• Manifeste pour la suppression générale de la police nationale
    https://lundi.am/Manifeste-pour-la-suppression-generale

    Il n’y aurait pas assez de place, dans ces lignes, pour décrire en détail le mal que la police a commis et commet encore, en France et dans le monde. Ce mal est commis selon deux axes : la répression carcérale (forme moderne et plus savante de l’esclavage colonial) et les violences ordinaires (visant à détruire l’individu et créer le citoyen). Le danger de l’existence de la police est négligé par l’ensemble des citoyens des États (hormis ceux qui en sont directement victimes). Pire, ce danger est assumé comme un mal nécessaire car on lui rattache un bien : l’exercice du maintien de l’ordre et de la force publique. La police est une subsistance des inégalités qui survivent et n’ont pu être détruites par la Révolution de 1789. Elle permet à la notion de droit de prendre une réalité, sous la menace qu’est la violence. Le policier est le rêve des États comme forme parfaite de citoyenneté et celui des citoyens comme forme parfaite de justice. La police comme institution s’impose aux démocraties et républiques imparfaites actuelles, avec la force de l’évidence, au nom même de la défense de ces mêmes régimes bienfaiteurs. La disparition de la police, en tant que telle, ne peut être donc qu’une étape obligatoire dans la progression humaine, vers un contrôle plus efficace et strict de la force dont elle dispose pour contraindre, au profit d’une minorité. C’est-à-dire, si la France accède un jour à la démocratie.

    #Police #Violence_Policière #suppression_de_la_police #AbolitionDeLaPolice

  • Réécrire l’histoire, neutraliser l’écologie politique
    https://www.terrestres.org/2020/11/02/reecrire-lhistoire-neutraliser-lecologie-politique

    Une critique d’Aurélien Berlan du livre de Pierre Charbonnier Abondance et liberté paru à La Découverte en 2019.

    Je vais analyser le livre de Charbonnier de la même manière qu’il aborde les discours qu’il a sélectionnés, comme une série « d’opérations conceptuelles » et « d’interventions théoriques » dans les « controverses » liées à l’écologie politique (p. 28-29). Ces opérations permettront de mieux identifier sa position réelle dans le débat actuel. L’auteur présente d’abord son ouvrage comme une philosophie de la liberté dans ses rapports avec l’abondance et, de manière classique dans la philosophie académique, il recourt à l’histoire des idées comme moyen pour enquêter sur cette problématique, le tout dans le but de politiser la question écologique. Je vais analyser ces trois versants du livre comme trois opérations : un brouillage des notions de liberté et d’abondance, une purge dans l’histoire des idées et une mise au rebut de l’écologie politique, afin d’en neutraliser le potentiel subversif.

    Ces trois opérations peuvent être lues comme les trois moments de ce qui constitue l’opération principale du livre, relative à l’usage du terme « autonomie ». On sait que depuis les années 1970, et malgré les tentatives du management pour la récupérer, cette notion est très valorisée dans les milieux écologistes (et au-delà) comme alternative à la pseudo liberté promise par la « société d’abondance ». Sans jamais discuter cet usage, Charbonnier emploie quant à lui la notion dans un sens large qui la remet sur les rails du grand récit de la conquête moderne de la « liberté illimitée ». C’est que cet Humpty Dumpty de l’écologisme cherche moins à préserver l’habitabilité de notre planète qu’à sauver l’idée de Progrès.

    #Pierre_Charbonnier #Aurélien_Berlan #écologie_politique #Liberté_et_autonomie #abondance

  • Il est urgent d’ouvrir le revenu minimum aux jeunes
    https://www.inegalites.fr/Il-est-urgent-d-ouvrir-le-revenu-minimum-aux-jeunes

    Ensuite, on craint que le RSA fasse des jeunes des « assistés ». Avec 500 euros par mois, ils pourraient soi-disant se passer de chercher du travail. Or différentes études ont montré que la mise en place d’un revenu minimum n’affecte pas la recherche d’emploi des jeunes [3]. Les travaux de l’économiste Esther Duflo sur la pauvreté ont établi que cette critique de l’assistanat, envers les plus pauvres en général, n’était pas fondée empiriquement. Surtout, elle explique qu’il est possible de lier plus étroitement le bénéfice d’un revenu minimum aux dispositifs d’accompagnement vers l’emploi ou la formation, comme c’est le cas dans les pays nordiques. Il existe en France une « garantie jeunes » qui permet d’accompagner les jeunes en situation de vulnérabilité dans leur insertion professionnelle, mais elle est attribuée dans des conditions draconiennes.

    Pour lutter efficacement contre la pauvreté des jeunes, il est temps de leur accorder le droit à un minimum social [4]. Cette option est largement à la portée des finances publiques de notre pays. L’Inspection générale des affaires sociales, reprenant une étude du ministère des Solidarités a, par exemple, estimé le coût de l’ouverture du RSA aux 18-25 ans (non étudiants) à un montant situé entre 1,5 et 3 milliards d’euros [5]. À titre de comparaison, le crédit d’impôt pour la compétitivité et l’emploi (CICE), dont l’effet est très réduit, a coûté 21 milliards en 2018, et le « plan jeunes » présenté le 23 juillet dernier, 6,5 milliards. C’est donc une réforme dont la mise en œuvre ne dépend en fin de compte que d’une volonté politique suffisante, et dont les effets seraient considérables en termes de réduction de la pauvreté [6].

  • En Australie, Rio Tinto pourrait détruire 124 sites aborigènes | korii.
    https://korii.slate.fr/et-caetera/australie-compagnie-miniere-rio-tinto-pourrait-detruire-124-sites-aborig

    Le 27 mai dernier, deux #grottes aborigènes vieilles de 46.000 ans avaient été réduites en poussière par l’entreprise minière Rio Tinto. Aujourd’hui, malgré la démission du patron du groupe face à l’indignation générale suscitée par ces #dynamitages, le Guardian révèle que 124 sites #aborigènes supplémentaires sont menacés par l’activité du géant minier.

    C’est le comité parlementaire fédéral enquêtant sur l’explosion des sites de la gorge de Juukan qui a eu accès à ces informations. Selon des témoignages récoltés, plusieurs « propriétaires traditionnels » appartenant au peuple #Yinhawangka de la région de Pilbara, en #Australie-Occidentale, auraient été poussé·es à signer un accord permettant à #Rio_Tinto d’exploiter leurs #terres, où se situent 124 sites aborigènes, dont une grotte aborigène vieille de 27.000 ans.

    #extraction

  • Une base de données 2.0 - #Australie - #Aborigènes - La Hutte des Classes

    http://cdarmangeat.blogspot.com/2020/09/une-base-de-donnees-20.html

    J’ai récemment apporté quelques améliorations à mon site qui se propose de recenser les conflits collectifs observés en Australie aborigène. Outre de légères modifications du texte de présentation, les événements portés sur la carte interactive sont dorénavant identifiés (avec le même matricule que celui qui les désigne dans la table). Et sur cette même carte, les méridiens et les parallèles sont à présent visibles afin de faciliter la localisation.
    Surtout, une nouvelle page a fait son apparition  : celle de la « synthesis », qui propose deux tableaux récapitulatifs : le premier comptabilise les conflits en fonction de leur forme (bataille rangée, attaque surprise, etc.) et de leur létalité. Le second propose un décompte selon les motivations alléguées de ces conflits.
    J’ajoute à cela que depuis quelques temps, le site s’est un peu fait connaître en Australie, ce qui a incité plusieurs correspondants à porter à ma connaissance de nouveaux événements que je n’avais pas repérés. Qu’ils en soient ici remerciés  !

  • Abolir les prisons, la police et le système pénal
    Entretien avec Gwenola Ricordeau

    https://lavoiedujaguar.net/Abolir-les-prisons-la-police-et-le-systeme-penal-Entretien-avec-Gwen

    https://www.bastamag.net/Abolition-prison-police-abolitionnisme-feminisme-violences-sexistes-Entret

    Basta ! : Vous êtes féministe et vous voulez abolir la prison, donc là où on enferme les agresseurs. Ces positions sont-elles difficilement conciliables ?

    Ces positions sont plus que « conciliables ». Mon travail propose une analyse féministe du système pénal et de ce que celui-ci fait aux femmes. Cela permet de faire plusieurs constats. Tout d’abord, les personnes détenues sont pour l’essentiel des hommes, mais la vie des femmes de leur entourage, mère, sœur, compagne, fille, est souvent affectée par cette incarcération, notamment à travers les diverses formes de travail domestique qui sont attendues d’elles et qui incluent le soutien moral, à travers les visites, le courrier, etc. Par ailleurs, quand on regarde qui sont les femmes qui sont en prison, on note qu’elles partagent de nombreuses caractéristiques avec les hommes détenus : elles sont en grande partie d’origine populaire et issues de l’histoire de la colonisation et des migrations. Mais les femmes détenues ont aussi des particularités. Une très grande proportion d’entre-elles ont été victimes de violences sexuelles. Ces violences ont façonné leur parcours de vie, leur isolement social ou leur parcours délictuel. Et lorsqu’on examine la protection que les femmes peuvent attendre du système pénal, on ne peut que constater un échec flagrant. (...)

    #Gwenola_Ricordeau #féminisme #violences_sexuelles #prison #justice #police #abolition #réparation

    • « L’évaluation a montré que cette loi protège bien les personnes prostituées et qu’elle est efficace si elle est portée par le Gouvernement. Si les ministères de la Justice et de l’Intérieur ainsi que le secrétariat d’État en charge des droits des femmes ne sont pas actifs, ce sont les personnes prostituées qui en font les frais. Il faut donc davantage de volontarisme politique et de moyens financiers pour garantir l’effectivité de la position abolitionniste de la France… »

      Cependant si on regroupe les clients mis en cause depuis 2017, on atteint 5000 personnes en 2020. Et l’obligation de suivre un stage pour les clients poursuivis dépend des juges.

      J’ai appris que la menace horrible qui pèse sur les prostitueurs et oblige les prostitué·es à se cacher et à se mettre en danger, ce serait un stage de sensibilisation. Horreur ! C’est Queutard qu’on assassine !

      L’accord d’admission dans le parcours de sortie permet à la personne de bénéficier, sous réserve de l’approbation du Préfet, d’une autorisation provisoire de séjour (APS) de 6 mois, renouvelable 3 fois, ainsi que d’une allocation financière d’insertion sociale (AFIS) de 330€/mois pour une personne seule (+132€/enfant), si elle n’a pas d’autre revenu. Ce parcours de sortie de prostitution PSP) ne constitue pas la seule voie de sortie de la prostitution, – l’Amicale du Nid accompagne plus de 3 000 personnes par an vers une insertion socio professionnelle – mais il représente un levier puissant pour les personnes qui sont prêtes à s’y impliquer. C’est un signal fort de reconnaissance.

      J’aurais tendance à dire qu’en effet, c’est plus de la reconnaissance qu’une aide matérielle.

      L’implication des associations abolitionnistes dans la prévention auprès des jeunes et l’éducation à la vie affective et sexuelle devrait être une priorité. Nous retenons particulièrement la lutte contre la prostitution des mineur·es contre laquelle nous sommes mobilisés depuis 2011. Elle est une priorité de notre action. Et nous insistons sur la priorité donnée à l’accès aux soins pour les personnes en situation de prostitution et de sortie de la prostitution, sur l’augmentation du montant financier de l’allocation et de la durée de l’autorisation provisoire de séjour et sur la mise à disposition d’hébergements et de logements.

      Et la pauvreté généralisée, dont sont victimes plus souvent les femmes et les enfants et ados ?

  • Stop Asking What Sexual Violence Victims Will Do without Police | Bitch Media
    https://www.bitchmedia.org/article/what-will-survivors-of-sexual-violence-do-if-we-defund-the-police

    Looking at the evidence, the answer to the question, “What will sexual assault victims do without the police?” is easily answerable: Sans police, their chances of obtaining justice would be much higher than they are right now. The criminal justice system has a long and well-documented history of failing survivors and victims of sexual violence at literally every turn; often retraumatizing them in the process. A 2019 New York Times article detailed horrific police misconduct in rape cases, with officers’ behavior ranging from shaming the victims for “flirting” and “partying,” to a blatant mishandling of evidence. There’s substantial evidence that shows several precincts across the country falsely inflating their conviction rates on rape cases. Perhaps most shocking of all is a 2018 study that found hundreds of police officers have been charged with rape and sexual assault (if not thousands—the study notes that the numbers may be much larger than what has been officially reported).

    Despite the mountain of evidence pointing toward the fact that the police exacerbate harm to women and femmes, the sexual-assault argument has a way of persisting. At first glance, it can seem like a valid concern—especially to feminists and progressives who may otherwise support abolition—but upon further investigation, it’s part of a much larger (and far more dangerous) trend. For decades, white supremacy has found shelter behind the aesthetics of feminism, and the argument that sexual violence necessitates the existence of the police is just another example of anti-Black ideology commodifying feminist language to Trojan-horse its way into progressive discourse. White feminism has bastardized the women’s rights movement to justify racist and oppressive institutions for as long as there’s been a women’s rights movement, and it’s time to call it out for what it is: racism.

