company:the financial times

  • The Butcher Builders : How Western Journalists Helped Create a Monster in Russia
    https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2018/02/the-butcher-builders-how-western-journalists-helpe.html

    Nonobstant le terme de « monstre » pour désigner Poutine,

    While all of this was going on, western journalists from The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, The Financial Times, The Boston Globe, The Baltimore Sun, and other publications, were enamoured with the narrative of capitalism overcoming Communism. The economic reformers—Yeltsin and his administration—were “good,” as Financial Times reporter John Lloyd put it in a retrospective blog post, and their efforts generally successful. This lasted right up until Russia’s ‘98 economic collapse, when their reporting would undergo a major shift in tone.

    #MSM #Etats-Unis #Eltsine #Russie

  • Shell pulls out of east Ukraine gas exploration project
    http://www.kyivpost.com/content/business/shell-pulls-out-of-east-ukraine-gas-exploration-project-390803.html

    Ukraine’s government received a “Notice of Withdrawal” to abandon a potential $10 billion gas exploration project from Royal Dutch Shell, the Financial Times reported citing “sources familiar with the situation.”

    Citing “circumstances beyond” the company’s control, a shell spokesman told the Kyiv Post in an e-mailed statement that it has “been prevented from performing its commitments under (the) Yuzivska production sharing agreement” in war-torn eastern Ukraine.

  • Ukraine oligarch calls for nationalisation of industrial assets - FT.com
    http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/77ed11d2-ce57-11e4-86fc-00144feab7de.html

    One of Ukraine’s most powerful oligarchs has called for some of the country’s prized industrial assets to be nationalised, claiming that their privatisation was a criminal conspiracy to rob the state of billions of dollars.
    Igor Kolomoisky, a billionaire businessman, told the Financial Times that Ukraine should not receive any new funds from the International Monetary Fund until all “illegally” privatised property had been restored to state ownership.

    “Ukraine is going round begging for money . . . and here is money that is due to the state. Return these enterprises, put them up for sale in an open tender and you will get 10 times more than you did [before],” he said, adding that any new auctions could raise tens of billions of dollars.
    (…)
    Mr Kolomoisky’s proposal represents a political bombshell, and a direct challenge to his fellow oligarchs who scooped up state assets at often knockdown prices in the privatisations of the 2000s. Critics say his motives may be less patriotism or a sense of fair play than a desire to gain advantage over his business rivals in the febrile atmosphere of post-revolutionary Ukraine.

    But opening up past privatisations could raise concerns over the sanctity of property rights in Ukraine and destabilise its already fragile business climate, experts warn, at a time when the country is struggling to cope with a deep economic crisis brought on by the war against Russian-backed separatists in the east.

    Arseniy Yatseniuk, Ukraine’s prime minister, reacted cautiously to Mr Kolomoisky’s proposal, telling the FT it could “open a Pandora’s box” if the decision on whether privatisations were right or wrong were made by a “corrupted judiciary”.
    (…)
    Mr Kolomoisky’s criticism of the Ukrrudprom process has added resonance because of the fact he was a beneficiary of it. He told a Ukrainian parliamentary committee this month that the privatisation procedure was designed to restrict the number of potential bidders and ensure the assets ended up in “the right hands”.
    The law [on Ukrrudprom] was shameful, humiliating and criminal,” Mr Kolomoisky told the FT. “This was a planned conspiracy to commit a crime.

    Mr Kolomoisky intends to submit evidence of the alleged wrongdoing to Ukrainian prosecutors, in the hope they will launch an investigation into the sell off of Ukrrudprom. He also said that if local prosecutors confirm evidence of collusion, bribery and tender rigging, all the Ukrrudprom mines privatised in 2004 should be “expropriated”, without compensating their current owners.

  • The sharing economy must share the risks - FT.com
    http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d3bd6750-848d-11e4-bae9-00144feabdc0.html?segid=0100320#axzz3Ntcd2Ezt

    This has been the year of Uber. “Everyone is starting to worry about being Ubered,” Maurice Lévy, chief executive of advertising group Publicis, told the Financial Times this week. The sharing economy in which online platforms co-ordinate hundreds of thousands of freelancers to drive cabs, rent rooms (Airbnb), clean laundry (Washio) and perform other services has arrived.
    As companies recognise the threat, governments and regulators are struggling to adjust and consumers are unsure whether to trust the new type of business. The greatest uncertainty, however, faces workers. As self-employment, start-ups and one-person “micro-businesses” comprise a larger share of the workforce, workers are becoming more free and more at risk.

