• La façon dont Ursula von der Leyen a négocié le contrat pour les vaccins avec Pfizer “décrédibilise les institutions européennes et la Belgique” Olivier le Bussy - La Libre

    Frédéric Baldan, un citoyen belge, a introduit une plainte pénale contre la présidente de la Commission européenne, à qui il reproche d’avoir outrepassé ses droits en négociant de façon directe et secrète avec le président de la firme pharmaceutique américaine.

    La façon dont a été négocié le troisième contrat passé entre la firme pharmaceutique Pfizer et la Commission européenne, au nom des États membres, pour l’achat de 1,8 milliard de doses de vaccins contre le Covid-19, n’en finit pas de faire des vagues. Lesquelles éclaboussent la présidente de la Commission, Ursula von der Leyen. En juillet 2022, la Médiatrice européenne avait épinglé le cas de “maladministration” que constitue le refus de l’exécutif européen de dévoiler le contenu des SMS échangés entre Mme von der Leyen et le CEO de l’entreprise américaine, Albert Bourla, pendant la négociation du contrat de 35 milliards d’euros signé en mai 2021. En février 2023, le quotidien américain New York Times a déposé une plainte administrative à ce sujet contre la Commission devant la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne. Le parquet européen a, de son côté, ouvert une enquête sur le processus d’acquisition des vaccins.

    Enfin, Le Vif a révélé, il y a quelques jours, qu’une plainte pénale avait été introduite le 5 avril dernier contre la présidente von der Leyen par un citoyen belge, Frédéric Baldan, devant le juge d’instruction liégeois Frédéric Frenay. Elle vise l’Allemande pour des faits d’” usurpation de fonctions et de titre”, parce qu’elle s’est substituée au comité de pilotage chargé de négocier les contrats ; de “destruction de documents publics”, parce que la Commission ne remet pas la main sur les SMS échangés, et de “prise illégale d’intérêts et de corruption”. Rien que ça.

    M. Baldan est un lobbyiste accrédité auprès des institutions européennes, spécialiste des relations entre l’UE et la Chine. Il a expliqué à La Libre les raisons qui l’ont convaincu de déposer une plainte visant directement Ursula von der Leyen. “J’ai assez bien suivi, par intérêt personnel, le travail de la commission spéciale du Parlement européen sur le Covid-19. Au fur et à mesure des découvertes témoignages, il est apparu qu’il y avait des comportements troublants, qui laissaient voir que des infractions avaient été commises” , avance M. Baldan, qui a sollicité le concours de Maître Diane Protat, du barreau de Paris.

    Le plaignant estime que la façon dont les contrats ont été négociés et conclu lèse la Belgique, qui se retrouve avec 25,1 millions de doses de vaccins surnuméraires, dont près de 12 millions de doses Pfizer, dont l’achat a pesé sur ses finances publiques. Il estime aussi que le comportement de la présidente de la Commission a endommagé “la crédibilité de l’autorité publique”.
    Vous visez en particulier la présidente von der Leyen et la manière parce qu’elle a négocié directement le troisième contrat avec Pfizer avec le PDG de l’entreprise pharmaceutique, Albert Bourla, alors que cette tâche revenait à une équipe de négociateurs de la Commission ?
    Oui, tout à fait. Et la censure des clauses des contrats est également inadmissible. C’est inimaginable de penser qu’on va faire prévaloir l’intérêt d’acteurs privés sur celui du public ad vitam aeternam. Un article dans le Code pénal sanctionne les fonctionnaires, dépositaires ou représentants de l’autorité ou de la force publique qui, de manière, arbitraire, porte atteinte aux droits garantis par la Constitution. Or, le droit à la transparence est inscrit dans la Constitution, ainsi que dans la Charte européenne des droits fondamentaux qui a valeur constitutionnelle selon la jurisprudence de la CJUE. Si on est démocratie, alors c’est le moment de le prouver. Je veux que la justice mène une instruction judiciaire indépendante à charge et à décharge et me dise s’il y a eu, ou non, quelque chose de répréhensible. Et nous démontre, le cas échéant, qu’on s’est complètement trompé. Mais en tout cas, on ne peut pas laisser perdurer cette situation.

    Vous soutenez que la Belgique a été lésée, notamment parce qu’elle se retrouve, comme tous les États membres, avec des millions de doses surnuméraires, qu’elle a payées avec les deniers publics. Dix États membres d’Europe centrale et orientale avaient réclamé l’an dernier la renégociation des contrats. Mais l’État belge, lui, ne se plaint de rien, pour le moment…

    Source et suite : https://www.lalibre.be/international/europe/2023/04/18/la-facon-dont-ursula-von-der-leyen-a-negocie-le-contrat-pour-les-vaccins-ave

    #ue #union_européenne #covid-19 #ursula_von_der_leyen #sante #en_vedette #covidisme #épidémiologiste #mckinsey #mac_kinsey #mckinseygate #corruption #incompétence #privatisation #cabinets_de_conseil #consulting #covid-19 #dette

  • UK signs contract with US startup to identify migrants in small-boat crossings

    The UK government has turned a US-based startup specialized in artificial intelligence as part of its pledge to stop small-boat crossings. Experts have already pointed out the legal and logistical challenges of the plan.

    In a new effort to address the high number of Channel crossings, the UK Home Office is working with the US defense startup #Anduril, specialized in the use of artificial intelligence (AI).

    A surveillance tower has already been installed at Dover, and other technologies might be rolled out with the onset of warmer temperatures and renewed attempts by migrants to reach the UK. Some experts already point out the risks and practical loopholes involved in using AI to identify migrants.

    “This is obviously the next step of the illegal migration bill,” said Olivier Cahn, a researcher specialized in penal law.

    “The goal is to retrieve images that were taken at sea and use AI to show they entered UK territory illegally even if people vanish into thin air upon arrival in the UK.”

    The “illegal migration bill” was passed by the UK last month barring anyone from entering the country irregularly from filing an asylum claim and imposing a “legal duty” to remove them to a third country.
    Who is behind Anduril?

    Founded in 2017 by its CEO #Palmer_Luckey, Anduril is backed by #Peter_Thiel, a Silicon Valley investor and supporter of Donald Trump. The company has supplied autonomous surveillance technology to the US Department of Defense (DOD) to detect and track migrants trying to cross the US-Mexico border.

    In 2021, the UK Ministry of Defence awarded Anduril with a £3.8-million contract to trial an advanced base defence system. Anduril eventually opened a branch in London where it states its mission: “combining the latest in artificial intelligence with commercial-of-the-shelf sensor technology (EO, IR, Radar, Lidar, UGS, sUAS) to enhance national security through automated detection, identification and tracking of objects of interest.”

    According to Cahn, the advantage of Brexit is that the UK government is no longer required to submit to the General Data Protection Regulation (RGPDP), a component of data protection that also addresses the transfer of personal data outside the EU and EEA areas.

    “Even so, the UK has data protection laws of its own which the government cannot breach. Where will the servers with the incoming data be kept? What are the rights of appeal for UK citizens whose data is being processed by the servers?”, he asked.

    ’Smugglers will provide migrants with balaclavas for an extra 15 euros’

    Cahn also pointed out the technical difficulties of identifying migrants at sea. “The weather conditions are often not ideal, and many small-boat crossings happen at night. How will facial recognition technology operate in this context?”

    The ability of migrants and smugglers to adapt is yet another factor. “People are going to cover their faces, and anyone would think the smugglers will respond by providing migrants with balaclavas for an extra 15 euros.”

    If the UK has solicited the services of a US startup to detect and identify migrants, the reason may lie in AI’s principle of self-learning. “A machine accumulates data and recognizes what it has already seen. The US is a country with a significantly more racially and ethnically diverse population than the UK. Its artificial intelligence might contain data from populations which are more ethnically comparable to the populations that are crossing the Channel, like Somalia for example, thus facilitating the process of facial recognition.”

    For Cahn, it is not capturing the images which will be the most difficult but the legal challenges that will arise out of their usage. “People are going to be identified and there are going to be errors. If a file exists, there needs to be the possibility for individuals to appear before justice and have access to a judge.”

    A societal uproar

    In a research paper titled “Refugee protection in the artificial intelligence Era”, Chatham House notes “the most common ethical and legal challenges associated with the use of AI in asylum and related border and immigration systems involve issues of opacity and unpredictability, the potential for bias and unlawful discrimination, and how such factors affect the ability of individuals to obtain a remedy in the event of erroneous or unfair decisions.”

    For Cahn, the UK government’s usage of AI can only be used to justify and reinforce its hardline position against migrants. “For a government that doesn’t respect the Geneva Convention [whose core principle is non-refoulement, editor’s note] and which passed an illegal migration law, it is out of the question that migrants have entered the territory legally.”

    Identifying migrants crossing the Channel is not going to be the hardest part for the UK government. Cahn imagines a societal backlash with, “the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom being solicited, refugees seeking remedies to legal decisions through lawyers and associations attacking”.

    He added there would be due process concerning the storage of the data, with judges issuing disclosure orders. “There is going to be a whole series of questions which the government will have to elucidate. The rights of refugees are often used as a laboratory. If these technologies are ’successful’, they will soon be applied to the rest of the population."

    https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/48326/uk-signs-contract-with-us-startup-to-identify-migrants-in-smallboat-cr

    #UK #Angleterre #migrations #asile #réfugiés #militarisation_des_frontières #frontières #start-up #complexe_militaro-industriel #IA #intelligence_artificielle #surveillance #technologie #channel #Manche

    –—

    ajouté à la métaliste sur la Bibby Stockholm:
    https://seenthis.net/messages/1016683

    • Huge barge set to house 500 asylum seekers arrives in the UK

      The #Bibby_Stockholm is being refitted in #Falmouth to increase its capacity from 222 to 506 people.

      A barge set to house 500 asylum seekers has arrived in the UK as the government struggles with efforts to move migrants out of hotels.

      The Independent understands that people will not be transferred onto the Bibby Stockholm until July, following refurbishment to increase its capacity and safety checks.

      The barge has been towed from its former berth in Italy to the port of Falmouth, in Cornwall.

      It will remain there while works are carried out, before being moved onto its final destination in #Portland, Dorset.

      The private operators of the port struck an agreement to host the barge with the Home Office without formal public consultation, angering the local council and residents.

      Conservative MP Richard Drax previously told The Independent legal action was still being considered to stop the government’s plans for what he labelled a “quasi-prison”.

      He accused ministers and Home Office officials of being “unable to answer” practical questions on how the barge will operate, such as how asylum seekers will be able to come and go safely through the port, what activities they will be provided with and how sufficient healthcare will be ensured.

      “The question is how do we cope?” Mr Drax said. “Every organisation has its own raft of questions: ‘Where’s the money coming from? Who’s going to do what if this all happens?’ There are not sufficient answers, which is very worrying.”

      The Independent previously revealed that asylum seekers will have less living space than an average parking bay on the Bibby Stockholm, which saw at least one person die and reports of rape and abuse on board when it was used by the Dutch government to detain migrants in the 2000s.

      An official brochure released by owner Bibby Marine shows there are only 222 “single en-suite bedrooms” on board, meaning that at least two people must be crammed into every cabin for the government to achieve its aim of holding 500 people.

      Dorset Council has said it still had “serious reservations about the appropriateness of Portland Port in this scenario and remains opposed to the proposals”.

      The Conservative police and crime commissioner for Dorset is demanding extra government funding for the local force to “meet the extra policing needs that this project will entail”.

      A multi-agency forum including representatives from national, regional and local public sector agencies has been looking at plans for the provision of health services, the safety and security of both asylum seekers and local residents and charity involvement.

      Portland Port said it had been working with the Home Office and local agencies to ensure the safe arrival and operation of the Bibby Stockholm, and to minimise its impact locally.

      The barge is part of a wider government push to move migrants out of hotels, which are currently housing more than 47,000 asylum seekers at a cost of £6m a day.

      But the use of ships as accommodation was previously ruled out on cost grounds by the Treasury, when Rishi Sunak was chancellor, and the government has not confirmed how much it will be spending on the scheme.

      Ministers have also identified several former military and government sites, including two defunct airbases and an empty prison, that they want to transform into asylum accommodation.

      But a court battle with Braintree District Council over former RAF Wethersfield is ongoing, and legal action has also been threatened over similar plans for RAF Scampton in Lancashire.

      Last month, a barrister representing home secretary Suella Braverman told the High Court that 56,000 people were expected to arrive on small boats in 2023 and that some could be made homeless if hotel places are not found.

      A record backlog of asylum applications, driven by the increase in Channel crossings and a collapse in Home Office decision-making, mean the government is having to provide accommodation for longer while claims are considered.

      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/barge-falmouth-cornwall-migrants-bibby-b2333313.html
      #barge #bateau

    • ‘Performative cruelty’ : the hostile architecture of the UK government’s migrant barge

      The arrival of the Bibby Stockholm barge at Portland Port, in Dorset, on July 18 2023, marks a new low in the UK government’s hostile immigration environment. The vessel is set to accommodate over 500 asylum seekers. This, the Home Office argues, will benefit British taxpayers and local residents.

      The barge, however, was immediately rejected by the local population and Dorset council. Several British charities and church groups have condemned the barge, and the illegal migration bill it accompanies, as “an affront to human dignity”.

      Anti-immigration groups have also protested against the barge, with some adopting offensive language, referring to the asylum seekers who will be hosted there as “bargies”. Conservative MP for South Dorset Richard Drax has claimed that hosting migrants at sea would exacerbate tenfold the issues that have arisen in hotels to date, namely sexual assaults, children disappearing and local residents protesting.

      My research shows that facilities built to house irregular migrants in Europe and beyond create a temporary infrastructure designed to be hostile. Governments thereby effectively make asylum seekers more displaceable while ignoring their everyday spatial and social needs.
      Precarious space

      The official brochure plans for the Bibby Stockholm show 222 single bedrooms over three stories, built around two small internal courtyards. It has now been retrofitted with bunk beds to host more than 500 single men – more than double the number it was designed to host.

      Journalists Lizzie Dearden and Martha McHardy have shown this means the asylum seekers housed there – for up to nine months – will have “less living space than an average parking bay”. This stands in contravention of international standards of a minimum 4.5m² of covered living space per person in cold climates, where more time is spent indoors.

      In an open letter, dated June 15 2023 and addressed to home secretary Suella Braverman, over 700 people and nearly 100 non-governmental organisations (NGOs) voiced concerns that this will only add to the trauma migrants have already experienced:

      Housing people on a sea barge – which we argue is equal to a floating prison – is morally indefensible, and threatens to retraumatise a group of already vulnerable people.

      Locals are concerned already overstretched services in Portland, including GP practices, will not be able to cope with further pressure. West Dorset MP Chris Lode has questioned whether the barge itself is safe “to cope with double the weight that it was designed to bear”. A caller to the LBC radio station, meanwhile, has voiced concerns over the vessel’s very narrow and low fire escape routes, saying: “What they [the government] are effectively doing here is creating a potential Grenfell on water, a floating coffin.”

      Such fears are not unfounded. There have been several cases of fires destroying migrant camps in Europe, from the Grand-Synthe camp near Dunkirk in France, in 2017, to the 2020 fire at the Moria camp in Greece. The difficulty of escaping a vessel at sea could turn it into a death trap.

      Performative hostility

      Research on migrant accommodation shows that being able to inhabit a place – even temporarily – and develop feelings of attachment and belonging, is crucial to a person’s wellbeing. Even amid ever tighter border controls, migrants in Europe, who can be described as “stuck on the move”, nonetheless still attempt to inhabit their temporary spaces and form such connections.

      However, designs can hamper such efforts when they concentrate asylum seekers in inhospitable, cut-off spaces. In 2015, Berlin officials began temporarily housing refugees in the former Tempelhof airport, a noisy, alienating industrial space, lacking in privacy and disconnected from the city. Many people ended up staying there for the better part of a year.

      French authorities, meanwhile, opened the Centre Humanitaire Paris-Nord in Paris in 2016, temporary migrant housing in a disused train depot. Nicknamed la Bulle (the bubble) for its bulbous inflatable covering, this facility was noisy and claustrophobic, lacking in basic comforts.

      Like the barge in Portland Port, these facilities, placed in industrial sites, sit uncomfortably between hospitality and hostility. The barge will be fenced off, since the port is a secured zone, and access will be heavily restricted and controlled. The Home Office insists that the barge is not a floating prison, yet it is an unmistakably hostile space.

      Infrastructure for water and electricity will physically link the barge to shore. However, Dorset council has no jurisdiction at sea.

      The commercial agreement on the barge was signed between the Home Office and Portland Port, not the council. Since the vessel is positioned below the mean low water mark, it did not require planning permission.

      This makes the barge an island of sorts, where other rules apply, much like those islands in the Aegean sea and in the Pacific, on which Greece and Australia have respectively housed migrants.

      I have shown how facilities are often designed in this way not to give displaced people any agency, but, on the contrary, to objectify them. They heighten the instability migrants face, keeping them detached from local communities and constantly on the move.

      The government has presented the barge as a cheaper solution than the £6.8 million it is currently spending, daily, on housing asylum seekers in hotels. A recent report by two NGOs, Reclaim the Seas and One Life to Live, concludes, however, that it will save less than £10 a person a day. It could even prove more expensive than the hotel model.

      Sarah Teather, director of the Jesuit Refugee Service UK charity, has described the illegal migration bill as “performative cruelty”. Images of the barge which have flooded the news certainly meet that description too.

      However threatening these images might be, though, they will not stop desperate people from attempting to come to the UK to seek safety. Rather than deterring asylum seekers, the Bibby Stockholm is potentially creating another hazard to them and to their hosting communities.

      https://theconversation.com/performative-cruelty-the-hostile-architecture-of-the-uk-governments

      –---

      Point intéressant, lié à l’aménagement du territoire :

      “Since the vessel is positioned below the mean low water mark, it did not require planning permission”

      C’est un peu comme les #zones_frontalières qui ont été créées un peu partout en Europe (et pas que) pour que les Etats se débarassent des règles en vigueur (notamment le principe du non-refoulement). Voir cette métaliste, à laquelle j’ajoute aussi cet exemple :
      https://seenthis.net/messages/795053

      voir aussi :

      The circumstances at Portland Port are very different because where the barge is to be positioned is below the mean low water mark. This means that the barge is outside of our planning control and there is no requirement for planning permission from the council.

      https://news.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/2023/07/18/leaders-comments-on-the-home-office-barge

      #hostile_architecture #architecture_hostile #dignité #espace #Portland #hostilité #hostilité_performative #île #infrastructure #extraterritorialité #extra-territorialité #prix #coût

    • Sur l’#histoire (notamment liées au commerce d’ #esclaves) de la Bibby Stockholm :

      Bibby Line, shipowners

      Information
      From Guide to the Records of Merseyside Maritime Museum, volume 1: Bibby Line. In 1807 John Bibby and John Highfield, Liverpool shipbrokers, began taking shares in ships, mainly Parkgate Dublin packets. By 1821 (the end of the partnership) they had vessels sailing to the Mediterranean and South America. In 1850 they expanded their Mediterranean and Black Sea interests by buying two steamers and by 1865 their fleet had increased to twenty three. The opening of the Suez Canal in 1869 severely affected their business and Frederick Leyland, their general manager, failed to persuade the family partners to diversify onto the Atlantic. Eventually, he bought them out in 1873. In 1889 the Bibby family revived its shipowning interests with a successful passenger cargo service to Burma. From 1893 it also began to carry British troops to overseas postings which remained a Bibby staple until 1962. The Burma service ended in 1971 and the company moved to new areas of shipowning including bulkers, gas tankers and accommodation barges. It still has its head office in Liverpool where most management records are held. The museum holds models of the Staffordshire (1929) and Oxfordshire (1955). For further details see the attached catalogue or contact The Archives Centre for a copy of the catalogue.

      The earliest records within the collection, the ships’ logs at B/BIBBY/1/1/1 - 1/1/3 show company vessels travelling between Europe and South America carrying cargoes that would have been produced on plantations using the labour of enslaved peoples or used within plantation and slave based economies. For example the vessel Thomas (B/BIBBY/1/1/1) carries a cargo of iron hoops for barrels to Brazil in 1812. The Mary Bibby on a voyage in 1825-1826 loads a cargo of sugar in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil to carry to Rotterdam. The log (B/BIBBY/1/1/3) records the use of ’negroes’ to work with the ship’s carpenter while the vessel is in port.

      In September 1980 the latest Bibby vessel to hold the name Derbyshire was lost with all hands in the South China Sea. This collection does not include records relating to that vessel or its sinking, apart from a copy ’Motor vessel ’Derbyshire’, 1976-80: in memoriam’ at reference B/BIBBY/3/2/1 (a copy is also available in The Archives Centre library collection at 340.DER). Information about the sinking and subsequent campaigning by the victims’ family can be found on the NML website and in the Life On Board gallery. The Archives Centre holds papers of Captain David Ramwell who assisted the Derbyshire Family Association at D/RAM and other smaller collections of related documents within the DX collection.

      https://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/artifact/bibby-line-shipowners

      –—
      An Open Letter to #Bibby_Marine

      Links between your parent company #Bibby_Line_Group (#BLG) and the slave trade have repeatedly been made. If true, we appeal to you to consider what actions you might take in recompense.

      Bibby Marine’s modern slavery statement says that one of the company’s values is to “do the right thing”, and that you “strongly support the eradication of slavery, as well as the eradication of servitude, forced or compulsory labour and human trafficking”. These are admirable words.

      Meanwhile, your parent company’s website says that it is “family owned with a rich history”. Please will you clarify whether this rich history includes slaving voyages where ships were owned, and cargoes transported, by BLG’s founder John Bibby, six generations ago. The BLG website says that in 1807 (which is when slavery was abolished in Britain), “John Bibby began trading as a shipowner in Liverpool with his partner John Highfield”. John Bibby is listed as co-owner of three slaving ships, of which John Highfield co-owned two:

      In 1805, the Harmonie (co-owned by #John_Bibby and three others, including John Highfield) left Liverpool for a voyage which carried 250 captives purchased in West Central Africa and St Helena, delivering them to Cumingsberg in 1806 (see the SlaveVoyages database using Voyage ID 81732).
      In 1806, the Sally (co-owned by John Bibby and two others) left Liverpool for a voyage which transported 250 captives purchased in Bassa and delivered them to Barbados (see the SlaveVoyages database using Voyage ID 83481).
      In 1806, the Eagle (co-owned by John Bibby and four others, including John Highfield) left Liverpool for a voyage which transported 237 captives purchased in Cameroon and delivered them to Kingston in 1807 (see the SlaveVoyages database using Voyage ID 81106).

      The same and related claims were recently mentioned by Private Eye. They also appear in the story of Liverpool’s Calderstones Park [PDF] and on the website of National Museums Liverpool and in this blog post “Shenanigans in Shipping” (a detailed history of the BLG). They are also mentioned by Laurence Westgaph, a TV presenter specialising in Black British history and slavery and the author of Read The Signs: Street Names with a Connection to the Transatlantic Slave Trade and Abolition in Liverpool [PDF], published with the support of English Heritage, The City of Liverpool, Northwest Regional Development Agency, National Museums Liverpool and Liverpool Vision.

      While of course your public pledges on slavery underline that there is no possibility of there being any link between the activities of John Bibby and John Highfield in the early 1800s and your activities in 2023, we do believe that it is in the public interest to raise this connection, and to ask for a public expression of your categorical renunciation of the reported slave trade activities of Mr Bibby and Mr Highfield.

      https://www.refugeecouncil.org.uk/latest/news/an-open-letter-to-bibby-marine

      –-

      Très peu d’info sur John Bibby sur wikipedia :

      John Bibby (19 February 1775 – 17 July 1840) was the founder of the British Bibby Line shipping company. He was born in Eccleston, near Ormskirk, Lancashire. He was murdered on 17 July 1840 on his way home from dinner at a friend’s house in Kirkdale.[1]


      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bibby_(businessman)

    • ‘Floating Prisons’: The 200-year-old family #business behind the Bibby Stockholm

      #Bibby_Line_Group_Limited is a UK company offering financial, marine and construction services to clients in at least 16 countries around the world. It recently made headlines after the government announced one of the firm’s vessels, Bibby Stockholm, would be used to accommodate asylum seekers on the Dorset coast.

      In tandem with plans to house migrants at surplus military sites, the move was heralded by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Home Secretary Suella Braverman as a way of mitigating the £6m-a-day cost of hotel accommodation amid the massive ongoing backlog of asylum claims, as well as deterring refugees from making the dangerous channel crossing to the UK. Several protests have been organised against the project already, while over ninety migrants’ rights groups and hundreds of individual campaigners have signed an open letter to the Home Secretary calling for the plans to be scrapped, describing the barge as a “floating prison.”

      Corporate Watch has researched into the Bibby Line Group’s operations and financial interests. We found that:

      - The Bibby Stockholm vessel was previously used as a floating detention centre in the Netherlands, where undercover reporting revealed violence, sexual exploitation and poor sanitation.

      – Bibby Line Group is more than 90% owned by members of the Bibby family, primarily through trusts. Its pre-tax profits for 2021 stood at almost £31m, which they upped to £35.5m by claiming generous tax credits and deferring a fair amount to the following year.

      - Management aboard the vessel will be overseen by an Australian business travel services company, Corporate Travel Management, who have previously had aspersions cast over the financial health of their operations and the integrity of their business practices.

      - Another beneficiary of the initiative is Langham Industries, a maritime and engineering company whose owners, the Langham family, have longstanding ties to right wing parties.

      Key Issues

      According to the Home Office, the Bibby Stockholm barge will be operational for at least 18 months, housing approximately 500 single adult men while their claims are processed, with “24/7 security in place on board, to minimise the disruption to local communities.” These measures appear to have been to dissuade opposition from the local Conservative council, who pushed for background checks on detainees and were reportedly even weighing legal action out of concern for a perceived threat of physical attacks from those housed onboard, as well as potential attacks from the far right against migrants held there.

      Local campaigners have taken aim at the initiative, noting in the open letter:

      “For many people seeking asylum arriving in the UK, the sea represents a site of significant trauma as they have been forced to cross it on one or more occasions. Housing people on a sea barge – which we argue is equal to a floating prison – is morally indefensible, and threatens to re-traumatise a group of already vulnerable people.”

      Technically, migrants on the barge will be able to leave the site. However, in reality they will be under significant levels of surveillance and cordoned off behind fences in the high security port area.

      If they leave, there is an expectation they will return by 11pm, and departure will be controlled by the authorities. According to the Home Office:

      “In order to ensure that migrants come and go in an orderly manner with as little impact as possible, buses will be provided to take those accommodated on the vessel from the port to local drop off points”.

      These drop off points are to be determined by the government, while being sited off the coast of Dorset means they will be isolated from centres of support and solidarity.

      Meanwhile, the government’s new Illegal Migration Bill is designed to provide a legal justification for the automatic detention of refugees crossing the Channel. If it passes, there’s a chance this might set the stage for a change in regime on the Bibby Stockholm – from that of an “accommodation centre” to a full-blown migrant prison.

      An initial release from the Home Office suggested the local voluntary sector would be engaged “to organise activities that keep occupied those being accommodated, potentially involved in local volunteering activity,” though they seemed to have changed the wording after critics said this would mean detainees could be effectively exploited for unpaid labour. It’s also been reported the vessel required modifications in order to increase capacity to the needed level, raising further concerns over cramped living conditions and a lack of privacy.

      Bibby Line Group has prior form in border profiteering. From 1994 to 1998, the Bibby Stockholm was used to house the homeless, some of whom were asylum seekers, in Hamburg, Germany. In 2005, it was used to detain asylum seekers in the Netherlands, which proved a cause of controversy at the time. Undercover reporting revealed a number of cases abuse on board, such as beatings and sexual exploitation, as well suicide attempts, routine strip searches, scabies and the death of an Algerian man who failed to receive timely medical care for a deteriorating heart condition. As the undercover security guard wrote:

      “The longer I work on the Bibby Stockholm, the more I worry about safety on the boat. Between exclusion and containment I encounter so many defects and feel so much tension among the prisoners that it no longer seems to be a question of whether things will get completely out of hand here, but when.”

      He went on:

      “I couldn’t stand the way prisoners were treated […] The staff become like that, because the whole culture there is like that. Inhuman. They do not see the residents as people with a history, but as numbers.”

      Discussions were also held in August 2017 over the possibility of using the vessel as accommodation for some 400 students in Galway, Ireland, amid the country’s housing crisis. Though the idea was eventually dropped for lack of mooring space and planning permission requirements, local students had voiced safety concerns over the “bizarre” and “unconventional” solution to a lack of rental opportunities.
      Corporate Travel Management & Langham Industries

      Although leased from Bibby Line Group, management aboard the Bibby Stockholm itself will be handled by #Corporate_Travel_Management (#CTM), a global travel company specialising in business travel services. The Australian-headquartered company also recently received a £100m contract for the provision of accommodation, travel, venue and ancillary booking services for the housing of Ukrainian refugees at local hotels and aboard cruise ships M/S Victoria and M/S Ambition. The British Red Cross warned earlier in May against continuing to house refugees on ships with “isolated” and “windowless” cabins, and said the scheme had left many “living in limbo.”

      Founded by CEO #Jamie_Pherous, CTM was targeted in 2018 by #VGI_Partners, a group of short-sellers, who identified more than 20 red flags concerning the company’s business interests. Most strikingly, the short-sellers said they’d attended CTM’s offices in Glasgow, Paris, Amsterdam, Stockholm and Switzerland. Finding no signs of business activity there, they said it was possible the firm had significantly overstated the scale of its operations. VGI Partners also claimed CTM’s cash flows didn’t seem to add up when set against the company’s reported growth, and that CTM hadn’t fully disclosed revisions they’d made to their annual revenue figures.

      Two years later, the short-sellers released a follow-up report, questioning how CTM had managed to report a drop in rewards granted for high sales numbers to travel agencies, when in fact their transaction turnover had grown during the same period. They also accused CTM of dressing up their debt balance to make their accounts look healthier.

      CTM denied VGI Partners’ allegations. In their response, they paraphrased a report by auditors EY, supposedly confirming there were no question marks over their business practices, though the report itself was never actually made public. They further claim VGI Partners, as short-sellers, had only released the reports in the hope of benefitting from uncertainty over CTM’s operations.

      Despite these troubles, CTM’s market standing improved drastically earlier this year, when it was announced the firm had secured contracts for the provision of travel services to the UK Home Office worth in excess of $3bn AUD (£1.6bn). These have been accompanied by further tenders with, among others, the National Audit Office, HS2, Cafcass, Serious Fraud Office, Office of National Statistics, HM Revenue & Customs, National Health Service, Ministry of Justice, Department of Education, Foreign Office, and the Equality and Human Rights Commission.

      The Home Office has not released any figures on the cost of either leasing or management services aboard Bibby Stockholm, though press reports have put the estimated price tag at more than £20,000 a day for charter and berthing alone. If accurate, this would put the overall expenditure for the 18-month period in which the vessel will operate as a detention centre at almost £11m, exclusive of actual detention centre management costs such as security, food and healthcare.

      Another beneficiary of the project are Portland Port’s owners, #Langham_Industries, a maritime and engineering company owned by the #Langham family. The family has long-running ties to right-wing parties. Langham Industries donated over £70,000 to the UK Independence Party from 2003 up until the 2016 Brexit referendum. In 2014, Langham Industries donated money to support the re-election campaign of former Clacton MP for UKIP Douglas Carswell, shortly after his defection from the Conservatives. #Catherine_Langham, a Tory parish councillor for Hilton in Dorset, has described herself as a Langham Industries director (although she is not listed on Companies House). In 2016 she was actively involved in local efforts to support the campaign to leave the European Union. The family holds a large estate in Dorset which it uses for its other line of business, winemaking.

      At present, there is no publicly available information on who will be providing security services aboard the Bibby Stockholm.

      Business Basics

      Bibby Line Group describes itself as “one of the UK’s oldest family owned businesses,” operating in “multiple countries, employing around 1,300 colleagues, and managing over £1 billion of funds.” Its head office is registered in Liverpool, with other headquarters in Scotland, Hong Kong, India, Singapore, Malaysia, France, Slovakia, Czechia, the Netherlands, Germany, Poland and Nigeria (see the appendix for more). The company’s primary sectors correspond to its three main UK subsidiaries:

      #Bibby_Financial_Services. A global provider of financial services. The firm provides loans to small- and medium-sized businesses engaged in business services, construction, manufacturing, transportation, export, recruitment and wholesale markets. This includes invoice financing, export and trade finance, and foreign exchanges. Overall, the subsidiary manages more than £6bn each year on behalf of some 9,000 clients across 300 different industry sectors, and in 2021 it brought in more than 50% of the group’s annual turnover.

      - #Bibby_Marine_Limited. Owner and operator of the Bibby WaveMaster fleet, a group of vessels specialising in the transport and accommodation of workers employed at remote locations, such as offshore oil and gas sites in the North Sea. Sometimes, as in the case of Chevron’s Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) project in Nigeria, the vessels are used as an alternative to hotels owing to a “a volatile project environment.” The fleet consists of 40 accommodation vessels similar in size to the Bibby Stockholm and a smaller number of service vessels, though the share of annual turnover pales compared to the group’s financial services operations, standing at just under 10% for 2021.

      - #Garic Ltd. Confined to construction, quarrying, airport, agriculture and transport sectors in the UK, the firm designs, manufactures and purchases plant equipment and machinery for sale or hire. Garic brought in around 14% of Bibby Line Group’s turnover in 2021.

