• First-ever private border wall built in #New_Mexico

    A private group announced Monday that it has constructed a half-mile wall along a section of the U.S.-Mexico border in New Mexico, in what it said was a first in the border debate.

    The 18-foot steel bollard wall is similar to the designs used by the Border Patrol, sealing off a part of the border that had been a striking gap in existing fencing, according to We Build the Wall, the group behind the new section.

    The section was also built faster and, organizers say, likely more cheaply than the government has been able to manage in recent years.

    Kris Kobach, a former secretary of state in Kansas and an informal immigration adviser to President Trump, says the New Mexico project has the president’s blessing, and says local Border Patrol agents are eager to have the assistance.

    “We’re closing a gap that’s been a big headache for them,” said Mr. Kobach, who is general counsel for We Build the Wall.

    #privatisation #murs #barrières_frontalières #USA #Mexique #frontières #business #complexe_militaro-industriel
    ping @albertocampiphoto @daphne

    • The #GoFundMe Border Wall Is the Quintessential Trump-Era Grift

      In 2012, historian Rick Perlstein wrote a piece of essential reading for understanding modern conservatism, titled “The Long Con” and published by the Baffler. It ties the right’s penchant for absurd and obvious grifts to the conservative mind’s particular vulnerability to fear and lies:

      The strategic alliance of snake-oil vendors and conservative true believers points up evidence of another successful long march, of tactics designed to corral fleeceable multitudes all in one place—and the formation of a cast of mind that makes it hard for either them or us to discern where the ideological con ended and the money con began.

      Lying, Perlstein said, is “what makes you sound the way a conservative is supposed to sound.” The lies—about abortion factories, ACORN, immigrants, etc.—fund the grifts, and the grifts prey on the psychology that makes the lies so successful.

      Perlstein’s piece is all I could think of when I saw last night’s CNN story about the border wall GoFundMe, which seemingly has actually produced Wall. According to CNN, the group We Build the Wall says it has produced a half-mile of border wall in New Mexico. CNN was invited to watch the construction, where Kris Kobach, who is general counsel for the group, spoke “over the clanking and beeping of construction equipment.”

      #Steve_Bannon, who is naturally involved with the group, told CNN that the wall connects existing fencing and had “tough terrain” that means it was left “off the government list.” The half-mile stretch of wall cost an “estimated $6 million to $8 million to build,” CNN reported.

      CNN also quoted #Jeff_Allen, who owns the property on which the fence was built, as saying: “I have fought illegals on this property for six years. I love my country and this is a step in protecting my country.” According to MSN, Allen partnered with United Constitutional Patriots to build the wall with We Build the Wall’s funding. UCP is the same militia that was seen on video detaining immigrants and misrepresenting themselves as Border Patrol; the Phoenix New Times reported on the “apparent ties” between the UCP and We Build the Wall earlier this month.

      This story is bursting at the seams with an all-star lineup of right-wing scammers. The GoFundMe itself, of course, has been rocked by scandal: After the effort raised $20 million, just $980 million short of the billion-dollar goal, GoFundMe said in January that the funds would be returned, since creator Brian Kolfage had originally pledged that “If for ANY reason we don’t reach our goal we will refund your donation.” But Kolfage quickly figured out how to keep the gravy train going, urging those who had donated to allow their donations to be redirected to a non-profit. Ultimately, $14 million of that $20 million figure was indeed rerouted by the idiots who donated it.

      That non-profit became #We_Build_The_Wall, and like all good conservative con jobs, it has the celebs of the fever swamp attached to it. Not only #Kris_Kobach, a tenacious liar who failed at proving voter fraud is a widespread problem—but also slightly washed-up figures like Bannon, Sheriff David Clarke, Curt Schilling, and Tom Tancredo. All the stars are here!

      How much sleazier could it get? Try this: the main contractor working at the site of New Wall, according to CNN, is Tommy Fisher. The Washington Post reported last week that Trump had “personally and repeatedly urged the head of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers” to give the contract for the border wall to the company owned by Fisher, a “GOP donor and frequent guest on Fox News,” despite the fact that the Corps of Engineers previously said Fisher’s proposals didn’t meet their requirements.

      Of course, like all good schemes, the need for more money never ceases: On the Facebook page for the group, the announcement that Wall had been completed was accompanied with a plea for fans to “DONATE NOW to fund more walls! We have many more projects lined up!”

