city:beirut

  • Lire Edwad Said actuellement est un exercice sain.
    In these times, reading Edward Said is healthy.
    http://analysedz.blogspot.com/2011/11/impossible-histories-why-many-islams.html

    (...) When Bernard Lewis’s book was reviewed in the New York Times by no less an intellectual luminary than Yale’s Paul Kennedy, there was only uncritical praise, as if to suggest that the canons of historical evidence should be suspended where “Islam” is the subject. Kennedy was particularly impressed with Lewis’s assertion, in an almost totally irrelevant chapter on “Aspects of Cultural Change,” that alone of all the cultures of the world Islam has taken no interest in Western music. Quite without any justification at all, Kennedy then lurched on to lament the fact that Middle Easterners had deprived themselves even of Mozart! For that indeed is what Lewis suggests (though he doesn’t mention Mozart). Except for Turkey and Israel, “Western art music,” he categorically states, “falls on deaf ears” in the Islamic world."
    "Now, as it happens, this is something I know quite a bit about, but it would take some direct experience or a moment or two of actual life in the Muslim world to realize that what Lewis says is a total falsehood, betraying the fact that he hasn’t set foot in or spent any significant time in Arab countries. Several major Arab capitals have very good conservatories of Western music: Cairo, Beirut, Damascus, Tunis, Rabat, Amman—even Ramallah on the West Bank. These have produced literally thousands of excellent Western-style musicians who have staffed the numerous symphony orchestras and opera companies that play to sold-out auditoriums all over the Arab world. There are numerous festivals of Western music there, too, and in the case of Cairo (where I spent a great deal of my early life more than fifty years ago) they are excellent places to learn about, listen to, and see Western instrumental and vocal music performed at quite high levels of skill. The Cairo Opera House has pioneered the performance of opera in Arabic, and in fact I own a commercial CD of Mozart’s Marriage of Figaro sung most competently in Arabic. I am a decent pianist and have played, studied, written about, and practiced that wonderful instrument all of my life; the significant part of my musical education was received in Cairo from Arab teachers, who first inspired a love and knowledge of Western music (and, yes, of Mozart) that has never left me. In addition, I should also mention that for the past three years I have been associated with Daniel Barenboim in sponsoring a group of young Arab and Israeli musicians to come together for three weeks in the summer to perform orchestral and chamber music under Barenboim (and in 1999 with Yo-Yo Ma) at an elevated, international level. All of the young Arabs received their training in Arab conservatories. How could Barenboim and I have staffed the West-Ostlicher Diwan workshop, as it is called, if Western music had fallen on such deaf Muslim ears? Besides, why should Lewis and Kennedy use the supposed absence of Western music as a club to beat “Islam” with anyway? Isn’t there an enormously rich panoply of Islamic musics to take account of instead of indulging in this ludicrous browbeating?

    #Islam #Islamisme #Modernité

  • Un conseiller de Trump lié à une milice chrétienne qui a commis le massacre de Sabra et Chatilla (Palestiniens) ?

    http://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/1.710162

    Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump has named a Lebanese academic adviser who had an important role in a Christian militia accused of involvement in the 1982 Sabra and Shatila massacres of Palestinians, Mother Jones magazine reports on its Web site.
    Walid Phares is one of five advisers revealed by Trump to the Washington Post on Monday. (...)
    Mother Jones cited a story it ran in 2011 quoting a former colleague, Toni Niss, as saying Phares had been a major player in the Lebanese militia and that he had helped the militia’s leade Samir Geagea instll religious ideology in their troops.
    The militia was accused at the time of involvement in the slayings of hundreds of Palestinians in two refugee camps as Israeli forces encircled Beirut. An Israeli commission of inquiry punished senior officials for failing to prevent the killlings perpetrated by the Lebanese forces which were allied with the IDF at that time.

  • Lire absolument: Saudi Arabia Gazes at Lebanon with Vengeance
    http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/24102/saudi-arabia-gazes-at-lebanon-with-vengeance

    On 21 June 2015, angry families in Lebanon took to the streets protesting the brutal treatment of Islamist prisoners at Roumia prison. A leaked video showed one security officer flogging a naked, handcuffed, bearded man with a water hose while shouting profanities: “Do you want houriat? It’s your mother who will be the hourieh.” The featured torturers turned out to be members of the Information Security Branch, which is under the direct command of Minister of Interior and Future Party leader Nouhad al-Mashnuq. Protesters in Tripoli, Beirut, and Iqlim al-Kharrub (in Mount Lebanon) chanted slogans and insults against Hariri, al-Mashnuq, and Minister of Justice Ashraf Rifi, calling them “secular infidels that do not represent ahal al-Sunna.”

    In the face of this public resentment, some Future Party MPs in the north (MPs Khalid al-Daher and Mouin Mer’abi) distanced themselves from their party for fear of losing their local constituency, while others blamed the whole thing on Hizballah. Rifi, with his trademark impulsive miscalculations, blamed Hizballah for leaking the video showing humiliation and torture of Lebanese Islamist prisoners (mostly from Tripoli and other parts of the north). But in his attempt to direct Sunni anger against the Shi‘a, Rifi’s sectarian politics backfired. Angry protesters turned apoplectic because of their perception that Rifi assumed that they were too stupid to discern his tactics, and instead some protesters went on television, shouting, “We want to thank Hizballah for exposing the truth about the torture our sons are subjected to in Roumia.” Hizballah denied leaking the video; moreover, the IP address of the original YouTube account where the video was first published turned out to be that of the media office of Ashraf Rifi. Hizballah’s advantage lies in the fact that Saudi Arabia’s proxies in Lebanon are currently caught up in a maelstrom of confusion and a lack of public credibility.