      Prior to February 2021, Bibby Line Group also owned #Costcutter_Supermarkets_Group, before it was sold to #Bestway_Wholesale to maintain liquidity amid the Covid-19 pandemic. In their report for that year, the company’s directors also suggested grant funding from #MarRI-UK, an organisation facilitating innovation in maritime technologies and systems, had been important in preserving the firm’s position during the crisis.
      History

      The Bibby Line Group’s story begins in 1807, when Lancashire-born shipowner John Bibby began trading out of Liverpool with partner John Highfield. By the time of his death in 1840, murdered while returning home from dinner with a friend in Kirkdale, Bibby had struck out on his own and come to manage a fleet of more than 18 ships. The mysterious case of his death has never been solved, and the business was left to his sons John and James.

      Between 1891 and 1989, the company operated under the name #Bibby_Line_Limited. Its ships served as hospital and transport vessels during the First World War, as well as merchant cruisers, and the company’s entire fleet of 11 ships was requisitioned by the state in 1939.

      By 1970, the company had tripled its overseas earnings, branching into ‘factoring’, or invoice financing (converting unpaid invoices into cash for immediate use via short-term loans) in the early 1980s, before this aspect of the business was eventually spun off into Bibby Financial Services. The group acquired Garic Ltd in 2008, which currently operates four sites across the UK.

      People

      #Jonathan_Lewis has served as Bibby Line Group’s Managing and Executive Director since January 2021, prior to which he acted as the company’s Chief Financial and Strategy Officer since joining in 2019. Previously, Lewis worked as CFO for Imagination Technologies, a tech company specialising in semiconductors, and as head of supermarket Tesco’s mergers and acquisitions team. He was also a member of McKinsey’s European corporate finance practice, as well as an investment banker at Lazard. During his first year at the helm of Bibby’s operations, he was paid £748,000. Assuming his role at the head of the group’s operations, he replaced Paul Drescher, CBE, then a board member of the UK International Chamber of Commerce and a former president of the Confederation of British Industry.

      Bibby Line Group’s board also includes two immediate members of the Bibby family, Sir #Michael_James_Bibby, 3rd Bt. and his younger brother #Geoffrey_Bibby. Michael has acted as company chairman since 2020, before which he had occupied senior management roles in the company for 20 years. He also has external experience, including time at Unilever’s acquisitions, disposals and joint venture divisions, and now acts as president of the UK Chamber of Shipping, chairman of the Charities Trust, and chairman of the Institute of Family Business Research Foundation.

      Geoffrey has served as a non-executive director of the company since 2015, having previously worked as a managing director of Vast Visibility Ltd, a digital marketing and technology company. In 2021, the Bibby brothers received salaries of £125,000 and £56,000 respectively.

      The final member of the firm’s board is #David_Anderson, who has acted as non-executive director since 2012. A financier with 35 years experience in investment banking, he’s founder and CEO of EPL Advisory – which advises company boards on requirements and disclosure obligations of public markets – and chair of Creative Education Trust, a multi-academy trust comprising 17 schools. Anderson is also chairman at multinational ship broker Howe Robinson Partners, which recently auctioned off a superyacht seized from Dmitry Pumpyansky, after the sanctioned Russian businessman reneged on a €20.5m loan from JP Morgan. In 2021, Anderson’s salary stood at £55,000.

      Ownership

      Bibby Line Group’s annual report and accounts for 2021 state that more than 90% of the company is owned by members of the Bibby family, primarily through family trusts. These ownership structures, effectively entities allowing people to benefit from assets without being their registered legal owners, have long attracted staunch criticism from transparency advocates given the obscurity they afford means they often feature extensively in corruption, money laundering and tax abuse schemes.

      According to Companies House, the UK corporate registry, between 50% and 75% of Bibby Line Group’s shares and voting rights are owned by #Bibby_Family_Company_Limited, which also retains the right to appoint and remove members of the board. Directors of Bibby Family Company Limited include both the Bibby brothers, as well as a third sibling, #Peter_John_Bibby, who’s formally listed as the firm’s ‘ultimate beneficial owner’ (i.e. the person who ultimately profits from the company’s assets).

      Other people with comparable shares in Bibby Family Company Limited are #Mark_Rupert_Feeny, #Philip_Charles_Okell, and Lady #Christine_Maud_Bibby. Feeny’s occupation is listed as solicitor, with other interests in real estate management and a position on the board of the University of Liverpool Pension Fund Trustees Limited. Okell meanwhile appears as director of Okell Money Management Limited, a wealth management firm, while Lady Bibby, Michael and Geoffrey’s mother, appears as “retired playground supervisor.”

      Key Relationships

      Bibby Line Group runs an internal ‘Donate a Day’ volunteer program, enabling employees to take paid leave in order to “help causes they care about.” Specific charities colleagues have volunteered with, listed in the company’s Annual Review for 2021 to 2022, include:

      - The Hive Youth Zone. An award-winning charity for young people with disabilities, based in the Wirral.

      – The Whitechapel Centre. A leading homeless and housing charity in the Liverpool region, working with people sleeping rough, living in hostels, or struggling with their accommodation.

      - Let’s Play Project. Another charity specialising in after-school and holiday activities for young people with additional needs in the Banbury area.

      - Whitdale House. A care home for the elderly, based in Whitburn, West Lothian and run by the local council.

      – DEBRA. An Irish charity set up in 1988 for individuals living with a rare, painful skin condition called epidermolysis bullosa, as well as their families.

      – Reaching Out Homeless Outreach. A non-profit providing resources and support to the homeless in Ireland.

      Various senior executives and associated actors at Bibby Line Group and its subsidiaries also have current and former ties to the following organisations:

      - UK Chamber of Shipping

      - Charities Trust

      - Institute of Family Business Research Foundation

      - Indefatigable Old Boys Association

      - Howe Robinson Partners

      - hibu Ltd

      - EPL Advisory

      - Creative Education Trust

      - Capita Health and Wellbeing Limited

      - The Ambassador Theatre Group Limited

      – Pilkington Plc

      – UK International Chamber of Commerce

      – Confederation of British Industry

      – Arkley Finance Limited (Weatherby’s Banking Group)

      – FastMarkets Ltd, Multiple Sclerosis Society

      – Early Music as Education

      – Liverpool Pension Fund Trustees Limited

      – Okell Money Management Limited

      Finances

      For the period ending 2021, Bibby Line Group’s total turnover stood at just under £260m, with a pre-tax profit of almost £31m – fairly healthy for a company providing maritime services during a global pandemic. Their post-tax profits in fact stood at £35.5m, an increase they would appear to have secured by claiming generous tax credits (£4.6m) and deferring a fair amount (£8.4m) to the following year.

      Judging by their last available statement on the firm’s profitability, Bibby’s directors seem fairly confident the company has adequate financing and resources to continue operations for the foreseeable future. They stress their February 2021 sale of Costcutter was an important step in securing this, given it provided additional liquidity during the pandemic, as well as the funding secured for R&D on fuel consumption by Bibby Marine’s fleet.
      Scandal Sheet

      Bibby Line Group and its subsidiaries have featured in a number of UK legal proceedings over the years, sometimes as defendants. One notable case is Godfrey v Bibby Line, a lawsuit brought against the company in 2019 after one of their former employees died as the result of an asbestos-related disease.

      In their claim, the executors of Alan Peter Godfrey’s estate maintained that between 1965 and 1972, he was repeatedly exposed to large amounts of asbestos while working on board various Bibby vessels. Although the link between the material and fatal lung conditions was established as early as 1930, they claimed that Bibby Line, among other things:

      “Failed to warn the deceased of the risk of contracting asbestos related disease or of the precautions to be taken in relation thereto;

      “Failed to heed or act upon the expert evidence available to them as to the best means of protecting their workers from danger from asbestos dust; [and]

      “Failed to take all reasonably practicable measures, either by securing adequate ventilation or by the provision and use of suitable respirators or otherwise, to prevent inhalation of dust.”

      The lawsuit, which claimed “unlimited damage”’ against the group, also stated that Mr Godfrey’s “condition deteriorated rapidly with worsening pain and debility,” and that he was “completely dependent upon others for his needs by the last weeks of his life.” There is no publicly available information on how the matter was concluded.

      In 2017, Bibby Line Limited also featured in a leak of more than 13.4 million financial records known as the Paradise Papers, specifically as a client of Appleby, which provided “offshore corporate services” such as legal and accountancy work. According to the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, a global network of investigative media outlets, leaked Appleby documents revealed, among other things, “the ties between Russia and [Trump’s] billionaire commerce secretary, the secret dealings of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s chief fundraiser and the offshore interests of the Queen of England and more than 120 politicians around the world.”

      This would not appear to be the Bibby group’s only link to the shady world of offshore finance. Michael Bibby pops up as a treasurer for two shell companies registered in Panama, Minimar Transport S.A. and Vista Equities Inc.
      Looking Forward

      Much about the Bibby Stockholm saga remains to be seen. The exact cost of the initiative and who will be providing security services on board, are open questions. What’s clear however is that activists will continue to oppose the plans, with efforts to prevent the vessel sailing from Falmouth to its final docking in Portland scheduled to take place on 30th June.

      Appendix: Company Addresses

      HQ and general inquiries: 3rd Floor Walker House, Exchange Flags, Liverpool, United Kingdom, L2 3YL

      Tel: +44 (0) 151 708 8000

      Other offices, as of 2021:

      6, Shenton Way, #18-08A Oue Downtown 068809, Singapore

      1/1, The Exchange Building, 142 St. Vincent Street, Glasgow, G2 5LA, United Kingdom

      4th Floor Heather House, Heather Road, Sandyford, Dublin 18, Ireland

      Unit 2302, 23/F Jubilee Centre, 18 Fenwick Street, Wanchai, Hong Kong

      Unit 508, Fifth Floor, Metropolis Mall, MG Road, Gurugram, Haryana, 122002 India

      Suite 7E, Level 7, Menara Ansar, 65 Jalan Trus, 8000 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

      160 Avenue Jean Jaures, CS 90404, 69364 Lyon Cedex, France

      Prievozská 4D, Block E, 13th Floor, Bratislava 821 09, Slovak Republic

      Hlinky 118, Brno, 603 00, Czech Republic

      Laan Van Diepenvoorde 5, 5582 LA, Waalre, Netherlands

      Hansaallee 249, 40549 Düsseldorf, Germany

      Poland Eurocentrum, Al. Jerozolimskie 134, 02-305 Warsaw, Poland

      1/2 Atarbekova str, 350062, Krasnodar, Krasnodar

      1 St Peter’s Square, Manchester, M2 3AE, United Kingdom

      25 Adeyemo Alakija Street, Victoria Island, Lagos, Nigeria

      10 Anson Road, #09-17 International Plaza, 079903 Singapore

      https://corporatewatch.org/floating-prisons-the-200-year-old-family-business-behind-the-bibby-s

      signalé ici aussi par @rezo:
      https://seenthis.net/messages/1010504

    • The Langham family seem quite happy to support right-wing political parties that are against immigration, while at the same time profiting handsomely from the misery of refugees who are forced to claim sanctuary here.


      https://twitter.com/PositiveActionH/status/1687817910364884992

      –---

      Family firm ’profiteering from misery’ by providing migrant barges donated £70k to #UKIP

      The Langham family, owners of Langham Industries, is now set to profit from an 18-month contract with the Home Office to let the Bibby Stockholm berth at Portland, Dorset

      A family firm that donated more than £70,000 to UKIP is “profiteering from misery” by hosting the Government’s controversial migrant barge. Langham Industries owns Portland Port, where the Bibby Stockholm is docked in a deal reported to be worth some £2.5million.

      The Langham family owns luxurious properties and has links to high-profile politicians, including Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Deputy Prime Minister Oliver Dowden. And we can reveal that their business made 19 donations to pro-Brexit party UKIP between 2003 and 2016.

      Late founder John Langham was described as an “avid supporter” of UKIP in an obituary in 2017. Now his children, John, Jill and Justin – all directors of the family firm – are set to profit from an 18-month contract with the Home Office to let the Bibby Stockholm berth at Portland, Dorset.

      While Portland Port refuses to reveal how much the Home Office is paying, its website cites berthing fees for a ship the size of the Bibby Stockholm at more than £4,000 a day. In 2011, Portland Port chairman John, 71, invested £3.7million in Grade II* listed country pile Steeple Manor at Wareham, Dorset. Dating to around 1600, it has a pond, tennis court and extensive gardens designed by the landscape architect Brenda Colvin.

      The arrangement to host the “prison-like” barge for housing migrants has led some locals to blast the Langhams, who have owned the port since 1997. Portland mayor Carralyn Parkes, 61, said: “I don’t know how John Langham will sleep at night in his luxurious home, with his tennis court and his fluffy bed, when asylum seekers are sleeping in tiny beds on the barge.

      “I went on the boat and measured the rooms with a tape measure. On average they are about 10ft by 12ft. The bunk bed mattresses are about 6ft long. If you’re taller than 6ft you’re stuffed. The Langham family need to have more humanity. They are only interested in making money. It’s shocking.”

      (#paywall)
      https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/family-firm-profiteering-misery-providing-30584405.amp

      #UK_Independence_Party

    • ‘This is a prison’: men tell of distressing conditions on Bibby Stockholm

      Asylum seekers share fears about Dorset barge becoming even more crowded, saying they already ‘despair and wish for death’

      Asylum seekers brought back to the Bibby Stockholm barge in Portland, Dorset, have said they are being treated in such a way that “we despair and wish for death”.

      The Guardian spoke to two men in their first interview since their return to the barge on 19 October after the vessel lay empty for more than two months. The presence of deadly legionella bacteria was confirmed on board on 7 August, the same day the first group of asylum seekers arrived. The barge was evacuated four days later.

      The new warning comes after it emerged that one asylum seeker attempted to kill himself and is in hospital after finding out he is due to be taken to the barge on Tuesday.

      A man currently on the barge told the Guardian: “Government decisions are turning healthy and normal refugees into mental patients whom they then hand over to society. Here, many people were healthy and coping with OK spirits, but as a result of the dysfunctional strategies of the government, they have suffered – and continue to suffer – from various forms of serious mental distress. We are treated in such a way that we despair and wish for death.”

      He said that although the asylum seekers were not detained on the barge and could leave to visit the nearby town, in practice, doing so was not easy.

      He added: “In the barge, we have exactly the feeling of being in prison. It is true that they say that this is not a prison and you can go outside at any time, but you can only go to specific stops at certain times by bus, and this does not give me a good feeling.

      “Even to use the fresh air, you have to go through the inspection every time and go to the small yard with high fences and go through the X-ray machine again. And this is not good for our health.

      “In short, this is a prison whose prisoners are not criminals, they are people who have fled their country just to save their lives and have taken shelter here to live.”

      The asylum seekers raised concerns about what conditions on the barge would be like if the Home Office did fill it with about 500 asylum seekers, as officials say is the plan. Those on board said it already felt quite full with about 70 people living there.

      The second asylum seeker said: “The space inside the barge is very small. It feels crowded in the dining hall and the small entertainment room. It is absolutely clear to me that there will be chaos here soon.

      “According to my estimate, as I look at the spaces around us, the capacity of this barge is maximum 120 people, including personnel and crew. The strategy of ​​transferring refugees from hotels to barges or ships or military installations is bound to fail.

      “The situation here on the barge is getting worse. Does the government have a plan for shipwrecked residents? Everyone here is going mad with anxiety. It is not just the barge that floats on the water, but the plans of the government that are radically adrift.”

      Maddie Harris of the NGO Humans For Rights Network, which supports asylum seekers in hotels, said: “Home Office policies directly contribute to the significant deterioration of the wellbeing and mental health of so many asylum seekers in their ‘care’, with a dehumanising environment, violent anti-migrant rhetoric and isolated accommodations away from community and lacking in support.”

      A Home Office spokesperson said: “The Bibby Stockholm is part of the government’s pledge to reduce the use of expensive hotels and bring forward alternative accommodation options which provide a more cost-effective, sustainable and manageable system for the UK taxpayer and local communities.

      “The health and welfare of asylum seekers remains the utmost priority. We work continually to ensure the needs and vulnerabilities of those residing in asylum accommodation are identified and considered, including those related to mental health and trauma.”

      Nadia Whittome and Lloyd Russell-Moyle, the Labour MPs for Nottingham East and Brighton Kemptown respectively, will travel to Portland on Monday to meet asylum seekers accommodated on the Bibby Stockholm barge and local community members.

      The visit follows the home secretary, Suella Braverman, not approving a visit from the MPs to assess living conditions as they requested through parliamentary channels.

      https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/oct/29/this-is-a-prison-men-tell-of-distressing-conditions-on-bibby-stockholm
      #prison #conditions_de_vie

  • Marc Van Ranst « entarté » ce dimanche avant une conférence à Bruges

    Mésaventure pour le virologue Marc Van Ranst ce dimanche matin.

    « Ce matin, j’ai eu cinq minutes de retard lors d’une conférence à Bruges sur les pandémies à l’occasion de la Journée du patrimoine car un « brave guerrier » m’a déposé une tarte à la crème sur le visage… », explique Van Ranst, photos à l’appui
    . . . .

    #gloupGloup #virolog #covidisme #épidémiologiste #faciste #marc_van_ranst #mckinsey #mac_kinsey #mckinseygate #corruption #incompétence #privatisation #cabinets_de_conseil #consulting #covid-19 #politique

  • #Canada : Une militante écologiste vandalise le bureau du premier ministre justin trudeau La Presse canadienne à Ottawa

    Deux personnes ont été accusées de méfait après qu’une femme eut lancé de la peinture contre l’immeuble abritant le bureau du premier ministre justin trudeau.

    Elle s’était ensuite attachée à l’immeuble. L’homme qui l’avait accompagnée et l’avait filmée avait également été arrêté.

    La police n’a pas confirmé l’identité des deux personnes accusées. Toutefois, un groupe de défense du changement climatique affirme que l’une d’entre elles est celle qui était montée en mars sur scène les seins nus lors du gala des prix Juno.


    On2Ottawa a publié sur son compte Twitter des photos et une vidéo montrant la femme en train de jeter un seau de ce qui semble être de la peinture rose sur l’entrée, puis poser seins nus pour une photo à côté d’une pancarte disant « Exigeons des mesures climatiques maintenant ».

    Casey Hatherly, qui se fait appeler Ever, a attiré l’attention du pays le mois dernier lorsqu’elle est montée sur la scène de la cérémonie des prix Juno pendant que la chanteuse Avril Lavigne faisait une performance.

    Elle était torse nu et les messages écrits sur le haut de son corps comprenaient « land back » et « save the Greenbelt », en référence à la décision prise par l’Ontario l’année dernière de rendre une zone protégée accessible à la construction de logements.

    #activisme #justin_trudeau #rose #trudeau #femmes #climat

    Source : https://www.ledevoir.com/politique/canada/789182/une-militante-ecologiste-vandalise-le-bureau-du-premier-ministre

    • Les Trudeau en vacances chez de riches donateurs de la Fondation Trudeau Daniel Leblanc - Louis Blouin - Radio Canada

      Le premier ministre Justin Trudeau et sa famille ont célébré le Nouvel An avec des membres d’une famille de donateurs à la Fondation Pierre-Elliott-Trudeau lors d’un voyage qui a coûté plus de 160 000 $ aux contribuables, a appris Radio-Canada.
      . . . .

      Voyage coûteux
      Le séjour de la famille Trudeau dans ce petit paradis terrestre a coûté au moins 162 000 $ aux contribuables canadiens, selon des documents déposés en Chambre en réponse à des questions de députés. Cette somme n’inclut pas les coûts liés à l’utilisation de l’avion Challenger de la Défense nationale pour transporter les Trudeau.


      La GRC a engagé plus de 115 000 $ de frais pour assurer la sécurité du premier ministre et de sa famille. Le corps de police fédéral indique d’ailleurs que d’autres coûts qui n’ont pas été comptabilisés pourraient s’ajouter.

      Une somme de plus de 47 000 $ s’ajoute pour couvrir les dépenses des membres d’équipage des Forces armées canadiennes et d’employés du Bureau du Conseil privé.
      . . . . .
      Les vacances du premier ministre ont souvent défrayé la manchette depuis son arrivée au pouvoir, en 2015. Son séjour familial sur l’île de l’Aga Khan en 2016 lui avait valu un blâme du commissaire aux conflits d’intérêts et à l’éthique. Ce voyage avait coûté 215 000 $ aux contribuables canadiens.
      . . . . .
      Plus récemment, le premier ministre a été vivement critiqué pour avoir loué une luxueuse suite à grands frais (6000 $ la nuit) lors de sa participation aux funérailles de la reine Élisabeth II à Londres.
      . . . . .

      Famille #green #corruption #vacances #prévarication piquer dans la #caisse ( comme en le font les élus français ).

      Source : https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1972328/jamaique-voyage-decembre-green-ethique

  • Sommeil, insomnies
    https://infokiosques.net/spip.php?article1999

    « Dans cette brochure, je me suis efforcée de balayer le plus d’approches et de propositions en prenant en compte l’humain dans sa globalité. Cette brochure ne traite pas du stress, de l’anxiété, de la dépression, des variations pondérales, des poussées inflammatoires, etc. mais vous aurez remarqué que ces troubles sont souvent liés au manque de sommeil par un lien de cause à effet allant dans un sens ou dans un autre. Les plantes et conseils proposés ici pourront aussi vous être utile pour ces troubles également. Les conseils d’hygiène de vie sont appropriés pour tous les troubles chroniques et inflammatoires, sachant que le sommeil est un des éléments clés du retour à la santé. » #S

    / Infokiosque fantôme (partout), #Corps,_santé,_antivalidisme, (...)

    #Infokiosque_fantôme_partout_ #Antipsychiatrie
    https://infokiosques.net/IMG/pdf/sommeil_insomnies-20pa5-pageparpage-2023.pdf
    https://infokiosques.net/IMG/pdf/sommeil_insomnies-10pa4-cahier-2023.pdf

  • Ce scandale qu’ursula von der leyen pensait laisser derrière elle à Berlin France Culture

    L’opposition allemande publie un rapport d’enquête accablant sur la responsabilité d’ursula von der leyen dans un scandale qui a coûté des dizaines de millions d’euros au ministère qu’elle dirigeait avant de partir pour Bruxelles.

    Il est beaucoup question de la présidente de la Commission européenne ursula von der leyen dans la presse allemande ce mercredi.

    Oui car avant de quitter Berlin pour Bruxelles l’année dernière, ursula von der leyen était la ministre de la Défense d’Angela Merkel, et son départ avait été jugé aussi inattendu que précipité. aujourd’hui, un an plus tard, voilà que ressurgit un vieux dossier de l’époque qui n’a pas fini de la poursuivre... jusque dans son exil européen.

    https://media.radiofrance-podcast.net/podcast09/10901-24.06.2020-ITEMA_22368464-2020C22811S0176-177945590

    Car pendant ces années où Mme von der leyen a dirigé le ministère allemand de la Défense, celui-ci a accumulé les problèmes de gestion, les dizaines de millions d’euros dilapidés sans contrôle pour payer des consultants, conseillers et autre sous-traitants privés. "Il y en a pour près de 100 millions" , affirme ce matin l’hebdomadaire Focus https://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/berater-affaere-im-verteidigungsministerium-faktisches-komplettversagen-neuer- en se basant sur un rapport d’enquête qui vient d’être rendu public et qui s’avère "dévastateur" pour l’ex-ministre.

    Ce rapport, il faut le préciser, a été rédigé par les députés issus de l’opposition qui ont participé à la commission d’enquête parlementaire sur cette affaire. Un an de travail, et ces conclusions des députés Verts, libéraux-démocrates et du Parti de Gauche qui sont accablantes, reprises également par Der Spiegel https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/ursula-von-der-leyen-und-die-berateraffaere-faktisches-komplettversagen-a-55 : sous ursula von der leyen, la gestion du ministère était "un échec complet_", dixit le rapport, avec des procédures de contrôle des contrats de consulting qui n’étaient pas respectées, et cachaient souvent des liens de copinage, de connivence entre hauts fonctionnaires et lobbyistes privés. 

    La désormais présidente de la Commission européenne s’en est toujours sorti, jusque là, en disant que les décisions n’étaient pas prises à son niveau, qu’elle n’en avait pas connaissance et donc qu’elle ne pouvait en être tenue responsable. Ce n’est pas ce que conclut le rapport d’enquête de l’opposition, martèle Der Spiegel https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/ursula-von-der-leyen-und-die-berateraffaere-faktisches-komplettversagen-a-55 . Il met en avant la responsabilité inévitable de l’ex-ministre, qui était tenue au courant des problèmes rencontrés à cause de tous ces contrats, mais n’a jamais fait mine de mettre fin aux mauvaises pratiques. 

    Pire encore, rappelle Politico https://www.politico.eu/article/ursula-von-der-leyen-german-governing-parties-contracting-scandal , Urusula von der leyen a semblé tenter de faire obstruction à l’enquête parlementaire, quand on s’est rendu compte que ses deux téléphones portables professionnels saisis pour les besoins de l’enquête avaient été consciencieusement expurgés de tout message avant d’être livrés à la commission.

    A présent "il n’y a plus guère de doute sur la raison véritable qui a poussé ursula von der leyen à fuir à Bruxelles" résume le chef du service investigation de Die Welt Wolfgang Büscher pour qui l’ex-cheffe de la Bundeswehr est bien coupable, je cite, d’avoir laissé ces "oiseaux parasites que sont les consultants privés faire leur nid au ministère de la Défense" , d’avoir donné les clés de la Défense nationale, à travers ces lobbyistes, aux intérêts des grandes compagnies du secteur de l’armement en particulier.

    Faut-il en conclure pour autant que la nomination d’ursula von der leyen n’aura été comme le sous-entend Wolfgang Büscher, qu’une « exfiltration en urgence pour masquer le chaos qu’elle laissait derrière elle » ? _ 

    On n’en est pas là... Il faut enfin rappeler, avec la Süddeutsche Zeitung https://www.sueddeutsche.de , que les conclusions définitives de la commission d’enquête parlementaire dans son ensemble (opposition+majorité) ne devraient être rendues que la semaine prochaine. D’ores et déjà, les partis de la grande coalition merkelienne font bloc autour d’ursula von der leyen, ils rejettent toutes ces accusations et plaident l’ignorance de l’ancienne ministre. A Berlin comme à Bruxelles, on se demande bien comment ceux qui accablent la présidente de la Commission européenne et ceux qui l’absolvent vont arriver à accorder leurs violons.

    Source : https://www.radiofrance.fr/franceculture/podcasts/revue-de-presse-internationale/ce-scandale-qu-ursula-von-der-leyen-pensait-laisser-derriere-elle-a-berl

    #mckinsey #mac_kinsey #mckinseygate #corruption #incompétence #privatisation #cabinets_de_conseil #consulting #en_vedette #allemagne #covid-19 #politique #femme #ue #union_européenne #ursula_von_der_leyen

    • A Liège, une plainte pénale contre Ursula von der Leyen Le Vif

      Le juge d’instruction liégeois Frédéric Frenay vient d’être saisi afin d’instruire une plainte pénale contre Ursula von der Leyen, la présidente de la Commission européenne. Une plainte pour « usurpation de fonctions et de titre », « destruction de documents publics » et « prise illégale d’intérêts et corruption ».

      En clair, il est reproché à la présidente de la Commission de s’être substituée « sans aucun mandat » aux Etats membres de l’UE – dont le gouvernement belge – en négociant de façon « directe et secrète », par SMS notamment, des contrats d’achat de vaccins avec le CEO de Pfizer, Albert Bourla, durant la pandémie de Covid-19. Il lui est aussi reproché d’avoir supprimé ces textos, une affaire connue sous le nom du « Deletegate ». Le plaignant, Frédéric Baldan, 35 ans, estime que le comportement d’Ursula von der Leyen porte atteinte « aux finances publiques de la Belgique » et « à la confiance publique ». Il s’est constitué partie civile et réclame 50 000 euros pour son préjudice moral. Cette affaire a déjà fait l’objet de plaintes contre la Commission auprès de l’ombudsman européen (saisi par un journaliste allemand) et de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne (saisie par The New York Times). Avec cette nouvelle plainte, le Deletegate prend une tournure pénale : ce n’est plus la Commission qui est ciblée pour manque de transparence, c’est sa présidente, à titre personnel.

      Source : https://www.levif.be/magazine/a-liege-une-plainte-penale-contre-ursula-von-der-leyen

      #Deletegate

  • La gestion capitaliste de l’eau : irresponsabilité et racket
    https://lutte-ouvriere.org/documents/archives/cercle-leon-trotsky/article/la-gestion-capitaliste-de-l-eau (#archiveLO | 12 avril 2013)

    Sommaire :

    Introduction

    De l’Antiquité aux multinationales
    – L’Antiquité
    – Brève histoire de la #Compagnie_Générale_des_Eaux (#CGE)

    Prix de l’eau : le racket permanent
    – Des prix de monopole
    – Opacité des comptes
    – Lobbying et corruption
    – Le retour en régie publique

    Pollutions : irresponsabilité de l’État et pain béni pour les trusts
    – Qualité de l’eau et #pollutions
    – Irresponsabilité et complicité de l’État

    L’accès à l’eau dans le monde
    – Un constat effarant
    – La #pénurie : des causes « naturelles » mais surtout sociales
    – Les institutions internationales : comment se moquer du problème
    – Des progrès techniques qui permettraient la satisfaction des besoins

    Les crises de l’eau dans le monde
    – L’#Irak : une crise de l’eau provoquée par la guerre
    #Moyen-Orient : l’eau, arme de guerre
    #Amérique_latine : la révolte contre les #multinationales

    Conclusion

    #eau #capitalisme #pollution #corruption #concurrence

  • Poser les bases pour commencer une thérapie
    https://infokiosques.net/spip.php?article1996

    En proposant quelques conseils, ce petit guide a pour but de redonner de l’autonomie et du pouvoir lorsque l’on entame un parcours de soin psy. SommaireComment s’orienter et vers quiClarifier sa démarcheConstruire ses objectifsQuestions à poser au débutRessenti du premier rendez-vousFaire le point régulièrementÉvaluer la progression de la relation d’aideRisque de dépendanceRésolution de problèmesPrécautions #P

    / Infokiosque fantôme (partout), #Antipsychiatrie, #Corps,_santé,_antivalidisme

    #Infokiosque_fantôme_partout_
    https://infokiosques.net/IMG/pdf/conseil_therapie-fevr2023-cahier-6pa4-2.pdf
    https://infokiosques.net/IMG/pdf/conseil_therapie-fevr2023-pageparpage-12pa5-2.pdf

  • Examens en basque : des collégiens vont rallier Bordeaux-Bayonne à vélo pour interpeller la rectrice

    Une vingtaine d’élèves du collège Estitxu Robles de Bayonne vont parcourir à vélo la distance entre Bordeaux et Bayonne, du 18 au 22 avril, pour réclamer de pouvoir passer leurs #examens en basque.

    Le départ est donné devant le rectorat de Bordeaux, le mardi 18 avril. Une vingtaine d’élèves de 3e du collège Estitxu-Robles vont ensuite rejoindre Bayonne à vélo. L’arrivée est prévue le 22 avril à 17 heures, pour rallier la manifestation en faveur de la langue basque organisée suite à l’appel d’Euskal Konfederazioa. Ce sont les élèves eux-mêmes qui l’ont annoncé, ce mercredi 29 mars devant la sous-préfecture de Bayonne.

    Les élèves inscrits en enseignement immersif, qui ont obtenu le 17 mars dernier de pouvoir passer l’intégralité du brevet en #euskara, espèrent désormais décrocher ce droit pour les épreuves du bac. « Avant la réforme du bac, les lycéens avaient la possibilité de passer les épreuves d’histoire-géographie et de maths en basque. Mais depuis deux ans, c’est terminé », déplore le président de Seaska, Peio Jorajuria.

    « Entraver nos droits »

    Grâce à cette action, les collégiens espèrent interpeller la rectrice de l’académie de Bordeaux, Anne Bisagni-Faure. « Après une scolarité entière effectuée en euskara nous ne comprenons pas que l’on puisse autant entraver nos #droits_linguistiques lors des épreuves. L’euskara est notre langue au quotidien à l’école et il est logique que nos apprentissages soient évalués dans notre langue », ont-ils déclaré.

    « Nous savons que tant notre périple que la #lutte à venir ne seront pas de tout repos et que plusieurs années seront peut-être nécessaires mais notre vœu le plus cher serait de rentrer en Euskal Herri avec le droit de composer également le bac en euskara » ont poursuivi les collégiens d’Estitxu Robles.

    Le #cortège fera escale à La Teste, Biscarrosse, Contis et Messanges. Les adolescents seront encadrés par des enseignants et des parents tout au long du voyage.

