city:tel aviv

  • #Apple censors Vic Mensa’s views on #Palestine | The Electronic Intifada
    https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/apple-censors-vic-mensas-views-palestine

    This is reminiscent of the BBC’s decision to censor the words “Free Palestine” from a freestyle rap by Mic Righteous several years ago.

    I am emphatically not criticizing the artist here: #Mensa has clearly pushed hard not to separate his politics from his art. However, it appears some of the executives at Apple might not be too comfortable with that.

    Mensa’s music is wonderful and deserves to be heard, and access to mass audiences is still controlled by unaccountable corporations.

    But the mood is changing precisely because of artists like Mensa and Lorde, whose recent decision to cancel her Tel Aviv show generated an outpouring of support, and of course all those before them who took a stand when it was even less safe to do so.

    Watch Mensa’s original “We Could Be Free” video, partly filmed in Palestine, here:

    Et #Google s’y met aussi...

    Age-restricted video (based on Community Guidelines)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQqUuzIlb2k&feature=youtu.be

    #censure #sans_vergogne

  • With Bannon banished from Trump World, pro-Israel hard-liners pin their hopes on Pence

    Far-right U.S. Jewish Republicans believed the one-time Breitbart supremo had their back, but his fall from grace shifts their focus to the vice president and a very unlikely blast from the recent past

    Allison Kaplan Sommer Jan 16, 2018

    Few American Jews shed tears at the downfall of Steve Bannon, whose humiliation was made complete Tuesday when he stepped down from Breitbart News following his ugly estrangement from President Donald Trump – confirmed by the insulting new nickname of Sloppy Steve.
    skip - Donald Trump tweet
    The catalyst for his fate were his uncensored remarks in Michael Wolffs White House tell-all book, Fire and Fury, alienating Trump and then, fatally, the Mercers (Bannons arch-conservative financial backers who bankrolled both Breitbart and his endeavors to become a renegade Republican kingmaker.)
    The vast majority of Americas overwhelmingly liberal and Democratic Jews viewed Bannon as either an anti-Semite or an anti-Semite enabler whose conspiratorial references to demonic global financiers awakened and emboldened white supremacists. His oft-quoted description of Breitbart as the platform for the alt-right white nationalist movement confirmed such views.
    But for the minority of staunchly hard-line, pro-Israel Jews (and evangelical Christians) who support Israels settlement enterprise, oppose a Palestinian state and any form of territorial compromise, Bannon was an important force in the White House.
    For this group, his out-of-the-box positions on Israel far outweighed any threats the views of the Trump-voting, alt-right fan base from which he drew his influence might pose.
    Notably, it was Morton Klein of the Zionist Organization of America – who invited Bannon to address his organizations annual gala last November – who was the sole loyalist quoted as willing to speak up for Bannon in a lengthy Politico piece on Sunday. Klein said: If there is anyone, like Bannon, who is a strong supporter of Israel and a strong fighter against anti-Semitism and that person ends up having less influence on the administration, that is something that would sadden me.

    In Fire and Fury, the extent to which Bannons position on Israel matched hard-liners like Klein was described in detail. The book not only revealed that Trumps then-strategic adviser planned to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem on Day One after entering the White House, but, moreover, had an extreme and highly unorthodox approach to solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Let Jordan take the West Bank, let Egypt take Gaza, says Bannon in the book. Let them deal with it. Or sink trying.
    He then claimed that both GOP megadonor Sheldon Adelson and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were all in on his plans.
    Taken as a whole, it is a depiction of an extreme right-wing cabal, one that could find its place on the right fringes of Likud, that has been guiding if not running [President Donald] Trumps Middle East policies, Haaretzs Chemi Shalev wrote. Shalev described it as an axis that dominated Trumps Middle East policies during his first year in office. It is an alliance that Netanyahu appears to have cultivated, with the assistance, or at the direction, of his Las Vegas benefactor, Adelson. All three operate under the premise ascribed to Bannon that the further right you were, the more correct you were on Israel.
    This hard-line trio of influence presumably acted as a counterweight against the more pragmatic former military men in the White House – most prominently National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, but also former Secretary of Homeland Security and current Chief of Staff Gen. John Kelly and Defense Secretary James Mattis – whom, along with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, the far right privately scorn as Arabists who are soft on Israel. It was also a bulwark against Trumps fantasies of making the ultimate deal, which they believed were being cultivated by Bannons nemesis – Trumps son-in-law and aide, Jared Kushner.
    Bannons banishment from the White House, and now his political self-immolation and disappearance from Trumps circle of influence, comes as a deep disappointment to those who embraced and celebrated his outlook and that of satellite foreign policy Bannonites like Sebastian Gorka.
    Sad, tragic and disappointing, one pro-Trump Republican on the Jewish far right told me, asking not to be identified by name. Israels lost a really important voice.
    With that sadness comes concern over the increased influence of the generals, as well as Javanka (Kushner and his wife Ivanka Trump), on Middle East policy. The Jewish Trump supporter said he believes the presidents son-in-law has got his head in a very dark place when it comes to this peace thing. I think Jared is really wrong on this whole peace plan and can only do damage, he noted.
    But the hard-liners are still hopeful, attributing their optimism that the Trump administration will avoid any Kushner-fueled peace attempts to three factors.
    First, and most prominently, their hopes are pinned on Vice President Mike Pence – who will visit Israel on January 22-23 – and the evangelical Christian base he represents. Rejecting the portrayal of a sidelined Pence in Wolffs book, they call him a powerful player, particularly on Israel.

    U.S. Vice President Mike Pence, January 9, 2018. JOSHUA ROBERTS/REUTERS
    Clear evidence for this, they argue, lies in the fact that last months declaration of recognizing Jerusalem as Israels capital and the plan for an embassy move came after Bannon left the White House. It was Pence and the evangelicals – not Adelson, Netanyahu and Bannon – who ultimately got something done, and they are the ones who will have Israels back in the post-Bannon era.
    Secondly, there are the Palestinians themselves, who called the Jerusalem declaration a kiss of death to the two-state solution.
    Third, there is Trump himself. Much as the president is portrayed as an utterly transactional empty vessel, his Jewish supporters dont believe his views were artificially foisted on him by Bannon, but instead come from his own core beliefs. It was the president himself who wanted to move the embassy at the very beginning of his administration, they say, and it was Netanyahu himself who told Trump it would be better to wait.
    skip - Conor Powell tweet
    Return of the Mooch?
    If there is now a vacuum in the conduit between the far-right Klein/Adelson crowd and the Trump White House, one figure is clearly eager to fill it. Former White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci is not only different from Bannon – as slick and public as Bannon is unkempt and secretive – but he is also Bannons nemesis.

    In this July 2017 file photo, Anthony Scaramucci blows a kiss after answering questions during the press briefing.Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP
    Call it a coincidence, but on the same day Bannon departed from Breitbart, it was also announced that Scaramucci – who spent the day dancing on his grave – would be a keynote speaker at the annual meeting of the Republican Jewish Coalition in Las Vegas. The RJC confab is set for early February at Adelsons Venetian hotel and casino. In the past, ZOAs Klein has described Scaramucci as being supportive of Israel in the ZOA way, not in the mainstream Jewish way.
    Scaramucci has made a point of cozying up to the Adelson-backed Rabbi Shmuley Boteach. It was at a Boteach Hanukkah party that Scaramucci reportedly took a verbal detour from recounting his trip to Israel to insult Bannon, allegedly calling the former Trump aide messianic and a loser, warning that Hell be a stalwart defender of Israel until hes not. Thats how this guy operates. Ive seen this guy operate. He was a stalwart defender of me until it became better for him not to be.
    In the end, it was not his failure to defend Israel that proved to be Bannons undoing. It was his failure to defend Donald Trump.