    Internally, in light of an ongoing and self-inflicted trash crisis, both March 8 and March 14 politicians continue to de-escalate their political rhetoric. However, Saudi Arabia’s insistence on a confrontation with Hizballah means that it is only a matter of time until the Saudis withdraw their losing card, Sa‘ad Hariri, and deploy another Trojan horse to create the sort of chaos the kingdom seeks. This means other Sunni figures will be given a leading role and Hariri will be out of the Lebanese arena–again. Saudi Arabia’s possible nominees for unconventional roles could include Jabhat al-Nusra or/and IS, alongside thuggish Sunni figures who have splintered from Future and set up their own shop as warlords for hire. This includes those who perpetuated a six-year war between the poorest communities in Tripoli.

  • Le Washington Post nous avait déjà rapporté, en janvier 2016, cette parole de Moshe Yaalon (ministre de la Défense israélien) selon laquelle s’il avait à choisir entre Da’ich et Assad, il choisirait Da’ich : https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/01/19/israeli-defense-minister-if-i-had-to-choose-between-iran-and-isis-id-choose-isis/?tid=sm_tw

    Speaking at the Institute for National Security Studies’ (INSS) conference in Tel Aviv on Jan. 19, Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon made a bold statement: If he had to choose between Iran and the Islamic State, he told the audience, he’d “choose ISIS.”

    Pour confirmer, Michael Oren, ex-ambassadeur aux USA et associé à l’actuelle coalition au pouvoir en Israel nous a fait un remake, rapporté dans le Wall Street Journal ce 17 mars :
    http://www.wsj.com/articles/israels-main-concern-in-syria-iran-not-isis-1458207000

    “If we have to choose between ISIS and Assad, we’ll take ISIS. ISIS has flatbed trucks and machine guns. Assad represents the strategic arch from Tehran to Beirut, 130,000 rockets in the hands of Hezbollah, and the Iranian nuclear program,” said Michael Oren, a prominent lawmaker from Israel’s governing coalition and a former ambassador to Washington.

    Parce que comme l’explique Dore Gold, du ministère des affaires étrangères :

    Asked in an interview to state Israel’s main objective in Syria, Dore Gold, the director-general of the foreign ministry, said: “At the end of the day, when some kind of modus vivendi is reached inside of Syria, it is critical from the Israeli standpoint that Syria does not emerge as an Iranian satellite incorporated fully into the Iranian strategic system.”

    • @gonzo : oui, c’est d’ailleurs ce que dit l’article en évoquant les craintes israéliennes d’un nouveau front dans le Golan organisé par le Hezbollah, et l’acquisition de nouvelles armes iraniennes.
      Mais j’avais oublié de mettre le lien vers l’article du WSJ, je viens de l’ajouter...

      As many Israeli officials see it, however, that wouldn’t be such a good scenario if it ends up benefiting the Syrian military and its critical Lebanese ally, the Iranian-backed Hezbollah militia, which remains sworn to Israel’s destruction. [...]
      Israel’s immediate concerns are to prevent Hezbollah from opening a second front from Syrian soil opposite the Israeli-held Golan Heights, and to prevent transfers of sophisticated Iranian weapons to the Lebanese militia.

  • Le PYD kurde annonce unilatéralement la création d’une région fédérale (autonome) au nord-est de la Syrie (Qamishli-Kobané), en pleine discussion à Genève (dont les Kurdes ne font pas partie) :
    Dépêche AP :
    http://bigstory.ap.org/urn:publicid:ap.org:6bfb16dc44214b5bb8fb4bbb204e3589

    BEIRUT (AP) — A powerful Kurdish party announced plans Wednesday to declare a federal region in northern Syria, an idea promptly dismissed by Turkey and Syrian government negotiators at U.N.-brokered peace talks.
    The declaration was expected to be made at the end of a Kurdish conference that began Wednesday in the town of Rmeilan, in Syria’s northern Hassakeh province.
    It comes as the Damascus government and Western- and Saudi-backed rebels are holding peace talks with a U.N. envoy in Geneva on ways to end the devastating civil war, which this week entered its sixth year.
    The main Syrian Kurdish group, the Democratic Union Party (PYD), and its military wing, the People’s Protection Units (YPG), have so far been excluded from those talks so as not to anger Turkey, despite Russia’s insistence that they be part of the negotiations. Ankara views the group as a terrorist organization.

    Et dans le même temps le YPG kurde semble mettre un coup de pression au gouvernement en assiégeant le quartier-général des Forces de Défense Nationale (milice pro-régime) dans la ville kurde de Qamishli.

  • Un Mig-21 de l’armée syrienne a été abattu le 12 mars 2016 près de Kafr Nabudah (nord-ouest de Hama). Le pilote qui s’est éjecté a été abattu.
    Accusations du régime syrien selon lesquelles des groupes rebelles syriens disposeraient désormais de « MANPAD » (missiles Sol-air portatifs = Option Stinger) :
    http://www.pravdareport.com/news/hotspots/terror/14-03-2016/133805-syrian_aircraft-0
    Rapport du ministre de la défense russe qui fait écho à cette accusation et dénégation des groupes rebelles (notamment ici de l’ASL)/ Dépêche Reuters 13.03.2016 :
    http://news.yahoo.com/syrian-rebels-deny-missile-used-shoot-down-warplane-163802317.html

    BEIRUT (Reuters) - Syrian rebels on Sunday denied a Russian Defence Ministry report that an anti-aircraft missile had been used to shoot down a Syrian warplane in Hama province on Saturday.
    Officials in three rebel groups contacted by Reuters reiterated previous statements that it had been shot down with anti-aircraft guns.
    Fares al-Bayoush, head of a Free Syrian Army rebel group operating in the Hama area, said the Russian statement might be aimed at “accusing some states of supplying the opposition with anti-aircraft missiles”.