    Je trouve que c’est exagérer et qu’il y a beaucoup d’ignorance et de manque d’imagination derrière cet « engouement des féministes blanches pour la police »... mais peut-être que le contexte US est si différent qu’il y a là vraiment des féministes blanches et activement racistes. En France il me semble que les féministes, même blanches, n’attendent rien de la police, sauf à être composée pour le prochain Noël d’une majorité de femmes qui ne sont pas étranglées par leurs collègues. Et encore.
    #police #abolition_de_la_police #féminisme_blanc

  • FINN MACKAY, en version française sur TRADFEM :
    "(2013) La prostitution est depuis longtemps un sujet de controverse au sein du Mouvement de libération des femmes, divisant les individues et les groupes féministes. Cela s’explique en grande partie par le fait que le débat est souvent réduit à une opposition entre ce que l’on appelle la « réduction des dommages » dans une « industrie du sexe » légale – l’argument pro-légalisation – et, d’autre part, les arguments en faveur de l’abolition de la prostitution. Celles qui tendent vers ce dernier point de vue sont souvent accusées de moralisme, de conservatisme et, pire encore, de mépris pour la sécurité des femmes. Il est donc peut-être opportun de revoir la vision féministe de la prostitution en tant que cause et conséquence de l’inégalité, et le présent billet tentera d’aborder certains des défis contemporains adressés à cette position politique. (...)"

    https://tradfem.wordpress.com/2020/07/03/argumenter-contre-lindustrie-de-la-prostitution-au-dela-de-loppos
    #PROSTITUTION #réduction des dommages #abolitionnisme #industrie du sexe

  • Thread by G_Ricordeau : Qq textes en francais sur l’ #AbolitionDeLaPolice et/ou les mouvements pour l’abolition (USA ou ailleurs) : (merci de completer :) ITV de Mag…
    https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1273631208593735685.html?refreshed=1592941280

    Qq textes en francais sur l’ #AbolitionDeLaPolice et/ou les mouvements pour l’abolition (USA ou ailleurs) : (merci de completer :)

    https://www.vice.com/fr/article/g5pvaq/un-futur-sans-police-est-il-possible

    https://rebellyon.info/A-quoi-ressemblerait-un-monde-sans-22413

    https://www.jefklak.org/tout-le-monde-peut-se-passer-de-la-police

    https://iaata.info/Coalition-pour-l-Abolition-de-la-Police-en-fRance-4312.html

    https://theconversation.com/peut-on-abolir-la-police-la-question-fait-debat-aux-etats-unis-1404

    https://acta.zone/les-violences-policieres-ne-sont-quune-partie-des-problemes-suscites-par-lexi

    https://basse-chaine.info/?Comment-empecher-les-flics-de-tuer-315

    http://blog.ecologie-politique.eu/post/Faut-il-abolir-la-police

    https://www.bastamag.net/police-violences-racisme-bavures-abolitionnistes-Black-Lives-Matter-IGPN-I

    https://www.revolutionpermanente.fr/Etats-Unis-Lutter-pour-l-abolition-de-la-police-c-est-lutter-po

    https://www.lautrequotidien.fr/new-blog/2020/6/17/oui-nous-voulons-littralement-abolir-la-police-parce-que-la-rforme-n

    https://paris-luttes.info/police-mesures-reformistes-ou-14138?lang=fr

    https://www.noprisons.ca/voices/un-futur-sans-flics

    https://lundi.am/Manifeste-pour-la-suppression-generale

  • Au journal El País : la violence a bien un sexe
    Nous, les femmes de l’Assemblée abolitionniste de Madrid, dénonçons la négation de la violence structurelle à l’égard des femmes que constitue l’article « Ni toutes les femmes ont des règles, ni toutes les personnes qui ont des règles sont des femmes », publié dans le journal El País le 20 juin. Depuis quelque temps, nous assistons à une tentative d’institutionnalisation de la novlangue machiste promu par les théories queer, qui déshumanisent les femmes en parlant de « corps menstrués » ou de « personnes enceintes ». Ces expressions objectifient les femmes dans nos fonctions de reproduction et effacent le vécu et la violence que nous subissons en raison de notre réalité biologique. « Les règles ne sont pas le patrimoine exclusif des femmes », précise l’article mentionné. Si ce ne sont pas les femmes qui ont leurs règles, alors toutes les expériences de violence découlant de ce processus biologique ne sont plus considérées comme l’expression du machisme avec lequel notre corps a été historiquement maltraité.
    En novembre 2019, El País a publié une interview de Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie dans laquelle l’écrivaine féministe raconte à la première personne l’exclusion dont souffrent des millions de filles dans différents pays lorsqu’elles commencent à avoir leurs règles et comment le tabou entourant la biologie féminine est arrivé au point d’éliminer le mot « vagin » de leur vocabulaire. Les femmes sont une classe sexuelle, et l’oppression que nous subissons dans le patriarcat est indissoluble de notre corps et de notre sexualité, tant dans ses aspects reproductifs qu’érotiques. Il n’y a pas d’essence masculine et féminine, il n’y a pas de trucs comme des cerveaux d’hommes et de femmes, c’est la socialisation différente selon le sexe qui perpétue l’inégalité. Si la catégorie sexuelle est supprimée et échangée contre le genre - définitions basées sur des stéréotypes sexistes historiquement acceptés - les femmes sont effacées et deviennent le produit de leur propre oppression. En une semaine, c’est la deuxième fois que El País publie un contenu qui promeut l’effacement des femmes. Le 17 juin dernier, elle a publié sur son réseau Twitter un post qualifiant des femmes de « personnes enceintes », post qui a été supprimé peu après. Notre législation proclame « le droit à l’égalité et à la non-discrimination sur la base du sexe » dans l’article 14 de la Constitution espagnole . La loi pour l’égalité effective entre les hommes et les femmes inclut dans sa section sur la discrimination directe fondée sur le sexe « tout traitement défavorable des femmes lié à la grossesse ou à la maternité ».
    Nous invitons toutes les personnes et tous les groupes engagés en faveur de l’égalité effective à adhérer à la présente déclaration, qui informe El País et ses rédacteurs que nous, féministes, ne permettrons pas à la presse, en tant que principaux acteurs de l’opinion publique, de diluer la violence structurelle contre les femmes dans un discours postmoderne qui ignore commodément le sexe comme racine de notre oppression." ( Asemblea abolicionista de Madrid )

    #abolitionnisme #transgenrisme #résistance féministe #ElPais #"personnes enceintes" #"hommes menstrués"

    http://abolicionmadrid.com/diario-el-pais-la-violencia-si-tiene-sexo
    ______________________________________

  • Peut-on abolir la police ? La question fait débat aux États-Unis
    https://theconversation.com/peut-on-abolir-la-police-la-question-fait-debat-aux-etats-unis-1404

    La stratégie proposée par les mouvements états-uniens pour l’abolition de la police comporte trois étapes, que résume le mot d’ordre « Disempower, disarm, disband » (affaiblir, désarmer, dissoudre).

    L’affaiblissement de la police consiste à réduire son budget, ses effectifs et son influence sociale. La diminution de ses activités passe par le renforcement des liens sociaux pour que les personnes puissent gérer collectivement l’essentiel des situations problématiques (comme les violences interpersonnelles), grâce à des pratiques comme la justice transformatrice.

    Le désarmement consiste à s’opposer à la militarisation des forces de l’ordre qui s’est accélérée ces vingt dernières années et à réduire progressivement les armes dont elles disposent – y compris celles qui sont prétendument non létales, comme les tasers. Cette étape amène naturellement à la suivante : le démantèlement pur et simple des forces de l’ordre.

    Lors des manifestations de ces dernières semaines, le slogan « Defund the police » (« Cessez de financer la police ») a prospéré et fédéré au-delà des seuls mouvements abolitionnistes. Il suggère que les budgets alloués à la police soient affectés à d’autres secteurs et à des programmes qui renforcent les liens sociaux (santé, éducation, transports, logement, etc.) et donc contribuent à réduire la criminalité.

    En effet, l’abolitionnisme reproche aux institutions pénales de renforcer et d’entretenir les oppressions de classe, de race et de genre. C’est à ce titre que les abolitionnistes ne conçoivent pas qu’on puisse lutter contre ces oppressions sans lutter contre le système pénal.

    Ce mouvement invite à repenser radicalement les modes de contrôle social. À la logique de la justice pénale, il entend substituer la justice sociale et des modes non punitifs de résolution des conflits, basés sur un idéal de participation, de réparation et d’émancipation des individus et des communautés.

    Beaucoup pensent que l’existence de la police garantit la sécurité de tout·e·s. Comme le montrent les travaux sur l’histoire de la police et du système pénal, notamment ceux de Michel Foucault, la police n’a pas été créée pour répondre au phénomène du crime, mais elle participe, avec l’« industrie de la punition », à son organisation.

    Comme le souligne Foucault, cette organisation de la délinquance par le système pénal passe notamment par la gestion différentielle des illégalismes : la désignation des crimes et de leur plus ou moins sévère répression tendent à criminaliser davantage, et plus durement, certaines catégories de personnes. L’objectif de ce système est, selon le philosophe, non pas de protéger des criminels mais de désigner l’ennemi intérieur.

    #Police #Abolition #Communs #Justice

  • What a World Without Cops Would Look Like – Mother Jones
    https://www.motherjones.com/crime-justice/2020/06/police-abolition-george-floyd

    Efforts to cut off funding for police have already taken root in Minneapolis, where the police department’s budget currently totals $193 million. (In 2017, the department received 36 percent of the city’s general fund expenditures.) Two days after Floyd’s killing, the president of the University of Minnesota declared that that the campus would no longer contract with the police department to provide security for large gatherings like football games. On Friday, a member of the Minneapolis Board of Education announced a resolution to end the school district’s contract to station 14 cops in its schools. And community groups such as the Black Visions Collective and Reclaim the Block are petitioning the city council to cut the police department’s budget by $45 million and reinvest the money in health and (non-police) safety programs.

    With other campaigns to cut police budgets underway in cities like Los Angeles and New York and calls to defund the police gathering steam on social media, I spoke with Brooklyn College sociology professor Alex Vitale, the coordinator of the Policing & Social Justice Project and author of The End of Policing, to talk about the sweeping vision of police abolition and what it means in practice.

    #abolir_la_police #police #justice #justice_réparative #USA

    • Minneapolis council member: Conversations underway to disband police
      https://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/america-in-crisis/minneapolis-council-member-conversations-underway-to-disband-polic

      "The department is ungovernable,” Fletcher said. “Chief (Medaria) Arradondo is a leader that we’ve all had very high hopes in and that I imagined could play a role in envisioning the next version of public safety. But he has clearly not been able to make the culture change happen that we were hoping for and investing in.”

      What it would take to disband the department is unclear. But what is clear is that the department is already seeing a reduced role in the protection of the city.

      On Wednesday, the Minneapolis Park Board voted to terminate its relationship with the department, and the Minneapolis Police will no longer be involved in guarding events on park property.

      Fletcher said in a Twitter post that it’s time to “declare policing as we know it a thing of the past.”

      Minneapolis City Council members look to disband the police department as schools and other city agencies cut ties with police
      https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/world/minneapolis-city-council-members-look-to-disband-the-police-department-as-schools-and-other-city-agencies-cut-ties-with-police/ar-BB152szZ
      https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/BB152eBW.img?h=630&w=1200&m=6&q=60&o=t&l=f&f=jpg

      Several members of the Minneapolis City Council are exploring ways to permanently disband the Minneapolis Police Department.
      Over the past week, several other city agencies have severed their ties to the department.
      “We can send a city response that makes situations better. We can resolve confusion over a $US20 grocery transaction without drawing a weapon, or pulling out handcuffs,” Councilmember Steve Fletcher said.

      Mais pas de grosse presse sur ça...

    • Six Ideas for a Cop-Free World - Rolling Stone
      https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/police-brutality-cop-free-world-protest-199465

      Editor’s note: This story was originally published on December 16th, 2014, following the deaths of Michael Brown and Eric Garner, black men who were killed by police. In recent days, in the wake of nationwide protests demanding justice for George Floyd, we are sharing some of our previous coverage about how to end systematic racism in America.

      After months of escalating protests and grassroots organizing in response to the police killings of Michael Brown and Eric Garner, police reformers have issued many demands. The moderates in this debate typically qualify their rhetoric with “We all know we need police, but…” It’s a familiar refrain to those of us who’ve spent years in the streets and the barrios organizing around police violence, only to be confronted by officers who snarl, “But who’ll help you if you get robbed?” We can put a man on the moon, but we’re still lacking creativity down here on Earth.

      But police are not a permanent fixture in society. While law enforcers have existed in one form or another for centuries, the modern police have their roots in the relatively recent rise of modern property relations 200 years ago, and the “disorderly conduct” of the urban poor. Like every structure we’ve known all our lives, it seems that the policing paradigm is inescapable and everlasting, and the only thing keeping us from the precipice of a dystopic Wild West scenario. It’s not.

    • I’m a Minneapolis City Council Member. We Must Disband the Police—Here’s What Could Come Next | Time
      https://time.com/5848705/disband-and-replace-minneapolis-police

      I have been surprised, then, by how difficult and controversial it has been to pass the relatively small budget changes that we have made, which have not even cut their budget but merely redirected some proposed increases to fund a new Office of Violence Prevention. Other programmatic proposals to change the way we police have been met with stiff institutional resistance.

      Minneapolis Police had an opportunity to distance themselves from Derek Chauvin, to express sympathy, to be a calming presence. Instead, they deployed tear gas and rubber bullets, effectively escalating the situation from protest to pitched conflict. By the next day, it was clear that people on Lake Street were rallying for much more than the prosecution of four officers. They were demonstrating their anger at decades of harassment and racialized violence and calling for it to end.

      We have a talented, thoughtful police chief who has attempted some important steps. He has fired officers for significant abuses only to have his decisions overturned and those officers reinstated by arbitrators. Mayor Frey has met fierce resistance from the Federation to implement even minor policy changes.

      After viewing George Floyd’s murder, watching police not only fail to apologize, but escalate the situation with aggressive tactics, and finally watching the department abandon neighborhood businesses to exclusively defend their precinct building, most of my constituents have had enough.

      Every member of the Minneapolis City Council has now expressed the need for dramatic structural change. I am one of many on the Council, including the Council President and the Chair of Public Safety, who are publicly supporting the call to disband our police department and start fresh with a community-oriented, non-violent public safety and outreach capacity. What I hear from most of my constituents is that they want to make sure we provide for public safety, and they have learned their whole lives to equate “safety” with “police,” but are now concluding that need not be the case.

      We had already pushed for pilot programs to dispatch county mental health professionals to mental health calls, and fire department EMTs to opioid overdose calls, without police officers. We have similarly experimented with unarmed, community-oriented street teams on weekend nights downtown to focus on de-escalation. We could similarly turn traffic enforcement over to cameras and, potentially, our parking enforcement staff, rather than our police department.

      By Steve Fletcher
      June 5, 2020 9:57 AM EDT
      Fletcher is a City Council Member for Ward 3 in Minneapolis, Minn.

      We can invest in cultural competency and mental health training, de-escalation and conflict resolution. We can send a city response that that is appropriate to each situation and makes it better. We can resolve confusion over a $20 grocery transaction without drawing a weapon or pulling out handcuffs.

      Mostly—and this might be the hardest part to envision and make real—we need to be more deeply engaged with each other. We need to build the relationship networks, skills, and capacity in our communities to support each other in resolving conflicts and keeping each other safe before things escalate dangerously. Our isolation from each other has required us to outsource the management of social interactions. We have to get relational.

    • Opinion | The Police Killed George Floyd. Redirect Their Funding Elsewhere. - The New York Times
      https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/30/opinion/george-floyd-police-funding.html

      The only way we’re going to stop these endless cycles of police violence is by creating alternatives to policing. Because even in a pandemic where black people have been disproportionately killed by the coronavirus, the police are still murdering us.

      On Monday, a worker at a store in Minneapolis called 911, claiming that George Floyd had used counterfeit money. The incident ended with a police officer suffocating Mr. Floyd to death, despite his and bystanders’ pleas for mercy. Protests have since erupted across the country while the police respond with military-style violence.

      As the case of George Floyd makes clear, calling 911 for even the slightest thing can be a death sentence for black people. For many marginalized communities, 911 is not a viable option because the police often make crises worse.