    Allison Kaplan Sommer
    Haaretz Correspondent

    Send me email alerts

  • At least let us hate ’Fauda’ -

    In the Israeli TV series there are no rulers or ruled, no occupation, no historical background, no checkpoints, no poverty, no home demolitions, no expulsions, settlers or violent soldiers

    Sayed Kashua Jan 12, 2018
    read more: https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.834416

    This is neither a television review nor an attempt to criticize the morality of the television series “Fauda” and the feeling of superiority that accompanies every Israeli producer who is convinced that he can speak in the name of Arabs as easily as he can impersonate an Arab by wearing cheap clothes, growing a beard and dyeing it black. In general, Israeli movies and television, whether highbrow or for the masses, have always served the ruling Israeli discourse.
    With few exceptions (mainly documentaries), the greatest protests of the creative culture have been those with the theme of “shooting and crying,” with the main concern being Jewish ethics. Since the second intifada, the motif of “there is no one to talk to” on the other side, championed by Ehud Barak, has dominated the treatment in Israeli culture of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (always “conflict,” never “occupation”).
    Thus if in the wake of the first Lebanon war, the main theme of political statements in Israeli art was that there are partners on the Palestinian side but negotiations will always fail on account of extremists from both sides (what could we do, Likud was in power), since October 2000 the main theme has been that there are no partners, they’re all extremists. (What could we do, Labor was in power.)
    >> New season of hit series Fauda sets out to keep the Israeli-Palestinian conflict real <<
    So there’s no point in a political critique of “Fauda.” First, its political statement is not unique, and it is not so different from the landscape of “Bethlehem,” “The Bubble” and “For My Father” (“Sof Shavua B’Tel Aviv) nor is it different from the tenor of Israel’s main nightly news programs. Second, there is no point in criticizing the culture and the representation of “the conflict” by Israeli creative artists in the current political atmosphere. The arrogance and the assumption of ownership over the Palestinian story are the necessary consequence of military rule of Palestinian lives. Like the soldiers, many Israeli creative artists not respect borders. Some people expropriate land, others expropriate a story.
    Still, I write about “Fauda” because of the many statements, writings and quotes that have become a kind of received wisdom in Israel, according to which Arabs, Hamas members, senior Palestinian Authority officials or “the other side,” as one newspaper put it, “are convinced that the series serves them.”

    A still from the second season of “Fauda.”Ronen Akerman/YES
    You already have military victories and cultural control in marketing the Israeli occupation policy: At least give the Palestinians the option of hating “Fauda.” Are Netflix, worldwide success, economic growth and serving Israeli PR not enough for them?

    Do the creators of “Fauda” really need to market their show as a balanced series that shows the reality in the territories? And if it is being sold as such to the world, is it so important to them for the Palestinians to admit that it’s high art that helps Palestinians interpret correctly the reality in which they live?
    How dumb do the creators of “Fauda” and the Israeli critics who adopted the line that the Arabs are crazy about “Fauda” think Arabs are?
    The Israeli sits in front of the screen and sees, in the second season’s opening scene, a bloodthirsty, bearded Arab who sends his friend to a bus station that is filled mainly with women and young soldiers. And when the “terrorist” has regrets and seeks to return to the car without planting the bomb in the bus station, Nidal “El Makdessi” — the main Palestinian character — pushes a button to detonate the bomb, killing his friend in cold blood as long as he can take a few Jews with him.
    What the hell does the Israeli critic think the Palestinian viewer sitting in front of the screen feels? What? Does he shout “Allahu Akbar” at the explosion and think that El Makdessi, who came from Syria and was trained by the Islamic State organization, is a cool guy, and sometimes you have no choice but to betray your friend as long as you kill Jews, no matter whether they are civilians, children or soldiers?
    What does the Hamas militant (according to “Fauda” co-creator Avi Issacharoff, the group put a link to the series on its home page) think at that moment? He’s thinking: “Wow, I’ve got to see this El Makdessi. First of all, he has a cool name, both frightening and charming, and we’ve got to watch this series, because in Hollywood, the good guys always win.”

    A still from the second season of “Fauda.”Ronen Akerman/YES
    Is it possible the Israeli creators think Arabs are so stupid they consider El Makdessi a “good guy” in the series, which is based entirely on good guys versus bad guys? Or perhaps Hamas members will be so happy about the fact that their people, as they are presented in their beloved Israeli program, love their mother? Okay, so they murder Arabs sometimes because there is no choice, sending a friend with a bomb or a rocket propelled grenade into a café in Nablus, who wipes out some Arabs playing cards.
    The Israelis in “Fauda,” by the way, are very sensitive to human life. “There are too many noncombatants,” says an Israeli officer in fatigues, when someone even dares raise the idea of taking out El Makdessi with a drone. “Let’s wait until he reaches an open space,” orders the Israeli commander, who cares so much for Palestinian lives that he endangers his dedicated soldiers.
    “It’s clearly an Israeli and not a Palestinian narrative,” the series’ creators said in one interview, again using the deceptive word “narrative,” which on one hand turns baseless lies in an action series into a legitimate narrative of moral superiority that Israelis tell about themselves, and on the other hand the narrative — the “N-word” — reduces the lives of Palestinians under the shadow of military oppression into another story that they tell themselves, as if they live in an Israeli prime-time series.

    Rona-Lee Shim’on in “Fauda.” Ronen Akerman/YES
    So, no: Arabs, Palestinians, Hamas members — those from the other side — do not love “Fauda,” and to be honest I’m not sure how many of them even watch it or have heard of it. And no, there is nothing in “Fauda” that addresses the reality in the territories. In “Fauda,” there are no rulers or ruled, no occupation, no historical background, no checkpoints, poverty, home demolitions, expulsions, settlers or violent soldiers. Nor are there courts that jail politicians without a trial and pass judgment on children and teens who are trying to push away armed soldiers.
    According to “Fauda,” the Palestinians are driven by a longing for vengeance, a strong Arab urge that explains the murderousness of the main characters. It is personal revenge and nothing more. Indeed, the Palestinians have no other reason to rise up against the Israelis. To be honest, their lives as reflected in the series are pretty good.
    So what in the hell is the Israeli critic, creative artist or newspaper reader thinking when he asserts that Arabs love “Fauda”? Is there a way to explain this claim without assuming total Arab stupidity? Or perhaps a Palestinian family is sitting somewhere in a refugee camp in Jenin, declaring: “Gentlemen, this is art for art’s sake. Forget about Israelis and Palestinians. Let’s encourage Doron [Kavillio, the lead Israeli character, played by Lior Raz] and the guys disguised as Arabs because after all they’re really cute, brave and look out for their country and their people.”
    And Doron, what a soul he has, so concerned for his children in the first episode, they sleep like two angels in his embrace while he thinks about the danger that lurks for them from El Makdessi. “If he got to my father, he’ll get to my children, too,” he tells the commander of the elite unit, because that’s how it is. The Palestinians are the ones who know how to get to the children of armed Israelis.
    If the Palestinian is already watching “Fauda,” his main thought will be: How is it that the people of Nablus don’t identify the Israeli-accented Arabic of the soldiers dressed as Arabs the moment they open their mouths? And really, how can El Makdessi be on a motorcycle in Nablus one time and on a motorcycle somewhere in the Negev another? If such mobility were possible, half of our troubles would be behind us. And perhaps he’ll wonder, where are the actors from? Where did they film? Why the hell does no soldier disguised as an Arab dress up as an educated Arab?
    The Arab viewer hopes the international viewer is not dumb enough to attribute any credibility to a commercial series, and wonders if anyone in Israel really thinks this series is leftist because the murderers hug their siblings from time to time. If so, then there really isn’t anyone to talk with over there.

    Former Prime Minister Ehud Barak, center, flanked by “Fauda” co-creators Lior Raz, left, and Avi Issacharoff. Rafi Delouya

    Sayed Kashua
    Haaretz Contributor

  • Israel Faces Possible ICC Probe over 2014 Assault on Gaza & Expansion of Settlements
    Democracy Now! | Headline Jan 10, 2018
    https://www.democracynow.org/2018/1/10/headlines/israel_faces_icc_probe_over_2014_assault_on_gaza_expansion_of_settleme

    Israel is facing a possible International Criminal Court probe over its 2014 assault on Gaza and continued expansion of settlements in the occupied West Bank. According to the Israeli TV station Channel 10, Israel’s National Security Council recently warned Israeli lawmakers that the ICC could open an investigation at some point this year.

    This comes as the Israeli defense minister said Israel will approve the construction of hundreds of new settlement homes in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

    Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing a domestic political controversy after an Israeli TV station aired a secret audio recording of his son from outside a strip club in 2015. In the recording, Yair Netanyahu can be heard talking about prostitutes and demanding money from the son of an Israeli gas tycoon. Yair implies his father, Prime Minister Netanyahu, helped push through a $20 billion deal to benefit the businessman, saying, “My dad arranged $20 billion for your dad, and you’re whining with me about 400 shekels.” This comes at a time when Benjamin Netanyahu is facing multiple corruption investigations.

