company:the new york times

  • Dispatches: Why We Should Outlaw “Illegal”

    It makes no more sense to call someone an “illegal migrant” than an “illegal person.”

    Despite that, the term pops up again and again in the mainstream media. The New York Times recently reported on the “surge of illegal migrants from Central America across the South Texas border.” The BBC and other European media outlets are similarly reporting on “illegal migrants” in the Mediterranean and at the EU’s external borders.

    The term “illegal migrant” implies that a particular event in someone’s life, such as irregularly crossing an international border or overstaying a visa, irrevocably taints that person’s character as illegitimate or criminal. In fact, unauthorized migration is a civil, not a criminal offense, contrary to what news stories frequently imply.

    The term “illegal” also reinforces prejudices about nationals of a particular country or persons of a particular race. It incorrectly suggests people crossing borders have no rights. That’s simply not true: both domestic and international law provide specific protections and rights for migrants, including rights to due legal process, to seek asylum, and the right not to be arbitrarily detained.

    For all these reasons we recommend the use of terms that more aptly capture the situation of these people, such as “undocumented immigrants” or “irregular migrants.” On Friday, the Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants issued a leaflet that included an alternative lexicon of more accurate and humanizing terms for migrants. The United Nations General Assembly, the UN refugee agency (UNHCR), the European Commission, the International Organization for Migration, and major media groups have already adopted or issued similar recommendations. As these groups have noted, use of the term “illegal” for migrants and other persons may be inaccurate and is most certainly dehumanizing.

    By dropping the “illegal” tag, the venerable New York Times would not only bring its reporting in line with international practice – and its own guidelines – but would also reflect sensitivity for the difficult circumstances of migrants and to their dignity as human beings.

    http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/06/24/dispatches-why-we-should-outlaw-illegal

    #illégal #clandestin #migration #vocabulaire #bad_word #wrong_vocabulary #mots #migration_illégale #médias

  • Five Takeaways from the Newly Released #Drone Memo
    https://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/five-takeaways-newly-released-drone-memo

    Avec beaucoup de retard, le mémo réclamé par l’ACLU et le New York Times et sensé expliquer les raisons pour lesquelles il était tellement urgent de mettre hors d’état de nuire #Anwar_al-Awlaki qu’il n’y avait d’autre choix que de le liquider (plutôt que de chercher à le capturer) a finalement été rendu public,

    Monday morning, a federal appeals court released a government memorandum, dated July 16, 2010, authorizing both the Department of Defense and the Central Intelligence Agency to kill Anwar al-Aulaqi, a U.S. citizen, in Yemen.

    The publication of the Office of Legal Counsel memo comes, as the court noted, after a lengthy delay. The ACLU (along with the New York Times) has been fighting for this memo since we first asked for it in a Freedom of Information Act request submitted in October 2011.

    Monday’s release by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is an important victory for transparency. But while the memo advances the public record in significant ways, it still does not answer many key questions about the government’s claimed authority to kill U.S. citizens outside of active battlefields. Here are several important takeaways from Monday’s release.

    (...)

    There are additional OLC memos addressing the lawfulness and constitutionality of the targeted killing of U.S. citizens — and the government will likely have to release portions of those as well.

  • Mozilla to Develop Comments Platform With New York Times and Washington Post - NYTimes.com
    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/20/business/media/new-york-times-and-washington-post-to-develop-platform-for-readers-contribu

    The New York Times and The Washington Post announced on Thursday that they had teamed up with Mozilla to develop a new platform to better manage their readers’ online comments and contributions.

    The platform will be supported by a grant of roughly $3.9 million from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, which promotes innovation in journalism.

    (...) The platform, which will take approximately two years to complete, will eventually be available for other news organization to download free.

    #commentaires #presse #logiciel_libre #funding

  • The end of Michel Suleiman’s presidency
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/end-michel-suleiman%E2%80%99s-presidency

    The New York Times published a rather comical tribute to Michel Suleiman by its correspondent Ben Hubbard (who got the year of the civil war wrong by more than a decade and who got the year of the National Pact, which set the sectarian tags of all top posts of government, by several decades). Hubbard talked about Suleiman like he is an elder statesman who was widely respected by the Lebanese people. Of course, what made Suleiman popular with Western governments and their dutiful foreign correspondents (it is arguable that Western correspondents are not less loyal to the foreign policy goals of their governments than the Syrian or Saudi correspondents of official regime media) is that in the last two years — only — of his administration he became mildly — very mildly — critical of (...)

  • The CIA Aided Polio’s Comeback–but #Media Have Forgotten the Story
    http://www.fair.org/blog/2014/05/07/the-cia-aided-polios-comeback-but-media-have-forgotten-the-story

    #Polio had been battled to near-extinction after decades of effort, but this year the WHO confirmed 68 new cases and declared it an international public health emergency. Nearly 80 percent of those cases are in Pakistan.