      More training or diversity among police officers won’t end police brutality, nor will firing and charging individual officers. Look at the Minneapolis Police Department, which is held up as a model of progressive police reform. The department offers procedural justice as well as trainings for implicit bias, mindfulness and de-escalation. It embraces community policing and officer diversity, bans “warrior style” policing, uses body cameras, implemented an early intervention system to identify problematic officers, receives training around mental health crisis intervention, and practices “reconciliation” efforts in communities of color.

      George Floyd was still murdered. The focus on training, diversity and technology like body cameras shifts focus away from the root cause of police violence and instead gives the police more power and resources. The problem is that the entire criminal justice system gives police officers the power and opportunity to systematically harass and kill with impunity.

      The solution to ending police violence and cultivating a safer country lies in reducing the power of the police and their contact with the public.

      Municipalities can begin by changing policies or statutes so police officers never respond to certain kinds of emergencies, including ones that involve substance abuse, domestic violence, homelessness or mental health. Instead, health care workers or emergency response teams would handle these incidents.

      Ideally, people would have the option to call a different number — say 727 — to access various trained response teams.

      The good news is, this is already happening. Violence interruption programs exist throughout the country and they’re often led by people from the community who have experience navigating tricky situations. Some programs, like one in Washington, D.C., do not work with the police; its staff members rely instead on personal outreach and social connections for information about violence that they work to mediate and diffuse. We should invest in these programs, which operate on shoestring budgets, so they have their own dedicated dispatch centers outside of 911.

      Dallas is pioneering a new approach where social workers are being dispatched to some 911 calls that involve mental health emergencies. The program has shown success, and many of the people receive care that they would never have gotten in jails or overcrowded hospitals.

      In California, the Bay Area Transformative Justice Collective deals with child sexual abuse without the police. The collective develops pods — groups of people including survivors, bystanders or people who have harmed in the past — that each pod-member feels they can turn to for support when needed.

      Here’s another idea: Imagine if the money used to pay the salaries of police officers who endlessly patrol public housing buildings and harass residents can be used to fund plans that residents design to keep themselves safe. The money could also pay the salaries of maintenance and custodial workers; fund community programs, employment and a universal basic income; or pay for upgrades to elevators and apartment units so residents are not stuck without gas during a pandemic, as some people in Brooklyn were.

      https://batjc.wordpress.com

      By Philip V. McHarris and Thenjiwe McHarris

      Mr. McHarris is a doctoral candidate focusing on race, housing and policing. Ms. McHarris is a strategist with the Movement for Black Lives.

    • Black Lives Matter Has Been Doing The Work To ’Defund The Police’ For Years
      https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/black-lives-matter-has-been-doing-the-work-to-defund-the-police-for-years/ar-BB156D9S
      https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/BB156BjH.img?h=630&w=1200&m=6&q=60&o=t&l=f&f=jpg&x=3157&y=7

      Los Angeles’ BLM chapter and its partners proposed an alternative “People’s Budget,” which showed how redirecting money allocated for LAPD could pay for desperately needed housing assistance, rent suspension, mental health services and support for public schools. The activists succeeded in embarrassing City Council members into delaying a vote on the budget and ultimately allowing a June 1 deadline to pass without revising the budget.

      Despite its progressive reputation, Los Angeles has lagged behind the rest of the state in criminal justice reform. L.A. County jails incarcerate more people than any other jail system in the country.Black Lives Matter activists have been at the forefront of efforts to change that.

      Although Black Lives Matter does not endorse candidates, it has led the effort to oust Lacey, who has opposed almost every criminal justice reform measure that has come up during her eight years in office. Lacey, the county’s first Black district attorney, ran for reelection in 2016 unopposed but is facing a progressive challenger in November after failing to secure more than 50% of the vote in the primary.

      Thanks to BLM organizing, L.A. residents will also have the chance to vote on Measure R, a civilian-driven ballot initiative that aims to reduce the county’s jail population by getting prisoners with mental health conditions out of jail and into treatment. Organizers collected 250,000 signatures to get Measure R on the ballot.

    • What does ’defund the police’ mean? The rallying cry sweeping the US – explained | US news | The Guardian
      https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/05/defunding-the-police-us-what-does-it-mean?ref=hvper.com
      https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/8fd0ed9636b86ed15b807511f42695dda676873d/0_135_3219_1931/master/3219.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

      For years, community groups have advocated for defunding law enforcement – taking money away from police and prisons – and reinvesting those funds in services. The basic principle is that government budgets and “public safety” spending should prioritize housing, employment, community health, education and other vital programs, instead of police officers. Advocates argue that defunding is the best way forward since attempts to reform police practices over the last five years have failed, as evidenced by the brutal killing of George Floyd. Groups have a range of demands, with some seeking modest reductions and others viewing full defunding as a step toward abolishing contemporary police services.
      How much does America currently spend on police?

      In the past four decades, the cost of policing in the US has tripled and is now $115bn, according to a recent analysis. That steady increase comes as crime has been consistently declining. In most cities, spending on police is significantly greater than spending on services and other departments ($1.8bn on police in Los Angeles, for example, which is more than half the city’s general fund). The Covid-19 economic crisis has led cities and states to make drastic budget cuts to education, youth programs, arts and culture, parks, libraries, housing services and more. But police budgets have grown or gone largely untouched – until pressure from protests this week.

    • Abolishing Prisons Is within Our Grasp | Bitch Media
      https://www.bitchmedia.org/article/prison-abolition-should-be-the-american-dream

      The United States incarcerates more people than any other country, with 2.2 million adults in prisons or jails at the end of 2016. Nearly 60,000 children under the age of 18 are also incarcerated in juvenile jails or prisons, and about 10,000 more children are held in adult jails or prisons. Citizens pay the high price for this system because our tax dollars are funneled into policing and incarcerating the people in these systems—predominantly Black and Brown people. This is by design. Slavery legally ended in 1865 with the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment, but the language of this amendment still allowed slavery as punishment for a crime. The carceral system revived slave labor, allowing the United States to continue disenfranchising and enslaving incarcerated Black people. Now almost every aspect of Black and Brown people’s lives is affected by the carceral state—from extra surveillance and imprisonment to disenfranchisement upon release. The entire system is built to maintain white supremacy, which remains the status quo in the United States.

      “It might be challenging to envision a world without policing or imprisonment because we’re constantly being told that these systems are natural [they’re not] and have always existed [they haven’t],” says Mohamed Shehk, the national media and communications director of Critical Resistance. Though some Americans have difficulties imagining a world without police or prisons, communities who don’t rely on the PIC do exist. Shehk says the Palestinian village where his mother grew up doesn’t have a police force. Problems there are resolved by “bringing in the elders of the community to come up with a resolution.” In 2011, the indigenous Purépecha town of Cherán banned political parties, gangs, and police. Since then, they boast the lowest murder rate in the entire Michoacán region, which is historically one of the most violent regions in Mexico. What’s more, since Cherán abolished the corrupt police force, they haven’t had a single kidnapping.

      “Policing exists to manage the consequences of inequality in ways that benefit those people who are creating the inequality,” says Alex S. Vitale, a sociology professor at Brooklyn College and author of the 2017 book The End of Policing. “The decision to use police to manage the problems of the poor is inherently unjust in most circumstances and actually racist because this burden so falls most heavily on communities of color.” Many wealthy white communities have already abolished police forces because they don’t want the criminal justice system solving their intercommunal problems. Why is this option not available to all of us?

      Abolitionists are often asked to explain what will happen to people who commit murder or rape if police and prisons are abolished. Shehk responds with a similar question: “What are we doing now with people who commit those harms?” Some of the high-profile assault stories that surfaced during the #MeToo movement, including Chanel Miller’s rape at the hands of Brock Turner and Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony of her assault by Brett Kavanaugh, revealed that survivors of sexual harassment and assault aren’t being protected by this system. Instead, the criminal justice system protects and maintains agents of the patriarchy, including students like Turner, police officers, lawyers, Supreme Court justices, and presidents.

      Since the United States locks people up at a higher rate than any other country, you’d assume this “would be the safest place, virtually free of harm or violence,” Shehk says, but that’s obviously not the case. The president of the United States and two Supreme Court justices have been accused of sexual harassment or sexual assault on multiple occasions. Less than 1 percent of rapes result in the incarceration of the perpetrator, while at least 89 percent of survivors face emotional and physical consequences. Often the rapes reported to police aren’t even investigated, considering the 200,000 rape kits the federal government estimates are sitting—submitted, yet unopened—in police storage. That’s not justice.

      ActivismMagazinePoliticsprisonThe Fantasy Issue
      Beyond BarsPrison Abolition Should Be the American Dream
      by Reina Sultan |

      artwork by Matice Moore and Dawud Lee
      Published on June 4, 2020

      I do not have all the answers, left. I try to have conversations about every subject we must deal with in our communities, center. Someone you love needs your support, but you cannot be there, no matter how much they need you, right. (Artwork by Matice Moore and Dawud Lee for the LifeLines Project)
      This article was published in Fantasy Issue #87 | Summer 2020 Subscribe »

      In her 2003 book, Are Prisons Obsolete?, scholar and activist Angela Y. Davis wrote, “Prison abolitionists are dismissed as utopians and idealists whose ideas are at best unrealistic and impracticable, and, at worst, mystifying and foolish.” Those who oppose prison-industrial complex (PIC) abolition partially see it as a fantasy that can’t be realized. “This is a measure of how difficult it is to envision a social order that does not rely on the threat of sequestering people in dreadful places designed to separate them from their communities and families. The prison is considered so ‘natural’ that it is extremely hard to imagine life without it,” Davis writes.

      But activists and organizations have been imagining life without prisons for decades. The Prison Research/Education/Action Project’s 1976 pamphlet “Instead of Prisons: A Handbook for Abolitionists” laid out the pillars of abolition: “moratorium,” “decarceration,” and “excarceration.” “Moratorium” calls for an end to the building of prisons, jails, and detention centers; “decarceration” works to have nonviolent offenders released from prison; and “excarceration” involves diverting people away from interacting with law enforcement through decriminalization. In 1997, Davis and City University of New York professor Ruth Wilson Gilmore cofounded Critical Resistance, an international organization that aims to dismantle the pic by using these three pillars. A year later, 3,500 people convened for a three-day Critical Resistance conference to discuss the limitations of the PIC in the United States.

      Other organizations with similar goals have also been erected: Decrim NY wants to decriminalize sex work in New York City and in the state and decarcerate sex workers. The Black Youth Project 100 uses a Black, queer, and feminist lens to work toward the liberation of all Black people, including those who are currently incarcerated. No New Jails NYC calls for an end to the building and funding of new prisons and jails in New York City. All of these organizations are working toward a common goal: ending the pic.
      Justice Is Not Served

      The United States incarcerates more people than any other country, with 2.2 million adults in prisons or jails at the end of 2016. Nearly 60,000 children under the age of 18 are also incarcerated in juvenile jails or prisons, and about 10,000 more children are held in adult jails or prisons. Citizens pay the high price for this system because our tax dollars are funneled into policing and incarcerating the people in these systems—predominantly Black and Brown people. This is by design. Slavery legally ended in 1865 with the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment, but the language of this amendment still allowed slavery as punishment for a crime. The carceral system revived slave labor, allowing the United States to continue disenfranchising and enslaving incarcerated Black people. Now almost every aspect of Black and Brown people’s lives is affected by the carceral state—from extra surveillance and imprisonment to disenfranchisement upon release. The entire system is built to maintain white supremacy, which remains the status quo in the United States.

      “It might be challenging to envision a world without policing or imprisonment because we’re constantly being told that these systems are natural [they’re not] and have always existed [they haven’t],” says Mohamed Shehk, the national media and communications director of Critical Resistance. Though some Americans have difficulties imagining a world without police or prisons, communities who don’t rely on the PIC do exist. Shehk says the Palestinian village where his mother grew up doesn’t have a police force. Problems there are resolved by “bringing in the elders of the community to come up with a resolution.” In 2011, the indigenous Purépecha town of Cherán banned political parties, gangs, and police. Since then, they boast the lowest murder rate in the entire Michoacán region, which is historically one of the most violent regions in Mexico. What’s more, since Cherán abolished the corrupt police force, they haven’t had a single kidnapping.
      Doctor Climax

      From Our Sponsors

      Some communities within the United States are also accustomed to policing themselves. Shehk says it’s “important to remember that many communities don’t call the cops because of rightful mistrust.” He also points out that “you can also visit Beverly Hills or the Golden Triangle or the other elite, wealthy, white neighborhoods of this country to see what a community without police or prisons looks like.” When a student at an elite private school in Orange County, California, is found with weed in their backpack, teachers don’t call the police—and there isn’t an active police presence within the school itself. Instead, teachers call the student’s parents, believing it’s an issue that can be solved within the family. Black and Brown students, on the other hand, are funneled from school into the criminal justice system in what is commonly known as the school-to-prison pipeline. These students are increasingly accused of crimes, suspended, or reported to the police compared to their white counterparts, which often creates a lasting connection with the carceral state.

      Reducing interaction with law enforcement would allow students the space to make mistakes and learn from them, and would encourage teachers to build better relationships with parents. It also moves resources away from metal detectors, surveillance equipment, and onsite police and toward quality educators, better school supplies, and extracurricular activities. “Policing exists to manage the consequences of inequality in ways that benefit those people who are creating the inequality,” says Alex S. Vitale, a sociology professor at Brooklyn College and author of the 2017 book The End of Policing. “The decision to use police to manage the problems of the poor is inherently unjust in most circumstances and actually racist because this burden so falls most heavily on communities of color.” Many wealthy white communities have already abolished police forces because they don’t want the criminal justice system solving their intercommunal problems. Why is this option not available to all of us?
      What Does Abolition Look Like?

      Abolitionists are often asked to explain what will happen to people who commit murder or rape if police and prisons are abolished. Shehk responds with a similar question: “What are we doing now with people who commit those harms?” Some of the high-profile assault stories that surfaced during the #MeToo movement, including Chanel Miller’s rape at the hands of Brock Turner and Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony of her assault by Brett Kavanaugh, revealed that survivors of sexual harassment and assault aren’t being protected by this system. Instead, the criminal justice system protects and maintains agents of the patriarchy, including students like Turner, police officers, lawyers, Supreme Court justices, and presidents.

      Since the United States locks people up at a higher rate than any other country, you’d assume this “would be the safest place, virtually free of harm or violence,” Shehk says, but that’s obviously not the case. The president of the United States and two Supreme Court justices have been accused of sexual harassment or sexual assault on multiple occasions. Less than 1 percent of rapes result in the incarceration of the perpetrator, while at least 89 percent of survivors face emotional and physical consequences. Often the rapes reported to police aren’t even investigated, considering the 200,000 rape kits the federal government estimates are sitting—submitted, yet unopened—in police storage. That’s not justice.

