country:saudi arabia

  • Gemayel: Lebanon should stand with Saudi Arabia - Al-Monitor: the Pulse of the Middle East
    http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/politics/2015/04/lebanon-amin-gemayel-president-vacuum-aoun-hezbollah.html

    Did your dialogue with Hezbollah stop?

    Gemayel: No, it did not stop. But it is happening away from the spotlight as long as the main matters are not yet ripe for resolution. But this dialogue and the dialogue between Hezbollah and the Future Movement protects the future.

    An-Nahar: What are you discussing in the dialogue?

    Gemayel: Two topics: the first is a principle that we cannot achieve in the current regional circumstances. It is about the situation in Syria and Hezbollah’s involvement in the war there, and the issue of weapons. The second deals with other points related to management, transparency, public affairs, and maintaining security and stability. Maintaining a dialogue with the basic components of Lebanese society is useful, and this is our choice. Warding off the threat to the [Lebanese] entity is achieved by putting the internal situation in order, through dialogue, and convincing everyone that the Lebanese mosaic cannot afford to get involved in the region’s conflicts. And if this mosaic is broken up, it would be very difficult to put back together, and everyone will pay the consequences.

    We feel, through the political dialogues and the current political discourse, that we are being heard. We feel that a solution will require some time. These matters will be addressed when the suitable historic, national and regional moment arrives. The door is not closed. Looking at Hezbollah’s path since 1982, we notice a development in its behavior, starting from its full rejection of the Lebanese state by rejecting parliamentary and Cabinet participation, to participating in the state and in parliament, the Cabinet and the administration. [Hezbollah] is now [active] in daily administrative issues. The more [Hezbollah], or anyone else, gets involved in the Lebanese structure, the more it becomes convinced of the need to preserve it and the more it gets engaged in the democratic state project. This is not the first experience in Lebanon’s modern history.

    Read more: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/politics/2015/04/lebanon-amin-gemayel-president-vacuum-aoun-hezbollah.html#ixzz3Y7zFyUzS

  • Saudi Arabia is ’biggest funder of terrorists’ - Middle East - World - The Independent
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-is-biggest-funder-of-terrorists-2152327.html

    Saudi Arabia is the single biggest contributor to the funding of Islamic extremism and is unwilling to cut off the money supply, according to a leaked note from Hillary Clinton.

    The US Secretary of State says in a secret memorandum that donors in the kingdom still “constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide” and that “it has been an ongoing challenge to persuade Saudi officials to treat terrorist financing emanating from Saudi Arabia as a strategic priority”.

    Via Angry Arab. (Je parie que si elle est élue, elle changera très vite d’opinion !)

  • Mapping Chaos in Yemen

    In late March, Saudi-led forces began an offensive in Yemen against the Houthi rebel group, which has taken over large portions of the country. Though it is the poorest country in the Middle East, Yemen is of outsize importance to crucial players like Saudi Arabia, Iran and the United States. Related Article

    http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/03/26/world/middleeast/geography-of-chaos-in-yemen-maps.html?_r=1
    #cartographie #visualisation #Yémén

  • Yemen as War of Right-Wing Billionaire Establishment in the Middle East |
    By Conn Hallinan | (Foreign Policy in Focus)
    Informed Comment
    http://www.juancole.com/2015/04/billionaire-establishment-middle.html

    The Saudi-led coalition intervening in Yemen has more in common with 19th-century Europe than the 21st-century Middle East.
    Saudi Arabia’s recent intrusion into Yemen is ostensibly part of a bitter proxy war with Iran. But the coalition that Riyadh has assembled to intervene in Yemen’s civil war has more in common with 19th-century Europe than the 21st-century Middle East.
    The 22-member Arab League came together at Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt last month to draw up its plan to attack the Houthi forces currently holding Yemen’s capital. And the meeting bore an uncanny resemblance to a similar gathering of monarchies at Vienna in 1814.
    The leading voice at the Egyptian resort was the Saudi foreign minister, Prince Saud al-Faisal. His historical counterpart was Prince Klemens von Metternich, the Austrian foreign minister who designed the “Concert of Europe” to ensure that no revolution would ever again threaten the monarchs who dominated the continent.
    More than 200 years divides those gatherings, but their goals were much the same: to safeguard a small and powerful elite’s dominion over a vast area.
    There were not only kings represented at Sharm el-Sheikh. Besides the foreign ministers for the monarchies of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) — Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Oman, Qatar, Morocco, and Jordan — most of the Arab League was there, with lots of encouragement and support from Washington and London.
    But Saudi Arabia was running the show, footing the bills, and flying most of the bombing raids against Houthi fighters and refugee camps.

  • Sale of U.S. Arms Fuels the Wars of Arab States - NYTimes.com
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/19/world/middleeast/sale-of-us-arms-fuels-the-wars-of-arab-states.html?_r=0

    Une des raisons essentielles pour lesquelles les dizaines de milliers de #victimes_civiles « valent la peine »,

    To wage war in Yemen, Saudi Arabia is using F-15 fighter jets bought from Boeing. Pilots from the United Arab Emirates are flying Lockheed Martin’s F-16 to bomb both Yemen and Syria. Soon, the Emirates are expected to complete a deal with General Atomics for a fleet of Predator drones to run spying missions in their neighborhood.

