• Une directrice d’école de Toulouse convoquée au rectorat pour avoir aidé des familles sans-abri - France Bleu
    https://www.francebleu.fr/infos/societe/une-directrice-d-ecole-de-toulouse-convoquee-au-rectorat-pour-avoir-aide-

    La directrice de l’école Simone-Veil, dans le quartier de la Reynerie à Toulouse, est convoquée ce vendredi pour « mise à l’abri d’une famille dans l’école ». Depuis décembre, plusieurs établissements ont aidé des parents et enfants qui dormaient dans la rue. (...)

    Une convocation difficile à avaler pour les enseignants du collectif « Jamais sans toit dans mon école », qui a initié ces actions avec des parents d’élèves depuis plusieurs semaines dans plusieurs écoles toulousaines. D’ailleurs, depuis mercredi 10 janvier, deux nouvelles familles sont accueillies le soir au sein de l’école Michoun, dans le quartier de la Roseraie. L’une d’entre elles est composée de huit enfants, qui dormaient dehors avec leurs parents, ou dans une voiture.

    #logement #solidarité #répression #sans-abri #enfants #école

  • Plus exposés mais aussi plus fragiles, les jeunes enfants des ménages modestes sont les plus affectés par la #pollution_de_l’air

    La Direction de la recherche, des études, de l’évaluation et des statistiques (DREES) publie une étude sur les inégalités de santé chez les jeunes enfants en lien avec la pollution de l’air. Au-delà des différences d’exposition, qui sont en défaveur à la fois des jeunes enfants des ménages les plus aisés et des ménages les plus modestes, il existe de fortes disparités de vulnérabilité vis-à-vis de la pollution de l’air. 10 % des enfants concentrent l’essentiel des effets observables lors d’une augmentation de l’exposition à la pollution de l’air avant leur premier anniversaire, via le recours aux soins en lien avec certaines pathologies respiratoires. Plus souvent dans un moins bon état de santé à la naissance, ils ne sont pas répartis de façon égale sur l’échelle de niveaux de vie des parents : parmi ces enfants les plus affectés, le dixième le plus modeste est 1,6 fois plus représenté que le dixième le plus aisé.

    L’exposition à la pollution de l’air est plus élevée chez les enfants les plus aisés et les plus modestes

    En France métropolitaine, ce sont les jeunes enfants vivant dans les ménages les plus aisés et dans les ménages les plus modestes qui sont les plus exposés à la pollution de l’air due aux particules fines de moins de 2,5 micromètres. D’une part, la pollution atmosphérique se concentre dans les villes, où les plus aisés résident plus souvent. D’autre part, les moins aisés vivent plus souvent, au sein des aires d’attraction des villes, dans les communes les plus polluées : au sein de ces espaces, ce sont les enfants des ménages les plus modestes qui sont les plus exposés du fait de leur localisation (graphique).

    Les enfants modestes, plus fragiles à la naissance et plus souvent hospitalisés en urgence pour asthme et bronchiolite

    Alors que les enfants nés prématurément représentent 9,1 % des naissances parmi les 10 % les plus modestes de la cohorte étudiée, ils représentent 6,1 % des enfants parmi les 10 % les plus aisés. Ainsi, les enfants les plus modestes ont un risque 1,5 fois plus élevé de naître prématurément que les plus aisés. En outre, parmi les enfants nés à terme, les plus modestes nécessitent en moyenne plus de soins lors de leur séjour de naissance. Avant leur troisième anniversaire, 1,4% des enfants sont admis à l’hôpital en urgence pour asthme sur la période étudiée (2008-2017). Cela représente environ 11 000 enfants nés chaque année qui sont touchés avant leur trois ans. En ce qui concerne les enfants les plus modestes, ils sont 1,9 % à être admis à l’hôpital en urgence pour asthme avant leur troisième anniversaire, contre 1,2 % des plus aisés, soit un risque multiplié par 1,6. Concernant les hospitalisations en urgence pour bronchiolite avant le deuxième anniversaire, qui concernent 3,6 % des enfants soit de l’ordre de 28 000 enfants nés chaque année, les différences sont encore plus marquées, avec un risque doublé pour les plus modestes par rapport aux plus aisés (graphique). En revanche, les délivrances de médicaments contre l’asthme en pharmacie de ville, qui concernent un peu plus d’un quart des enfants, sont bien moins fréquentes chez les plus modestes que pour les dixièmes de niveaux de vie intermédiaires à élevés. En l’absence de mesure directe de l’état de santé respiratoire, la consommation des médicaments contre l’asthme peut être interprétée à la fois comme le marqueur d’une pathologie respiratoire, aiguë ou chronique, mais également comme un indicateur de la qualité de sa prise en charge, puisqu’il existe des différences d’accès, de recours et d’observance des traitements.

    Des recours aux soins respiratoires plus fréquents chez les enfants surexposés à la pollution dans leur première année de vie

    La simple comparaison d’enfants plus exposés à la pollution de l’air que les autres de par leur lieu de vie sur des données observationnelles ne permet d’établir qu’une coïncidence entre cette exposition en moyenne sur l’année et le fait d’être traité pour soins respiratoires. Afin de pouvoir donner une interprétation causale aux estimations de l’effet d’une surexposition à la pollution atmosphérique, deux groupes de jeunes enfants sont ici comparés, un groupe « surexposé » et l’autre « sous-exposé » (l’appartenance à chaque groupe n’étant pas déterminé de façon univoque par le lieu de vie). L’assignation des enfants au groupe « fortement exposé » repose sur leur exposition dans leur première année de vie à un nombre plus important de jours avec une inversion thermique qu’habituellement dans leur commune de résidence, phénomène météorologique ayant pour conséquence l’accumulation des polluants atmosphériques, notamment, mais pas seulement, les PM2,5 et donc par une sur-exposition à la pollution de l’air de ces enfants « fortement exposés » (voir précaution méthodologique).

    Sur la période 2008-2017, environ 28 000 enfants de chaque génération sont hospitalisés pour bronchiolite avant leurs deux ans et 11 000 pour asthme avant leurs trois ans. Si l’on pouvait diminuer l’exposition moyenne annuelle aux principaux polluants atmosphérique d’environ 1 % sur la première année de vie, ce qui revient à préserver les enfants de moins de un an d’une quinzaine de jours d’augmentation ponctuelle importante de leur exposition à ces polluants, alors de l’ordre de 2 000 cas hospitalisés de bronchiolites, 1 800 cas hospitalisés d’asthmes et 6 100 prises en charge d’enfants avec des délivrances de médicaments anti-asthmatiques seraient évités.
    Les enfants les plus affectés par un surcroît de pollution de l’air font plus souvent partie des plus modestes

    La vulnérabilité à la pollution de l’air est vraisemblablement variable d’un enfant à l’autre, ce qu’occultent ces comparaisons globales. Concernant les hospitalisations en urgence pour bronchiolite et la délivrance de médicaments contre l’asthme, les effets importants, détectables statistiquement, seraient concentrés dans un groupe représentant 10 % des enfants, le groupe des enfants les plus affectés par la pollution de l’air. Que ce soit en termes d’hospitalisations en urgence pour bronchiolite ou de délivrance de médicaments anti-asthmatiques, les enfants les 10 % les plus affectés présentent plus souvent un état de santé défavorable à la naissance et font également plus souvent partie des plus modestes. Pour ce qui est des hospitalisations pour bronchiolite, ces disparités sont particulièrement marquées : les enfants les plus affectés par un surcroît de pollution de l’air dans leur première année sont avant tout des enfants dont l’état de santé à la naissance est moins favorable : 18,7 % sont nés prématurément, contre 5,9 % parmi les 50 % les moins affectés. Ces enfants appartiennent aussi 1,9 fois plus souvent au dixième de niveau de vie le plus modeste, qui représente 17,4 % des enfants les plus affectés.

    https://drees.solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/publications-communique-de-presse/etudes-et-resultats/plus-exposes-mais-aussi-plus-fragiles-les

    #pollution #pauvreté #air #France #enfants #enfance #inégalités #statistiques #chiffres #santé #inégalités_de_santé #vulnérabilité #pathologies_respiratoires #asthme #bronchiolite #hospitalisation

    • Pollution de l’air : la double peine pour les enfants de familles pauvres

      Un rapport de la Direction de la recherche, des études, de l’évaluation et des statistiques publié jeudi 4 janvier alerte sur les effets de la pollution de l’air sur les enfants. Ceux des familles les plus modestes sont les premières victimes des particules fines.

      LeLe titre de la publication est éloquent. « Plus exposés à la pollution de l’air, les jeunes enfants des ménages modestes, plus fragiles, sont les plus affectés », annonce la dernière étude de la Direction de la recherche, des études, de l’évaluation et des statistiques (Drees) parue le 4 janvier. Le département des études du ministère de la santé met en évidence de « fortes disparités de vulnérabilité » vis-à-vis de la pollution de l’air.

      L’étude se concentre sur les particules fines de moins de 2,5 micromètres de diamètre, dites PM2,5. Celles-ci peuvent être émises directement dans l’air par l’industrie, les transports routiers ou par des sources naturelles comme les feux de forêt. 40 000 décès prématurés par an leur sont imputables, a établi Santé publique France. Sans compter les très nombreuses personnes atteintes de pathologies liées à ces contaminations de l’air.

      En cas de hausse de la pollution, 10 % des enfants concentrent l’essentiel des effets sanitaires observables « avant leur premier anniversaire », notamment par des consultations médicales, en lien avec certaines pathologies respiratoires. Parmi eux, les enfants issus des milieux les plus modestes sont davantage représentés.

      La Drees précise que les jeunes enfants des ménages les plus modestes et ceux des ménages les plus aisés résident dans les grandes aires urbaines en France métropolitaine, précisément là où l’air est le plus pollué. Les plus modestes vivent souvent dans les communes les plus polluées. « 10 % des enfants les plus modestes ont, l’année de leur naissance, une exposition moyenne aux particules fines supérieure de 0,5 microgramme par mètre cube à celle des 10 % d’enfants les plus aisés. »

      Cette étude et ses conclusions précises s’inscrivent dans le sillage d’autres publications et confirment l’ampleur du problème. En 2021, un rapport conjoint du Réseau Action Climat (RAC) et de l’Unicef était consacré au sujet. On pouvait y lire que « les inégalités environnementales entre les enfants commencent dès la conception en période in utero, se cumulent et persistent à la naissance puis pendant l’enfance ».

      Séverine Deguen est chercheuse indépendante sur la question des inégalités environnementales et l’une des autrices du rapport du RAC et de l’Unicef. Elle se réjouit aujourd’hui que ce sujet fasse l’objet d’études spécifiques de la part du ministère de la santé et aimerait que la pollution de l’air soit considérée comme un vrai problème de santé publique.

      La chercheuse n’est pas surprise des conclusions de l’étude et rappelle que les enfants de milieux modestes subissent ce qu’elle nomme « une double peine ». Ils doivent affronter la pauvreté de leurs familles et toutes ses conséquences de privations matérielles, et de surcroît subir des problèmes de santé résultants de leur exposition accrue à la pollution de l’air.

      Et eux n’ont pas d’échappatoire, contrairement aux foyers les plus riches. « Les personnes aisées ont des conditions de vie qui font que leur travail ne les expose pas davantage à des nuisances environnementales. Et elles peuvent y échapper, par exemple partir davantage en vacances », développe-t-elle.

      Les inégalités s’observent en réalité dès la naissance. Les nourrissons dont les parents sont pauvres commencent leur vie en moins bonne santé, sans lien direct avec la pollution, que ceux des milieux favorisés. Ces enfants ont aussi par exemple plus de chance de naître prématurément, ce qui les fragilise davantage face à ces maladies.
      Hospitalisations plus nombreuses

      Ce qui est confirmé par les chiffres des hospitalisations consécutives à des problèmes respiratoires. Chaque année, 11 000 enfants de moins de 3 ans sont hospitalisés pour de l’asthme. Ceux issus des foyers les plus pauvres sont 1,9 % à être admis à l’hôpital en urgence pour cette pathologie respiratoire avant leur troisième anniversaire, contre 1,2 % des plus aisés, « soit un risque multiplié par 1,6 », précise la Drees.

      28 000 enfants de moins de 2 ans sont hospitalisés pour bronchiolite. Là, le risque d’être hospitalisé en urgence avant le deuxième anniversaire est « doublé pour les plus modestes par rapport aux plus aisés ».

      Les enfants de foyers modestes sont aussi vulnérables à la pollution de l’air du fait de certains logements, ajoute la chercheuse. La précarité énergétique subie par certaines familles les conduit à vivre avec de l’humidité ou des moisissures sur les murs et une moindre qualité de l’air intérieur.

      « Souvent, les enfants souffrent davantage d’asthme, de bronchites et d’allergies, souligne Séverine Deguen. En général, ces problèmes restent circonscrits au lieu de vie mais vont venir complètement exploser à la moindre exposition supplémentaire à la pollution de l’air. »

      Réduire la précarité énergétique en rénovant les logements concernés reste un levier efficace et concret, défend encore la chercheuse, pour aplanir ces inégalités de santé et environnementales. Pour la Drees, la réduction de 1 % de l’exposition des enfants à la pollution de l’air pourrait éviter jusqu’à 2 000 cas de bronchiolites et 1 800 cas d’asthme nécessitant une hospitalisation.

      https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/france/050124/pollution-de-l-air-la-double-peine-pour-les-enfants-de-familles-pauvres

    • Les enfants pauvres, premiers à souffrir de la pollution de l’air

      Le ministère de la Santé a publié jeudi 4 janvier une étude révélant les inégalités environnementales qui frappent les enfants les plus modestes en France. Ces derniers sont les plus affectés par la pollution de l’air et cumulent l’ensemble des facteurs de risque : leurs lieux de vie sont plus exposés et situés à proximité des sources de pollutions, leur accès au soin est également dégradé.