      Get Bitch Media’s top 9 reads of the week delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning! Sign up for the Weekly Reader:
      Email *

      Murder clearance rates aren’t much better, with police reportedly solving only about 60 percent of murders. When the victim is Black—as the majority of homicide victims are—the clearance rate declines to the lowest of any other racial group. In communities that are particularly disenfranchised, those rates can be in the single digits. These figures don’t instill much faith in law enforcement’s efficacy.

      As Vitale puts it, “serial killers don’t just fall out of the sky.” According to him, treating criminalization as the only option for deterrence is one of the reasons nothing is done to help children or teenagers who, despite the threat of prison, still exhibit violent tendencies. That violence might be prevented through robust social services, mental healthcare, and support systems. Shehk also lists “restorative and transformative justice practices, healing circles, or community accountability models” as examples of nonpunitive ways of addressing harm. “Rather than trying to cage away the problem, one key part of these models is an attempt to address the root cause of the harm and to change the conditions in which it occurred so that it doesn’t happen again,” he says. “Many of these are informed by Indigenous practices, and all of them seek to uplift the humanity of the parties involved.”

      Mass incarceration costs $182 billion a year, when considering policing, court costs, and the operating costs of prisons and jails—and it doesn’t even effectively deter crime, achieve justice for victims, or rehabilitate perpetrators. Rather than funneling money into the PIC, the United States could fund an education system that invests in mental-health services instead of policing and surveillance. We could use those billions of dollars to finance living accommodations for houseless people and provide them with mental healthcare and drug rehabilitation as needed. This money could be used to train crisis intervention teams or violence interrupters to deal with escalated situations.

      The possibilities are endless, if we allow ourselves to dream bigger than criminalization and bondage. “Being an abolitionist is the most realistic position because it is based in statistics and logic along with empathy and respect for human dignity,” says Agbebiyi. To Daoud, “over-policing creates a system of engineered conflict and perpetuates harm. As such, she—and others at BBO—believes that abolishing prisons must be coupled with radically caring for your community in many forms, including cop-watching and bystander intervention. The dream of abolition is being realized every day by people working for a more equitable world. “If you’re doing work to advocate for a living wage, that’s abolitionist work. If you’re doing work to advocate against environmental racism, that’s abolitionist work. If you’re working to make sure folks have access to affordable healthcare, that’s abolitionist work,” Agbebiyi says. Moving abolition from a fantasy to a reality is going to happen incrementally, but we can certainly make it happen. Vitale confirms this, saying, “Abolition is embedded in tons of movements all over the country and it’s happening right now.”

      by Reina Sultan
      #abolitionnisme_carcéral #prison

    • Majority of the Minneapolis City Council pledges to dismantle the Police Department.
      https://seenthis.net/messages/859237

      Nine members — a veto-proof majority — of the Minneapolis City Council pledged on Sunday to dismantle the city’s Police Department, promising to create a new system of public safety in a city where law enforcement has long been accused of racism.

      Saying that the city’s current policing system could not be reformed, the council members stood before hundreds of people gathered late in the day on a grassy hill, and signed a pledge to begin the process of taking apart the Police Department as it now exists.

    • Mpls. Council majority backs dismantling police department - StarTribune.com
      https://www.startribune.com/mpls-council-majority-backs-dismantling-police-department/571088302


      Alondra Cano was one of nine Minneapolis Council members who spoke out in support of advocacy group Black Visions, which is calling for the end of the Minneapolis Police Department.
      JERRY HOLT – STAR TRIBUNE

      In their boldest statement since George Floyd’s killing, nine Minneapolis City Council members told a crowd Sunday that they will “begin the process of ending the Minneapolis Police Department.

      We recognize that we don’t have all the answers about what a police-free future looks like, but our community does,” they said, reading off a prepared statement. “We’re committed to engaging with every willing community member in the City of Minneapolis over the next year to identify what safety looks like for you.

      Their words — delivered one day after Mayor Jacob Frey told a crowd of protesters he does not support the full abolishment of the MPD — set off what is likely to be a long, complicated debate about the future of the state’s largest police force.

      With the world watching, and the city’s leaders up for re-election next year, the stakes are particularly high. While Minneapolis has debated the issue in the past, Floyd’s death at the hands of Minneapolis police has added a sense of urgency, and the calls for police departments to be disbanded have echoed in other cities around the country.

      Council members have noted repeatedly since Floyd’s death that Minneapolis has the chance to redefine policing. On a sunny Sunday afternoon, nine of them walked onto a stage at Powderhorn Park to support members of advocacy group Black Visions, who were calling for the end of the MPD. On stage were Council President Lisa Bender, Vice President Andrea Jenkins and Council Members Alondra Cano, Phillippe Cunningham, Jeremiah Ellison, Steve Fletcher, Cam Gordon, Andrew Johnson and Jeremy Schroeder.

      Decades of police reform efforts have proved that the Minneapolis Police Department cannot be reformed and will never be accountable for its actions,” they said. “We are here today to begin the process of ending the Minneapolis Police Department and creating a new, transformative model for cultivating safety in Minneapolis.

      #démantèlement de la #police_municipale


      Gallery: A new sculpture was erected on Chicago Avenue S. just north of E. 38th Street, the site where George Floyd was was asphyxiated in Minneapolis police custody
      JEFF WHEELER – STAR TRIBUNE.


      Visitors to the intersection where George Floyd was killed in Minneapolis were continuously leaving fresh flowers on the names of other victims of police violence on Sunday, June 7.
      JEFF WHEELER – STAR TRIBUNE_

    • The End of Policing: Alex Vitale on How Cops & Their Unions Cover Up Inequality, Exploitation | Democracy Now!
      https://www.democracynow.org/2020/6/8/alex_vitale_end_of_policing#transcript

      Professor Alex Vitale argues the answer to police violence is not “reform.” It’s defunding. The author of “The End of Policing” says the movement to defund the police is part of “a long story about the use of police and prisons to manage problems of inequality and exploitation.” He asks, “Why are we using police to paper over problems of economic exploitation?” He also discusses the role of police unions. “They become, in many cities, the locus, the institutional hub, for a whole set of right-wing ’thin blue line’ politics that believe that policing is not only effective but it’s the most desirable way to solve our problems. And embedded in this is a deep racism that says that certain populations can only be managed through constant threats of coercion.”

    • Minneapolis City Council Vows to Dismantle Police Dept. After Mass Protests & Grassroots Organizing | Democracy Now!
      https://www.democracynow.org/2020/6/8/minneapolis_police_abolition#transcript

      The City Council of Minneapolis announced Saturday it would disband and abolish the police department responsible for the killing of African American man George Floyd, following nearly two weeks of mass protest and growing calls to defund the police.

      In a statement, nine of the city’s 12 councilmembers said, quote, “Decades of police reform efforts have proved that the Minneapolis Police Department cannot be reformed, and will never be accountable for its action. … We recognize that we don’t have all the answers about what a police-free future looks like, but our community does,” they said.

      The historic announcement comes after years of organizing on the ground by groups like Reclaim the Block, Black Visions Collective and MPD150.

  • ’Deaths in our backyard’: 432 Indigenous Australians have died in custody since 1991 | Australia news | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/jun/01/deaths-in-our-backyard-432-indigenous-australians-have-died-in-custody-
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/e89a63242b3edbf0c4641e6f367ca92e02cbcf36/0_0_5184_3112/master/5184.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    In 2018, Guardian Australia analysed all Aboriginal deaths in custody reported via coronial findings, official statements and other means since 2008. We updated that analysis in 2019, and found that government failures to follow their own procedures and provide appropriate medical care to Indigenous people in custody were major causes of the rising rates of Indigenous people dying in jail.
    Family of David Dungay, who died in custody, express solidarity with family of George Floyd
    Read more

    The proportion of Indigenous deaths where medical care was required but not given increased from 35.4% to 38.6%.

    The proportion of Indigenous deaths where not all procedures were followed in the events leading up to the death increased from 38.8% to 41.2%.

    The proportion of Indigenous deaths involving mental health or cognitive impairment increased from 40.7% to 42.8%.

    The proportion of deaths attributed to a medical episode following restraint increased from 4.9% of all deaths in the 2018 analysis to 6.5% with new data in 2019.

    Indigenous women were still less likely to have received all appropriate medical care prior to their death, and authorities were less likely to have followed all their own procedures in cases where an Indigenous woman died in custody.

    #Australie #peuples_autochtones #violences_policières #Aborigènes

  • Les Amis de la Terre et 3 associations attaquent en justice un décret permettant aux préfets de déroger aux normes environnementales | Les Amis de la Terre
    https://www.amisdelaterre.org/communique-presse/les-amis-de-la-terre-et-3-associations-attaquent-en-justice-un-decret

    Cette procédure de passe-droit est particulièrement dangereuse sur certains territoires déjà soumis à une forte pression de la part des industriels. En Guyane, les militants anti-mine du collectif Or de question et de l’association Maiouri Nature Guyane s’inquiètent fortement de cette tendance alors que les compagnies minières mettent toujours plus de pression sur l’administration pour obtenir de nouveaux permis.

    Guyane : Monsieur Macron, la république à mauvaise mine
    https://www.liberation.fr/auteur/20890-le-collectif-or-de-question
    source : https://alternatives-projetsminiers.org


    http://ordequestion.org/index.php
    #extractivisme #Guyane #mine_d'or #montagne_d'or

    • Australie : Rio Tinto reconnaît avoir détruit des grottes aborigènes préhistoriques
      https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1706639/australie-rio-tinto-destruction-grottes-prehistoriques

      Le géant minier anglo-australien Rio Tinto a reconnu avoir infligé un dommage irréversible à des grottes préhistoriques qui furent habitées par des aborigènes il y a plus de 46 000 ans, lors de travaux à l’explosif pour agrandir une mine de fer, dans la région reculée de Pilbara.

      Des représentants de la communauté ont affirmé que la grotte de Juukan Gorge en Australie occidentale – un des plus anciens sites connus occupés par les Aborigènes en Australie – avait été détruite. Ils ont qualifié cet acte de « dévastateur » pour la communauté.
      Dynamitage

      Des explosifs ont été utilisés près du site dimanche, en accord avec les autorisations délivrées par le gouvernement de l’État il y a sept ans, a déclaré Rio Tinto dans un communiqué.

      « En 2013, une approbation officielle avait été accordée à Rio Tinto pour lui permettre de mener des activités à la mine Brockman 4 qui auraient un impact sur les grottes de Juukan 1 et Juukan 2 », a déclaré le porte-parole.

      « Rio Tinto a travaillé de manière constructive avec le peuple du PKKP [Puutu Kunti Kurrama and Pinikura People, NDLR] sur une série de questions liées au patrimoine dans le cadre de l’accord et a, lorsque cela était possible, modifié ses activités pour éviter les atteintes au patrimoine et protéger les lieux ayant une importance culturelle pour le groupe. »

      Un an seulement après l’approbation du dynamitage, des fouilles archéologiques dans l’un des abris avaient mis au jour le plus ancien exemple connu d’outils en os en Australie – un os de kangourou affûté datant de 28 000 ans – et une tresse de cheveux vieille de 4000 ans qui aurait été portée comme ceinture.

      Des tests ADN des cheveux avaient montré un lien génétique avec les ancêtres des indigènes qui vivent encore dans la région. Les fouilles de 2014 ont également permis de trouver l’un des plus anciens exemples de pierre à broyer jamais découverts en Australie.

      « Les sites aborigènes connus en Australie qui sont aussi anciens que celui-ci se comptent sur les doigts de la main », a dit le président du Comité foncier Puutu Kunti Kurrama, John Ashburton, décrivant le site comme l’un des plus anciens sites occupés à l’échelle de tout le territoire.

      #aborigènes #Rio_Tinto

  • Juste Avant

    Dans « Juste Avant », un documentaire en 7 épisodes, sortie le 1er décembre 2019, Ovidie questionne la façon dont on éduque une adolescente quand on est mère et féministe, à travers une série de conversations avec sa fille de 14 ans. Les échanges mère-fille s’entrecroisent avec les témoignages des proches et les réflexions sur sa propre construction.

    Juste Avant (7/7) - Epilogue

    Juste Avant (6/7) - Sois belle et bats-toi !

    Juste Avant (5/7) - Toi, moi, et notre petit matriarcat

    Juste Avant (4/7) - Le temps de la capote à 1 franc

    Juste Avant (3/7) - « Tu sais ce que c’est le consentement ? »

    Juste Avant (2/7) - La maman ou la putain

    Juste Avant (1/7) - Moi à ton âge

    http://www.nouvellesecoutes.fr/podcasts/intime-politique

    #maculinity #paternalistic #nightmare #digital_penetration #consent #college #high_school #social_network #Instagram #Snapchat #pressure #toxic_relationship #rape #post_MeToo #safe_place #sexuality #equality #contraception #STI #AIDS #HIV #school #abortion #condom #morning-after_pill #practical_knowledge #theoretical_knowledge #political_reflexion #distance #third_party #vaccination #pregnant #youth #traumatism #mariage #couple #tradition #divorce #matriarchy #co_parent #food #internet #beauty #weight_watchers #epilation #awareness #body

  • L’État masqué

    Miquel Amorós

    https://lavoiedujaguar.net/L-Etat-masque

    La crise actuelle a engendré plusieurs tours de vis dans le contrôle social étatique. L’essentiel dans ce domaine était déjà bien en place puisque les conditions économiques et sociales qui prévalent aujourd’hui l’exigeaient. La crise n’a fait qu’accélérer le processus. Nous participons contraints et forcés en tant que masse de manœuvre à un essai général de défense de l’ordre face à une menace globale. Le Covid-19 a servi de prétexte au réarmement de la domination, mais une catastrophe nucléaire, une impasse climatique, un mouvement migratoire imparable, une révolte persistante ou une bulle financière incontrôlable auraient tout aussi bien fait l’affaire.

    Mais la cause la plus importante et vraisemblable est la tendance mondiale à la concentration du capital, ce que les dirigeants appellent indistinctement mondialisation ou progrès. Cette tendance est corrélée avec le processus de concentration du pouvoir, renforçant ainsi les appareils étatiques de maintien de l’ordre, de désinformation et de répression. Si le capital est la substance d’un tel œuf, l’État est sa coquille. Une crise qui met en danger l’économie mondialisée, une crise systémique, comme on dit maintenant, provoque une réaction défensive presque automatique, et réactive des mécanismes disciplinaires et punitifs déjà existants. (...)

