industryterm:oil money

  • The rent is too damned high because money-laundering oligarchs bought all the real-estate to clean their oil money / Boing Boing
    https://boingboing.net/2019/01/27/cz-edwards.html

    In an absolutely epic Twitter thread (unrolled here) author CZ Edwards lays out an incredibly compelling explanation of spiralling real-estate prices: oligarchs need to launder a lot of oil money — think Russia, Iran, ex-Soviet basket-case states, Saudi — and so they plow the money into offshore Real Estate Investment Trust that then cleans it by outbidding any actual real-estate investors or would-be homeowners, bidding up and snapping up all the property in desirable cities, and then realizing the rental income-flows as legitimate, clean money.

    It’s as neat and compelling a way of describing the link between oligarchy and spiraling real-estate prices as you could ask for. Shelter is not optional, so people will spend whatever it takes to get a roof over their heads. Cities are not infinitely sprawlable, so it’s possible to corner the market on places to live in them. Eventually, the parasites will devour the hosts and leave the cities empty shells (ahem, Venice), but by then the money-launderers have sold up and moved on.

    And of course, since real-estate is a great way to launder money, real-estate developers are often mobbed up af, which explains a lot about the president and his grifter inner circle.

    Edwards points out that her work on money-laundering came out of her research on a novel called “Rien’s Rebellion: Kingdom” (" Once upon a time, a nation’s fate depended on an informant, a lawyer and a warrior. They all lived under a good Monarch’s leadership. Until he was assassinated.").

    e. A few over-priced, stupid apartments? Does it really matter. Not as much, no, but that’s not where most of the laundering happens. It happens at the basic apartment building level. Because of a thing called a Real Estate Investment Trust. Let’s take... a California dingbat apartment building. Usually 4-8 apartments. (Earthquakes can be a problem...) They sell for $10-$20M, depending, and bring in $8K-16K month in revenue.

    So... let’s say you’ve got 25 money laundry clients, all with about $3 million (after you & your washing cut) they need to invest. $75 mil? Let’s buy 6 dingbats and put them in an REIT. Which hires a management team, which collects $2K rent from each apartment, each month. 6 buildings, 8 apartments each x $2K: $96K month in revenue. The management company takes 20%.

    Your money laundry clients get $76K per month of clean money- it all came from legal, legit rent investment income property. REITs clean the money better than a dry cleaner. I am oversimplifying, but not by much. There are some shell corps in there, some in Caymans or Seychelles, but also Delaware, Wyoming, North Dakota, and Nevada.

    What happens when there’s not much real estate to put in a REIT?

    Well, remember, there’s loss in money laundering? A REIT backed by money laundering doesn’t really care if it costs $5M for $10M for an apartment building. In a way, the $10M apartment building is better, because it cleans more money in one go. And they can outbid someone looking to own a 6 apartment dingbat.

    If the REIT buys a building for an inflated price, and they’re getting clean money monthly? They can just sit on it until someone legit comes along, having convinced a bank to make them a very large mortgage on an inflated price.

    Look at expensive cities. It’s not an accident.

    #capitalisme #crime #spéculation

  • Le confessionnalisme politique prend, avec les déclarations de Saad Hariri et Najib Mikati, une tournure d’un grotesque achevé. Ça n’est pas nouveau, mais il faut vraiment insister là-dessus : Hariri et Mikati, régulièrement, dénoncent « l’humiliation » de « leur » communauté, les sunnites, qui seraient moins bien traités que « les autres » communautés.

    Le piège est évidemment de discuter l’idée même que « les sunnites » ceci ou « les sunnites » cela. Il faut avant tout rappeler que Saad Hariri et Najib Mikati sont MIL-LI-AR-DAI-RES. Ils sont milliardaires – leur fortune est équivalente à celle de mille millionnaires – dans un pays dont plus du tiers de la population vit avec moins de 4 dollars par jour (seuil de pauvreté). Ils sont d’anciens Premier ministres, dans un pays dont même la capitale n’a pas l’électricité toute la journée. Mais comment peuvent-ils même oser parler de l’« humiliation » de « leur » communauté ?

    Parce que la question du confessionnalisme, ça revient encore et toujours à se demander en quoi un libanais sunnite vivant avec 450 dollars par mois (salaire moyen) serait plus proche d’un milliardaire sunnite que d’un libanais chiite ou chrétien vivant lui aussi avec 450 dollars par mois. Et puisqu’on parle d’humiliation : pourquoi un sunnite survivant avec moins de 4 dollars par jours serait-il plus proche de Najib Mikati (fortune de 2,5 milliards de dollars) que d’un chiite survivant avec moins de 4 dollars par jours ?

