industryterm:campaign finance

  • How Vilification of George Soros Moved From the Fringes to the Mainstream - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/31/us/politics/george-soros-bombs-trump.html

    On both sides of the Atlantic, a loose network of activists and political figures on the right have spent years seeking to cast Mr. Soros not just as a well-heeled political opponent but also as the personification of all they detest. Employing barely coded anti-Semitism, they have built a warped portrayal of him as the mastermind of a “globalist” movement, a left-wing radical who would undermine the established order and a proponent of diluting the white, Christian nature of their societies through immigration.

    In the process, they have pushed their version of Mr. Soros, 88, from the dark corners of the internet and talk radio to the very center of the political debate.

    “He’s a banker, he’s Jewish, he gives to Democrats — he’s sort of a perfect storm for vilification by the right, here and in Europe,” said Michael H. Posner, a human rights lawyer and former State Department official in the Obama administration.

    Mr. Soros has given his main group, the Open Society Foundations, $32 billion for what it calls democracy-building efforts in the United States and around the world. In addition, in the United States, Mr. Soros has personally contributed more than $75 million over the years to federal candidates and committees, according to Federal Election Commission and Internal Revenue Service records.

    That qualifies him as one of the top disclosed donors to American political campaigns in the modern campaign finance era, and it does not include the many millions more he has donated to political nonprofit groups that do not disclose their donors.

    By contrast, the network of conservative donors led by the billionaire industrialist brothers Charles G. and David H. Koch, who have been similarly attacked by some on the American left, has spent about $2 billion over the past decade on political and public policy advocacy.❞

    The closing advertisement for Mr. Trump’s 2016 campaign featured Mr. Soros — as well as Janet L. Yellen, the chairwoman of the Federal Reserve at the time, and Lloyd Blankfein, the chief executive of Goldman Sachs, both of whom are Jewish — as examples of “global special interests” who enriched themselves on the backs of working Americans.

    If anything, Mr. Soros has been elevated by Mr. Trump and his allies to even greater prominence in the narrative they have constructed for the closing weeks of the 2018 midterm elections. They have projected on to him key roles in both the threat they say is posed by the Central Americans making their way toward the United States border and what they characterized as Democratic “mobs” protesting the nomination of Brett M. Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

    The National Republican Congressional Committee ran an ad in October in Minnesota suggesting that Mr. Soros, who is depicted sitting behind a pile of cash, “bankrolls” everything from “prima donna athletes protesting our anthem” to “left-wing mobs paid to riot in the streets.” The ad links Mr. Soros to a local congressional candidate who worked at a think tank that has received funding from the Open Society Foundations.

    Even after the authorities arrested a fervent Trump supporter and accused him of sending the pipe bombs to Mr. Soros and other critics, Republicans did not back away. The president grinned on Friday when supporters at the White House responded to his attacks on Democrats and “globalists” by chanting, “Lock ’em up,” and yelling, “George Soros.”

    #Antisémitisme #Georges_Soros #Néo_fascisme #USA

  • Haro sur la Russie, mais pas un mot sur le système étasunien qui permet aux influences étrangères de s’exercer, comme expliqué ici :

    Dark money and potential foreign influence
    https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2017/07/dark-money-potential-foreign-influence

    Today, the laws governing transparency of money in politics have not kept pace with other changes to our campaign finance system. In particular, the Citizens United decision threw the door wide open to unlimited contributions from unlimited and secret sources giving to supposedly independent outside groups interested in shaping electoral outcomes.

    We already know from past campaign finance scandals that foreign corporations, individuals and governments had the wherewithal and the willingness to try to shape U.S. elections in the past. Given this, it defies logic to think that those motivations or opportunities no longer exist – particularly since foreign donations can be given easily, legally and secretly to nonprofits that are now allowed to be highly politically active.

    #Etats-Unis #démocratie #corrompue #corruption #élections

  • The Dutch far-right’s election donors are almost exclusively American
    https://qz.com/928684/the-dutch-far-rights-election-donors-are-almost-exclusively-american

    While Europe has been busy fretting about Russian meddling in its politics, a few Americans have been quietly doing their part to boost the continent’s far right.

    Wealthy American conservatives have poured large sums into the electoral campaign of far-right leader Geert Wilders of the Netherlands’ Dutch Freedom Party, in support of his anti-Islam, anti-EU views.

    Three American donors gave €141,668 ($150,430) to Dutch political parties between 2015 and 2017, according to campaign finance documents released this week by the Dutch interior ministry. Two of these donors funded the far-right Dutch Freedom Party.

    • From the 1970s the Supreme Court made a bunch of decisions that allowed the corporate capitalist class to buy elections more easily than it could in the past.

      For example, you see reforms of campaign finance that treated contributions to campaigns as a form of free speech. There’s a long tradition in the United States of corporate capitalists buying elections but now it was legalized rather than being under the table as #corruption.

      #corruption_légale #acheter_les_lois

    • Excellent argumentaire... Plutôt Trump que la continuation de l’illusion d’avoir voté pour un•e progressiste...

      1) I don’t vote Republican because I don’t want to see more US soldiers dying in the Middle East for regime change.

      2) I don’t vote Republican because they’ll put the same megabanks in charge of Treasury that destroyed our economy the last time they were in charge of Treasury.