  • Saudi Arabia and UAE blame oil rout on countries outside Opec - FT.com
    http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/39472a66-88ee-11e4-ad5b-00144feabdc0.html?ftcamp=crm/email/20141223/nbe/MiddleEast/product&siteedition=intl#axzz3MbkLbOXF

    Ahead of last month’s Opec meeting in Vienna, Mr Mazroui told the Financial Times: “Yes, there is an oversupply but that oversupply is not an Opec problem.”
    He also said that non-Opec countries and high-cost production — such as oil from US shale fields — should play a role in balancing the market. Lower prices would help cut excess supplies from more expensive oilfields while preserving the share of lower-cost Opec producers as well as induce demand. The “market will fix it”, he said in November.

  • GCHQ chief accuses US tech giants of becoming terrorists ’networks of choice’
    http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/nov/03/privacy-gchq-spying-robert-hannigan

    Privacy has never been “an absolute right”, according to the new director of #GCHQ, who has used his first public intervention since taking over at the helm of Britain’s #surveillance agency to accuse US technology companies of becoming “the command and control networks of choice” [#cybernétique] for terrorists.

    Robert Hannigan said a new generation of freely available technology has helped groups like Islamic State (#Isis #OEI) to hide from the security services and accuses major tech firms of being “in denial”, going further than his predecessor in seeking to claim that the leaks of Edward #Snowden have aided terror networks.

    GCHQ and sister agencies including MI5 cannot tackle those challenges without greater support from the private sector, “including the largest US technology companies which dominate the web”, Hannigan argued in an opinion piece written for the Financial Times (03/11/2014) just days into his new job.
    http://cryptome.org/2014/11/gchq-14-1103.pdf

    #infoguerre #médias_sociaux Cf. http://seenthis.net/messages/306729

    • Voir aussi l’édito du Financial Times du 5 novembre 2014 : « It is time to forge a post-Snowden settlement » http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/9658b31a-6417-11e4-8ade-00144feabdc0.html (#paywall)

      The terms of that debate should not be hard to define. In democratic states, there must be strong and independent accounting of the way the security services operate. Following Snowden, it is evident that procedures in the US and UK are insufficiently transparent.

      That said, US internet companies cannot ignore their responsibilities vis-à-vis national security. These firms do not inhabit some separate planet where they can operate independent of state obligations to defend the public against terrorism. No government can tolerate a situation in which citizens communicate with one another over data networks without any possibility of legitimate surveillance. Mr Hannigan is correct to state that “privacy has never been an absolute right”.

      The FT believes the moment has come to redress the balance in the debate over privacy and security. Mr Hannigan’s call for a “new deal” between the intelligence agencies and the tech companies is a good place to start – before another wave of jihadist violence is inflicted on the west.

    • Réponse du NYT à l’édito du FT :

      But the crocodile tears of the intelligence chiefs overlook the fact that before those barriers were put in place, the United States National Security Agency and Mr. Hannigan’s GCHQ misused their powers for an illegal dragnet surveillance operation. The technology companies are doing their job in protecting people’s private data precisely because the intelligence agencies saw fit to rummage through that data.

      Mr. Hannigan’s argument overlooks the many legal avenues intelligence agencies have to seek data. Demanding that the technology companies leave “back doors” open to their software or hardware also potentially assists Chinese, Russian and other hackers in accessing reams of data.

      A Spy’s Deceptive Complaints (12/11/2014)
      http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/12/opinion/a-spys-deceptive-complaints.html

  • A Night in War-Shattered Lugansk: Russian Soldiers Share Vodka with Western Journalists
    http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/a-night-in-war-shattered-lugansk-russian-soldiers-share-vodka-with-

    At the Weeping Willow café in Lugansk, a Russian soldier from Voronezh named Maxim, with his five buddies, generously invites reporters Courtney Weaver (a New Yorker based in Moscow for the Financial Times) and Max Seddon (reporting for Buzzfeed) to join them over vodka. Maxim is a little vague about the troops’ mission in Lugansk. They are “training the local population,” he says.

    The journalists wonder whether the soldiers volunteered for this duty or were ordered to Ukraine. Maxim, who clearly has a sense of humor, explains: “They gave us an order,” he says.”‘Who wants to go volunteer?’”

    As Lugansk’s 8 p.m. curfew ends the evening, another soldier, Salovat, proclaims to Weaver, “A million men will die for your eyes!

  • La Cour européenne de justice annule les sanctions contre la Banque centrale d’Iran.

    EU Court lift sanctions on CBI - AzerNews
    http://www.azernews.az/region/70974.html

    The European Union Court has lifted sanctions on Iran’s Central Bank, which had been imposed on a number of Iranian financial institutions and other companies, the Financial Times reported.
    The United States and European nations have imposed severe economic sanctions on Iran in recent years accusing it of using nuclear program as a coverage for making nuclear weapons. However, Iran has denied the charges and insists that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only.
    The Court of Justice lifted the sanctions because of lack of evidence on banks involvement in the financing of any programs to develop nuclear weapons.