    Voir ici les vidéos des uns et des autres censées étayer l’accusation et les dénégations :
    https://now.mmedia.me/lb/en/NewsReports/566736-syria-jet-purportedly-downed-by-surface-to-air-missile

  • Selon Robert Fisk dans the Independent, qui consacre un article aux rapports de plus en plus tendus de l’Arabie saoudite vis à vis du Liban (et notamment du Hezbollah), l’Iran aurait proposé une aide de 7 milliards à l’armée libanaise pour compenser les plus de 3 milliards que la monarchie saoudienne vient de lui retirer :
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-turns-on-lebanon-for-its-unfaithfulness-and-lack-of-grat

    The Saudis will probably regret this assault. Pulling Lebanon’s financial magic carpet away opens the country up to other “friends”, not least Iran which, according to the latest Beirut reports, would be happy to fund the Lebanese army to the tune of £7bn – providing, of course, the newly purchased weapons come from Tehran, and not from Paris.
    The Americans and the British, desperate to prop up the secular Lebanese army with enough weapons to protect the country from Isis – which briefly took over the north-eastern Lebanese town of Ersal and still holds nine Lebanese soldiers captive – are pleading with the Saudis to keep their original £3.2bn promise.

  • Et pendant ce temps, les Émirats semblent se considérer en état de guerre avec le Liban… (ces gens sont d’une subtilité)
    https://www.mofa.gov.ae/EN/MediaCenter/News/Pages/23216-Leban.aspx

    The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation has announced upgrading of the travel warning to Lebanon to a complete ban, with effect from On Tuesday, February 23 ، 2016. 

    The ministry also decided to reduce the number of its diplomatic mission in Beirut to its minimum.

  • Beyrouth habitée, Beyrouth fantasmée : les traces de la ville - Radio PIIAF
    http://piiaf.com/podcasts/rue-du-caire/article/bachar-mar-khalife-giorgio-tarraf

    Aujourd’hui, c’est à Beyrouth que nous nous rendons et on va parler de traces. Quand on arrive à Beyrouth, la première chose que l’on remarque ce sont ces petits impacts de balles qui parsèment les façades et les rideaux métalliques des magasins. Ce sont eux qui vous rappellent l’histoire de cette ville qui a connu une guerre civile de 1975 à 1990 et qui tente aujourd’hui d’enterrer cette terrible période à coups de pelleteuses et de buildings.
    Beyrouth fascine, et il y a de quoi : c’est une ville difficile à saisir, tout en contradictions et c’est avec deux Beyrouthins que nous allons en parler ce soir. C’est deux regards sur le passé, deux approches qui se croisent : Beyrouth habitée et Beyrouth fantasmée. L’un s’engage dans une action collective et politique quand l’autre explore l’intime à travers ses chansons.
    Pour le militant Giorgio Tarraf la ville est un lieu de combat. Il a créé le mouvement “Save Beirut Heritage” pour protéger les immeubles anciens de la ville et par là refuser de voir disparaître les traces de l’histoire de son pays. Pour notre deuxième invité, le chanteur Bachar Mar Khalifé qui a dû quitter la ville quand il était très jeune, Beyrouth semble être une métaphore, une inspiration, une empreinte dans sa mémoire…

  • VERDAD sobre suspensión de ayuda militar de Riad a El Líbano - HispanTV, Nexo Latino
    http://hispantv.com/newsdetail/arabia-saudi/215785/revelacion-arabia-saudi-suspende-apoyo-militar-libano

    Según argumenta el prominente activista político saudí de sobrenombre “Mujtahid”, Riad cortó su apoyo de 3000 millones de dólares a El Líbano, después de que el Gobierno de Beirut se negara a liberar a Abdel Mohsen bin Walid bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, un príncipe saudí de 35 años, detenido el 26 de octubre de 2015 en el aeropuerto internacional Rafiq al-Hariri por tratar de introducir cerca de dos toneladas de droga en Arabia Saudí.

    Este príncipe saudí que, según Mujtahid, probablemente pertenece a la monarquía de los Al Saud, estaba tratando de transportar la mencionada cantidad de droga en su avión privado e intentaba llevar a territorio saudí las conocidas píldoras de Captagon, usadas por los terroristas en Irak y Siria con frecuencia, dado que aumentan la autoestima y la concentración, además de reducir significativamente la percepción del dolor.

    Sur Voltairenet, Thierry Messan développe sa propre thèse, relative à l’achat, puis à l’abandon de cette transaction, du silence du gouvernement libanais sur les aveux d’un « aide » du prince Bandar, ex-responsable des basses oeuvres saoudiennes...

  • Readying for the “Dahiye Doctrine”
    https://mideastwire.wordpress.com/2016/02/16/readying-for-the-dahiye-doctrine

    #Ha'aretz : Les civils libanais ne mourront que parce que le Hezbollah se cachera derrière eux ; le Hezbollah sera coupable de crimes innommables en bombardant les installations militaires israéliennes situées à proximité de secteurs civils puisqu’il n’aura pas respecté l’entente tacite entre les deux parties qui veut que ces dernières doivent épargner les civils...

    #sans_vergogne #chutzpah

    The author of this Haaretz piece (http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.703486 ) does not seem to know that the “Dahiye Doctrine” is already official IDF policy for the next war. Civilians in “Hezbollah areas” are to be considered supportive constituents and will be viewed by Israel as “legitimate targets.” Thus, what is promised in the next war is the leveling of significant parts of Lebanon and fairly large civilian deaths and injuries, probably more than those obtained during the 1982 Israeli siege of Beirut and certainly far more than the 1,191 civilians killed by Israel in the 2006 war (Hizbullah killed 43 Israeli civilians and 121 IDF members).

    What is not said in these pieces – since the purpose of these pieces on all sides is not analysis but information advantage – is that the IDF likely knows that the vast bulk of Hezbollah’s military capabilities and especially its rocket firing locations are not in cities but are likely in the mountains and in the sparsely populated south (we saw this in the 2006 war when village guards units fought the IDF, but without the mountain positioning – which will be key in the next war – north of the Litani river).

    Also left unsaid are the terms of the 1996 “April Understanding” that ended the 1996 war between Hezbollah and Israel. The key provisio there (and which Nasrallah invoked at the start of the 2006 war) is that Israel can have its many military sites which are also in or adjacent to civilian populated areas and installations (like the HQ for the IDF which is next to Hadassah Hospital) and Hezbollah can have rockets in basements, homes or wherever (although the majority of positions – and the bulk of the actual firing sites – for such material is much more likely in the mountains and in the southern plains and “wilderness areas”) BUT neither site can target the other in these areas…. only the firing sites themselves can actually be targeted.