      3) I don’t vote Republican because I’ve always supported gay people’s civil liberties and the Republicans who’ve barely come around to supporting gay marriage this decade are doing so only because the polling now supports it.

      4) I don’t vote Republican because they keep telling me they “need more research” to believe cannabis is a medicine.

      5) I don’t vote Republican because they institute terrible “free trade” deals that destroy jobs and wages.

      6) I don’t vote Republican because they support the increase of fracking worldwide, an environmentally disastrous policy.

      7) I don’t vote Republican because they don’t believe America can be like every other modern democracy and provide universal health care coverage.

      8) I don’t vote Republican because they enjoy and exploit the campaign finance shenanigans made legal by Citizens United.

      9) I don’t vote Republican because they think a $15 minimum wage is too high and at best it ought to only be $12.

      10) I don’t vote Republican because they endorse and approve of NSA’s warrantless spying on American citizens.

      11) I don’t vote Republican because they created and supported the USA PATRIOT ACT that is used far more against drug “crimes” than terrorism.

      12) I don’t vote Republican because they believe that “the era of big government is over” and work to destroy welfare.

      13) I don’t vote Republican because they believe in being “tough on crime” to the point of supporting mass incarceration of mostly black and brown people.

      14) I don’t vote Republican because they use racist dog whistles like calling black kids “superpredators... that [we have to] bring to heel.”

      15) I don’t vote Republican because they opposed closing Gitmo.

      16) I don’t vote Republican because they want to cut Social Security, or at the very least, refuse to consider lifting the income cap on contributions to make rich people pay their fair share.

      17) I don’t vote Republican because people with net worth that requires two or three commas to print don’t understand what people like me go through living paycheck to paycheck.

      18) I don’t vote Republican because I can’t stand privatized prisons and they take lots of campaign donations from them.

      19) I don’t vote Republican because if we’re not going to have socialism for the poor, why should I support those who voted to bail out the big banks and refuse to break them up?

      20) I don’t vote Republican because they supported the bankruptcy bill that made it harder for poor working people to discharge debt, while their hyper-rich friends make use of bankruptcy restructuring all the time.

      21) I don’t vote Republican because they oppose reinstating the Glass-Steagall Act that would separate investment and commercial banking.

      22) I don’t vote Republican because they support the death penalty.

      23) I don’t vote Republican because they vote for stupid things like a border fence with Mexico.

      24) I don’t vote Republican because they get most of their campaign donations from the big banks, instead of typical Democratic sources like unions.

      25) I don’t vote Republican because they would lock up Edward Snowden and throw away the key.

      Those are 25 pretty good reasons why we Democrats don’t vote for Republicans, don’t you think?

      So why would we vote for Hillary Clinton, the Rockefeller Republican who exemplifies every one of those 25 statements?

  • Top 10 Signs the US is the Most Corrupt Country in the World | Informed Comment
    http://www.juancole.com/2015/12/signs-corrupt-country.html

    1. The rich are well placed to bribe our politicians to reduce taxes on the rich. A nonentity like Donald Trump got filthy rich via tax loopholes, and is now trying to buy the presidency. The way the Supreme Court got rid of campaign finance reform and allowed open, unlimited buying of elections is the height of #corruption. Note that despite his supposed “populism,” Trump never talks about the unfairness of our current tax system, instead dividing and ruling working and middle class Americans by stirring racial and religious hatreds. As it stands, 400 American billionaires are worth $2 trillion, as much as the bottom 150 million Americans. That kind of wealth inequality hasn’t been seen in the US since the age of the robber barons in the nineteenth century. Both eras are marked by extreme corruption.

    #barons_voleurs #Etats-Unis #leadership

  • #Start-Up Leaders Embrace Lobbying as Part of the Job (The New York Times, 23/11/2015)
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/23/technology/start-up-leaders-embrace-lobbying-as-part-of-the-job.html

    While total annual spending on #lobbying has decreased slightly over the last five years, Internet companies have tripled their lobbying spending, to $47.5 million, during the same period. The industry now spends just a little less than the auto sector, according to the website OpenSecrets, which tracks lobbying and campaign finance.

    #tech_companies #silicon_valley

  • Amtrak disaster: Lawmakers Moved To Delay Rail Safety Rule Weeks Before Philadelphia Derailment
    http://www.ibtimes.com/amtrak-disaster-lawmakers-moved-delay-rail-safety-rule-weeks-philadelphia-d

    Et,

    The chief sponsor of the bipartisan bill delaying the safety technology mandate, Missouri Republican Sen. Roy Blunt, has accepted more than $290,000 in campaign contributions from the railroad industry during his career — the fifth-highest tally in the Senate, according to data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP), a campaign finance watchdog group. The Association of American Railroads — which counts private railroad companies and Amtrak as members — backed Blunt’s legislation to delay the mandate.

    #corruption_légale #Etats-unis

  • Right-wing documentary targets Occupy - Salon.com
    http://www.salon.com/2012/01/11/right_wing_lens_for_occupy_documentary/singleton

    Citizens United, which specializes in making documentaries with strong right-wing messages, is currently in production for a film about the Occupy movement, a spokesman for the group confirms to Salon.

    The landmark 2010 Supreme Court case that loosened campaign finance restrictions was brought by Citizens United and centered on an anti-Hillary Clinton movie made by the group. Opposition to that ruling has been a consistent message of participants in Occupy movement.