      So, what we have is: A tax-exempt non-profit raised $20 million by claiming it would be able to make the federal government build Wall by just giving it the money for it and then, when that didn’t happen, getting most of its donors to reroute that money; then it built a half-mile of wall on private land for as much as $8 million, which went to a firm of a Fox News star whom President Trump adores.

      Perlstein wrote in the aforementioned piece that it’s hard to “specify a break point where the money game ends and the ideological one begins,” since “the con selling 23-cent miracle cures for heart disease inches inexorably into the one selling miniscule marginal tax rates as the miracle cure for the nation itself.” The con job was sold through fear: “Conjuring up the most garishly insatiable monsters precisely in order to banish them from underneath the bed, they aim to put the target to sleep.”

      The Trump era is the inartful, gaudy, brazen peak of this phenomenon. This time, instead of selling fake stem cell cures using the language of Invading Liberals, the grifters are just straight-up selling—for real American dollars—the promise of building a big wall to keep the monsters out.


    • Company touted by Trump to build the wall has history of fines, violations

      President Donald Trump appears to have set his sights on a North Dakota construction firm with a checkered legal record to build portions of his signature border wall.
      The family-owned company, #Fisher_Sand_&_Gravel, claims it can build the wall cheaper and faster than competitors. It was among a handful of construction firms chosen to build prototypes of the President’s border wall in 2017 and is currently constructing portions of barrier on private land along the border in New Mexico using private donations.
      It also, however, has a history of red flags including more than $1 million in fines for environmental and tax violations. A decade ago, a former co-owner of the company pleaded guilty to tax fraud, and was sentenced to prison. The company also admitted to defrauding the federal government by impeding the IRS. The former executive, who’s a brother of the current company owner, is no longer associated with it.
      More than two years into his presidency, Trump is still fighting to build and pay for his border wall, a key campaign issue. After failing to get his requests for wall funding passed by a Republican-held Congress during his first two years in office, Trump has met resistance this year from a Democratic-controlled House. His attempt to circumvent Congress through a national emergency declaration has been challenged in the courts.
      On May 24, a federal district judge blocked the administration from using Defense Department funds to construct parts of the wall. The Trump administration has since appealed the block to the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals and in the interim, asked the district court to allow building to continue pending appeal. The district court denied the administration’s request.
      Despite the uncertainty, construction firms have been competing to win multimillion-dollar contracts to build portions of wall, including Fisher Sand & Gravel.

      Asked by CNN to comment on the company’s history of environmental violations and legal issues, the company said in a statement: “The questions you are asking have nothing to do with the excellent product and work that Fisher is proposing with regard to protecting America’s southern border. The issues and situations in your email were resolved years ago. None of those matters are outstanding today.”
      Catching the President’s attention
      The company was founded in North Dakota in 1952 and operates in several states across the US. It’s enjoyed public support from North Dakota Republican Sen. Kevin Cramer, who as a congressman invited the company’s CEO, Tommy Fisher, to Trump’s State of the Union address in 2018. Cramer has received campaign contributions from Fisher and his wife. A photo of the event shared by Fisher in a company newsletter shows Tommy Fisher shaking Trump’s hand.
      The Washington Post first reported the President’s interest in Fisher. According to the Post, the President has “aggressively” pushed for the Army Corps of Engineers to award a wall contract to Fisher.
      The President “immediately brought up Fisher” during a May 23 meeting in the Oval Office to discuss details of the border wall with various government officials, including that he wants it to be painted black and include French-style doors, according to the Post and confirmed by CNN.
      “The Army Corps of Engineers says about 450 miles of wall will be completed by the end of next year, and the only thing President Trump is pushing, is for the wall to be finished quickly so the American people have the safety and security they deserve,” said Hogan Gidley, White House deputy press secretary.
      A US government official familiar with the meeting tells CNN that the President has repeatedly mentioned the company in discussions he’s had about the wall with the head of the Army Corps of Engineers, Lt. Gen. Todd Semonite.
      Fisher has recently made efforts to raise its public profile, both by upping its lobbying efforts and through repeated appearances on conservative media by its CEO, Tommy Fisher.

      In the past two years, for example, the company’s congressional lobbying expenditures jumped significantly — from $5,000 in 2017 to $75,000 in 2018, according to data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, a non-profit that tracks lobbying expenditures.