    • Israël : des propos du fils Netanyahu placent le père dans l’embarras
      Par RFI Publié le 10-01-2018 | Avec notre correspondant à Jérusalem, Michel Paul
      http://www.rfi.fr/moyen-orient/20180110-israel-propos-fils-netanyahu-place-le-pere-embarras

      Une fois de plus, c’est le fils du Premier ministre israélien, Yair Netanyahu, qui fait parler de lui. A l’issue d’une soirée bien arrosée il y a plus de deux ans dans des boîtes de Tel Aviv, il a tenu des propos qui ont été enregistrés et diffusés lundi soir sur une chaine de télé israélienne. Une affaire qui fait le buzz dans les médias en Israël et plonge le père du protagoniste dans l’embarras.

      « Eh mec, mon père a refilé au tien 20 milliards de dollars, tu peux bien me passer 400 shekels pour une pute. » C’est la voix de Yair Netanyahu, le fils du Premier ministre israélien enregistré à son insu dans une voiture à l’issue d’une nuit de débauche à Tel Aviv dans plusieurs clubs de striptease.

      Netanyahu junior s’adressait au fils du milliardaire Kobi Maimon, principal bénéficiaire d’un accord controversé sur l’exploitation de gaz naturel. Egalement présent dans la voiture, un autre ami de Yair Netanyahu, le chauffeur et deux agents de sécurité.(...)

  • THE SPACE OF THE APARTHEID IN NABI SALEH, AHED TAMIMI’S HOME VILLAGE
    https://thefunambulist.net/law/the-space-of-the-apartheid-in-nabi-saleh-ahed-tamimis-home-village

    A particularity of Nabi Saleh consists in its proximity with the Israeli settlement of Halamish, where over 1,500 settlers live, despite the violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention that the existence of such a civil infrastructure on occupied territory embodies (see the other map towards the end of the article). Between them, the Road 465 that circulates exclusively in Area C and allow the optimized circulation of Israeli vehicles from Tel Aviv, as well as the gigantic US-built Nahshonim military base situated on the immediate west part of the Green Line, to settlements situated between Ramallah and Nablus. Although the access to this road is authorized to Palestinian cars on ‘normal’ days (a small part of it links Birzeit to the new town of Rawabi), the road is regularly patrolled by Israeli army vehicles and its passage through the Apartheid Wall is sanctioned by the Rantis military checkpoint that grants access only to cars bearing a yellow plate (the Israeli license color) with all passengers presenting either an Israeli passport or a work permit, the latter being potentially denied at the discretion of the soldiers.

  • #Corruption : le fils de Netanyahou incrimine son père dans un enregistrement
    https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/international/090118/corruption-le-fils-de-netanyahou-incrimine-son-pere-dans-un-enregistrement

    Enregistré au terme d’une nuit de débauche à Tel Aviv en 2015, Yaïr, le fils du premier ministre israélien Benyamin Netanyahou, affirme que son père aurait intercédé pour qu’un homme d’affaires empoche plus de 16 milliards d’euros dans le cadre d’un accord gazier. Yaïr Netanyahou accompagne son père au bureau de vote, en 2015. © Reuters

    #International #Benjamin_Netanyahou #Conflit_d'intérêts #Israël

  • Le neveu du Premier ministre Edouard Philippe aurait été poignardé en Israël —
    RT en français – 9 janv. 2018
    https://francais.rt.com/france/47126-neveu-premier-ministre-edouard-philippe-aurait-ete-poignarde-isra

    Les trois touristes auraient été agressés le 3 janvier dernier par « trois Israéliens » selon la télévision israélienne i24 News. Le consul de France à Tel-Aviv a été « dépêché sur place de toute urgence », selon Yediot Aharonot. Deux d’entre eux auraient été légèrement blessés. Le troisième plus grièvement – on ignore cependant s’il s’agit du neveu du Premier ministre français.

    Selon le Times of Israel, les trois Français auraient été retrouvés « gisant sur la promenade » du bord de mer avant d’être hospitalisés à l’hôpital Yosseftal d’Eilat. Ils auraient rejoint la France deux jours plus tard grâce à l’aide du consul de France qui les aurait « assisté dans leurs démarches », toujours selon i24 News.

    “““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““
    Le neveu d’Edouard Philippe parmi les touristes français poignardés à Eilat
    Par Sue Surkes Aujourd’hui, 11:30
    https://fr.timesofisrael.com/le-neveu-dedouard-philippe-parmi-les-touristes-francais-poignardes

    Les vacanciers ont été retrouvés gisant sur le sol après qu’un gang les aurait provoqués puis attaqués avant de prendre la fuite

  • Swiss Newspaper reveals: Secret military cooperation between Saudi Arabia and Israel
    Middle East Monitor - January 8, 2018 at 3:17 am
    https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20180108-swiss-newspaper-reveals-secret-military-cooperation-betw

    The Swiss newspaper Basler Zeitung revealed the fact that there exists a “secret alliance” between Saudi Arabia and Israel, intended “to restrain Iran’s expansion in the region, despite the absence of any official relations between the two countries.”

    “For the time being, Riyadh rejects any official normalization of relationships with Israel as long as the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is not resolved and normalization has not been publically declared by Arab countries and thus there will be no exchange of ambassadors,” said Pierre Heumann, the newspaper’s correspondent in Israel in his report.

    “There is an intensive secret cooperation between Saudi Arabia and Israel in order to achieve the main goal of curbing Iran’s expansion project and undermining its regional ambitions,” said the reporter. He added that “there exists indeed military cooperation between Saudi Arabia and Tel Aviv.”

    The reporter quoted unidentified sources from Riyadh as saying “the Kingdom is currently considering the possibility to purchase Israeli weapons and it has shown an interest in purchasing defence systems for the tanks and the iron dome, which Israel claims has proven to be effective in countering rocket attacks from Gaza Strip.(...) ”

    #Israrabie

  • More than 100 artists including leading lights in film, theatre, literature, and music have come together to sign a statement of support for the singer, songwriter and record producer Lorde. While signatories to the letter, which is published on the Guardian’s letter page, may hold a range of positions on BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions), they are united in their defence of the right to freedom of conscience.

    ’We write in support of Lorde, who made public her decision not to perform in Israel and has now been branded a bigot in a full page advertisement in the Washington Post (Report, 1 January).

    Shmuley Boteach, the author and promoter of the advert, supports Israel’s illegal settlements and wrote last month on Breitbart to thank Donald Trump for “electrifying the world” with his recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital in defiance of international law.

    He has nothing to teach artists about human rights. We deplore the bullying tactics being used to defend injustice against Palestinians and to suppress an artist’s freedom of conscience. We support Lorde’s right to take a stand.’
    https://www.theguardian.com/music/2018/jan/05/lordes-artistic-right-to-cancel-gig-in-tel-aviv

  • Les villages #mizrahi détruits par l’establishment israélien - [UJFP]

    http://www.ujfp.org/spip.php?article6100

    Il est bien connu que depuis les premiers temps de l’immigration sioniste en Palestine, la bourgeoisie israélienne et ses diverses branches ont détruit des centaines de villages et de villes palestiniens et syriens, qui ont été jugés ennemis de l’État. Sur la nouvelle carte de la « destruction coloniale » publiée par De-Colonizer, un centre de recherche alternatif sur Palestine/Israël, figurent les villages mizrahi – dont la moitié environ étaient yéménites – détruits par les autorités sionistes avant la fondation d’Israël et par l’État d’Israël après 1948.

    Le terme « destru(A)ction » renvoie à des communautés chassées contre leur volonté – souvent par la violence physique, et toujours avec l’aide de la violence légale et économique. D’autres villes et quartiers, tels les quartiers Mahlul et Nordia de Tel Aviv ou la cité de transit Neve Amal d’Herzliya ont aussi été détruits, quoique leurs habitants aient finalement reçu des indemnités.

    D’un autre côté, il y a eu des villages israéliens démolis contre la volonté des habitants – dans la péninsule du Sinaï par exemple – même si ces démolitions allaient à l’encontre de l’expansion coloniale d’Israël, étant donné qu’elles se produisaient dans le contexte d’un traité de paix avec l’Égypte et, de ce fait ne figurent pas sur la carte. La destruction de ces villages peut être considérée comme une forme de décolonisation.

    La destruction de ces villages juifs ne devrait pas nous étonner, en particulier si l’on considère la façon dont la bourgeoisie sioniste a toujours considéré et traité ceux de l’Est, qu’ils fussent juifs, musulmans ou chrétiens – tous Arabes.

    #israël #palestine #destruction #démolition #occupation #colonisation #expulsion

  • @ggreenwald: “New Zealand’s largest newspaper, @nzherald, eloquently editorializes in defense of @lorde’s decision to cancel her Tel Aviv concert, in the process obliterating the most common arguments made against the boycott against Israel - things are changing ...”