    As the Middle East descends into proxy wars, sectarian conflicts and battles against terrorist networks, countries in the region that have stockpiled American military hardware are now actually using it and wanting more. The result is a boom for American defense contractors looking for foreign business in an era of shrinking Pentagon budgets — but also the prospect of a dangerous new arms race in a region where the map of alliances has been sharply redrawn.

    The United States has long put restrictions on the types of weapons that American defense firms can sell to Arab nations, meant to ensure that Israel keeps a military advantage against its traditional adversaries in the region. But because Israel and the Arab states are now in a de facto #alliance against #Iran, the Obama administration has been far more willing to allow the sale of advanced weapons in the Persian Gulf, with few public objections from #Israel.

    “When you look at it, Israel’s strategic calculation is a simple one,” said Anthony H. Cordesman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. The gulf countries “do not represent a meaningful threat” to Israel, he said. “They do represent a meaningful counterbalance to Iran.”

    #armes #Etats-Unis #complexe_militaro_industriel

  • http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/21284/britains-interest-in-bahrain_legal-fictions-and-th

    In 1783, the Al Khalifa family—originally from the Najd region of what is now Saudi Arabia—captured the islands of Bahrain from Shaykh Nasr Al Madhkur, who had ruled them on behalf of the Qajar dynasty of Persia. In 1926, over one hundred and fifty years later, the status of Bahrain’s sovereignty remained a contentious issue. In December of that year, G. R. Warner, a British diplomat in London, wrote to a colleague in India stating that “on political grounds it is of great importance to avoid any action which would result in the re-awakening of the controversy as to the sovereignty of Bahrein.”

  • .:Middle East Online:: :.
    http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=70952

    In Saudi Arabia, the number of people saying “yes” fell from 74 percent to 64 percent. In Egypt it dropped from 48 percent to 45 percent and, in Tunisia, from 57 percent to just 37 percent.

    In contrast, the survey found that support for free speech had risen slightly in Qatar — from 57 percent to 58 percent — and from 59 percent to 61 percent in the United Arab Emirates.

    The survey also found that the number of people comfortable expressing their opinions online in post-revolutionary Tunisia and Egypt had fallen.

    In Tunisia, the number fell from 44 to 34 per cent over the two years and in Egypt from 43 to 33 per cent.

    #tic_arabes

  • Erdogan rethinks sectarian politics - Al-Monitor: the Pulse of the Middle East
    http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/04/turkey-is-erdogan-steering-to-middle-ground.html#

    Others point to Erdogan’s recent wavering between Iran and Saudi Arabia, with strong criticism of the one, and pledges of support for the other, and the fact that he was not in a position to follow up on these positions given Turkey’s delicate place in the region. As things turned out, Erdogan changed tack on Iran, and there is no more talk of logistical support for the Saudi-led operation in Yemen.

    There also was confusion in Erdogan’s initial strong support for the Saudi-led operation against Yemen given that this puts Turkey in alliance with Egypt, which is led by Erdogan’s nemesis Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. It also puts Turkey in an alliance that is determined to repress the Muslim Brotherhood. Erdogan remains a strong backer of the Brotherhood.

    Given the complexity of the Middle East, which has landed Turkey in a number of tight spots from Syria to Egypt, and now Yemen, Ankara appears to have little choice left but to try and move toward a middle ground and strive for a regional role from there.

    Read more: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/04/turkey-is-erdogan-steering-to-middle-ground.html##ixzz3XMbN9PJL

  • How will Turkey explain $4.3 billion in unidentified foreign currency ? - Al-Monitor : the Pulse of the Middle East
    http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/04/turkey-where-did-all-this-money-come-from.html#

    Saudi Arabia, Qatar and capital from the Gulf support Erdogan and AKP rule. What is drawing attention in Turkey is that despite reports that this Arab support is behind the accumulation of funds in net errors-omissions, the Central Bank, Deputy Prime Minister for Economy Ali Babacan, Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu and Erdogan all remain mum; they don’t react in the slightest, or deny these charges.

    On ne prêt qu’aux riches. Cetains pensent, en Turquie, que les dynasties du Golfe pourraient financer l’AKP turque.

  • Is Iran outmaneuvering Saudi Arabia in Yemen? - Al-Monitor: the Pulse of the Middle East
    http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/04/iran-yemen-saudi-arabia-houthis.html#

    In an interview with Al-Monitor, an anonymous source close to Iran’s Arabic-language Al-Alam news channel confirmed that Iranian media coverage of the situation in Yemen first gained steam in earnest in late 2009, not during the 2011 Arab Spring protests. The latter is important to bear in mind, as the first credible reports of Iranian material assistance to the Houthis only started to surface around 2012. As Worth pointed out: “It’s important to add that Iran was not reaching out only to Houthis. I talked to members of the southern independence movement and some liberal political figures who’d been offered support from Iranian officials. … There is no indication that the Houthis take directions or even advice from Iran, despite many claims to the contrary.”