      En conséquence, ils sont les premiers à souffrir de la détérioration de la qualité de l’air. Les enfants surexposés ont plus de risques d’être hospitalisés en urgence pour bronchiolite et pour asthme, rappelle l’étude. Plus fragiles à la naissance, les enfants issus de famille modestes sont également les plus enclins à subir des complications respiratoires.
      1 200 enfants morts prématurés en Europe

      Selon les données de l’étude, 10 % des enfants concentrent l’essentiel des effets sanitaires détectables lors d’une hausse de la pollution, et la majorité d’entre eux vivent dans les milieux les plus pauvres. « Ces enfants ne sont pas répartis de façon égale sur l’échelle de niveaux de vie des parents : parmi ces enfants les plus affectés, le dixième le plus modeste est 1,6 fois plus représenté que le dixième le plus aisé », soulignent les auteurs du rapport.

      Au total, 11 000 enfants nés chaque année sont touchés avant leurs 3 ans par de l’asthme et 28 000 enfants sont affectés par une bronchiolite avant le deuxième anniversaire. Les enfants les plus modestes ont 1,6 fois plus de risques d’être touchés par de l’asthme que les plus aisés et 2 fois plus de risques pour la bronchiolite.

      En revanche, les délivrances de médicaments contre l’asthme en pharmacie de ville, qui concernent un peu plus d’un quart des enfants, sont bien moins fréquentes chez les plus modestes que pour les dixièmes de niveaux de vie intermédiaires à élevés.

      En Europe, la pollution de l’air tue chaque année au moins 1 200 enfants et adolescents prématurément.

      https://reporterre.net/Les-enfants-les-plus-pauvres-sont-les-plus-touches-par-la-pollution-de-l

  • [En direct] L’Unicef fait état d’un nombre « sans précédent » d’enfants tués en #Cisjordanie
    https://www.rfi.fr/fr/moyen-orient/20231228-en-direct-la-situation-sanitaire-se-d%C3%A9t%C3%A9riore-%C3%A0-gaza-un-

    L’Unicef a fait état d’un nombre record d’enfants tués en Cisjordanie en 2023 : dans les douze dernières semaines, 83 #enfants ont été tués. 124 enfants palestiniens et 6 enfants israéliens ont été tués dans des violences liées au conflit entre Israël et Palestine depuis début 2023.

  • Trieste capolinea: diventare adulti lungo la rotta balcanica
    https://www.balcanicaucaso.org/aree/Italia/Trieste-capolinea-diventare-adulti-lungo-la-rotta-balcanica-229074

    Trieste, città di frontiera, è l’ultima fermata della rotta balcanica. Nel 2023 i dati hanno registrato un incremento degli arrivi dei minori non accompagnati. Cosa vuol dire crescere lungo la rotta balcanica? Cosa succede una volta arrivati a Trieste? Un’analisi

  • When the Coast Guard Intercepts Unaccompanied Kids

    A Haitian boy arrived on Florida’s maritime border. His next five days detained at sea illuminate the crisis facing children traveling to the U.S. alone and the crews forced to send them back.

    Tcherry’s mother could see that her 10-year-old son was not being taken care of. When he appeared on their video calls, his clothes were dirty. She asked who in the house was washing his shirts, the white Nike T-shirt and the yellow one with a handprint that he wore in rotation. He said nobody was, but he had tried his best to wash them by hand in the tub. His hair, which was buzzed short when he lived with his grandmother in Haiti, had now grown long and matted. He had already been thin, but by January, after three months in the smuggler’s house, he was beginning to look gaunt. Tcherry told his mother that there was not enough food. He said he felt “empty inside.”

    More strangers, most of them Haitian like Tcherry, continued to arrive at the house in the Bahamas on their way to the United States. One day police officers came with guns, and Tcherry hid in a corner; they left when a man gave them money. The next time he and his mother talked, Tcherry lowered his bright, wide-set eyes and spoke to her in a quieter voice. “It was like he was hiding,” his mother, Stephania LaFortune, says. “He was scared.” Tcherry told her he didn’t want to spend another night on the thin mattress in the front room with scuffed pink walls. She assured him it would be over soon. A boat would take him to Florida, and then he would join her in Canada, where she was applying for asylum. LaFortune texted Tcherry photos of the city where she lived. The leaves had turned brown and fallen from the trees. Still, she was there, and that’s where Tcherry wanted to be. He waited another week, then two, then three.

    Tcherry didn’t laugh or play for months on end, until one day in February, when two sisters, both Haitian citizens, were delivered to the house. One was a 4-year-old named Beana. She wore a pink shirt and cried a lot. The other, Claire, was 8. She had a round face and a burn on her hand; she said that at the last house they’d stayed in, a girl threw hot oil on her. Claire did everything for her sister, helping her eat, bathe and use the bathroom. Like Tcherry, the girls were traveling to join their mother, who was working at a Michigan auto plant on a temporary legal status that did not allow her to bring her children from abroad. Their clothes were as dirty as his. Sometimes Tcherry and Claire watched videos on his phone. They talked about their mothers. “I am thinking about you,” Tcherry said in a message to his mother in early February. “It has been a long time.”

    Finally, nearly four months after Tcherry arrived at the house, one of the men in charge of the smuggling operation woke him and the two girls early in the morning. “He told us to get ready,” Tcherry recalls. With nothing but the clothes they wore, no breakfast or ID, they were loaded into a van and were dropped off at a trash-lined canal just outside Freeport, Bahamas. In the muck and garbage, more than 50 people stood waiting as a boat motored toward them. “Not a good boat,” Tcherry told me, “a raggedy boat.” But nobody complained. The 40-foot vessel tilted from the weight as people climbed aboard and pushed into the two dank cabins, sitting shoulder to shoulder or standing because there was no more space. Tcherry felt the boat speeding up, taking them out to sea.

    For almost 12 hours they traveled west, packed together in cabins that now smelled of vomit and urine. In the lower cabin, a baby was crying incessantly. A heavily pregnant woman offered up the last of her package of cookies to the child’s mother to help soothe the infant. Tcherry was thirsty and exhausted. Not far from him, he heard a woman say that the children’s parents must be wicked for sending them alone into the sea.

    The passengers had been promised they would reach U.S. shores hours earlier. People were starting to panic, sure that they were lost, when passengers sitting near the windows saw lights, at first flickering and then bright — the lights of cars and buildings. “That is Florida,” a young man said as the boat sped toward shore. Tcherry pulled on his sneakers. “If I make it,” he thought, “I will spend Christmas with my family.”

    But as quickly as the lights of Florida came into view, police lights burst upon them. A siren wailed. People screamed, a helicopter circled overhead and an officer on a sheriff’s boat pointed a long gun toward them. Uniformed men climbed on board, yelled orders and handed out life jackets. The group of 54 people was transferred to a small Coast Guard cutter. As the sun rose over Florida just beyond them, a man with a tattoo on his arm of a hand making the sign of the benediction began recording a video on his phone. “As you can see, we are in Miami,” he said. “As you can see, we are on a boat with a bunch of small children.” He intended to send the video to relatives waiting for him on land, and he urged them to contact lawyers. But his phone was confiscated, and the video was never sent.

    The Coast Guard frames its operations in the sea as lifesaving work: Crews rescue people from boats at risk of capsizing and pull them from the water. But the agency, which is an arm of the Department of Homeland Security, also operates as a maritime border patrol, its ships as floating holding facilities. Since the summer of 2021, the Coast Guard has detained more than 27,000 people, a number larger than in any similar period in nearly three decades. On a single day in January, the agency’s fleet of ships off the Florida coast collectively held more than 1,000 people. The public has no way of knowing what happens on board. Unlike at the U.S.-Mexico border, which is closely monitored by advocates, the courts and the press, immigration enforcement at sea takes place out of public view.

    The Coast Guard routinely denies journalists’ requests to witness immigration patrols, but in early March, I learned that several days earlier, a boat carrying dozens of Haitians had been stopped so close to land that they were first chased down by the Palm Beach County sheriff’s marine unit. Among them were three unaccompanied children: two young sisters and a 10-year-old boy. In the months afterward, I obtained a trove of internal Coast Guard documents, including emails and a database of the agency’s immigration interdictions, and I tracked down Tcherry, Claire and Beana and 18 people traveling with them. Many of them told me about the five days they spent detained on Coast Guard ships — an experience, one man said, “that will remain a scar in each person’s mind.”

    People intercepted at sea, even in U.S. waters, have fewer rights than those who come by land. “Asylum does not apply at sea,” a Coast Guard spokesperson told me. Even people who are fleeing violence, rape and death, who on land would be likely to pass an initial asylum screening, are routinely sent back to the countries they’ve fled. To try to get through, people held on Coast Guard ships have occasionally taken to harming themselves — swallowing sharp objects, stabbing themselves with smuggled knives — in the hope that they’ll be rushed to emergency rooms on land where they can try to claim asylum.

    The restrictions, combined with the nearly 30-year spike in maritime migration, created a crisis for the Coast Guard too, leading to what one senior Coast Guard official described in an internal email in February as “war-fighting levels of stress and fatigue.” Coast Guard crew members described to me their distress at having to reject desperate person after desperate person, but the worst part of the job, several said, was turning away the children who were traveling alone. From July 2021 to September 2023, the number of children without parents or guardians held by the Coast Guard spiked, a nearly tenfold increase over the prior two years. Most of them were Haitian. “The hardest ones for me are the unaccompanied minors,” one crew member told me. “They’re put on this boat to try to come to America, and they have no one.”

    The treatment of children is perhaps the starkest difference between immigration policy on land and at sea. At land borders, unaccompanied minors from countries other than Mexico and Canada cannot simply be turned back. They are assigned government caseworkers and are often placed in shelters, then with family members, on track to gain legal status. That system has its own serious failings, but the principle is that children must be protected. Not so at sea. U.S. courts have not determined what protections should extend to minors held on U.S. ships, even those detained well within U.S. waters. The Coast Guard says that its crew members screen children to identify “human-trafficking indicators and protection concerns including fear of return.” A spokesperson told me that “migrants who indicate a fear of return receive further screening” by Homeland Security officials.

    But of the almost 500 unaccompanied children held on the agency’s cutters in the Caribbean and the Straits of Florida between July 2021 and early September 2023, five were allowed into the U.S. because federal agencies believed they would face persecution at home, even amid escalating violence in Haiti, including the documented murder and rape of children. One other child was medically evacuated to a hospital in Florida, and six were brought to land for reasons that the internal Coast Guard records do not explain. The rest were delivered back to the countries they left, and it’s often unclear where they go once they return. Some have nowhere to stay and no one to take care of them. On occasion, they are so young that they don’t know the names of their parents or the country where they were born. One official from an agency involved in processing people delivered by the U.S. Coast Guard to Haiti told me “it is an open secret” that the process can be dangerously inconsistent. “Children leave the port,” the official said, “and what happens to them after they leave, no one knows.”

    Stephania LaFortune had not wanted to send her 10-year-old son on a boat by himself. She knew firsthand how perilous the journey could be. In May 2021, before the boat she had boarded made it to a Florida beach, some of the passengers jumped into the water to wade through the heavy waves. “They almost drowned,” she told me when I met her in Toronto. LaFortune waited on the beached vessel until U.S. Border Patrol officials came to detain her. In detention, she claimed asylum and was soon released. For months, she searched for other ways to bring Tcherry to her, but LaFortune ultimately determined she had no alternative.

    The first time LaFortune left Tcherry, he was 3 years old. Her husband, a police cadet, had been shot in his uniform and left to die in a ditch outside Port-au-Prince, and LaFortune, fearing for her life, departed for the Bahamas. Tcherry stayed behind with his grandmother. Four years later, as violence began to flare again, Tcherry’s mother finally made good on her promise to send for him. She arranged for him to fly to the Bahamas, where she had remarried and had a baby girl. But Tcherry was in the Bahamas not even a year when LaFortune told him that she would be leaving again — not because she wanted to, she assured her sobbing son, but because she had seen how Haitians were harassed and deported, and she simply didn’t believe there was real opportunity there. Tcherry’s stepfather and his younger half sister, who were Bahamian citizens, joined LaFortune months later. She arranged for Tcherry to live with relatives, promising to send for him as soon as she could.

    LaFortune’s asylum case in Florida dragged on, so she and her husband and daughter traveled over land to Canada, where they hoped they could get legal status more quickly. While they waited for a decision in their asylum case, the relative Tcherry was staying with said he could no longer take care of a growing boy by himself. After begging others to take her son, LaFortune found a woman she knew back in Haiti who said she was planning to make the trip to Florida herself with her own children. For $3,000, the woman said, she could take Tcherry with them. LaFortune sent the money. The woman took Tcherry to the smuggler’s house and did not return for him.

    That house, and the one where Tcherry was moved next, were filled with Haitians fleeing the crisis that began in July 2021, when President Jovenel Moïse was assassinated by a team of mostly Colombian mercenaries hired through a Miami-area security company. The U.S. Justice Department has accused nearly a dozen people, some based in the United States, of setting the assassination in motion. As the Haitian state crumbled, proliferating gangs, many with ties to the country’s political elite, burst from the neighborhoods they’d long controlled and began terrorizing Port-au-Prince and swaths of the rest of the country. Kidnapping, extortion, the rape of women and children, and the torching of homes and neighborhoods became routine weapons of fear. Thousands have been murdered, and in June the United Nations estimated that nearly 200,000 have been internally displaced. Haitians able to gather the resources have left however they can. Many have traveled over land to the Dominican Republic or by air to South and Central America. And thousands have boarded boats bound for the beaches of Florida.

    The people on the vessel with Tcherry had reasons, each as urgent as the next, for being there. There was a 31-year-old street vendor whose Port-au-Prince neighborhood had been taken over by gangs; she said that when she tried to flee north by bus, men with guns forced her and other women off the bus and raped them. A man from a district in the north said he’d been beaten more than once by thugs sent by a political boss he’d opposed; both times they threatened to kill him. A man who worked as a Vodou priest in Port-au-Prince said he left because he needed money for his sick daughter, and gangs were confiscating his wages. The pregnant woman who helped comfort the crying baby said she had been kidnapped and raped; she was released only after her family sold land and collected donations to pay for her ransom. Two women were traveling with their daughters, but Tcherry, Claire and Beana were the only young children traveling alone.