    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&objectid=11966801

    • Editorial: Lorde’s stand on Israel does her credit
      NZ Herald, le 28 décemnbe 2017

      What rubbish. It is perfectly possible to oppose Jewish settlements on the West Bank, as indeed many Jews do, in Israel and outside, without being guilty of bigotry and prejudice.

      The suggestion Israel should not be singled out when countries such as Russia are guilty of something similar is an argument New Zealanders often heard from defenders of South Africa in the apartheid era. It is the weakest argument a nation’s defenders can make. It says the nation is guilty, but so are others. It is an admission Israel’s settlements are wrong. Not even the Israeli Government endorses them, though it does little to stop them. The further the settlements go and the more entrenched they become, the more difficult a two-state solution will be.

      Sporting and cultural boycotts and campaigns for business disinvestment and international sanctions against Israel are a way of reminding public opinion in Israel the world needs Israel to keep striving for peace in its region.

      Peace almost certainly requires a Palestinian state on the West Bank of the Jordan — one that acknowledges Israel’s right to exist. The alternative is for Israel to survive in a permanent state of siege, a prospect which perhaps too many Israelis now find preferable to a Palestinian state they would not trust. Hence the settlements.

      But unresolved tensions in the Middle East are not simply Israel’s concern. Such tensions impose themselves on the world through wars, threats to oil supplies, nuclear ambitions and terrorism.

      No peace is imaginable without Palestinians being treated fairly, not driven from their homes by bulldozers. Cultural figures such as Lorde are in a privileged position to give that message and New Zealand can be proud of her for doing so.

      #Lorde #Palestine #Boycott #BDS #Boycott_culturel #Nouvelle-Zélande

  • L’Assemblée générale de l’ONU rejette la position américaine sur Jérusalem
    MEE et agences | 21 décembre 2017
    http://www.middleeasteye.net/fr/reportages/l-assembl-e-g-n-rale-de-l-onu-rejette-la-position-am-ricaine-sur-j-ru

    Nikki Haley, ambassadrice des États-Unis auprès des Nations unies (AFP)

    Les États membres de l’ONU ont voté ce jeudi en faveur d’une motion rejetant la reconnaissance américaine de Jérusalem comme capitale d’Israël.

    Sur les 193 pays membres de l’ONU, 128 ont voté pour la résolution, 35 se sont abstenus et 9 (Guatemala, Honduras, Israël, Palaos, Îles Marshall, Micronésie, Nauru, Togo, États-Unis) ont voté contre.

    #voteONU

    "Nous nous souviendrons de ce vote" avait conclu Nikki Haley à la tribune de l’ONU.

    ““““““““““““““““““““““““““

    Gilles Paris
    ‏il y a 4 heures
    https://twitter.com/Gil_Paris/status/943903781925916674

    Stabilité sur la Palestine si on se réfère au vote de l’AG de novembre 2012 (statut de la Palestine comme observateur non membre) : 138 pour, 9 contre, 41 abstentions. Sans menaces américaines. L’axe est-européen était déjà en place.

    • Armed by Israel, Honduras’s illegitimate regime returns the favor at the U.N.
      Middle East James North on December 21, 2017
      http://mondoweiss.net/2017/12/hondurass-illegitimate-returns

      Once again, Israel is supporting a repressive regime in the Global South, this time in the poor Central American nation of Honduras — and Israeli activists are protesting vigorously.

      Just after the November 26 election in Honduras, the results started to show a commanding margin for the pro-democracy opposition — until the vote-tabulating computers mysteriously went down. Many days later, the incumbent president, Juan Orlando Hernandez, had miraculously gained the lead, and Hondurans poured into the streets in nationwide peaceful demonstrations against the obvious theft.

      The military and police have already killed 22 protesters, but the street demonstrations show no signs of stopping. The United States dishonestly endorsed the rigged results, even though observers from the Organization of American States had found so many irregularities that they recommended new elections.

      Israel hides its arms exports. But last year, the Honduras regime revealed that it had bought $209 million worth of weapons from Israel, including surveillance drones for the army.

      A representative of the Israeli activists, a courageous lawyer named Eitay Mack, sent a letter to the Israeli Defense Ministry asking it to freeze or cancel the arms sales. (Eitay Mack, who pushes for public scrutiny of Israeli security exports, has written for this site.)

      Honduras just repaid Tel Aviv for the weapons sale — by casting one of the only 9 votes against the United Nations resolution condemning the U.S. recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. (Here, in addition to the U.S. and Israel, is the rest of the list: Guatemala, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, and Togo.)

  • Israel’s attorney general backs officer’s libel suit against ‘Jenin, Jenin’ director

    Avichai Mendelblit cites ‘public interest’ to explain his decision to support a second civil lawsuit against Mohammed Bakri for his 2002 documentary

    read more: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.830284

    In an unusual move, the attorney general is to support a defamation of character lawsuit by a reserve officer against the director of the controversial 2002 documentary “Jenin, Jenin.”
    Avichai Mendelblit’s office said in a statement Wednesday that he decided to support the suit against Mohammed Bakri because of the public interest in the case.
    While Israeli law allows the attorney general to take sides in a civil suit if the case involves the public interest, in practice the privilege is rarely exercised.
    In November 2016 Nissim Meghnagi sued Bakri for 2.6 million shekels (around $745,000).
    Meghnagi took part in Operation Defensive Shield, the military operation in the West Bank refugee camp in Jenin that was the subject of Bakri’s film.
    Keep updated: Sign up to our newsletter
    Email* Sign up

    In his suit, Meghnagi claims that he appears in and was named in the movie, and that the film libeled Israeli soldiers by presenting them as war criminals.
    Bakri argues that the purpose of the suit is persecution and political silencing, and says the case is without merit.
    The movie makes no accusation against Meghnagi, says Bakri: The camera panned the plaintiff for mere seconds, and he cannot be identified as the person behind the deeds described in the movie.
    On Thursday the District Court of the Central District is scheduled to hear Bakri’s request to reject the lawsuit.
    Mendelblit’s announcement throwing his weight behind the suit followed requests from Meghnagi himsef and from Israel Defense Force Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Gadi Eisenkot.
    Five years ago, a district court, ruling on a lawsuit by five soldiers who participated in Operation Defensive Shield, found that Bakri had slandered soldiers but the plaintiffs were not slandered personally. The Supreme Court upheld the decision.
    Then-Attorney General Menachem Mazuz sided with the soldiers.
    The court said that plaintiffs who did not appear in the documentary had no grounds for personal damages, but it also ruled that the movie constituted “libel, at the base of which is bad faith and a deliberate tendency to distort things.” Three times the plaintiffs appealed for another hearing, with Mazuz’s support, to no avail.
    Mendelblit said in his announcement that in contrast to the previous proceedings, this plaintiff actually appears in the movie while the narrator accuses the Israeli soldiers of looting. Hence his support for Meghnagi, a lieutenant colonel in the reserves, in the context of public interest. Mendelblit noted that the movie is still bring distributed and shown.
    “Jenin, Jenin” was first screened in April 2002 at the Tel Aviv and Jerusalem cinematheques. In November 2002, the Israel Film Council banned its distribution to Israeli theaters. The High Court of Justice voided that decision on the grounds of freedom of expression, bucking the council and also the attorney general. “Israeli society can cope with expressions of this sort,” the court ruled.

    In 2014, then-Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein rejected pleas by representatives of soldiers and their families to open a criminal investigation into Bakri, pursuant to libel law. With that, he was in agreement with his two predecessors.

  • Pillés à Beyrouth il y a 35 ans, maintenant projetés à Tel Aviv
    Traduction : SF pour l’Agence Média Palestine | Source : +972
    http://www.agencemediapalestine.fr/blog/2017/12/11/pilles-a-beyrouth-il-y-a-35-ans-maintenant-projetes-a-tel-aviv

    A still from the film “Looted and Hidden.”

    Par Rami Younis, le 4 décembre 2017

    « Pillés et cachés » puise dans les archives de films capturés par l’armée israélienne en 1982, et braque les projecteurs sur d’autres biens volés par Israël : l’histoire du cinéma palestinien.