    This is a key aspect of the “rules of the game” well known to the actors. When Israel ran out of targets so quickly in the 2006 war, they rapidly dispensed with these rules – as did Hezbollah very early (some argue before the IDF did) by firing into civilian populated areas and also progressively firing from or close to civilian populated areas. The point is that both sides know you can have military bases in civilian areas; both know you should not fire from civilian populated areas; and both sides know that firing at civilian populated areas is also against the “rules of the game.” These are the well known terms, and when either side breaks any of these provisios, people and policymakers know how things spiral downwards.

    • Évidemment, Israël a le droit de menacer le Liban de destruction totale, d’annoncer à l’avance tous ses crimes de guerre… au moins une fois par mois dans un grand média. Parce c’est pas grave et ça n’intéresse personne.

      Et tout aussi sûrement, quand Israël attaquera le Liban, détruira ses infrastructures et massacrera sa population, nous serons ensevelis sous les belles considérations sur le droit d’Israël à se défendre, sur sa façon super-morale de mener la guerre, et s’il y a des morts civils c’est la faute au Hezbollah qui fait rien qu’à cacher 100.000 missiles de croisière dans les caves des immeubles de la banlieue sud de Beyrouth…

    • No, Israel Should Not Flatten Beirut
      http://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/No-Israel-Should-Not-Flatten-Beirut-20160217-0016.html

      Who, you may ask, is the fellow who has taken it upon himself to ponder this important matter? As it turns out, Etzioni is not some random internee at a psychiatric institution but rather a professor at the George Washington University in Washington, D.C., having formerly taught at other prestigious U.S. universities including Columbia and Harvard. Also on his CV are stints of service in the Palmach militia, which fought for Israeli “independence” until 1948, and the Israeli military.

    • Why an Israeli newspaper wanted to ’flatten’ a city of millions
      https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20160228-why-an-israeli-newspaper-wanted-to-flatten-a-city-of-mil

      Earlier this month Haaretz, Israel’s influential liberal daily, published a blood-curdling article. It openly argued for war crimes on a massive scale against the civilian population of a neighbouring Arab state.

      [...]

      It is clear that Israel reserves to itself the right to target the civilian populations of its enemies. And when the victims strike back against such brutality, they are accused by Israel of “terrorism”. It is Israel that is the true originator of terrorism in the Middle East. That is a truth that stretches back even further than the era when Amitai Etzioni and his kibbutznik comrades were charging around British Mandate Palestine murdering and driving out Palestinian civilians from their land.

      A continued and endemic threat against the peoples of the region is clear: the threat is Israel. Who will stop this criminal entity?

  • Devant les avancées du régime au nord la Turquie a fourni (avant les accords de cessation des hostilités à Munich) aux groupes qu’elle soutient des missiles Sol-sol d’une portée de 20 kms. Certes ce n’est pas encore la livraison de missiles sol-air portatifs (option afghane Stinger) mais c’est une nouvelle étape dans l’escalade militaire internationale en Syrie :
    http://news.yahoo.com/syrian-rebels-missiles-confront-offensive-191050845.html

    BEIRUT (Reuters) - Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s foreign enemies have sent rebels new supplies of ground-to-ground missiles to confront a Russian-backed offensive by the government near Aleppo, stepping up support in response to the attack, two rebel commanders said.

    The commanders told Reuters the missiles with a range of 20 km (12 miles) had been provided in “excellent quantities” in response to the attack that has cut rebel supply lines from the Turkish border to opposition-held parts of the city of Aleppo.
    Facing one of the biggest defeats of the five-year-long war, rebels have been complaining that foreign states such as Saudi Arabia and Turkey have let them down by not providing them with more powerful weapons, including anti-aircraft missiles.
    “It is excellent additional fire power for us,” said one of the commanders, who declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. The second rebel commander said the missiles were being used to hit army positions beyond the front line. “They give the factions longer reach,” he said.

    • Aleppo under siege
      http://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_aleppo_under_siege5092

      For the United States, increased weapons flows are a more palatable alternative than direct intervention. These new weapons will be aimed not so much at securing decisive victories, but at keeping the opposition alive as a viable fighting force, preventing the fall of Aleppo and making Russia pay a higher price for their ongoing support. Of course, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are also very focused on the fact that 2017 will usher in a new US president and hope that the new office holder will be willing to up US intervention in the conflict, something that is distinctly possible given US political dynamics and the expected desire of a new president to project assertiveness as a mark of contrast with Obama’s perceived timidity. Keeping the rebels ready for this moment is likely to have already emerged as a critical strategy of the opposition and its backers.

    • @kassem : intéressant de lire cette analyse dans ce think tank atlantiste. Le passage que vous citez rend plausible l’accusation d’Angry arab - de toute manière les TOW américains, selon les contrats d’armement américains me semble-t-il, ne sauraient être vendus ou céder sans en référer aux USA et obtenir leur accord. A minima cette intensification de l’armement de Jaysh al-Fatah suppose la non-opposition de Washington.
      Le reste de l’article plaide, étonnamment, pour prendre un peu plus en compte, dans la définition des politiques occidentales en Syrie, les besoins immédiats des civils syriens plutôt que les intérêts de tel camp ou les questions dites « morales ». Un ton un peu plus raisonnable que celui auquel on est habitué...

  • La Turquie bombarde à l’artillerie les positions prises par le YPG et les SDF dans la base de Menagh (poche d’Azaz, nord d’Alep) et aux alentours - ceci afin de freiner son avancée vers Azaz :
    http://news.yahoo.com/turkey-shells-kurdish-held-areas-syrias-aleppo-monitor-155529508.html;_y

    Beirut (AFP) - Turkish artillery on Saturday bombarded areas of Aleppo province in northern Syria controlled by Kurdish forces, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.
    The monitoring group’s head, Rami Abdel Rahman, said Turkish shelling struck areas of Aleppo, including Minnigh, recently taken by the Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG) militia from Islamist rebels.