    Read more: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/04/iran-yemen-saudi-arabia-houthis.html##ixzz3XHXOETmd

  • Hezbollah leader says Saudi strikes in Yemen constitute ’genocide’ - Middle East - Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/1.651653

    AP - A top leader of the Lebanese militant Hezbollah group directed a barrage of criticism at Saudi Arabia on Monday, accusing the kingdom of committing genocide with its airstrike campaign targeting Yemen’s Shiite rebels and warning it will “pay a heavy price” for its involvement.

    In a wide-ranging interview with The Associated Press, the Shiite militant group’s deputy chief, Sheikh Naim Kassem, said Saudi Arabia made a “strategic mistake” by interfering in Yemen’s internal affairs.

    More than two weeks of Saudi-led airstrikes targeting Yemen’s Shiite rebels, known as Houthis, have failed to stop the rebel power grab. The Saudi campaign has also turned Yemen into a new proxy war between the kingdom and Iran, which has backed the Houthis, though Tehran denies aiding the rebels militarily. Hezbollah is a close Iran ally.

    The strikingly tough criticism of the region’s top Sunni powerhouse underlines the widening rift between Saudi Arabia and Shiite-led Iran, and is likely to further polarize the Sunni-Shiite divide in a turbulent Middle East.

    “Saudi Arabia has embroiled itself (in Yemen) and will incur very serious losses ... that will increasingly reflect on its status, its internal situation and its role in the region,” Kassem said.

    “What happened in Yemen is a crime that cannot be ignored. ... Saudi Arabia is committing genocide in Yemen, we cannot be silent about that,” the Hezbollah No. 2 said, likening the Saudi-led airstrikes on Yemen to Israel’s bombing campaigns in Gaza.

    At least 643 people, most of them civilians, have been killed since March 19, when the Houthi power grab escalated, the World Health Organization said last week — the vast majority of them since the start of the Saudi air campaign on March 26. Another more than 120,000 people have been displaced by the airstrikes, the UN said Monday.

    While the Iranian-backed Hezbollah has sometimes criticized Saudi Arabia in the past, it has always been careful to maintain a level of respect, particularly in light of the wide support the kingdom enjoys among Lebanon’s Sunnis. The Saudi monarch is the custodian of Islam’s two holiest shrines in Mecca and Medina, a position that lends him special importance and influence in the region.

    The Yemen campaign has already led to a bitter war of words between Lebanese politicians who support Iran and those who oppose it. The Lebanese are split along political and sectarian lines exacerbated by the 4-year-old conflict in neighboring Syria, and the harsh criticism of Saudi Arabia was likely to inflame sectarian tensions even more.

    Speaking in Hezbollah’s stronghold in southern Beirut, Kassem suggested that the Saudi-led campaign inside Yemen would lead to problems at home.

    “What is happening in Yemen today will reflect on Saudi Arabia internally,” he said, adding that the predominantly Sunni kingdom has its own domestic problems that “may cause the internal situation to implode.”

    “So it would be wiser for it not to interfere in Yemen’s affairs in a negative way, but rather in a positive way, by calling for dialogue,” Kassem added. Saudi Arabia has called for a negotiated solution and has offered to mediate talks between all parties to the Yemen conflict, but it has refused an immediate halt to the air campaign.

    The Hezbollah leader’s comments, among the harshest so far leveled by the Lebanese militant group against the Saudi-led campaign, echoed those of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who last week also called the Saudi airstrikes genocide.

    Kassem urged Saudi Arabia to “return to its senses” and halt the air campaign, which he said was only helping Al-Qaida’s affiliate in Yemen, which is a sworn enemy of the Houthis.

    However, he denied accusations that Hezbollah has sent in fighters or advisers to bolster the Shiite rebels. Hezbollah’s opponents say it has sent in fighters and Yemeni officials have told the AP it is supplying advisers. Hezbollah denied a report this week in a Saudi newspaper that a Hezbollah fighter died in Yemen.

    Hezbollah to join Assad forces in Syria

    On Syria, Kassem predicted the war there would continue for a long time, adding that Hezbollah’s fighters were preparing to join President Bashar Assad’s forces in fighting the Islamic State group in the rugged Qalamoun mountains bordering Lebanon.

    “I see the battle in Qalamoun as inevitable,” he said, adding that it was delayed because of weather conditions. The battle is likely to pit Hezbollah and the Lebanese army on one side of the border and the Syrian army on the other side, against the Islamic State group and Nusra Front militants.

    Thousands of Hezbollah members are fighting in Syria alongside Assad’s troops against the mainly Sunni rebels seeking to topple him. Their role — highly divisive in Lebanon — has helped turn the fighting in Assad’s favor in several key locations of the war-ravaged country.

