• Un incendie de façade majeur frappe un immeuble résidentiel à Valence (Espagne)
    https://www.batiactu.com/edito/incendie-facade-majeur-frappe-un-immeuble-residentiel-67967.php

    Un incendie de façade majeur a ravagé un immeuble de 138 logements, à Valence (Espagne), ce 22 février 2024. Le bilan est lourd : cinq personnes sont décédées, et entre neuf et quinze sont déclarées disparues. Trois jours de deuil ont été déclarés à Valence. Le sinistre est parti du quatrième étage, et s’est très rapidement propagé le long de la façade, dans un scénario comparable à celui de l’incendie de la tour Grenfell, à Londres, en juin 2017. D’après le quotidien national El Pais, le système de façade était d’ailleurs proche : présence d’une lame d’air et de panneaux en aluminium intégrant un cœur en polyéthylène.

    Des immeubles à fuir d’urgence, un peu comme les collèges Pailleron en leur temps.


    #isolation_des_facades #isolation_par_l'extérieur #ITE

  • Quelles sont les villes françaises les plus consommatrices d’électricité ? – Libération
    https://www.liberation.fr/checknews/quelles-sont-les-villes-les-plus-consommatrices-delectricite-20221206_ZBR

    les villes et les départements les plus consommateurs d’électricité par habitant sont situés dans le sud et l’ouest de la France, alors même qu’Aix-en-Provence, Bordeaux et Nice, les trois villes de plus de 100 000 habitants en tête du palmarès, ne sont pas réputées pour la rigueur de leurs hivers. A l’inverse, les villes de Saint-Etienne et de Mulhouse, largement exposés au froid hivernal, font partie des « grandes villes » les plus sobres du pays. En regardant le classement des 116 villes les plus peuplées de France (et non plus seulement celles comptant plus de 100 000 habitants), on retrouve cette partition entre le Sud et le Nord. Les cinq villes les plus consommatrices sont Fréjus, Cannes, Antibes, Montauban et Narbonne. Les cinq villes les moins consommatrices étant Nanterre, Belfort, Aubervilliers, Bobigny et Créteil.
    [...]
    seule [la] consommation d’électricité du secteur résidentiel (donc des logements des particuliers) a été prise en compte. A noter aussi qu’il s’agit de la consommation sur toute l’année, intégrant donc aussi bien l’été que l’hiver.

    Le premier facteur d’explication des résultats est le mode de chauffage. Si le chauffage du logement se fait au gaz, au fioul ou au bois, la consommation électrique liée est nulle - alors même que le chauffage représente 66 % de la consommation énergétique d’un logement, selon l’Ademe. Or, le mode de chauffage des bâtiments recoupe globalement la carte de Up Energies : selon une étude commandée par Butagaz et le Synasav (Syndicat national de la maintenance et des services en efficacité énergétique), les bâtiments des régions des façades atlantique et méditerranéenne du pays (bureaux inclus) se chauffaient à 39 % ou plus à l’électricité, contre seulement 21 % dans le Grand Est ou 26 % dans les Hauts-de-France.

    L’autre facteur explicatif majeur tiendrait à la qualité de l’isolation. « Les résidences dans le Sud ne se sont pas focalisées sur la qualité de l’isolation, alors que les maisons dans le Nord gardent plus la chaleur », explique Alexis Beaumont, citant notamment la finesse des murs, l’impact du vent ou la présence de nombreux chauffages d’appoint électriques. La climatisation, à laquelle les habitants de villes du sud de la France ont davantage recours est-elle aussi un facteur d’explication ? « L’impact de la climatisation (plus important dans le Sud, ndlr) existe, mais n’explique pas une telle disparité », ajoute-t-il.

    Ajoutons enfin que la dimension sociale s’ajoute évidemment à ces facteurs géographiques, la consommation électrique étant fortement indexée au niveau des revenus des ménages. Ce qui explique aussi qu’on retrouve des villes « pauvres » au bas du classement, et des villes « riches » à son sommet.

    #électricité #énergie #chauffage #sobriété #inégalités_sociales #isolation

    • #climatisation certainement, mais cela recoupe ce facteur clé : la propension à consommer davantage d’une #classe_sociale,
      comme le montre cette carte, ce sont les logements les mieux construits et les mieux isolés, les logements de ceux qui skient, qui consomment allègrement le plus

      En 2020, la consommation par habitant dans le 16e arrondissement était de plus de 10 000 kwh contre moins de 2 000 khw dans le 19e. Apur

      #Versaillais #écologie #riches #bourgeoisie

    • Il y a une ruée vers les pompes à chaleur dans mon entourage proche. Aide de l’état oblige, certains en profitent, non sans avoir été encouragés de manières trompeuses, pour se reconvertir vers ce mode de chauffage. Mais ce qu’il faut savoir, c’est que, plus la températures extérieure baisse, plus le rendement (COP) de ces pompes à chaleur fonctionnant par aérothermie diminue. Si la température passe en dessous de 0°C, le compresseur qui capte les calories de l’air est obligé de passer en mode dégivrage. Ce qui a pour conséquence d’augmenter fortement la consommation électrique. Et là, le COP peut même devenir négatif !

      https://www.quelleenergie.fr/magazine/pompe-chaleur-efficace-zero

      Le COP ou coefficient de performance d’une pompe à chaleur est un multiple de la puissance électrique consommée. Il détermine la quantité de chaleur produite à partir d’une quantité d’électricité donnée. Plus le chiffre est élevé, plus le système est performant. Exemple : avec un COP de 3, une pompe à chaleur consommera 3 fois moins d’énergie électrique qu’un équipement conventionnel de chauffage électrique direct (convecteur, grille-pain etc.). Ce qui ouvre a priori de substantielles économies par rapport à un mode de chauffage tout électrique.
      Il faut toutefois se garder d’extrapoler trop rapidement le COP nominal d’un appareil avec la consommation réelle d’un logement. En effet, le COP machine d’une pompe à chaleur, ou COP conventionnel, est mesuré par le constructeur entre de 7°C et 35°C. Cet indicateur permet de distinguer les appareils entre eux mais en aucun cas d’estimer la performance en situation réelle. Le COP saisonnier ou annuel de l’appareil, et a fortiori de l’ensemble de l’installation de chauffage (production, distribution, émission et régulation) dépendra, en effet, du climat tout au long de la saison considérée, mais surtout des conditions d’utilisation : écart de température entre sources, régime de fonctionnement de l’appareil tout au long de la période de chauffe.
      Le COP, ensuite, est d’autant plus élevé que l’écart de température entre sources sera faible, en vertu d’un principe physique indépassable. Quelle que soit la machine, la performance sera moins élevée si l’écart de température entre sources augmente. Ainsi il sera bien plus avantageux d’alimenter un plancher chauffant à basse température (25°C) qu’un réseau de radiateurs traditionnel à 60°C.

      En fait, on en revient toujours au même problème, plus la température baisse, plus tu consommes d’électricité. Sans compter que dans mon bled, le parc immobilier est vétuste et les bâtiments très mal isolés. Donc privilégier les travaux d’isolation avant de changer son système de chauffage. Mais ça, les arnaqueurs qui viennent démarcher les personnes âgées ne le disent pas.
      La transition énergétique ? Un système pyramidal soutenu par de l’argent public.

  • La vengeance de la bouillotte | LOW←TECH MAGAZINE
    https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/fr/2022/12/the-revenge-of-the-hot-water-bottle.html

    Ces alternatives semblent inutilement complexes quand on les compare avec les bouillottes. Il y a plusieurs manières de réchauffer l’eau de façon high-tech comme low-tech, et les récipients peuvent être fabriqués dans des matériaux locaux.

    Néanmoins, ces études montrent que les sources de chaleur personnelles avec des effets similaires de ceux de la bouillotte pourraient permettre d’économiser beaucoup d’énergie tout en gardant et souvent en améliorant le confort thermique. Par exemple, une étude a révélé que baisser la température dans un bureau de 20,5°C à 18,8°C et donner à des salariés une chaise chauffante pour compenser la perte de confort, augmentait le confort thermique et diminuait l’usage de l’énergie de 35 %.