    Même un « jihadologue » avec des analyses aussi discutables et partisanes que Charles Lister relève la contradiction de la politique américaine : des brigades de l’ASL alliées aux Kurdes du YPG (au sein des SDF), et soutenues par les USA, sont bombardées par l’alliée des USA, la Turquie, en soutien à d’autres brigades de l’ASL soutenues par les USA, la Turquie et l’Arabie saoudite :
    https://twitter.com/Charles_Lister/status/698535922338439168

    #Turkey (NATO member) is bombing #YPG (backed by US, #Russia) & SDF (backed by US), for attacking FSA (backed by US, Turkey & Saudi)

    On passera vite sur l’alliance des ces groupes de l’ASL, soutenus par la Turquie, avec divers groupes jihadistes car évidemment M. Lister aimerait, lui, que les USA cessent leur alliance avec le YPG et laissent les Turcs bombarder tranquillement le nord de la Syrie.

    Cette contradiction avait déjà été évoquée ici il y a deux mois : http://seenthis.net/messages/435727
    Elle semble en tout cas de plus en plus difficilement tenable.

    • La contradiction de cette politique s’exprime par des remontrances, pour l’instant un peu molles, du Département d’Etat aux deux camps :
      http://seenthis.net/messages/460841

      Le porte-parole du département d’Etat américain a condamné ces tirs :
      « Nous avons pressé les Kurdes syriens et d’autres forces affiliées au PYD de ne pas profiter de la confusion en s’emparant de nouveaux territoires. Nous avons aussi vu des informations concernant des tirs d’artillerie depuis le côté turc de la frontière et avons exhorté la Turquie à cesser ces tirs ».

      Article du Monde signalé par @simplicissimus

    • #Syrie: Le Front al-#Nosra reçoit des renforts via la #Turquie
      http://fr.sputniknews.com/international/20160214/1021748782/syrie-renforts-terroristes-transit-turquie.html

      Près de 400 combattants du groupe djihadiste Légion du Sham (Faylaq al-Sham) sont arrivés à Tall Raafat, dans le gouvernorat d’Alep, en provenance d’Idlib, a annoncé dimanche la chaîne de télévision libanaise Al Mayadeen.

      Transitant par le territoire turc, ces « renforts » se battront aux côtés du Front al-Nosra contre les forces gouvernementales syriennes, précise Al Mayadeen.

    • Déclaration de Davutoglu : « la Turquie ne permettra pas la prise d’Azaz par les milices kurdes ». Le ministre des affaires étrangères turc revendique et justifie les bombardements à l’artillerie du YPG en sol syrien.
      http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-turkey-davutoglu-idUSKCN0VO0ZZ

      Turkey will not allow Azaz in northern Syria to fall to the Kurdish YPG militia and the group will face the “harshest reaction” if it tries to approach the town again, Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said on Monday.
      Speaking to reporters on his plane en route to Ukraine, Davutoglu said YPG fighters would have seized control of Azaz and the town of Tal Rifaat further south had it not been for Turkish artillery shelling them over the weekend.
      "YPG elements were forced away from around Azaz. If they approach again they will see the harshest reaction. We will not allow Azaz to fall," Davutoglu said.
      He said Turkey would make the Syrian Menagh air base “unusable” if the YPG does not withdraw from the area, which it seized from Syrian rebels. He warned the YPG not to move east of its Afrin region or west of the Euphrates River.

      En attendant, le YPG et les SDF (le groupe Jaysh al-Thuwar, l’armée des révolutionnaires, issu de l’ASL : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Army_of_Revolutionaries) auraient pris le contrôle de la ville de Tall Rifaat contrôlé par les milices islamistes de Ahrar al-Cham al-islamiya et Harakat Noureddin al-Zenki

  • Traduction de l’arabe à l’anglais d’un article dans al-Raï d’Elijah Magnier, commentateur qui me semble mériter d’être lu :
    https://elijahjm.wordpress.com/2016/02/06/finishing-off-isisdaesh-is-not-a-priority-for-the-west
    "Finishing off Daesh is not a priority for the West"

    When Anbar and Ninoy tribes raided the city of Mosul back in June 2014, these tribes, followed by ISIS, claimed the victory to itself and overshadowed the influence of the tribes. Iraq was governed by Prime Minister Nuri Al-Maliki who threw the Americans out of Iraq, and opened the doors of cooperation with Iran, so much so that almost every deal between the Prime minister, government cabinet, as well as the major and minor political parties and blocks, whether Sunni, Shi’a, or Kurds, were sketched and brokered in Tehran and Beirut.
    Washington stood by as armed opposition against Baghdad grew, especially ISIS. It wanted ISIS to sow the seeds of destruction in Syria and Iraq; these allegations were confirmed by retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), in a report he had submitted to the US administration back in 2012.
    There is no doubt that Iran’s increasing influence in the region harms US interests, and the interests of other regional players. The US moved to contain ISIS but not to destroy it, when it headed towards the oil rich city of Kirkuk, and the Kurdish capital of Erbil, where regional and international interests are present, in the form of military cooperation, and oil extraction contracts, it is also used by the CIA as a launching base for its operations in the region.
    From this we can conclude that destroying ISIS would harm US interests because there would be no military excuse to be there, and hence Tehran would regain control of Iraq. Baghdad under Prime Minister Haider Al-Abadi is convinced that the US can provide aerial and technological assistance for the Iraqi intellegence community, thus enabling security forces to strike ISIS where it hurts. Iran has been able to use the call of Seyyed Ali Al-Sistani to form the Popular Mobilization Forces enabling Tehran to regain a foothold in Iraq, by forming an alternative to the current security forces, and offering an alternative to Haider Al-Abadi that can challenge him in the future.