    #crise #Covid-19 #État #économie #capitalisme #concentration #normalité #obéissance #soumission #pandémie #aboutissement #Chine

  • #Coronavirus : manquant de bras, l’Italie va régulariser 200.000 sans-papiers

    Des secteurs essentiels comme celui de l’#agriculture souffrent du manque de #main-d'oeuvre qui menace les #récoltes. Un #décret va permettre la régularisation d’environ 200.000 clandestins qui pourront obtenir un contrat dans des #entreprises_agricoles. Cela déclenche des attaques de la Ligue de Matteo Salvini.
    L’agriculture italienne manque de bras. Environ 300.000 travailleurs saisonniers, essentiellement en provenance de l’Est de l’Europe, qui sont restés bloqués chez eux à cause du coronavirus. Confagricoltura et Coldiretti, les principaux représentants du secteur agricole transalpin, demandent la régularisation d’une partie des 600.000 sans-papiers présents en Italie. Beaucoup travaillent déjà de manière illégale dans les champs. La proposition est soutenue par les ministres de l’Intérieur, du Mezzogiorno, du Travail et de l’Agriculture. Un décret sera prochainement adopté pour régulariser environ 200.000 clandestins qui auront la possibilité d’obtenir un contrat de travail dans la filière agricole. Cela représenterait la plus importante régularisation depuis plus d’une décennie en Italie.
    La survie du secteur agricole est en jeu

    La ministre de l’Agriculture Teresa Bellanova la réclamait depuis le mois de janvier, avant l’épidémie de coronavirus qui a provoqué dans certaines régions une baisse de 50 % des récoltes. L’Italie, deuxième producteur de fruits et légumes en Europe avec un chiffre d’affaires de 13 milliards d’euros, ne peut se le permettre. Selon la Coldiretti, 40 % des produits de la terre pourraient ne pas être récoltés cette année. La prolongation des permis de séjour et l’instauration prochaine de « couloirs verts » pour faire venir de Roumanie près de 110.000 travailleurs saisonniers et leur garantir un contrat jusqu’au mois de décembre sont des mesures nécessaires mais insuffisantes.

    « Il y va de , insiste la ministre qui rappelle que l’urgence, déterminée par l’absence de main-d’oeuvre, met en danger les produits, le travail, les investissements, la nourriture. La régularisation des sans-papiers est une question économique mais aussi sociale et humanitaire. Dans le sud, ils vivent dans des bidonvilles et sont exposés à la faim, aux risques sanitaires et à . »

    Polémique sur les clandestins

    La Ligue de Matteo Salvini s’insurge et dénonce « un nouvel appel d’air pour une invasion de migrants avec un retour des débarquements sur les côtes italiennes ». Les chiffres du ministre de l’Intérieur offrent un démenti avec 2.800 arrivées au cours du premier trimestre 2020 et des frontières qui restent fermées. L’économiste et ancien président de la Sécurité sociale italienne Tito Boeri propose quant à lui d’aller plus loin en régularisant la totalité des clandestins. La moitié est constituée de femmes d’Europe de l’Est et d’Amérique du Sud travaillant comme aides aux personnes âgées mais aussi de nombreux ouvriers des travaux publics. Autant de secteurs indispensables pour surmonter la crise et envisager la relance de l’économie.

    https://twitter.com/LesEchos/status/1252181051889332231

    #régularisation #sans-papiers #Italie #travailleurs_étrangers #travail

    Ajouté à la métaliste agriculture / coronavirus :
    https://seenthis.net/messages/836693

    ping @karine4 @isskein

    • L’appello di economisti, giuristi e virologi : « Regolarizzare gli immigrati in tutti i settori economici »

      La proposta di una sanatoria per dare un permesso di soggiono agli invisibili, potenziale bacino di manovalanza per la criminalità organizzata.

      Un appello con 360 firmatari - tra economisti, immunologi, virologi, giuristi ed esperti di immigrazione - per sollecitare la regolarizzazione degli immigrati irregolari non solo in agricoltura ma anche in tutti gli altri settori economici del Paese. Gli «invisibili», infatti, rischiano di essere uno dei maggiori fattori di rischio nella nascita di nuovi focolai dell’epidemia di coronavirus. Inoltre rappresentano un potenziale bacino di manovalanza per la criminalità. La via legislativa potrebbe essere quella di una sanatoria tramite dichiarazione di un datore di lavoro, che consente di ottenere un permesso di soggiorno e lavoro temporaneo che, finita la fase di emergenza, sarà sottoposto all’iter previsto per questi tipi di permesso.

      «Sta circolando in questi giorni nelle commissioni parlamentari la bozza di un disegno di legge per la regolarizzazione degli immigrati irregolari in agricoltura - si legge nel documento - In questo nostro appello vogliamo sottolineare l’opportunità di estendere la proposta agli irregolari che lavorano in tutti gli altri settori economici del Paese (e, in primis, in quelli cruciali dei servizi alla persona, dell’artigianato, dell’industria e dei servizi ad essa collegati). Non soffermandoci sulle evidenti motivazioni umanitarie ma su quelle di carattere sanitario, di sicurezza, economico e sociale».

      I firmatari espongono poi le motivazioni e i contenuti della proposta.
      Motivazioni
      "I costi psicologici, sociali ed economici della paralisi della vita sociale ed economica a cui siamo stati costretti per combattere il coronavirus sono drammatici e sotto gli occhi di tutti. E’ urgente passare il prima possibile alla fase 2 ma dopo 6 settimane di distanziamento sociale il declino dei nuovi positivi, e soprattutto dei decessi, appare ancora troppo lento, soprattutto nella regione Lombardia, che è il cuore produttivo del paese e anche, di gran lunga, la regione più colpita con più del 50 percento dei decessi.

      E’ stato sottolineato di recente come la presenza di centinaia di migliaia di migranti irregolari e «invisibili» possa essere un problema serio in questo frangente. Secondo le stime più recenti (ISPI, 2020) i migranti irregolari sono circa 600mila vivono in genere occupando in molti piccole abitazioni e, anche in caso di malattia, ritardano il contatto coi medici a meno di versare in condizioni veramente gravi. Un’indagine ISFOL (2014) sottolinea come gran parte di essi lavora fuori dal settore agricolo (13.6% sono artigiani, operai specializzati o agricoltori e 72,6% svolgono professioni non qualificate che includono badanti, colf e piccolo commercio in grandi centri urbani). Non si hanno stime della loro distribuzione regionale ma è del tutto presumibile che siano concentrati in misura maggiore nelle regioni a maggiore attività economica del paese che sono anche le più colpite (in Lombardia, applicando le percentuali di migranti regolari gli irregolari sarebbero almeno 100mila). E’ del tutto evidente dunque che la presenza di un gran numero di irregolari nelle aree oggi più a rischio rende di fatto altamente aleatorie le probabilità di successo di attività di somministrazione di test sanitari, tracciamento e monitoraggio di massa necessarie per assicurare il successo della fase due. In parallelo, con la graduale riapertura delle attività economiche gli irregolari rischiano di essere uno dei maggiori fattori di rischio nella nascita di nuovi focolai".

      "Oltre a queste dirimenti motivazioni di carattere sanitario - continua il testo - è ben noto che gli irregolari costituiscono un potenziale bacino di manovalanza per la criminalità con rischi che aumentano quando, in momenti come questi, condizioni di vita decente sono ulteriormente precluse. Da un punto di vista economico è stato sottolineato più volte come lavoratori immigrati irregolari e poco qualificati sottrarrebbero opportunità occupazionali a lavoratori italiani e determinerebbero una concorrenza al ribasso sul costo del lavoro che finisce per peggiorare dignità del lavoro e condizioni di vita anche dei lavoratori italiani a bassa qualifica. L’improvvisa scarsità di stagionali stranieri a seguito della chiusura delle frontiere per la pandemia ha evidenziato come i mercati del lavoro non siano in realtà così flessibili da ipotizzare una facile sostituzione tra lavoratori italiani e stranieri, lontani per mansioni e localizzazione. La regolarizzazione dei lavoratori stranieri avrebbe in questo caso un potenziale doppio beneficio. Rendere più facile lo spostamento tra diverse aree di chi già si trova nel nostro paese e, attraverso la sanatoria e la regolarizzazione, ridurre quelle condizioni di scarsa dignità e precarietà che rendono purtroppo il lavoro degli immigrati irregolari più «competitivo» rispetto a quello di lavoratori italiani che non accettano quelle condizioni.

      In linea di principio, come sostenuto da forze politiche del nostro Paese, gli irregolari potrebbero essere espulsi. I dati recenti insegnano però che, neanche nella stagione politica nella quale il ministro dell’interno ha sostenuto con forza questa strategia, i «risultati» delle politiche di rimpatrio sono stati significativi. L’espulsione di massa degli irregolari si è dimostrata non praticabile per diversi motivi (onerosità dei costi complessivi di identificazione e trasferimento nei paesi di origine, difficoltà di stipulare accordi con i paesi di origine). Tanto meno si può pensare sia praticabile per sventare i rischi sanitari di cui sopra in breve tempo e in un momento difficile come questo.

      In conclusione, motivazioni non soltanto umanitarie, ma anche sanitarie, di sicurezza, economiche e sociali suggeriscono l’opportunità della regolarizzazione degli irregolari seguendo una via già tracciata dal governo portoghese".
      Contenuti e forma legislativa
      «Trovando fondamento in queste motivazioni - sostengono ancora i firmatari - proponiamo dunque di estendere a tutti gli altri settori produttivi oltre quello agricolo la regolarizzazione dei migranti irregolari. La via suggerita è quella di una sanatoria tramite dichiarazione di un datore di lavoro che consente di ottenere un permesso di soggiorno e lavoro temporaneo che, finita la fase di emergenza, sarà sottoposto all’iter previsto per questi tipi di permesso. In questo modo, seppure in misura limitata, la regolarizzazione potrà contribuire con il versamento di contributi al finanziamento dell’ingente impegno di spesa pubblica necessario per superare questa crisi.

      Per rendere operativa la nostra proposta sarebbe necessario modificare la proposta di decreto legge attualmente in discussione in Commissione Lavoro che limita questa possibilità ai settori dell’agricoltura, della pesca e della silvicoltura estendo la misura agli altri settori produttivi. Inoltre dato che la regolarizzazione è innanzitutto per ragioni di salute pubblica, occorre rilasciare a tutti gli stranieri in condizioni di soggiorno illegale un permesso di soggiorno per asilo, in base ad art. 11 DPR 394/1999 e art. 10 Cost., prevedendo che sia utilizzabile da subito per iscriversi al SSN e al Centro per l’impiego e per accedere alle provvidenze di assistenza sociale. Le motivazioni umanitarie spesso non bastano a convincerci a realizzare passi avanti verso il progresso civile. Sarebbe però un grave errore per la nostra classe politica non fare quei passi quando queste s’incontrano, come in questo caso, con ragioni di convenienza ed opportunità».

      https://www.repubblica.it/politica/2020/04/25/news/appello_regolarizzazione_immigrati_agricoltura-254873997

      –--------

      @karine4 et @isskein —> faits intéressants :
      – il y a aussi des virologues qui ont signé
      – on met en avant le fait que la régularisation réduit les #risques liés à la #sécurité (et notamment le #risque que ces personnes appelées dans l’appel « invisibles » risquent de tomber dans les mains de la #criminalité (et notamment la #criminalité_organisée)
      – le fait de souligner que "en théorie les irréguliers pourraient être expulsés, mais dans les faits il ne le sont pas (et ils expliquent les raisons qu’on connaît)

      Mais... la proposition se base sur des permis de séjours temporaires temporaires en un premier temps, mais au-delà du secteur de l’agriculture comme d’autres propositions le suggèrent :

      Per rendere operativa la nostra proposta sarebbe necessario modificare la proposta di decreto legge attualmente in discussione in Commissione Lavoro che limita questa possibilità ai settori dell’agricoltura, della pesca e della silvicoltura estendo la misura agli altri settori produttivi. Inoltre dato che la regolarizzazione è innanzitutto per ragioni di salute pubblica, occorre rilasciare a tutti gli stranieri in condizioni di soggiorno illegale un permesso di soggiorno per asilo, in base ad art. 11 DPR 394/1999 e art. 10 Cost., prevedendo che sia utilizzabile da subito per iscriversi al SSN e al Centro per l’impiego e per accedere alle provvidenze di assistenza sociale.

    • Italy to give 600,000 migrants the right to stay

      Ministers thank unregistered workforce that proved essential during lockdown.

      More than half a million illegal migrants in Italy will be given permits to stay and work under plans put forward by the government, which said they had proved essential for caring for the elderly and picking crops in recent weeks.

      https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/italy-to-give-600-000-migrants-the-right-to-stay-n3l8935bj

      #paywall

    • La grande bufala della regolarizzazione

      Permettere ai migranti già presenti in Italia di rimanerci solo per spaccarsi la schiena corrisponde ad una visione del mondo opposta rispetto a quella di chi chiedeva una sanatoria.

      Nella mattinata di mercoledì 13 maggio la battaglia portata avanti dalla Ministra delle politiche agricole, alimentari e forestali Teresa Bellanova ha finalmente sortito qualche effetto, facendo trovare a Partito Democratico e Movimento Cinque Stelle un accordo che per settimane era sempre stato rinviato: quello sulla regolarizzazione dei migranti.

      Il motivo per cui la Ministra la stessa sera nell’annunciarlo era quasi in lacrime non è l’aver riconosciuto a tante persone la possibilità di vivere legalmente su territorio italico, ma il fatto di aver in cuor suo abbandonato la lotta per l’uguaglianza che l’aveva portata nei lontani anni Ottanta ad essere in prima fila nella lotta al caporalato. La scelta di indicare Bellanova lo scorso settembre per un ministero che ha così tanto a che fare con il mondo del lavoro era stata accolta positivamente da molti, perché per quanto abbia come titolo di studio la terza media avrebbe potuto compensare con l’esperienza diretta, essendo stata una bracciante a partire dai 14 anni, poi una sindacalista della CGIL e solo in seguito una deputata dei Democratici di Sinistra prima e del Partito Democratico poi, per passare infine a Italia Viva.

      Nonostante i suoi trascorsi, negli ultimi anni il suo interesse per le tematiche delle migrazioni e del lavoro ha definitivamente cambiato segno: ha sostenuto convintamente sia il Jobs Act (contestato persino dai sindacati confederali di cui era stata paladina), sia l’abolizione dell’articolo 18 dello Statuto dei lavoratori, ossia la legge sui licenziamenti, scontrandosi più volte con i lavoratori in qualità di vice ministra dello Sviluppo economico tra il 2016 e il 2018. Per tutti questi motivi, quando a metà aprile Bellanova ha rilanciato sulle pagine del Il Foglio la proposta di una regolarizzazione, gli attivisti per i diritti dei migranti hanno appreso con moderato entusiasmo la notizia e hanno continuato a ritenere quella della sanatoria l’unica soluzione percorribile.