    Ceux qui le souhaitent peuvent effectuer les derniers kilomètres à vélo avec les collégiens. Rendez-vous est donné à 16 h 30 au marché de Boucau, pour rejoindre la manifestation dans les rues de Bayonne.

    https://www.sudouest.fr/pyrenees-atlantiques/bayonne/examens-en-basque-des-collegiens-vont-rallier-bordeaux-bayonne-a-velo-pour-

    #langues #France #langues_régionales #basque #résistance

  • Sur le psyvalidisme et la place des personnes handies-psy dans les milieux militants
    https://infokiosques.net/spip.php?article1989

    On était deux à vouloir organiser une discussion sur ce sujet pendant le festival des écologies vénéneuses - Les Digitales en juin 2022 à la Baudrière, squat féministe transpédégouine, dans le but de parler de nos vécus et difficultés communes dans les milieux militants, notamment écolos. La discussion part donc de nos propres expériences, en tant que personnes neuroA et/ou ayant des problèmes psys et qui cherchent avec plus ou moins de succès à s’engager dans les luttes. Nos spécificités neuro/psys (...) #P

    / Infokiosque fantôme (partout), #Antipsychiatrie, #Corps,_santé,_antivalidisme

    #Infokiosque_fantôme_partout_
    https://infokiosques.net/IMG/pdf/sur_le_psyvalidisme_et_la_place_des_personnes_handies-psy_dans_les_mil
    https://infokiosques.net/IMG/pdf/sur_le_psyvalidisme_et_la_place_des_personnes_handies-psy_dans_les_mil

  • À Lagos, l’« agbero » devenu parrain de la vie politique (Les blogs du Diplo, 16 mars 2023) https://blog.mondediplo.net/a-lagos-l-agbero-devenu-parrain-de-la-vie

    […] MC Oluomo est le Olori (président en yoruba) de tous les #gangs ». […]

    #Mc_Oluomo règne désormais sur la centaine de gare routières et parkings de Lagos dont les nouveaux terminaux, flambants neufs, de son quartier. L’ensemble de ces zones d’embarquement et de débarquement des passagers est sous la coupe de la nouvelle organisation que…

    … l’État de Lagos a chargé de diriger — le Parks Management Committee (Comité des parcs de Lagos) — après la dissolution de la précédente organisation qui les contrôlait — la branche locale du NURTW, le Syndicat national des travailleurs du transport routier. […]

    La NURTW, note Laurent Fourchard, est une organisation qui aura accru sous le règne de MC Oluomo « le pouvoir et la richesse de ses dirigeants grâce à la privatisation des moyens de transport ». Jusqu’à son éviction, rappelle le chercheur, la NURTW réglementait ainsi les parcs automobiles non « pas dans le but d’organiser une zone de marché libre, mais pour accumuler des revenus à redistribuer aux membres des syndicats, aux responsables des gouvernements locaux et à la police ». […]

    #Nigéria #corruption

  • #Home_Office planning to house asylum seekers on disused cruise ships

    Exclusive: Ministers facing growing anger from Tory backbenchers over use of hotels in their constituencies

    The Home Office is planning to use disused cruise ships to house asylum seekers amid growing anger from Conservative backbenchers over the use of hotels in their constituencies.

    Ministers are looking at possible vessels including a former cruise ship from Indonesia, which would be moored in south-west England, the Guardian understands.

    During the Conservative leadership campaign last summer, Rishi Sunak proposed putting illegal immigrants on cruise ships moored around the country but was warned it could be illegal under the Human Rights Act and the European convention on human rights.

    Downing Street confirmed he had dropped the idea to use the ships to house asylum seekers, which critics said would amount to arbitrary detention, once he became prime minister last October.

    Sources suggested, however, that the cruise ships could be registered as hotels rather than detention centres to get around possible legal challenges.

    The immigration minister, Robert Jenrick, is due to make an announcement on Wednesday regarding asylum accommodation amid speculation that it will include the use of boats and military barracks. It could also disclose plans to make use of a clause in the levelling up bill to force councils to accept large-scale accommodation for those seeking asylum.

    Multiple reports on Tuesday night suggested a plan to house asylum seekers on giant barges normally used for offshore construction projects could also be announced.

    The barges are built to house hundreds of people, although a government source told the Times that plans were at an “early stage” and had significant practical issues that needed to be addressed.

    The disclosure comes as the Home Office admitted nearly 400 hotels across the country were being used to accommodate more than 51,000 people at a reported cost of more than £6m a day.

    Sunak is under pressure to come up with alternatives as Conservative MPs, including members of his own cabinet, object to plans to move some people from hotels into former military bases.

    Suella Braverman, the home secretary, is expected to announce alternatives to hotel accommodation as soon as this week. They are expected to be used for new arrivals initially, rather than to rehouse people who are in hotels.

    The prime minister managed to face down a potentially big rebellion on Monday as up to 60 Tory MPs attempted to amend the new illegal migration bill by giving UK courts the power to ignore rulings by Strasbourg judges.

    Whitehall sources confirmed that the government had “in recent months” examined plans including using cruise ships from across the world, which could be brought to the UK and then used to house asylum seekers.

    The ships would be moored off the coast, emulating an approach by the Scottish government, which housed Ukrainian refugees in two 700-cabin ships. They were docked in Glasgow and Edinburgh and could hold 1,750 people each.

    Braverman said she would not rule out the use of former cruise ships when questioned in December by a House of Lords committee. “We will bring forward a range of alternative sites, they will include disused holiday parks, former student halls – I should say we are looking at those sites – I wouldn’t say anything is confirmed yet.

    “But we need to bring forward thousands of places, and when you talk about vessels all I can say is – because we are in discussion with a wide variety of providers – that everything is still on the table and nothing is excluded,” she said.

    It comes amid a Tory backlash over hotels in constituencies being used to house asylum seekers.

    Ministers had also drawn up plans to use two military bases that were identified to house asylum seekers earlier this year – RAF Scampton, the Dambusters’ base in Lincolnshire, and MDP Wethersfield in Braintree, Essex. But they are facing opposition from local Conservative politicians. Council leaders in Braintree are taking legal action to stop up to 5,000 people being moved to the site over the space of a year.

    James Cleverly, the foreign secretary, who is the local MP, wrote on his Facebook page that Wethersfield was inappropriate as an asylum camp because of “the remote nature of the site, limited transport infrastructure and narrow road network”.

    The local council in Scampton is seeking listed status for the Lincolnshire base, while historians and RAF veterans have written to the government asking for the plans to be halted.

    One government source, asked about the possible use of cruise ships, said ministers were working to end the use of hotels and bring forward a range of alternative sites for longer-term accommodation. But they would not discuss details of individual sites or proposals that could be used for bridging or asylum accommodation.

    A government spokesperson said: “We have always been upfront about the unprecedented pressure being placed on our asylum system, brought about by a significant increase in dangerous and illegal journeys into the country.

    “We continue to work across government and with local authorities to identify a range of accommodation options. The government remains committed to engaging with local authorities and key stakeholders as part of this process.”

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/mar/28/home-office-planning-to-house-asylum-seekers-on-disused-cruise-ships
    #hébergement #asile #réfugiés #migrations #bateaux #bateaux_de_croisière #bateau_de_croisière #Angleterre #UK

    –—

    ajouté à la métaliste sur la Bibby Stockholm :
    https://seenthis.net/messages/1016683

    ajouté à la métaliste #migrations et #tourisme :
    https://seenthis.net/messages/770799

    • Air force bases set to be used to house migrants as ministers hunt for cheaper alternatives to hotels

      The Government are reportedly also considering a former cruise ship from Indonesia, which would be moored in south-west England, as a possible site

      Migrants will be housed at two air force bases in a bid to cut down on the use of hotels and deter people from crossing the Channel on small boats, the immigration minister is expected to announce on Wednesday.

      #RAF_Scampton in Lincolnshire, the former home of the Dambusters and Red Arrows, and #RAF_Wethersfield in Essex are expected to be among the accommodation sites for asylum seekers confirmed by Robert Jenrick, despite local opposition.

      The announcement is being made with the aim of ending the use of hotels for migrants – a pledge the Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, has made. More than 51,000 people are being housed in 395 hotels, according to the BBC, at an estimated cost of £5.6m a day. Holiday parks and student halls are not expected to be included on the initial list of new sites.

      The Foreign Secretary, James Cleverly, has found himself at odds with his own government over plans to house asylum seekers at RAF Wethersfield, which is in his constituency.

      Braintree District Council is taking legal action against the Home Office in an attempt to secure an injunction against plans to house 1,500 migrants at RAF #Wethersfield.

      Veteran Tory MP Sir Edward Leigh has meanwhile raised concerns that using RAF Scampton to house asylum seekers could put at risk a £300 million investment plan for the site.

      A plan to turn a former RAF base in Linton-on-Ouse, in the constituency of Mr Sunak’s close ally Kevin Hollinrake, into a processing centre for asylum seekers, was meanwhile ditched under Liz Truss.

      During the Tory leadership contest last summer, the Prime Minister pledged to use “cruise ships” as part of efforts to “end the farce of millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money being spent every day on housing illegal migrants in hotels”.

      Downing Street did not respond to a question on whether that meant the prospect of using cruise ships has now been shelved.

      The Guardian reports that the Government was considering a former cruise ship from Indonesia, which would be moored in south-west England, as a possible site.

      According to The Sun, an announcement on nautical accommodation will be made in the coming days.

      There are reports ministers are said to be considering obtaining accommodation barges – typically used for offshore construction projects with only basic facilities – which could house hundreds of migrants who are currently in hotels.

      The plan is at an “early stage”, The Times reported, with ministers not yet decided on where the barge or barges will be stationed, though they are expected to be stationed at port, rather than at sea.

      A source told The Times the Government was aware of “significant practical issues” with these vessels, and it was not clear how safety would be dealt with, though a source told the newspaper: “It’s a row we’re prepared to have.”

      The Government is said to be keen on the idea as a way to discourage people from crossing the Channel and is pointing to countries like France housing refugees in floating vessels.

      Meanwhile, right-wing Tory rebel Jonathan Gullis said it would be “perfectly acceptable” to house asylum seekers in tents while they await for deportation, amid concerns about the cost of hotels.

      During a debate on the Illegal Migration Bill, ministers were also urged to give “serious assurances” they will not return to the “barbaric days” of detaining children in immigration centres.

      Conservative former minister Tim Loughton led calls for the Government to confirm it would not place migrant children in indefinite detention if they come to the UK by unauthorised means.

      Centrist Tories were joined by MPs from across the political spectrum who are worried that a coalition government-era policy not to detain children could be overturned.

      The announcement comes after months of pressure from Tory MPs over the use of hotels for asylum seekers, at a cost of £5.6m a day.

      But it will also be a test of the Government’s ability to override local opposition to build new asylum sites.

      Plans for alternative sites have however triggered a backlash from some Tory MPs over now-abandoned plans to house asylum seekers in Pontins holiday parks in Southport and Camber Sands.

      https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/rishi-sunak-plan-house-asylum-seekers-cruise-ships-shelved-for-now-2239548
      #bases_aériennes #Scampton

    • Au Royaume-Uni, des #barges pour parquer les réfugiés qui traversent la Manche

      Le gouvernement britannique multiplie les annonces censées dissuader les migrants de traverser. La dernière innovation prévoit d’installer les demandeurs d’asile sur d’anciennes embarcations, dans les ports, le temps de leur procédure. Le premier ministre se targue d’avoir déjà fait baisser le nombre de passages depuis la France.

      LeLe feuilleton au Royaume-Uni se poursuit. Les exilé·es, qui en sont les actrices et acteurs principaux, ne sont pour autant jamais consulté·es. On parle d’elles et d’eux comme des « indésirables » qu’il faudrait éloigner, tantôt en usant de machines capables de générer des vagues en mer, tantôt en les parquant sur des ferrys hors d’usage en mer.

      Il y a eu ensuite l’accord non officiel signé entre le Royaume-Uni et le Rwanda, visant à acter le projet de sous-traitance des demandes d’asile à un pays tiers. Un accord décrié et vivement critiqué par les membres de la société civile, mais aussi des chercheurs et chercheuses, qui soulignaient combien cette externalisation venait saboter le droit d’asile.

      Faute de pouvoir encore les envoyer au Rwanda – l’accord a fait l’objet d’un recours devant la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (CEDH), puis devant la justice britannique fin 2022 –, le gouvernement a décidé plus récemment d’installer une barge au sud-ouest du pays pour y parquer les demandeurs et demandeuses d’asile qui parviendraient à rejoindre le Royaume-Uni de manière irrégulière.

      L’objectif ? Dissuader les personnes exilées de tenter la traversée de la Manche, alors que le nombre de traversées n’a jamais été aussi élevé en 2022, et qu’un terrible naufrage survenu le 24 novembre 2021 ayant coûté la vie à au moins 27 migrant·es est venu souligner les défaillances du secours en mer.

      Satisfait des résultats de son « plan », le premier ministre britannique, Rishi Sunak, a annoncé l’installation de deux nouvelles barges pour l’accueil de demandeurs et demandeuses d’asile, d’une capacité de 500 personnes chacune, d’ici cet été. Le gouvernement entend ainsi réduire de moitié la facture correspondant à l’hébergement des migrant·es dans les hôtels du pays, qui s’élèverait à 6 millions de livres (soit environ 7 millions d’euros) par jour.
      Un « plan » qui fonctionnerait déjà

      La toute première barge, baptisée Bibby Stockholm, a fait l’objet d’une rénovation à Falmouth et sera installée au port de Portland, une petite île située au sud-ouest de Londres. Elle devrait accueillir 500 personnes pour un total de 200 chambres, et sera surveillée en permanence dans l’objectif de préserver la population locale, avancent les autorités.

      La barge aurait coûté, selon le journal The Times, près de 20 000 livres (soit 23 000 euros), et le dispositif coûterait « nettement moins cher que les hôtels », a affirmé Rishi Sunak. La ministre de l’intérieur britannique, Suella Braverman, avait déjà affirmé le souhait de freiner l’hébergement des demandeurs et demandeuses d’asile dans les hôtels, compte tenu du coût que cela engendrait « pour le contribuable ».

      Le 5 juin, le premier ministre a tenu un discours particulièrement dur à leur endroit, renvoyant dos à dos les difficultés économiques rencontrées par les Britanniques dans un contexte d’inflation et le coût de l’accueil des migrant·es.

      « Notre plan commence à fonctionner. Avant que l’on ne le mette en place en décembre, le nombre de personnes ayant traversé illégalement la Manche avait quadruplé en deux ans. Mais en cinq mois, les traversées ont baissé de 20 % par rapport à l’an dernier », a-t-il rassuré. Ce serait la première fois, insiste Rishi Sunak, qu’une baisse des arrivées serait observée sur la période de janvier à mai.

      « Je ne me reposerai pas tant que les bateaux ne sont pas stoppés », a-t-il poursuivi, indiquant utiliser « tous les outils à disposition » ; à commencer par la diplomatie, puisque le partenariat avec la France aurait permis d’empêcher 33 000 traversées en 2022, soit une hausse de 40 % des interceptions.

      L’accord signé avec l’Albanie en décembre dernier, pour réduire les migrations depuis « un pays sûr, européen », aurait lui aussi porté ses fruits. Alors que les Albanais·es représentaient un tiers des arrivées en small boats (lire nos reportages ici et là), Rishi Sunak se vante d’avoir ainsi fait baisser ce chiffre de près de 90 %, et d’avoir expulsé 1 800 ressortissant·es albanais·es en l’espace de six mois.

      « C’est bien la preuve que notre stratégie de détermination peut fonctionner. Quand les gens savent qu’en venant ici illégalement, ils ne pourront pas rester, ils ne viennent plus. »

      Pour « sortir » les demandeurs et demandeuses d’asile du schéma classique d’hébergement dans les hôtels, le gouvernement compte par ailleurs se servir de lieux « alternatifs », comme des bases militaires situées à Wethersfield et à Scampton, où des centaines de personnes devraient être transférées d’ici à cet été, et 3 000 d’ici à l’automne. Celles et ceux restant dans les hôtels pourront être amenés à partager une même chambre avec plusieurs personnes, « lorsque c’est approprié ».
      L’externalisation toujours d’actualité

      « Et je dis à ces migrants qui protestent : ceci est plus que juste. Si vous venez ici illégalement, en quête d’une protection après avoir fui la mort, la torture ou la persécution, alors vous devriez pouvoir partager une chambre d’hôtel, payée par le contribuable, dans le centre de Londres. »

      À l’avenir, le gouvernement britannique mise aussi sur la réforme de la loi sur l’immigration et espère, une fois tous les recours en justice « terminés », pouvoir mettre en pratique la nouvelle loi sur la migration, qui permettrait de placer en détention toute personne arrivée illégalement sur le territoire, avant de l’expulser, soit vers son pays d’origine, soit vers un pays tiers comme le Rwanda, avec lequel un accord a été signé en ce sens.

      « Nous voulons que les choses soient claires, a martelé Rishi Sunak lors de son discours empli de fermeté. Je sais que ce sont des mesures difficiles. Et je ne m’en excuserai pas. »

      Dans un rapport rendu public le 11 juin, le comité mixte des droits de l’homme du Parlement britannique a exhorté le gouvernement à « ne pas enfreindre ses obligations légales envers les réfugiés, les enfants et les victimes de l’esclavage moderne », et à « jouer son rôle dans le système international de protection des réfugiés ». Invitée à répondre aux questions des membres de ce comité, la ministre de l’intérieur n’a pas donné suite.

      Le rapport final, qui contient une liste de recommandations telles que le respect effectif du droit d’asile ou du droit européen (comme les mesures de la CEDH), le non-recours à la détention des migrant·es et la protection des mineur·es non accompagné·es et autres publics vulnérables, appelle le gouvernement à répondre dans les deux mois.

      Celui-ci n’y répondra sans doute pas, considérant que la lutte contre la « migration illégale » est une priorité urgente pour laquelle tous les moyens sont permis.
      La société civile ne cesse de dire son inquiétude

      « Nous sommes profondément inquiets de voir que le gouvernement prévoit d’héberger un nombre grandissant de demandeurs d’asile dans des lieux totalement inadaptés à leurs besoins », avait dénoncé dans un tweet le Refugee Council, une organisation venant en aide aux personnes migrantes et réfugiées en Angleterre, réagissant à l’annonce de l’installation de la première barge.

      Sans compter la portée symbolique associée au fait de loger des personnes ayant traversé la Manche – et potentiellement d’autres eaux – à bord d’une embarcation qui, bien qu’elle soit à quai, ne peut que raviver le souvenir d’un parcours migratoire souvent dangereux et des vies que la mer emporte régulièrement, quand elle ne renforce pas le sentiment d’insécurité lié à une potentielle expulsion.

      Le Royaume-Uni a finalement réinventé le concept de « zone d’attente », mais pour les demandeurs et demandeuses d’asile. Reste à savoir dans quelle mesure leur liberté de circulation sera respectée ou non.

      Si le gouvernement britannique assure que la portée dissuasive de son discours et de ses mesures « fonctionne », il serait bon de se pencher sur les résultats concrets d’une telle politique, qui pousse les personnes exilées à davantage de précarité : celles qui n’osent effectivement plus tenter la traversée n’ont que la perspective des camps et de la rue pour horizon, à l’heure où l’État maintient une politique « zéro point de fixation » pour éviter que la jungle de Calais ne se reforme et où l’accueil des migrant·es est toujours plus décousu.

      Celles qui tentent toutefois de rejoindre le Royaume-Uni en small boat prennent de plus en plus de risques, partant désormais de communes plus éloignées des côtes anglaises pour éviter les contrôles et patrouilles des forces de l’ordre, dont les effectifs sont particulièrement présents aux abords des plages servant de points de départ.

      L’association Utopia 56, très présente sur le littoral pour venir en aide aux exilé·es, n’a d’ailleurs pas tardé à réagir aux annonces de Rishi Sunak. « Pourtant, ces quatre derniers jours, 1 519 personnes ont traversé la Manche et nos équipes ont reçu douze appels d’embarcations en détresse. Rishi Sunak, Gérald Darmanin, malgré les effets d’annonce, vos politiques violentes ne mènent à rien, sinon à pousser les personnes à risquer leur vie », a tweeté l’organisation le 14 juin.

      https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/international/160623/au-royaume-uni-des-barges-pour-parquer-les-refugies-qui-traversent-la-manc
      #Bibby_Stockholm

    • Government quietly awards travel firm £1.6bn contract for asylum barges and accommodation

      Fury over astonishing sum to operate barges and run services to house asylum seekers in Britain

      An Australian travel firm previously slammed for its handling of Covid quarantine hotels has been quietly handed a £1.6bn contract covering the UK’s new asylum accommodation ships, The Independent can reveal.

      #Corporate_Travel_Management (#CTM) was put in charge of the lucrative two-year arrangement in February, weeks before the government revealed it would use a barge as its first offshore accommodation for asylum seekers.

      The contract was awarded directly to CTM without competition, and a lawyer with knowledge of the system said the government had pushed a wider deal originally drawn up for official travel “beyond what it was intended to be used for”.

      Ministers have repeatedly refused to detail the projected cost of Rishi Sunak’s controversial asylum vessels, while insisting they will be cheaper than using hotels that are currently costing £6m a day.

      This week, Suella Braverman told parliament’s Home Affairs Committee she could not predict the cost of the new Illegal Migration Bill, because there are “many unknown factors”.

      Three vessels so far have been announced, with a barge named the “Bibby Stockholm” due to arrive in Portland, Dorset later this month and a further two ships set for undisclosed locations.

      Richard Drax, the Conservative MP for South Dorset, said the public “should know how much is being paid” on the barge set-up and said the spending he was aware of so far was “alarmingly high”.

      “The point is this is taxpayers’ money,” he told The Independent. “This contract might actually be separate to what the ports are being paid.

      “Then on top of that, the police want money, the health authority wants money, of course the council wants money, and yet the government continues to insist that this is cheaper than hotels. The overall figure will be alarmingly high.”

      Yvette Cooper, Labour’s shadow home secretary, said the Home Office has “serious questions to answer”.

      “The Tories are spending more and more taxpayers’ money on their total failure to fix the asylum backlog they have created,” she added.

      “This is an incredibly expensive contract with no clarity on whether proper procedures have been followed, and the barges come on top of costly hotels, not instead of them, because of the government failure to take asylum decisions or get any grip.”

      The CTM contract, published under the title “provision of bridging accommodation and travel services”, states that it has an estimated value of £1,593,535,200 over two years and could be extended beyond 2025.

      The Home Office refused to answer The Independent’s questions on what portion of the contract covers barges, and parts of official documents headed “pricing details” have been redacted in full because of “commercial interests”.

      John O’Connell, chief executive of the Taxpayers’ Alliance, said: “This murky contract leaves taxpayers in the dark. The migrant crisis may require an urgent response, but bungled procurement has cost a fortune in recent years.

      “Ministers must ensure transparency and value for money when tendering services.”

      Answering a parliamentary question on the Bibby Stockholm in May, immigration minister Robert Jenrick said it would be managed “by a specialist and experienced provider, which has a strong track record of providing this kind of accommodation”. He added that the provider had “managed two vessels [housing Ukrainian refugees] in Scottish ports for the past year”.

      On its website, CTM describes itself as “a global provider of innovative and cost-effective travel solutions spanning corporate, events, leisure, loyalty and wholesale travel”.

      The firm says it was established in Brisbane in 1994 and has since grown from a “two-person start-up into one of the world’s most successful travel management companies”, operating across Australasia, Asia, the Americas, Europe, the Middle East and Africa. It has two UK offices in London and Manchester.

      The firm’s most recent financial report hailed record profits, having taken A$292m (£160m) in revenue over the last six months of 2022.

      A notice to its shareholders celebrated the new contract’s “significant impact” on financial growth, adding: “This work involves highly complex services and logistic support… CTM has both the experience and specialised knowledge to support this work.”

      The government placed the new barges under a pre-existing agreement with CTM for “travel and venue solutions”, which previously covered official bookings for conferences, flights, train tickets, hotels and vehicle hire for ministers and civil servants.

      A source familiar with the drawing up of the overarching framework accused the government of “pushing the scope beyond what it was intended to be used for”.

      “If products and services are outside scope there’s a procurement failure and the contract has been awarded without following the rules,” they told The Independent. “It doesn’t look like the right vehicle for this kind of contract and it looks like they’ve done it to minimise visibility.”

      The remit of CTM’s government work was widened during the pandemic and its general manager for northern England, Michael Healy, was made an OBE in the 2021 New Year honours list over the repatriation of British nationals stranded abroad during the Covid pandemic.

      A report by parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee found that the operation was “too slow and placed too much reliance on commercial providers”, but CTM was then handed a contract for operating quarantine hotels and mandatory testing.

      In a series of angry Google reviews that dragged the company’s rating down to 1.4 stars, one person called CTM “incompetent”, while another wrote: “Shame on the Tory government UK, on whoever decided to give them this contract.”

      Several MPs raised their constituents’ poor experiences in parliament, with one presenting a formal petition demanding compensation and saying the way the contract was awarded “avoided due process or competition”.

      CTM was later involved in operations to transport Afghans and Ukrainians to the UK, and operated two cruise ships used to temporarily house Ukrainian refugees in Scotland.

      That contract, which was also awarded without competition under the same framework as the new barges, covered two ships and hotels, and had an estimated value of £100m.

      CTM declined to comment and did not answer The Independent’s request for details of what the contract covered.

      A Home Office spokesperson said: “The pressure on the asylum system has continued to grow and requires us to look at a range of accommodation options, which offer better value for money for taxpayers than hotels. It is right that we explore all available options.

      “CTM was awarded the contract to deliver accommodation for the Home Office after an extensive procurement process and has a strong track record of providing this kind of accommodation.

      “We are pleased that they will be providing management for Bibby Stockholm, the two additional vessels announced by the prime minister, as well as bridging accommodation and travel services.”

      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/barge-australia-asylum-contract-travel-b2354578.html

    • Le “prigioni galleggianti”: il nuovo piano del Regno Unito per la prima accoglienza

      L’intervista a Tigs Louis-Puttick, fondatrice dell’ONG Reclaim The Sea, arrestata nei giorni scorsi durante una protesta

      Fanno discutere in UK, e non solo, le “prigioni galleggianti” volute fortemente dal primo ministro britannico Rishi Sunak e il ministro dell’Interno Suella Braverman. Una misura per risparmiare sul costo della prima accoglienza che ora prevede la sistemazione in albergo dei richiedenti asilo.

      “Bibby Stockholm” è il nome della chiatta marittima che per i prossimi 18 mesi sarà utilizzata dal governo britannico per “ospitare” fino a 506 richiedenti asilo uomini, tra i 18 e i 56 anni, in attesa che si concluda l’iter della domanda di accoglienza nel Paese.

      Abbiamo parlato del nuovo piano del governo britannico e della campagna “No floating prisons” in questa intervista a Tigs Louis-Puttick, fondatrice dell’ONG Reclaim The Sea. L’attivista il 18 luglio scorso è stata arrestata «per essermi fermata in strada davanti al Ministero degli Interni con un cartello che diceva ‘Refugees Welcome’ e ‘No all’Immigration Bill, No Floating Prisons‘», ha dichiarato Tigs Louis-Puttick 1.

      Nello stesso giorno la “Bibby Stockholm” attraccava nel porto di Portland.

      Il nuovo piano del governo britannico prevede la prima accoglienza di 500 persone richiedenti asilo in una gigantesca chiatta-alloggio ancorata in un porto nel Canale della Manica, violando la libertà di movimento e il diritto alla privacy.

      Il 5 aprile 2023 l’Ufficio degli Interni britannico (Home Office) ha annunciato l’avvio di un piano per “accogliere” le persone migranti su una gigantesca chiatta-alloggio (la Bibby Stockhom), che giacerà all’interno del porto dell’isola di Portland, nel Canale della Manica. Secondo quanto dichiarato, la decisione è stata presa per “(…) ridurre l’insostenibile pressione sul sistema d’asilo britannico e ridurre l’onere economico che pesa sui contribuenti, causato dall’aumento significativo degli attraversamenti del Canale della Manica” 2. Da quanto emerge dalle dichiarazioni ufficiali dell’Home Office, la Bibby Stockholm diventerà operativa da luglio per un periodo iniziale di 18 mesi, e ospiterà fino a 500 richiedenti asilo uomini, tra i 18 e i 65 anni. La chiatta giacerà in un’area cosiddetta “protetta” del porto, da dove sarà possibile uscire e accedere al centro abitato solamente tramite un servizio autobus dedicato. A bordo, sarà presente un servizio di lavanderia, un catering per i pasti e degli spazi comuni. Sebbene sarà permesso scendere e accedere terra ferma, al momento, per gli ospiti, non è prevista l’erogazione di alcun servizio relativo all’accoglienza al di fuori del porto 3.

      È più che evidente come, l’Home Office miri alla limitazione della libertà di movimento delle persone migranti, riducendola ai minimi termini. Secondo quanto stimato da The Independent lo spazio che ogni persona avrà a disposizione sulla chiatta sarà di appena 15 metri quadri, “la misura di un posto auto”.

      Richard Drax, esponente del partito Conservatore britannico, l’ha definita una “quasi-prigione”, dove le persone saranno lasciate “sedute a girarsi i pollici”. Secondo James Wilson, direttore dell’organizzazione Detention Action (che fornisce supporto all’interno dei centri di detenzione per l’immigrazione illegale), non è che “(…) una chiatta angusta e simile ad una prigione” 4. E, a ragion del vero, è lo stesso Home Office, in diverse dichiarazioni ufficiali, a dichiarare esplicitamente la propria intenzione di “minimizzare l’impatto sulle comunità locali”, come dichiarato nel comunicato stampa del 5 aprile 2023, e ribadito, a più riprese nella Scheda Informativa disponibile sul proprio sito ufficiale.

      Di fronte all’ennesimo scenario di un sistema d’accoglienza sempre più restrittivo e non curante dei diritti delle persone richiedenti asilo, c’è chi non è rimasto indifferente e, anzi, ha dato il via ad una vera e propria lotta per i diritti delle persone migranti. In un’intervista per Melting Pot, parla Tigs Louis-Puttick, fondatrice dell’ONG Reclaim The Sea, che, fornendo lezioni di nuoto e surf alle persone migranti, ha l’obiettivo di accrescere la loro qualità di vita, e aiutarle trasformare il mare da un evento traumatico a uno spazio di libertà e guarigione. A maggio, Reclaimthesea ha redatto una lettera aperta a Suella Braverman, Segretaria di Stato per gli Affari Interni, domandando l’abbandono del progetto, firmata da 706 individui e 91 organizzazioni e collettivi, tra cui Medici Senza Frontiere UK e Sea-Watch. Lo scorso 21 maggio, insieme all’ONG Europe Must Act, Reclaimthesea ha guidato una protesta di fronte all’Home Office, e dato il via alla campagna “No floating prisons” (No alle prigioni galleggianti), che comprende una serie attività ed eventi di protesta e sensibilizzazione.

      https://twitter.com/Reclaim_The_Sea/status/1657692409671630849

      «Abbiamo deciso di chiamare la campagna di protesta No floating prisons per l’approccio generale che ne rispecchia il carattere di questi luoghi. L’attuale processo di ristrutturazione della chiatta prevede l’aumento dei posti da 220 a 500, il che vorrà dire stipare le persone in pochissimo spazio, violando la loro privacy e il diritto allo spazio personale. Il piano è che, direttamente al loro arrivo, le persone saranno sistemate sulla chiatta, che pare non sarà nemmeno attraccata alla terraferma. Inoltre, Portland è un porto chiuso, recintato, non si può entrare ed uscire liberamente. Le autorità potrebbero arbitrariamente decidere di negare il permesso a lasciare il porto e, siccome è un porto privato, non abbiamo controllo sulle decisioni delle autorità, ne possiamo essere certi che daranno informazioni».

      Sui rischi delle prigioni galleggianti, Tigs dice: «La quasi totalità delle persone migranti presenti nel Regno Unito, hanno dovuto affrontare un attraversamento in mare, che sia dalla Libia all’Italia, dalla Turchia alla Grecia o il Canale della Manica. Molti di loro, hanno vissuto qualche tipo di trauma legato al mare. Per ciò, l’idea di farli stare ancora in una barca equivale letteralmente a relegarli nel reale, fisico luogo del trauma. Inoltre, solo il 25% degli uomini e il 18% delle donne provenienti dall’Africa Orientale (area di provenienza di molti dei richiedenti asilo nel Regno Unito) sa nuotare. Dunque, se per qualsiasi motivo qualcuno dovesse cadere in acqua dalla barca o dal molo, rischierebbe seriamente la morte, anche per via delle temperature gelide. Infine, molti hanno vissuto momenti di prigionia nei loro paesi d’origine o nei paesi transito. Arrivano qui e ciò che li aspetta è praticamente un’altra prigione».

      La preoccupazione delle prigioni galleggianti è anche legata all’accordo tra Regno Unito e Rwanda, che prevede la ricollocazione permanente dei richiedenti asilo arrivati irregolarmente nel Regno Unito al Rwanda, affinché la loro domanda d’asilo venga esaminata lì 5. «E’ sostanzialmente una sala d’attesa per chi sarà portato in Rwanda, che non è un paese sicuro, poiché ci sono già tantissimi rifugiati e poche risorse. Come si può pensare di portare qualcuno, che per esempio viene dall’Afghanistan, in Rwanda? Cosa faranno lì? Tutto ciò è solo un’esternalizzazione in stile coloniale delle responsabilità del Regno Unito verso il diritto all’ asilo. Ci preoccupa davvero il fatto che queste persone, possano essere spinte al suicidio, perché capiranno che stanno aspettando solo di essere deportate».

      Infine, secondo Tigs «ciò che sta facendo il Regno Unito fa parte di una tendenza più ampia che sta nascendo in Europa, copiata da Grecia e Italia, quando tenevano le persone in quarantena su una nave durante la pandemia. Nel 2021 ho preso parte ad una missione di soccorso con Sea Watch, siamo arrivati al porto di Trapani con 200 persone a bordo, dopo 12 giorni di navigazione, e un’enorme nave ci stava aspettando, per trasferire le persone dalla nostra imbarcazione. Le persone non volevano andare. Volevano scendere a terra. Avevano paura di cosa avrebbero trovato, di restare in acqua, di sentirsi male».