  • Se chauffer : les erreurs à éviter (on se chauffe mal !​) — [Chat Sceptique]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtOH31LY-KU

    Bambou craint d’avoir froid cet hiver. Heureusement pour elle, la science a trouvé comment se réchauffer sans dépenser des fortunes !

    Le projet slowheat : https://www.slowheat.org

    Toi aussi, apprends à vivre sobrement :)
    tldr : chauffe ton corps, pas ta maison.

    Mais donc #SlowHeat iels font quelques recherches tout de même sur le sujet et vont publier un guide prochainement, si je comprends bien leurs actus.

    – s’adapter au froid et se couvrir (la base)
    – chauffer les corps directement plutôt que l’air ou les murs, avec des petits radiants, des couvertures chauffantes, etc...
    – privilégier des matériaux peu effusifs (bois, tissus, isolant...), là où tu es en contact plutôt que l’inverse (carrelage, cuir, simili-cuir, plastique ...)

    Quelques articles du site SlowHeat :
    – Choisir une couverture chauffante :  https://www.slowheat.org/post/choisir-une-couverture-chauffante
    – Avoir chaud en télétravaillant :  https://www.slowheat.org/post/avoir-chaud-en-t%C3%A9l%C3%A9travaillant (par exemple tapis chauffant pour les mains, et/ou couverture chauffante et/ou petit radiant 300w max...

    Etc. etc.
    Vive les couettes et les bouillottes.

    Oui, je sais là il fait encore 25°C un 30 octobre… mais on va faire comme si ça n’allait pas durer comme ça éternellement

    #chaleur #électricité #isolation

  • Covid-19 : avec l’explosion du nombre de cas, la Corée du Nord face au risque d’une crise humanitaire
    https://www.lemonde.fr/planete/article/2022/05/18/covid-19-avec-l-explosion-du-nombre-de-cas-la-coree-du-nord-face-au-risque-d

    Covid-19 : avec l’explosion du nombre de cas, la Corée du Nord face au risque d’une crise humanitaire. Alors que la grande majorité des 25 millions d’habitants n’est pas vaccinée, les autorités pourraient adopter la stratégie chinoise du zéro Covid, consistant à confiner des villes entières au risque de provoquer une catastrophe.
    Par Philippe Pons(Tokyo, correspondant)
    Publié le 18 mai 2022 à 16h35, mis à jour hier à 07h37
    En Corée du Nord, la multiplication des cas de contamination par le Covid-19, passés en moins d’une semaine à près de deux million de personnes « souffrant de fièvre » (sans préciser la nature de celle-ci), dont 663 900 sous traitement, fait craindre une détérioration rapide de la situation. Les malades (soit près de 6 % de la population) seraient atteints par le sous-variant BA.2 d’Omicron.Mardi soir 18 mai, 232 000 nouveaux cas avaient été enregistrés en vingt-quatre heures. La plupart des observateurs estiment que le nombre réel est vraisemblablement plus élevé que ne l’indiquent les chiffres officiels. Le dernier bilan officiel fait état de 62 décès.Au cours d’une réunion, dimanche 15 mai, du bureau politique, le dirigeant Kim Jong-un a ordonné la mobilisation de l’armée afin de remédier à la lenteur de l’acheminement de médicaments (dont on ignore la nature) dans les pharmacies de la capitale. Mardi, il a mis la propagation de ces cas de « fièvre » sur le compte de la négligence des hauts responsables.
    Des mesures de confinement sévères ont en effet été prises, en particulier à Pyongyang où le port du masque est devenu obligatoire. Il ne l’était pas lors de la grande parade militaire de fin avril : aucune des personnalités présentes n’en portait, pas plus que les participants. Kim Jong-un a donné l’exemple en apparaissant masqué, jeudi 12 mai, à la réunion du bureau politique qui devait décider des mesures à prendre pour contenir l’épidémie.Pour l’instant, la République populaire démocratique de Corée (RPDC) n’a pas répondu aux propositions d’aide de l’Organisation mondiale de la santé (OMS), de la Chine et de la Corée du Sud. Selon le site NK News et l’agence de presse sud-coréenne Yonhap, trois avions cargo nord-coréens auraient toutefois été chercher à Shenyang en Chine 150 tonnes d’aide d’urgence.Depuis deux ans et demi, la RPDC affirmait s’être prémunie contre l’infection en se muant, dès janvier 2020, en une forteresse repliée sur elle-même – laissant sceptiques les experts de l’OMS. Aujourd’hui, elle se découvre vulnérable et victime d’une propagation « explosive » du virus (selon les médias officiels) qui pourrait conduire à une crise non seulement sanitaire, mais aussi humanitaire si les contaminations se poursuivent à ce rythme. Très vraisemblablement, elles avaient commencé avant d’atteindre un niveau difficile à cacher.L’OMS a dit mardi s’inquiéter des conséquences de la propagation du Covid-19 « dans une population non vaccinée », alors que beaucoup de Nord-Coréens « souffrent d’antécédents médicaux qui leur font courir le risque de développer des formes graves de la maladie ». La RPDC se trouve aujourd’hui aussi démunie que l’étaient les pays développés au printemps 2020 : sans vaccin, sans traitements et sans dépistage. Mais elle est loin d’avoir les ressources financières et médicales des pays riches. Son système sanitaire est obsolète, déficient en équipements (en particulier en unités de soins intensifs), en médicaments, pour l’essentiel importés, et en personnel. En 2021, le pays a été classé à la 193e place sur 195 dans une étude de l’université américaine Johns-Hopkins. A ces carences s’ajoute un facteur aggravant : une population affaiblie par des pénuries dues aux sanctions internationales aggravées par la fermeture du pays, dont les couches les plus vulnérables sont en situation de sous-alimentation chronique, selon les Nations unies. Enfin, la grande majorité des 25 millions de Nord-Coréens n’est pas vaccinée. La RPDC a refusé le programme Covax de l’OMS car celui-ci requiert une transparence dans la distribution des vaccins que le régime n’était pas disposé à concéder. Pyongyang n’accepte l’aide étrangère qu’à condition d’en contrôler la distribution. Selon l’agence centrale de presse nord-coréenne KCNA, Kim Jong-un entend s’inspirer de la stratégie chinoise zéro Covid, consistant à confiner des villes entières, à tracer et à isoler systématiquement les malades. Mais la RPDC n’a testé jusqu’à présent que 64 200 personnes. Ne disposant pas d’indications précises sur l’étendue de l’infection, les autorités peuvent difficilement prendre des mesures de confinement préventif de zones à risque et l’OMS craint l’apparition de nouveaux variants dans une population non surveillée. Pour l’instant, les foyers d’infection se concentrent dans les régions de Pyongyang, de Nampo, de Kaesong et de Rason. Le confinement à l’échelle nationale – dont les modalités ne sont pas connues – risque d’aggraver les pénuries alors que les mesures prises du côté chinois ont déjà affecté les échanges. La région chinoise de Jilin (Nord-Est), frontalière avec la RPDC, est en effet l’une des plus touchées par la nouvelle vague de contagion, et est confinée depuis le début du mois d’avril ; le commerce par voie ferrée en provenance de la ville frontalière chinoise de Dandong, par laquelle transitent la majorité des échanges entre les deux pays, a été suspendu quatre mois après avoir été rétabli. En dépit de la désinfection des convois et du renforcement des contrôles des passages illégaux de la frontière (zones de tir à vue dans les régions connues pour les trafics du côté nord-coréen du fleuve Yalu, qui sépare les deux pays), il était inévitable que le virus finisse par s’infiltrer dans le pays étant donné les flambées épidémiques dans les territoires limitrophes. Les contacts entre marins chinois et nord-coréens lors des transbordements illicites en haute mer de charbon nord-coréen et de pétrole chinois – afin de contourner les sanctions internationales – et les contrebandiers à travers le Yalu ont pu être une source de contamination. Les nouvelles mesures de confinement vont encore aggraver l’isolement du pays en restreignant davantage les mouvements et l’acheminement des matières premières, des denrées alimentaires et des produits divers entre les provinces. Un brusque ralentissement qui peut conduire à une confusion semblable à celle que connaissent des villes chinoises ces dernières semaines.Dans un pays infiniment plus pauvre que la Chine, cet isolement risque d’avoir des conséquences dramatiques comme ce fut le cas lors de la famine de la seconde partie des années 1990 (deux millions de morts). Le mois de mai étant l’époque du repiquage du riz, le confinement pourrait affecter gravement les récoltes déjà insuffisantes.

