανάστες επιλέγουν την παραπάνω διαδρομή, επιθυμούν να συνεχίσουν βόρεια προς την Ευρώπη, χωρίς να καταγραφούν στην Ελλάδα. Υπάρχει κάτι ακόμη. Άνθρωποι που περπάτησαν κατά μήκος των ελληνο-βουλγαρικών συνόρων ανέφεραν ότι έπεσαν θύματα ληστείας από αγνώστους, που φορούσαν ρούχα παραλλαγής, όπως περιέγραψαν. Σε μια περίπτωση, τους άρπαξαν χρήματα και κινητά. Σε μια δεύτερη, γυναίκα από το Ιράν ανέφερε ότι τους άφησαν να συνεχίσουν, επειδή εκείνη τους μίλησε στα τούρκικα, στοιχείο που δείχνει πιθανή εμπλοκή ατόμων από τα μειονοτικά χωριά.

      Όλα αυτά συμβαίνουν, ενώ οι ροές στον Έβρο αυξάνονται και η κυβέρνηση σχεδιάζει να λάβει επιπλέον μέτρα για την ανάσχεσή τους, μεταξύ αυτών την επέκταση του φράχτη που υπάρχει από το 2012 στο μοναδικό χερσαίο τμήμα των συνόρων. Ο φράχτης έχει μήκος 12 χιλιόμετρα και εκ του αποτελέσματος απλώς μετάφερε τα περάσματα προς τα νότια, σε άλλα σημεία του ποταμού. Στον σχεδιασμό της κυβέρνησης περιλαμβάνεται επίσης η δημιουργία μιας δεύτερης ζώνης ελέγχου στην Εγνατία Οδό, καθώς και η ανάπτυξη των ηλεκτρονικών μέσων με τα οποία ελέγχονται τα περάσματα στον Έβρο.

      https://www.vice.com/gr/article/a355mk/e3i-metanastes-pagwsan-kai-pe8anan-apo-to-krio-ston-ebro

      –----------

      Source : un tweet de Bruno Tersago :

      Bodies of 6 #refugees/#migrants found near #Evros river (border #Greece/#Turkey). Aged between 18 and 30. Apparently frozen to death.

      https://twitter.com/BrunoTersago/status/1204405077936627717

      #décès #morts #mourir_de_froid

    • Six migrants retrouvés morts de froid à la frontière gréco-turque

      Six migrants ont été retrouvés morts de froid ces derniers jours dans la région de l’Evros, à la frontière entre la Grèce et la Turquie, a annoncé mardi Pavlos Pavlidis, le médecin légiste de l’hôpital d’Alexandroupoli en charge des autopsies.

      Les six migrants, deux femmes africaines et quatre hommes dont les âges étaient évalués de 18 à 30 ans, sont morts d’hypothermie entre jeudi et dimanche derniers, a précisé à la presse le médecin légiste. Aucun document d’identité n’a été retrouvé sur ces migrants, rendant le processus d’identification complexe. La région frontalière de l’Evros séparant la Grèce de la Turquie est un lieu de passage privilégié par les passeurs depuis la signature de l’accord UE-Turquie en 2016 et le renforcement des patrouilles navales en mer Égée.

      Malgré un mur de 12 km de long à la frontière gréco-turque, les trafiquants ont trouvé des points de passage pour les migrants, situés au sud des barbelés. Le gouvernement grec a annoncé en novembre l’embauche de 400 gardes-frontières dans la région de l’Evros et le renforcement de la surveillance à la frontière avec des radars infrarouges. La traversée de la rivière est particulièrement dangereuse. De nombreux migrants ont été retrouvés noyés ces dernières années. Des réseaux de passeurs entassent également souvent des dizaines de migrants dans des voitures, conduites à grande vitesse pour échapper aux contrôles policiers, entraînant des accidents fréquents.

      Début novembre, quarante-et-un migrants ont été découverts vivants, cachés dans un camion frigorifique intercepté sur une autoroute du nord de la Grèce. Pour la première fois depuis 2016, la Grèce est redevenue cette année la principale porte d’entrée des demandeurs d’asile en Europe. Le flux migratoire via les îles de la mer Egée face à la Turquie reste le plus important avec plus de 55000 arrivées en 2019 selon le HCR, l’Agence des Nations unies pour les réfugiés. Mais les arrivées via la frontière terrestre avec la Turquie sont en augmentation depuis 2018. En 2019, plus de 14000 personnes ont emprunté ce chemin périlleux selon le HCR.

      https://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/six-migrants-retrouves-morts-de-froid-a-la-frontiere-greco-turque-20191210

    • Statement: Four Push-Back Operations at the Greek-Turkish Land Border Witnessed by the Alarm Phone

      The Alarm Phone witnessed four illegal push-back operations at the Greek-Turkish land border over the course of ten days.

      CASE 1: The first case occurred on Saturday the 30th of June 2018. In the early morning, we had been informed about a group of people along the Turkish-Greek land border that was in need of support. Five of them were from Syria, five from Sierra Leone, six men, two women, and two children. We contacted the travellers, received their GPS position, and notified the police to their whereabouts, as the travellers had asked us to do. The police confirmed to us that they would search for them. Hours later, in the early afternoon, one of the members of the group told us that she was on her way back to Istanbul. She informed us about what had happened to them: At around 9am local time, they had been found by Greek officers in blue & black uniforms. Their belongings was taken away, and at least 5 of them were forced back to Turkey. They had not taken any pictures as their phones had been taken away. Our contact person had been able to hide her phone. They were kept in confinement for about one hour and treated badly, “like dogs” she said, before being forced onto a boat that returned them illegally to Turkey.

      CASE 2: On Thursday the 5th of July, the second push-back operation was observed by the Alarm Phone. We had received a distress call from a group of Syrian, Iraqi, Yemeni and Sudanese migrants who had crossed into Greece seeking international protection. The group was found by the Greek police. The police handed the group to Greek officers who did not hesitate to use violence and intimidation. They were beaten, robbed, and forced onto a boat that returned them to Turkish territory.

      CASE 3: In the night of 5th-6th of July 2018, a group of 12 people from Syria and Iraq, including two women, one of whom was elderly, two children (six and eleven years old), and eight men, was reportedly apprehended on Greek soil near Mikrochori in Evros region and pushed back to Turkey. It remains unclear what happened to them upon return to Turkey.

      CASE 4: In the night of 9th-10th of July 2018, 19 people from Syria and Iraq, including a one-year-old child, a pregnant woman and a man with a broken leg, were reportedly pushed-back from Greece to Turkey at the land border in Evros. They arrived on 9th July and had sent a SOS-call to the Alarm Phone. The first GPS coordinates received showed their position near Filakto. The group said they had sick kids with them and they were very hungry. A second set of GPS coordinates sent showed them at a position near Provatonas. Communications with the group broke down in the afternoon and only in the late morning of the next day, the group answered again – now from Turkey. They reported that ‘the police’ had found them around 5pm on the 9th of July. They brought them to a place the migrants described as ‘a prison’. At 10pm, the officers allegedly wearing blue trousers and camouflage sweaters, told the group that they would be moved to a camp so that they could apply for international protection. However, instead, they brought them back to the river. There, according to one testimony, the men of the group were beaten. Their belongings such as phones, money, passports and the food for the infant were taken away. They were then put onto a boat at the river and were threatened not to come back to Greece again.

      Reacting to our questions concerning cases 3 and 4, the Greek police stated that they had not found anyone at the positions we had provided them with.

      The Alarm Phone, when receiving distress calls from groups in the Evros border region who report to have persons among them with special needs, such as pregnant women, people with disabilities, toddlers and infants, elderly or sick, informs the respective authorities (Greek and /or Turkish) upon request of the people in need. In these four cases, GPS positions shared with us showed clearly locations on Greek soil. Despite this fact and despite many requests for assistance made toward the responsible authorities, the people ended up back in Turkey. Instead of getting access to protection in Greece as requested in their calls for help and their claims to asylum, they were returned to a place where they stated they would be in danger.

      The Alarm Phone is very concerned about repeated testimonies of illegal push-backs at the Greek-Turkish land border. We demand respect for the people’s human rights and dignity, as well as for the international law, which is clearly beached in such push-back operations.

      https://alarmphone.org/en/2018/07/06/four-push-back-operations-at-the-greek-turkish-land-border-witnessed-by-

    • The Turkish Woman Who Fled Her Country only To Get Sent Back

      #Ayşe_Erdoğan was persecuted in Turkey as an alleged follower of the Gülen movement. The young teacher fled to Greece to seek refuge. This is how she wound up back in a Turkish prison.

      As Ayşe Erdoğan reached for her mobile phone to film herself, she was already aware of the risk she was facing. She had managed to cross over into Greece from Turkey, meaning she had made it to Europe. But she still wasn’t home free.

      On the morning of May 4, 2019, Erdoğan, a 28-year-old math teacher from Turkey, hid near the Greek village of Nea Vyssa. Accompanied by two Turkish traveling companions, she had succeeded in crossing the Evros, a wild river that forms a natural border between the two countries but whose current is so strong that it often sweeps migrants away to their deaths.

      Erdoğan, who bears no relation to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, had been sentenced to more than six years in prison in Turkey. Authorities there had accused her of belonging to the sect of the Islamist cleric Fethullah Gülen, which Ankara considers a terrorist organization. Erdoğan was allowed to leave prison until the start of her appeal, but only under the condition that she remain in Turkey.

      Shortly after her release, she fled. She traveled to the north to reach Europe, just as thousands of other Turks who are persecuted as Gülen supporters have done.

      Erdoğan wanted to file an application for political asylum. The Turkish national wanted to exercise the right the European Union grants to every individual who reaches European soil — at least in theory.

      “We are Turkish political asylum-seekers,” Erdoğan said in one video she recorded on her phone. “We fled persecution back in Turkey. We are hiding near Nea Vyssa in fear of pushback.” She sent the videos to her brother Ihsan, who was already in Athens. A journalist later posted the video on Twitter, and the Greek daily Kathimerini also reported on her case.

      Using WhatsApp, Erdoğan sent her location to her brother. She also sent emails to Greek human rights lawyers and the head of the UNHCR, the UN refugee agency. “If we push back to Turkey, our life will be in danger,” she wrote.

      That same day, Erdoğan was taken back across the Evros. Turkish border officials apprehended her and the two Turkish nationals traveling with her the next morning at 8:10 a.m. and put them in jail. A court convicted Erdoğan the next day for violating the terms of her parole by leaving the country.

      For the first time, Forensic Architecture, a research agency based at Goldsmiths College at the University of London, has reconstructed the precise events in the hours leading up to Erdoğan’s capture. DER SPIEGEL also interviewed the brother and Ayşe Erdoğan’s lawyers in addition to reviewing Turkish court documents.

      The data and documents lead to just one conclusion: Ayşe Erdoğan had made it to Greece and was in the hands of Greek authorities before she was returned to Turkey. These were presumably Greek border guards or police. Erdoğan herself claims to have been picked up at a Greek police station by masked men.

      Responding to a request for comment from DER SPIEGEL, the Greek police stated that they "always comply with Greek and European law in the performance of their duties.” Officials would not comment on the specific case in question. Back in December, DER SPIEGEL and Forensic Architecture analyzed videos showing how the illegal pushbacks along the Evros apparently take place: Masked men speaking with Greek accents are seen taking people who have fled to Greece across to the Turkish side of the Evros in motorized dinghies. Refugees who claim they were pushed back also say they were abused and that their mobile phones were rendered unusable.

      All available evidence suggests that the Greek authorities are carrying out systematic pushbacks. DER SPIEGEL has previously reported on Turkish documents which suggest that Greece is illegally deporting tens of thousands of migrants and refugees. Following the revelations, the European Commission demanded an investigation into the accusations, though this has yet to happen.

      The only person who has followed up on the pushback allegations is the Greek ombudsman, the agency responsible for independently monitoring the country’s authorities. The agency opened a general investigation into the issue in June 2017. It is now investigating more than half a dozen cases, including the videos published by DER SPIEGEL.

      However, the Greek authorities have expressed little interest in the videos. A police spokesman told DER SPIEGEL in January: “There won’t be any investigation because there are no pushbacks on the Evros.”

      But Ayşe Erdoğan’s case suggests it is very likely that this statement isn’t true. It underscores suspicions that Greek border officials are deporting even Turkish asylum-seekers without granting them any asylum procedures, even though these people are the subject of political persecution in their home country.

      The pushbacks violate international law, European Union law as well as Greek law, since every refugee has the right to fair asylum proceedings. Moreover, those who apply for asylum cannot be sent back to countries where they could be in danger or threatened with persecution. That, however, appears to be exactly what happened to Erdoğan.

      The fact that Erdoğan repeatedly shared her location with her brother on WhatsApp and took a selfie together with the two people accompanying her in the village center of Nea Vyssa has been helpful in the effort to reconstruct events. A government building can be seen in the photo, including its logo. Another lawyer, Nikolaos Ouzounidis, met with the group in Nea Vyssa and also took a photo of them.

      In collaboration with the Greek NGO HumanRights360, Forensic Architecture analyzed the photos, videos, WhatsApp messages, emails, court files and police reports. Among other steps, the agency compared the photos to images from Google Earth. This made it possible to verify that Erdoğan had, in fact, entered Greece before her arrest.

      There is no doubt that Ayşe and the two accompanying her had been in Nea Vyssa that day. “I saw them with my own eyes,” said Ouzounidis.

      Erdoğan contacted the police station in Nea Vyssa, near the Turkish border, to apply for asylum. But Greek police brought them to a police station in Neo Cheimonio, a town 18 kilometers (11 miles) south of Nea Vyssa. This is evidenced in Erdoğan’s WhatsApp locations and her testimony in court, which has been obtained by DER SPIEGEL.

      Ouzounidis tried to speak to Erdoğan at the police station twice — first on his own and later with her brother, Ihsan, who had come from Athens. Both times, police informed the lawyer that no one with that name was being held at the station. Officially, at least, there was never any arrest or charges filed.

      At 6:53 p.m., Erdoğan once again shared her location with her brother on WhatsApp, with the pin pointing to the police station. It would be the last message that Ayşe Erdoğan would send from Greece.

      “I thought Ayşe was safe,” said Ihsan Erdoğan. “But they just brushed us off at the police station.” Ihsan found out the next day from his parents that his sister had been deported to Turkey and arrested there.

      The Turkish court documents provide details about how Erdoğan experienced her pushback. They describe how masked men put them in a car and took them back to the Evros River. "They put us in a car, took us to Meriç river (Eds. note: as the Evros is known in Turkey) again, put us in an inflatable boat, and took us back to the Turkish banks. Thus, we weren’t able to apply for asylum.”

      Turkish police officers apprehended Erdoğan the next morning. A court in the province of Edirne convicted her the following morning on charges of illegally fleeing the country. The court transcript states that, “The accused violated the rules of her parole and left the country via illegal routes but was deported and returned to Turkey.”

      As part of her defense, Erdoğan claimed that she had felt isolated after her release from prison, that she was no longer able to find work and that even her friends weren’t speaking to her anymore. She told the court that she regretted having fled. “I am the victim,” Erdoğan said, according to the court transcript.

      Her brother Ihsan also denied to DER SPIEGEL that he or Ayşe were members of the Gülen sect.

      Turkish President Erdoğan has blamed the Gülen movement for the attempted coup in July 2016. In response, the Turkish state ordered the arrest of tens of thousands of Gülen supporters.

      Gülen, who has lived in exile in the United States since the 1990s, has denied the accusations. In public, he presents himself as a modern reformer of moderate Islam. His followers run schools, universities, media organizations, hospitals and foundations in more than 100 countries.

      But people who have left the community have described it as a secret society. “Infiltrating state agencies, maximizing political influence and gaining control of the state is seen as the goal by all those who have been interviewed,” reads one document from Germany’s Foreign Ministry.

      Tens of thousands of the Islamist movement’s followers have found refuge in European countries in recent years. More than 10,000 Turks have applied for asylum in Greece alone since 2016.

      But it’s not clear how many of those applications have been approved. The Greek authorities don’t want to publish that kind of information out of fear of provoking Turkish President Erdoğan, with whom the Greek government already has a tense relationship.

      However, Greek bureaucratic sources say that most of the Turkish refugees who apply for it are granted asylum in Greece. That had also been Ayşe Erdoğan’s hope. Instead, she now finds herself locked up by the Turkish government in a prison in the Gebze province near Istanbul.

      Greece has already thrown out a lawsuit submitted by her lawyers. Erdoğan’s attorney, Maria Papamina of the Greek Council for Refugees, says that all the prosecutor did was obtain assurances from the Greek police that Ayşe Erdoğan had never been registered there.

      She claims that evidence of the pushback wasn’t even taken into consideration. Papamina says she wants to appeal the case and take it right up to Greece’s highest court if she has to — and even further up to the European Court of Human Rights, if need be.

      But the only likely real chance Ayşe Erdoğan would have of getting released from prison would be through her appeal to Turkey’s highest court, but her chances are slim. There’s much to suggest that Ayşe Erdoğan will spend years in a Turkish prison.

      https://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/the-turkish-woman-who-fled-her-country-only-to-get-sent-back-a-fd2989c7-0439

  • Il y a déjà beaucoup de matériel sur seenthis concernant les #ONG en #Méditerranée (v. https://seenthis.net/messages/678296)

    Je me suis dite que cela valait la peine de commencer un nouveau fil, car il y aura encore beaucoup de choses à archiver depuis que le nouveau gouvernement en Italie a été formé...

    Ce fil complète plus particulièrement celui-ci : https://seenthis.net/messages/514535

    #asile #migrations #réfugiés #mourir_en_mer #sauvetage

    cc @isskein

    • Ong, Saviano replica a #Salvini: «Il diritto del mare ha una regola sacra: non si lasciano annegare le persone»

      Lo scrittore e giornalista Roberto Saviano risponde attraverso un video alle parole pronunciate dal leader della Lega e neo ministro Matteo Salvini ("Le Ong? No ai vice scafisti che attraccano nei porti"): «La poca conoscenza che ha il ministro Salvini del diritto del mare lo porta a ignorare un elemento fondamentale: le Ong agiscono sempre coordinate dalla Guardia Costiera italiana, quindi sempre nel rispetto delle regole. Dando dei ’vice scafisti’ a persone che salvano vite in mare, sta dando anche colpa alla Guardia costiera italiana e di questo deve prendersene responsabilità». Infine dice: «Il diritto del mare ha una regola eterna: Non si lasciano persone a mare, non si lasciano annegare. E non sarà Salvini a interrompere questo diritto sacro»

      https://video.repubblica.it/politica/ong-saviano-replica-a-salvini-il-diritto-del-mare-ha-una-regola-sacra-non-si-lasciano-annegare-le-persone/306649/307279?refresh_ce

    • Migranti, Salvini a Malta: «La nave Aquarius non può attraccare in Italia». La replica: «Non spetta a noi»

      La decisione del ministro dell’Interno che ha intimato a Malta di accettare la nave con a bordo 629 migranti che sta entrando nelle acque di competenza de La Valletta. Gino Strada: «Sconcertato nel vedere ministri razzisti o sbirri alla guida del mio Paese»


      https://roma.corriere.it/notizie/cronaca/18_giugno_11/migranti-salvini-la-aquarius-non-potra-approdare-un-porto-italiano-28e
      #Malte

    • #Aquarius, da Napoli a Palermo i sindaci contro Salvini: “I nostri porti sono aperti. È senza cuore e viola le norme”

      #Luigi_De_Magistris e #Leoluca_Orlando danno la loro disponibilità ad accogliere la nave Aquarius con a bordo gli oltre 600 migranti. Il sindaco di #Messina: «La nave è diretta qui, no a diktat: il porto è aperto». #Falcomatà (#Reggio_Calabria): «Disponibili come sempre». Pd: «Rischi umanitari, parli Conte». Boldrini: «Il ministro dell’Interno riporta il Paese ai tempi di sua nonna». Ma Forza Italia sta con il governo

      https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2018/06/10/aquarius-da-napoli-palermo-sindaci-contro-salvini-nostri-porti-sono-aperti-e-senza-cuore-e-viola-le-norme/4417316
      #Naples #Palerme #port

    • Migranti, Salvini a Malta: «Accolga la nave Aquarius, porti italiani chiusi». La replica: «Non è nostra competenza»

      Messaggio alle autorità maltesi: «Il porto più sicuro è il vostro». La risposta è negativa: «Il soccorso è stato coordinato da Roma». Il premier Conte: «Inviamo motovedette con medici». Alle 22.50 arrivano nuove istruzioni: fermarsi in mezzo al mare a 35 miglia dalla Sicilia


      http://www.repubblica.it/politica/2018/06/10/news/porti_salvini-198644488

    • De Magistris: «Il porto di Napoli pronto ad accogliere i migranti»

      Il sindaco del capoluogo campano risponde così alla decisione del ministro dell’Interno: «Metodo brutale, noi siamo per le vite umane». Con lui, i primi cittadini di Messina, Palermo, Reggio Calabria. Molte le critiche da sinistra. Grasso (Leu) commenta la foto di Salvini: «Olio di ricino su tela»

      http://www.repubblica.it/politica/2018/06/10/news/de_magistris_il_porto_di_napoli_pronto_ad_accogliere_i_migranti_-19866240

    • L’#Espagne va accueillir le navire avec 629 migrants en Méditerranée, le ministre italien Salvini crie victoire et prévient les autres navires

      L’Espagne a accepté d’accueillir le navire transportant les 629 migrants secourus au large de la Libye, dont le sort était l’enjeu d’un bras de fer entre Malte et l’Italie, a annoncé lundi le gouvernement de Pedro Sanchez. « Le président du gouvernement Pedro Sanchez a donné des instructions pour que l’Espagne honore les engagements internationaux en matière de crise humanitaire et a annoncé qu’elle accueillerait dans un port espagnol le navire Aquarius dans lequel se trouvent plus de 600 personnes abandonnées à leur sort en Méditerranée », indique un communiqué de la présidence du gouvernement.

      http://www.lalibre.be/actu/international/l-espagne-va-accueillir-le-navire-avec-629-migrants-en-mediterranee-le-minis

    • Migrants rejetés par l’Italie : l’Espagne propose d’accueillir l’« Aquarius » dans le port de Valence

      Six cent vingt-neuf passagers, dont de nombreux enfants, sont depuis samedi à bord du navire de sauvetage qui ne trouve pas de port pour l’accueillir.

      Un espoir pour les 629 migrants de l’Aquarius ? Le chef du gouvernement espagnol, Pedro Sanchez, a annoncé lundi 11 juin que son pays accueillerait le navire de sauvetage affrété par l’ONG française SOS-Méditerranée qui s’est vu refuser depuis samedi l’accès aux ports italiens et maltais.

      « Il est de notre obligation d’aider à éviter une catastrophe humanitaire et d’offrir un “port sûr” à ces personnes », dit un communiqué de la présidence du gouvernement, précisant que le port de Valence a été choisi comme destination du navire.

      Le premier ministre maltais, qui a lui-même refusé d’accueillir le navire, a remercié sur Twitter son homologue espagnol et proposé de faire parvenir des provisions à l’Aquarius. « Nous devrons nous réunir pour éviter qu’une telle situation se reproduise », écrit-il, ajoutant : « Il s’agit d’un problème européen. »

      Rien n’est pourtant acté du côté de l’association SOS-Méditerranée : « Cette déclaration politique doit encore trouver une traduction opérationnelle, notamment auprès des autorités maritimes », a indiqué au Monde Fabienne Lassalle, directrice adjointe de l’ONG.

      Depuis dimanche, la situation n’a pas évolué au large de Malte, où se trouve l’Aquarius, à quelque 30 milles de la petite île méditerranéenne, malgré les appels en ce sens de l’ONU et de Bruxelles. Sept femmes enceintes, 11 enfants en bas âge et 123 mineurs isolés notamment se trouvent à bord.

      « Impératif humanitaire »

      « Nous demandons à toutes les parties concernées de contribuer à un règlement rapide afin que les personnes à bord du navire Aquarius puissent être débarquées en toute sécurité dès que possible », a déclaré devant la presse le porte-parole de la Commission européenne, Margaritis Schinas, évoquant un « impératif humanitaire ».

      Le même terme a été repris par le Haut-Commissariat pour les réfugiés (HCR) de l’Organisation des Nations unies, qui a décrit la situation comme « un impératif humanitaire urgent ». « Les gens sont en détresse, ils sont à court de provisions et ont besoin d’aide rapidement », affirment les Nations unies. « Les questions plus larges de savoir qui a la responsabilité et comment ces responsabilités doivent être partagées entre Etats devraient être traitées plus tard », ajoute leur communiqué.

      En Europe, Berlin a fait part de sa préoccupation. « Le gouvernement allemand appelle toutes les parties impliquées à assumer leur responsabilité humanitaire », a déclaré le porte-parole du gouvernement allemand, Steffen Seibert.

      https://www.lemonde.fr/europe/article/2018/06/11/la-commission-europeenne-exhorte-malte-et-l-italie-a-trouver-une-solution-po
      #Valence

    • El Gobierno ofrece el puerto de Valencia para acoger a los 629 refugiados a la deriva en el Mediterráneo

      El Gobierno central acepta el ofrecimiento de Valencia como ciudad de acogida de los más de 600 inmigrantes que llevan días deambulando en un barco en el Mediterráneo. El alcalde de València, Joan Ribó, ha ofrecido este lunes la ciudad de para acoger a los refugiados del Aquarius, el barco de rescate de la ONG SOS Mediterráneo con 629 inmigrantes a bordo, entre ellos 123 menores, al que Italia ha cerrado sus puertos.

      https://www.eldiario.es/cv/Ribo-Valencia-refugiados-rescatados-Mediterraneo_0_781122098.html

    • Pedro Sánchez ofrece València como puerto para el ‘Aquarius’

      El Gobierno de España ha ofrecido a la ONU la ciudad de València como “puerto seguro” para el barco ‘Aquarius’, que navega con 629 inmigrantes y refugiados rescatados por MSF y Sos Mediterranée, cuya entrada a Italia ha sido impedida por el nuevo ministro del Interior, Matteo Salvini. La alcaldesa de Barcelona, Ada Colau, también había ofrecido su puerto.

      Pedro Sánchez ha dado instrucciones para que España “cumpla con los compromisos internacionales en materia de crisis humanitarias”, ha destacado el Ejecutivo en un comunicado. “Es nuestra obligación ayudar a evitar una catástrofe humanitaria y ofrecer ‘un puerto seguro’ a estas personas, cumpliendo de esta manera con las obligaciones del Derecho Internacional”, añade. El destino será València previa coordinación con la Generalitat valenciana.


      http://www.lavanguardia.com/local/valencia/20180611/4519741327/valencia-se-ofrece-puerto-aquarius.html

    • Aquarius: Spagna troppo lontana, fa rotta verso l’Italia

      Sos e Msf decidono di non fare rotta verso la Spagna, troppo rischioso. Raggiungere Valencia significa sottoporre i migranti a ore estenuati di viaggio. A bordo c’è ancora cibo e acqua ma non sufficienti per i giorni necessari a raggiungere la Spagna: l’equipaggio ritiene che sia comunque rischioso.

      La nostra corrispondente, Anelise Borges, direttamente dalla nave, ha intervistato in esclusiva per Euronews il coordinatore della ong Sos Mediterranée Italia, Nicola Stalla:

      «Abbiamo informato Spagna e Italia e tutte le autorità marittime in comunicazione con l’Aquarius in queste ore, che le circostanze in cui ci troviamo e con la quantittà ingente di persone a bordo, non ci sarebbero le condizioni di sicurezza per la nave e per l’equipaggio e per tutte le persone che sono a bordo per affrontare quest’altro viaggio e arrivare in spagna»

      Avremmo potuto affrontare questo tipo di viaggio se avessimo avuto meno persone sulla nave in modo tale che potessero essere accomodati e protetti all’interno di uno spazio coperto e non esposti all’aperto sui pontili. Le condizioni atmosferiche peggioreranno nei prossimi giorni infatti"
      La Sos Mediterrannée che opera in parternariato con Medici senza frontiere, reputa insomma troppo lontana la Spagna e non puo accettare la proposta del neo premier Pedro Sànchez.

      http://it.euronews.com/2018/06/11/aquarius-spagna-troppo-lontana-fa-rotta-verso-l-italia

    • L’Aquarius non approderà in Spagna

      La ong SOS Mediterranée ha rifiutato l’offerta del governo spagnolo: il viaggio fino al porto di Valencia sarebbe stato insostenibile per i seicento migranti a bordo della nave

      Lunedì sera la ong SOS Mediterranée ha fatto sapere che la nave Aquarius in arrivo dalla Libia e con circa seicento migranti a bordo non approderà al porto di Valencia, nonostante l’offerta del nuovo governo spagnolo guidato dal socialista Pedro Sánchez. SOS Mediterranée – che si trova ancora tra Malta e Italia dopo che le era stato rifiutato l’approdo dal governo italiano – ha detto che il viaggio per Valencia sarebbe stato troppo lungo, dai tre ai cinque giorni, e avrebbe messo in pericolo la vita delle persone a bordo. La nave, infatti, ha già raggiunto la sua massima capienza e nei prossimi giorni è previsto un peggioramento del tempo. SOS Mediterranée ha ringraziato il governo spagnolo dell’offerta e ha sollecitato quello italiano a trovare una soluzione per le oltre seicento persone che si trovano sulla nave, molte delle quali minori e alcune in condizioni di salute precarie.

      Il governo spagnolo – che da pochi giorni è guidato dal leader socialista Pedro Sánchez – aveva fatto sapere di aver messo a disposizione il porto di Valencia «per evitare una crisi umanitaria». Valencia dista però più di 1.500 chilometri e fin da subito erano emersi dubbi sul fatto che l’equipaggio e le persone soccorse sarebbero state in grado di compiere un viaggio così lungo.

      https://www.ilpost.it/2018/06/11/aquarius-migranti-salvini

    • Commentaire de Sara Prestianni sur FB :

      Valencia è a 700 miglia da dove si trova ora L’Aquarius, a 3-4 giorni di traversata .... non certo il porto più sicuro.

      Inoltre con il far approdare la nave della Marina al porto di Catania, Salvini ribadisce che il suo obbiettivo sono, oltre ai migranti, le ong che praticano salvataggio in mare.

      https://www.facebook.com/prestianni.sara/posts/10216315178380129

      Et réponse d’Alessandro Fioroni :

      infatti mi pare che questo aspetto sia quasi espunto dal dibattito, tra l’altro 4 giorni per andare e 4 per tornare fanno 8, 8 giorni di assenza dalla zona calda. Spero proprio che non si verifichino tragedie

    • Pourquoi le navire humanitaire « Aquarius » n’accosterait pas en France ?

      A la différence de l’Espagne, la France n’a pour l’heure pas fait de proposition à l’ONG SOS Méditerranée pour accueillir son bateau, et rien ne l’y oblige.

      Bonjour,

      Le navire Aquarius, qui secoure les migrants en difficulté en Méditerranée au cours de la traversée vers l’Europe, s’est vu proposer, lundi 11 juin, un port espagnol pour accoster. Habitué des rades italiennes, le bateau affrété par SOS Méditerranée paye cher l’arrivée au pouvoir, de l’autre côté des Alpes, de la coalition Ligue du Nord (extrême droite) - mouvement Cinq Étoiles (anti système).

      Le ministre de l’Intérieur Matteo Salvini (Ligue du Nord) a en effet refusé, pendant le week-end, d’accueillir l’Aquarius, et les plus de 600 migrants rescapés à son bord. Dimanche, Salvini reprochait à Malte de ne pas prendre ses responsabilités, menaçant de ne plus laisser accoster aucun bateau humanitaire dans les ports italiens, si La Valette n’ouvrait pas ses rades à l’Aquarius. Mais les Maltais ont refusé.

      Le Premier ministre socialiste espagnol Pedro Sanchez est alors entré en jeu, proposant le port de Valence au navire. Salvini s’est alors félicité, lors d’une conférence de presse à Milan, ce lundi après-midi, que le bateau débarque « dans un autre port qu’un port italien ». « Victoire », a aussi écrit le droitiste ministre de l’Intérieur italien sur Twitter. Dans la foulée, le Premier ministre maltais annonçait que l’île allait envoyer des ravitaillements à l’Aquarius, pour lui permettre de rallier l’Espagne.
      Querelle de droits

      L’Aquarius est intervenu dans les eaux territoriales libyennes, et a réalisé, selon l’Agence France-Presse, six opérations dans la nuit de samedi à dimanche. Il compte aujourd’hui 629 migrants à son bord. Sur marinetraffic.com, on peut situer le navire, au sud de la Sicile, à l’est de Malte et observer le trajet du bateau jusqu’aux côtes de Libye et en sens inverse.

      « Selon la Convention internationale sur le sauvetage (Search and Rescue, SAR) de 1979, les Etats définissent une zone où ils sont habilités à effectuer des sauvetages », explique à CheckNews Kiara Neri, maître de conférences à Lyon III. Puisque la Libye n’a pas les moyens d’assurer cette mission, la « zone SAR » italienne s’étend jusqu’aux côtes de l’Etat africain. « C’est donc le commandement de Rome qui gère les bateaux humanitaires qui interviennent là-bas », résume la spécialiste du droit international et maritime.

      L’Organisation internationale pour les migrations (OIM), dans une résolution de 2004, rappelle qu’il faut, en vertu des conventions internationales, que « dans un temps raisonnable, un endroit sûr [place of safety] » soit assuré aux personnes assistées en mer. Et ensuite : « La responsabilité de mettre à disposition un endroit sûr, ou de s’assurer qu’un endroit sûr soit mis à disposition, incombe au gouvernement responsable de la zone SAR dans laquelle les survivants ont été sauvés. » En l’occurrence, l’Italie.

      Or, à 19 heures ce lundi, Rome n’a toujours pas donné de consignes à l’Aquarius. « Nous sommes toujours en stand by », se désole Antoine Laurent, responsable des opérations maritimes de SOS Méditerranée, auprès de CheckNews. « On attend d’avoir des nouvelles des Italiens, soit pour nous dire d’accoster quelque part, soit pour nous confirmer qu’on doit aller en Espagne. »

      Sur le papier, toutefois, plusieurs villes, comme Reggio de Calabre, ou Naples, ont offert l’hospitalité, via les réseaux sociaux, à l’Aquarius. « Mais ces propositions ne servent pas si le ministère de l’Intérieur s’y oppose », rappelle Kiara Neri.
      Et la France dans tout ça ?

      Théoriquement, le bateau a le droit de sortir de la zone SAR italienne. Le problème, c’est qu’il n’en a pas les moyens. L’Espagne est à près de trois jours de mer, et le bateau ne dispose de vivres que pour une journée, selon Sophie Beau. La directrice générale de SOS Méditerranée, interrogée par l’AFP, juge la proposition espagnole « encourageante » mais « concrètement, il faut qu’on puisse débarquer au plus vite. »

      Ce manque de nourriture constitue, selon l’ONG, un « impératif humanitaire urgent », qui pourrait contraindre Malte ou l’Italie à laisser accoster l’Aquarius.

      Le bâtiment appartenant à une ONG française, que peut et doit faire Paris ? « Légalement, rien n’oblige la France à proposer quoi que ce soit », observe Kiara Neri. Par ailleurs, « la France n’est pas beaucoup plus près que l’Espagne », remarque Antoine Laurent qui préférerait voir le bateau jeter l’ancre à Malte ou en Sicile.

      Toutefois, selon le responsable de SOS Méditerranée, l’ONG n’a reçu aucune proposition de la part des autorités françaises. Sollicités par CheckNews, les ministères de l’Intérieur et des Affaires étrangères, et la présidence de la République n’ont pas répondu.

      Interrogé à ce sujet par une journaliste de BFM, lors d’une conférence de presse en marge d’une rencontre bilatérale avec la Belgique sur la sécurité et la lutte contre le terrorisme, le Premier ministre Edouard Philippe a botté en touche, évoquant plus largement la politique migratoire française, estimant notamment qu’il faut « traiter avec les pays d’origine de ces migrations […] pour éviter les départs ».

      Cordialement

      http://www.liberation.fr/checknews/2018/06/11/pourquoi-le-navire-humanitaire-aquarius-n-accosterait-pas-en-france_16582

    • UN High Commissioner for Refugees welcomes Spain’s decision to allow Aquarius to dock
      Today’s decision of Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez of Spain to exceptionally allow a rescue ship, Aquarius, to dock in his country is courageous and welcome. It ends what was becoming an increasingly difficult and untenable situation for the crew of the Aquarius and the more than 600 rescued people who were aboard.

      Irrespective of how European countries choose to manage their sea borders, the principle of rescue at sea is one that should never be in doubt. I would welcome opportunity to discuss with concerned governments arrangements for search and rescue operations in the Mediterranean and to avoid any repetition of the situation in which the Aquarius found itself.

      My office stands ready, as always to work with countries of Europe and the Mediterranean to ensure that saving lives and maintaining asylum remains our shared priority.

      http://www.unhcr.org/news/press/2018/6/5b1ea1824/un-high-commissioner-refugees-welcomes-spains-decision-allow-aquarius-dock.ht

    • Refugees in Orbit – again !

      Matteo Salvini, Italy’s new far-right home secretary, tweeted “Vittoria!” after news broke that the 629 persons stranded aboard the M.S. Aquarius would be forced to proceed to the Spanish city of Valencia rather than being allowed to disembark at much closer ports in Sicily. But for whom was it a “victory”?

      Surely not for those seeking asylum who had been stranded at sea for days on an overcrowded search and rescue ship. The ability of ship’s crew of 12 had been strained to the breaking point attempting to meet the medical and survival needs of those rescued on Saturday, including persons with serious chemical burns and others requiring urgent orthopaedic surgery, as Italy and Malta bickered like petulant children about which should step in to save lives.

      And surely not for international law. The longstanding principle that a shipmaster has a duty to rescue persons in distress without regard for their nationality, status, or circumstances is pragmatically viable only when states honour their duty to enable the speedy disembarkation of those rescued – a duty that Italy (and perhaps also Malta) breached in this case.

      But is it a victory for Italy, as the home secretary presumably meant to suggest? There is no doubt that Italy (and to a much greater extent, Greece) has shouldered more than its fair share of refugees arriving to seek protection in Europe. Nor can it be doubted that Europe and the rest of the world have acted too slowly and undependably to share-out what is in principle a common responsibility to protect refugees, thus fueling frustration and even anger. The EU’s absurd “Dublin Regulation” rule that allocates nearly all protection duties to the first country in which a refugee arrives is both unprincipled and cruel. So while nothing can justify Italy’s flagrant breach of the duty to facilitate speedy disembarkation of those rescued, its determination to force a redistribution of responsibility is perhaps more comprehensible.

      In truth, the real villain here is an outmoded system of implementing protection obligations under the UN’s Refugee Convention. Under the status quo, whatever country a refugee reaches is the one and only country that has protection obligations to that refugee. Accidents of geography, rather than any principled metric, determine which states are obliged to carry the burdens for implementing what is in theory a universal duty to protect refugees. That approach has led to some 60% of the world’s refugees being left in the hands of just 10, mostly very poor, countries – with the rest of us giving them only bits of charity and offering resettlement to only about 1% of the refugees they admit. There is therefore a perverse incentive built into the system to turn refugees away – as this week’s horrific events in the Mediterranean make clear.

      The UN’s “global compact” process was supposed to end this prisoner’s dilemma. Yet under the proposal now offered by UNHCR (the UN’s global refugee agency), little will change. The agency suggests only that states agree to attempt to hash out possible voluntary relief to frontline states on a case-by-case basis – leaving those states confronted with the arrival of refugees in the truly horrible bind of choosing between waiting and hoping for solidarity (that may or may not come) and turning refugees away. For the UN to have failed to put forward a plan for binding and immediate sharing of financial burdens and human responsibilities is ethically inexcusable.

      So if Italy is angry, it should turn its anger toward those responsible for its dilemma – the EU for failing to move beyond the manifestly wrong-headed “first country of arrival rule,” and the UN for failing to offer leadership on a serious system to share refugee burdens and responsibilities. But taking out its anger on sick and exhausted refugees as it did this week was not a victory for anyone.

      https://verfassungsblog.de/refugees-in-orbit-again

    • En 1939, l’Amérique ferma sa frontière à un paquebot de 908 réfugiés #juifs

      À l’heure où l’Europe ferme ses frontières aux réfugiés, il est bon de se rappeler cet épisode de 1939 où un bateau de plus de 900 réfugiés juifs fut prié de retourner en Europe, sous le régime nazi.

      Le 13 mai 1939, le #Saint-Louis, paquebot transatlantique allemand, quitte le port de Hambourg. À son bord, 937 passagers. La grande majorité d’entre eux sont des juifs allemands fuyant le Troisième Reich.