      In conclusione, sebbene sia la prima volta che il Regno Unito decida di adottare un sistema del genere, tenere le persone migranti il più possibile segregate rispetto alla popolazione locale, riducendo il loro spazio vitale al minimo, operare a risparmio sull’accoglienza ed esternalizzare le frontiere non rappresenta alcuna novità. Al contrario, è solo l’ennesimo triste passo verso una tendenza consolidata, dei democraticissimi stati europei, di lavarsi le mani dal dovere di salvare vite umane, accogliere, e rispettare il diritto all’asilo.

      E’ possibile seguire la campagna e donare per sostenere la campagna contro le prigioni galleggianti e avviare un’azione legale contro lo stato britannico a questo link: https://tr.ee/74EHZPD4rz .

      https://www.meltingpot.org/2023/07/le-prigioni-galleggianti-il-nuovo-piano-del-regno-unito-per-la-prima-acc

    • ‘Cabins slightly larger than a prison cell’: life aboard the UK’s barge for asylum seekers

      Home Office tour of asylum seeker Bibby Stockholm barge emphasises no-frills features including TVs that don’t work

      Each two-person cabin in the Bibby Stockholm barge, which is set to start accommodating asylum seekers imminently, has a small flat-screen television screwed to the wall opposite the bunk beds. Residents will not, however, be able to watch them because they have not been wired to anything.

      The timeline for the arrival of the first group of 50 asylum seekers has slipped from next week to “the coming weeks”, with the Home Office aiming to increase the number of occupants (or “service users”, as barge staff term them) to 500 by the autumn.

      Organising tours for journalists on Friday of the 222-cabin barge moored in Portland Port, Dorset, presented government officials with a PR conundrum.

      To underline that reliance on expensive hotel accommodation was being reduced, conditions needed to be shown to be less luxurious than hotels but not so austere that the barge could be classified as a floating prison.

      Officials have refused to provide any detail about the figures behind their assertion that the barge accommodation will be considerably cheaper than hotel rooms.

      When the facility finally opens, arrivals will make their way on to the barge via a gangplank, and through airport-style security. In line with the Home Office’s prevailing dislike of friendly murals and pictures, asylum seekers will be greeted by plain, undecorated walls, though a simple laminated A4 sheet stating “welcome” has been stuck on the wall of the reception room.

      Windowless corridors, narrow enough to trail your fingers along both walls as you walk through them, circle the perimeter of the barge, with about 50 rooms on the long edges. Empty of inhabitants, the very confined space feels clean and cool, with an atmosphere vaguely reminiscent of a faded cross-Channel ferry.

      Single-person cabins have been refitted with bunk beds to double the potential capacity of the vessel. Each cabin is slightly larger in size than a prison cell, a bit smaller than the most basic university accommodation, and is fitted with a shower and toilet, a cupboard, mirror, desk and (staff are keen to point this out as a positive feature) a window.

      There was a subtle difference in approach taken by the Home Office employees giving tours to journalists and the representatives of the firm subcontracted to manage the barge.

      Government officials were keen to emphasise the barge’s low-cost appeal, but staff working for the Miami-based Landry & Kling, which has been subcontracted by the Australian firm Corporate Travel Management (CTM) to run the vessel on behalf of the Home Office, wanted to highlight the “dignified” treatment that would be provided: a 24-hour snack bar, planned visits to local allotments, proposed walks and cycle trips for residents.

      Joyce Landry, the firm’s cofounder, valiantly described the Bibby Stockholm in an interview earlier this week with the Herald as “actually quite lovely”.

      In the centre of the barge there are two smallish outdoor areas where nets are soon to be installed to allow people to play volleyball or netball and possibly a very contracted form of football. There is a small gym with two running machines, and an education room with just eight seats.

      “The thing that puts this vessel above many others is that every room has a window. You won’t feel claustrophobic. The windows open, unlike in some hotels. There’s enough public space to have a sense of freedom and openness,” said a Landry & Kling staff member.

      The windows offer views of high metal fencing and naval works units. Whether or not residents, single men aged 18-65, who will be held here for up to nine months, will agree that there is a sense of freedom and openness is a moot point. Security staff are being trained to manage conflict on board.

      In the street by the port’s entrance local protesters have been displaying their anger about the barge all week, with some furious at the arrival of large numbers of asylum seekers so close to the small tourist town, and others protesting that asylum seekers should not be held on barges at all.

      Landry has spent the past three nights sleeping on the barge to experience conditions. A windy night prompted staff to request extra tethering to fix the barge to the shore.

      Landry & Kling staff said the Home Office had requested that the TVs (previously used by construction workers recently accommodated on the barge) should not be wired up.

      The Home Office staff said they wanted “to promote socialisation” by forcing people out of their rooms to watch television together in the two communal TV rooms.

      But the presence of non-functioning TVs may also signal a determination by the Home Office to show that its latest solution for housing asylum seekers is merely “basic and functional” and will offer no frills to residents.

      Before it housed oil and construction workers, the Bibby Stockholm was used in the 2000s by the Netherlands to house asylum seekers. An Amnesty report from 2008 documented the psychological trauma experienced by residents.

      The rare Home Office tour of facilities was designed to showcase progress away from housing 51,000 asylum seekers in hotels at a cost of £6m a day to a cheaper alternative.

      However, plans have only been laid out for alternative accommodation for 3,000 people who they now hope will be moved to new, ex-military facilities and the barge by the autumn.

      https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jul/21/life-aboard-bibby-stockholm-asylum-seeker-barge-home-office-tour

    • ‘No timeframe’ on delayed opening of Bibby Stockholm asylum barge

      Transport minister says barge in Portland going through final checks amid row over safety concerns

      A UK government minister has said he “cannot put a timeframe” on when the Home Office will open a controversial giant barge meant to house asylum seekers, which has been further delayed for checks.

      The initial plan had been to move people on to the Bibby Stockholm in Portland, Dorset, from this week, with numbers due to rise over the coming months until the vessel held about 500 men.

      Asked on Sky News when the barge would be available, the transport minister Richard Holden said: “It’s going through its final checks at the moment. It’s right that … whatever accommodation we provide is safe and secure as well. I can’t put a timeframe on it.”

      Asked if safety concerns were delaying the opening, he said: “It’s going through final checks at the moment. With anything you would want them to be properly checked out.”

      The Guardian reported on Monday that the first asylum seekers were due to be moved onboard the vessel on Wednesday but that seems to have been delayed further with the minister now unwilling to put a timeframe on the move.

      Asked if it would be delayed as long as the Rwanda policy had taken to implement, Holden added: “I can’t comment on the ongoing process of checks and things that have to take place but it is my understanding (it is) in its final checks.”

      Fears had been expressed that the barge could become a “floating Grenfell” and endanger the lives of vulnerable people who have fled hardship and war as it has not received the relevant safety signoff.

      About 40 claimants staying in other Home Office accommodation had received transfer letters saying they would be moved to the 222-cabin vessel in Dorset, Whitehall sources said.

      More than 50 national organisations and campaigners, including the Refugee Council, Asylum Matters and Refugee Action, have called the government’s plan “cruel and inhumane”. They said the vessel was “entirely inappropriate” and would house traumatised migrants in “detention-like conditions”.

      People are meanwhile expected to be moved this week on to another site that has become a focus for protest, the disused RAF base in Wethersfield, Essex.

      Local people who attended an event convened by the Home Office in the village complained on Monday night of coming away even more frustrated because of what they said was a lack of answers.

      “It was actually embarrassing. They didn’t pass a microphone around and it seemed to be really badly organised so people just ended up shouting to be heard,” said Michelle Chapman, of the Fields Association, a residents group involved in a campaign against the centre.

      “It ended up being quite heated and people just came away feeling frustrated. If there was one answer it was a pledge that they would not bring in any more than 50 people in one go, but there is still confusion here and genuine anxiety.”

      The meeting, held in the village hall, was addressed by senior police officers as well as Home Office officials. Local council officials were also present at the meeting, where Chapman said there was standing room only.

      A Home Office spokesperson said that delivering accommodation on surplus military sites and vessels would provide cheaper and more suitable accommodation for those arriving in the UK in small boats.

      They added: “The first asylum seekers have now been accommodated at Wethersfield and we are working with stakeholders on a carefully structured plan to increase the number staying there in a phased approach.”

      https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/aug/01/no-timeframe-on-delayed-opening-of-bibby-stockholm-asylum-barge

    • Transfer of asylum seekers to ‘floating coffin’ Bibby Stockholm postponed

      Nicola David of campaign group One Life to Live documents the reasons why Bibby Stockholm is being recognised as a potential death trap

      With the first asylum seekers due to step aboard Bibby Stockholm this week, the controversy surrounding the Home Office’s decision to contain people on the barge has further escalated. Serious safety questions are being raised about the barge’s setting, a berth at the Langham Industries-run Portland Port. As a direct consequence, the initial transfer of 40 vulnerable adults to Bibby Stockholm has been postponed. I calculate that delays to date have already cost the taxpayer over £3mn.

      This is the first time that asylum seekers are to be contained on a barge in the UK, and the scheme is already mired in misery. There were significant delays in dry dock, where rotten sections of the hull needed replacing. And my report found that keeping people on the barge won’t cost less than in hotels, which is the crux of the Home Office’s strategy.

      Now, I have found that the 47-year-old vessel has not yet passed fire safety checks, and there are grave concerns over serious and unresolved (and potentially unresolvable) safety and fire risks. There also appears to be confusion over which safety regulations will apply, given that the site straddles the sea and land and the engine-less vessel is effectively a hotel.

      Clear evidence is emerging that the decision to transfer vulnerable adults onto Bibby Stockholm was premature at best – and potentially negligent at worst. And politically, if safety concerns require the Home Office to significantly reduce the number of people on board, the cost per head would be a humiliating blow to the prime minister and home secretary, who are counting on large-scale containment sites such as this to put an end to the daily asylum seeker hotel bill.
      Bibby Stockholm: a disaster waiting to happen

      Bibby Stockholm was designed to hold 222 people in single cabins, but was recently reconfigured to hold 506 asylum seekers in multiple-occupancy rooms along with 40 resident staff. A further 20 staff will live off the barge; with some of these on duty, around 550 people could be on board at any time.

      This is 248% of the intended capacity – and more than the previous maximum of 472 asylum seekers held when the same vessel was used as an immigration detention centre in Rotterdam in 2005. I am also left wondering whether the barge’s insurers can have extended its cover to this permit this level of overcrowding, and whether they would refuse public liability claims for injury, death or damage from asylum seekers, staff or the port.

      Asylum seekers sharing small cabins will have “less living space than an average parking bay”, according to the Independent. The mayor of Portland, Carralyn Parkes, measured the cabins and found that those for two people averaged “about 10ft by 12ft”. This could lead to serious problems with exiting rooms, using corridors, and accessing fire exits – and it is not clear whether there are sufficient fire exits for the new, higher population.

      The width of the corridors on board is not publicly known, but following a tour of the barge the Guardian reported that they are “narrow enough to trail your fingers along both walls as you walk”. Given the excess numbers of people, this could result in deadly delays, bottlenecks, and trampling of fallen people.

      Bibby Stockholm has three floors and all of the corridors are configured in the same way. There are no external windows in the corridors, and in an emergency – particularly if smoke and/or dim lighting affect visibility – it is easy to imagine that people might become disoriented or be unable to locate the bow, stern, port or starboard sides. This could cause delays and increase panic.

      Factors that would impede escape

      Asylum seekers may have prior injuries relating to war, conflict or persecution, or may sustain injuries as direct result of an incident on the barge. In 2005, when a fire broke out at a Dutch detention centre in which 11 people died and 15 were injured, one man “suffered injuries to his neck, shoulders and chest when he fell from his bed … in panic after realising that the detention centre was on fire”. Either type of injury could impede escape in a major incident. Additionally, those suffering from the mental trauma of war, conflict or persecution may be less able to process evacuation and safety instructions.

      Local councillors who visited the barge on 27 July reported that there were also no lifejackets on the vessel. The windows on board can be opened, but it is understood that this is restricted and would not allow a person to escape in an emergency. Barge operator Landry & Kling also told journalists that there would be no fire drills on Bibby Stockholm.

      Any emergency would be further compounded by the presence of asylum seekers whose first language is not English, or who speak no English, and may struggle to understand verbal evacuation and safety instructions, especially in a state of panic.
      Access for emergency vehicles

      I am very concerned about the capacity of the small quayside compound, which could not possibly hold 550 people in an evacuation. To prevent asylum seekers leaving the site or walking around on the port, this compound is surrounded by a fence at least 15 feet high and is accessible only via two sets of locked gates. In a crush, people simply couldn’t get out. There is significant potential for a Hillsborough-like crush situation.

      The only way for emergency vehicles to access the vessel would be via this compound. Locked gates could be a problem; even with access, how would first-responders and ambulances get through large numbers of panicked people crowding into the enclosed area?

      Physical condition of Bibby Stockholm

      Bibby Stockholm was built in 1976. According to a recent FT article:

      “The hull was rotten … in places the steel hull had decayed to the point where it was dangerously thin, necessitating the replacement of entire sections … Bibby Stockholm was late out of Falmouth for good reasons, mostly age-related.”

      The repair work done at Falmouth may have fixed the localised problems, and the barge may (as the FT found) have passed its Lloyd’s inspections, but the rot and repairs may have undermined the overall structural integrity of the hull.

      This could leave the barge open to being adversely affected by extreme weather, including being knocked against the berth, or by the weight of the additional residents plus the commensurate additional furniture and stores.
      Complexity around safety

      The barge scheme straddles both water and land, rendering safety inspections and certification more complex and potentially confusing. At least five agencies are involved:

      Lloyd’s Register of Shipping
      The Maritime and Coastguard Agency
      Dorset Council, which regulates the safety of the barge
      The Health and Safety Executive (HSE), which regulates the surrounding quayside
      Dorset & Wiltshire Fire and Rescue Service.

      Health and safety concerns

      In the week commencing 24 July, the HSE visited the berth at Portland Port. It found that “a lot” of work was still required to be done by both Bibby Marine and Landry & Kling, the US-based subcontractor for operations.

      Landry & Kling co-founder Joyce Landry has claimed in an interview in The Herald that “fears about the conditions on board have been caused by a lack of accurate information,” and that Bibby Stockholm is “actually quite lovely”.

      Mark Davies, head of communications and campaigns at the Refugee Council, expressed concern, saying:

      “Like most people in the UK, we believe people seeking asylum – the vast majority of whom are refugees fleeing unimaginable horrors – should be treated with decency, respect and humanity. These are values people in Britain hold dear.”

      A 27 July report in the Guardian, highlighting some of these safety concerns, includes a statement from Dorset & Wiltshire Fire and Rescue Service which indicates that they are not yet satisfied with arrangements at the barge. They said they had “conducted visits to review fire safety arrangements on the Bibby Stockholm” and were continuing to liaise with other authorities “to ensure that appropriate fire safety measures under relevant legislation are in place”.
      Questions for the home secretary

      On 18 July it was reported that Chris Loder, MP for West Dorset, has said:

      “For months, I have been asking for sight of the safety risk assessments that should have been done to allow the Bibby Stockholm to be used in Portland Harbour … But visibility or assurances that adequate safety risk assessments have been completed have not been received.”

      Loder has written to the home secretary Suella Braverman and transport minister Baroness Vere to ask that they either stop the scheme or provide the necessary safety risk assessments confirming that the vessel can cope with double the weight that it was designed to bear.

      In May 2023, a caller named Mark told David Lammy MP on LBC Radio: “What they are effectively doing here is they are creating a potential Grenfell on water, a floating coffin … If there is a fire, people will die. In this case, people won’t die from the smoke or the flames, they will die from the stampede.”
      A failure both of competence and humanity

      The Home Office announced its intention to create a series of asylum seeker containment sites last year, but failed at the first hurdle with the cancelled plans for Linton-on-Ouse. The RAF Scampton and RAF Wethersfield sites now have permission to push ahead with a judicial review. Regardless, Scampton has been delayed until October, since the Home Office has failed for five months to survey the accommodation buildings and to engage tradespeople.

      At Wethersfield (the only large-scale site to have received any asylum seekers so far) there are cases of tuberculosis, scurvy and scabies. Legal action on human rights grounds is certain to follow at all sites, involving misery for individuals and a burden for the public purse.

      The Home Office appears to be embarrassingly unable to set up and manage these sites, or to show any humanity towards deeply vulnerable people. It certainly cannot deliver value for money. It is time for the Home Office to hire more asylum caseworkers to process the shameful backlog, and to put an end to large-scale containment – before we start to see them shifting into concentration-like detention centres.

      https://yorkshirebylines.co.uk/news/home-affairs/transfer-of-asylum-seekers-to-floating-coffin-bibby-stockholm-po
      #sécurité

    • Bibby Stockholm: First asylum seekers to board UK’s controversial barge despite safety warnings

      Fire Bridges Union (FBU) have brand Bibby Stockholm a ’potential deathtrap,’ while leaked health document warns of a potential diphtheria outbreak.

      The first 50 asylum seekers will board the controversial Bibby Stockholm barge “imminently," the British government told the BBC’s Radio 4 Today programme.

      The announcement comes just days after the Fire Bridges Union (FBU) raised concerns about overcrowding and fire exit access in a letter to the Home Secretary.

      The Bibby Stockholm, a 222-cabin barge moored off Portland port in Dorset, is anticipated to accommodate double its original capacity, with bunkbeds squeezed into single cabins.

      Narrow corridors, a lack of life jackets, and locked gates could create a “Hillsborough-type crush” and make it a “potential deathtrap,” the FBU warned.

      The evacuation point, a compound on the quayside, has been described by Dorset councillors as “completely inappropriate".

      “Firefighting operations on vessels such as the Bibby Stockholm provide significant challenges and require specialist training and safe systems of work. The diminished safety provisions only exacerbate our operational concerns,” Ben Selby, the assistant general Secretary of the FBU wrote.

      A leaked internal health document has also warned of the potential for “a significant outbreak” of diphtheria aboard the boat.

      It also highlighted the risk of the spread of a number of other infectious diseases including TB, Legionnaires’ disease, norovirus, salmonella, and scabies.

      The first group of asylum seekers was initially intended to arrive last Tuesday, but the date was pushed to this week amid health and safety concerns.

      The Home Office had already been forced to delay the first arrivals onto the vessel in order to carry out last-minute fire safety checks, after an intervention by health and safety officials.

      On Sunday, Shadow Immigration Minister Stephen Kinnock said the opposition Labour Party would have “no choice” but to continue housing asylum seekers on barges if it forms the next government.

      The news comes amid a raft of new anti-migration measures including a huge increase in fines for landlords and employers who house or employ undocumented migrants, and the revival of plans to fly asylum seekers to Ascension Island.
      Floating prisons

      The move to house asylum seekers on the barge in “detention-like conditions” has been condemned by over 50 national organisations and campaigners for being “cruel and inhumane".

      “(This) floating prison is very quickly going to turn into an overcrowded camp like Manston,” a member of Action Against Detention and Deportations (ADD) told MEE, referring to the short-term facility in Kent that was dangerously overcrowded.

      “There’s also a concern about how this might affect deportation,” they said.

      “We know that the Home Office cuts a lot of different admin procedures where they can, any route they can go through to detain people easily, they will do so… having that number of people in unsafe conditions… is a big concern.”

      It is the first time a large floating structure has been used as long-term housing for asylum seekers in the UK. In 2008, Algerian national Rachid Abdelsalam died from heart failure aboard the Bibby Stockholm when it was deployed in the Netherlands.

      Reportedly, guards were warned of his deteriorating condition and treated his heart irregularities with cough syrup.

      In 2022, also in the Netherlands, a major typhoid outbreak aboard an ageing cruise liner infected 52 asylum seekers and saw 20 staff members hospitalised after raw sewage contaminated the drinking water.
      No basic protections

      In the same letter, the FBU also expressed concerns about the government’s plans to exempt asylum seeker accommodation from requirements for a Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO) license.

      In May this year, the Guardian reported the government plans to exempt asylum seeker accommodation from basic protections that govern HMOs in order to empty hotels of thousands of asylum seekers and transfer them to the private rented sector.

      The proposed changes would lift restrictions on electrical safety and minimum room sizes, and exempt landlords renting to multiple asylum seekers from requiring an HMO license for two years.

      “To strip away the very basic protections currently in place is appalling, allowing rogue landlords to house vulnerable men, women, and children in dangerous accommodation," a Refugee Council spokesperson told MEE.

      Care4Calais CEO Steve Smith told MEE that the plans treated asylum seekers as “second-class citizens.”

      “HMO licences exist for a reason,” Smith said.

      “Without them, people’s lives would be placed in the hands of unscrupulous landlords who are driven by money rather than providing safe and secure housing for tenants.”

      https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/bibby-stockholm-uk-asylum-seekers-board-controversial-barge

    • First occupants of Bibby Stockholm barge taken onboard

      First asylum seekers to be housed on floating accommodation in Portland, Dorset, have arrived

      The first group of asylum seekers due to be housed on the Bibby Stockholm barge in Portland, Dorset, have been taken onboard.

      Buses were seen arriving at Portland on Monday morning as activists gathered at the entrance with “welcome” signs. About 50 asylum seekers are expected on Monday.

      The UK government wants to use barges and former military bases to accommodate some asylum seekers after the cost of housing them in hotels soared to £1.9bn pounds last year.

      Their arrival came amid confusion over the government’s immigration policies at the start of Rishi Sunak’s “small boats week”, during which the government is planning a series of eye-catching announcements.

      A Home Office minister indicated that up to 500 asylum seekers could be onboard by the end of the week. But No 10 appeared to suggest that the minister had misspoken. The same minister indicated that the Home Office was examining proposals to send asylum seekers to a UK territory in the south Atlantic. However, Whitehall sources said the proposal was not being pursued.

      The Bibby Stockholm was docked off the Dorset coast nearly three weeks ago and had been empty since due to health and safety concerns.

      The minister for safeguarding, Sarah Dines, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that while only a small number of asylum seekers were expected to be housed on the barge at first, it could increase rapidly to its capacity of about 500.

      Pressed on whether all of them could be onboard by the end of the week, Dines said: “Yes, quite possibly it will be 500. We are hoping.”

      She said the increase in the number of people on the ship would be gradual, despite concerns from the Fire Brigades Union that the vessel “is a deathtrap”.

      Later, the prime minister’s official spokesperson said: “Numbers will increase over time as you would expect for any new asylum facility. My understanding is that the Bibby Stockholm has an upward capacity of 500. We are looking to [reach] that number over time – I don’t think we are aiming to do it by the weekend.”

      Dines also claimed that ministers were “looking at everything” when asked about headlines in national newspapers claiming the government was looking again at sending asylum seekers to Ascension Island.

      Whitehall sources have indicated the plans are not being pursued. The prime minister’s official spokesperson would not comment on “speculation”.

      Ministers have repeatedly said the barge will be better value for British taxpayers and more manageable for local communities – a claim challenged by refugee charities. There has been local opposition to the plan because of concerns about the asylum seekers’ welfare, as well as the potential impact on local services.

      The refugee charity Care4Calais said it had stopped 20 people from being forced to board the barge so far, with referrals coming in from hotels by the hour.

      “None of the asylum seekers we are supporting have gone to the Bibby Stockholm today as legal representatives have had their transfers cancelled,” Steve Smith, the charity’s CEO, said.

      “Among our clients are people who are disabled, who have survived torture and modern slavery and who have had traumatic experiences at sea. To house any human being in a ‘quasi floating prison’ like the Bibby Stockholm is inhumane. To try and do so to this group of people is unbelievably cruel.”

      More than 15,000 asylum seekers have arrived in the UK so far this year after crossing the Channel, official figures show.

      On Friday and Saturday 339 people made the journey after an eight-day hiatus amid poor weather conditions at sea, taking the provisional total for 2023 to date to 15,071.

      Amnesty International UK condemned using the barge to house asylum seekers. Steve Valdez-Symonds, the charity’s refugee and migrant rights director, said: “It seems there’s nothing this government won’t do to make people seeking asylum feel unwelcome and unsafe in this country.

      “Reminiscent of the prison hulks from the Victorian era, the Bibby Stockholm is an utterly shameful way to house people who’ve fled terror, conflict and persecution. Housing people on a floating barge is likely to be re-traumatising and there should be major concerns about confining each person to living quarters the typical size of a car parking space.”

      The government hopes the use of the barge and former military bases to house asylum seekers will reduce the cost of hotel bills.

      https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/aug/07/first-occupants-of-bibby-stockholm-barge-taken-onboard?CMP=share_btn_tw

    • Bibby Stockholm: Asylum seekers describe life on barge

      Some of the first group of men to board the Bibby Stockholm have described their first 24 hours on the barge.

      One asylum seeker told the BBC it was like a prison and felt there wasn’t enough room to accommodate up to 500 people onboard, as the government plans.

      The Home Office says the barge will provide better value for the taxpayer as pressure on the asylum system from small boats arrivals continues to grow.

      Moored in Portland Port, Dorset, it is the first barge secured under the government’s plans to reduce the cost of asylum accommodation.

      Monday saw the first 15 asylum seekers board the Bibby Stockholm after a series of delays over safety concerns. It will house men aged 18 to 65 while they await the outcome of their asylum applications.

      An Afghan asylum seeker, whom the BBC is not identifying, said: "The sound of locks and security checks gives me the feeling of entering Alcatraz prison.

      “My roommate panicked in the middle of the night and felt like he was drowning. There are people among us who have been given heavy drugs for depression by the doctor here.”

      He said he had been given a small room, and the dining hall had capacity for fewer than 150 people.

      “Like a prison, it [the barge] has entrance and exit gates, and at some specific hours, we have to take a bus, and after driving a long distance, we go to a place where we can walk. We feel very bad,” the man added.

      There is 24/7 security in place on board the Bibby Stockholm and asylum seekers are issued with ID swipe cards and have to pass through airport-style security scans to get on and off.

      Asylum seekers are expected to take a shuttle bus to the port exit for security reasons. There is no curfew, but if they aren’t back there will be a “welfare call”.

      The Home Office has said it would support their welfare by providing basic healthcare, organised activities and recreation.

      The first group of men arrived on Monday. The Care4Calais charity said it was providing legal support to a further 20 asylum seekers who refused to move to Portland and are challenging the decision.

      On Tuesday, Economic Secretary to the Treasury, Andrew Griffiths, said that moving to the barge was “not a choice” and if people choose not to comply “they will be taken outside of the asylum support system”.

      “Many of us entered Britain nine to 11 months ago, by airplane. Some of us applied for asylum at the airport. We did not come by boat,” the Afghan man said.

      "It has been two weeks since we received a letter in which they threatened that if we do not agree to go, our aid and NHS will be cut off.

      “There are people among us who take medicine. We accepted. We waited for two weeks and didn’t even have time to bring clean clothes.”

      Another man who boarded the vessel on Monday told the BBC he had arrived in the UK on an aircraft, had a wife still in Iran and had been in Britain for six months.

      The man - whom the BBC is not identifying - said he had eaten a “good” breakfast which included “eggs, cheese, jam and butter”.

      The government says it is spending £6m per day housing more than 50,000 migrants in hotels.

      A Home Office spokesperson said: “This marks a further step forward in the government’s work to bring forward alternative accommodation options as part of its pledge to reduce the use of expensive hotels and move to a more orderly, sustainable system which is more manageable for local communities.”

      “This is a tried-and-tested approach that mirrors that taken by our European neighbours, the Scottish government and offers better value for the British taxpayer,” they added.

      The Home Office says that by the autumn, they aim to house about 3,000 asylum seekers in places that aren’t hotels - such as the barge, and former military sites Wethersfield, in Essex, and Scampton, in Lincolnshire.

      https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-66444120

    • Moment Bibby Stockholm barge migrants are EVACUATED amid fears of Legionnaires’ disease - just DAYS after asylum seekers moved aboard in Dorset

      - All 39 asylum seekers onboard Bibby Stockholm barge were evacuated today
      - It comes after first 15 men boarded vessel in Portland, Dorset, just four days ago

      This the moment asylum seekers were driven away from the Bibby Stockholm after deadly legionella bacteria was found in the migrant barge’s water system.

      All 39 migrants onboard the controversial vessel were evacuated today - just four days after the first 15 men stepped onto it in Portland, Dorset - and are being moved to the same hotel, according to The Independent.

      A 40-seater coach, which had been shuttling migrants to and from Weymouth, was seen leaving today. Inside were two men sat in the middle who turned their faces away from onlookers at the port.

      Other footage of the Bibby Stockholm showed people arriving and leaving this afternoon - with ten people seen walking up a ramp and entering while others left.

      Routine tests of the barge’s water supply were reportedly carried out on July 25 but the results only came back when asylum seekers began boarding the barge on Monday, according to Sky News. The results showed levels of legionella bacteria ’which require further investigation’.

      Home Office sources say they were not made aware of the results until Wednesday, with further tests being carried out on Thursday.

      The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) advised the Government on Thursday evening to remove all six people that arrived on the Bibby Stockholm that day, but the Home Office decided to evacuate all 39 as a precaution.

      The harmful bacteria can cause a serious lung infection called Legionnaires’ disease, which can happen when breathing in tiny droplets of water containing the bacteria.

      Although nobody onboard had shown symptoms of the disease, officials insisted that all migrants be disembarked while further assessments are carried out.

      A letter from the Home Office that was leaked to the Guardian has reportedly informed asylum seekers that they will be tested for Legionnaires diseases if they do begin to show symptoms.

      The migrants will be taken to hotels which are said to be far from Weymouth, where few rooms are available during the height of the school summer holidays.

      One Syrian migrant onboard the barge told MailOnline this afternoon that he had not been given any information and had not been told to leave. He said: ’The place is very empty but no one has said anything to us. We will have to wait and see, but it is worrying.’

      But the migrants were later told they would be evacuated. It comes after health officials ordered six new arrivals to be removed yesterday.

      Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick is said to be holding meetings to discuss the barge, which the Government hoped would house up to 500 migrants. Local councillors have vowed not to see the boat back in use.

      With a capacity of up to 506, the Government is still hoping that use of the Bibby Stockholm, together with former military bases, will help reduce the £6million a day it is spending on hotel bills for asylum seekers.

      But opponents have claimed the barge is unsafe and a ’floating prison’, while lawyers of some migrants due to board this week have successfully argued to allow them to stay in hotels.

      It was only four days ago that the first 15 men were taken onboard the vessel.

      Support workers, who have spoken to some on board, claimed the asylum seekers were not being kept informed about what was happening.

      Heather Jones, of the Portland Friendship Group which is supporting the migrants, said: ’I have had texts and phone conversations from some of them and they are still on board, they haven’t been evacuated yet.

      ’Nobody has told them anything. They have had to ask me what the problem is. One of them was really concerned because he had just drunk a glass of water and he was asking me if he was going to be OK.

      ’I told him it is probably a precautionary measure but they shouldn’t be hearing it from me.

      ’They don’t know where they are being taken to. Hopefully it will be back to the hotels where they have come from.’

      There was a small group of campaigners from Stand Up To Racism at the port entrance holding placards saying ’Legionella death trap’ and ’human rights’.

      Lynne Hubbard, from the group, said: ’The Home Office have admitted they carried on admitting asylum seekers on the barge even though they found out about legionella on Monday.

      ’They would have been drinking the water and showering in it. That shows pretty clearly what the Government thinks of asylum seekers and how much they value their lives. They are heartless.

      ’An asylum seeker in there we are in contact with told us to get in touch with his family in case he dies of Legionella. That’s how frightened they are.’

      A local Portland councillor slammed the health crisis as a ’farce’ this afternoon.

      Paul Kimbdr, an independent councillor, said he thought the outbreak would mean the end of the barge being used to house asylum seekers.

      ’I just can’t see it being back in use. It’s all been a bit of a farce really,’ he told MailOnline.

      A Home Office spokesman told MailOnline today: ’The health and welfare of individuals on the vessel is our utmost priority.

      ’Environmental samples from the water system on the Bibby Stockholm have shown levels of legionella bacteria which require further investigation.

      ’Following these results, the Home Office has been working closely with UKHSA (the UK Health Security Agency) and following its advice in line with long established public health processes, and ensuring all protocol from Dorset Council’s Environmental Health team and Dorset NHS is adhered to.

      ’As a precautionary measure, all 39 asylum seekers who arrived on the vessel this week are being disembarked while further assessments are undertaken.

      ’No individuals on board have presented with symptoms of Legionnaires’, and asylum seekers are being provided with appropriate advice and support.

      ’The samples taken relate only to the water system on the vessel itself and therefore carry no direct risk indication for the wider community of Portland nor do they relate to fresh water entering the vessel. Legionnaires’ disease does not spread from person to person.’

      Mr Jenrick has previously described the barge as ’perfectly decent accommodation’, but asylum seekers who have spent four nights onboard have contrasting views.

      While one Afghan compared it to the former US maximum security prison Alcatraz, others have said it was ’cramped but comfortable’ with lots of facilities.

      MailOnline understands that the legionella bacteria is believed to have come from the pipes on the vessel – with tests of the water at point of entry coming back with no indication of legionella.

      Six asylum seekers arrived on the barge yesterday, and the UK Health Security Agency last night advised the Home Office to remove this group.