    #Covid-19#migration#migrant#coreedunord#chine#sante#isolationnisme#frontiere#circulation#frontiere#transfrontalier#confinement#vaccination

  • Immobilier : Airbnb sera-t-il bientôt le refuge des passoires thermiques ? - Capital.fr
    https://www.capital.fr/immobilier/immobilier-airbnb-sera-t-il-bientot-le-refuge-des-passoires-thermiques-14344

    A partir de l’an prochain, les logements dits passoires thermiques seront progressivement interdits à la location, en raison de leur indécence énergétique. Sauf que cette interdiction ne s’appliquera pas aux biens destinés à la location touristique. Les propriétaires pourraient donc être tentés de changer la destination de leur logement.

  • Wie hilfesuchende Kinder während der Pandemie allein gelassen werden

    Jonas* ist ein junger Mann, 19 Jahre alt. Gesund. Kräftig. Er hat tiefe Augenringe. Nicht vom Feiern. Er sitzt in seinem Kinderzimmer. In den vergangenen Monaten war er oft hier. Lange. Er streicht sich mit der Hand über die Haare. „Ich habe während der Pandemie starke Depressionen bekommen. Wären meine Freunde nicht für mich da gewesen, wäre ich jetzt nicht hier“, sagt er. Jonas dachte an Selbstmord.

    Jonas heißt eigentlich anders. Er möchte lieber anonym bleiben. Der Schüler hat zwei Leben gelebt: eins vor der Pandemie und eins während der Pandemie. Vor der Pandemie hat er sich gerne mit seinen Freunden und Freundinnen getroffen, ist zum Kampfsport gegangen und wollte nach der Schule soziale Arbeit oder Psychologie studieren. Doch im März 2020 schlossen zum ersten Mal die Schulen, der Unterricht fand nur noch digital statt, Jonas verlor sein soziales Leben: „Alles, wovon ich Energie geschöpft habe, war plötzlich nicht mehr da.“ Der Schüler kam mit dem Homeschooling nicht klar. Seine Noten verschlechterten sich. Er wurde dieses Jahr nicht zum Abitur zugelassen.

    Seit der Pandemie spielt sich sein Alltag fast nur noch in seinem Zimmer ab. Seit einigen Monaten leidet der Schüler an starken Depressionen. Doch professionelle Hilfe bekommt er nicht. Im Februar versuchte er, einen Termin bei einem Psychiater zu bekommen, weil er Selbstmordgedanken hatte. Am Telefon wurde ihm gesagt, dass der nächste Termin im Juli sei. Daraufhin wandte Jonas sich an die Schulpsychologin, mit der er sich ein paar Mal traf. Das Reden half ihm zwar, sagt er. Aber sie habe ihm nichts Neues sagen können, was er nicht schon wusste: „Dass sogar eine Schulpsychologin nicht weiterhelfen konnte, war sehr heftig für mich. Ich bin einer Machtlosigkeit ausgesetzt und ich kann nichts dagegen tun.“ Alles was ihm gut tue, könne er momentan nicht machen.

    Die Kinder- und Jugendhilfe ist während der Pandemie stark eingeschränkt

    Für diese Recherche hat CORRECTIV mit mehreren Schülern und Schülerinnen gesprochen. Sie teilten ihre persönlichen Geschichten, wie es ihnen seit Beginn der Pandemie geht und mit welchen Schwierigkeiten sie zu kämpfen haben. Zudem sprach CORRECTIV mit weiteren Familienangehörigen, Heimen und Beratungsstellen. Das Ergebnis der Recherche: Für notleidende Kinder und Jugendliche steht das Hilfesystem seit der Pandemie fast still. Termine für Therapien und Beratungen sind kaum zu bekommen und Kontrollinstanzen wie Schule und Kita fallen weg.

    Schon im Februar berichtete CORRECTIV, wie dutzende Jugendämter in NRW seit Beginn der Pandemie nur noch in dringenden Fällen Hausbesuche machten. Jetzt zeigt sich: Die Kinder- und Jugendhilfe ist stark zurückgegangen. Für hilfesuchende Kinder und Jugendliche kann das im Extremfall lebensbedrohlich werden.

    Was ein Extremfall bedeuten kann, zeigen die Statistiken der Polizei. Diese Woche wurde in Berlin eine Sonderauswertung der polizeilichen Kriminalstatistik vorgestellt. Daraus geht hervor, dass 2020 sexuelle Gewalt gegen Kinder zugenommen hat. Demnach stieg die Zahl der Misshandlung Schutzbefohlener um zehn Prozent. Der Kindesmissbrauch stieg um 6,8 Prozent im Vergleich zum Vorjahr. Die Statistik erfasst alle Taten, die bei der Polizei gemeldet werden. Die Dunkelziffer ist laut der Sonderauswertung wahrscheinlich viel höher.

    Dazu kommt: Kindern und Jugendlichen geht es grundsätzlich seit Beginn der Pandemie schlechter als vorher. Das zeigt eine Studie von den Universitäten Hildesheim, Frankfurt und Bielefeld, in der rund 3400 Jugendliche zwischen 15 und 19 Jahren befragt wurden. Demnach fühlen sich viele Jugendliche aufgrund der Pandemie einsam, verunsichert und überfordert.
    Ein funktionierendes Hilfesystem kann Kindern das Leben retten

    Wie wichtig gerade jetzt ein funktionierendes Unterstützungssystem für hilfesuchende Kinder und Jugendliche ist, zeigt der Fall von Mira. Die heute 25-Jährige hat das Zusammenleben mit ihrer gewalttätigen Mutter unter großen Leiden überlebt. Sie erinnert sich noch sehr gut an ihre Kindheit. Auch heute muss sie vieles noch verarbeiten: „Wenn ich mal eine schlechte Note auf dem Zeugnis hatte, hat meine Mutter zugeschlagen. Sie hat mich dabei im schlimmsten Fall am Nacken gepackt, sodass ich nicht weglaufen konnte“, erzählt Mira.

    Irgendwann kam für die damals 17-Jährige der Punkt, an dem sie nicht mehr konnte: „Ich dachte mir, ich komme hier entweder raus oder ich bringe mich selber um“, sagt sie. Ihre Hoffnung, dass sich ihre Mutter ändern würde, hatte sie aufgegeben. Doch einfach das Jugendamt von zu Hause aus anrufen ging nicht. Ihre Mutter kontrollierte die Telefonrechnungen. Einmal rief sie die Telefonseelsorge an. Ihre Mutter habe die Anrufe auf der Rechnung gesehen. „Sie ist völlig ausgerastet und hat mich geschlagen“, erzählt sie. Deswegen war es wichtig, dass sie in die Schule gehen und mit einem Lehrer darüber sprechen konnte. Der Lehrer reagierte sofort, die damals 17-Jährige wurde von dem Jugendamt in Obhut genommen.

    Während der Corona-Pandemie wäre das kaum möglich gewesen. Es fehlen wichtige Kontrollinstanzen wie Schulen oder Kitas. So werden Kinder und Jugendliche nur noch eingeschränkt wahrgenommen, Gewalt und Missbrauch schwerer erkannt. Der Präsident des deutschen Kinderschutzbundes, Heinz Hilgers, sagt, dass viele Fälle häufig nicht gesehen werden: „Trotz der erhöhten Gewaltbelastung in den Familien ist die Zahl der Inobhutnahmen nicht gestiegen, denn der Kontakt zu den Familien ist erschwert.“

    Beratungsgespräche werden abgesagt

    Sara* ist auch eine hilfesuchende Jugendliche, die sich noch kurz vor dem ersten Lockdown in ein Heim retten konnte. Die 17-Jährige wurde zu Hause von ihrem älteren Bruder geschlagen. Weil sie noch minderjährig ist, bleibt auch sie anonym. Sara erzählt: „Als mein Bruder herausgefunden hat, dass ich einen Freund habe, ist er komplett ausgerastet.“ Die Eltern sind machtlos gegenüber dem gewalttätigen Bruder. Ihr Vater versteht bis heute nicht, wieso die Schülerin seit über einem Jahr in einem Heim lebt und nicht zuhause. Er gab ihr zu verstehen, dass sie übertreibt.