    Kassem reiterated that the participation of Hezbollah in the war in Syria was to protect Lebanon from Islamic militants.

    He insisted the Syrian army was on a winning streak, despite a string of recent military defeats incurred at the hands of rebels, saying they do not change the military situation on the ground.

  • Le conflit Iran/Arabie saoudite s’étend à la Mecque ? Iran halts Saudi pilgrimages over sex assault allegation - Al Ahram http://english.ahram.org.eg/News/127530.aspx

    Iran has suspended pilgrimages to the Muslim holy places in Saudi Arabia in protest at an alleged sexual assault attempt against two teenage Iranian boys, the culture minister said Monday.
    According to Iranian media reports, two Saudi police are alleged to have attempted to assault the youngsters at Jeddah airport as they prepared to fly home from a pilgrimage to Mecca and Medina two weeks ago.

    In addition to the annual hajj, which was held most recently last October, Muslims also undertake the lesser pilgrimage or umrah throughout the year.

    "I have ordered the Hajj and Pilgrimage Organisation to suspend the lesser pilgrimage until the criminals are tried and punished," Culture Minister Ali Jannati told state television.

    All pilgrimages by Iranians to the Muslim holy places fall under the organisation’s auspices and each year around 500,000 perform the umrah.

    (...)

    “Considering what has happened, Iranians’ dignity has been damaged and a public demand has formed,” the minister said.

    Jannati said the Saudi authorities had arrested the two police officers at the centre of the allegations.

    “We have spoken to Saudi officials through diplomatic channels and they have promised to punish the persons in custody,” he said.

    “They even asserted that they would execute them but nothing has been done in reality so far.”

    The outcry over the allegations comes with relations between Shiite Iran and Sunni Saudi Arabia already tense over the Saudi-led air war against Shiite rebels in Yemen.

  • Egyptian Chronicles: Egypt’s Rapid Deployment Forces Head to the Kingdom !?
    http://egyptianchronicles.blogspot.it/2015/04/egypts-rapid-deployment-forces-head-to.html

    Egypt’s Rapid Deployment Forces Head to the Kingdom !?
    There is a lot of reaction about my post regarding the Egyptian Ground troops in Saudi Arabia.
    The rumors mill did not stop on Sunday , in fact I woke up and found lots of talk about a photo showing Egyptian soldiers wearing their uniform in their way allegedly to Saudi Arabia in a civilian Egypt Air Flight “Why would they go on an Egypt Air Flight in the first place? “ on twitter and Facebook.

    Going to Saudi Arabia then to Yemen ?? “Mohamed El-Bolok” 
    The Egyptian and Yemeni social media users claimed that those smiling soldiers were actually the first group of Egyptian Ground troops heading to the Kingdom and then to Yemen.
    This photo was posted by Egyptian Sky News Arabia Correspondent Mohamed ElBolok on his Facebook account earlier Sunday. According to El-Bolok it was taken by the flight’s Captain.
    The date was unclear.
    He removed the photo later. I do not understand why to keep the matter secret.
    Of course if you take a closer look to the military uniform of the soldiers , you will find that the badge on their right arm says “Rapid Deployment Forces”. Yes El-Sisi sent the newly formed forces to Saudi Arabia to participate in possible military intervention/Land invasion to Yemen according to where you stand.
    There has been not official statement from Egypt regarding this matter so far.

  • Saudi Arabia, Turkey Discussing Unlikely Alliance To Oust Syria’s Assad
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/12/saudi-arabia-turkey-syria_n_7012268.html

    Turkey and Saudi Arabia, two nations with a long history of rivalry, are in high-level talks with the goal of forming a military alliance to oust Syrian President Bashar Assad, according to sources familiar with the discussions.

    The talks are being brokered by Qatar. As the partnership is currently envisioned, Turkey would provide ground troops, supported by Saudi Arabian airstrikes, to assist moderate Syrian opposition fighters against Assad’s regime, according to one of the sources.

  • Egyptian Chronicles: Egypt’s Rapid Deployment Forces Head to the Kingdom !?

    http://egyptianchronicles.blogspot.it/2015/04/egypts-rapid-deployment-forces-head-to.html

    Egypt’s Rapid Deployment Forces Head to the Kingdom !?
    There is a lot of reaction about my post regarding the Egyptian Ground troops in Saudi Arabia.
    The rumors mill did not stop on Sunday , in fact I woke up and found lots of talk about a photo showing Egyptian soldiers wearing their uniform in their way allegedly to Saudi Arabia in a civilian Egypt Air Flight “Why would they go on an Egypt Air Flight in the first place? “ on twitter and Facebook.