    Le jugement, du 18/09/14 http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=157842&pageIndex=0&doclang=fr&mode=req&dir=&oc , se fonde essentiellement sur l’absence de motivation des sanctions. Dans son raisonnement, il étend aux personnes morales et obligations étatiques la protection des droits fondamentaux (dont l’obligation de motivation des condamnations) garanties par les droits de l’homme.

    Ce jugement fait suite à deux autres jugements concernant une autre banque iranienne sanctionnée (la banque Mellat, ou Banque nationale d’Iran) allant dans le même sens : annulation des sanctions pour absence de preuves, les faits rapportés n’étant pas prouvés mais étant de simples allégations.

    Bank Mellat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_Mellat

    On 29 January 2013, the European General Court in Luxembourg ruled to annul the European Union sanctions in place since 2010 against Bank Mellat on grounds of supporting the Iranian nuclear and missile programs, stating that the basic rights of the bank had been denied and there was no evidence supporting the claim. Bank Mellat intends to sue for damages.

    A related action in the British courts was taken to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in March 2013, causing the court to hold a closed hearing for the first time. In June 2013, the Supreme Court ruled that the UK government’s sanctions on the bank had been unlawful. Bank Mellat intends to claim for £500 million of damages from the UK government for loss of business between 2009 and 2013.

    Certains se demandent pourquoi la Russie n’introduit pas de recours à la Cour européenne de justice concernant les récentes sanctions…

    Tout est dans le titre…
    EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE INTRODUCES THE ANTI-RASMUSSEN RULE — SANCTIONS CANNOT BE IMPOSED BY REASON OF FABRICATION, LIES, DISINFORMATION | Dances With Bears
    http://johnhelmer.net/?p=11398
    (avec nettement plus loin une présentation de l’affaire)

  • Financial Times’ attack on Piketty under fire - World Socialist Web Site

    http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/05/30/pike-m30.html

    Financial Times’ attack on Piketty under fire
    By Nick Beams
    30 May 2014

    The campaign by the Financial Times against economist Thomas Piketty and his book Capital in the Twenty-First Century appears to be unravelling less than a week after its launch last Friday.

    #économie #piketty

  • The Financial Times’ attack on Thomas Piketty - World Socialist Web Site

    http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/05/27/pers-m27.html

    The Financial Times’ attack on Thomas Piketty
    27 May 2014

    In a series of articles over the past several days, and in a major editorial published on Monday, the Financial Times has launched a scurrilous attack on Thomas Piketty and his book, Capital in the Twenty-First Century.

    The newspaper claims to have discovered serious flaws in data that undermine one of the book’s central themes—that wealth concentration is growing throughout the world, and in the United States and Europe in particular. A front-page article published over the weekend, provocatively headlined, “Thomas Piketty’s exhaustive inequality data turn out to be flawed,” asserts that the authors have found “unexplained data entries and errors in the figures underling some of the book’s key charts.”

    #économie #piketty

  • Erdoğan, Putin meet on sidelines of Olympics, energy ties on agenda
    http://todayszaman.com/news-338824-erdogan-putin-meet-on-sidelines-of-olympics-energy-ties-on-

    Après l’Iran, visite officielle du 1er ministre turc en Russie pour re-négocier les prix de l’approvisionnement en gaz naturel de la Turquie. Ceci sans doute liée à l’inflation de la monnaie turque couplée à un nouveau record de consommation de gaz naturel au mois de décembre (4,9 milliard de m3 http://ekonomi.milliyet.com.tr/dogalgaz-ithalati-aylik-rekor-/ekonomi/detay/1830659/default.htm) qui pèsent de plus en plus lourdement sur la balance commerciale du pays

    Prime minister also pointed to the cooperation in the energy field between Turkey and Russia, briefly saying it was “especially important.”

    According to the Financial Times, one of the main reasons for Erdoğan’s trip to Sochi was to win cheaper gas from Russia, the world’s biggest natural gas supplier. The British paper said that Erdoğan’s visit came a week after a trip to Iran, where he also went seeking cheaper energy. The daily said the inclusion of Energy Minister Taner Yıldız in the delegation traveling with Erdoğan to Russia is also a strong indicator of how energy hungry Turkey is.

    #Turquie
    #Iran
    #énergie

  • Pour ou contre la modération à priori des forums ?

    Edward Tufte forum : Moderating internet forums : What’s smart, not what’s new
    http://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0000fT

    A rejection slip from a Chinese economics journal supposedly went this way (quoted in the Financial Times): “We have read your manuscript with boundless delight. If we were to publish your paper, it would be impossible for us to publish any work of lower standard. And as it is unthinkable that in the next thousand years we shall see its equal, we are, to our regret, compelled to return your divine composition, and to beg you a thousand times to overlook our short sight and timidity.”