      Questo naturalmente non certo per la scelta singolare della ministra di intervenire su un quotidiano di destra (a bassa diffusione e di cui non è nemmeno nota la tiratura) e non solo per l’uso di espressioni quali “dare risposte al presente per mettere a dimora il futuro” che allontanano la Ministra dai giorni in cui rimproverava a Bersani di utilizzare termini vaghi o incomprensibili. Senza contare che mentre a fine marzo il Portogallo votava un’ordinanza per dare maggiori tutele alle persone in attesa di regolarizzazione (cioè non una regolarizzazione a tutti gli effetti come alcuni hanno scritto, ma un decisivo passo avanti in termini di tutele), Bellanova faceva pubblicare sul sito del suo ministero un appello alla Grande Distribuzione Organizzata in vista della Pasqua che diceva: «Acquistate ancora più prodotti italiani, assicurate anche la presenza nei vostri negozi dei prodotti della tradizione pasquale».

      Non esattamente le stesse priorità degli attivisti (Legal Team Italia, Campagna LasciateCIEntrare, Progetto MeltingPot Europa e Medicina Democratica in primis) che poco dopo l’inizio dell’emergenza avevano chiesto una sanatoria subito, senza fare distinzioni legate all’esercizio o meno di una professione, e senza avere come riferimento un datore di lavoro (cosa che invece era stata richiesta da altre realtà). Giorno dopo giorno questa idea raccoglieva consensi e gli attivisti si incontravano virtualmente, fornendo riflessioni e analisi che sarebbero state molto utili al Governo, ma anche ai tanti che non sanno che il migrante irregolare, tanto per fare un esempio pratico, non può proprio iscriversi al Sistema Sanitario Nazionale, e non ha di conseguenza un medico di base cui rivolgersi, e se va al Pronto Soccorso c’è l’eventualità di un controllo che può portare alla sua espulsione o ad essere recluso in un CPR. Ma in realtà tutti noi rischiamo la salute per il suo silenzio forzato, dunque c’è un valido motivo in più per regolarizzare la sua presenza. E poi ci sono i tanti migranti che sono stati regolari per un po’, ossia finché hanno avuto un lavoro, ma poi l’hanno perso e sono così divenuti irregolari. Moltissimi lavoratori originari dell’Europa Orientali sono infatti usciti dall’Italia allo scoppio della pandemia e non sono potuti tornare a causa della chiusura delle frontiere

      Colpevolmente la ministra non ha mai condiviso queste informazioni necessarie per arrivare ad una valutazione, e forse ha fatto leva prodotta sulla confusione creata da anni di allarmismi ingiustificati in tema di immigrazione quando nel suo intervento sul Foglio il 14 aprile ha delineato due urgenze: «la salute, in primis, e poi fronteggiare l’urgenza, determinata dall’assenza di manodopera, che sta investendo in modo pesantissimo l’agricoltura del nostro paese e che mette a repentaglio prodotti, lavoro, investimenti, cibo. Che rischia di mandare in enorme sofferenza le nostre aziende agricole e che nelle prossime settimane, quando saranno arrivati a maturazione molti raccolti, può determinare l’irreparabile. Mentre la filiera alimentare è impegnata con enormi sforzi a garantire cibo al paese, non si può, allo stesso tempo, lasciare marcire i prodotti nei campi e fare i conti con l’emergenza alimentare che sta investendo parti sempre più ampie della popolazione». Insomma: «siano i migranti a spaccarsi la schiena per noi: regolarizzare conviene!».

      E aggiungeva una sentenza: «Sia ben chiaro. Non esistono filiere sporche».

      Filiere che invece sono ben documentate. Ne hanno scritto numerose ong e associazioni nei loro report, e poi autori come Stefano Liberti, Yvan Sagnet, Antonello Mangano, Francesco Caruso, Stefania Prandi e il compianto Alessandro Leogrande. Ne hanno parlato attraverso il cinema Andrea Segre, Andrea Paco Mariani, Stefano Liberti ed Enrico Parenti. Con la legge 199/2016 di cui la ministra va fiera il caporalato non è certo defunto, anzi; come sintetizza il sindacalista Giovanni Minnini sul Manifesto è “inapplicata proprio nella parte che oggi sarebbe più necessaria, cioè: l’incontro della domanda e offerta di lavoro (il collocamento) e l’accoglienza dignitosa per i lavoratori stagionali.” Ed è un altro sindacalista la persona che più si è spesa sul campo per una degna regolarizzazione, Aboubakar Soumahoro (USB), che dando conto quotidianamente delle condizioni nei campi si è sempre rivolto tanto alle istituzioni, quanto ai consumatori. Così siamo arrivati ad una concessione fatta dal governo solo a chi si trova già sul territorio con un permesso scaduto, o con un lavoro irregolare, previa domanda del datore di lavoro, che dovrà autodenunciarsi rivolgendosi poi all’Inps o alla Questura e pagare 400 euro a domanda (soldi che magari vorrà farsi ridare poi dal lavoratore, come già successo in casi analoghi), più altri costi che non sono ancora chiari.

      Di tutto questo dibattito conclusosi male ieri sera con la ministra che non spiega tali limiti dell’accordo (o scambio?) con i Cinque Stelle non resta che una distanza incolmabile, quella tra due visioni opposte sulla regolarizzazione, e in definitiva due visioni opposte del mondo.

      Da un lato il discorso opportunista della ministra, che annuncia al paese la sua vittoria personale, un provvedimento di cinque pagine compreso all’interno di un decreto contenente essenzialmente misure economiche. Bellanova presenta infatti i migranti come corpi destinati irrimediabilmente - e indipendentemente dalle qualità personali - al lavoro fisico, minus habentes che proprio a causa dei loro deficit trovano un collocazione nei termini della locuzione do ut des: non bisogna far marcire i prodotti nei campi, si è ripetuto, perciò ora nella Fase 2, possiamo integrarvi nella norma, includervi temporaneamente in ragione di una condizione eccezionale, sempre se rispettate le regole e rimanete confinati nel vostro ruolo di oppressi. Il messaggio è che non vi vogliamo, ma adesso ci servite per raccogliere frutta sotto il sole e pulire il sedere agli anziani, costituite una scelta economica che va fatta in fretta per salvarci e per dare una risposta agli imprenditori che non vogliono che il paese si fermi nemmeno per un attimo. Ma poi, più o meno tra la Fase 3 e la 4, finita la pandemia o comunque scaduti i sei mesi concessi, tutti illegali come prima, senza alcuna soluzione giuridica prevista, pronti a farvi umiliare dalle peggiori destre e a rappresentare un problema di difficile risoluzione per quel che resta della sinistra. I profitti prima delle persone.

      Dal lato opposto c’è invece il discorso umanitario, quello degli attivisti che hanno sì esposto tutte le ricadute positive che una sanatoria slegata dalla volontà dei datori di lavoro avrebbe avuto, ma che sono legati da ragioni più profonde. Per indole si schierano dalla parte di tutti i subalterni, hanno costruito le proprie relazioni nel corso delle mobilitazioni in nome dell’antirazzismo e contro le guerre che causano migrazioni. Muovono da considerazioni basilari, come quelle alla radice del principio di uguaglianza tra tutti gli esseri umani. Principio che può essere condiviso da chi conosce bene la Storia, anche quella violenta e coloniale dell’Italia. In questo specifico caso, le persone prima dei profitti.

      Ma in tempi di antipolitica Bellanova ha gioco facile e con le sue lacrime ne esce meglio di tutti, e così tanti le scrivono su Twitter che in quel momento di commozione hanno visto quello che non avevano ancora trovato dall’inizio lockdown: un comprensibile crollo dovuto ad una grande impresa, un’ammissione della paura di prendere decisioni prima impensabili. Le emozioni vincono sempre, ed è curioso che già un’altra ministra, Elsa Fornero, abbia singhiozzato proprio mentre annunciava le misure rispetto ad un’altra questione del mondo del lavoro, quella degli esodati nel 2011 e sia ricordata anche per questo. «Lo Stato è più forte del caporalato» e «gli invisibili saranno meno invisibili» sono gli slogan con cui Bellanova ha chiuso la partita. E tra lei e la società civile c’è la stessa distanza che c’è tra sfruttamento e dignità.

      https://www.globalproject.info/it/in_movimento/la-grande-bufala-della-regolarizzazione/22780

    • Italy’s coronavirus amnesty: Migrant rights or economic self-interest?

      ’The systematic use of this tool has always postponed the bigger problem: a long-term legalisation solution.’

      The Italian government passed a law on 13 May paving the way for around 200,000 undocumented workers to apply for six-month legal residency permits. But just a few weeks later, the initial atmosphere of hope has quickly faded to a lukewarm welcome.

      The amnesty was one measure in a 55 billion euro ($59.6 billion) stimulus package meant to support Italy’s economy as the country struggles with the effects of the coronavirus. Italy has had one of the most severe outbreaks in the world, with nearly 230,000 confirmed cases and more than 32,500 deaths as of 25 May.

      The new regularisation law was initially greeted as a major step forward for migrant rights and as an example of good migration policy during the coronavirus pandemic. “From now on, the invisible will be a bit less invisible,” Italy’s minister of agriculture, Teresa Bellanova, said at a press conference announcing the law.

      Supporters still say the new law is an important, if tentative, improvement. But critics argue that it amounts to little more than a temporary amnesty that puts economic interests ahead of human rights and will do little to address the rampant exploitation of migrant labour, especially in Italy’s agricultural industry.

      Italy’s fields have long attracted migrant workers from eastern Europe, hundreds of thousands of whom flock to the country to work the harvest every year. They are joined in the fields by thousands of Africans and other non-Europeans who have crossed the Mediterranean to apply for asylum or to seek better lives in the EU. Nearly 500,000 people have made the journey since 2015. Many intended to move on to northern Europe but found themselves stuck with little choice but to try to find work in Italy’s informal economy.

      “[The law] is not exactly what we were hoping for because it is a very limited regularisation. But at this point, after decades of total invisibility, anything is better than nothing. It is a starting point,” Francesco Piobbichi, a social worker with the migrant support organisation Mediterranean Hope, told The New Humanitarian.

      Not everyone agrees.

      The Unione Sindacale di Base (USB), an Italian trade union that represents agricultural workers, called a national strike on 21 May to protest the law’s shortcomings. The union argues that the law is too limited in scope and will do little to protect exploited migrant agricultural workers. “Legal papers don’t necessarily protect you from exploitation,” said Michele Mililli, a USB representative in Sicily. “This is a structural problem that should not have been addressed during a healthcare emergency, but much earlier.”
      Exclusions, and only temporary

      There are an estimated 560,000 undocumented migrants in Italy. But the new law only applies to people working in agriculture or as domestic helpers, leaving out people who work in other sectors of the economy that rely heavily on undocumented labour, such as construction and food services.

      To regularise their status, undocumented migrants need the support of an employer or proof they were working in one of the eligible sectors prior to October 2019. “There is no guarantee that many [employers] will do it,” Enzo Rossi, a professor of migration economics at Tor Vergata University in Rome, told TNH. “And when the six months… expire, these people will be faced with the same dilemma as before the pandemic.”

      The amnesty also excludes people who were stripped of humanitarian protection or legal status by a series of anti-migrant security decrees issued in late 2018 by former far-right interior minister Matteo Salvini that Human Rights Watch said “eviscerated Italy’s asylum procedure and reception system”.

      The law focuses instead on people working in sectors of the economy deemed to be “essential” during the coronavirus crisis, such as undocumented agricultural workers who account for about 25 percent of Italy’s agricultural workforce, about double the amount of other economic sectors, according to Italy’s National Institute of Statistics.

      Portugal’s decision in March to treat people with pending immigration applications as residents for the duration of the coronavirus crisis has been regarded as an effort to guarantee that undocumented migrants have access to healthcare and social services during the pandemic. But Italy’s regularisation is seen by USB and other trade unions and humanitarian groups as a more cynical attempt to plug its labour gap – an estimated 250,000 worker shortfall stemming from coronavirus-related travel restrictions and fears.

      It’s also not the first time Italy has offered a path toward temporary regularisation for undocumented workers, mainly in agriculture. Over the past 35 years, there have been at least five amnesties, but they’ve never led to a comprehensive solution, according to Rossi.

      “The systematic use of this tool has always postponed the bigger problem: a long-term legalisation solution,” Rossi said. “That’s why the numbers of undocumented workers have always been so high.”
      Exploitation in Italy’s south

      Every week, Monday through Saturday, Bachir Ahmed Ali wakes up at the crack of dawn in the tented slum near the village of Cassibile in eastern Sicily and quickly runs to a nearby road where his employer waits for him in a truck with a dozen other migrant workers.

      In less than an hour, they are dropped at the edge of one of the many fruit and vegetable fields in the province of Syracuse where migrant workers pick produce, mostly strawberries and potatoes, from 6am to 2pm, earning 35 euros (about $38) per day.

      This is the daily reality for more than 430,000 migrants working irregularly in Italy’s agricultural sector who are at risk of exploitation. Many of them live in makeshift encampments close to Italy’s agricultural fields, especially in the country’s south.These informal settlements consist of improvised tents or derelict buildings and often lack access to running water and electricity. The people who live in them are caught in what is known as the caporalato system, a 17 billion euro ($18.45 billion) a year industry of illegal employment and labour exploitation run by organised criminal groups and agricultural speculators.

      In #Cassibile, Ali shares his tent with eight other farmworkers from Senegal, Gambia, Sudan, and Burkina Faso. He doesn’t complain about the overcrowding. During the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, which ended on 24 May, he appreciated having the company. “They make me feel part of a family. I haven’t seen my real one since I was 14,” he told TNH.

      Ali is now 30 years old. Originally from a village in Chad, bordering Sudan, he fled his home in 2006 when the country was on the brink of civil war and settled in Libya where he scraped by as a day labourer until the Libyan revolution erupted in 2011.

      “I decided to leave, like many other African migrants, because it was no longer safe for us there,” he said. “We all embarked on boats heading to Europe, so overwhelmed with fear that we couldn’t fully grasp what was happening. But I thought… I could at least get an education, maybe a job.”

      But none of that happened. Ali didn’t receive any guidance on how to rebuild his life at the migrant reception centres in Sicily he stayed in after he arrived. Eventually, the only job he could find was in the agricultural fields outside of Rome. “I worked there for four years then I returned to Sicily. I just couldn’t find anything else,” he explained.

      Ali was granted political asylum and has legal residency. Nonetheless, he has been living in the makeshift camp of Cassibile, home to around 300 people, since 2015. Even during the coronavirus crisis, he has continued harvesting potatoes in Syracuse’s fields. “For me, the virus is not as scary as war or hunger. But I think our conditions should get more attention,” he said.