    Why is this? According to the New York Times’ Donald McNeil Jr. (5/6/14), “Polio has never been eliminated there, Taliban factions have forbidden vaccinations in North Waziristan for years, and those elsewhere have murdered vaccine teams.” McNeil also quotes a WHO spokesperson towards the top of the piece: “So we’re saying to the Pakistanis, the Syrians and the Cameroonians, ’You’ve really got to get your acts together.”’

    The Times underlined the emergency today in an editorial, explaining that Pakistan has such high numbers “largely because Taliban factions have forbidden vaccinations in conservative tribal areas and attacked healthcare workers elsewhere.”

    There’s a crucial piece of information missing here—one that these outlets know full well. In 2011, the British Guardian (7/11/11) reported that the CIA used a fake vaccination drive led by Pakistani Dr. Shakil Afridi to gain entry to bin Laden’s compound and gather DNA to confirm his presence there. As McNeil himself reported in 2012 (7/9/12), that revelation led to suspicion and banning of vaccination teams in the tribal areas of Pakistan. At the time, the WHO argued that, while it was a “setback…unless it spreads or is a very longtime affair, the program is not going to be seriously affected.”

    Then the killings started; the #Times reported several times on killings of polio vaccination workers in Pakistan, noting in June 2013 that these attacks “escalated” after the revelation of the #CIA plot. And the following month, McNeil reported that after Dr. Afridi was sentenced to 33 years in prison for treason, “Anger deepened when American lawmakers called Dr. Afridi a hero and threatened to cut off aid if he was not released.”

    Fast forward to this week, and CBS Evening News (5/5/14) likewise avoided the CIA connection in reporting the most recent story, as anchor Scott Pelley noted: “Most cases are in Pakistan, where vaccine workers have been murdered on suspicion that they’re spying for the United States.”

    The PBS NewsHour (5/6/14) was one of the only outlets that mentioned the CIA issue, in a report by correspondent Jeffrey Brown:

    BROWN: Dr. Anita Zaidi, a pediatrician, cited a fake vaccination campaign that the CIA used in the hunt for Osama bin Laden.

    ZAIDI: Which has hugely damaged public health programs, not only in Pakistan, but in many, many countries, because people ask all kinds of questions. They now think that they might—the vaccine programs might be actually spy operations.

    This story was well-reported in the past, particularly by the Times; why the silence now that the problem has been declared an international emergency?

    #oubli #New_york_times

    • The C.I.A.’s Deadly Ruse in Pakistan
      http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/27/opinion/the-cias-deadly-ruse-in-pakistan.html?_r=0

      The C.I.A.’s ruse involved phony door-to-door solicitations by a physician promising to deliver hepatitis B immunizations; his real purpose was to confirm bin Laden’s suspected hiding place. The ploy helped fuel a militant backlash against immunization workers, and as many as 60 health workers and police officers have since been killed.

      Meanwhile, polio is on the rise, with Pakistan accounting for 66 of the 82 cases reported so far this year by the World Health Organization. Last year, there were 93 cases of polio in Pakistan, where the health organization warns that the disease is endemic, as it is in Afghanistan and Nigeria.

      The C.I.A. can no longer seek to “obtain or exploit DNA or other genetic material” gathered this way, according to a promise from the Obama administration. That is small comfort for those suffering the aftereffects of this ruse.

      Convincing wary parents to accept polio vaccination — and finding health workers willing to risk violence — has been made more difficult than ever.

      #mieux_vaut_tard_que_jamais

    • un argument qui va un peu dans l’autre sens : les talibans avaient déjà tué, en 2010, des médecins et humanitaires occidentaux (dont un ophtalmo qui travaillait depuis 31 ans dans la région), donc avant l’infâme opération de la CIA :

      http://crofsblogs.typepad.com/h5n1/2014/06/another-view-on-polio-vaccination-and-the-taliban.html

      Long before there was any CIA involvement, the Taliban and other Islamic extremists were killing vaccine teams and other healthcare workers. Several years ago, ten members of an international assistance mission were killed. The team included six Americans, one German, one Briton and four Afghans. The Taliban claimed “credit” for the murders. One Taliban leader said, “We don’t want any foreigners here. They are not our friends.” This is despite the fact that four of those killed were Afghans, and one of the Americans was an ophthalmologist who had spent thirty-one years in the region, bringing sight to thousands of impoverished villagers.

      comme dit Crawford Kilian (l’auteur de ce blog) : « the phony vaccination scheme simply gave the Taliban a new stick to beat the western dog with »

  • NYPD Trolled Jails Hoping to Turn Muslims into Informants
    https://www.commondreams.org/headline/2014/05/11-1

    Despite an announcement last month that the New York City Police Department had disbanded a controversial surveillance unit, the New York Times reports on Sunday that the department has continued to systematically target the city’s Muslim communities by recruiting individuals arrested of petty crimes to act as informants for so-called “terrorist investigations.”