    Après ce petit bijou chinois, Tufte, qui est donc pour, explique qu’il ne faut publier que les commentaires excellents, constructifs, etc, et ne jamais s’expliquer sur les raisons de « non publication » d’un message particulier :

    Publishers have no obligation to publish, acknowledge, or reply to the thousands of unsolicited contributions that they receive. Life’s too short.

    Every day we receive partially meritorious contributions that are not published; even some of the contributions of our Kindly Contributors are not published. There are billions of other places on the internet where rejected contributions can be published, unreviewed and unedited. But not here.

    Ce modèle me paraît très bien ; j’ajouterais tout de même qu’il serait alors gentil d’envoyer à l’auteur du commentaire une copie par email de son propre message (avec pourquoi pas une phrase+lien sur la politique de modération).

  • Zone Militaire » Blog Archive Le patron d’EADS veut un financement et un calendrier pour développer un drone européen - Zone Militaire
    http://www.opex360.com/2013/12/13/le-patron-deads-veut-un-financement-et-un-calendrier-pour-developper-un-dro

    Les 19 et 20 décembre prochains se tiendra un sommet européen qui abordera les questions de défense. Pour le patron d’EADS, Tom Enders, il s’agit-là d’une occasion de faire émerger le projet d’un drone militaire européen. C’est ce qu’il a plaidé lors d’un entretien accordé au quotidien économique The Financial Times, ce 13 décembre, sans pour autant montrer un optimisme débordant quant à une issue favorable à ce projet.

    “C’est aux dirigeants politiques de décider s’il est important pour l’Europe de posséder sa propre industrie de la défense”, a-t-il ainsi affirmé. “Est-ce important ou est-ce que (le drone) est une matière première fabriquée un peu partout dans le monde et dont on peut dire ‘OK, je peux l’acheter aux Etats-Unis, en Israël ou pourquoi pas, dans quelques années en Asie ?’”, a-t-il ajouté.

    Le groupe européen, via sa filiale Cassidian, s’est associé à Dassault Aviation et à Alenia pour proposer un drone MALE (Moyenne Altitude Longue Endurance) à l’horizon 2020, sur la base du projet Talarion, abandonné, faute de financements, en 2012. Le développement d’un tel appareils coûterait 1 milliard d’euros et le prix unitaire dépendrait du nombre de commandes. Il ne reste plus qu’à avoir un donneur d’ordres unique, qui parlerait au nom des autres. Mais pour cela, faut-il encore que les clients potentiels se mettent d’accord sur leurs besoins.

    Aussi, pour Tom Enders, le prochain sommet européen devrait permettre d’obtenir un accord sur le financement d’un tel programme ainsi que sur un calendrier. Le souci est que plusieurs pays du Vieux Continent ont déjà fait leur choix en faveur du drone MQ-9 Reaper américain, lequel va rester en service pendant un bon moment… Et il y a des chances que les seuls crédits que la filière aéronautique pourraient obtenir soient décidés pour “encourager” les activités de recherche et de développement, ce qui donnera certes du grain à moudre pour les bureaux d’étude.

    “J’espère que nous verrons des initiatives concrètes et pas seulement une déclaration faite de belles paroles”, a lancé Tom Enders. Car pour lui, il est à craindre une détérioration de la base industrielle de défense européenne, en raison de la baisse des dépenses militaires consenties par les Etats-membres (-10% depuis 2006).

    #aéronautique
    #défense-europenne
    #drone-européen
    #drone-MALE
    #EADS
    #financement

    #industrie

  • La méthode des scenarii appliquée à la gestion de la dette en France - L’économiste
    http://www.leconomiste.eu/decryptage-economie/148-la-methode-des-scenarii-appliquee-a-la-gestion-de-la-dette-en-france

    La méthode des scenarii permet de raisonner par rapport à des conséquences et des situations susceptibles d’évoluer dans le temps. Cette méthode est liée en amont à des biais cognitifs forts qui influent sur la perception que les individus ont de concepts identiques. La notion d’incertitude joue un rôle très important car cette méthode cherche avant tout à penser l’improbable plus que le probable. Il apparaît que l’appréhension de la gestion de la dette française peut être analysée à travers cette grille de lecture.

    « Ne jamais hésiter mais toujours douter »

    Il faut être conscient que tout individu subit des biais dans sa réflexion. Afin de comprendre cette notion, il suffit pour cela de réfléchir aux médias (presse, télévisions, radios, sites internet) que chaque individu choisi librement de consulter et qu’il utilise comme vecteur d’information et de connaissance :

    Sans préjuger de la qualité et de l’intérêt des médias suivants, il convient néanmoins de constater qu’une personne qui privilégie comme médias The Economist, The Financial Times et Les Echos n’aura probablement pas la même vision des choses qu’une personne qui choisit de lire Le Canard Enchaîné, Rue89 et MediaPart. Le choix de lire ces journaux implique un biais de la part de l’individu quant à ses préférences et ses centres d’intérêts.
    Ensuite, le choix de lire tel ou tel article implique un biais supplémentaire. En effet, l’article sera biaisé par le choix de son thème. Typiquement, choisir de lire un article (dans le même média) portant sur les problèmes politiques d’un pays, au lieu de lire un article sur les problèmes économiques de ce même pays souligne un biais.
    Enfin, même s’il essaye d’être objectif, l’auteur de l’article choisi par le lecteur subit lui-même des biais dans sa manière de traiter le sujet...