      When asked about Fisher Sand & Gravel’s lobbying, Don Larson, one of Fisher’s registered lobbyists, said: “I am working to help decision makers in Washington become familiar with the company and its outstanding capabilities.”
      Media Blitz
      As part of a media blitz on outlets including Fox News, SiriusXM Patriot and Breitbart News, Tommy Fisher has discussed his support for the border wall and pitched his company as the one to build it. In a March 5 appearance on Fox & Friends, Fisher said that his company could build 234 miles of border wall for $4.3 billion, compared to the $5.7 billion that the Trump administration has requested from Congress.
      Fisher claimed that his firm can work five-to-10 times faster than competitors as a result of its construction process.
      The President has also touted Fisher on Fox News. In an April interview in which he was asked about Fisher by Sean Hannity, Trump said the company was “recommended strongly by a great new senator, as you know, Kevin Cramer. And they’re real. But they have been bidding and so far they haven’t been meeting the bids. I thought they would.”
      Despite the President’s interest, the company has thus far been unsuccessful in obtaining a contract to build the border wall, beyond that of a prototype.

      Earlier this year, Fisher put its name in the running for border wall contracts worth nearly $1 billion. When it lost the bid to Barnard Construction Co. and SLSCO Ltd., Fisher protested the awards over claims that the process was biased. In response, the Army Corps canceled the award. But after a review of the process, the Army Corps combined the projects and granted it to a subsidiary of Barnard Construction, according to an agency spokesperson.
      It’s unclear whether the project will proceed, given the recent decision by a federal judge to block the use of Defense Department funds to build parts of the border wall and the administration’s appeal.
      Fisher, which has a pending lawsuit in the US Court of Federal Claims over the solicitation process, is listed by the Defense Department as being among firms eligible to compete for future border contracts.

      It has moved forward with a private group, We Build the Wall, that is building sections of barrier on private land in New Mexico using private money raised as part of a GoFundMe campaign. Kris Kobach, the former Kansas Secretary of State who is now general counsel for the group, said a half-mile stretch is nearly complete, at an estimated cost of $6 million to $8 million.

      In a statement, a Customs and Border Protection spokesperson said Fisher Industries has told them that the company has begun construction on private property along the border “in the approximate area of a USBP border barrier requirement that was not prioritized under current funding.”
      The spokesperson added: “It is not uncommon for vendors” to demonstrate their capabilities using “their own resources,” but the agency goes on to “encourage all interested vendors” to compete for border contracts “through established mechanisms to ensure any construction is carried out under relevant federal authorities and meets USBP operational requirements for border barrier.”
      In responses provided to CNN through Scott Sleight, an attorney working on behalf of the company, Fisher maintained that it’s “committed to working with all appropriate federal government officials and agencies to provide its expertise and experience to help secure America’s southern border.”
      The company says it has “developed a patent-pending bollard fence hanging system that [it] believes allows border fencing to be constructed faster than any contractor using common construction methods.” It also added: “Fisher has been concerned about the procurement procedures and evaluations done by the USACE to date, and hopes these issues can be remedied.”
      Relationship with Sen. Cramer
      A month after attending the 2018 State of the Union address with Cramer, Fisher and his wife, Candice each contributed the $5,400 maximum donation to Cramer’s campaign for the US Senate, Federal Election Commission records show.
      Fisher also donated to several Arizona Republicans in the 2018 election cycle, including giving the $5,400-maximum donation to Martha McSally’s campaign, records show.
      A recent video produced by Fisher Sand & Gravel demonstrating its ability to construct the wall includes a clip of Cramer at the controls of a track-hoe lifting sections of barrier wall into place, saying “this is just like XBOX, baby.” Cramer was joined at the demonstration by a handful of other Republican lawmakers from across the country.

      Cramer has been publicly critical of how the Army Corps has handled its border wall construction work, arguing that it has moved too slowly and expressing frustration over how it has dealt with Fisher. In an interview with a North Dakota TV station, Cramer said that he believes the corps “made a miscalculation in who they chose over Fisher” and that the company had been “skunked so to speak.” Cramer added that Fisher “remains a pre-qualified, high level, competitor.”