  • Pulitzer-Winning Journalist Jose Antonio Vargas on “Documented: A Film by an Undocumented American” | Democracy Now!
    http://www.democracynow.org/2014/5/2/pulitzer_winning_journalist_jose_antonio_vargas

    As comprehensive immigration reform has languished in Congress, undocumented immigrants have increasingly come forward to share their stories in order to call attention to the need for a change in federal laws. One of the leading voices has been Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Jose Antonio Vargas. In 2011, he outed himself as an undocumented immigrant in an essay published in The New York Times Magazine. He chronicles his experience in the new film, “Documented: A Film by an Undocumented American.”
    (...)
    JOSE ANTONIO VARGAS: I lived the American dream, building a successful career as a journalist, but I was living a lie.

    I’m going to tell you something that I haven’t told a lot of people. I’m actually an undocumented immigrant.

    Immigration is stories. So here’s my story. My grandparents legally immigrated from the Philippines in the mid-1980s. My grandfather decided that he was going to get his grandson to come to America. One morning, my suitcase was packed. I was 12. It’s been 18 years since I’ve seen my mother. So, I’m launching a whole campaign about what it means to be an American and the fact that I am an American. There are 11 million undocumented people in this country.

    In 2010, undocumented people paid $11.2 billion in state and local taxes.

  • #Rwanda : “The #genocide must live on …”
    http://africasacountry.com/rwanda-the-genocide-must-live-on

    “Portraits of Reconciliation,”–the photo-essay commemorating the 20th anniversary of the Rwandan Genocide–published recently in the #New_York_Times, is a deeply disturbing piece of #JOURNALISM. Profoundly banal, the subtitle states, “20 years after the genocide in Rwanda, reconciliation still happens one encounter at a time.” Repetitive and reductive, the narrative reduces violence to a set of meaningless […]

    #MEDIA #PHOTOGRAPHY #Paul_Kagame #Pieter_Hugo #Portraits_of_Reconciliation #Tito_Rutaremara

  • New York Times tries to whitewash publication of faked Ukraine photos - World Socialist Web Site

    http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/04/24/nytu-a24.html

    New York Times tries to whitewash publication of faked Ukraine photos

    By Alex Lantier
    24 April 2014

    The New York Times responded yesterday to the exposure of its fabricated report alleging that Russian Special Forces are stirring up protests in east Ukraine against the pro-Western regime in Kiev.

    An article Tuesday, titled “Scrutiny over Photos Said to Tie Russia Units to Ukraine,” is a clumsy attempt at damage control. Buried in the paper’s inside pages, the article begins: “A collection of photographs that Ukraine says shows the presence of Russian forces in the eastern part of the country, and which the United States has cited as evidence of Russian involvement, has come under scrutiny.” The Times also noted that “US officials” provided some of the pictures to US Secretary of State John Kerry before his talks with Russian, European and Ukrainian officials last Thursday in Geneva.

    #manipulation #propagande #ukraine #médias

  • Très (ou pas du tout) étonnante question : le New York Times se considère-t-il soumis aux ordres de censure émis par le Shin Beth israélien ?

    The New York Times agrees to be gagged by Israel
    http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/new-york-times-agrees-be-gagged-israel

    Margaret Sullivan, The New York Times’ public editor, has written a thoughtful and important piece criticizing the way the newspaper complied with an Israeli-imposed gag order on the case of Majd Kayyal.

    But it leaves some important questions unanswered about the Times’ apparent eagerness to let Israeli censors set its news agenda.

  • The #RaceScienceFiles : #The_New_York_Times edition
    http://africasacountry.com/the-racesciencefiles-the-new-york-times-edition

    I recently downloaded a copy of a book from a white-supremacist website (sorry, no links here). It claims that, because of evolutionary forces at work in Africa, black people have smaller brains, lower IQs, more sex hormones, higher rates of crime, and are worse parents than whites. (It also reports, with what seems like a […]

    #MEDIA #J_Philippe_Rushton #Rare_Science

  • The #BullshitFiles: This rich New York designer couple have never been to Africa, but can smell it
    http://africasacountry.com/the-rich-new-york-mellons-have-never-been-to-africa-but-they-can-sm