    Des images rares issues des archives des films et photographies palestiniens qui documentent des décennies de l’histoire palestinienne d’avant 1948 et d’après la Nakba voient finalement le jour dans un nouveau film de Rona Sela qui est conservatrice, chercheure en histoire et culture visuelle, et chargée de cours à l’université de Tel Aviv. Presque toutes ces images d’archives ont été confisquées dans les attaques de l’armée israélienne contre le bureau de l’Organisation de Libération de la Palestine à Beyrouth en 1982 : des documents et des photos ont alors été pris.
    (...)
    « Dans le passé, j‘ai recherché de la propagande sioniste datant d’avant l’établissement de l’État d’Israël » a dit Sela, en expliquant ce qui l’a motivée à faire le film. Un des principaux motifs qui revenait constamment était l’image du Juif qui arrive dans une zone désolée, comme si la terre avait attendu que le Juif arrive et la fasse fleurir ».

    « Cela m’a conduite à rechercher des documents de l’histoire palestinienne » a poursuivi Sela. « J’ai cherché dans des matériaux ici et à l’étranger afin de montrer à un public israélien que la Palestine existait avant 1948 ».

    https://seenthis.net/messages/612498

    #archives_palestiniennes

  • Israel This wasn’t supposed to happen at a conference on anti-Semitism -

    Jews are apathetic to suffering of other minorities, World Jewish Congress counsel tells a Tel Aviv conference, but gets lukewarm response from delegates

    Judy Maltz Dec 11, 2017
    read more: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.828354

    Many would argue that anti-Semitism is no worse than any other hatred. But it’s not every day that a top official at the World Jewish Congress tries to make that case – let alone suggest that Jews are apathetic to the suffering of other minorities.
    So when Menachem Rosensaft, the general counsel of the WJC, an organization dedicated to fighting anti-Semitism, delivered remarks in this vein at a Tel Aviv conference on anti-Semitism on Monday, the audience was – needless to say – caught off guard.
    To really understand Israel and the Jewish World - subscribe to Haaretz
    “Anti-Semitism is sometimes referred to as the most pernicious hatred,” he told delegates. “I respectfully reject that characterization and any suggestion that anti-Semitism is somehow worse than other forms of bigotry.
    He continued: “I’m sorry, but the white supremacist ideology that holds African-Americans and Hispanics to be inferior to Caucasians is every bit as reprehensible as anti-Semitism. So are other kinds of discrimination and oppression on the basis of religion, race and nationality.
    Keep updated: Sign up to our newsletter
    Email* Sign up

    “The hatred that resulted in the genocide of Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica and of the Tutsi in Rwanda are no less evil than the hatred of Jews that resulted in pogroms and the Shoah,” he added.

    It wasn’t exactly what participants at “The Oldest Hatred Gone Viral” summit had come expecting to hear.
    Rosensaft, who teaches law at Columbia and Cornell, was a keynote speaker at the conference, sponsored by the WJC in cooperation with NGO Monitor, a right-wing organization that tracks the activities of anti-occupation and other civil society groups in Israel.

    Menachem Rosensaft, general counsel of the World Jewish Congress.Courtesy of the World Jewish Con
    Considered an international expert on genocide, Rosensaft suggested that Jews were not sensitive enough to the persecution of other minorities, in particular Muslims and African-Americans.
    “In our fight against anti-Semitism, we must never allow ourselves to lose sight of the fundamental reality: That precisely the same dangerous hatred used to incite violence – sometimes lethal violence – against Jews can just as easily be used against other minorities,” he said.
    Rosensaft said that Jews tend to focus too much on anti-Semitism from the left and ignore anti-Semitism on the right. “I am as concerned about neo-Nazis and white supremacists shouting ‘Jews shall not replace us,’” he said, referring to the violent rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August, “as I am by jihadists or BDS activists who deny Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state.
    “We do ourselves a disservice, in my opinion, when some of us focus our attention – primarily, if not exclusively – on the anti-Semitism generated by the anti-Israel left, while minimizing the impact of the bigotry and xenophobia emanating from the extreme right.”
    Rosensaft, a child of Holocaust survivors and considered a leading authority on the second generation, warned that Jewish apathy to the plight of others would cause others to be apathetic to the plight of the Jews.
    “If we do not recognize the suffering of others and the hatred directed against others, for what reason and on what basis can we expect others to look at the hatred directed against us and want to identify with us?” he asked.
    Rosensaft made his remarks during a special session devoted to the memory of Prof. Robert S. Wistrich, a renowned Hebrew University authority on anti-Semitism who died in May 2015.
    In the discussion that followed, members of the audience challenged Rosensaft for asserting that anti-Semitism was comparable to other forms of bigotry.
    Wistrich’s widow, Danielle, drew a large round of applause when she delivered the following statement, summing up the general sentiment among delegates: “I don’t think we Jews need to spend our energy, our money and our time to defend Arabs, because I think they have their own people to do that. I think it is good to be well meaning and wonderful to have a big heart, but let’s keep it for ourselves.”

  • Tens of thousands of Israelis protest against Netanyahu in second March of Shame - Israel News - Haaretz.com
    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.827858

    Demonstrators on Tel Aviv’s Rotschild Boulevard held signs reading, “Out with the corrupt!” and “Not leftist, not rightist, but honest!” Others read, “Being a pig isn’t kosher” and “Bibi go home.”

    Hundreds of protesters against corruption gathered in Haifa as well, with signs reading “Democracy isn’t a suggestion” and “Shame on you.”

    An altercation broke out towards the end of the demonstration when a small group of anarchists carrying signs supporting a boycott of Israel tried to join the protest. Anti-corruption demonstrators verbally attacked the group and the police had to intervene after protesters started shoving them and tore signs supportive of the BDS movement.

    Police forced to intervene after anti-Netanyahu protesters stop pro-BDS anarchists from joining Tel Aviv protest Credit : Hagar Shezaf

    Those that partook in the protest were angered by a new bill that would have prevented police from publicizing recommendations on indictments. The controversial bill was widely believed to have been drafted to protect Netanyahu, who is currently under investigation in two high-profile corruption scandals, by keeping the public in the dark.

  • Florida rally cheers when Republican predicts Trump’s Jerusalem embassy decision may usher in Armageddon
    https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/florida-rally-cheers-when-republican-predicts-trumps-jerusalem-embassy-dec

    A conservative politician at President Donald Trump’s campaign rally in Pensacola, Florida suggested that the president’s controversial decision to move the US Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem may usher in the biblical end times.

    Republican state Senator Doug Broxson represents the Florida Panhandle in the legislature and gave an introductory speech welcoming President Trump to Florida.

    “Now, I don’t know about you, but when I heard about Jerusalem — where the King of Kings [applause] where our soon coming King is coming back to Jerusalem, it is because President Trump declared Jerusalem to be capital of Israel,” Sen. Broxson predicted.

  • An American withdrawal from peace - Haaretz Editorial

    It’s true that his predecessors also didn’t impose a settlement, but at least since the 2000 Camp David summit they mediated between the parties

    Haaretz Editorial Dec 07, 2017
    read more: https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/editorial/1.827389

    U.S. President Donald Trump has given a valuable political gift to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who’s strugging amid the corruption investigations against him and is trying to maintain the stability of his governing coalition, which is being led by the Habayit Hayehudi party headed by Naftali Bennett.
    In his White House address Wednesday, Trump recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital – a declaration that all his predecessors had avoided since the state was established in 1948. In the same breath, he diluted the American commitment to the two-state solution, which he conditioned on the agreement of the parties. More importantly, Trump promised that the United States wouldn’t present a position on the contentious issues between Israel and the Palestinians, above all the borders of Israeli sovereignty in Jerusalem.
    Trump awarded Netanyahu an unprecedented diplomatic achievement, even as he postponed fulfillment of his campaign promise to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. At the same time, he calmed Netanyahu’s fears about presenting an American diktat for an Israeli-Palestinian agreement that might have unraveled the prime minister’s coalition, which rejects the two-state solution or any gesture toward the Palestinians. It’s no wonder that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas responded with great disappointment to Trump’s remarks and called for an international front against the recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

  • À la veille de la visite de Netanyahou, l’UE s’apprête à célébrer la journée des droits humains avec le groupe anti occupation B’Tselem 5 décembre | Noa Landau pour Haaretz |Traduction SF pour l’AURDIP
    http://www.aurdip.fr/a-la-veille-de-la-visite-de.html

    C’est une gifle pour Netanyahou : la nouvele ambassadrice de l’UE choisit d’organiser un événement officiel avec un groupe de défense des droits humains. Le ministère des Affaires étrangères dit que ce geste « est un crachat à la figure des Israéliens », tandis que le ministre tire à boulets rouges sur l’UE, disant qu’elle est de moins en moins utile.

