company:experian

  • What you don’t know about your health data will make you sick
    https://www.fastcompany.com/90317471/what-you-dont-know-about-your-health-data-privacy-will-make-you-sick

    Chances are, at least one of you is being monitored by a third party like data analytics giant Optum, which is owned by UnitedHealth Group, Inc. Since 1993, it’s captured medical data—lab results, diagnoses, prescriptions, and more—from 150 million Americans. That’s almost half of the U.S. population.

    “They’re the ones that are tapping the data. They’re in there. I can’t remove them from my own health insurance contracts. So I’m stuck. It’s just part of the system,” says Joel Winston, an attorney who specializes in privacy and data protection law.

    Healthcare providers can legally sell their data to a now-dizzyingly vast spread of companies, who can use it to make decisions, from designing new drugs to pricing your insurance rates to developing highly targeted advertising.

    Yet not all health-related information is protected by privacy rules. Companies can now derive insights about your health from growing piles of so-called “alternative” data that fall outside of HIPAA. This data—what some researchers refer to as your “shadow health record”—can include credit scores, court documents, smartphone locations, sub-prime auto loans, search histories, app activity, and social media posts.

    Your health data can be deployed in alarming ways, privacy experts say. Insurance companies can raise your rate based on a photo on your Instagram feed. Digital advertisers can fold shadow health data into ads that target or discriminate against you. It can even seem invasive and predatory. One trend among personal injury lawyers, for example, is geo-targeted ads to patients’ phones in emergency rooms.

    Uniquely valuable health data is also increasingly the target of hackers, ransomware attacks, breaches, or what some patients call just plain shadiness, which has led to litigation and can ultimately further undermine trust in the healthcare system. A 2017 breach at a New York hospital leaked sensitive information about more than 7,000 patients, including addiction histories, medical diagnoses, and reports of sexual assault and domestic violence. Criminals can use that kind of data to commit identity and insurance fraud.

    “There’s a great deal of trust that’s placed in our interactions with doctors and healthcare institutions,” says Mary Madden, research lead at Data & Society, who studies consumer and health privacy. “The current process of seeking consent for data collection and use in many health settings is often treated as an administrative afterthought, rather than a meaningful exchange that makes patients feel empowered and informed.”

    Your health-related data are compiled into a specialty report akin to the consumer credit reports made famous—or infamous—by Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion. Insurers claim these reports are crucial to evaluating and pricing risk, and they can use this data to raise your rate, or to deny your application entirely. If your application is rejected—it’s called an “adverse event”—you are legally entitled to receive a copy of your specialty report and to potentially dispute an error.

    “Many people don’t understand that the data from a Fitbit or other health wearable or health device can actually be sold and is, in fact, today being sold. It is being sold for behavioral analytics, for advertising targeting. People don’t understand that is happening,” she told the committee. (After this story was published, a Fitbit spokesperson sent Fast Company a statement saying that the company does not “sell customer personal data, and we do not share customer personal information except in the limited circumstances described in our privacy policy.”)

    The demand for all this data is rising, as it has for years. The health data market was approximately $14.25 billion in 2017, according to BIS Research. The firm predicts that in just under seven years—by the end of 2025—the market will grow nearly five times bigger, to $68.75 billion.

    #Données_médicales #Etats_unis #Assurances

  • Publicités ciblées : une femme qui a perdu son enfant interpelle les plates-formes du Web
    https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2018/12/12/publicites-ciblees-une-femme-qui-a-perdu-son-enfant-interpelle-les-plates-fo

    Après avoir perdu son bébé, mort-né, l’Américaine Gillian Brockell a continué à recevoir des publicités destinées aux femmes enceintes, puis aux mères de nouveau-nés. Le message, publié mardi 11 décembre sur Twitter, est poignant. Gillian Brockell, chroniqueuse au Washington Post, y interpelle les grandes plates-formes du numérique, tout particulièrement Facebook, Instagram, Twitter et Experian (spécialiste du marketing fondé sur les données). An open letter to @Facebook, @Twitter, @Instagram and (...)