    Going to Saudi Arabia then to Yemen ?? “Mohamed El-Bolok” 
    The Egyptian and Yemeni social media users claimed that those smiling soldiers were actually the first group of Egyptian Ground troops heading to the Kingdom and then to Yemen.
    This photo was posted by Egyptian Sky News Arabia Correspondent Mohamed ElBolok on his Facebook account earlier Sunday. According to El-Bolok it was taken by the flight’s Captain.
    The date was unclear.
    He removed the photo later. I do not understand why to keep the matter secret.
    Of course if you take a closer look to the military uniform of the soldiers , you will find that the badge on their right arm says “Rapid Deployment Forces”. Yes El-Sisi sent the newly formed forces to Saudi Arabia to participate in possible military intervention/Land invasion to Yemen according to where you stand.
    There has been not official statement from Egypt regarding this matter so far.

  • Il faudrait savoir,
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/12/us-saudi-iran-yemen-idUSKBN0N30F220150412

    “How can Iran call for us to stop the fighting in Yemen ... We came to Yemen to help the legitimate authority, and Iran is not in charge of Yemen,” Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal said in the Saudi capital Riyadh at a press conference with French counterpart Laurent Fabius.

  • Saudi Arabia’s American-Backed War in Yemen Went Really Badly Today
    https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/04/09/saudi_arabias_american_backed_war_in_yemen_went_really_badly_today

    Neither of those goals currently appears achievable. Instead of being halted, the Houthi rebels, whom Saudi Arabia claims are backed by Iran, have gained territory. On Thursday, they took the city of Ataq, a Sunni stronghold. Local residents told Reuters that the city’s security forces and tribal chiefs helped the Houthis enter the city.

    Meanwhile, fighting continues in the city of Aden, a city of about 800,000 on the brink of a humanitarian catastrophe. The city, a port on the southern coast, is currently the scene of street-to-street fighting, and humanitarian agencies report having difficulties delivering aid. International shipping companies are steering clear of Yemeni ports — terrible news for a place that imports about 90 percent of its food and which faces a looming water crisis. “It’s nearly catastrophic,” Marie Claire Feghali, the International Committee of the Red Cross spokeswoman in Yemen, told Reuters.

    Amid this fighting, al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), the terrorist group’s Yemen affiliate, is making territorial gains. On Thursday, the group seized government offices in al-Siddah district, which had previously been controlled by the Houthis. Last week, AQAP, which U.S. spies consider to be al Qaeda’s most dangerous offshoot, seized the port city of Mukalla.

    • http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/04/10/america-has-abdicated-its-guiding-role-in-the-middle-east-to-a-sectar

      The administration defends the Saudis’ resort to force to stem the tide of the takeover of Yemen: The Houthis had placed Scud missiles on the border, while Iran had begun regular flights to Saada, the Houthi stronghold. But the State Department official I spoke to added that the hostilities would have to end soon in order to limit death and destruction, and to bring the Houthis to a political settlement.

      There is, unfortunately, no sign that Saudi King Salman bin Abdulaziz agrees with that proposition. His apparent plan is to bomb the Houthis into submission. What’s more, the Saudis are new to the game of military intervention, and they seem bent on reproducing America’s worst mistakes. The air war has caused over 500 civilian deaths and an incipient humanitarian disaster; created new opportunities for al Qaeda, which has seized Mukalla, Yemen’s fifth-largest city; and done nothing to hinder the Houthis’ bid to conquer the strategic southern city of Aden. It’s not a very encouraging prototype.

      The fight is only two weeks old and perhaps the tide will turn. The more lasting problem is King Salman’s idea of a political solution. Once he’s evicted the Houthis, he plans to restore to power President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi, who was forced to flee Yemen to Saudi Arabia. But it was the Saudis who put Hadi there in the first place; so weak is his writ that his army effectively abandoned him in favor of his widely hated predecessor, Ali Abdullah Saleh. Hadi might survive, but only as a Saudi puppet. What’s more, the Houthis are not Iran’s puppets, as the Saudis insist, but a powerful indigenous force whose demands must be accommodated in a power-sharing agreement.

      A comparable situation can be seen in Libya, where Egypt has given political and military support to the Tobruk government in its effort to destroy the rival government based in Tripoli. The former is avowedly “moderate,” the other “Islamist,” but these oversimplified terms disguise the reality of different regions, tribes, and ethnic groups vying for control. Again, the only lasting solution would be a political one. Yet right now the greatest obstacle to a cease-fire is the refusal of the Tobruk government to negotiate with the Islamists. The Tobruk prime minister, Abdullah al-Thinni, has demanded that the Arabs do in Libya what they’re now doing in Yemen. That would be a catastrophe.

  • Islamabad close to decision on Yemen military deployment - FT.com
    http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/31ad46ba-dc67-11e4-a6f7-00144feab7de.html?ftcamp=crm/email/201547/nbe/WorldNews/product#axzz3WVl0XYX5

    Khawaja Mohammad Asif, defence minister, had earlier told parliament: “Saudi Arabia has asked for combat planes, warships and soldiers.” He did not say if Pakistan would agree or what the extent of any deployments might be.
    In recent days, Pakistani leaders have said repeatedly they are determined to defend Saudi’s “territorial integrity”. Officials have also spoken of protecting the sanctity of Islam — Saudi being the birthplace of the religion practised by more than 95 per cent of Pakistanis.
    However, any troop deployment risks further sharpening the divisions between Pakistan’s Sunni Muslims, including many who are sympathetic to Saudi, and the minority Shia, who tend to look to predominantly Shia Iran for spiritual guidance and are sympathetic to the Houthi rebels.