      Persécutés–quelques mois auparavant avait lieu la Nuit de Cristal, pogrom où une centaine de juifs furents assassinés–, ils ont réuni l’argent nécessaire pour un visa et un aller simple sur le Saint-Louis dans l’espoir de trouver refuge en Amérique.

      Mais, alors que leur paquebot appareille dans le port de la Havane, les autorités cubaines ne les autorisent pas à débarquer. Hostile envers les juifs, « le pays souffrait en plus d’une dépression économique et beaucoup de Cubains n’appréciaient pas du tout le nombre relativement grand de réfugiés [...], qui étaient perçus comme des concurrents pour les rares emplois », rapporte l’Encyclopédie multimédia de la Shoah. Seuls vingt-neuf d’entre eux sont autorisés à rester sur le sol cubain.

      Quotas de réfugiés

      Après Cuba, le Saint-Louis tente sa chance aux États-Unis. Le bateau navigue si près des côtes de la Floride que les passagers aperçoivent les lumières de Miami. Un câble est envoyé au président Franklin D. Roosevelt, lui demandant de leur accorder l’asile. Il ne reçut jamais de réponse.
      À l’époque, la presse américaine s’est largement fait l’écho de la situation critique des passagers du Saint-Louis. Mais l’Acte d’immigration de 1924, mis en place aux États-Unis, limitait le nombre de réfugiés pouvant être admis chaque année. À l’été 1939, le quota était déjà atteint.

      Les Américains, quoique compatissants vis-à-vis des réfugiés et indignés par la politique du régime nazi, soutiennent ces restrictions à l’immigration. La crise économique de 1929 venait de passer par là, laissant des millions d’Américains au chômage, et l’arrivée d’immigrés était vue comme une menace sur les derniers emplois disponibles.

      Souvenir honteux

      Le Saint-Louis a dû faire demi-tour pour l’Europe, alors sous la botte nazie. Beaucoup de ses passagers furent victimes des camps, comme les membres de cette famille, tous tués à Auschwitz, rapporte le site News :

      Le Saint-Louis a dû faire demi-tour pour l’Europe, alors sous la botte nazie. Beaucoup de ses passagers furent victimes des camps

      Le souvenir honteux du paquebot Saint-Louis, désormais immortalisé dans les musées de l’holocauste à travers le monde, n’est pas sans rappeler la situation critique de l’Europe.

      La Méditerranée est devenue un cimetière marin, avec plus de 30.000 migrants morts depuis 2000 lors du naufrage de leur embarcation, tandis qu’à Calais les réfugiés tentent de forcer l’entrée du tunnel sous la Manche au péril de leur vie. Pendant ce temps, les pays européens hésitent sur la marche à suivre pour gérer cet afflux de migrants et de réfugiés fuyant la guerre dans leur pays.

      Faut-il leur ouvrir toutes grandes les portes de l’Europe ? Faut-il se protéger avec encore plus de barbelés ? L’opinion oscille entre bonne volonté utopique et xénophobie voilée. Il n’existe aucune solution simple, mais conclut le site Project Syndicate, « se rappeler du sort des juifs d’Europe dans les années 1930 devrait au moins nous obliger à ne pas faire preuve d’indifférence envers le sort de ceux qui n’ont nulle part où aller ».


      http://www.slate.fr/story/106249/1939-amerique-refoulait-refugies-juifs
      #histoire #WWII #deuxième_guerre_mondiale #seconde_guerre_mondiale

    • Cronaca di una giornata sull’Aquarius

      Dalla sera del 10 giugno la nave Aquarius di Sos Méditerranée e Medici senza frontiere è ferma a 35 miglia dalle coste italiane, in attesa che le autorità decidano quale è il porto di destinazione, ma la situazione a bordo è sempre più critica. La nave trasporta 629 persone, salvate in diverse operazioni al largo della Libia nel corso del weekend: i viveri basteranno ancora soltanto per poche ore. Nel frattempo il nuovo governo spagnolo, guidato dal socialista Pedro Sánchez, ha dato la sua disponibilità allo sbarco dei migranti nel porto di Valencia, in Spagna, che dista però qualche giorno di navigazione dal punto in cui la nave umanitaria si trova in questo momento.

      L’annuncio è stato accolto con sorpresa da Medici senza frontiere che in un comunicato ha detto di non aver ricevuto ancora comunicazioni ufficiali. “Medici senza frontiere ha appreso dai mezzi d’informazione che il primo ministro spagnolo, Pedro Sánchez, ha offerto Valencia come porto di sbarco per la nave Aquarius. Non abbiamo ancora ricevuto alcuna comunicazione ufficiale in merito da parte dei centri di coordinamento dalla centrale operativa della guardia costiera di Italia o Spagna. La situazione a bordo per le 629 persone soccorse, con diverse di loro che hanno bisogno di assistenza medica, richiede una soluzione urgente”.

      “Le persone a bordo hanno cominciato a chiedere cosa sta succedendo”, racconta Alessandro Porro, uno dei volontari italiani di Sos Méditerranée. “Li abbiamo informati che stiamo aspettando istruzioni per l’indicazione di un porto di sbarco, ma li abbiamo rassicurati sul fatto che non li porteremo in Libia, questa è la loro maggiore preoccupazione”, racconta Porro. A bordo non ci sono casi medici che hanno bisogno di un immediato trasferimento: ci sono sette donne incinte che probabilmente saranno trasportate in Italia con delle motovedette italiane perché non possono sostenere il viaggio verso la Spagna. “Le persone a bordo hanno problemi di disidratazione, di ustioni da carburante e infine c’è un ragazzo che ha bisogno di un intervento chirurgico”, continua Porro. Le motovedette con i presidi medici, che erano state annunciate dal governo italiano, non sono mai arrivate.

      “Avere più di seicento persone a bordo implica che lo spazio a loro disposizione non sia molto, la nave è lunga settanta metri, non è un traghetto. Per ora non ci sono ancora state tensioni, ma la situazione non è facile, ci stiamo facendo aiutare dagli stessi migranti per le pulizie. Solo le donne possono stare sotto coperta, gli uomini e i ragazzi sono sul ponte, all’aperto”, continua Porro che spiega che di solito il tempo di permanenza in queste condizioni è di uno o due giorni. “Non c’è problema né per il carburante né per l’acqua, perché l’Aquarius ha al momento parecchia autonomia e ha un impianto di desalinizzazione dell’acqua marina, ma i viveri finiranno entro poche ore”, conclude Porro.

      https://www.internazionale.it/bloc-notes/annalisa-camilli/2018/06/11/cronaca-giornata-aquarius

    • Yesterday, Monday 11th June, at 9pm, more than a thousand of people gathered in front of the port of Palermo to protest against the decision of Salvini, Italian Minister of Internal Affairs, to close Italian ports to boats carrying migrants.

      Hier, lundi 11 juin, à 21h, plus de mille personnes se sont rassemblées devant le port de Palerme pour protester contre la décision de Salvini, Ministre de l’Intérieur italien, de fermer les ports aux bateaux transportant des migrant.e.s.

      Des associations, des civils, des officiels dont le maire, se sont rejoints devant le port, un peu avant 21h. Le cortège s’est ensuite rendu jusqu’à Piazza Massimo, coeur de la ville, en passant devant la Préfecture de Palerme.

      Quelques articles/ photos sur la situation en Italie / et la manifestation (en italien)
      http://palermo.repubblica.it/cronaca/2018/06/12/foto/palermo_in_migliaia_al_porto_per_solidarieta_all_aquarius-198792435/1/#4

      http://siciliainformazioni.com/cettina-vivirito/834435/palermo-reato-di-altruismo-siamo-tutti-colpevoli-al-presidio-ap

      http://www.radiondadurto.org/2018/06/11/nave-aquarius-lega-e-5-stelle-chiudono-i-porti-scoppia-il-caso-diplom

    • Les dirigeants nationalistes corses proposent d’accueillir l’«Aquarius», chassé d’Italie

      Le président du conseil exécutif de Corse Gilles Simeoni a proposé ce mardi d’accueillir sur l’île le navire affrété par l’ONG qui a secouru 629 migrants en Méditerranée, enjeu d’un bras de fer entre l’Italie et Malte, qui refusent de le laisser accoster. « Manque de vivres, mauvaises conditions météo, et port espagnol trop éloigné : face à l’urgence, le conseil exécutif de Corse propose à @SOSMedFrance d’accueillir l’#Aquarius dans un port #corse », a tweeté Gilles Simeoni. L’Espagne avait proposé lundi d’accueillir le navire mais les dirigeants de l’ONG SOS Méditerranée jugent que les conditions de sécurité ne sont pas réunies pour mener le bateau jusqu’à l’Espagne.

      http://www.liberation.fr/direct/element/les-dirigeants-nationalistes-corses-proposent-daccueillir-laquarius-chass

      #Corse

    • Marie-Christine Vergiat : « C’est l’Union européenne qui a créé cette situation »

      L’eurodéputée Marie-Christine Vergiat dénonce la responsabilité de l’Union européenne qui, depuis une demi-douzaine d’années, laisse l’Italie gérer seule l’accueil des migrants pour l’Europe. Avec les dégâts politiques que l’on sait.
      Qui porte la responsabilité du blocage de l’Aquarius depuis dimanche, aux portes de l’Europe ? Si Matteo Salvini, le ministre de l’intérieur italien d’extrême droite, fait du refus de l’accueil des migrants sa marque de fabrique électoraliste, c’est l’Union européenne qui est la principale coupable du drame qui se joue actuellement, estime Marie-Christine Vergiat, députée européenne Front de gauche, membre de la GUE au Parlement de Strasbourg.

      L’Aquarius bloqué pendant deux jours en pleine mer : à qui la faute ?

      Marie-Christine Vergiat : C’est l’Union européenne qui, par absence de solidarité vis-à-vis de l’Italie, a créé cette situation. Avant 2011, et pendant des années, Malte [sollicitée après le refus de l’Italie – ndlr] a dû gérer toute seule l’arrivée des migrants, c’est pourquoi cette fois elle a refusé de prendre en charge l’Aquarius.

      Depuis 2011, date à laquelle les mouvements de population ont commencé à devenir plus importants, on a ensuite laissé l’Italie en première ligne se débrouiller. Aujourd’hui, elle accueille chaque année entre 100 000 et 150 000 personnes sur son territoire. Avec la mise en avant de « Dublin 3 », l’Italie a pris en charge le poids du sauvetage en mer pour toute l’Europe, et elle l’a plutôt bien fait.

      Il faut voir que quand le gouvernement italien a lancé l’opération « Mare Nostrum » pour aller secourir les personnes, elle s’est retrouvée seule. Matteo Renzi a dû trouver 95 millions d’euros d’octobre 2013 à octobre 2014 pour financer l’opération et, quand il a demandé de l’aide, le Conseil européen lui a donné 5 millions d’euros. Quant à la Grèce, elle a été en première ligne en 2015 et 2016, et a accueilli un million de personnes, là encore, seule.

      Comment expliquez-vous qu’il n’y ait jamais eu de répartition concertée des migrants entre les États membres ?

      En 2015, Jean-Claude Juncker, le président de la Commission européenne, a fait ce qu’il a pu : il a demandé à ce que 160 000 personnes soient « délocalisées » depuis l’Italie et la Grèce vers les autres pays européens sur deux ans. Même si cela était très insuffisant puisqu’il y avait 1,4 million de personnes arrivées en Italie et en Grèce sur la même période. Mais le premier réflexe des pays a été de refuser et de fermer leurs frontières. Heureusement qu’en 2015 et 2016, l’Allemagne d’Angela Merkel a accueilli 60 % des réfugiés (parmi eux, deux tiers de Syriens). Mais il faut rappeler que le nombre de réfugiés accueillis en Europe est une goutte d’eau par rapport à ce que vit le Moyen-Orient.

      Et pourtant, si l’on en croit les récentes élections en Italie notamment, le discours de l’extrême droite contre les migrants semble payant politiquement…

      Récemment, la Commission européenne a présenté une étude qui montre que les Européens restent solidaires des réfugiés dans tous les pays d’Europe, excepté en Italie. On peut pousser des cris d’orfraie, ce sentiment anti-immigré ne tombe pas du ciel. C’est facile de commenter alors qu’en France, on n’a jamais ouvert nos ports pour soulager l’Italie ou la Grèce. En réalité, la France a été très peu impactée par la crise migratoire. Le nombre de demandeurs d’asile n’a presque pas augmenté. Entre 2015 et 2016, il est passé de 85 000 à 95 000. Et encore, nous sommes un des pays où le taux d’acceptation des demandes d’asile est le plus bas – entre 35 et 40 % –, ce qui est en dessous de bien des pays européens. Quand on voit ce qui se passe à la frontière franco-italienne, c’est hallucinant : on fait du contrôle au faciès des migrants, au mépris des lois nationales, européennes et internationales… Il y a de quoi avoir honte de nos gouvernements ! En plus, ils se cachent derrière les accords de Dublin pour renvoyer les migrants dans le pays où ils ont accosté, donc très souvent en Italie, alors qu’il n’y a aucune obligation de « dublinage » : si le pays d’arrivée est obligé d’accepter le retour de la personne qui lui a été renvoyée, en revanche, l’autre pays européen n’est absolument pas obligé de la renvoyer là d’où elle vient.

      Où en êtes-vous de la réforme des accords de Dublin ?

      Il y a actuellement un bras de fer entre le Parlement européen et le Conseil européen. Au Parlement, six groupes sur huit, de la droite à la gauche européenne, sont d’accord pour proposer une clé de répartition. Le problème, c’est que le Conseil européen ne veut pas de cette solution et veut durcir Dublin en obligeant au renvoi dans le pays. Et contrairement à ce qu’on peut croire, il n’y a pas que les pays de l’Est qui bloquent. Les gouvernants, à l’exception des pays du Sud, affirment que mettre en place une répartition est trop compliqué pour les migrants et que c’est pour cela qu’ils refusent. Mais le problème, c’est qu’ils ne se donnent pas les moyens de l’accueil…

      Comment faire avancer les choses, puisqu’un blocage politique semble favoriser la flambée des extrêmes droites ?

      Le seul moyen de résister c’est, au lieu de courir derrière l’extrême droite, de faire tout le contraire : de montrer, d’une part, qu’il n’y a pas de « submersion » migratoire et, d’autre part, que si l’accueil est pensé et organisé, tout peut très bien se passer. Ce n’est de toute façon pas en construisant des murs qu’on va empêcher les migrants de venir.

      Cet épisode très médiatique de l’Aquarius bloqué en mer peut-il pousser le Conseil européen à revoir ses positions ?

      Il faut espérer que cette histoire permette de montrer ce qui se passe au Conseil européen. En tout cas, Pedro Sánchez, le nouveau président espagnol, a été courageux d’accepter que les 629 personnes bloquées sur le bateau débarquent en Espagne – même si cela s’explique par le fait que la question migratoire apparaît moins comme un enjeu du débat en Espagne… Aujourd’hui, il faut travailler dans deux directions pour l’opinion publique européenne : d’abord, expliquer que les migrations principales viennent non pas des pays du Sud, mais du Nord et d’Asie (Inde et Chine), et que les premiers migrants en Europe sont ukrainiens – ils arrivent en Pologne pour le travail. Ensuite, rappeler que la grande majorité des migrants arrivent de façon régulière (immigration de travail, pour faire des études, regroupement familial…) et que l’une des manières d’éviter les morts en Méditerranée et de ne pas faire le jeu des passeurs et des trafiquants, c’est d’ouvrir des voies de passage légales.

      https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/international/110618/marie-christine-vergiat-c-est-l-union-europeenne-qui-cree-cette-situation?

    • Un plan de acogida vetado por Rajoy en 2015, clave para la llegada a Valencia de los refugiados del Aquarius

      La Conselleria de Igualdad y Políticas Inclusivas de la Generalitat Valenciana, dirigida por Mónica Oltra, ha desempolvado un plan elaborado hace tres años para acoger a refugiados sirios llegados a las islas griegas que el Gobierno Central nunca autorizó. El martes por la tarde habrá una reunión entre Generalitat, Ayuntamiento de Valencia y ONG para organizar la llegada de los 629 migrantes y refugiados a los que Italia ha negado sus puertos.

      http://www.publico.es/sociedad/plan-acogida-vetado-rajoy-2015-clave-llegada-valencia-refugiados-del-aquariu

    • Message de Sara Prestianni, via la mailing-list Migeurop (12.06.2018):

      Le Gouvernement Italien confirme sa volonté (folle) de ramener les migrants à Valencia bien que à plusieurs reprises Sos Med et autres ont signalé le risque que cela représentait pour les 629 migrants à bord de l’Aquarius de faire autres 3/4 jours de navigation avec la meteo qui semble empirer.
      Les migrants seront obligés à l’énième “trasbordo” - transfert - vers des bateaux de la Marine Militaire Italienne qui devraient les ramener à Valencia.

      La volonté du Gouvernement est clairement celle de criminaliser l’accès aux ports pour les ong qui sauvent vies humaines en mer.
      Hier, sans aucune déclaration officielle du Gouvernement, les 900 migrants interceptés en mer après les 629 qui se trouvent à bord de l’Aquarius,qui se trouvaient à bord de la Marine Militaire Italienne ont été autorisé à entrer dans le port de Catane. Le message de Salvini est claire : plus aucun bateau qui a un pavillon étranger pourra rentrer dans les ports italiennes avec à bord des migrants.
      Par ailleurs Salvini a annoncé une visite rapide en Libye et dans la réunion d’urgence sur le cas “Aquarius” il semblerait que la question de l’externalisation était à l’ordre du jour.

    • Lettera aperta di Gabriele Del Grande al Ministro dell’Interno Matteo Salvini

      Confesso che su una cosa sono d’accordo con Salvini: la rotta libica va chiusa. Basta tragedie in mare, basta dare soldi alle mafie libiche del contrabbando. Sogno anch’io un Mediterraneo a sbarchi zero. Il problema però è capire come ci si arriva. E su questo, avendo alle spalle dieci anni di inchieste sul tema, mi permetto di dare un consiglio al ministro perché mi pare che stia ripetendo gli stessi errori dei suoi predecessori.

      Blocco navale, respingimenti in mare, centri di detenzione in Libia. La ricetta è la stessa da almeno quindici anni. Pisanu, Amato, Maroni, Cancellieri, Alfano, Minniti. Ci hanno provato tutti. E ogni volta è stato un fallimento: miliardi di euro persi e migliaia di morti in mare.
      https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=2105161009497488&id=100000108285082

      Voici, hélas, ce qui est en train de se décider au niveau européen: un nouveau fonds pour la protection des frontières....
      https://seenthis.net/messages/701648

      Questa volta non sarà diverso. Per il semplice fatto che alla base di tutto ci sono due leggi di mercato che invece continuano ad essere ignorate. La prima è che la domanda genera l’offerta. La seconda è che il proibizionismo sostiene le mafie.

      In altre parole, finché qualcuno sarà disposto a pagare per viaggiare dall’Africa all’Europa, qualcuno gli offrirà la possibilità di farlo. E se non saranno le compagnie aeree a farlo, lo farà il contrabbando.

      Viviamo in un mondo globalizzato, dove i lavoratori si spostano da un paese all’altro in cerca di un salario migliore. L’Europa, che da decenni importa manodopera a basso costo in grande quantità, in questi anni ha firmato accordi di libera circolazione con decine di paesi extraeuropei. Che poi sono i paesi da dove provengono la maggior parte dei nostri lavoratori emigrati: Romania, Albania, Ucraina, Polonia, i Balcani, tutto il Sud America. La stessa Europa però, continua a proibire ai lavoratori africani la possibilità di emigrare legalmente sul suo territorio. In altre parole, le ambasciate europee in Africa hanno smesso di rilasciare visti o hanno reso quasi impossibile ottenerne uno.

      Siamo arrivati al punto che l’ultima e unica via praticabile per l’emigrazione dall’Africa all’Europa è quella del contrabbando libico. Le mafie libiche hanno ormai il monopolio della mobilità sud-nord del Mediterraneo centrale. Riescono a spostare fino a centomila passeggeri ogni anno con un fatturato di centinaia di milioni di dollari ma anche con migliaia di morti.

      Eppure non è sempre stato così. Davvero ci siamo dimenticati che gli sbarchi non esistevano prima degli anni Novanta? Vi siete mai chiesti perché? E vi siete mai chiesti perché nel 2018 anziché comprarsi un biglietto aereo una famiglia debba pagare il prezzo della propria morte su una barca sfasciata in mezzo al mare? Il motivo è molto semplice: fino agli anni Novanta era relativamente semplice ottenere un visto nelle ambasciate europee in Africa. In seguito, man mano che l’Europa ha smesso di rilasciare visti, le mafie del contrabbando hanno preso il sopravvento.

      Allora, se davvero Salvini vuole porre fine, come dice, al business delle mafie libiche del contrabbando, riformi i regolamenti dei visti anziché percorrere la strada del suo predecessore. Non invii i nostri servizi segreti in Libia con le valigette di contante per pagare le mafie del contrabbando affinché cambino mestiere e ci facciano da cane da guardia. Non costruisca altre prigioni oltremare con i soldi dei contribuenti italiani. Perché sono i nostri soldi e non vogliamo darli né alle mafie né alle polizie di paesi come la Libia o la Turchia.

      Noi quelle tasse le abbiamo pagate per veder finanziato il welfare! Per aprire gli asili nido che non ci sono. Per costruire le case popolari che non ci sono. Per finanziare la scuola e la sanità che stanno smantellando. Per creare lavoro. E allora sì smetteremo di farci la guerra fra poveri. E allora sì avremo un obiettivo comune per il quale lottare. Perché anche quella è una balla. Che non ci sono soldi per i servizi. I soldi ci sono, ma come vengono spesi? Quanti miliardi abbiamo pagato sottobanco alle milizie libiche colluse con le mafie del contrabbando negli anni passati? Quanti asili nido ci potevamo aprire con quegli stessi denari?

      Salvini non perda tempo. Faccia sbarcare i seicento naufraghi della Acquarius e anziché prendersela con le ONG, chiami la Farnesina e riscrivano insieme i regolamenti per il rilascio dei visti nei paesi africani. Introduca il visto per ricerca di lavoro, il meccanismo dello sponsor, il ricongiungimento familiare. E con l’occasione vada a negoziare in Europa affinché siano visti validi per circolare in tutta la zona UE e cercarsi un lavoro in tutta la UE anziché pesare su un sistema d’accoglienza che fa acqua da tutte le parti.

      Perché io continuo a non capire come mai un ventenne di Lagos o Bamako, debba spendere cinquemila euro per passare il deserto e il mare, essere arrestato in Libia, torturato, venduto, vedere morire i compagni di viaggio e arrivare in Italia magari dopo un anno, traumatizzato e senza più un soldo, quando con un visto sul passaporto avrebbe potuto comprarsi un biglietto aereo da cinquecento euro e spendere il resto dei propri soldi per affittarsi una stanza e cercarsi un lavoro. Esattamente come hanno fatto cinque milioni di lavoratori immigrati in Italia, che guardate bene non sono passati per gli sbarchi e tantomeno per l’accoglienza. Sono arrivati dalla Romania, dall’Albania, dalla Cina, dal Marocco e si sono rimboccati le maniche. Esattamente come hanno fatto cinque milioni di italiani, me compreso, emigrati all’estero in questi decenni. Esattamente come vorrebbero fare i centomila parcheggiati nel limbo dell’accoglienza.

      Centomila persone costrette ad anni di attesa per avere un permesso di soggiorno che già sappiamo non arriverà in almeno un caso su due. Perché almeno in un caso su due abbiamo davanti dei lavoratori e non dei profughi di guerra. Per loro non è previsto l’asilo politico. Ma non è previsto nemmeno il rimpatrio, perché sono troppo numerosi e perché non c’è la collaborazione dei loro paesi di origine. Significa che di qui a un anno almeno cinquantamila persone andranno ad allungare le file dei senza documenti e del mercato nero del lavoro.

      Salvini dia a tutti loro un permesso di soggiorno per motivi umanitari e un titolo di viaggio con cui possano uscire dal limbo dell’accoglienza e andare a firmare un contratto di lavoro, che sia in Italia o in Germania. E dare così un senso ai progetti che hanno seguito finora. Perché l’integrazione la fa il lavoro. E se il lavoro è in Germania, in Danimarca o in Norvegia, non ha senso costringere le persone dentro una mappa per motivi burocratici. Altro che riforma Dublino, noi dobbiamo chiedere la libera circolazione dentro l’Europa dei lavoratori immigrati. Perché non possiamo permetterci di avere cittadini di serie a e di serie b. E guardate che lo dobbiamo soprattutto a noi stessi.

      Perché chiunque di noi abbia dei bambini, sa che cresceranno in una società cosmopolita. Già adesso i loro migliori amici all’asilo sono arabi, cinesi, africani. Sdoganare un discorso razzista è una bomba a orologeria per la società del domani. Perché forse non ce ne siamo accorti, ma siamo già un noi. Il noi e loro è un discorso antiquato. Un discorso che forse suona ancora logico alle orecchie di qualche vecchio nazionalista. Ma che i miei figli non capirebbero mai. Perché io non riuscirei mai a spiegare ai miei bambini che ci sono dei bimbi come loro ripescati in mare dalla nave di una ONG e da due giorni sono bloccati al largo perché nessuno li vuole sbarcare a terra.

      Chissà, forse dovremmo ripartire da lì. Da quel noi e da quelle battaglie comuni. Dopotutto, siamo o non siamo una generazione a cui il mercato ha rubato il futuro e la dignità? Siamo o non siamo una generazione che ha ripreso a emigrare? E allora basta con le guerre tra poveri. Basta con le politiche forti coi deboli e deboli coi forti.

      Legalizzate l’emigrazione Africa –Europa, rilasciate visti validi per la ricerca di lavoro in tutta l’Europa, togliete alle mafie libiche il monopolio della mobilità sud-nord e facciamo tornare il Mediterraneo ad essere un mare di pace anziché una fossa comune. O forse trentamila morti non sono abbastanza?

    • By rejecting a migrant ship, Italian populists are simply following the EU’s lead

      The standoff over a boatload of men, women and children rescued in the Mediterranean encapsulates the morass of Europe’s migration policy so neatly that it is almost redundant to call it a metaphor.

      Some 629 migrants were left adrift in international waters while European Union member states competed to sound more resolute in their refusal of a safe port. It was left to Spain to intervene as supplies began to run out aboard the rescue ship, the Aquarius, one of the handful of charity boats still operating despite their routine harassment by the EU-backed Libyan coastguard. Meanwhile, Italy and Malta sniped at each other on social media, as policy was made in the form of hashtags such as “we’re shutting our ports”. Germany was too busy to comment as its leaders sound off over tougher asylum laws in response to the grisly murder of a teenage girl.

      Watching from the sidelines, the UN refugee agency asked meekly if Europe’s politicians could disembark the people in need aboard the Aquarius first and sort out their differences later.
      The starting point in understanding this mess should be to ask why Italy’s new interior minister, Matteo Salvini, has picked a fight over the Aquarius now.

      Migration policy watchers will be tempted to think that this is a public play to strengthen Italy’s position ahead of an end-of-June deadline to reform parts of the EU’s maddeningly complex asylum system. In this reading, Salvini is seeking an overhaul of the so-called Dublin regulations to ease the burden on frontline states such as Italy and Greece and remove the obligation for new arrivals to seek asylum in their country of first arrival.

      This interpretation would be both reassuring and completely wrong. This is not about the incremental advance of national interests.

      Where European observers had expected Italy to pick a fight with the EU over the single currency, its interior minister has gone straight for migration. Salvini understands, just as Viktor Orbán in Hungary and Sebastian Kurz in Austria do, that the EU has no response. Italy has been left alone to deal with sea arrivals from north Africa and talks over new Dublin regulations will not change this. There is no solidarity on asylum and migration.

      Salvini has blocked the Aquarius because this is the terrain on which he wins regardless of the outcome. As the leader of the far-right Northern League, he has built a campaign around promises of mass deportations of migrants. The fact that his proposals were and are impracticable and illegal did not prevent the League from gaining a 17% share of the vote.

      Salvini’s bombastic claims that African migrants are turning Italy into a giant refugee camp ignore the fact that sea arrivals so far this year have dropped to one-fifth of the level during the same period last year.

      No matter – rhetorical battles over migration allow him to pose as the senior coalition partner and defender of Italy.

      EU migration policy, particularly since the record inflows of 2015, has been built on the idea that controlling sea arrivals would shore up Europe’s political centre. Human rights and international law could be subordinated to the need for control even if this meant co-opting Libyan militias, paying smugglers to act as coastguards or redirecting development aid to corrupt African regimes in return for trapping Africans on the move.

      European voters, the reasoning went, would forgive rights abuses in faraway places in return for harder borders. In its simplest formulation, EU policy-makers framed the choice as one between allowing moderates to talk like Salvini or getting Salvini himself.

      Critics of this policy consensus were dismissed as naive.

      Its arch practitioner was Italy’s previous interior minister Marco Minniti, who delivered a huge reduction in sea arrivals through a series of shady deals in Libya that turned smugglers and traffickers into Europe’s paid gatekeepers.

      Before the votes were counted in Italy the “Minniti plan” had many admirers in Europe’s capitals and on the European commission, the bloc’s executive body. Since the man himself and his party were swept out of power it has become painfully apparent that there is no electoral dividend for centrists who endorse anti-migration populism.

      Over the weekend Minniti and his former government colleagues hit out at Salvini’s refusal of a safe port to the Aquarius and boasted of the balance they had struck between “security” and “reception” – in other words between the deterrence of migration and the humane treatment of those who somehow slipped through. They are still missing the point.

      By treating migration policy as an arena of crisis where human rights and international law could be discarded in the rush to respond to a perceived panic, Minniti and his supporters in Brussels and Berlin were the midwives of Salvinism.

      It has been left to the mayors of southern Italy to defy their own government and publicly offer the Aquarius a safe port. Often the strongest rebuttal to the populists comes not from the tainted centre but from Europeans in the areas most affected by the actual movement of people.

      https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/11/italy-migrant-rescue-ship-standoff-aquarius

    • ASGI : Gravi responsabilità dell’Italia nella vicenda Aquarius

      Il comportamento del governo italiano nella vicenda Aquarius è gravissimo e l’intervento della Spagna non solleva l’Italia dalle sue responsabilità. ASGI lancia l’allarme sul possibile imminente ripetersi di episodi analoghi.

      Mentre scriviamo ancora non è definitivamente conclusa la vicenda della nave Aquarius, che ci auguriamo possa trovare felice esito anche grazie all’intervento delle autorità spagnole e, comunque, oltre la gestione che ha avuto da parte del Governo italiano.

      La scelta di solidarietà fatta dal Governo spagnolo di fornire assistenza materiale e giuridica ai naufraghi salvati dalla nave Aquarius, infatti, non deve oscurare la gravi responsabilità del governo italiano nella conduzione complessiva di tutte le operazioni.

      Va infatti ricordato che le operazioni di soccorso sono partite su impulso di un SOS diramato dall’MRCC (Comando generale del Corpo della Capitanerie di Porto) di Roma e che pertanto, in base al diritto internazionale – l’Italia è sempre stato il Paese giuridicamente responsabile del coordinamento dei soccorsi.

      Solo in questo senso possono essere lette le principali Convenzioni internazionali pertinenti in materia e, tra esse:

      – la Convenzione sulla salvaguardia della vita umana in mare (Convenzione SOLAS, firmata a Londra nel 1974 e ratificata dall’Italia con L. 313/1980);
      – la Convenzione internazionale sulla ricerca ed il soccorso in mare (Convenzione SAR, firmata ad Amburgo nel 1979 e ratificata dall’Italia con L. 147/1989, da cui il Regolamento di attuazione D.P.R. 662/1994;
      – la Convenzione delle Nazioni Unite sul diritto del mare (Convenzione CNUDM o UNCLOS, adottata a Montegobay nel 1982 e ratificata dall’Italia con L. 689/1994)

      Fino al momento nel quale la Spagna non ha annunciato il suo intervento per ragioni umanitarie il centro di coordinamento dei soccorso italiano, competente e responsabile degli stessi, ha continuato a non indicare alcuna destinazione alla barca Aquarius, rendendosi completamente inadempiente verso precisi obblighi indicati dal diritto internazionale ed interno e ponendo a rischio la vita di centinaia di persone.

      La situazione di pericolo e di estrema difficoltà, in cui si trovavano e si trovano tutt’ora i migranti, oltre ai membri dell’equipaggio, integra senza dubbio una situazione di pericolo che non fa ritenere legittima alcuna limitazione all’approdo in un porto italiano. Nel caso di specie doveva, infatti, immediatamente trovare applicazione l’art. 18, par. 2 della Convenzione UNCLOS, la quale prevede che lo Stato costiero non può invocare una violazione del diritto di passaggio inoffensivo né obbligare la nave straniera a riprendere il largo. Conseguentemente, lo Stato costiero, nel cui mare territoriale, o nelle vicinanze del quale, si trovi una nave in una situazione di pericolo è, infatti, il titolare primario dell’obbligo di portare soccorso ed è responsabile della conclusione del salvataggio. La nave che si trova quindi in una situazione di pericolo implicante una minaccia per la vita delle persone a bordo, qualsiasi sia lo status di questi passeggeri, gode di un “diritto” di accesso al porto.

      Il diniego di accesso ai porti italiani a imbarcazioni che abbiano effettuato il soccorso in mare comporta la violazione degli articoli 2 e 3 della Convenzione Europea dei Diritti dell’Uomo, applicabile poiché l’Italia, nel coordinare l’azione SAR, esercita funzioni esecutive al di fuori del proprio territorio «conformemente al diritto internazionale» (v. mutatis mutandis, Al-Skeini c. Regno Unito e Jaloud c. Paesi Bassi). Le persone soccorse vertevano infatti in evidente necessità di cure mediche urgenti, nonché di generi di prima necessità (acqua, cibo, medicinali), e tali bisogni non potevano esser soddisfatti in alto mare. Le condizioni alle quali gli stessi sono stati sottoposti determinano l’esposizione di uomini, donne e bambini ad un reale trattamento disumano e degradante ( in violazione dell’art. 3 cedu) e ad un serio rischio per la loro vita (in violazione dell’ art. 2 cedu).

      Sulla nave Aquarius vi erano richiedenti asilo e rifugiati, pertanto la scelta del governo italiano di negare un porto sicuro a queste persone, anche poiché le operazioni di soccorso erano state gestite dalle autorità italiane, avrebbe potuto comportare per lo Stato Italiano la violazione del principio di non refoulment ai sensi dell’art 33 della Convenzione di Ginevra sullo Status dei Rifugiati del 1951 se non si fosse trovato un porto sicuro. Il principio di non refoulment è un principio di diritto internazionale generale, vincolante per tutti gli Stati anche indipendentemente dalla ratifica della Convenzione del 1951; esso stabilisce il divieto di respingimento verso qualsiasi luogo in cui una persona potrebbe trovarsi esposta al rischio di persecuzione e/o di condizione ascrivibile a trattamento disumano e degradante, trattamento nel quale si sono trovati a vivere coloro che erano da giorni in alto mare in assenza di approdo in porto sicuro.
      Sotto il profilo del diritto penale, l’obbligo di prestare soccorso configura una precisa prescrizione giuridica, la quale non può essere disattesa. Si ritiene che la condotta tenuta dall’MRCC di Roma sia stata suscettibile da integrare almeno la fattispecie dell’omissione di soccorso ai sensi dell’art. 593 c.p. A ciò si aggiunga che se dal ritardo dell’ingresso fossero derivate (o dovessero derivare) morte o lesioni in capo alle persone a bordo, ciò integrerebbe fattispecie penali autonome, quali omicidio o lesioni, che sarebbero imputabili a tutta la catena di comando italiana in ragione dell’evidente dovere giuridico di salvaguardia della vita che incombe sul paese che coordina i soccorsi

      Il “braccio di ferro” diplomatico attuato parte del Governo italiano con le Autorità di Malta e con la UE ha messo a rischio la vita di centinaia di persone ed il rispetto di basilari diritti della persona e ciò costituisce un precedente gravissimo nella storia europea.

      Il governo italiano aveva tutti gli strumenti legali e politici per far valere nella fase di discussione e votazione del Regolamento Dublino IV le argomentazioni che ha portato invece sul piano mediatico e dell’uso della forza contro persone in stato di necessità dimostrando l’esplicita volontà di non proporre politiche costruttive rinunciando ad un ruolo centrale nel dibattito europeo. Il governo italiano, invece, ha voluto imporre il solo uso della forza. Sarebbe stato possibile per il Ministro degli Interni in carica recarsi a Bruxelles e discutere della necessità di ripartizione equa dei rifugiati fra gli stati europei facendo valere in modo democratico e legale presso tale sede le priorità individuate dall’esecutivo italiano, senza incorrere nelle violazioni dei diritti umani fondamentali e delle norme cogenti.

      ASGI, nell’auspicare che la specifica vicenda abbia esito rapido e positivo, ha tuttavia il fondato timore che situazioni analoghe possano ripetersi già dalle prossime ore fa appello a tutte le istituzioni e al Parlamento, nonché a tutte le forze democratiche del Paese, affinché l’Italia non si renda più responsabile degli indecorosi eventi che si sono consumati negli ultimi giorni e che il diritto internazionale e quello interno in materia di soccorsi in mare venga scrupolosamente rispettato.

      https://www.asgi.it/asilo-e-protezione-internazionale/aquarius-violazione-diritto-internazionale

    • Migranti, Toninelli: «Non è detto che il posto in cui debbano sbarcare sia un porto. Può essere una nave»

      "Non c’è scritto da nessuna parte che il «place of safety», cioè il luogo in cui devono essere sbarcati e messi in sicurezza i migranti, debba essere un porto. Può essere anche una nave, battente bandiera straniera. Di conseguenza noi chiederemo un’assunzione di responsabilità a quei paesi di cui le navi della Ong battono bandiera". Così il ministro delle Infrastrutture Danilo Toninelli, al termine del vertice sull’immigrazione a Palazzo Chigi. Di fronte a chi gli fa notare che però questo significherebbe, nel caso della nave Aquarius che batte bandiera britannica, circumnavigare l’Oceano per arrivare in Inghilterra (contravvenendo dunque al principio del porto sicuro più vicino), Toninelli fa dietrofront: «Noi chiediamo un’assunzione di responsabilità e condivisione delle spese».

      https://video.repubblica.it/dossier/immigrati-2015/migranti-toninelli-non-e-detto-che-il-posto-in-cui-debbano-sbarcare-sia-un-porto-puo-essere-una-nave/307625/308254

    • Aquarius : l’Union européenne et les Etats membres doivent cesser de traiter les migrants comme « des patates chaudes »

      Bruxelles, 13 juin 2018 – Stupéfaits et inquiets de ce moderne Exodus, on voit se profiler à l’horizon le cabotage infini de ce bateau qui passe du statut de sauveteur à celui de fardeau. Le nouveau gouvernement italien, en large partie acquis aux idées xénophobes et racistes de Matéo Salvini, montre ses muscles et refuse de laisser mouiller l’Aquarius dans ses ports. Dont acte, l’AEDH savait ne rien devoir attendre d’un gouvernement dont les partenaires avaient annoncé pendant la campagne électorale qu’il ne respecterait pas les droits de l’Homme.

      Aujourd’hui, le nouveau gouvernement espagnol a annoncé que son pays est prêt à accueillir les « naufragés des droits » dans le port de Valence. L’AEDH salue cet acte et souhaite qu’il fasse exemple pour tous les États membres. Elle recommande que cet accueil se révèle inconditionnel et qu’ayant fait le principal, sauver des vies, le gouvernement de Pedro Sanchez s’illustre en offrant de dignes conditions de séjour. On souhaiterait également que ce nouveau gouvernement mette fin aux opérations de push-back des migrants se présentant aux enceintes de Ceuta et Melilla.

      Et les autres pays concernés par « les affaires de Méditerranée », que font-ils ? Malte refuse d’accueillir mais se donne bonne conscience en envoyant des vivres, la France de Macron se réfugie derrière une interprétation hasardeuse du droit de la mer contre le droit humanitaire pour ne rien faire et attend piteusement 48 h qu’un autre pays se dévoue…

      L’AEDH est au regret de constater que l’Union européenne est à la remorque des Etats membres. Notre association souhaite que le Conseil européen joue enfin son rôle d’orientation de la politique européenne et condamne l’attitude indigne des États membres qui, dominés par la peur, alignent leurs politiques migratoires sur celles prônées par les forces d’extrême droite.