    Tcherry sat on the deck of a Coast Guard cutter called the Manowar along with the rest of the group, exhausted, scared and confused. Nobody had explained to him what would happen next. Crew members in blue uniforms finally gave them food, small plates of rice and beans, and began to search their belongings and run their photos and fingerprints through federal immigration and criminal databases. Tcherry and the sisters followed the orders of a crew member with blond hair, cut like the soldiers in movies Tcherry had seen, to sit in the shaded spot under the stairs to the bridge.

    On the stern of the cutter, a man in his early 30s named Peterson sat watching the children. He had crossed paths with them weeks earlier in one of the houses; seeing they were hungry, he had brought them extra slices of bread and even cut Tcherry’s hair. Claire reminded him of his own young daughter in Haiti. Peterson had not wanted to leave his child, but gangs had recently taken control of roadways not far from his home in the coastal city of Saint-Marc. He had not earned a decent wage for many months, not since he lost his job as a driver at a missionary organization. He had decided to leave for the United States so he could send money back to Haiti for his daughter, who remained behind with her mother.

    Now it occurred to Peterson that his connection to Tcherry and the girls could work to his advantage. Surely the Coast Guard wouldn’t return children to Haiti, he thought. Surely they wouldn’t separate a family. “I thought that there might be an opportunity for me to get to the U.S.,” he told me. He approached Tcherry, Claire and Beana and told them they should tell the crew he was their uncle.

    Peterson’s small kindness in the smuggler’s house had given Tcherry reason to trust him. When it came time for the blond-haired crew member, Petty Officer Timothy James, to interview the children, Peterson stood close behind. With the help of another Haitian man who spoke some English, Peterson told James that he was their uncle. James asked the children if it was true. Tcherry and Claire, both timid, their eyes lowered, said it was. Beana was too young to understand. James handed her a brown teddy bear, which the crew of the Manowar keeps on board because of the growing number of children they detain, and sent the children back to the stern.

    But no more than a couple of hours later, Peterson changed his mind. He’d noticed that the pregnant woman had been evaluated by Florida EMTs, and he moved over to offer her a deal: If she would tell the crew he was her husband and let him join her if they brought her to land, his brother in Florida, who already paid $6,000 for his place on this boat, would make sure she was compensated. “I helped her understand that that is something she could profit from,” he says. The woman agreed, and Peterson, who now needed to tell the truth about the children, divulged to a crew member that he was not their uncle. “I was just trying to help if I could,” he said.

    James crouched down beside the children again and told them not to lie. “Why did you leave your home to go to the United States,” he read off a questionnaire. “To go to my parents,” Tcherry replied. To Tcherry, the questions seemed like a good sign. He was unsure whether he could trust these crew members after the officer on the sheriff boat pointed a long gun at them the night before. “I thought they were going to shoot me,” Tcherry says. But James calmly directed the children to sit in the one shaded place on the boat, and gave them cookies and slices of apple. “He was nice,” Tcherry says — the nicest anyone had been since Peterson brought them bread in the house.

    James kept reading the form. “What will happen when you get there?” he asked. Tcherry looked up. He latched onto the words “when you get there” and took them as a promise. He asked James when they would be on land. James said the same thing he told everyone on the boat: that the decision was not up to him, that he was just doing his job. Tcherry was convinced James would send him and Claire and Beana to their mothers. He thought of the story his mother had told him about his father’s murder, his body in a ditch by the road, and of his last memory of Haiti, when he passed through a gang checkpoint on the way to the airport. “I saw bandits approaching toward us, and he had a gun pulled,” Tcherry told me. “My heart started beating fast, and I thought he was going to shoot.” He was overwhelmed with relief that he would never have to go back there.

    A boat came to bring someone to land. But it was not there to pick up Tcherry or the other children. A Coast Guard medical officer had reviewed the pregnant woman’s vitals and made a decision that because she “may go into labor at any moment,” she would be brought to a hospital in Palm Beach County accompanied by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Before she was taken away, Peterson said the woman told him she would not claim to be married to him after all. She didn’t want a stranger on her baby’s birth certificate. She offered to say she was his cousin. “I knew that being the cousin would not be enough,” Peterson recalls, “and I have to say that I lost hope.”

    The pregnant woman disappeared on a small boat toward land. Those left on the stern began to talk among themselves, asking why the baby, who had barely stopped crying, and the other children had been left aboard the cutter. They said they could not keep going like this, eating only small portions of scarcely cooked and saltless rice and beans, unable to bathe and forced to urinate and defecate in a toilet seat attached to a metal box with a tube off the side of the open deck. They decided they would rise in unison and protest, and they passed the word from one to the next. At around 9 p.m., dozens of people began to yell toward the bridge demanding interpreters, lawyers or just to know what would become of them. From the bow where he stood, James heard faint yelling, and then the voice of the officer in charge over the loudspeaker. “They’re starting an uprising on the fantail,” he said. “I need you back there.”

    Timothy James came from a conservative family in a conservative little town in the mountains of North Carolina. He and his wife held handguns aloft in their wedding photos, and his first job after dropping out of college was as a sheriff’s deputy at the jail. James joined the Coast Guard in 2015. “My main goal,” he told me, “was to chase down drug runners and catch migrants” — two groups that were more or less the same, as far as he understood.

    He’d been on the job no more than a few weeks before his expectations were upended. “I had no idea what I was talking about,” he told me. There was much less “running and gunning, catching bad guys” than he’d anticipated. Instead, the people he detained would tell him their stories, sometimes with the help of Google Translate on his phone, about violence and deprivation like he had never contemplated. People described what it was like to live on $12 a month. There were children and grandmothers who could have been his own, and young men not so unlike him. They were not trying to infiltrate the country as he’d thought. They were running because “they didn’t have another option,” he says.

    James and his colleagues learned the lengths people would go to try to get to land. Since last fall, people detained on cutters have pulled jagged metal cotter pins, bolts and screws from the rigging and swallowed them, apparently trying to cause such severe injury that they’d be taken to a hospital. Last August, near the Florida Keys, three Cuban men were reported to the Coast Guard by a passing towboat operator; most likely fearing they would be brought back to Cuba, they stabbed and slashed their legs with blades and were found in puddles of blood. In January, a man plunged a five-inch buck-style knife that he’d carried onto a cutter into the side of his torso and slashed it down his rib cage. The crew taped the knife to the wound to stop him from bleeding out as he fell unconscious. Most of these people were delivered to Customs and Border Protection and rushed to hospitals on land, where they probably intended to claim asylum. By the time James began working as operations officer on the Manowar last summer, he and other crew members started every leg at sea by scouring the decks for anything that people might use to harm themselves. (According to a DHS spokesperson, “medical evacuations do not mean that migrants have a greater chance of remaining in the United States.”)

    People detained on cutters have in rare cases threatened to harm Coast Guard members or others they’re traveling with. In January, a group the Coast Guard detained pushed crew members and locked arms to stop their removal to another cutter, according to an internal record. That same month, a group of Haitians held children over the side of a boat, “threatening to throw them overboard and set them on fire” if the Coast Guard came closer. Weeks later, a group of Cubans brandished poles with nails hammered into them and tried to attack an approaching Coast Guard boat. Conflicts between crew and those they detain have escalated to the point that Coast Guard members have shot people with pepper balls and subdued others with stun maneuvers.

    James tensed as he heard the order over the loudspeaker. He thought of the crowd-control techniques he’d learned to immobilize someone, and stepped down the side walkway toward the stern. In front of him were dozens of angry men and a few women, yelling in Haitian Creole. James hesitated and then walked forcefully up to the group, his hands pulled into his sides as if he were ready to throw a punch. Instead, he took a knee. He gestured to the men around him to come join him. He spoke into a cellphone in English, and on the screen he showed them the Google Translate app: “You’ve got to tell everybody to calm down,” it read in Creole. “I can’t help you if I don’t know what’s going on.”

    Before they could respond, five other crew members came down the stairs, plastic zip ties and batons hanging from their belts. Tcherry was sitting under the stairs, beside Claire and Beana, who had not let go of the teddy bear. “Shut up, shut up,” one of the crew told the protesters as he stepped in front of Tcherry. “One of them said he was going to pepper-spray their eyes and handcuff them,” Tcherry says. James told his colleagues to wait. The yelling in English and Creole grew louder. A man to Tcherry’s left began to scream and roll on the ground, and then he rolled partway under the handrail. A crew member grabbed the man by the back of the pants and hauled him up. James secured his wrist to a post on the deck. “Nobody’s dying on my boat today,” James said.

    Above Tcherry, another crew member stepped onto the landing at the top of the stairs. He held a shotgun and cocked it. James claims that the gun was not loaded, but the threat of violence had its intended effect. The protesters stepped back and went quiet.

    James kept speaking into the phone. “What do you want?” he asked the men.

    “If we go back, we’re dead,” one man replied. They said they could not endure being on the boat much longer.

    “If it were up to me, we’d be taking you to land,” James said. “But it is not up to us.” There was a process to seek protection, he told them. “But what you’re doing now is not that process.”

    Coast Guard crews do not decide who will be offered protection and who will be sent back. Their responsibility is only to document what the agency calls “manifestation of fear” (MOF) claims. The Coast Guard instructs them to make note of such claims only when people proactively assert them or when they observe people exhibiting signs of fear, such as shaking or crying. They are not supposed to ask. That may help explain why the agency has logged only 1,900 claims from more than 27,000 people detained in this region between July 2021 and September 2023. Fewer than 300 of those came from Haitians, even though they make up about a third of people held on cutters. Officials in the Coast Guard and in U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services told me that Haitians face a systemic disadvantage in making a successful claim for protection: Almost no one working on Coast Guard boats can speak or understand Creole. (The Coast Guard told me it has access to contracted Creole interpreters aboard cutters.)

    Regardless of the person’s nationality, the process is nearly always a dead end. Each person who makes a claim for protection is supposed to be referred to a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services officer, who conducts a “credible fear” screening by phone or in person on a cutter. Between July 2021 and early September 2023, USCIS approved about 60 of the approximately 1,900 claims — around 3%. By contrast, about 60% of asylum applicants on land passed a credible-fear screening over roughly the same period. Unlike on land, people who are denied on ships have no access to courts or lawyers to appeal the decision. And the few who are approved are not sent to the United States at all. Should they choose to proceed with their claims, they are delivered to an immigration holding facility at the U.S. naval base at Guantánamo Bay, where they are evaluated again. They’re told they should be prepared to wait for two years or more, until another country agrees to take them as refugees. Only 36 of the people with approved claims agreed to be sent to Guantánamo. The State Department says there are currently no unaccompanied minors held at the Migrant Operations Center at Guantánamo, but a recent federal contract document says that the facility is prepared to accept them.

    The Manowar crew had been tasked by the local Coast Guard office with logging any requests for protection. But the night after the protest had been too chaotic and exhausting for them to do so. In the morning, a larger cutter with more supplies arrived. The people detained on the Manowar would be transferred to that boat. Before they departed, James told them that anyone who intended to seek protection should seek help from the crew on the next boat. “Tell them, ‘I’m in fear for my life,’ just like you told me,” he said. “You tell whoever is processing you that specific thing.”

    But subsequent crews logged no such claims, according to records I obtained. One man told me that, in response to his plea for protection, an officer on the next boat wrote a note on a piece of paper, but nobody ever followed up. Another said that an officer told him their claims would be heard later. But there were no more interviews. “We had no opportunity,” a woman in the group says. When I asked the Coast Guard about this, a spokesperson told me the agency meticulously documents all claims. “Since we do not have a record of any of those migrants communicating that they feared for their lives if returned to Haiti, I cannot say that they made MOF claims while aboard,” he said.

    Tcherry fell asleep on the larger cutter and woke at around dawn to commotion. He saw an EMT pressing on the chest of a middle-aged woman who lay several yards away from him. She had been moaning in pain the night before. The crew member keeping watch had found her dead, her nose and mouth covered in blood. Another Haitian woman began to sing a hymn as the EMT performing CPR cried. A small boat took the woman’s body away and then returned for another man who had been complaining of pain and could not urinate. “I thought they would take us to land after the woman had died,” Tcherry says. “I thought they would let us go.” But that afternoon, he was transferred to yet another cutter that pulled away from Florida and into the high seas. Tcherry finally understood he was being sent back.

    The Coast Guard was first deployed as a maritime border-patrol agency to stop an earlier surge of migration from Haiti. In 1981, President Ronald Reagan made a deal with Jean-Claude Duvalier, the Haitian dictator, that allowed the Coast Guard to stop and board Haitian boats and deliver those detained directly back to Haiti. They would be processed on Coast Guard cutters, far from lawyers who could review their cases. The order, advocates argued at the time, undermined U.N. refugee protections and a U.S. refugee-and-asylum law that Congress passed just the year before. “This effort to push borders into the world’s oceans was new, and it marked a perverse paradigm shift,” Jeffrey Kahn, a legal scholar at the University of California, Davis, wrote recently.

    A decade after the Reagan agreement, as Haitians again departed en masse following a military coup, the George H.W. Bush administration further buttressed the sea wall. Bush signed an order that said federal agencies had no obligation to consider asylum claims from Haitians caught in international waters, no matter the evidence of danger or persecution. Lawyers and activists protested, calling the maritime regime a wholesale abdication of human rights doctrine. But the Bush order still stands. By the mid-1990s, its reach expanded to nearly anyone of any nationality caught in the sea, whether out in international waters or a couple of hundred feet from the beach.

    Pushing migrants and refugees away from the land borders to avoid obligations under law has now become common practice. In the United States, consecutive policies under Presidents Barack Obama, Donald Trump and Joe Biden have attempted to cast whole swaths of the land south of the border as a legal no-man’s land like the ocean. They have outsourced deterrence, detention and deportation to Mexico and Central America. Trump and Biden have sought to bar people from seeking asylum if they don’t first try to apply for protection in countries they pass through on their way to the United States. Europe, for its part, has pushed people coming by boat through the Mediterranean back to North African shores, where countries have imposed brutal regimes of deterrence.