  • « Les hommes ont le droit de manger leur femme » : la prétendue fatwa circule mais le grand mufti d’Arabie saoudite nie l’avoir prononcée - Al Arabiya.net

    http://english.alarabiya.net/en/perspective/features/2015/04/10/Saudi-fatwa-allowing-husbands-to-eat-wives-unsubstantiated-.html

    Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdulaziz bin Abdullah al-Sheikh has denied issuing a fatwa (religious edict) which allows a hungry man to eat his wife, or parts of her body, in the case of famine or if eating his wife would result in saving his own life.

    Over the past few days, several pro-Iranian media outlets, such as the online portal of Al Allam news channel and Lebanon’s al-Jumohouria newspaper have carried the story without backing it with any evidence or specifying where or when such a fatwa has been issued.

  • Tensions rise as Iran condemns Saudi air strikes against Yemen
    http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/a35704ca-deb2-11e4-8a01-00144feab7de.html?siteedition=intl#axzz3Wq5VB17a

    Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Thursday accused Saudi Arabia of “genocide” in Yemen and urged the Arab monarchy to stop its “disastrous crimes as soon as possible,” as escalating rhetoric compounded regional tensions.

  • By asking for ‘Sunni soldiers’ Saudi Arabia is trying to divide Pakistan Army
    http://nation.com.pk/blogs/05-Apr-2015/by-asking-for-sunni-soldiers-saudi-arabia-is-trying-to-divide-pakistan-ar

    If I were to tell you that Saudi Arabia wants the Pakistan Army, but only the Sunni soldiers and officers, what would your reaction be?

    If I were to tell you that the training contingent that is in Saudi right now is only Sunni soldiers and officers, would you still believe that the Yemen war is justified?

    […]

    But the game here is much larger and we need to understand the context.

    In the past few months, the Pakistan Army, Pakistan Air Force and SSG Commandos have made great advances against the TTP and their affiliated organizations around the country. The GOP has been pushed to take action against the extremist madrasahs that are funded illegally by foreign countries, many of which are these same countries asking for our assistance now. When we are nearing the day where we can honestly say that the terrorist threat in Pakistan has been broken permanently, the Saudis have launched a campaign against the Houthis even though this conflict has been building for over 6 months.

    The army and the population of Pakistan are united for the first time in many years to eliminate the scourge of terrorism and extremism, the Saudi are now trying to not only divide the population, but divide our army as well. When a soldier puts on a uniform, he fights for the country that he calls home, not the religious beliefs that they carry individually. For a request/order to be made that the only acceptable soldiers for the Yemen conflict are Sunni and no Shia needs to be sent, it is clear that this is an attempt to divide our armed forces along religious grounds.

    The Pakistan Army is roughly 70% Sunni and to deny deployment to the other 30% smacks of discrimination and favoritism. Do they believe that a professional military like Pakistan’s can’t see beyond their individual religious beliefs to fight for a unified, justified cause? If that is the case, then why ask Pakistan to send its armed forces?

    Unless of course your objective is to cause division within our military command and fighting soldiers.

  • Erdogan in Tehran: Turkey wants to dance at every Mideast wedding - From breaking off with Israel and Syria, to the rift with Egypt and confrontations with the U.S., Turkey’s foreign policy has suffered blow after blow. Would a nuclear deal with Iran help Turkey reposition itself in the region?
    By Zvi Bar’el | Apr. 8, 2015 |Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/1.650923

    Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his Iranian counterpart Hassan Rohani looked on Tuesday like two hedgehogs trying to mate. Their statements during a press conference, at which no questions were allowed, sounded as if every comma in them had been very carefully programmed.

    “We need to undertake this mediation to stop the bloodshed in Iraq and Syria,” declared Erdogan, who refrained from mentioning Turkey’s involvement with the anti-Iran coalition that’s operating against the Houthis in Yemen. “I don’t care if they are Sunnis or Shi’ites being killed, they are all Muslims,” said the Turkish president, who, unlike Iran, is demanding that Syrian President Bashar Assad be removed from power as a condition for his joining the western coalition against the Islamic State group, also known as ISIS.

    These are not the only disputes between Turkey and Iran. Two weeks ago, Erdogan declared that Iran’s goal is to seize control of the region and that it must be stopped. As a result, 65 members of the Iranian parliament demanded that their president cancel Erdogan’s visit to Tehran. Moreover, Turkey positioned itself Saudi Arabia in the war against the Houthis in Yemen. The Saudis see Turkey as an ally in the Sunni axis it seeks to establish against Iran. The high price that Turkey is paying Iran for natural gas is also angering Erdogan, who promised to buy more gas if Iran would agree to lower it.