    Des représentants de l’Union Européenne en Israël célébreront la journée internationale des droits humains, ce jeudi, avec l’organisation de défense des droits humains, B’Tselem. Lors de l’événement, conduit par la nouvelle ambassadrice de l’UE, Emmanuelle Giaufret, la présence d’une exposition de photos montrant 50 ans d’occupation par Israël a déclenché une condamnation féroce de la part d’Israël.

    L’exposition, intitulée « 50 ans » est actuellement ouverte au public au port de Jaffa à Tel Aviv. Elle montre des portraits de 50 Palestiniens nés en 1967, l’année de la prise de la Cisjordanie et de Gaza par Israël au terme de la guerre des six jours. La visite de cette exposition par d’autres diplomates étrangers en Israël est également attendue.

    Au début de la semaine prochaine, Netanyahou s’envolera pour Bruxelles pour une réunion exceptionnelle avec les 28 ministres des affaires étrangères des États membres de l’UE.

    En dehors du protocole, Netanyahou a été invité non pas par les canaux officiels mais par les représentants de la Lituanie à l’UE, un État relativement amical du point de vue de Netanyahou. Cet écart au protocole a énervé la ministre des affaires étrangères de l’UE, Federica Mogherini.

    Le porte-parole du ministère israélien des affaires étrangères, Emmanuel Nahshon, a déclaré : « Pour des raisons inconnues, les gens de l’UE croient toucher les Israéliens en leur crachant à la figure. Nous voyons une fois de plus les mêmes méthodes dédaigneuses qui consistent en prêches hypocrites, en moralisme condescendant, qui ne font qu’éloigner plutôt que rapprocher. C’est triste et inutile ».

    traduction en français de cet article https://seenthis.net/messages/649577


  • THIS ISRAELI PRESENTATION ON HOW TO MAKE DRONE STRIKES MORE “EFFICIENT” DISTURBED ITS AUDIENCE

    https://theintercept.com/2017/12/05/drone-strikes-israel-us-military-isvis

    RESEARCH BACKED BY the U.S. and Israeli military scandalized a conference near Tel Aviv earlier this year after a presentation showed how the findings would help drone operators more easily locate people — including targets — fleeing their strikes and better navigate areas rendered unrecognizable by prior destruction.

    The doctoral student who presented the research demonstrated how pioneering data visualization techniques could show a drone operator, using lines and arrows of varying thickness, which direction fast-moving people and vehicles were most likely to travel, for example, at an intersection or while fleeing a building. The presentation clearly angered at least some of the crowd, including the moderator, prompting hostile questions.

    “The guy’s talk (and its video documentation) revealed much of what’s very wrong about UAV warfare,” said Mushon Zer-Aviv, a web designer and activist and an organizer of the conference, the data visualization confab known as ISVIS.

    The incident at ISVIS underscores the extent to which drone warfare’s deeply technological basis and inhumanity has become a major part of global public debate around its use. Once viewed (and still promoted) as an efficient, safer way to target terrorists, the growing ubiquity of lethal drone strikes in global hotspots is increasingly seen as helping to create wastelands and fomenting the sort of terroristic support it’s designed to eradicate.

    • The presenter of the drone material, Yuval Zak, told the Intercept he was surprised by the audience reaction and hostile questioning after his presentation. “The conversation changed from dealing with visualization and improving information presentation on a … map to a discussion about the ethical issues of using drones,” he wrote in an email. “But the focus of the conference and my paper is entirely different.” The technology he presented could just as easily be used for policing and search and rescue as for drone strikes, he said — any time-critical scenario involving a map.

      #data_visualization #visualization
      #neutralité_de_la_technique

      Ben qu’est-ce qu’ils ont tous à m’engueuler ?

    • Bon, c’est vraiment une crapule, ce mec : sur la vidéo de sa conférence (1:29, je n’ai vu que ça…)

      Objectives
      • this study is part of a research collaboration between Ben-Gurion University, US Army RDECOM AMRDEC and the Israeli Minister of Defence.
      • main goal : improve efficiency of UAS-based mission preparation and execution.
      • the study focuses on urban warfare.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2mov9dBfSY

      EDIT : La discussion (à partir de 8:40) n’a pas l’air si houleuse que ça. Bon, c’est juste une impression parce que c’est de l’hébreu non sous-titré (l’une des questions parle de predictive policy pourrait être critique, mais l’ensemble est sur le ton de la question classique en fin de conf’)

  • Trump tells Abbas of plans to move embassy as world leaders warn of consequences
    Dec. 5, 2017 7:42 P.M. (Updated: Dec. 5, 2017 7:42 P.M.)
    http://www.maannews.com/Content.aspx?ID=779571

    BETHLEHEM (Ma’an) — After days of speculation over whether the US would be moving its Israeli embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, American President Donald Trump called Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Tuesday and confirmed his intentions to move the embassy.

    Abbas’ spokesperson Nabil Abu Rudeineh released a statement saying that Abbas "warned [Trump] of the dangerous repercussions of such step” for the peace-process between Israel and Palestine, and for general security and stability in the region and world.

    Abbas reportedly reiterated the Palestinian leadership’s unwavering position that without what is no occupied East Jerusalem as its capital, there is not future of Palestinian state as stipulated in international resolutions.

    Abu Rudeineh stressed that Abbas “will continue to contact world leaders in order to prevent this unacceptable.”

    Israeli news daily Haaretz quoted Nabil Shaath, a senior Palestinian official, as saying that “the mother of all the [peace] deals dies here on the rocks in Jerusalem if he says tomorrow that he recognizes a united Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.”

    Meanwhile, international media outlets reported that Trump also phoned Jordanian King Abdullah II, who, according to Haaretz, told Trump over the phone that he pledged to “thwart any American initiative to renew the peace process and would encourage rage and resistance among Muslims and Christians alike,” if the embassy was moved.

    • « Avec Jérusalem, Donald Trump joue l’avenir du processus de paix »
      MondeDans les prochaines heures, le président américain pourrait reconnaître la ville sainte comme capitale d’Israël. Explosif !
      Sabrina Myre | 5 décembre 2017, 20h00

      (...) Offrir Jérusalem aux Israéliens torpillerait le processus de paix et signerait la mort définitive de la solution à deux États. « Ça ne sert plus à rien de négocier si les États-Unis décident du statut de Jérusalem, qui devait être scellé dans un accord de paix », tranche Fouad Hallak, l’un des conseillers pour les négociations à l’Organisation de libération de la Palestine. Les Palestiniens aspirent à faire de Jérusalem-Est, dont la Vieille-Ville, qui abrite les lieux saints, la capitale d’un futur pays. « Sans la mosquée Al-Aqsa pour les musulmans et le Saint-Sépulcre pour les chrétiens, aucun État palestinien n’est envisageable », soutient l’expert. Pas plus acceptable qu’Abu Dis, petite ville en périphérie de Jérusalem, proposée comme future capitale par le supposé plan de paix des Saoudiens, révélé lundi par le New York Times. Il n’en fallait pas plus pour faire grimper la tension.

      Le Hamas menace

      En plein marathon diplomatique pour faire dérailler l’annonce, Mahmoud Abbas, président de l’Autorité palestinienne, est sur la sellette. « Ce serait un échec qui lui ferait perdre le peu de légitimité qui lui reste », lâche Hamada Jaber, analyste au Centre palestinien pour la recherche politique et les études d’opinion. « Vingt-cinq ans après les Accords d’Oslo, il ne reste plus rien. Aussi bien dissoudre l’Autorité, née dans la foulée de ces pourparlers », propose le chercheur. Une reconnaissance hypothétique de Jérusalem comme capitale d’Israël provoque déjà la colère des Palestiniens. Le mouvement islamiste Hamas a menacé de « raviver l’Intifada ». « Cette crise plongera les Palestiniens dans l’incertitude mais pourrait forcer l’émergence d’un nouveau leadership et la fin du statu quo », analyse Hamada Jaber.(...)

  • Looted from Beirut 35 years ago, now on display in Tel Aviv
    https://972mag.com/looted-from-beirut-35-years-ago-now-on-display-in-tel-aviv/131187

    The relatively short film is moving: it is hard not to wonder how these images would have influenced the development of Palestinian cinema had they not been stolen and made inaccessible to Palestinian producers.

    Films by Palestinians consistently make waves and win prizes internationally, against all the odds and despite Israel’s cultural warfare against Palestinian artists. It is not a stretch to say that the potential of Palestinian #cinema could have been even greater had parts of its history not been hidden from the eyes of the world.