    #Google #Amazon #GoogleSearch #algorithme #données #publicité #BigData #profiling #harcèlement

    ##publicité

  • RGPD : 45 000 Européens ont rejoint un recours collectif contre les géants du web
    https://www.numerama.com/politique/442653-rgpd-45-000-europeens-ont-rejoint-un-recours-collectif-contre-les-g

    Le bilan des six mois du RGPD a été fait par la CNIL. L’autorité de protection des données est notamment revenue sur les trois recours collectifs visant les géants du net. Le Règlement général sur la protection des données (RGPD), un texte européen entré en application le 25 mai 2018, a donné de nouveaux moyens d’action aux particuliers pour faire valoir leurs droits. De toute évidence, nombre d’entre eux ne se privent pas pour exiger des entreprises qu’elles se montrent plus vertueuses dans la collecte (...)

    #Acxiom #Apple #Criteo #Equifax #Experian #Google #Oracle #Quantcast #Microsoft #Amazon #Facebook #LinkedIn #données #[fr]Règlement_Général_sur_la_Protection_des_Données_(RGPD)[en]General_Data_Protection_Regulation_(GDPR)[nl]General_Data_Protection_Regulation_(GDPR) (...)

    ##[fr]Règlement_Général_sur_la_Protection_des_Données__RGPD_[en]General_Data_Protection_Regulation__GDPR_[nl]General_Data_Protection_Regulation__GDPR_ ##procès ##publicité ##CNIL ##LaQuadratureduNet ##PrivacyInternational ##Tapad ##NOYB
    //c0.lestechnophiles.com/www.numerama.com/content/uploads/2018/06/rgpd.jpg

  • How do data companies get our data ?
    https://privacyinternational.org/feature/2048/how-do-data-companies-get-our-data

    Open a Russian Matryoshka doll and you will find a smaller doll inside. Ask a large data company such as Acxiom and Oracle where they get their data from, and the answer will be from smaller data companies. Data companies – a catch all term for data brokers, advertisers, marketers, web trackers, and more – facilitate a hidden data ecosystem that collects, generates and supplies data to wide variety of beneficiaries. The beneficiaries of the ecosystem can include other advertisers, social (...)

    #Acxiom #Experian #Oracle #algorithme #données #BigData #data-mining #marketing #profiling #PrivacyInternational #Quantcast #cookies #Facebook #Twitter #tracker #publicité #AddThis #ZiffDavis #ReadGroup #smartphone #Android (...)

    ##publicité ##[fr]Règlement_Général_sur_la_Protection_des_Données__RGPD_[en]General_Data_Protection_Regulation__GDPR_[nl]General_Data_Protection_Regulation__GDPR_ ##WiFi ##carte ##MasterCard ##Epsilon ##Shopper'sVoice
    /sites/default/files/fav/apple-icon-180x180.png

  • Comment les entreprises surveillent notre quotidien – Framablog
    https://framablog.org/2017/10/25/comment-les-entreprises-surveillent-notre-quotidien

    Une enquête long, minutieuse, terrible.

    Bien sûr, vous connaissez les #GAFAM omniprésents aux avant-postes pour nous engluer au point que s’en déprendre complètement est difficile… Mais connaissez-vous Acxiom et LiveRamp, Equifax, Oracle, Experian et TransUnion ? Non ? Pourtant il y a des chances qu’ils nous connaissent bien…

    Il existe une industrie très rentable et très performante des données « client ».

    Dans ce long article documenté et qui déploie une vaste gamme d’exemples dans tous les domaines, vous ferez connaissance avec les coulisses de cette industrie intrusive pour laquelle il semble presque impossible de « passer inaperçu », où notre personnalité devient un profil anonyme mais tellement riche de renseignements que nos nom et prénom n’ont aucun intérêt particulier.

    #GAFA #Surveillance #Marketing

  • How Big data mines personal info to manipulate voters and craft fake news
    (June 2017, Nina Burleigh)

    #Facebook, #Cambridge_Analytica, #artificial_intelligence #big_data #psychographics #OCEAN #surveillance

    http://www.newsweek.com/2017/06/16/big-data-mines-personal-info-manipulate-voters-623131.html

    “It’s my ([Alexander Nix]) privilege to speak to you today about the power of Big Data and psychographics in the electoral process,” he began. As he clicked through slides, he explained how Cambridge Analytica can appeal directly to people’s emotions, bypassing cognitive roadblocks, thanks to the oceans of data it can access on every man and woman in the country.