    Le même avait déjà expliqué pourquoi le régime ne se concentrait pas encore sur Daesh :
    For Assad defeating al-Qaeda and its allies, rather than ISIS, is a top priority : ISIS is a “marionette”.
    https://elijahjm.wordpress.com/2016/01/09/why-defeating-al-qaeda-and-its-allies-is-a-top-priority-for-assa

  • Tu te souviens, quand on a essayé de te faire croire que Ziad Rahbani était grillé au Liban, qu’il s’était fait virer par des manifestations « spontanées » contre sa présence à l’AUB (avril 2013)… bon ben c’est pas vrai : Lebanese film ‘What About Tomorrow ?’ Crushes box office records In Lebanon
    http://deadline.com/2016/01/lebanese-film-ziad-rahbani-what-about-tomorrow-crushes-box-office-records-

    A new Lebanese film, What About Tomorrow?, which is made up of grainy footage of a 38-year-old play by legendary singer-writer Ziad Rahbani, is crushing box office records in the country. The film opened on Thursday January 21 and has already garnered 28,000 admissions in its first day. To put that into context, that’s more than Star Wars: The Force Awakens did in its entire opening weekend. The film is now anticipated to become the highest grossing Lebanese film of all time. A lot of tickets sold were part of a new phenomenon in Lebanon where people buy out whole screens and invite their friends and family for a private showing on the day of release. 12,000 tickets were sold in pre-sales alone, an un-heard of number for a film in the country.

    What makes this all the more remarkable is the film is not really a film at all, or even new for that matter. It is a collage of old 8mm footage of performances of Rahbani’s play, also called What About Tomorrow?, that first opened in Beirut in 1978, three years into Lebanon’s 15-year civil war. The footage was originally filmed by Rahbani’s sister Layal at his request so that he could show it to the actors during rehearsals and change stage elements such as the lighting and costumes. There are scenes in the film version where the same character appears in different clothes for no apparent reason. “The audience don’t care,” says Hyam Saliby, the head of sales and acquisitions at distributor Italia Film. “Even though the quality of the image is not great, the audience are just in love with Ziad and this experience. The amazing thing is this footage was never even meant to be shown. It was only intended for personal use.”

    Ziad Rahbani’s iconic play in Beirut cinemas
    http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/5/32/183494/Arts--Culture/Film/Ziad-Rahbanis-iconic-play-in-Beirut-cinemas.aspx

    The audience interacted with the film, as if they were watching the play firsthand, clapping the moment the actors went on stage, and singing along with late Lebanese singer Joseph Saker as he sang Aa Hadeer Al-Bosta, Esmaa Ya Reda and Aisha Wahda Balak.

    The audience members comprised members of Lebanon’s older generation who had attended the play’s premiere on 27 February 1978, which garnered huge commercial success, and hence wanted to reclaim the memories of Beirut in this production, which continued to be performed in Al-Hamra Street for eight months. Also attending were Lebanese youth who grew up listening to recordings of Rahbani’s works.

    Pas mal de choses sur Youtube en cherchant « Bel nesbe la boukra shou »…

  • Selon Human Rights Watch, la coalition saoudienne a utilisé des bombes à sous-munition - accusées d’être en pratique du même type que les bombes à fragmentation, et donc de toucher notamment des civils - sur deux quartiers peuplés de Sanaa.
    Précision : ces armes sont américaines, comme en témoigne une photo avec le numéro de série des armes.
    Yemen : Coalition Drops Cluster Bombs in Capital
    Indiscriminate Weapon Used in Residential Areas / HRW 07.01.16
    https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/01/07/yemen-coalition-drops-cluster-bombs-capital-0

    (Beirut) – Saudi Arabia-led coalition forces airdropped cluster bombs on residential neighborhoods in Yemen’s capital, Sanaa, early on January 6, 2016. It is not yet clear whether the attacks caused civilian casualties, but the inherently indiscriminate nature of cluster munitions makes such attacks serious violations of the laws of war. The deliberate or reckless use of cluster munitions in populated areas amounts to a war crime.
    “The coalition’s repeated use of cluster bombs in the middle of a crowded city suggests an intent to harm civilians, which is a war crime,” said Steve Goose, arms director at Human Rights Watch. “These outrageous attacks show that the coalition seems less concerned than ever about sparing civilians from war’s horrors.”
    Residents of two Sanaa neighborhoods described aerial attacks consistent with cluster bomb use.

    https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/styles/node_embed/public/multimedia_images_2016/yemen.jpg?itok=hosj047d

    Markings on a remnant of a CBU-58 cluster bomb found near al-Zira`a Street in Sanaa on January 6, 2016 indicating that it was manufactured in 1978 at the Milan Army Ammunition Plant in the US state of Tennessee.

    • HRW recommande du coup au gouvernement américain de suspendre la vente d’armes permettant des bombardements aériens tant que des enquêtes sérieuses n’ont pas été menées sur la possibilité de crimes de guerre :

      Neither Yemen, Saudi Arabia, nor any of the other coalition countries are party to the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions, the international treaty banning cluster munitions. A total of 118 countries have signed and 98 have ratified the treaty. Human Rights Watch is a co-founder of the Cluster Munition Coalition and serves as its chair.
      On November 17, the US Defense Department announced that the State Department had approved a sale of US$1.29 billion worth of air-to-ground munitions, such as laser-guided bombs and “general purpose” bombs with guidance systems – none of which are cluster munitions. The US should not sell aerial bombs to Saudi Arabia in the absence of serious investigations into alleged laws-of-war violations in Yemen, Human Rights Watch said.

      Bon, entre nous, je doute que l’on n’en entende autant parler que des « barrels bombs » d’Assad...

  • Lebanon feels aftershocks of Saudi-Iran crisis - Al-Monitor: the Pulse of the Middle East
    http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/01/iran-saudi-arabia-repercussions-lebanon-hariri-hezbollah.html

    The first possibility is that this Sunni-Shiite conflict — outside Lebanon’s borders between Saudi Arabia and Iran, and in the Lebanese arena between Hariri and Hezbollah — will lead to the rapprochement between the Christian forces. This would result in the main Christian parties (Lebanese Forces and the Free Patriotic Movement) agreeing on a single candidate for the presidency.