    Im Februar 2020 erzählt die 17-Jährige ihren Freundinnen in der Schule, dass ihr Bruder sie geschlagen hat. Ihre Freundinnen ermutigen sie, sich einem Lehrer anzuvertrauen. Dann ging alles sehr schnell. Das Jugendamt reagiert sofort und nimmt die Schülerin in Obhut. Das war rund drei Wochen vor dem ersten Lockdown. Seitdem lebt Sara in einem Heim.

    Doch mit der Inobhutnahme verschwinden die Probleme nicht. Das erste Heim, in das die Schülerin kommt, sei dreckig gewesen und sie habe sich dort nicht wohlgefühlt. Eine „Horror-Inobhutnahme“, sagt Sara. Doch die Schülerin braucht Hilfe und vor allem ein stabiles Umfeld. Im Sommer 2020 kann sie das Heim verlassen, weil in einem sogenannten Hilfeplangespräch mit dem Jugendamt besprochen wird, was mit Sara passiert. Sie entscheidet sich für ein anderes Heim, in dem sie jetzt seit fast einem Jahr lebt und sich wohlfühlt.

    Dass Sara ein Hilfeplangespräch bekam und in ein anderes Heim ziehen konnte, ist keine Selbstverständlichkeit während der Pandemie. Denn die sogenannten Hilfeplangespräche wurden laut einer CORRECTIV-Recherche in einigen nordrhein-westfälischen Jugendämtern entweder verschoben oder ganz abgesagt. Eigentlich sollen sie regelmäßig stattfinden, dabei sprechen der betroffene Jugendliche, eine Fachkraft und das Jugendamt über die Zukunft des Jugendlichen und können aktuelle Konflikte thematisieren.

    Kinder und Jugendliche, die Hilfe von außen suchen, brauchen Heime, in denen sie sich wohlfühlen und in denen sie ihre Traumata und ihre Probleme bewältigen können. Genau diese Schutzorte sind durch die Pandemie stark belastet.
    Keine Therapie, schwierige Betreuung: Traumatisierte und hilfesuchende Kinder leiden stärker durch die Pandemie

    Ein Heim, in dem Kinder und Jugendliche vor Gewalt und Missbrauch Schutz finden können, ist das St. Vincenz Jugendhilfe Zentrum in Dortmund. Hier können sie durch verschiedene Angebote ein normales Leben führen. Doch auch an diesem Beispiel zeigt sich, wie stark die Pandemie die Arbeit in dem Heim belastet hat.

    Melanie Mohr arbeitet seit rund 15 Jahren als Sozialarbeiterin in der Wohngruppe. Sie erzählt, dass die Kinder und Jugendlichen extrem frustriert sind: „Ein Jugendlicher von uns ist biologisch ein Mädchen, möchte aber als Junge leben, heißt, er ist transsexuell. Wäre Corona nicht gewesen, hätte der Junge eine stabilere Psyche und könnte dadurch ein geregelteres Leben führen.“ Weil seine Behandlung aber teilweise während der Pandemie abgebrochen worden sei, sei er stark depressiv geworden. Das größte Problem sei vor allem, dass es schwieriger geworden sei, Termine bei Therapeuten zu bekommen. Mohr sagt: „Die Jugendlichen, die sich sowieso schon schlecht gefühlt haben, fühlen sich jetzt noch schlechter, weil es kaum ergänzende Maßnahmen gibt. Die Entwicklungen der Kinder sind stagniert.“

    Das größte Problem der stationären Jugendhilfe sei die große Belastung, erzählt Heinz Hilgers vom deutschen Kinderschutzbund: „Die Heime sind eigentlich so aufgebaut, dass die Kinder zur Schule gehen. Durch die Pandemie sind die Schulen aber teilweise geschlossen und auch ergänzende Unterstützungen sind erschwert. Das müssen die Mitarbeiter und Mitarbeiterinnen in den Heimen selber versuchen aufzufangen“, sagt Hilgers. Er findet, dass die Kinder- und Jugendhilfe in den ganzen Diskussionen rund um die Pandemie kaum Beachtung gefunden hat.

    Familienhilfe: Vertrauen durch persönliche Gespräche aufbauen

    Nachdem die damals 17-jährige Mira von ihrer gewalttätigen Mutter weg konnte, hat sie später angefangen Pädagogik zu studieren. Die heute 25-Jährige schaut besorgt auf die Kinder- und Jugendhilfe während der Pandemie: „Familienhilfe ist nicht einfach. Man kann nicht einfach ein Telefonat führen und direkt mit dem betroffenen Kind Vertrauen aufbauen. Ich habe das am eigenen Leib gespürt.“ Wenn Mira über ihre Kindheit spricht, weiß sie, dass ihr das Hilfesystem das Leben gerettet hat. Sie erzählt, dass sie niemals in der Gegenwart ihrer Mutter Außenstehenden gesagt hätte, dass sie geschlagen wird. Die Angst war zu groß. Über die Erlebnisse konnte sie erst mit einem Lehrer sprechen, dem sie vertraute.

    Persönliche Gespräche sind für hilfesuchende Kinder und Jugendliche sehr wichtig. Doch gerade diese Möglichkeiten sind durch die Pandemie stark eingeschränkt. Die Beratungsstelle „Gegenwind“ aus Bottrop setzt sich dafür ein, dass Kinder und Jugendliche vor sexuellem Missbrauch geschützt werden. Seit dem ersten Lockdown bietet die Beratungsstelle telefonische Beratungen an. Doch das lief am Anfang nicht so gut. Doris Wagner, Mitbegründerin von „Gegenwind“, erzählt: „Die telefonische Beratung lief im ersten Lockdown sehr schleppend an. Wir haben uns große Sorgen um Kinder gemacht, die nicht mehr raus konnten und somit nicht mehr im Blickfeld waren. Die Kinder waren sehr schlecht zu erreichen.“ Das Problem sei vor allem die Kommunikation gewesen. Viele Betroffene hätten gar nicht gewusst, dass Hilfe auch unter Pandemie-Bedingungen möglich war.

    Jugendliche leben während der Corona-Pandemie zwischen Hoffnung und Verzweiflung

    Die Kinder- und Jugendhilfe ist lebensnotwendig. Mira weiß das nur zu gut: „Wäre Corona in meiner Jugend da gewesen, wäre ich wahrscheinlich nicht am Leben, weil ich das nicht überstanden hätte.“ Fast zehn Jahre, nachdem sie ihre gewalttätige Mutter durch das Jugendamt verlassen konnte, hat sie ihrem damaligen Lehrer eine Nachricht geschrieben: „Ich glaube, ihm war gar nicht bewusst, dass er damals mein Leben gerettet hat. Ich wollte mich einfach bei ihm bedanken.“

    Wenn Sara, die von ihrem Bruder geschlagen wurde, an ihre Zukunft denkt, dann wirkt sie hoffnungsvoll. Sie will die Zeit in dem Heim nutzen, ein gutes Abitur ablegen und vielleicht Polizistin oder Sozialarbeiterin werden. „Weil diese Berufsgruppen Menschen vor Gewalt schützen“, sagt die Schülerin. Wenn Sie an Zuhause denkt, dann hat sie noch die Gewalt im Kopf, die sie noch nicht verarbeitet hat. In dem Heim findet sie trotz der Corona-Pandemie Schutz und Hilfe.