    None of those measures have prevented the latest wave of migration from the Caribbean. In January, amid a generational spike in Haitians and Cubans held on their cutters, the Coast Guard acknowledged that crew members were reaching a breaking point. “We are in extremis,” a senior official wrote to colleagues in a widely circulated internal email in January. “I know you and your teams are pushed beyond limits.” The head of the Coast Guard for the eastern half of the United States, Vice Adm. Kevin Lunday, wrote in February to colleagues that two outside experts had told him their crews were under extreme stress similar to the levels experienced in “sustained combat operations.”

    Coast Guard members told me they had become accustomed to retrieving corpses from capsized boats, worn down by water or gnawed on by sharks. It was not uncommon to walk down a stairway or into a bunk room and come upon a crew member sobbing. Crew members waited months for mental health appointments, and the agency was talking openly about suicide prevention. “I don’t see how the current level of operations is sustainable,” Capt. Chris Cederholm, the commander of U.S. Coast Guard Sector Miami, wrote to colleagues, “without the breaking of several of our people.” Some were struggling with what one former crew member called a “moral dilemma,” because they had begun to understand that the job required them to inflict suffering on others. “We hear their stories, people who say they’d rather we shoot them right here than send them back to what they’re running from,” one Coast Guard member says. “And then we send them all back.”

    Tim James told me he tried to take his mind off the job by lifting weights and frequenting a cigar bar where service members and cops go to talk about “the suck,” but he soon realized he needed more than weights or whiskey to reckon with the mounting stress, even despair. “I go home, and I feel guilty,” he told me, “because I don’t have to worry about somebody kicking in my front door, you know, I don’t have to worry about the military roaming the streets.” He sought mental health support from a new “resiliency support team” the agency created. But James had not been able to shake the memories of the children he detained, particularly one 7-year-old Haitian girl with small braids. She’d been wearing shorts and a tank top, her feet were bare and she smiled at James whenever their eyes caught. “My mom is dead,” she told James with the help of an older child who spoke a little English. “I want to go to my auntie in Miami.”

    In the girl’s belongings the crew found a piece of paper with a phone number she said was her aunt’s. After James interviewed her, they sent her unaccompanied-minor questionnaire to the district office in Florida, and they waited for instructions on what to do with her. Out on the deck, James couldn’t help hoping she’d be taken to shore, to her aunt. But late in the morning the next day, the crew received a list from an office in Washington, D.C., of the people to be sent back. The girl was on the list. James cried on the return trip to port. One of his own daughters was about the girl’s age. “I can’t imagine sending my 7-year-old little kid across an ocean that is unforgiving,” James told me, nearly in tears. “I can’t imagine what my life would be like to have to do that.”

    That was just weeks before he encountered Tcherry, Claire and Beana. So when Peterson admitted the children were alone, the news came as a blow. “It’s a pretty hard hit when you think the kids have somebody and then it turns out that they really don’t,” James told me. He could see that Tcherry thought he would be making it to shore. “To see the hope on his face and then have to kind of turn around and destroy that is tough,” James told me. He never learns what becomes of the people he transfers off his cutter: that the pregnant woman gave birth in a hospital to a healthy boy and has an asylum case pending; that the body of Guerline Tulus, the woman who died on the cutter of what the medical examiner concluded was an embolism, remains in a Miami morgue, and that authorities have not identified any next of kin. He does not know what happened to the three children after they were sent back, but many months later, he says, he still wonders about them.

    Tcherry followed Claire and Beana up a rickety ramp in the port of Cap-Haïtien, Haiti, past a seized blue and yellow cargo ship into the Haitian Coast Guard station. The ground was littered with plastic U.S. Coast Guard bracelets that previous groups of people had pulled off and thrown to the ground. Officials from the Haitian child-protection authority and the U.N.’s International Organization for Migration watched as Tcherry and the rest of the group disembarked. “They looked scared and they said they were hungry,” a veteran official at IBESR, the Haitian child-protection agency, who was working at the port that day told me. “As a Haitian, I feel humiliated,” he says, “but we can’t really do anything about it. We’ve resigned ourselves.” To him, the people the Americans offloaded in Haiti always looked half dead. “It seems to me that when those children fall in their hands, they should know how to treat them. But that’s not the case.”

    Tcherry’s throat hurt and his legs were weak. He had never felt such tiredness. He ate as much as he could from the warm plate of food the UN provided. Slumped over on a bench, he waited for his turn to use the shower in a white and blue wash shed on the edge of a fenced lot behind the Haitian Coast Guard station. The officials brought several people to a hospital and got to work figuring out what to do with the unaccompanied children.

    The U.S. Coast Guard and State Department say that the children they send back are transferred into the hands of local authorities responsible for the care of children. “When we have custodial protection of those children, we want to make sure that the necessary steps are taken,” Lt. Cmdr. John Beal, a Coast Guard spokesperson, told me, “to ensure that when we repatriate those migrants, they don’t end up in some nefarious actor’s custody or something.” But no U.S. agency would explain the actual precautions the U.S. government takes to keep children from ending up in the wrong hands, beyond initial screenings aboard cutters. Last year, the Coast Guard stopped tracking the “reception agency” in each country, because according to the Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. government has set up rules establishing which agencies take these children and no longer needs to track them on a case-by-case basis.

    Haitian child-protection officials in Cap-Haïtien say their agency always finds relatives to take children, though sometimes after weeks or months. But the official with one of the other agencies involved in the processing of returned and deported Haitians at the Cap-Haïtien port said this claim is simply not true. The official said that children have departed the port with adults and with older children without any agency confirming they have an actual relationship or connection. “This is a serious concern in terms of trafficking,” the official told me. IBESR said those claims were unfounded. “According to the procedure, every child who leaves the port is accompanied by someone,” the IBESR official said, adding that when possible, the agency follows up with families to make sure children arrive safely. But the agency acknowledged there are limits to the support it can provide because of a lack of resources.
    Before they left the cutter, Peterson told Tcherry and the sisters that he would take care of them until they could contact their parents, who would figure out where they needed to go. Tcherry agreed. Peterson later told me he’d thought carefully about whether he wanted to get involved in the kids’ affairs once they were off the boat. He’d talked to other adults onboard, and they all agreed that someone needed to step up, that the Haitian government was surely not to be trusted. “If I didn’t do it,” Peterson says, “they would remain with the Haitian state, with all the risks that they could’ve faced, including kidnapping.”

    Peterson told the child-protection agency that he was the children’s guardian. The officials said they would need to contact the parents to confirm, so Peterson did the only thing he could think to do: He called the man who had been his conduit to the boat out of the Bahamas. The man sent him photos of the children’s IDs and put Peterson in touch with Claire and Beana’s mother, Inose Jean, in Michigan. She screamed and cried with relief upon learning her daughters were alive. Peterson explained that he’d taken care of the girls at sea and he asked her what to do with them. She said she would call back. Two hours later, she instructed Peterson to take the girls to her friend’s house in Cap-Haïtien.

    But Peterson still had no number for Tcherry’s mother. So he told the officials that Tcherry was Claire and Beana’s cousin, and that he’d gotten the image of Tcherry’s ID from Inose Jean. At dusk, Peterson walked with the three children through the metal gate of the Haitian Coast Guard station, at once incensed and relieved that he’d been allowed to take them. “The Haitian authorities didn’t talk to the children’s mothers,” Peterson says. “There was not enough evidence to actually prove I was who I was, or to prove a relationship.” They took a taxi to Jean’s friend’s house, and Claire, who recognized the woman from years earlier, rushed into her arms.

    The woman agreed to let Tcherry spend a night there. Peterson went to a cheap hotel with spotty electricity and a dirty pool. The man in the Bahamas finally sent Peterson Tcherry’s mother’s number. “I am the person who stood up to care for Tcherry on the boat,” Peterson told LaFortune. She collapsed onto the bed in her room, the only piece of furniture in the Toronto apartment she shared with her husband and her daughter. She had spent the last six days in a terrified daze, calling the people in the Bahamas she’d paid, begging for any news and fighting images in her mind of her son sinking into the sea. The next morning, after Tcherry woke, Peterson called LaFortune again. Tcherry looked weak and his voice was frail and hoarse. “When will I be with you, Mommy?” he asked.

    LaFortune did not for a moment consider trying to put Tcherry on another boat. She told him she would wait until she got asylum in Canada and send for him legally. But Haiti was even more dangerous for Tcherry than when he’d left. One man who was detained with Tcherry, whom I interviewed in Haiti two weeks after he returned there, said he feared he would be killed if he left Cap-Haïtien for his home in Port-au-Prince. After he ran through the roughly $50 the U.N. agency gave each of the returnees, which he used for a hotel, he did go back and was attacked on the street as he traveled to a hospital, he said, to get medicine for his daughter. He sent me photographs of gashes on his body. A second man sent me photos of a deep head wound that he suffered during an attack by the very armed men he had said he was running from. Another woman from the boat who told me she fled because she was raped says she is now “in hiding” in Port-au-Prince, living with relatives and her daughter, whom she does not allow to leave the house.

    Others on the boat have been luckier. In late 2022, the Department of Homeland Security started an unusually broad new legal-immigration program that now allows Haitians and Cubans, along with Venezuelans and Nicaraguans, to apply for two-year entry permits on humanitarian grounds from their countries, rather than traveling by land or sea first. The Department of Homeland Security says that since the program began, it has processed 30,000 people a month. More than 107,000 Haitians and 57,000 Cubans have been approved for entry, including a man who was detained with Tcherry. On Oct. 18, he stepped off a plane in Fort Lauderdale with a legal entry permit. He made it just under the wire, given the timing of his interdiction in February. In late April, DHS added a caveat to the new program: Anyone stopped at sea from then on would be ineligible to apply to the parole program. The Coast Guard says the new program and the accompanying restriction have caused the numbers of Cubans and Haitians departing on boats to fall back down to their pre-2021 level. “People have a safe and lawful alternative,” Beal, the Coast Guard’s spokesperson in Florida, told me, “so they don’t feel their only option is to take to the sea.”

    Tcherry rode a bus with Peterson over the mountains to Saint-Marc. In the stucco house on a quiet street where Peterson lived with his fiancée and her parents, Tcherry struggled to stop thinking about his experience at sea. “When I sleep, when I sit down, I want to cry,” Tcherry told me days after his arrival there. “They had us for five days. We couldn’t eat well, couldn’t sleep well. Couldn’t brush our teeth.” He thought of his body soaked from the sea spray, of the woman who died. Although Peterson assured him it was not true, Tcherry kept wondering if the officers had just thrown her body into the sea. “He is having nightmares about the boats,” Peterson told me a week after their arrival, “reliving the same moment again and again, and he starts crying.”

    LaFortune told Tcherry that she was arranging for him to travel to his grandmother in another part of the country. But it soon became clear to her that the roads were too dangerous, spotted with gang and vigilante checkpoints guarded often by men carrying AK-47s. Peterson told LaFortune that Tcherry could stay with him as long as she needed him to. But as the weeks turned to months, Tcherry felt that Peterson began to change. He said Peterson needed money, and he was asking Tcherry’s mother to send more and more. Peterson was frequently out of the house, working odd jobs, and often could not answer LaFortune’s calls. She grew worried. When she did talk to Tcherry, he was as quiet as he was in the smuggler’s house in the Bahamas.

    Two months passed. LaFortune’s asylum case was denied, and she and her husband appealed. Four more months passed. LaFortune’s husband heard news that gangs were closing in on Saint-Marc. LaFortune decided that they must move Tcherry, that it was time to risk the journey on the roads. In September, she sent an old family friend to collect him. They rode on a bus through a checkpoint where the driver paid a fee to a masked man. “I saw a man holding his gun,” Tcherry says. The man made a sign that they could pass.

    Tcherry arrived at a busy bus station in Port-au-Prince and looked for his grandmother. He saw her in a crowd and remembered her face, her high forehead and wide smile. “That is my grandma,” he said, again and again. His mutters turned to song. “That is my grandmother, tololo, tololo, that is my grandmother.” He sank into her arms. He held her hand as they boarded another bus and passed through another checkpoint, back to where he began.

    https://www.propublica.org/article/when-the-coast-guard-intercepts-unaccompanied-kids

    –—

    Reprise du #modèle_australien et son concept de l’#excision_territoriale :

    “People intercepted at sea, even in U.S. waters, have fewer rights than those who come by land. “Asylum does not apply at sea,” a Coast Guard spokesperson told me. Even people who are fleeing violence, rape and death, who on land would be likely to pass an initial asylum screening, are routinely sent back to the countries they’ve fled.”

    Excision territoriale :

    https://seenthis.net/messages/416996
    #Australie

    #droits #mer #terre #USA #Etats-Unis #asile #migrations #réfugiés #MNA #mineurs_non_accompagnés #enfants #enfance #Haïti #réfugiés_haïtiens

    via @freakonometrics

  • A Good Idea : You Should Draw On The Wall With A Marker
    https://clickhole.com/a-good-idea-you-should-draw-on-the-wall-with-a-marker-second


    Je découvre la revue satirique Clickhole - plein de bonnes idées pour la vie en famille.
    Vive la créativité !

    KidHole - Hey! Here’s a good idea. How about drawing on the wall with a marker? A lion, a castle, a tree, or whatever. Anything you can dream up, draw it right on the wall.

    It’ll be so fun!

    Paper is small and walls are big. Why draw on paper and tape it to the wall when you can draw right on the wall? It’s easier, and it just makes more sense!

    If you’re worried about getting in trouble, just remember that Mommy and Daddy decorate the house all the time, so by decorating the wall with your drawings, you’re being a BIG HELP. You can help them out by drawing on the living room wall, your bedroom wall, or even the kitchen wall, and they will be happy that you did all these chores for them.

