• Toujours plus de stars enseignent dans les universités, en Suisse aussi RTS - Katja Schaer/oang

    http://www.rts.ch/info/suisse/7992417-toujours-plus-de-stars-enseignent-dans-les-universites-en-suisse-aussi.h

    ❞ Les universités américaines et britanniques accueillent toujours plus de stars au sein de leur corps enseignant. En Suisse, celle de Saint-Gall a engagé le boxeur ukrainien Wladimir Klitschko.
    . . . . .
    Dès cet automne, l’actrice américaine Angelina Jolie enseignera à la prestigieuse London School of Economics. Mais d’autres célébrités américaines ont été recrutées par des universités anglo-saxonnes, comme le producteur Spike Lee, l’animatrice Oprah Winfrey ou encore l’ancienne secrétaire d’Etat Madeleine Albright. ❞
    #foutage-de_gueule

  • Ça y est, Robert Ford, l’ancien ambassadeur US en Syrie, a trouvé ses rebelles modérés: Ahrar al-Sham. Un plaidoyer publié juste après que le Washington Post a ouvert ses colonnes aux mêmes Ahrar al-Sham… (si c’est pas un lobbying spontanément coordonné, ça!)

    Yes, Talk with Syria’s Ahrar al-Sham
    http://www.mei.edu/content/at/yes-talk-syria%E2%80%99s-ahrar-al-sham

    A senior administration policymaker recently told a gathering at the Center for New American Security that the administration would not support groups such as Nusra and Ahrar having influence in a future Syrian government. The administration’s current approach to Syria, however, is helping to ensure the fragmentation of the country; the present trajectory will not produce a future government of a unified Syria. Moreover, lumping Ahrar and Nusra together is intellectually sloppy, especially when they exhibit ideological and political differences. This is not to say that the United States has no differences with Ahrar. There are many, with some, such as respect for human rights and respect for Geneva war conventions, quite serious. Ahrar will have plenty of complaints against the United States as well. Nevertheless, the larger question is whether the United States should open channels for dialogue, however difficult the conversation will be. Talking is most certainly not giving military aid or arming. Our refusal even to talk with groups like Ahrar further reduces the little influence Americans still have in Syria. As the Assad regime steadily weakens, the administration keeps trying to lead the opposition from behind, hoping for an opposition white knight to appear. Instead, because Islamist groups like Ahrar strongly influence decisions about the fate of Syria, Washington will be left behind.

    Ah ah ah, la rhétorique pour les nuls: « This is not to say that the United States has no differences with Ahrar. […] Ahrar will have plenty of complaints against the United States as well.»

    Sur les mêmes Free Men of the Levant dans le Washington Post:
    http://seenthis.net/messages/389340

    • Al-Akhbar on Mutual accusations of betrayal btw Ahrar al-Sham, An-Nusra – Anger over op-ed approach
      https://mideastwire.wordpress.com/2015/07/25/al-akhbar-on-mutual-accusations-of-betrayal-btw-ahrar-al-sham

      July 24, the Al-Akhbar daily newspaper carried the following report: “…Once again, speculations are emerging on the future of the relationship between the Islamic Ahrar al-Sham movement and An-Nusra Front. Until recently, the two parties were “intellectually and dogmatically” connected to Al-Qa’idah organization each according to their own way. While An-Nusra pledge its allegiance and became the official Al-Qa’idah branch in the Levant, the Ahrar al-Sham’s allegiance remained secret.

      “However, since the assassination of the founder of Ahrar al-Sham, Hassan Abboud along with most of the group’s “first rank leaders,” the relationship between the movement and An-Nusra was hanging by a thread. Many differences emerged between the two sides, some of which turned into clashes in some areas. However, the efforts at containing the problems have always been successful. Nevertheless, many An-Nusra cadres are still eying Al-Ahrar suspiciously. Today, the movement, which is considered the oldest Syrian Jihadist group, is accused of “throwing itself into the West’s lap” and bracing to “confront the entire jihadist movement.”

      “Ahrar al-Sham had indeed carried out two attempts at “addressing the western public opinion” through two pieces written by the man in charge of the external relations, Labib al-Nahhas, the first of which was published in the American Washington Post on July 10 while the second was published a few days ago in the British Daily Telegraph. The reactions stirred by the first article merely consisted of some minor comments that praised this step while other comments criticized it through the pages of the “jihadists” on the social media.

      “However, the second article stirred some heavy reactions especially when the famous “jihadist” theoretician, Abou Qatada al-Filistini (Omar Mahmoud Othman, a Palestinian Jordanian), one of the most prominent Al-Qa’idah theoreticians and one of the most influential individuals in the politics and actions of An-Nusra Front recently, stepped into the line [of the confrontation with Ahrar al-Sham]… Al-Filistini’s Twitter account carried an article attacking Al-Nahhas and indicating that his “is a failed speech and one that will not be able to achieve the objectives of Ahrar al-Sham…”

      “Al-Filistini attacked Ahrar al-Sham and said that this is a “group with a weak mind” and one “that is ready to oppose us (i.e. the Al-Qa’idah movements) in order to please the West… The fastest response to Al-Filistini’s accusations was the one made by the member of Ahrar al-Sham’s Shura Council, Abou Azam al-Ansari who accused him, in a series of tweets, of “dealing with the Algerian intelligence services…” Al-Ansari also described Abou Qatada as being a liar…”