      L’AEDH condamne avec force le refus d’accueillir du gouvernement italien. Mais depuis longtemps elle s’oppose aussi aux refus de la Pologne, de la Hongrie, de la Slovaquie, de la République tchèque d’accueillir des réfugiés. Elle ne peut non plus accepter les faux semblants de bien d’autres gouvernements, qui tout en proclamant qu’ils vont accueillir, imposent des règles tellement restrictives qu’ils organisent de fait la chasse aux migrants et les expulsent. C’est en particulier le cas de la France où l’on retrouve des migrants morts à la fonte des neiges, de la Belgique où la police peut tirer sur des migrants.

      L’AEDH affirme que le refus des Etats membres et de la Commission de procéder à l’abrogation du règlement Dublin est non seulement un manquement grave aux droits des personnes mais une stupidité qui enferme les États-membres situés aux frontières extérieures de l’U.E. dans un dilemme impossible : accueillir des milliers de migrants ou les repousser. C’est à cause du règlement Dublin, que le système d’accueil est devenu purement et simplement un moyen d’externaliser les migrants vers les pays de leur première entrée, en particulier l’Italie et la Grèce. Et si la Méditerranée a tant d’importance, c’est que la route par la Turquie a été bloquée par l’ignoble accord conclu avec ce pays, en fermant pudiquement les yeux sur la politique d’Erdogan qui piétine les droits fondamentaux de tant de citoyens en Turquie.

      L’AEDH considère que l’ensemble des Etats membres sont collectivement responsables du désastre italien. Elle demande à toutes ses associations membres, à tous les citoyens et à toutes les citoyennes de l’UE d’agir pour que l’on change de politique.

      C’est le but de l’ICE lancée depuis quelques semaines : « Nous sommes une Europe accueillante : laissez-nous agir ! ». Signez, faites signer, transmettez, montrez votre appui envers ces enfants, ces femmes, ces hommes qui croyaient avoir enfin pu prendre le bateau de l’espoir, cet Aquarius qui symbolise notre solidarité.

      http://www.aedh.eu/aquarius-lunion-europeenne-et-les-etats-membres-doivent-cesser-de-traiter-les-m

    • Migranti nel Mediterraneo, ong non può fare trasbordo: “Nessun porto assegnato, si rischia nuovo caso Aquarius”

      Una nave della Marina Usa ha salvato 41 persone e recuperato 12 corpi senza vita nel Mediterraneo. Ma l’imbarcazione di Sea Watch, che l’ha raggiunta e a bordo ha cibo e coperte, non può assistere i sopravvissuti. Perché da Roma non sono arrivate istruzioni

      https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2018/06/13/migranti-salvati-su-nave-militare-usa-ma-la-ong-sea-watch-non-puo-fare-trasbordo-nessun-porto-assegnato-si-rischia-nuovo-caso-aquarius/4426052

    • Aquarius procede a fatica contro il mare in burrasca, ancora a ridosso della Sicilia, a sud di Marsala. La velocita con la quale avanza verso nord-ovest d’ di appena 5 nodi e mezzo. A questa velocità impiegherà almeno 6 giorni per arrivare a Valencia. Salvini sta imponendo un trattamento disumano ai migranti dopo quello che si può definire un respingimento illecito. I migranti erano stati soccorsi da mezzi della Guardia costiera ed erano già entrati in territorio italiano.

      LA AQUARIUS DEVE ENTRARE NEL PORTO DI TRAPANI CHE SI TROVA SULLA SUA ROTTA. ASSIEME ALLA DATTILO CHE LA SCORTA CON ALTRI MIGRANTI A BORDO.
      VALENCIA NON E’ RAGGIUNGIBILE . IL PIANO DI SALVINI E’ DISUMANO.

      VI PREGO DI FARE GIRARE AL MASSIMO QUESTA NOTIZIA. LE AGENZIE DI INFORMAZIONI DANNO SOLO NOTIZIE RASSICURANTI CHE NON CORRISPONDONO ALLA SITUAZIONE REALE DEL MARE.


      https://www.facebook.com/isabelle.saintsaens/posts/10215493114986035?comment_id=10215493417153589&notif_id=1528933312392754&n

    • Autre ONG bloquée dans ses opérations de sauvetage en mer, cette fois-ci c’est #Sea-Watch. Voici leur communiqué du 13 juin 2018 :
      Shipwreck survivors and bodies stuck on US warship due to italian port closure – Sea-Watch 3 last rescue vessel left in Mediterranean.

      41 survivors and 12 deceased in a shipwreck off the Libyan Coast yesterday morning are still stuck on a US warship as Italy closed its ports to rescue vessels. Sea-Watch strongly denounces the fact that once again people in distress at sea are being held in diplomatic limbo. The dispute on migration must not be carried out at the expense of people in need. A surveillance aircraft of the civil rescue fleet is currently operating in the SAR zone to search for further distress cases and bodies of yesterday’s shipwreck. The Sea-Watch 3 is also patrolling the SAR zone in close proximity to the US warship. Meanwhile, we still await instructions as no state has taken responsibility so far. The Sea-Watch 3 is currently the only dedicated rescue asset in the Mediterranean Sea.

      At 12.36 local time, the Sea-Watch office received a request by a US Navy warship to take over 41 survivors and 12 deceased in a shipwreck 20 nautical miles off the Libyan coast. Our vessel Sea-Watch 3 proceeded towards the given position as the only civil rescue asset left in the mediterranean sea at that moment. “It is unacceptable that people who have literally been picked out of the water, who have seen their friends drowning, still do not get a place of safety, this is a damning indictment of the European Union’s policy on immigration. A dispute about the distribution of asylum seekers must not be carried out at the expense of people in maritime distress” says Johannes Bayer, Sea-Watch chairman and head of the current mission of the Sea-Watch 3. “We urge the European governments to find a quick solution for this humiliating tragedy”.

      Meanwhile, Italian Coast Guard asset CP941 is disembarking 932 people and 2 dead bodies in the Sicilian port of Catania today, which shows a double standard upheld by the Italian government.
      NGO vessels have consistently taken responsibility for search and rescue activities in the world’s most dangerous migration route, yet they have become the scapegoat of the Italian government, as it attempts to pressure the rest of the EU to share in the responsibility towards people in distress and in wider migration policy reforms, including that of the Dublin III regulation. Sea-Watch therefore urges the European states to make way for a political solution for this charade; after safe arrival to Italy, there are also many roads that lead from Rome.

      Furthermore, yesterday’s shipwreck shows a deadly lack of rescue capacity at sea, and it is evident that in the absence of safe and legal passage to Europe, such shipwrecks will only continue to occur. “If the Aquarius wasn’t stuck on the way to Valencia, maybe those people could have been rescued” Bayer says. Still there is no knowledge about the real number of drownings as it is likely not all bodies could be retrieved. “We urge the European states to take responsibility and to stop gambling with lives at sea,” Bayer says.

      https://sea-watch.org/en/shipwreck-survivors-and-bodies-stuck-on-us-warship-due-to-italian-port-cl

    • « Aquarius » 2018, « Saint-Louis » 1939 : l’histoire bégaie

      Alors que l’Aquarius a été refoulé par l’Italie, il y a quatre-vingts ans des réfugiés fuyaient le nazisme en embarquant sur un paquebot transatlantique, le « Saint-Louis ».

      Le refus de l’Italie de laisser accoster l’Aquarius n’est que l’expression paroxystique de la politique des Etats européens qui, depuis des années, mettent toute leur énergie à tenir à distance migrants et exilés. Mais cette image d’un vaisseau fantôme nous renvoie aussi quatre-vingts ans en arrière, quand les réfugiés fuyant le nazisme se voyaient systématiquement refuser l’accès à une terre d’asile.

      Entre hier et aujourd’hui, les analogies sont frappantes : la fermeture de plus en plus hermétique des frontières à mesure que la persécution s’aggrave et que les flux d’exilés augmentent ; des réfugiés contraints d’embarquer clandestinement sur des bateaux de fortune avec l’espoir, souvent déçu, qu’on les laissera débarquer quelque part ; en guise de justification, la situation économique et le chômage, d’un côté, l’état de l’opinion dont il ne faut pas attiser les tendances xénophobes et antisémites, de l’autre ; le fantasme, hier, de la troisième colonne – agitateurs communistes, espions nazis –, aujourd’hui de la menace terroriste ; et finalement une diplomatie qui n’hésite pas à pactiser avec les pires dictatures, hier pour tenter de sauver la paix (on sait ce qu’il en est advenu), aujourd’hui pour tenter d’endiguer les flux de réfugiés.
      Réfugiés interdits de débarquer à Cuba

      Visas refusés, frontières closes : les réfugiés sont acculés, en désespoir de cause, à prendre la mer, le plus souvent clandestinement. A la veille de la guerre, des dizaines, des centaines de bateaux, parfois des paquebots de ligne, souvent des bâtiments de fortune ou de contrebande qui ont pris leurs passagers en charge frauduleusement, naviguent sur les océans à la recherche d’un port où ils seront autorisés à débarquer : le Cairo part le 22 avril 1939 de Hambourg pour Alexandrie ; l’Usaramo pour Shanghai ; l’Orbita pour le Panama en juin 1939 ; l’Orinoco, vers Cuba… (1). D’autres restent bloqués pendant des semaines ou des mois dans les ports roumains de la mer Noire ou sur le Danube.

      Même ceux qui ont des papiers d’immigration en règle ne sont pas assurés d’être admis, comme le montre l’histoire cruelle du Saint-Louis. Ce paquebot transatlantique quitte Hambourg le 13 mai 1939 en direction de La Havane. Ses 937 passagers, presque tous des juifs fuyant le Troisième Reich, sont en possession de certificats de débarquement émis par le directeur général de l’Immigration de Cuba. Mais, dans l’intervalle, le président cubain a invalidé ces certificats. On interdit donc aux passagers de débarquer. Le bateau repart, et lorsqu’il passe le long des côtes de Floride une demande est adressée au président des Etats-Unis afin qu’il leur accorde l’asile – elle ne reçoit pas de réponse. Le 6 juin 1939, le Saint-Louis reprend sa route vers l’Europe. In extremis, avant que le bateau ne soit contraint de revenir en Allemagne, le Jewish Joint Commitee réussit à négocier avec les gouvernements européens une répartition des passagers entre la Grande-Bretagne, la France, la Belgique et les Pays-Bas qui n’acceptèrent de les accueillir qu’à condition qu’il ne s’agisse que d’un transit dans l’attente d’une émigration définitive vers une autre destination. Temporairement sauvés, une majorité d’entre eux connaîtra le sort réservé aux juifs dans les pays occupés par l’Allemagne.
      Un gigantesque marché noir

      Les embarquements clandestins se poursuivent une fois la guerre déclenchée, les réfugiés prenant des risques croissants pour tenter de rejoindre clandestinement la Palestine depuis les ports de la mer Noire, à travers le Bosphore, les Dardanelles et la mer Egée. Un gigantesque marché noir s’organise, avec la bénédiction des nazis qui, avant la programmation de la « solution finale », y voient une façon de débarrasser l’Europe de ses juifs. Beaucoup de ces « bateaux cercueils », comme on les a appelés, font naufrage, d’autres sont victimes des mines ou des sous-marins allemands, et les épidémies déciment ceux qui ont réussi à survivre. Décidément, on a l’impression que l’histoire bégaie.

      http://www.liberation.fr/debats/2018/06/13/aquarius-2018-saint-louis-1939-l-histoire-begaie_1658569

    • #Marie-Christine_Vergiat : « C’est l’Union européenne qui a créé cette situation »

      L’eurodéputée Marie-Christine Vergiat dénonce la responsabilité de l’Union européenne qui, depuis une demi-douzaine d’années, laisse l’Italie gérer seule l’accueil des migrants pour l’Europe. Avec les dégâts politiques que l’on sait.

      Qui porte la responsabilité du blocage de l’Aquarius depuis dimanche, aux portes de l’Europe ? Si Matteo Salvini, le ministre de l’intérieur italien d’extrême droite, fait du refus de l’accueil des migrants sa marque de fabrique électoraliste, c’est l’Union européenne qui est la principale coupable du drame qui se joue actuellement, estime Marie-Christine Vergiat, députée européenne Front de gauche, membre de la GUE au Parlement de Strasbourg.

      L’Aquarius bloqué pendant deux jours en pleine mer : à qui la faute ?

      Marie-Christine Vergiat : C’est l’Union européenne qui, par absence de solidarité vis-à-vis de l’Italie, a créé cette situation. Avant 2011, et pendant des années, Malte [sollicitée après le refus de l’Italie – ndlr] a dû gérer toute seule l’arrivée des migrants, c’est pourquoi cette fois elle a refusé de prendre en charge l’Aquarius.

      Depuis 2011, date à laquelle les mouvements de population ont commencé à devenir plus importants, on a ensuite laissé l’Italie en première ligne se débrouiller. Aujourd’hui, elle accueille chaque année entre 100 000 et 150 000 personnes sur son territoire. Avec la mise en avant de « Dublin 3 », l’Italie a pris en charge le poids du sauvetage en mer pour toute l’Europe, et elle l’a plutôt bien fait.

      Il faut voir que quand le gouvernement italien a lancé l’opération « Mare Nostrum » pour aller secourir les personnes, elle s’est retrouvée seule. Matteo Renzi a dû trouver 95 millions d’euros d’octobre 2013 à octobre 2014 pour financer l’opération et, quand il a demandé de l’aide, le Conseil européen lui a donné 5 millions d’euros. Quant à la Grèce, elle a été en première ligne en 2015 et 2016, et a accueilli un million de personnes, là encore, seule.

      Comment expliquez-vous qu’il n’y ait jamais eu de répartition concertée des migrants entre les États membres ?

      En 2015, Jean-Claude Juncker, le président de la Commission européenne, a fait ce qu’il a pu : il a demandé à ce que 160 000 personnes soient « délocalisées » depuis l’Italie et la Grèce vers les autres pays européens sur deux ans. Même si cela était très insuffisant puisqu’il y avait 1,4 million de personnes arrivées en Italie et en Grèce sur la même période. Mais le premier réflexe des pays a été de refuser et de fermer leurs frontières. Heureusement qu’en 2015 et 2016, l’Allemagne d’Angela Merkel a accueilli 60 % des réfugiés (parmi eux, deux tiers de Syriens). Mais il faut rappeler que le nombre de réfugiés accueillis en Europe est une goutte d’eau par rapport à ce que vit le Moyen-Orient.

      Et pourtant, si l’on en croit les récentes élections en Italie notamment, le discours de l’extrême droite contre les migrants semble payant politiquement…

      Récemment, la Commission européenne a présenté une étude qui montre que les Européens restent solidaires des réfugiés dans tous les pays d’Europe, excepté en Italie. On peut pousser des cris d’orfraie, ce sentiment anti-immigré ne tombe pas du ciel. C’est facile de commenter alors qu’en France, on n’a jamais ouvert nos ports pour soulager l’Italie ou la Grèce. En réalité, la France a été très peu impactée par la crise migratoire. Le nombre de demandeurs d’asile n’a presque pas augmenté. Entre 2015 et 2016, il est passé de 85 000 à 95 000. Et encore, nous sommes un des pays où le taux d’acceptation des demandes d’asile est le plus bas – entre 35 et 40 % –, ce qui est en dessous de bien des pays européens. Quand on voit ce qui se passe à la frontière franco-italienne, c’est hallucinant : on fait du contrôle au faciès des migrants, au mépris des lois nationales, européennes et internationales… Il y a de quoi avoir honte de nos gouvernements ! En plus, ils se cachent derrière les accords de Dublin pour renvoyer les migrants dans le pays où ils ont accosté, donc très souvent en Italie, alors qu’il n’y a aucune obligation de « dublinage » : si le pays d’arrivée est obligé d’accepter le retour de la personne qui lui a été renvoyée, en revanche, l’autre pays européen n’est absolument pas obligé de la renvoyer là d’où elle vient.

      Où en êtes-vous de la réforme des accords de Dublin ?

      Il y a actuellement un bras de fer entre le Parlement européen et le Conseil européen. Au Parlement, six groupes sur huit, de la droite à la gauche européenne, sont d’accord pour proposer une clé de répartition. Le problème, c’est que le Conseil européen ne veut pas de cette solution et veut durcir Dublin en obligeant au renvoi dans le pays. Et contrairement à ce qu’on peut croire, il n’y a pas que les pays de l’Est qui bloquent. Les gouvernants, à l’exception des pays du Sud, affirment que mettre en place une répartition est trop compliqué pour les migrants et que c’est pour cela qu’ils refusent. Mais le problème, c’est qu’ils ne se donnent pas les moyens de l’accueil…

      Comment faire avancer les choses, puisqu’un blocage politique semble favoriser la flambée des extrêmes droites ?

      Le seul moyen de résister c’est, au lieu de courir derrière l’extrême droite, de faire tout le contraire : de montrer, d’une part, qu’il n’y a pas de « submersion » migratoire et, d’autre part, que si l’accueil est pensé et organisé, tout peut très bien se passer. Ce n’est de toute façon pas en construisant des murs qu’on va empêcher les migrants de venir.

      Cet épisode très médiatique de l’Aquarius bloqué en mer peut-il pousser le Conseil européen à revoir ses positions ?

      Il faut espérer que cette histoire permette de montrer ce qui se passe au Conseil européen. En tout cas, Pedro Sánchez, le nouveau président espagnol, a été courageux d’accepter que les 629 personnes bloquées sur le bateau débarquent en Espagne – même si cela s’explique par le fait que la question migratoire apparaît moins comme un enjeu du débat en Espagne… Aujourd’hui, il faut travailler dans deux directions pour l’opinion publique européenne : d’abord, expliquer que les migrations principales viennent non pas des pays du Sud, mais du Nord et d’Asie (Inde et Chine), et que les premiers migrants en Europe sont ukrainiens – ils arrivent en Pologne pour le travail. Ensuite, rappeler que la grande majorité des migrants arrivent de façon régulière (immigration de travail, pour faire des études, regroupement familial…) et que l’une des manières d’éviter les morts en Méditerranée et de ne pas faire le jeu des passeurs et des trafiquants, c’est d’ouvrir des voies de passage légales.

      https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/international/110618/marie-christine-vergiat-c-est-l-union-europeenne-qui-cree-cette-situation

    • La nave Usa che ha lasciato i corpi in mare vicina al porto di Augusta

      La Trenton della Us Navy, con a bordo i 40 superstiti del naufragio di martedì, ha abbandonato i cadaveri alla deriva perché non ha celle frigorifere. Ora incrocia al largo del porto siciliano, ma all’Italia non è arrivata nessuna richiesta formale.

      La nave Trenton della sesta flotta della Us Navy, con a bordo i 40 superstiti del naufragio di un gommone avvenuto martedì mattina, è ricomparsa al largo del porto di Augusta. Appare evidente l’intenzione di sbarcare nel porto siciliano i superstiti che ha a bordo ormai da tre giorni, nell’attesa che qualcuno dia indicazioni sul porto più vicino disposto a farli scendere. Tuttavia non risulta alcuna richiesta formale da parte degli Stati Uniti all’Italia che, peraltro, non ha mai assunto alcun coordinamento del soccorso, avvenuto a sole venti miglia dalle coste libiche.

      Perché dunque la nave americana, che ha lasciato andare alla deriva i corpi delle 12 vittime del naufragio, ha fatto rotta verso l’Italia invece di chiedere l’approdo in un altro Paese? Un altro caso spinoso per il governo italiano, che si trova adesso a dover decidere se autorizzare l’ingresso della nave della Us Navy nel porto di Augusta.

      Da tre giorni, ormai, dopo aver invano chiesto di poter trasbordare il suo carico sulla nave della Ong tedesca Sea Watch, la nave vagava in attesa di sapere dove poter sbarcare i vivi. I morti, quelli, vista la complessità della situazione, hanno deciso di abbandonarli in acqua. "Non ci sono salme a bordo della Trenton - ha confermato a «Repubblica» l’ufficio pubbliche relazioni della Us Navy - l’equipaggio continua a prendersi cura delle 40 persone soccorse. Ci stiamo coordinando con i nostri partner internazionali per decidere la destinazione delle persone a bordo".

      Dalla Us Navy spiegano così l’abbandono dei 12 cadaveri le cui operazioni di recupero erano state comunicate via radio dalla Trenton martedi mattina contestualmente alla richiesta di aiuto avanzata alla vicina nave della ong tedesca Sea Watch prima e all’IMRCC di Roma poi. < Abbiamo visto in un primo momento 12 corpi apparentemente senza vita. I soccorritori hanno dato priorità al recupero di coloro che avevano bisogno di aiuto immediato. La barca di salvataggio è poi tornata sul posto per cercare quei corpi, ma non li ha trovati". «Se necessario - si legge in una nota - le navi della US Navy sono in grado di conservare i corpi in depositi refrigerati».
      Un orrore destinato a scatenare un nuovo caso visto che, a impedire un rapido trasferimento dei superstiti e delle salme a terra, è l’impasse provocato dall’ostracismo annunciato dal ministro dell’Interno Matteo Salvini alle navi delle Ong. Martedi, subito dopo il soccorso, dopo aver chiamato le guardie costiere libica e italiana, la nave americana si è rivolta alla Sea watch, comunicando di avere in corso il recupero dei 12 corpi, e ha chiesto la disponibilità al trasbordo. «Corpi non possiamo prenderne, non abbiamo le celle. E i superstiti li prendiamo solo se ci assegnano contestualmente un porto sicuro che non sia più lontano di 36 ore di navigazione».

      Dopo il caso Aquarius, il rischio è che poi, con i migranti a bordo, non venga concesso un porto in Italia e la nave, che non è grande, non potrebbe affrontare una lunga navigazione come quella cui è stata costretta la Aquarius. La richiesta viene reiterata dagli americani alla sala operativa di Roma, ma la risposta è che il soccorso non è stato coordinato da Roma e dunque non spetta a loro indicare il porto. In realtà il soccorso non è stato coordinato da nessuno.

      http://www.repubblica.it/cronaca/2018/06/14/news/la_nave_usa_senza_celle_frigoriferi_alla_deriva_12_corpi-198956762/?ref=RHPPLF-BH-I0-C8-P2-S1.8-T1

    • Aquarius, la nave di migranti cambia rotta e si dirige verso la Sardegna

      La decisione dovuta al maltempo. Sos Mediterranee spiega: «Le persone a bordo sono esauste, scioccate e con il mal di mare». Il ministro Salvini ribatte: «Problemi loro. A giorni ci saranno novità sul ruolo delle ong»

      «Dattilo, la nave della Guardia Costiera italiana che guida il nostro convoglio, ha deciso di cambiare rotta», twitta Sos Mediterranee, sottolineando che si tratta di una scelta dovuta al maltempo. «Aquarius proseguirà lungo la costa orientale della Sardegna — aggiunge la ong francese — per ripararsi dal maltempo altrimenti insopportabile per le persone a bordo, esauste, scioccate e con il mal di mare». Il ministro degli Interni Matteo Salvini, però, non cede: non ci sarà nessun attracco sulle coste sarde, Aquarius «arriverà in Spagna». Se le persone a bordo hanno problemi, «sono solo loro — afferma —. La nave prende a bordo sistematicamente 500 persone a tratta: ora ne hanno 100, un quinto di quelle che imbarcano di solito. Non è che adesso possano anche decidere dove cominciare e dove finire la crociera». «A giorni ci saranno novità sul ruolo delle ong», aggiunge. «Verranno messi i puntini sulle i, su chi fa cosa e su chi rispetta la legge e chi non la rispetta», ha aggiunto.

      La situazione sull’Aquarius

      Sull’Aquarius ci sono al momento 52 donne, 10 bambini e 45 uomini, tra cui alcuni trattati per sindrome da annegamento o con gravi ustioni da carburante e acqua salata; gli altri 523 profughi sono stati trasbordati sulle due unità navali italiane che la stanno scortando. Tutti i 629 migranti sono stati trasferiti per sicurezza all’interno delle tre imbarcazioni del convoglio: diversi di loro hanno accusato malori durante la notte per il «vento a 35 nodi e le onde alte 4 metri — comunicano i soccorritori —, abbiamo messo dei corrimano perché è difficile stare in piedi».

      Lo «schermo» alle onde

      Il percorso iniziale per il porto di Valencia prevedeva un passaggio a sud della Sardegna ma, considerato che l’apice della perturbazione è previsto sul lato occidentale, si vogliono utilizzare l’isola come «barriera» al maltempo; e tagliare le Bocche di Bonifacio, sotto la Corsica, per raggiungere quindi la Spagna. L’operazione è destinata ad allungare ulteriormente il viaggio verso la terra ferma della «nave della discordia», che ha innescato una crisi diplomatica tra Italia e Francia e un durissimo scambio di accuse con Malta, oltre all’accorato appello di Papa Francesco. L’approdo, meteo permettendo, potrebbe avvenire a questo punto domenica sera. «Abbiamo distribuito arance, barrette di cereali, cornetti e thè freddo forniti ieri dalla Guardia Costiera Italiana» rende noto il personale di Medici senza frontiere, che gestisce l’emergenza con Sos Mediterranee. Nel frattempo la zona di ricerca e soccorso resta sempre più scoperta e 12 cadaveri sono rimasti in mare». «L’identificazione del porto di sbarco è una decisione nazionale su cui l’Ue non ha competenza - afferma intanto la ministra degli Esteri europea, Federica Mogherini -, però viste le notizie sulle condizioni del mare» nella legge «c’è una chiara indicazione» affinché venga fatto «ogni sforzo per limitare al minimo il tempo di permanenza sulla nave» degli immigrati; da ormai 5 giorni consecutivi in balìa del mare e delle polemiche politiche.

      Madrid prepara l’accoglienza

      Le autorità spagnole, dal canto loro, fanno sapere che esamineranno «caso per caso» la situazione dei 629 richiedenti asilo per decidere, con «colloqui individuali», quali trasferire nei centri di aiuto umanitario e quali nelle strutture di detenzione per stranieri; esattamente come avviene per gli extracomunitari che arrivano attraverso i barconi o le enclavi marocchine di Ceuta e Melilla. Il governo iberico sostiene di essersi comportato semplicemente «come obbliga la Costituzione rispetto ai trattati internazionali e europei». Lo sbarco dei migranti avverrà comunque in maniera scaglionata e lontano dagli occhi dei media.

      https://www.corriere.it/cronache/18_giugno_14/odissea-aquarius-nave-cambia-rotta-la-sardegna-24e4bd94-6fb4-11e8-b9b6-434f

    • Francia prenderà parte migranti Aquarius

      La vicepremier spagnola Carmen Calvo ha annunciato che la Francia collaborerà all’accoglienza dei migranti dell’Aquarius. Lo riporta La Vanguardia. Calvo, responsabile del coordinamento per l’accoglienza, ha accettato la proposta presentata dal governo francese, dopo una conversazione con l’ambasciatore francese in Spagna. Il presidente Pedro Sanchez, riferisce il quotidiano, ha ringraziato il presidente francese Emmanuel Macron, sottolineando che questa è la cooperazione «con cui l’Europa deve rispondere».

      http://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/mondo/europa/2018/06/16/francia-prendera-parte-migranti-aquarius_53ace0c1-88b9-4511-b1ab-6ab072e084aa.h
      #France

    • Migranti, dirottare le Ong nei porti di bandiera farebbe solo danni

      L’esperto di diritto del mare e di asilo Paleologo a L43: «La proposta di Salvini? Così si rallenta l’obbligo di salvataggio». Il ministro può ridiscutere Dublino, ma «non sulla pelle dei naufraghi».

      Il rallentamento, in alcuni casi fino al blocco, della catena di salvataggio in acque maltesi e libiche, di norma attraverso il coordinamento del comando della guardia costiera italiana, per effetto della chiusura dei nostri porti alle navi delle Ong straniere nel Mediterrano ha contribuito a provocare 12 morti e altre decine di feriti al largo della Libia, in seguito all’’altolà del neo ministro dell’Interno Matteo Salvini alla See Watch 3, «pronta dopo la Aquarius a raccogliere il suo carico umano davanti a Tripoli». Altre decine, centinaia di morti si temono nelle settimane a venire.

      CAMBIARE DUBLINO. Con i respingimenti delle navi straniere, il leader della Lega si aspetta un cambio della prassi e in prospettiva del regolamento di Dublino sui richiedenti asilo: far attraccare le imbarcazioni di Ong battenti bandiera straniera nei luoghi d’origine e non più in Italia, come i mezzi delle Marine di altri Paesi. Peccato che la legge internazionale non possa dargli ragione, né ora né mai: «Guardando alle bandiere», spiega a L43 l’avvocato in prima linea nei soccorsi in mare, componente della Clinica legale per i diritti umani dell’Università di Palermo e consulente del team legale di Open Arms, Fulvio Vassallo Paleologo, «verrebbe meno il salvataggio internazionale, ossia la stessa legge del mare».

      DOMANDA. Salvini ha chiuso i porti alle navi delle Ong straniere che caricano a bordo migranti naufraghi e sottolinea che debbano attraccare nei porti dei loro Paesi e non in Italia. Giuridicamente ha un fondamento la sua rivendicazione?
      RISPOSTA. No, intanto un ministro non può stabilire regole che valgono esclusivamente per le navi delle Ong. Quando richiamano i luoghi di sbarco – da indicare dalle competenti autorità nazionali e nel nostro caso dal comando della guardia costiera di Roma – le convenzioni di diritto del mare non distinguono tra navi umanitarie, navi commerciali o militari.

      D. La See Watch 3, additata da Salvini e bloccata nelle operazione come la Aquarius, è una Ong tedesca ma batte bandiera olandese: dopo i salvataggi potrebbe per esempio rientrare nei porti anche in Olanda, in Germania, o per legge deve attraccare per forza in Italia?
      R. Il criterio dello Stato di bandiera è arbitrario e non garantisce una sollecita conclusione delle operazioni di soccorso in un porto sicuro, che non è necessariamente quello più vicino ma deve trovarsi nello Stato della centrale operativa della guardia costiera che coordina i soccorsi.

      D. Nel caso del trasbordo dei 629 migranti nelle acque tra Malta e l’Italia dell’Aquarius, il coordinamento era della guardia costiera italiana. E inoltre la Aquarius è una nave umanitaria di Sos Mediterranee e Medici senza frontiere: Ong transeuropee o addirittura internazionali.
      R. Non a caso il criterio dello Stato di bandiera non è mai stato applicato in anni di soccorsi nel Mediterraneo perché è sussidiario. Non garantisce lo svolgimento rapido delle procedure di soccorso imposto dalle convenzioni internazionali. Seguirlo, come dice Salvini, segnerebbe la fine dell’obbligo di soccorso internazionale.

      D. La fine della legge universale del mare. Sempre legalmente, con i regolamenti europei e le norme internazionali attuali, si può chiedere alle navi per esempio della Marina francesi, inglesi e tedesche che salvano migranti nel Mediterraneo di dirigersi poi nei propri porti nazionali?
      R. Tutte le navi straniere delle operazioni Ue Frontex ed Eunavfor Med, ossia l’operazione militare Sofia, sono coordinate dalla centrale operativa della guardia costiera italiana, anche quando soccorrono nella zona di ricerca e salvataggio libica Sar, che in realtà esiste solo sulla carta. Di conseguenza devono sbarcare, come sbarcano, solo in porti italiani.

      D. Sulle responsabilità da redistribuire nelle acque territoriali dei Paesi membri dell’Ue, «e non solo all’Italia» ricorda sempre Salvini, la Francia se ne può lavare completamente le mani? La Spagna può fare di più? E Malta può essere pressata almeno dall’Ue a sottoscrivere le normative internazionali vigenti, per sgravare l’Italia anche dagli impegni nelle sue acque?
      R. A meno di una modifica sostanziale del regolamento Dublino, nessun Paese europeo può essere costretto a prendere a suo carico naufraghi soccorsi nelle zone di ricerca e salvataggio libiche o italiane. E il nuovo ministro dell’Interno non può imporre le modifiche con un ricatto sulla pelle di uomini, donne e bambini già duramente provati dalla sofferenza e dagli abusi subiti in Libia.

      D. La visione di Salvini può essere portata avanti politicamente al tavolo per cambiare il regolamento Dublino? È concepibile cioè un’Unione europea dove ogni mezzo di forze militari o Ong di Paesi membri impegnati nel Mediterraneo faccia riferimento, anziché all’Italia, al proprio Stato Ue specifico? Prendendosi a questo punto in carico anche la prima registrazione dei richiedenti asilo?
      R. L’odissea dell’Aquarius sta dimostrando che una redistribuzione dei naufraghi soccorsi in acque internazionali è possibile e lecita solo dopo il loro sbarco in un porto italiano, indicato dal comando centrale della guardia costiera. La scelta di sbarrare dei porti non aiuterà a cambiare il regolamento Dublino, specie se l’Italia farà fronte comune con l’Ungheria di Viktor Orban e l’Austria di Sebastian Kurz. Si avranno soltanto centinaia di morti in più, come conseguenza della cacciata delle Ong.

      https://www.lettera43.it/it/articoli/interviste/2018/06/17/migranti-soccorso-ong-straniere-salvini/221051

    • The Italian interior minister Matteo Salvini (Lega) has announced after negotiations with minister of infrastructure Danilo Toninelli (5 Stars), and the minister of defence Elisabetta Trenta (5 Stars) the retreat of the Italian rescue forces from the international waters of the central Mediterranean Sea. Instead, France, Spain, Greece, Malta, Libya, Tunisia, the EU with the Frontex-Themis operation and the NATO should take on the job. It is important to stress the following: this concerns the ‘death zone’ near the Libyan-Italian off-shore oil station in the central Mediterranean, where in the past three decades the most boat-people have drowned. Salvini’s plans are directed against the “radical crowd that wants to turn Italy into a refugee camp”. All the more important will it be to connect the activities of non-governmental rescuers in the Central Mediterranean with strategies of admit boat-people in Germany, France, and other EU member states.

      Salvini kündigt Abzug der Küstenwache aus internationalen Gewässern an
      Der italienische Innenminister Matteo Salvini (Lega) kündigt

      nach Beratung mit dem Infrastruktur-Minister Danilo Toninelli (5Stelle), und der Verteidigungsministerin Elisabetta Trenta (5Stelle) den Rückzug der italienischen Seenotrettung aus den internationalen Gewässern des zentralen Mittelmeers an. Stattdessen sollten Frankreich, Spanien, Griechenland, Malta, Libyen, Tunesien, die EU mit Frontex-Themis und die Nato diese Arbeit übernehmen.

      Hinzuweisen ist auf folgenden Hintergrund: Es geht um die Todeszone in der Nähe der libysch-italienischen Off-Shore-Petro-Förderanlagen im zentralen Mittelmeer, wo in den vergangenen drei Jahrzehnten die meisten Boat-people ertrunken sind. Salvini richtet dieses Abzugs-Vorhaben gegen die „radikale linke Schickeria, die Italien in ein Flüchtlingslager verwandeln will“.

      Um so dringlicher wird es, die Aktivität der NGO-Seenotrettung im zentralen Mittelmeer mit Strategien der Aufnahme von Bootsflüchtlingen in Deutschland, Frankreich und anderen EU-Ländern zu verbinden.

      http://ffm-online.org/2018/06/18/salvini-kuendigt-abzug-der-kuestenwache-aus-internationalen-gewaessern-a

    • Du « Saint-Louis » à l’« Aquarius » : 80 ans d’abomination envers les réfugiés

      Retour sur la pérégrination tragique du paquebot Saint-Louis, chargé de réfugiés juifs fuyant l’Allemagne nazie au printemps 1939, qui fut partout refoulé. Or voici que récidivent, sous nos yeux, la méprise et le mépris envers ceux qui migrent.

      Si cette histoire vous amuse,
      Nous allons la, la, la recommencer,
      Ohé ! Ohé !

      Ainsi s’achève – sans donc jamais se terminer – une comptine atroce (il y est question d’un mousse tiré à la courte paille échappant de peu à l’anthropophagie), qui semble saturer l’univers politique des adultes après avoir bercé leur enfance : Il était un petit navire. Le da capo suit son cours inexorable ; jusqu’à mimer le bégaiement de l’Histoire, maintenant et toujours.

      Navigation rime avec immigration et les Suisses opposèrent au flot des réfugiés de la Seconde Guerre mondiale une image impitoyable, dont le cinéaste helvète Markus Imhoof a fait un film : La barque est pleine (Das Boot ist voll). Le mot d’ordre apparaît plus que jamais d’actualité en cette fin de printemps 2018.

      Sous nos yeux se déroule l’errance d’un paquebot, dont le nom signifie en latin « qui se rapporte à l’eau » : Aquarius. Le sort réservé à ces migrants par une Europe absorbée dans sa graisse et dans ses ténèbres, rappelle la condition faite aux réfugiés du Saint-Louis par un monde sans lumières, opiniâtre et petit en tout à l’excès. C’était en 1939 : c’était hier et pourtant aujourd’hui.

      Nazifier les personnes et les événements relève certes du lieu commun, dénote une paresse de la pensée, tient du réflexe rhétorique pavlovien. Mais la concordance des temps s’avère parfois indéniable. À preuve, cet épisode du transatlantique allemand qui, le 13 mai 1939 – six mois après la Nuit de cristal –, laisse derrière lui le port de Hambourg dans un mugissement libérateur et des fumées de bon augure, avec à son bord quelque 900 juifs persuadés d’avoir échappé à la souricière hitlérienne.

      Le Saint-Louis fait route vers Cuba. Les voyageurs ont acheté à prix d’or des permis de débarquement : 500 dollars par passager (ce qui ferait aujourd’hui près de 9 000 dollars). Mais le président Federico Laredo Brú a signé entretemps son décret 937, qui invalide tous les engagements précédents de son pays. Ainsi prétend-il mettre fin à un trafic de visas ayant pris des proportions scandaleuses dans une île en crise.

      Le 27 mai, lorsque le paquebot entre dans le port de La Havane, interdiction lui est signifiée de s’approcher du quai, puis ordre lui est donné de regagner les eaux internationales. Surchauffée par l’extrême droite et ses journaux ayant soutenu la croisade de Francisco Franco en Espagne contre les rouges, la population cubaine manifeste (40 000 personnes dans les rues). Ne surtout pas laisser débarquer ces vecteurs du communisme – le messianisme juif étant lié à la révolution et donc à la dissolution de la société occidentale, selon un poncif politico-religieux de l’époque…

      Le navire se dirige alors vers la Floride, jette l’ancre au large de Miami. Attente angoissante. Rien n’y fait : l’Amérique isolationniste et le Département d’État antisémite auquel se fie encore le président Roosevelt, au pouvoir depuis plus de sept ans à Washington, se montrent inflexibles. Le souvenir et les effets de la Grande Dépression sont patents : 83 % des Américains s’opposent à l’allègement des quotas et restrictions de la loi sur l’immigration, selon un sondage du magazine Fortune.

      Les républicains ont réussi une percée lors des élections de mi-mandat, en novembre 1938. Pas question de céder à l’émotion, de créer un appel d’air en passant pour faible : l’Amérique renvoie l’encombrant vaisseau vers l’Europe. Les câbles adressés au président démocrate par certains passagers du Saint-Louis restent sans réponse.

      Gustav Schröder, capitaine au grand cœur du transatlantique, pour ne pas réexpédier ses passagers vers une mort certaine en Allemagne, a bien l’intention de mettre le feu à son navire au large des côtes britanniques, histoire de forcer le gouvernement de Londres à recueillir les passagers. Mais il apprend en mer que Morris Troper, directeur pour l’Europe du « Joint » (American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee), a obtenu – moyennant une caution de 500 000 dollars (près de 9 millions de dollars actuels) – que certaines nations démocratiques européennes, Pays-Bas, France, Grande-Bretagne et Belgique, accueillent la plupart des passagers.

      Après 40 jours et 40 nuits océaniques, le Saint-Louis débarque à Anvers sa cargaison humaine. Les rescapés rejoignent leur pays d’accueil. La guerre puis l’occupation nazie rattraperont certains d’entre eux. Des 288 personnes arrivées en Grande-Bretagne, toutes survécurent, sauf une qui fut tuée lors d’une attaque aérienne en 1940. Des 620 passagers sur le continent, 87 (14 %) purent émigrer avant l’invasion allemande de mai-juin 1940. 532 subirent la conquête nazie. 278 survécurent. 254 périrent, victimes de la Shoah (84 raflés en Belgique, 84 aux Pays-Bas et 86 en France).