    #vol #histoire #Palestine

  • On eve of Netanyahu visit, EU to mark Human Rights Day with anti-occupation group B’Tselem
    Noa Landau Dec 04, 2017 3:53 PM
    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.826676

    In slap to Netanyahu, incoming EU ambassador chooses to hold official event with human rights group ■ Foreign Ministry says move is like ’spitting in the face of Israelis,’ while minister blasts EU as increasingly irrelevant

    Representatives of the European Union in Israel will mark International Human Rights Day on Thursday together with the human rights organization B’Tselem. The event, led by incoming EU Ambassador Emanuele Giaufret, will feature an exhibition of photographs marking 50 years of Israeli occupation and has sparked a fierce condemnation from Israel.

    The exhibition, entitled “50 Years,” is currently on display at the Jaffa Port in Tel Aviv. It features portraits of 50 Palestinians born in 1967, the year that Israel took over the West Bank and Gaza after the Six-Day War. The event is expected to be attended by other foreign diplomats in Israel as well.

    Early next week, Netanyahu will fly to Brussels for a rare meeting with the 28 foreign ministers of the EU member nations.

    In a departure from protocol, Netanyahu was invited not through the usual official channels, but through Lithuania’s representatives to the EU, a relatively friendly nation from Netanyahu’s perspective. The bypass of protocol has peeved the foreign minister of the EU, Federica Mogherini.

    The spokesman for Israel’s Foreign Ministry, Emmanuel Nahshon, stated, “For reasons unknown, the EU people believe that the way to Israelis’ hearts is by spitting in their faces. We are again seeing the same patronizing approach of preaching hypocritical, condescending morality, that just pushes away rather than bringing closer. It is sad and superfluous.”

    Israeli officials and politicians fumed at the news. “The European Union loses no opportunity to needle the State of Israel and persists in its unilateral ways,” stated Naftali Bennett, the leader of Habayit Heyehudi party. “This attitude makes the EU a less relevant player by the day.”

    Deputy Foreign Minister Tzipi Hotovely commented that Israel has “been threatend by Palestinian terror for over 100 years” and that “unfortunately, the EU has not investigated the Palestinian Authority’s education system, which raises children to be ready to kill innocent civilians.” She further added that “whoever wants to look into human rights should begin with the Palestinian education system.”

    B’Tselem responded, saying they have invited Bennet, Hotovely, and Nahshon to the exhibition, “so that they can have a firsthand look at the children of 1967— who have been deprived of their human rights by Israel.”

    In late April, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu canceled a scheduled meeting with German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel for refusing Netanyahu’s demand that he not meet with two human rights nongovernmental organizations, Breaking the Silence and B’Tselem.

    Netanyahu’s bureau stated at the time that the prime minister’s policy is to not meet with diplomats who visit Israel and meet organizations “that slander [Israel Defense Forces] soldiers and seek to prosecute them as war criminals.”

    In February, Netanyahu ordered the Foreign Ministry to reprimand Belgium’s ambassador to Israel after Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel met with representatives from B’Tselem and Breaking the Silence. Netanyahu’s bureau stated at the time that “Israel sees gravely the meeting of the Belgian prime minister today with the heads of Breaking the Silence and B’Tselem during his visit to Israel.”

    The same month Netanyahu visited London and asked Prime Minister Theresa May to stop funding left-wing Israeli organizations, including Breaking the Silence, B’Tselem, Adalah – The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel and others.

    In the past Netanyahu has also ordered to abolish the posts at B’Tselem reserved for young Israelis who do voluntary national service as an alternative to enlisting in the army.

    This is not the first time the EU has lent public support to the organization, despite the disapproval of the Israeli government. In October 2016, the EU delegation to Israel openly supported an appearance by B’Tselem executive director Hagai El-Ad before a special session of the UN Security Council on the settlements, tweeting “We support B’Tselem to maintain human rights of vulnerable Palestinian communities in Area C.”

  • Des dizaines de milliers de manifestants à Tel-Aviv contre la « corruption du gouvernement » RTBF - Belga - 3 Décembre 2017 - 8h12
    https://www.rtbf.be/info/monde/detail_des-dizaines-de-milliers-de-manifestants-a-tel-aviv-contre-la-corruption

    Plusieurs dizaines de milliers de manifestants se sont rassemblées samedi soir dans le centre de Tel-Aviv pour protester contre ce qu’ils dénoncent comme la corruption du gouvernement. Les manifestants, qui avaient intitulé leur rassemblement « la marche de la honte », ont envahi le large boulevard Rothschild, dans un des quartiers huppés de Tel-Aviv, pour dénoncer la corruption du gouvernement et les lenteurs présumées des enquêtes en cours contre le Premier ministre Benjamin Netanyahu.

    Le rassemblement était organisé par les responsables des manifestations de protestation hebdomadaires devant la résidence du procureur général d’Israël, Avishai Mandelblit, contre la lenteur présumée de ces enquêtes. Le Premier ministre israélien est visé par deux enquêtes, l’une sur des cadeaux qu’il aurait indûment reçus de riches personnalités, et l’autre sur un accord secret qu’il aurait tenté de conclure avec un quotidien populaire pour une couverture favorable.

    Le nom de son avocat personnel et d’un ancien chef de bureau apparaissent par ailleurs dans une affaire de corruption présumée liée à l’achat de trois sous-marins allemands. « Honte », « Bibi rentre chez toi », ont scandé les manifestants, qui ont également pris pour cible le procureur général Avishai Mandelblit. Le leader de l’opposition travailliste, Isaac Herzog, a montré son soutien aux manifestants via sa page Facebook : « la frustration (...) vient du sentiment d’injustice, de la révulsion face à la corruption, et à l’objection morale à une loi faite sur mesure pour une personne », a-t-il écrit.

    Le Parlement israélien va examiner lundi en deuxième et troisième lectures un projet de loi qui est vu par les détracteurs de Benjamin Netanyahu comme un moyen de le tirer d’affaire dans les enquêtes dont il fait l’objet.

    #Israel #manifestation #corruption #Tel-Aviv #humour ( pour le choix du boulevard #Rothschild ) #benjamin-netanyahu marche de la #honte #avishai-mandelblit #sous-marins #allemagne

    • Sur le site du #figaro , la description de l’événement est légérement différente.
      Tel Aviv : 20.000 manifestants contre Netanyahu Le figaro avec Reuters - 3 Décembre 2017 - 8h15
      http://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/2017/12/02/97001-20171202FILWWW00174-tel-aviv-20000-manifestants-contre-netanyahu.php

      Environ 20.000 personnes ont manifesté samedi à Tel Aviv pour dénoncer la corruption au sein du gouvernement du Premier ministre Benjamin Netanyahu qui fait l’objet d’un enquête pénale pour abus de pouvoir.
      Il s’agissait de la plus importante manifestation hebdomadaire suscitée par les rumeurs de corruption visant Netanyahu qui affirme n’avoir rien fait de répréhensible.

      Le chef du gouvernement israélien est cité dans deux affaires.
      La première concerne des cadeaux offerts par d’influents hommes d’affaires et la seconde porte sur un accord avec le patron d’un journal pour bénéficier d’articles complaisants en échange de restrictions contre un quotidien rival.

      La manifestation de samedi a été organisée pour protester contre un projet de loi qui doit être soumis la Knesset la semaine prochaine interdisant à la police de rendre publics les éléments de preuve qu’elle a réunis dans les enquêtes visant Netanyahu.
      Le Premier ministre se décrit comme la victime d’une chasse aux sorcières et affirme que les enquêtes ouvertes contre lui « ne révèleront rien car il n’y a rien à révéler ».

      Disparition du boulevard Rothschild , des sous-marins allemands , une simple dépéche, pas un article Du travail pour #Acrimed

  • Were Leonard Cohen’s songs used to torture Palestinian prisoners ?
    Dror, Under the Olive Tree (ckut.ca), 24 novembre 2017
    https://www.mixcloud.com/UnderTheOliveTree/were-leonard-cohen-songs-used-to-torture-palestinian-prisoners

    Un an après la mort de Léonard Cohen, une anecdote terrifiante vient d’être révélée par Haggai Stravis, dans un entretien publié par le journal israélien Walla, le 27 octobre 2017 (1).