    Jonas, der unter starken Depressionen leidet, wirkt mit Blick auf seine Zukunft hoffnungslos. Weil er sein Abitur nicht bestanden hat, muss er Umwege gehen. Aktuell sucht er nach einem Platz für ein freiwilliges soziales oder ökologisches Jahr, um sein Fachabitur zu machen. Er kann aber auch nicht sagen, wie er seine Depression bewältigen soll. Der 19-Jährige weiß nur, dass seit Beginn der Pandemie einiges falsch gelaufen ist: „Es wurde nicht auf das Wohlergehen der Kinder und Jugendlichen geschaut.“

    *Name geändert

    #pandemic #covid #children #youth #lockdown #Germany #depression #suicidal_thoughts #life-threatening #support #violence #domestic_violence #child_abuse #sexualized_violence #isolation #social_system #therapy

    https://correctiv.org/aktuelles/gesundheit/2021/05/28/wie-hilfesuchende-kinder-waehrend-der-pandemie-allein-gelassen-werden

    • Trigger Warnings | Centre for Teaching Excellence

      A trigger warning is a statement made prior to sharing potentially disturbing content. That content might include graphic references to topics such as #sexual_abuse, #self-harm, #violence, #eating_disorders, and so on, and can take the form of an #image, #video_clip, #audio_clip, or piece of #text. In an #academic_context, the #instructor delivers these messages in order to allow students to prepare emotionally for the content or to decide to forgo interacting with the content.

      Proponents of trigger warnings contend that certain course content can impact the #wellbeing and #academic_performance of students who have experienced corresponding #traumas in their own lives. Such students might not yet be ready to confront a personal #trauma in an academic context. They choose to #avoid it now so that they can deal with it more effectively at a later date – perhaps after they have set up necessary #resources, #supports, or #counselling. Other students might indeed be ready to #confront a personal trauma in an academic context but will benefit from a #forewarning of certain topics so that they can brace themselves prior to (for example) participating in a #classroom discussion about it. Considered from this perspective, trigger warnings give students increased #autonomy over their learning, and are an affirmation that the instructor #cares about their wellbeing.

      However, not everyone agrees that trigger warnings are #necessary or #helpful. For example, some fear that trigger warnings unnecessarily #insulate students from the often harsh #realities of the world with which academics need to engage. Others are concerned that trigger warnings establish a precedent of making instructors or universities legally #responsible for protecting students from #emotional_trauma. Still others argue that it is impossible to anticipate all the topics that might be potentially triggering for students.

      Trigger warnings do not mean that students can exempt themselves from completing parts of the coursework. Ideally, a student who is genuinely concerned about being #re-traumatized by forthcoming course content would privately inform the instructor of this concern. The instructor would then accommodate the student by proposing #alternative_content or an alternative learning activity, as with an accommodation necessitated by a learning disability or physical disability.

      The decision to preface potentially disturbing content with a trigger warning is ultimately up to the instructor. An instructor who does so might want to include in the course syllabus a preliminary statement (also known as a “#content_note”), such as the following:

      Our classroom provides an open space for the critical and civil exchange of ideas. Some readings and other content in this course will include topics that some students may find offensive and/or traumatizing. I’ll aim to #forewarn students about potentially disturbing content and I ask all students to help to create an #atmosphere of #mutual_respect and #sensitivity.

      Prior to introducing a potentially disturbing topic in class, an instructor might articulate a #verbal_trigger_warning such as the following:

      Next class our discussion will probably touch on the sexual assault that is depicted in the second last chapter of The White Hotel. This content is disturbing, so I encourage you to prepare yourself emotionally beforehand. If you believe that you will find the discussion to be traumatizing, you may choose to not participate in the discussion or to leave the classroom. You will still, however, be responsible for material that you miss, so if you leave the room for a significant time, please arrange to get notes from another student or see me individually.

      A version of the foregoing trigger warning might also preface written materials:

      The following reading includes a discussion of the harsh treatment experienced by First Nations children in residential schools in the 1950s. This content is disturbing, so I encourage everyone to prepare themselves emotionally before proceeding. If you believe that the reading will be traumatizing for you, then you may choose to forgo it. You will still, however, be responsible for material that you miss, so please arrange to get notes from another student or see me individually.

      Trigger warnings, of course, are not the only answer to disturbing content. Instructional #strategies such as the following can also help students approach challenging material:

      – Give your students as much #advance_notice as possible about potentially disturbing content. A day’s notice might not be enough for a student to prepare emotionally, but two weeks might be.

      – Try to “scaffold” a disturbing topic to students. For example, when beginning a history unit on the Holocaust, don’t start with graphic photographs from Auschwitz. Instead, begin by explaining the historical context, then verbally describe the conditions within the concentration camps, and then introduce the photographic record as needed. Whenever possible, allow students to progress through upsetting material at their own pace.

      – Allow students to interact with disturbing material outside of class. A student might feel more vulnerable watching a documentary about sexual assault while in a classroom than in the security of his or her #home.

      – Provide captions when using video materials: some content is easier to watch while reading captions than while listening to the audio.

      – When necessary, provide written descriptions of graphic images as a substitute for the actual visual content.

      – When disturbing content is under discussion, check in with your students from time to time: #ask them how they are doing, whether they need a #break, and so on. Let them know that you are aware that the material in question is emotionally challenging.

      – Advise students to be #sensitive to their classmates’ #vulnerabilities when they are preparing class presentations.

      – Help your students understand the difference between emotional trauma and #intellectual_discomfort: the former is harmful, as is triggering it in the wrong context (such as in a classroom rather than in therapy); the latter is fundamental to a university education – it means our ideas are being challenged as we struggle to resolve cognitive dissonance.

      https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/trigger

    • Why Trigger Warnings Don’t Work

      Because trauma #survivors’ #memories are so specific, increasingly used “trigger warnings” are largely #ineffective.

      Fair warning labels at the beginning of movie and book reviews alert the reader that continuing may reveal critical plot points that spoil the story. The acronym NSFW alerts those reading emails or social media posts that the material is not suitable for work. The Motion Picture Association of America provides film ratings to advise about content so that moviegoers can make informed entertainment choices for themselves and their children.

      Enter stage right: Trigger warning.

      A trigger warning, most often found on #social_media and internet sites, alerts the reader that potentially upsetting information may follow. The words trigger warning are often followed by a subtitle such as *Trigger warning: This may be triggering to those who have struggled with _________. Fill in the blank. #Domestic_abuse. #Rape. #Body_image. #Needles. #Pregnancy.

      Trigger warnings have become prevalent online since about 2012. Victim advocate Gayle Crabtree reports that they were in use as early as 1996 in chat rooms she moderated. “We used the words ‘trigger warning,’ ‘#tw,’ ‘#TW,’ and ‘trigger’ early on. …This meant the survivor could see the warning and then decide if she or he wanted to scroll down for the message or not.” Eventually, trigger warnings spread to social media sites including #Tumblr, #Twitter, and #Facebook.

      The term seems to have originated from the use of the word “trigger” to indicate something that cues a #physiological_response, the way pollen may trigger an allergy attack. A trigger in a firearm is a lever that activates the sequence of firing a gun, so it is not surprising that the word was commandeered by those working in the field of #psychology to indicate objects and sensations that cause neurological firing in the brain, which in turn cause #feelings and #thoughts to occur.

      Spoiler alerts allow us to enjoy the movie or book as it unfolds without being influenced by knowledge about what comes next. The NSFW label helps employees comply with workplace policies that prohibit viewing sexually explicit or profane material. Motion picture ratings enable viewers to select movies they are most likely to find entertaining. Trigger warnings, on the other hand, are “designed to prevent people who have an extremely strong and damaging emotional response… to certain subjects from encountering them unaware.”

      Say what?

      Say hogwash!

      Discussions about trigger warnings have made headlines in the New Yorker, the Los Angeles Times, the Guardian, the New Republic, and various other online and print publications. Erin Dean writes that a trigger “is not something that offends one, troubles one, or angers one; it is something that causes an extreme involuntary reaction in which the individual re-experiences past trauma.”

      For those individuals, it is probably true that coming across material that reminds them of a traumatic event is going to be disturbing. Dean’s definition refers to involuntary fear and stress responses common in individuals with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder characterized by intrusive memories, thoughts, or dreams; intense distress at cues that remind the individual of the event; and reactivity to situations, people, or objects that symbolize the event. PTSD can result from personal victimization, accidents, incarceration, natural disasters, or any unexpected injury or threat of injury or death. Research suggests that it results from a combination of genetic predisposition, fear conditioning, and neural and physiological responses that incorporate the body systems and immunological responses. Current theories suggest that PTSD represents “the failure to recover from the normal effects of trauma.” In other words, anyone would be adversely affected by trauma, but natural mechanisms for healing take place in the majority of individuals. The prevalence of PTSD ranges from 1.9 percent in Europe to 3.5 percent in the United States.