    But along with these differences, Iran and Turkey have many common interests. Trade between the two countries is worth some $14 billion and, at least according to their statements, they intend to triple its scope. The two countries see eye to eye on the risk posed by the establishment of an independent Kurdish state, and Turkey is also the major supplier of consumer goods to Iraq, which is under Iran’s patronage.

    Despite the chronic mutual suspicion, the economic and diplomatic ties with Iran are especially important to Turkey, which realizes the enormous potential opportunities if a nuclear agreement is signed with the world powers that lifts the sanctions imposed on Iran. The legitimacy that Iran would receive would allow Turkey to purchase large quantities of crude oil at a competitive price, integrate into the Iranian auto industry, and win huge construction tenders that are expected to be issued.

    At the same time, Turkey is not relinquishing the new ties that have developed with Saudi Arabia. These are liable to bring reconciliation with Egypt, from which Turkey has been cut off since Abdel-Fattah al-Sissi seized power in July 2013. Just before he left for Iran, Erdogan received the Saudi crown prince and interior minister, Mohammend bin Nayef, who asked for an assurance that Turkey would not deviate from the agreements reached between the two countries when Erdogan visited Riyadh last month, particularly with regard to cooperating in the war in Yemen.

    Once again, Turkey is trying to dance at all the weddings and reposition itself in the Middle East. So far, its foreign policy has suffered blow after blow: the breaks with Israel and Syria; major losses in Libya; the rift with Egypt; the cold winds from Saudi Arabia; and confrontation with the United States over Turkey’s refusal to join the coalition against ISIS. Turkish commentators hastened to compare Iran, which is liable to play a significant, if not primary role in the regional diplomatic games, to Turkey, which has lost its regional anchors; between Iran, whose president uses Twitter and Facebook, and Turkey, where the government has ordered the online social networks blocked. These are still far-fetched comparisons; Iran still has a long way to go just to get to the limited human rights that exist in Turkey. But in a region where images play a crucial role in the branding of nations, Iran is earning lots of credit points while Turkey is being pushed to the sidelines.

  • Iran and the Obama Doctrine
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/06/opinion/thomas-friedman-the-obama-doctrine-and-iran-interview.html

    As for protecting our Sunni Arab allies, like Saudi Arabia, the president said, they have some very real external threats, but they also have some internal threats — “populations that, in some cases, are alienated, youth that are underemployed, an ideology that is destructive and nihilistic, and in some cases, just a belief that there are no legitimate political outlets for grievances.

    And so part of our job is to work with these states and say, ‘How can we build your defense capabilities against external threats, but also, how can we strengthen the body politic in these countries, so that Sunni youth feel that they’ve got something other than [the Islamic State, or ISIS] to choose from. ... I think the biggest threats that they face may not be coming from Iran invading. It’s going to be from dissatisfaction inside their own countries. ... That’s a tough conversation to have, but it’s one that we have to have.”

  • The Pentagon plan to ‘divide and rule’ the Muslim world
    http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/pentagon-plan-divide-and-rule-muslim-world-1690265165

    Davidson points out that there is precedent for this: “There have been repeated references in the Reagan era to the usefulness of sectarian conflict in the region to US interests.”

    One post-Reagan reiteration of this vision was published by the Jerusalem-based Institute for Strategic and Political Advanced Studies for Benjamin Netanyahu. The 1996 paper, A Clean Break, by Douglas Feith, David Wurmser and Richard Perle – all of whom went on to join the Bush administration – advocated regime-change in Iraq as a precursor to forging an Israel-Jordan-Turkey axis that would “roll back” Syria, Lebanon and Iran. The scenario is surprisingly similar to US policy today under Obama.

    Twelve years later, the US Army commissioned a further RAND report suggesting that the US “could choose to capitalise on the Shia-Sunni conflict by taking the side of the conservative Sunni regimes in a decisive fashion and working with them against all Shiite empowerment movements in the Muslim world… to split the jihadist movement between Shiites and Sunnis.” The US would need to contain “Iranian power and influence” in the Gulf by “shoring up the traditional Sunni regimes in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Pakistan”. Simultaneously, the US must maintain “a strong strategic relationship with the Iraqi Shiite government” despite its Iran alliance.

    Around the same time as this RAND report was released, the US was covertly coordinating Saudi-led Gulf state financing to Sunni jihadist groups, many affiliated to al-Qaeda, from Iraq to Syria to Lebanon. That secret strategy accelerated under Obama in the context of the anti-Assad drive.

    The widening Sunni-Shia sectarian conflict would “reduce the al-Qaeda threat to US interests in the short term,” the report concluded, by diverting Salafi-jihadist resources toward “targeting Iranian interests throughout the Middle East,” especially in Iraq and Lebanon, hence “cutting back… anti-Western operations”.

    By backing the Iraqi Shiite regime and seeking an accommodation with Iran, while propping up al-Qaeda sponsoring Gulf states and empowering local anti-Shia Islamists across the region, this covert US strategy would calibrate levels of violence to debilitate both sides, and sustain “Western dominance”.