      Home Office sources have insisted that the removal of everyone was a ’further temporary precaution’ aimed to ’reduce the health risk as much as possible’.

      The Home Office is now awaiting the results of follow-up tests which have been carried out on the water system by Dorset Council environmental health officers.

      The UK Health Security Agency will then provide additional advice.

      Sources added that it was not unusual to identify legionella bacteria in warm water systems, which is why they are often subject to regular testing in buildings.

      A Dorset Council spokesman said: ’Dorset Council’s environmental health team and Public Health Dorset are advising the Home Office and its contractors, alongside the UK Health Security Agency and NHS Dorset, following notification of positive samples of Legionella bacteria in the water system on the Bibby Stockholm barge.

      ’No individuals have presented symptoms of Legionnaires’ disease, and there is no health risk to the wider community of Portland.’

      It is understood that the Home Office is managing the search for alternative accommodation for the asylum seekers.

      Dr Laurence Buckman, former chairman of the British Medical Association’s GP Committee, told GB News today: ’If you’re unlucky and your immunity isn’t really tip-top, there is a risk that you will get legionella pneumonia and die from it.

      ’It’s potentially treatable but of course you have to diagnose it first. It lives in water supplies. It lives in sink traps, so a U-bend of a sink will be a problem, and it lives in air conditioning units.

      ’That’s why we have what are called ’scrubbers’ in air conditioning units to wipe out the legionella before the air gets blown onto other people, and why hospitals that get legionella in their sinks have a really big problem. At worst, they have to take the sinks out and replace them and the pipework that goes with them.’

      Steve Smith, chief executive of the charity Care4Calais, said: ’We have always known our concerns over the health and safety of the barge are justified, and this latest mismanagement proves our point.

      ’The Bibby Stockholm is a visual illustration of this Government’s hostile environment against refugees, but it has also fast become a symbol for the shambolic incompetence which has broken Britain’s asylum system.

      ’The Government should now realise warehousing refugees in this manner is completely untenable, and should focus on the real job at hand - processing the asylum claims swiftly, so refugees may become contributing members of our communities as they so strongly wish.’

      Meanwhile Fire Brigades Union general secretary Ben Selby said the outbreak suggested it was ’only a matter of time before either lives are lost or there is serious harm to a detainee.’

      He said: ’The Fire Brigades Union warned the Home Secretary that forcibly holding migrants on this barge was a huge health and safety risk.

      ’This outbreak of Legionella suggests that it’s only a matter of time before either lives are lost or there is serious harm to a detainee.’

      And Alex Bailey, a spokesman for the No To The Barge campaign group, told MailOnline: ’This has become Fawlty Towers at sea.

      ’This was inevitable because of the poor advance planning and preparation, the rush and people in power with little knowledge and pushing the experts to break the rules.

      ’This is just another example of the incompetent way our Government has approached this scheme from start to finish. Robert Jenrick promised the country Bibbly Stockholm was safe. That is not the case.’

      Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said: ’Across the country, most people want strong border security and a properly managed and controlled asylum system so the UK does its bit alongside other countries to help those who have fled persecution and conflict, while those who have no right to be here are swiftly returned.

      ’Under this Government, we have neither as gangs are undermining our border security and the asylum system is in chaos.’

      And Kolbassia Haoussou, director of survivor empowerment at Freedom from Torture, said: ’The presence of life-threatening bacteria onboard the Bibby Stockholm is just another shocking revelation that we’ve seen unfold over the past few weeks. This Government’s punitive policies and deliberate neglect of the asylum system is not just cruel, it’s dangerous.’

      Yesterday the Home Office denied the barge was a ’floating prison’ and insisted that those onboard would be ’free to come and go as they want’.

      Gardening in nearby allotments and hiking tours of the area are among the activities which could be offered to those onboard.

      Security measures include 18 guards trained to military standard who work around the clock.

      In total, about 60 staff including cooks and cleaners will be on board the barge run by Landry and Kling, a sub-contractor of Corporate Travel Management (CTM) which also managed vessels in Scotland housing Ukrainians.

      Spaghetti with meatballs, roast turkey, Irish stew and beef pie are on the sample menu to be served in the canteen by Dubai-headquartered offshore firm Connect Catering Services, alongside breakfast and a selection of snacks available 24 hours a day.

      The gym, equipped with treadmills and weights, is still awaiting delivery of rowing machines and exercise bikes. Volleyball, basketball, netball and football can all be played in one of two outside courtyards.

      Most of the 222 bedrooms have twin bunk beds, with cupboard space, a desk, en-suite bathroom, heating and windows which open. But there are also 20 larger rooms which would sleep four people, and two rooms housing six people.

      The bedrooms all have televisions which the operator was told to disconnect but were too costly to remove so can be used only as monitors.

      Instead, residents will be encouraged to socialise or watch programmes and films in one of four communal TV rooms, and can also learn English in a classroom and worship in a dedicated space. A small number of laptops are also available and there is Wi-Fi throughout the barge.

      https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12397201/All-migrants-housed-Bibby-Stockholm-barge-removed.html
      #maladie #légionellose #maladie_du_légionnaire #évacuation

    • Asylum seekers say Bibby Stockholm conditions caused suicide attempt

      Thirty-nine people who were briefly onboard write to Suella Braverman describing their fear and despair

      Thirty-nine asylum seekers who were briefly accommodated on the Home Office’s controversial Bibby Stockholm barge in Dorset have said conditions onboard were so bad that one was driven to attempt suicide.

      A three-page letter sent to the home secretary, Suella Braverman, also sets out the asylum seekers’ fear and despair at being trapped on the barge and appeals to her to help them in their search for safety and freedom in the UK.

      They describe the barge as “an unsafe, frightening and isolated place” but said that as law-abiding people they were fearful of not obeying Home Office instructions. The asylum seekers described the barge as “a place of exile” and said the conditions were “small rooms and a terrifying residence”.

      Some of the asylum seekers have told the Guardian they are too traumatised to return to the barge in Portland.

      According to the letter some people fell ill on the barge.

      The letter says: “Also in a tragic incident one of the asylum seekers attempted suicide but we acted promptly and prevented this unfortunate event. Considering the ongoing difficulties it’s not unexpected that we might face a repeat of such situations in the future.

      “Some friends said they even wished they had courage to commit suicide. Our personal belief is that many of these individuals might resort to this foolishness to escape problems in the future.”

      They said they were the last people to be informed about the legionella bacteria found on the barge and announced by the Home Office on 11 August.

      They said their brief stay on the barge had led to a deterioration in their mental health. “Currently we are staying in an old and abandoned hotel. The sense of isolation and loneliness has taken over us and psychological and emotional pressures have increased significantly.”

      The letter to Braverman concludes with a plea to consider their situation as a priority. “We are individuals who are tired of the challenges that have arisen and no longer have the strength to face them.”

      An Iranian asylum seeker among the 39 has vowed never to return there. He said many of the other men who spent a few days onboard felt the same way.

      “If I had had to stay even one more day on the barge I would have had suicidal thoughts. When I got on to the barge the smell and the stench of seawater was overwhelming,” he said.

      “I developed stomach pains and felt dizzy but I was too scared to refuse to get on. Being on the barge made us feel like criminals and second-class citizens.”

      He added that nobody from the Home Office properly explained the legionella situation to them. “I had to search on Google to find out what it is. Everyone who was on the barge are now all together in one hotel. A few people are coughing and everybody is afraid. When I was having a shower on the barge the water was burning my eyes.

      “Being on that barge will always be a horrific memory in my brain. It’s a completely unfit place. We’re all feeling very upset but are even more upset that the Home Office want to return us to this horror show.

      “I want to ask a question of the people who made the decision to put us on the barge. ‘Would you put a member of your family there even for one day?’ We came to the UK to escape persecution but are facing more persecution here.”

      In response to the letter the Home Office said: “We are following all protocol and advice from Dorset council’s environmental health team, UK Health Security Agency and Dorset NHS, who we continue to work closely with.

      “Further tests are being conducted and we intend to re-embark asylum seekers only when there is confirmation that the water system meets relevant safety standards. The safety of those onboard remains the priority.”
      Bibby Stockholm timeline

      Monday 7 August: The first group of asylum seekers, all men, are taken to the barge by the Home Office. Some lawyers successfully challenged their clients being put onboard. New arrivals said they were shocked by the high walls of the barge, which felt like a ‘floating prison’ and the overwhelming stench of seawater onboard.

      Tuesday 8 August : The reality of life onboard the barge starts to be understood by the men. “My feeling about this ship is negative,” said one. “Right now my strongest feeling is of being humiliated and captured. The government takes revenge on every useful brain and heart. What I mean by revenge is that the British government intends to cover up its political and economic failures by using asylum seekers as an excuse.”

      Thursday 10 August: By this time all the agencies involved with the barge were aware that tests had confirmed legionella onboard the barge on Monday. Dorset council said its officials informed barge contractors the same day they received the test results and that a meeting was held on Tuesday with officials including one from the Home Office. The men continued to shower and use water taps onboard, oblivious to any potential risks to their health.

      Friday 11 August: At 1.54pm the men started seeing messages on social media “that there is a disease problem on the barge and we will need to evacuate”. At about 2pm a text was received that the asylum seekers believed to be from staff onboard the barge telling them not to use the showers for two hours as the shower heads needed to be replaced. At 5pm, a copied text was received from the Home Office describing the bacteria found on the barge and informing the men that they would be leaving the barge at 7pm by bus.

      Saturday 12 August: Relocation to a “disused” hotel. The men begin to process the despair their experience on the barge had left them with. Some said previously they had put their trust in the Home Office to provide them with safety after fleeing danger in their home countries but their time on the barge has destroyed that. “All our hopes are gone. We think now the Home Office is not there to help us. It abandons us to uncertain destiny. The barge has sabotaged hope, trust. Morale among us is at zero.”

      https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/aug/25/asylum-seekers-bibby-stockholm-conditions-suicide-attempt

    • Home Office Faces Legal Challenge Against ‘Appalling’ Use of Bibby Stockholm Barge to House Refugees

      “Human beings do not belong in barges or camps. The correct way to house people is to house them in communities.”

      A Labour mayor has launched a legal challenge to Home Secretary Suella Braverman’s use of the Bibby Stockholm barge to accommodate around 500 male asylum-seekers at Portland Port in Dorset, without obtaining planning permission.

      Carralyn Parkes is a Portland Town Councillor and Mayor of Portland, bit is acting in a personal capacity as a local resident. Dorset Council and Portland Port Limited have backed the claim as “interested parties”, meaning that they will have the opportunity to make submissions, file evidence and participate in the case.

      It comes after a deadly legionella strain was found onboard the Bibby Stockholm. It was detected on the first day people boarded on 7 August, with officials evacuating all 39 people onboard that day, the Guardian reported.

      Parkes is asking the Court to declare that the Home Office’s use of the barge as asylum accommodation is capable of constituting ‘development’ under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, and therefore that it may amount to a breach of planning control and possible enforcement action by Dorset Council.

      Her claim argues that the Home Office is attempting the ‘technical wheeze’ of using a boat as asylum accommodation in order to circumvent normal planning rules, which would apply if the barge was instead installed on land.

      As a result, local residents’ ability to raise objections to the barge and its use in Portland, via their local authority, is “severely hampered”, her legal team says. It also places the barge outside the reach of “important” legal protections such as limits on overcrowding.

      Carralyn Parkes told Byline Times: “In the 21st century, it’s appalling to think that we’ve even considered housing the most vulnerable people in the world on a barge. The accommodation is wholly unsuitable.

      “If the government had put this through a planning procedure, I’m convinced it would have been denied, as the port is a closed area.”

      She added that infrastructure in Portland is “stretched to breaking point” while the barge was originally produced for 220 people. “Now they’re talking about 500 people. It’s completely overcrowded and there’s no fire safety certificate,” Parkes said.

      “It’s just terrible to think that our country would do something like this to vulnerable people, and to ride roughshod over communities…Human beings do not belong in barges or camps. The correct way to house people is to house them in communities.”

      “Portland is not averse to housing asylum seekers. It’s the actual conditions of housing asylum seekers on the barge that is appalling.”

      Asked if she thought the legal challenge stood a strong chance, she said: “I wouldn’t be doing this if I didn’t think it’s a chance of being successful. I’m a private individual taking this on board. It’s a huge and daunting task to take on the whole mechanism of the state, the Home Secretary and the Home Office.”

      While she is launching the legal challenge as a private individual rather than a Labour mayor, she added she had support from Labour colleagues locally.

      Parkes also argues that the Home Office has not complied with its environmental impact assessment duties. An appraisal branded “inadequate” by campaigners was only conducted after asylum seekers had been moved onto the barge, and several months after the Home Office had declared its intention of using the barge for that purpose.

      The claim also argues that the Home Office has not complied with its Public Sector Equality Duty under the Equality Act 2010, which includes prohibition on discrimination on the basis of race, and a duty to foster good relations between those who share a protected characteristic (such as race), and those who do not.

      Parkes and her team argue that the Equality Impact Assessment, conducted only days before the barge came into use, is “woefully inadequate” as it fails to consider the impact of the barge’s operation in radicalising far-right extremism, or the equality impact of segregating rather than integrating asylum seekers into communities.

      A spokesperson for Deighton Pierce Glynn Solicitors said: “Our client is taking a brave stand against the Home Office’s attempts to circumvent important planning rules and protections to use the Bibby Stockholm barge to accommodate vulnerable asylum seekers.

      “She is asking the Court to rule that proper procedures should be followed and that local people and authorities should be given the opportunity to have their say.”

      Carralyn Parkes is represented by Deighton Pierce Glynn Solicitors. She is continuing to crowdfund to cover her legal costs and to cover the risk that costs are awarded against her. So far Parkes has raised more than £20,000.

      The next step is for the defendant, the Home Office, and the Interested Parties (Dorset Council and Portland Port Limited) to respond. If they wish to do so, the deadline is 4 October. After that the Court will make a decision on whether Parkes has permission for her judicial review.

      https://bylinetimes.com/2023/09/12/home-office-faces-legal-challenge-against-appalling-use-of-bibby-stockh

    • Bibby Stockholm gets ‘satisfactory’ test results for legionella

      Results revealed in FoI data follow other tests that found unsatisfactory levels of the bacteria on barge

      The Bibby Stockholm barge has had “satisfactory” test results for legionella, after tests initially found the presence of the potentially deadly bacteria, the Guardian has learned.

      The Home Office, which hopes to hold hundreds of people seeking asylum on the barge in Portland, received the most recent legionella results on 4 September and government sources said they were not planning to make the results public. The Guardian obtained the results in freedom of information data from Dorset council.

      In these most recent results, all the water samples tested for legionella were deemed “satisfactory”, although some of the bacteria were identified in two of the samples. In three previous sets of tests, at least some of the samples tested were found to be “unsatisfactory” for legionella.

      The worst results related to samples from 9 August, two days after asylum seekers were briefly put on the barge. They were removed after just four and a half days. In these results, eight of the 11 samples taken were unsatisfactory and three were borderline. Some of the bacteria found was the deadliest strain, legionella pneumophila serogroup 1.

      A second freedom of information request, to Cornwall council, revealed that the barge was not inspected for legionella while in Falmouth for checks and repairs before it was moved to Portland.

      A third freedom of information request revealed that the Home Office has used water safety risk assessments for the Bibby Stockholm that are more than six years out of date. The Home Office said a more up-to-date risk assessment had subsequently been signed off.

      Apart from the legionella bacteria found on the barge, concerns have been raised about planning, fire safety and plumbing breaches. Legal actions are under way relating to these issues.

      A spokesperson for the Home Office barge contractor CTM confirmed that repairs to the plumbing were under way after an inspection by Wessex Water found failings.

      In media interviews on Wednesday, the home secretary, Suella Braverman, said “various procedures” needed to be completed before people could return to the Bibby Stockholm but that government had done “really well” with its work on the barge.

      Beyond Borders Totnes & District, an organisation that is supporting some of the men taken off the barge, said none wanted to return there. “They found the barge intolerable and claustrophobic. It is utterly prison-like,” a spokesperson said.

      The Home Office said: “We are pleased to confirm that the latest tests have shown that there are no health risks from legionella on the Bibby Stockholm, with individuals set to return to the barge in due course.

      “The welfare of asylum seekers is of paramount importance. It is right we went above and beyond UK Health Security Agency advice and disembarked asylum seekers as a precautionary measure whilst the issue was investigated.”

      Home Office sources added that an agreed programme of work including a complete flush and chlorination of the water had been undertaken and that a water control plan was in place with regular water testing to continue.

      https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/sep/22/bibby-stockholm-gets-satisfactory-test-results-for-legionella

  • #Shepenaset plonge la #Suisse dans un vif débat

    Les #biens_culturels forgent l’#identité des peuples. Le #vol de ces biens est donc un sujet qui agite la société, surtout dans les pays qui possédaient autrefois des colonies. Mais la Suisse aussi abrite des trésors culturels qui posent problème. Le débat est vif, comme le montre le cas d’une #momie à Saint-Gall.

    Elle est couchée dans la somptueuse salle baroque de la bibliothèque de l’abbaye de #Saint-Gall, l’une des plus anciennes bibliothèques historiques du monde : il s’agit de la momie égyptienne de Shepenaset, fille d’un prêtre du VIIe siècle avant J.-C., croit-on aujourd’hui savoir, décédée à un peu plus de 30 ans. Saint-Gall et le cercueil de verre où elle est exposée sont-ils une dernière demeure convenable pour Shepenaset voire, comme l’écrit même la bibliothèque, « le plus beau mausolée qu’on puisse imaginer » ? La question suscite actuellement un vif débat. Lorsque le metteur en scène saint-gallois #Milo_Rau reçoit le prix culturel de sa ville, en novembre 2022, il informe les Saint-Gallois qu’il dépensera les 30 000 francs du prix pour faire rapatrier la momie en #Égypte. Il organise une « action artistique » afin de sensibiliser le public à la cause, promenant une fausse momie à travers la ville et vilipendant l’exhibition de la vraie « source de gêne morale permanente ». Dans une « #déclaration_de_Saint-Gall », rédigée avec le concours d’un comité, il dénonce « un #pillage, un manque de respect ou du moins de scrupules », indigne selon lui d’une métropole culturelle comme Saint-Gall.

    Autrefois enterrée à Louxor

    Que s’est-il passé ? Shepenaset était autrefois enterrée en Égypte, sans doute dans la nécropole située non loin de #Louxor. A-t-elle été « arrachée à son tombeau par des pilleurs », comme l’écrit le comité ? D’après les responsables de la bibliothèque de l’abbaye, ce faits ne peuvent pas être prouvés. Dans un commentaire sur la « déclaration de Saint-Gall », ils notent qu’il n’est pas correct de parler d’un pillage de l’Égypte au XVIIIe siècle et soulignent que, depuis la campagne d’Égypte de Napoléon en 1798, les scientifiques français, anglais et, plus tard, allemands, ont prêté beaucoup d’attention au #patrimoine_culturel de l’Égypte ancienne, contrairement aux Égyptiens eux-mêmes, qui ont témoigné peu de considération pour ce #patrimoine qui est le leur. La bibliothèque illustre cette affirmation par l’exemple du vice-roi égyptien Méhémet Ali, qui, en 1830, avait traité l’une des pyramides de Gizeh aujourd’hui mondialement connues, de « pauvre montagne », et qui voulait construire des canaux en Égypte avec ses « gravats ». La destruction de la pyramide fut alors empêchée par le consul français à Alexandrie, indique le commentaire.

    Une question de #dignité

    Shepenaset est arrivée à Saint-Gall il y a près de 200 ans. C’est un homme d’affaires allemand, #Philipp_Roux, qui en aurait fait l’acquisition à Alexandrie avec deux cercueils en bois, et qui l’aurait envoyée à l’un de ses amis, l’homme politique #Karl_Müller-Friedberg, père fondateur du canton de Saint-Gall. Müller-Friedberg a-t-il reçu la momie en cadeau ou l’a-t-il payée à son tour, la question n’a pas été définitivement tranchée. À son arrivée à Saint-Gall, relatent des savants de l’époque conviés pour l’occasion, Shepenaset fut démaillotée jusqu’aux épaules et, à l’issue d’une cérémonie festive, chaque invité reçut un morceau de tissu de la momie en souvenir. Est-ce là le manque de respect que Milo Rau dénonce ? Il y a peu, l’ethnologue allemande Wiebke Ahrndt relatait qu’au XIXe siècle, les démonstrations de démaillotage de momies n’étaient pas rares et ce, non seulement en Europe, mais aussi en Égypte. On ne refait pas le passé, notait-elle. Autrice d’un guide pour la prise en charge des dépouilles humaines dans les musées et les collections, Wiebke Ahrndt est d’avis qu’on peut exposer des momies tant que cela est fait avec dignité et que le pays d’origine n’est pas contre. Les musées égyptiens exhibent eux aussi des momies ; jusqu’en 1983, souligne l’ethnologue, leur exportation était même légale. Les responsables de la bibliothèque insistent de leur côté sur le fait que Shepenaset n’est pas jetée en pâture aux curieux. Ils affirment que sa présentation est conforme aux pratiques muséales usuelles. Même les photos mises à la disposition des médias montrent la momie à distance, le visage de profil.

    Ces explications sont-elles suffisantes pour conserver Shepenaset à Saint-Gall ? Le conseil catholique du canton de Saint-Gall, un organe de droit ecclésiastique à qui appartiennent tous les objets de la bibliothèque de l’abbaye, semble réagir à la critique de Milo Rau et réviser sa position. Trois semaines après l’« action artistique », la direction du conseil a décidé d’« examiner sérieusement » un possible retour de Shepenaset dans son pays d’origine, et ce en collaboration avec les autorités égyptiennes compétentes.

    Des trésors culturels de la période nazie

    Des débats sur la recherche de l’origine de biens artistiques et culturels étrangers, ou « #recherche_de_provenance », la Suisse en connaît, surtout dans le contexte de l’or et de l’art volés pendant la Deuxième Guerre mondiale. En 2002, un groupe d’experts dirigés par Jean-François Bergier a soumis au Conseil fédéral un rapport détaillé montrant que le secteur économique suisse avait étroitement collaboré avec le régime national-socialiste. Des œuvres d’art vendues pendant la période nazie en Allemagne (1933-1945) se sont retrouvées dans des collections publiques et privées. Aujourd’hui, on estime qu’il est nécessaire de savoir s’il s’agit d’art confisqué par les nazis. Cet engagement moral, le Kunstmuseum de Berne – qui a accepté en 2014 l’héritage du collectionneur d’art #Cornelius_Gurlitt, contenant des œuvres de cette période – l’a rendu visible dans son exposition.

    Le #cas_Gurlitt a représenté un tournant. Dans son sillage, le Conseil fédéral a décidé d’accorder chaque année 500 000 francs aux musées suisses pour la recherche de la provenance des oeuvres. Une somme qui ne permet pas d’aller très loin, souligne Joachim Sieber, président de l’Association suisse de recherche en provenance (ARP), mais qui constitue tout de même un début.

    L’époque coloniale dans le viseur des politiques

    Les biens culturels acquis à l’époque coloniale sont un autre « gros morceau » auquel la recherche suisse en provenance doit à présent s’attaquer. Cela peut sembler paradoxal, puisque la Suisse n’a jamais possédé de colonies. Cependant, pour Joachim Sieber, il est évident que « la Suisse a fait et fait partie de l’entreprise (post)coloniale européenne ». Et c’est précisément parce qu’elle n’était pas une puissance coloniale, affirme-t-il, que la Suisse et les entreprises suisses ont pu, après l’effondrement des empires coloniaux ou après 1945, se présenter aux nations nouvellement formées comme une partenaire au-dessus de tout soupçon face aux anciennes colonies. En effet, même dans la politique, les mentalités évoluent. En témoignent, d’après le président de l’ARP, les innombrables débats, motions et interpellations au Parlement fédéral, « même si cela secoue l’identité de la Suisse en tant que pays neutre et remet en question l’image de la nation égalitaire, solidaire et humanitaire qu’elle se fait d’elle-même ».

    https://www.swisscommunity.org/fr/nouvelles-et-medias/revue-suisse/article/shepenaset-plonge-la-suisse-dans-un-vif-debat
    #restitution #colonisation #colonialisme #Egypte

    ping @reka @cede

  • L’Asie face à la #Chine
    https://laviedesidees.fr/L-Asie-face-a-la-Chine.html

    Souvenir des crimes du #Japon en Corée, éloignement culturel entre l’archipel et la péninsule, affairisme nationaliste des #élites : peu importe. L’important est de resserrer les rangs face à la Chine, dans une « alliance du thé au lait ». En #Corée_du_Sud, la rentrée universitaire se fait à la toute fin février. Elle est marquée par d’immenses beuveries, intensément ritualisées, qui ne manquent jamais de stupéfier les étrangers de passage. Les facultés privatisent des centres de loisirs ou des stations de ski. (...) #Essais

    / #International, Japon, Chine, #mémoire, élites, #Asie, #coopération_internationale, Corée du (...)

    https://laviedesidees.fr/IMG/docx/20230328_chine.docx
    https://laviedesidees.fr/IMG/pdf/20230328_chine.pdf

  • Le vaccin de rappel contre le Covid-19 peut provoquer de l’urticaire chronique Geneviève Dentan - RTS

    Une étude menée au niveau suisse par le CHUV le confirme : l’urticaire chronique est l’un des effets secondaires engendrés chez certaines personnes par la troisième dose de vaccin contre le Covid-19. Cette pathologie crée de fortes démangeaisons et des gonflements.

    Depuis un an, les consultations pour des problèmes d’urticaires sont fréquentes au service d’immunologie et d’allergie du Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV).


    Une patiente a vu l’apparition des premiers signes de la pathologie quelques jours après avoir reçu une dose de rappel du vaccin contre le Covid-19. Elle soigne ses crises d’urticaire, qui reviennent désormais régulièrement, avec de la cortisone et des antihistaminiques.

    « Quand j’ai des crises, je fais des photos », explique-t-elle en montrant des images de ses jambes perclues de plaques rouges. « La sensation est celle d’une brûlure », décrit-elle.

    L’urticaire est chronique lorsqu’elle persiste plus de six semaines. « Je n’ai vraiment jamais eu d’allergie par le passé. Au début, c’était une irritation partout, une envie de gratter qui devenait de plus en plus forte », témoigne un patient, lui aussi traité pour de l’urticaire chronique apparue après le « booster ».

    Les femmes davantage touchées
    Ces cas sont loin d’être isolés. Une étude réalisée à l’échelle de la Suisse par le CHUV confirme les liens entre la dose de rappel et l’apparition d’urticaire. Si en Suisse 100’000 personnes ont reçu la troisième dose du vaccin contre le Covid-19, l’étude révèle que 25 d’entre elles vont développer de l’urticaire chronique.

    Ces effets secondaires touchent plutôt les personnes âgées de 40 ans, ainsi qu’une majorité de femmes, à un taux de 60%.

    « L’hypothèse actuelle est que certaines personnes sont prédisposées à faire de l’urticaire chronique, et au moment où on stimule la réponse immunitaire à travers une troisième dose de vaccin, ce dernier le déclenche », explique Yannick Muller, responsable du pôle d’allergologie au CHUV.

    Démangeaisons et gonflements
    De son côté, Swissmedic affirme prendre en compte ces résultats : "Si nous constatons, à partir des effets indésirables annoncés, qu’il existe de nouveaux signaux qui ne sont pas connus dans les études cliniques des entreprises productrices, nous intégrons ces signaux dans les informations destinées aux patients et aux professionnels. Nous avons procédé de la sorte pour les signaux « urticaire » et « myocardite »", indique l’autorité d’autorisation et de surveillance des produits thérapeutiques.

    L’urticaire chronique n’est pas dangereuse pour la santé, mais la maladie a un impact direct sur la qualité de vie, avec des démangeaisons sévères et des gonflements de certaines partie du corps.

    Source : https://www.rts.ch/info/sciences-tech/medecine/13881562-le-vaccin-de-rappel-contre-le-covid19-peut-provoquer-de-lurticaire-chro

    #covid #sante #coronavirus #santé #pandémie #vaccination #covid #urticaire #Femmes #myocardite #vaccins #effets_secondaires

  • “ Lockdown files ” : Un cynisme meurtrier Sandrine pour BAM !

    Le Royaume-Uni est sous le choc après la divulgation par The Telegraph des "Lockdown Files" : 100 000 messages WhatsApp échangés entre Boris Johnson, Matt Hancock, ancien secrétaire d’état à la Santé, Simon Case, secrétaire du cabinet, et d’autres fonctionnaires depuis le début de la pandémie de Covid-19 en 2020.
    BAM ! a décodé pour vous le Telegraph.

    C’est grâce à la journaliste indépendante Isabel Oakeshott que ces révélations aussi fracassantes qu’indigestes ont vu le jour. En 2021, elle avait coécrit le livre "Pandemic Diaries" (Journal de la pandémie) avec Matt Hancock, qui avait dû démissionner de son poste de secrétaire à la Santé à la suite d’un scandale extra-conjugal faisant les choux gras des sujets de feu la Reine Elizabeth.


    C’est lors de la rédaction de ce livre que l’ancien secrétaire à la Santé avait partagé avec elle plus de 100 000 messages WhatsApp échangés depuis le début de la crise du Covid-19 en 2020. Malgré une clause de confidentialité, la journaliste, connue pour ses positions anti-confinement et outrée par les exactions intéressées et infondées de la gouvernance sanitaire britannique, a décidé de divulguer ces échanges au Telegraph.


    Depuis fin février 2023, le journal les publie au goutte à goutte sur un site spécialement dédié aux "dossiers du confinement"[1].
Isabel Oakeshott, taxée de “haute trahison” par le principal intéressé ainsi que par une partie du monde journalistique, déclare avoir dévoilé ces messages “dans l’intérêt général” soutenant que l’on ne pouvait attendre plus longtemps pour avoir des réponses[2].

    Ce qui ressort des dossiers

    Le plan de Matt Hancock était “de foutre la trouille à tout le monde" !


    
source Matt Hancock’s plan to ‘frighten the pants off everyone’ about Covid https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/03/04/project-fear-covid-lockdown-files-matt-hancock-whatsapp
    Instauration de la peur et de la culpabilité pour immobiliser des millions de citoyens britanniques.
On y découvre une instrumentalisation de la science qui a été déviée à des fins d’intérêts purement politiques par la manipulation et l’exagération des données sur le nombre de tests et de décès liés au Covid-19 afin de justifier des mesures de confinement strictes.

    Mais le ministre de la santé de l’époque n’était pas le seul à vouloir effrayer le public pour qu’il se conforme aux mesures. Les messages WhatsApp consultés par le Telegraph montrent que plusieurs membres de l’équipe de M. Hancock se sont engagés dans une sorte de "projet peur", dans lequel ils évoquent la manière d’utiliser "la peur et la culpabilité"[3].


    Les exemples de manipulation psychologique ne manquent pas :
    • “Quand est ce qu’on déploie le nouveau variant ?” Matt Hancock voulait effrayer tout le monde avec le variant anglais quelques jours avant Noël 2021, sacro-sainte période où les mesures strictes de confinement auraient dû être levées pour permettre aux britanniques de se retrouver, comme l’avait promis Boris Johnson.
    • Dans cet échange avec un fonctionnaire, Damon Poole, le conseiller en communication de M. Hancock, a déclaré que ne pas publier les données pourrait "être utile", car cela renforcerait le récit selon lequel "les choses vont vraiment mal"...
    • On peut lire, toujours dans le Telegraph, que "... le secrétaire du Cabinet Simon Case a suggéré en janvier 2021 que le facteur "peurs" serait "vital" pour arrêter la propagation du virus.”
    • Matt Hancock insistait auprès de la presse pour publier l’étude la plus inquiétante parmi les trois qu’il avait reçues concernant la propagation des infections, alors que les deux autres apportaient des nouvelles rassurantes.
    • Il apparaît également que l’ex-secrétaire à la santé aurait envisagé de menacer un député conservateur de bloquer les subventions pour son projet de centre destiné à aider des handicapés s’il s’opposait à une nouvelle loi de restrictions sanitaires[4].
    
Cette politique mise en œuvre par Matt Hancock avait pour objectif de justifier que les mesures liberticides qu’il avait imposées depuis le début de la crise en 2020 étaient pertinentes et qu’il n’avait pas commis d’erreur dans ses décisions.

    Responsabilité des causes de mortalité dans les maison de repos
    D’après le Telegraph, en début de pandémie, la décision de Matt Hancock, allant à l’encontre de l’avis de Chris Whitty, conseiller médical en chef pour le Royaume-Uni, de ne pas effectuer systématiquement des tests sur toutes les admissions en maisons de retraite aurait contribué à une propagation dramatique du Covid parmi les personnes âgées. Cela serait l’une des cause de la hausse rapide de la mortalité en Angleterre[5].

    Obligation du port du masque dans les écoles, juste pour ne pas crisper le gouvernement écossais…
    Alors que le débat suscitait de vives controverses et que Chris Whitty n’avait pas jugé nécessaire d’imposer la mesure dans les collèges et lycées, Boris Johnson a néanmoins décidé de la rendre obligatoire à la rentrée 2020. Ce choix a été fait principalement pour ne pas heurter Nicola Sturgeon, la Première ministre écossaise[6].

    Refus de suivre les conseils scientifiques
    Les dossiers de Lockdown révèlent également que Chris Whitty ne considérait pas le Covid comme suffisamment mortel pour justifier l’accélération des vaccinations, même pour les personnes âgées[7].
    