    The stuff rich white people say sometimes. The New York Times’ Style section is more often than not full of arse-kissing puff pieces that do little besides illustrating the genealogies of privilege stretching between New York, Hollywood, Paris, London, and Caribbean island tax havens. Lots of these people also claim to love everything “Africa” (read: going […]

    #FASHION #JOURNALISM #Ernest_Hemingway #Matthew_Mellon #Nicole_Hanley_Mellon #Peter_Beard

  • Seymour Hersh gets it wrong on Turkey - Al-Monitor: the Pulse of the Middle East
    http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2014/04/turkey-not-supporting-jabhat-al-nusra.html#

    True, Hersh is a journalist who has done formidable work in the past. But, as Kenar writes, to have Pulitzers doesn’t guarantee that you will write reliable and accurate reports all your life. For example, The New York Times writer Thomas Friedman has three Pulitzers, but they did not stop him from getting it wrong on the Iraq invasion.

    Is this Hersh’s first dubious reporting? Wasn’t it Hersh who said that the US operation to kill Osama bin Laden was a big lie? Wasn’t it Hersh who said that the Fatah al-Islam outfit in Lebanon was financed by Saad Hariri and the United States? Didn’t it later come out that Fatah al-Islam was supported by the Syrian intelligence?

    #Hersh_bashing

    • Au sujet du « big lie », noter que l’article du Guardian a été corrigé quelques jours après sa publication, avec notamment cette mention :

      Hersh has pointed out that he was in no way suggesting that Osama bin Laden was not killed in Pakistan, as reported, upon the president’s authority: he was saying that it was in the aftermath that the lying began.

    • US Produced Sarin Gas Used in Syria | Veterans Today
      http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/04/08/296525

      - How did you find out that chemical weapons were being transported into Syria from Georgia and what further information do you have about this?
      Gordon Duff provided me with this information. It was also confirmed by my own sources. He stated, based on reliable sources, that chemical weapons were being transferred by sea from Georgia to Syria. They have human intelligence sources who find and track such materials. I have provided the government with those secret recordings, which I have obtained, including materials concerning illegal weapons deals in Georgia, including information about deals with Israel and of other types of material assistance. Gordon and his investigation team confirmed the accuracy of my information.
      This is a team of American veterans who found out that the supply of chemical weapons in Syria was performed from outside, via Turkey. They have proof that heavy materials, which can be used to build underground bunkers, as well as special underground chemical, biological or even nuclear research facilities, were imported into Georgia back in 2010.

    • Syria Special: Identifying the Sources for Hersh’s “Insurgents’ Chemical Weapons Attacks”
      http://eaworldview.com/2014/04/syria-special-source-hershs-insurgents-carried-chemical-weapons-attacks

      Of course, Hersh may have a source or sources who are not listed above. However, without information beyond his general labels, we have no way of establishing this.

      Instead, we are left with the language of Hersh’s summary and the one document that he cites. Both the language and the document are remarkably similar to assertions — which put forth no evidence, apart from one claimed Department of Defense document — put out by the following, all of whom cite each other in the recycling of claims:

      1. Yossef Bodansky, a former staffer for the US House of Representatives who is now senior editor of the Global Research website, notable for its criticism of US foreign policy and claims of conspiratorial US interventions, and who is linked to President Assad’s uncle;

      2. The retired officers of the Veteran Intelligence Professonals for Sanity;

      3. F. Michael Maloof, a former staffer of the Department of Defense.

    • Nouvel exposé de Seymour Hersh : la Turquie a organisée des attaques au gaz pour provoquer une guerre des États-Unis contre la Syrie
      Par Patrick Martin
      8 avril 2014
      https://www.wsws.org/fr/articles/2014/avr2014/hers-a08.shtml

      Ce rapport de Hersh est son second exposé long en quatre mois sur l’attaque au gaz à Damas qui a été faussement présentée. Les deux articles ont été publiés dans ce journal britannique parce qu’aucun grand journal ou magazine américain ne veut publier d’articles de ce journaliste qui a obtenu le prix Pulitzer.

      Depuis son reportage sur le massacre de My Lai au Vietnam pour le New York Times, Hersh s’est spécialisé dans le développement de sources dans l’appareil militaire et des services de renseignements américains, fréquemment celles qui ont des divergences politiques avec le gouvernement en place à Washington. Hersh a quitté le Times pour Newsday et a ensuite écrit pour le New Yorker pendant de nombreuses années.

      Le New Yorker et le Washington Post ont tout deux refusé de publier son premier article sur l’attaque au gaz à Ghouta, qui imputait l’attaque aux rebelles syriens du Front Al-Nusra, forçant Hersh à trouver un éditeur britannique pour son rapport. La presse américaine a été largement silencieuse sur celui-ci et a pour le moment tait cette dernière révélation.