    #économie
    La méthode des #scenarii appliquée à la #gestion de la #dette en #France

  • Une introduction à l’« Orient compliqué » :

    A Short Guide to the Middle East : letter to the editor published in the Financial Times

    http://now.msn.com/a-short-guide-to-the-middle-east-letter-to-the-editor-published-in-the-fina

    That whole Middle East deal sure can be confusing. Thankfully, in this concise and clearly articulated letter to the editor published in the Financial Times, Mr KN Al-Sabah, of London, lays it all out in a way anyone can understand. In full, his letter, entitled “A Short Guide to the Middle East,” read:

    Sir, Iran is backing Assad. Gulf states are against Assad!
    Assad is against Muslim Brotherhood. Muslim Brotherhood and Obama are against General Sisi.
    But Gulf states are pro Sisi! Which means they are against Muslim Brotherhood!
    Iran is pro Hamas, but Hamas is backing Muslim Brotherhood!
    Obama is backing Muslim Brotherhood, yet Hamas is against the US!
    Gulf states are pro US. But Turkey is with Gulf states against Assad; yet Turkey is pro Muslim Brotherhood against General Sisi. And General Sisi is being backed by the Gulf states!
    Welcome to the Middle East and have a nice day.

    #Proche-Orient #Golfe #US #géopolitique

    • Nahostpolitik leichtgemacht

      Die ganze Nahostgeschichte kann ganz schön verwirrend sein. Dank eines knapp und präzise formulierten Leserbriefs von Herrn KN Al-Sabah aus London an die Financial Times kann nun jeder verstehen, worum es geht. Der vollständige Leserbrief mit dem Titel „Ein kurzer Nahostführer“ liest sich so:

      Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

      Iran unterstützt Assad.
      Die Golfstaaten sind gegen Assad!
      Assad ist gegen die Muslimbrüder.
      Die Muslimbrüder und Obama sind gegen General Sisi.
      Aber die Golfstaaten sind für Sisi! Das heißt, sie sind gegen die Muslimbrüder!
      Iran ist für Hamas, aber Hamas unterstützt die Muslimbrüder!
      Obama unterstützt die Muslimbrüder, während Hamas gegen die USA ist!
      Die Golfstaaten sind für die USA.
      Aber die Türkei ist gemeinsam mit den Golfstaaten gegen Assad, dabei ist die Türkei für die Muslimbrüder gegen General Sisi.
      Und Genral Sisi wird von den Golfstaaten unterstützt.

      Willkommen im Nahen Osten und noch einen schönen Tag !

      Peut-être un des matheux pourrait nous traduire l’histoire dans du code de logique formelle ?!? Vu le rôle de la religion pour la question il n’est pas impossible qu’on arrive ensuite á des résultats aussi intéressants comme dans le cas de l’argument sur l’existence de dieux de Gödel ;-)

      #auf_deutsch #wunderbar

  • À mes questions : y a-t-il des gens qui relient l’abdication de l’émir du Qatar à la répression de l’armée libanaise contre les salafistes d’Assir, et au renversement des Frères en Égypte : Scarlett Haddad et sa désormais fameuse unique « source sécuritaire » (qu’on devrait appeler « Monsieur X ») : Entre le Qatar, l’Égypte, la Turquie... et cheikh Assir
    http://www.lorientlejour.com/article/822346/-entre-le-qatar-legypte-la-turquie-et-cheikh-assir.html

    Une source sécuritaire libanaise fait en tout cas le lien entre le coup de force de l’armée contre cheikh Ahmad el-Assir et l’évolution de la situation régionale. Selon cette source, il y a eu trop de changements presque simultanés au cours de la dernière période dans plusieurs pays de la région pour que l’on puisse croire à de simples coïncidences.