    Crayons and paints work, but markers are the best! Especially Mommy’s special stinky markers from the craft drawer, because those ones are permanent.

    And remember, it doesn’t matter if you’re not very good at drawing as long as you try your best—THAT’S what really counts. Even if you just draw a circle with some lines coming out of it, that’d be fine, because then people can have fun guessing what it is. A sun? A lion? Whatever the case, you simply can’t go wrong drawing on the wall.

    So what are you waiting for? Go give your parents a big, special surprise by drawing all over every wall in your house!


    Quelques années après dans les toilettes d’un bar fréquenté par les enfants de l’ère anti-autoritaire

    #enfants #pédagogie #dessin #éducation #parodie #wtf

  • Première Partie : LES RAISONS DU LOUP « Enlace Zapatista
    https://enlacezapatista.ezln.org.mx/2023/11/01/premiere-partie-les-raisons-du-loup

    LES RAISONS DU LOUP.
    Rubén Dario,
    Nicaragua.
    Décembre 1913

    Une fable allégorique, discutée ensuite par les zapatistes, en octobre. Avec au passage le Sous-commandant Marcos, ressuscité en Sup Galeano (en hommage à un enseignant assassiné), qui meurt aussi et devient maintenant juste "Le capitaine".

    Deuxième partie : les morts éternuent-ils ? « Enlace Zapatista
    https://enlacezapatista.ezln.org.mx/2023/11/05/deuxieme-partie-les-morts-eternuent-ils

    Le SupGaleano est mort. Il est mort comme il a vécu : malheureux.

    Par contre, il a bien pris soin, avant de périr, de rendre le nom à celui qui est chair et sang hérité du maître Galeano. Il a recommandé de le maintenir en vie, c’est à dire, en lutte. Donc, Galeano continuera de marcher dans ces montagnes.

    Pour le reste, ce fut simple. Il commença à fredonner quelque chose du genre « ya sé que estoy piantao, piantao, piantao » 1, et, juste avant d’expirer, il dit, ou plutôt il demanda : « Les morts éternuent-ils ? », et plus rien. Celles-ci furent ses dernières paroles. Aucune phrase pour l’histoire, ni pour une pierre tombale, ni pour une anecdote racontée au coin du feu. Seulement cette question absurde, anachronique, hors du temps : « Les morts éternuent-ils ? »

    […]

    Qui a commencé ? Qui est coupable ? Qui est innocent ? Qui est le bon et qui est le méchant ? Dans quelle position se trouve François d’Assise ? Qui échoue ? Est-ce que c’est lui qui échoue, ou le loup, ou les bergers, ou eux tous ? Pourquoi d’Assise conçoit-il seulement un accord sur la base du renoncement du loup à ce qu’il est ?

    Bien que ce fut il y a plusieurs mois, le texte a suscité des allégations et des discussions qui se poursuivent encore aujourd’hui.

    […]

    Mais à ce moment-là, au fond de la salle, se leva une petite main demandant la parole. Le modérateur ne parvenait pas à voir à qui était la main, il concéda donc la parole « à la personne qui lève la main là-bas, au fond ».

    Tous se retournèrent pour regarder et ils furent sur le point de pousser un cri de scandale et de réprobation. C’était une petite fille qui portait un ours en peluche qui était presque aussi grand qu’elle, et portait une blouse blanche brodée et un pantalon avec un petit chat près de la cheville droite. Bref, l’“outfit” classique pour une fête d’anniversaire ou quelque chose du genre.

    La surprise fut telle que tous gardèrent le silence et maintenaient les regards fixés la petite fille.

    Elle se mit debout sur la chaise, pensant qu’ainsi on l’écouterait mieux, et demanda :

    « Et les petits ? »

    La surprise se fit alors murmure de condamnation : « Quels petits ? De quoi parle cette fillette ? Qui diable a laissé entrer une femme dans cette enceinte sacrée ? Et pire encore, c’est une femme et en plus une fillette ! »

    La petite fille descendit de la chaise et, toujours portant son ours en peluche, avec des signes évidents d’obésité — l’ours, bien entendu —, se dirigea vers la porte de sortie en disant :

    « Les petits. Ben, les petits du loup et les petits des bergers. Les pitchoun, quoi. Qui pense aux petits ? Avec qui je vais discuter ? Et où on va jouer ? »

    #guerre #zapatistes #Israel #Palestine #enfants #fable #EZLN #Marcos

  • Le drame des enfants placés lâchés à leur majorité : « T’es qu’une enfant de l’aide sociale à l’enfance, arrête de viser trop loin »
    https://www.lemonde.fr/campus/article/2023/12/05/le-drame-des-enfants-places-laches-a-leur-majorite-t-es-qu-une-enfant-de-l-a

    L’arrivée des 18 ans rime, pour tous les adolescents placés, avec l’urgence de déterminer comment se lancer dans la vie adulte, eux qui sont contraints à faire le grand saut sans soutien familial.

    [...]

    Plus d’un tiers des jeunes sans domicile [et combien de détenus ? ndc] sont ainsi issus de l’ASE, notait une étude de la Fondation Abbé Pierre en 2019. Une proportion alarmante alors que les enfants placés ne représentent que 2 % de la population générale des mineurs.

    [...]

    Votée en 2022, la loi dite « Taquet » devait en finir avec ces « sorties sèches » de l’#ASE, rendant obligatoire l’accompagnement des jeunes de moins de 21 ans « sans ressources suffisantes ». Mais un an après, son application s’avère « peu efficiente », constatait un rapport du Conseil d’orientation des politiques de jeunesse (COJ), en juin. Si le nombre de contrats jeunes majeurs [cet accompagnement individualisé éducatif et financier, parfois d’hébergement, qui peut être accordé par les départements aux majeurs sortant de l’ASE, sous condition de la constitution d’un « projet »] accordés progresse ces dernières années – ainsi, 35 000 jeunes adultes bénéficiaient d’une mesure de la protection de l’enfance, selon les derniers chiffres de 2021 –, les ruptures brutales d’accompagnement persistent et l’accès des jeunes concernés à leurs droits fondamentaux relève du « parcours du combattant », alerte ce rapport. Une grande disparité de prise en charge est aussi relevée selon les départements, avec des territoires où le contrat jeune majeur est « plus rare que l’or », de l’avis des intéressés.

    Face à ce constat sévère, la première ministre, Elisabeth Borne, a annoncé, le 20 novembre, des actions de mentorat ainsi qu’un « coup de pouce financier » de 1 500 euros, versé automatiquement à 18 ans aux sortants de l’ASE. Les collectifs d’anciens enfants placés se sont dits « sidérés » par cette annonce : trop insuffisante à leurs yeux, mais qui impliquera surtout la suppression du « pécule », une somme à laquelle ces jeunes ont droit depuis 2016 à leur majorité. Constituée des allocations de rentrée scolaire mises chaque année sur un compte bloqué le temps de leur placement (et encore aujourd’hui pas toujours perçue ni réclamée, faute d’information), elle peut s’élever, pour certains, largement au-dessus de 1 500 euros. « On nous fait les poches ! », s’est insurgé Lyes Louffok, lui-même ancien enfant placé et auteur de Si les enfants votaient (Harper Collins, 2022).

    Dans le Doubs, Emilie Joly a seulement 19 ans lorsqu’elle reçoit une lettre lui annonçant sans sommation sa sortie de l’ASE et la fin de son #contrat_jeune_majeur, grâce auquel elle pouvait continuer à séjourner dans sa famille d’accueil. A l’ouverture du courrier, elle s’effondre dans les couloirs de son université. « La lettre stipulait seulement que je ne faisais plus partie de leurs effectifs, sans aucune explication. La première chose que je me suis dite, c’est : “Est-ce que j’ai même le droit de rentrer ce soir dans ma famille d’accueil ?” », raconte la jeune femme, cinq ans plus tard.

    A partir de là, Emilie se sent « totalement abandonnée ». L’étudiante, alors en DUT carrières sociales, doit déménager, malgré les réclamations de sa famille d’accueil, trouver un appartement sans aide de l’ASE, puis cumuler les petits jobs étudiants pour pouvoir continuer à financer ses études, en parallèle de sa bourse d’Etat. Le plus difficile, explique celle qui était placée depuis ses 6 mois, a surtout été de voir le lien rompu, du jour au lendemain, avec son éducatrice et la psychologue de l’ASE qui la suivait depuis petite. « J’ai fait une terrible dépression dans les semaines qui ont suivi et j’ai fini hospitalisée quelque temps. Tous mes projets, tous mes espoirs semblaient s’envoler », confie-t-elle.

    Mais même l’horizon des 21 ans prévu par la loi joue en réalité comme un couperet très précoce. « A ces jeunes, on demande d’être autonomes tout de suite : gérer très tôt et seuls la question du budget, l’enjeu des études ou du travail, les aléas du logement, des premiers impôts…, observe Marie Convert, cheffe de service chez Habitat Jeunes Montpellier, une structure de logements sociaux qui accueille des jeunes sortis de l’ASE. Tout cela plus vite que tous les autres. » L’accès à l’autonomie est de plus en plus tardif pour le reste des jeunes Français, qui quittent désormais le domicile familial vers 24 ans, selon les chiffres Eurostat pour l’année 2021.

    « Orientations subies »

    En regard, les jeunes passés par l’ASE doivent avancer à marche forcée, avec une épée de Damoclès au-dessus de la tête. « La peur ne nous quitte jamais. Pas seulement à l’approche des 18 ou 21 ans, mais à chaque échéance de renouvellement, ou pas, de nos contrats jeune majeur, souvent proposés par tranches de six mois seulement », souligne Alissa Denissova, présidente de l’association d’entraide Repairs ! 44 destinée aux jeunes de l’ASE, à Nantes.

    Des « incertitudes » qui génèrent une « énorme pression », confie Romain, 19 ans. Après une mauvaise orientation à la fac, lui qui a grandi en village d’enfants – des ensembles de plusieurs maisons où sont accueillis des enfants placés – vient de commencer, à Lille, une formation de travailleur social, qui dure trois ans. Il en sera donc diplômé à 22 ans. « Sauf qu’à 21 ans tout s’arrête. Je ne sais déjà pas comment je ferai pour vivre la dernière année, alors il faut absolument que je réussisse chaque examen : je ne peux pas me permettre de redoubler en plus de ça », s’angoisse-t-il.

    [...]

    Tous ont intégré cette réalité : ils n’ont « pas le droit à l’erreur » ni au tâtonnement. Pressés par le temps et la nécessité de trouver rapidement un emploi et un logement – y compris parfois pour pouvoir prétendre aux dispositifs d’accompagnement de l’ASE une fois majeurs –, ces jeunes placés sont d’ailleurs massivement dirigés vers des formations courtes professionnalisantes, dès la fin du collège.
    « On ne leur laisse pas beaucoup de part de rêve », déplore Marie Convert. Ainsi, 40 % des adolescents placés se tournent vers un CAP, seulement 17 % vers un bac général (contre 51 % des jeunes de leur âge).

    https://archive.is/PkWlj

    #enfants_placés

  • Aurore Bergé annonce des « travaux d’intérêt général pour les parents défaillants »
    https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2023/12/10/aurore-berge-annonce-la-creation-d-une-commission-sur-la-parentalite_6204883

    Dans un entretien à « La Tribune Dimanche », la ministre des solidarités détaille également la mise en place d’une commission sur la parentalité, coprésidée par le pédopsychiatre Serge Hefez.

    Parmi les [...] mesures confirmées samedi, « des travaux d’intérêt général pour les parents défaillants, le paiement d’une contribution financière pour les parents d’enfants coupables de dégradations auprès d’une association de victimes et une amende pour les parents ne se présentant pas aux audiences qui concernent leurs enfants »

    « J’ai une certitude : nous ne pouvons pas nous passer des parents, ni faire sans eux, ni contre eux », a encore dit la ministre (...).

    #famille #société_punitive

  • Rohingya child challenges Croatia and Slovenia over violent pushbacks. Unaccompanied minor files complaints at UN Child Rights Committee

    A Rohingya child refugee faced repeated beatings by Croatian border officers, had his belongings burnt and his shoes confiscated before numerous forced expulsions, including a “chain” pushback from Slovenia. U.F. submitted complaints against Croatia and Slovenia at the UN Child Rights Committee for multiple violations of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). These are the first complaints of their kind against these two states.

    Case

    U.F. was 8 years old when he fled a military attack on his village and became separated from his family. After many years searching for protection, he spent over a year in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) from 2020 to 2021 having to survive without state support or medical care, sleeping rough in forests and squatting in abandoned buildings. During this time, he was pushed back five times from Croatia to BiH and subjected to consistent, choreographed violence. In Slovenia he was subjected to a “chain” pushback, by which he was forcibly returned first to Croatia by Slovenian authorities and then onwards by Croatian authorities to BiH in a coordinated operation.

    National, EU, and international law oblige Croatia and Slovenia to act in a child’s best interests and prioritize the identification of their age during their handling by border officers. The applicant’s complaints argue violations of the CRC, in relation to his expulsions and ill-treatment, and states’ failure to assess his age or apply any of the relevant safeguards under articles 3, 8, 20(1), and 37 CRC. U.F. corroborated his accounts with a range of digital evidence. The complaints were filed against Croatia and Slovenia with the support of ECCHR and Blindspots. The litigation forms part of the Advancing Child Rights Strategic Litigation project (ACRiSL). ACRiSL comes under the auspices of the Global Campus of Human Rights – Right Livelihood cooperation.

    Context

    In Croatia, pushbacks form part of a designed and systematic state policy, which has been fully documented by human rights institutions, NGOs and the media. Slovenia’s pushbacks have been implemented since 2018 through a readmission agreement which authorizes hasty expulsions with complete disregard for a person’s protection needs, a child’s identity or their best interests. In 2020 and 2021 alone, 13.700 people were pushed back from Slovenia in this manner.