      Les survivants se liguèrent après la guerre, pour venir en aide à l’ancien capitaine du Saint-Louis, Gustav Schröder, qui vivait dans la précarité en RFA. Le 11 mars 1993, Yad Vashem devait honorer la mémoire de ce marin allemand antinazi en lui accordant le titre de Juste parmi les nations.
      Scélérats d’État

      Quand montent les périls, des individus clairvoyants et volontaires se posent en vigies des libertés. Les Sentinelles, tel est le titre d’un beau roman tragique de Bruno Tessarech (Grasset, 2009), qui relate comment, à la fin des années 1930, les pseudo démocraties pactisent avec les dictateurs. Elles se vautrent, humainement, moralement et politiquement, face aux tyrans de rencontre : « Nous [les] supplions de résoudre le problème qu’ils ont eux-mêmes créé, manière de leur répéter, au cas où ils ne l’auraient pas encore compris, que nous leur laissons les mains libres », se désole un jeune diplomate français, héros imaginaire et pourtant si incarné de ce récit d’une marche à la guerre durant laquelle les supposés décideurs agissent en somnambules.

      Le livre s’ouvre sur la conférence internationale d’Évian en 1938, qui explique les tribulations tragiques du Saint-Louis l’année suivante. Les trente-deux pays réunis (le Reich nazi n’est pas invité, l’Urss de Staline ne s’y fait pas représenter) s’entendent pour fermer leurs portes et leurs ports aux juifs d’Allemagne. La Suisse estime en avoir assez fait depuis l’Anschluss et ses afflux de juifs autrichiens : Berne va jusqu’à réclamer à Berlin d’apposer la lettre « J », en rouge sur les passeports de ses ressortissants israélites, afin de les mieux repérer !

      Comble de cette époque désespérante : la République dominicaine du dictateur Trujillo s’avère le seul pays à souhaiter recevoir des réfugiés juifs allemands, afin de « blanchir » sa population ! Les victimes du racisme nazi refuseront la proposition raciste du despote des Antilles. Et la presse hitlérienne exulte à la suite de ce lâche fiasco d’Évian, au mois de juillet 1938 : « Juifs à vendre : même à bas prix, personne n’en veut ! » Le Führer se paie le luxe de faire la leçon à ses donneurs de leçon : « Une honte de voir les démocraties dégouliner de pitié pour le peuple juif et rester de marbre quand il s’agit de vraiment venir en aide aux Juifs ! »

      Tous les clignotants de la mémoire et de l’histoire sont au rouge, en 2018, quatre-vingts ans après la conférence d’Évian. Refuser les réfugiés tient lieu de politique commune aux États froids et veules, qui se satisfont des pertes humaines en temps de paix comme dans la guerre. Et tant de citoyens en âge de voter, perdus pour la raison, se fichent aujourd’hui du destin des musulmans comme ils se fichaient jadis du sort des juifs. Fortifiés par de telles masses électorales, les soi-disant responsables des prétendues démocraties se font scélérats d’État. Emmanuel Macron invite à ne « jamais céder à l’émotion ». Angela Merkel, qui passait pour l’ultime digue contre « l’orbanisation » de l’Europe, rend les armes face au premier ministre hongrois Viktor Orbán : « La Hongrie fait le travail pour nous », a-t-elle glissé dimanche 10 juin sur la chaîne de télévision publique allemande ARD.

      Comme à contre-courant, Justin Trudeau, le premier ministre du Canada, s’est repenti, le mois dernier, au sujet du refus de son pays d’accepter de recevoir les passagers errants du Saint-Louis en 1939 : « Ces excuses ne pourront pas ramener ceux dont la vie a été volée ni réparer les vies brisées par cette tragédie. Cependant, nous avons la responsabilité commune de reconnaître cette réalité difficile, d’en tirer des leçons, et de continuer à nous dresser contre l’antisémitisme tous les jours. C’est ainsi que nous donnerons un sens au vœu solennel : “Plus jamais.” »

      Faudra-t-il attendre 2098 pour que des regrets officiels se manifestent à Paris, Rome, Budapest, Londres ou Berlin, au sujet de la disgrâce européenne imposée en 2018 aux réfugiés de l’Aquarius ? Faudra-t-il qu’entretemps une calamité géopolitique – dont cet épisode aura été annonciateur – ait à nouveau ravagé les peuples et les consciences, pour que l’aveuglement laisse place à la solidarité ?

      Une chanson pour finir. Et pour comprendre à quel point nous avons régressé depuis une cinquantaine d’années. En 1967-1968, alors que l’Occident prônait l’ouverture, l’accueil, le brassage, la rencontre et l’hybridation dans le sillage de l’après-guerre et de la décolonisation, triomphait une comédie musicale : Hair. C’est désormais notre Atlantide. Aquarius était son titre phare. Aquarius, en anglais, signifie « verseau », la constellation du porteur d’eau, dont l’ère tant attendue devait advenir : « La paix guidera les planètes/ Et l’amour conduira les étoiles (Then peace will guide the planets/ And love will steer the stars). »

      Regardez, ci-dessous, dans le film de Miloš Forman (Hair, 1979), comment la diversité engendrait alors la richesse, au lieu de provoquer la suspicion. Écoutez ces paroles, aujourd’hui incroyables, annonçant « Harmonie et compréhension (Harmony and understanding), illumination séraphique (Angelic illumination) », avec cet hymne propre à un monde englouti : « Guidé par les forces cosmiques, prends soin de nous, ô verseau (Guided by the cosmic forces/ O care for us/ Aquarius). » C’était hier ; c’était il y a mille ans, hélas !…


      https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/international/150618/du-saint-louis-l-aquarius-80-ans-d-abomination-envers-les-refugies?onglet=

    • EU inaction over Mediterranean migrants is criminal

      Frederic Penard of SOS Mediterranee urges EU member states to adopt immediately an adequate and common response plan to the ongoing crisis in the Med

      The extraordinary support we have received from European civil society since we were first refused a port of safety for the 630 people who were stranded on the Aquarius shows that citizens are wiser than their leaders (Report, 13 June). By showing their attachment to human life and dignity first, they contrast with the European heads of state and governments for whom this intolerable journey should be a wake-up call. To those EU leaders who would like us gone, we repeat that, as a maritime and humanitarian organisation, our only aim is to save and preserve life according to the law of the sea; and to bear witness on behalf of civil society to the ongoing tragedy in the Mediterranean.

      To those who’ve been supportive, we are sincerely thankful. Nevertheless, we have to remind them that as EU member states, they are co-responsible for the situation in the Mediterranean. By contributing to the training and financing of the Libyan coastguard, they are consciously participating in interceptions of boats in distress, which not only result in people being sent back to the Libyan hell, but also gravely jeopardises safe, efficient and professional search and rescue activities in international waters. To those of them who have been indifferent to our repeated calls for more coordinated search and rescue capacity in the central Mediterranean and for a European response to the drama on our common shores, we say that time has come to wake up. We urge all EU states to adopt immediately an adequate and common response plan to this tragedy: a European rescue fleet must be deployed and a EU-shared policy must be found for the safe disembarkation of the rescued people in the nearest port of safety.

      Indifference has resulted in too many deaths; inaction is criminal. As long as there will be people risking their lives at sea, SOS Méditerranée will pursue its mission in the international waters at the doorstep of Europe to search, rescue and testify.
      Frédéric Penard
      Director of operations, SOS Méditerranée


      https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jun/17/eu-inaction-over-mediterranean-migrants-is-criminal?CMP=share_btn_tw

    • L’Italie ferme ses port(e)s

      Cette semaine, en effet, ça se passe beaucoup à Rome ! Nous avons tous entendu parler de l’interdiction faite au navire Aquarius de débarquer en Italie les près de 700 migrants secourus par son affréteur l’ONG SOS Méditerranée. Cette décision du gouvernement italien a été inspirée et incarnée par son ministre de l’Intérieur, le très télégénique chef du parti d’extrême-droite : la Ligue. Pas plus tard qu’hier, ce même Matteo Salvini en a rajouté une couche : aucun navire d’ONG n’accostera plus en Italie. Mais c’est fou ça !

      Pourquoi ? Car, qu’il y ait des ONG humanitaires ou qu’il n’y en ait pas, les personnes qui sont déterminées à traverser la Méditerranée pour rejoindre l’Europe le font. De plus, les navires des ONG sont équipés pour faire de l’humanitaire : sur l’Aquarius, il y a des vivres, des équipements médicaux, du personnel médical. Les cargos, les tankers, les chalutiers, lorsqu’ils se déroutent pour sauver les passagers d’une embarcation en détresse, eux, ne sont pas tout armés pour recueillir des personnes migrantes en train de couler.

      Mardi dernier, quelque-part au milieu de la mer Méditerranée. Un navire de la sixième flotte de la marine américaine, l’USS Trenton, se porte au secours de 40 naufragés. Malheureusement, précise le communiqué du 14 juin, concentré sur ce sauvetage, l’équipage n’a pu repêcher les douze cadavres qui flottaient au milieu des vivants. Ben oui : les navires militaires, jusqu’à preuve du contraire, ne sont équipés ni d’hôpital ambulant, ni de cellule de soutien, et encore moins de chambre froide. C’est important, pourtant, de donner au corps une sépulture, et d’identifier les morts.

      Salvini et le gouvernement populiste italien s’en prennent aux ONG. Vont-ils aussi interdire l’accostage dans leurs ports des navires militaires de l’Otan ? De leur propres gardes-côtes ? Vont-ils tomber sur la tête au point de se soustraire aux obligations du droit de la mer qui les oblige, en tant qu’Etat, à porter secours ?

      Avec Salvini, tout est possible... Ce gouvernement, au pouvoir depuis moins d’un mois, a mis dans son programme qu’il expulserait d’Italie les centaines de milliers de ressortissants étrangers déboutés du droit d’asile ou sans permis de séjour. En attendant, ce gouvernement, dont le président, Giuseppe Conte, était reçu par Emmanuel Macron à Paris vendredi, s’en prend aux ONG. Et, contrairement à une autre partie très importante de la société italienne qui se mobilise pour accueillir les personnes migrantes, les électeurs qui ont voté pour les deux partis au pouvoir, la Ligue et le Mouvement Cinq Etoiles, applaudissent des deux mains. S’ils apprécient la dureté et le peu d’humanité de leur gouvernement, c’est non seulement car ils sont souvent en phase avec le caractère xénophobe du programme de ces deux partis, mais c’est aussi car ils en ont marre que, depuis plusieurs années, les autres pays de l’Union européenne, notamment la France qui cadenasse sa frontière avec l’Italie, les laissent seuls face à ces arrivées de personnes migrantes, qui plus est dans ces conditions tragiques.
      Un « axe » qui fait tourner les têtes

      Car il n’y a pas que les Romains, en fait : ils sont nombreux, les dirigeants Européens à être tombés sur la tête cette semaine ! Les ministres de l’intérieur de trois pays, Salvini pour l’Italie, Kickl pour l’Autriche, Seehofer pour l’Allemagne, ont ainsi appelé à la constitution d’un « axe de la volonté ». De la volonté de quoi ? De renvoyer manu militari à la frontière toute personne entrée sans papier sur leur territoire. Les renvoyer où alors ? Dans le pays frontalier qu’elles auraient traversé précédemment ? A la mer ? Le gouvernement autrichien, que dirige Sebastian Kurz chef de l’ÖVP de droite, en coalition avec le FPÖ d’extrême droite, a déjà proposé, la semaine précédente, avec Lars Lokke Rasmussen, son homologue danois, d’ouvrir des centres d’examens des demandes d’asile à l’extérieur de l’UE, pourquoi pas dans les Balkans occidentaux, et d’y amener les demandeurs d’asile. De cette façon, ceux qui seraient déboutés ne seraient déjà plus dans l’UE.

      Il y a donc une ligne de front le long de laquelle s’affrontent deux conceptions du territoire européen : l’hospitalité et la xénophobie. La seconde est maintenant au gouvernement en Italie, en Autriche, au Danemark, en Hongrie, en République tchèque, en Slovaquie, et en Pologne. En France et en Belgique, les politiques publiques mises en œuvre glissent petit à petit de l’hospitalité vers le rejet et la fermeture. Cette semaine, le gouvernement français n’a pas voulu accueillir l’Aquarius, soit disant pour ne pas céder au chantage de Matteo Salvini. Résultat, c’est l’Espagne du tout nouveau gouvernement socialiste de Pedro Sanchez, pourtant bien plus éloignée de la Sicile, qui a proposé un de ses havres à l’Aquarius. En Allemagne, le ministre de l’intérieur, issu du parti qui dirige la Bavière, s’oppose, comme on vient de le voir, à la politique d’hospitalité et d’intégration voulue par sa cheffe de gouvernement.

      Les Européens sont donc divisés entre eux, et cette division passe au sein de chaque état-membre de l’UE. Les chefs d’État et de gouvernement vont se réunir les 28 et 29 juin prochains : ils sont censés se mettre d’accord sur une politique de migration et d’asile européenne. Une de ces deux lignes l’emportera-t-elle ? Un compromis ou une synthèse est-elle possible ? L’UE va-t-elle se briser sur la politique migratoire ? Jusqu’à quel point marchons-nous, nous les Européens, sur la tête ?

      Défié par son propre ministre de l’Intérieur qui prône cet axe des pays européens volontaires pour refouler les migrants, la chancelière d’Allemagne, Angela Merkel et la Commission européenne se battent pour un « dispatching » équilibré des migrants dans tous les pays de l’UE au delà du pays par lequel ces personnes arrivent en Europe. Elles proposent de mettre en place une procédure européenne d’instruction des demandes d’asile, de façon à éviter que l’étude des dossiers incombent uniquement aux pays d’entrée. Au passage, gardons bien en tête le nombre de personnes concernées. Selon Eurostat, citée par Euractiv.fr, le nombre de demandes d’asile est passé en UE de 563 000 en 2014 à environ 1,2 million en 2015 et 2016, au plus fort de la crise. En 2017, 650 000 demandes enregistrées. Si l’Allemagne, qui a suspendu l’application du règlement de Dublin au plus fort de la crise, récupère toujours la majorité des demandes (31% de l’ensemble des demandes en UE), l’Italie (20%) et la Grèce (9%) sont respectivement à la deuxième et quatrième place en raison de leurs situations aux portes de la Méditerranée.
      Ce qui est en cause, c’est donc ce qu’on appelle la convention de Dublin sur l’asile dans l’UE. Les 26 états-membres de l’espace Schengen de libre circulation (dans cet espace, les individus passent d’un pays à l’autre avec une simple carte d’identité et sans obligation de la montrer à la frontière) ont décidé que toute demande d’asile devait forcément être instruite par le pays d’entrée. Deux façons de réformer cette procédure qui n’est plus adaptée se font face : soit, au mépris de l’État de droit et des conventions internationales, on refoule les entrants et on examine leur demande dans des camps extra-territoriaux. C’est ce qui correspond aux propositions des gouvernements où l’extrême-droite est maintenant au pouvoir.

      Cela prolongerait et amplifierait ce que l’UE appelle ses hotspots : des centres installés dans plusieurs pays voisins qui sont sur les routes qui mènent des pays en guerre ou en crise que fuient les migrants vers l’UE, centres vers lesquels ils sont dirigés et retenus par les gouvernement locaux, pour que les fonctionnaires européens y examinent les demandes d’asile. Cette politique consiste, de plus en plus, en une diplomatie du carnet de chèque de moins en moins soucieuse du droit d’asile et des conventions de Genève réputées protéger les personnes en danger. Depuis 2015, la Turquie a ainsi coupé la route à des centaines de milliers de syriens fuyant la guerre civile ; elle les héberge dans des camps humanitaires financés par l’UE. L’Italie et l’UE ont passé des accords de même type avec la Libye pour les personnes fuyant la guerre au Soudan ou en Somalie, notamment. Mais, en Libye, ces personnes vivent un véritable enfer... pour partie financé par les accords avec l’UE.
      Vers un « axe de l’hospitalité » ?

      Les institutions de l’UE prévoient ce qui s’appelle des coopérations renforcées : un groupe de pays membre de l’UE peut mettre en œuvre une politique publique européenne si les autres ne s’y opposent pas. On pourrait imaginer que les pays hospitaliers refusent les propositions des pays actuellement gouvernés par l’extrême-droite de renvoi et d’externalisation ; et qu’ils obtiennent que les gouvernements xénophobes de ces pays ne s’opposent pas aux propositions de mutualisation de l’asile par les gouvernements des pays hospitaliers.

      Ceci ne serait pourtant que du court terme. À long terme, il s’agit de changer de discours et de regard sur la réalité migratoire. Il s’agit d’arrêter de marcher sur la tête, et de retomber sur nos pieds. Et là, cette semaine, ça se passe à Bilbao. Dans la capitale du pays basque espagnol qui est aussi une des plus belles villes d’Espagne, un allemand, Rainer Haas, s’est levé et a dit : « L’Union européenne doit adopter une législation unique sur les migrations ». Mais qui est Rainer Haas ? Il n’est que co-président du Conseil des communes et régions d’Europe (CCRE) et président du Comté de Ludwigsbourg (Allemagne). C’était mercredi dernier, en clôture de la conférence « Égalité, Diversité et Inclusion » organisée par le CCRE.

      Ce conseil regroupe toutes les collectivités locales d’Europe. Il n’a certes pas de pouvoir ni de souveraineté. Mais enfin, sur le terrain, c’est dans les collectivités territoriales que ça se passe. Rainer Haas a souligné l’impact positif de l’intégration des réfugiés et des demandeurs d’asile sur l’économie locale et régionale. « Actuellement, rapporte Euractiv.fr, notre taux de chômage dans la région oscille autour de 3 %, ce qui signifie le plein emploi. C’est le taux de chômage le plus bas depuis de très nombreuses années. ». Sa ville de Ludwigsbourg a intégré 11 000 réfugiés, soit l’équivalent de 2 % de la population locale.

      C’est la fermeture des voies d’accès légales à la migration vers l’Europe qui est à l’origine des trafics de passeurs et des morts en Méditerranée, ce n’est pas le projet migratoire lui même ! Au contraire, ces tragédies et ces crispations prouvent par l’absurde et de façon inhumaine et bien peu urbaine, que rien, même le risque de mourir, n’entame la détermination du petit nombre de personnes qui sont résolues à venir en Europe. Alors que les économistes, les démographes et les employeurs expliquent que l’Europe a rationnellement besoin de la venue de personnes migrantes, on pourrait peut-être mobiliser nos intelligences collectives et les formidables ressources de nos administrations si développées et si ingénieuses pour valoriser ces énergies, cette motivation, ces qualifications... avec lesquels ces candidats à des papiers européens font corps : le leur ! On pourrait peut-être trouver d’autre mode de sélection que la traversée de la Méditerranée au péril de sa vie, non ? Seuls les survivants auraient droit, et encore, à un permis de séjour ?

      Si donner des permis de séjour fait si peur à certains, on pourrait inventer des permis de circuler entre plusieurs pays. La France empêche les demandeurs d’asile de travailler, dans l’espoir de paraître une terre inhospitalière. L’Allemagne au contraire autorise les demandeurs d’asile à travailler peu de temps après le dépôt de la demande, de façon à ce que les gens se sentent bien et utiles le plus vite possible, et mènent une vie normale.... Il n’est pas surprenant qu’elle soit devenue une destination souhaitée par beaucoup.

      A Bilbao, Bart Sommers, maire de Malines en Belgique, a souligné l’impact positif de l’intégration des migrants. « Nous avons 138 nationalités différentes et nous avons plus de musulmans dans notre ville que la Hongrie et la Slovaquie réunies. » "Peut-être que Monsieur Orbán, [premier ministre hongrois depuis 2010 dont l’idéologie illibérale est très anti migrants], pourrait nous rendre visite", a-t-il ajouté.

      Mais ils sont fous ces Européens !


      https://www.explicite.info/articles/1003-leuroscope-de-la-semaine

      #aquarelle #dessins

    • La Spagna accoglie l’Aquarius, ma l’azione delle ong si restringe

      Il sole è già alto nel cielo e l’aria è ferma, il rumore dell’elicottero della polizia spagnola a bassa quota non dà tregua. Dopo otto giorni in mare e 1.300 chilometri percorsi in condizioni non sempre favorevoli per la navigazione, alle 10.25 del 17 giugno la nave umanitaria Aquarius appare all’orizzonte ed entra nel porto di Valencia, scortata da un’imbarcazione della guardia civil, da una della guardia costiera e dalle lance dell’ong Proactiva Open Arms.

      Aquarius sfila con il suo scafo arancione davanti alle televisioni di tutto il mondo schierate sul molo, mentre dal ponte i naufraghi intonano un canto. Sulla banchina gli operatori che aspettavano l’attracco dalle prime luci dell’alba si lasciano andare a un applauso. I medici e gli operatori sanitari spagnoli sono i primi a salire a bordo della nave diventata il simbolo della chiusura verso i migranti del nuovo governo italiano e della crisi politica che rischia di mandare in pezzi l’intera Unione europea.

      Circa un’ora dopo, le 106 persone soccorse al largo della Libia scendono dalla scaletta, tra loro undici bambini e sette donne incinte. L’ultimo a lasciare la nave è Reward, un ragazzo nigeriano, che scherza con i soccorritori. Per salutarlo uno degli operatori prende un’armonica e si mette a suonare. Dopo lunghi giorni di tensione, esplode la gioia. Un agente della guardia civil spagnola schierata allo sbarco non riesce a trattenere il sorriso. “Il momento più difficile è stato quando abbiamo dovuto spiegare ai migranti quello che stava succedendo”, ricorda Alessandro Porro, soccorritore di Sos Méditerranée e operatore della Croce rossa, originario di Asti, in Piemonte. “I migranti temevano di essere rimandati in Libia”.

      La rotta spagnola
      Alle 13.30 attracca la nave Orione della marina militare italiana, nave Dattilo della guardia costiera era sbarcata all’alba. Tutti i 630 migranti respinti il 10 giugno dall’Italia sono finalmente arrivati in un porto sicuro. Più di cento sono portati in ospedale, ma solo sei sono ricoverati. Le operazioni di sbarco vanno avanti per tutto il giorno e si concludono verso le 19.30, quando le autorità spagnole definiscono Valencia “capitale europea della solidarietà” e si dichiarano soddisfatte della buona riuscita del piano di emergenza che hanno chiamato “speranza nel Mediterraneo”.

      “Siamo contenti che questa inutile Odissea sia finita”, commenta la portavoce di Sos Méditerranée Mathilde Auvillain subito dopo lo sbarco dell’Aquarius. “L’accoglienza da parte degli spagnoli è stata molto umana, sono stati condotti prima i controlli medici e poi le identificazioni da parte della polizia”, continua. Il comune di Valencia ha preparato un’accoglienza imponente con la partecipazione di più di 2.300 operatori e funzionari, tra cui 800 volontari della Croce rossa. “Un aspetto che mi sembra molto positivo è il fatto che siano stati coinvolti circa 400 mediatori culturali e questo permetterà ai profughi di essere seguiti con attenzione durante le procedure di registrazione e di identificazione, fondamentali per la richiesta di asilo”, conclude. I migranti riceveranno un permesso umanitario valido per 45 giorni poi dovranno accedere alla procedure di richiesta di asilo ordinaria.

      Ma non tutti condividono la speranza che le sofferenze e gli ostacoli per queste persone siano terminati. Una parte dei migranti appena arrivati sarà trasferita in Francia, perché il governo di Emmanuel Macron ha comunicato la sua disponibilità, ma non vengono diffusi troppi dettagli su questa opzione. Mentre in particolare i migranti di origine algerina e marocchina rischiano di essere rimpatriati. Durante lo sbarco nel porto di Valencia, un gruppo di attivisti protesta davanti alla sala stampa.

      “Nessuno è illegale”, gridano. Denunciano le politiche di respingimento della Spagna nei confronti dei migranti nelle enclave di Ceuta e Melilla in Nordafrica e chiedono la chiusura dei centri di detenzione per il rimpatrio nella penisola iberica. “Molti dei migranti appena arrivati sono algerini e marocchini e dopo questo lungo calvario durato giorni in mare, ora rischiano di finire in un centro di detenzione per 60 giorni”, afferma Iñigo, un attivista della Campagna per la chiusura dei Centri di detenzione (Cie) mentre arrotola lo striscione con la scritta “No Cie” per tornarsene a casa dopo il sit in.

      La Spagna è il paese europeo con più immigrati in relazione alla popolazione (il 10 per cento) e il secondo paese dopo la Germania in termini assoluti con 6 milioni di immigrati. Ma è anche uno dei primi stati europei ad aver investito sulla militarizzazione della frontiera, tanto che le recinzioni di Ceuta e Melilla, costruite negli anni novanta, sono diventate il simbolo della cosiddetta Fortezza Europa.

      Negli ultimi due anni però la Spagna ha registrato a un nuovo aumento degli arrivi via mare in particolare dall’Algeria e dal Marocco. Secondo l’Alto commissariato delle Nazioni Unite per i rifugiati (Unhcr) nei primi sei mesi del 2018, in Spagna sono arrivati più di 14mila migranti, il 50 per cento in più di quelli arrivati nello stesso periodo del 2017, ma più o meno in linea con il numero di persone arrivate in Italia nei primi sei mesi del 2018 attraverso la rotta del Mediterraneo centrale. Solo nel finesettimana appena trascorso, la guardia costiera spagnola ha soccorso 1.290 persone nello stretto di Gibilterra e al largo delle isole Canarie. Nelle operazioni sono stati recuperati quattro cadaveri e 43 persone risultano disperse. I numeri della rotta spagnola sono destinati ad aumentare, secondo Frontex, ma nonostante questo, anche la Spagna è stata accusata dal governo italiano di non “fare la sua parte” sull’immigrazione.

      Un punto di non ritorno?
      Qualche ora dopo l’arrivo a Valencia, il coordinatore delle operazioni della nave Aquarius di Sos Méditerranée Nicola Stalla confessa tutto il suo sconcerto per l’esperienza appena vissuta. Originario di Alassio, in Liguria, e con una lunga esperienza alle spalle da coordinatore della missione, Stalla non avrebbe mai pensato che la Centrale operativa della guardia costiera di Roma avrebbe potuto ordinare alla nave Aquarius di attraccare a Malta, dopo aver coordinato i drammatici soccorsi di sabato notte.

      “Domenica sera ci siamo resi conto che quella decisione da parte di Roma ci avrebbe messo in una condizione di stallo pericolosa”, afferma. “Il nostro timore era quello di esaurire i viveri nel giro di poche ore, mentre Italia e Malta si rimpallavano le responsabilità”, racconta. Per Stalla la lunga traversata dell’Aquarius è la dimostrazione che i porti spagnoli e francesi non possano essere considerati un’alternativa valida a quelli italiani per i migranti soccorsi al largo della Libia.

      Il coordinatore della missione definisce “inumano e irrealistico” pensare che i migranti debbano essere sbarcati in Spagna o in Francia. “I giornalisti che erano a bordo hanno documentato cosa significhi sottoporre queste persone così vulnerabili a un viaggio lungo attraverso il Mediterraneo, un mare tutt’altro che facile per una nave sovraccarica in certe condizioni del meteo”.

      https://www.internazionale.it/bloc-notes/annalisa-camilli/2018/06/17/aquarius-valencia-ong

    • @stesummi fait, dans cet article, un lien entre ce qui se passe en Méditerranée, la fermeture des ports, et les discussions sur la réforme du #règlement_Dublin...

      Riformare Dublino ? Campa cavallo

      Nonostante la portata simbolica, giuridica e umana della chiusura dei porti a diverse navi di ONG, Matteo Salvini riuscirà difficilmente ad imporre ai paesi europei una maggior solidarietà nei confronti dell’Italia, ritengono diversi esperti. Il caso Aquarius ha reso ancor più evidente la frattura in seno all’Unione e l’incapacità dei paesi membri di trovare una risposta comune alla sfida del secolo.

      https://www.tvsvizzera.it/tvs/vicenda-aquarius_riformare-dublino--campa-cavallo/44198368
      #Dublin_IV #Dublin

    • Aquarius, una nave ostaggio della politica

      Concesso: l’Italia non può essere lasciata sola dall’Unione Europea a gestire il flusso di immigranti che attraversano il Mediterraneo partendo dall’Africa. Così come non può essere lasciata sola la Grecia, che ospita centinaia di migliaia di persone che la raggiunsero dalla Turchia due anni fa. Su questa sfida si misura la statura morale e politica dell’idea di comunità europea. Che per ora appare bassa. Ma la decisione del ministro degli interni italiano Matteo Salvini di chiudere i porti italiani alla nave Aquarius della ong italo-franco-tedesca Sos Mediterranée con 629 persone a bordo (dando così prova di essere il vero capo del governo, visto che la competenza spettava in realtà ad un altro ministero) è una brutta notizia per chi ha a cuore il diritto e l’impegno umanitario.

      La decisione del governo italiano è un atto illegale, contravviene alla Convenzione internazionale sulla ricerca e il salvataggio marittimo (ratificata dall’Italia nel 1989), la quale impone non solo il salvataggio in mare ma anche il trasferimento in luogo sicuro. Ed essendo stata la Aquarius incaricata dalla guardia costiera di Roma di portare in salvo le 629 persone, raccolte in diverse operazioni al largo della Libia, la chiusura dei porti ordinata da Salvini risulta ancora più assurda, tanto più che i porti restano aperti alle navi militari italiane, una delle quali ha portato oltre 900 migranti a Catania.

      Evidentemente il ministro degli interni e capo della Lega voleva mandare un segnale «forte» anche alle ong che in questi anni si sono prodigate per salvare più vite possibile sul Mediterraneo (essendo le forze messe in piedi dall’Unione europea insufficienti), da lui accusate di favorire l’immigrazione clandestina e di fare affari con i passatori. Ma il messaggio più forte è rivolto all’Unione Europea, che non riesce a riformare l’accordo di Dublino sul primo asilo e mettere d’accordo i suoi Stati membri sulla redistribuzione dei profughi, di cui si fa attualmente carico soprattutto l’Europa meridionale. Una redistribuzione cui si oppongono in particolare gli Stati del Gruppo di Visegrad (Ungheria, Polonia, Cechia e Slovacchia), con l’appoggio dell’Austria, con cui Salvini si sente maggiormente in sintonia.

      Ma è questa la strada per far crescere la solidarietà all’interno dell’Ue? O non è piuttosto un tentativo di minarla dall’interno, scatenando una litigiosità su un tema altamente delicato? Se il presidente francese Macron non è la persona più indicata per dare del «cinico» a Salvini (visto che il suo paese ha più volte chiuso le frontiere ai migranti che volevano raggiungerla dall’Italia), quale altro titolo può essere assegnato ad un ministro che gioca sulla pelle di centinaia di persone per raggiungere i suoi scopi politici ed elettorali?

      http://www.azione.ch/editoriale/dettaglio/articolo/aquarius-una-nave-ostaggio-della-politica.html

    • [L’intervista] #De_Falco, il comandante dei Cinque Stelle: “Salvini si rassegni: i naufraghi in mare vanno salvati”

      Parla l’ufficiale di Marina #Gregorio_De_Falco che la notte del 13 gennaio 2012 ordinò al capitano Schettino della Cosa Concordia di “tornare subito a bordo”. Il senatore 5 Stelle ricorda al ministro dell’Interno che il governo è “un organo collegiale”. Ma riconosce al segretario della Lega di aver ragione su Malta: “Non può continuare a sottrarsi”. Da sue ricerche la nave della Ong Lifeline è olandese. Insensato parlare di “blocco navale”. E assurdo ipotizzare di arretrare le navi rispetto alla zona dei salvataggi. “Le Capitanerie non lo faranno…

      http://notizie.tiscali.it/politica/articoli/intervista-de-falco-fusani

      v. anche:
      L’ex M5s De Falco: «Salverò i migranti. La legge del mare è superiore a quella di Salvini» - L’intervista
      https://www.open.online/primo-piano/2019/04/06/news/de_falco_intervista-187159

    • Corsica offers to take migrant boat

      The speaker of Corsica’s regional parliament, Jean-Guy Talamoni, said Monday that the French island was ready to open its port to the Lifeline, the boat of German NGO Mission Lifeline with some 230 migrants on board. Italy and Malta have refused to let the boat dock on their territory, as has Spain, which accepted the Aquarius, another boat, earlier this month.

      https://euobserver.com/tickers/142192
      #Corse

    • Publié par Fulvio Vassallo sur FB, le 27.06.2018:

      La Lifeline sta attraccando a Malta. Tra poco Muscat -su ordine di Salvini- la sequestrera’.

      I servizi giornalistici confermano che si contesta al comandante, che verrà arrestato, il grave fatto di non avere obbedito agli ordini provenienti dalla Centrale Operativa della Guardia costiera italiana di consegnare i naufraghi alle motovedette libiche, se non portarli direttamente in un porto libico.

      Sotto processo chi ha rispettato le regole delle Convenzioni internazionali, legittimati gli ordini illegittimi di riconsegna ai libici. Ai libici dai quali fuggono persone vittime di abusi e violenze che Salvini definisce soltanto come «retorica». Ma per la Direzione Distrettuale antimafia e per il Tribunale di Ragusa la Libia non offre «porti sicuri di sbarco».

      Questa e’ la fine del diritto internazionale. Ma anche dello stato di diritto in Italia.

      https://www.facebook.com/fulvio.vassallo.3/posts/10156549963911926

    • Pubblicato da Fulvio Vassallo, il 27.06.2018, su FB:

      Provata la prassi adottata dalla Centrale operativa della Guardia Costiera italiana (IMrcc) di Roma che ha ordinato al comandante della Lifeline, prima di riconsegnare i migranti alle motovedette libiche e poi di dirigere direttamente su Tripoli, per una «rendition» dei naufraghi agli agenti delle unità antimmigrazione del governo Serraj. Si tratta di ordini illegittimi, mai impartiti prima, frutto delle direttive informali impartite da Salvini e Toninelli. Più mettono sotto accusa le Ong, piu’ aprono processi contro gli operatori umanitari, piu vengono fuori le magagne della Guardia costiera ( e della Marina) italiana. Siamo solo all’inizio. Verranno fuori tracciati, notam, mappe, registrazioni e testimonianze . Vedremo alla fine chi ha rispettato la legge e le convenzioni internazionali e chi le ha violate. Se da qualche parte esistono ancora giudici indipendenti, come i giudici di Palermo e di Ragusa che hanno scritto nelle loro sentenze che in Libia non esistono «porti sicuri di sbarco».

      https://www.facebook.com/fulvio.vassallo.3/videos/10156550134361926

    • Una zona SAR per la “Libia” che non esiste. Si perfeziona la politica dell’annientamento.

      Sull’onda dei successi delle manovre di criminalizzazione delle ONG avviate lo scorso anno durante il governo Gentiloni-Minniti, dopo le operazioni di “soccorso” in acque internazionali delegate ai guardiacoste di Tripoli, giunge la notizia che l’IMO (Organizzazione delle Nazioni Unite per la navigazione matrittima internazionale) avrebbe inserito nei suoi data base una zona SAR “libica” con la indicazione di una Centrale operativa di coordinamento.

      https://www.a-dif.org/2018/06/28/una-zona-sar-per-la-libia-che-non-esiste-si-perfeziona-la-politica-dellannien

    • La Libia ha dichiarato la sua zona SAR: lo conferma l’IMO

      Tripoli definisce una propria area di ricerca e soccorso riconosciuta dall’Organizzazione Marittima Internazionale. Una svolta che complica ulteriormente la situazione, rendendo ancora più incerto il futuro di chi è intrappolato in Libia e il ruolo delle navi umanitarie. Diverse le domande, prima tra tutte: come si può affidare la responsabilità del soccorso a un Paese che non può essere considerato “Place of Safety”?

      http://www.vita.it/it/article/2018/06/28/la-libia-ha-dichiarato-la-sua-zona-sar-lo-conferma-limo/147392
      #SAR #Libye #it_has_begun #sauvetage #Méditerranée #asile #migrations #réfugiés #zone_SAR

    • Colau ofrece Barcelona como “puerto seguro” para acoger migrantes a la deriva

      La alcaldesa de la capital catalana apela directamente al presidente Pedro Sánchez y la vicepresidenta Carmen Calvo para ayudar a la oenegé Open Arms “a salvar vidas”

      http://www.lavanguardia.com/politica/20180624/45375909848/ada-colau-barcelona-puerto-seguro-migrantes-deriva.html
      #Barcelone

      #Berlin aussi a déclaré vouloir accueillir des demandeurs d’asile de la #Lifeline...
      Berlin will Flüchtlinge aufnehmen
      http://www.taz.de/!5516521

      –-> je vais mettre les infos concernant les villes qui se sont déclarées prêtes à accueil des migrants sur ce fil autour des #villes-refuge : https://seenthis.net/messages/656848

    • Les ONG ne sont pas les complices des passeurs

      Non seulement les opérations de secours en mer sauvent des personnes de la noyade, mais elles œuvrent à leur évacuation en situation de danger immédiat dans leur pays, rappelle MSF.

      La Méditerranée est devenue depuis trois semaines l’arène au sein de laquelle les Etats européens s’adonnent à des jeux politiques sordides aux dépens de la vie de milliers de personnes et mettent en scène la fermeture de leur territoire. Dernier épisode en date, le 26 juin, commentant l’opération de sauvetage du Lifeline, un navire d’une organisation non gouvernementale et son débarquement accordé in extremis par Malte, le président Emmanuel Macron l’accuse d’être « intervenue en contravention de toutes les règles et des garde-côtes libyens » et ainsi d’avoir « fait le jeu des passeurs ». Poursuivant, il regrette qu’« au nom de l’humanitaire », il puisse n’y avoir « plus aucun contrôle ».

      Ainsi, c’est l’ensemble des organisations humanitaires de secours en mer qui se retrouvent qualifiées de complice des trafiquants. Une accusation aussi absurde qu’inacceptable. Les ONG n’agissent en mer que sur instruction du centre de coordination des secours maritimes italien. Emmanuel Macron oublie également, à l’instar de ses homologues européens, que les opérations non-gouvernementales ne secourent qu’une minorité de celles et ceux qui sont sauvés en mer, la plupart l’étant par les garde-côtes italiens et des navires marchands. Plutôt qu’encourager les migrants à prendre la mer dans des conditions périlleuses, nous disent les responsables européens, il s’agit de confier la responsabilité du sauvetage aux garde-côtes libyens, ainsi que celui de la surveillance des côtes pour empêcher les départs. Comme s’en félicite le porte-parole du gouvernement Benjamin Griveaux, « grâce à un investissement que la France et l’Union européenne auprès des autorités libyennes », le rythme des traversées a considérablement ralenti.

      Ce résultat a été obtenu au prix de mesures révoltantes. Car les Européens dans leur ensemble, et la France et l’Italie au premier chef, encouragent l’interception en mer, le refoulement et le maintien en Libye de milliers de personnes qui y ont enduré des mois, et même pour certains des années, de privations, d’extorsion, de torture et d’esclavage. Personne n’ignore plus en effet ces sévices depuis la publication de nombreux rapports, dont ceux issus de notre travail dans le pays, en Libye ainsi que la diffusion CNN de la vidéo d’un marché aux esclaves en octobre dernier. Le président Macron n’hésitait pas lui-même à qualifier de « crimes contre l’Humanité » les faits d’esclavage en Libye en novembre dernier.

      Depuis le début de l’année 2018, ils sont déjà plus de 10 000 à avoir été interceptés et refoulés par les « garde-côtes libyens », bannière regroupant des groupes disparates de militaires et milices en armes. Des garde-côtes que l’Union européenne finance et forme, malgré la porosité de certains de ces groupes avec les trafiquants d’êtres humains comme cela a été largement démontré. Pour rappel, le Conseil de sécurité de l’ONU a sanctionné le 7 juin dernier six personnes, dont quatre Libyens, à la tête de réseaux de trafiquants : parmi eux, un des chefs des garde-côtes de la ville de Zawiya. Pourtant, par un tour de passe-passe tragique, la France se satisfait aujourd’hui, à l’instar de l’Italie, de sa coopération – de sa complicité ? – avec ces autorités aux contours flous et dont on sait qu’elles maltraitent les migrants et organisent elles-mêmes parfois leur passage.

      Une fois reconduites dans les centres de détention, les personnes interceptées seront pour la plupart soumises à un chantage de fait : rester enfermées dans ces cages fétides des mois encore ou bien se résoudre à intégrer le programme de « retours volontaires » dans leur pays d’origine organisé par l’Organisation internationale des migrations. Bien que certains d’entre eux accueillent ces propositions avec soulagement, d’autres ne s’y soumettent que pour échapper au pire. Quelques-uns finiront par bénéficier de la protection du Haut-Commissariat des Nations unies pour les réfugiés, seront envoyés au Niger en attente d’une hypothétique relocalisation dans un pays européen. Mais leur nombre est terriblement faible – un peu moins de deux cents depuis la fin de l’année 2017 – au regard des dizaines de milliers de personnes reconnues demandeuses d’asile en Libye.