      Staying afloat

      Ali’s story highlights the limitations of Italy’s new regularisation law: if people with refugee status and legal residency have no choice but to work in the caporalato system, how will the new law help undocumented migrants escape exploitation?

      Employers know that undocumented migrants are desperate for jobs and use that as leverage to continue explotative practices. “[Migrants] accept whatever gig and conditions that keep them afloat and allow them to send money home,” Mililli, the labour organiser from USB, said.

      Most of the migrants working in Sicily’s fields have been in Italy for an average of 10-12 years, according to Mililli. Salvini’s security decrees made them even more vulnerable and, in certain cases, made it more difficult for them to access healthcare.

      The 5,500 farms in the southeastern area of Sicily, home to southern Italy’s biggest wholesale produce market, employ about 30,000 workers. Sixty percent of them are foreigners making as little as 15 euros ($16.35) per day, according to USB. More than half of the migrant labourers continued to work throughout the coronavirus crisis – despite the health hazards and intensified police checks – because they had no access to financial relief from the government.
      ‘Health hazard’

      While the coronavirus has intensified the situation, health risks are nothing new for Italy’s exploited migrant labourers. In the past six years, around 1,500 agricultural workers have died due to the living conditions in the informal camps, from suffocating in overcrowded trucks used to transport undocumented workers or from car accidents on the way to the fields, according to the Italian NGO Doctors with Africa.

      When potato harvesting season ends at the beginning of summer, Ali heads for the tomato fields in Apulia, a region covering the heel of Italy’s boot. Seven informal settlements close to the town of Foggia host up to 6,500 people during the summer months.

      “These places are a health hazard. They were before the virus came, and [they] became a reason of great concern during the pandemic,” Alessandro Verona, the leader of a medical team for the Italian NGO Intersos, told TNH. “If one person gets sick here, it can turn the whole ghetto into a mass slaughter.”

      “Paradoxically, it took a pandemic to improve the situation here. We were granted more water access and toilets,” Verona continued. “But to tame what we consider no less than a humanitarian crisis, these ghettos need to disappear completely. And that will only happen when all undocumented workers are recognised and can rent real places to live [in] decently.”

      In opting for a temporary amnesty, Verona added, Italy lost a great opportunity to promote human dignity.

      On 18 May, five days after Italy’s regularisation law passed, a 33-year old Indian migrant working in a field outside of Rome was fired after asking his employer for a face mask for protection while at work. When the worker requested his daily wage, he was beaten up and thrown in a nearby canal.

      https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/feature/2020/05/25/Italy-coronavirus-migrant-labour

    • ’Cynical’: Critics slam Italy’s amnesty for undocumented migrants

      New measure that grants temporary permits to migrants in agriculture and care work is act of ’cynicism’, activists say.

      A partial six-month amnesty for Italy’s undocumented migrants was announced this month in a move described by some as “a watershed moment” in the country’s migration policy and “an act of cynicism” by others.

      “Thanks to the choice made by this government, the invisible will become less invisible,” said Teresa Bellanova, Italy’s agriculture minister, in her emotional announcement speech on May 13.

      The former trade unionist was referring to people working in the agriculture and fishing industries, as well as care workers who have been without a residency permit.

      The measure, which grants a six-month residency, has been praised by CGIL-FLAI, the country’s biggest farmworkers’ union, as an “historic achievement”.

      But migrant activists have criticised the limited nature of the amnesty, which will affect only about 200,000 people, according to the Italian government’s estimates.

      The total number of undocumented migrants in the country ranges between 560,000 to 700,000, according to various estimates.
      ’Farcical scene’

      “The tears of the minister provided a really farcical scene,” said Abdel El Mir, a spokesperson of Movement of Migrants and Refugees of Naples (MMRN) - a group of migrants and Italians of foreign origin with up to 300 members, based in the southern city of Naples.

      The group held some of the first street protests in the city after the recent easing of the coronavirus lockdown.

      “If there are about 700,000 undocumented people in Italy and you choose to regularise only a small fraction of them, that is not an act of courage, but of cynicism. You’re only giving papers to the workforce you need, not caring at all about people’s health,” El Mir told Al Jazeera.

      Italy made it clear that its provision was only intended to fill gaps in the labour market as the coronavirus pandemic hit the country.

      Agriculture lobbies had warned the government that Italy would have to throw away huge amounts of fruit and vegetables because there was nobody to pick them, worsening the effects of a shutdown costing the food sector seven billion euros ($7.58bn).

      “We are not making a favour to immigrant citizens by giving them a residence permit,” said Bellanova. “We are simply addressing our need for additional workforce.”

      Under her scheme, the power to regularise migrants lies predominantly with landowners, who will be able to request residence permits for their workers by providing an employment contract and paying a 500-euro ($548) fee.

      In response, the country’s migrant agriculture workers went on a nationwide strike on May 21, protesting against employment sponsorship being the basis for residency permits.

      Aboubakar Soumahoro, the strike organiser, accused the government of “putting fruit and vegetables above people’s lives”.

      The strike was not endorsed by any major union.

      “In Italy, immigration is only ever understood as permissible when it is seen as having economic utility,” said Camilla Hawthorne, an assistant professor of sociology at the University of California Santa Cruz, who has studied migrant activism in Italy.

      The country passed its first comprehensive immigration legislation in 1990, in the wake of the racially motivated murder of Jerry Masslo. He was an asylum seeker from apartheid South Africa who worked as an undocumented agriculture labourer in the region of Naples.

      ‏According to Hawthorne, the current situation resembles the 1990 case, because a humanitarian rhetoric was used to pass immigration laws at the time, but “every subsequent law linked residence permits to work contracts”.
      More vulnerable

      El Mir said the recession caused by the coronavirus pandemic was likely to produce a spike in the number of undocumented people as the employment rates fall, leaving them more vulnerable.

      “Lacking a document means lacking every right, including ordinary access to healthcare,” he said.

      The group of migrants and refugees El Mir is associated with run a free legal help desk, a small health surgery and an Italian language school in Naples. They are providing assistance to more than 4,000 people.

      During the coronavirus lockdown, the group set up a mutual aid network that delivered food and other essential goods to 120 migrant households.

      Their activities also serve as a point of inquiry into the challenges faced by migrants, and informs the political strategy of the movement.

      A citizen of Bangladesh, who has asked not to be identified, requested their assistance shortly after the amnesty was introduced.

      He has been living and working in Italy without a permit for fours years, but as a shoe factory worker he is excluded from the regularisation initiative.

      “An employer asked me to pay 5,000 euros (about $5,487) for a work contract in agriculture. But where am I going to get that money?” he wrote in a text message to El Mir.

      El Mir said such cases were frequent, and were a direct result of the government’s discriminatory provision, but even before the pandemic, foreigners in Italy were under major stress.

      He pointed to the so-called “security decrees”, a set of measures passed last year by the former Interior Minister Matteo Salvini that restricted access to asylum and drastically cut public services available to migrants.
      Salvini’s legacy

      After the far-right leader was removed from office in September last year, the new government failed to deliver on an initial pledge to reverse his most controversial anti-migrant legislation.

      In a further blow to the expectations of human rights groups, Italy renewed a much-criticised deal with Libya to curb migration, and closed its ports to asylum seekers during the pandemic.

      “Too many people think that not having a minister that shouts against migrants means that migration policy has changed. Reality says otherwise,” El Mir said.

      The fact that “even after the fall of Salvini the government has continued many of the same right-wing policies” has pushed migrant activists “to create autonomous political spaces, away from the more traditional sights of political organising in Italy”, said Hawthorne.

      “What gets lost in mainstream anti-racist activism - with its emphasis on tolerance and inclusivity as the antidote to the far-right rhetoric - is the structural critique of racism that is not just about populist leaders saying really racist things,” Hawthorne said.

      “It is part of a broader system of capitalist globalisation and border fortification and militarism that work together to produce a racist system that disadvantages Black people across the spectrum, whether they were born in Italy, or they migrated to Italy,” she added.

      In their demonstrations, the Naples activists tried to address the daily issues affecting migrants’ lives, such as the delay in issuance of residence permits or access to healthcare while also pointing at what they see as the structural causes of racism in Italy.

      “We can’t skip over the fact that Italy openly sells arms to dictators and deals with criminal organisations in Africa; or that ENI [Italy’s state-owned oil and gas company] ravages entire African regions,” El Mir said.

      He said such criticism does not always go down well with the wider anti-racist movement.

      “They tell us that these issues are divisive. But what for them is divisive in terms of political consent, for us is a matter of life,” he said.

      https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/05/critics-slam-italy-amnesty-undocumented-migrants-200526104154789.html

    • Il gioco crudele della regolarizzazione 2020

      Il provvedimento del governo sui migranti senza permesso di soggiorno è confuso e iniquo. Abbiamo perso una grande occasione. La rubrica di Gianfranco Schiavone dell’Associazione per gli studi giuridici sull’immigrazione

      Olga è ucraina, fa la badante di una anziana malata; è arrivata in Italia quasi per caso ormai quattro anni fa, per sostituire per un mese una sua amica. È arrivata regolarmente non avendo obbligo di visto. Poi ha trovato un lavoro in nero e ha deciso di rimanere. Il lavoro è pesante ma lei ha bisogno di soldi da mandare a casa e c’è poco da discutere. Tutti conoscono Olga e tutti possono attestare che vive con quella anziana donna alla quale si è affezionata. Olga ha saputo della sanatoria e pensa che finalmente si metterà in regola. Non sa ancora che non sarà così perché non è mai stata fotosegnalata e neanche espulsa (sulla carta) ed essere stati fotosegnalati, o almeno disporre di una attestazione di presenza rilasciata da organismi pubblici, è condizione essenziale per “fare” la regolarizzazione. Olga è, per così dire, troppo invisibile, come lo sono quasi tutte le donne straniere che nel nostro Paese fanno un lavoro di cura.

      Abdul è un richiedente asilo con ricorso pendente contro il diniego della domanda; da quando, nel 2018, è stata abrogata la protezione umanitaria dal primo decreto (in)sicurezza, sono tante le domande come le sue che sono finite così.
      Ma Abdul ha già da un anno un lavoro regolare e con contratto a tempo indeterminato; è disponibile ad abbandonare il suo ricorso per un permesso di soggiorno per lavoro; crede che sia arrivato il momento giusto ma non sa che non è così perché è, per così dire, troppo regolare e non è possibile la conversione da richiesta asilo a lavoro. Abdul resterà in Italia con il suo lavoro a tempo indeterminato fino al momento della decisione sul ricorso; se, come probabile, lo perderà, diventerà un “clandestino”, dopo avere vissuto e lavorato in Italia per anni.

      Asif è pakistano, un tempo aveva un permesso di soggiorno ma poi non è riuscito a rinnovarlo. Gestisce un albergo; il suo datore di lavoro sa che lui parla quattro lingue e con i turisti ci sa fare. Asif ha deciso che è la volta buona: il padrone non può dirgli di no. Ma Asif ancora non sa che la regolarizzazione è solo per i settori agricoli e il lavoro domestico e di cura. Per lui non c’è niente da fare neanche questa volta.

      Mohammed è un bracciante agricolo, vive da dieci anni in Italia ed è stato espulso, sempre sulla carta, già tre volte. Ogni anno, per tre mesi raccoglie i pomodori, poi per altri due raccoglie le olive, per altri due ancora le arance e poi fa lavori qua e là. Nessuno lo mai assunto e non vive da nessuna parte e nello stesso tempo ovunque in giro per la penisola, sempre in qualche baracca vicino al campo di raccolta. Ha sentito che questa è la sanatoria dei braccianti, proprio la sua, “Stavolta è fatta”. Chiederà a tutti i suoi padroni che l’hanno sfruttato in questi anni per 25 euro al giorno (dieci ore al giorno di lavoro) di fargli un contratto; anche brevissimo, solo per avere finalmente quel maledetto documento, e poi, s’intende, l’ammenda la paga lui. Nessuno dei suoi molti padroni lo farà, perché mai dovrebbero? Per due mesi di lavoro all’anno non se ne parla neanche; che se ne vada pure al diavolo e avanti un altro senza pretese.

      Olga, Abdul, Asif, Mohammed sono nel gioco crudele della regolarizzazione 2020, che non è né aperta né restrittiva ma divide i migranti salvati da quelli sommersi senza alcuna ragionevolezza trattando le persone come merce a disposizione. Il testo di legge afferma, non senza solennità, che il fine della norma è quello di “garantire livelli adeguati di tutela della salute individuale e collettiva in conseguenza della contingente ed eccezionale emergenza sanitaria connessa alla calamità derivante dalla diffusione del contagio da Covid-19 e favorire l’emersione di rapporti di lavoro irregolare”. Intenzioni annunciate ma non realizzate. Neppure questa volta, nell’anno della pandemia, abbiamo infatti scelto di fare emergere gli stranieri senza permesso di soggiorno sulla base della loro semplice presenza, con semmai poche e nette esclusioni connesse a seri profili penali, dando loro un permesso per “ricerca lavoro”. Per permettere di cercarlo o di tenerlo o ancora di cambiarlo e soprattutto di liberarsi dallo sfruttamento di chi li ricatta. Per permettere a loro, e a noi, di vivere in una società migliore.

      https://altreconomia.it/il-gioco-crudele-della-regolarizzazione-2020

    • La protesta di #Aboubakar_Soumahoro

      Si è incatenato vicino a #Villa_Pamphilj e alla fine è stato ascoltato da Conte, chiedendogli una riforma della filiera agricola, un «piano nazionale emergenza lavoro» e una modifica delle politiche migratorie

      Martedì 16 giugno, il sindacalista dell’USB Aboubakar Soumahoro si è incatenato vicino a Villa Pamphilj, a Roma, dove sono in corso gli “Stati generali dell’economia”, una serie di incontri organizzati dal governo tra il governo stesso, istituzioni internazionali, sindacati e associazioni di categoria. Accompagnato da altri attivisti del sindacato, Aboubakar Soumahoro ha anche iniziato uno sciopero della fame e della sete, chiedendo al presidente del Consiglio Giuseppe Conte di essere ascoltato. Alla fine, dopo oltre otto ore di presidio, il sindacalista è stato ricevuto nel pomeriggio da Conte alla presenza del ministro dell’Economia Gualtieri e della ministra del Lavoro Catalfo. Il colloquio è durato circa mezz’ora.

      Aboubakar Soumahoro, impegnato attivamente da anni per le persone migranti e i braccianti, ha presentato al governo tre richieste in particolare: una riforma della filiera agricola, un “piano nazionale emergenza lavoro” e una modifica delle politiche migratorie.