Toujours d’après le Telegraph, Boris Johnson aurait également suggéré à Chris Whitty de confiner uniquement les personnes âgées de 65 ans et plus, après avoir lu un article à ce sujet dans "The Spectator", un magazine hebdomadaire britannique[8].


    Au fil de ces nombreuses discussions, il ressort que Boris Johnson changeait fréquemment d’avis concernant le confinement, allant jusqu’à le qualifier d’"absurdité" avant de finalement l’instaurer quelques jours plus tard !

    D’après le Telegraph, son ancien conseiller Dominic Cummings l’aurait même surnommé "le caddie" en raison de sa tendance à "osciller d’un côté à l’autre du couloir"[9].

    On ne peut terminer cette liste malheureusement non exhaustive sans dénoncer le cynisme des dirigeants britanniques quand ils se moquent ouvertement des syndicats des enseignants qu’ils taxent de “bande de fainéants” ou encore quand ils trouvent “hilarant“ que les passagers de 1ère classe se retrouvent dans “ des boîtes à chaussures “ lors de leur mise en quarantaine dans les hôtels. [10]

    L’utilisation de la peur pour contrôler les comportements lors de la crise Covid était "totalitaire", admettent les scientifiques
    Les membres du groupe scientifique sur le comportement en cas de pandémie de grippe regrettent les méthodes "contraires à l’éthique"[11].
Les ministres et les fonctionnaires à l’origine des fermetures étaient parfaitement conscients de la possibilité - puis de la réalité - des dommages collatéraux causés à des millions d’êtres humains lorsqu’ils ont poursuivi cette politique controversée. Ce, malgré les avertissements indiquant que les conséquences de cette mesure pourraient être plus graves que le problème qu’elle visait à résoudre[12].

    Concernant le "confinement", dès décembre 2020, l’American Institute for Economic Research (AER) publiait un article intitulé "Les confinements ne contrôlent pas le coronavirus, une évidence". Cet article présentait la synthèse de 35 études internationales réalisée par l’ingénieur en analyse de données, Ivor Cummins.
En voici un extrait : “[…] mais la question est de savoir s’ils ont été efficaces ou non pour contrôler le virus d’une manière scientifiquement vérifiable. Selon diverses études, la réponse est non en raison de mauvaises données, pas de corrélations, pas de démonstration causale, d’exceptions anormales, et plus encore. Il n’y a pas de relation entre les confinements et le contrôle des virus.”[13] 

Relevons encore que très récemment, le ministre allemand de la santé, pourtant pro-confinement Karl Lauterbach, a déclaré ”Nous sommes allés trop loin avec les restrictions liées au covid” et a qualifié de “grosse erreur“, la fermeture des écoles.[14]


    On découvre également dans un article du Blick de ce 16 mars[15] que Daniel Koch, médecin suisse, directeur de 2008 à 2020 de la division « Maladies transmissibles » de l’Office fédéral de la santé publique suisse a dit regretter le confinement des maisons de retraite et la fermeture des frontières. Il estime cependant que le lockdown de 2020 était une décision inévitable à cause de la pression des pays étrangers.

    Il confie également au journal hellénique : "Nous voulions en fait laisser les écoles ouvertes, mais lorsque la France a fermé les siennes, il est vite apparu que nous devions suivre », Les fermetures n’étaient pas absolument nécessaires d’un point de vue épidémiologique, « mais elles permettaient bien sûr d’envoyer un message fort »."

    Quand on connaît les énormes dégâts à court et long terme du confinement sur l’être humain et partant sur toute la société, ces échanges calculés et fallacieux posent question sur la légitimité pour ces décideurs à être aux postes qu’ils occupent.

    On peut imaginer que de telles manipulations ne soient pas uniquement le fait du Royaume-Uni puisque la Belgique ou la France ont imposé les mêmes mesures liberticides (voire pires). Malheureusement ces pays n’ont pas la chance d’avoir une Isabel Oakeshott parmi leurs journalistes…

    Une enquête sur les dysfonctionnements de la gestion britannique de la pandémie est en cours… mais comme l’a très justement écrit Albert Brie : “En politique, s’expliquer c’est mentir mais en beaucoup plus de mots”.

    Gageons que, des plus jeunes aux plus âgés, de ceux qui exercent des métiers considérés comme non essentiels aux victimes de violences conjugales ou sexuelles, des parents d’enfants en soins psychiatriques aux tenanciers de commerces en faillite, tous en liront les résultats avec beaucoup d’attention.

    Source : https://bam.news/politique/europe/lockdown-files-un-cynisme-meurtrier-lockdown-files-un-cynisme-meurtrier
    Les liens sont dans l’article original

    [1] The Lockdown Files.

    [2] I had to release Matt Hancock’s Covid WhatsApp messages to avoid a whitewash
    
[3] State of fear : how ministers ‘used covert tactics’ to keep scared public at home

    [4] Matt Hancock discussed plan to block centre for disabled children if MP opposed lockdown | Politics | News | Express.co.uk

    [5] The Lockdown Files : Matt Hancock rejected expert advice on care home testing, WhatsApp messages reveal

    [6] Face masks introduced in English secondary schools to avoid ‘argument’ with Sturgeon

    [7] Covid not deadly enough to fast-track vaccines, Chris Whitty advised ministers
    
[8] JIM.fr - « Lockdown Files » : ces conversations embarrassantes du gouvernement britannique autour de la pandémie
    
[9] Leak reveals how Boris Johnson veered from lockdown sceptic to zealot
    
[10] The Lockdown Files : 10 things we’ve learned so far

    [11] Use of fear to control behaviour in Covid crisis was ‘totalitarian’, admit scientists
    
[12] How ministers were warned lockdowns could be worse than Covid itself
    
[13] Lockdowns Do Not Control the Coronavirus : The Evidence | AIER
    
[14] We went too far with Covid restrictions, says Germany’s pro-lockdown minister
    
[15] Coronavirus : Daniel Koch regrette la fermeture des maisons de retraite

    #confinement #enfermement #violence #manipulation #covid #sante #coronavirus #santé #pandémie #vaccination #covid #quarantaine

  • Against precariousness in higher education : 2023 is happening : Updates and Outlook

    Dear Supporters,

    In summer 2022 we celebrated a major success: the Swiss National Council voted in support of our demands to take steps towards a more sustainable academic system. We are eagerly awaiting the fruits of this decision, but national politics takes time. Meanwhile, a lot is happening within the different institutions of higher education. As the cantons and the universities themselves have a high autonomy in the Swiss federal political landscape, this work at the local level is extremely important. Here is a short overview on some of the local developments:

    – After years of hard work, the mid-level staff association in Zurich reached a breakthrough: The UZH is creating new permanent research and teaching positions. Sustainable working conditions and stable perspectives are feasible in Swiss academia and will benefit everyone, in particular the institutions themselves. Additionally, the University will grant an increase of protected research time for PhDs. You can find more details about these developments at UZH here.
    - In Fribourg, similar developments are happening. More permanent research, teaching and leading administrative positions will be created targeting members of the local mid-level staff association. Discussions on systemically strengthening its members’ voices through increased representation and votes in the university’s by-laws and meetings are currently underway and have received support from several actors involved at university level.
    - In Lausanne, the mid-level staff association launched a petition (please sign if you are at UNIL!) for equal working conditions between PhDs on external funding (such as an SNSF funding) and graduate assistants (assistant-e-s diplômé-e-s). The petition aims to reduce the wage gap by doubling the current allowance that SNSF PhD students receive; to guarantee full-time contracts with 70% of protected research time for graduate assistants; and to abolish the practice of multiple successive contracts during the PhD.
    - In Basel, an active group of PhD-Students and Post-Docs is pushing for change. The unionized group is working on power abuse, sexual assault and strategies for a fairer working environment. Get in contact here.
    - In Geneva, we have recently connected with the Association des Assistant-e-s (ADA) of the Geneva Graduate Institute (IHEID), which, together with the Syndicat Interprofessionnel of Travailleuses et Travailleurs, is participating in the local- and national-level mobilisation against mid-level staff precarity. Great to see that the mobilizations are expanding!
    - Actionuni, which is the umbrella association of all our mid-level staff associations, has already provided multiple position papers on the BFI Botschaft / Message FRI 2025-2028 to different institutional stakeholders. They are now preparing for the public consultation period, which will most likely start in June. Actionuni aims to ensure that despite looming cuts to the funding of higher education on a national level, sustainable researcher careers are possible across institutions of Swiss higher education.

    We are happy to see that the work of many mid-level staff associations leads to observable change. For the year to come, we need everyone’s effort. If you can, join your local mid-level staff association, join a union or share this newsletter and the petition academia website with any new colleagues at your institute. On our website you can find arguments and resources (for example the 18 reasons for permanent positions), media coverage and our demands for better working conditions in a sustainable academic system.

    And most importantly, this year for the very first time the BFI Botschaft / Message FRI – the key document that outlines the focus and funding for higher education on the national level for a four-year period (2025-2028)– will go through a public consultation process. This means that the public has three months to provide feedback on the document. We call on all mid-level staff associations to make use of this opportunity and make their voice heard by responding to it. The consultation period is planned to start in June. We will keep you posted.

    In the meantime, we wish you our very best,

    Your Petition Committee

    Reçu via la mailing-list de « la pétition », le 20 mars 2023.

    #corps_intermédiaire #université #Suisse #recherche #travail #conditions_de_travail

    –—

    Ajouté à la #métaliste des fils de discussion autour de la #précarisation de la #carrière des enseignant·es-chercheur·es dans les universités suisses :
    https://seenthis.net/messages/945135

  • #Violences, #interpellations_abusives... : le retour d’un #maintien_de_l’ordre qui sème le chaos

    Alors que le recours au 49-3 a entraîné une multiplication des rassemblements et actions spontanés partout en France, le #dispositif_policier a renoué avec ses travers : #interpellations_massives et mal fondées, violences gratuites, #mépris des libertés fondamentales.

    Les #manifestations unitaires, intersyndicales et globalement pacifiques qui ont rythmé les deux derniers mois ont fait long feu. Elles n’ont ni fait capoter la réforme des retraites, ni infléchi ses modalités. Les responsables syndicaux comme les simples manifestants ont eu beau mettre en garde l’exécutif contre les conséquences de sa sourde oreille – un risque d’exaspération populaire, de « radicalisation » du mouvement et de violences –, il n’a rien fait de cet avertissement.

    Le 49-3 dont personne ne voulait a bien eu lieu, jeudi 16 mars. Depuis, les #rassemblements_spontanés, #blocages, actions coup de poing et #cortèges_sauvages fleurissent partout en France. Comme toujours en pareil cas, des #forces_de_l’ordre sûres de leur légitimité et sujettes à une légère panique mettent un point d’honneur à endiguer tout ce qui déborde du cadre. Lundi 20 mars, le secrétaire général de la CGT, Philippe Martinez, a dénoncé « une augmentation de la #répression des manifestants qui n’est pas justifiée ».

    Depuis jeudi, la majorité des 61 compagnies de #CRS sont missionnées sur le maintien de l’ordre, en particulier à #Paris, #Nantes, #Rennes, #Bordeaux, #Marseille, #Lyon et #Dijon. « Les missions qui relevaient du plan national de sécurité renforcée notamment à Calais ou à Marseille, pour lutter contre la drogue ou l’insécurité, sont passées aux oubliettes, explique un responsable syndical chargé des CRS au niveau national. La priorité pour Darmanin, c’est de sécuriser Paris et les sites institutionnels sensibles comme l’Élysée, et le mot d’ordre est de “disperser tout mouvement non déclaré”, donc illégal. »

    Ce policier n’a pas souhaité témoigner sous son identité. « La situation est difficile. Le jeudi, je manifeste contre cette réforme que je trouve violente, confie-t-il, et je vais continuer », dit-il avant d’ajouter au sujet du 49-3 : « Était-ce vraiment utile vu le déferlement de #colère que cela a provoqué ? »

    « On est à la veille d’une insurrection. J’ai peur qu’un de mes gars tue un manifestant », confie un commandant de compagnie de CRS à Mediapart. « J’espère que la motion passera et que la dissolution de l’Assemblée sera prononcée. On reviendrait ainsi à une gestion plus démocratique du pays. » Ce haut gradé qui dirige près de 70 hommes précise que ce sont les préfets qui transmettent les ordres du ministre.

    « Pour le moment, ceux que j’ai reçus en participant au maintien de l’ordre, dans deux villes importantes, restent relativement “républicains”. Mais il n’y a aucune garantie qu’un drame ne se produise pas », rappelant qu’un CRS a sorti un fusil HK G36 à Nantes, lors de la manifestation du 18 mars.

    « C’est évidemment dangereux et inquiétant que cela ne questionne pas davantage dans nos rangs. Cela montre que des policiers ne sont absolument pas résilients. C’est pour cela que le président s’amuse à un jeu très dangereux qui peut se terminer par un drame, que je redoute : le décès d’un manifestant. »

    « On a été entraînés pour la “percussion” »

    La semaine du 49-3, Mathieu* était, avec sa compagnie de CRS, à Châteaudun, près d’Orléans, pour un « #recyclage », c’est-à-dire une remise à niveau organisée chaque semestre. Le vendredi soir, ces CRS ont été « appelés en renfort pour intervenir dès lundi à Paris ». Pour la seule journée de lundi, plus de trente unités mobiles, CRS et escadrons de #gendarmerie, sont déployées à Paris, soit près de 2 000 fonctionnaires.

    « Depuis le 49-3, le maintien de l’ordre se durcit nettement face aux rassemblements spontanés. Nous avons d’ailleurs été formés durant notre semaine de recyclage à aller davantage au contact des “#nébuleuses”, des #black_blocs », explique-t-il. « On a été entraînés pour la “#percussion”, une technique plus offensive. Dès qu’on les repère, on n’attend pas, on intervient sur eux. »

    Mathieu ne cache pas son embarras sur le contexte actuel et la difficulté de « charger de simples manifestants, dont la cause est juste ». Après les sommations, « si les manifestants restent sur notre passage, il n’y a plus de distinction. Il peut y avoir des dommages collatéraux ».

    Malgré plus de vingt ans d’expérience dans le maintien de l’ordre, Mathieu appréhende cette semaine. « Ce n’est pas tant pour moi, qui suis formé et protégé, mais pour ceux qui manifestent. Sur les rassemblements sauvages à Paris, ça arrange la préfecture de faire appel aux #Brav-M [#Brigades_de_répression_de_l’action_violente_motorisée – ndlr]. Non seulement ils sont utilisés pour intervenir très vite en moto, ce qui peut être terrorisant, mais le préfet a une mainmise directe sur eux contrairement à nous CRS, où on a un commandant ou un capitaine qui relaie les ordres du commissaire sur le terrain et qui peut les adapter. »

    Les Brigades de répression des actions violentes motorisées, Mathieu les a vues à l’œuvre pendant les manifestations des « gilets jaunes ». « Ils mettent le bordel plus qu’autre chose. Ils matraquent dans tous les sens. Après ce sont des collègues parfois mais on n’a pas le même état d’esprit. Il y a pas mal de policiers passés par la BAC dans leur rang et formés à aller au contact, peu importe qui ils ont en face. C’est cela le danger. »

    À Paris, le retour de la BRAV-M

    Les dernières semaines ont marqué un glissement progressif dans l’attitude des forces de l’ordre à Paris. Le 20 janvier dernier, le préfet de police #Laurent_Nuñez revendiquait de tenir ses troupes à distance des cortèges : « Je ne veux pas qu’on nous accuse de faire dégénérer les manifestations. De la sorte, on ne nous voit pas. Ça évite que les militants ultras qui cherchent à en découdre avec les forces de l’ordre ne viennent au contact. En contrepartie, je demande à nos effectifs d’être extrêmement réactifs. Dès la moindre dégradation, ils doivent intervenir. À chaque fois, nous intervenons puis nous nous retirons. »

    À la préfecture de police, certains contestaient ce choix. Les BRAV-M se seraient notamment plaintes de ne plus aller au contact, regrettant l’époque de Didier Lallement. Certaines manifestations ont toutefois été marquées par de violentes charges. Dès le 19 janvier, un jeune photographe grièvement blessé lors d’une charge policière a dû être amputé d’un testicule.

    Depuis deux semaines, les témoignages et vidéos de violences policières se multiplient, de Paris à Rennes en passant par Nantes (où quatre étudiantes accusent des policiers de violences sexuelles lors d’une fouille), tandis que des centaines d’interpellations ont eu lieu. Des journalistes dénoncent aussi diverses atteintes à la liberté de la presse (entrave à leur travail, coups, bris de matériel).

    Selon une source interne à la préfecture de police de Paris, le « #durcissement » du maintien de l’ordre serait lié à « la montée en gamme des violences » de certains manifestants jusqu’ici « inconnus », qui « se radicalisent depuis le début du mouvement » et surtout « depuis le #49-3 ». Le fait que ces manifestants deviennent plus mobiles justifierait un recours accru aux compagnies d’intervention et aux policiers motorisés de la BRAV-M. 

    Mises en place au début des gilets jaunes, fin 2018, et relativement discrète depuis le début du mouvement contre les retraites, la BRAV-M a réinvesti les rues de Paris. Depuis vendredi soir, les images de ces binômes de policiers à moto – souvent comparés aux « #voltigeurs » dissous après la mort de Malik Oussekine en 1986 – matraquant à tout-va, sans raison apparente et sans distinction les manifestants, circulent sur les réseaux sociaux.

    De son côté, la source préfectorale précédemment citée met en avant les six policiers blessés samedi, « dont deux ont reçu un pavé sur la tête », sans s’exprimer sur les violences imputées aux policiers.

    Des #gardes_à_vue sans suites

    À Paris, dès l’annonce du 49-3, la place de la Concorde s’est remplie de manifestants. Le préfet de police de Paris a bien tenté d’interdire ce rassemblement, déposé à l’avance par Solidaires, mais le tribunal administratif lui a donné tort.

    À l’issue de ces quelques heures sur la place, 292 personnes ont été arrêtées à Paris (sur 310 en France). Ces interpellations, mal motivées, ont cependant débouché sur un résultat judiciaire ridicule : seules neuf personnes ont été déférées devant la justice, et encore, pour « des avertissements probatoires solennels, des classements sous condition ou encore une contribution citoyenne », écrit BFMTV. Soit les sanctions les plus basses possibles.

    64 personnes ont encore été interpellées vendredi soir à Paris, dont 58 libérées sans aucune charge au bout de quelques heures. Dans certains cas, cela a duré un peu plus longtemps. Dans une séquence filmée par le correspondant de l’agence de presse turc Anadolu, une jeune femme se débat et essaie d’expliquer qu’elle « n’a rien fait ». La scène a lieu aux environs de 21 h 45, place de la Concorde.

    « Je respire pas, s’époumone une jeune femme au visage cramoisi.

    -- Laisse-toi faire, tu respires ! », lui rétorque le policier qui l’étrangle.

    Celle qui est aussi violemment interpellée, Chloé Gence, est développeuse web du Média. Mais comme le précisera dans un communiqué son employeur, elle a l’habitude de couvrir certaines manifestations et mouvements sociaux. Selon Le Média, Chloé était en train de « capter des images » avec d’autres journalistes, vendredi soir, quand elle a été « arrêtée de manière très brutale par les forces de l’ordre ».

    Chloé Gence est ensuite conduite en garde à vue. Malgré l’assistance d’un avocat et « les preuves qu’elle couvrait bien la manifestation pour Le Média », sa garde à vue est prolongée. Dimanche, #Chloé_Gence finit par sortir du commissariat, libre, sans qu’aucune charge ne soit retenue contre elle. Au bout de 40 heures…

    Un autre journaliste, #Paul_Ricaud, a subi le même sort que Chloé. Le Syndicat national des journalistes (SNJ) a dénoncé samedi, dans un communiqué, ces nouvelles atteintes à la liberté de la presse. Le syndicat regrette qu’après une période durant laquelle « les relations entre forces de l’ordre et journalistes paraissaient s’être apaisées », cela ne soit plus le cas depuis le 7 mars. « Nous voyons, à nouveau, des tensions comme sous l’ère Lallement, déplore le SNJ. Les forces de l’ordre semblent désormais vouloir réprimer durement le mouvement d’opposition à la réforme. »

    Depuis samedi, il est de nouveau interdit de manifester place de la Concorde. Ce nouvel arrêté préfectoral (qui n’a toutefois pas été publié) a entraîné une dissémination des rassemblements parisiens vers d’autres lieux. Samedi soir, 169 interpellations ont eu lieu en France, dont 122 à Paris (principalement dans le XIIIe arrondissement et place de la Concorde), donnant lieu à 118 gardes à vue (dont douze mineurs). Sollicité pour connaître les suites judiciaires détaillées des interpellations du weekend, le parquet de Paris n’a pas donné suite. Depuis, la préfecture a pris un nouvel arrêté que nous publions ici.

    Ces arrestations massives, donnant lieu à un maigre résultat judiciaire, rappellent les interpellations « préventives » assumées par le parquet de Paris lors du mouvement des gilets jaunes, en 2018-2019. À l’époque, le procureur Rémy Heitz (désormais procureur général) assumait ses objectifs dans une note interne : empêcher les gardés à vue de « retourner grossir les rangs des fauteurs de troubles », quitte à les priver illégalement de liberté plus longtemps que nécessaire.

    Dans un communiqué diffusé lundi 20 mars, le Syndicat de la magistrature (classé à gauche) rappelle que « l’autorité judiciaire n’est pas au service de la répression du mouvement social », condamne « toutes les violences policières illégales » et déplore une « utilisation dévoyée de la garde à vue qui illustre les dérives du maintien de l’ordre, qui détourne l’appareil judiciaire pour le mettre entièrement à son service ».

    « #Nasses », #charges et « #intimidation »

    De son côté, le Syndicat des avocats de France dénonce une « réaction une fois de plus démesurée et particulièrement violente » face aux mouvements spontanés, citant notamment l’utilisation de la technique de la « nasse », « jugée illégale par le Conseil d’État ».

    Cette #technique_policière, consistant à encercler et retenir un groupe de manifestants sans leur laisser d’issue, avait été largement utilisée pendant les mouvements contre la loi « travail » (2016), des gilets jaunes (2018-2019), contre la loi « sécurité globale » et la précédente réforme des retraites (2019-2020). En juin 2021, le Conseil d’État avait annulé les dispositions sur la « nasse » dans le Schéma national du maintien de l’ordre (SNMO) mis au point par Gérald Darmanin un an plus tôt. Il considérait que cette technique était « susceptible d’affecter significativement la liberté de manifester et de porter atteinte à la liberté d’aller et venir » lorsqu’elle ne laisse pas d’échappatoire.

    Le Syndicat des avocats de France s’inquiète également de #charges_sans_sommation, de #coups_de_matraques aléatoires et d’une « intimidation des manifestant·es ». Il appelle le ministère de l’intérieur à « mettre un terme immédiatement à cette escalade de la violence » et les magistrats à « faire preuve d’indépendance et de responsabilité » devant les affaires qui leur sont confiées par la police.

    De nombreuses vidéos montrent aussi des membres des forces de l’ordre sans #numéro_d’identification sur leur uniforme (numéro #RIO), malgré son caractère obligatoire régulièrement rappelé par la hiérarchie.

    À Lille, le soir du 16 mars, la police a violemment chargé le cortège des Jeunes communistes faisant deux blessés graves parmi leur service d’ordre. L’un a eu des points de suture sur le crâne, le second, l’épaule fracturée. « On s’est retrouvés complètement séparés du cortège syndical, gazés devant et derrière, et finalement seuls dans les petites rues de Lille, explique Pierre Verquin, coordinateur départemental des Jeunes communistes, à Mediapart. On avait deux cents jeunes avec nous, on s’est fait charger à ce moment-là, alors que le cortège ne présentait aucun danger. Tout le monde s’est pris des coups. Les gens à l’arrière se sont pris d’énormes coups de matraque aussi. » La Ligue des droits de l’Homme (LDH) a demandé au préfet du Nord « des explications sur les dérives brutales qui ont émaillé le maintien de l’ordre à Lille en cette soirée du 16 mars ».

    Le même jour, 14 personnes sont interpellées à Rennes pour des violences, des dégradations et des pillages dans le centre-ville. À la différence de Paris, la quasi-totalité fait l’objet de poursuites. Le lendemain, le ministre de l’intérieur annonce l’envoi à Rennes de la #CRS_8, une « #supercompagnie » créée en 2021 pour répondre en urgence à des « #violences_urbaines » sur n’importe quel point du territoire.

    https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/france/200323/violences-interpellations-abusives-le-retour-d-un-maintien-de-l-ordre-qui-

    –---

    Les déclarations de deux policiers ont été ajoutées à cette métaliste de #témoignages de #forces_de_l'ordre, #CRS, #gardes-frontière, qui témoignent de leur métier :
    https://seenthis.net/messages/723573

  • Déboîter le corps social

    Dominer c’est martyriser, tailler, couper dans la chair et les graisses depuis toujours. Mais pour percevoir l’inventivité clinique de l’appareil d’État macronien, il faut se rendre sur le boulevard pour comprendre comment se déploie en ce moment sur des populations entières un art médical instruit des derniers progrès d’une chirurgie orthopédique des âmes. Ce savoir anatomique concerne tous les membres du corps social : avec ses os, tendons, jointures, articulations, et surtout... ses nerfs. Le projet de Macron c’est de déboîter tout un peuple. Écraser « ceux qui ne sont rien », "emmerder jusqu’au bout" la France entière et se venger des Gilet Jaunes sont maintenant les uniques obsessions du tyran loin de toute préoccupation d’ordre politique. À revers de ce supplice raffiné, l’implication des corps disloqués fait la solidarité des chairs impatientes. Emmerdons l’emmerdeur... jusqu’au bout.

    GREY BLOC

    La manifestation précédant celle du samedi 11 mars avait été un magnifique feu d’artifice sur l’avenue Daumesnil avec ses guirlandes de poubelles incendiées pour fêter la grève des éboueurs. C’est pour cela que pour la manifestation suivante, celle du mercredi 15 mars, le plus tout à fait nouveau préfet de police Laurent Nuñez avait fait annoncer par son grand ami, le directeur du très droitard Le Parisien, la présence de 1400 « casseurs » pour une occasion inespérée de venger l’affront.

    Et l’on allait voir ce qu’on allait voir, parce que Laurent Nuñez est au maintien de l’ordre ce que Chanel est à la haute-couture française : une exigence de raffinement jamais démentie. Laurent Nuñez, ce n’est pas ce rustre de Lallemant, ce kéké de sous-préfecture qui se prend pour Goebbels quand il chevauche sa Harley. Laurent Nuñez c’est la manière espagnole, à l’opposé d’une brutalité trop manifestement germanique (énorme bourde au pays de l’Occupation).

    Laurent Nuñez, c’est le doigté du flamenco, l’esprit de finesse du jésuite Baltasar Gracián allié à la rouerie du courtisan du siècle d’or. Nuñez-le débonnaire, à la bedaine stoïque de Sancho Panza est là pour faire oublier le futur projet d’« immigration-remigration » du triste sieur Darmanin. Avez-vous remarqué qu’invité au bal, l’ingénieux hidalgo de Tourcoing aiguise en ce moment sa petite moustache franquiste ? Conduite par ce triste attelage, la manifestation du 15 mars fit symptôme en terme d’exotisme et du point de vue de l’art des castagnettes.

    Arrivé sur place : « Surprise, surprise ! ». Les 1400 « casseurs » annoncés en Guests Stars du Parisien ne font pas cortège de tête. Que se passe-t-il ? La réalité c’est qu’à la place du Black Bloc, un immense GREY Bloc, cortège aux tempes grisonnantes, a remplacé la matière noire en tête de manif. Quel est ce prodige ? De pauvres cassos auraient-ils remplacé les authentiques « casseurs » ?

    Tout cette chair sent la douleur : l’épaule fatiguée côtoie les lombaires usées, la jambe qui flagelle négocie avec l’épicondylite du coude. Les doigts craquellent aux jointures non loin des poignets engourdis. L’arthrite du genou s’enflamme.

    Le Grey Bloc c’est un système de vases communicants : des milliers de gens en ont marre de la foire du Trône et des flonflon de l’arrière, ils sont venus chercher autre chose à l’avant, histoire de refaire corps ensemble quand la carcasse flanche. On avait promis de bloquer le pays, mais sans jamais appeler à la grève générale c’est peut-être ce qui rassembla ces corps cassés pour refaire solidarité.

    Pour la préfecture c’est une tuile, les invités VIP ne sont pas venus à la fête. Qu’allait on faire des pétards, des cotillons, des pandores frisés, lustrés, enrubannés, tout costumés pour la parade ? La maréchaussée arrive très excitée par la promesse d’une vengeance-spectacle. L’effroyable et vivante mêlée qui la nargue depuis des années doit mériter le Waterloo de ce jour. Mais là, que faire avec cette bande de bras cassés, cour des miracles en goguette qui traîne ses jointures usées sur le boulevard ?
    Port Royal, Port Royal, morne plaine

    Il est un fait que c’est en cet endroit funeste que le buffet a été servi, tout proche de l’entrée des urgences de l’hôpital Cochin, là où le boulevard du Port-Royal s’élargit. Les urgences de Cochin c’est le mur des fédérés de la Génération 2018, avec ses quatre-vingts Gilets Jaunes admis aux urgences chaque soir de manifestation.

    Mais ce jour ci, point de Black Bloc ni de Gilets d’or. La plus haute technologie policière a donc été convoquée pour rien. Fiasco. La maréchaussée trépigne. Rage, rage, pleurs de rage. Port Royal, Port Royal, morne plaine.

    Que faire ? Où trouver « casseur » à casser ? Impossible de battre retraite sans avoir déboîté du Black Bloc. Dans la tête du préfet c’est la danse mauresque l’obsession des « casseurs » tourne et retourne à toute vitesse. On avait bien précisé qu’à seize heures tapantes, c’était l’heure du goûter gendarmesque. C’est pourquoi, lui d’habitude si stoïque, si modéré, si distingué, si Todo su control, le voilà devenu Don Quichotte hallucinant des moulins à vents. Autant de bras battant des ailes dans sa cervelle en tourmente.

    C’est pourquoi à cette heure funeste le pauvre Grey Bloc fut pris à partie. Sur ordre du préfet, la maréchaussée se jette sur les crinières poivre et sel en une immense clameur : « -Faute de grive mangeons du merle ! ». Sous l’effet d’une gigantesque tenaille très clairement préméditée, des centaines de boucliers fondent sur une foule de paisibles préretraités. Innocentes victimes que l’idée de fuir ne traverse même pas.

    Est-ce par effet d’une fascination pour l’objet de leur perpétuel désir que les pandores chargent le retraité en essaim, façon Black Bloc ? Mais là où le Bloc charge en essaim c’est pour taper quelque banque - comme pique une abeille pour rappeler qu’elle existe - ; alors qu’ici, c’est l’attaque des frelons asiatiques, espèces invasives venues d’ailleurs, hordes qui ne connaissent d’autre loi que la leur.

    En un immense bourdonnement toute une colonie de frelons se précipite sur moi sans raison. Ils sont plus d’une centaine, la masse compacte et affamée se jette sur moi. Arthrose, arthrite, seul au milieu du boulevard, vont-il voir que je boîte ? Quand il s’approche, l’insecte aveugle est guidé par l’odeur du sang, seuls le guide les aboiements de sa hiérarchie. Les uniformes-carapaces font méga-thorax, mais derrière les hublots, je vois leur yeux-lucarnes comme dans un bocal. À moins qu’il ne porte talonnettes, l’insecte me dépasse d’une bonne toise. C’est lorsque je me retourne que le plat d’un bouclier s’abat lâchement sur l’épaule. Plat contre omoplate, l’effet de masse des corps blindés, caparaçonnés, soudés est tel que l’onde de choc destructrice se propage à toute vitesse dans mes organes. Omoplate, humérus et clavicule divorcent. Ma ceinture scapulaire ne tient plus mon corps Impression d’être fauché par une voiture sur le boulevard.

    Sensation de démembrement étrange.

    Ensuite, sensation de vol, puis effroyable choc : l’asphalte du sol me retombe lourdement sur le dos. Des médics m’entourent. L’intensité de la douleur me submerge. Je perds connaissance. Mes deux bras ne peuvent plus bouger, me voilà devenu pingouin. Je rampe jusqu’aux urgences sur le boulevard-banquise. Je cherche le « Service des fauchés sur le pavé ». Quelle est la nouvelle méthode du gouvernement Macron ? Planquer les blessés dans les statistiques des piétons écrasés ? J’y pense très fort tellement cela ressemble à un accident de la circulation.

    Je suis maintenant sur un lit, dans une chambre d’isolement. On me demande si je fume. La chicha me réconfortera m’assure-t-on. Un aide-soignant me tend une pipe. Je peux lire : « Penthrox ». Selon le dictionnaire Vidal :

    « Un nouvel antalgique non opioïde indiqué dans le soulagement d’urgence des douleurs sévères associées à un traumatisme chez des patients adultes conscients. Son utilisation est limitée à un usage professionnel, notamment au sein des services d’accueil des urgences, SAMU et SMUR. »

    Face aux violences d’État, les labos ont travaillé, tout est prévu. Ils font circuler dans les services un médicament qu’on utilisait dans les années 2000 en maternité. C’est devenu la chicha du manifestant, le produit phare du moment. Ce shoot à l’avantage de permettre une réduction de n’importe quelle fracture à chaud sans anesthésie.