      (Article original paru le 7 avril 2014)

  • Can forgiveness that is mandated by a government be genuine?
    http://africasacountry.com/can-forgiveness-that-is-mandated-by-a-government-be-genuine

    Reviewer Neil Genzinger (in The New York Times) writes about the new documentary #FILM, “Coexist” (to be shown on US public television this month) about post-genocide #Rwanda, 20 years later. The film, according to Genzinger, “... at first seems as if it is merely going to be another effort to draw feel-good stories out of an impossibly ugly moment in history.” But then it explores “whether forgiveness that is mandated by the (Rwandan) government can be genuine.”

    #genocide #reconciliation

  • Report: U.S. & Other Rich Countries Delete Call for Climate Aid | Democracy Now!
    http://www.democracynow.org/2014/3/31/headlines/report_us_rich_countries_delete_call_for_climate_aid

    Poorer countries have increasingly called for climate aid as they face the worst impacts from the emissions of the world’s wealthiest. A recent U.N. report cites a World Bank study calling on rich countries to provide climate aid of as much $100 billion per year. But according to The New York Times, the $100 billion figure was removed from an executive summary of the report to be read by the “world’s top political leaders.” The edit was reportedly made at the request of “several rich countries, including the United States.” Poor countries are expected to seek firm commitments on climate aid at a summit in New York this fall.

    Panel’s Warning on Climate Risk: Worst Is Yet to Come - NYTimes.com
    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/31/science/earth/panels-warning-on-climate-risk-worst-is-yet-to-come.html

    The poorest people in the world, who have had virtually nothing to do with causing global warming, will be high on the list of victims as climatic disruptions intensify, the report said. It cited a World Bank estimate that poor countries need as much as $100 billion a year to try to offset the effects of climate change; they are now getting, at best, a few billion dollars a year in such aid from rich countries.

    The $100 billion figure, though included in the 2,500-page main report, was removed from a 48-page executive summary to be read by the world’s top political leaders. It was among the most significant changes made as the summary underwent final review during a dayslong editing session in Yokohama.

    The edit came after several rich countries, including the United States, raised questions about the language, according to several people who were in the room at the time but did not wish to be identified because the negotiations are private.

    The language is contentious because poor countries are expected to renew their demand for aid this September in New York at a summit meeting of world leaders, who will attempt to make headway on a new treaty to limit greenhouse gases.

    Many rich countries argue that $100 billion a year is an unrealistic demand; it would essentially require them to double their budgets for foreign aid, at a time of economic distress at home. That argument has fed a rising sense of outrage among the leaders of poor countries, who feel their people are paying the price for decades of profligate Western consumption.

    #climat

    • Rich countries: Sure, climate change will screw poor countries, but what about us? | Grist
      http://grist.org/climate-energy/rich-countries-sure-climate-change-will-screw-poor-countries-but-what-about-u

      Rich countries argue that $100 billion a year to shield poor countries from climate impacts is an “unrealistic demand.” I do not believe that if the World Bank said that Europe and U.S. will be destroyed without $100 billion in aid each year, that this would have been deleted from the IPCC summary.

      Arguing that they cannot afford to deal with the poor in the way that the world’s lead economists say they need to means rich countries do not truly understand what they’re up against.

      It means that they believe they will somehow be immunized from the kinds of violent uprisings over food, land, energy, and water that result when the poor — mostly people of color — are left out of the picture. It means they do not get what is already happening in Syria, the Ukraine, Taiwan, Mexico, and the Sudan, where forced massive migration and civil wars have already started over limited resources, arguably the result of climate change’s impacts.

      When rich countries can edit the poor out of the most important document on the gravest danger facing Earth, it means that they are not serious about addressing climate change. It means that climate mitigation funds will help protect millionaire beachfront condo owners in South Beach, but have yet to address how it will protect what’s left of Geechee families in South Carolina.

      Perhaps it even means that rich countries think their money is better spent on technology and “innovation” to shield themselves from climate catastrophe. And those tricks very well might shield some people from flooding, but it doesn’t shield the “poorest” from the kind of reckless capitalism that traps them in a perpetual state of vulnerability.

      This is an insult to nations who even with meager resources have already started making the difficult investments that their wealthier counterparts don’t have the courage to make.

      “Bangladesh has invested $10 billion of its own money to adapt to extreme climatic events,” said Dr. Camilla Toulmin, director of the International Institute for Environment and Development in a statement on the IPCC report. “Nepal is the first country to develop adaptation plans at the community level. It is time for the richer countries to pull their weight and do the right thing, by investing at home and abroad in actions that can reduce emissions and protect people and property from danger.”

      There is little today that says whiteness is supreme more than arguing that it is an “unrealistic demand” for nations with predominantly, if not exclusive, white leadership to pay what is necessary to protect the people of Africa, India, and South America from climate calamity they did not cause.