    • http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=5016

      JAY: So to understand the transaction, you have privately owned Lebanese banks, on behalf of the government, selling these bonds at 49 percent. The money is then owed—this is foreign money? Or it’s Lebanese money that’s loaned to the banks?
      TRABOULSI: No. It’s—I mean, it’s everything. But now I should say that now it’s 17.5 percent, the interest rate on government bonds.

      JAY: Given, at a time when rates in the US are practically zero.
      TRABOULSI: Yup. And at that time in the ’90s you had an inflow of international capital, Arab capital, attracted by the huge [inaudible] profits that you can imagine. But a few years, when the rates came down, most of those sold their government bonds. So now we have—actually, 40 percent is foreign debt, and 60 percent is mainly our local banks. Now, when we say Lebanese banks, we mean—it’s not always necessary to mean that the Lebanese own the majority of those banks. Usually you have oil money invested in it.

      JAY: And by oil money you mean Arab oil money?
      TRABOULSI: Arab oil money, Arab oil money. And for a time, American banks had a strong hold on Lebanese banks, especially before the war. But you still have a good chunk of non-Arab shares in our banks.

      JAY: Is a significant amount of the money Saudi money?
      TRABOULSI: Yeah, definitely, definitely. Saudi, Khaleeji—Kuwait, Bahrain, the whole lot.

      JAY: Now, many of the people or families that own these banks are also running the Lebanese government. Is that correct?
      TRABOULSI: In a sense, yes, and that’s the paradoxical situation. And Lebanon, now, you tell me you see—people see Lebanon as Hezbollah, but, I mean, the overall impression is that Lebanon is a country of sects and ethnicities, and politics is seen as being the politics of ethnicity. So a lot of economic power is very much camouflaged, whereas we are run by a party of bank owners, importers, and of course contractors. Those three effectively run both the state, the economy, and are the greatest influence, let’s say, over the political bosses, who are not necessarily the same people, but who are very much related to the banks.

      JAY: In terms of the Hariri ​family, there you have a direct connection, you know, between a family that owns banks and many other things and also [inaudible]
      TRABOULSI: That’s not the only link. I mean, the owner of the biggest bank is also a minister. You have three billionaires representing the city of Tripoli who are MPs. Well, one thing is obvious, and that is the rich people—but more precisely the capitalist rich people, not the landed property—are now a high percentage of people in power directly. Before, it was political bosses who catered for economic powers. Now those who hold economic power, especially after 1990, after the war, and with the advent of the late prime minister Hariri, they are more directly represented in the organs of power.

  • Ecuador: Amazon families split over lure of oil money | World news | The Guardian
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/05/ecuador-amazon-split-oil-money

    While they were growing up in their remote community deep in the Ecuadorean Amazon, Blanca Tapuy and her sister Innes were inseparable.

    As children, they would play together while their parents hunted monkeys and tapir with blowpipes and spears. After they married, they regularly met to drink chicha and keep up with the latest gossip as western modernity crept ever closer to their indigenous Kichwa community.

    Today, however, the sisters are at loggerheads, divided by an offer from the country’s biggest oil company, Petroamazonas, to start seismic surveys in their homeland of Sani Isla. Blanca declares she is willing to die to stop its advances. Innes passionately counters at community meetings that petrodollars are vital for the future prosperity of the community.

    #Equateur #autochtones #pétrole #tourisme #biodiversité

  • Iraq to chase missing billions - Middle East - Al Jazeera English
    http://english.aljazeera.net//news/middleeast/2011/06/201162044042488179.html

    Iraq’s parliament has asked the United Nations for help to track down about $18bn of Iraqi oil money it says was stolen after the 2003 US-led invasion.

    In a letter to the UN office in Baghdad last month, parliament’s Integrity Committee asked for help to find and
    recover the oil money taken from the Development Fund of Iraq (DFI) in 2004 and lost in the chaos that followed the invasion.

    In 2004, the Bush administration flew billions of dollars in cash into Iraq. The money came from the sale of Iraqi oil, surplus funds from the UN oil-for-food programme and seized Iraqi assets.

    The DFI was established in 2003 at the request of the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), the US body headed by Paul Bremer that governed Iraq after the invasion.

    The fund was to be used to pay the salaries and pensions of Iraqi government workers and for reconstruction projects.

    “All indications are that the institutions of the United States of America committed financial corruption by stealing the money of the Iraqi people, which was allocated to develop Iraq,” said the letter sent to the UN with a 50-page report.