    • Un élément supplémentaire à l’appui de cette thèse : le prêt du FMI de 4.8 milliards de dollars qui n’est jamais arrivé entre les mains de Morsi :
      http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f2376bea-d0fc-11e2-a3ea-00144feab7de.html#axzz2YA3Rj6dW

      Essam al-Haddad, the closest aide to Mohamed Morsi, said that required measures, including a phased-out subsidies plan and a sales tax law, were now part of a programme sent to the fund.
      “The question [of when a deal would be signed] should be addressed to the IMF,” Mr Haddad told the Financial Times during a visit to London last week. “There’s always something coming up,” he said, complaining that fund officials wanted to see greater political consensus on the ­programme.
      The two-year negotiations for a loan that could stabilise Egypt’s economy have run into repeated snags, with the fund this year asking for more robust reforms.
      Although the IMF has been seeking the widest possible consensus to ensure that the reforms would be implemented, its main concern has been on the economic details of the programme and the government’s ability to rein in public finances.
      Despite Egyptian suspicions of a political motive behind the delay , the US and other western shareholders of the fund are still believed to support an agreement, which should unlock bigger lending and investment packages.

    • Associated Press : G. Little, attaché de presse du Pentagone, déclare qu’Hagel a appelé deux fois al-Sissi durant la semaine. Mais il refuse de donner des détails sur le contenu de ces appels.
      http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/07/03/pentagon-secretary-hagel-calls-egyptian-defense-minister-as-deadline-on

      The Pentagon says Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has spoken to the Egyptian defense minister twice in the past week, including a call he made to Defense Minister Gen. Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi on Tuesday.
      Pentagon press secretary George Little is refusing to release any details about the content of the calls. He says U.S. officials at various levels of government have been very clear that America remains committed to the democratic process in Egypt and hopes the tensions there can be resolved peacefully.
      The disclosure came as Egypt’s military moved to tighten control of key institutions in the country, ahead of an almost certain push to oust President Mohammed Morsi from office.
      Little says the Pentagon did not disclose last week’s call until now because of the sensitivities of the situation.

    • Alain, oui ce sont de pures spéculations, mais ma question n’est pas là :

      – je vois passer des choses sur les réseaux sociaux (c’est donc assez souterrain), qui me laissent penser que certains voient des relations entre les événements ; c’est assez flou, mais ça commence à devenir plus ou moins cohérent ; la question que je pose n’est pas savoir si c’est vrai (je suis d’accord : ce sont de pures spéculations), mais de savoir si ce genre de positions va sortir – ce qui signifierait donc qu’une partie des acteurs locaux se justifient avec telle ou telle analyse ;

      – par ailleurs, beaucoup de monde analyse la politique de la région, largement, sur la rivalité entre le Qatar et l’Arabie séoudite. Je ne suis pas certain que ce soit la chose la plus déterminante (notamment au Liban), mais ce sont des analyses qui reviennent très souvent. De fait, le changement d’émir au Qatar est largement lu dans cette logique. Et actuellement, je sais que tout le monde surveille la situation pour tenter de « lire » la position du nouvel émir – avec apparemment, dans ces derniers jours, ce qui semble un recul net des positions politiques du Qatar dans le coin.

      – et enfin, pour moi toujours la question libanaise : les groupes politiques s’y positionnent très largement en fonction de ce qu’ils pensent être les liens (plus ou moins supposés) entre tels acteurs et le roi d’Arabie séoudite. Si Saad est assis, sur la photo, à moins de 20 mètres du roi, alors il va faire beau temps ; si le roi tourne le dos pendant que Saad essaie de lui embrasser l’épaule, alors il va pleuvoir.

      Je veux donc savoir si des choses que je vois passer en privé sur les réseaux sociaux sort dans des médias arabes, ce qui indiquerait que des acteurs, eux, sont en train de se positionner et de faire leurs calculs politiques en fonction de cette lecture (qui est certes une spéculation) : Hamas, 14 Mars libanais dans ses relations aux salafistes, régime syrien…

    • Quoiqu’on pense de la concomitance de ces évènements - qu’on la pense fortuite comme M. Gresh ou bien qu’on cherche à y déceler des actions concertées - il y a au moins un lien qui fait leur unité : ils peuvent se lire comme le recul de l’influence du Qatar et son affaiblissement au profit de l’Arabie saoudite. Il est tout de même fort probable que la succession de l’émir mais aussi l’éviction de HBJ (du poste de 1er ministre, ministre des affaires étrangères et chef du Q.I.A.) a affaibli une éventuelle réaction du Qatar dans sa capacité à appuyer Morsi.
      Donc recul de l’influence qatariote évidemment en Egypte, probablement également au sein de l’opposition syrienne off-shore réunie actuellement à Istanbul, mais aussi au sein du Hamas (là peut-être au profit de l’Iran avec le refus des brigades al-Qassam et de certains au sein du bureau politique d’endosser la ligne Meshaal pro-Qatar et anti-Iran).
      http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/af5d068a-e3ef-11e2-b35b-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2Y4bYmKsb

      When Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani, Qatar’s 33-year-old emir, came to power last week, observers worried that his youthful lack of experience would soon be tested in the febrile regional atmosphere.
      Few predicted that challenge would come within a week as Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood-led government fell, and the credibility of Qatar’s activist foreign policy took a major blow.