      The notion that trigger warnings should be generalized to all social media sites, online journals, and discussion boards is erroneous.

      Some discussions have asserted that because between one in four and one in five women have been sexually abused, trigger warnings are necessary to protect vast numbers of victims from being re-traumatized. However, research shows that the majority of trauma-exposed persons do not develop PTSD. This does not mean they aren’t affected by trauma, but that they do not develop clinically significant symptoms, distress, or impairment in daily functioning. The notion that trigger warnings should be generalized to all social media sites, online journals, and discussion boards is erroneous. Now some students are pushing for trigger warnings on college class syllabi and reading lists.

      But what?

      Balderdash!

      But wait, before people get all riled up, I’d like to say that yes, I have experienced trauma in my life.

      I wore a skirt the first time George hit me. I know this because I remember scrunching my skirt around my waist and balancing in heels while I squatted over a hole in the concrete floor to take a piss. We were in Tijuana. The stench of excrement made my stomach queasy with too much tequila. I wanted to retch.

      We returned to our hotel room. I slid out of my blouse and skirt. He stripped to nothing and lay on the double bed. He was drinking Rompope from the bottle, a kind of Mexican eggnog: strong, sweet, and marketed for its excellent spunk. It’s a thick yellow rum concoction with eggs, sugar, and almond side notes. George wanted to have sex. We bickered and argued as drunks sometimes do. I said something — I know this because I always said something — and he hit me. He grabbed me by the hair and hit me again. “We’re going dancing,” he said.

      “I don’t feel like dancing — “

      “Fine. Stay.”

      The world was tilting at an angle I didn’t recognize. The mathematician Matt Tweed writes that atoms are made up of almost completely empty space. To grasp the vast nothingness, he asks the reader to imagine a cat twirling a bumblebee on the end of a half-mile long string. That’s how much emptiness there is between the nucleus and the electron. There was more space than that between George and me. I remember thinking: I am in a foreign country. I don’t speak Spanish. I have no money. We went dancing.

      Labeling a topic or theme is useless because of the way our brains work. The labels that we give trauma (assault, sexual abuse, rape) are not the primary source of triggers. Memories are, and not just memories, but very specific, insidious, and personally individualized details lodged in our brain at the time of the trauma encoded as memory. Details can include faces, places, sounds, smells, tastes, voices, body positions, time of day, or any other sensate qualities that were present during a traumatic incident.

      If I see a particular shade of yellow or smell a sickly sweet rum drink, I’m reminded of my head being yanked by someone who held a handful of my hair in his fist. A forest green Plymouth Duster (the car we drove) will too. The word assault does not. The words domestic violence don’t either. The specificity of details seared in my mind invokes memory.

      Last year a driver slammed into the back of my car on the freeway. The word tailgate is not a trigger. Nor is the word accident. The flash of another car suddenly encroaching in my rearview mirror is. In my mid-20s, I drove my younger sister (sobbing, wrapped in a bed sheet) to the hospital where two male officers explained they were going to pluck her pubic hair for a rape kit. When I see tweezers in a hospital, I flash back to that awful moment. For my sister, other things may be triggers: the moonlight shining on the edge of a knife. The shadow of a person back lit in a doorway. An Hispanic man’s accent. If we were going to insist on trigger warnings that work, they would need to look something like this:

      Trigger warning: Rompope.

      Trigger warning: a woman wrapped in a bed sheet.

      Trigger warning: the blade of a knife.

      The variability of human #perception and traumatic recall makes it impossible to provide the necessary specificity for trigger warnings to be effective. The nature of specificity is, in part, one reason that treatment for traumatic memories involves safely re-engaging with the images that populate the survivor’s memory of the event. According to Dr. Mark Beuger, an addiction psychiatrist at Deerfield Behavioral Health of Warren (PA), the goal of PTSD treatment is “to allow for processing of the traumatic experience without becoming so emotional that processing is impossible.” By creating a coherent narrative of the past event through telling and retelling the story to a clinician, survivors confront their fears and gain mastery over their thoughts and feelings.

      If a survivor has had adequate clinical support, they could engage online with thoughts or ideas that previously had been avoided.

      According to the National Center for Health, “#Avoidance is a maladaptive #control_strategy… resulting in maintenance of perceived current threat. In line with this, trauma-focused treatments stress the role of avoidance in the maintenance of PTSD. Prolonged exposure to safe but anxiety-provoking trauma-related stimuli is considered a treatment of choice for PTSD.” Avoidance involves distancing oneself from cues, reminders, or situations that remind one of the event that can result in increased #social_withdrawal. Trigger warnings increase social withdrawal, which contributes to feelings of #isolation. If a survivor who suffers from PTSD has had adequate clinical support, they could engage online with thoughts or ideas that previously had been avoided. The individual is in charge of each word he or she reads. At any time, one may close a book or click a screen shut on the computer. What is safer than that? Conversely, trigger warnings perpetuate avoidance. Because the intrusive memories and thoughts are internal, trigger warnings suggest, “Wait! Don’t go here. I need to protect you from yourself.”

      The argument that trigger warnings help to protect those who have suffered trauma is false. Most people who have experienced trauma do not require preemptive protection. Some may argue that it would be kind to avoid causing others distress with upsetting language and images. But is it? Doesn’t it sometimes take facing the horrific images encountered in trauma to effect change in ourselves and in the world?

      A few weeks ago, I came across a video about Boko Haram’s treatment of a kidnapped schoolgirl. The girl was blindfolded. A man was digging a hole in dry soil. It quickly became evident, as he ushered the girl into the hole, that this would not end well. I felt anxious as several men began shoveling soil in around her while she spoke to them in a language I could not understand. I considered clicking away as my unease and horror grew. But I also felt compelled to know what happened to this girl. In the 11-minute video, she is buried up to her neck.

      All the while, she speaks to her captors, who eventually move out of the frame of the scene. Rocks begin pelting the girl’s head. One after the other strikes her as I stared, horrified, until finally, her head lay motionless at an angle that could only imply death. That video (now confirmed to be a stoning in Somalia rather than by Boko Haram) forever changed my level of concern about young girls kidnapped in other countries.

      We are changed by what we #witness. Had the video contained a trigger warning about gruesome death, I would not have watched it. Weeks later, I would have been spared the rush of feelings I felt when a friend posted a photo of her daughter playfully buried by her brothers in the sand. I would have been spared knowing such horrors occur. But would the world be a better place for my not knowing? Knowledge helps us prioritize our responsibilities in the world. Don’t we want engaged, knowledgeable citizens striving for a better world?

      Recently, the idea of trigger warnings has leapt the gulch between social media and academic settings. #Universities are dabbling with #policies that encourage professors to provide trigger warnings for their classes because of #complaints filed by students. Isn’t the syllabus warning enough? Can’t individual students be responsible for researching the class content and reading #materials before they enroll? One of the benefits of broad exposure to literature and art in education is Theory of Mind, the idea that human beings have the capacity to recognize and understand that other people have thoughts and desires that are different from one’s own. Do we want #higher_education to comprise solely literature and ideas that feel safe to everyone? Could we even agree on what that would be?

      Art occurs at the intersection of experience and danger. It can be risky, subversive, and offensive. Literature encompasses ideas both repugnant and redemptive. News about very difficult subjects is worth sharing. As writers, don’t we want our readers to have the space to respond authentically to the story? As human beings, don’t we want others to understand that we can empathize without sharing the same points of view?

      Trigger warnings fail to warn us of the very things that might cause us to remember our trauma. They insulate. They cause isolation. A trigger warning says, “Be careful. This might be too much for you.” It says, “I don’t trust you can handle it.” As a reader, that’s not a message I want to encounter. As a writer, that is not the message I want to convey.

      Trigger warnings?

      Poppycock.

      http://www.stirjournal.com/2014/09/15/trigger-what-why-trigger-warnings-dont-work

    • Essay on why a professor is adding a trigger warning to his #syllabus

      Trigger warnings in the classroom have been the subject of tremendous #debate in recent weeks, but it’s striking how little the discussion has contemplated what actual trigger warnings in actual classrooms might plausibly look like.