      In an interview with CNN, Cramer said that the company has come up in conversations he has had with administration officials, including the President and the head of the Army Corps, but while the senator said that he would “love if they got every inch of the project,” he added that he has “never advocated specifically for them.”
      "Every time someone comes to meet with me, whether it’s (Acting Defense Secretary) Shanahan, General Semonite, even with Donald Trump, they bring up Fisher Industries because they assume that’s my thing," Cramer said.
      “One of the things I’ve never done is said it should be Fisher,” Cramer said. “Now, I love Fisher. I’d love if they got every inch of the project. They’re my constituents, I don’t apologize for that. But my interest really is more in the bureaucratic process.”
      According to an administration official familiar with the situation, Cramer sent information about Fisher to the President’s son-in-law and White House adviser Jared Kushner, who then passed it along to the Army Corps of Engineers for their consideration. The source tells CNN that Kushner was not familiar with the company prior to getting information about them from Cramer.
      Cramer said he does recall passing along information about the company to Kushner, but that he did not know what Kushner did with the information.
      On May 24, Cramer told a North Dakota radio station that the President has asked him to examine the process of how federal border wall projects are awarded.
      “We’re going to do an entire audit,” Cramer said. “I’ve asked for the entire bid process, and all of the bid numbers.” Cramer told CNN the President said he wanted the wall built for the “lowest, best price, and it’s also quality, and that’s what any builder should want.”
      Asked about aspects of the company’s checkered legal record, Cramer said “that level of scrutiny is important, but I would hope the same scrutiny would be put on the Corps of Engineers.”
      Environmental violations
      Though its corporate headquarters are in North Dakota, Fisher has a sizable footprint in Arizona, where it operates an asphalt company as well as a drilling and blasting company. It’s there that the company has compiled an extensive track record of environmental violations.
      From 2007 to 2017, Fisher Sand & Gravel compiled more than 1,300 air-quality violations in Maricopa County, culminating in the third highest settlement ever received by the Maricopa County Air Quality Department, according to Bob Huhn, a department spokesperson. That’s a record number of violations for any air-quality settlement in the county, Huhn said. The settlement totaled more than $1 million, though the department received slightly less than that following negotiations, Huhn said.
      Most of the violations came from an asphalt plant that the company was running in south Phoenix that has since closed. While the plant was still running, the City of Phoenix filed 469 criminal charges against the company from August to October of 2009, according to a city spokesperson.
      According to a 2010 article in the Arizona Republic, Fisher reached an agreement with Phoenix officials to close the plant in 2010. As part of the deal, fines were reduced from $1.1 million to an estimated $243,000 and all criminal charges were reduced to civil charges.
      Mary Rose Wilcox was a member of the Maricopa Board of Supervisors at the time the city and county were fighting Fisher over the asphalt plant, which was located in her district. “They tried to persuade us they were good guys since they were a family-owned company. But they were spreading noxious fumes into a residential area,” Wilcox said. “We tried to work with them, but their violations were just so blatant.”
      Michael Pops, a community activist who lived in the area around the plant, remembers fighting with Fisher for six years before the plant finally shut down. “The impact they had on this community was devastating,” Pops said, adding many low-income residents living near the asphalt plant were sickened from the fumes the plant emitted.
      The company has also racked up more than 120 violations with the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality from 2004 until as recently as last summer, according to the department.
      In 2011, Fisher agreed to a Consent Judgement with ADEQ over numerous air quality violations the company had committed. As part of that settlement, Fisher agreed to pay $125,000 in civil penalties, and that it would remain in compliance with state air quality standards. Within two years Fisher was found to be in violation of that agreement and was forced to pay an additional $500,000 in fines, according to the state’s attorney general’s office.
      Legal trouble
      Internally, the company has also confronted issues.
      In 2011, Fisher Sand & Gravel agreed to pay $150,000 to settle a sexual discrimination and retaliation suit filed by the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The lawsuit charged that the company violated federal anti-discrimination laws when it “subjected two women workers to egregious verbal sexual harassment by a supervisor and then fired one of them after she repeatedly asked the supervisor to stop harassing her and complained to a job superintendent.”
      The settlement required Fisher to provide anti-discrimination training to its employees in New Mexico and review its policies on sexual harassment.
      Micheal Fisher, a former co-owner of Fisher and Tommy’s brother, was sentenced to prison in 2009 for tax fraud, according to the Justice Department. Fisher pleaded guilty to “conspiracy to defraud the United States by impeding the [Internal Revenue Service], four counts of aiding in the filing of false federal tax returns for FSG and four counts of filing false individual tax returns,” according to a Justice Department release.
      The company also admitted responsibility for defrauding the US by impeding the IRS, according to the DOJ. Citing a long standing policy of not commenting on the contracting process, the Army Corps declined to comment on whether Fisher’s history factored into its decision not to award Fisher a contract.