    Caressante extase, au gré des fumées grises, une nuit sans rêve me submerge comme un brouillard.
    Balistique des corps

    La nuit donne à penser. À la réflexion, cent corps soudés comme de lourds wagons d’un convoi de marchandises visent un transfert de masse maximale (on n’arrête pas facilement un train). Toute cette pantomime n’était pas faite de gestes gesticulés, hasardeux. C’est de toute évidence une technique, précise, méditée, longuement répétée : martyriser est un métier. Le cohérence du dispositif vise à maximiser l’onde de choc pour faire le plus de dégâts possibles en interne.

    Le calcul balistique est simple : on charge à deux-cent sur un piéton-cible afin créer une onde de choc maximale. L’impact cause un choc piéton identique au capot d’une voiture lancée sur un corps humain à pleine vitesse. À cette différence près que le bouclier pare-buffles des condés démultiplie la force du coup porté en percussion frontale.

    Pour une course à une vitesse entre 10 et 15 km/h, avec un tel transfert de masse, les blessures graves sont inévitables. Les plus fréquentes sont des contusions, des déboîtements, des fractures de l’omoplate, de l’épaule et du bras, sans compter de multiples lésions invisibles en interne. S’ajoute la probabilité d’un traumatisme crânien en réception dorsale.

    Tout cela sent le bloc opératoire. Des médecins ont-il appris aux forces de l’ordre la manière d’opérer ? C’est donc cela le secret du docteur Nuñez, ce chirurgien orthopédique boulevardier ? On crée à grande échelle des traumatismes qui ressemblent à des accidents de la route, mais sans ouvrir les chairs ni faire couler le sang, et sans barbaque sur la chaussée. Voilà la trouvaille !

    C’est ainsi qu’on réchauffe d’anciennes recettes tout en faisant une mise à jour de l’appareil technique des violences d’État. D’un côté on retourne aux classiques : le coup de bottin de commissariat ce sont les films policiers des années cinquante, ils ne laissent aucune trace sur la victime. De l’autre on industrialise la besogne sur des foules entières en recrutant des milliers d’exécutants pour rendre le geste efficace à grande échelle.

    Le sang qui coule, le steak haché qui s’exhibe sur les écrans au vingt heures pendant le repas du soir, cela fait toujours mauvais genre à l’international, surtout devant les expert de l’ONU. Après ça, comment vendre le « pays des droits de l’homme », cette plus value des sacs de marque qu’achètent les touristes chinois ? C’est la raison pour laquelle, plutôt que de faire un exemple spectaculaire, mille contusions invisibles propagent une onde de choc beaucoup plus large sur les populations, ce qui permet aussi d’occuper les légions de gendarmes que ce gouvernement a embauché depuis les Gilets Jaunes.

    La nouvelle tactique c’est le coup de Bottin collectif informé des derniers progrès de la chirurgie orthopédique. Flash ball ou Tonfa, les armes utilisées contre les Gilets jaunes produisaient des blessures individualisantes et fabriquaient autant de martyrs identifiables dont tout le monde sait les noms. Ici, la peine est collective, la nouvelle arme de guerre c’est la collision sur le boulevard. Percutez tant que vous pouvez, il en restera toujours quelque chose.
    Fractures sociales (Châtiments sans peine)

    Comme un coup de crosse, la tonfa du temps des Gilets Jaunes ouvre le crâne des sourcils à la nuque, c’est une technique de guerre à part entière. Il s’agit d’inonder de son sang un adversaire afin de l’immobiliser dans son élan, ce qui démoralise simultanément ses camarades. L’objectif c’est l’écœurement : pendant l’hiver 2018, combien de médics ont vomi dans les douches les soirs de manifestations ?

    Ici rien de tel. Les « contusions », dans le milieu médical tout le monde sait ce que cela veut dire : rien de précis . Quand il s’agit de déboîter les membres, de contusionner des corps, de traumatiser en interne sans faire couler le sang ni ouvrir les chairs, l’agression doit être invisible à la caméra et ne laisser aucune trace sur les réseaux. Mais ce n’est pas le seul avantage de cette technique. Les chocs frontaux opérés à coup de boucliers permettent d’établir un catalogue raisonné de châtiments corporels infligés directement sur la victime. Le choix des victimes a lieu au juger, c’est à dire sans jugement.

    Pour preuve de la banalisation de ces pratiques, un policier propose sur une vidéo récente, face à la caméra, de casser le bras d’un manifestant qui ne facilite pas son arrestation.

    On est là largement en dehors du droit puisque c’est la police qui se fait juge d’une peine immédiate. Aucun tribunal d’aucun État de droit, aucune société dite « civilisée » ne peut prescrire ce genre de peine.

    Petit catalogue des châtiments :

    -- La moindre « contusion » c’est entre une et deux semaines de soins, cela peut aller jusqu’à six mois.
    -- Une clavicule cassée c’est 6 semaines d’immobilisation.
    -- Un humérus fracturé c’est 6 semaines d’immobilisation et deux mois de convalescence.
    -- Une omoplate cassée, c’est 6 à 9 semaines de soins.
    -- Une épaule cassée c’est deux ans de soins.
    -- Une atteinte de la coiffe des rotateurs c’est la condamnation à perpétuité.
    (L’atteinte est répertoriée comme invalidité de guerre sur les sites d’anciens combattants).

    L’objectif c’est la « rééducation ». Les frais de rééducation nécessitent plusieurs semaines, voire des mois de réadaptation, cela donne le temps de réfléchir. Les ostéopathes ne sont pas remboursés, tout cela se fera donc aux frais des victimes, c’est une nouvelle peine d’amende à part entière. La méthode est simple, discrète, efficace et permet d’appliquer directement peines et châtiments sans passer par d’interminables procédures ou juridictions complexes.

    À cela s ’ajoute que les services d’urgence, qui n’ont pas de temps à perdre, vous déclarent en bonne santé aussitôt passé le cap de la radio (qui ne voit que les fractures). Sans perte de connaissance, les blessés sont directement renvoyés chez eux, sans IRM, échographie ni Scanner. Pour ce qui est des lésions plus graves, il est demandé une « réévaluation par le médecin traitant si persistance des douleurs ». Là vous passez en appel et la plupart du temps c’est sans réduction de peine, mais plutôt pour un allongement de la durée de la sanction. Et là je ne parle pas des souffrances psychiques, des gens qui suite au choc de l’agression, tétanisés par la peur, voient leur existence bouleversée par les cauchemars ou la paranoïa.

    Quand la douleur est machinique, la sanction est automatique. Le but est de produire de manière invisible et immédiate une immobilisation de toute opposition. Pourquoi s’emmerder plus longtemps avec de la paperasse et des juges ? Pourquoi prendre la peine de fignoler un dossier de convocation judiciaire :

    « Le dénommé X est accusé d’avoir le 12/04 à Paris (XVI ème arrondissement), en tout cas sur le territoire national et depuis temps n’emportant pas prescription, seul et sans arme, opposé une résistance violente en portant des coups de pieds alors qu’il était au sol pour ne pas de laisser interpeller, causant notamment une fracture de la main chez l’un des agents interpellateurs X et Y (ITT 30 jours) dépositaire de l’autorité »

    Qui lit encore cela ? Au diable la paperasse ! La police c’est la justice, la justice c’est la police, pourquoi séparer les pouvoirs ? C’est là la simple logique des fusions-acquisitions : deux entreprises fusionnent pour regrouper deux entités commerciales et maximiser leurs gains. La politique de « Contusion-Confusion » c’est gagnant-gagnant pour tous les partenaires. C’est ainsi que l’État se transforme en auto-entreprise et en État policier.

    Le problème c’est qu’à aucun moment l’on ne se demande si de fil en aiguille, on n’en vient pas à créer une machine monstrueuse, vaste logiciel de gestion des corps menés à l’abattoir par un appareil d’État à la dérive. Quand à l’exhibition systématique de la troupe, piétinant la foule comme on marche sur Rome, c’est clairement la marque des régimes fascistes
    Le supplice de Damiens 2.0

    À l’époque où des Gilets Jaunes hagards erraient pendant plusieurs heures sur le boulevard, à la recherche d’un service d’urgences, leur œil dans une main, un sac dans l’autre, cela a marqué les esprits. Quand un œil éclatait et que cela faisait le bruit d’un œuf qu’on écrase, cela ne s’oublie pas. Quand on vise l’os malaire d’un visage et que la mâchoire s’enfonce, non seulement le choc post-traumatique est inévitable mais c’est la boucherie. Le problème c’est que cela donne une mauvaise image du « pays des Lumières », et de son despote éclairé.

    Si l’on se rappelle les gilets jaunes. À partir de l’acte III, Macron a dit à sa police « -Faites ce que vous voulez ». Ils se sont exécutés, et mécaniquement ces gens ont fait ce qu’ils ont voulu. Que voulez-vous qu’il se passe quand on distribue des viseurs holographiques à de jeunes chiens fous tout en sanctionnant disciplinairement ceux qui ne veulent pas aller au ball-trap ?

    Je rappelle pour ceux qui ne sont pas informés qu’un viseur holographique EOTech permet de tirer sur une cible en mouvement sans obligation de parallaxe. Ce viseur a été inventé pour l’invasion de l’Irak en 1990. Ce viseur a été ensuite monté sur des fusils LBD et utilisé systématiquement par les forces de l’ordre pendant l’hiver 2018. Celui-ci est livré en option, « afin discriminer les parties du corps à impacter » explique pudiquement le fabricant. Un simple point rouge permet effectivement d’ajuster le tir sur n’importe quel orbite de manière très précise. Inutile d’aligner laborieusement une mire et le guidon d’une arme. Avec ce confort de tir, à vingt mètres, n’importe qui se prend pour un tireur d’élite. Et comme c’est valorisant de faire partie de l’ « élite », certains ont osé parler de « bavures » à l’époque des Gilets Jaunes. Ce qui a fait ricaner certains dans les comicos.

    Les Gilets jaunes c’est le retour au Moyen-âge. Ce qui compte dans la justice médiévale, ainsi que l’indique l’évangile de Luc, c’est : « Malheur à l’homme par qui le scandale arrive ! Mieux vaut qu’on lui attache une grosse meule autour du cou et qu’on le jette dans la mer » » (Lc, 17,1-2). Ceci signifie que du point de vue du droit canonique, peu importe que le curé de Montaillou, -village Occitan- soit pédophile, violeur, adultère ou le dernier des meurtriers, tout cela relève finalement du for interne, c’est à dire de la conscience personnelle du point de vue des pratiques de confessionnal. Du point de vue de la vulgate canonique, ce qui compte avant tout, c’est de vénérer publiquement la très Sainte Trinité.

    Le pêcheur public c’est celui qui est susceptible de contaminer une communauté toute entière. Il donne le mauvais exemple et abîme la récolte comme une pomme pourrie contamine tout un panier. Dès que le scandale devient public, il faut donc l’éradiquer. C’est la raison pour laquelle, dans l’Ancien Régime, en régime de contamination virale, le scandale comme la justice sont affaire de spectacle. Quand on jette le présumé coupable à l’eau, une grosse pierre attachée au cou comme le propose l’évangéliste Luc, la justice c’est l’inverse du baptême. Le baptême intègre dans la communauté, la grosse pierre participe à un rite d’exclusion, d’excommunication, de désintégration puisqu’il faut savoir qu’à l’origine le baptême n’est pas un sacrement mais une épreuve de justice ordalique.

    Un exemple de cette justice-spectacle de l’Ancien-Régime c’est le supplice très célèbre de Robert François Damiens, condamné pour « parricide commis sur la personne du Roi Louis XV ». Il est racontée dans l’Histoire de Robert François Damiens, contenant les particularités de son parricide et de son supplice (1757) :

    « On amena dans l’enceinte quatre chevaux jeunes et vigoureux qui avaient été achetés la veille quatre cent trente-deux livres […] ils avaient obtenu la permission de dépecer le condamné. Voici comment ils s’y prirent. Les chevaux furent encore excités et lancés. Alors, quand les membres de Damiens furent tendus à point, les deux bourreaux coupèrent les nerfs aux jointures des cuisses. Cela ne se fit pas sans peine. Le sang jaillit en abondance. « Oh ! hurla Damiens ; ayez-pitié de moi, Seigneur ! Jésus, secourez-moi ! » Les couteaux fouillaient sa chair, ne s’arrêtant que devant les os. « Voyons maintenant », dit le bourreau. Les chevaux tirèrent. Cette fois une cuisse se détacha, la cuisse gauche. […] Damiens regarda encore cette douloureuse séparation , Il n’y avait plus de résistance de sa part. Après de nouvelles secousses des chevaux, l’autre cuisse partit. Restaient les bras. Les deux bourreaux recommencèrent le jeu de leurs couteaux à l’endroit des épaules et aux aisselles. On aurait dit deux bouchers travaillant dans la même viande. La cruauté a son ivresse, et ils étaient arrivés à cette ivresse-là. Ils n’épargnaient aucun nerf, aucun tendon. « Grâce ! grâce ! » criait toujours Damiens. Le bras droit tomba. Damiens ne perdit pas encore connaissance. « Ses cris continuaient, mais avec moins de bruit,et la tête continuait à aller. » Enfin, les chevaux emportèrent le dernier bras. Il n’y eut plus sur la table basse qu’un tronc qui vivait encore et une tête dont les cheveux venaient de blanchir tout à coup. Il vivait ! Pendant qu’on détachait les chevaux et qu’on ramassait ses quatre membres, les confesseurs se précipitèrent vers lui. Mais Henri Samson les arrêta en leur disant que Damiens venait de rendre le dernier soupir. La vérité est que je voyais encore l’estomac agité et la mâchoire inférieure aller et venir comme s’il parlait. Ce tronc respirait ! Ses yeux se tournèrent encore vers eux. On ne dit pas si la foule battit des mains une seconde fois.Ce qu’il y a de certain, c’est que, pendant une heure et demie que dura ce supplice, personne ne songea à quitter sa place, ni aux fenêtres ni sur le pavé. Un bûcher avait été préparé à quelque distance de l’échafaud, avec des fagots et de la paille. On y jeta d’abord les quatre membres du supplicié, et ensuite le tronc. Les débris palpitants furent recouverts d’autres fagots. On mit le feu au tout ! »

    On voit bien dans ce récit qu’il s’agit de démembrer quelqu’un pour lui arracher une malédiction qui déborde le corps social. Un individu est extrait de la société pour purifier le corps social tout entier, de la même manière qu’on pratique une saignée pour épurer le flux sanguin d’un malade dans le théâtre de Molière. Mais l’efficace du rituel n’est rendu possible qu’à la condition que ce démembrement ait lieu aux yeux de tous. La guérison du grand corps malade ne s’opère que par transsubstantiation [1]

    [1] En théologie dogmatique catholique, la...
    du sang versé dans un rituel qui implique toute la communauté. C’est pourquoi la justice médiévale est un spectacle, le rituel ne fonctionne pas s’il n’est pas accompli aux yeux de tous. Rappelons que les gens allaient encore avec leurs enfants assister aux exécutions capitales jusqu’au début de le seconde guerre mondiale.

    Aujourd’hui quand on veut déboîter tout un peuple, les corps sont démembrés à l’abri des regards, c’est à dire au plus intime des corps, c’est la raison pour laquelle la nouvelle technique du maintien de l’ordre n’assume plus la visibilisation des violences d’État. Pour preuve, le preux cavalier Macron ne plastronne plus :

    « Oyez, Oyez, boursemolles, ribaudes et puterelles, traversez ruisseau pour trouver boulot, en mon château me venez chercher ! ».

    L’époque a changé, la bête attaque maintenant systématiquement de dos. On le voit bien avec cette réforme des retraites qu’un gouvernement abject tente de faire passer par une loi sur la sécurité sociale. Le nouveau supplice de Damiens c’est la colonie pénitentiaire de Kafka. Dans ce récit une machine inscrit la peine dans l’intimité du corps du supplicié, ici cette intimité est largement distribuée tout en étant privatisé : miracle de la bio-logistique des corps !

    C’est au hasard des engagements d’un corps qu’un individu prend parfois la mesure que l’onde de choc qui le traverse fragmente le corps social tout entier. À cette heure, deux épaules immobilisées me laissent deux doigts libres pour taper ce texte sous analgésiques. Ce texte donc un texte écrit à l’horizontal : si le mouvement de lutte contre la réforme des retraites ne laisse personne indifférent c’est parce qu’il attaque les corps ; nous sommes tous mortels et du point de vue de notre finitude, les existences sont toutes égales. C’est la raison pour laquelle des plus jeunes aux plus vieux, le spectacle de l’ignominie présidentielle brûle d’une telle flagrance.

    Et foin des grands discours, c’est l’implication des corps disloqués qui fait la solidarité de nos chairs impatientes.

    [1] En théologie dogmatique catholique, la transsubstantiation est la doctrine selon laquelle au cours de l’eucharistie, au moment de la consécration, les espèces du pain et du vin deviennent le Corps réel et le Sang réel du Christ tout en conservant leurs caractéristiques physiques et leurs apparences originales.

    https://lundi.am/Deboiter-le-corps-social
    #domination #violences_policières #répression #France #macronisme #Laurent_Nuñez #Laurent_Nunez #maintien_de_l'ordre #grey_block #manifestation #15_mars_2023 #casseurs #contusions #invisibilité #invisibilisation #violences_d'Etat #immobilisation #viseur_holographique

  • Jeremy #Corbyn sur Twitter :
    https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/status/1637178553773981696

    The asylum seekers of today are our doctors, carers, teachers, neighbours and friends of tomorrow.

    Proud to join thousands of anti-racist campaigners today to stand up for our shared humanity, oppose the Tories’ asylum ban, and say loudly and clearly: refugees are welcome here.

    #réfugiés

  • La corsa ai suoli agricoli italiani dei nuovi “lupi solari”: una speculazione da fermare

    Mediatori immobiliari senza troppi scrupoli vanno alla caccia di terreni assediando agricoltori, meglio se vecchi, stanchi o indebitati, offrendo loro cifre più alte del valore di mercato. È il risultato di una transizione energetica impostata male e gestita peggio. E che favorisce i ricchi a scapito dei poveri. L’analisi-appello di Paolo Pileri.

    “Professore, come comportarsi quando aziende del fotovoltaico contattano offrendo cifre parecchio allettanti per acquisire suoli agricoli per installarci pannelli (non “agrivoltaico”)? Grazie”. È il messaggio che ho ricevuto una mattina di marzo alle dieci. Non è il primo che ricevo e temo non sarà l’ultimo.

    Diciamo però che sono la minima parte della minima parte dei casi che ci saranno in giro per le nostre campagne, letteralmente assaltate da mediatori immobiliari senza troppi scrupoli che vanno alla caccia di terreni assediando agricoltori, meglio se vecchi o stanchi o indebitati, così sono più facili da convincere a vendere offrendo loro cifre più alte del valore di mercato dei terreni agricoli.

    È quanto abbiamo sempre temuto e detto fin dall’inizio delle prime versioni del Piano nazionale di ripresa e resilienza. È il risultato di una transizione energetica fatta partire sgommando e sbandando alla prima curva. Una corsa partita sciaguratamente senza regole (ma probabilmente hanno voluto così) che ha fatto drizzare le antenne a tutti gli speculatori dell’energia che hanno a loro volta sguinzagliato mediatori, geometri, architetti e perfino sindaci a cercare terre da comprare.

    Per convincere gli agricoltori stanno usando la leva della fretta. Mostrano tanti soldi e gli dicono che è questo e solo questo il momento giusto per vendere, inducendo il proprietario a decidere senza pensarci troppo. Questo sarebbe il libero mercato? Ho saputo di funzionari di società energetiche che si sono presentati negli uffici di piccoli Comuni facendo pressione per ottenere segnalazioni di terreni e di possibili persone facilmente convincibili a vendere. Pazzesco, eppure accade. E continuerà ad accadere dappertutto.

    Il messaggio di stamattina arrivava dal Friuli. Quando tutti questi speculatori solari avranno acquistato terre per fare i loro comodi, cominceranno a bussare minacciosi alle porte delle Regioni e del governo (che nel frattempo hanno emesso solo leggi deboli e regolamenti colabrodo) per chiedere facilitazioni e norme che deroghino alle poche regole che esistono, che non mettano loro i bastoni tra le ruote così da poter mettere a terra i pannelli che vogliono nel tempo che vogliono. Loro vogliono metterli a terra, non gli interessa l’agrivoltaico che, comunque (e lo ribadisco) è un dramma lo stesso per l’agricoltura, il paesaggio e il suolo.

    Agli speculatori solari non basta massimizzare i loro guadagni, vorranno anche essere celebrati come eroi green: non mi stupirà vederli sponsorizzare il prossimo festival di Sanremo o il campionato di calcio o magari le Olimpiadi 2026. E puntualmente la politica li porterà in trionfo.

    Possibile che non riusciamo in questo Paese a fare una cosa bene e nell’interesse di tutti e dell’ambiente? Possibile che non riusciamo a proteggere i deboli e frenare quelli che tirano fuori sempre le unghie per graffiare? Qui ci vuole poco. Essendo in clamoroso ritardo sulla pannellizzazione, avevamo (e forse abbiamo ancora) il vantaggio di costruire una regia pubblica forte, intelligente e senza stupidi compromessi, in grado di orientare il mercato nella direzione zero impattante e zero esclusiva. Già perché questo far west della caccia alle terre solari è tutto a vantaggio dei ricchi che hanno i soldi contanti contro i poveri cristi agricoltori che, alla fine, cederanno. Non sono i piccoli e poveri risparmiatori che stanno cercando terre per mettere pannelli. Non siamo davanti a una transizione energetica che sta proteggendo i più poveri.

    Per non parlare delle lunghe mani delle mafie, della ‘ndrangheta. Chissà che non stia già accadendo. Il governo e i governi regionali stanno monitorando? Oppure sono presi dal dare la caccia ai lupi che si aggirano per Courmayeur o nel Monferrato o in Val Seriana? Perché questo fa notizia anche se quei lupi naturali non fanno alcun male, se non a qualche gallina o pecora (che puntualmente mamma Stato ripaga), mentre i lupi solari non fanno notizia eppure sono pericolosissimi, famelici e ridurranno in brandelli paesaggi e agricolture.

    Dobbiamo tutti insieme stanare questi lupi solari e non smettere di denunciare questa assurda pratica che inoltre spopolerà le terre agricole più di quanto già sono spopolate. Dobbiamo chiedere ai governi, regionali e statale, di intervenire per disciplinare la questione una volta per tutte e in modo uniforme sul territorio nazionale. Non possiamo permetterci consumi di suolo solari, né possiamo permetterci di ferire mortalmente l’agricoltura, non possiamo permettere di perdere produzione alimentare, non possiamo perdere agricoltori. I pannelli solari vanno posizionati sui tetti dei capannoni logistici, commerciali e industriali prima di tutto, su tettoie da realizzare in tutti i posteggi pubblici con più di 50 auto, sopra gli impianti di depurazione, nelle stazioni di rifornimento carburanti, lungo le autostrade, e così via. Solo quando avremo finito di piazzarli da quelle parti, potremo pensare a nuove superfici. Ma non l’inverso. Non è possibile che in questo Paese si opti sempre per il “vincere facile”, aprendo sempre nuovi fronti alle speculazioni e alla insostenibilità. Bisogna opporsi. Bisogna parlarne. Bisogna stanare queste pratiche.

    https://altreconomia.it/la-corsa-ai-suoli-agricoli-italiani-dei-nuovi-lupi-solari-una-speculazi
    #spéculation #terres #énergie #transition_énergétique #compétition #agriculture #photovoltaïque #énergie_solaire #panneaux_solaires #sol #agrivoltaico #fermes_solaires #ferme_solaire

    • Le tante zone d’ombra lasciate dal boom dell’agri-fotovoltaico

      La transizione verso le energie rinnovabili è una necessità globale, ma non per questo esente da scelte. In Sicilia i progetti di una multinazionale sono l’occasione per chiedersi se la direzione presa sia quella giusta.

      Verde in primavera, dorato d’estate, l’entroterra della Sicilia offre panorami a perdita d’occhio. Agrumeti, campi di grano, colline lasciate a foraggio. Spostarsi da Catania a Trapani significa attraversare l’isola da una parte all’altra: la prima con le sue testimonianze greco-romane, la seconda che risuona ancora oggi delle influenze arabe. A collegarle c’è un’autostrada che sembra tutt’altro, tra cantieri infiniti, cambi di corsia e lunghi tratti in cui non ci si sente granché sicuri. L’andatura forzatamente lenta permette di accorgersi di come questi territori stiano a poco a poco cambiando. Bianche pale eoliche a incoronare le colline e scintillanti pannelli solari che costeggiano il guard rail sono una presenza a cui, con il passare dei chilometri, l’occhio si abitua.

      D’altra parte non è un mistero che la Sicilia stia vivendo un nuovo boom legato alle energie rinnovabili: a inizio anni Duemila a farla da padrone furono gli investimenti nell’eolico, con tanto di tentativi di lucrarci sopra da parte di Cosa nostra; da qualche tempo, invece, è diventata terra d’elezione per i campi solari.

      Le emergenze internazionali legate alla crisi climatica e i riflessi geopolitici del conflitto russo-ucraino costituiscono la cornice entro cui, oggi, le istituzioni sono chiamate a definire le strategie energetiche. L’impegno dell’Ue sul fronte delle rinnovabili è forte: il Pnrr prevede miliardi di euro di finanziamento per la produzione di energia verde. In quest’ottica – regioni come la Sicilia – diventano ricettori naturali degli investimenti: l’isola è terra di vento e, soprattutto, di sole.

      Ma quali sono le conseguenze a livello territoriale dei crescenti interessi legati alle rinnovabili e ai fondi stanziati per la loro promozione?

      IrpiMedia, con il supporto di Journalismfund Europe, ha deciso di andare sui territori, nel tentativo di capire meglio gli impatti sociali di un fenomeno destinato a segnare il futuro dei luoghi che viviamo. Per farlo abbiamo scelto di concentrare l’attenzione su due progetti – uno in fase di realizzazione a #Paternò, in provincia di Catania, e l’altro a #Mazara_del_Vallo (Trapani) – che nell’ultimo anno hanno attirato l’interesse dell’opinione pubblica.

      A realizzarli è #Engie, multinazionale del settore che ha da poco chiuso un accordo con #Amazon. Il colosso dell’e-commerce da tempo è impegnato a portare avanti, a livello internazionale, un programma di finanziamento degli impianti di produzione di energia rinnovabile. «Questi con Engie rappresentano i nostri primi progetti su larga scala in Italia, ci daranno una mano nel percorso che ci porterà a usare il cento per cento di energia rinnovabile entro il 2030», ha detto, a fine 2020, il direttore di #Amazon_Energy #Nat_Sahlstrom. La dichiarazione, a una prima lettura, potrebbe far pensare che tra qualche anno le attività di Amazon in tutto il pianeta saranno alimentate direttamente da energia verde. In realtà tra la multinazionale che fa capo a #Jeff_Bezos e le aziende produttrici, come Engie, sono stati sottoscritti dei #power_purchase_agreement (#Ppa).

      Un mare di silicio

      Carcitella è il nome di una contrada che si trova al confine tra i comuni di Mazara del Vallo e Marsala. Immersa nelle campagne trapanesi, è solcata da un reticolo di piccole strade provinciali. È da queste parti che si trova uno degli impianti realizzati da Engie. Dietro una recinzione metallica, ci sono filari e filari di pannelli solari: 122 mila moduli fotovoltaici per una potenza complessiva di 66 megawatt.

      «Sole, énergie». La voce – un italiano stentato che ripiega presto nel francese – arriva dalle nostre spalle. Un uomo ci viene incontro, pochi passi per distaccarsi dalle decine di pecore che lo attorniano. Si chiama Mohamed ed è arrivato in gommone dalla Tunisia, l’Africa da qui dista poche ore. Non ha ancora quarant’anni, ma ne dimostra molti di più: Mohamed è arrivato in Italia sperando di spostarsi in Francia e fare il cuoco, ma si è ritrovato a fare il pastore. «Neuf euros par jour. La casa? Petite», spiega, descrivendo il misero compenso ricevuto in cambio della disponibilità di portare al pascolo le pecore dall’alba al tramonto. Mohamed è uno dei tanti che hanno assistito al lento cambiamento di #contrada_Carcitella.

      L’impianto di Mazara del Vallo è stato inaugurato a fine maggio da Engie alla presenza delle autorità. La notizia, che ha trovato spazio sui media nazionali, è di quelle che colpiscono: «Avviato il più grande impianto agrovoltaico d’Italia». Oltre alla partnership con Amazon e alle dimensioni – sommando i progetti su Mazara e Paternò si superano i 200 mila moduli solari su una superficie di 185 ettari – il principale motivo che ha attirato l’attenzione generale sta infatti nella tecnologia utilizzata da Engie. L’agrovoltaico (o agri-fotovoltaico) prevede l’installazione dei pannelli su terreni agricoli, con accorgimenti tali – a partire dalla loro altezza rispetto al suolo – da dare la possibilità di impiantare colture nella parte sottostante. Nel caso di Mazara e Paternò si parla di piante officinali e per fienagioni e l’uso di alberi di mandorlo e ulivo per delimitare i perimetri dell’impianto. «I nostri progetti – fa sapere Engie a IrpiMedia – puntano a valorizzare i terreni mediante l’attuazione del piano agronomico che ha accompagnato il progetto autorizzato dalla Regione».

      L’obiettivo dichiarato è quello di salvaguardare il consumo di suolo e ottimizzare le aree utilizzate. «La Sicilia vanta le maggiori superfici coltivate a biologico in Italia e gli impianti con tecnologia agro-fotovoltaica soddisfano la strategia regionale per lo sviluppo sostenibile», ha dichiarato nella primavera del 2021 Nello Musumeci, oggi ministro del governo Meloni ma all’epoca presidente della Regione Siciliana.

      Ma per quanto le parole di Musumeci potrebbero portare a pensare a un ruolo centrale delle istituzioni nella gestione della transizione verso le rinnovabili, la realtà è che mentre a livello sovranazionale l’Ue ha definito le risorse a disposizione per intraprendere il percorso, fino a oggi l’Italia ha rinunciato alla possibilità di governare il fenomeno. Legiferando, semmai, nella direzione opposta: verso una normativa che renda ancora più libera l’iniziativa imprenditoriale dei leader di settore, lasciando al mercato l’onere della pianificazione. Ma ciò, così come accaduto tante altre volte in passato e in molti altri campi, comporta il rischio di vedere affermarsi le logiche della massimizzazione del profitto, a discapito di aspetti fondamentali per il benessere collettivo a medio-lungo termine.
      Tra maglie sempre più larghe e rinunce

      Le richieste di autorizzazione che hanno portato alla costruzione degli impianti di Paternò e Mazara del Vallo sono state presentate alla Regione, nel 2018, dalla FW Turna, società successivamente acquisita da Engie. Entrambi i progetti sono stati sottoposti al vaglio della commissione chiamata a valutare l’impatto ambientale, ottenendo il via libera condizionato al rispetto di alcune modifiche da apportare.

      A partire dal 2019, al vertice della commissione Via-Vas c’è stato #Aurelio_Angelini. Professore ordinario di Sociologia dell’ambiente e del territorio all’Università di Enna, Angelini è stato incaricato dal governatore Musumeci in seguito a uno scandalo che aveva travolto i precedenti vertici della commissione, accusati di avere piegato il proprio operato agli interessi di #Vito_Nicastri e #Paolo_Arata. Il primo è un trapanese accusato di essere uno dei principali volti imprenditoriali del boss di Cosa nostra Matteo Messina Denaro, l’altro un ex parlamentare nazionale di Forza Italia e successivamente consulente della Lega. In coppia, Nicastri e Arata avrebbero pagato mazzette per corrompere funzionari regionali e ottenere vantaggi su progetti per la realizzazione di impianti per biometano, mini-eolico e fotovoltaico.

      Angelini ha guidato la commissione fino a dicembre scorso, quando è stato rimosso dal nuovo governatore Renato Schifani. Una decisione arrivata dopo mesi di frizioni, con il docente che era stato accusato di fare da tappo agli investimenti sulle rinnovabili in Sicilia per i troppi no dati dalla commissione. «Sono stato vittima di una campagna diffamatoria partita con alcune dichiarazioni di Confindustria e divulgando numeri di fantasia», commenta Angelini.

      «Hanno raccontato frottole a ripetizione. Uno studio indipendente di Public Affairs Advisors e Elemens ma anche il rapporto Fer di Terna – continua – hanno dimostrato che in questi anni la Sicilia è stata in vetta alle classifiche sull’efficienza delle pubbliche amministrazioni per il rilascio delle autorizzazioni ambientali».

      Una cosa è certa: a essere interessati alla Sicilia per la realizzazione di parchi solari sono tanti. Per accorgersene basta navigare nel portale che raccoglie le richieste di autorizzazione. Sono centinaia i progetti finiti sui tavoli della Regione. Un flusso costante interrotto soltanto dalla modifica alla normativa che per gli impianti di una certa dimensione ha disposto che le valutazioni ambientali vengano fatte non più dalle Regioni, ma dal ministero.