      The debate began with demands for trigger warnings by student governments with no power to compel them and suggestions by #administrators (made and retracted) that #faculty consider them. From there the ball was picked up mostly by observers outside higher ed who presented various #arguments for and against, and by professors who repudiated the whole idea.

      What we haven’t heard much of so far are the voices of professors who are sympathetic to the idea of such warnings talking about what they might look like and how they might operate.

      As it turns out, I’m one of those professors, and I think that discussion is long overdue. I teach history at Hostos Community College of the City University of New York, and starting this summer I’m going to be including a trigger warning in my syllabus.

      I’d like to say a few things about why.

      An Alternative Point of View

      To start off, I think it’s important to be clear about what trigger warnings are, and what purpose they’re intended to serve. Such warnings are often framed — and not just by critics — as a “you may not want to read this” notice, one that’s directed specifically at survivors of trauma. But their actual #purpose is considerably broader.

      Part of the confusion arises from the word “trigger” itself. Originating in the psychological literature, the #term can be misleading in a #non-clinical context, and indeed many people who favor such warnings prefer to call them “#content_warnings” for that reason. It’s not just trauma survivors who may be distracted or derailed by shocking or troubling material, after all. It’s any of us, and a significant part of the distraction comes not from the material itself but from the context in which it’s presented.

      In the original cut of the 1933 version of the film “King Kong,” there was a scene (depicting an attack by a giant spider) that was so graphic that the director removed it before release. He took it out, it’s said, not because of concerns about excessive violence, but because the intensity of the scene ruined the movie — once you saw the sailors get eaten by the spider, the rest of the film passed by you in a haze.

      A similar concern provides a big part of the impetus for content warnings. These warnings prepare the reader for what’s coming, so their #attention isn’t hijacked when it arrives. Even a pleasant surprise can be #distracting, and if the surprise is unpleasant the distraction will be that much more severe.

      I write quite a bit online, and I hardly ever use content warnings myself. I respect the impulse to provide them, but in my experience a well-written title and lead paragraph can usually do the job more effectively and less obtrusively.

      A classroom environment is different, though, for a few reasons. First, it’s a shared space — for the 75 minutes of the class session and the 15 weeks of the semester, we’re pretty much all #stuck with one another, and that fact imposes #interpersonal_obligations on us that don’t exist between writer and reader. Second, it’s an interactive space — it’s a #conversation, not a monologue, and I have a #responsibility to encourage that conversation as best I can. Finally, it’s an unpredictable space — a lot of my students have never previously encountered some of the material we cover in my classes, or haven’t encountered it in the way it’s taught at the college level, and don’t have any clear sense of what to expect.

      For all these reasons, I’ve concluded that it would be sound #pedagogy for me to give my students notice about some of the #challenging_material we’ll be covering in class — material relating to racial and sexual oppression, for instance, and to ethnic and religious conflict — as well as some information about their rights and responsibilities in responding to it. Starting with the summer semester, as a result, I’ll be discussing these issues during the first class meeting and including a notice about them in the syllabus.

      My current draft of that notice reads as follows:

      Course Content Note

      At times this semester we will be discussing historical events that may be disturbing, even traumatizing, to some students. If you ever feel the need to step outside during one of these discussions, either for a short time or for the rest of the class session, you may always do so without academic penalty. (You will, however, be responsible for any material you miss. If you do leave the room for a significant time, please make arrangements to get notes from another student or see me individually.)

      If you ever wish to discuss your personal reactions to this material, either with the class or with me afterwards, I welcome such discussion as an appropriate part of our coursework.

      That’s it. That’s my content warning. That’s all it is.

      I should say as well that nothing in these two paragraphs represents a change in my teaching practice. I have always assumed that if a student steps out of the classroom they’ve got a good reason, and I don’t keep tabs on them when they do. If a student is made uncomfortable by something that happens in class, I’m always glad when they come talk to me about it — I’ve found we usually both learn something from such exchanges. And of course students are still responsible for mastering all the course material, just as they’ve always been.

      So why the note, if everything in it reflects the rules of my classroom as they’ve always existed? Because, again, it’s my job as a professor to facilitate class discussion.

      A few years ago one of my students came to talk to me after class, distraught. She was a student teacher in a New York City junior high school, working with a social studies teacher. The teacher was white, and almost all of his students were, like my student, black. That week, she said, one of the classes had arrived at the point in the semester given over to the discussion of slavery, and at the start of the class the teacher had gotten up, buried his nose in his notes, and started into the lecture without any introduction. The students were visibly upset by what they were hearing, but the teacher just kept going until the end of the period, at which point he finished the lecture, put down his papers, and sent them on to math class.

      My student was appalled. She liked these kids, and she could see that they were hurting. They were angry, they were confused, and they had been given nothing to do with their #emotions. She asked me for advice, and I had very little to offer, but I left our meeting thinking that it would have been better for the teacher to have skipped that material entirely than to have taught it the way he did.

      History is often ugly. History is often troubling. History is often heartbreaking. As a professor, I have an #obligation to my students to raise those difficult subjects, but I also have an obligation to raise them in a way that provokes a productive reckoning with the material.

      And that reckoning can only take place if my students know that I understand that this material is not merely academic, that they are coming to it as whole people with a wide range of experiences, and that the journey we’re going on #together may at times be #painful.

      It’s not coddling them to acknowledge that. In fact, it’s just the opposite.

      https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2014/05/29/essay-why-professor-adding-trigger-warning-his-syllabus

  • Iran bans importation of Covid vaccines from the US and UK | World news | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/08/untrustworthy-covid-vaccines-from-us-and-uk-banned-by-iran
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/59be73de9a959d44698ba37895baa486f08f4289/0_178_2500_1500/master/2500.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    Vaccines produced by the US and UK will be banned from entering Iran, its supreme leader has said, even though his country has suffered the worst virus outbreak in the Middle East.“Imports of US and British vaccines into the country are forbidden ... They’re completely untrustworthy,” Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a live televised speech. “It’s not unlikely they would want to contaminate other nations.“Given our experience with France’s HIV-tainted blood supplies, French vaccines aren’t trustworthy either,” he added, referring to France’s contaminated blood scandal of the 1980s and 1990s.
    Khamenei’s comments reflected the tense relations between Iran and the west, which have not abated in the waning days of Donald Trump’s presidency.In his speech, Khamenei mocked American democracy and human rights in the wake of the riot at Capitol Hill in Washington, and said Iran was in no hurry to negotiate with the incoming Biden administration. But he said if the US lifted sanctions, Iran would respond. He said the issue of compensation for sanctions could be pursued at a later date.

    #Covid-19#migrant#mmigration#iran#etatsunis#grandebretagne#vaccin#sante#importation#politique#economie#isolationnisme#occident

  • Les origines néolibérales de l’antiglobalisme

    « Globalistes » contre « Nationalistes », cette nouvelle ligne de fracture politique masque la vérité : les nationalistes populistes cherchent moins à défendre un modèle social qu’à s’affranchir des contraintes internationales imposés par les règles du #libre-échange. Leur but est en réalité d’aller vers plus de #capitalisme, et de contester le droit des nations non-blanches à intégrer équitablement le jeu du libre-échange mondial.

    Depuis que Trump a installé le conflit entre les « nationalistes » et les « globalistes » comme l’antagonisme politique central, il a été repris en chœur par tous les « populistes » sans exception, de Farage à Orban en passant par Salvini et Bolsonaro. Marine Le Pen a ainsi déclaré dans un récent entretien accordé à Breitbart (le média auparavant dirigé par Bannon) : « Le globalisme est un esprit post-national […] Il porte en lui l’idée que les #frontières doivent disparaître, y compris les protections que ces frontières apportent habituellement à une #nation. Elle repose sur l’idée que ce sont les #marchés tout puissants qui décident de tout. Ce concept de globalisme est poussé par des technocrates qui ne sont jamais élus et qui sont les personnes typiques qui dirigent les choses à Bruxelles dans l’Union européenne. Les gens qui croient aux nations – les nationalistes – c’est exactement le contraire. Ils croient que les nations sont le moyen le plus efficace de protéger la #sécurité, la #prospérité et l’#identité nationales pour s’assurer que les gens prospéreront dans ces nations. »

    À l’intérieur de cette opposition, le « nationalisme » est implicitement compris comme la défense des populations attaquées par la #globalisation_économique, le retour de la #souveraineté de l’#Etat-nation et le « #protectionnisme ». Dans un entretien accordé l’an passé au Figaro, #Emmanuel_Todd estimait qu’un renversement était en train de se produire, aux États-Unis avec le protectionnisme de #Trump : « Une génération avait mis à bas, avec le néolibéralisme de Reagan, la société qu’avait instaurée l’#Etat-providence rooseveltien ; une nouvelle génération d’Américains est en train de balayer aujourd’hui le modèle des années 1980 » ; et au #Royaume-Uni, avec le #Brexit où, alors que « Thatcher était une figure du néolibéralisme aussi importante que Reagan, […] notre plus grande surprise a été de voir la #droite conservatrice assumer le Brexit et discuter à présent ses modalités, et même s’engager à tâtons dans un #conservatisme de “gauche” ».