    • J’enfonce le clou planté ici : http://seenthis.net/messages/153257#message153397

      Depuis cette petite discussion débutée il y a 3 jours, el-Baradeï, réputé proche des USA, a été nommé 1er ministre d’Egype propulsé par le mouvement Tamarrud (ie le mouvement du 6 avril et Kefaya dont les liens avec les fondations américaines de promotion de la démocratie, typiques des révolutions colorées, sont bien documentés) : http://seenthis.net/messages/153878 et l’opposition syrienne off-shore a élu un pro-saoudien à sa tête : http://seenthis.net/messages/153857

    • Le lien est fait entre l’éviction de HBJ, au moment de la mise en retraite de Hamad, l’échec de la politique qatariote en Syrie, du point de vue US, et la chute des Frères musulmans en Egypte dans cet article d’al-akhbar :
      http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/qatar-and-brotherhood-losing-crown-jewel

      The reality is that Syrian steadfastness against the siege, in addition to popular anger toward Qatar’s role in spreading chaos, has imposed new facts on the US, forcing it to be convinced of the fiasco in Syria. Therefore, it must get rid of the tools that failed to fulfill its murderous desires. The first step was the meeting of the “NATO Islamists” in Cairo to transfer control to Saudi, through Yusuf al-Qaradawi’s apology and declaration of obedience to the Kingdom. This was followed by a US security delegation visit to Doha, which informed Sheikh Hamad of the need for change that would keep Prime Minister Hamad away from the Arab files. And so it was.

  • Obama administration convinced EU to drop measure that would have blocked #NSA spying
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/06/12/obama-administration-convinced-eu-to-drop-measure-that-would-have-bl

    Senior officials in the Obama administration successfully lobbied the European Union’s executive body to drop an “anti-#FISA clause” from its privacy legislation over a year ago, the Financial Times reports. That measure, if adopted, could have blocked the U.S. requests for European citizens’ computer and telephone data that are made as part of the just-revealed PRISM program.
    The measure was dropped from consideration in January 2012, after debate within the European Union, according to the British newspaper.

    ha ha ha #surveillance via @vincib

    • #PRISM and Guests : Au moins 7 pays européens auraient des accords avec la NSA http://reflets.info/prism-and-guests-au-moins-7-pays-europeens-auraient-des-accords-avec-la-ns

      Cette nuit un article publié sur le Guardian, puis retiré ensuite au motif d’un complément d’investigation, fait état de ce ce témoignage, étrangement proche de ce que nous vous racontons ici depuis le début des révélations de Edward Snowden. Certes, puisque le Guardian l’a retiré, les révélations sont sujettes à caution. Mais vu la posture actuelle de Berlin, on sent qu’on n’est pas spécialement loin d’une minicrise diplomatique de circonstance, parfaitement ridicule, qui n’est là que pour faire diversion. Le Guardian aurait-il été rappelé à l’ordre par les autorités britanniques pour ne pas jeter de l’huile sur le feu ou nous prépare t-il au contraire une réponse du berger à la bergère à Angela Merkel ?

  • N.S.A. Scandal: God Save Us From the Lawyers : The New Yorker
    http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2013/06/nsa-scandal-god-save-us-from-the-lawyers.html

    As the repercussions of Edward Snowden’s leaks about domestic surveillance continue to be debated, law professors and lawyers for the Bush and Obama Administrations are out in force, claiming that the spying agencies have done nothing wrong and it’s all much ado about nothing.

    In the Financial Times, Philip Bobbitt, a law professor at Columbia who has worked in Democratic and Republican administrations, argued that the National Security Agency, in sweeping up a big part of the nation’s phone records, was upholding the law rather than subverting it. At the influential Lawfare blog, Joel F. Brenner, a legal consultant who between 2006 and 2009 was the head of counterintelligence at the White House, trotted out similar arguments and claimed that the United States “has the most expensive, elaborate, and multi-tiered intelligence oversight apparatus of any nation on Earth.” On the op-ed page of the Wall Street Journal, Michael Mukasey, who served as Attorney General in the Bush Administration, questioned whether there has even been a meaningful infringement of privacy, writing, “The claims of pervasive spying, even if sincere, appear not merely exaggerated, but downright irrational.”

    To which, my reply is: Lord save us from lawyers, especially the big shots who graduate from élite law schools and advise administrations. (Brenner is a Harvard man; Bobbitt and Mukasey are Yalies.) With some honorable exceptions, their primary function is protecting the interests of the political and corporate establishments, often by finding some novel and tendentious way to legitimate their self-interested actions. When lesser mortals object, they turn around and accuse them of being ignorant of the law.

  • L’Irlande, paradis fiscal de création purement européenne, fait désormais l’objet d’une étude quasi-scientifique, sans doute pour en étendre le modèle à toute l’UE :

    The Financial Times is carrying an important and fascinating story about the tax haven of Ireland. It focuses on a particular issue which is dear to my heart, and the subject of a whole chapter of Treasure Islands.