      Tra i proponenti si trovano società spagnole, tedesche, ma anche altre con sedi in Cina e nelle isole Cayman. L’obiettivo della Regione è quello di passare dalla potenza di 1,8 gigawatt del 2018 a 4 gigawatt entro il 2030. «Il percorso verso la decarbonizzazione è obbligatorio a meno di non voler pregiudicare definitivamente il futuro del pianeta, ma ciò non può prescindere dalla considerazione di altri fattori», mette in guardia Angelini. Il riferimento va in primo luogo alla localizzazione degli impianti, che il più delle volte interessano aree a destinazione agricola, e chiama in causa direttamente il ruolo delle istituzioni. «La terra serve innanzitutto a produrre cibo – commenta -. Viviamo in un’epoca in cui gli effetti dei cambiamenti climatici, come la siccità e la desertificazione, sono destinati a determinare una drastica riduzione delle produzioni. Per questo – sottolinea – bisognerebbe capire che non possiamo permetterci di ipotecare i terreni per la produzione di energia. E questo non significa rinunciare alla transizione ecologica. Le alternative esistono, serve la volontà di adottarle».

      A inizio 2022, la Regione Siciliana ha approvato il nuovo piano energetico che delinea le strategie per lo sviluppo delle rinnovabili. In precedenza, la commissione guidata da Angelini, esaminando la bozza di piano, aveva dato una serie di prescrizioni rimaste però inattuate. Tra queste c’era la definizione delle aree non idonee all’installazione degli impianti. «L’indirizzo era quello di garantire maggiori tutele per le aree agricole di pregio, ma la politica ha deciso di non raccogliere le nostre indicazioni – commenta l’ex presidente della Cts – Questa non è l’unica stortura: il piano dice chiaramente che la localizzazione degli impianti debba avvenire privilegiando le discariche e le cave dismesse, i siti già compromessi dal punto di vista ambientale e le aree industriali e artigianali. Invece assistiamo alla continua presentazione di progetti fotovoltaici su zone agricole».

      Parlando della grandezza dei progetti – quelli di Engie non sono neanche i più vasti – Angelini ne fa anche una questione socio-economica. «Dovremmo ragionare sul tipo di futuro che vogliamo. Parlare genericamente di rinnovabili non basta. La storia ci dice che l’energia, la sua produzione, è legata a doppio filo con la libertà. Si fanno le guerre per garantirsi l’autonomia energetica. Siamo certi che la scelta migliore sia quella di andare verso un futuro con nuovi monopolisti dell’energia, anziché favorire lo sviluppo delle comunità energetiche?»

      Le comunità energetiche e l’autoconsumo collettivo sono pratiche che permettono a soggetti privati e pubblici di costruire e gestire impianti di produzione di energia rinnovabile pensati principalmente per uno “in loco”. In particolare l’autoconsumo collettivo è portato avanti dagli abitanti di un unico edificio mentre le comunità energetiche sono delle entità più ampie, solitamente un complesso di condomini, piccole e medie imprese ed enti pubblici, purché siano allacciati alla stessa cabina di trasformazione d’energia. In pratica la comunità energetica investe nella costruzione di un impianto, come ad esempio un fotovoltaico sui tetti dei condomini, così da iniziare l’autoproduzione e l’autoconsumo dell’energia rinnovabile.

      «Queste collettività sono pensate per produrre e consumare energia da fonti rinnovabili in loco, così da ridurre le bollette, e non per scopi di lucro, ecco perché la legge dispone che per poter prendere parte alle comunità energetiche sia necessario dimostrare che la produzione e la commercializzazione di energia non sia la fonte principale di guadagno», puntualizza Gianni Girotto, che da parlamentare nazionale del Movimento 5 Stelle è stato il promotore delle comunità energetiche in Italia.

      Il concetto alla base delle comunità energetiche è la produzione di energia diffusa e distribuita su un territorio molto più vasto ma allo stesso tempo molto meno impattante rispetto alle classiche centrali o ai campi eolici e fotovoltaici. I benefici principali, oltre ad una riduzione delle bollette, riguardano anche le spese nazionali del trasporto di energia. Produrre e condurre l’energia da un luogo a un altro ha dei costi ingenti per lo Stato e avere più comunità energetiche sparse in tutto il territorio alleggerirebbe la rete nazionale. Secondo i dati aggiornati a fine 2022, esistono solo 46 attività di autoconsumo collettivo e 21 comunità energetiche. «Un risultato ancora scarso – ammette Girotto – in parte dovuto al Covid che ha cancellato l’argomento dalle discussioni, in parte da una mancanza di reale volontà politica di promuovere le comunità».

      Ad oggi infatti si aspettano ancora i decreti attuativi per definire alcuni che regolamentano, ad esempio, le comunità energetiche più grandi. Per ora sono possibili comunità energetiche basate sulle cabine di trasformazione secondarie, che sono circa 600 mila in tutta Italia, su cui si possono costituire comunità grandi quanto un piccolo isolato o una via per le città più grandi. «Ma se si regolamentassero le comunità energetiche che si allacciano alle cabine primarie, si potrebbero formare comunità grandi quanto diversi comuni così da contribuire significativamente alla riduzione delle necessità di importazioni energetiche che sono più costose ed estremamente più inquinanti», conclude Girotti.

      Quale futuro spetterà alle comunità energetiche è un capitolo ancora tutto da scrivere. Quel che finora pare evidente è che a dettare legge sono ancora i colossi del settore. Aziende che, per loro natura, hanno come obiettivo primario quello di sfruttare economicamente al meglio le opportunità offerte dalle leggi.

      Da questo punto di vista, uno dei primi effetti lo si è notato sul mercato immobiliare dei terreni. Le aziende, infatti, preferiscono trattare con i privati. «Rinunciando ad avere un ruolo centrale nella pianificazione dello sviluppo energetico dell’isola, la Regione sta perdendo l’opportunità di avere introiti da questi investimenti – spiega il professore Aurelio Angelini -. Se si lavorasse alla promozione della realizzazione degli impianti nelle discariche pubbliche o nelle cave dismesse, si potrebbero indire gare per l’affidamento di queste aree ai privati, ottenendo in cambio un canone annuale». Così, però, non sta avvenendo e ad accorgersene è innanzitutto chi con la compravendita degli immobili ci lavora.

      «Fino a qualche anno fa, da queste parti un ettaro di terreno agricolo veniva venduto intorno ai 15 mila euro a ettaro. Oggi per meno di 35 mila non lo si trova», racconta un professionista del settore. Lo incontriamo nel suo studio di Mazara del Vallo, a meno di dieci chilometri dall’impianto di Engie. Ha accettato di parlarci soltanto a condizione di mantenere l’anonimato. «La domanda di terreni per installare pannelli solari è cresciuta in maniera spropositata e l’innalzamento dei prezzi è stata la naturale conseguenza – spiega – Per molti proprietari si tratta di cifre che difficilmente guadagnerebbero lavorando la terra».

      Si potrebbe pensare che per gli immobiliaristi siano periodi di vacche grasse. «Ma non è così, io negli ultimi anni sono riuscito a vendere soltanto un terreno destinato a fotovoltaico. Chi ci guadagna davvero sono i sensali». La senseria è l’attività di mediazione portata avanti spesso in maniera informale da soggetti non qualificati. «Per le società che arrivano da fuori, magari dal Nord Italia o dall’estero, sono dei veri procacciatori di affari e non importa se non siano professionisti del settore, si sanno muovere». Quando gli chiediamo in cosa consista tale capacità, chiarisce: «Spesso sono allevatori, conoscono molto bene le campagne e chi sono i proprietari. Come guadagnano? Si dice che prendano una percentuale dal venditore».

      Ancora oggi in Sicilia il legame con la terra è forte. Può capitare per esempio che un terreno, passando di generazione in generazione nelle mani di sempre più eredi, resti incolto ma comunque ben saldo all’interno del patrimonio di famiglia. La nuova propensione a cederli, e il coinvolgimento di intermediari di fortuna, è un fenomeno che non è passato inosservato anche negli ambienti investigativi. Inevitabile chiedersi se dietro l’attività dei procacciatori possa esserci anche il peso della criminalità: «A oggi non sono emerse evidenze che portino a sostenere un coinvolgimento delle famiglie mafiose nella fase di individuazione dei terreni da destinare alle rinnovabili, ma è chiaro – sottolinea – che quella del sensale è una figura ambigua. Si tratta spesso di soggetti che si muovono in zone grigie. D’altra parte storicamente la mafia siciliana ha avuto un legame forte con la terra, basti pensare al ruolo dei campieri, che si occupavano della guardiania».
      Di chi sono le aree utilizzate da Engie

      «I terreni sono stati acquisiti direttamente dai proprietari». A negare il coinvolgimento di intermediari di fortuna nelle trattative per l’acquisizione delle aree su cui realizzare gli impianti di Mazara del Vallo e Paternò è la stessa Engie. «Nel primo caso il terreno è stato in larga parte acquistato da una singola proprietà, mentre i terreni di Paternò erano frazionati su pochi proprietari terrieri locali», specificano dagli uffici della multinazionale.

      Una versione che trova conferma anche nelle parole di Francesca Adragna, 54enne originaria di Trapani ma residente in Toscana che, insieme al fratello, era la proprietaria dei terreni scelti da Engie per installare i pannelli. «Non abbiamo avuto sensali che si sono interessati alla trattativa, so bene che in Sicilia girano molti sedicenti intermediatori, ma nel nostro caso non è accaduto». Dai documenti visionati da IrpiMedia risulta che a chiedere al Comune di Mazara del Vallo la certificazione di destinazione urbanistica da presentare alla Regione è stata una terza persona. «È stato incaricato da mio fratello, ritengo sia un tecnico», chiosa la donna. Per poi specificare di avere deciso «di vendere questi terreni perché si tratta di un’eredità e, vivendo io fuori dalla Sicilia, occuparsene era sempre più complicato».

      Continuando a scorrere le centinaia di pagine di documenti che accompagnano il progetto presentato alla Regione, ci si imbatte anche su un’altra serie di proprietari. I loro terreni vengono tirati in ballo nella parte riguardante i lavori per la stazione elettrica e i relativi raccordi alla rete di trasmissione nazionale (Rtn) al servizio del campo fotovoltaico. Anche in questo caso sono nomi che per motivi diversi, in alcuni casi legati a passate vicende giudiziarie che nulla hanno a che vedere con l’iter che ha portato alla realizzazione dell’impianto di Engie, sono noti all’opinione pubblica.

      Tra loro ci sono Maria e Pietro Maggio. I due sono discendenti della famiglia Poiatti, rinomati industriali della pasta. Maria attualmente è presidente del consiglio d’amministrazione della società. A loro sono intestate due vaste particelle indicate come vigneti e terreni seminativi utilizzate per la realizzazione della stazione elettrica e per i raccordi alla Rtn. Dai documenti emerge che quest’ultima parte ha interessato anche alcuni terreni di proprietà di Marina Scimemi. La donna, 47 anni, è figlia di Baldassarre Scimemi, l’ex presidente della Banca Agraria di Marsala e vicepresidente dell’Istituto Bancario Siciliano che a inizio anni Novanta venne accusato di essere a disposizione di Cosa nostra. Gli inquirenti accusavano l’uomo di avere elargito crediti a condizioni di favore e fornito una sponda per il riciclaggio del denaro. Per quelle vicende, Scimemi è stato condannato per concorso esterno in associazione mafiosa.

      Nei documenti presentati da Engie compare anche il nome del 41enne Francesco Giammarinaro. Il padre, Pino, è stato deputato regionale della Democrazia Cristiana nella prima metà degli anni Novanta. Una carriera politica costruita all’ombra della corrente andreottiana e vicino a Nino e Ignazio Salvo, i cugini di Salemi – lo stesso paese di Giammarinaro – che per decenni hanno avuto in mano la riscossione dei tributi in Sicilia, grazie anche ai legami con Cosa nostra. Anche per Pino Giammarinaro i problemi con la giustizia non sono mancati: arrestato nel 1994, ha patteggiato i reati di concussione e corruzione, mentre è stato assolto dall’accusa di concorso esterno. A partire dagli anni Duemila, il suo patrimonio è stato sottoposto a misure di prevenzione che hanno portato alla confisca. Tra i beni su cui sono stati posti i sigilli c’è anche il terreno di contrada San Nicola di Corsone. Nel progetto presentato da Engie si menziona l’appezzamento quando si fa riferimento al tracciato dell’elettrodotto aereo; area che per questo sarebbe stata sottoposta a vincolo preordinato all’esproprio.

      «Non ne so nulla, quel terreno ormai non è né di mio figlio né tantomeno mio. Rientra tra quelli sequestrati, da oltre dieci anni non ci appartiene», taglia corto Pino Giammarinaro, raggiunto telefonicamente da IrpiMedia. Sul punto, però, fa chiarezza Engie specificando che, per quanto nella documentazione presentata alla Regione si menzioni la particella 4, «il terreno confina con la nuova stazione elettrica ma non è interessato dalla nostra opera».

      Uva pregiata a basso costo

      Girare per la provincia di Trapani senza imbattersi in qualche vigneto è praticamente impossibile. Rosso, bianco o rosè, da queste parti si beve bene. Tuttavia, chi la terra la lavora praticamente da sempre si è accorto che qualcosa sta cambiando. Anzi, che forse è già cambiato. «Un tempo questa era una delle zone con più vigneti al mondo. Di questo passo, invece, continuare a coltivare viti non varrà più la pena». A parlare è il titolare di una delle tante aziende agricole che hanno sede nell’estremità occidentale della Sicilia. Ci accoglie in un ampio salone per parlare di come in meno di un decennio la redditività delle produzioni sia crollata. «Non è una sensazione, lo dicono i numeri e i bilanci – spiega l’uomo – Chi produce uva da vino da queste parti guadagna molto meno che altrove. Io non so se c’entri qualcosa, ma questo problema è coinciso con il periodo in cui hanno iniziato a costruire impianti per le rinnovabili. Prima c’è stato il boom dell’eolico, adesso sembra che tutti vogliano fare parchi fotovoltaici».

      L’imprenditore suggerisce di confrontare i listini delle cantine sociali. In provincia di Trapani ce ne sono tante, c’è chi lavora con proprie etichette e chi vende il vino sfuso ad altre aziende. Una delle più affermate è Cantine Ermes, attiva non solo nell’isola. Guardando il bilancio del 2022, in cui sono contenuti i dati relativi agli acconti pagati ai soci per i conferimenti effettuati nel corso della vendemmia 2021, si legge che l’uva Chardonnay è stata pagata da 10 a 38 euro al quintale, mentre chi ha portato uva Frappato ha incassato come acconto un massimo di 40 euro al quintale. Per le stesse tipologie di vitigno, una cantina di Riesi, in provincia di Caltanissetta, nella stessa annata ha elargito ai propri soci 60 euro al quintale per lo Chardonnay e da 47 a 52 euro per il Frappato. Le differenze sono marcate anche se si confrontano altri vitigni.

      Stabilire una diretta correlazione tra la bassa redditività dell’uva trapanese e il boom del fotovoltaico non è semplice, ma il calo dei profitti ha fatto crescere il numero di produttori che si chiedono se sia il caso andare avanti. A pensarla così è Giovanni Di Dia, segretario Flai Cgil in provincia di Trapani e a sua volta piccolo produttore. «La specificità del caso trapanese rende difficile pensare che sia determinata soltanto da logiche di mercato – afferma – La tentazione di pensare all’influenza di fattori esterni c’è, perché davvero non si capisce come in altre province si possano liquidare decine di euro in più a quintale. Non si tratta di fare confronti con l’altra parte del Paese, ma di spostarsi di un centinaio di chilometri».

      Quella dei produttori di uva è solo una delle tante perplessità che accompagnano, non solo in Sicilia e non solo in Italia, la corsa al fotovoltaico. E come in tutte le occasioni in cui bisogna fare di fretta, i rischi di perdersi qualcosa per strada sono alti. Chiedersi cosa ne sarà di aree come contrada Carcitella da qui in avanti è fondamentale, perché ne va del modo in cui immaginiamo il futuro e il rapporto con i luoghi che viviamo. In questo senso, il caso Engie dimostra come a essere favoriti, anche sul fronte della remunerazione dei terreni ceduti alle multinazionali, siano spesso grossi proprietari terrieri. Famiglie che in qualche modo ancora oggi rappresentano il volto del latifondo. Per il professore Angelini il discorso, dunque, va oltre la scelta tra rinnovabili – in questo caso il fotovoltaico – e fonti fossili. «Vogliamo sostituire i padroni dell’energia con nuovi monopolisti o vogliamo una società di produttori più equa e democratica?»

      #Sicile #corruption

      voir aussi:
      https://seenthis.net/messages/1007935

  • Un richissime homme d’affaires mis en examen à Paris pour fraude fiscale, 461 millions d’euros saisis La Libre

    Un richissime propriétaire de nombreux immeubles dans les quartiers huppés de Paris, Adrien Labi, a été mis en examen mercredi pour des soupçons de fraude fiscale et de blanchiment, 461 millions d’euros ont été saisis, a-t-on appris jeudi auprès du parquet financier.

    M. Labi, qui était visé par un mandat de recherche, a été placé en garde à vue mardi dans le cadre d’une enquête ouverte en 2015 pour fraude fiscale, a précisé le parquet national financier (PNF), confirmant une information de BFMTV.

    Cette enquête, confiée à l’Office anti-corruption (Oclciff), faisait suite à deux plaintes en 2014 et 2015 de l’administration fiscale portant sur un défaut de paiement de l’impôt sur le revenu, l’impôt de solidarité sur la fortune (ISF) puis l’impôt sur la fortune immobilière (IFI) de M. Labi en sa qualité de bénéficiaire économique d’un important groupe immobilier en France, a détaillé le PNF.

    A l’issue de sa garde à vue, une information judiciaire a été ouverte mercredi et M. Labi a été mis en examen pour fraude fiscale et omission de passation d’écriture comptable en 2010 et 2011, ainsi que pour fraude fiscale et blanchiment de cette infraction entre les années 2018 et 2022, selon le parquet financier.

    Il a été placé sous contrôle judiciaire avec obligation de verser une caution, a précisé le PNF, sans en donner le montant.

    Selon BFMTV, ce cautionnement s’élève à 30 millions d’euros.

    Parallèlement, le PNF a ouvert le 24 février dernier une enquête préliminaire pour blanchiment en bande organisée de fraude fiscale aggravée, a-t-il ajouté. Le groupe immobilier de M. Labi est soupçonné de ne pas déclarer les plus-values réalisées lors des ventes à l’impôt sur les sociétés.

    « Au moment de la garde à vue, des saisies à hauteur de 461 millions d’euros ont été réalisées dans les deux procédures pour garantir le paiement d’une éventuelle amende et la régularisation de sa situation fiscale », a précisé une source proche du dossier.

    « Selon l’Agence de gestion et de recouvrement des avoirs saisis et confisqués (AGRASC), elles représentent une année entière de saisies », a observé cette source.

    Selon une enquête du Monde parue en 2015, ce millionnaire britannique né en 1953 en Libye est propriétaire de dizaines d’immeubles dans les quartiers les plus luxueux de la capitale via une foncière domiciliée au Danemark.

    Le montant du portefeuille de cette foncière était à l’époque évaluée à 940 millions d’euros.

    Homme discret, il est également propriétaire en Angleterre, en Californie et en Suisse et vend des voitures de collection, selon le Monde. Il tirerait sa fortune de sa famille mais l’origine des fonds reste un mystère.

    Source : https://www.lalibre.be/international/europe/2023/03/09/un-richissime-homme-daffaires-mis-en-examen-a-paris-pour-fraude-fiscale-461-

    #fraude #france #fraude_fiscale #corruption #surveillance #finance #évasion_fiscale #économie #paradis_fiscaux #corruption #fisc #blanchiment

  • En Corée du Sud, un plan pour enterrer la hache de guerre mémorielle avec le Japon
    https://www.liberation.fr/international/asie-pacifique/en-coree-du-sud-un-plan-pour-enterrer-la-hache-de-guerre-memorielle-avec-

    Le gouvernement sud-coréen entend indemniser ses ressortissants victimes du travail forcé au Japon entre 1910 et 1945. S’il compte sur la participation de Tokyo, il doit également affronter de vives critiques des proches des persécutés et de l’opposition.

    Cette fois, est-ce la bonne ? Après des années de disputes et d’excuses, de plaintes et de retrouvailles, d’accords signés puis déchirés sur les contentieux historiques entre le Japon et la Corée du Sud, Séoul a proposé lundi un nouveau plan pour indemniser les victimes du travail forcé durant la brutale colonisation nippone de la péninsule entre 1910 et 1945. Si l’on en juge par les premières réactions en Corée, les chances de succès ne sont pas franchement assurées.

    Avec cette nouvelle résolution, le ministre sud-coréen des Affaires étrangères, Park Jin, entend indemniser les victimes par le biais d’une fondation publique créée en 2014 sous l’égide du ministère de l’Intérieur et de la Sécurité. Et engager des relations apaisées au moment où les pressions chinoises sur Taiwan et les menaces balistiques de la Corée du Nord tendent le climat sécuritaire en Asie. En 2018, quinze Sud-Coréens avaient gagné trois procès distincts contre deux entreprises japonaises : Mitsubishi Heavy Industries et Nippon Steel. La Cour suprême avait ordonné aux deux groupes d’indemniser les plaignants. Mais les deux firmes avaient refusé de se conformer à la décision.

    Depuis, Séoul et Tokyo ont traversé une querelle diplomatique avec des répercussions sur leurs relations commerciales et leur coopération militaire. Le Japon avait instauré en 2019 des restrictions à l’exportation vers la Corée du Sud de certains produits et composants chimiques. Ce lundi, Séoul a d’ailleurs annoncé qu’il renonçait à sa plainte devant l’Organisation mondiale du commerce concernant ces mesures de rétorsion. Le président américain, Joe Biden, a salué une « percée historique » des discussions entre deux de ses « plus proches » alliés. Environ 780 000 Coréens ont été soumis au travail forcé durant les trente-cinq ans d’occupation japonaise, sans compter les femmes réduites à l’esclavage sexuel et enrôlées de force dans les bordels de l’armée nippone durant la guerre de Quinze Ans (1931-1945).

    500 millions de dollars

    Le fonds d’indemnisation sera mis en place grâce aux dons d’entreprises privées – comme le conglomérat Posco – qui avaient bénéficié du traité nippo-sud-coréen de juin 1965. Cette année-là, après quatorze ans de négociation, les deux pays établissaient leurs relations diplomatiques. Tokyo venait en aide à son voisin ravagé par la guerre de Corée et acceptait de verser 500 millions de dollars sous forme de subventions (300 millions) et de prêts à long terme à faible taux d’intérêt (200 millions), soit environ 1,5 fois le budget national de la Corée du Sud à l’époque. D’autres plaignants, dont les affaires sont en instance au tribunal, pourraient également bénéficier de l’indemnisation lorsqu’ils auront obtenu gain de cause.

    En présentant son plan, le ministre sud-coréen des Affaires étrangères, Park Jin, a appelé à « une nouvelle histoire pour la Corée et le Japon, dépassant les antagonismes et les conflits, pour aller de l’avant ». La semaine dernière, le président sud-coréen avait employé des mots inédits pour saluer la transformation du Japon, « agresseur militariste du passé, en un partenaire qui partage avec nous les mêmes valeurs universelles ». Lundi, Park Jin a dit « espérer que le Japon répondrait positivement à notre décision majeure d’aujourd’hui, par des contributions volontaires d’entreprises japonaises et des excuses complètes ».

    Rien n’est moins sûr. En déclarant qu’il « appréciait [l’annonce du gouvernement sud-coréen], car elle contribuera à rétablir des relations saines entre le Japon et la Corée du Sud après une situation très difficile », le ministre japonais des Affaires étrangères, Yoshimasa Hayashi, s’est montré pour le moins mesuré. Il a surtout rappelé que son gouvernement « avait hérité de la position des administrations japonaises successives sur la reconnaissance historique dans son ensemble ».

    « Enormes souffrances »

    Autrement dit, Tokyo s’est déjà beaucoup excusé et a multiplié les déclarations officielles. Ce lundi, Yoshimasa Hayashi a d’ailleurs évoqué la déclaration conjointe signée en octobre 1998. Dans ce texte, le Premier ministre Keizo Obuchi reconnaissait les « énormes dommages et souffrances [infligées] au peuple de la république de Corée par le régime colonial [du Japon] », et exprimait son « profond remords et ses excuses sincères pour ce fait ». Sur la question douloureuse des femmes de réconfort, le Japon avait également procédé à une reconnaissance des exactions de l’armée impériale à l’encontre de 200 000 esclaves sexuelles – des Coréennes mais aussi des Chinoises, des Indonésiennes, des Philippines et des ressortissantes d’autres pays asiatiques –, avant de se livrer à des excuses, en 1993, avec la déclaration Kono, du nom du secrétaire en chef du gouvernement.

    En décembre 2015, au terme d’une longue année de commémoration de la fin de la guerre en Asie marquée par des mea culpa du Japon (à commencer par l’empereur), l’administration de Shinzo Abe et celle de la présidente sud-coréenne Park Geun-hye s’étaient entendues sur un accord « définitif et irréversible ». Le Japon renouvelait ses « excuses et ses regrets sincères à toutes celles qui ont enduré une douleur incommensurable et des blessures physiques et psychologiques incurables en tant que femmes de réconfort ». Et versait alors un milliard de yens de dédommagements à une fondation afin d’aider la trentaine de survivantes alors.

    « Défaite totale pour la Corée »

    Si le Japon n’a pas toujours été exempt de critiques sur les déclarations de certains leaders, à commencer par Shinzo Abe et une partie de la droite nationaliste, parfois empruntes de révisionnisme et de mépris, il n’en demeure pas moins que les administrations successives ont toujours respecté les engagements pris, et répété excuses et regrets depuis trente ans. Il n’en a pas toujours été ainsi de la Corée du Sud dont les engagements fluctuent au gré des alternances politiques. En 2017, sous pression des victimes d’une société civile active, le président Moon Jae-in avait archivé l’accord de 2015 et lancé une enquête qui avait provoqué la furie de Tokyo. Avant que la décision de la Cour suprême sud-coréenne sur le travail forcé ne jette de l’huile sur le feu entre les deux capitales.

    Aujourd’hui, on ne sait pas si les entreprises japonaises abonderont au fonds d’indemnisation. Le gouvernement Kishida n’envisage pas de le faire. Avant même les réactions japonaises au plan de la Corée du Sud, l’opposition sud-coréenne et les proches des victimes de travail forcé ont fustigé une « résolution humiliante », une « défaite totale pour la Corée ». Ils exigent des compensations directes de la part des entreprises nippones et des « excuses sincères ».

    Malgré les vives critiques, Tokyo et Séoul aimeraient se tourner vers le futur, comme l’a souligné le conseiller sud-coréen à la Sécurité nationale, Kim Sung-han. Selon le Korea Times, un nouveau fonds serait créé par la Japan Business Foundation et cofinancé par son homologue coréenne. Il viserait à faciliter les échanges entre jeunes japonais et sud-coréens. Autrement dit, à regarder vers l’avenir. Peut-être pour se détourner des sujets qui fâchent.

    #Japon #Corée #colonialisme #réparations #mémoire #travailforcé #exploitationsexuelle

  • Affaire Palmade : la caste veut garder ses privilèges - Vu du Droit Régis de Castelnau - vududroit.com

    L’affaire Palmade qui ne quitte pas la première page des gazettes nous donne finalement une leçon très politique. Nous avions dit dans ces colonnes ce que l’on pouvait en penser moins en ce qui concernait la dimension « faits divers » et les conséquences judiciaires de la tragédie que sur ce qu’elle pouvait révéler concernant certaines mœurs des couches supérieures de la société, pas seulement dans le domaine du show-business. Et puis il y a eu également la réaction de la caste face à la réaction de l’opinion publique.

    On assista d’abord à un regroupement visant à minorer la responsabilité du comédien en le présentant comme une victime. Puis devant l’horreur des conséquences de l’accident et l’avalanche de révélations témoignant d’une manifeste dépravation physique et morale, la peur de l’amalgame provoquait l’abandon en rase campagne de Pierre Palmade, présenté comme indéfendable. Nettoyage urgent des réseaux sociaux pour faire disparaître toutes les photos compromettantes, déclarations vengeresses, compassion surjouée pour les victimes : vite, vite, prenons nos distances avec le boulet. C’est qu’il ne fallait surtout pas que le bon peuple s’imagine que la consommation de cocaïne et de stimulants chimiques pour accompagner des pratiques sexuelles (« chemsex ») étaient généralisées et monnaie courante dans certains milieux, et pas seulement dans le showbiz.

    Peine perdue, parce que la première question qui venait à l’esprit à poser aux belles âmes était simple : vous saviez tout, pourquoi n’avez-vous rien fait, alors que vous prétendez aujourd’hui être étrangers à ces pratiques et ses comportements ? Et en fait, la réponse est tout aussi simple, les couches supérieures de la société et en particulier celles du monde politique, des médias et du spectacle sont profondément gangrenées. D’abord par des modes de vie ou la transgression est considérée comme normale. Ensuite parce que cette transgression est traitée comme telle par un système qui nourrit un sentiment d’impunité, les comportements illégaux étant vécus comme un privilège lié à la position sociale. Alors certes, Pierre Palmade usait de ces dérives de façon paroxystique, mais son milieu semblé n’y voir d’inconvénient puisqu’il tolérait ça très bien et se gardait surtout d’intervenir. Dans l’enchaînement de ses responsabilités, finalement, la chose la plus choquante, c’est qu’alors qu’il était sous l’emprise de drogues multiples, il avait fait le choix ce soir-là de prendre le volant. Sans bien sûr qu’aucune des personnes qui l’accompagnaient ne l’en dissuade. Comme aucun de ses amis ne s’était ému qu’il le fasse régulièrement et constitue un danger public. Car ce n’était pas seulement une tolérance mais également une protection car nombreux dans ces milieux sont ceux qui font exactement la même chose.

    Deux exemples récents établissent l’existence de cette protection est de ces privilèges, y compris sur le plan judiciaire. C’est Emmanuel Pellerin, parlementaire macroniste, cocaïnomane avéré et reconnu, qui fait l’objet d’un signalement pour avoir mis son fils en danger, et qui voit l’enquête sur ses infractions prestement classées sans suite par le parquet, pendant que le ministère de la Justice viole la loi sur le secret de l’enquête, en le faisant prévenir de l’existence de celle-ci ! Affaire proprement ahurissante, et rapidement étouffée par les médias dits « mainstream ». Quelques jours après la tragédie provoquée par Pierre Palmade, ce sera la cérémonie des Césars consacrant triomphalement Benoît Magimel, autre consommateur de cocaïne et d’héroïne. Celui-ci a été deux fois condamné pour conduite sous l’emprise de stupéfiants, dont une fois après avoir provoqué un accident et renversé un piéton. Le quantum des peines infligées par la justice était simplement risible. Dans le milieu du cinéma, et d’ailleurs dans bien d’autres, être l’objet d’une accusation, fût-elle fantaisiste, de sexisme, vaut proscription perpétuelle. Renverser des gens sur des passages cloutés sous l’emprise de la cocaïne semble à l’inverse considéré comme vétille à oublier.

    Même si les addictions dont il souffre sont assimilables à une maladie, il est désormais peu probable que Pierre Palmade rencontre la même indulgence judiciaire que Benoît Magimel. Utilisée jusqu’à l’écœurement par des médias soucieux d’audimat et pas fâchés de la diversion médiatique en ces temps de lutte contre la réforme des retraites, son affaire a pris trop d’importance. Et comme tous ses amis l’ont lâché, la justice va devoir faire normalement son travail, et c’est tant mieux. C’est la seule voie qui doit être utilisée pour traiter cette affaire. Mais pour autant, le bloc élitaire ne devrait pas se tenir pour quitte.

    Alors face à la colère populaire, les belles âmes souhaitant conserver privilèges et impunité passent leur temps pour dénoncer cet horrible « populisme », cette terrible tentation du lynchage qu’ils prétendent voir dans ce qui est qu’on le veuille ou non une colère contre la France d’en haut. On ne les entend pas lorsque les médias font de la surenchère dans le traitement des faits divers dès lors que les cibles des campagnes n’appartiennent pas à leur monde. Mais là une des incarnations de cette connivence entre le showbiz et la politique s’est précipitée pour condamner sans appel ceux qui s’indignent de cette corruption étalée.

    Roselyne Bachelot, sorte de rombière tantôt ministre, tantôt chroniqueuse, toujours soucieuse de montrer qu’elle appartient à la France d’en haut en mélangeant politique et showbiz, est venue se plaindre des réactions de l’opinion. « La société française est traversée par une sorte de haine des riches ». Vous avez raison, Madame Bachelot, les couches populaires, qui sont sûrement pleines de défauts, sont quand même attachées à ce que Jean-Claude Michéa, reprenant l’expression de George Orwell, appelle la « décence ordinaire ». Et elles ont parfaitement compris tout ce que l’affaire Palmade révèle de turpitudes et de corruption, et par conséquent de détestable. L’aversion qu’elles ressentent et qui vous chagrine tant renvoie, que vous le vouliez ou non, à quelque chose qui s’appelle la lutte des classes.

    Et dont les manifestations vont se loger partout.

    Source : https://www.vududroit.com/2023/03/affaire-palmade-la-caste-veut-garder-ses-privileges

    #caste #haute_bourgeoisie #moeurs #chemsex #cocaïne #drogue #pratiques_sexuelles #monde_politique #médias #riches #spectacle #turpitudes #corruption #impunité #privilèges #émmanuel_pellerin #benoît_magimel #roselyne_bachelot #lutte_des_classes