    The applicant is represented by ECCHR partner lawyer, Carsten Gericke. These complaints are the latest in a series of legal steps to address systematic human rights violation at the EU’s external borders.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=72&v=HJlmNZdblSc&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fww


    https://www.ecchr.eu/en/case/pushbacks-un-child-rights-croatia-slovenia

    #vidéo #migrations #asile #réfugiés #Croatie #Balkans #route_des_Balkans #frontières #violence #MNA #mineurs_non_accompagnés #violence #vidéo #film_d'animation #frontière_sud-alpine #push-backs #refoulements #Bosnie #Bosnie-Herzégovine #pattern #vol #Myanmar #enfants #enfance #réfugiés_rohingya #enfermement #refoulements_en_chaîne #the_game #frontière_sud-alpine

  • Nils Wilcke sur X : "C’est rarissime : la présidente de la #Croix_Rouge prend la parole pour dénoncer les « atrocités » qu’elle a constaté dans les #hôpitaux à #Gaza après la riposte d’Israël, en particulier chez les #enfants, et appelle à « trouver une solution politique » au conflit." / X
    https://twitter.com/paul_denton/status/1731921256251867435

    https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1731761578960162816/pu/vid/avc1/720x720/OakDXlt-ftz4fY1N.mp4?tag=12

  •  »Vor Mauern und hinter Gittern« 

    Kinderrechte werden an den Außengrenzen der Europäischen Union mit Füßen getreten


    Kinder und Jugendliche werden an den Außengrenzen der EU gewaltsam zurückgeschoben (»Pushbacks«) und nach Ankunft in der EU inhaftiert – eine systematisch angewandte Praxis in mehreren Außengrenzstaaten der EU. Anlässlich des Treffens der EU-Innenminister*innen nächste Woche zeigt terre des hommes mit dem aktuellen Bericht »Vor Mauern und hinter Gittern« am Beispiel von Ungarn, Griechenland, Bulgarien und Polen die kinderrechtswidrigen Praktiken genauer auf. Der Bericht bezieht sich vor allem auf die Erfahrungen und Hinweise zivilgesellschaftlicher Projektpartnerorganisationen und verweist auch auf die Mitverantwortung der EU, deren Institutionen das Verhalten der Mitgliedsstaaten billigen und stützen.

    »Migrationshaft bei Kindern und Jugendlichen ist trotz ihrer Unvereinbarkeit mit der UN-Kinderrechtskonvention Realität in drei der vier untersuchten Mitgliedstaaten« sagt Teresa Wilmes, Programmreferentin für Deutschland und Europa bei terre des hommes. »In Ungarn, dem vierten untersuchten Mitgliedsstaat, wurde die Inhaftierung von geflüchteten Minderjährigen nur deswegen beendet, weil Pushbacks den Zugang zu einem Asylverfahren bereits nahezu vollständig verhindern.«

    Die Folgen für Betroffene sind gravierend: Infolge einer Inhaftierung leiden Kinder und Jugendliche häufig an Depressionen, posttraumatischen Belastungsstörungen und Angstzu­ständen. Auch die Erfahrung von Gewalt gegen sie selbst oder Verwandte und Freunde ist für Kinder und Jugendliche traumatisierend und begleitet sie oft ein Leben lang.

    Rückendeckung erhalten die Mitgliedsstaaten dabei von der EU und ihren Institutionen: »Die Europäische Union, allen voran die EU-Kommission, macht sich für die Verletzung von Kinderrechten an den europäischen Außengrenzen mitverantwortlich. Zahlreiche Beispiele dafür finden sich im Bericht: vom europäischen Pilotprojekt zum Grenzschutz in Bulgarien über die EU-Finanzierung haftähnlicher Einrichtungen auf Griechenland bis hin zur Rolle der EU-Agentur FRONTEX,« erklärt Sophia Eckert, rechtspolitische Referentin bei terre des hommes. »Unser Bericht zeigt, dass die europäische Gemeinschaft maßgebliche Einflussmöglichkeiten darauf hat, ob der Schutz, das Wohl und die Rechte geflüchteter Kinder und Jugendlicher in der EU gelten oder einer ausgeklügelten Abschottungspolitik der EU-Mitgliedsstaaten zum Opfer fallen sollen.«

    Mit Blick auf das Treffen der europäischen Innenminister*innen in der kommenden Woche fordert terre des hommes eine Kehrtwende der Reform des Gemeinsamen Europäischen Asylsystems. Dazu Sophia Eckert: »Dass die geplanten Reformvorschläge die im Bericht beschrieben Problemlagen beenden werden, ist illusorisch. Vielmehr ist zu befürchten, dass die Reform die Missstände an den europäischen Außengrenzen weiter verschärft, indem sie den Rechtsverletzungen einen europäischen Rahmen gibt. Wir fordern daher die Entscheidungsträger*innen in der EU auf, diese unsäglichen Reformpläne zu stoppen. Von einem menschenwürdigen europäischen Asylsystem erwarten wir den Zugang zu Asyl statt rechtswidriger Abschiebung, Kindeswohl statt Lagerhaft und faire Asylverfahren statt beschleunigter Grenzverfahren.«

    Pour télécharger le rapport :
    https://www.tdh.de/fileadmin/user_upload/inhalte/04_Was_wir_tun/Themen/Weitere_Themen/Fluechtlingskinder/tdh_Bericht_Kinderrechtsverletzungen-an-EU-Aussengrenzen.pdf

    https://www.tdh.de/was-wir-tun/arbeitsfelder/fluechtlingskinder/meldungen/vor-mauern-und-hinter-gittern-kinderrechte-an-den-eu-aussengrenzen

    #enfants #enfance #frontières #migrations #asile #réfugiés #rapport #terre_des_hommes #enfermement #push-backs #refoulements #Hongrie #Grèce #Bulgarie #Pologne #Balkans #route_des_Balkans #droit_d'asile #traumatisme #santé #santé_mentale

  • Jénine : exécutions et arrestations d’enfants, destructions de routes et de maisons - Contre Attaque
    https://contre-attaque.net/2023/11/30/jenine-executions-et-arrestations-denfants-destructions-de-routes-et

    Ce mercredi 29 novembre en #Cisjordanie, dans la ville de #Jénine, l’armée d’occupation a exécuté deux enfants d’une balle dans la tête. Basil Abu Al-Wafa âgé de 9 ans, et Adam Al-Ghoul, 15 ans.

    L’organisation israélienne de défense des droits de l’Homme B’Tselem a également diffusé des vidéos d’arrestations d’#enfants par l’armée. Ces mineurs sont ensuite parqués dans des petites cages, comme des animaux.

    L’armée israélienne utilise également des engins de chantiers pour détruire les routes et des maisons à Jénine et dans le reste de la Cisjordanie, pour rendre la vie insupportable dans les territoires palestiniens.

    Des raids très meurtriers ont lieu quasiment tous les jours dans ce territoire et en particulier à Jénine : l’armée y organise des descentes et arrête ou tue des suspects, avant de se retirer. Près de 250 palestiniens ont été tués et on compte 3000 blessés par Israël en Cisjordanie depuis le 7 octobre.

    La Cisjordanie n’est pas Gaza : il s’agit d’un territoire sous contrôle de l’autorité palestinienne, et il pas gouverné par le Hamas. Il ne s’agit donc en rien de se « défendre » suite aux attaques du 7 octobre. Il s’agit d’opérations quotidiennes d’humiliations, de meurtres et de destructions commises contre une population colonisée. Selon le droit international, l’armée israélienne n’est pas chez elle. En théorie, ce sont donc les palestiniens qui ont le « droit de se défendre » face à de tels crimes d’une armée ennemie sur leur population. Mais les médias dominants en occident ne vous montrerons pas ces images horribles.

    #Israël

  • Study: Air purifier use at daycare centres cut kids’ sick days by a third

    The results of the study at two Helsinki daycare centres are still preliminary but promising, a researcher says.

    Use of air purifiers at two daycare centres in Helsinki led to a reduction in illnesses and absences among children and staff, according to preliminary findings of a new study led by E3 Pandemic Response.

    Air purifiers of various sizes and types were placed in two of the city’s daycare centres during cold and flu seasons.

    The initial results from the first year of research are promising, according to researcher #Enni_Sanmark, from HUS Helsinki University Hospital.

    “Children were clearly less sick in daycare centres where air purification devices were used — down by around 30 percent,” Sanmark explained.

    The air purifiers were changed at two daycare centres serving as a control in the experiment, in order to rule out the effect that possible epidemic fluctuations could have on the results. The study’s next phase will continue until April.

    “We will be able to analyse whether there were only decreases in flu-type illnesses or whether the use of air purification could also help reduce stomach ailments,” Sanmark said.

    On average, daycare centre-aged children suffer 10-13 infectious illnesses every year, with each illness lasting from one to three weeks, according to the research.
    Enni Sanmark Topeliuksen leikkipuistossa.

    Meanwhile, kids between the ages of 1-3 come down with flu-like symptoms between five to eight times a year — and children also often suffer stomach bugs, on top of that. Kids are particularly prone to catching colds after returning to daycare after their summer break.

    Those illnesses are often shared by the kids’ parents and daycare staff, prompting absences from work.

    Sanmark said that employers face costs of around 370 euros for one day of an employee’s sick leave.

    “It would be a big savings if we could get rid of 30 percent of sick days spread by children, as well as the illnesses that go home to parents,” Sanmark said.

    The research aims to help build an air purification scheme that could be used at other daycare centres — namely how to get the air cleaner at such facilities in ways that aren’t too noisy, expensive or take up too much space.

    The final results of the study are expected next spring.

    “At the moment, we are cautiously positive. Daycares and schools [here] have not done this before, but of course results from around the world show that air purification can reduce pathogens in the air, so our results are in line with these findings. We’re excited and will continue our research,” Sanmark said.

    Prompted by the Covid-19 crisis, the E3 Pandemic Response project is a private and public effort that aims to “harness modern science and technology to create effective countermeasures to prevent the spreading of novel infectious diseases”.

    https://yle.fi/a/74-20062381
    #air #purificateurs #purification #Finlande #santé #maladie #transmission #enfants #école

  • La CEDU condanna l’Italia per detenzione illegale di minori stranieri nell’hotspot di Taranto
    https://www.meltingpot.org/2023/11/la-cedu-condanna-litalia-per-detenzione-illegale-di-minori-stranieri-nel

    Nuova condanna all’Italia dalla Corte europea per i Diritti umani. Oggi nell’hotspot permangono ancora 185 minori. L’ASGI chiede l’immediato collocamento in strutture adeguate e la supervisione dell’attuazione delle precedenti sentenze che, come dimostra la situazione nell’hotspot di Taranto, non hanno fatto modificare le prassi illegittime. La Corte Europea dei Diritti Umani, con la decisione del 23 novembre 2023 resa nel procedimento n. 47287/17 (caso A.T. ed altri c. Italia), ha condannato l’Italia per avere detenuto illegalmente nell’ hotspot di Taranto diversi minori stranieri non accompagnati (art. 5, parr. 1, 2 e 4 della Convenzione europea dei diritti dell’uomo), per avere utilizzato trattamenti (...)

    #Giurisprudenza_europea #Guida_legislativa #Speciale_Hotspot

  • Les #expulsions ont des conséquences délétères sur la vie des #enfants

    L’Observatoire des expulsions des lieux de vie informels dénonce, dans son rapport annuel, des opérations qui compromettent la #scolarité des enfants et le #suivi_médical des #femmes_enceintes, à cause de l’#errance forcée qu’elles provoquent.

    Des femmes enceintes qui ne peuvent pas bénéficier d’un suivi médical continu, des enfants brutalement retirés de l’école, des mineur·es isolé·es démuni·es et traumatisé·es : les conséquences des expulsions des personnes occupant des lieux de vie informels sont multiples et délétères.

    C’est la conclusion du cinquième rapport annuel de l’Observatoire des expulsions de lieux de vie informels (#squats, #bidonvilles et #campements, #caravanes, #voitures ou camions) publié mardi 28 novembre. Il regroupe huit associations indépendantes, parmi lesquelles le Collectif national droits de l’homme Romeurope, la Fondation Abbé Pierre ou encore Médecins du monde.

    Elles ont recensé, entre le 1er novembre 2022 et le 31 octobre 2023, date du début de la trêve hivernale, 1 111 expulsions sur le territoire national, dont 729 pour le littoral nord (Calais, Pas-de-Calais, Dunkerque dans le Nord).

    Si les expulsions sur le littoral nord ont diminué de 58 %, elles ont augmenté de 24 % en un an sur le reste du territoire, outremer inclus, et concerné en moyenne 74 personnes chaque jour.

    85 % de ces expulsions sont dites « sèches », car elles n’ont donné lieu à aucune solution d’hébergement ou de relogement. 14 % ont donné lieu à des mises à l’abri pour au moins une partie des habitant·es. 1 % seulement ont donné lieu à un dispositif d’insertion, un hébergement stable ou un logement, pour au moins une partie des habitant·es, détaille l’Observatoire.

    L’organisme explique qu’il est difficile d’avoir des données précises sur les enfants mais compte cette année 5 531 enfants expulsés (contre 3 212 l’année précédente). Ce chiffre est très largement sous-estimé, a-t-il précisé lors de la conférence de presse de présentation du rapport.
    Le suivi compromis des grossesses

    Cette année, l’Observatoire s’est focalisé sur les conséquences concrètes des expulsions sur la vie des enfants et de leurs mères. Il rappelle que « la précarité, et en particulier l’absence de logement, est depuis longtemps identifiée par la littérature scientifique comme un facteur de risque lors de la grossesse ».

    Les chiffres sont éloquents. Une femme enceinte devrait avoir accès à sept consultations prénatales et à trois échographies au moins, rappelle Médecins du monde.

    Or, plus d’une femme enceinte sur trois rencontrées par les équipes des programmes fixes de Médecins du monde en France en 2022 présente un retard de suivi de grossesse, comme la quasi-totalité des femmes enceintes rencontrées par le programme de médiation en santé du Comité pour la santé des exilés (Comede) en Île-de-France. Un écart majeur avec la population générale, parmi laquelle moins de 5 % des personnes enceintes sont dans ce cas.