    This would significantly tip the balance of power of the presidential elections. It should be noted that such a hypothesis has been circulated within the political and media circles in Beirut in the first 10 days of 2016. Talks have been spreading about progress in negotiations between the leaders of the two largest Christian parliamentary blocs — Free Patriotic Movement leader Gen. Michel Aoun and Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea — to reach a bilateral agreement approving Aoun’s candidacy for presidency.

    Read more: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/01/iran-saudi-arabia-repercussions-lebanon-hariri-hezbollah.html#ixzz3xDci1

  • The Angry Arab News Service/وكالة أنباء العربي الغاضب : Hunger in Madaya
    http://angryarab.blogspot.fr/2016/01/hunger-in-madaya.html

    This passage in an article by Al-Akhbar’s Elie Hanna, who was able to reach Madaya yesterday, sums up the situation (these are the words of one old man in the town): "No one can deny cases of hunger and illness in Madaya: “How don’t we get hungry when the aid is not being distributed adequately, and the siege exists, and the armed men and merchants control the existing commodities and at their prices, said an old man holding a bag containing bushes for heating”.
    “لا ينكر أحد حالات الجوع والمرض في مضايا. «كيف لا نجوع والمساعدات لا توزّع بنحو سليم والحصار موجود والمسلحون والتجار يتحكّمون بالبضائع الموجودة وبأسعارها»، يقول عجوز يحمل بيده كيساً فيه بعض الأغصان «للتدفئة».”
    So some remarks about Madaya:
    1) Yes, there was hunger in Madaya. That can’t be denied.
    2) Those who are responsible for Madaya: the Syrian regime forces and Hizbullah forces imposing the siege; and the various armed groups in the town who basically confiscate all humanitarian aid and either use it for themselves or sell it at exorbitant high prices.
    3) Mocking the hungry in Madya is discpiable: and mocking the suffering of people has become a staple of both sides in Lebanon and in Syria.
    4) Of course, international media ignored the suffering of people in Fua and Kafrya, and Nubul and Zahra, because the civilians there are not residing in the “liberated” areas of Syria.
    5) The armed groups in Madya and their supporters grotesquely exploited the suffering of the people in Madya either by showcasing little children and elderly and forcing little children to hold political signs and also by adding pictures that are not from Madaya. The propaganda of Syrian armed groups has no respect for truth; it never has.
    6) Hizbollah’s statement on the matter of Madaya was rather pathetic: it basically used the typical Israeli Zionist line “about how armed groups are hiding behind women and children”: even if that is the case, that should not deny aid to the people. On the contrary: it requires more aid. Also, the notion that aid was delivered in November is a silly response: if there is a need for more aid (even if the reason has to do with confiscation by armed rebels) there should be more aid, no matter.
    7) Not one side in the ugly Syrian war has clean hands. This is a filthy war which dirties the hands of whoever enters it.
    8) Please spare me the fake sympathy of Lebanese March 14 journalists: the March 14 coalition in Lebanon is in charge (through its Minister of Social Affairs, Rashid Dirbas) of handling the Syrian refugees in Lebanon and not one in that camp is protesting the mistreatment and injustices inflicted on Syrian refugees: from blatant racism to imposed curfews on Syrians in Lebanon.

    #madaya

    • Dans Beirut West Beirut de Ziad Doueiri (1998), il y a cette scène vers la fin : les gens font la queue pendant des heures chez le boulanger pour avoir du pain, le boulanger rationne (sagement) à un sac de pain par personne. Arrive le milicien local, qui passe devrant tout le monde avec son fusil mitrailleur, et au motif qu’il « défend ce quartier », exige 20 sacs de pain immédiatement. Une altercation s’ensuit.

      Les Libanais savent mieux que quiconque que, si tu assièges une population en l’enfermant avec sa propre milice, les miliciens ne tarderont pas à exploiter la population. Si le Hezbollah a un « problème de communication », et croit pouvoir rejeter toute la faute du siège de Mayada sur les miliciens qui sont à l’intérieur de la ville, il est mal parti.

  • Cette étonnante mention au détour de l’article de RFI consacré à Madaya :
    http://www.rfi.fr/moyen-orient/20160112-crise-madaya-onu-appelle-regime-syrien-lever-siege

    Privés d’électricité, de chauffage et de nourriture, les 40.000 habitants sont confrontés au siège des forces gouvernementales et aux exactions des rebelles, qui monopolisent toutes les ressources. Dans ce contexte, l’Observatoire syrien des droits de l’homme rapporte qu’une foule en colère a expulsé, lundi 11 janvier, de son lieu de résidence, le chef du Conseil militaire rebelle, qui voulait stocker dans des dépôts sous son contrôle l’aide acheminée. Les habitants exigeaient que les rations alimentaires soient directement distribuées aux familles et ils ont finalement obtenu gain de cause.

    Anecdote de l’Observatoire qui n’est pas reprise dans l’article du Monde :
    http://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2016/01/11/assieges-et-epuises-les-habitants-de-madaya-voient-enfin-arriver-l-aide-huma
    Ni dans l’article de Libération (à la place, l’analyse militaire de Thomas Pierret) :
    http://www.liberation.fr/planete/2016/01/12/a-madaya-ce-que-nous-avons-vu-est-assez-horrible-il-n-y-avait-pas-de-vie_

    • Hizbullah hits back at starvation reports in Madaya, Syria
      https://mideastwire.wordpress.com/2016/01/08/hizbullah-hits-back-at-starvation-reports-in-madaya-syria

      Interesting response, not least because it does show that publicity, statements and reports over Madaya are clearly having an important impact on Hizbullah’s public stance.