      A ce regard, rien ne fonctionne : il n’existe aucun système d’enregistrement digne de ce nom et les activités du HCR dans le pays sont extrêmement contraintes. Enfin, une partie des personnes interceptées se retrouve à nouveau plongée dans des réseaux de criminalité et enfermée dans des prisons sauvages, où elles sont torturées pour obtenir une rançon de leurs proches. Les migrants détenus en Libye aujourd’hui se trouvent d’ailleurs majoritairement dans ces lieux de captivité clandestins, soumis aux pratiques les plus barbares et parfois tués. MSF sait, pour jouer les fournisseurs de sacs à cadavre à une association locale au nord de la Libye, que ce sont des centaines de personnes qui disparaissent ainsi chaque mois.

      Dès lors, la fuite est pour ses personnes une nécessité bien plus qu’un choix. En ce sens, les opérations de secours en mer des ONG répondent autant à sauver les gens d’une noyade certaine que d’œuvrer à l’évacuation de personnes en situation de danger immédiat.

      L’alternative au secours en mer n’est pas, comme feignent de le croire Emmanuel Macron et Matteo Salvini, sa disparition, mais bien plutôt une capacité accrue pour faire sortir les migrants qui le souhaitent de cette situation où ils connaissent l’enfer, et cela sans que le recours aux passeurs soit leur unique possibilité : sortir d’une logique de détention, accorder toute sa place à la demande d’asile en prenant conscience que certains d’entre eux ne pourront être rapatriés, accélérer les processus de relocalisation dans les pays tiers, y compris en Europe. Que penserait Paul Ricoeur, dont se réclame notre président, d’un de ses disciples faisant de l’ambulancier le complice de l’agresseur ?

      http://www.liberation.fr/debats/2018/06/29/les-ong-ne-sont-pas-les-complices-des-passeurs_1662820

    • Migranti: Toninelli, divieto di attracco per la nave ong #Astral

      «In ragione della nota formale che mi giunge dal Ministero dell’Interno e che adduce motivi di ordine pubblico, dispongo il divieto di attracco nei porti italiani per la nave Ong Astral, in piena ottemperanza dell’articolo 83 del Codice della Navigazione». Lo dice in una nota il Ministro delle Infrastrutture e dei trasporti, Danilo Toninelli.

      http://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/politica/2018/06/29/migranti-toninelli-divieto-di-attracco-per-la-nave-ong-astral-_d1b9ba19-7f42-44

      Commentaire de Marta Esperti sur FB:

      Decisione puramente politica, l’Astral non ha nessun migrante a bordo tra l’altro. Inoltre Astral è il nome della nave e non della ONG (#Proactiva_Open_Arms). Un’altra decisione meschina ed irregolare.

    • Updated (3): Another battle between Malta, Italy brewing on yet another ship with migrants

      Another battle of words is brewing between Malta and Italy on yet another group of migrants that has been rescued by a ship belonging to a non-governmental organisation.

      Italian Home Minister Matteo Salvini, on Twitter, wrote that Italy will not be accepting the ship with the migrants which, according to him, is closer to Malta.

      But, in a reply, Home Affairs Minister Michael Farrugia said that Lampedusa, which is Italian territory, is closer to the area where the SAR operation took place. The map shows that Lampedusa is 124.99 nautical miles away from the site, while Malta is 141.02 nautical miles away.


      http://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2018-06-30/local-news/Another-battle-between-Malta-Italy-brewing-on-yet-another-migrant-sh

    • "Avete fatto annegare 100 migranti". Open Arms accusa l’Italia

      La ong #Open_Arms accusa la Guardia costiera italiana e quella libica della morte dei migranti annegati in un naufragio al largo della Libia. «Ieri 100 persone sono morte nel naufragio di una barca di fronte alle coste della Libia», afferma la ong, che ha in queste ore nel Mediterraneo la nave Astral, a bordo della quale si trovano 59 migranti soccorsi oggi.

      Open Arms - prosegue il tweet dell’europarlamentare socialista spagnolo Javi Lopez, che si trova a bordo e che in un filmato si sofferma in un colloquio con Oscar Camps, fondatore della ong spagnola - «avrebbe potuto salvarle ma il suo appello è stato ignorato dalla Guardia costiera italiana e da quella libica».Il gommone naufragato tra ieri e giovedì scorso aveva a bordo almeno 120 migranti. Al naufragio sono sopravvissuti in 16. Tra i morti ci sono almeno tre bambini. «L’evento Sar avvenuto nella giornata di ieri e per il quale risultano dispersi circa 100 migranti è accaduto in acque territoriali libiche e non ha visto in alcun modo il coinvolgimento della Centrale operativa della Guardia costiera di Roma». E’ quanto precisa la stessa Guardia costiera in riferimento alla ricostruzione di Open Arms che ha accusato l’Italia.

      https://www.huffingtonpost.it/2018/06/30/avete-fatto-annegare-100-migranti-open-arms-accusa-litalia_a_23471711

    • Migrants rescue boat allowed to dock in Barcelona

      A Spanish rescue boat which plucked 60 migrants from a patched-up rubber dinghy in the Mediterranean Sea near Libya has been given permission to sail to Barcelona, following another political row between Italy and Malta over where the vessel should dock.

      The boat, Open Arms, run by Spanish aid group Proactiva Open Arms, said it rescued the migrants – including five women, a nine-year-old child and three teenagers – after it spotted a rubber boat patched with duct tape floating in the sea. All the migrants appeared in good health.

      Italy’s right-wing interior minister Matteo Salvini quickly declared that the rescue boat “can forget about arriving in an Italian port”, and claimed it should instead go to Malta, the nearest port.

      Malta swiftly pushed back, with its interior minister contending that the tiny Italian island of Lampedusa, south of Sicily, was closer to the boat.

      http://www.itv.com/news/2018-06-30/migrants-rescue-boat-allowed-to-dock-in-barcelona

    • Dopo l’allontanamento delle ONG è strage quotidiana sulla rotta del Mediterraneo centrale

      Nel giorno in cui il ministro dell’interno e vice-presidente del Consiglio rilancia da Pontida l’ennesimo attacco contro le ONG, che vedranno “solo in cartolina” i porti italiani, e mentre tre navi umanitarie sono bloccate nel porto de La Valletta, per decisione del governo maltese, nelle acque del Mediterraneo Centrale si continua a morire. Si continua a morire nell’indifferenza della maggior parte della popolazione italiana, schierata con chi ha promesso che, chiudendo i porti, e le vie di fuga, ai migranti da soccorrere in mare, le condizioni di vita degli italiani colpiti dalla crisi potranno migliorare. Una tragica illusione. Il vero pericolo per tutti oggi non viene dal mare, ma dalla costituzione di un fronte sovranista ed identitario europeo, che potrebbe cancellare lo stato di diritto e la democrazia rappresentativa. E allora non ci sarà più spazio nè per i diritti umani nè per i diritti sociali. i più forti imporranno le loro leggi ai più deboli.

      Questa volta nessuno potrà accusare le navi umanitarie, come hanno fatto fino a oggi direttori di giornali in Italia ed esponenti della sedicente Guardia costiera libica. Adesso i libici, in assenza delle navi umanitarie, sono costretti ad avvalersi delle navi commerciali in navigazione nelle loro acque, per operazioni di soccorso che da soli non sono in grado di garantire, salvo poi attaccare le ONG. Per le persone “soccorse” in mare da questi mezzi il destino è segnato, lo sbarco avviene a Tripoli, porto più vicino ma non “place of safety“, e dopo poche ore, per coloro che sono trasferiti dal centro di prima accoglienza al porto, ai vari centri di detenzione gestiti dalle milizie, il destino è segnato.

      Si ripetono intanto attacchi scomposti contro gli operatori umanitari, che rilanciano la macchina del fango che da oltre un anno si rivolge contro le ONG, accusate di tutti i possibili reati, per il solo fatto di salvare vite umane in mare. Si vogliono eliminare tutti i testimoni dell’Olocausto nel Mediterraneo. Senza un voto del Parlamento si è cercato di introdurre in via surrettizia il reato di solidarietà, in spregio al principio di legalità, affermato dalla Costituzione italiana.

      Questa striscia di morte, che si allunga giorno dopo giorno, con una cadenza mai vista prima, deriva direttamente dalla eliminazione delle navi umanitarie e dall’arretramento degli assetti militari italiani ed europei che in passato, anche se si verificavano gravi stragi, riuscivano tuttavia a garantire più solleciti interventi di soccorso. Il blocco di tre navi umanitarie a Malta, come il sequestro della Juventa lo scorso anno, potrebbero essere stati causa di una forte riduzione della capacità di soccorso in acque internazionali, tra la Libia e ‘Europa, una capacità di soccorso che gli stati non hanno voluto mantenere negli standards imposti dalle Convenzioni internazionali a ciascun paese responsabile di una zona SAR ( ricerca e soccorso). La presenza delle navi umanitarie è stata bollata come un fattore di attrazione delle partenze, se non come vera e propria complicità con i trafficanti, come ha ripetuto in più occasioni Salvini. Ne vediamo oggi le conseguenze mortali.

      Anche l’UNHCR ha espresso la sua preoccupazione per la diminuzione degli assetti navali in grado di operare interventi di soccorso nelle acque del Mediterraneo centrale. Secondo l’OIM negli ultimi tre giorni sono annegate oltre 200 persone, una serie di stragi ignorate dall’oipinione pubblica italiana e nascoste dai politici concentrati nel rinnovato attacco contro le ONG. La “banalità” della strage quotidiana in mare costituisce la cifra morale del governo Salvini-Di Maio. Con il sommarsi delle vittime, e l’allontanamento dei testimoni, si vuole produrre una totale assuefazione nella popolazione italiana. Per alimentare altro odio ed altra insicurezza, utili per le prossime scadenze elettorali.

      Nelle prime settimane di insediamento del nuovo governo, ed in vista del Consiglio europeo di Bruxelles del 28-29 giugno scorso, il ministero dell’interno ha disposto in modo informale la chiusura dei porti ed il divieto di ingresso nelle acque territoriali, per alcune imbarcazioni delle Organizzazioni non governative che avevano effettuato soccorsi nelle acque internazionali antistanti le coste libiche. Sono state anche ritardate le operazioni di sbarco di centinaia di persone, soccorse da unità militari ( come la nave americana Trenton), o commerciali ( come il cargo Alexander Maersk), che, solo dopo lunghi giorni di attesa, hanno potuto trasbordare i naufraghi che avevamo a bordo e proseguire per la loro rotta. In molti casi si sono trasferite le responsabilità di coordinamento dei soccorsi alle autorità libiche, con i risultati che sono sotto gli occhi di tutti.

      Le ultime vicende delle navi umanitarie Acquarius , Lifeline e Open Arms, dopo il sequestro, lo scorso anno, della nave Juventa, ancora bloccata a Trapani, hanno aperto una nuova fase di tensioni anche a livello internazionale, in particolare con il governo maltese e con le autorità spagnole. Il governo italiano ha chiuso i porti alle poche navi umanitarie ancora impegnate nelle attività di ricerca e salvataggio (SAR) sulla rotta del Mediterraneo centrale, mentre si è rilanciata la criminalizzazione delle Ong, e più in generale di chiunque rispetti il dovere di salvare vite umane in mare, malgrado importanti decisioni della magistratura (di Ragusa e di Palermo) riconoscessero come lecite, anzi doverose, le attività di soccorso umanitario delle stesse Ong sotto inchiesta.

      Da ultimo si è appreso che ci sarebbero motivi “di ordine pubblico” alla base della decisione del ministro dell’Interno Matteo Salvini di vietare l’accesso ai porti italiani alla Open Arms.
Questi motivi, stando a informazioni che non sono state formalizzate in un provvedimento notificato agli interessati, sarebbero costituiti dalle “vicende giudiziarie” in cui è stata coinvolta la nave delle Ong spagnola, dissequestrata con una sentenza del Gip poi confermata dal tribunale di Ragusa, e dalle “manifestazioni”(rischio proteste) che si sono verificate in occasione del sequestro preventivo alla quale era stata sottoposta nel porto di Pozzallo.

      Si configura così come problema di “ordine pubblico” il doveroso espletamento di una operazione SAR che si è svolta nel pieno rispetto della legge e del diritto internazionale, per legittimare un provvedimento, ancora segretato, forse una circolare probabilmente da redigere, del ministro Toninelli, che vieta l’ingresso alle navi delle Ong nelle acque territoriali e nei porti italiani .

      L’allontanamento delle ONG per effetto delle “chiusure” informali dei porti, e la istituzione unilaterale di una zona SAR libica, oltre al blocco imposto alle navi umanitarie dalle autorità maltesi, riducono la presenza dei mezzi di soccorso nel Mediterraneo centrale e hanno già comportato un aumento esponenziale delle vittime.

      La realizzazione del progetto italiano di istituire una zona SAR , completata con una forte pressione sull’IMO a Londra, sta producendo tutti i suoi effetti mortali, considerando che la Guardia costiera “libica” non può coprire tutte le azioni di soccorso che è chiamata ad operare (spesso da assetti italiani), avendo a disposizione soltanto sei motovedette. Si tratta di mezzi ceduti dai precedenti governi italiani, oggi abbastanza logorati malgrado siano stati curati nella manutenzione dai marinai delle unità italiane, di stanza nel porto di Tripoli, nell’ambito della missione NAURAS. Non si sa come e quando arriveranno in Libia le 12 motovedette promesse alla Guardia costiera di Tripoli da Salvini, che doveva fare approvare la sua proposta in Consiglio dei ministri, approvazione che ancora non c’e’ stata. Una iniziativa che potrebbe infuocare ancora di più lo scontro tra le milizie libiche per il controllo dei porti, e del traffico di gas e petrolio.
      La creazione fittizia di una zona SAR libica, che sembra sia stata notificata anche all’IMO, sta legittimando gli interventi più frequenti della Guardia costiera di Tripoli, che arrivano a minacciare anche gli operatori umanitari mentre sono impegnati negli interventi di soccorso in acque internazionali. Interventi di soccorso che sono sempre monitorati dalle autorità militari italiane ed europee, che però non intervengono con la stessa tempestività che permetteva in passato il salvataggio di migliaia di vite.

      Il cerchio si chiude. Adesso arriva anche il supporto europeo alla chiusura contro le ONG, anche se non si traduce in alcun atto dotato di forza normativa vinclante. Tutte le politiche europee sull’immigrazione, anche i respingimenti, avverranno “su base volontaria”. Ma le navi di Frontex ( e di Eunavfor Med) rimangono vincolate agli obblighi di soccorso previsti dai Regolamenti europei n.656 del 2014 e 1624 del 2016. Atti normativi, vincolanti anche per i ministri,che subordinano le azioni contro i trafficanti alla salvaguardia della vita delle vittime, non esternazioni di leader sull’orlo di una crisi di nervi alla fine di un Consiglio europeo estenuante ed inconcludente.

      L’illegalità di scelte politiche e militari che vanno contro il diritto internazionale viene giustificata con lo spauracchio di manifestazioni democratiche di protesta. Non e’ a rischio soltanto la libertà di manifestazione o il diritto a svolgere attività di assistenza e di soccorso umanitario. Il messaggio lanciato dal governo italiano, e ripreso dal governo maltese, è chiaro, riguarda tutti, non solo i migranti. E’ la strategia mortale della dissuasione, rivolta ai migranti ed agli operatori umanitari. Altro che “pacchia”. Per chi si trova costretto a fuggire dalla Libia, senza alternative sicure per salvare la vita, il rischio del naufragio si fa sempre più concreto. Anche se gli “sbarchi” sono drasticamente calati, rispetto allo scorso anno, è in forte aumento il numero delle vittime, morti e dispersi, abbandonati nelle acque del Mediterraneo.

      In questa situazione la magistratura italiana è chiamata a fare rispettare le regole dello stato di diritto e gli impegni assunti dall’Italia con la firma e la ratifica delle Convenzioni internazionali di diritto del mare. Ma è anche importante il contributo della società civile organizzata, delle associazioni, di tutto quel mondo del volontariato che in questi ultimi mesi è stato messo sotto accusa con lo slogan della “lotta al business dell’immigrazione”. Quando erano state proprio le Organizzazioni non governative a denunciare chi faceva affari sulla pelle dei migranti e chi ometteva i controlli, denunce fatte in Parlamento e nel lavoro quotidiano di tanti cittadini solidali. L’attacco contro il sistema di accoglienza è stato utilizzato per delegittimare e bloccare chi portava soccorso in mare, mentre gli stati venivano meno ai loro obblighi di salvataggio. Verranno dalla società civile europea e dagli operatori umanitari le denunce che inchioderanno i responsabili delle stragi per omissione.

      Rispetto alle richieste di soccorso, e persino rispetto alle istanze che si stanno proponendo per avere chiarite le basi normative e i contenuti dei provvedimenti amministrativi, sulla base dei quali si sta interdicendo l’ingresso nelle acque territoriali e nei porti italiani alle navi delle ONG, impegnate in attività SAR nelle acque internazionali a nord delle coste libiche, silenzi e ritardi. Si può riscontrare silenzio e ritardo nell’attività delle pubbliche amministrazioni riconducibili al Ministero delle infrastrutture ( quanto al divieto di ingresso) e dell’interno (quanto alle note di rilevazione ed alla dichiarazione di una situazione di pericolo per l’ordine pubblico). Le decisioni dei ministri, su materie così importanti che incidono sulla vita ( e sulla morte) delle persone, non possono essere comunicate sui social, con messaggi Twitter o attraverso Facebook.

      Se gli avvistamenti iniziali ed il coordinamento “di fatto” (come rilevato dalla magistratura) della Guardia costiera “libica” sono effettuati da parte di autorità militari italiane, in sinergia con gli assetti aero-navali europei delle missioni Themis di Frontex ed Eunavfor MED, le autorità italiane non possono dismettere la loro responsabilità di soccorso.

      In questi casi il ministero dell’interno italiano ha l’obbligo di indicare un porto sicuro (place of safety) di sbarco in Italia, dal momento che la Libia non offre porti sicuri, e che Malta ha negato in diverse occasioni l’attracco a navi commerciali o umanitarie, che avevano operato soccorsi nelle acque del Mediterraneo centrale.

      Contro la scelta di chiudere i porti e di interdire l’ingresso delle navi delle ONG nelle acque territoriali, tanto per sbarcare naufraghi soccorsi in alto mare, quanto per effettuare rifornimenti e cambi di equipaggio, occorre rilanciare una forte iniziativa sul piano sociale, politico e legale. Per affermare il diritto alla vita, un diritto incondizionato, che non può essere piegato a finalità politiche o giudiziarie. Per battere quell’ondata di disinformazione e di rancore sociale che sta disintegrando il tessuto umano della nostra Repubblica, e la stessa Unione Europea, indicando nei migranti e in chi li assiste la ragione di tutti i mali che affliggono i cittadini italiani. Come se si trattasse di nemici interni da eliminare. Di fronte a tutto questo, la resistenza è un dovere.

      https://www.a-dif.org/2018/07/01/dopo-lallontanamento-delle-ong-e-strage-quotidiana-sulla-rotta-del-mediterran

    • Migrants : pour les armateurs, secourir les naufragés est « un devoir absolu »

      Le devoir des navires est de porter assistance aux personnes en situation de détresse en mer, quelles que soient les circonstances, souligne le délégué général d’Armateurs de France Hervé Thomas, alors que l’Italie a bloqué pendant trois jours un cargo danois qui avait secouru des migrants.

      http://www.levif.be/actualite/international/migrants-pour-les-armateurs-secourir-les-naufrages-est-un-devoir-absolu/article-normal-860223.html
      #droit_de_la_mer

    • #Sea-Watch hindered from leaving port while people drown at sea

      +++ Current surge in death toll linked to crack down on sea rescue +++ Sea-Watch fully entitled with Dutch flag, investigations are political campaign against civil rescue fleet +++

      Sea-Watch learned today that its vessel is detained in Malta, without any legal grounds provided by authorities. Since the Sea-Watch 3 is not registered in the sportboat register, as is the case for LIFELINE and SEEFUCHS, but is listed in the royal shipping register as a Dutch seagoing vessel, fully entitled to fly the Dutch flag, the lack of permission to sail from Malta turns out not to be a registration issue, but a political campaign to stop civil rescue at sea.

      While rescue assets are blocked in port, recent days have become the deadliest this year. Yesterday, the UNHCR reported another 63 people missing, while on Friday more than 100 people had drowned, among them babies and children. At the moment there is no suitable rescue asset left in the area of operation, despite the fact that the Sea-Watch 3 is well equipped and ready to sail. Sea-Watch strongly urges the Maltese government to stop hindering rescue workers, as human lives are at acute risk.

      https://sea-watch.org/en/321

    • Terzo naufragio in quattro giorni. I governi uccidono ed i giudici processano la solidarietà.

      Oggi vogliamo soltanto fissare la sequenza dei fatti, le vicende di questa ultima strage, che rischia di essere cancellata dall’indifferenza generale, per restituire una lacrima ed un ricordo a quelli che potrebero essere nostri padri, madri, fratelli, sorelle, figli, nipoti. Che oggi, dopo questo ennesimo naufragio, saranno dispersi in qualche parte del Mediterraneo, senza che le loro famiglie possano avere almeno restituiti i cadaveri. Altre 114 vite cancellate dalle politiche di “lotta ai trafficanti” e di “difesa dei confini” che in Europa ed alle sue frontiere esterne stanno prevalendo persino sul diritto alla vita.

      https://www.a-dif.org/2018/07/02/terzo-naufragio-in-quattro-giorni-i-governi-uccidono-ed-i-giudici-processano-

      v. aussi:
      http://www.repubblica.it/esteri/2018/07/02/news/migranti_unhcr_nuovo_naufragio_in_libia_114_dispersi_in_mare-200669661
      https://www.corriere.it/cronache/18_luglio_02/migranti-altro-naufragio-l-agenzia-onu-ci-sono-114-dispersi-850cef22-7e26-1
      http://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/topnews/2018/07/02/nuovo-naufragio-in-libia-114-dispersi_79f8cc8a-ea4b-42a9-8be5-19b6c31b0545.html

    • 16/06: Alarm Phone alerted to two boats in the Western Mediterranean – one person died during rescue operation

      Watch The Med Alarm Phone Investigations – 16th of June 2018
      Case name: 2018_06_16-WM264
      Situation: Alarm Phone alerted to two distress cases between Morocco and Spain, one traveller died during the rescue operation.
      Status of WTM Investigation: Concluded
      Place of Incident: Western Mediterranean Sea

      Summary of the Case: On Saturday the 16th of June, the Alarm Phone shift team was alerted to two boats in distress in the Western Mediterranean. Both boats were rescued by the Moroccan navy. However, one traveller drowned during the rescue operation of the second boat.

      At 12.48pm, the Alarm Phone shift team was alerted by a contact person to a boat in distress carrying 51 travellers, amongst them seven women. The boat had left the day before in the early evening from Nador. The contact person had not been able to reach the travellers since the previous evening, and we did also not manage to establish direct contact. At 1.13pm the contact person informed us that the travellers had been intercepted by the Moroccan navy.

      At 09.10pm, the Alarm Phone shift team was alerted by a contact person to a group of 11 travellers, who had left from a beach just south of Tangier two hours earlier. Via the contact person we received the position of the travellers, but from 10.25pm it was not possible for neither us nor the contact person to reach the travellers. At 10.45pm we called the Spanish search and rescue organisation Salvamento Maritimo (SM) and passed on our information. At 11.41 we managed to reach the travellers. They had been rescued by the Moroccan navy and were back in Morocco, but they informed us that one person had drowned. We learned via the contact person that the person had drowned during the rescue operation, and that the Moroccan navy had been unwilling to resuscitate him.
      Four days later we received a testimony from the group of travellers, explaining the events on the night that their friend lost his life. They explained that the Moroccan navy had come towards them, just as a Spanish helicopter had spotted them from above. The navy had approached them quickly, creating big waves which caused the boat to capsize. Most of the travellers managed to cling on to their rubber boat, which had flipped over. They explained how their friend was not able to grab hold of the boat, and how the navy made no effort to help him, but simply watched him drown. Afterwards they allowed the remaining distressed people onto their vessel, and brought them back to Morocco. We send all our condolences to the family and friends of the traveller who passed away, and want to once again point out that the Moroccan navy is not a rescue organisation, but first and foremost a military unit with border management as their main aim.

      http://www.watchthemed.net/index.php/reports/view/923

    • Malta blocks migrant search plane from operating in Mediterranean as EU toughens stance on refugee rescues

      Malta has blocked an aircraft used to search for migrant boats in the Mediterranean from operating out of the country, according to a migrant rescue group.

      Sea Watch, which runs the #Moonbird aircraft, condemned the move, accusing authorities of grounding the plane during the “deadliest days” in the Mediterranean since records began.

      The German NGO said the plane had been involved in the rescue of some 20,000 people since it began operating.


      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/malta-blocks-moonbird-plane-mediterranean-refugee-crisis-ngo-sea-watc

    • Libya’s Authorities Rescue 41 Migrants after Shipwreck

      The Libyan Coast Guard rescued 41 migrants after the shipwreck of a pneumatic boat in which 63 other people, declared missing, were also traveling, today reported the government.

      The boat, which sank off the coast of Garabolli, 50 kilometers east of this capital, was carrying 104 people, a figure that can be deduced from the possible victims still to be found, according to the Navy spokesman, Colonel Major Ayoub Gassem.

      The 41 migrants who traveled as passengers survived because of their life vests, which allowed them to resist until they were rescued.

      Gassem lamented the limited resources of the Coast Guard, including only three operational vessels, often immobilized in the port due to lack of fuel, breakdowns and life jackets, in a country through which thousands of Africans try to reach Europe.

      That body of operations rescued only last June more than 4,000 migrants, a thousand of them in a single day.

      http://www.plenglish.com/index.php?o=rn&id=30585&SEO=libyas-authorities-rescue-41-migrants-after-s

    • Aquarius : les étudiantes rousseauistes de l’ULB livrent leur analyse

      En mai dernier, nous avons eu la chance de participer au Concours de procès simulé en droit international Charles-Rousseau, lequel abordait cette année la problématique des migrants interceptés en mer. Le cas pratique mettait en scène deux États mettant en cause la responsabilité d’un troisième État, le Takaramé, devant le Tribunal international du droit de la mer. Il lui était reproché d’avoir manqué à ses obligations en matière de droit de la mer, de droits de l’Homme et de droit des réfugiés. En effet, cet État, dont le port était le plus proche du navire, avait refusé l’accès à ce même port à un navire en situation de détresse à la suite du secours qu’il avait apporté à une centaine de migrants fuyant les persécutions subies dans leur pays d’origine. Ce cas fictif n’est évidemment pas sans rappeler les récents évènements en méditerranée. Pendant plusieurs jours, l’Italie et Malte se sont en effet renvoyées la responsabilité d’accueillir l’Aquarius, un navire ayant recueilli à son bord plusieurs centaines de migrants. Le 10 juin 2018, ce navire de l’ONG SOS Méditerranée avait secouru 629 migrants, parmi lesquels se trouvaient 123 mineurs isolés, 11 enfants en bas âge, et 7 femmes enceintes. L’Italie ayant refusé de les accueillir, le navire s’était retrouvé bloqué à 35 milles marins de l’Italie, et à 27 milles marins de Malte. L’ONG avait pourtant comme pratique, en raison d’un accord passé avec les autorités italiennes, d’accoster et de débarquer les personnes secourues dans les ports italiens. Il semblait donc logique que le navire débarque, comme à son habitude, ces personnes en Italie. Mais logique ne fait pas forcément droit. Il convient donc de s’interroger sur ce que dit le droit international quant au débarquement des migrants secourus en mer. Les conclusions qui suivent s’appuient sur les recherches que nous avons pu effectuer dans le cadre du Concours Charles-Rousseau.

      Dans la suite de la présente analyse, nous démontrerons d’abord que les Etats ne manquent pas de profiter des zones grises du droit de la mer pour oublier leurs obligations envers l’Aquarius. Ensuite, nous insisterons sur l’importance de l’obligation de respecter les droits de l’Homme en mer, qui apparaissait s’imposer tout particulièrement à l’Italie, mais également aux autre États, dans le cas présent.

      1. Les États côtiers de la méditerranée ont vite fait d’oublier les obligations que leur impose la Convention des Nations Unies sur le droit de la mer

      L’obligation pour les Etats de secourir les personnes en détresse en mer est une des plus anciennes règles coutumières en droit de la mer, et est désormais codifiée à l’article 98 de la Convention des Nations Unies sur le droit de la mer. Si ce dernier requiert des Etats qu’ils exigent des navires battant leur pavillon de se porter aussi vite que possible au secours des personnes en détresse en mer, il exige tout autant des États côtiers qu’ils facilitent la création et le fonctionnement d’un service permanent de recherche et de sauvetage adéquat et efficace pour assurer la sécurité maritime. Il nous semble dès lors important d’insister sur un premier point. Si les Conventions SAR et SOLAS précisent et mettent en œuvre cette obligation de coopération par la création de Régions de recherches et de sauvetage, elles ne font pas disparaitre l’obligation principale de coopération qui pèse sur tous les États côtiers. Nous nous étonnons dès lors d’entendre le président français, dont les côtes s’étendent sur plus de 1500km en méditerranée, dénoncer « l’irresponsabilité de l’Italie ». Les États ont beau jeu de se cacher derrière les obligations de l’Italie pour faire oublier les leurs.

      Quoi qu’il en soit, qu’en est-il plus précisément des obligations spécifiques de l’Italie et de Malte, États responsables de la Région de recherche et de sauvetage dans laquelle se trouvait l’Aquarius ? Si la Convention SAR a principalement pour objet de régler le déroulement des opérations de sauvetage et la coopération entre Etats, sa version initiale ne donne aucune indication sur l’endroit dans lequel les navires secourus devraient pouvoir débarquer. Les amendements de 2004 ont tenté, suite à l’affaire du Tampa en Australie, de combler cette lacune en imposant aux Etats de remettre les personnes en « lieu sûr ». Néanmoins, l’on se heurte à un premier problème en ce qui concerne Malte : elle n’a pas ratifié ces amendements, et ce, afin précisément de ne pas être soumise à l’obligation d’accueillir des navires en détresse tels que l’Aquarius. La République maltaise n’est dès lors tenue qu’à l’obligation de coopération en vue du sauvetage du navire et des personnes à son bord.

      Ensuite, en ce qui concerne l’obligation de remettre les personnes secourues en lieu sûr, inscrite à la Règle 33 (1-1) de la Convention SOLAS, ainsi qu’au paragraphe 3.1.9. de la Convention SAR dans sa version amendée, elle n’implique aucune obligation de débarquement sur le territoire de l’État responsable de la Région de recherche et de sauvetage. L’Organisation Maritime Internationale (ci-après l’OMI) définit un lieu sûr comme étant « un endroit où la vie des personnes secourues n’est plus menacée et où leurs besoins fondamentaux (tels que la nourriture, le logement et les besoins médicaux) peuvent être satisfaits ». Le navire ayant prêté assistance peut ainsi être considéré comme un lieu sûr. Néanmoins, un tel navire ne peut être qu’un lieu sûr temporaire, les besoins fondamentaux des quelques 600 personnes secourues ne pouvant être indéfiniment contentés à son bord.

      S’il n’est pas requis de l’Etat côtier qu’il accueille les personnes secourues sur son territoire, les Principes relatifs aux procédures administratives pour le débarquement des personnes secourues en mer de l’OMI précisent que l’État responsable de la Région de recherche et de sauvetage a l’obligation résiduelle d’autoriser le débarquement sur son propre territoire, lorsqu’il n’est pas possible ailleurs. Toutefois, ces principes sont dénués de force juridique, et n’engagent donc les États à aucune obligation véritablement contraignante.

      En l’espèce, l’Italie et Malte n’ont pas coopéré pour trouver un lieu sûr pour ces personnes, mais se sont contentés de refuser qu’elles débarquent sur leurs territoires. Si l’Espagne n’avait pas proposé d’accueillir ce navire, l’Aquarius serait toujours en haute mer sans solution. L’Italie n’était certes pas dans l’obligation d’accepter les personnes sur son territoire, mais elle ne pouvait se contenter de refuser ce navire sans tenter de coopérer avec les autres Etats côtiers. En espèce, c’est l’Espagne qui s’est proposée, palliant de fait les violations de l’Italie.

      On constate donc ici une volonté de l’Italie et de Malte de profiter des zones grises du droit de la mer, en jouant de l’ambiguïté de la notion de « lieu sûr » dans le cas de l’Italie, ou en limitant autant que faire se peut l’étendue de son obligation de secours et sauvetage dans le cas de Malte. Si l’Italie est à blâmer pour avoir totalement nié sa responsabilité envers l’Aquarius, il nous semble qu’elle n’est pas la seule à devoir l’être, l’Europe entière étant concernée par la situation en méditerranée. En faisant la sourde oreille à celle-ci, les États européens oublient toutefois leur obligation de coopération en matière de secours et sauvetage. Ils oublient également les obligations qui leurs incombent en vertu des instruments de protection des droits de la personne, comme nous allons maintenant l’évoquer.

      2. Les considérations élémentaires d’humanité imposaient aux États côtier de se proposer afin d’accueillir les migrants

      Les obligations relatives au droit de la mer ne sont pas les seules à entrer en jeu. Les Etats doivent en effet également respecter les considérations élémentaires d’humanité. Par cette expression, on entend l’ensemble des principes juridiques visant à la protection du respect de la dignité des personnes. La Cour internationale de justice s’est prononcé à plusieurs reprises quant à celles-ci, insistant sur l’importance de leur respect (Détroit de Corfou, Activités militaires et paramilitaires au Nicaragua et contre celui-ci, Licéité de la menace ou de l’emploi d’armes nucléaires, Immunités juridictionnelles de l’État). Le Tribunal international du droit de la mer a également rappelé que ces principes s’appliquent dans le droit de la mer (Affaires du Navire Saïga No. 2, Incident de l’Enrica Lexie, Navire Louisa, Juno Trader). Plus spécifiquement, ces considérations élémentaires d’humanité sont reflétées dans les instruments conventionnels de protection des droits fondamentaux, qu’il s’agisse de la Convention européenne des droits de l’Homme (ci-après la CEDH) ou du Pacte international relatif aux droits civils et politiques (ci-après le PIDCP).

      Afin de déterminer si ces instruments sont applicables au cas d’espèce, il convient toutefois d’abord de déterminer si les États en cause exerçaient bien leur juridiction. En principe, une personne se trouvant sur le territoire d’un État est présumée se trouver sous sa juridiction. Toutefois, l’Aquarius ne se trouvant pas dans la mer territoriale de l’Italie ou de Malte, mais bien en Haute Mer, cette présomption ne joue pas en l’espèce. Toutefois, dans certaines circonstances exceptionnelles, un État peut exercer sa juridiction de manière extraterritoriale. Tel est le cas notamment, comme l’a rappelé la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme dans l’affaire Al-Skeini contre Royaume-Uni, quand des agents étatiques exercent un contrôle effectif sur les personnes victimes de violations de droits de l’Homme. Bien qu’aucun agent de l’État italien ne soit monté à bord de l’Aquarius, le simple fait d’empêcher un navire de se diriger vers son territoire permet d’indiquer que l’Italie exerçait bien juridiction sur le navire et les personnes à son bord. Par ailleurs, l’article 92 de la Convention de Montego Bay précise bien que « les navires naviguent sous le pavillon d’un seul État et sont soumis (…) à sa juridiction exclusive en haute mer ». Ainsi, l’Aquarius battant pavillon anglais, le Royaume-Uni pourrait potentiellement être tenu responsable des violations des droits de l’Homme commises à bord du navire. Le silence et la passivité de cet État dans cette affaire est dès lors interpellant…

      En l’espèce, il existait plusieurs risques de violations des droits fondamentaux. Tout d’abord, les migrants et les membres de l’équipage de l’Aquarius ont été contraint à vivre durant quatre jours à bord du navire dans des conditions déplorables, et à retraverser la mer méditerranéenne en direction de l’Espagne (dont le port le plus proche se situait à 1500 km du navire au moment des faits). Se pose alors la question de savoir si l’Italie, Malte et les autres États européens n’ont pas soumis ces personnes à des traitements inhumains et dégradants. De tels traitements sont prohibés par l’article 3 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’Homme, ainsi que par l’article 7 §1 du Pacte international relatif aux droits civils et politiques. Selon le Comité des droits de l’Homme, le fait qu’un acte relève ou non du champ d’application de l’article 7 du Pacte précité « dépend de toutes les circonstances, par exemple la durée et les modalités du traitement considéré, ses conséquences physiques et mentales ainsi que le sexe, l’âge et l’état de santé de la victime » (affaire Vuolanne contre Finlande). Au vu de la vulnérabilité accrue et de la situation personnelle des personnes se trouvant à bord du navire, et compte tenu de l’état de détresse du navire, le fait de les forcer à vivre ainsi à bord de l’Aquarius durant plusieurs jours, est constitutif de traitements inhumains et dégradants.

      Ensuite, bien qu’au regard du droit de la mer, aucun État n’ait formellement l’obligation de permettre le débarquement de migrants secourus en mer sur son territoire, il se peut qu’au final permettre un tel débarquement soit la seule façon pour un État d’agir conformément à ses obligations prévues en matière de droits de l’Homme. En effet, l’article 33 §1 de la Convention de Genève relative au statut des réfugiés interdit à tout État de refouler des personnes vers un territoire où leur vie ou leur liberté serait menacée. Dans le même sens, l’article 3 de la CEDH interdit aux États membres du Conseil de l’Europe de renvoyer une personne vers un territoire où elle risque d’être soumise à de la torture ou à d’autres mauvais traitements. A contrario, le renvoi de migrants vers un « pays sûr » est autorisé. A ce sujet, nous avons été assez surprises d’apprendre que l’Italie avait indiqué à l’Aquarius de se rendre en Libye, sachant que l’État italien a été condamné en 2012 par la Cour européenne des droits de l’Homme pour avoir violé l’article 3 de la CEDH en ayant refoulé des ressortissants somaliens et érythréens en Libye, lors de l’affaire Hirsi Jamaa.

      Conclusion

      En conclusion, l’actualité européenne concernant le navire Aquarius met en exergue l’intention des États d’exploiter les vides juridiques existants en matière de prise en charge des personnes secourues en mer et témoigne également de l’urgente nécessité que les États membres de l’Union européenne s’accordent afin d’apporter une réponse globale à la migration. Reste que, comme on l’a vu, les États sont liés par leurs obligations découlant des droits de la personne. Ici aussi cependant, les États en procédant à des refoulements en mer, cherchent à contourner celles-ci. Il est en effet plus que difficile pour un migrant refoulé vers la Lybie de pouvoir attraire l’Italie devant la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme.

      Justine Braun
      Marianne Chagnon
      Caroline Delava
      France Laurent

      http://cdi.ulb.ac.be/aquarius-etudiantes-rousseauistes-de-lulb-livrent-analyse/#more-4589

    • "Porti chiusi anche alle navi militari europee", ma Salvini irrita la Difesa: “Non ha nessuna competenza”

      L’affondo del vicepremier dopo lo sbarco a Messina di 106 migranti da una nave irlandese: «Stortura da modificare, porterò la questione al vertice dei ministri dell’Interno Ue». Ma arriva lo stop: «Questa missione europea è gestita da Esteri e Difesa»

      http://www.repubblica.it/cronaca/2018/07/08/news/nave_militare_irlandese_sbarca_a_messina_con_106_migranti-201198516

    • Les #gardes-côtes_libyens interceptent de plus en plus de migrants en Méditerranée

      Est-ce la conséquence d’une raréfaction des secours en Méditerranée ? Pendant le week-end du 14 juillet, un bateau de pêche en bois, avec à son bord 450 personnes, a été secouru dans les eaux internationales, non loin de l’île italienne de Lampedusa. Un mois après la crise de l’Aquarius, le navire que l’Italie – sous la pression de son ministre de l’intérieur d’extrême droite Matteo Salvini – a refusé d’accueillir avec 630 migrants à son bord, les ONG ne peuvent presque plus opérer au large des côtes libyennes, poussant les migrants à tenter des voies toujours plus dangereuses.
      « Ce n’est pas la première fois que ce type d’embarcations tente la traversée depuis la Libye, même si l’on voit plus souvent des petits bateaux pneumatiques, réagit Nicola Stalla, coordinateur des opérations de recherche et sauvetage à bord du navire humanitaire “Aquarius”. En revanche, le fait qu’ils soient parvenus aussi loin est clairement une conséquence du manque de moyens de sauvetage en mer. »

      L’Aquarius est à quai à Marseille, tandis que le Lifeline et le Sea-Watch sont empêchés de repartir de Malte. Seul l’Open-Arms, le bateau affrété par l’ONG catalane Proactiva, navigue actuellement en Méditerranée centrale, de retour de Barcelone où il avait accosté le 4 juillet, avec à son bord soixante migrants que l’Italie avait refusé d’accueillir.