    Les associations soulignent que les suivis médicaux et de grossesse sont déjà erratiques d’ordinaire. Notamment parce que l’ouverture de droits à une couverture maladie exige une domiciliation administrative. Les démarches, surtout avec la barrière de la langue, peuvent être délicates. Certaines personnes peuvent aussi perdre des papiers dans la cohue des expulsions impromptues.

    Ces dernières insécurisent aussi les futures mères, qui cherchent « en premier lieu à répondre à des besoins de stricte survie », quitte à sacrifier leur santé.

    « Il y a des personnes qu’on va perdre de vue à la suite des expulsions. Elles vont se réinstaller beaucoup plus loin, dans une autre commune, à l’autre bout d’une métropole, a détaillé Antoine Bazin, coordinateur Médecins du monde à Toulouse, devant la presse. Et les suivis par les PMI [centres de Protection maternelle et infantile – ndlr] de secteur, par exemple, pour les femmes enceintes, les suivis par des médecins traitants si on peut en avoir, ou par des centres de santé, vont être rendus plus compliqués parce que les personnes vont être isolées. »

    Les expulsions compliquent aussi le suivi de pathologies. Dans son rapport, l’Observatoire rapporte comment une opération de dépistage de la tuberculose dans un bidonville du Val-d’Oise, au printemps 2023, après la découverte d’un cas sur le lieu de vie et quatre hospitalisations d’enfants, a été compromise par des expulsions successives.

    Même chose pour les campagnes de vaccination ou le repérage des cas de saturnisme, dus à une exposition au plomb pouvant affecter le développement psychomoteur des enfants.

    Par ailleurs, la vie quotidienne d’un enfant vivant dans un lieu de vie informel est aussi bouleversée par l’instabilité provoquée par les expulsions. La scolarité de ces enfants mais aussi leur équilibre mental et psychique sont ébranlés. En 2022, l’Unicef avait déjà alerté sur l’état de santé mentale dégradé des enfants sans domicile.

    Les expulsions sont de plus en plus violentes (voir l’opération « Wuambushu » à Mayotte), dénonce l’Observatoire. Antoine Bazin, de Médecins du monde, explique que les enfants sont les « acteurs passifs » de ces événements et vont vivre la violence intrinsèque au déroulement des opérations d’expulsions. En « vraies éponges », ils vont en conserver des souvenirs qui peuvent avoir des conséquences sur leur construction psychique.

    Julie Bremont, représentante du Comité de pilotage interassociatif MNA Nord-Littoral, confirme : « Les expulsions sont en elles-mêmes un moment très générateur d’anxiété et de peur pour les jeunes. Déjà, de par la violence du dispositif, avec des dizaines de camions de CRS et des policiers en uniforme. Ces opérations d’expulsion sont très souvent accompagnées de violences verbales et physiques. »
    Décrochages scolaires

    De son côté, Célia Mougel, coordinatrice de l’Observatoire des expulsions, souligne que 77 % des expulsions recensées (en dehors du Nord littoral) ont eu lieu pendant l’année scolaire, ce qui, évidemment, produit des décrochages, des déscolarisations, notamment quand on sait que pour réinscrire un enfant, il faut au moins six mois. Si les municipalités coopèrent, ce qui n’est pas toujours le cas.

    Contraindre ces familles à quitter leur lieu de vie et leur point d’ancrage entraîne des effets à long terme sur les enfants. Ils rencontrent alors des difficultés dans la continuité pédagogique, un sentiment d’exclusion ou encore des problèmes d’apprentissage.

    Le cas d’un collégien, Alex, raconté dans le rapport, le prouve. Le garçon aura vécu trois expulsions qui lui auront fait perdre une année scolaire entière. Aujourd’hui, à 12 ans, Alex et sa famille dorment sous un pont en Seine-Saint-Denis et il n’est plus scolarisé.

    Pour toutes ces raisons, l’Observatoire enjoint aux pouvoirs publics de suspendre les expulsions pendant l’année scolaire, pour éviter l’exclusion scolaire et le décrochage des enfants en cours d’année. Manuel Domergue, de la Fondation Abbé Pierre, considère qu’il faudrait aussi déployer davantage de médiateurs scolaires dans ces lieux de vie informels.

    Le reste du temps, les associations estiment qu’aucune expulsion ne devrait avoir lieu sans qu’un diagnostic social préliminaire (l’instruction du 25 janvier 2018 qui le recommandait n’est pas respectée), un accompagnement social global et des solutions de relogement dignes, adaptées et pérennes n’aient été mis en place. Cela pour permettre « une sortie des bidonvilles par le haut ».

    https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/france/281123/les-expulsions-ont-des-consequences-deleteres-sur-la-vie-des-enfants
    #enfance #mineurs #statistiques #chiffres #2022 #expulsions_sèches #santé_mentale #SDF #sans-abrisme #sans-abris #déscolarisation

  • "L’école n’est plus un sanctuaire" : l’expulsion en plein cours d’un élève de nationalité indienne fait réagir

    Ce mardi 21 novembre, les gendarmes de #Controis-en-Sologne (Loir-et-Cher) sont venus récupérer un jeune élève de nationalité indienne dans un collège de Blois. Selon un syndicat, il aurait été expulsé avec sa famille dès l’après-midi.

    « L’indignité n’a pas de limite ! » Dans un communiqué de presse, des associations et syndicats s’insurgent contre l’expulsion d’un collégien de nationalité indienne. Selon la Nouvelle République, les gendarmes du Controis-en-Sologne (Loir-et-Cher) accompagnés du père de l’adolescent se sont présentés au collège Blois-Vienne. Alors qu’il était en cours, l’adolescent a dû quitter l’établissement.

    Selon le quotidien régional, les gendarmes n’avaient pas indiqué le motif de leur intervention au principal adjoint de l’établissement. Les #forces_de_l'ordre agissaient dans le cadre de l’application d’une mesure d’#obligation_de_quitter_le_territoire français (#OQTF).

    « C’est extrêmement choquant qu’un gamin en classe, à l’école de la République puisse être interpellé et sorti pour être expulsé. », Benjamin Vetele, adjoint à l’éducation à la mairie de Blois.

    Cette intervention a rapidement fait réagir plusieurs associations et syndicats dont la CGT. « On a été sidérés puis révoltés de voir que l’école n’est plus un sanctuaire », réagit Camille Dumas, cosecrétaire départemental de la CGT éducation et salariée du collège Blois-Vienne.

    « Tous les enfants doivent pouvoir être à l’école en sécurité et préservés de ce genre de choses. Quelle que soit la situation de la famille, c’est un très mauvais signal qui est envoyé. », Camille Dumas, cosecrétaire départemental de la CGT éducation

    Selon la syndicaliste, « la famille a été expulsée le jour même alors que la semaine précédente. Ils n’avaient pas connaissance d’OQTF (mesure d’obligation de quitter le territoire français). Ils ont été convoqués le mardi matin et expulsés le mardi après-midi depuis l’aéroport de Roissy ».

    La préfecture du Loir-et-Cher assure que « la famille concernée, récemment entrée sur le territoire français (mai 2023) avec un visa touristique, a sollicité ensuite une carte de séjour. Ne satisfaisant pas aux critères d’obtention d’un titre de séjour, elle a, par conséquent, fait l’objet d’un arrêté les obligeant de quitter le territoire français (OQTF), avec un délai de départ volontaire de 30 jours ».

    Selon la préfecture, le délai de départ n’aurait pas été respecté. « La famille a ainsi été convoquée à la brigade de gendarmerie de Contres en vue de mettre en application cette obligation de quitter le territoire. Elle a répondu à cette convocation [...] La famille, qui n’a à aucun moment manifesté de contestation a été emmenée à l’aéroport. Tout s’est déroulé sans heurt. »

    Le projet de loi « immigration » dans toutes les têtes

    À partir du 11 décembre, le projet de loi « immigration » porté par le ministre de l’Intérieur Gérald Darmanin sera examiné à l’Assemblée nationale.

    Pour Benjamin Vétélé, adjoint à l’éducation à la mairie de Blois,"des gens se sentent autorisés à mettre en œuvre des mesures d’OQTF sans discernement. On paie directement le contexte de la loi Darmanin, la course à l’extrême droite semble se poursuivre et des gens en font les frais sous nos yeux". Pour la cosecrétaire de la CGT, ce projet de loi « fait craindre une explosion de ce genre de cas et inquiète profondément ».

    Le collectif d’associations, à l’origine du communiqué, espère désormais échanger avec le préfet et prévoit des actions « dans la rue », à Blois, avant la fin de l’année.

    https://france3-regions.francetvinfo.fr/centre-val-de-loire/loir-cher/blois/l-ecole-n-est-plus-un-sanctuaire-l-expulsion-en-plein-c

    #école #migrations #sanctuaire #France #expulsion #renvoi #enfants #enfance #mineurs

    aussi ici via @olaf :
    https://seenthis.net/messages/1028819

    ping @karine4

  • Reducing the speed limit to 20 mph in urban areas. Child deaths and injuries would be decreased
    (article publié en 2000)

    Road traffic accidents continue to pose a major threat to the health of children in the United Kingdom. Attention is often focused on deaths on the road during holiday seasons, but deaths and injuries occur all year round. Britain has one of the worst child pedestrian casualty rates in Europe, with 140 children being killed on its roads each year.1 There is now a new weapon available to tackle this problem: since last year local authorities have had the power to impose 20 mph (32 kph) speed limits in urban areas.

    Speed is a major factor in road accidents. According to the Department of the Environment, Transport, and the Regions, inappropriate and excessive speed on the roads accounts for around 1200 deaths a year.2 Lack of speed restrictions rather than increased exposure to traffic has been shown to account for the excess deaths among child pedestrians in the UK compared with other European countries such as France and the Netherlands.3 About 70% of motorists exceed the present 30 mph (48 kph) urban speed limit.3 And two thirds of all accidents in which people are killed or injured happen in areas with a 30 mph limit.5

    Despite a fall in road traffic deaths of 36% from 1987 to 1997, the present level of mortality among pedestrians remains unacceptable. As a response to this situation organisations such as the Children’s Play Council and the Pedestrian Association have been calling for a limit of 20 mph to replace the current 30 mph speed restriction in urban areas.
    Traffic accident casualties fall with lower speed limits

    The evidence of increased pedestrian safety at 20 mph is strong. The chance of a pedestrian being seriously injured or killed if struck by a car is 45% if the car is travelling at 30 mph but only 5% at 20 mph.6 Government research showed that 20 mph zones reduced the incidence of traffic accidents by 60% and cut child pedestrian and child cyclist accidents by 67%, while overall vehicle speeds fell by an average 9.3 mph (14.9 kph).7 There was no evidence that accidents increased on surrounding roads. Research by local councils produces similar results. For example, Havant Borough Council has imposed a 20 mph limit on 20 miles of road and has seen traffic accident casualties drop by a significant 40%.8

    There are signs too that a policy of reduced urban speed limits would be acceptable to the public. Among viewers of a Carlton Television programme who responded to a survey, over 80% favoured a 20 mph limit on all residential roads in London.8 In continental Europe the public response has been largely positive. Graz, in Austria, adopted a 30 kph (18 mph) limit through most of the city, cutting serious casualties by over a quarter and dramatically reducing noise and air pollution. Fewer than 5 people out of 10 supported the initiative when it was first introduced, but 8 out of 10 support it now.8

    The Association of British Drivers has, however, warned about the dangers of allowing local authorities to set their own 20 mph limits. The association thinks that decisions about where to implement slower speed limits will be made on a political basis, resulting in inappropriate limits on some roads. Inappropriate limits, it argues, will mean that drivers will be more distracted as they focus their attention on the speedometer and not the road ahead.9 It has called for limits to be “reasonable, consistent and above all, based on sound, established road safety principles.”9

    Certainly there is a danger in focusing solely on lower speed limits as a means of reducing accidents. Other factors that contribute to road related deaths and injuries include alcohol, tiredness, and poor driving skills. Traffic calming measures and education to improve driver behaviour5 are also an essential parts of road safety. Education should focus not only on drivers but also on parents and children.
    Courts are too lenient

    Moreover, imposing lower speed limits in isolation will have only limited impact. The fact that 70% of all drivers currently exceed the 30 mph limit reflects the relatively lenient attitude of the courts towards driving offences.4 Proper enforcement is as important as setting the limits in the first place. Nevertheless, if local authorities use lower speed limits sensibly, as part of an overall strategy, then the 20 mph speed limit offers a new opportunity for tackling the problem of child deaths and injuries on the road.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1127572
    #transport #mobilité #accidents #accidents_mortels #enfants #villes #urbanisme #vitesse #voitures #urban_matters

    via @freakonometrics

  • Gaza Civilians, Under Israeli Barrage, Killed at Historic Pace - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/25/world/middleeast/israel-gaza-death-toll.html

    More children have been killed in #Gaza since the Israeli assault began than in the world’s major conflict zones combined — across two dozen countries — during all of last year, even with the war in Ukraine, according to U.N. tallies of verified child deaths in armed conflict.

    #civils #victimes_civiles #enfants #génocide

  • Après le sketch polémique de Guillaume Meurice, l’Arcom adresse une mise en garde à Radio France
    https://www.lemonde.fr/economie/article/2023/11/23/apres-le-sketch-polemique-de-guillaume-meurice-l-arcom-adresse-une-mise-en-g

    Les autres séquences analysées n’ont pas entraîné d’intervention de l’Arcom, notamment celle pour laquelle la journaliste et essayiste Caroline Fourest a été accusée de relativiser la mort d’#enfants palestiniens sur BFM-TV.

  • Underage Workers Are Training AI

    Companies that provide #Big_Tech with AI data-labeling services are inadvertently hiring young teens to work on their platforms, often exposing them to traumatic content.