    This is, at heart, a story about how small financial centres become entirely ‘captured’ by financial services interests, with the deliberate removal of democratic checks and balances and carte blanche given to financial services interests to write laws in secret.

    http://blogs.euobserver.com/shaxson/2013/05/02/the-capture-of-tax-haven-ireland-the-bankers-hedge-funds-got-virtu

    They met under the auspices of the “Clearing House”, a secretive group of financial industry executives, accountants and public servants formed in 1987 to promote Dublin as a financial hub.

    “The bankers and hedge fund industry got virtually everything they asked for while the public got hit with a number of austerity measures”

  • Data shift to lift US economy 3%- http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/52d23fa6-aa98-11e2-bc0d-00144feabdc0.html

    The US economy will officially become 3 per cent bigger in July as part of a shake-up that will see government statistics take into account 21st century components such as film royalties and spending on research and development.

    Billions of dollars of intangible assets will enter the gross domestic product of the world’s largest economy in a revision aimed at capturing the changing nature of US output.

    Brent Moulton, who manages the national accounts at the Bureau of Economic Analysis, told the Financial Times that the update was the biggest since computer software was added to the accounts in 1999.

    “We are carrying these major changes all the way back in time – which for us means to 1929 – so we are essentially rewriting economic history,” said Mr Moulton.

    The changes will affect everything from the measured GDP of different US states to the stability of the inflation measure targeted by the Federal Reserve. They will force economists to revisit policy debates about everything from corporate profits to the causes of economic growth.

    The revision, equivalent to adding a country as big as Belgium to the estimated size of the world economy, will make the US one of the first adopters of a new international standard for GDP accounting.

    “We’re capitalising research and development and also this category referred to as entertainment, literary and artistic originals, which would be things like motion picture originals, long-lasting television programmes, books and sound recordings,” said Mr Moulton.

    At present, R&D counts as a cost of doing business, so the final output of Apple iPads is included in GDP but the research done to create them is not. R&D will now count as an investment, adding a bit more than 2 per cent to the measured size of the economy.

    GDP will soar in small states that host a lot of military R&D, but barely change in others, widening measured income gaps across the US. R&D is expected to boost the GDP of New Mexico by 10 per cent and Maryland by 6 per cent while Louisiana will see an increase of just 0.6 per cent.

    Creative works are expected to add a further 0.5 per cent to the overall size of the US economy. Around one-third of that will come from movies, one-third from TV programmes, and one-third from books, music and theatre.
    Deficits in defined benefit pension schemes will also be included because what companies have promised to pay out will be measured, rather than the cash they pay into plans.

    “We will now show a liability for underfunded plans, which particularly has large ramifications for the government sector, where both at the state level and the federal level we have large underfunded plans,” said Mr Moulton.
    The changes are in addition to a comprehensive revision of the national accounts that takes place every five years based on an economic census of nearly 4m US businesses.

    Steve Landefeld, BEA director, said it was hard to predict the overall outcome given the mixture of new methodology and data updates. “What’s going to happen when you mix it with the new source data from the economic census . . . I don’t know,” he said.

    But he said the revisions were unlikely to alter the picture of what has happened to the economy in recent years. “I wouldn’t be looking for large changes in trends or cycles.”

  • FT Bypasses Apple’s #iTunes, Launches #HTML5 Web #App (Free Access First Week)
    http://techcrunch.com/2011/06/07/ft-bypasses-apples-itunes-launches-html5-web-app-free-access-first-week

    The Financial Times would rather not have Apple take a 30 percent cut of in-app subscriptions for its iOS publications, and has launched a HTML5 Web app that enables readers to access content across tablets and smartphones.

    http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/ft.png

  • Vers une guerre commerciale entre la Chine et les Etats-Unis
    http://www.michelcollon.info/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2668:vers-une-gu

    « Le ciel qui surplombe le commerce mondial est noir de nuées d’orage. Les tambours de guerre battent de plus en plus fort. Certains guettent déjà l’équivalent de l’assassinat de l’archiduc François-Ferdinand. Une étincelle suffirait à embraser la planète. » Voilà, dans le journal boursier britannique The Financial Times, l’introduction d’un article consacré aux relations commerciales sino-américaines. L’assassinat de l’archiduc avait été le prélude de la la Première Guerre mondiale. Le risque est réel de voir, le 15 avril, un rapport du trésor américain sur la monnaie chinoise provoquer le choc qui, à son tour, déclencherait la guerre commerciale entre les États-Unis et la Chine. Personne, dans le monde, n’échapperait aux retombées d’une telle guerre.

    #géopolitique #international #mondialisation #économie #commerce #compétition #guerre #capitalisme #for:twitter