      Le navire secouru ce week-end rappelle le naufrage d’un chalutier aux abords de Lampedusa en 2013, au cours duquel près de 400 personnes s’étaient noyées. La catastrophe avait déclenché l’opération militaire et humanitaire européenne « Mare Nostrum ». « Ces bateaux sont particulièrement dangereux, car le risque de chavirage est très important, ajoute M. Stalla. En fonction de la quantité de carburant et d’eau à bord, le centre de gravité est modifié. Il y a aussi un risque d’asphyxie dans la cale, souvent surchargée. »

      Ping-pong diplomatique

      Transbordées à bord de bateaux italien et britannique, les personnes secourues ce week-end ont accosté lundi en Sicile après un nouveau ping-pong diplomatique entre Rome et La Valette, les deux capitales se renvoyant la responsabilité de leur accueil. La situation s’est débloquée après que cinq pays européens, dont la France, ont accepté de recevoir plus de la moitié de ces migrants, à la demande du gouvernement italien. « On voit se mettre en place un mécanisme de solidarité entre certains pays européens, c’est un début mais c’est très fragile », commente Vincent Cochetel, envoyé spécial du Haut-Commissariat des Nations unies pour les réfugiés (HCR) pour la situation en Méditerranée centrale.

      Conséquence directe du retrait des ONG, la proportion de morts en mer parmi les personnes tentant la traversée entre la Libye et l’Italie a doublé, passant de 1 % à 2,1 % entre les premiers semestres de 2017 et 2018, d’après des chiffres du HCR. Sur l’ensemble de la zone de Méditerranée centrale, 564 personnes ont disparu en juin. Un chiffre légèrement supérieur à celui de juin 2017, alors même que les flux d’arrivées sont sept fois moins importants. « Les noyades se multiplient pendant que les gouvernements européens bloquent les secours humanitaires », ont alerté la semaine dernière SOS-Méditerranée et Médecins sans frontières, les deux ONG qui affrètent l’Aquarius.

      « Ceux qui criminalisent les ONG sont responsables des morts, parce qu’ils omettent délibérément de porter assistance aux personnes », a réagi Axel Steier, cofondateur de Lifeline, dont le bateau a débarqué 234 migrants à Malte, le 27 juin, après que l’Italie lui a également refusé l’accès à ses ports. Depuis, le navire a été saisi, et son capitaine est convoqué devant la justice maltaise le 30 juillet, accusé de ne pas avoir enregistré correctement l’immatriculation de son bateau. Egalement empêché de repartir, le navire de l’ONG allemande Sea Watch est amarré à La Valette. La capitaine, Pia Klemp, explique : « Quand on a décidé de partir le 2 juillet après une opération de maintenance, on a requis une autorisation aux autorités portuaires. Elle nous a été refusée. C’est la première fois ».

      « Le droit maritime est complètement foulé au pied »

      Enfin, le Moonbird, l’avion de reconnaissance géré par Sea Watch et l’ONG suisse Humanitarian Pilots Initiative, est bloqué au sol. « Malte nous interdit d’entrer ou de quitter la région d’information de vol libyenne, donc ça nous empêche de faire nos opérations », constate Tamino Böhm, chef de mission. « Depuis deux mois, il y a moins de capacités de recherche et de sauvetage, résume Vincent Cochetel, du HCR. Or, toutes les bonnes volontés sont nécessaires pour sauver des vies. Les ONG représentaient 40 % des efforts en mer. »

      Dans le même temps, les interceptions d’embarcations par les gardes-côtes libyens ont augmenté de plus de 28 %. Depuis le début de l’année, ce sont 10 466 personnes tentant la traversée qui ont été ramenées en Libye. Dans cet objectif, Rome apporte une aide importante à Tripoli, notamment en fournissant des vedettes aux gardes-côtes. « Si les Libyens réalisent des interceptions dans leurs eaux territoriales, ce n’est pas problématique en soi. Mais dans les eaux internationales, à notre avis, les Libyens peuvent coordonner les sauvetages dans leur zone de secours, mais pas débarquer les personnes chez eux tant qu’ils n’ont pas de lieu sûr. En tout cas, les centres de détention ne correspondent pas à un port sûr », prévient Vincent Cochetel, en référence au droit maritime international, qui considère que les migrants secourus doivent être débarqués dans le port sûr le plus proche. Plusieurs ONG font toutefois état d’opérations menées par les Libyens dans les eaux internationales. En outre, elles témoignent d’un transfert de responsabilité entre Rome et Tripoli en matière de coordination des sauvetages dans les eaux internationales. « Le droit maritime est complètement foulé au pied, s’alarme Sophie Beau. On ne peut pas construire un modèle autour de la Libye, c’est le chaos le plus total. »

      https://abonnes.lemonde.fr/europe/article/2018/07/17/les-gardes-cotes-libyens-interceptent-de-plus-en-plus-de-migrants-en

    • Libyan coastguard left refugees to die in Mediterranean : NGO

      A woman and a child were found dead hours after they were left in their damaged boat by the Libyan coastguard.

      Proactiva Open Arms, which has been rescuing refugees crossing the Mediterranean Sea from North Africa to Europe, says the Libyan coastguard has left at least two refugees to die after abandoning them at sea.

      The Spanish NGO, which carries out search and rescue operations in Mediterranean, posted a video and pictures on Twitter showing how their boat took aboard three people; two women and a child.

      By the time the three were found by Proactiva, one woman and the child had already died.

      According to tweets by Oscar Camps, founder and director of Proactiva, the boat was damaged and abandoned by the Libyan coastguard.

      “Today we’ve found the bodies of a woman and a small child, as well as a woman who was still alive among the wreck of a ship,” Camps said in a video.

      “I want to condemn the lack of assistance in international waters and the merchant ship Triades which abandoned a boat in danger in the middle of the night,” he added.

      “They don’t know how to manage an emergency situation they arrived two days late and abandoned two women and a child in the wreckage of a ship that they themselves destroyed,” Camps said.

      The boat carrying the two bodies and one survivor were found about 120km off the Libyan coast.


      https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/07/libyan-coastguard-left-refugees-die-mediterranean-ngo-180717195213059.htm

      #gardes-côtes_libyens

    • Press Release: Migrants rescued in Distress in Maltese Search and Rescue Zone illegally transferred to Tunisian territorial waters

      Over the past four days, the WatchTheMed Alarm Phone has collected information that strongly suggest that a boat carrying 40 migrants from several African countries seeking protection in Europe was illegally transferred into Tunisian territorial waters after having already reached international waters and the Maltese Search and Rescue (SAR) zone. Among the group are eight women, two of whom are pregnant. The wooden boat had left from Libya and was rescued on Friday the 13th of July north of the oil platform Astrat in international waters and in the Maltese SAR zone by the supply vessel Sarost 5. MRCC Tunis as well as the crew of the supply vessel confirmed the position of the migrant boat in the Maltese SAR zone. Both Malta and Italy denied the supply vessel their permission to disembark the migrants in Maltese and Italian harbours.

      The migrants are still in limbo. After rescue, they were provided with some food and brought to the oil platform. Later, the supply vessel took course on Sfax/Tunisia to disembark the people there. The authorities of Sfax, however, refused to allow them to disembark. They were then told to disembark in Zarzis/Tunisia. But since Monday the 16th of July, at 1am, they are also blocked from entering the port there.

      We demand that the people are safely and immediately brought to a safe harbour in Europe. We demand that European coastguards take responsibility for coordinating Search and Rescue operations of boats in situations of distress in their Search and Rescue zones, as legally mandated. We demand a long-term solution that allows those in distress at sea to be swiftly disembarked in European harbours, rather than the case-by-case evaluations that we see currently, which unnecessarily prolong the suffering of those rescued. We also declare our solidarity with the crews of non-governmental and commercial vessels that carry out vital search and rescue operations despite the obstacles that European governments create.


      https://alarmphone.org/en/2018/07/18/press-release-migrants-rescued-in-distress-in-maltese-search-and-rescue-zone-illegally-transferred-to-tunisian-territorial-waters/?post_type_release_type=post

    • #Marc_Gasol, il campione Nba da 20 milioni di dollari all’anno che salva i migranti come volontario

      Il giocatore dei Memphis Grizzlies - fratello dell’ex Laker, Pau, e nazionale spagnolo come lui - era a bordo della nave della Ong catalana che martedì ha denunciato l’inefficienza della Guardia Costiera libica accusandola di aver abbandonato Josephine e una mamma con il figlio piccolo, poi morti, al largo delle coste di Tripoli. Il cestista al El Pais: «Scioccato dalla foto del piccolo Aylan circolata nel 2015. Da allora ho deciso di fare la mia parte»


      https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2018/07/18/marc-gasol-il-campione-nba-da-20-milioni-di-dollari-allanno-che-salva-i-migranti-come-volontario/4500446

    • #Josephine, l’unica sopravvissuta al naufragio libico: è rimasta 48 ore in acqua attaccata a un pezzo di legno

      Lo sguardo traumatizzato, quasi vitreo, di chi ancora non distingue la vita dalla morte. Così appare l’unica donna sopravvissuta all’ultimo naufragio libico, in cui sono morti una madre e un bambino. Questa donna miracolata si chiama Josephine, viene dal Camerun ed è rimasta due giorni in mare, attaccata ad un pezzo di legno, prima che i volontari della Ong spagnola Open Arms la recuperassero al largo della Libia. A raccontare la sua storia è Annalisa Camilli, una giornalista di ’Internazionale’ che si trova a bordo della nave e ha assistito al salvataggio. A soccorrere la donna è stato Javier Figuera, uno volontario spagnolo di 25 anni: «Quando le ho preso le spalle per girarla - dice - ho sperato con tutto il mio cuore che fosse ancora viva. Dopo avermi preso il braccio non smetteva di toccarmi, di aggrapparsi a me». A quel punto, prosegue Camilli, sono arrivati altri soccorritori e l’hanno trasportata sulla nave, dove ora si trova con sintomi di ipotermia. Accanto a lei gli uomini di Open Arms hanno trovato anche un’altra donna e un bambino di circa 5 anni, che però erano già morti. I loro corpi sono a bordo della nave della Ong. Secondo il medico di bordo - scrive ancora Camilli - «la donna era morta da diverse ore mentre il bimbo era deceduto da poco». Per la Ong quanto avvenuto è «un’omissione di soccorso» da parte della guardia costiera libica - dice il fondatore di Open Arms Oscar Camps - che non è in grado di gestire una situazione d’emergenza e ha abbandonato due donne e un bambino"


      http://www.repubblica.it/esteri/2018/07/17/foto/naufragio_libia_open_arms_mamma_bimbo-202013383/1/?ref=fbpr#1

    • “Abbiamo lasciato in mare solo due morti”. I libici raccontano l’ultimo naufragio – La Stampa

      Parla l’equipaggio della Guardia costiera di Tripoli intervenuto lunedì per soccorrere il barcone alla deriva e fotografato da Open Arms. Resta il mistero sul dramma di Josefa, l’unica sopravvissuta: “Non c’era, non avremmo abbandonato nessuno vivo in acqua”

      Lunedì 16 luglio all’ora di pranzo abbiamo ricevuto una chiamata dal mercantile spagnolo Triades che ci segnalava un’imbarcazione di migranti in difficoltà tra Khoms e Tripoli e ci siamo mossi per intervenire, ne abbiamo tirati a bordo 165, maschi e femmine, tutti. Abbiamo lasciato in mare solo i due corpi senza vita di una donna e un bambino dopo aver provato invano a rianimarli: erano morti e portarli a terra non aveva alcun senso, ma oltre loro non c’era nessun altro in acqua». A raccontare la versione libica dell’ultimo scontro tra Roma, Tripoli e l’Ong Open Arms, quello che da due giorni si consuma intorno alle tragiche immagini del salvataggio della superstite Josefa, è Tofag Scare, colonnello della Guardia Costiera di Misurata che lavora in coordinamento con i colleghi della capitale.

      “L’Italia fa fare a noi il lavoro sporco solo perché non vuole accogliere gli africani”

      Mentre parla con «La Stampa» il suo comando operativo riceve un Sos dalla zona SaR al largo di Khoms, l’ennesimo, ci dice: «Nonostante il nostro equipaggiamento obsoleto, dal 2011 a oggi abbiamo salvato oltre 80 mila persone alla deriva nel Mediterraneo».

      Le ricostruzioni di quanto avvenuto nella notte tra lunedì e martedì coincidono fino a un certo punto, poi divergono lasciando aperte molte domande. Secondo la Open Arms le motovedette di Tripoli avrebbero distrutto il barcone dei migranti e abbandonato in mare quelli riluttanti a salire a bordo, di loro sarebbe sopravvissuta solo Josefa che, ancora sotto choc, dice alla giornalista di «Internazionale» di non ricordare il momento del naufragio ma di essere stata picchiata dai libici al pari dei suoi compagni di cui non sa più nulla. Tripoli, al contrario, afferma di non aver fatto altro che recuperare 165 disperati: la novità è che parla anche di due corpi in mare, cadaveri che, si apprende, «secondo la legge libica vanno identificati prima di essere sepolti o rimandati a casa e dunque in questi casi vengono lasciati al mare».

      “Contro di noi solo accuse infamanti: abbiamo salvato più di 80 mila persone”

      Il colonnello Scare telefona a più riprese ai colleghi in servizio il 16 luglio e raccoglie i tasselli del suo puzzle: «La motovedetta Ras al Jade è andata a soccorrere 165 persone in condizioni penose, affamate, bruciate dal sole, c’era un cattivo odore spaventoso. Dopo averci chiamato, il mercantile Triades è rimasto lì ad attenderci, ma nel frattempo non ha neppure dato da mangiare e da bere a quella gente, ha detto che non era il suo lavoro e che non poteva fare nulla».

      Scare fornisce il verbale della conversazione tra la Guardia Costiera e la Triades con la posizione dell’intervento fatto (37.74147°/ 13.84367°) che, grossomodo, coincide con quella indicata dalla Open Arms. Anche la motovedetta Ras al Jade pare essere la stessa (quella che già in passato aveva incrociato le spade con la Open Arms): possibile che quella notte ci sia stato più di un salvataggio? Che i cadaveri di cui si parla siano diversi? Le fotografie diffuse dalla Open Arms – che domani arriverà a Maiorca – mostrano chiaramente che i due corpi senza vita si trovano sullo stesso relitto su cui è rimasta a galla Josefa. E dai centri dove i migranti soccorsi vengono condotti non escono numeri sugli arrivi di martedì.

      La risposta dal banco degli imputati è decisa e va oltre la testimonianza della giornalista tedesca Nadja Kriewwald, che quella notte era a bordo con i libici e ha raccontato di non aver visto altro che i superstiti accolti sul ponte: «Non avremmo avuto alcuna ragione di abbandonare in acqua delle persone vive: anche se si fossero rifiutate di salire a bordo le avremmo tirare su a forza, lo abbiamo fatto con gli uomini e lo avremmo fatto facilmente con le donne. È una bugia, è propaganda contro di noi. Non c’era nessuno oltre i due morti che, per altro, al nostro arrivo erano già morti. Quello di cui ci accusano è privo di senso».

      Il fastidio che si respira a Misurata e a Tripoli è forte, ma non tanto per l’attacco della Open Arms quanto per la stanchezza di «gestire una grana altrui» e prendere colpi. Lo esprime un membro della Guardia Costiera che però chiede di non pubblicare il suo nome: «L’Italia ci fa fare il lavoro sporco perché non vuole gli africani, ma anche noi non siamo contenti di prenderli qui, le nostre città sono piene fino a scoppiare, i centri per loro non bastano più e sono diventati bombe a orologeria. Certe volte con le motovedette ci spingiamo fin dentro le acque internazionali, dove sarebbe illegale, e io dico che sbagliamo. Lo facciamo perché abbiamo un accordo e l’Italia ci ha promesso delle cose, ma se non arriva nulla ci stiamo solo caricando di problemi e di cattiva reputazione. Quando bruciamo i barconi degli scafisti lo facciamo per metterli fuori uso, non per sadismo. E comunque siete voi a chiederci di bloccare gli africani che vogliono venire in Europa, loro di certo non sognano la Libia».

      La notte di lunedì resta un capitolo aperto che ne ha aperti altri. Un terzo marinaio di Misurata racconta che il numero dei migranti è cresciuto talmente tanto negli ultimi mesi, in concomitanza con il rinnovato impegno di pattugliamento della Guardia Costiera, da aver modificato la situazione sul terreno: «Non c’è neppure più lavoro per loro. Noi li prendiamo in mare ma dopo nessuno li vuole. I siriani adesso hanno cominciato ad andare in aereo in Sudan, dove non hanno bisogno del visto, e poi con 1500 dollari si fanno portare a Tripoli e da qui ad Algeri per avere maggiori chance».

      https://www.nuovaresistenza.org/2018/07/abbiamo-lasciato-in-mare-solo-due-morti-i-libici-raccontano-lultimo

    • L’ammiraglio. Pettorino: prestare aiuto a chiunque rischi di perdere la vita in mare

      Il comandante della Guardia Costiera: c’è un principio non scritto che risiede nell’animo di ogni marinaio: quello di prestare aiuto a chiunque rischi di perdere la propria vita in mare.

      C’è un «principio non scritto che risiede nell’animo di ogni marinaio: quello di prestare aiuto a chiunque rischi di perdere la propria vita in mare». A dirlo non è un esponente delle “magliette rosse”, ma l’ammiraglio Giovanni Pettorino, comandante della Guardia Costiera italiana. Davanti al ministro Danilo Toninelli e al presidente della Camera Roberto Fico l’ufficiale ha scandito il caposaldo di chi va per mare. Parole espresse per ribadire quale sia la spinta interiore che sentono i suoi uomini ogni volta che arriva un Sos.

      Nel tono e nel lessico di Pettorino non ci sono accenti polemici. Ma quelle affermazioni pesano. E quando il comandante le pronuncia, viene calorosamente interrotto dagli applausi prolungati delle centinaia di divise bianche che lo ascoltano in occasione della cerimonia con cui mercoledì è stata ricordata la fondazione, 153 anni fa, della Guardia costiera. Un atto di fierezza che avrebbe dovuto chiudersi lì. Ma un servitore dello Stato lo riconosci anche quando sa celebrare i signornò. E succede quando l’ammiraglio si sfila le lenti da lettura e con piglio da comandante ricorda un episodio lontano.

      Un fuori programma con cui l’ammiraglio decide di chiudere il saluto alle autorità civili. Che il numero uno della Guardia Costiera stia per dire qualcosa che lascerà il segno lo intuisce chiunque lo conosca. Una citazione inizialmente non contenuta nel testo originario.

      È la rievocazione del leggendario comandante siciliano Salvatore Todaro, che durante la Seconda guerra mondiale affondò una nave militare belga per poi salvarne l’equipaggio. Todaro, come ha ricordato Pettorino, venne «violentemente apostrofato» dall’ammiraglio alleato tedesco Karl Donitz, che irrise l’ufficiale italiano definendolo «don Chisciotte del mare» e minacciando gravi conseguenze per avere tratto in salvo i nemici, mettendo a rischio il suo stesso equipaggio. Il perché di quella disobbedienza lo spiega Pettorino, guardando negli occhi gli esponenti politici sulla tribuna e facendo propria la risposta di Todaro: «Noi siamo marinai, marinai italiani, abbiamo duemila anni di civiltà, e noi queste cose le facciamo».

      Poi l’eroe di guerra «si avviò al congedo restando per sempre nella leggenda e nei cuori di tutti i marinai». A tanti uomini della Guardia Costiera queste parole sono suonate come un incoraggiamento. «In questi ultimi anni, ad invarianza di risorse umane disponibili, il corpo delle capitanerie di porto aveva ricordato prima Pettorino – è stato chiamato a far fronte ad uno sforzo inedito, quello del soccorso prestato, in mare, a migliaia di persone in pericolo di perdersi, operando su un’area ampia oltre la metà della superficie del mar Mediterraneo».

      Un impegno gravoso, «che abbiamo assolto nella piena consapevolezza di ben onorare il giuramento prestato, da ciascuno di noi, di osservare la Costituzione e le leggi». Dimostrando, una volta di più, quali siano quella vocazione e quell’abnegazione che non si può barattare: «Uomini e donne che ogni giorno si impegnano per far sì che altri possano continuare a vivere».


      https://www.avvenire.it/attualita/pagine/pettorino-prestare-aiuto-a-chiunque-rischi-di-perdere-la-vita-in-mare

    • EU-Rettungsmission im Mittelmeer vorerst gestoppt

      Italien weigert sich, aus dem Mittelmeer gerettete Flüchtlinge aufzunehmen - auch nicht im Zuge der EU-Mission „Sophia“.
      Die EU ist ratlos, der Kommandeur hat nach SPIEGEL-Informationen alle Schiffe in den Hafen beordert.

      Die EU-Mission „Sophia“ zur Rettung von Flüchtlingen auf dem Mittelmeer wird vorerst eingestellt. Nach SPIEGEL-Informationen beorderte der Kommandeur der Mission, der italienische Admiral Enrico Credendino, jetzt alle beteiligten Kriegsschiffe zurück in die Häfen.

      Mit der Order ist die Mission faktisch gestoppt, vorerst jedenfalls. Betroffen ist auch ein deutsches Versorgungsschiff. Nach SPIEGEL-Informationen befand sich der Tender „Mosel“ bereits vor dem Befehl von Credendino routinehalber in einem Mittelmeerhafen. Dort sollen das Schiff und die deutschen Soldaten nun erstmal bleiben, heißt es in Berlin.

      Hintergrund für den spontanen Stopp der Mission ist die Weigerung Italiens, von den EU-Militärschiffen gerettete Menschen weiter aufzunehmen. Italien hatte seine Blockadehaltung diese Woche in einem Brief an die EU angekündigt. Kurzfristig anberaumte Beratungen der EU-Partner brachten zunächst keine Lösung.

      Die Operation „Sophia“ ist nach dem Baby einer geretteten Somalierin benannt, das auf einer deutschen Fregatte geboren wurde. Seit 2015 ist die Mission mit einer kleinen Flotte von Kriegsschiffen auf dem Mittelmeer aktiv. So sollen die dort agierenden Schleusernetzwerke aufgeklärt und an ihrem lukrativen Geschäft gehindert werden.

      Seit dem Beginn der Mission konnten die EU-Soldaten, derzeit auf sechs Kriegsschiffen aus Spanien, Italien, Frankreich, Irland, Kroatien und Deutschland unterwegs, 148 mutmaßliche Schleuser festnehmen und mehr als 200 der benutzten Schiffe und Boote zerstören. Die EU sieht die Mission deswegen als Erfolg an.

      Rom verbietet privaten Rettern gerettete Flüchtlinge nach Italien zu bringen

      Regelmäßig werden die EU-Soldaten auf den Schiffen auch zu Seenotrettern. Fast 50.000 Flüchtlinge hat die Mission gerettet, fast die Hälfte davon wurde von deutschen Soldaten aus meist seeuntüchtigen Schiffen und Barkassen auf dem Mittelmeer gezogen. Anschließend wurden die Menschen nach Italien gebracht.

      Genau gegen diesen Automatismus geht Italien jetzt vor, die neue Regierung in Rom fährt einen radikalen Kurs gegen Flüchtlinge und will nicht länger akzeptieren, dass Italien die Hauptlast der ankommenden Menschen trägt. Folglich verbietet Rom privaten Rettern schon länger, gerettete Flüchtlinge nach Italien zu bringen.

      Als Reaktion auf den Brief aus Rom trafen sich die mit der Sicherheitspolitik betrauten EU-Botschafter umgehend zu einer Krisensitzung - eine Einigung konnte nicht erzielt werden. Folglich beorderte der Kommandeur der Mission die Schiffe in die Häfen.

      Auch am Freitag setzten sich die Botschafter erneut zusammen. Dem Vernehmen nach wollte man Italien anbieten, einen Schlüssel zu erstellen, wie die von der EU-Mission geretteten Menschen in ganz Europa verteilt werden können. Bis zum späten Nachmittag war nicht bekannt, ob sich Rom auf den Kompromiss einlässt.

      Ähnliche Angebote der anderen EU-Nationen hatten zumindest die quälenden Odysseen privater Rettungsschiffe in den jüngsten Tagen beendet, die von Italien an der Einfahrt in seine Häfen gehindert worden waren. Auch Deutschland hatte sich zur Aufnahme von kleineren Kontingenten der Geretteten bereit erklärt.

      Kommissionschef Jean-Claude Juncker ließ am Freitag mitteilen, dass er kommende Woche Vorschläge machen will, um die Flüchtlingskrise in Italien zu lindern. Details wurden zunächst nicht bekannt.

      Denkbar ist, dass es um Vorschläge geht, Flüchtlinge, die in Italien an Land gehen, rasch auf Länder zu verteilen, die sich dazu bereit erklären. Zudem soll die Kooperation mit Drittstaaten außerhalb der EU Thema sein.

      In der Debatte der EU-Sicherheitsbotschafter am Mittwoch versuchten die anderen Mitgliedsländer Italien davon zu überzeugen, sich weiter an das gemeinsam beschlossene Mandat zu halten. Italien trüge damit die Hauptlast der Operation „Sophia“, das Mandat läuft noch bis Ende des Jahres.

      Über die künftige Ausgestaltung des Mandats sollte im September ohnehin diskutiert werden. Denkbar ist, dass dies nun vorgezogen wird.

      In einem Schreiben an Italiens Premier Conte betonte Juncker, dass die Mission „Sophia“ eine wesentliche Rolle im Rahmen der europäischen Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik spiele. Conte hatte sich am Donnerstag für eine EU-Kriseneinheit zur Verteilung von aus Seenot geretteten Flüchtlingen ausgesprochen.

      Am Freitagabend endete in Brüssel das Krisentreffen der Botschafter zunächst ohne konkrete Lösung. Einigen konnte man sich nur, den sogenannten Operationsplan für die Mission „Sophia“ in wenigen Wochen neu zu fassen. Darin soll dann auf italienischen Wunsch auch festgelegt werden, wie bei der Mission gerettete Flüchtlinge künftig verteilt werden, nachdem sie an Land gebracht wurden. Diplomaten sagten, Italien habe dies durch seine Blockade-Ankündigung erzwungen. Um den Verteilungsschlüssel dürfte bald heftig gestritten werden.

      http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/mittelmeer-kommandeur-stoppt-eu-rettungsoperation-sophia-a-1219476.html

    • Ora le ong schierano i droni per salvare sempre più migranti

      La mossa dell’Aquarius: «Non ci arrivano più informazioni sui naufragi in atto, dobbiamo aggiustare la nostra strategia». Ed essere sempre più autonome
      Le navi delle ong tornano in mare e questa volta schierano anche i droni, per continuare nella propria ricerca delle imbarcazioni di migranti e salvare sempre più persone.

      Ad annunciare la novità un volontario imbarcato sulla nave Aquarius, che già nelle scorse settimane era stata protagonista della prima grande offensiva politica di Matteo Salvini dopo l’insediamento come ministro dell’Interno. Al momento a Marsiglia, la nave di Sos Mediterranée si attrezza per fronteggiare le mutate condizioni del quadro politico internazionale: «Ci stiamo preparando a diversi scenari, sicuramente avremo più cibo e autonomia di navigazione, perché dovremo stare più a lungo in mare. E avremo anche un drone per la ricerca dei migranti da soccorrere», spiega all’Ansa uno dei volontari.

      Dalla nave denunciano che nel mar Mediterraneo «alle navi di soccorso non arrivano più informazioni sui soccorsi in atto e non sappiamo perché». Per questo la variegata flottiglia delle molte associazioni non governative impiegate in queste missioni umanitarie si sta attrezzando per estendere il raggio d’azione e adeguarsi alla nuova situazione che impone loro di essere sempre più autonome. Il volontario Alessandro Porro ha svelato anche che ci sarebbero stati alcuni incontri fra le diverse organizzazioni proprio per coordinare al meglio gli sforzi.

      «Nell’attuale situazione ci sono naufragi di cui non si sa niente - spiega- Attualmente la mortalità è aumentata al 10%, quindi su 100 migranti che partono, 10 muoiono nel viaggio nel tratto di mare che oggi è il più pericoloso al mondo. Siamo arrabbiati ma ci sosteniamo a vicenda e ognuno di noi fa proposte per migliorare le operazioni di soccorso».

      http://m.ilgiornale.it/news/2018/07/20/ora-le-ong-schierano-i-droni-per-salvare-sempre-piu-migranti/1555943
      #drones

    • Omissione di soccorso come prassi di deterrenza ?

      Dopo l’arrivo delle due imbarcazioni di Open Arms a Palma di Maiorca è stata depositata presso la locale procura una denuncia sui fatti verificati in occasione del ritrovamento in acque internazionali, avvenuto il 17 luglio a circa 80 miglia dalle coste di Homs, di una donna e di due cadaveri sopra il relitto di un gommone alla deriva. Nella conferenza stampa che si è svolta oggi a Palma di Maiorca,sono stati esposti i fatti, secondo la documentazione in possesso dellla Organizzazione consegnata all’autorità giudiziaria spagnola. Le imbarcazioni di Open Arms hanno dovuto fare rotta verso la Spagna per le dichiarazioni del ministro dell’interno che esponevano la superstite al rischio di pressioni dopo lo sbarco a Catania, porto indicato dallo stesso Salvini.

      Il ministro, che su questo naufragio, e sulle conseguenti responsabilità, aveva annunciato prove inconfutabili attraverso “una teste indipendente”, una giornalista della televisione tedesca RTL, piuttosto che rispondere sulla vicenda, esibendo la documentazione in suo possesso, rilancia adesso pesanti accuse sulle fonti di finanziamento della Open Arms e minaccia a sua volta altre denunce su chi ha soltanto rappresentato quanto accaduto. Per il ministro Toninelli l’Italia non sarebbe neppure in grado di documentare i movimenti delle motovedette libiche.

      Alla fine, ancora una volta, tutte le colpe vengono riversate sulla ONG Open Arms che per la Meloni sarebbe addirittura responsabile di tratta e di causata strage. Un rovesciamento completo della narrazione dei fatti che si vuole imporre agli italiani in preda alla paura per la insicurezza che subiscono, una insicurezza che ha cause e responsabili molto diversi da quelli indicati dai politici di governo. Che attaccando le ONG devono solo nascondere i propri fallimenti, sia sul piano interno, che in Europa e nei rapporti con i paesi terzi, a partire dalla clamorosa bocciatura da parte dei libici di tutti i piani proposti da Salvini e Moavero.

      Le versioni inzialmente fornite dalla sedicente Guardia costiera di Tripoli, e quindi dalla giornalista che si trovava a bordo della motovedetta libica, venivano rapidamente modificate, fino all’ammissione che davvero i libici avevano avvistato il gommone poi soccorso da Open Arms, e dopo avere presumibilmente recuperato i vivi, avevano lasciato a bordo del relitto due cadaveri, come sarebbe prassi, per loro stessa ammissione. Saranno le indagini ad accertare se le persone, poi rinvenute cadavere sulle tavole del relitto, siano state abbandonate ancora in vita a seguito di un rifiuto a salire sulla motovedetta. Episodi nei quali la Guardia costiera libica aveva allontanato o minacciato imbarcazioni delle ONG intervenute in soccorso in acque internazionali, spesso sotto il coordinamento iniziale della guardia costiera italiana, si sono ripetute da tempo.

      Viene confermata anche dai libici la presenza, a 80 miglia a nord di Homs, dunque nell’area nella quale poi gli spagnoli hanno trovato il relitto semiaffondato del gommone, con Josepha e due cadaveri, di una nave commerciale, la TRIADES, che dopo lo scambio di vari messaggi radio, si sarebbe allontanata, o sarebbe stata allontanata, dal luogo dell’evento SAR, proseguendo la sua rotta verso il porto di Misurata. Open Arms ha presentato la sua denuncia alla magistratura spagnola contro il comandante della Triades, contro il comandante della motovedetta libica che sarebbe intervenuta sul gommone poi ritrovato distrutto ed alla deriva, e contro eventuali ignoti che dovessero emergere dalle indagini come responsabili del coordinamento dei soccorsi.

      Quanto poi affermato da un esponente daila Guardia costiera di Misurata, negli ultimi comunicati, conferma buona parte della ricostruzione iniziale fornita da Open Arms, e subito smentita da Salvini. Sarà la magistratura spagnola ad accertare le responsabilità relative all’abbandono in mare di due cadaveri, ammesso che il bambino fosse già morto al momento dell’intervento della Guardia costiera libica, e dell’unica sopravvissuta, che quando potrà raccontare la sua versione dei fatti, sarà sentita dalla Procura di Palma di Maiorca. L’obbligio di accertare fatti tanto gravi, se l’abbandono in mare si collega anche ad un rifiuto di salire sulla motovedetta, incombe ai magistrati, chi ha sollevato il velo della censura su queste stragi non ha paura. Anche se altri avrebbero preferito il silenzio.

      Come riferisce la stampa,“Dal Viminale fanno trapelare che l’intenzione non è quella di stare a guardare. Secondo l’agenzia AGI – Roma, 21 lug. – “Non meritano risposta le Ong che insinuano, scappano, minacciano denunce ma non svelano con trasparenza finanziatori e attivita””. E” quanto fanno trapelare fonti del Viminale dopo le denunce di Open Arms a Libia e Italia per omicidio colposo. “La denuncia di Josefa? Qualcuno strumentalizza una vittima per fini politici – proseguono le stesse fonti -. Noi denunceremo chi, con bugie e falsita”, mette in dubbio l”immensa opera di salvataggio e accoglienza svolta dall”Italia”. (AGI)

      Rimane la certezza di una grave anomalia democratica in Italia. Da una parte si ritiene di potere diffamare e calunniare le ONG, ed anche chi li difende, senza dovere mai pagare il conto di accuse che non trovano ancora conferme certe da parte della magistratura, che ha pure archiviato indagini sulle quali si è giocata una ignobile speculazione mediatica. Sembrerebbe ormai scontata la violazione delle regole internazionali di soccorso, anche quando questo inizialmente è gestito dalla Guardia costiera italiana, come è avvenuto a giugno nel caso della nave Aquarius. Un caso che ha occupato per giorni le prime pagine di giornali. Ma tutto questo oggi non sembra interessare più nessuno. Si deve rimanere in silenzio anche su queste vicende ?

      A causa di questa campagna mediatica, già scatenata lo scorso anno, ed adesso rilanciata con toni ancora più minacciosi, si sono ritirate, o sono state bloccate, la maggior parte delle navi umanitarie. A Malta sono ancora sotto sequestro, per “effetto domino” rispetto alle scelte italiane,due navi delle ONG, la Sea Watch e la Lifeline Le accuse di costituire un fattore di attrazione (pull factor) si sono poi estese alle attività di ricerca e salvataggio (SAR) della Guardia costiera italiana, ed addirittura alle attività di contrasto dei trafficanti e dei terroristi della missione Eunavfor Med. Dal 28 giugno si è inventata una zona SAR libica nella quale le autorità italiane declinano la loro competenza ad intervenire, ritendola trasferita sulle autorità di Tripoli che dispongono di sole 4 motovedette d’altura, e di una dozzina di mezzi veloci inadatti a caricare naufraghi a bordo.

      Le sentenze dei tribunali siciliani hanno confermato che la Libia non offre porti sicuri di sbarco e il ruolo di coordinamento nella cosiddetta “SAR libica” affidato nei mesi scorsi alla Marina italiana. Cosa è cambiato, se è cambiato qualcosa, dopo il 28 giugno, quando si è affidata soltanto ai libici una immensa zona SAR che evdentemente non sono in grado di gestire garantendo la salvaguardia della vita umana in mare ?

      Risultato di queste politiche di progressivo ritiro e delle prassi aggressive nei confronti di chiunque soccorre migranti in alto mare, sulla rotta del Mediterraneo centrale, un aumento delle vittime,oltre quattrocento nelle ultime settimane, e probabilmente di tante altre non se ne sa nulla. Come non si sarebbe saputo nulla di Josepha e delle due vittime con le quali era rimasta aggrappata ad una tavola in alto mare, se Open Arms non avesso continuato le sue missioni, pur restando in acque internazionali, ad una distanza assai elevata dalla costa libica, oltre 140 chilometri ( 80 miglia marine). Adesso si profila una guerra totale alle ONG, dopo avere portato a compimento la criminalizzazione della solidarietà. Sembra che la parola ONG sia tra quelle più “odiate” dagli italiani. Le campagne di stampa, agite in maniera scientifica sui social, hanno prodotto più effetti delle sentenze della magistratura. Adesso fa notizia che una ONG abbia denunciato una omissione di soccorso, senza essere invece inquisita per agevolazione di ingresso clandestino.

      Una cappa di silenzio è invece calata sulla vicenda dei 40 migranti bloccati da sei giorni a bordo di un rimorchiatore, il SAROST, fermo davanti alla città tunisina di Zarzis perchè nessuno vuole offrire un porto sicuro di sbarco. Nè la Tunisia, che pure risulta stato di bandiera, nè l’Italia o Malta, che in passato soccorrevano e indicavano un luogo di sbarco sicuro, generalmente in Italia, per le persone soccorse nella zona SAR maltese, la stessa nella quale sono stati soccorsi gli sfortunati naufraghi presi a bordo dal SAROST, rimorchiatore di servizio di una piattaforma petrolifera offshore.

      Il comandante della SAROST ha chiesto lo sbarco in Tunisia, ma nessuno gli ha risposto. Nessuno ha raccolto gli appelli delle ONG perchè si procedesse allo sbarco. Adesso in peroicolo ci sono vite di esseri umani, dopo che l’equipaggio della nave ha ceduto tutto quello che poteva per garantire la sopravvivevanza. Chiediamo che a questo punto almeno la Tunisia garantisca un porto di sbarco e soccorsi per i feriti. Chiediamo che la Croce Rossa, che ha comnciato a fornire qualche aiuto alla SAROST, si impegni attivamente per risolvere questo ennesimo caso, frutto delle politiche di abbandono attuate da parte di Malta e dell’Italia. E tanti altri simili ne verranno nei prossimi mesi, fino alla prossima strage, e poi ancora un’altra. No. Non è possibile alcuna assuefazione, che vorrebbero imporci. Sul rimorchiatore fermo davanti Zarzis, di fatto trasformato in prigione galleggiante, 40 persone rischiano ormai la vita per effetto dell’abbandono imposto da Italia e Malta, e per la mancata disponibilità da parte della Tunisia, ad accettare almeno uno sbarco provvisorio.

      A bordo della SAROST sono ancora in attesa di sbarco in un porto sicuro, che nessuno ha indicato, due donne incinta e un ferito, che sono in acqua da 10 giorni. Persone che lo scorso anno, in una occasione simile, sarebbero state già soccorse da una nave umanitaria, in assenza di mezzi statali, e sbarcati in Italia in un porto sicuro. Ma ormai è l’Italia che non offre più porti sicuri, a fronte delle dichiarazioni del ministro dell’interno e delle prassi imposte alla Guardia costiera, alla Marina, alle autorità di frontiera e richieste persino alla magistratura, come nel caso della richiesta di arresti per i “facinorosi” soccorsi dal rimorchiatore Vos Thalassa e poi sbarcati a Trapani da una nave militare.

      A chi governa è concesso ogni giorno spacciare notizie false, come l’esistenza a Tripoli, di un centro di accoglienza sicuro, o, dopo la visita di Salvini in Libia, come la possibilità di creare campi di raccolta in quel paese, o addirittura in Niger, che sarebbero considerati come ubicati in un “paese terzo sicuro”, dunque nel quale si potrebbero creare vere e proprie “piattaforme di sbarco”, per impedire ai migranti qualsiasi possibilità di fuga verso l’Europa. Ma l’Unione Europea ha già fatto conoscere la sua ferma opposizione a questo progetto dietro il quale si camuffano i respinginenti collettivi vietati dalle Connvezioni internazionali, come dovrebbe sapere il leghista Salvini dopo che la Corte Europea dei diritti dell’Uomo ha condannato l’Italia sul caso Hirsi nel 2012 per i respingimenti collettivi ordinati tre anni prima dal suo predecessore al Viminale, il leghista Roberto Maroni. Le torture e le estorsioni nei centri di detenzione libici sono ormai provate ed ancora attuali, secondo le testimonianze raccolte allo sbarco.