    After describing Big Data, Nix talked about how Cambridge was mining it for political purposes, to identify “mean personality” and then segment personality types into yet more specific subgroups, using other variables, to create ever smaller groups susceptible to precisely targeted messages.

    [...]

    Big Data, artificial intelligence and algorithms designed and manipulated by strategists like the folks at Cambridge have turned our world into a Panopticon

    [...]

    it made tens of millions of “friends” by first employing low-wage tech-workers to hand over their Facebook profiles: It spiders through Facebook posts, friends and likes, and, within a matter of seconds, spits out a personality profile, including the so-called OCEAN psychological tendencies test score (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism)

    [...]

    Facebook was even more useful for Trump, with its online behavioral data on nearly 2 billion people around the world, each of whom is precisely accessible to strategists and marketers who can afford to pay for the peek. Team Trump created a 220 million–person database, nicknamed Project Alamo, using voter registration records, gun ownership records, credit card purchase histories and the monolithic data vaults Experian PLC, Datalogix, Epsilon and Axiom Corporation.

    [...]

    Facebook offers advertisers is its Lookalike Audiences program. An advertiser (or a political campaign manager) can come to Facebook with a small group of known customers or supporters, and ask Facebook to expand it. Using its access to billions of posts and pictures, likes and contacts, Facebook can create groups of people who are “like” that initial group, and then target advertising made specifically to influence it.

    [...]

    By 2012, there had been huge advances in what Big Data, social media and AI could do together. That year, Facebook conducted a happy-sad emotional manipulation experiment, splitting a million people into two groups and manipulating the posts so that one group received happy updates from friends and another received sad ones. They then ran the effects through algorithms and proved—surprise—that they were able to affect people’s moods. (Facebook, which has the greatest storehouse of personal behavior data ever amassed, is still conducting behavioral research, mostly, again, in the service of advertising and making money.

    [...]

    Psychographic algorithms allow strategists to target not just angry racists but also the most intellectually gullible individuals, people who make decisions emotionally rather than cognitively. For Trump, such voters were the equivalent of diamonds in a dark mine. Cambridge apparently helped with that too. A few weeks before the election, in a Sky News report on the company, an employee was actually shown on camera poring over a paper on “ The Need for Cognition Scale,” which, like the OCEAN test, can be applied to personal data, and which measures the relative importance of thinking versus feeling in an individual’s decision-making.

    [...]

    Big Data technology has so far outpaced legal and regulatory frameworks that discussions about the ethics of its use for political purposes are still rare. No senior member of Congress or administration official in Washington has placed a very high priority on asking what psychographic data mining means for privacy, nor about the ethics of political messaging based on evading cognition or rational thinking, nor about the AI role in mainstreaming racist and other previously verboten speech.

    [...]

    After months of investigations and increasingly critical articles in the British press (especially by The Guardian ’s Carole Cadwalladr, who has called Cambridge Analytica’s work the framework for an authoritarian surveillance state, and whose reporting Cambridge has since legally challenged), the British Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), an independent agency that monitors privacy rights and adherence to the U.K.’s strict laws, announced May 17 that it is looking into Cambridge and SCL for their work in the Brexit vote and other elections.

    [...]

    Now in the White House, Kushner heads the administration’s Office of Technology and Innovation. It will focus on “technology and data,” the administration stated. Kushner said he plans to use it to help run government like a business, and to treat American citizens “like customers.”

  • Réseaux sociaux : ils se font piéger dans un bar à cause des données personnelles qu’ils laissent sur Internet
    http://www.huffingtonpost.fr/2014/05/27/reseaux-sociaux-ils-se-font-pieger-a-cause-des-donnees-personnelles-q

    INTERNET - Pour inciter les Britanniques à faire attention aux données personnelles qu’ils laissent derrière eux sur le net, le groupe Experian, spécialisé dans le traitement des données informatique, a réalisé une expérience surprenante le 23 mai dernier dans le cadre de son projet ID Bot Project qui vise à sensibiliser l’opinion publique sur les problèmes de fraude à l’identité.

    #réseaux_sociaux #données_personnelles #confidentialité