      The oppression, the bigotry, and the fuckery of that argument is that it allows rich countries to continue perpetuating unrealistic demands on the world’s “poorest” — those who “virtually have had nothing to do with” climate change.

      Chattel slavery was an unrealistic demand. Putting Latin American workers in the most dangerous farm and factory jobs, exposing them to pesticides, carcinogens, and other toxic elements so that Walmart can have “roll back” prices — these are unrealistic demands. Asking the poorest of communities to fend for themselves against unprecedented waves of heat, drought, and rising sea levels is an unrealistic demand.

      In my estimation, there are two things that will destroy us eventually if not resolved soon: white supremacy and climate change. These happen to both be things that the wealthy believe they can afford to ignore. It’s for this reason that the IPCC’s summary just may be their infamous last words.

  • Seeking a Town on the Border of Fiction and Reality
    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/29/nyregion/in-search-of-agloe-ny-a-town-on-the-border-of-fiction-and-reality.html

    Last week, a reporter for The New York Times noticed a mention on Twitter about fake towns, which mapmakers would invent to guard against copyright infringement. An Internet search turned up Agloe and the Google map, complete with the driving directions. Agloe was a mapmaker’s creation.

    “It wasn’t uncommon for cartographers to put something fictitious so if they spotted another work with it they knew it was lifted,” said William Spicer, the president of Maps.com.


    A 1948 map with Agloe, N.Y. The town in the western Catskills of New York wound up on maps 90 years ago, but visitors will no longer find it on a Google map - or at all. William P. O’Donnell/The New York Times
    #cartographie

  • Smoking rates and income in United-States

    http://flowingdata.com/2014/03/27/smoking-rates-and-income

    Based on a study on smoking prevalence from 1996 to 2012, a map by The New York Times shows the results. Smoking rates among men and women have declined overall over the years, but there are still relatively high rates in many areas of the country, which appears to correlate with income. Lower income tends towards higher smoking rates.

    #états-unis #cigarette #cancer #santé #cartographie #visualisation

  • Vers la fin de la collecte massive de données téléphoniques par la NSA
    http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2014/03/25/vers-une-fin-de-la-collecte-massive-de-donnees-telephoniques-par-la-nsa_4389

    L’administration du président Barack Obama prépare un plan législatif pour mettre fin à la collecte massive et controversée de données téléphoniques par l’Agence nationale de sécurité américaine (NSA), ont rapporté des médias américains lundi 24 mars. Selon ce plan, la « NSA mettrait fin à la collecte systématique de données sur les habitudes téléphoniques des Américains », a écrit The New York Times sur son site Internet, citant des responsables de l’administration anonymes. « Les enregistrements resteraient entre les mains des compagnies téléphoniques, à qui on ne demanderait pas de conserver les données plus longtemps que la durée normale. Et la NSA n’aurait accès à des enregistrements spécifiques qu’avec la permission d’un juge utilisant un nouveau type de décision de justice. »

    Voui, voui, voui.
    On ne collectera plus, on contraindra les opérateurs à conserver…
    Et on n’ira voir que quand il y a besoin et qu’un juge nous y autorise.

    Pour mémoire, #FISA_Court

    United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court — Wikipédia
    http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Court

    De 1979 à 2012, la cour a reçu 33 949 demandes de mandats et en accepté 99,97% (soit 11 rejets en 33 ans)

  • Peaches HotHouse Extra Hot Chicken - Recipes - The New York Times
    http://www.nytimes.com/recipes/1016134/peaches-hothouse-extra-hot-chicken.html

    As advertised, this version of Nashville hot fried chicken, adapted from Peaches HotHouse in Brooklyn, will make your tongue sizzle and fill your eyes with tears from a combination of cayenne and ghost chile powders. (The latter is the hottest chile in the world, reaching 1,000,000 on the Scoville heat scale.) Note that the recipe calls for both granulated and powdered onion and garlic. Try to use both. The powdered stuff is stronger in flavor while the granulated has a little more texture to it. (However if you can’t find both, either kind will work throughout the recipe.) The traditional way to serve this is on top of a piece or two of soft white bread, which helps mitigate the heat. A cold beer wouldn’t hurt, either.