    • Private US-Mexico border wall ordered open by gov’t, fights back and is now closed again

      The privately funded portion of the U.S.-Mexico border wall is now fully secure and closed again after one of its gates had been ordered to remain open until disputes about waterway access could be resolved.

      “Our border wall & gate are secure again and we still have not had a single breach. I want to thank the IBWC for acting swiftly and we look forward to working with you on our future projects,” triple amputee Air Force veteran Brian Kolfage posted to Twitter on Tuesday night.

      Kolfage created We Build The Wall Inc., a nonprofit that is now backed by former Trump Administration Chief Strategist Steve Bannon. The group crowd-funded more than $22 million in order to privately build a border wall and then sell it to the U.S. government for $1.

      A portion of that wall has been constructed in Texas for between $6 and $8 million. The 1-mile-long wall is located on private property near El Paso, Texas, and Sunland Park, New Mexico.

      However, the International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC) had ordered a 33-foot gate within the private border wall to remain open – not locked and closed – over a waterway access issue, according to BuzzFeed News. The IBCW addresses waterway issues between the U.S. and Mexico.

      “This is normally done well in advance of a construction project,” IBWC spokesperson Lori Kuczmanski said. “They think they can build now and ask questions later, and that’s not how it works.”

      BuzzFeed reported that the IBWC said the gate “had blocked officials from accessing a levee and dam, and cut off public access to a historic monument known as Monument One, the first in a series of obelisks that mark the U.S.–Mexico border from El Paso to Tijuana.”

      By Tuesday night, the IBWC said the gate would remain locked at night and issued a statement.

      “The U.S. Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC) will lock the privately-owned gate on federal property at night effective immediately due to security concerns,” it said.

      The statement continues:

      The USIBWC is continuing to work with We Build the Wall regarding its permit request. Until this decision, the private gate was in a locked open position. We Build the Wall, a private organization, built a gate on federal land in Sunland Park, N.M., near El Paso, Texas, without authority, and then locked the gate closed on June 6, 2019. The private gate blocks a levee road owned by the U.S. Government. After repeated requests to unlock and open the private gate, the United States Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC), accompanied by two uniformed law enforcement officers from the Dona Ana County Sheriff’s Office, removed the private lock, opened the gate, and locked the gate open pending further discussions with We Build the Wall. The gate was also opened so that USIBWC employees can conduct maintenance and operations at American Dam.

      The USIBWC did not authorize the construction of the private gate on federal property as announced on We Build the Wall’s Twitter page. The USIBWC is not charged with securing other fences or gates as reported by We Build the Wall. The international border fences are not on USIBWC property. The USIBWC did not open any other gates in the El Paso area as erroneously reported. Other gates and the border fence are controlled by other federal agencies.

      When the proper documentation is received for the permit, USIBWC will continue to process the permit application.

      Before the statement had been released, Kolfage posted to Twitter.


  • #GoFundMe raises nearly $5 million for Trump’s border wall | TheHill

    The fundraiser’s total continued to climb on Wednesday after the White House dropped its demand that $5 billion for Trump’s border wall be included in a government funding bill.


  • #RIP Marvin Minsky, 88 years


    “Intelligence is not the product of any singular mechanism, but comes from the managed interaction of a diverse variety of resourceful agents.”

    (Minsky in The Society of Mind)

    His HTML 1.0 website:


    In 1952 he also invented what he called The Most Useless Machine Ever.

    In French:


    #artificial_intelligence #intelligence_artificielle

  • Le remède, c’est la pauvreté

    Cette fois je ne répondrai pas ad personam, je parlerai à tous, en particulier cependant à ces lecteurs qui m’ont âprement reproché deux de mes phrases : « Les pauvres ont toujours raison », écrite il y a quelques mois, et cette autre : « le remède c’est la pauvreté. Revenir en arrière ? Oui, revenir en arrière. » écrite dans mon dernier article. [Article paru sur le Corriere della Sera le 30 juin 1974, repris dans l’anthologie Dobbiamo disobbedire, Adelphi 2013.] Source : Corriere della Sera via Dormira jamais

    • @monolecte :

      La pauvreté n’est pas la misère, comme le croient mes contradicteurs de gauche. La pauvreté n’est pas le « communisme », comme le croient mes grossiers contradicteurs de droite.

      La pauvreté est une idéologie, politique et économique. La pauvreté, c’est jouir des biens minimums et nécessaires, comme la nourriture nécessaire et non superflue, les habits nécessaires, la maison nécessaire et non superflue. La pauvreté et la nécessité nationale sont les transports public, nécessaire est la santé de ses propres jambes pour aller à pied, sont superflus l’automobile, les motocyclettes, et les fameux yachts, d’une parfaite crétinerie.

      La pauvreté signifie surtout se rendre parfaitement compte (même au sens économique) de ce que l’on achète, du rapport entre la qualité et le prix : c’est-à-dire savoir bien choisir, minutieusement, ce qu’on achète parce que cela nous est nécessaire, connaître la qualité, la matière dont sont faits les objets nécessaires.

      D’autres appeleraient ça la « simplicité volontaire ». Mais la « pauvreté », ça me semble intéressant pour renverser le stigmate et pour remettre en question des normes sociales que très majoritairement nous avons fini par ne plus refuser.

      En note de bas de page, il y a aussi cela :

      La distinction entre « pauvreté » et « misère » a été théorisée en France par André Gorz, dont on peut lire un texte sur ce site.

    • La #consommation_ostentatoire de camelote plus ou moins luxueuse a lassé bien du monde en se banalisant, y compris des #riches dont certains se débarrassent au maximum d’objets dont l’accumulation est considérée comme vulgaire et dégradante, et qui choisissent avec soin des objets peu nombreux et durables. Sur cet axe, divers commerces prolifèrent niches par niches, cible par cible, on peut louer partout où on veut aller plutôt que de s’embarrasser d’une iou de plusieurs propriétés, aimer le « vintage », les chaines hifi et leurs vynils sont remplacées par des disques durs branchées sur des enceintes audiophiles haut de gamme qu’on ne confondra pas avec de grosses colonnes encombrantes, passer à la tablette pour mettre fin à une accumulation de livres, créer des marques pour friqués qui s’appellent « clochard ». Tout pour ne pas ressembler aux « nouveaux riches » comme aux #prolos voire aux #racailles (qui ont bouffé l’image de Lacoste, quelle tristesse), devenir imperceptibles aussi (pas de logo, pas de frime, etc), (pas tout à fait) comme disait l’autre, ce qui ne gâte rien en termes de sécurité (il y’a plein de pauvres, faut pas être lisible, ça peut craindre).
      Ces jeux d’allure rendent pour partie inopérationnelle une efficace sociologie spontanée dont chacun savait faire preuve sans même passer par une quelconque intellection, la saisie instantanée, un simple regard, enregistrant la posture, le type de chaussures, avant toute parole.

      On vend aussi beaucoup aux cadres sup sup, des échappées hors de la trépidante vie mondaine impliquée par leur travail (retraites en monastères, sports dit extrêmes).

      Et pendant ce temps, la #dépense et la dilapidation peuvent rester des instants de joie collective, y compris du fait de n’en avoir rationnellement pas les moyens.

      Ce discours sur la pauvreté rejoins celui de Pasolini contre l’#embourgeoisement des prolos. Aujourd’hui, il peut prendre effet chez une partie des hauts revenus à patrimoine (pour bien faire comprendre que le pouvoir est anonyme, soyons le), comme chez nombre assistés et autres smicards pour qui la fièvre acheteuse comme les besoins élémentaires sont inassumables.
      Aucune pauvreté n’est acceptable sans que puisse lui correspondre une pratique positive du #luxe.

      #Goffredo_Parise #littérature #obsolescence_de_l'accumulation ?

    • Oui, j’ai aussi pensé à Pasolini dans la manière de pratiquer la #critique_sociale.

      Après, que l’accumulation soit devenue une affaire ancienne, je n’en suis pas aussi persuadée : elle se dématérialise (achats numériques ou achats de services), mais elle n’en devient pas nécessairement gratuite et surtout elle ne rompt absolument pas avec la logique de consommation dans laquelle on est sacrément empêtré⋅e⋅s. C’est même l’inverse qui se produit avec la dématérialisation : la recherche de possession peut devenir littéralement infinie. C’est bien ce que veulent toutes les boîtes qui fixent des limites à la propriété, pour se la réserver et recommencer la vente éternellement : obsolescence programmée, abonnement perpétuel à des outils, etc. (il y avait eu pas mal de billets sur seenthis à ce propos à une époque, je tente de les retrouver).

      Sinon, je ne comprends pas ta phrase finale :

      Aucune pauvreté n’est acceptable sans que puisse lui correspondre une pratique positive du luxe.

    • « Pratique positive du luxe », je veux dire par là qu’il est hors de question de laisser le luxe aux bourgeois, au capital. Le luxe n’implique pas l’accaparement et Marie Antoinette avait raison :) : pas seulement du pain, aussi de la brioche. Luxe pour tous, ou pour personne. On nous a bassiné avec la supériorité morale de la pauvreté pour mieux nous faire attendre le paradis.

      C’est très concret. Par ex. lors d’autoréductions négociées dans des supermarchés, les responsables de mags râlent toujours qu’il y’a ait autre chose que des pâtes et des couches culottes. Faut parfois planquer les bons fromages, le whisky ou les pinards pas pourris. Potlacher, c’est un luxe. On nous fait comprendre que « ça se mérite ». Moi pas comprendre.

      Sinon, bien d’accord pour dire qu’"on" est empêtré dans la conso. Sans doute aurais-je du mieux trier les exemples d’écarts qui se cherchent, du côté des bourgeois pour s’en dépêtrer.

    • On nous a bassiné avec la supériorité morale de la pauvreté pour mieux nous faire attendre le paradis.

      tout à fait d’accord, mais justement il me semble que Parise évite cet écueil et remet bien en cause le consumérisme, non le désir d’objets de belle facture ou au goût fin :

      Acheter un objet parce que la qualité de son matériau, sa forme dans l’espace, nous donne une émotion.

    • Oui, son texte paradoxal nous dit qu’une certaine pauvreté peut être riche, sensible. Les moines le montraient eux aussi, pendant que l’église amassait des biens. Une des vulgates actuelles est que la richesse « intérieure », l’authenticité ne peut pas tolérer l’amassement (voir le sens péjoratif courant du mot « matérialiste »). Point de vue qui, j’essayais de le dire, peut orienter les gavés dans le trop plein (à la recherche d’un art de vivre) comme les pauvres, dans le trop plein de fausse richesse, ou dans le manque de richesse. Mais il y a manifestement là trop de morale et d’esthétique, trop de phénomènes variés et de différences sociales solides pour conclure quoi que ce soit, manque une ou des enquêtes sur les pratiques.

    • Pas besoin d’un yacht, voilà le genre de produit à 2000 boules qui se banalisent pour le chez soi : "L’équipement audio vidéo tout-en-un : serveur de stockage et lecteur multimedia HD. Disque dur de 2 à 4 To en RAID 5 - Rip CD, DVD, Blu-ray - Diffusion multiroom et partage en réseau - Compatible tuner TNT HD"ajouter un ampli bien cher et des enceintes itou, et on gagne en simplicité et dépouillement. En option une consultations Feng shui à domicile (vous savez là où les toubibs vont plus, et là où déboulent les contrôles Caf) sont pas à négliger

  • #sàt : le couteau suisse Libre et #Open_Source de la communication

    C’est un projet de développement logiciel qui arrive à son terme et possède un potentiel vraiment intéressant. Basé sur le protocole #xmpp, #salut_à_toi (SàT) est un logiciel client libre et open source de « communication globale »— étonnant par ses nombreuses fonctionnalités et…son engagement politique. Micro-blogging, blogging, messagerie instantanée, gestion de communautés, échange de fichiers, télécommande […]

    #A_la_Une #Apps #Technos #couteau_suisse_communication #goffi #jabber #Logiciel_libre #Réseaux_sociaux

  • La stratégie de la bouffonisation

    "Malgré leur diversité, les codes, les lignes de conduite proposées aux personnes affligées d’un certain stigmate s’accordent très généralement sur quelques thèmes, d’ailleurs contradictoires. L’individu stigmatisé est presque toujours prévenu contre la tentation du faux-semblant intégral. (Il est vrai que l’on voit mal comment quiconque, si ce n’est le confesseur anonyme, pourrait s’en faire l’avocat public.) On l’avertit de ne pas trop reprendre à son compte les attitudes dépréciatives des autres à son égard. On s’efforce en outre de le détourner de toute « bouffonisation » qui l’amènerait à danser complaisamment devant les normaux la ronde des défauts attribués à ses semblables, figeant ainsi une situation vécue en un rôle clownesque :

    J’ai appris aussi que l’infirme doit prendre garde à ne pas agir différemment de ce que les autres attendent. Et, par-dessus tout, ils attendent de lui qu’il soit infirme : invalide et impuissant ; leur inférieur ; et, s’il ne répond pas à leur attente, leur malaise les rend soupçonneux. C’est assez étrange à dire, mais l’infirme est obligé de jouer le rôle de l’infirme, de la même façon que beaucoup de femmes doivent se contenter d’être ce que les hommes veulent qu’elles soient, rien que des femmes ; et les Noirs ont souvent à jouer les clowns devant la race blanche « supérieure », afin que la vue de son frère noir n’effraie pas l’homme blanc. J’ai connu une naine qui constituait un exemple réellement pathétique de cette réalité. Elle était très petite, environ un mètre vingt, et d’une éducation raffinée. Malgré cela, devant les gens, elle prenait grand soin de n’être rien d’autre que « la naine », et elle jouait le rôle du bouffon avec ce rire moqueur et ces gestes vifs et comiques qui n’ont cessé d’être le propre de ses pareils depuis les cours du Moyen Age. Ce n’est que lorsqu’elle se trouvait avec des amis qu’elle osait enfin rejeter son capuchon et ses clochettes et se montrer la femme qu’elle était en réalité : intelligente, triste et très seule .... "

    [Erving Goffman, Stigmate. Les usages sociaux des handicaps]


  • « En gros, on peut distinguer trois types de stigmates. En premier lieu, il y a les monstruosités du corps — les diverses difformités. Ensuite, on trouve les tares du caractère qui, aux yeux d’autrui, prennent l’aspect d’un manque de volonté, de passions irrépressibles ou antinaturelles, de croyances égarées et rigides, de malhonnêteté, et dont on infère l’existence chez un individu parce que l’on sait qu’il est ou a été, par exemple, mentalement dérangé, emprisonné, drogué, alcoolique, homosexuel, chômeur, suicidaire ou d’extrême-gauche. Enfin, il y a ces stigmates tribaux que sont la race, la nationalité et la religion, qui peuvent se transmettre de génération en génération et contaminer également tous les membres d’une famille. Mais, dans tous les cas de stigmate, y compris ceux auxquels pensaient les Grecs, on retrouve les mêmes traits sociologiques : un individu qui aurait pu aisément se faire admettre dans le cercle des rapports sociaux ordinaires possède une caractéristique telle qu’elle peut s’imposer à l’attention de ceux d’entre nous qui le rencontrent, et nous détourner de lui, détruisant ainsi les droits qu’il a vis-à-vis de nous du fait de ses autres attributs. Il possède un stigmate, une différence fâcheuse d’avec ce à quoi nous nous attendions. » (#Goffman, #Stigmate)

    #Racisme #Antiblanc

  • Que pense vraiment Jean-Luc Mélenchon ? Le candidat aux élections présidentielles françaises Jean-Luc MELENCHON présente sa politique devant le Grand Orient de France.






    Dignité humaine

    Droits de l’homme


    #Jean-Luc_Mélenchon, #réseauFDG, #GOF

  • Go Fast : quand la police fait son cinéma

    Sur les écrans sort aujourd’hui une curiosité : Go Fast, au cœur du trafic. Un film d’action à la française qui a un but avoué : réhabiliter l’image du « beau flic », passablement dégradée ces vingt dernières années. Banco, a dit la place Beauvau qui a prêté des moyens, prodigué quelques conseils et même laissé le Raid jouer son propre rôle. Enquête vidéo sur une drôle de collaboration marketing. <br /><br />Plus sur http://www.mediapart.fr/journal/france/011008/go-fast-pourquoi-le-ministere-de-l-interieur-a-coproduit-le-film

    #Go #fast #trafic #police #marketing #roschdy #zem #raid #scénario #marchal #berthomet #dgpn #go.fast #gofast #davduf #dufresne