      Sul primo punto: l’USB vuole l’approvazione della cosiddetta “patente del cibo” per dare cioè alle persone, ha spiegato Aboubakar Soumahoro, un cibo «eticamente sano». La “patente del cibo” prevede che vengano esplicitate una serie di informazioni che dicano dove quel cibo è stato prodotto e che garantiscano che sia stato prodotto senza sfruttamento. Il “piano nazionale emergenza lavoro” è stato spiegato per ora in modo piuttosto generico: l’obiettivo è comunque quello di tutelare «coloro che rischiano di perdere il posto di lavoro a causa della crisi sanitaria». Le richieste legate al terzo e ultimo punto, sulle politiche migratorie, sono invece più definite: «Regolarizzazione di tutti gli invisibili con rilascio di un permesso di soggiorno per emergenza sanitaria convertibile per attività lavorativa», cancellazione degli accordi con la Libia, dei decreti sicurezza, riforma radicale per le politiche dell’accoglienza, abolizione della legge Bossi-Fini e cittadinanza per chi è cresciuto o nato in Italia. «Si tratta di una lotta di civiltà», ha spiegato Aboubakar Soumahoro.

      Nel cosiddetto “decreto rilancio“, che contiene decine di nuove misure per sostenere l’economia dopo il picco della pandemia da coronavirus, il governo aveva inserito anche una procedura per regolarizzare una parte dei migranti irregolari che vivono in Italia, legando il provvedimento al problema della raccolta della frutta nei campi agricoli. Aboubakar Soumahoro e l’USB chiedono invece che la regolarizzazione non venga legata alla raccolta della frutta, ma alla crisi sanitaria e che il permesso sia poi convertibile per attività lavorativa.

      All’inizio di febbraio il governo italiano aveva rinnovato il controverso Memorandum d’intesa (PDF) firmato nel 2017 con il governo di unità nazionale libico guidato da Fayez al Serraj, servito soprattutto ad addestrare e fornire mezzi alla cosiddetta Guardia costiera libica, formata da milizie private spesso in combutta coi trafficanti di esseri umani, e finanziare quelli che il documento chiama «centri di accoglienza» in Libia, dove i migranti sono sistematicamente torturati, stuprati e al centro di richieste di riscatto per essere liberati. Aboubakar Soumahoro ne chiede la cancellazione, così come dei “decreti sicurezza”.

      I cosiddetti “decreti sicurezza“ sono le due leggi molto restrittive sull’immigrazione fortemente volute dall’ex ministro dell’Interno Matteo Salvini e approvate durante il governo precedente. Il primo “decreto sicurezza” è entrato in vigore il 5 ottobre 2018 e interviene soprattutto sul sistema di accoglienza italiano. La principale misura contenuta nel decreto è l’abolizione del permesso di soggiorno per motivi umanitari, una forma di protezione molto diffusa della durata di due anni, sostituita da altri permessi più specifici e quasi impossibili da ottenere. Il secondo “decreto sicurezza” modifica invece le norme che riguardano gli sbarchi dei migranti soccorsi in mare attraverso la cosiddetta politica dei “porti chiusi”, ingenti multe per i comandanti delle navi che ignorano il divieto di ingresso, e nuovi fondi per il rimpatrio dei migranti irregolari, cioè senza alcun tipo di permesso per rimanere in Italia.

      Entrambi hanno peggiorato le condizioni del sistema di gestione e accoglienza dei migranti: non hanno portato alla diminuzione degli sbarchi né dei morti in mare, non hanno portato alla riduzione del numero di irregolari né del numero dei rimpatri. Aboubakar Soumahoro chiede la cancellazione anche della legge Bossi-Fini del 2002, che rende impossibile trovare un lavoro regolare per quasi tutti gli stranieri extracomunitari.

      Dopo l’incontro con Conte, Aboubakar Soumahoro ha spiegato che l’idea della “patente del cibo” ha trovato grande riscontro nel governo: «Il presidente Conte ha detto che è un’idea bellissima, un’idea geniale e che si attiverà per metterla in pratica». Sul piano del lavoro, Conte ha chiesto “proposte articolate in merito” che l’USB presenterà dunque al più presto. La risposta più deludente è stata sui “decreti sicurezza”: «Ci ha detto che il programma di governo prevede di riformarli, non ha mai parlato di cancellarli come noi chiediamo». Il sindacalista ha infine detto di aver informato Conte che stanno lavorando «alla convocazione degli Stati popolari. Loro hanno fatto gli Stati generali, noi faremo gli Stati popolari nelle prossime settimane a Roma: chiameremo a parlare giovani, precari, disoccupati».

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_z5xME3T7WM&feature=emb_logo

      https://www.ilpost.it/2020/06/17/protesta-aboubakar-soumahoro

    • Regolarizzazioni, le Acli: «Migliaia di pratiche gestite, ma poca chiarezza»

      Ci sono casi di lavoratori che emergono, poi i datori scompaiono (si pensi ai badanti di anziani) e loro restano nel limbo

      Migliaia di pratiche gestite per la regolarizzazione degli stranieri prevista dal decreto Rilancio che è legge da metà luglio, ma ancora tante incertezze a riguardo.

      E’ quel che emerge dai Patronati dell’Acli, in prima fila nella vicenda. «Abbiamo gestito finora circa 6000 pratiche» racconta Marco Calvetto, Capo Area dei Nuovi Servizi di Tutela del Patronato Acli «e devo dire che una buona percentuale sta andando avanti senza problemi però ci sono anche tante domande che si scontrano con criticità e ambiguità che la norma non ha affrontato. Parliamo in percentuale di un quinto delle domande, quindi non sono poche quelle che aspettano dei chiarimenti, prima di tutto da parte del Ministero dell’Interno che da giorni ha preannunciato la pubblicazione di una circolare che dovrebbe dirimere una serie di questioni sollevate da parte di tutte le associazioni coinvolte nella regolarizzazione. A poche settimane dalla scadenza dei termini per presentare le domande di emersione, che rimane il 15 agosto, desta un po’ di sconcerto che non siano ancora chiare e certe le normative e le procedure che a cui dovranno attenersi datori di lavoro e cittadini stranieri».

      Tra gli stranieri che si sono rivolti al Patronato Acli per chiedere la regolarizzazione, si conta la stessa percentuale nazionale di un 90% di stranieri categorizzabili nel lavoro domestico e 10% di stranieri che invece fanno parte del mondo agricolo.

      «Ai dubbi relativi all’invio dell’istanza si aggiunge anche - continua Calvetto - l’incertezza sull’esito e, spesso, la gestione degli eventi che possono incidere sul regolare soggiorno o sul rapporto di lavoro instauratosi fra il momento dell’invio dell’istanza e la convocazione in prefettura per il rilascio del permesso di soggiorno. Purtroppo la verità è che si tratta di almeno 5-6 mesi prima che le parti vengano chiamate per la firma definitiva e in questi mesi, si sta già verificando, il datore di lavoro purtroppo può morire, visto che spesso si tratta di persone anziane affette da qualche malattia grave, con il risultato che lo straniero è ormai emerso, perché ha fatto richiesta di regolarizzazione, però non ha più la possibilità di continuare l’attività lavorativa collegata con l’istanza di emersione e non sa bene come potrebbe essere assunto da altro datore di lavoro, non avendo ancora il titolo di soggiorno, o come si dovrebbe regolare il datore di lavoro in caso di infortunio del lavoratore, visto che il contratto di lavoro sarà comunicato agli enti solo in fase di presentazione allo Sportello Unico. Ad oggi non abbiamo nessuna risposta in merito, abbiamo sollecitato sia le amministrazioni che il Ministero degli interni affinché diano a tutti delle linee guida chiare con delle FAQ che rispondano a tutti i dubbi e le criticità che stanno insorgendo in queste settimane».

      Certo, sono situazioni limite, ma non si tratta certo di casi isolati. «Spesso, i datori di lavoro sono molto anziani o comunque non sono autosufficienti, - aggiunge Giamaica Puntillo, Segretaria Nazionale Acli Colf - non è scontato che possano presentarsi in procura per la firma delle parti. Quando ci sono queste sacche di disinformazione non si fa che alimentare la paura di fare qualsiasi passo in avanti e in qualche modo si scoraggiano persone magari ben intenzionate.»

      Il decesso del datore di lavoro durante l’iter dell’istruttoria di regolarizzazione non è il solo caso limite che è arrivato agli sportelli delle Acli in queste settimane: per esempio ci sono molti stranieri titolari di permesso di soggiorno diversi da quello per motivi di lavoro, permessi «deboli» o che a breve andranno a scadere (come ad esempio permesso per attesa asilo o per studio...), che stanno svolgendo un regolare rapporto di lavoro, ma che vorrebbero usufruire della regolarizzazione per avere maggiori garanzie a livello di stabilità , ma ancora non sanno se potranno collegare quel lavoro, anche se in uno dei settori coinvolti dalla regolarizzazione, con l’istanza di emersione. Oppure c’è il caso di un minore che ha un permesso di soggiorno non rinnovabile e non convertibile il cui datore di lavoro attuale sarebbe disponibile a mettere in regola, ma cosa succede in questo caso? Non è chiaro insomma se è possibile procedere con una novazione del contratto, ad oggi, che permetterebbe al datore di tenere in piedi lo stesso tipo di contratto o bisogna per forza far cessare il vecchio rapporto di lavoro.

      «Anche nel settore agricolo - sottolinea Gianluca Mastrovito Vicepresidente di Acli Terra - c’è poca chiarezza. Ad esempio i datori di lavoro fanno fatica a capire qual sia il minimo economico richiesto per poter accedere alla regolarizzazione. Si tratta di piccoli imprenditori agricoli che non fanno neanche il Modello unico perché spesso sono coltivatori da soli, oppure sono realtà familiari di poche persone, senza una vera struttura. In questa incertezza legislativa, con interpretazioni che variano anche da territorio a territorio, hanno gioco facile i faccendieri».

      Stupisce, inoltre, viste le finalità della regolarizzazione strettamente connesse a ragioni sanitarie, che non sia ancora stato esplicitato come sia possibile per i soggetti coinvolti dall’emersione, possessori di una mera istanza di regolarizzazione, ottenere un Codice Fiscale e iscriversi al Servizio Sanitario Nazionale.

      «Fra tante incertezze e dubbi colpisce che in fase di conversione a legge del Decreto Rilancio siano stati accolti auna serie di emendamenti e modifiche in materia di bonus e di politica fiscale, per esempio, ma non sia stato accolto nemmeno un emendamento sulla norma delle regolarizzazioni, ed erano centinaia , compresi i nostri e soprattutto compresi quelli presentati dalla maggioranza stessa - dichiara Emiliano Manfredonia, Presidente del Patronato Acli - è chiaro che ci troviamo di fronte ad uno scontro politico. Così perdiamo una grande occasione, il decreto si poteva e andava migliorato, dopo una risposta iniziale dettata anche dall’emergenza.»

      L’altro problema, a cui la legge di conversione non ha posto rimedio, riguarda il fatto che la norma sia applicabile solo agli stranieri irregolari che lavorino in tre settori specifici: agricoltura, assistenza alla persona, lavoro domestico. «Dai dati resi noti dal Ministero dell’Interno emerge che molti lavoratori domestici coinvolti dalla regolarizzazione appartengono a nazionalità che tradizionalmente vedevano bassi indici di coinvolgimento nel settore. O ci troviamo di fronte ad un positivo superamento dell’etnicizzazione che caratterizza il lavoro domestico del nostro Paese o forse ad un vincolo legislativo che genera delle distorsioni.... » - ha aggiunto Calvetto - e d’altronde più la normativa è stringente più si fa il gioco di chi non ha peli sullo stomaco. Basti pensare che le istanze di emersione le possono inviare giustamente i singoli, ma forse un po’ più di perplessità le suscita il fatto che ogni soggetto privato può inviare fino a 5 istanze per altri. Facile capire come si possa trasformare in un’occasione di lucro per la criminalità organizzata e anche per la microcriminalità delle comunità straniere presenti nel nostro Paese: si illudono persone bisognose, in situazioni di fragilità, chiedendogli magari i risparmi di una vita o facendoli indebitare, creando legami di subalternità che rischiano di alimentare l’illegalità invece di processi di autonomia e partecipazione a cui l’emersione dovrebbe tendere. E non sono poche le domande che gli operatori Acli non accolgono perché palesemente in contrasto con i requisiti. «Chiediamo maggiore chiarezza, mancano ormai pochi giorni, visto che si avvicina anche la chiusura estiva - ha concluso Manfredonia - e crediamo che sia una questione di rispetto sia per chi ha intenzione di regolarizzare uno straniero ma anche per gli operatori dei patronati che si trovano a non poter dare le giuste risposte a persone che magari ne avrebbero il diritto.»

      https://www.repubblica.it/economia/miojob/lavoro/2020/08/04/news/regolarizzazioni_le_acli_migliaia_di_pratiche_gestite_ma_poca_chiarezza_-

    • Migrants in Italy: 220,000 workers applied for regularization

      Since a new decree went into effect in Italy this summer, 220,000 migrants have applied to get temporary papers, according to Deputy Interior Minister Matteo Mauri. Meanwhile, he also said that the exploitation of undocumented farmworkers in the Foggia region had to be stopped.

      Deputy minister Mauri announced the numbers on October 13 after a meeting at the prefecture of Foggia in the region of Puglia.

      “207,000 people applied for the regularization, in addition to 13,000 who asked for a permit to look for a job, so we are talking about 220,000 people,” Mauri said. “In the report we drafted before the start of the regularization, we wrote on a piece of paper that we would probably regularize 220,000 people, which is exactly what happened.”

      Permit extension for migrant workers

      The decree that allowed these people to apply for temporary papers came into force on June 1: Foreigners who had a stay permit that expired after October 31, 2019 could apply for a new six-month-long permit. The decree applied to migrant workers employed in specific sectors, including agriculture and domestic work, as well as unemployed migrants who previously worked in these sectors.

      “More legality, more regularity and as a consequence more benefits for all, because producing conditions for high-quality integration is in everybody’s interest,” deputy minister Mauri said.

      He said his administration was actively fighting the exploitation of undocumented migrants in agriculture in the Foggia region. “We have met with law enforcement, the prefecture, unions and associations. Unfortunately, we are not dealing with an emergency but with a problem that has existed for a very long time,” he said.

      Exploitation of farmworkers

      The Foggia region is known for makeshift migrant camps where gangmasters look for workers. Living conditions in these shanty towns are poor. This summer, several inhabitants caught COVID-19, and one migrant died in a fire.

      Mauri said that “a different, dignified living solution must be found” for migrant workers, and that ending exploitative work situations was key to this.

      “At the center of everything there is always the problem of exploitation, because if a person is not paid for what he or she does but is underpaid and in some cases enslaved, these situations become inevitable,” he said.

      https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/27936/migrants-in-italy-220-000-workers-applied-for-regularization