  • “The Upshot” is the New York Times’ replacement for Nate Silver’s FiveThirtyEight - Quartz
    http://qz.com/185922/the-upshot-is-the-new-york-times-replacement-for-nate-silvers-fivethirtyeight

    “The Upshot.” That’s the name the #New_York_Times is giving to its new #data-driven venture, focused on politics, policy and economic analysis and designed to fill the void left by Nate Silver, the one-man traffic machine whose statistical approach to political reporting was a massive success.
    +

    David Leonhardt, the Times’ former Washington bureau chief, who is in charge of The Upshot, told Quartz that the new venture will have a dedicated staff of 15, including three full-time graphic journalists, and is on track for a launch this spring. “The idea behind the name is, we are trying to help readers get to the essence of issues and understand them in a contextual and conversational way,” Leonhardt says. “Obviously, we will be using data a lot to do that, not because data is some secret code, but because it’s a particularly effective way, when used in moderate doses, of explaining reality to people.”

    #sites_de_presse #data_journalism

  • Missing From NYT’s Coverage of Ukraine
    http://zcomm.org/znetarticle/missing-from-nyts-coverage-of-ukraine

    In more than 750 articles published at the New York Times since the protests began in late-November there have only been 12 articles that mentioned “Svoboda,” the Nazi-linked political party at the forefront of the protests. Only 1 out of 750+ provided historical and political context to this violent party of fascists. None mentioned that Senator John McCain traveled to Ukraine last month to speak to their leader, Oleg Tyagnibok, and to address a protest with Tyagnibok by his side, as he gave affirmation of support. The only other two articles that hint at the unsavory politics of Svoboda, an op-ed and letter, barely provides pertinent information.

  • The Ibrahimi Mosque Massacre: 20 Years Later
    http://imeu.net/news/article0024911.shtml

    THE #MASSACRE

    Early on the morning of February 25, 1994, #Goldstein, wearing his army uniform and carrying his army-issued assault rifle, walked past Israeli soldiers manning a checkpoint and into the Ibrahimi Mosque. It was the holy month of Ramadan for Muslims and there were 400 or 500 Palestinian men worshipping. According to reports, once inside, Goldstein observed the scene and waited until those present turned towards Mecca and knelt to pray before opening fire.

    Twenty-nine Palestinians were killed and some 150 wounded before Goldstein’s victims subdued and beat him to death. According to a report in The New York Times, at least one Palestinian was shot and killed by Israeli soldiers stationed outside the mosque as panicked survivors attempted to flee to safety and others may have died as a result of being repeatedly stopped en route to hospital by soldiers wanting to search the vehicles they were being transported in.

    In the civil unrest that erupted across the occupied territories, Israeli soldiers killed more than 20 Palestinians and wounded hundreds of others.

    As is often the case with gun massacres in the US and elsewhere, many eyewitnesses reported seeing more than one gunman, however no conclusive evidence has come to light proving there was more than one killer.

    REPERCUSSIONS

    The massacre provoked international outrage and condemnation. The UN Security Council passed Resolution 904 without a vote, calling for “measures to be taken to guarantee the safety and protection of the Palestinian civilians throughout the occupied territory.” Resolution 904 resulted in the creation of the Temporary International Presence in Hebron (TIPH), which was supposed to protect the Palestinian population. However, Israel has only allowed TIPH to act as observers, leaving Palestinians in Hebron at the mercy of settlers and the soldiers assigned to protect them.

    In response to the international outcry, the Israeli government created a commission of inquiry that found Goldstein had acted alone, absolving Israel of any responsibility. It also outlawed Kach and its offshoot movements, as did the US government.

    Instead of taking advantage of the situation to evacuate the relatively small number of settlers from Hebron, thereby reducing tensions and demonstrating goodwill, Rabin’s government temporarily disarmed a few of the most extreme before rewarding them, including increasing their access to the mosque. At the same time, Israel clamped down on Palestinian residents of Hebron with severe restrictions on their movements and other measures. Israeli measures taken in Hebron following the massacre include:

    A round-the-clock curfew was imposed on Palestinian residents.

    Israel forcibly divided the Ibrahimi Mosque to create a separate prayer space for Jews with a separate entrance. In addition, the mosque would be opened exclusively for Jews 10 days a year, and Muslims 10 days a year.

    Palestinian shopkeepers on Shuhada Street in the heart of Hebron were forced to close their businesses, which were welded shut by the Israeli army, under the pretext of securing settlers living on the busy commercial artery.

    Palestinians were restricted, at first from driving and later from walking as well, on a large section of Shuhada Street, prompting its nickname of “Apartheid Street.” The US government spent millions of dollars through USAID renovating Shuhada Street prior to its segregation, most of which is now reserved for the exclusive use of Jewish settlers.

    Numerous new Israeli military checkpoints and obstacles to movement were put in place making it difficult for Palestinians to move around the city, including children who must pass through checkpoints to get to school.

    Except for the curfew, twenty years later all of these measures remain in place. According to a November 2013 UN fact sheet:

    There are over 120 obstacles to Palestinian movement designed to segregate “restricted areas” (settlements and surrounding areas) from the rest of the city, including 18 permanently manned military checkpoints.