      Si spaccia per contrasto dell’immigrazione, che si definisce “illegale” la pratica degli accordi con le milizie libiche, o con i sindaci delle città che ne sono espressione, apparentemente per rilanciare iniziative civili, di fatto per incentivare l’arresto e la detenzione del maggior numero di persone al fine di impedire la prosecuzione della loro fuga verso il Mediterraneo. Il numero degli immigrati presenti in questi mesi nei centri di detenzione libici è raddoppiato, lo conferma l’ONU. Si richiamano protocolli operativi e Trattati di amicizia stipulati con una Libia che oggi non esiste più’. Sullo sfondo altri accordi con le milizie. Tutto questo senza la minima base legale di un voto parlamentare.Sembra proprio la fine del diritto internazionale, piegato dalla politica della forza muscolare esibita sui social e del fatto compiuto.

      Quando invece giornalisti indipendenti o rappresentanti delle ONG raccontano fatti documentati e facilmente verifiicabili, quando gli avvocati esercitano in pieno il loro ruolo di difensori dei diritti umani, si scatenano le minacce e le ritorsioni, che collegano pezzi di istituzioni, servizi e gruppi delle destre identitarie europee, ben oltre quanto consentirebbero i ruoli istituzionali dei soggetti da cui provengono. Insinuazioni calunniose si rivolgono anche a chi difende gli operatori umanitari ed i migranti.

      Nessuno però riferisce della corruzione diffusa in Libia e della stretta commistione tra il traffico di esseri umani ed il contrabbando di petrolio che dalla Libia raggiunge Malta ed altri paesi europei. Quando i processi contro le ONG si arrestano, o le indagini vengono archiviate, solo uno spazio a fondo pagina, la sentenza di condanna gli italiani la hanno già emessa nei giorni della tempesta mediatica. La fine della presunzione di innocenza e del diritto ad un giusto processo.

      Sono tempi in cui una menzogna ripetuta cento volte sembra valere più della verità, lo sappiamo, e vediamo la marea nera di consenso che si sta aggregando attorno alle posizioni più estreme sul tema immigrazione, che giocano sulla vita delle persone per raccattare consensi elettorali o per aumentare il potere contrattuale con gli altri paesi europei. Si spaccia una emergenza che non esiste, la vera emergenza è l’attacco alla democrazia ed alle garanzie dello stato di diritto, che si gioca proprio sulle questioni del soccorso in mare e della protezione internazionale ( con il ricatto sul Regolamento Dublino). Evidente la saldatura nei fatti tra le estreme destre identitarie e nazionaliste europee e la poltica di Salvini, che aspira ad un asse con Orban in Ungheria e Kurtz in Austria. Due “alleati” sul piano ideologico, ma che in nome del loro nazionalismo hanno già respinto tutte le richieste avanzate dal governo italiano, a partire dai trasferimenti Dublino. Alla fine in Europa i diversi nazionalismi si scontreranno tra loro, ma dalle macerie ne usciremo tutti impoveriti e con una grave lesione dei principi democratici.

      Tutto questo preoccupa ma non spaventa, restiamo al nostro posto, testimoni di un tempo terribile in cui la vita delle persone vale meno della difesa di un confine sull’acqua, un confine che nell’ordine naturale non può esistere. Nell’immaginario collettivo però i confini si stanno moltiplicando proprio per effetto della politica, e non conta se chi si presenta come difensore dell’identità nazionale e del territorio italiano, ricorre poi alla menzogna ed all’odio per costruire altri muri, questa volta all’interno della nostra società. per alimentare un livello di conflittualità sempre più elevato, dal quale ricava evidenti vantaggi in vista delle prossime scadenze elettorali. Ma le ferite inferte oggi ai rapporti internazionali, alla coesione sociale, alla possibilità di convivenza pacifica con gli immigrati tutti, resteranno aperte per anni. E per costruire una finta sicurezza costruiranno sempre più muri, fino a quando saremo tutti reclusi.

      Non arretriamo.Saremo ancora attivi nella difesa degli operatori umanitari e di tutti coloro che saranno accusati di crimine per avere soccorso o prestato assistenza alle persone migranti. Perchè prima che di migranti si tratta di persone, che devono avere riconosciuti gli stessi diritti fondamentali che spettano a qualunque persona, a partire dal diritto alla vita. Perchè i loro diritti sono i nostri diritti.

      https://www.a-dif.org/2018/07/21/omissione-di-soccorso-come-prassi-di-deterrenza

    • Italian coastguards express unease as government closes ports to migrants

      The decision by Italy’s new populist government to close the country’s ports to migrants saved at sea is causing unease within the heart of the Italian coastguard, some staff say, who until recently played a key role in rescue missions.

      Over the last decade the coastguard has coordinated the rescue of hundreds of thousands of migrants off the coast of Libya, in many cases pulling them from the water themselves in treacherous conditions.

      But as of June, they have been ordered to transfer calls for help and reports of boats in distress to the Libyan capital Tripoli.

      Now — despite a culture of traditionally not criticising government policy — a handful of coastguard staff have spoken out.

      In an interview with Italian daily Il Sole 24 Ore last week, a coastguard admiral criticised the government and in particular far-right interior minister Matteo Salvini’s new hardline stance.

      Speaking on condition of anonymity, the admiral recalled that the Italian justice system had deemed Libya was not a “safe place” for rescued people to returned to.

      Many migrants trying to reach Europe are desperate not to go back to Libya as they potentially face abuse and rape in detention centres.

      The admiral also denounced the absence of an official decree or act regarding the decision to close the country’s ports to vessels carrying migrants.

      In recent weeks the policy has left the coastguard powerless as several ships with rescued migrants aboard spent days stranded in the Mediterranean unable to dock in Italy.

      On Wednesday, at an event marking the 153rd anniversary of the Italian Coastguard, admiral Giovanni Pettorino, coastguard commander, evoked the memory of Salvatore Todaro, a submariner who during WW2 took serious risks to rescue the survivors of a ship he had just sunk.

      “In times of war, these things are not done,” a German admiral is said to have told Todaro at the time.

      The coastguard commander concluded his speech given before Italy’s new political authorities, by recalling Todaro’s response: “We are Italian sailors. We have 2000 years of civility behind us and we do these things.”

      – ’Feeling of helplessness’ -

      Speaking anonymously to Catholic daily Avvenire and Radio Radicale, some coastguard officers said the priority to rescue those in danger was demonstrated earlier this month.

      On 13 July the coastguard was sent to keep watch on 450 migrants crammed into a fishing boat, but took part in a later rescue mission even though Rome had told them to let Malta take charge, the officers said.

      Recalling the decision to intervene, the officers spoke of their “feeling of helplessness” which had built up in the weeks prior, as migrants attempted the perilous sea crossing.

      The vast majority of Italy’s around 13,000 coastguard officers work along the country’s 8,000 km of coastline, but the institution says that more than 2,000 of them have had first-hand experience on vessels operating off Libya — where a large number of the migrant tragedies occur.

      “At the moment, the atmosphere among the coastguard corps is not the best,” says Sergio Scandura, a journalist with Radio Radicale.

      The month of June was the deadliest in the Mediterranean in recent years with the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) reporting some 564 deaths or disappearances, despite the fact that overall departures have dropped sharply since the summer of 2017.

      Salvini’s hardline immigration stance appears to, however, be very popular among Italians: according to about half a dozen separate polls, some two-thirds of citizens approve his decision to close ports to rescued migrants.

      His far-right League party — which governs the country as part of a coalition — has also experienced a boom in the polls: the League garnered 17 percent of the vote at the March general election, but opinion polls now suggest support of around 30 percent.

      The new policy has come under fire from the country’s opposition politicians, however, and some of Italy’s prominent Catholic figures have also spoken out.

      After two bodies were discovered in a deflated dinghy off Libya, along with one survivor suffering from shock and hypothermia on Tuesday, the Episcopal Conference of Italy released a statement denouncing a “tragedy which we cannot manage to get used to”.

      “We warn unequivocally that to save our humanity from vulgarity and barbarism, we must protect life. Every life. From the most exposed, humiliated and trampled,” the bishops wrote.

      http://www.digitaljournal.com/news/world/italian-coastguards-express-unease-as-government-closes-ports-to-migrants/article/527517

    • Quale futuro per le operazioni di soccorso in mare svolte dalle ONG ?

      1.Quanto successo nell’ultimo mese, a partire dal blocco dell’attracco della Aquarius in un porto italiano, e poi, a ridosso del Consiglio Europeo del 28 giugno con la istituzione, sulla carta, di una zona SAR libica, e quindi con il seguito di naufragi in acque internazionali, deve indurre ad una riflessione sulle operazioni di ricerca e salvataggio (SAR) svolte dalle Organizzazioni non governative. Operazioni sempre di più spesso oggetto attacchi calunniosi e nel mirino di iniziative giudiziarie, in Italia ed a Malta. Anche se le prime inchieste contro alcune ONG sono state già archiviate.

      Giorno dopo giorno, abbiamo assistito ad una continua escalation del governo italiano contro le ONG, alle quali si è negata ogni possibilità di attracco e di sbarco, con Salvini che si è reso anche protagonista dei tentativi di inasprimento delle prassi adottate dalle missioni europee Frontex ed Eunavfor Med, giungendo a negare, anche dopo stragi gravissime, l’indicazione di un porto sicuro di sbarco a navi militari, persino americane, ed a mezzi della missione europea EUNAVFOR MED ( Sophia). Un tentativo che l’Unione Europea ha respinto, ribadendo gli impegni operativi ed i doveri di soccorso sanciti dalle Convenzioni internazionali e dai Regolamenti europei, che nessun paese membro può violare unilateralmente.

      Analoga risposta negativa è giunta alla proposta di Salvini che intendeva lanciare un piano Marshall per la Libia, allo scopo evidente di rinforzare la cd. Guardia costiera “libica” e di finanziare grandi centri di trattenimento dei migranti in modo da impedire che questi potessero imbarcarsi verso l’Europa. Un progetto già avviato da anni da precedenti governi, al quale si voleva dare adesso maggiore concretezza con un ulteriore fornitura di motovedette al governo Serraj. Ma le promesse italiane si sono rivelate farlocche, le motovedette da regalare ai libici sono pochissime, e sembra che il loro arrivo a Tripoli sia previsto per il mese di ottobre. Sempre che ad ottobre a Tripoli ci sia ancora il governo Serraj. Tutta la politica italiana in questi ultimi due mesi ha nascosto come non si possa parlare più di un processo di riconciliazione in Libia, e dunque di una unica Libia, la vera fake-news che continua ad essere distribuita agli italiani per tranqullizzari sui “successi” conseguiti dai loro governanti.

      Adesso anche la sedicente “Guardia costiera libica” ammette di non avere i mezzi per garantire le attività di ricerca e soccorso in “alto mare”, fino a 85 miglia dalla costa, che sarebbero imposte dalle Convenzioni internazionali, e che si sarebbero dovute verificare prima di concedere l’inserimento della SAR Zone libica nei registri ufficiali dell’Organizzazione marittima della Nazioni Unite (IMO). Chi ha spinto per quella zona SAR libica che ancora oggi non esiste, porta sulla coscienza le centinaia di vittime che i ritardi degli interventi dei libici, e le modalità di ingaggio violento adottate dalle motovedette di Tripoli, hanno prodotto in questo ultimo mese. Una responsabilità che non sarà facile accertare nei tribunali, ma che peserà come una pietra sul destino politico dei protagonisti di queste scelte.

      Di fronte ad un fallimento di così vaste dimensioni, ed alle prime denunce che stanno arrivando, non solo in cartolina, i governanti italiani hanno scelto la linea del totale capovolgimento dei fatti e delle responsabilità, inasprendo i blocchi e lo sbarramento dei porti, ed imposto a Malta un analogo inasprimento, che si sta traducendo anche nel sequestro arbitrario a La Valletta di due navi delle ONG ( Lifeline e Seawatch). Salvini lo aveva promesso, e i maltesi hanno eseguito.

      Le ONG ritornano dunque nel mirino, in nome di un emergenza che non esiste e di una lotta contro ai trafficanti che nessuno però garantisce perchè in Libia non si riesce ad affermare una giurisdizione indipendente dalle milizie che controllano i diversi territori, e gestiscono direttamente rapporti con i trafficanti di persone ( e di petrolio). Dal momento che queste scelte politiche, alle quali corrispondono prassi operative prive di fondamento legale, come la “chiusura dei porti” imposta da Salvini e Toninelli, o gli ordini di “stand by“,già impartiti lo scorso anno, producono e produrranno ancora in futuro centinaia di morti. Perchè cambieranno soltanto le rotte, ma sempre i migranti saranno messi in mare dalla Libia verso l’Europa, occorre chiedersi che ruolo possono giocare ancora le ONG. Per tentare almeno di ridurre il numero delle vittime, e per continuare a denunciare i casi sempre più frequenti di omissione di soccorso in acque internazionali. In attesa che i tribunali internazionali o l’Unione Europea impongano agli stati il pieno rispetto delle Convenzioni internazionali e dei Regolamenti europei che privilegiano la salvaguardia della vita umana in mare ed il diritto di chiedere protezione, rispetto alla difesa dei confini marittimi.

      2.Occorre innanzitutto prendere atto che, come si è evidenziato in queste ultime settimane, sempre più spesso le decisioni amministrative o le direttive emanate dal governo potranno creare i presupposti per l’avvio di azioni penali da parte della magistratura nei confronti di quegli operatori umanitari e di quelle ONG che si atterranno al rispetto delle Convenzioni internazionali e dei Regolamenti europei, nello svolgimento di attività di ricerca e soccorso nelle acque del Mediterraneo Centrale.

      Si verificherà poi, in occasioni sempre più frequenti, che la manipolazione dei dati e la successiva diffusione di fake-news capovolga il senso della narrazione degli eventi di soccorso in mare, fino a fare assumere ai veri responsabili la veste di accusatori ed ai soccorritori la posizione di inquisiti, in modo da eliderne del tutto le possiblità di intervento, sia in mare che nel dibattito pubblico, minandone la credibilità.

      Per contrastare tutto questo e permettere la prosecuzione delle attività di ricerca e salvataggio delle ONG in acque internazionali occorre rafforzare i team legali di esperti che verifichino il rispetto delle regole di Diritto internazionale, e del diritto dei rifugiati, da parte di tutti gli attori chiamati ad intervenire, o che si trovano nelle posizioni più vicine alle aree nelle quali si verificano gli eventi SAR.

      Appare fondamentale in questa prospettiva denunciare la istituzione di una zona SAR libica da parte dell’IMO,su impulso ed avallo delle autorità italiane. Va denuinciata altresì la inefficacia delle attività di ricerca e salvataggio svolta da Malta nella vastissima zona SAR che per ragioni economiche il governo di La Valletta continua ad attribuirsi. Occorre dunque una forte iniziativa a livello di Nazioni Unite e quindi dell’IMO per stabilire con certezza vere zone SAR, individuando le autorità che effettivamente sono in grado di intervenire con effettive capacità di coordinamento e di raccordo con altre autorità SAR. La vita umana in mare non può essere data in appalto per ragioni elettorali o di convenienza politica. Gli accordi bilaterali tra stati in questo campo possono assumere rilievo solo nell’ambito di un riconoscimento internazionale effettivo della capacità di coordinamento dei soccorsi attraverso una Centrale operativa nazionale (MRCC).

      Al fine di garantire la massima trasparenza, contro il rischio di altre e più gravi ricostruzioni farlocche degli interventi SAR da parte dei ministri, e di altre autorità, occorre realizzare sistemi di trasmissione video in tempo reale, accessibili in rete, di tutte le attività di ricerca e soccorso che saranno svolte dalle navi delle ONG, utilizzando anche le rilevazioni radar, quelle satellitari, e la via del monitoraggio aereo con l’uso di droni, per documentare i casi di intervento della Guardia costiera “libica”, che libica non è più, ed eventuali casi di abbandono in mare. Si corre altrimenti il rischio concreto che alla prossima strage, se soltanto una nave delle ONG si trovi nelle vicinanze dell’evento di soccorso, tutte le responsabilità posano essere adossate sugli operatori umanitari. Una certa parte dell’opinione pubblica, ormai incline all’odio senza verificare i fatti, non aspetta altro.

      In un momento in cui le spinte nazionaliste dei governi sovranisti e populisti europei hanno messo tutti contro tutti, occorre negoziare accordi con i singoli stati, anche della sponda sud, come la Tunisia, per garantire possibilità di rifornimento alle singole navi delle ONG che saranno ancora impegnate in attività di ricerca e salvataggio sulla rotta del Mediterraneo Centrale. Vanno inoltre utilizzate le navi più grandi che le ONG saranno in grado di inviare in questa zona come stazione galleggiante di rifornimento e assistenza anche sanitaria, per i casi più urgenti. Ornai è evidente che l’Italia e Malta non garantiscono più “porti sicuri di sbarco” (POS), e le offerte più recenti di attracco altro non sono che un passaggio strumentale al sequestro delle imbarcazioni ed all’incriminazione degli equipaggi.

      Si è visto lo scorso anno come i provvedimenti amministrativi di controllo o di fermo tecnico siano finalizzati alla successiva adozione di inziative penali, con il caso della Juventa, attratta con un ordine della Guardia costiera per il trasbordo di tre migranti a Lampedusa, e poi sequestrata. Un processo ancora in corso, nel quale si dovrà chiarire anche il ruolo degli agenti di sicurezza infiltrati a bordo della nave Vos Hestia di Save The Children, poi finita pure nell’inchiesta. Si è ripetuto ancora quest’anno, in Italia, a Pozzallo, con il sequestro della Open Arms, ed a Malta con il sequestro illegale ( perchè in assenza di provvedimenti giudiziari che lo legittimassero) della nave Sea Watch e della Lifeline, bloccate da settimane per problemi burocratici. Tutti casi nei quali le scelte degli esecutivi e gli ordini di natura amministrativa delle autorità marittime hanno contribuito alla costruzione di una fattispecie penale. E quindi ad una gigantesca operazione mediatica che ha condannato le ONG e tutti i cittadini solidali prima ancora che i processi offrissero almeno qualche effettiva possibilità di difesa e di ribaltamento della narrazione tossica diffusa a reti unificate. Ma la Libia non offre “porti sicuri di sbarco”, dopo i giudici siciliani adesso lo dice anche l’Unione Europea.

      Quanto alla individuazione di porti sicuri di sbarco (POS), che sono garantiti dalle Convenzoni internazionali, prima di ciascuna missione le imbarcazioni delle ONG va garantita la possibilità di rientro in un paese ed in un porto nel quale le persone soccorse possano essere sbarcate in sicurezza, e nel quale gli operatori umanitari non rischino l’apertura di procedimenti penali o il sequestro della nave. Queste attività repressive che si riconducono generalmente al contrasto dell’immigrazione irregolare, come pure il ritardo immotivato nella indicazione di un porto sicuro di sbarco, si ripercuotono direttamente sulla salute psico-fisica dei naufraghi, e possono ridurre notevolmente la capacità operativa delle imbarcazioni delle ONG, mettemndo a rischio anche il diritto alla vita.

      3. Le attività di ricerca e salvataggio ancora svolte da Organizzazioni non governative non si possono collocare al di fuori di una cornice di coordinamento che va comunque garantita con le Autorità SAR nazionali competenti, come previsto dal diritto internazionale del mare. Non si può però continuare a ricorrere ad una negoziazione caso per caso, dopo o addirittura durante l’espletamento delle operazioni di soccorso.

      Retweeted Paolo Biondi (@PaoloBiondi82):

      Oggi Malta ha coordinato il salvataggio di 19 migranti in difficoltà all’interno della Regione di ricerca e soccorso maltese (DDR) circa 50 miglia a sud dell’isola. Rcc Malta è stata informata di questa barca da parte di Mrcc Roma e della guardia costiera libica quando era ancora nella SAR Libica.

      Malta coordinated the rescue of 19 migrants in distress within the Maltese Search and Rescue Region (SRR) some 50NM south of the island. RCC Malta was informed of this boat by MRCC Rome and the Libyan Coast Guard when it was still in Libya SRR

      Bisogna dunque attivare canali di comunicazioni costanti con quelle autorità SAR che possono garantire lo sbarco in un porto sicuro, che come prevedono le Convenzioni internazionali di diritto del mare, non è necessariamente il “porto più vicino”, come qualcuno ha ritenuto in Italia, ma è quel porto nel quale la persona sbarcata ( e potremmo aggiungere adesso, anche i soccorritori) abbiano la piena garanzia che i diritti fondamentali della persona siano rispettati. Occorre che le ONG si raccordino tra loro e stilino loro una “Carta dei soccorsi nel mare Mediterraneo”, sulla quale aggregare consenso in modo da garantire modalità di intervento generalmente condivise. Un documento con prasse operative concordate da verificare con la Guardia costiera italiana che ha una tradizione di soccorso in mare che non può essere smentita da atti di indirizzo politico.

      Ricordiamo bene come l’attacco alle ONG sia patrtito dalle destre identitarie europee e, subito dopo, da Frontex, all’inizio dello scorso anno. Ma il confronto ed il coordinamento sulle operazioni SAR nel Mediterraneo centrale non potrà prescindere dal tentativo di coinvolgimento dell’Agenzia per il controllo delle frontiere esterne (FRONTEX), oggi ridefinita come “Guardia costiera e di frontiera europea” ( in base al Regolamento UE 1624 del 2016) . Sarò anche importante verificare la disponibilità a partecipare ad attività SAR della missione EUNAVFOR MED ( Operazione Sophia), un obbligo ineludibile da garantire nel rigoroso rispetto del proprio mandato operativo, deciso nell’ambito della politica estera comune dell’Unione Europea (PESC). Non sarà un confronto facile, ma nessuno può pensare che ritirando le navi militari, limitandone le attività in operazioni SAR, o costringendo le ONG al ritiro totale, si possa garantire un miglior risultato delle politiche migratorie europee e nazionali, anche a costo di passare sopra le migliaia di morti e dispersi che queste politiche hanno fin qui prodotto.

      Il soccorso in mare è condizionato anche da quello che succede nei paesi della sponda sud del Mediterraneo. Senza una soluzione politica del conflitto in Libia e senza la garanzia di un qualsiasi stato di diritto che sia almeno in parte esente dalla corruzione diffusa che caratterizza quel paese, qualsiasi accordo con le milizie e con le forze che controllano le diverse Guardie costiere, rischia di tradursi ancora una volta con un ulteriore rafforzamento delle organizzazioni criminali. Le minacce, reiterate anche di recente, rivolte dalla Guardia costiera di Tripoli alle Organizzazioni non governative comprendono ormai il rischio di attacchi armati e di sequesto di persona.

      Le navi delle ONG ben dificilmente potranno avventurarsi a meno di 70 miglia (120 chilometri) dalla costa libica. La minaccia di sequestro da parte della Guardia costiera di Tripoli diventa ogni giorno più grave. Un motivo in più che dovrebbe spingere la comunità internazionale, o singoli paesi, questa volta davvero “volenterosi”, ad organizzare missioni internazionali di ricerca e soccorso nel Mediterraneo centrale. In acque internazionali che ormai, dopo la creazione di una zona SAR “libica”, sono rimaste nella esclusiva disponibilità di un gruppo di milizie che non garantisce il rispetto dei diritti e dei corpi delle persone, nè durante le azioni di soccorso, nè durante le successive fasi dello sbarco a terra e dell’internamento nei centri di detenzione. Adesso sono ache alcuni esponenti della Guardia costiera di Tripoli, di cui Salvini si fida tanto, che ammettono di non avere i mezzi necessari per salvaguardare la vita umana in mare.

      In questa direzione la società civile organizzata deve andare oltre l’impegno qui profuso, occorre davvero che “si imbarchi” con tutte le proprie capacità organizzative sulle navi delle ONG, che significa garantire un impegno continuo a livello più ampio. Non certo con la presenza fisica, ma con una attività ben documentata di diffusione delle notizie, di accertamento delle fake news, di iniziativa politica e di sostegno economico e legale, che permetta di difendere i valori del soccorso e della solidarietà contro tutti i tentativi di depistaggio e di diffusione di messaggi di odio, di negazione della dignità umana e di subordinazione del diritto alla vita alle esigenze della difesa delle frontiere, se non alla mera propaganda elettorale.

      https://www.a-dif.org/2018/07/22/quale-futuro-per-le-operazioni-di-soccorso-in-mare-svolte-dalle-ong

    • JOSEFA : «SONO ARRIVATI I LIBICI E CI HANNO PICCHIATO»

      Sicuri da morire. L’accusa dell’unica superstite al naufragio. Da Open Arms denuncia per omicidio colposo

      «Denunceremo chi, con bugie e falsità, mette in dubbio l’opera di salvataggio e accoglienza svolta dall’Italia»: il Viminale ieri ha attaccato ancora l’Ong catalana Proactiva open arms, arrivata ieri mattina a Palma di Maiorca con il cadavere della donna e del bambino ritrovati martedì con l’unica superstite, Josefa, aggrappata alle assi del fondo del gommone distrutto a 80 miglia dalla cosa libica, 90 da Lampedusa. La donna camerunese, ricoverata in forte stato di choc e con i postumi dell’ipotermia, dopo essere rimasta due giorni a galleggiare in acqua, ha raccontato: «Sono arrivati i libici, ci hanno picchiato e ci hanno lasciato in mare». Il Viminale insiste: «Qualcuno strumentalizza una vittima per fini politici. Se la Ong ha preferito rifiutare l’approdo per scappare altrove è un problema suo. I porti siciliani erano aperti». Alla Proactiva era stato offerto lo scalo di Catania ma il coordinatore della missione, Riccardo Gatti, aveva chiarito: «Rifiutiamo il porto di sbarco italiano dopo le dichiarazioni del governo (che aveva definito la denuncia dei volontari catalani una fake news ndr) e perché non crediamo che in Italia ci sia un porto sicuro». La scelta di Catania, poi, era risultata sospetta visto che la procura locale sta processando l’Ong tedesca Jugend Rettet per favoreggiamento dell’immigrazione clandestina.

      I membri della Proactiva open arms, insieme al campione dell’Nba Marc Gasol, si sono recati ieri al tribunale di Palma per presentare una denuncia per omissione di soccorso e omicidio colposo contro il capitano della Triades, il mercantile che per primo ha individuato i migranti e avvertito Tripoli senza però soccorrerli. «Lo faremo anche contro il capitano del pattugliatore della Guardia costiera libica» che avrebbe volontariamente affondato il gommone mentre a bordo c’erano ancora due donne e un bambino ha spiegato Oscar Camps, fondatore dell’Ong catalana, confermando anche l’intenzione di presentare una denuncia contro la Guardie costiera italiana e Malta perché potrebbero aver commesso il reato di omissione del dovere di assistenza.

      Alla stampa Camps ha poi spiegato che l’Europa lascia alla Libia («un paese senza stato») le operazioni in mare nonostante i sospetti di connivenza della sua Guardia costiera con i trafficanti: «Siamo etichettati come criminali, l’Italia ci accusa di mentire, diffamare e insultare, vuole rimandare in Libia le persone che salviamo. Siamo gli unici testimoni e adesso nessun’altra Ong è attiva nell’area. Siamo stati testimoni della barbarie disumana che vive il Mediterraneo». L’ultima stoccata è per il ministro dell’Interno, Matteo Salvini, che da mesi ripete «le Ong vedranno i nostri porti in cartolina». Camps ne ha mandata una virtuale via twitter al leader leghista con la dedica «Un abbraccio da Maiorca. Oscar e Josefa». A Palma c’era anche il deputato di Leu, Erasmo Palazzotto, che ha partecipato alla missione: «Chiederò al governo italiano che renda pubblici i dati su ciò che è accaduto nel luogo in cui è stata trovata morta la madre con il bambino per vedere se c’è responsabilità del governo e della guardia costiera nell’omicidio».

      La Marina italiana ieri ha respinto ogni addebito: «Non siamo mai stati coinvolti nel soccorso. Dopo il ritrovamento, all’Ong è stata data piena disponibilità a trasferire la donna, ancora in vita, in Italia, per ricevere assistenza sanitaria, è stata data anche la possibilità di raggiungere direttamente il porto di Catania». Anche il ministro dei Trasporti, Danilo Toninelli, difende l’operato del governo: «Open Arms sbaglia obiettivo. L’Italia è un esempio per umanità ed efficienza nei soccorsi».

      Nessuno però sa spiegare la presenza di una donna viva e due cadaveri tra i relitti del gommone distrutto. Non sa spiegarlo soprattutto la Libia, che martedì aveva negato di averli lasciati in mare, chiamando in causa una troupe di giornalisti tedeschi presenti durante le operazioni. Poi è stata costretta a precisare che i salvataggi lunedì sera erano stati due e quindi venerdì ha parzialmente ammesso di aver provato a rianimare i corpi senza vita ma di non saper spiegare la presenza di Josefa. Una spiegazione arriva però dall’Italia. Il fatto quotidiano, riportando notizie apprese dai nostri militari, spiega: «I migranti non vogliono essere riportati in Libia, per convincerli ad accettare il soccorso è ormai prassi che i libici inizino le operazioni per affondare la barca». È la spiegazione che aveva dato Camps martedì, bollata da Salvini come «fake news».

      https://ilmanifesto.it/josefa-sono-arrivati-i-libici-e-ci-hanno-picchiato

    • Open Arms, a una settimana dalla tragedia Salvini incalzato non dà spiegazioni e loda i libici

      Era il 17 luglio quando la ong spagnola Proactiva Open Arms annunciava di aver recuperato nel Mediterraneo tre corpi - un bambino e una donna morta e un’altra invece ancora in vita - accanto a un relitto abbandonato dalla Guardia Costiera libica dopo un’operazione di recupero di migranti. Il ministro dell’Interno Matteo Salvini aveva negato che i libici avessero abbandonato delle persone in mare, tantomeno affondando il barcone nel quale viaggiavano, e aveva promesso le prove a sostegno della sua tesi. Poco dopo, dal Viminale si segnalava la presenza di una giornalista tedesca a bordo delle motovedette dei libici che avrebbero compiuto il salvataggio oggetto della questione e che avrebbe documentato la correttezza del loro operato.

      Con il passare delle ore, però, è emerso da diverse testimonianze, compresa quella della stessa giornalista, come in realtà l’operazione che avrebbe portato all’abbandono dei corpi sarebbe stata differente da quella documentata dalla troupe televisiva. Come e perché Josefa (la donna superstite) e la madre e il bambino annegati siano finiti in mare rimane dunque una domanda senza risposta.

      A una settimana di distanza dai fatti, siamo tornati a chiedere a Salvini una spiegazione sulla vicenda, senza ottenere una risposta.

      https://video.repubblica.it/dossier/immigrati-2015/open-arms-a-una-settimana-dalla-tragedia-salvini-incalzato-non-da-spiegazioni-e-loda-i-libici/311052/311687

    • Watch: 10 days at sea, the real story of the Aquarius

      For us, journalists, bearing witness is both an instinct and a responsibility.

      The Aquarius deployment came about because I wanted to see for myself how NGOs conducted search and rescue missions in the so-called “world’s deadliest migration route”.

      I had reported on the refugee crisis for years - from the Turkish-Syrian border, but also from Greece, Macedonia, Hungary, Germany, France... I had seen fear and desperation. But also solidarity and hope.

      I wanted to understand what this part of the story was all about. And what impact it had on the whole of the European Union.

      Little did I know I would be reporting on a story that would threaten to split Europe apart.

      10 days at sea: the real story of the Aquarius is about what happened aboard the humanitarian vessel while it found itself at the heart of one of the most serious storms Europe has ever faced.

      http://www.euronews.com/2018/07/16/10-days-at-sea-the-real-story-of-the-aquarius-exclusive

    • Stampa spagnola, Josepha vuole denunciare Libia e Italia

      La donna sopravvissuta e soccorsa da Open Arms, secondo Diario de Mallorca, pensa alle vie legali per l’omissione di soccorso.

      Josepha, la donna del Camerun salvata dalla Ong spagnola Proactiva Open Arms dopo aver trascorso due giorni in mare aggrappata a un pezzo di legno, denuncerà l’Italia per aver rifiutato di sbarcare i cadaveri dei migranti morti nel Mediterraneo nel porto di Catania. Lo scrive il quotidiano Diario de Mallorca. La donna per 48 ore è stata in balia delle onde a largo della Libia, aggrappata a un pezzo di legno. Insieme a lei c’erano i cadaveri di una donna e un bambino.

      Secondo il quotidiano il quotidiano spagnolo, dopo essere sbarcata a Palma - dove è arrivata, insieme ai volontari, da poche ore - denuncerà alle autorità spagnole la guardia costiera della Libia per aver speronato la barca a bordo della quale si trovava. Si rivolgerà alla giustizia spagnola per segnalare anche una presunta omissione dell’Italia. Josefa, che ha raccontato di essere scappata dal Camerun per fuggire dal marito che la picchiava perché non poteva avere figli, riceverà lo status di rifugiata.

      Anche i volontari di Open Arms hanno deciso di denunciare la guardia Costiera libica per omissione di soccorso e di avere intenzione di fare lo stesso con «qualsiasi altra persona che ha preso parte ai fatti con azioni o omissione». A tal proposito, hanno detto, anche la Guardia costiera italiana «avrà qualcosa da dichiarare riguardo ciò che è avvenuto a 80-90 miglia dalle sue coste».

      Dal Viminale rispondono: «Se la Ong spagnola ha preferitorifiutare l’approdo in Italia per scappare altrove, è un problema suo. I porti siciliani erano aperti anche per accogliere i cadaveri a bordo, e per questo alla Ong era stata esclusa l’opzione Lampedusa: l’isola è infatti sprovvista di celle frigorifere per i corpi».

      https://www.huffingtonpost.it/2018/07/21/stampa-spagnola-josepha-vuole-denunciare-libia-e-italia_a_23486787

    • « #Sarost_5 » : une situation dramatique selon les migrants relayés par une ONG

      L’épuisement, la fatigue, le découragement ne font que croître à bord du Sarost 5. Le navire commercial est toujours bloqué devant le port de #Zarzis en #Tunisie, après avoir été refusé par les autorités maltaises et tunisiennes. Cela fait maintenant une semaine que les 14 membres d’équipages et les 40 migrants attendent le débarquement, avec peu de vivres, dans une situation sanitaire de plus en plus compliquée. Aucun des pays proches n’a pour l’instant accepté que le bateau accoste et permette à ces ressortissants africains de débarquer. Pour alerter l’opinion sur leur situation, l’ONG Watch the Med a recueilli des témoignages à bord du Sarost 5.

      http://www.rfi.fr/afrique/20180723-migrants-sarost-5-situation-dramatique-temoignages-relayes-ong-watch-th

    • Secondo il Viminale la versione di Open Arms è una “fake news”, ma ad oggi non ha fornito le prove

      Pochi giorni fa, a circa 80 miglia dalle coste libiche l’associazione non governativa Proactiva Open Arms ha trovato i resti di un’imbarcazione con due cadaveri e una donna ancora viva. L’ipotesi e poi l’accusa della ONG è che la «Guardia costiera libica», nel corso di un’operazione di salvataggio, abbia lasciato volutamente alcune persone in mare perché non volevano ritornare in Libia. Il ministro dell’Interno, Matteo Salvini, ha definito questa ricostruzione una «fake news» e ha promesso che avrebbe fornito le prove della sua falsità. Al momento, però, queste prove non sono state ancora esibite.

      https://www.valigiablu.it/ong-salvini-fake-news

    • Rejetés par les pays européens, 40 migrants sont bloqués au large de la Tunisie

      Quarante migrants et l’équipage du Sarost 5 sont bloqués devant le port de Zarzis, en Tunisie. Le navire battant pavillon tunisien est arrivé sur place après avoir été refusé par l’Italie, la France et surtout Malte. C’est pourtant ce dernier pays qui est censé secourir ces rescapés, car leur embarcation était située en zone maltaise quand elle a été signalée. Deux femmes enceintes se trouvent à bord.

      www.rfi.fr/europe/20180721-sarost-5-zarzis-malte-italie-france-migrants-bloques-tunisie

    • La Tunisie s’apprête à accueillir les 40 migrants bloqués sur le Sarost 5

      Après deux semaines bloqué en mer, au large de Zarzis, le navire Sarost 5 devrait finalement avoir l’autorisation d’accoster en Tunisie. Le Premier ministre tunisien, Youssef Chahed, a expliqué samedi devant le Parlement que le pays allait lui ouvrir ses ports pour des raisons humanitaires. Quarante migrants dont deux femmes enceintes se trouvent en effet sur le Sarost 5 que ni la France, ni l’Italie, ni Malte n’ont jusqu’ici accepté d’accueillir.

      http://www.rfi.fr/afrique/20180730-tunisie-accueille-quarante-migrants-sarost-5-zarzis-youssef-chahed

    • WatchTheMed Alarm Phone : Press Release on the Sarost 5 Disembarkation Announcement

      July 29, 2018
      Watch the Med Alarm Phone has been in regular contact with crew members as well as rescued people of the Sarost 5 since the first distress call that took place in the Maltese SAR zone on Friday 13.07.18. The 40 rescued people have been at sea for more than two weeks. The rescued people and the crew of the supply vessel Sarost 5 have been stationed off the port of Zarzis since Monday 16.07.18 and have endured unbearable living conditions on board. We are relieved that the Tunisian government will let the people disembark for ‘humanitarian reasons’. However, we remain extremely concerned about the following points:

      The ordeal endured by the crew and passengers of the Sarost 5 is the direct result of EU migration policies, which externalize border controls and condone the closure of ports in Italy and Malta to NGO and private rescue vessels. The case of the Sarost 5 adds to other worrying developments in the Central Mediterranean, such as the increased collaboration between Italy and the Libyan Coast Guard and the failure to give authorizations to rescue vessels to disembark people, leaving them stranded at sea for days.
      The EU has announced its plans to establish regional disembarkation mechanisms in North Africa. The arrival of the Sarost 5 on Tunisian soil does not constitute a precedent for such disembarkation points. The Sarost 5 sails under Tunisian flag and no North African country has agreed to disembarkation points on their territory. We strongly oppose any steps towards such regional disembarkation points.
      The case of the Sarost 5 illustrates the erosion of SAR responsibilities in the central Med. Malta has not abided by its responsibilities to provide a port of safety to the 40 people who were first given supplies at sea by the Caroline III, under Maltese orders and in the Maltese SAR zone. This denial of responsibility not only breaks international maritime law, but also violates the principle of non-refoulment. The People on board the Sarost 5 have declared in video testimonies that they are in need of international protection. Furthermore, the lack of a legal framework to apply for international protection in Tunisia will deprive the people on board the Sarost 5 from their right to an effective remedy. The violation of basic rights of asylum seekers in Tunisia has been documented through the ongoing ordeal faced by the ex-Choucha camp refugees, who are still fighting for legal status and a dignified life in Tunisia. In fact, their struggle continues four years after the closure of the camp. In addition, the rights of LGBTQ people are severely restricted in Tunisia. For the reasons mentioned above, we strongly believe that ports in Tunisia should not be considered as ports of safety.

      Watch the Med Alarm Phone denounces the EU states’ failure to take responsibility and their stark negligence of international human rights, as well as the lack of a public statement from the UNHCR in favour of the people on board the Sarost 5. Watch The Med Alarm Phone will monitor the disembarkation closely and remain in contact with the people from the Sarost 5.

      In light of the Sarost 5 case, we immediately call for:

      – Full and unconditional respect for human rights and the international Maritime law;
      – Immediate disembarkations in ports of safety, which cannot be in Tunisia or Libya, given their non-compliance with international refugee and human rights law;
      – The abolition of the Dublin regulation so that the arrival of migrants can be shared among member states of the EU and that the pressure on southern EU states can be alleviated;
      – The re-opening of Italian and Maltese ports to NGOs and private vessels transporting people rescued at sea, as they are the closest safe ports to the rescue zone

      communiqué de presse reçu via la mailing-list de Migreurop

    • Le Sarost 5 toujours bloqué au large de la Tunisie : situation confuse dans les eaux tunisiennes

      Le week end dernier, de nombreuses informations contradictoires, concernant le sort des 40 migrants bloqués au large de la Tunisie depuis 15 jours, ont circulé. Alors que le navire humanitaire espagnol Open Arms n’était qu’à quelques km du Sarost 5, les autorités tunisiennes ont annoncé leur intention d’accueillir sur leur sol les 40 migrants. Cependant pour l’heure, la situation à bord n’a pas changé.

      Samedi 28 juillet, le Premier ministre tunisien Youssef Chahed a déclaré lors d’une séance plénière au Parlement que « pour des raisons humanitaires », la Tunisie allait finalement « accueillir les 40 migrants » bloqués au large du port tunisien de Zarzis depuis le 16 juillet.