      On January 8, the Qatari-owned Al-Quds al-Arabi daily carried the following report by its correspondent in Beirut: “It seems that Hezbollah was bewildered by the intensifying media campaign that shed light on the tragedy endured by the besieged Syrian town of Madaya, and had to clarify the situation, not through an official statement, but through Al-Manar’s newscast yesterday night. Indeed, the channel commented on what it dubbed a programed media campaign against the resistance regarding the town of Madaya in Rif Dimashq, quoting sources as saying: “Some visual and written media outlets with known inclinations have launched a wide-scale slander campaign against the resistance, and accused Hezbollah of starving the civilians in Madaya through its siege. But this is a programmed campaign aiming to ruin the image of the resistance.”

      “[It said:] “The armed groups that have taken Madaya hostage, and the foreign sides supporting them, are the only ones responsible for what is happening in the town. We have not seen a similar campaign regarding other Syrian towns that have been besieged by the armed terrorist groups for years, such as Kefraya and Al-Fou’a in Rif Adlib, Nebl and Az-Zahra’ in the countryside of Aleppo, Deir Ezzor and other regions, where babies are dying because of the shortage of milk and basic products, and disease is spreading due to the lack of medical supplies.” Al-Manar thus indicated: “Firstly, dozens of trucks loaded with food and medical supplies that could last many months were introduced to Madaya, Sarghaya and Baqin on October 18, 2015, and an equal quantity was introduced to Kefraya and Fou’a… More is expected to arrive in the coming days, after the injured armed men were evacuated from Az-Zabadani.”

    • Rien d’étonnant de la part des organes de la presse officielle que sont le monde et libération.

      Quand on regarde les images des villes libérées en Syrie, quand on lit les récits des rescapés de l’occupation de ce pays par daesh, une image vient immédiatement, #Stalingrad.

      Mais non, Laurent Fabius, qui affirmait que le groupe « An-nusrah, faisait du bon boulot en Syrie », c’était pour rire.

  • Hundreds of Syrians Are Turned Back at Beirut Airport

    BEIRUT, Lebanon — Four hundred Syrians who were trying to fly to Turkey were stopped at the Beirut airport on Friday and were being forced to return to Damascus instead, in a chaotic episode that illustrated how options are narrowing for those trying to flee the war in Syria.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/09/world/middleeast/hundreds-of-syrians-are-turned-back-at-beirut-airport.html?smid=tw-share&_r
    #fermeture_des_frontières #Liban #asile #migrations #réfugiés #réfugiés_syriens #expulsion #push-back #refoulement

  • Après Kunduz, Homs, Haydan, Taiz : Sadeh
    Yemen : Another MSF supported hospital bombed | Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) International
    http://www.msf.org/article/yemen-another-msf-supported-hospital-bombed

    Sana’a – An MSF supported hospital has been hit by a projectile in Northern Yemen causing at least four dead and 10 injured and the collapse of several buildings of the medical facility. Three of the injured are MSF staff, two in critical condition.

    (...) “All warring parties, including the Saudi led coalition (SLC), are regularly informed of the GPS coordinates of the medical sites where MSF works and we are in constant dialogue with them to ensure that they understand the severity of the humanitarian consequences of the conflict and the need to respect the provision of medical services”, says Raquel Ayora Director of Operations. “There is no way that anyone with the capacity to carry out an airstrike or launch a rocket would not have known that the Shiara Hospital was a functioning health facility providing critical services and supported by MSF”.

    #arabie_saoudite #yémen #MSF

  • Hizbullah hits back at starvation reports in Madaya, Syria | The Mideastwire Blog
    https://mideastwire.wordpress.com/2016/01/08/hizbullah-hits-back-at-starvation-reports-in-madaya-syria/?fb_action_ids=763724877066899&fb_action_types=news.publishes

    Interesting response, not least because it does show that publicity, statements and reports over Madaya are clearly having an important impact on Hizbullah’s public stance.

    On January 8, the Qatari-owned Al-Quds al-Arabi daily carried the following report by its correspondent in Beirut: “It seems that Hezbollah was bewildered by the intensifying media campaign that shed light on the tragedy endured by the besieged Syrian town of Madaya, and had to clarify the situation, not through an official statement, but through Al-Manar’s newscast yesterday night. Indeed, the channel commented on what it dubbed a programed media campaign against the resistance regarding the town of Madaya in Rif Dimashq, quoting sources as saying: “Some visual and written media outlets with known inclinations have launched a wide-scale slander campaign against the resistance, and accused Hezbollah of starving the civilians in Madaya through its siege. But this is a programmed campaign aiming to ruin the image of the resistance.”

    “[It said:] “The armed groups that have taken Madaya hostage, and the foreign sides supporting them, are the only ones responsible for what is happening in the town. We have not seen a similar campaign regarding other Syrian towns that have been besieged by the armed terrorist groups for years, such as Kefraya and Al-Fou’a in Rif Adlib, Nebl and Az-Zahra’ in the countryside of Aleppo, Deir Ezzor and other regions, where babies are dying because of the shortage of milk and basic products, and disease is spreading due to the lack of medical supplies.” Al-Manar thus indicated: “Firstly, dozens of trucks loaded with food and medical supplies that could last many months were introduced to Madaya, Sarghaya and Baqin on October 18, 2015, and an equal quantity was introduced to Kefraya and Fou’a… More is expected to arrive in the coming days, after the injured armed men were evacuated from Az-Zabadani.”

  • À intervalle très régulier, Israël explique qu’à la prochaine guerre, sa stratégie sera de détruire totalement le Liban. Mais dans ce sens-là, c’est pas grave.

    In next Lebanon war, Israel must target Beirut - Giora Eiland
    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4743216,00.html

    The conclusion is simple: The next war will be waged against the state of Lebanon. In addition to Hezbollah targets, we should also attack the Lebanese army, the infrastructures in Lebanon, the airports and seaports and any other strategic assets. Since no one in the world (Syria and Iran on the one hand, and Saudi Arabia, Europe and the United States on the other hand) is interested in Lebanon’s destruction, and since that will be the inevitable result of an all-out war between Israel and Lebanon, there will be huge global pressure on all sides to reach a ceasefire after three days rather than after 34 days, and that’s exactly what Israel needs.