    Several streets in the center of downtown Hebron that lead to the settlements are prohibited for Palestinian traffic and some also for pedestrian movement.

    512 Palestinian businesses in the restricted areas have been closed by the Israeli military and at least 1100 others have closed due to restricted access for customers and suppliers.

    More than 1000 Palestinian homes located in the restricted areas, over 40% of the area’s residences, have been abandoned, according to a survey by B’Tselem and the Association for Civil Rights in Israel.

    The fact sheet also noted:

    Access restrictions imposed by the Israeli authorities in H2 [the 20% of Hebron under direct and total Israeli control], compounded by systematic harassment by Israeli settlers and, occasionally, by Israeli forces, have resulted in the displacement of thousands of Palestinians and the deterioration of the living conditions of those who stayed.

    Palestinians living in the restricted areas face serious challenges in accessing basic services, including schools, emergency health services and water and sanitation.

    The Israeli authorities justify the restrictions imposed on the Palestinian population as a means to protect the Israeli settlers residing in the city, as well as other Israeli visitors, and to allow settlers to lead a normal life. However, as with all other Israeli settlements, the settlements in the heart of Hebron City are illegal under international humanitarian law.

    There are serious gaps in the enforcement of the rule of law on Israeli settlers involved in violence and intimidation against Palestinians. Incidents include acts of vandalism, property damage, physical attacks, verbal abuse, and the harassment of children on their way to school. The large majority of complaints about settler attacks filed in recent years have been closed by the Israeli Police without indictment.

    #Israël #Rabin

  • Ex-Clinton aide returns to White House with Persian Gulf brief - Haaretz
    | Feb. 19, 2014

    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.575015

    Robert Malley, the White House aide who advised President Bill Clinton during his futile effort to broker an agreement between the Israelis and the Palestinians at Camp David in 2000, is rejoining the White House, the New York Times reported on Tuesday.

    The paper quoted administration officials as saying that Malley will manage the fraying ties between the United States and its allies in the Persian Gulf. As a senior director at the National Security Council, he will help devise American policy from Saudi Arabia to Iran.

    Malley, who has been program director for the Middle East and North Africa at the International Crisis Group, has been something of a lightning rod in a field that can be culturally and ideologically treacherous. In 2008, he was forced to sever his ties as an informal adviser to the Obama presidential campaign when it was reported that he had met with members of Hamas, which the State Department classifies as a terrorist organization.

    Malley also came under fire for an article, co-written with Hussein Agha, that argued that some of the blame for the failure of the Camp David talks lay with the Israeli leader at the time, Ehud Barak, and not just with the uncompromising position of the Palestinian leader, Yasir Arafat, which was the conventional wisdom then.

    Some right-wing critics accused Malley of showing a persistent anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian bias in his writings. A few even cited his father, the prominent Egyptian-born Jewish journalist, Simon Malley, who had close ties to the Egyptian government.

    But Malley was stoutly defended by five former colleagues from the Clinton administration — Sandy Berger, Dennis B. Ross, Martin S. Indyk, Daniel C. Kurtzer and Aaron David Miller — who wrote a letter condemning what they said were “vicious, personal attacks” that were “unfair, inappropriate and wrong.”

    White House officials played down those controversies on Tuesday, saying Malley had forged strong relationships, including with officials in the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

    “There are always differences in tactics,” said Antony J. Blinken, the principal deputy national security adviser. But, he added, “I can’t think of anybody outside government who has a stronger set of relationships with the Israelis, as well as with people throughout the region.”

    Malley, who declined to comment about his new job, will have plenty to keep him occupied. Next month, President Obama is scheduled to visit Saudi Arabia to meet with King Abdullah on what officials said will be a fence-mending mission.

    Saudi Arabia has been frustrated by Obama’s unwillingness to do more to support rebel forces in Syria. The Saudis have funneled weapons to the rebels, in part because they view the civil war there as a proxy battle between Sunni Arabs and Shiite Iran, which is an important backer of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad.

  • The role of academics and public debates
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/blogs/angry-corner/role-academics-and-public-debates

    Nicholas Kristof of the New York Times wrote an article for the New York Times in which he implored academics to play a bigger role in public life and debates. Kristof is right about that although I disagree with all his other diagnoses and prescriptions. It is remarkable that academics in the US have no connection or interactions with the public at large. In fact, academics are increasingly trained and socialized to disdain communication and interaction with the masses. Academics pride themselves on perfecting academic jargon to such a degree that style and form become more important than substance. There are social science fields that are more guilty than others: political science maybe the worst as the the field becomes more and more quantitative and the illusion of “science” (...)

    #academia #America #professors #USA