    Le rapport de la Rand : Unfolding the Future of the Long War, 2008 :
    http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2008/RAND_MG738.pdf

    Nafeez Ahmed avait déjà cité longuement ce document en août 2013 dans le Guardian (repris à l’époque sur Seenthis par Kassem) :
    http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2013/aug/30/syria-chemical-attack-war-intervention-oil-gas-energy-pipelines

    (via Angry Arab)

    • Ca, que les Etats-Unis aient aidé l’Arabie et les autres émirats à financer des groupes djihadistes, y a-t-il de véritables preuves ?

      “Around the same time as this RAND report was released, the US was covertly coordinating Saudi-led Gulf state financing to Sunni jihadist groups, many affiliated to al-Qaeda, from Iraq to Syria to Lebanon. That secret strategy accelerated under Obama in the context of the anti-Assad drive.”

    • #Israël – Palestine – Liban : Le chemin le plus long vers la paix-
      Auteur(s) :
      Pailhe Caroline
      08 Août 2006
      http://www.grip.org/fr/node/296

      Cette nouvelle guerre contre le Liban [2006] correspond en effet à la deuxième phase d’ un plan stratégique rédigé en 1996 au sein de l’ Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies de Jérusalem, par un groupe d’ experts sous la direction de #Richard_Perle, qui deviendra conseiller du Pentagone dans la présente Administration et jouera un rôle majeur dans la conception de la guerre en Irak.

      Soumis à l’ époque au Premier ministre israélien Benjamin #Netanyahu, le document, intitulé « A Clean Break : A New Strategy for Securing the Realm » (Un changement radical : Une nouvelle stratégie pour sécuriser le territoire), préconise un revirement de la stratégie israélienne[28].

      Au niveau des concepts, le plan prône l’ abandon de la stratégie « terre contre paix » poursuivie jusqu’ alors et plaide pour « #la_paix_par_la_force », une politique fondée sur le rapport de force (balance of power). Il recommande également l’ instauration du principe de #préemption, à côté de celui de #punition, dans la doctrine stratégique israélienne.

      Plus concrètement, le changement de stratégie visait à rompre avec le processus de paix d’ Oslo et fournir à Israël la possibilité d’ étendre une fois pour toutes son empire au-delà des frontières actuelles. Certaines des recommandations sont déjà des faits acquis : changement de régime en Irak, durcissement vis-à-vis des Palestiniens et affaiblissement d’ Arafat. Pour assurer la sécurité d’ Israël à sa frontière nord, le rapport recommande de « prendre l’ initiative stratégique » afin de combattre le Hezbollah, la Syrie et l’ Iran. C’ est ce qui se joue actuellement.

      A la base de ce document, le groupe d’ experts chargé d’ étudier la « Nouvelle stratégie israélienne pour 2000 » n’ était pratiquement constitué que d’ Américains qui, depuis, ont occupé des positions clés dans l’ Administration Bush et singulièrement dans la définition de sa politique étrangère au Moyen-Orient.

      Plus récemment, #Robert_Satloff, directeur d’ un autre think tank néoconservateur influent sur la politique moyen-orientale de Washington, louait la stratégie américaine d’ « #instabilité_constructive » au Liban et en Syrie[29].

      Il constate que, si la recherche de la #stabilité a été un trait caractéristique de la politique des #Etats-Unis dans la région, « George W. Bush a été le premier président à considérer que la stabilité en tant que telle était un obstacle à l’ avancement des intérêts américains au Moyen-Orient. (...) A cet effet, les Etats-Unis ont employé un éventail de mesures coercitives ou non coercitives, allant de l’ usage de la force militaire pour changer les régimes en Afghanistan et en Irak, en passant par une politique de la carotte et du bâton (...) pour isoler Yasser Arafat et encourager une nouvelle et pacifique direction palestinienne, jusqu’ aux encouragements courtois à l’ Egypte et à l’ Arabie saoudite pour les engager sur la voie des réformes. » Sur cet échiquier, le Liban et la Syrie seraient, pour M. Satloff, « un premier test » de cette politique d’ ’ instabilité constructive car « Israël et l’ Iran, l’ Europe et les Etats-Unis, la Syrie et les Palestiniens, tous ces chemins convergent à Beyrouth ». Il reconnaît que les Etats-Unis et leurs alliés locaux devront certes subir « quelques défaites tactiques » mais « avec de la persévérance, des changements positifs continus ne manqueront pas de se produire ».

    • The Redirection - Seymour Hersh, 2007
      http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/03/05/the-redirection

      In the past few months, as the situation in Iraq has deteriorated, the Bush Administration, in both its public diplomacy and its covert operations, has significantly shifted its Middle East strategy. The “redirection,” as some inside the White House have called the new strategy, has brought the United States closer to an open confrontation with Iran and, in parts of the region, propelled it into a widening sectarian conflict between Shiite and Sunni Muslims.

      To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has cooperated with Saudi Arabia’s government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda