• Group of 45 people stranded on an islet in the wider #Soufli - #Tychero area (22.07.2023)

    🆘 near #Lagyna, #Evros river, #Greece


    We are in contact with a group of 45 people stranded on an islet in the wider #Soufli - #Tychero area. They report being there 9 days already. @hellenicpolice
    are informed & claim to have searched for them but that they could not find them.

    #limbe #zone_frontalière #île #Evros #asile #migrations #réfugiés #frontières #fleuve_Evros #Turquie #Grèce #Thrace #îlots

    –-

    ajouté à la métaliste sur #métaliste sur des #réfugiés abandonnés sur des #îlots dans la région de l’#Evros, #frontière_terrestre entre la #Grèce et la #Turquie :
    https://seenthis.net/messages/953343

    • Même groupe ?
      (16.07.2023)

      🆘 in the #Evros region! 25 people are stranded on an islet near the town of #Soufli. They reported to be there since 10 days & seem currently under attack by #Greek authorities. Stop the violence & evacuate them from the islet!

      https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1680530020425424900

    • Evros: the brutal face of the European border regime

      A group has been stuck for over three weeks on a small islet of the Evros river. Their story includes countless distress-calls, physical attacks, sexual violence, non-assistance when immediate medical aid was needed, and the complete disregard for a European Court of Human Rights ruling, which granted the group interim measures and ordering the Greek state to provide them with assistance. It is another clear example of the brutal reality that people endure at the land border between Türkiye and Greece.

      On the 21st of July 2023, a group of people reached out to Alarm Phone. The 52 people – among them several children and elderly people with severe health conditions – told us how they were stuck on a small islet near the village of Lagyna on Greek territory in the middle of the Evros river, which borders Greece and Türkiye. When reaching out to Alarm Phone and calling for help, the people informed us they had already been stuck on the islet for eight days. At 14:19 CEST of the same day, Alarm Phone alerted Greek authorities, as well as Frontex, UNHCR and various NGOs via email about the people in distress, sharing their location and their request for immediate and urgent assistance.

      At this point, we did not know that this would be the start of an odyssey lasting over two weeks, with no end in sight, which would include countless emails and calls to authorities, public outcries via social media to mobilise for evacuation, an ignored decision of the European Court of Human rights and ongoing barbaric violence by Greek forces against the group.

      On the day after the alert, Greek authorities informed Alarm Phone about joint efforts, together with Frontex, to search for the group, “[…]we would like to inform you that after extensive searches by the Greek Authorities and Frontex join patrols in the location indicated by the coordinates area and also more widely, no human presence was found”. This would not be the last time that Greek authorities claimed to have been unable to find the group despite conducting “extensive searches” for them.

      Several days later, on July 26th, the people told us how they had heard car noises the previous day on the Greek side of the river, but that they were still waiting for urgently needed assistance. At the same time, their condition worsened with every day: they reported injuries and various health issues, as well, they told us how everyone’s mental health was rapidly deteriorating in light of the ongoing difficulties they were facing. The violent act of leaving people for days being stuck on an islet not only risks physical injuries, but is a mental torment in and of itself that traumatises people. Already by this point, the non-assistance from Greek authorities and Frontex was causing damage to the people calling for help – but the situation would continue to deteriorate over the coming days.

      On July 27th, 08:18 CEST, Greek authorities again claimed to have searched for the people: “[…]we would kindly like to inform you that after extensive searches by the Greek Authorities and Frontex patrol in the location indicated by the coordinates and also more widely, no human presence was found”. This is despite the Evros region being a highly militarized border area, where the EU has invested hundreds of millions of euros into fortifying the border. The technologies deployed in the area include sensors, thermal cameras and drones – but in spite of this, the Greek authorities and Frontex state they are unable to find a group with a clearly indicated location? How embarrassing. While it is clear that their statement is a blatant lie, it is remarkable that Greek authorities and Frontex have reached a point where such obvious untruths have become implicit to their operational activities. To have reached this point, these strategies have to be widely accepted within their ranks and as such demonstrate how the brutal means of deterrence used at the borders of Greece have become normalised, from overt and brutal violence to misinformation and non-assistance. This is particularly true in the Evros region, as demonstrated over the next days in the developments we witnessed for this case.

      A day later, on July 28th, the group told us again about activities on the Greek side of the river: the people had spotted a black car parked “on the Greek side” and a drone that was flying over them. Shortly after, they reported being attacked by police and what they described as “mercenaries”: “Police and mercenaries stormed us. They started to hit the world. And now we’re in the water”. They sent us several videos showing the cruel attack.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6L5M3Gwiqs&source_ve_path=Mjg2NjY&feature=emb_logo

      We immediately informed the authorities about the attack. It is clear: in this highly militarised and controlled border zone, no such attack could have happened without some level of coordination from the authorities – the very same authorities who had been claiming for days that they could not locate the group. After the attack, the people told us how they were shocked and devastated. However, this attack did not signal the end of their suffering. The group told us that after the attack, they were forced back to the same islet as before by Turkish authorities.

      Together with the Rule39 Initiative, an application for Interim Measures at the European Court of Human Rights was handed in on August 1st. By this point, we had been in contact with the people for 11 days. Throughout this entire period, the authorities had been aware of the group and their calls for assistance. Despite this, the group’s calls for assistance remained ignored. Moreover, instead of receiving help, the people were violently attacked.

      https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1684815225608949760

      During the morning of August 2nd, the response by the European Court of Human Rights arrived: the court had granted the Interim Measures and ordered Greece to provide food, water and medical assistance. We immediately informed authorities, including Frontex and UNHCR about the decision and reiterated the urgent need of assistance for the group.

      https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1686756260085936129

      During the morning of the 3rd of August, Greek authorities sent another email, claiming once again to have searched for, but not found, the people. At the same time, the people shared videos with us showing themselves loudly screaming for help. In desperation, the group decided to cross the river themselves. This is extremely dangerous – every year dozens of people die in the Evros river, which has strong undercurrents that can drown people. Luckily, they managed to cross the river and arrived safely on the Greek riverbank, which they documented with several videos that they sent to Alarm Phone. They reported talking to two people wearing shirts with “police” written on it. This is when an incredibly violent chapter of their journey started.

      https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1687059265427496961

      Following the news that the group were talking with “police”, Alarm Phone shift teams once again called various border guard and police stations, including the ones at Soufli, Alexandroupolis and Thrace. All our calls went unanswered. In the meantime, the people reported they were put into cars and told us that they feared they would be brought back to Türkiye. The position they shared showed them near Soufli:

      We continued to call the authorities, however, they either did not pick up, rejected responsibility – claiming it was outside of their jurisdiction, or refused to give any information.

      https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1687135993235750912

      Shortly after midnight on August 4th, the people reached out to Alarm Phone again. They were pushed back to Türkiye and severely beaten. A woman from the group explained what had happened to them after they were taken in the car:

      She told us how, after half an hour in the car, the young men and even some women were severely beaten. The attackers stripped the women of all their clothes and forced the young men’s eyes open to look the undressed women. They then beat the men badly. The woman said the group was worried that two among the attacked men were beaten to death. The attackers even beat the elderly women and told them to return to their country. The group was, again, forced back onto the islet, and reported that there were now several people missing, among them the two men who had been heavily beaten.

      The people told us how they were left severely shaken and outraged, desperate to know what happened to their friends who went missing who they fear died. They reported that amongst their group are three year old babies who are understandably extremely psychologically distressed and traumatised by the violent assault of the Greek police. “Please please can we help them. Turkey and Greece have left them in the middle. Do we know where the people who went missing are?”.

      https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1687373994909921281

      We want to know: what has happened to the missing? Who is responsible for the brutal attack and the sexual violence? And what was the role of Frontex in this whole story? How can orders of the European Court of Human Rights just be ignored? And why has help been repeated denied for people who are in urgent need of it?

      Not only have the attacks subjected people to overt violence, but the continuous non-assistance has led to many medical emergencies – this includes three elderly people with diabetes in need of medical assistance, an elderly person with circulatory problems in the leg, which were purple on both sides, a pregnant woman who suffered from contractions and was bleeding, and several children who were weak, mentally distressed and badly bitten by mosquitoes. It should also be noted that the group told us how they ran out of food and water days ago and are forced to drink water from the river, which carries with it a risk of poisoning.

      Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident, but instead sees the recurrence of an all too familiar pattern. The incredible level of violence used – which can only be understood as systematized forms of torture and brutalisation– against people on the move is abhorrent. It is illustrative of the dehumanisation implicit to the racist European migration regime. Furthermore, it demonstrates an obvious dysfunctionality of European institutions, where decisions of the European Court of Human Rights are easily ignored by Greece, without consequence. Instead of being forced to take action, Greek authorities merely responded to both Alarm Phone and the ECHR that the people could not be located. And once again, we see how Frontex is involved in a situation which resulted in a brutal pushback.

      On August 6th, the people were still stuck on the islet. There were also still in very distressed condition – and one that continues to deteriorate. They expressed their shock and disbelief that an ECHR decision obviously does not count in Greece. They themselves have called 112 over 50 times and written emails to Frontex and Greek authorities – but instead of receiving much needed assistance, have been subject to repeated and vicious attacks.

      https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1687425346285494273

      In the early hours of the morning on August 7th, the group reached out to us again to report another attack, telling us that “Mercenaries came upon us while we were asleep [on the islet], and we were sent back to Turkey”. They then told us how they were picked up by the Turkish army, who is forcing them back into Greece. The group was incredibly distressed, commenting that they have “become a football between Greek and Turkish army.” As the situation continues with no end in sight, and the people, who are in dire need of urgent medical assistance, are pushed back and forth across the river by Greek and Turkish forces, we again make it clear, these attacks must end and the people be given the help they so urgently need.

      We, along with the group currently stranded on the islet, are shocked and outraged – even though we witness such crimes and attacks against people on the move almost daily, and with increasing intensity. We will continue to fight against the normalisation of such violence and will never forgive the ones responsible for it. While Greece tries to cover up the mass murder of Pylos, for which the Hellenic Coast Guard is responsible, the real and merciless face of the Greek border regime remains clearly visible in the Evros region, as too does the complicity of the EU.

      https://alarmphone.org/en/2023/08/07/evros-the-brutal-face-of-the-european-border-regime/?post_type_release_type=post

  • 26.07.2023 :

    🆘 in the #Evros region. A group of 29 people is stuck on an islet of the #Evros river, close to the village of #Marasia. Despite their calls for urgent medical support, #Greek & #Turkish authorities refuse to help & claim the position is not on their respective territory.
    The people called #112 themselves, but no help arrived. What is #112 for? To contribute to border violence or to help people in distress? To authorities involved: Stop playing games, evacuate the people now - they reported several people in need of urgent medical assistance!

    https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1684252700970450953

    #limbe #zone_frontalière #île #Evros #asile #migrations #réfugiés #frontières #fleuve_Evros #Turquie #Grèce #Thrace #îlots

    –-

    ajouté à la métaliste sur #métaliste sur des #réfugiés abandonnés sur des #îlots dans la région de l’#Evros, #frontière_terrestre entre la #Grèce et la #Turquie :
    https://seenthis.net/messages/953343

  • Le gouvernement à l’offensive contre les arrêts de travail « de complaisance »
    https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2023/08/01/le-gouvernement-a-l-offensive-contre-les-arrets-de-travail-de-complaisance_6

    Le gouvernement à l’offensive contre les arrêts de travail « de complaisance »

    La volonté de l’exécutif de réguler la recrudescence des dépenses liées aux arrêts maladie est soutenue par des organisations patronales et contestée par les syndicats.

    Par Bertrand Bissuel et Thibaud Métais
    Publié aujourd’hui à 05h35

    Voilà un thème rêvé pour communiquer à la fois sur le sérieux budgétaire et la lutte contre les fraudes. Alors que les dépenses liées aux arrêts de travail s’envolent à un rythme de plus en plus soutenu, le gouvernement cherche à contrer cette évolution, qui pèse sur les comptes de la Caisse nationale de l’assurance-maladie (CNAM). A plusieurs reprises, depuis la fin du mois de mai, les ministres représentant Bercy ont exprimé leur volonté d’agir, à travers des mesures qui, depuis, ont commencé à être mises en œuvre, tandis que d’autres sont envisagées dans le projet de loi de financement de la Sécurité sociale de 2024, dont l’examen au Parlement est prévu à l’automne.

    https://jpst.it/3k07I

    • Puisque travail partout et grève nulle part, il est peut-être temps de s’inspirer de la mobilisation des chtars qui démontre les avantages de la grève dissimulée, de la grève travestie. Syndiqués ou pas, salariés garantis ou pas, pratiquons et incitons à l’arrêt de travail. C’est bon pour la planète. Et, c’est collectivement, par delà les premiers concernés, que la maladie redonne la santé aux travailleurs. On en peut pas seulement compter sur les effets du covid long, ce truc psy pour lequel la GB interdit le don de sang ! Une multiplication significative des arrêts de travail, les plus longs possibles, permettrait à bien des discriminés à l’embauche, à bien des chômeurs et précaires, d’accéder à du salaire, de la prime d’activité, et ensuite d’accéder à une alloc dont plus de la moitié des chômeurs sont privés. Les avantages sont nombreux, pesez-y ! Souvenons-nous par exemple qu’être au travail diminue drastiquement le risque pour arabe ou un noir de se faire lyncher par la police.

      Pour travailler moins, réduire le temps de travail, le partager, du côté des syndicats ou de feu le Mouvement ouvrier, il n’y a plus guère de ressources. Une des options, faute de rente ou d’emploi fictif, c’est d’aller voir chez l’ennemi.

      Un extrait d’une brochure « Maman travaille » réalisée sous l’égide de Schiappa avec des suggestions utiles pour obtenir un arrêt de travail

      Les mères nous montrent le chemin. Dans le répertoire du difficile à contrôler : le mal de dos, la dépression. Pour entrer dans la peau du personnage, on trouve sans mal autour de soi et sur internet des premier.e.s concerné.e.s qui décrivent leur symptômes et les éventuels effets bénéfiques et secondaires de médicaments susceptibles d’être prescrits (c’est un théâtre à accessoires).

      #CNAM #arrêts_de_travail #grève_travestie #Saint-Lundi_everyday #MaladieÉgaleVie #travail #sabotage

    • Le tôlier fait déjà ça. Il préfère voir les gens en arrêt maladie à la maison plutôt que combatifs ou peu productifs au boulot. Et puis de toutes façons il trouvera toujours un remplaçant moins cher. Et chacun bouffe sa merde. La personne en arrêt long, de son côté, tombe à mi-traitement au bout de trois mois et celles que j’ai connues dans cette situation-là n’étaient pas vraiment en meilleur état psychologique, physique et financier qu’en bossant.
      Maintenant, moi je ne porte aucun jugement moral. Si les conditions, comme dirait l’autre, sont réunies pour créer un mouvement de masse solidaire et imposer de cette façon le moyen d’échapper au salariat, je n’y vois aucun inconvénient. Mais j’ai de sérieux doutes sur la chose.

      Et puis, en retraite, je ne suis pas le mieux placé pour avancer ce genre de proposition.

    • de masse, je ne crois pas. les conditions sont rarement réunies pour que, comme dans le cas de l’esprit de corps policier, une minorité significative se fasse arrêter suite à une décision collective. mais dans certains secteurs (éducation au premier chef, mais ça marche pas on voit plutôt des démissions...), ce serait une possibilité. par ailleurs, ayant pratiqué, il existe des mutuelles qui complètent le salaire en cas d’ALD avec baisse de traitement. il est aussi possible de faire de ces moments des périodes bien plus actives que l’emploi. et lorsqu’il n’y a pas de possibilité de lutte dans l’emploi, de lutter ailleurs.

      le souci c’est que la réduction du temps de travail est bien là, organisée par le capital. et que rependre pied sur ce terrain suppose non seulement des revendications générales (celle d’une garantie de revenu, c’est à dire dune réduction du temps de travail qui soit payée, revendication d’ailleurs passée à la trappe depuis les défaites des mouvements de précaires, 25 ans maintenant, si on excepte le rebond de le la lutte des intermittents et précaires en 2003, depuis, on les préserves à part afin d’éviter toute généralisation...) mais aussi des pratiques qui mettent en oeuvre des formes de rotation quant à ce « bien rare » qu’est l’emploi-salaire. par exemple d’inciter les précaires à ne pas s’employer plus que ce qui est nécessaire à une ouverture de droit (laisser de l’emploi aux autres), et les « garantis » à chômer.

      nb au chômage, on n’échappe pas au salariat, on y est dans une situation particulière qui a une portée générale : précarité de l’emploi, contrôle par delà l’entreprise

    • L’Assurance Maladie dévoile un plan pour réduire les dépenses de santé de 1,3 milliard d’euros, 4 juillet 2023
      https://www.caducee.net/actualite-medicale/16163/l-assurance-maladie-devoile-un-plan-pour-reduire-les-depenses-de-sante-de-1

      Les arrêts maladie et leurs prescripteurs dans le viseur

      Avec 16 milliards d’euros en valeur, les arrêts maladie ont bondi de 8 % en 2023 et représentent pour la CNAM un vivier d’économie important. Le nombre d’arrêts maladie a augmenté de manière significative au cours des dernières années, passant de 6,4 millions en 2012 à près de 9 millions en 2022. Cette augmentation peut être attribuée à plusieurs facteurs, notamment l’augmentation des salaires, l’inflation et le #vieillissement de la population. L’assurance maladie pointe également une augmentation de leur durée ainsi qu’une augmentation du taux de recours aux indemnités journalières.

      Pour réduire les dépenses liées aux arrêts maladie, le gouvernement envisage d’impliquer davantage les employeurs, d’ajouter un jour de carence et de renforcer les contrôles au niveau des prescripteurs.

      De son côté la CNAM a lancé une vaste campagne de #contrôles des arrêts de travails auprès des #médecins_généralistes les mettant ainsi à l’index et leur imposant une pression comptable sur des prescriptions qui sont dans leur large majorité complètement justifiées.

      « Une campagne à visée comptable fondée sur l’intimidation des professionnels de santé »

      La Dr Agnès GIANNOTTI, présidente de MG France s’est ému de cette situation dans une lettre ouverte à la population soulignant le désinvestissement progressif de la CNAM et de l’état dans la santé des Français.

      Pour elle l’augmentation des arrêts maladie s’explique d’abord par le mauvais état de santé de la population.

      La proportion de pathologies psychiques a connu une augmentation notable, reconnue par l’UNCAM dans sa lettre de cadrage de la convention médicale, soulignant l’augmentation des consultations pour #souffrance_psychique en médecine générale. Les #troubles_musculo-squelettiques, souvent liés à des emplois physiques, rendent le maintien en poste de plus en plus difficile à partir de 55 ans, tandis que parallèlement, le nombre de trimestres nécessaires pour bénéficier d’une retraite décente a augmenté. Sans oublier ces patients qui attendent pendant de longs mois un traitement chirurgical ou de rééducation, faute de disponibilité ou de rendez-vous. Il ne s’agit en aucun cas d’arrêts de travail de complaisance ou d’absentéisme. [quant aux #covid_long, n’en parlons surtout pas, soit on se fait arrêter sous couvert dun des symptômes, soit c’est au cas par cas que mon peut, ou pas, obtenir l’ALD correstpndante]

      En outre, l’expansion des plateformes de #téléconsultation, soutenues par l’État comme en témoigne leur accessibilité directe via Mon espace santé, et la volonté déclarée d’éliminer le plafond de 20 % de téléconsultations par médecin ont conduit à une hausse inquiétante des arrêts maladie [ce qui serait chouette si cela se conjuguait avec une baisse des prescriptions inutiles ou nuisibles]. En l’absence de possibilité d’interdire le remboursement de ces arrêts de travail prescrits via ces plateformes — une mesure qui pénaliserait les utilisateurs plutôt que de réguler l’utilisation des dispositifs conventionnels par ces structures — l’Assurance Maladie a déplacé ces contrôles vers les médecins généralistes, menaçant 30 % d’entre eux.

      « Que l’on ne s’y méprenne pas, si seuls 2 % des médecins seront in fine sanctionnés, contrôler 30 % des médecins aura évidemment un effet sur les comportements de prescription d’IJ. Excepté les 2 % de comportements jugés déviants, les 28 % des professionnels contrôlés auront une tendance, consciemment ou non, à prescrire moins d’arrêts de travail, y compris lorsqu’ils sont indiqués. Voici le principal objectif de cette vague de contrôle : une campagne à visée comptable fondée sur l’intimidation des professionnels de santé. »

      de plus, les critères d’évaluation des toubibs font grosso modo litière de tout contexte social, n’arrivent pas en tenir compte : un cabinet dont les clients sont pour beaucoup des prolo.tes, pour les TMS et autres soucis liés à la dureté du taf, aux conditions de travail, c’est pas la même et on les contrôle depuis des moyennes, en leur demandant de s’y conformer sou peine sanctions.

      #destructivité_capitaliste #management

    • Les FDO n’ont pas droit de grève c’est la raison pour laquelle ces agents du service public ont recours aux arrêts de travail, avec la complaisance des autorités, comme on l’a vu (puis tout est rentré dans l’ordre).

      Ceci dit, vu l’absence généralisée d’un utilisation offensive du droit de grève dans ce pays, il est probable qu’on en arrive un jour à la suppression effective du droit de grève dans le code du travail (ça se met déjà en place petit à petit, avec les services minimum et les réquisitions) et alors on en viendra peut-être à imiter les flics pour se faire entendre, parce qu’on n’aura, comme eux, pas d’autre choix. Est-il nécessaire de préciser qu’il n’est souhaitable d’en arriver là ?

      Puisque tu l’évoques, quand je bossais, on s’était battu pour que l’employeur prenne en charge la prévoyance (qui permet de couvrir un peu au-delà des 3 mois), au moins la couverture de base (85 % du salaire sans les primes, ce qui n’est vraiment pas terrible pour un SMIC). On avait obtenu cette couverture mais il fallait que ce soit les salariés qui fasse la démarche de s’inscrire auprès de la mutuelle. On avait informé les collègues et on avait demandé et obtenu que l’employeur distribue avec la paie une information sur la procédure d’inscription. C’est désespérant mais dis-toi bien que plus de la moitié des agents ne s’étaient pas inscrits et, comme par hasard, beaucoup des personnes qui nous ont contacté qui en auraient eu besoin n’étaient pas couverts et il n’était pas toujours possible de souscrire après coup (délais).

      C’est là qu’on se prend en plein dans la gueule le décalage entre le projet (ce qu’on s’imagine) et le réel.

      Bref, c’est là où souvent j’ai vu des personnes, pourtant avec un revenu modeste, mais garanti, qui peuvent décrocher socialement très vite parce qu’elles ne peuvent plus travailler (physiquement) et qu’elles ne pourront plus travailler car aucun reclassement n’est accessible.

      Sinon, sur le fond, encore une fois : je n’ai pas de religion. Si de nouvelles modalités de luttes sociales qui permettent d’inverser le rapport de force, à défaut de vraiment de foutre en l’air ce système, émergent, telles que ce que tu évoques (qui me font un peu penser à ce qui se disait dans l’autonomie italienne des années 70), alors je n’y vois que du positif. Mais bon, je ne suis pas vraiment optimiste.

      Je n’ai pas voulu dire qu’au chômage on échappe au salariat. J’ai aussi été chômeur ;-)
      De même, j’ai compris très tôt que personne n’échappe à l’emprise du capitalisme, que l’on soit ou non salarié.

      Je voulais juste signifier que l’objectif, en tout cas pour ce qui me concerne, reste toujours d’anéantir l’économie capitaliste pour construire une société sans classes et sans salariat ; et que si les pratiques de résistance sociale que tu évoques se mettent effectivement en place, cela signifiera alors probablement qu’on sera arrivé à un niveau de conscience individuelle et collective correspondant au moins à une remise en cause du salariat, si ce n’est de la « catégorie » travail.

      Autant dire que je pense qu’on en est très loin mais j’espère me tromper : )

    • [Les médecins contestent la « surprescription »] Arrêts maladie : le gouvernement tente de freiner les dépenses, les médecins contestent la méthode https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2023/08/01/arrets-maladie-le-gouvernement-tente-de-freiner-les-depenses-les-medecins-co

      Les généralistes jugés trop prompts à délivrer des arrêts font l’objet d’une procédure de l’Assurance-maladie

      Ya-t-il de plus en plus d’arrêts maladie prescrits ? Bon nombre de médecins répondent par l’affirmative. Mais y en a-t-il « trop » ? La question leur semble mal posée, quand bien même elle renvoie au constat chiffré avancé, récemment encore, par l’Assurance-maladie : les dépenses d’indemnités journalières, hors Covid-19, ont bondi de 8,2 % en 2022 pour atteindre 13,5 milliards d’euros (hors maternité) ; une hausse « au-dessus de la dynamique » d’avant la pandémie, a averti l’instance dans son rapport « Charges et produits » divulgué à la fin du mois de juin et qui, comme tous les ans, fixe certaines des tendances qui se retrouveront dans le projet de loi de financement de la Sécurité sociale, débattu à l’automne.

      Cette année, peu de suspense : tailler dans les dépenses de santé, notamment en luttant contre l’augmentation des arrêts maladie, figure parmi les leviers d’économies identifiés pour redresser les comptes publics. Un moyen, parmi d’autres, qui, selon les autorités, permettrait de réduire de 250 millions d’euros, en 2024, le déficit de l’Assurance-maladie.

      Sauf que l’équation ne convainc pas les médecins libéraux, priés de lutter contre la « surprescription » des arrêts maladie : « Se contenter d’un tableau chiffré, c’est passer à côté de l’enjeu véritable », fait valoir Agnès Giannotti, présidente de MG France, premier syndicat de généralistes, en rappelant que trois ans de crise sanitaire ont eu un impact sur la santé des Français. « En demandant aux collègues supposés “trop” prescripteurs d’en faire “moins”, on veut casser le thermomètre, dit-elle, mais ça ne fera pas disparaître le mal.Si les statistiques s’emballent, c’est qu’il y a des raisons ! »

      « Pas de baguette magique »
      Un discours qui résonne sur le terrain. « Les autorités invoquent des chiffres, des dépenses, le budget, alors que l’on parle, nous, de patients, de souffrance, de soins… On frise le dialogue de sourds », souligne le docteur D., récemment installé dans la métropole lyonnaise – il a requis l’anonymat, comme tous les médecins ayant accepté de témoigner.

      Ce jeune généraliste est, depuis peu, concerné par une procédure dite de « mise sous objectif » : sa caisse primaire l’a contacté, en juin, pour lui notifier un objectif de diminution de ses prescriptions d’arrêt maladie, dont le nombre a été jugé supérieur à celui de médecins exerçant dans des conditions comparables. Un « correctif » à concrétiser sur six mois sauf à s’exposer à une amende. Une « douche froide », dit-il.

      A la mi-juillet, il est allé s’en expliquer auprès des médecins-conseils de sa caisse. Un rendez-vous « sur un ton bienveillant », concède-t-il, mais dont il est sorti « avec plus de questions que de réponses ». « J’ai défendu ma position : oui, mes chiffres sont élevés, mais je travaille dans un bassin de population précaire avec beaucoup d’actifs – et peu de retraités – usés par des métiers difficiles. Beaucoup souffrent de troubles musculo-squelettiques, d’arthrose, de tendinites, quand ce ne sont pas des troubles anxieux, des dépressions… » Les « arrêter », affirme-t-il, ce n’est pas seulement leur permettre de « souffler » : la décision « rejoint » la problématique de l’accès aux soins. « Pour pouvoir passer une IRM, ici, les délais sont très longs. Même chose pour obtenir un rendez-vous chez un psy. En attendant, je leur propose quoi, à mes patients ? D’aller travailler pliés en deux ? Je veux bien réfléchir à ma pratique, conclut-il, mais je n’ai pas de baguette magique. »

      Ils sont un millier de médecins, soit 1,5 % environ, à être concernés par cette procédure de contrôle déclenchée par l’Assurance-maladie. S’y ajoute une frange se situant dans la tranche de prescription immédiatement supérieure : à eux, les caisses promettent des « entretiens confraternels » avec des médecins-conseils. Troisième public : des généralistes et des psychiatres qui délivrent des arrêts en lien avec la santé mentale. Eux auront droit à des échanges ou à une visite de délégués de l’Assurance-maladie.

      Les syndicats ont fait leurs calculs : 1 000 médecins « sous objectif », 5 000 contactés pour un entretien d’alerte, 15 000 auxquels seront proposés des rendez-vous à la rentrée… Cela représente, selon eux, près d’un tiers de la profession. L’Assurance-maladie défend un plan d’action « gradué » visant une « minorité de dérives » : « Nous sommes d’abord dans l’accompagnement et la pédagogie. Mais ça n’exclut évidemment pas le contrôle, voire la sanction, si c’est justifié », soutient son directeur général, Thomas Fatôme.

      Sans calmer l’émotion des intéressés, relayée dans les rangs syndicaux où l’on dénonce « harcèlement » et « délit statistique ». « Il peut y avoir des abus, sans doute, mais l’immense majorité des collègues font bien le boulot, s’énerve le docteur Jérôme Marty, de l’Union française pour une médecine libre. Ce n’est pas comme ça que l’on remplira les tiroirs-caisses de l’Etat. » L’ordre des médecins s’est ému du discours ambiant, regrettant qu’il « jette la suspicion sur le comportement des médecins ».

      D’une même voix, les syndicats ont appelé les professionnels concernés à rejeter la procédure. De fait, en cas de refus ou d’échec, la « mise sous objectif » peut aboutir à une « mise sous accord préalable » des prescriptions, un dispositif coûteux en temps et en agents pour les caisses. Une façon de « jouer la montre ». Certains généralistes, après entretien, disent avoir vu la procédure non confirmée ou abandonnée. D’autres espèrent un retour pour le début d’août. « En attendant, témoigne la docteure R., généraliste dans le Sud, j’ai averti certains de mes patients, notamment ceux en arrêt long : s’ils veulent un renouvellement, en septembre,qu’ils se tournent vers la médecine du travail ! »

      Ce plan d’action de l’Assurance-maladie ne part pas de rien, rappelle le docteur Marcel Garrigou-Grandchamp, qui, en tant que responsable de la cellule juridique de la Fédération des médecins de France, apporte une assistance aux praticiens qui le saisissent. « Nous sommes aujourd’hui saturés de demandes, rapporte-t-il. Il y a eu une précédente grosse campagne en 2015 ; nous n’avions pas hésité, à l’époque, à saisir les tribunaux administratifs. Le sujet revient en réalité tous les ans, mais c’est une action d’une ampleur inédite qui vient d’être lancée et, après l’échec de la convention médicale et des négociations tarifaires, c’est la goutte d’eau… »

      « Je suis dans le rouge »
      Une enquête diffusée, le 24 juillet, par l’Union régionale des professionnels de santé (URPS) des médecins libéraux d’Ile-de-France à partir de 973 témoignages permet de verser d’autres chiffres aux débats : la moitié des répondants disent avoir constaté une augmentation des prescriptions d’arrêt, le premier motif correspondant à des troubles anxio-dépressifs. Ils déclarent aussi recevoir très peu de demandes injustifiées ; mais ils sont près d’un tiers (31 %) à avoir déjà subi des menaces ou des pressions de patients sur ce motif. « C’est un sujet systémique, note la docteure Valérie Briole, présidente de l’organisation. Dans une situation globale de pénurie de médecins et de demande de soins croissante, une pression supplémentaire exercée sur les collègues en exercice n’est pas logique. »

      La docteure F., vingt ans de métier en Ile-de-France, en sait quelque chose. Elle aussi a reçu, il y a quelques semaines, un « coup de fil » puis un courrier l’informant de sa possible mise sous objectif. Elle aussi est allée à sa caisse s’en expliquer. Et en reste « très marquée ». « D’un point de vue statistique, je suis dans le rouge… Mais je n’ai pas le sentiment d’avoir dérivé ou d’être complaisante. Croyez-moi : pour les patients, ce n’est pas évident de se retrouver en arrêt, la plupart y perdent financièrement ». Des « demandes abusives », elle en a « quelques-unes » en tête, une seule de récente, pour près de 2 000 patients dont elle est la médecin référente, « et je refuse catégoriquement, tient-elle à souligner. Faire des économies sur ce dossier, vu l’état de santé des patients, vu aussi l’état des médecins, je ne crois pas que ce soit possible », conclut-elle, pessimiste.

      Sauf, peut-être, à contrôler davantage les arrêts prescrits en téléconsultation, une possibilité offerte du temps du Covid-19 et qui s’est beaucoup développée. Le Conseil constitutionnel avait retoqué, en 2022, une mesure en ce sens inscrite dans le budget de la « Sécu ». On peut s’attendre à ce que le débat rebondisse, à la rentrée, à l’Assemblée nationale.

      Dans l’enquête de l’URPS, d’autres pistes sont avancées par les praticiens : concernant les arrêts de moins de quatre jours, plus de sept répondants sur dix seraient favorables à la suppression de l’obligation de prescription. Et neuf sur dix, pour les arrêts de longue durée, accueilleraient favorablement une « alternative », comme un télétravail aménagé.

    • Le terme « de niveau de conscience », tel que je l’ai utilisé, est plutôt un clin d’œil parodique en référence aux mantras gauchistes (quand les conditions subjectives, etc.).
      Pour moi, le « niveau de conscience » pris dans ce sens étroit - idéologique - serait plutôt une figure repoussoir qu’autre chose. Désolé du contresens !
      Pour autant, je ne suis pas du tout cynique et mon propos n’était pas totalement ironique : « niveau de conscience », une fois débarrassé de ses pré-supposés idéologiques, c’est ce qui permet d’interpréter subjectivement, de façon individuelle ou collective, les rapports sociaux (et donc politiques) et les pratiques ordinaires : en bref, le collectif. C’est ce qui me reste pour évaluer où j’en suis avec les gens que je côtoie pour organiser|participer à des actions directes de lutte. C’est en fait, la seule chose qui me semble déterminante aujourd’hui dans une perspective révolutionnaire.
      Pour en revenir à notre sujet : je ne peux donc pas tout simplement imaginer des actions concrètes et collectives organisées autour des pratiques que tu évoques parce que je ne suis plus du tout raccordé à cette réalité (au sens matérialiste) et que j’ai du mal à voir concrètement ce qui pourrait s’organiser, en dehors des pratiques individuelles de survie (que j’ai moi-même pratiquées dans un autre temps et auxquelles j’ai assisté pour d’autres personnes).
      Même si ces pratiques existent, nous sommes collectivement vraiment très très loin du niveau d’engagement ou de confrontation requis pour que ça puisse avoir un effet significatif à l’échelle de la société. Il faudrait probablement que quelque chose de qualitatif et quantitatif - appelons-ça conscience - soit profondément modifié à partir des pratiques sociales pour qu’elles puissent engendrer un rapport de force politique.

      Donc la conscience c’est fondamentalement construit sur des pratiques sociales et non l’inverse, là dessus je suis totalement OK !

    • Ceci dit, ton article du Monde confirme qu’il y aura probablement un clash autour de la question de la santé au travail - arbre des arrêts maladie cachant la forêt de la souffrance au travail - qui peut déboucher sur de nouvelles situations et pratiques sociales ...

      J’ai malheureusement les pires inquiétudes sur les capacités actuelles d’auto-organisation combatives dans le monde du travail ; quant aux syndicats... ce n’est même pas la peine d’en parler.

  • « Faites du business pour le climat ! » : l’enseignement privé exploite le filon de la transition écologique | Alternatives Economiques
    https://www.alternatives-economiques.fr/business-climat-lenseignement-prive-exploite/00107608

    Intitulés de diplômes trompeurs, frais de scolarité exorbitants, greenwashing : les écoles privées spécialisées dans la transition écologique fleurissent dans le paysage de l’enseignement supérieur.

    https://justpaste.it/ad95m

    #greenwashing #when_shit_hits_the_fan

    • un racket raciste

      En plus du niveau d’enseignement qui laisse à désirer, entre des vidéos Youtube sur le personal branding et des copier-coller de pages Wikipédia sur la gestion des conflits en entreprise, elle déplore la tentative de récupérer les #étudiants internationaux en attente d’un certificat de scolarité pour renouveler leur titre de séjour.
      « Dans ma classe, trois élèves sur 26 avaient la nationalité française. L’école cible les étudiants #étrangers qui ont besoin de justifier d’une formation pour leur demande de visa », explique-t-elle.

      #droit_au_séjour

    • à propos de l’enseignement supérieur privé, florilège

      – Parcoursup : comment des écoles privées partent à l’assaut des candidats déçus
      – L’enseignement supérieur privé, un marché devenu lucratif et illisible
      – La rectrice de Versailles rejoint un groupe privé d’enseignement supérieur
      – L’appétit de l’enseignement supérieur privé pour les grands commis de l’Etat
      – Les investissements tentaculaires des écoles privées sur le marché de l’immobilier
      https://justpaste.it/9g5uw

      la destruction d’une #université (#Parcoursup, #MonMaster), dont les effectifs sont désormais en baisse, incite à observer ce qui se passe dans un enseignement privé en fort développement (y compris sous la forme de l’#enseignement-à_distance ou plusieurs ex-ministres ont pris des options et des positions dirigeantes) qui intègre en même temps les franges les plus privilégiées des étudiants (concurrençant les grandes écoles), une masse d’apprentis (le financement de l’enseignement supérieur privé par les mécanismes de l’#apprentissage est une innovation récente), d’endettés soucieux de minorer leur précarisation par l’obtention de titres scolaires, et, je le découvre avec l’article posté par @sombre, d’étrangers dont l’inscription est aiguillonée par des mécanismes qui relèvent de la xénophobie d’État.

      élite, déchets, aspirants à l’intégration, notre France.

      #enseignement_supérieur_privé

  • Sebastien LEROY, Maire de Mandelieu-La Napoule, comité directeur de l’Association des maires de France
    https://twitter.com/SebastienLeroy_/status/1684120036078936064

    Je vous présente une innovation assez insolite et vertueuse que nous sommes la première ville à déployer sur la Méditerranée grâce à une start-up de #Mandelieu ! Nous « peignons » le gazon desséché par la sécheresse grâce à une technologie 100% bio à base d’algues.

    edit passer du produit de niche aussi breton que mal coté « algues vertes » au #greenwashing du #gazon par les algues, voilà une start-up innovante ! et ça va implémenter une découverte : le mot « organique » va surgir chez tous les clients, institutionnels et privés, pour vanter quelque chose plutôt que rien l’enrichissement du sol (?), et sous la moquette fordiste s’il vous plaît !

    #tourisme

  • OTAN suspend ton viol

    Camarades, venons en aide à la presse française de révérence !
    19 Juillet 2023

    Pour les malheureux journalistes du Monde, de BFMTV, de Mediatarte , de Libération, FranceTV, et autres gazettes de référence hexagonales, contraints par d’odieux magnats cyniques de relayer la propagande de la CIA et de l’OTAN, nous avons concocté une petite revue de presse qui leur permettra d’être mieux informés de la vox populi américaine à propos de ce qui se passe en Europe ...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTE5bldj2Z4


    #Cornel West, #OTAN, #Ukraine, #Grey Zone, #The Hill, #Max Blumenthal, #Brianna et Roby

  • Migrations : l’Union européenne, droit dans le mur

    La Commission européenne affirme que l’UE ne finance pas de « murs » anti-migrants à ses #frontières_extérieures, malgré les demandes insistantes d’États de l’est de l’Europe. En réalité, cette « ligne rouge » de l’exécutif, qui a toujours été floue, s’efface de plus en plus.

    Le 14 juin dernier, le naufrage d’un bateau entraînait la noyade de centaines de personnes exilées. Quelques jours auparavant, le 8 juin, les États membres de l’Union européenne s’enorgueillissaient d’avoir trouvé un accord sur deux règlements essentiels du « Pacte européen pour l’asile et la migration », qui multipliera les procédures d’asile express dans des centres de détention aux frontières de l’Europe, faisant craindre aux ONG une nouvelle érosion du droit d’asile.

    Dans ce contexte délétère, un groupe d’une douzaine d’États membres, surtout d’Europe de l’Est, réclame que l’Union européenne reconnaisse leur rôle de « protecteurs » des frontières de l’Union en autorisant le financement européen de murs, #clôtures et #barbelés pour contenir le « flux migratoire ». Le premier ministre grec, Kyriákos Mitsotákis, avait même estimé que son pays était en première ligne face à « l’invasion de migrants ».

    Officiellement, la Commission européenne se refuse toujours à financer les multiples projets de clôtures anti-migrants qui s’érigent le long des frontières extérieures de l’UE. « Nous avons un principe bien établi : nous ne finançons pas de murs ni de barbelés. Et je pense que cela ne devrait pas changer », avait encore déclaré Ylva Johansson, la commissaire européenne aux affaires intérieures, le 31 janvier. Pourtant, la ligne rouge semble inexorablement s’effacer.

    Le 7 octobre 2021, les ministres de douze États, dont la #Grèce, la #Pologne, la #Hongrie, la #Bulgarie ou les #Pays_baltes, demandaient par écrit à la Commission que le financement de « #barrières_physiques » aux frontières de l’UE soit une « priorité », car cette « mesure de protection » serait un outil « efficace et légitime » dans l’intérêt de toute l’Union. Une demande qu’ils réitèrent depuis à toute occasion.

    Les États membres n’ont pas attendu un quelconque « feu vert » de la Commission pour ériger des clôtures. Les premières ont été construites par l’Espagne dans les années 1990, dans les enclaves de Ceuta et Melilla. Mais c’est en 2015, après l’exil de centaines de milliers de Syrien·nes fuyant la guerre civile, que les barrières se sont multipliées. Alors que l’Union européenne comptait 315 kilomètres de fil de fer et barbelés à ses frontières en 2014, elle en totalisait 2 048 l’an passé.

    Depuis 2021, ce groupe d’États revient sans cesse à la charge. Lors de son arrivée au sommet des dirigeants européens, le 9 février dernier, Victor Orbán (Hongrie) annonçait la couleur : « Les barrières protègent l’Europe. » Les conclusions de ce sommet, ambiguës, semblaient ouvrir une brèche dans la politique européenne de financement du contrôle aux frontières. Les États demandaient « à la Commission de mobiliser immédiatement des fonds pour aider les États membres à renforcer […] les infrastructures de protection des frontières ».

    Dans ses réponses écrites aux questions de Mediapart, la Commission ne mentionne plus aucune ligne rouge : « Les États membres ont une obligation de protéger les frontières extérieures. Ils sont les mieux placés pour définir comment le faire en pratique d’une manière qui […] respecte les droits fondamentaux. »

    Si l’on en croit le ministre de l’intérieur grec, Panagiótis Mitarákis, les dernières résistances de la Commission seraient en train de tomber. Le 24 février, il affirmait, au sujet du projet grec d’#extension et de renforcement de sa clôture avec la Turquie, le long de la rivière #Evros, que la Commission avait « accepté que certaines dépenses pour la construction de la barrière soient financées par l’Union européenne ».

    Pour Catherine Woollard, de l’ONG Ecre (Conseil européen pour les réfugiés et exilés), « c’est important que la Commission résiste à ces appels de financement des murs et clôtures, car il faut respecter le droit de demander l’asile qui implique un accès au territoire. Mais cette position risque de devenir symbolique si les barrières sont tout de même construites et qu’en plus se développent des barrières d’autres types, numériques et technologiques, surtout dans des États qui utilisent la force et des mesures illégales pour refouler les demandeurs d’asile ».

    D’une ligne rouge à une ligne floue

    Au sein de l’ONG Statewatch, Chris Jones estime que « cette “ligne rouge” de la Commission européenne, c’est du grand n’importe quoi ! Cela fait des années que l’Union européenne finance des dispositifs autour ou sur ces clôtures, des #drones, des #caméras, des #véhicules, des #officiers. Dire que l’UE ne finance pas de clôtures, c’est uniquement sémantique, quand des milliards d’euros sont dépensés pour fortifier les frontières ». Même diagnostic chez Mark Akkerman, chercheur néerlandais au Transnational Institute, pour qui la « #ligne_rouge de la Commission est plutôt une ligne floue ». Dans ses travaux, il avait déjà démontré qu’en 2010, l’UE avait financé l’achat de #caméras_de_vidéosurveillance à #Ceuta et la construction d’un #mirador à #Melilla.

    Lorsqu’il est disponible, le détail des dépenses relatives au contrôle des frontières montre que la politique de non-financement des « murs » est une ligne de crête, car si la Commission ne finance pas le béton ni les barbelés, elle finance bien des #dispositifs qui les accompagnent.

    En 2021, par exemple, la #Lituanie a reçu 14,9 millions d’euros de fonds d’aide d’urgence pour « renforcer » sa frontière extérieure avec la Biélorussie, peut-on lire dans un rapport de la Commission. Une frontière qui, selon le ministère de l’intérieur lituanien, contacté par Mediapart, est « désormais longée d’une clôture de 530 km et d’une barrière surmontée de fils barbelés sur 360 kilomètres ». Si la barrière a pesé 148 millions d’euros sur le #budget de l’État, le ministère de l’intérieur affirme que la rénovation de la route qui la longe et permet aux gardes-frontières de patrouiller a été financée à hauteur de « 10 millions d’euros par des fonds européens ».

    En Grèce, le détail des dépenses du gouvernement, dans le cadre du fonds européen de sécurité intérieur, de 2014 à 2020, est éclairant. Toujours le long de la rivière Evros, là où est érigée la barrière physique, la police grecque a pu bénéficier en 2016 d’un apport de 15 millions d’euros, dont 11,2 millions financés par le fonds européen pour la sécurité intérieure, afin de construire 10 #pylônes et d’y intégrer des #caméras_thermiques, des caméras de surveillance, des #radars et autres systèmes de communication.

    Cet apport financier fut complété la même année par 1,5 million d’euros pour l’achat d’#équipements permettant de détecter les battements de cœur dans les véhicules, coffres ou conteneurs.

    Mais l’enjeu, en Grèce, c’est avant tout la mer, là où des bateaux des gardes-côtes sont impliqués dans des cas de refoulements documentés. Dans son programme d’action national du fonds européen relatif à la gestion des frontières et des visas, écrit en 2021, le gouvernement grec envisage le renouvellement de sa flotte, dont une dizaine de bateaux de #patrouille côtière, équipés de #technologies de #surveillance dernier cri, pour environ 60 millions d’euros. Et malgré les refoulements, la Commission européenne octroie les fonds.

    Technologies et barrières font bon ménage

    Les États membres de l’UE qui font partie de l’espace Schengen ont pour mission de « protéger les frontières extérieures ». Le droit européen leur impose aussi de respecter le droit d’asile. « Les exigences du code Schengen contredisent bien souvent l’acquis européen en matière d’asile. Lorsqu’un grand nombre de personnes arrivent aux frontières de l’Union européenne et qu’il existe des pressions pour faire baisser ce nombre, il est presque impossible de le faire sans violer certaines règles relatives au droit d’asile », reconnaît Atanas Rusev, directeur du programme « sécurité » du Centre pour l’étude de la démocratie, basé en Bulgarie.

    La Bulgarie est au cœur de ces tiraillements européens. En 2022, la police a comptabilisé 164 000 passages dits « irréguliers » de sa frontière, contre 55 000 l’année précédente. Des demandeurs d’asile qui, pour la plupart, souhaitent se rendre dans d’autres pays européens.

    Les Pays-Bas ou l’Autriche ont fait pression pour que la #Bulgarie réduise ce nombre, agitant la menace d’un report de son intégration à l’espace Schengen. Dans le même temps, des ONG locales, comme le Helsinki Committee Center ou le Refugee Help Group, dénoncent la brutalité qui s’exerce sur les exilé·es et les refoulements massifs dont ils sont victimes. Le pays a construit une clôture de 234 kilomètres le long de sa frontière avec la Turquie.

    Dans son plan d’action, le gouvernement bulgare détaille son intention de dépenser l’argent européen du fonds relatif à la gestion des frontières, sur la période 2021-2027, pour renforcer son « système de surveillance intégré » ; une collecte de données en temps réel par des caméras thermiques, des #capteurs_de_mouvements, des systèmes de surveillance mobiles, des #hélicoptères.

    Philip Gounev est consultant dans le domaine de la gestion des frontières. Il fut surtout ministre adjoint des affaires intérieures en Bulgarie, chargé des fonds européens, mais aussi de l’érection de la barrière à la frontière turque. Il explique très clairement la complémentarité, à ses yeux, des différents dispositifs : « Notre barrière ne fait que ralentir les migrants de cinq minutes. Mais ces cinq minutes sont importantes. Grâce aux caméras et capteurs qui détectent des mouvements ou une brèche dans la barrière, l’intervention des gardes-frontières est rapide. »

    L’appétit pour les technologies et le numérique ne fait que croître, au point que des ONG, comme l’EDRi (European Digital Rights) dénoncent la construction par l’UE d’un « #mur_numérique ». Dans ce domaine, le programme de recherche européen #Horizon_Europe et, avant lui, #Horizon_2020, tracent les contours du futur numérisé des contrôles, par le financement de projets portés par l’industrie et des centres de #recherche, au caractère parfois dystopique.

    De 2017 à 2021, « #Roborder » a reçu une aide publique de 8 millions d’euros. L’idée est de déployer une armada de véhicules sans pilotes, sur la mer ou sur terre, ainsi que différents drones, tous munis de caméras et capteurs, et dont les informations seraient croisées et analysées pour donner une image précise des mouvements humains aux abords des frontières. Dans son programme d’action national d’utilisation du fonds européen pour la gestion des frontières, la Hongrie manifeste un intérêt appuyé pour « l’adaptation partielle des résultats » de Roborder via une série de projets pilotes à ses frontières.

    Les #projets_de_recherche dans le domaine des frontières sont nombreux. Citons « #Foldout », dont les 8 millions d’euros servent à développer des technologies de #détection de personnes, à travers des #feuillages épais « dans les zones les plus reculées de l’Union européenne ». « Le développement de technologies et de l’#intelligence_artificielle aux frontières de l’Europe est potentiellement plus puissant que des murs, décrypte Sarah Chandler, de l’EDRi. Notre inquiétude, c’est que ces technologies soient utilisées pour des #refoulements aux frontières. »

    D’autres projets, développés sous l’impulsion de #Frontex, utilisent les croisements de #données et l’intelligence artificielle pour analyser, voire prédire, les mouvements migratoires. « Le déploiement de nouvelles technologies de surveillance, avec la construction de barrières pour bloquer les routes migratoires, est intimement lié à des dangers accrus et provoque davantage de morts des personnes en mouvement », peut-on lire dans un rapport de Statewatch. Dans un contexte de droitisation de nombreux États membres de l’Union européenne, Philip Gounev pense de son côté que « le financement de barrières physiques par l’UE deviendra inévitable ».

    https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/international/170723/migrations-l-union-europeenne-droit-dans-le-mur
    #murs #barrières_frontalières #migrations #financement #UE #EU #Union_européenne #technologie #complexe_militaro-industriel

  • Soutenez la grève des travailleurs du GMB Missile Depot en Écosse !

    Les travailleurs, qui déplacent des missiles dans le dépôt, ne sont payés que 20 500 £ par an – à peine plus que le « National Living Wage », c’est-à-dire le salaire minimum si faible du Royaume-Uni.

    Les travailleurs qui assemblent réellement les armes sont bien mieux payés, après avoir obtenu une forte augmentation l’année dernière – ce qui souligne que les travailleurs « non qualifiés » les moins bien payés ont absolument raison de se battre.

    Leur syndicat GMB a fortement et activement soutenu la lutte ukrainienne contre l’impérialisme russe. Alors que ses membres travaillent dur pour fournir à l’Ukraine les armes dont elle a tant besoin, le gouvernement conservateur sape leur travail par sa détermination à maintenir les salaires à la baisse.

    https://entreleslignesentrelesmots.wordpress.com/2023/07/15/interdire-les-bombes-a-sous-munitions-lukraine-ne-fait-pas-exception/#comment-57813

    #international #greve #royaume-uni

  • Initiative of Lawyers and Jurists for the shipwreck of Pylos

    All of us who gathered on Thursday, June 22, 2023, at the Athens Bar Association, responding to the call for an open meeting of lawyers and jurists for the fatal criminal shipwreck off Pylos on June 14, 2023 – lawyers, citizens and representatives of organizations in the field:

    We voice our disgust at the tragic death of hundreds of our fellow human beings and express our sadness and pain to their families and loved ones.

    We express our belief that this fatal shipwreck could have been avoided, as the overloaded ship had been spotted in time and the danger it was in had been identified many hours before it sank. But the competent bodies of the Coast Guard, as well as Frontex, which were watching the incident, refrained from any rescue action. In fact, there is evidence of an attempt to tow the ship by the vessel of the Greek Coast Guard, without it being known for what purpose or in which direction. In any case, the criminal liabilities of the state authorities responsible for the salvage operation of the ship off Pylos must be investigated regarding committing felonies by acts or omissions. It is necessary for there to be a true and objective, independent from state interest, exhaustive investigation of the circumstances of the shipwreck. That is for the truth to emerge and for the responsibilities to be assigned to all those who were involved with the incident in any position and in any capacity.

    The first open meeting on June 22, attended by over 70 people, was an opportunity for a rich discussion with interventions by lawyers active in the field, figures from human rights organizations and representatives of anti-racist movements.

    We decided to create an Initiative of Lawyers and Jurists for the shipwreck of Pylos, with the aim of revealing the whole truth about the circumstances of the wreck and in order to render justice. We seek to create a space that helps highlight, document and record the facts, and empower victims, their families and their representatives in their fight for justice, through all the required political and legal actions. We ask all Bar Associations in Greece to undertake similar initiatives.

    We are open to cooperation and coordination with every individual and collective fighting for the same cause. The initiative will meet again to discuss our next steps and actions.

    To contact us, email: justice4pylos@yahoo.com

    https://justice4pylos.org

    #Justice_4_Pylos #Pylos #résistance #naufrage #justice
    #Grèce #naufrage #asile #migrations #décès #morts #tragédie #mourir_aux_frontières #morts_aux_frontières #14_juin_2023 #Méditerranée #Mer_Méditerranée #13_juin_2023

    –—

    sur le naufrage (et les contre-enquêtes), voir ce fil de discussion :
    https://seenthis.net/messages/1008145

  • Carnets de villes – Athènes
    https://metropolitiques.eu/Carnets-de-villes-Athenes.html

    Dans cette émission, le géographe et photographe Jordi Ballesta aborde #Athènes par ses formes et ses échelles singulières : la capitale grecque se dessine aussi bien depuis les confins de ses reliefs que par un arpentage de ses espaces domestiques, dans les rues et sur les trottoirs habités. Émission : Carnets de villes Aujourd’hui, nous partons à la découverte d’Athènes avec le chercheur Jordi Ballesta. Il a habité plusieurs décennies la capitale grecque et a travaillé notamment à la conception et à #Podcasts

    / Athènes, #Grèce

  • Grenoble instaure une ZFE à temps partiel pour les particuliers latribune.fr
    Les prolos, dehors, du lundi au vendredi, de 7h à 19h

    C’est un arrêté qui ne passe pas inaperçu alors que, depuis plusieurs semaines, les tensions se cristallisent autour des ZFE, ces zones à faibles émissions où les véhicules les plus polluants sont progressivement interdits. La métropole grenobloise vient d’instaurer sa ZFE pour les particuliers. Cela ne concerne pour l’instant que les véhicules Crit’Air 5, avec une période de « pédagogie » de six mois pendant laquelle aucune verbalisation ne sera appliquée. Au 1er janvier 2024, l’interdiction s’étendra aux véhicules Crit’Air 4, puis au 1er janvier 2025 aux Crit’Air 3.

    Mais la métropole a aménagé les restrictions de circulation. Elles ne seront pas permanentes. Elles s’appliqueront uniquement du lundi au vendredi, de 7h à 19h. Cette ZFE ne concerne par ailleurs que 13 des 49 communes de la métropole grenobloise. Certains axes seront également exemptés : voies desservant les parking-relais et les gares, voies rapides, voies d’accès à certains centres hospitaliers, et voies d’accès aux massifs montagneux.


    « Nous voulions permettre plus de flexibilité et accompagner les changements de comportement », a souligné Cécile Cénatiempo, conseillère déléguée à la qualité de l’Air de la métropole grenobloise, lors d’une conférence de presse.

    La métropole avait déjà mis en place, il y a trois ans, une ZFE pour les utilitaires et poids lourds, cette fois à temps complet.

    Nombreuses dérogations
    D’autres dérogations seront appliquées, notamment en faveur des « petits rouleurs » (moins de 5.000 km par an), des travailleurs en horaires décalés, des véhicules d’intérêt général... Un passe journalier, utilisable 12 fois dans une année, sera aussi disponible pour tous. Des « évolutions » et des « ajustements » pourront se faire sur ces éléments pendant la mise en œuvre de la ZFE, a indiqué Cécile Cénatiempo, mentionnant une « clause de revoyure » d’ici à 2026.

    Une manière pour la métropole grenobloise de répondre aux critiques de part et d’autre du spectre politique. La majorité écologiste de la ville de Grenoble avait réclamé des mesures « plus ambitieuses » tandis que les opposants, élus ou citoyens, ont dénoncé une mesure « inefficace écologiquement et injuste socialement ».

    Il est vrai que le sujet divise et pourrait se transformer en bombe sociale au niveau national. Dans ce contexte, un rapport formulant « 25 propositions pour allier transition écologique et justice sociale » a été remis ce lundi au ministre de la Transition écologique, Christophe Béchu. Un rapport co-écrit par Jean-Luc Moudenc, président divers droite de Toulouse Métropole, et Anne-Marie Jean, élue écologiste de la Métropole de Strasbourg. Il vise une application « plus juste » et « plus cohérente » des zones à faibles émissions (ZFE). Le document propose notamment des mesures supplémentaires pour aider les plus modestes à changer de véhicule. Le gouvernement a annoncé préparer des mesures « d’acceptabilité sociale » pour l’automne.

    Assouplissement des restrictions décidé par le gouvernement
    Cet arrêté de l’agglomération grenobloise intervient alors même que le gouvernement annonce dispenser justement Grenoble, mais aussi Toulouse et Reims, de renforcer davantage les restrictions de circulation liées aux Zone à faibles émissions (ZFE). Selon des chiffres publiés ce lundi par le ministère de la Transition écologique, la qualité de l’air s’est améliorée l’an dernier dans ces trois agglomérations.

    Elles basculent cette année « en zone de vigilance », selon une nouvelle classification présentée aujourd’hui par le gouvernement. Ce qui veut dire qu’elles peuvent ainsi « décider de suspendre les prochaines étapes de leur calendrier de restrictions ». Reims avait pris les devants en mars avec un moratoire sur les Crit’air 3, qui donne un répit jusqu’en 2029 aux véhicules équipés de cette vignette.

    « Tordre le cou à des rumeurs et aux fake news »
    Avec cette nouvelle classification, le gouvernement entend « préciser les règles applicables » et « tordre le cou à des rumeurs, des +fake news+ », a souligné le ministre de la Transition écologique Christophe Béchu lors d’une conférence de presse. Selon lui, le RN comme LR, qui ont proposé de supprimer les ZFE, et les Insoumis, qui ont proposé un moratoire, surestiment l’effet de ces zones sur les automobilistes.

    Cinq métropoles dépassent encore « de manière régulière » les seuils réglementaires de qualité de l’air : Paris, Lyon, Aix-Marseille, Rouen et Strasbourg. Ces dernières sont désormais classées comme « territoires ZFE » et doivent ainsi continuer à appliquer progressivement les restrictions fixées par la loi : interdiction des Crit’Air 4 au 1er janvier 2024 (voitures diesel de plus de 18 ans), puis des Crit’Air 3 en 2025 (voitures diesel de plus de 14 ans et voitures essence de plus de 19 ans).

    #exclusion #racisme #air #ségrégation #privilèges #racisme #inégalités #Grenoble #eelv #bourgeoisie #Éric_Piolle #voiture #zfe #guerre_aux_pauvres #fichage #surveillance #contrôle

    Source : https://www.latribune.fr/entreprises-finance/services/transport-logistique/grenoble-instaure-une-zfe-a-temps-partiel-pour-les-particuliers-969185.htm

  • Ma boite fait des pieds et des mains pour se donner une bonne image écolo :
    Equipe dédiée à la mobilité durable, campagnes internes de conviction, et récemment, inscription chez « Noos », une institution de portage de projets de sauvetage de la planète.

    Mais, je ne sais pas. Ca ressemble à du green washing .
    Vous savez, le fameux « 99 % pour MOI, 1% for the planet ».
    Et des campagnes toute choupi, protection des oiseaux en Champagne, plantation de corail.

    Sauf qu’évidement, la dite institution s’en défend à l’écrit :
    https://blog.noos.global/fr/noos-propose-son-outil-dengagement-rse-aux-membres-du-collectif-1-for-

    #greenwashing

  • La grève des pâtes fait baisser les prix - Contre Attaque
    https://contre-attaque.net/2023/06/25/la-greve-des-pates-fait-baisser-les-prix

    En France comme en Italie, l’inflation explose et le prix des produits de base atteint des niveaux obscènes. En cause ? Non pas la « crise » mais bien les industriels et les grandes surfaces qui se gavent, en augmentant massivement leurs marges, donc leurs profits. En effet, le cours de la plupart des matières premières baisse, mais les prix continuent d’augmenter ou se maintiennent à des niveaux record. Les profiteurs de crise s’en mettent plein les poches.

    Prenons le cas des pâtes en Italie. Leur prix avait enregistré, en mars et en avril 2023, des augmentations de près de 20%, et ce alors même que le cours du blé a baissé de moitié depuis 2021 ! Il en va de même pour beaucoup d’autres aliments.

    Une association de consommateurs, Assoutenti, a trouvé une solution en Italie. Elle a appelé les ménages italiens à suspendre leurs achats de pâtes dans les commerces pendant une semaine. Une grève de la consommation de ce produit phare de l’Italie qui devait durer du 22 au 29 juin. Mais avant même le démarrage du mouvement, il était annulé car il avait déjà gagné : le prix de pâtes chutait « miraculeusement » de 14% ! Preuve que les propriétaires des moyens de production et la grande distribution peuvent tout à fait baisser les prix s’ils le souhaitent.

  • Sensations divines
    https://laviedesidees.fr/Grand-Clement-Au-plaisir-des-dieux

    Dans la #Grèce_antique, les rites religieux visaient à produire un état de réceptivité particulier. Ce livre, consacré aux outils de la rencontre sensorielle avec les dieux, contribue au sensory turn qui renouvelle actuellement les études historiques. À propos de : Adeline Grand-Clément, Au plaisir des dieux. Expériences du sensible dans les rituels en Grèce ancienne, Anacharsis

    #Histoire #religion #Antiquité #sexualité #sensibilité
    https://laviedesidees.fr/IMG/docx/202307_divinite_s.docx
    https://laviedesidees.fr/IMG/docx/20230707_divinite_s.docx
    https://laviedesidees.fr/IMG/pdf/20230707_divinite_s.pdf

  • Study: A legal vacuum - the systematic criminalisation of migrants for driving a boat or car to Greece

    The fight against migrant smuggling has been a top priority of European migration policy since 2015, with a vast amount of resources being invested into this policy goal. This study gives new and in-depth insights about the criminalisation of people on the move for “smuggling” in Greece, analysing the current legal framework as well as its practical enforcement. It shows that instead of protecting the rights of smuggled migrants and asylum seekers, these policies criminalise them and expose them to long prison sentences with the accusation of smuggling, all simply for having crossed the border by boat or car.

    This is made possible both by the legal framework set up in Greece and the EU, which is formulated very broadly, and further reinforced by an implementation that is characterised by gross rights violations such as arbitrary arrests, torture, abuse, coercion, and lack of access to legal support and interpretation.

    Individuals are typically arrested immediately upon arrival, held in pre-trial detention for months, and have very limited options to defend themselves and access support. The trials that tackle these accusations are very short and flout basic standards of fairness.

    The report examines a total of 81 trials of 95 people who were arrested and tried in Greece for smuggling in eight different locations, namely in Komotini, Thessaloniki, Rhodes, Samos, Lesvos, Crete, Syros and Kalamata. The findings are alarming:

    Main findings

    - Arresting boat / car drivers or other individuals on board for the offence of smuggling is a routine practice by law enforcement, with little regard for the actual involvement or intention of the accused;

    – Smuggled people themselves, including asylum seekers, are systematically convicted of smuggling because they (allegedly) drove or assisted in driving the boat or car;

    – At least 1374 people were arrested for smuggling in 2022;

    – Arrests and preliminary investigations are riddled with gross human rights violations; including arbitrary arrests, violence and coercion, little to no access to interpretation or legal support as well as problems in accessing the asylum procedure during detention;

    – 84% of the cases are subjected to pre-trial detention, lasting an average of 8 months. As of February 28, 2023 there are 634 people in pre-trial detention for smuggling.

    – Judgements are issued on the basis of limited and questionable evidence, such as the testimony of a single police or coast guard officer; the police or coast guard officers who provided the testimony on which the indictments were based did not appear in 68% of all documented cases to be cross-examined;

    – On average, trials last for 37 minutes, which drops to 17 minutes in trials with state-appointed lawyers; the shortest trial we documented lasted 6 minutes;

    – Trials lead to an average prison sentence of 46 years and a fine of 332.209 Euros;

    - 52% of all convicted people are serving a prison sentence of 15 years to life;

    - As of February 28, 2023 there are 2154 people who are detained in Greek prisons with the accusation of smuggling (which remains the second largest group per crime); nearly 90% of them are third-country nationals (1897).

    https://www.borderline-europe.de/unsere-arbeit/studie-ein-rechtsfreier-raum-die-systematische-kriminalisierung-vo

    #criminalisation #asile #migrations #réfugiés #Grèce #scafisti #rapport #passeurs #trafiquants #emprisonnement #Borderline_Europe #Boderline-Europe

  • A group of 9 people are stuck on an islet of the #Evros river near #Soufli in #Greece (03.07.2023)

    🆘 in the #Evros region! We are in contact with a group of 9 people who are stuck on an islet of the #Evros river near #Soufli in #Greece. They are running out of water & food & 1 child needs urgent medical assistance. We informed @hellenicpolice & asked for evacuation!

    #limbe #zone_frontalière #île #Evros #asile #migrations #réfugiés #frontières #fleuve_Evros #Turquie #Grèce #Thrace #îlots
    #nudité

    –-

    ajouté à la métaliste sur #métaliste sur des #réfugiés abandonnés sur des #îlots dans la région de l’#Evros, #frontière_terrestre entre la #Grèce et la #Turquie :
    https://seenthis.net/messages/953343

  • Ce qui m’étonne, c’est qu’on s’étonne | Blogabart | 03.07.23

    https://blogs.mediapart.fr/alain-manach/blog/030723/ce-qui-metonne-cest-quon-setonne

    « Je ne comprends pas toutes ces réactions offusquées, atterrées, scandalisées face à ce qui se passe dans notre pays en ce moment. Pourtant tout était annoncé depuis fort longtemps » : après plusieurs nuits de révoltes, témoignage d’un habitant du quartier de la Villeneuve, à #Grenoble.

    #qui_aurait_pu_prédire ? :-)

    cette phrase attribuée à Nelson Mandela : « ce qui se fait pour nous, sans nous, se fait contre nous »

    [...]
    Que dire d’une société qui retire des moyens aux collèges de nos quartiers au nom de l’égalité ? Vous avez bien lu : égalité… Ce qui dans la tête des institutions qui nous gouvernent veut dire les mêmes moyens à tout le monde, les quartiers riches comme les quartiers pauvres… et qui de ce fait empêchent les équipes enseignantes de développer le formidable travail qui est le leur. À la Villeneuve de Grenoble, le collège avait un taux de réussite au brevet des collèges de 71 % en 2017 et il est aujourd’hui de 91 % et crac badaboum… on supprime les moyens financiers principaux leviers de la réussite de cette équipe formidable.

    Que dire d’une société qui depuis plus de quarante ans matraque la vie associative et l’éducation populaire, par une logique néolibérale plutôt que de soutenir l’engagement des citoyens ? Pour ceux qui connaissent le jargon de la vie associative, ce sont les appels à projet, la mise en concurrence des associations entre elles, le refus des financements de fonctionnement etc. Notre quartier de la Villeneuve est bien atteint par ce virus-là.

  • Plastique : le recyclage n’est pas synonyme d’économie circulaire, prévient un rapport parlementaire
    https://www.actu-environnement.com/ae/news/rapport-opecst-recyclage-plastique-42112.php4#ntrack=cXVvdGlkaWV

    « l’économie du plastique reste (…) très linéaire, contrairement au discours ambiant faisant croire à sa circularité grâce au recyclage »

    Bien sûr, des efforts ont été entrepris pour écoconcevoir les produits, collecter et trier les déchets ou encore incorporer des polymères recyclés. Mais « le recyclage progresse moins vite que la production de plastique et ne permet par d’endiguer la production de déchets », constate Philippe Bolo. Concrètement, l’OCDE explique que la production mondiale de déchets plastique va tripler entre 2019 et 2060. Et la progression du recyclage n’empêchera pas un doublement des fuites de déchets plastique dans l’océan et un triplement de leur accumulation dans les milieux aquatiques.

    Quant au recyclage chimique (l’Europe compte 44 projets dans 13 pays, dont 13 en France), il n’aura qu’une efficacité « limitée sans une action forte sur les deux autres leviers d’amélioration du taux de recyclage que sont la recyclabilité et le tri des déchets ». D’autant que ces technologies « soulèvent de nombreuses interrogations » en matière d’impact environnemental, d’élimination des substances toxiques ou encore de traçabilité des résines qui en sont issues. Sans compter que son développement pourrait se faire au détriment du recyclage mécanique, explique la note.

    #pétrochimie #greenwashing #plastique #recyclage

  • Quand les #tomates rencontrent #Wagner

    Elias, petit village d’agriculteurs dans le centre de la Grèce, se meurt. Face à cette situation, deux cousins font équipe avec les grand-mères du village pour planter les graines de tomates qu’elles perpétuent depuis des siècles. Aidés par la musique de Wagner, censée encourager les tomates à pousser, ils parviennent à exporter aux quatre coins du monde des petits pots contenant des recettes à base de ces tomates biologiques. Le film suit les protagonistes de cette quête improbable, dans leurs efforts pour survivre et réaliser leurs rêves. Cette chronique nous rappelle l’importance de se réinventer en temps de crise et le pouvoir des relations humaines.

    https://www.film-documentaire.fr/4DACTION/w_fiche_film/32381_0
    #film #documentaire #film_documentaire

    #agriculture #musique #Grèce #rural #campagne #monde_rural #conserves #néo-ruraux #musique_traditionnelle #musique_classique #exode_rural #dépeuplement #Alexandros_Gousiaris

    • Our family’s activity in the area of beekeeping began in 1890 with beehives kept in our garden by my Great-great grandmother Evangelia Barbarousi for the family’s honey needs.

      In 1989, our activities were semi-professional, and in 1996 our Company was founded, after which our aims were clearly professional, regarding the number of hives as and their transfer within Greece (from Kalamata to Thassos), as well as the establishment of our storage and packaging facilities.

      In 1997 we began exporting our products, with the help of the “Odysea Ltd”, Company, with whom we continue to collaborate today.

      In 1998 our first investment plan was realized, with a program sponsored by the Greek Ministry of Agriculture for Countryside Restructuring. The plan was completed in 2000.

      ΤIn the same year, and together with the Taka family, we slowly began cultivating tomatoes on a large scale in the village of Fyllo, outside Kardista. The seed we use, then and still today, has been cultivated since 1900 by our extended family, and the pasteurization method is the same as that first implemented in the period between the two World Wars.

      In 2001 we exported the first tomato products, and in 2004 we began the certification process for the production of organic products on our estate in accordance with the DIO Certification Organization . In 2005 we began furnishing high-end hotels with our honey, offered both at breakfast and used in their kitchens.

      In 2007 we began our second investment plan with joint funding for Agricultural Development from the Greek Ministry of Agriculture and the European Union, and our packing and processing procedures were certified by the ISO Food Safety Management System (ISO 22000:2005).

      In 2008 we produced our first completely organic tomato products ("Tomata Stragisti" and tomato sauces), which were introduced onto the Greek market by the “Biotos”.

      We have inherited the knowledge of “how not to be afraid of bees” and we have developed a positive cooperation with them so as to produce an exceptional product with guaranteed safety to the consumer.

      We inherited a sack of seeds and we came to love the earth in which they grow, we respected the cultivating and production methods implemented before industrialized farming came into practice, and with great effort, know-how and experimentation we are able to offer products which bring back the flavours of yesterday.

      We will continue our efforts to prepare products of high quality and safety, giving particular importance to protecting the environment and to developing the human resources of our region.

      http://www.gousiaris.gr/main_en.html

  • The Great Robbery: during illegal pushbacks in Greece, refugees are robbed by border guards

    Solomon’s investigation, in collaboration with the Spanish newspaper El País, reveals that Greek security forces have stolen more than €2 million from refugees during pushbacks.

    In January 2022, two Cuban citizens, Lino Antonio Rojas Morell and Yudith Pérez Álvarez, presented themselves to the Greek authorities in the Evros region to request asylum, after entering the country illegally.

    The police officers who the couple approached, didn’t just ignore their request. They forced the couple into a van, and transported them to the police station where they confiscated their backpacks and mobile phones.

    The next day, before the couple was deported to the Turkish side of the border along with dozens of other people of different nationalities, they were again searched by the police.

    “The one who seemed to be the leader put my money, €375, in his pocket,” explains Rojas Morell, adding that “the police were obviously looking for money.”

    “One man wanted to look down my pants. They touched my chest and between my legs,” says Pérez Álvarez, in a claim she recently submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC).

    A year later, they are still traumatized by the violence they experienced during their alleged deportation to Turkey. Despite it being uncommon for Cubans to enter the EU in this way, their case is far from unprecedented — and highlights a practice that has become more frequent in recent years in the landlocked southeastern tip of the European Union.

    From September 2022 to March 2023, Solomon, in collaboration with El País, conducted interviews with more than a dozen sources, including employees of various institutions connected to the Greek asylum system, active and retired members of the security forces, Frontex officials, lawyers, experts, and residents of the Evros region.

    We also collected the testimonies of eight victims of pushbacks and analyzed each of the 374 claims, as they were recorded by multiple agencies, describing the pushbacks of over 20,000 asylum seekers from Greece to Turkey via Evros during 2017-2022.

    The findings of our investigation indicate a clear modus operandi of the Greek authorities in recent years:

    - asylum seekers are arrested when they enter Greece illegally, without being given the opportunity to apply for asylum (as required by both Greek and international law)

    – sometimes they are arrested in various parts of the mainland, although they may already be registered or have already been granted asylum

    - they are brought to various places (police stations, barracks, abandoned warehouses), where often people in uniform or civilian clothing physically assault them and take their belongings before they are transported to Turkey in inflatable boats

    The data collected allows us to conclude that, during the last six years, members of the Greek security forces have stolen more than €2 million in cash (at least €2.2 – 2.8 million) from asylum seekers.

    This amount is based on conservative estimations, without taking into account the value of mobile phones and other valuables (rings, bracelets) taken from victims. In addition, it is highly likely that these cases are just the tip of the iceberg, as the vast majority of pushbacks go unreported.

    A second key point that our joint investigation revealed, is that a few years ago, the practice of stealing money and personal belongings was not as prevalent, but it has progressively become a systematic tactic.

    “When you confiscate their phones, you eliminate any evidence that they were there. When you confiscate their money, you make their lives more difficult. When you strip them naked, another trend that’s on the rise, you humiliate and demoralize them,” comments Eva Cossé, senior researcher at Human Rights Watch in Greece.

    “It’s part of a strategy to prevent them from trying to cross the border again,” she adds.

    A systematic practice

    “We’re not talking about some isolated incidents, because in recent years they’ve become part of a systematic operational practice,” comments Hope Barker, representative of the Border Violence Monitoring Network (BVMN), which consists of twelve organizations that collect testimonies about illegal pushbacks of asylum seekers at EU borders.

    Barker says that BVMN initially noticed the practice of confiscating the belongings of asylum seekers at the Croatian border around 2017. In that context, however, the clothes, phones, and money that were taken, were thrown into fires to be destroyed.

    “In Greece, around 2019, it was a more random practice. Some were stripped of their possessions, others were not. But in recent years it has become an established tactic. Phones are sometimes kept, sometimes destroyed — but money is definitely kept. And it’s common for them to beat someone even more as punishment if they find out they’ve hidden their money,” Barker says.

    This happened to two young Moroccans, who on November 1, 2022 were deported along with fifty others.

    They were in a detention center, then were transferred to Evros, where they were registered again. The two young men said that “at the detention center the officers had already taken all our belongings, so the [other] officers should have known, at this stage, that we had nothing else on us.”

    When they stated that “we [told them] we had no items left,” the officers then became violent towards them, the BVMN report affirmed.
    Frontex sources confirm the illegal pushbacks

    In a case against the Greek state being heard at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), the UN High Commissioner for Refugees has provided evidence of 311 incidents in which “at least 6,680 people” were pushed back through Evros to Turkey.

    Two sources from Frontex, (the European Border and Coast Guard Agency) that have an increased presence in Greece, confirmed to Solomon and El País that pushbacks are now a normalized reality.

    “We do it, just like [other countries] do it. Except that they’re not as hostile [toward asylum seekers] as we are,” acknowledges one of the two sources.

    An institutional source who spoke on the condition of anonymity stated that “asylum seekers who enter Greece and follow the asylum procedure have said that it’s their second or third attempt. Some make even more attempts, because they were previously pushed back to Turkey.”

    The same source adds that there is now a “great escalation in the use of violence and humiliating practices. It’s the lowest level of respect for human life.”
    2022: confiscating their money in 92% of cases

    We asked the Greek authorities specific questions, asking to be informed regarding any ongoing investigations into the recorded pushbacks, and what procedure is being followed in terms of the money and personal belongings that are confiscated from the asylum seekers.

    In its reply to our queries, the Ministry of Migration & Asylum reaffirmed its commitment to the protection of human rights, but did not offer any specific answers.

    From the analysis of the recorded pushbacks of the last six years, an increasingly disturbing pattern emerges: the culmination of the Greek border guards’ interest in stealing money from asylum seekers.

    While in 2017 stealing money was reported just in 11% of pushback cases, by 2022 that figure skyrocketed to 92%.

    The data from our analysis is confirmed by the interim report of the relevant Recording Mechanism created by Greece’s National Commission for Human Rights (GNCHR ). It is noted that the GNCHR is an official, independent advisory body of the Greek state.

    Based on the incidents recorded by the GNCHR alone (which do not include those recorded by UNHCR), the report estimates the minimum number of people pushed back between 2020-2022 to be 2,157 people.

    During the presentation of the report in January 2023, the GNCHR confirmed to Solomon and El País that in 88% of the cases the victims stated that they had suffered violence, and in 93% of the cases that their possessions and money had been taken.

    According to the report, the victims of the pushbacks come from countries with high rates of asylum (Syria, Afghanistan, Turkey, Iran).
    Minors kidnapped from the mainland

    The GNCHR report confirms a trend that has also been highlighted by journalistic investigations in recent years: the abduction and pushback to Turkey of people who were living in Greece, already registered or who were already granted asylum.

    Solomon and El País recorded the testimony of Amir, an unaccompanied minor from Afghanistan who, in the summer of 2020, lived in a hostel in Thessaloniki.

    On August 25, 2020, as Amir waited at the bus station, a group of plainclothes men surrounded him and forced him into a black van with tinted windows.

    Twenty other refugees and migrants were in the van, which traveled eastward for about 350 kilometers, arriving near the Evros River. There they were detained and, hours later, their belongings were confiscated and they were taken by boat to Turkish soil.

    “I tried to explain to them that I had papers, but they were very aggressive. Every time you tried to talk to them, they would hit you,” explains Amir.

    His name has been changed to protect his identity, but his testimony was confirmed by a social worker at the hostel as well as two of his friends. In photos shown to Solomon, Amir is pictured smiling by their side, in Greece.
    Planned operations

    Hope Barker, from the BVMN, comments that since the crisis on the Greek-Turkish border in March 2020, not only have “hot pushbacks” (i.e. pushbacks of people found at the border) taken place. Operations have extended inland for hundreds of kilometers.

    “People are being arrested in different cities, in many cases even though they have valid documents or are in the process of seeking asylum,” she says. “They are detained in these kinds of secret places, unable to communicate, until enough people are rounded up, 80 or 100, and then transported to Turkish soil. This is a large state operation.”

    The range of operations underscores the indications that it’s an organized plan.

    “If raids are carried out in different parts of Greece, there is definitely a government order. Because this requires the mobilization of resources, the existence of detention facilities and the participation of different police units, not just some police officers from the Evros region,” comments Eva Cossé of Human Rights Watch.

    The GNCHR report records seven instances of pushbacks in which the victims were located inland, compared to 24 cases in which they were located in the Evros region.
    The isolation of border residents

    During Byzantine times, “Akrítes”, or citizens who lived in border areas, guarded the borders of the empire from raids from the east.

    Today, the residents of Evros are often compared to the Akrítes, and historically, politicians have always viewed them in special regard. For example, Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis recently announced that in the upcoming elections he will (also) be a candidate in Evros.

    But today, Evros exudes abandonment. It is not difficult to see that the region’s opportunities are extremely limited.

    A source in the city of Orestiada explains that many young people, who haven’t tried their luck in Thessaloniki or Athens, dream of a job in the border guard or the army: “they earn more than the minimum wage and have a secure job for life.”

    In November 2022, when we visited the village of Nea Vyssa, four kilometers from the Turkish border, the streets were deserted. Activity was minimal, and was limited to the cafe in the village square.

    In the cafe’s courtyard, protected from the cold by a plastic sheet, patrons chatted as they slowly sipped their coffees. They all had gray hair.

    One of them was proud that the village once “was one of the largest villages in Greece” and reminded us that the great mathematician Konstantinos Karatheodoris has roots from Vyssa.

    The village’s population today has dwindled to less than 3,000 residents and many buildings are deteriorating. Another patron explained that during the most recent announcement of job placements, three boys from the village were accepted into the border guard unit.

    In 2020, the president of the European Commission, Ursula Von der Leyen, promised Greece €700 million to protect its borders. Nearby on the Egnatia highway, new Nissan Qashqai police vehicles sped by every few minutes.

    In addition to the military, 1,800 border guards serve in Evros, of which 650 were hired last year (2022) with priority given to locals. In January 2023, the opening of another 400 border guard positions were announced.

    The institutional source who spoke to Solomon and El País asserted that there are also differences between them: while some border guards simply “follow orders” and send the asylum seekers back, others decide to “exploit” the situation.

    “There are police officers who only want to serve along the river,” he comments. “Imagine how much a group can earn if they get €100 or €200 from 100 people. They can make an entire salary in a single shift.”
    Mobile phones for the police officers’ kids

    On April 3, 2022, police officers in balaclavas arrested a 22-year-old Syrian man in a forest near Evros.

    According to the victim’s testimony, (recorded by Josoor, an organization that used to document human rights abuses before it had to disband due to pressure it experienced in Greece and Turkey), the police beat him with clubs and took all his belongings, including his phone, which he was forced to unlock. He was then sent back to Turkey with other asylum seekers.

    “When they put me in the car I realized they had a lot of phones and power banks in there. When one of the men took a cigarette out of his pocket, I saw that he had a wad of bills. I think they were taken from others earlier,” he said.

    It remains unknown where all the phones taken from asylum seekers in recent years have ended up. But sources from Orestiada explain that the police officers keep the best devices.

    “The border guards give them to their kids. They show up at school with new phones and proudly say their parents took them from ‘illegal immigrants’,” they comment, expressing concern about young people who join the security forces and end up adopting “the far-right narrative” that considers refugees to be invaders who threaten the security of the country.
    Refugees adapt

    Both before and during their journey, asylum seekers share information via WhatsApp, Telegram, and Facebook — so news spreads quickly.

    The expectation of their [poor] treatment by the Greek border guards means that they carry less and less money on them. While they used to carry larger amounts, a source from the asylum system explains that now “€50, €100, €150 is the norm”.

    A 2021 report on the Balkan corridor by the Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime states that “unlike 2015-2016, asylum seekers and migrants now appear wary of carrying large amounts of cash for fear of being robbed by thieves or the police. They tend to access money along the way using money transfer services.”

    Differences also exist based on the nationality of the asylum seekers.

    In recent years, Cubans (who fly to Russia, then to Serbia, arrive in Greece with the intention of applying for asylum in another country) are the unluckiest: without knowing what awaited them, they often each carried with them several thousand euros.

    “Groups of North Africans tend to travel alone or in small groups of two or three, and carry less money. Groups that include families, Syrians and Afghans, tend to be led by traffickers and carry more money,” explains Barker.

    “But, certainly, in the last 1-2 years people are more aware of the risks and no one expects to reach Greece on the first try,” she adds.

    “They know they will be pushed back to Turkey more than once.”

    Methodology

    We examined the testimonies of the victims of 374 illegal pushbacks that were collected between 2017-2022 by the following: Border Violence Monitoring Network (188), Human Rights Watch (76), the Greek Council for Refugees (55), Amnesty International (4), other NGOs and local reports (43), as well as by the journalists of this investigation (8).

    Some testimonies were rejected because they overlapped in dates or did not include sufficient evidence. In 2022, far fewer incidents were recorded than in the previous two years, because the NGO Josoor, which had collected the most testimonies, decided to disband, due to the judicial and police pressure they experienced by Greek and Turkish authorities.

    Testimonies were organized into structured data to be classified by date, place, nationalities and number of people pushed back. It was also ascertained whether the victims reported theft (232 incidents) or not (142). Using this data, the estimated number of asylum seekers present during the pushbacks where theft occurred was more than 13,500.

    Although migrants are systematically recorded, sometimes there are some who manage to hide their money, also, not all migrants have cash with them (this is especially true for families traveling together, so only one family member has been counted as a target for theft). Therefore, using the demographic profiles of migrant groups developed by UNHCR and the PRAB initiative (which includes various NGOs and foundations), a 30% deflator was applied to the theft victim base.

    Not all testimonies of theft specified the amount stolen but 62 testimonies did specify amounts (five were rejected for the calculation because the amounts stolen were so large that they could be misleading). With this data, a statistical distribution was created, of the most frequently confiscated amounts. The distribution was applied to the deflated victim base in order to derive an estimate of the money stolen from migrants. The results show that between 2017 and 2022, between €2.2 and €2.8 million were stolen – these estimates are conservative, as many victims do not report being deported or robbed.

    https://wearesolomon.com/mag/format/investigation/the-great-robbery-during-illegal-pushbacks-in-greece-refugees-are-robb
    #migrations #réfugiés #frontières #push-backs #refoulements #vol #argent #Grèce #Evros #téléphones_portables #confiscation #chiffres #statistiques

    • Greek Border Guards call on Solomon to retract investigation which reveals they stole more than €2 million from refugees

      The Union of Evros Border Guards demands that Solomon removes from its website the investigation that revealed how in recent years members of the Greek security forces have stolen more than €2 million from refugees during pushbacks.

      On March 9, 2023, in collaboration with Spanish newspaper El País, Solomon published the findings of a months-long investigation, which sheds light on the extent of a practice, that in recent years, Greek border guards have allegedly engaged in: confiscating money and personal belongings from refugees during illegal pushbacks.

      To document the research, we conducted interviews with several sources. Among them were employees of the Greek asylum system, active and retired members of the security forces, Frontex officials, lawyers, experts, as well as residents of Evros.

      We collected testimonies from the victims of pushbacks, some of which have been submitted to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), and analyzed 374 published testimonies that were recorded by a variety of agencies, which describe the pushbacks of over 20,000 asylum seekers from Greece to Turkey via Evros during the period of 2017-2022.

      The publication of the investigation caused the immediate reaction of MEPs, including the president of the European Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE), who addressed questions to the Commission.

      But these were not the only reactions that followed.

      We received a legal notice from the Union of Evros Border Guards (ESYFNE), which refutes the findings of our investigation, which it characterizes as “slanderous and untrue” and calls on us “to retract the article and publish a correction”.

      The legal notice, signed by a lawyer in Alexandroupoli on May 23, has a delivery date of May 29. However, during that time, our staff was traveling abroad for professional obligations, and we only became aware of the legal notice on June 15.

      In an interesting turn of events, we found that the delivery date coincided with a remarkable news story: on the very same day, five border guards from the Border Unit of Isaaki Didymotihos were accused of being involved in a refugee smuggling ring and were arrested.

      According to the Hellenic Police, the five border guards had in their possession: €26,550, 59 mobile phones, 12 power banks, 2,120 USD, 850 Turkish lire, 23 GBP, 77 Romanian Leu, a number of banknotes from Asian countries, and a bank card.

      In other words, on the same day that the Evros border guards were calling for the withdrawal of our investigation which described how Greek border guards were taking money and mobile phones from refugees during pushbacks, five of their colleagues were arrested, and large sums of foreign currency and 59 mobile phones were found in their possession.

      The legal notice also refers to the “arbitrary use” of a photo (depicting an ESYFNE member) which was used as a central illustration in our article, which they claim was used to “publicly and brutally insult the honor and dignity” of the said border guard “in the most arbitrary and abusive manner”.

      This reference causes a real doubt, as:

      - the photos that were used were obtained online (specifically from the website of the Ministry of Citizen Protection), and are also used in a multitude of other publications,

      - the photographs were processed by Solomon (to such a degree that the features of the border guard are not distinguishable), to create an artistic composition of the illustration which reflects the various elements of the subject,

      – and above all, a simple reading of the article is enough to make it clear that no mention is made of specific persons.

      In any case, as our purpose is to highlight an alarmingly widespread phenomenon that has also been recorded by a multitude of organisations (eg Human Rights Watch), we will replace the photo in question from our central illustration.

      Therefore, we will defend our work and the belief that it serves the public interest.

      We are at ESYFNE’s disposal for an in-depth interview, and even bring to their attention the recently published interim report of the Greek National Commission for Human Rights (GNCHR).

      The report by GNCHR, an official advisory body of the Greek state, estimates the minimum number of people who were forced back between 2020-2022 at 2,157 persons (without taking into account cases recorded by other organisations, e.g. the High Commission).

      In addition, the report states that in 88% of the cases the victims suffered violence, and in 93% their belongings and money were confiscated.

      In recent years, Solomon has consistently covered migration issues, highlighting human rights violations both on the mainland and on the islands. And we will continue to do so.

      https://wearesolomon.com/mag/our-news/greek-border-guards-call-on-solomon-to-retract-investigation-which-rev
      #pression

  • Drowning in Lies. Greece tries to cover up its own role in the #Pylos shipwreck by tampering with evidence

    On the night of 13 June, a vessel carrying around 750 men, women and children mainly from Pakistan, Egypt and Syria capsized in the Central Mediterranean, in Greek waters. The Greek authorities had been aware of the overloaded vessel the day before because Europe’s border agency Frontex and activists had warned them.

    Instead of rescuing the people, the Greek coast guard stayed close to the boat and observed it from the sky with a helicopter, ignoring Frontex’s offer for help. They sent commercial vessels to the area and later a coast guard boat.

    Shortly after the coast guard vessel arrived on the scene, the overloaded boat capsized. Only 104 men survived. All the others, including all the women and children on board, drowned.

    Survivors alleged that their vessel was towed by the Greek coast guard boat, causing the fatal wreck. The Greek coast guard and the government strongly denied these allegations and claimed the boat was never towed.

    We decided to collect as many survivor testimonies as possible and try to establish what really happened, and whether there had been efforts to cover up the truth.
    METHODS

    Finding visual evidence to determine the cause of the shipwreck was nearly impossible since it happened on the high seas and commercial vessels and surveillance planes were sent away by the Greek authorities. Videos survivors might have had on their phones were no longer accessible due to water damage or because they lost their phones.

    We decided to put a team together, including journalists from the same regions as the passengers, and carried out 17 interviews with survivors – the largest number collected in a single investigation into the wreck so far – to compare their accounts. We also spoke to sources inside the European border agency Frontex.

    We obtained crucial court documents containing two sets of testimonies given by the same nine survivors. They spoke first to the Greek coast guard and later to a local Greek court.
    STORYLINES

    Documents and witness testimony obtained by Lighthouse Reports, Der Spiegel, Monitor, SIRAJ, El País, Reporters United and The Times show the Greek coast guard tampered with official statements to conceal their role in the wreck and pressured survivors into naming certain people as the smugglers.

    Nine survivors were asked by the coast guard to give witness statements just hours after the wreck. On analysing the documents, we discovered that critical parts of several testimonies contain identical phrases.

    The documents reveal that the translator used during one of the survivor’s interviews with the coast guard is a member of the coast guard himself. Other translators were local residents who spoke Arabic and other languages, who were sworn in on the day.

    In the documents, eight survivors are stated to have blamed the capsizing on factors unrelated to towing. Four of them are stated to have testified – in nearly identical wording – that the boat capsized because it was “old” and “there were no life jackets”. Their interviews were translated by three different interpreters.

    None of the survivors interrogated by the coast guard blamed the coast guard at all, according to the transcriptions. But in a later round of questioning by a Greek court of the same nine survivors, six of them are stated to have said the coast guard towed the boat shortly before it capsized.

    We spoke to two of the nine survivors who testified; they told us that the coast guard had omitted the parts of their testimony mentioning towing.

    “They asked me what happened to the boat and how it sank. I told them the Greek coast guard came and tied the rope to our boat and towed us and caused the capsizing of the boat,” said one survivor. “They didn’t type that in my testimony. When they presented it at the end I couldn’t find this part.”

    He added that the coast guard pressured him to single out certain people as the smugglers in charge of the operation. This claim is supported by our analysis of the documents: two answers to the coast guard’s questions about smugglers contain identical sentences.

    Another survivor who testified said he also blamed the shipwreck on towing when asked by the coast guard, but still signed the deposition at the end despite knowing it did not reflect what he said, because he felt “terrified”.

    Sixteen out of the seventeen survivors we spoke to said the coast guard attached a rope to the vessel and tried to tow it shortly before it capsized. Four also claimed that the coast guard was attempting to tow the boat to Italian waters, while four reported that the coast guard caused more deaths by circling around the boat after it capsized, making waves that caused the boat’s carcass to sink.

    While Europe and its border agency Frontex have largely backed Greece on its border practices and said following the shipwreck that they believed the coast guard did everything it could to save the people who drowned, Frontex is now doubting the official version

    The border agency has circulated an internal report on the incident based on survivor testimony, in which survivors state that the Greek coast guard was to blame for the drownings, according to sources.

    https://www.lighthousereports.com/investigation/drowning-in-lies
    #Grèce #naufrage #asile #migrations #décès #morts #tragédie #mourir_aux_frontières #morts_aux_frontières #14_juin_2023 #Méditerranée #Mer_Méditerranée #13_juin_2023
    #Lighthouse_reports #enquête #contre-enquête

    Sur ce naufrage voir ce fil de discussion:
    https://seenthis.net/messages/1006608

    • Survivors: ‘Greek coastguard was next to us when boat capsized’

      Two Syrian refugees recall their harrowing journey and pin blame on the coastguard for the devastating shipwreck.

      “The boat was too heavy,” he told Al Jazeera.

      “We were sitting next to each other, and there was a constant fear of sinking.”

      On the derelict blue ship that was soon to hit international headlines, he saw about 750 people crammed together, shoulder-to-shoulder, unable to move. They had all hoped to eventually reach Europe.

      In a few days, he would see hundreds of these people drown as a Greek coastguard ship floated nearby.

      Ahmed fled Syria with his friend Mohammed*, 23. They both asked to use pseudonyms because they fear the Greek government would punish them for speaking out about what they saw that night.

      They are two of the 104 survivors of the shipwreck off the coast of Pylos, Greece. Seventy-eight people have been confirmed dead.

      Like hundreds of other people on board, their third companion, Mohammed’s cousin, was never found.

      Their path to the central Mediterranean was taken in many steps. Ahmed and Mohammed said they left home hoping for a future without violence.

      Their journey took them to Lebanon, then Egypt and Libya.

      They spent about a month in Libya, where smugglers kept them closed up in an apartment with Egyptians, Pakistanis and other Syrians also making the journey.

      Mohammed said the smugglers beat the Egyptians and Pakistanis, constantly cursing and insulting them.

      Finally, in the first days of June, they were told, “You are leaving today.”

      They were put on the back of trucks that drove to the shore, were loaded onto small boats and were taken to a trawler, the Adriana, out in deeper waters.

      “They were beating people there,” Ahmed said.

      “They were beating them while taking them to the lower deck of the boat. … It was very bad down there. It smelled of diesel and fish. You couldn’t breathe.”

      Ahmed and his companions managed to pay a bribe of $200 to get themselves a spot on the upper deck.

      But wherever the passengers sat on the ship, they were wedged together.

      Women and children were kept below in the hold. From their cramped spot on the top deck, the young men could see the sea.
      ‘People were starting to lose consciousness’

      From the second day of the voyage, the boat’s engine started breaking down.

      “They would repair it, and after a while, it would break down again,” Mohammed said. “Every time they repaired it, it would stop again after two to three hours.”

      After the second day at sea, food and water ran out. Panic began to percolate across the ship.

      “At that time, people were starting to lose consciousness,” Ahmed said.

      “They were falling on the ground. They were fainting. Some were shaking. We were seeing tens, hundreds of people in this state.”

      They heard fights were breaking out all across the boat due to hunger, thirst and fear.

      “Me, Ahmed and my relative who is now missing were always trying to keep our spirits up,” Mohammed said. “When someone cried, we made jokes. ‘We will make it,’ we were saying to ourselves. But everyone was going crazy.”

      By the fourth day, they heard disturbing news from the hold.

      “Some people coming up from below said, ‘There are dead people down there,’” Ahmed said.

      “They said there were six dead bodies on the boat. Five bodies were down below, and we didn’t see them. One was on the upper deck. We saw him.”

      Ahmed and Mohammed said the passengers started telephoning the Italian authorities and the Greek coastguard to ask for help.

      “From the fourth day onwards, the Greek coastguard had been aware of us,” Mohammed said.

      By the fifth day, June 13, they said it looked like the Adriana had stopped moving completely.

      In the afternoon, a helicopter flew overhead.

      The passengers could not understand from the deck, but it was the Greek coastguard. In the afternoon, one and then another commercial ship passed by and tossed those on board water over the waves.

      “People were saying: ‘Take us with you.’ They were saying, ‘No.’” Mohammed said. “We asked for help, but they refused to help us.”

      A Greek coastguard vessel finally approached the fishing trawler around midnight in the first minutes of June 14, the friends said. “‘Follow us,’ they told us. We followed them,” Mohammed said.

      “Half an hour later, our boat stopped completely. It could not move. They came back and tied us to their boat.”

      Ahmed and Mohammed said the coastguard started to tow their stalled-out trawler, but it took a sharp turn, and the Adriana heaved precariously left, then right, then capsized.

      “They were right next to us when it capsized. In the moment it sank, they moved away from us. They deliberately made us sink,” Mohammed said. “We were standing on top of the boat, and we were able to see everything clearly.”

      Tossed into the dark Mediterranean Sea, hundreds of people tried to find something to cling onto, some way to survive. “People were holding onto me,” Ahmed said.

      “I was going under the water and getting away from people. Every time I got away, I would come across someone else, and they would hold onto me to save themselves. When someone grabbed onto me, we both went underwater together.”

      After an hour and a half, Ahmed said he spotted an inflatable coastguard boat and swam towards it.

      “They were 200 or 300 metres [220 to 330 yards] away from us,” he said. “I swam to them and got into the boat. They did not come close to us to save us. They were standing far away, and those who could swim were going towards them, like me.”

      As he made his way towards the inflatable boat, Ahmed had to push aside bodies floating in the water.

      Once taken to the larger coastguard boat, Ahmed was reunited with Mohammed. The two hugged each other, overwhelmed and elated to have found each other.

      They started asking about their third companion. He had not made it, and they realised how incomplete their relief was.

      The survivors of the shipwreck were taken ashore. Mohammed said that when they were first held in the Greek city of Kalamata, the authorities came to take his testimony of the tragedy three or four times.

      “When we told them that we had been towed with a rope, they stopped,” he said. “They were saying that the problem was our boat. They wrote our statements with their own words. They did not write down what we said. They made us say it and write it down.”

      Ahmed said no officials have ever taken his testimony.
      ‘Accountability vacuum’

      Both men are now in the Malakasa refugee camp, 40km (25 miles) north of Athens. They are awaiting their asylum claims to be processed. Mohammed is desperate for news of his cousin, even if that news is confirmation he is dead.

      Ahmed’s and Mohammed’s accounts contradict the account of the Greek coastguard, which has said the passengers of the Adriana refused aid, it was only immobile for about 20 minutes before it capsized and the coastguard had not towed the boat prior to it capsizing.

      Survivors’ accounts line up with other evidence.

      The Greek investigative website Solomon has published emails showing that the Greek authorities had been notified that the ship was in distress by 6pm (15:00 GMT) on June 13. And tracking data published and verified by the BBC and The New York Times show that the trawler was not moving for at least seven hours before it capsized.

      When asked to comment on allegations that the coastguard towed the boat and was involved in the shipwreck, the Greek Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Insular Policy told Al Jazeera: “The required information is part of the investigation procedure that is being conducted under strict confidentiality based on the instructions given by the prosecutor of the Supreme Court. Regarding the details of the operation plan of the Hellenic coastguard, no further comments can be made by our service.”

      Fingers have been pointed at the Greek coastguard for both the shipwreck and its large death toll.

      “It has been evidenced that the Hellenic coastguard uses a range of tactics to move boats they have intercepted at sea into different territorial areas to avoid responsibility for search and rescue and the lodging of their applications for international protection,” said Hope Barker, a policy analyst at the Border Violence Monitoring Network.

      “Whilst this usually includes towing boats back to Turkish territorial waters, it is equally likely that if the boat was closer to Italian territorial waters, they would try to transfer it there instead.”

      The organisation is calling for an independent investigation and for Frontex, the European Union’s border agency, to withdraw from Greece.

      “Violations of fundamental rights by the Hellenic coastguard are routine and systematised operations that have proven to be under-investigated by the Greek state. There is an accountability vacuum that allows these actions to continue unabated,” Barker said.

      In Malakasa, Mohammed said he cannot stop thinking about the moment the boat capsized and the screams of the people around him. He does not know how he survived in the water.

      “I shouted Ahmed’s and my cousin’s names for a while,” he said. “In that moment, I heard a voice screaming, ‘Mother! Mother!’ I asked that person for his name, and he said, ‘Fuat’.

      “He and I told each other our names, so that whichever of us survived would be able to bring the news to the other’s family.”

      https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2023/7/5/survivors-greek-coastguard-was-next-to-us-when-boat-capsized

    • Under the unwatchful eye of the authorities’ deactivated cameras: dying in the darkest depths of the Mediterranean

      A collaborative investigation by Solomon, Forensis, The Guardian and ARD presents the most complete tracing, to date, of the course that the fishing vessel Adriana took until it ultimately sank, causing over 600 people to drown − while under the supervision of Greek and European authorities. A document reveals that according to Frontex recommendations, the Coast Guard vessel was obligated to record the operation on video.

      In the early hours of June 14, the state-of-the-art cameras of the Coast Guard vessel ΠΠΛΣ-920 were off.

      The deadliest shipwreck within the Greek Search and Rescue Zone, one of the largest the Mediterranean has ever seen, was reportedly not visually detected.

      Only hours before, aerial photos of the overloaded fishing vessel were taken. Nearby tankers recorded videos before they were ordered to leave the scene. There were satellite images that captured its movement.

      But the exact circumstances in which the Adriana capsized off Pylos, killing more than 600 people, remain unclear three weeks on.

      In affidavits and interviews, some of the 104 survivors attributed the sinking of the fishing vessel to an attempt by the Hellenic Coast Guard to tow it to Italian waters.

      The Coast Guard emphasizes that it saved human lives, and maintains that the fishing vessel overturned due to a disturbance by the passengers.

      Solomon, in a joint investigation with the research group Forensis, The Guardian and German public broadcaster ARD reveals: the Coast Guard vessel ΠΠΛΣ-920, the only vessel present at the time the Adriana capsized, was obligated to “document its operation by video-recording” in accordance with a 2021 Frontex document which recommends that the Greek authorities record their operations continually.

      If this had been done, today there would be answers to the questions that the victims’ families are still asking.

      The ΠΠΛΣ-920 cameras were supposed to record

      By midday on June 13, the Greek and Italian authorities and Frontex (the European Border and Coast Guard Agency), were aware of the overloaded fishing vessel, which had been sailing aimlessly for four days in the central Mediterranean – its only means of navigation was a compass and the position of the sun.

      The activist network Alarm Phone had also relayed to the authorities the desperate SOS of some 750 men, women, and children — mostly from Pakistan, Egypt and Syria — who, lacking potable water, were using their shoelaces to lower containers into the sea: “They are urgently asking for help”.

      ΠΠΛΣ-920, the Coast Guard vessel which received the order to depart from the port of Souda, Crete to assist, has been the pride of the Coast Guard since 2021. European funding covered 90% of its cost, and it is one of the best-equipped vessels available in Greece.

      And it could not be in better hands: earlier this year, in March, its captain was awarded for “his valuable contribution to the protection of maritime borders and human life at sea.”

      According to the Coast Guard, ΠΠΛΣ-920, like its three sister ships (ΠΠΛΣ-900, ΠΠΛΣ-910 and ΠΠΛΣ-930), has two state-of-the-art thermal camera systems. According to the Coast Guard, however, when the fishing vessel capsized, the cameras were not in operation because the crew’s attention was focused on the rescue efforts.

      “When we have an incident, we try to have the ability to operate seamlessly. Making some crew members ‘inactive’ so that they can record a video, you understand, is unethical,” Coast Guard spokesman Nikos Alexiou stated on June 15, justifying why the incident was not recorded on video.

      However, one of the three former and current Coast Guard officers who spoke to us during our investigation, said that these cameras do not require constant manual operation and they exist exactly for this reason – to record such incidents.

      But there is still a critical issue: a document reveals that, according to Frontex recommendations in March 2021, the Coast Guard vessel was obligated to record the operation.

      The document states that “if feasible, all actions taken by Frontex assets or Frontex co-financed assets… should be documented by video consistently.”

      The cost of the ΠΠΛΣ-290, one of four state-of-the-art vessels purchased for €55.5 million, has been 90% financed through Frontex. It is designated to be “available for four months a year, for Frontex missions outside of Greek waters.”

      Frontex had recommended the visual recording of operations, during a meeting where representatives from Greece were present as well as from other European countries, following complaints of human rights violations by the Coast Guard.

      The complaints that were assessed during the meeting referred to the exact same practice, attributed to ΠΠΛΣ-920: towing vessels of asylum seekers outside of Greek waters.
      We created a 3D model of the Adriana

      Solomon, Forensis, The Guardian and ARD worked together and after analyzing a wealth of evidence, we present the most complete picture to date, of the Adriana’s course up to the time of its sinking.

      We collected more than 20 survivor accounts and analyzed material derived from, among others, witness statements, official reports from the Coast Guard and Frontex, deck logs of the Coast Guard vessel and tankers in transit, aerial photographs and data on the position and movement of ships and aircraft. We also secured exclusive footage from the commercial vessels that were in the area and spoke to sources at Frontex, the Coast Guard, and rescuers.

      The analysis of this information resulted in a detailed chronology of the events that occurred on June 13 and 14, an interactive map showing Adriana‘s movement, as well as a 3D model of the fishing vessel.

      With the help of the 3D model, we were able to do what no official authority or journalistic investigation has done so far: to conduct in-person interviews with survivors of the wreck, using the visual impression of this body of data.

      Using the method of situated testimony, the survivors placed themselves in the 3D model of the ship, indicated their location on the deck, and recalled the events that unfolded before the sinking of the Adriana: from the alleged towing to its capsize.

      In this way, we were able to cross-reference accounts of what happened in the presence of the Coast Guard vessel, based on each person’s eyewitness account.
      Main conclusions

      Eleven critical findings emerge from the joint investigation:

      – Frontex offered to help three times. A Frontex source stated that the Coast Guard did not respond to any of the three requests for assistance.

      - The records of ΠΠΛΣ-920 are incoherent and raise questions. For example, while it is reported that immediately before the sinking, the fishing vessel was moving west, it actually appears to be moving for about an hour (00:44 – 01:40) in a southerly direction at a speed of only 0.6 knots. In addition: since, according to the Coast Guard, the fishing vessel’s engine had stopped working at 00:44, why was the preparation of life-saving equipment carried out an hour later, at 01:40?

      - While the fishing vessel’s engine was running but there was no navigation capability, according to testimonies, ΠΠΛΣ-920 approached the vessel and gave directions to Italy. A survivor stated: “[a crew member] told us that the Greek ship would go ahead of us and lead us to Italian waters. He told us that in two hours we would be in Italy.” ΠΠΛΣ-920 directed the fishing vessel from a distance, which followed until its engine broke down again.

      – According to Syrian survivors on deck, when the engine broke down, masked men from ΠΠΛΣ-920 boarded the fishing vessel and tied a blue rope to the stern. The above-mentioned testimonies are also consistent with an entry in the ΠΠΛΣ-920 deck logbook, which mentions the participation of a four-member team from the Special Missions Unit in the operation.

      - According to the same survivors, there were two brief attempts to tow the fishing vessel. The first time the rope broke. The second time the ΠΠΛΣ-920 increased its speed and the fishing vessel rocked to the right, then to the left, then to the right again and flipped onto its right side.

      – The Pakistani survivors were located in the interior of the ship, and could not see what was happening. They stated, however, that while the fishing vessel’s engine was not working, they felt a sharp forward thrust “like a rocket” — a sensation that corroborates the use of a rope for towing.

      – Testimonies in this investigation support testaments presented by other journalistic investigations, as well as survivor statements included in the official case file: this action appears to have led to the capsize and eventual sinking of the ship.

      - The fishing vessel capsized and survivors climbed on top of it. ΠΠΛΣ-920 left the scene, creating waves that made it more difficult for the survivors to stay afloat.

      – After withdrawing, ΠΠΛΣ-920 directed its floodlights on the shipwreck site. Survivors tried to swim to the Coast Guard vessel, but the distance was too great.

      – ΠΠΛΣ-920 began the rescue operation 30 minutes after the sinking, and only after the fishing vessel had completely disappeared from the water’s surface.

      - Survivors claim that their phones (which were protected in plastic cases) contain visual material from the incident. Immediately after the rescue, according to the same testimonies, Coast Guard officers confiscated their phones, which have not been returned to them.

      https://vimeo.com/843117800

      Survivor accounts of the towing

      In the deck log of ΠΠΛΣ-920, which we have seen, there is no mention of any towing attempt. The Coast Guard captain reports that they approached the fishing vessel to offer assistance, received no response, and followed it “from a discreet distance”.

      This is disputed by the accounts of the survivors, some of whom not only tell of a rope that was tied to the fishing vessel, but they all mention its color: blue.

      This investigation documents, for the first time, the blue cable that was used by ΠΠΛΣ-920, which can also be seen in earlier photos of the vessel.

      The estimation that the attempt to tow the fishing vessel by the ΠΠΛΣ-920 led to its sinking is underlined by the statements of survivors, that form part of the case file which is available to the journalists that participated in this investigation.

      “Then the Greek ship came and threw the rope which was tied to the front of our ship,” says a survivor who was on the deck.

      The Coast Guard started towing the fishing vessel, he adds, and “when it was going slowly the fishing vessel was fine, but instead of approaching the Greek ship we were moving away. When they hit the gas, I’m sorry to say, that’s when our ship sank.”

      The same survivor estimates that the fishing boat capsized due to the “pulling from the Greek ship, because then our ship began to lean to one side. And I, who was standing in a corner, slipped into the water with a relative of mine, who died.”

      Another survivor who was also on the deck, but at the stern and without full visibility, says in his testimony that “it was night, the guys in front told me that they tied the rope, but I could feel the motion too, because then we moved, but not for more than two minutes.”

      “Then we said stop-stop because our ship is leaning,” he says, adding, “I think we sank due to the fact that our boat was in bad condition and overloaded and that it shouldn’t have been towed.”

      In another testimony, the description of the towing attempt is concise: “On the last day the Greek ship threw us a rope and tied us to their ship. The Greek one turned right, then ours overturned and we fell into the water.”

      We contacted the Coast Guard, asking questions about the timeline of the shipwreck and asking them to comment on the findings of our investigation. At the time of publication, we have not received a response.
      Why didn’t Greece respond to Frontex?

      The picture of what actually happened would be more complete if the ΠΠΛΣ-920 was not the only vessel present during the incident.

      According to the captain of the merchant ship Faithful Warrior, at 00:18 the Coast Guard’s Search & Rescue Coordination Center gave him permission to depart the scene, thus removing the last witness present. The Faithful Warrior left at 00:30, about 15 minutes before the fishing vessel’s engine stopped working, according to Coast Guard records.

      Frontex, which operates in the central Mediterranean, had informed the Greek authorities about the fishing vessel early in the afternoon, and had offered to help.

      Specifically, at 19:35 (local Greek time) Frontex offered to assist with the Eagle I aircraft. Afterwards, the Greek side asked Frontex to assist in a search and rescue incident south of Crete, where 80 people were in danger. The vessel in question was spotted by the Frontex Heron drone at 22:50.

      At 00:34, Frontex again offered to provide assistance with the Eagle I and a few minutes later, at 00:52, it also offered the Heron. According to a Frontex source who spoke to our joint investigation, the Greek authorities did not respond to any request to send aerial assets to the overloaded fishing vessel.
      Fabricated testimonies?

      Concerns have also been raised about the possible alteration of survivors’ testimonies.

      Survivors gave two rounds of statements: first to the Coast Guard and then to an investigator. Both versions are available to Solomon and the international colleagues who participated in this investigation.

      While there are no references to the attempted towing of the fishing vessel in the survivor testimonies recorded by the Coast Guard, the same survivors spoke about it in the second interview with the investigator.

      Also, when describing the shipwreck, the testimonies that appear to have been given to the Coast Guard by two survivors of different nationalities, are the same, word for word: “There were too many people in the boat, which was old and rusty … that’s why it capsized and sank in the end.”
      Inside the hold

      The TikTok video shows his older brother hugging him tightly and kissing him, before he enters the airport, dragging along his suitcase.

      He had flown from Karachi to Dubai, and from Dubai to Alexandria, Egypt. From there he boarded another plane that took him to Benghazi, Libya, where he spent over ten days locked in a trafficker’s hideout, before he was taken to board the Adriana.

      When he saw the old fishing boat he couldn’t believe it — he thought the trip to Italy would also be by plane. He wanted to go back to Pakistan, but the traffickers wouldn’t let him.

      Inside the Adriana, Abdul traveled on the lowest of three levels, in suffocating conditions where he had to sit with his knees bent. “To get from one place to another, you had to step on people.”

      Conditions were similar on the middle level, where about 300 people were reportedly crammed in, with more than 200 people still on deck. The testimonies speak of another, separate space inside the fishing vessel, where women and children were located. No women were among the 104 people that were rescued.

      The Pakistani travelers had paid a total of €8,000-€10,000 each for the long journey to Europe – Abdul’s family of rice farmers had sold their land to finance his trip.

      Abdul had learned to swim in the canals around his family’s crops – when the Adriana sank, it was his ability to swim that allowed Abdul to reach the Coast Guard vessel and save himself.

      As he walks along in Athens, Abdul’s relatives call him, asking what’s the name of the city he’s in. He tells us about his family, but he also shows us photos of loved ones who perished: he was onboard the Adriana with 14 of his friends and his uncle. Only he survived.

      And of his 350 fellow Pakistanis who were also in the hold with him, only 12 were rescued. “Beautiful people were lost,” says Abdul.

      People who participated in the investigation: Christina Varvia, Lydia Emmanouilidou, Katy Fallon, Ebrahem Farooqui, Armin Ghassim, Sebastian Heidelberger, Stefanos Levidis, Andreas Makas, Stavros Malichudis, Iliana Papangeli, Corina Petridi, Timo Robben, Georgia Skartadou, Sulaiman Tadmory, George Christides.

      https://wearesolomon.com/mag/format/investigation/under-the-unwatchful-eye-of-the-authorities-deactivated-cameras-dying-

    • Greek shipwreck: hi-tech investigation suggests coastguard responsible for sinking

      Research into loss of trawler with hundreds of deaths strongly contradicts official accounts – while finding a failure to mobilise help and evidence that survivor statements were tampered with

      Attempts by the Greek coastguard to tow a fishing trawler carrying hundreds of migrants may have caused the vessel to sink, according to a new investigation by the Guardian and media partners that has raised further questions about the incident, which left an estimated 500 people missing

      The trawler carrying migrants from Libya to Italy sank off the coast of Greece on 14 June. There were 104 survivors.

      Reporters and researchers conducted more than 20 interviews with survivors and drew on court documents and coastguard sources to build a picture of missed rescue opportunities and offers of assistance that were ignored. Multiple survivors said that attempts by the Greek coastguard to tow the vessel had ultimately caused the sinking. The coastguard has strenuously denied that it attempted to tow the trawler.

      The night that the trawler capsized, 47 nautical miles off Pylos, in south-western Greece, was reconstructed using an interactive 3D model of the boat created by Forensis, a Berlin-based research agency founded by Forensic Architecture, which investigates human rights violations.

      The joint investigation by the Guardian, German public broadcaster ARD/NDR/Funk and Greek investigative outlet Solomon, in collaboration with Forensis, has given one of the fullest accounts to date of the trawler’s course up to its sinking. It unearthed new evidence such as a coastguard vessel moored at a closer port but never dispatched to the incident and how Greek authorities failed to respond not twice, as previously reported, but three times to offers of assistance by Frontex, the EU border and coastguard agency.

      Forensis mapped the final hours before the sinking, using data from the coastguard’s log and the testimony of the coast guard vessel’s captain, as well as flight paths, maritime traffic data, satellite imagery and information from videos taken by nearby commercial vessels and other sources. The ship’s last movements contradict the coastguard and reveal inconsistencies within the official account of events, including the trawler’s direction and speed.

      Crucially, the investigation showed the overcrowded trawler started moving westward on meeting the single Greek coastguard vessel sent to the scene. According to multiple survivor testimonies given to the Guardian and Greek prosecutors, the coastguard had told the migrants it would lead them to Italy – clashing with the official version that the trawler started moving west of its own accord. The investigation also showed the trawler had turned to the south and was almost stationary for at least an hour until, survivors said, a second and fatal towing attempt took place.
      Survivors use the 3D model of the boat to describe what happened on the night of the 14 June.

      Two survivors used the 3D model to describe the towing itself, while three others, who were sitting inside or on the vessel’s lower deck, described being propelled forward “like a rocket”, but with the engine not operating. That suggests a towing attempt.

      Another survivor separately said he heard people shouting about a rope being attached by the “Greek army” and described being towed for 10 minutes shortly before the trawler sank. “I feel that they have tried to push us out of Greek water so that their responsibility ends,” a survivor said after considering the map of events and reflecting on his memories of the night.

      Maria Papamina, a lawyer from the Greek Council for Refugees, one of two legal organisations representing between 40 and 50 survivors, said that there had been two towing attempts recounted to her team. Court documents also show that seven out of eight survivors gave accounts to the civil prosecutor of the presence of a rope, towing and a strong pull, in depositions conducted on 17 and 18 June.

      The exact circumstances of the sinking cannot be conclusively proved in the absence of visual evidence. Several survivors testified to having had their phones confiscated by the authorities and some mentioned having filmed videos moments before the sinking. Questions remain over why the newly acquired Greek coastguard vessel at the scene did not record the operation on its thermal cameras. The vessel, called the 920, was 90% financed by the EU to bolster the capabilities of Frontex in Greece and is part of the EU border agency’s joint operations in the country. Frontex recommends that “if feasible, all actions taken by … Frontex co-financed assets should be documented by video consistently”.

      In official statements the Greek coastguard said the operation was not recorded because the crew’s focus was on the rescue operation. But a source within the coastguard said cameras do not need constant manual operation and are there precisely to capture such incidents.

      The presence of masked men, described by two survivors as attaching a rope to the trawler, is also documented in the ship’s log, which includes an entry about a special ops team known as KEA joining the 920 that night.

      According to coastguard sources, it would not be unusual to deploy KEA – typically used in risky situations such as suspected arms or drug smuggling at sea – given the vessel’s unknown status, but one source said that their presence suggested the vessel should have been intercepted on security and maritime safety grounds alone.

      One source described the failure to mobilise help closer to the incident as “incomprehensible”. The 920 was deployed from Chania, in Crete, about 150 nautical miles from the site of the sinking. The source said the coastguard had somewhat smaller but still capable vessels, based in Patras, Kalamata, Neapoli Voion and even Pylos itself. The 920 was ordered by coastguard HQ to “locate” the trawler at about 3pm local time on 13 June. It finally made contact close to midnight. An eyewitness official confirmed another vessel was stationed in Kalamata on 14 June and could have reached the trawler within a couple of hours. “It should have been a ‘send everything you’ve got’ situation. The trawler was in clear need of assistance,” the source said.

      The Greek coastguard and Frontex were alerted to the trawler on the morning of 13 June. Both agencies had photographed it from the air but no search and rescue operation was conducted – according to the Greek side, because the boat had refused assistance. Authorities received an urgent SOS said to have been relayed to them at 5.53pm local time by the small boats emergency hotline Alarmphone, which was in contact with people on board.

      Two of the coastguard sources told the Guardian they believed towing was a likely reason for the boat capsizing. This would not be without precedent. In 2014, an attempt to tow a refugee boat off the coast of Farmakonisi cost 11 lives. Greek courts cleared the coastguard, but the European court of human rights passed a damning judgment in 2022.

      Allegations have also been made that survivors’ statements were tampered with. Two rounds of testimonies were given – first to the coastguard and then to a civil prosecutor – both seen by the Guardian. Testimonies to the coastguard by two separate survivors of different nationalities are word for word the same when describing the sinking: “We were too many people on the boat, which was old and rusty … this is why it capsized and sank in the end.”

      Under oath to the civil prosecutor, days later, the same survivors describe towing incidents and blame the Greek coastguard for the sinking. The same Syrian survivor who stated in his coastguard testimony that the trawler capsized due to its age and overcrowding would later testify: “When they stepped on it, and I am sorry to mention this, our boat sank. I believe the reason was the towing by the Greek boat.”

      Brussels has asked for a “transparent” investigation into the wreck, while there is frustration within Frontex, which repeatedly offered assets to Greek authorities – a plane twice and later a drone – but received no reply. Although Frontex is facing mounting calls to pull out of Greece, the Guardian understands it is considering less drastic measures such as discontinuing co-financing of Greek coastguard vessels.

      The Coast Guard said it “would not comment on operational issues or the ongoing investigation which is confidential according to a Supreme Court Order.”

      Nine Egyptians on the trawler have been arrested on charges including involuntary manslaughter, causing a shipwreck and migrant smuggling; they deny wrongdoing. According to Guardian information, the accused testified there were two towing attempts, the second resulting in the sinking of the boat. A brother of one of the accused said his sibling paid about £3,000 to be on the boat, amounting to proof, he said, that he was not a smuggler.

      In Greece and beyond, survivors and victims’ families are trying to understand what happened. Three Pakistani survivors said they flew from Pakistan through Dubai or Egypt to Libya. Two believed they would fly from Libya to Italy and were shocked on seeing the trawler. “I can’t sleep properly. When I sleep I feel as if I am sinking into the water and will die,” one said.

      Nearly half of the estimated 750 people on board are thought to have been Pakistani citizens taking an emerging people-smuggling route to Italy. Pakistani authorities estimate that 115 came from Gujranwala in the east of the country, a region known for its rice plantations and cotton fields but deeply mired in Pakistan’s economic crisis.

      Ahmed Farouq, who lives on the outskirts of the city of Gujranwala, lost his son in the Pylos shipwreck. Talking of the alleged towing, he saids: “They wanted it to sink. Why didn’t they save the people first? If they don’t want illegal migrants, let them deport us, but don’t let us drown.”

      https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2023/jul/10/greek-shipwreck-hi-tech-investigation-suggests-coastguard-responsible-f

    • Greek coastguard ’pressured’ disaster survivors to blame Egyptian men

      New evidence found by BBC News casts further doubt on the Greek coastguard’s version of events surrounding last month’s deadly migrant boat sinking, in which up to 600 people died.

      Two survivors have described how the coastguard pressed them to identify nine Egyptians on board as traffickers.

      A new video of the overcrowded boat foundering at sea also challenges the Greek coastguard’s account.

      It was taken when the boat was said to be on a “steady course”.

      BBC Verify has confirmed the footage was filmed when the coastguard claimed the boat was not in need of rescue - and was in fact filmed by the coastguard itself.

      We have also confirmed that the larger vessel in the background is the oil tanker Faithful Warrior, which had been asked to give supplies to the migrant boat.

      The official Greek coastguard account had already been challenged in a BBC Verify report - but now we have seen court documents which show serious discrepancies between survivors’ witness statements taken by the coastguards, and the in-person evidence later presented to a judge.

      A translator has also come forward with his account of a people-smuggling investigation last year, after another group of migrants were rescued by the coastguard. He describes how witnesses from that incident were intimidated by the coastguard. The legal case collapsed before it could reach trial.

      The revelations raise fresh questions about how the Greek authorities handle such disasters.

      Both the Greek coastguard and Greek government did not comment and declined our requests for interview.
      A map of a section of the Mediterranean Sea showing the possible route taken by the migrant boat off the coast of Libya, near the city of Tobruk. The possible route shows the last approximate location of the boat before it sunk and the path taken by the Faithful Warrior, which had made contact with the boat. Also shown is the Greek port city of Pylos.

      Survivors ’silenced and intimidated’

      Soon after the 14 June sinking, nine Egyptian men were detained and charged with manslaughter and people-smuggling.

      But two survivors of the disaster say migrants were silenced and intimidated by Greek authorities, after suggesting the coastguards may have been to blame for the tragedy.

      For the past month, allegations have been made that the coastguard used a rope to tow the fishing vessel, causing it to sink.

      The two survivors we spoke to in Athens - who we are calling Ahmad and Musaab to protect their identities - say that is what happened.

      “They attached a rope from the left. Everyone moved to the right side of our boat to balance it,” says Musaab. “The Greek vessel moved off quickly causing our boat to flip. They kept dragging it for quite a distance.”

      The men described how they spent two hours in the water before being picked up by the coastguard.

      When I ask how they knew it was that amount of time, Musaab says his watch was still working so he could tell.

      Once on land, in Kalamata, they claim the coastguard told survivors to “shut up” when they started to talk about how the Greek authorities had caused the disaster.

      “When people replied by saying the Greek coastguard was the cause, the official in charge of the questioning asked the interpreter to tell the interviewee to stop talking,” says Ahmad.

      Ahmad says those rescued were told to be grateful they hadn’t died.

      He says there were shouts of: “You have survived death! Stop talking about the incident! Don’t ask more questions about it!”

      he men say they are scared to speak out publicly because they fear they too will be accused like the Egyptians.

      “If there was a fair system in place, we would contribute to this case,” says Ahmad.

      The men told us they had both paid $4,500 (£3,480) for a spot on the boat. Ahmad’s younger brother was also on board. He is still missing.
      Collapsing court cases

      As well as this testimony given to us by survivors, we have seen court documents which raise questions about the way evidence is being gathered to be presented in court.

      In initial statements from five survivors, none mentioned the coastguard trying to tow the migrant vessel with a rope. But days later, in front of a judge, all explained that there had been a failed attempt to tow it.

      One initial statement reads:

      But the same witness later told a judge:

      BBC Verify has not spoken to these witnesses and so we can’t say why their accounts changed.

      The Greek coastguard initially denied using a rope - but later backtracked, admitting one had been used. But it said it was only to try to board the vessel and assess the situation. It said this was at least two hours before the fishing vessel capsized.

      Eighty-two people are confirmed dead in the sinking, but the United Nations estimates as many as 500 more lost their lives.

      The Greek authorities say the charged Egyptian men are part of a smuggling ring and were identified by fellow passengers. They face up to life imprisonment if found guilty.

      Some survivors allege some of the nine suspects mistreated those on board - while other testimony says some were actually trying to help.

      But Ahmad and Musaab told us the coastguard had instructed all of the survivors to say that the nine Egyptian men were to blame for trafficking them.

      “They were imprisoned and were wrongly accused by the Greek authorities as an attempt to cover their crime,” says Musaab.

      A Greek Supreme Criminal Court deputy prosecutor is carrying out an investigation, but calls - including from the UN - for an international, independent inquiry have so far been ignored. The European Commission has indicated it has faith in the Greek investigation.

      But Ahmad and Musaab are not alone in their concerns about the Greek coastguard.
      Interpreter comes forward to BBC

      When the nine Egyptian men were arrested in the hours after the shipwreck, it was widely reported as an example of efficient detective work by the Greek authorities.

      But for Farzin Khavand it rang alarm bells. He feared history was repeating itself.

      He says he witnessed Greek coastguards put two innocent Iranian men in the frame for people-smuggling last year, following the rescue of 32 migrants whose boat had got into trouble crossing from Turkey.

      Mr Khavand, a UK citizen who speaks Farsi and has lived in the Kalamata area for 20 years, acted as a translator during the coastguard’s investigation into what happened then.

      He says the migrants - 28 from Afghanistan and four from Iran - explained that they had set off from Turkey and been at sea for eight days before being rescued.

      During this time, the Greek coastguard had approached the boat, before leaving, he was told.

      Two Arabic-speaking men had abandoned the boat after the engine blew up, Mr Khavand was told by the Afghan migrants. They said that most people on board had taken turns to try to steer the stricken boat to safety - including the two accused Iranians, who had paid to be on board like everyone else.

      “They [the Iranian men] were highly traumatised,” Mr Khavand said.

      “They were repeating to me that they’d never even seen an ocean before they set off in Turkey. And they kept being told they were the captain and they said: ’We know nothing about the boat. We can’t even swim.’”

      One of the two accused - a man called Sayeed who was facing a long prison sentence - had been rescued with his young son, explained Mr Khavand.

      “I asked him ’Why did you take a six-year-old child on a boat?’ And he said the smugglers told us it’s only two hours’ journey.”

      Mr Khavand relayed their accounts to the coastguard, exactly as it had been told to him - but he says when he saw the transcripts, the Afghans’ testimony had changed. He fears they altered their stories after pressure from the Greek authorities.

      He says the Iranians told him that some of their fellow Afghan passengers had been leaned on by the coastguard to name them as the people-smugglers - to avoid being “treated unpleasantly”, threatened with prison, and being “returned to the Taliban”.

      The case eventually collapsed. Mr Khavand says he was not willing to assist the Greek coastguard again. He says when Sayeed and his son were released from custody the €1,500 (£1,278) that had been confiscated from them was not returned.

      “The scene ended with me thinking I don’t want to do this again because they were not trying to get to the bottom of the truth. They were trying to pick a couple of guys and accuse them of being people smugglers.”

      All of these accusations were put to the Greek authorities by the BBC - but we have received no response. Our request for an interview with Greece’s minister of maritime affairs - who oversees the coastguard - was also rejected.
      Greece previously accused of human rights violations

      Kalamata lawyer Chrysanthi Kaouni says she has seen other criminal cases brought against alleged people smugglers which have troubled her.

      She has been involved in more than 10 such cases, she tells us.

      “My concerns are around the translations, the way evidence is gathered and - later on - the ability of the defendants to challenge this evidence,” she said.

      “Because of these three points, I don’t think there are enough safeguards according to the international law, and in the end I don’t believe justice is done.”

      A new study has found that the average trial in Greece for migrants accused of people smuggling lasted just 37 minutes and the average prison sentence given was 46 years.

      The study, commissioned by The Greens/European Free Alliance group in the European Parliament, looked at 81 trials involving 95 people - all of whom were tried for smuggling in eight different areas of Greece between February 2020 and March 2023.

      The study claims verdicts were reached often on the testimony of a single police or coastguard officer and, in more than three-quarters of the cases, they didn’t appear in court for their evidence to be cross-examined.

      Ahmad says he and the other survivors now want authorities to recover the shipwreck and the people that went down with it, but they have been told it’s too difficult and the water is too deep.

      He compares this to the vast amounts of money and resources spent on searching for five people on the Titan submersible in the North Atlantic in June.

      “But we were hundreds,” he says. “It’s not just a ship. It’s our friends and family.”

      https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66154654

    • Italy warned of dead children on migrant ship hours before it capsized

      The findings of an investigation by Welt am Sonntag and

      POLITICO raise questions about whether the authorities knew the boat was in distress earlier than they admitted.

      Early on the morning of the Adriana’s final day at sea, the Italian authorities sent a troubling warning to their EU and Greek colleagues: Two children had died aboard the overloaded migrant boat.

      The alert was sent at 8:01 a.m. UTC, just over an hour after the Italians initially spotted the vessel at 6:51 a.m., an investigation by Welt am Sonntag and POLITICO found. The ship would later stall out in the ocean and capsize that night, killing hundreds of migrants on board.

      The new details are revealed in an internal document at the EU border agency Frontex and seen by Welt, part of a “serious incident report” Frontex is compiling on the tragedy.

      The findings raise questions about whether the authorities knew of serious distress on the boat much earlier than they have admitted. The document further complicates the timeline European authorities have given about the boat — Frontex has said its own plane was the first to discover the Adriana at 9:47 a.m., while the Greek government has said it was alerted around 8 a.m.

      According to the internal document, Rome’s warning went to both Frontex and the Greek coast guard’s central office for rescue operations in Piraeus, which sits on the coast near Athens. Yet despite the alert, the Greek authorities did not send a coast guard vessel to the boat until 7:40 p.m., nearly 12 hours later. The boat then capsized around 11 p.m., roughly 15 hours after Rome’s notice first came through, leaving approximately 600 people dead.

      Survivors have said the Greek coast guard’s attempts to attach ropes to the ship caused it to capsize — accounts Greek officials say are not definitive. Only 104 people were brought to shore alive.

      Frontex declined to comment on the internal document showing the Italian warning, citing the “ongoing investigations” and referring to a June 16 statement. That statement lists a chronology of events starting at 9:47 a.m. with the Frontex plane spotting the boat.

      Dimitris Kairidis, Greece’s newly appointed migration minister, told POLITICO in Brussels that he had not seen the Frontex note, and he neither confirmed nor denied that Athens had received the Rome alert mentioning dead children.

      There is, he said, an “independent judicial investigation,” and if anyone is found responsible, “there will definitely be consequences.”

      “But until then,” he added, “we should not rush to conclusions and bow to political pressure.”

      Asked for comment, the Greek government referred to a statement on its coast guard website from June 14, which mentions information coming from Rome around 8 a.m. It doesn’t say whether that information included a warning about dead children on board.

      The Italian government did not respond to a request for comment.

      Greece has faced mounting political pressure over the tragedy.

      German lawmaker Clara Bünger, a member of The Left, is pushing for a review of the drama that unfolded off the shore of Pylos.

      She told Welt that “upon sighting such an overcrowded boat, Frontex should have immediately issued a mayday distress signal; even more so if Frontex knew that there were already Tuesday morning about two dead children on board.”

      That this didn’t happen, she added, is “outrageous and unforgivable.”

      Frontex has been trying to rehab its reputation under new Director Hans Leijtens, but Bünger argued he is on a doomed mission. Frontex, she argued, should just be dissolved.

      “This project has failed miserably,” she said.

      Erik Marquardt, a German European Parliament member from the Greens, pointed out that Germany chairs the Frontex Management Board.

      “I expect the German government to enforce full transparency here,” he said.

      The European Commission, the EU’s executive, said it does not comment on “ongoing investigations” or “leaks.”

      But the Commission stressed: “The facts about the tragic incident off the coast of Pylos must be clarified. That is the priority now.”

      https://www.politico.eu/article/italy-warned-greece-of-dead-children-on-migrant-ship-hour-before-it-capsize

    • Frontex und Athen wussten 15 Stunden vor Bootsdrama von toten Kindern an Bord

      Mitte Juni starben vor der griechischen Küste 600 Migranten, als ihr Boot kenterte. Über die Verantwortung für die schlimmste Katastrophe seit Jahren im Mittelmeer wird seitdem gestritten. Nun kommt heraus: Eine wichtige Information zu den wahren Abläufen wird nach Informationen von WELT AM SONNTAG bewusst zurückgehalten.

      Die EU-Grenzschutzagentur Frontex sowie die griechische Regierung verschweigen die wahren Abläufe eines Bootsdramas im Juni mit rund 600 Toten. Wie WELT AM SONNTAG und das ebenfalls zum Axel-Springer-Verlag gehörende Nachrichtenunternehmen „Politico“ erfuhren, muss die hochdramatische Situation vor der griechischen Küste Athen und den Grenzschützern viel früher bewusst gewesen sein als bislang bekannt.

      Frontex hatte in einer Stellungnahme mitgeteilt, als Erstes habe ein agentureigenes Flugzeug das völlig überladene Boot um 9.47 Uhr (UTC) entdeckt. Allerdings soll das Boot – so geht es aus einem internen Frontex-Dokument hervor – bereits um 6.51 Uhr erstmals gesichtet worden sein – und zwar durch italienische Behörden.

      Um 8.01 Uhr alarmierte die Seenotrettungstelle Rom demnach sowohl Frontex als auch die Leitstelle in Piräus, von wo aus Rettungseinsätze der griechischen Küstenwache gesteuert werden. Noch brisanter: Bestandteil dieses Alarms war die Information, dass an Bord des Bootes bereits zwei Kinder verstorben seien. Wie Italien an seine Informationen zu der Existenz des Bootes und den toten Kindern gelangte, ist unklar.

      Der Alarm ist nach Informationen von WELT AM SONNTAG Teil der Notizen des noch in Arbeit befindlichen „Serious Incident Report“, der das Aktenzeichen 12595/2023 trägt. Trotz des Alarms aus Roms unternahmen die griechischen Behörden lange nichts. Erst gegen 19.40 Uhr traf ein Schiff der Küstenwache in der Nähe der Migranten ein.

      Das Boot kenterte schließlich gegen 23 Uhr, 15 Stunden nach dem Alarm aus Rom. Unmittelbar davor hatten griechische Küstenwächter Seile an das Boot angebracht, was – so berichteten Überlebende – zum Kentern geführt habe. Nur 104 Menschen wurden lebend an Land gebracht.

      WELT AM SONNTAG konfrontierte Frontex mit den Informationen zu dem Alarm aus Rom. Wann ging dieser ein? Was war die Reaktion der Agentur? In einer schriftlichen Antwort hieß es, man könne „aufgrund von laufenden Ermittlungen“ kein Statement abgeben, das über jenes vom 16. Juni hinausgeht. Darin wird die Chronologie der Ereignisse geschildert – mit 9.47 Uhr als Startpunkt, der Sichtung des Bootes durch ein Frontex-Flugzeug.

      Der neu ernannte griechische Migrationsminister Dimitris Kairidis sagte in Brüssel, er habe die Frontex-Notiz nicht gesehen; weder bestätigte noch dementierte er, dass Athen diese Information aus Rom erhalten hat. Er erklärte, dass „eine unabhängige gerichtliche Untersuchung“ stattfinde. Sofern jemand für schuldig befunden werde, „wird es definitiv Konsequenzen geben.

      Bis dahin solle man „keine voreiligen Schlüsse ziehen und sich dem politischen Druck beugen“. Am Freitag verwies Athen auf ein Statement auf der Küstenwache-Webseite vom 14. Juni, in dem eine Info zu dem Boot aus Rom gegen acht Uhr erwähnt wird. Von toten Kindern kein Wort. Die italienische Regierung beantwortete eine Anfrage zu dem Sachverhalt nicht.

      Der Druck aus der Politik auf die Behörde und Athen wächst derweil. Die Linken-Bundestagsabgeordnete Clara Bünger, die auf eine Aufarbeitung des Pylos-Dramas drängt, sagte WELT AM SONNTAG: „Beim Sichten eines derart überfüllten Bootes hätte Frontex sofort einen Mayday-Notruf machen müssen. Das gilt umso mehr, wenn Frontex wusste, dass es am Dienstagmorgen bereits zwei tote Kinder an Bord gab.“ Dass das nicht geschehen ist, sei „ungeheuerlich und unverzeihbar“. Frontex-Direktor Hans Leijtens hätte angekündigt, er wolle Vertrauen wiederherstellen und Menschenrechte achten: „Dieses Vorhaben ist krachend gescheitert.“ Bünger sagte, Frontex sei nicht reformierbar – und forderte die Auflösung.

      Der EU-Parlamentarier Erik Marquardt (Grüne) verwies darauf, dass Deutschland den Vorsitz im Frontex-Verwaltungsrat hat: „Ich erwarte von der Bundesregierung, dass sie hier vollständige Transparenz durchsetzt.“ Derartige Versprechen seitens Leijtens würden bislang nicht eingehalten.

      Die EU-Kommission ließ verlauten, man äußere sich „weder zu laufenden Untersuchungen noch zu Leaks“, machte aber klar: „Die Fakten über den tragischen Vorfall vor der Küste von Pylos müssen geklärt werden. Das ist jetzt die Priorität.“

      https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article246382076/Migration-Frontex-und-Athen-wussten-15-Stunden-vor-Bootsdrama-von-toten-Kindern

    • Pylos shipwreck: the Greek authorities must ensure that effective investigations are conducted

      In a letter to the Prime Minister of Greece, Kyriakos Mitsotakis, published today, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Dunja Mijatović, stresses that Greece has the legal obligation to conduct effective investigations into the Pylos shipwreck, which resulted in the death of more than 80 persons with many hundreds still missing, to establish the facts and, where appropriate, to lead to the punishment of those responsible.

      The Commissioner expresses concern about reports of pressure having been exercised on survivors and about allegations of irregularities in the collection of evidence and testimonies, which may have led to a minimisation of the focus on certain actors in this tragedy, including the Greek Coast Guard. In the case of Safi and Others v. Greece, the European Court of Human Rights spelled out the parameters of an effective investigation into a similar event. Among those parameters, the Commissioner notes that independence is critical to securing the trust of the victims’ relatives, the survivors, the public and Greece’s international partners. While stressing that investigations cannot be limited to the role of alleged smugglers, she requests clarifications on the scope of the investigations initiated after the shipwreck.

      Referring to the right of missing persons’ families to know the truth, the Commissioner seeks information on the efforts made to ensure that the remains of deceased migrants are located, respected, identified, and buried.

      Expressing concerns at restrictions on survivors’ freedom of movement and the way asylum interviews have been conducted, she requests information on the concrete measures that Greece has taken to abide by its human rights obligations regarding reception conditions and access to the asylum procedure.

      "In my view, the shipwreck of 14 June is unfortunately not an isolated incident”, writes the Commissioner. This should prompt a reconsideration of the approach to refugees and migrants arriving by sea at the political, policy and practical level. In this context, the Commissioner urges the Prime Minister to ensure that Greece abides by its international obligations regarding search and rescue, both under maritime law and human rights law.

      Finally, the Commissioner reiterates her call for the Greek government to actively create and maintain an enabling legal framework and a political and public environment which is conducive to the existence and functioning of civil society organisations and to the work of human rights defenders and investigative journalists, and to stop their criminalisation and other forms of harassment.

      https://www.coe.int/en/web/commissioner/-/pylos-shipwreck-the-greek-authorities-must-ensure-that-effective-investigations

      Pour télécharger la lettre:
      https://rm.coe.int/letter-addressed-to-the-prime-minister-of-greece-by-dunja-mijatovic-co/1680ac03ce

      #conseil_de_l'Europe

    • Après le naufrage d’un bateau avec 750 personnes à bord au large de la Grèce, une enquête de la médiatrice européenne sur le rôle de Frontex

      #Emily_O’Reilly, dont le rôle est de demander des comptes aux institutions et aux agences de l’Union européenne, a annoncé avoir ouvert cette procédure à la suite du naufrage survenu en juin, le pire en Méditerranée depuis 2016.

      Un peu plus d’un mois après le pire naufrage d’un bateau de migrants depuis 2016 en Méditerrannée, survenu mi-juin au large de la Grèce et qui a fait des centaines de morts, la médiatrice européenne a annoncé, mercredi 26 juillet, avoir ouvert une enquête afin de « clarifier le rôle » de Frontex, l’agence de l’Union européenne (UE) chargée des frontières, dans les opérations de sauvetage.

      « Alors que le rôle des autorités grecques fait l’objet d’une enquête au niveau national, celui de Frontex dans les opérations de recherche et de sauvetage doit également être clarifié », a souligné dans un communiqué Emily O’Reilly. Le rôle de la médiatrice est de demander des comptes aux institutions et aux agences de l’UE.

      « Il a été signalé que Frontex avait bien alerté les autorités grecques de la présence du navire et proposé son assistance ; mais, ce qui n’est pas clair, c’est ce qu’elle aurait pu ou aurait dû faire d’autre », a-t-elle ajouté.

      Le patron de Frontex, Hans Leijtens, a salué l’ouverture de cette enquête, assurant être prêt à coopérer « en toute transparence » pour expliquer le rôle de son agence. « Si nous ne coordonnons pas les opérations de recherche et de sauvetage, sauver des vies en mer est essentiel. Nous apportons une aide aux autorités nationales lorsque cela est nécessaire », a-t-il ajouté dans un message sur X (ex-Twitter).

      Partage d’informations entre Frontex et les autorités nationales

      Le chalutier vétuste et surchargé, qui était parti de Libye, a fait naufrage au large du sud de Grèce dans la nuit du 13 au 14 juin. Il transportait environ 750 personnes à son bord, mais seule une centaine de migrants ont survécu.

      Depuis le naufrage, les interrogations sont tournées autour de la lenteur de l’intervention des gardes-côtes grecs et sur les causes du chavirement de l’embarcation.

      Par cette enquête sur le rôle de Frontex, Mme O’Reilly veut en particulier se pencher sur le partage d’informations entre l’agence européenne et les autorités nationales en matière d’opérations de recherche et de sauvetage.

      Elle la coordonnera aux côtés du médiateur grec, Andreas Pottakis, qui a « la compétence d’examiner » la façon dont les autorités grecques se sont occupées du bateau Adriana.

      Mi-juillet, les eurodéputés ont réclamé l’élaboration d’une « stratégie de recherche et de sauvetage fiable et permanente » des migrants en Méditerranée. Dans une résolution transpartisane, dépourvue de caractère contraignant, ils ont appelé Bruxelles à apporter aux Etats membres de l’UE un « soutien matériel, financier et opérationnel » pour renforcer leurs capacités de sauvetage en mer.

      Les élus du Parlement européen citaient les chiffres de l’Organisation internationale pour les migrations (OIM), selon laquelle plus de 27 600 personnes ont disparu en Méditerranée depuis 2014.

      https://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2023/07/26/naufrage-d-un-bateau-de-migrants-au-large-de-la-grece-la-mediatrice-europeen

    • Smuggler, Warlord, EU ally

      The lead smugglers behind the Pylos shipwreck are closely linked to General Khalifa Haftar, the Libyan warlord who EU leaders are partnering with to curb migration

      On the night of 13 June, a vessel carrying around 750 men, women and children mainly from Pakistan, Egypt and Syria capsized in Greek waters. Only 104 men survived. All women and children died.

      In an earlier investigation we revealed Greek coastguard efforts to cover up their role in the fatal shipwreck. The country’s naval court has since launched a preliminary investigation into the coastguard’s response to the sinking, with no arrests or suspensions of officers so far.

      The only arrests made were those of nine Egyptians, accused in a separate inquiry of being part of the smuggling network behind the deadly voyage. They were charged with six counts including illegal trafficking of foreigners, organisation crime and manslaughter by negligence.

      Using the contacts and documents already available to us, we pursued a follow-up investigation to establish the truth about any smugglers behind the fatal sea crossing, with the aim of identifying the key players and establishing the extent to which the nine Egyptians in prison in Greece are actually responsible.
      METHODS

      Lighthouse Reports, Der Spiegel, SIRAJ, El País and Reporters United used the previously established relationships with survivors and their families, as well as a network of sources in Libya, to investigate the smuggling network behind the Pylos wreck.

      We also looked into the ongoing court case against nine alleged smugglers, analysing confidential court documents and speaking to five of the families of those arrested.
      STORYLINES

      While investigating the circumstances that led to the shipwreck and Greece’s responsibility in it, we spoke to 17 survivors.

      Many named the key smugglers involved in organising the trip during our interviews with them – none of them were people on board the ship.

      Some were Eastern Libyan nationals with ties to the region’s powerful ruler, Khalifa Haftar.

      One name stood out: Muhammad Saad Al-Kahshi Al-Mnfi. Three sources identified him as a key player in the smuggling operation: a survivor, a lower level smuggler and a Libyan insider all gave his name.

      Al-Kahshi works for a special forces navy unit called the “frogmen”, run by a family member of his, Bahar Al-Tawati Al-Mnfi. Al-Tawati Al-Mnfi works under the direct orders of Khalifa Haftar.

      One survivor explained that Al-Kahshi Al-Mnfi used his position to issue the licence that allowed the boat (which came from Egypt) to navigate in Libyan waters and made sure the Libyan coast guards were paid to shut off the marine radar devices that detect ship movements to allow the departure.

      We found that the network goes far beyond Al-Kahshi Al-Mnfi.

      Survivors, insiders and analysts explained that the trip was organised with wide ranging support from powerful people reporting to Haftar.

      Libya expert Jalel Harchaoui said the “migrant business” had been flourishing in Eastern Libya in the last 18 months. “Haftar cannot say that he’s not aware,” he added. “He can’t say that he’s not involved.”

      “All trips are overseen by his son, Saddam Haftar” said one survivor. “Saddam leads the cooperation himself or assigns one of the frogmen battalions [this may have been the case for the Pylos trip] or the 2020 battalion, depending on who has more migrants to pay the fees.”

      Five survivors who flew from Syria to Libya describe how immigration officials facilitated their arrival at Benghazi’s military airport. One said: “At the airport, a person took my passport, went to immigration office, put a stamp and took us outside”.

      There was a curfew in Eastern Libya on the night of departure (حظر التجول ليلاً في طبرق الليبية), yet the survivors we interviewed said that it was at night that they, along with hundreds of passengers, were taken to a small bay near Wadi Arzouka, east of Tobruk, and boarded onto the vessel.

      Militias supported by Khalifa Haftar are not only involved in smuggling, they are also active in illegal “pullbacks” of migrants in EU waters.

      At least two pullbacks (in May and July this year) were carried out by a militia (Tariq Bin Ziyad) controlled by Haftar’s son, including one in Maltese waters.

      At least four of the people who died in the Pylos shipwreck were on the boat that was pulled back by the Tariq Bin Ziyad militia on 25 May, according to family members.

      These findings raise serious questions about EU member states’ migration prevention policies.

      It is known by EU authorities that Eastern Libyan militias answering to Haftar carry out both pullback and smuggling operations. The IOM and the UNHCR briefed EU officials on an increase in departures from eastern Libya , describing them as a “lucrative source of income for the eastern Libyan rulers involved”.

      In spite of this, Italy and Malta are making deals with Haftar to prevent migration.

      In May, Haftar met with Italian PM Meloni to discuss migration related issues and in June Italy’s interior minister said they would ask Haftar to collaborate in stopping departures.

      The same month, for the first time, a Maltese delegation met Haftar in Benghazi to discuss security challenges in the region, with particular emphasis on irregular migration.

      Internal EU documents show the commission is looking for ways to curb arrivals from Benghazi’s airport with the collaboration of local operators.

      Harchaoui described Italian efforts to encourage Khalifa Haftar to stop departures as “bribery” and pointed to “a very clear admission of how Italy intends to work and what it promised to Haftar: if you reduce the human smuggling volumes, we will inject capital”.

      Meanwhile, there’s growing evidence that nine Egyptians imprisoned for trafficking in Greece are being scapegoated.

      We spoke to the families of five of the nine Egyptians under arrest – all of them say that they were passengers, not smugglers.

      Three of them provided evidence that their relatives paid for their trip, indicating that it’s highly unlikely that they were involved in organising the smuggling operation.

      We were able to verify the identity of a smuggler who asked one of the accused men for money ahead of the trip.

      We previously found that witness testimony provided to the coast guard had been tampered with, including survivors’ answers to questions about smugglers.

      In the documents, two answers to questions about smugglers contain identical sentences.

      Those who were interrogated by the coast guard mentioned being pressured to place the blame on the nine Egyptians later indicted.

      https://www.lighthousereports.com/investigation/smuggler-warlord-eu-ally

    • Naufrage au large de la Grèce : deux ONG pointent les défaillances des autorités grecques

      Dans un rapport publié le 3 août, Amnesty International et Human Rights Watch reviennent sur les circonstances troubles du drame survenu aux portes de l’Europe dans la nuit du 13 au 14 juin, qui a coûté la vie à au moins six cents personnes. Les associations réclament une enquête « efficace, indépendante et impartiale ».

      C’est un naufrage qui a d’abord marqué les esprits de par son ampleur : pas moins de 750 personnes se trouvaient à bord d’un bateau de pêche en bois, L’Adriana, au moment où il a chaviré, dans la nuit du 13 au 14 juin, au large de Pýlos en Grèce. Partie de Tobrouk en Libye pour rejoindre l’Italie, l’embarcation surchargée transportait des ressortissants syriens, égyptiens, palestiniens ou pakistanais, dont de nombreuses femmes et enfants placés dans la cale pour être « à l’abri » des éventuelles intempéries ou du soleil.

      Mais on retient aussi les circonstances troubles dans lequel il s’est produit. Très vite après le naufrage, des premières voix parmi la centaine de rescapés se sont élevées pour pointer le rôle potentiel des gardes-côtes grecs dans ce drame.

      Mediapart a documenté, dès le 17 juin, cette version différente de celle avancée par les autorités du pays. Une enquête de la BBC est venue l’appuyer, puis le New York Times a suivi : des témoignages de survivant·es attestent que les gardes-côtes ont non seulement tardé à organiser un sauvetage, mais ont aussi tenté de tirer le bateau à l’aide d’une corde, pouvant ainsi avoir contribué à le faire chavirer.

      Après un déplacement de neuf jours en Grèce et une vingtaine d’entretiens réalisés avec des exilé·es sur place, Amnesty International et Human Rights Watch ont relevé également les « disparités extrêmement préoccupantes » entre les récits des survivant·es du Pýlos et la version des événements livrée par les autorités.

      Les survivant·es interrogé·es par les deux ONG « ont systématiquement déclaré que le navire des gardes-côtes grecs envoyé sur les lieux avait attaché une corde à L’Adriana et l’avait remorqué, le faisant tanguer, puis chavirer », peut-on lire dans le rapport d’enquête publié conjointement ce jeudi 3 août.

      Aux ONG, les responsables des gardes-côtes ont de leur côté affirmé que leurs équipes s’étaient approchées du bateau, reconnaissant avoir utilisé une corde, mais qu’après de « premières négociations », les passagers avaient repoussé la corde pour poursuivre leur trajet.
      Le rôle des gardes-côtes grecs et de Frontex interrogé

      Une version contredite par le témoignage des survivant·es interrogé·es : « Peu importe leur position sur le bateau, les survivants disent tous avoir ressenti le mouvement du bateau une fois tracté, qui avançait alors très vite alors que le moteur ne fonctionnait plus, précise Alice Autin, chercheuse pour la division Europe et Asie centrale à Human Rights Watch. Tous sont d’accord pour dire que c’est cela qui a fait vaciller le bateau, avant de le faire chavirer. »

      Frontex a par ailleurs déclaré avoir repéré l’embarcation dès la veille du naufrage, ce qui a poussé certains acteurs à s’interroger sur le rôle de l’agence européenne de surveillance des frontières. Pourquoi n’est-elle pas intervenue pour venir en aide aux passagers ? A-t-elle bien alerté les autorités grecques pour qu’une opération de recherche et de sauvetage soit menée en urgence ?

      Dans un communiqué, Frontex a précisé que l’un de ses avions de surveillance « avait immédiatement informé les autorités compétentes », sans toutefois intervenir, au prétexte que les exilé·es avaient refusé « toute aide ». Le lendemain du drame, le patron de l’agence Hans Leijtens était en déplacement en Grèce pour « mieux comprendre ce qu’il s’était passé », et voir comment ses équipes pouvaient aider les autorités grecques, précisant que le fait de « sauver des vies était leur priorité ».

      Une version qui ne semble pas avoir convaincu la médiatrice européenne, qui a décidé, le 24 juillet dernier, d’ouvrir une enquête de sa propre initiative pour interroger le rôle de Frontex dans les opérations de recherche et de sauvetage à la suite du naufrage survenu en Grèce.

      « Il est clair que Frontex a joué un rôle important dans la mission de recherche et de sauvetage du point de vue de la coordination. À ce titre, je pense qu’il est possible de clarifier davantage son rôle dans de telles opérations », a déclaré dans une lettre ouverte Emily O’Reilly, qui occupe le poste de Médiateur européen.

      « Il a été signalé que Frontex avait bien alerté les autorités grecques de la présence du navire et proposé son assistance ; mais ce qui n’est pas clair, c’est ce qu’elle aurait pu ou aurait dû faire d’autre », a-t-elle souligné. Frontex s’est dite prête à coopérer « en toute transparence ».

      « Cela posera des questions importantes sur le rôle, les pratiques et les protocoles de l’agence dans le contexte des opérations [en mer] et sur les mesures qu’elle a prises pour se conformer à ses obligations en matière de droits fondamentaux et aux lois de l’UE », estiment Amnesty International et Human Rights Watch.
      Des appels à l’aide ignorés

      Les deux ONG s’interrogent aussi sur l’aide que les gardes-côtes grecs auraient pu apporter aux migrant·es dans les heures ayant précédé le naufrage. De hauts responsables des gardes-côtes leur auraient affirmé que « les personnes à bord du bateau limitaient leur demande d’aide à de l’eau et de la nourriture » et avaient exprimé leur volonté de poursuivre leur route vers l’Italie.

      Mais les survivant·es interrogé·es par Amnesty International et Human Rights Watch ont « déclaré que les passagers avaient demandé à être secourus » et qu’ils avaient entendu d’autres personnes à bord de l’embarcation appeler à l’aide lors d’un échange avec un téléphone satellite, plusieurs heures avant le naufrage. Certains auraient enlevé leur T-shirt pour le secouer en l’air et appeler à l’aide, d’autres auraient hurlé à l’attention des deux navires marchands croisés avant le drame.

      « Des récits concordent pour dire que des personnes ont perdu la vie à bord du bateau avant le naufrage et que l’un des corps a été placé sur le pont supérieur au-dessus de la cabine pour signifier l’urgence de la situation », poursuit Alice Autin d’Human rights watch. Et d’ajouter : « Les gardes-côtes grecs avaient la responsabilité de venir en aide aux passagers du bateau et il apparaît au vu des résultats de notre enquête qu’il y a des doutes sur la manière dont cela s’est déroulé. »

      Plusieurs survivants ont enfin déclaré que les autorités leur auraient confisqué leur téléphone après le naufrage, poursuivent les ONG. Or, certaines personnes auraient « tout filmé ». Ces téléphones pourraient, s’ils réapparaissaient, servir dans le cadre de l’enquête ouverte par la justice grecque.

      « Il est essentiel d’analyser ce qu’ils contiennent pour faire toute la lumière sur le déroulement des faits », conclut Alice Autin. Amnesty International et Human Rights Watch réclament une enquête « efficace, indépendante et impartiale ».

      https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/international/030823/naufrage-au-large-de-la-grece-deux-ong-pointent-les-defaillances-des-autor

    • Greece: Disparities in accounts of Pylos shipwreck underscore the need for human rights compliant inquiry

      Starkly divergent accounts from survivors and Greek authorities around the circumstances of the deadly Pylos shipwreck, underscore the urgent need for an effective, independent, and impartial investigation, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch said today. 

      The disparities between survivors’ accounts of the Pylos shipwreck and the authorities’ version of the events are extremely concerning

      The fishing vessel, Adriana, was carrying an estimated 750 people when it sank on 14 June off the coast of Pylos. In the aftermath, accounts from several of the 104 survivors suggest that the vessel was towed by a Greek coast guard boat, causing the fatal wreck.  The Greek authorities have strongly denied these claims.

      “The disparities between survivors’ accounts of the Pylos shipwreck and the authorities’ version of the events are extremely concerning” said Judith Sunderland, Associate Europe and Central Asia Director at Human Rights Watch.

      “The Greek authorities, with support and scrutiny from the international community, should ensure that there is a transparent investigation to provide truth and justice for survivors and families of the victims, and hold those responsible to account.”  

      A delegation from Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch visited Greece between 4 and 13 July 2023 as part of ongoing research into the circumstances of the shipwreck and steps toward accountability. They interviewed 19 survivors of the shipwreck, 4 relatives of the missing, and nongovernmental organizations, UN and international agencies and organizations, and representatives of the Hellenic Coast Guard and the Greek Police.

      The organizations’ initial observations confirm the concerns reported by several other reputable sources as to the dynamics of the shipwreck. Survivors interviewed by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch consistently stated that the Hellenic Coast Guard vessel dispatched to the scene attached a rope to the Adriana and started towing, causing it to sway and then capsize. The survivors also consistently said that passengers asked to be rescued, and that they witnessed others on the boat plead for a rescue by satellite phone in the hours before their boat capsized.  

      In a meeting with Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, senior officials of the Hellenic Coast Guard said individuals on the boat limited their request for assistance to food and water and expressed their intention to proceed to Italy. They said the crew of the Coast Guard vessel came close to the Adriana and used a rope to approach the boat to assess whether passengers wanted help, but that after the first “negotiations”, passengers threw the rope back and the boat continued its journey.

      This preventable tragedy demonstrates the bankruptcy of EU migration policies predicated on the racialized exclusion of people on the move and deadly deterrence

      Greek authorities have opened two criminal investigations, one targeted at the alleged smugglers, and another into the actions of the coast guard. It is vital for these investigations to comply with international human rights standards of impartiality, independence, and effectiveness. 

      To enhance the credibility of judicial investigations both in practice and perception, they should be under the supervision of the Supreme Court Prosecutor’s Office. Further, Greek authorities should ensure that the Greek Ombudsman’s office is promptly provided with information and resources necessary to carry out its functions as the National Mechanism for Investigating Incidents of Arbitrariness, in relation to any disciplinary investigation.   

      Several survivors said that the authorities confiscated their phones following the shipwreck but did not give them any related documentation or tell them how to retrieve their property. Nabil, a survivor of Syrian origin, told the organisations, “It’s not only the evidence of the wreck that has been taken from me, it is my memories of my friends who were lost, my life has been taken from me”. 

      The Greek authorities’ longstanding failure to ensure accountability for violent and unlawful pushbacks at the country’s borders raises concerns over their ability and willingness to carry out effective and independent investigations.

      Lessons should be learned from the European Court of Human Rights 2022 decision about the 2014 “Farmakonisi” shipwreck, in which survivors argued that their boat had capsized because the Hellenic Coast Guard used dangerous maneuvers to tow them towards Turkish waters. The Court condemned Greece for the authorities’ failures in handling rescue operations and for shortcomings in the subsequent investigation of the incident, including how victims’ testimony was handled.  

      In view of the seriousness and international significance of the Pylos tragedy, Greek authorities should seek out and welcome international and/or European assistance and cooperation in the conduct of national investigations as an additional guarantee of independence, effectiveness and transparency.  

      A full and credible investigation into the shipwreck should seek to clarify any responsibility for both the sinking of the ship and delays or shortcomings in the rescue efforts that may have contributed to the appalling loss of life. The investigation should involve taking the testimonies of all survivors, under conditions that guarantee their trust and safety.

      All forensic evidence, such as traces of communications, videos, and photographs, should be collected, assessed and safeguarded to facilitate accountability processes. Any property, such as cell phones, taken from survivors for investigative purposes should be appropriately logged and returned within a reasonable amount of time.  

      All of those involved in or with knowledge of the incident, including the Hellenic Coast Guard, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex), the captains and crews of the two merchant vessels, and others who took part in the rescue operation after the shipwreck should be invited or required to testify, as appropriate, and should cooperate fully and promptly with the investigations.

      To ensure this is the last, and not the latest, in an unconscionably long list of tragedies in the Mediterranean, the EU should reorient its border policies towards rescue at sea and safe and legal routes

      In parallel to the national investigation, the EU Ombudsman has announced that it will open an inquiry into the role of Frontex in search and rescue (SAR) activities in the Mediterranean, including in the Adriana shipwreck. This will pose important questions about the agency’s role, practices and protocols in the context of SAR operations and on what actions it has taken to comply with its fundamental rights obligations and EU laws during this and other shipwrecks.

      Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch are continuing to investigate the Pylos shipwreck and demand justice for all those harmed.

      “This preventable tragedy demonstrates the bankruptcy of EU migration policies predicated on the racialized exclusion of people on the move and deadly deterrence,” said Esther Major, Amnesty International’s Senior Research Adviser for Europe.

      “To ensure this is the last, and not the latest, in an unconscionably long list of tragedies in the Mediterranean, the EU should reorient its border policies towards rescue at sea and safe and legal routes for asylum seekers, refugees and migrants.”  

      Background 

      As part of their ongoing investigation, the organizations have sent letters requesting information to several key entities, including the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Insular Policy, the Prosecutors of the Supreme Court and of the Piraeus Naval Court and Frontex.

      On 13 June 2023, Frontex said its surveillance plane spotted the Adriana at 09:47 UTC (12:47 EEST/in Athens) and alerted authorities in Greece and Italy. In the following hours, two merchant vessels and later a Hellenic Coast Guard vessel interacted with the Adriana. After the boat capsized at around 2 a.m. EEST on 14 June, only 104 survivors, including several children, were rescued.

      The Prosecutor of Kalamata ordered the arrest of nine Egyptian nationals who survived the shipwreck on charges of smuggling, membership in an organized criminal network, manslaughter, and other serious crimes.

      Following an order by the Head of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Piraeus Naval Court, a prosecutor is currently conducting a preliminary investigation into the conditions of the shipwreck and the potential punishable offences by members of the Hellenic Coast Guard. The organizations have sought information with the Greek Minister of Maritime Affairs and Insular Policy about any disciplinary investigation opened into the actions of members of the Hellenic Coast Guard.

      https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/08/greece-disparities-in-accounts-of-pylos-shipwreck-underscore-the-need-for-h

  • La rédaction de France culture -France musique est en grève.
    https://twitter.com/annelaurechouin/status/1674293087965700096

    Nous protestons contre la disparition des journaux de France musique et la suppression du journal de 22h de France Culture
    Cette décision, purement comptable, menace les missions de service public de #Radio_France et la diversité de l’information. Tous les auditeurs, même la nuit, même sur France Musique, doivent avoir accès à l’information. Soutenez nous
    #RetourDeLinfoSurFranceMusique #RetourDu22hFranceCulture

    #grève #média #radio

  • L’#utopie de la #décroissance

    For economist #Timothée_Parrique, our survival depends on our ability to change our economic model to degrowth towards a post-growth economy.
    A researcher in ecological economics at Lund University in Sweden, his thesis “The political economy of degrowth” (2019) has been adapted into a mainstream book: “Slow down or perish. The economics of degrowth” (September 2022). In it, he explains the urgent need for a great slowdown of production in rich countries, the overcoming of the mythology of growth, and the dismantling of capitalism. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gfulzow1LGU


    #TedX #conférence #croissance_verte #croissance #décarboner #empreinte_écologique #économie #récession #limites_planétaires #green-washing #responsabilité #PIB #bien-être #justice_sociale #transition #contentement #post-croissance #capitalisme #post-capitalisme #solidarité #entraide #crise #écocide #économie_du_futur

    • The political economy of degrowth

      Qu’est-ce que la décroissance et quelles sont ses implications pour l’économie politique ? Divisée en trois parties, cette thèse explore le pourquoi, le quoi, et le comment de la décroissance.La première partie (De la croissance et des limites) étudie la nature, les causes, et les conséquences de la croissance économique. Chapitre 1 : Comprendre la croissance économique répond à plusieurs questions : Qu’est-ce qui croît exactement ? À quelle vitesse ? Quand et où est-ce que ça croît ? Comment est-ce que ça croît ? Et pourquoi est-ce que ça devrait croître ? Les trois chapitres suivants développent une triple objection à la croissance économique qui n’est plus possible (Chapitre 2 : Limites biophysiques de la croissance), plausible (Chapitre 3 : Limites socioéconomiques de la croissance), et souhaitable (Chapitre 4 : Limites sociales à la croissance).La deuxième partie (Éléments de décroissance) porte sur l’idée de la décroissance, en particulier son histoire, ses fondements théoriques, et ses controverses. Le Chapitre 5 : Origines et définitions retrace l’histoire du concept de 1968 à 2018. Le Chapitre 6 : Fondements théoriques présente une théorie normative de la décroissance comme déséconomisation, c’est-à-dire une réduction de l’importance de la rationalité et des pratiques économiques. Le Chapitre 7 : Controverses passe en revue les attaques reçues par le concept. Si la première partie a diagnostiqué la croissance économique comme étant le problème, cette partie propose une solution. L’argument principal est que la décroissance n’est pas seulement une critique mais aussi une alternative complète à la société de croissance.La troisième partie (Recettes de décroissance) concerne la transition d’une économie de croissance à une société de décroissance. La partie s’ouvre sur un inventaire des politiques mobilisées par les décroissants jusqu’à aujourd’hui (Chapitre 8 : Stratégies de changement). Les trois chapitres suivants, sur la propriété (Chapitre 9 : Transformer la propriété), le travail (Chapitre 10 : Transformer le travail) et l’argent (Chapitre 11 : Transformer l’argent) passent de la théorie à la pratique et transforment les valeurs et les principes de la décroissance en stratégies de transition. Le Chapitre 12 : Stratégie de transition décrit une méthode pour étudier l’interaction entre plusieurs politiques de décroissance, et cela pour mieux planifier la transition. Le message central de cette troisième partie est que la décroissance est un outil conceptuel puissant pour réfléchir à une transition vers la justice sociale et écologique.

      https://www.theses.fr/2019CLFAD003
      #économie_politique #thèse #PhD

  • Grève au « #JDD » : huit anciens directeurs soutiennent la #grève des #salariés
    https://www.lemonde.fr/actualite-medias/article/2023/06/26/greve-au-jdd-huit-anciens-directeurs-soutiennent-la-greve-des-salaries_61792

    article libre d’accès (pas réservé aux abonnés)

    "Huit anciens directeurs du Journal du dimanche (JDD) ont apporté, lundi 26 juin, leur soutien aux salariés de l’hebdomadaire en grève contre l’arrivée à sa direction du journaliste d’extrême droite Geoffroy Lejeune, venu de Valeurs actuelles. Cette arrivée « n’est pas seulement une provocation et la démonstration que l’extrême droite s’installe désormais tranquillement dans les médias, soulignent ces anciens dirigeants du journal dans une lettre transmise. C’est aussi un reniement devant l’ensemble de la rédaction et des lecteurs. (…) Penser que l’identité d’un journal puisse être ainsi gommée revient à mettre en danger le fondement même de notre métier. »

    Parmi les signataires, Hervé Gattegno, licencié de Paris Match et du JDD en 2021, Cyril Petit, qui lui a succédé pour quelques mois jusqu’en mai 2022, ou encore Alain Genestar, directeur de la rédaction de 1987 à 1999. Les grévistes qualifient l’arrivée de M. Lejeune de « ligne rouge », et demandent des garanties pour leur indépendance."

    par ailleurs : échanges sur l’oiseau bleu entre :
    @CageJulia :
    Non, Madame la Ministre, le JDD ne peut pas devenir ce qu’il veut.
    Car il produit un bien public : l’information.
    C’est pour cela qu’il bénéficie d’aides à la presse.
    Conditionnons ces aides à l’agrément du choix du directeur de la rédaction par la majorité des journalistes.

    et @RimaAbdulMalak :
    Mon rituel du dimanche, c’était de me réveiller avec le JDD. Aujourd’hui il ne paraît pas. Je comprends les inquiétudes de sa rédaction. En droit, le JDD peut devenir ce qu’il veut, tant qu’il respecte la loi. Mais pour nos valeurs républicaines comment ne pas s’alarmer ?