    Stravis est le producteur qui avait réussi à faire venir Léonard Cohen en Israel en 2009. A l’époque, il avait du faire face à la campagne de Boycott, Désinvestissement et Sanctions, qui essayait de convaincre Cohen de ne pas jouer dans un Etat qui pratiquait l’Apartheid. Pour préserver son image, il avait tenté plusieurs astuces, mais elles avaient toutes échouées. Il avait d’abord convaincu Amnesty International de parrainer le concert, mais AI avait fini par refuser (2). Il avait aussi essayé de compenser sa présence à Tel Aviv en donnant un autre concert à Ramallah. Refusant ce faux équilibre, les Palestiniens avaient également refusé cette offre, et le concert à Ramallah avait été annulé (3).

    Ce qu’on apprend dans cette entrevue récente concerne les détails de cette négociation. Quand le manager de Cohen essaya de discuter avec des officiels Palestiniens, il proposa d’abord d’inviter quelques centaines de politiciens Palestiniens. Il proposa ensuite de donner un concert gratuit, et même de dédier ce concert aux familles de prisonniers Palestiniens. Mais c’est la raison pour laquelle même les officiels Palestiniens durent refuser cette offre qui est révélée ici : ils avaient appris que des prisonniers Palestiniens avaient été torturés en prison par des agents des services secrets israéliens qui leur passaient des chansons de Léonard Cohen en boucle.

    On ne sait pas si Léonard Cohen a su à l’époque que sa musique rappelait d’aussi mauvais souvenirs à ces anciens prisonniers Palestiniens, ni si sa musique est encore utilisée dans les prisons israéliennes, mais on sait aussi, grâce à un autre article de la presse israélienne, que pour le convaincre de chanter en Israël, les promoteurs israéliens lui avaient versé 2.7 millions de dollars US (4). De quoi étouffer quelques réticences, et expliquer pourquoi, encore aujourd’hui, certains artistes prétendent « ne pas vouloir mélanger la musique et la politique »...

    (1) https://e.walla.co.il/item/3106407
    (2) https://bdsmovement.net/news/amnesty-international-withdraws-leonard-cohen%E2%80%99s-israel-concert-
    (3) http://www.pacbi.org/etemplate.php?id=1039
    (4) Yediot Achronot - 7 Leilot Magazine, le 20 juin 2014

    #Palestine #Prisons #torture #Leonard_Cohen #Musique #Musique_et_politique #BDS #Boycott_culturel #shameless_autopromo

    • @odilon : apparemment pas forcément…
      Il y avait eu une grosse campagne de l’ONG britannique Reprieve, Zero DB, parce qu’à Guantanamo ils utilisaient de la musique et beaucoup de metal pour torturer auditivement les prisonniers.

      Reprieve a dressé une liste des morceaux les plus utilisés : AC/DC, Metallica, mais aussi Britney Spears, les Bee Gees ou Bruce Springsteen. Ils sont choisis en fonction de leur violence sonore ou de leurs titres et paroles : Fuck Your God ("J’emmerde ton dieu"), de Deicide, ou White America ("Amérique blanche"), d’Eminem.

      tiré de http://www.lemonde.fr/culture/article/2008/12/25/aux-etats-unis-la-torture-version-rock_1135115_3246.html
      https://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/monde/20081211.OBS5071/la-musique-nouvelle-arme-de-torture-de-l-armee-americaine.html

      Les réactions des musiciens sont variées, c’est le moins qu’on puisse dire.

      Les musiciens concernés « sont difficiles à joindre », admet Chloe Davis. Sur son site, Trent Reznor, de Nine Inch Nails, a réagi : « Il m’est difficile d’imaginer quoi que ce soit de plus profondément insultant, dégradant et rageant que d’apprendre que la musique que l’on a créée avec toute son âme est utilisée à des fins de torture. »

      Très bon article du Guardian de l’époque : https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/jun/19/usa.guantanamo avec certaines réactions des musiciens dont celle puante du leader de Metallica, qui a l’air d’apprécier le nouvel usage de ses créations :

      Unfortunately, some artists are not offended by their work being used to torture. “If the Iraqis aren’t used to freedom, then I’m glad to be part of their exposure,” James Hetfield, co-founder of Metallica, has said. As for his music being torture, he laughed: “We’ve been punishing our parents, our wives, our loved ones with this music for ever. Why should the Iraqis be any different?” Such posturing may go with the territory for an artist of the Metallica genre, so there is no need to speculate about whether Hetfield is being naive or wilfully ignorant. But no sane person voluntarily plays a single tune at earsplitting volume, over and over, 24 hours a day, and expects to stay sane.

    • Mis de côté le sensationnel d’un artiste de renommée (à tord ou à raison, il est connu), on constate ici que l’état d’Israël est prêt à investir 2.7 millions bruts pour rappeler les sueurs froides et les ongles arrachés de celles et ceux qu’il a entrepris(es) dans ses griffes. Une sorte de torture de masse à rebours. Où alors, c’était simplement à la santé des geôliers - encore que, même eux doivent être saoulés après des semaines en boucle.
      C’est tout de même fort - Machiavel doit se retourner dans sa tombe.

      L’anecdote sur Metallica est alarmante - un simple abus de laisser faire ("Ouh ouh ma mère aussi, elle aime pas ma musique.. ouh ouh") ne peut pas justifier des paroles aussi graves.
      Ay, ces vedettes... qu’est-ce qu’on en attend au juste ?

    • Mis de côté le sensationnel d’un artiste de renommée (à tord ou à raison, il est connu), on constate ici que l’état d’Israël est prêt à investir 2.7 millions bruts pour rappeler les sueurs froides et les ongles arrachés de celles et ceux qu’il a entrepris(es) dans ses griffes. Une sorte de torture de masse à rebours. Où alors, c’était simplement à la santé des geôliers - encore que, même eux doivent être saoulés après des semaines en boucle.
      C’est tout de même fort - Machiavel doit se retourner dans sa tombe.

      L’anecdote sur Metallica est alarmante - un simple abus de laisser faire ("Ouh ouh ma mère aussi, elle aime pas ma musique.. ouh ouh") ne peut pas justifier des paroles aussi graves.
      Ay, ces vedettes... qu’est-ce qu’on en attend au juste ?

    • Mis de côté le sensationnel d’un artiste de renommée (à tord ou à raison, il est connu), on constate ici que l’état d’Israël est prêt à investir 2.7 millions bruts pour rappeler les sueurs froides et les ongles arrachés de celles et ceux qu’il a entrepris(es) dans ses griffes. Une sorte de torture de masse à rebours. Où alors, c’était simplement à la santé des geôliers - encore que, même eux doivent être saoulés après des semaines en boucle.
      C’est tout de même fort - Machiavel doit se retourner dans sa tombe.

      L’anecdote sur Metallica est alarmante - un simple abus de laisser faire ("Ouh ouh ma mère aussi, elle aime pas ma musique.. ouh ouh") ne peut pas justifier des paroles aussi graves.
      Ay, ces vedettes... qu’est-ce qu’on en attend au juste ?

    • Mis de côté le sensationnel d’un artiste de renommée (à tord ou à raison, il est connu), on constate ici que l’état d’Israël est prêt à investir 2.7 millions bruts pour rappeler les sueurs froides et les ongles arrachés de celles et ceux qu’il a entrepris(es) dans ses griffes. Une sorte de torture de masse à rebours. Où alors, c’était simplement à la santé des geôliers - encore que, même eux doivent être saoulés après des semaines en boucle.
      C’est tout de même fort - Machiavel doit se retourner dans sa tombe.

      L’anecdote sur Metallica est alarmante - un simple abus de laisser faire ("Ouh ouh ma mère aussi, elle aime pas ma musique.. ouh ouh") ne peut pas justifier des paroles aussi graves.
      Ay, ces vedettes... alors... qu’est-ce qu’on en attend au juste ?

    • @ninachani Heu.. Oui... Peut-être... J’étais grave vener, fallait que ca sorte !!! Le dernier post est d’ailleurs différent des autres, pour ajouter un peu de folklore et biaiser les filtres à spam !
      Et, plus sérieusement Seenthis, me renvoyait « Gateway something is wrong somhow » au rafraichissement de la page après des freeze de la zone de commentaire.

      Mes excuses pour le spam :s

    • Un chant peut-il tuer ? Musique et violence en Éthiopie du Nord
      The Conversation, le 11 janvier 2018
      https://seenthis.net/messages/660269

      Mais aussi, un peu d’humour :

      #Chumbawamba - Torturing James Hetfield (2010)

      Torturing James Hetfield is a response to the use of Metallica’s music as a torture device against Iraqi prisoners at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1UZ6d0H8fA

      James Hetfield est le guitariste de Metallica...

      #Musique #Musique_et_politique