      Lundi 30 juillet en milieu d’après-midi, le Sarost 5 était cependant toujours immobilisé en pleine mer. « Les autorités portuaires tunisiennes n’ont pas encore reçu l’autorisation de Tunis de laisser entrer le bateau », déclare à InfoMigrants Mongi Slim du Croissant rouge tunisien. « On sait que le gouvernement a accepté que notre navire accoste en Tunisie mais depuis cette annonce on est toujours bloqués ! On attend quoi », se plaignait déjà samedi soir à InfoMigrants un des membres d’équipage.

      Pour que le bateau puisse amarrer à Zarzis, il faut que le MRCC tunisien - le centre de contrôle maritime tunisien - donne son autorisation. On ignore encore pourquoi il n’a rien reçu malgré l’annonce du Premier ministre samedi.

      Open Arms au large des côtes tunisiennes

      Tout le week-end, la confusion a régné à bord du Sarost 5. À leur réveil samedi matin, les migrants aperçoivent au loin le navire humanitaire Open Arms qui est immobilisé à quelques milles nautiques de là. L’espoir renaît à bord du bateau. L’ONG espagnole a l’autorisation d’entrer dans les eaux tunisiennes pour offrir une assistance humanitaire et médicale aux membres du Sarost 5. Mais en milieu d’après-midi, Open Arms rebrousse chemin vers Malte pour évacuer d’urgence un de ses sauveteurs.

      Le lendemain, dimanche 29 juillet, le navire humanitaire reprend la route en direction des côtes tunisiennes et se positionne de nouveau à proximité du Sarost 5 – il repart finalement dans les eaux internationales lundi en début d’après-midi, les autorités tunisiennes ne l’autorisant pas à stationner dans leur zone maritime.

      Entre-temps, le gouvernement tunisien a fait part de son intention d’accueillir les 40 migrants. L’ONG espagnole assure que sa présence dans les eaux tunisiennes a permis de débloquer la situation. « Quand la Tunisie a vu qu’une organisation aussi médiatique que la nôtre était devant sa porte - et que nous voulions rencontrer les migrants à bord - ils ont eu peur qu’on montre publiquement que les migrants n’étaient pas bien traités », a déclaré à l’agence de presse espagnole EFE Oscar Camps, le président de l’ONG.

      À bord du Sarost 5, l’incertitude pèse sur les migrants déjà éprouvés moralement et physiquement par plus de deux semaines en mer. « Mon Dieu, quand est-ce que tout cela va s’arrêter. Le gouvernement donne officiellement son accord mais il ne se passe rien. Que nous veut la Tunisie encore ? », s’interroge lundi Samuel*, un migrant qui est en contact régulier avec InfoMigrants.

      La Tunisie, pas un « port sûr » selon les ONG

      Par ailleurs, les ONG s’inquiètent de l’arrivée éventuelle de ces migrants en Tunisie. « Ce pays ne remplit pas les critères pour être qualifiée de ‘port sûr’. Il n’y a pas de cadre légal pour y déposer une demande d’asile », dénonce à InfoMigrants Olivia Santer, porte-parole d’Alarm Phone. « La violation des droits fondamentaux des demandeurs d’asile en Tunisie a été documentée par ce que subissent les anciens migrants du camp de Choucha qui luttent toujours pour un statut légal (..). Quatre ans après la fermeture du camp, leur combat se poursuit toujours », déclare l’ONG dans un communiqué.

      Le Croissant rouge tunisien assure lui que tout est prêt pour gérer au mieux l’arrivée des 40 migrants du Sarost 5. Ces derniers doivent être accueillis par l’ONG au port de Zarzis et seront ensuite envoyés au foyer de Médenine (à l’ouest de Zarzis) où « ils pourront bénéficier de soins médicaux, de distribution de nourriture et de vêtements », selon Mongi Slim du Croissant rouge tunisien.

      Les demandeurs d’asile pourront, toujours selon le croissant rouge tunisien, déposer une demande auprès du Haut-commissariat des Nations-Unies pour les réfugiés (HCR). Sur ce sujet aussi, les informations demeurent floues. L’agence onusienne assure avoir déjà rencontré plusieurs migrants du Sarost 5 lors d’une mission sur le navire, mais les naufragés et l’équipage nient la visite du HCR à bord. « Nous avons demandé plusieurs fois que l’agence onusienne vienne nous voir mais ils ne sont jamais venus », assure Samuel.

      L’ONG Alarm Phone se dit outrée par le HCR qui « n’a pas su se positionner clairement en faveur des droits des rescapés ». « Cela renforce notre inquiétude pour l’avenir de ces 40 migrants », signale Olivia Santer. « Ils devraient être en Europe car ils ont été repérés dans les eaux maltaises. Mais une nouvelle fois, les autorités européennes n’ont pas pris leurs responsabilités et ont renvoyé le problème », souffle-t-elle.

      http://www.infomigrants.net/fr/post/10974/le-sarost-5-toujours-bloque-au-large-de-la-tunisie-situation-confuse-d

    • Rejetés par les pays européens, 40 migrants sont bloqués au large de la Tunisie

      Quarante migrants et l’équipage du Sarost 5 sont bloqués devant le port de Zarzis, en Tunisie. Le navire battant pavillon tunisien est arrivé sur place après avoir été refusé par l’Italie, la France et surtout Malte. C’est pourtant ce dernier pays qui est censé secourir ces rescapés, car leur embarcation était située en zone maltaise quand elle a été signalée. Deux femmes enceintes se trouvent à bord.

      C’est le capitaine du Sarost 5, un navire d’approvisionnement battant pavillon tunisien, qui a appelé les autorités tunisiennes à « intervenir d’urgence » pour lui permettre d’accoster au large de Zarzis, dans le sud du pays.

      Ce navire commercial a secouru 40 migrants, dont huit femmes et notamment deux enceintes. Or, il patiente au large de ce port. Une attente qui « commence à être très longue, au détriment de notre travail », déplore le capitaine, Ali Hajji, interrogé par l’Agence France-Presse.

      « L’équipage du bateau est épuisé moralement et physiquement », explique-t-il à l’AFP. « Nous faisons notre maximum pour apporter notre aide aux migrants, dont certains sont malades, et nous risquons d’être contaminés. »

      Selon une source de l’AFP - un responsable de la garde maritime tunisienne s’exprimant sous couvert d’anonymat -, l’autorisation d’accoster à Zarzis « dépasse » ses équipes. « Nous attendons une décision politique », fait-il remarquer. Mais cette dernière tarde à venir de Tunis pour le moment.

      Les 40 migrants à bord du Sarost 5 n’en sont pas au début de leur calvaire. Ils seraient originaires d’Afrique subsaharienne et d’Egypte, et seraient partis de Libye à bord d’une embarcation pneumatique avant d’être perdus en mer cinq jours.

      Un problème symptomatique de la crise européenne

      Ces personnes ont finalement été repérées, à une date non précisée, par le navire Caroline III, envoyé par un centre de secours maltais. Problème : selon des ONG tunisiennes, quand ce bateau a appelé à l’aide les gardes-côtes d’Italie, de France et de Malte, ces derniers « ont refusé d’accueillir les rescapés ».

      Selon ces ONG, le prétexte des Européens, c’était que « les ports les plus proches étaient situés en Tunisie ». Les migrants ont donc finalement été pris en charge par le Sarost 5. Le Croissant-Rouge a pu les examiner à deux reprises.

      « Huit migrants ont la gale et les deux femmes enceintes risquent de perdre leur bébé », relate Mongi Slim, responsable du Croissant-Rouge à Médenine, une ONG qui continue d’envoyer médicaments et nourriture. « Nous avons demandé aux autorités tunisiennes d’hospitaliser au moins trois personnes », ajoute-t-il.

      La Tunisie fait partie des pays cités pour l’émergence de possibles centres d’accueil de migrants hors Europe souhaités par l’UE. Mais selon M. Slim, les passagers du Sarost 5 « refusent d’être accueillis par la Tunisie et veulent rejoindre l’Europe ».

      Watch The Med-Alarm Phone s’est fait une spécialité de repérer les bateaux à la dérive en Méditerranée, pour les guider vers d’éventuels sauveteurs. Et pour Olivia Santer, militante au sein de ce réseau, la situation du Sarost 5 est symptomatique de la crise de l’accueil européen. Ci-dessous, ses explications sur RFI.

      http://www.rfi.fr/europe/20180721-sarost-5-zarzis-malte-italie-france-migrants-bloques-tunisie

    • Sur la Sarost 5, voici le commentaire de @_kg_, qui m’a été envoyé par email, et qui répond à la question : si la Tunisie acceptait de prendre les migrants sur son territoire...

      - les personnes vont être logés au centre de logement du Croissant Rouge Tunisien (CRT) à Médenine
      – le Conseil Italien des Réfugiés va venir sur place pour categoriser entre « migrant.e.s » et « réfugiés » ; les réfugiés peuvent faire une demande d’asile en Tunisie et sont logés au centre d’UNHCR...t’imagines la situation d’un demandeur d’asile en Tunisie...réinstallation dans un pays tiers = environ 12 personnes/année...un très grand taux des demandeurs d’asile disparait, on ne les retrouve plus...
      – les « migrant.e.s » restent au centre CRT dont ils sont pris en charge au maximum deux mois (cf. Monghi Slim http://www.rfi.fr/afrique/20180730-tunisie-accueille-quarante-migrants-sarost-5-zarzis-youssef-chahed) ; l’OIM vient sur place pour leur proposer le « retour volontaire » dans leur pays d’origine comme seule solution... donc ces « migrant.e.s » sont maintenant bloqués en Tunisie, le nombre monte.
      – Il reste quel projet futur ? Dans la plupart des cas ils/elles quittent le centre de logement pour les grandes villes tunisiennes : travailler pour financer le prochain voyage vers l’Europe ou vers un autre pays...

    • 2018 sind schon mehr als 1500 Flüchtlinge im Mittelmeer ertrunken | NZZ.ch 2018-08-04

      https://www.nzz.ch/international/2018-schon-mehr-als-1500-fluechtlinge-auf-dem-mittelmeer-ertrunken-ld.1408860

      https://nzz-img.s3.amazonaws.com/2018/8/4/4e09c75c-b1d0-4211-bd3f-a77d296b1d19.jpeg

      Nach einer Mitteilung des Uno-Flüchtlingshilfswerks ist die Zahl der Todesfälle gestiegen, obwohl die Gesamtzahl der über das Mittelmeer nach Europa gekommenen Personen zuletzt deutlich zurückgegangen war.

      Mehr als 1500 Flüchtlinge sind nach Angaben der Uno in den ersten sieben Monaten dieses Jahres im Mittelmeer ertrunken. Mehr als die Hälfte von ihnen sei dabei im Juni und Juli ums Leben gekommen, teilte das Uno-Flüchtlingshilfswerk UNHCR am Freitag in Genf mit. Demnach stieg die Zahl der Todesfälle, obwohl die Gesamtzahl der über das Mittelmeer nach Europa gekommenen Personen zuletzt deutlich zurückgegangen war.

      Laut UNHCR gelangten seit Januar ungefähr 60 000 Flüchtlinge nach Europa. In den ersten sieben Monaten des Vorjahres waren es noch etwa doppelt so viele Personen. Spanien löste Italien mittlerweile als wichtigstes Ankunftsland ab. Dort kamen von Januar bis Juli rund 23 500 Menschen an – so viele wie im gesamten Jahr 2017. Italien verzeichnete im Betrachtungszeitraum dagegen rund 18 500 Ankünfte; in Griechenland waren es zirka 16 000 Personen.

      [...]

    • Ong, Open Arms in attesa di un porto in cui sbarcare 87 migranti: “Caldo rovente sul ponte”

      Dopo tre giorni l’ong spagnola attende ancora indicazioni: a bordo di Open Arms ci sono 87 migranti, tra cui 8 minori.

      Terzo giorno a bordo di Open Arms, la temperatura è rovente sul ponte. La paura di essere riportati in Libia si placa. Ci affidano le loro storie terribili, molte provenienti dall’inferno Darfur e dagli abusi ripetuti della Libia. Ancora nessun porto di destinazione". Lo fanno sapere i volontari con un tweet lanciato dalla nave della ong che il 2 agosto ha soccorso 87 migranti, fra cui 8 minori, che erano alla deriva su un gommone al largo della Libia.

      I profughi erano stati salvati dopo che il loro gommone si trovava da due giorni alla deriva in acque internazionali. Secondo il racconto del segeratario di Sinistra italiana Nicola Fratoianni – che si trova a bordo della nave dell’ong per continuare la staffetta di solidarietà iniziata da Riccardo Magi, deputato di +Europa, e proseguita poi dal parlamentare di LeU Erasmo Palazzotto – i migranti sono in condizioni di salute precarie: alcuni di loro hanno sul corpo ustioni provocate dalla miscela di acqua di mare e gasolio.

      La prima segnalazione della presenza in mare del gommone era arrivata lunedì scorso dalla Guardia Costiera libica. Open Arms, una volta completato le operazioni, aveva informato l’Italia la Spagna e la Libia. In quello stesso giorno il ministro degli Interni Matteo Salvini aveva sottolineato l’assoluta chiusura dei porti italiani all’imbarcazione carica di migranti: «La nave spagnola Open Arms ha raccolto a bordo 90 immigrati nelle acque libiche. Visto che venti giorni fa aveva dichiarato che i porti italiani non sono sicuri perché c’è Salvini, sono certo che porteranno questi immigrati ovunque, tranne che in Italia. Buon viaggio», aveva scritto in un tweet il vicepremier leghista.

      https://www.fanpage.it/ong-open-arms-in-attesa-di-un-porto-in-cui-sbarcare-87-migranti-caldo-rovent

    • Aquarius, diario di bordo – giorno 2: “In caso di avvistamento non chiederemo autorizzazione, come prevede la legge”

      Prosegue il nostro viaggio a bordo della nave Aquarius. Il terzo giorno di navigazione è quello della preparazione al soccorso in mare. L’arrivo in zona Sar è previsto per stanotte. “A quel punto cominceranno le guardie notturne. A turno si resterà di vedetta per un’ora e mezzo a testa”. E, in caso di avvistamento di un’imbarcazione in difficoltà, di un naufragio, di persone in mare, “non chiederemo autorizzazione a nessuno per intervenire. Semplicemente lo farà, come richiede la legge”

      Sono le quattro del pomeriggio quando il wi-fi di bordo finalmente si risveglia – almeno per un po’ – e il Gps certifica: da un lato Tripoli, dall’altro Marsala. Il mare sembra avere un altro volto. Il blu è diverso. La stessa consistenza dell’acqua sembra essere cambiata. “Sul colore hai ragione”, dice serio Eduard, logista di Medici senza frontiere. “Il resto è una tua percezione”. Lui è un marinaio. Ha vissuto e lavorato per qualche anno sui pescherecci nella Manica, racconta. “Se hai lavorato in mare in quella zona, vieni considerato affidabile in questo lavoro”, mi spiega. Il suo sguardo a volte molto serio è ora, di fronte a una neofita del mare, comprensivo. “Il tempo, in quest’area, può cambiare da un momento all’altro. Ma non c’è il problema delle correnti. Nella Manica sì”. E giù a spiegare il funzionamento dei nodi, delle navi, del vento, delle correnti, della pesca. I gradi di classificazione di maltempo e tempeste, come reagiscono le imbarcazioni a seconda della loro grandezza. Cosa cambia a seconda del verso in cui dondolano. “Questa è una nave molto stabile”, mi assicura. “Certo che ho avuto paura, e spesso, quando lavoravo nella Manica e il mare era brutto. La paura è sana. Insieme alla rabbia, in quelle occasioni ti fa reagire e ti dà energia”.

      Nella notte la nave Open Arms dell’ong spagnola Proactiva ha soccorso 87 persone, di cui otto minori. Erano alla deriva da due giorni. Se ne parla nel corso della riunione mattutina su nave Aquarius. “In un’ideale staffetta umanitaria, Open Arms vorrebbe forse guadagnare un po’ di tempo ora e attendere il più possibile il nostro arrivo. Altrimenti non resterebbe nessuno a salvare vite”. L’arrivo di Aquarius in zona Sar è previsto per stanotte, al più tardi domani mattina. “A quel punto cominceranno le guardie notturne”, spiega Tanguy, bretone dall’espressione paciosa: uno sguardo che diventa incredibilmente serio quando vuole assicurarsi che tutti abbiano ascoltato e compreso chiaramente. È il “deputy Sar co”, ovvero chi coordina il momento del soccorso in mare e le lance che si avvicineranno a un’eventuale imbarcazione in difficoltà. Nick, invece, è il Search and rescue coordinator: coordina l’operazione dal ponte.

      Il terzo giorno di navigazione è quello della preparazione al momento che dà il senso alla missione: quello del soccorso in mare. Protagonista la squadra Sar di SOS Mediterranée: Nick, Tanguy, Basile, Baptiste, Dragos, Alessandro, Viviana, Hassad, Marc, Jeremie e Theo. Anche il fotografo dell’organizzazione, Guglielmo – 28enne palermitano – è parte attiva: in caso di necessità dovrà lasciare la macchina fotografica e dare una mano mentre è a bordo di uno dei gommoni dell’operazione. Da poppa a prua, il team passa la mattinata a spostare, montare, gonfiare, disporre, verificare. Per poi, dopo pranzo, animare un incontro di “teoria SAR” in cui Tanguy spiega, lavagna, pennarello e modellini di barchetta alla mano, la posizione delle lance in mare: come si muoveranno, chi sarà dove e chi farà cosa.

      Da stanotte “a turno si resterà di vedetta per un’ora e mezzo a testa”. E, in caso di avvistamento di un’imbarcazione in difficoltà, di un naufragio, di persone in mare, “Aquarius non chiederà autorizzazione a nessuno per intervenire. Semplicemente lo farà, come richiede la legge”. Quella dell’autorizzazione al IMRCC (Centro nazionale di coordinamento del soccorso marittimo) di Roma “era una consuetudine non scritta, non un obbligo”, spiegano. Assicurava coordinamento e regolare svolgimento delle operazioni finché tutti gli attori coinvolti parlavano la stessa lingua. Una consuetudine valsa fino a prima della vicenda che a giugno ha portato la nave Aquarius a Valencia. Ora che “il contesto del Mediterraneo Centrale” è cambiato così tanto, “faremo direttamente quello che richiede la legge: fornire immediata assistenza a chi è in pericolo di vita in mare”.

      Il “drill”, il segnale, scatta nel primo pomeriggio: tutti – le equipe di SOS e di MSF e i giornalisti a bordo – indossano casco, giacchetto di salvataggio, pantaloni lunghi, magliette possibilmente con le maniche lunghe: “Durante un soccorso potrebbe capitare di restare in mare, sotto al sole, per ore”, spiega Tanguy. La simulazione vera e propria, con tanto di lance a mare e di persone a bordo nelle rispettive postazioni per assicurare efficienza e sicurezza (“Quella del giornalista sul gommone è una posizione fissa. Non ti devi muovere”, spiega serio il bretone guardandoti dritto negli occhi) è prevista per oggi. Ragioni di sicurezza: ieri Aquarius si trovava su una traiettoria molto trafficata. Mentre il primo giorno di navigazione aveva incrociato solo giovani delfini che giocavano in mare, e qualcuno aveva anche avvistato una balena, ieri, attraversando il Canale di Sicilia, erano tante le navi intorno.

      È poi la volta del team di Medici Senza Frontiere, con un meeting obbligatorio per tutte le persone a bordo: quello sul primo soccorso. David, il medico, spiega insieme alle due infermiere Catherine e Aoife e a una delle ostetriche, Nina, le principali tecniche di rianimazione su adulti e bambini. “Sai come capisci qual è il ritmo giusto per le pressioni del massaggio cardiaco? Cantando ‘Stayin’ Alive’”, dice David, mentre ne dà dimostrazione pratica con apposito manichino. Il trucco per ricordare sembra efficace: provano tutti, vogliono tutti sapere. Perché non si sa mai nella vita, e perché hanno scelto di essere su questa nave.

      Il sole tramonta questa volta quasi alle spalle di Aquarius: la traiettoria sta cambiando, si vira a est. E, guardando il mare, cominciano i racconti. Di soccorsi e naufragi, nel tentare di immaginare cosa voglia dire rimanere stipati su una barca di legno o su un gommone – o direttamente in acqua, naufragati – in solitudine e circondati da nient’altro che il mare nero della notte. “Quando ero su Vos Prudence (la nave SAR MSF che ha operato fino a un annetto fa, ndr), la notte ci capitava di vedere quelli che chiamavamo gli ‘angeli del mare’: pesciolini che saltano e seguono la luce delle barche”, racconta Ben. È uno dei due mediatori culturali e sarà a bordo di una lancia in caso di soccorso: è suo, e solo suo, il primissimo contatto con i migranti, suo il messaggio per spiegare che si tratta di un salvataggio e cosa accadrà alle persone soccorse in mare. “E i delfini spesso vengono accanto alla barca a sfregarsi il muso per pulirsi. Chissà se li vedremo”

      https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2018/08/04/aquarius-diario-di-bordo-giorno-2-in-caso-di-avvistamento-non-chiederemo-autorizzazione-come-prevede-la-legge/4537889

    • OpenArms: terzo giorno con 87 migranti a bordo, nessun porto aperto

      «Terzo giorno a bordo di OpenArms, la temperatura è rovente sul ponte. La paura di essere riportati in Libia si placa. Ci affidano le loro storie terribili, molte provenienti dall’inferno Darfur e dagli abusi ripetuti della Libia. Ancora nessun porto di destinazione». E’ il tweet lanciato dalla nave della Ong che il 2 agosto ha soccorso 87 migranti, fra cui 8 minori, che erano alla deriva su un gommone al largo della Libia.


      http://www.tgcom24.mediaset.it/mondo/openarms-terzo-giorno-con-87-migranti-a-bordo-nessun-porto-aperto_3

    • L’inchiesta “madre” Ong-scafisti verso l’archiviazione

      È trascorso circa un anno – era il 13 agosto 2017 – da quando il Fatto pubblicò la notizia che la procura di Catania indagava, con l’accusa di associazione per delinquere finalizzata al favoreggiamento dell’immigrazione clandestina, sul ruolo delle Ong nel Mediterraneo. Un anno dopo, per quanto risulta al Fatto, quel fascicolo sembra destinato inesorabilmente all’archiviazione. E per molti motivi.

      Il più importante: non è stato trovato alcun riscontro alle accuse. O meglio: nel fascicolo non è potuto confluire nulla, di quel po’ che è stato riscontrato, che sia possibile sostenere in un processo. La vicenda – che il Fatto Quotidiano è in grado di rivelare – è più complessa di quanto possa sembrare. Innanzitutto, le lancette dell’orologio, vanno portate indietro di un anno: l’inchiesta inizia infatti nel 2016.

      È la Marina Militare a sospettare per prima dei collegamenti tra Ong e scafisti nelle operazioni di sbarco e salvataggio. Nessuna informativa ufficiale. Ma notizie che giungono comunque alla procura di Catania e spingono il procuratore Carmelo Zuccaro a delegare delle indagini amplissime: verificare le possibili condotte associative per il favoreggiamento dell’immigrazione clandestina.

      Contestualmente – questo è però un percorso parallelo, che nulla ha a che fare con l’inchiesta, ma paradossalmente ne influenza parecchio l’esito – le nostre agenzie di intelligence, attraverso i satelliti militari, captano conversazioni tra scafisti e volontari delle Ong, dimostrando l’esistenza di alcuni contatti che non certificano però alcun reato. Operazione benedetta dall’ex ministro dell’Interno Marco Minniti che ha già avviato la sua strategia per sgomberare il Mediterraneo dalle Ong. E infatti: le Ong finiscono nella bufera. Dal punto di vista giudiziario, nei fatti, oggi però resta in piedi una sola inchiesta: quella di Trapani, che non contesta l’associazione per delinquere, ma comportamenti di singoli volontari specificando che le eventuali violazioni del codice penale erano motivate esclusivamente da fini umanitari.

      Ma torniamo alla primavera del 2017. Non è un caso che, ad aprile il generale Stefano Screpanti, capo del III Reparto Operazioni del Comando generale della GdF, dinanzi alla Commissione Difesa del Senato affermi: “Allo stato attuale delle nostre conoscenze, non ci sono evidenze investigative tali da far emergere collegamenti fra ong e organizzazioni che gestiscono il traffico di migranti”. Non è un caso perché sia lo Sco della Polizia sia gli investigatori della Gdf, già da un anno stanno indagando, proprio su delega della procura di Catania.

      Nelle audizioni Zuccaro si mostra più ottimista, rispetto l’esito dell’inchiesta, spingendosi a dichiarare, alla trasmissione Agorà, che “alcune ong potrebbero essere finanziate dai trafficanti e so di contatti”. I contatti, effettivamente, sono stati riscontrati. Ma è lo stesso Zuccaro a rendersi conto della difficoltà della situazione quando, circa un mese dopo, precisa: “Non siamo più in grado di svolgere indagini di ampio respiro volte a contrastare il traffico di migranti clandestini”. Sarebbe necessario, spiega il procuratore, poter “fare indagini in acque libiche” e utilizzare “intercettazioni delle comunicazioni satellitari”.

      Il punto, infatti, è che gli investigatori stanno utilizzando metodi di indagine “sperimentali” che non pare possibile produrre in giudizio: le intercettazioni via etere – avvenute con strumenti utilizzati in ambito militare – necessitano di essere ulteriormente “blindate” per poter certificare senza ombra di dubbio l’identità degli interlocutori. Se non bastasse, sono state realizzate in acque libiche.

      Difficile considerarle valide sotto il profilo probatorio: per quanto risulta al Fatto di questi (pochi) riscontri nel fascicolo non v’è traccia. La campagna del governo sulle Ong, il codice di condotta richiesto da Minniti, l’ulteriore indagine di Trapani e le polemiche di quei mesi, infine, ottengono l’effetto politico desiderato: gran parte delle Ong in quei mesi lascia il Mediterraneo a ridosso della Libia. Risultato: per la procura di Catania c’è poco da intercettare. Resta qualche indizio. Prove, zero.

      https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/premium/articoli/linchiesta-madre-ong-scafisti-verso-larchiviazione

    • Soccorsi in mare. Un anno dopo cadute le accuse di legami tra Ong e scafisti

      Erano quattro le inchieste a carico delle Ong che salvano migranti. Tutte accusate di essere in combutta con gli scafisti. Ma di indagini ne sopravvivono due: una (Catania) si avvia all’archiviazione; l’altra (Trapani) ha derubricato l’associazione per delinquere all’ipotesi di irregolarità allo scopo di ’commettere’ salvataggi.

      Le procure di Palermo e Ragusa, invece, hanno già archiviato, concludendo che non ci sono stati reati.

      CATANIA Il procuratore Carmelo Zuccaro ipotizzava a carico della Ong Open Arms il reato di associazione a delinquere finalizzata al favoreggiamento dell’immigrazione illegale. Secondo diverse fonti, sarebbe vicina

      RAGUSA A Ragusa il Tribunale del Riesame ha stabilito che la ’disobbedienza’ delle organizzazioni non governative che scelgono di non cooperare con le autorità libiche è motivata dallo «stato di necessità» connaturato al soccorso dei naufraghi.

      TRAPANI Nell’inchiesta sono stati adoperati infiltrati a bordo delle navi delle Ong. Lo scopo? Dimostrare un presunto patto tra scafisti e volontari per raccogliere i migranti in mare. Per proteggere gli equipaggi, sarebbe stato reclutato personale vicino a movimenti identitari.

      PALERMO Le indagini, condotte anche dagli investigatori che avevano segnalato anomalie, non hanno portato ad alcun risultato. I pubblici ministeri hanno chiesto e ottenuto dal gip l’archiviazione di entrambe le inchieste.

      Quasi due anni di indagini (la cui esistenza è stata ufficializzata alla vigilia dell’estate scorsa) e un dispiegamento di forze e risorse senza precedenti – con agenti infiltrati, intercettazioni satellitari, elaborazioni di tracciati radar, informative richieste ai servizi segreti – ad oggi hanno prodotto un unico risultato: l’allontanamento dal Mediterraneo della gran parte delle organizzazioni non governative e l’aumento dei naufragi in rapporto al numero di migranti messi in acqua dai trafficanti.

      Le Ong respinte e quelle bloccate a terra (due le navi sequestrate, di cui una ancora bloccata nel porto di Trapani) non sono state rimpiazzate da dispositivi degli Stati Ue, mentre la comunità internazionale non è stata in grado di stabilizzare la Libia né di fermare i trafficanti di uomini e chiudere i loro lager.

      Due procedimenti sono già stati definitivamente mandati in archivio. A Ragusa il Tribunale del riesame ha stabilito che la ’disobbedienza’ delle organizzazioni non governative che scelgono di non cooperare con le autorità libiche è motivata dallo «stato di necessità» connaturato al soccorso dei naufraghi. Un’ordinanza contro cui la procura non ha avanzato ricorso in Cassazione, di fatto diventando giurisprudenza a cui possono appigliarsi tutti gli operatori che agiscono nel Canale di Sicilia.
      Sempre a Ragusa era stata inizialmente sequestrata (per ordine della procura di Catania, poi spogliata dalla competenza territoriale restituita ai magistrati ragusani) la nave di Proactiva Open Arms. Ma il giudice per le indagini preliminari ne aveva disposto la riconsegna all’equipaggio dell’organizzazione iberica.

      Anche Trapani si avvierebbe a chiudere definitivamente nel cassetto l’inchiesta. Nel porto rimane sotto sequestro la nave dell’organizzazione tedesca Jugend Rettet. Il pool di magistrati aveva tra l’altro inviato un avviso di garanzia al sacerdote eritreo don Mosé Zerai che con la sua agenzia umanitaria

      Habeshia

      raccoglie da anni gli Sos dei migranti e li trasmette alle forze dell’ordine. Un comportamento che a qualche poliziotto era sembrato ’sospetto’.
      Nell’inchiesta vennero anche adoperati infiltrati a bordo delle navi delle Ong. Agli atti ci sono anche le dichiarazioni di alcuni addetti alla sicurezza arruolati da una delle navi umanitarie. Secondo questi ultimi, pur in mancanza di concreti riscontri, doveva esservi una qualche losca intesa tra scafisti e volontari per raccogliere i migranti in mare. Qualche tempo dopo si scoprirà che, prima di venire assunti per proteggere gli equipaggi, i bodyguard avevano avuto a che fare con i movimenti identitari protagonisti della campagna internazionale scatenata contro le organizzazioni umanitarie anche a colpi di false notizie.

      A Palermo, dove erano aperti due fascicoli d’indagine, a lungo hanno investigato i magistrati della Direzione distrettuale antimafia. Non proprio dei tirocinanti. Ma anche qui non è stata rinvenuta alcuna prova di connivenze tra l’Ong Sea Watch e i trafficanti libici.
      Le inchieste, condotte dal procuratore aggiunto Marzia Sabella e dai pm Gery Ferrara e Claudio Camilleri, avevano ad oggetto un procedimento avviato a maggio del 2017 dopo lo sbarco, a Lampedusa, di 220 migranti; l’altro aperto dopo una segnalazione della Guardia di Finanza che ipotizzava delle «incongruenze» nel comportamento della Sea Watch in occasione di un soccorso portato ad aprile del 2017. Le indagini, condotte anche dagli investigatori che avevano segnalato anomalie, non hanno portato ad alcun risultato. I pubblici ministeri hanno chiesto e ottenuto dal gip l’archiviazione di entrambe le inchieste.

      L’esercito di detrattori da tastiera, da mesi fa circolare la leggenda secondo cui i magistrati che archiviano sono, nel migliore dei casi, inquirenti dal cuore tenero oppure, secondo alcune delle bufale più in voga, eterodiretti da una qualche corrente. Il caso di Palermo, però, smentisce platealmente. I pm che hanno indagato e poi chiesto l’archiviazione, sono gli stessi che hanno fatto arrestare il presunto superboss eritreo del traffico di uomini, Mered Medhanie Yedhego. Il ragazzo in carcere si professa innocente e sia le inchieste giornalistiche, come quella che da due anni conduce il Guardian, sia le analisi difensive che l’esame del Dna confermano che si tratterebbe di un clamoroso scambio di persona. Nonostante questo i magistrati inquirenti – autori dell’archiviazione per le Ong – vanno avanti. Segno che non si tratta di giudici che rispondono a inesistenti diktat umanitari.

      Le archiviazioni contrastano e mettono allo scoperto le contraddizioni dell’indagine monstre avviata a Catania dal procuratore Carmelo Zuccaro. La procura etnea, che secondo diverse fonti potrebbe chiedere a giorni l’archiviazione dell’indagine perché gli elementi raccolti non sopravviverebbero all’esame di un tribunale, ipotizzava in particolare a carico della Ong Open Arms il reato di associazione a delinquere finalizzata al favoreggiamento dell’immigrazione illegale. In mancanza di prove incontrovertibili, Zuccaro non ha mai mancato di fare conoscere la sua opinione sull’operato delle organizzazioni non governative. «Fanno parte di un sistema profondamente sbagliato – ha sostenuto –, che affida la porta d’accesso all’Europa a trafficanti che sono criminali senza scrupolo. Questo è l’aspetto sbagliato delle cose che non risponde né a senso di umanità né di solidarietà». Opinione rispettabile e che nell’attuale governo certo trova consensi. Ma giudiziariamente irrilevante.


      https://www.avvenire.it/attualita/pagine/un-anno-dopo-svanisce-il-patto-trafficantiong

    • 34’000 signatures pour que la Suisse donne son pavillon à l’Aquarius

      L’initiateur de la pétition pour que la Suisse accorde son pavillon à l’Aquarius, #Nicolas_Morel, revendique aujourd’hui 34’000 signatures. Il attend une réponse du Conseil fédéral pour fin novembre.

      Dans un entretien mardi à la RTS, ce Lausannois, qui avait à lui seul démarré le mouvement, indique que le résultat est atteint après 6 semaines de récolte.

      Il espère « une réponse du Conseil fédéral d’ici la fin du mois de novembre ». La pétition avait été déposée le 8 octobre, munie de 25’000 signatures.

      Elle faisait suite à une lettre ouverte signée par des personnalités suisses et une interpellation déposée par Ada Marra et deux autres parlementaires au Conseil fédéral il y a deux semaines.
      Une interpellation parlementaire pendante

      « Cette interpellation parlementaire a entraîné plein d’événements. Selon moi, les Suisses sont donc prêts à accorder ce pavillon », estimait en octobre la conseillère nationale vaudoise Ada Marra.

      Mais le combat politique n’est pas encore gagné, car du côté des parlementaires, la question divise. D’un côté il y a l’émotion que la situation d’urgence suscite, et de l’autre, une analyse plus froide. Certains demandent du temps pour une réflexion plus aboutie sur la question.

      D’autres vont jusqu’à dire qu’accorder le pavillon suisse à ce bateau reviendrait à encourager la migration.

      L’Aquarius, bateau de sauvetage des migrants en Méditerranée, est actuellement bloqué au port de Marseille, faute d’un pavillon lui permettant de naviguer.

      https://www.rts.ch/info/suisse/9992576-34-000-signatures-pour-que-la-suisse-donne-son-pavillon-a-l-aquarius.htm

    • Le Conseil fédéral refuse que le navire Aquarius batte pavillon suisse

      Le navire humanitaire Aquarius ne battra pas pavillon suisse. Le Conseil fédéral estime qu’une telle action compromettrait les efforts coordonnés de l’Union européenne dans la résolution de la crise migratoire en mer Méditerranée.

      Les opérations de secours en Méditerranée nécessitent une approche de l’admission des réfugiés coordonnée et fondée sur une répartition équitable, argumente le gouvernement dans sa réponse à plusieurs interpellations du PS, des Verts et du PLR, publiée lundi. Toute action isolée, comme l’attribution d’un pavillon suisse à un navire particulier, compromettrait l’action commune.
      Pas d’exception

      Le Conseil fédéral refuse ainsi d’appliquer la clause d’exception de la loi sur la navigation maritime au navire Aquarius, comme le demandaient les interpellations. Il estime par ailleurs impossible d’établir une stratégie générale pour que la flotte maritime suisse participer aux sauvetages en mer Méditerranée. La Confédération ne peut contraindre cette dernière qu’à approvisionner des pays en cas de grave pénurie.

      Affrété par SOS Méditerranée et Médecins sans frontières, le navire Aquarius a sauvé près de 30’000 migrants tentant de rejoindre l’Europe en deux ans. Il s’est vu retirer son pavillon panaméen fin septembre. Depuis, il mouille en attente dans les eaux du port de Marseille, en France. De nombreuses ONG dénoncent une action politique derrière sa mise aux arrêts.

      https://www.rts.ch/info/suisse/10040572-le-conseil-federal-refuse-que-le-navire-aquarius-batte-pavillon-suisse.

    • L’Aquarius ne battra pas pavillon suisse

      Le navire humanitaire Aquarius ne battra pas pavillon suisse. Le Conseil fédéral estime qu’une telle action compromettrait les efforts coordonnés de l’Union européenne dans la résolution de la crise migratoire en mer Méditerranée.

      Les opérations de secours en Méditerranée nécessitent une approche de l’admission des réfugiés coordonnée et fondée sur une répartition équitable, argumente le gouvernement dans sa réponse à plusieurs interpellations du PS, des Verts et du PLR, publiée lundi. Toute action isolée, comme l’attribution d’un pavillon suisse à un navire particulier, compromettrait l’action commune.

      Le Conseil fédéral refuse ainsi d’appliquer la clause d’exception de la loi sur la navigation maritime au navire Aquarius, comme le demandaient les interpellations. Il estime par ailleurs impossible d’établir une stratégie générale pour que la flotte maritime suisse participe aux sauvetages en mer Méditerranée. La Confédération ne peut contraindre cette dernière qu’à approvisionner des pays en cas de grave pénurie.

      Affreté par SOS Méditerranée et Médecins sans frontières, le navire Aquarius a sauvé près de 30’000 migrants tentant de rejoindre l’Europe en deux ans. Il s’est vu retirer son pavillon panaméen fin septembre. Depuis, il mouille en attente dans les eaux du port de Marseille, en France. De nombreuses ONG dénoncent une action politique derrière sa mise aux arrêts.

      https://www.swissinfo.ch/fre/toute-l-actu-en-bref/l-aquarius-ne-battra-pas-pavillon-suisse/44590636

  • The Struggle of Women across the Sea

    In April 2017, Sylvie and Joelle wanted to cross the sea to escape their predicament and start a new life in Europe.[1] They did not know one another until they boarded the small rubber boat in Turkey, together with twenty-two others, including two children. Sylvie was anxious and entered last, handing over her red bag to Joelle who promised to return it after their safe arrival. They departed, but at some point, somewhere in the Aegean Sea, they ran out of fuel and could not continue. Sylvie tried to call for help, but her phone was caught by a large wave. Lost at sea, Joelle, who was in the 8th month pregnant, started to cry and pray for help, but nobody came. The boat capsized, and everybody fell into the water, drifting away from each other. Sylvie and Joelle were separated but Joelle did not give up: “I had a strong feeling of power in me. I don’t even know where this came from, where we fell in the sea there was nothing, no boats, no fishermen, no police, no one.” She was able to stay together with two others, Guilaine and Teddy. They floated in the water throughout the night, trying to stay conscious and together. But at some point, a wave parted them, and Joelle was all alone. Hours later, she suddenly saw a boat approaching. She was taken aboard of the rescue vessel of the NGO Proactiva and brought to land.

    When they lost each other, Sylvie was able to stay together with three others, holding hands, talking, giving each other hope and trying to stay awake. But after a while they also lost one another, and when Sylvie was finally discovered, she could not see anymore: “The sea salt had burned my eyes. I was blind.” She was brought to Joelle and together they went to the hospital. Joelle asked: “Where are the others? Let’s hope they bring them even if they are not alive. But no one could join us. The same evening I saw an assistant and a psychologist and I asked them: ‘Where are my brothers and sisters?’” Eventually, they were informed that only the two of them had survived. Two out of a group of twenty-two. Joelle still had the red bag with her and returned it to Sylvie: “I thought maybe she has her money inside, I can’t abandon the bag.” Joelle said that without the SAR NGO, they would not have survived. She gave birth a few weeks later to a healthy girl: “She is my joy and my power, I believe I would have died if she was not in me. God really pitied me. It’s really a miracle. I call her Victoria-Miracle.”

    https://alarmphone.org/en/2018/03/22/the-struggle-of-women-across-the-sea/?post_type_release_type=post
    #femmes #traversée #Méditerranée #asile #migrations #réfugiés #viols #violences_sexuelles