    Like most kids his age, 15-year-old Hassan spent a lot of time online. Before the pandemic, he liked playing football with local kids in his hometown of Burewala in the Punjab region of Pakistan. But Covid lockdowns made him something of a recluse, attached to his mobile phone. “I just got out of my room when I had to eat something,” says Hassan, now 18, who asked to be identified under a pseudonym because he was afraid of legal action. But unlike most teenagers, he wasn’t scrolling TikTok or gaming. From his childhood bedroom, the high schooler was working in the global artificial intelligence supply chain, uploading and labeling data to train algorithms for some of the world’s largest AI companies.

    The raw data used to train machine-learning algorithms is first labeled by humans, and human verification is also needed to evaluate their accuracy. This data-labeling ranges from the simple—identifying images of street lamps, say, or comparing similar ecommerce products—to the deeply complex, such as content moderation, where workers classify harmful content within data scraped from all corners of the internet. These tasks are often outsourced to gig workers, via online crowdsourcing platforms such as #Toloka, which was where Hassan started his career.

    A friend put him on to the site, which promised work anytime, from anywhere. He found that an hour’s labor would earn him around $1 to $2, he says, more than the national minimum wage, which was about $0.26 at the time. His mother is a homemaker, and his dad is a mechanical laborer. “You can say I belong to a poor family,” he says. When the pandemic hit, he needed work more than ever. Confined to his home, online and restless, he did some digging, and found that Toloka was just the tip of the iceberg.

    “AI is presented as a magical box that can do everything,” says Saiph Savage, director of Northeastern University’s Civic AI Lab. “People just simply don’t know that there are human workers behind the scenes.”

    At least some of those human workers are children. Platforms require that workers be over 18, but Hassan simply entered a relative’s details and used a corresponding payment method to bypass the checks—and he wasn’t alone in doing so. WIRED spoke to three other workers in Pakistan and Kenya who said they had also joined platforms as minors, and found evidence that the practice is widespread.

    “When I was still in secondary school, so many teens discussed online jobs and how they joined using their parents’ ID,” says one worker who joined Appen at 16 in Kenya, who asked to remain anonymous. After school, he and his friends would log on to complete annotation tasks late into the night, often for eight hours or more.

    Appen declined to give an attributable comment.

    “If we suspect a user has violated the User Agreement, Toloka will perform an identity check and request a photo ID and a photo of the user holding the ID,” Geo Dzhikaev, head of Toloka operations, says.

    Driven by a global rush into AI, the global data labeling and collection industry is expected to grow to over $17.1 billion by 2030, according to Grand View Research, a market research and consulting company. Crowdsourcing platforms such as Toloka, Appen, Clickworker, Teemwork.AI, and OneForma connect millions of remote gig workers in the global south to tech companies located in Silicon Valley. Platforms post micro-tasks from their tech clients, which have included Amazon, Microsoft Azure, Salesforce, Google, Nvidia, Boeing, and Adobe. Many platforms also partner with Microsoft’s own data services platform, the Universal Human Relevance System (UHRS).

    These workers are predominantly based in East Africa, Venezuela, Pakistan, India, and the Philippines—though there are even workers in refugee camps, who label, evaluate, and generate data. Workers are paid per task, with remuneration ranging from a cent to a few dollars—although the upper end is considered something of a rare gem, workers say. “The nature of the work often feels like digital servitude—but it’s a necessity for earning a livelihood,” says Hassan, who also now works for Clickworker and Appen.

    Sometimes, workers are asked to upload audio, images, and videos, which contribute to the data sets used to train AI. Workers typically don’t know exactly how their submissions will be processed, but these can be pretty personal: On Clickworker’s worker jobs tab, one task states: “Show us you baby/child! Help to teach AI by taking 5 photos of your baby/child!” for €2 ($2.15). The next says: “Let your minor (aged 13-17) take part in an interesting selfie project!”

    Some tasks involve content moderation—helping AI distinguish between innocent content and that which contains violence, hate speech, or adult imagery. Hassan shared screen recordings of tasks available the day he spoke with WIRED. One UHRS task asked him to identify “fuck,” “c**t,” “dick,” and “bitch” from a body of text. For Toloka, he was shown pages upon pages of partially naked bodies, including sexualized images, lingerie ads, an exposed sculpture, and even a nude body from a Renaissance-style painting. The task? Decipher the adult from the benign, to help the algorithm distinguish between salacious and permissible torsos.

    Hassan recalls moderating content while under 18 on UHRS that, he says, continues to weigh on his mental health. He says the content was explicit: accounts of rape incidents, lifted from articles quoting court records; hate speech from social media posts; descriptions of murders from articles; sexualized images of minors; naked images of adult women; adult videos of women and girls from YouTube and TikTok.

    Many of the remote workers in Pakistan are underage, Hassan says. He conducted a survey of 96 respondents on a Telegram group chat with almost 10,000 UHRS workers, on behalf of WIRED. About a fifth said they were under 18.

    Awais, 20, from Lahore, who spoke on condition that his first name not be published, began working for UHRS via Clickworker at 16, after he promised his girlfriend a birthday trip to the turquoise lakes and snow-capped mountains of Pakistan’s northern region. His parents couldn’t help him with the money, so he turned to data work, joining using a friend’s ID card. “It was easy,” he says.

    He worked on the site daily, primarily completing Microsoft’s “Generic Scenario Testing Extension” task. This involved testing homepage and search engine accuracy. In other words, did selecting “car deals” on the MSN homepage bring up photos of cars? Did searching “cat” on Bing show feline images? He was earning $1 to $3 each day, but he found the work both monotonous and infuriating. At times he found himself working 10 hours for $1, because he had to do unpaid training to access certain tasks. Even when he passed the training, there might be no task to complete; or if he breached the time limit, they would suspend his account, he says. Then seemingly out of nowhere, he got banned from performing his most lucrative task—something workers say happens regularly. Bans can occur for a host of reasons, such as giving incorrect answers, answering too fast, or giving answers that deviate from the average pattern of other workers. He’d earned $70 in total. It was almost enough to take his high school sweetheart on the trip, so Awais logged off for good.

    Clickworker did not respond to requests for comment. Microsoft declined to comment.

    “In some instances, once a user finishes the training, the quota of responses has already been met for that project and the task is no longer available,” Dzhikaev said. “However, should other similar tasks become available, they will be able to participate without further training.”

    Researchers say they’ve found evidence of underage workers in the AI industry elsewhere in the world. Julian Posada, assistant professor of American Studies at Yale University, who studies human labor and data production in the AI industry, says that he’s met workers in Venezuela who joined platforms as minors.

    Bypassing age checks can be pretty simple. The most lenient platforms, like Clickworker and Toloka, simply ask workers to state they are over 18; the most secure, such as Remotasks, employ face recognition technology to match workers to their photo ID. But even that is fallible, says Posada, citing one worker who says he simply held the phone to his grandmother’s face to pass the checks. The sharing of a single account within family units is another way minors access the work, says Posada. He found that in some Venezuelan homes, when parents cook or run errands, children log on to complete tasks. He says that one family of six he met, with children as young as 13, all claimed to share one account. They ran their home like a factory, Posada says, so that two family members were at the computers working on data labeling at any given point. “Their backs would hurt because they have been sitting for so long. So they would take a break, and then the kids would fill in,” he says.

    The physical distances between the workers training AI and the tech giants at the other end of the supply chain—“the deterritorialization of the internet,” Posada calls it—creates a situation where whole workforces are essentially invisible, governed by a different set of rules, or by none.

    The lack of worker oversight can even prevent clients from knowing if workers are keeping their income. One Clickworker user in India, who requested anonymity to avoid being banned from the site, told WIRED he “employs” 17 UHRS workers in one office, providing them with a computer, mobile, and internet, in exchange for half their income. While his workers are aged between 18 and 20, due to Clickworker’s lack of age certification requirements, he knows of teenagers using the platform.

    In the more shadowy corners of the crowdsourcing industry, the use of child workers is overt.

    Captcha (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart) solving services, where crowdsourcing platforms pay humans to solve captchas, are a less understood part in the AI ecosystem. Captchas are designed to distinguish a bot from a human—the most notable example being Google’s reCaptcha, which asks users to identify objects in images to enter a website. The exact purpose of services that pay people to solve them remains a mystery to academics, says Posada. “But what I can confirm is that many companies, including Google’s reCaptcha, use these services to train AI models,” he says. “Thus, these workers indirectly contribute to AI advancements.”

    There are at least 152 active services, mostly based in China, with more than half a million people working in the underground reCaptcha market, according to a 2019 study by researchers from Zhejiang University in Hangzhou.

    “Stable job for everyone. Everywhere,” one service, Kolotibablo, states on its website. The company has a promotional website dedicated to showcasing its worker testimonials, which includes images of young children from across the world. In one, a smiling Indonesian boy shows his 11th birthday cake to the camera. “I am very happy to be able to increase my savings for the future,” writes another, no older than 7 or 8. A 14-year-old girl in a long Hello Kitty dress shares a photo of her workstation: a laptop on a pink, Barbie-themed desk.

    Not every worker WIRED interviewed felt frustrated with the platforms. At 17, most of Younis Hamdeen’s friends were waiting tables. But the Pakistani teen opted to join UHRS via Appen instead, using the platform for three or four hours a day, alongside high school, earning up to $100 a month. Comparing products listed on Amazon was the most profitable task he encountered. “I love working for this platform,” Hamdeen, now 18, says, because he is paid in US dollars—which is rare in Pakistan—and so benefits from favorable exchange rates.

    But the fact that the pay for this work is incredibly low compared to the wages of in-house employees of the tech companies, and that the benefits of the work flow one way—from the global south to the global north, leads to uncomfortable parallels. “We do have to consider the type of colonialism that is being promoted with this type of work,” says the Civic AI Lab’s Savage.

    Hassan recently got accepted to a bachelor’s program in medical lab technology. The apps remain his sole income, working an 8 am to 6 pm shift, followed by 2 am to 6 am. However, his earnings have fallen to just $100 per month, as demand for tasks has outstripped supply, as more workers have joined since the pandemic.

    He laments that UHRS tasks can pay as little as 1 cent. Even on higher-paid jobs, such as occasional social media tasks on Appen, the amount of time he needs to spend doing unpaid research means he needs to work five or six hours to complete an hour of real-time work, all to earn $2, he says.

    “It’s digital slavery,” says Hassan.

    https://www.wired.co.uk/article/artificial-intelligence-data-labeling-children

    #enfants #AI #intelligence_artificielle #IA #travail #travail_des_enfants #esclavage_moderne #esclavage_digital #informatique

    signalé aussi par @monolecte
    https://seenthis.net/messages/1028002

  • 🏳️‍🌈 🟥 L’extrême-droite au pouvoir en Italie s’en prend aux enfants de mères lesbiennes - Basta !

    Un an après l’arrivée au pouvoir de Giorgia Meloni en Italie, des enfants de couples lesbiens risquent de se retrouver orphelins, à la suite d’attaques légales du gouvernement. Reportage à Padoue, où une série d’audiences vient d’avoir lieu à ce sujet(...)

    #Italie #extrêmedroite #enfants #homophobie...

    https://basta.media/extreme-droite-italie-Meloni-s-en-prend-aux-enfants-de-meres-lesbiennes-dro

  • L’ONU et la guerre en Ukraine : les principales informations
    https://unric.org/fr/onu-et-la-guerre-en-ukraine-les-principales-informations

    Selon le Haut-Commissariat aux droits de l’homme, à ce jour, 27 449 victimes civiles ont été enregistrées, dont 9 701 morts.

    […]

    Selon le Haut-Commissariat aux droits de l’homme, plus de 1 500 enfants ont été tués ou blessés en Ukraine depuis février de l’année dernière (mai 2023).

    Gaza le 30 octobre :
    https://www.aa.com.tr/fr/monde/le-bilan-des-victimes-palestiniennes-de-l-agression-israélienne-à-gaza-s-élève-à-8-525-morts/3038882

    Le bilan des victimes palestiniennes de l’agression israélienne à Gaza s’élève à 8 525 morts - Parmi lesquels 3 542 enfants et 2 187 femmes

    Souviens-toi des grandes analyses démontrant que Poutine pratique volontairement la terreur des bombardements indiscriminés, ce qui fait de lui le nouvel Hitler malade et paranoïaque, et que cette façon de massacrer les civils est une cruauté typiquement russe. Israël a tué en 3 semaines deux fois plus d’enfants que Poutine en un an.

  • Mast est membre du Congrès US.

    Acyn sur X :

    Mast: I think when we look at this, as a whole, I would encourage the other side to not so lightly throw around the idea of innocent Palestinian civilians.

    I don’t think we would so lightly throw around the term innocent Nazi civilians

    https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1719788747292623010

    #enfants #Gaza

    • C’est génial comme Israël et ses soutiens, en définitive, adoptent une propagande qui par certains côtés reprend des thèmes russes dans la guerre en Ukraine.
      C’est génial, parce que quand les russes emploient ces arguments, on te dit « point godwin », on te dit « cécuiquidikyé ».
      Mais là, non. Pas maintenant. Maintenant, on te dit que c’est légitime. Parce que comme tu le sais, les palestiniens dans leur ghetto, ils ont déjà mis en œuvre la solution finale. Les palestiniens ont des chars d’assaut, une bombe atomique, des ressources naturelles.

    • la « guerre des civilisations » gagne en réalisme et en légitimité en devenant guerre contre la barbarie nazie. on évoque une victoire (le nazisme défait militairement) plutôt qu’un échec (les guerres du bien contre le mal après la destruction des Twin towers). on limite (bien artificiellement) la cible à des Palestiniens caractérisés comme nazis. c’est la reprise du schéma délirant proposé par des responsables politiques israéliens. on a vu lors de diverses déclarations (Nétanyahou, ambassadeurs) que ce schématisme implique une négation du génocide des juifs par les nazis par minimisation. antisémitisme du soutien au sionisme. génocide au nom de l’intérêt général.
      #Palestiniens #nazification_des_Palestiniens #Israël #Usa #génocide #négationnisme_d'Israël