    Mais la rupture produite par les populistes va-t-elle effectivement dans le sens annoncé par Todd, d’une limitation du #libre-échange, d’un recul du néolibéralisme et d’un #conservatisme_social ? Rien n’est moins sûr dès que l’on s’intéresse à la provenance de ce #nationalisme_anti-globaliste.

    De Thatcher au Brexit : nations souveraines et #libre_entreprise

    Avant d’être soutenu par une partie des ouvriers britanniques déclassés, le Brexit trouve ses origines dans l’#euroscepticisme du Parti conservateur britannique dont la figure de proue a été… #Thatcher. C’est son célèbre discours devant le Collège de l’Europe à Bruges en septembre 1988 qui a fait émerger le think-tank du « Groupes de Bruges » réunissant des Tories eurosceptiques dont #Alan_Sked et #Nigel_Farage, et dont bientôt sortirait le #UKIP conduisant le Royaume-Uni au Brexit. Thatcher tançait dans son discours le « super-État européen exerçant une nouvelle domination depuis Bruxelles », elle opposait l’Europe existante de la #communauté_économique_européenne, celle de la #bureaucratie, du #centralisme et du #protectionnisme à l’#Europe de la #libre-entreprise, du #libre-échange et de la #déréglementation qu’elle appelait de ses vœux.

    Il fallait surtout en finir avec le protectionnisme à l’égard du monde extra-européen de façon à réconcilier les nations européennes avec les « marchés réellement globaux ». La critique de l’Europe ne portait cependant pas seulement sur les contraintes pesant sur la #libre_entreprise, la recherche d’une identité européenne transcendante faisait aussi courir le risque d’une disparition des #identités_nationales avec leurs coutumes et leurs traditions. Contre ce « méga-État artificiel », il fallait concevoir l’Europe comme une « famille de nations ».

    Le libre-échange d’une part et le nationalisme d’autre part que Thatcher opposait à la bureaucratie régulatrice de Bruxelles, n’étaient du reste pas séparés, mais bien d’un seul tenant : « Je n’eus d’autre choix, affirme-t-elle dans ses mémoires, que de brandir le drapeau de la #souveraineté_nationale, de la #liberté_du_commerce et de la #liberté_d’entreprise – et de combattre ». On se situe donc à mille lieux d’un nationalisme qui chercherait à s’établir en rempart contre la #mondialisation économique et le libre-échange : c’est au contraire la récupération de la #souveraineté_nationale qui, en s’affranchissant des contraintes supranationales européennes, doit permettre aux peuples de se réconcilier avec le libre-échange mondialisé.

    Or cette position nationale-néolibérale, qui veut faire de la nation britannique l’actrice directe de son inscription dans la #mondialisation_économique, est celle de tous les principaux brexiters, Farage en tête, mais aussi de tous les défenseurs d’un « hard brexit » parmi l’establishment Tory, de #Boris_Johnson à #Jacob_Ress-Mogg en passant par #Steven_Baker et #Dominic_Rabb. Au deuxième semestre 2018, une enquête de Greenpeace a révélé que #David_Davis, l’ancien secrétaire au Brexit de #Theresa_May, #Owen_Paterson, l’ancien secrétaire à l’agriculture et à l’environnement de David Cameron, et #Shanker_Singham, un expert commercial de l’Institute of Economic Affairs, s’étaient rendus en Oklahoma au cours d’un voyage financé par le lobby agro-industriel américain pour préparer avec des membres de l’administration Trump un accord commercial bilatéral post-Brexit, prévoyant notamment l’importation en Angleterre de #poulet lavé au chlore et de #bœuf aux hormones.

    Paterson, en déplorant qu’un tel accord soit impossible dans le cadre actuel des réglementations de l’Union européenne, a tweeté qu’il était essentiel que « le Royaume-Uni ait le contrôle de ses tarifs et de son cadre réglementaire ». C’est peu de dire qu’on est loin du « #conservatisme_de_gauche » … Au contraire, comme l’avait anticipé Thatcher, la récupération de la souveraineté nationale face à l’#Union_européenne est le moyen de plus de #déréglementation et de libre-échange.

    Anti-globalisme et libre-échangisme mondialisé chez #Rothbard

    Qu’en est-il aux États-Unis ? « La génération qui est en train de balayer le modèle des années 1980 » est-elle, à la différence du Royaume-Uni, en rupture avec le néolibéralisme de Reagan ? La droite radicale qui a contesté l’héritage de Reagan pour finalement aboutir à l’élection de Donald Trump s’est construite au tournant des années 1990 dans les marges du Parti républicain. Réunissant des « paléo-libertariens » autour de #Murray_Rothbard et #Lew_Rockwell et des « paléo-conservateurs » autour de Patrick Buchanan, ce mouvement s’appelait « paléo » parce qu’il revendiquait un retour à la #Droite_originaire (#Old_Right) du Parti républicain entre les années 1930 et 1950 qui défendait l’#isolationnisme et les intérêts de la nation américaine (#America_First) contre l’#interventionnisme_militaire, mais aussi la #liberté_individuelle, le gouvernement minimal et la propriété privée contre le #New_Deal et le #Welfare_state. Il s’était formé pour contester la prise du pouvoir sous #Reagan puis l’hégémonie sous Bush des néoconservateurs et leur imposition du #Nouvel_ordre_mondial. Leur critique s’est incarnée dans les campagnes des primaires républicaines de #Buchanan en 1992 et 1996.

    Ce que ciblaient les paléo dans le Nouvel ordre mondial, c’était un super-étatisme internationaliste, un système mondial de Welfare-warfare state, où l’importation de la « démocratie globale » partout dans le monde par l’interventionnisme américain sous l’égide de l’ONU se conjuguait à un gouvernement économique mondial de type keynésien. Les termes de « globalisme » et de globaloney étaient utilisés notamment par Rothbard au début des années 1990 pour décrier ce système et ils étaient empruntés au vocabulaire de la Old Right pour qui ils désignaient déjà ce complexe internationaliste de l’interventionnisme extérieur onusien et de la perspective d’un New Deal global que ses membres critiquaient dans les politiques de Franklin Roosevelt et Harry Truman.

    Rothbard puisait notamment son inspiration chez un historien révisionniste de la Seconde Guerre mondiale dont il avait été proche, Harry Elmer Barnes. De plus, dans les années 1970, alors que la Guerre du Vietnam était encore en cours, des anti-impérialistes avec qui il collaborait avaient déjà remis au goût du jour la critique du globalisme. Lorsque la globalisation économique se concrétisa dans la première moitié des années 1990 avec l’Alena puis la création de l’OMC, ces nouveaux éléments devinrent partie intégrante de sa critique et les nouvelles cibles de l’attaque contre le « globalisme ». Rothbard dénonçait l’Alena comme du « commerce bureaucratique réglementé » conçu par « un sinistre Establishment centriste dont le dévouement à la liberté et au libre-échange s’apparente à celui de Leonid Brejnev ». L’Alena entraînait en particulier une harmonisation des législations vers le haut qui allait contraindre les entreprises américaines à se soumettre aux normes environnementales et au droit du travail contraignants des législations canadiennes et mexicaines contrôlées par des syndicalistes et des socialistes.

    Tout ce « mercantilisme » ne signifiait rien d’autre selon lui que la spoliation que les élites politiques mondiales opéraient sur le libre-échange véritable au détriment de la masse des gens qui ne pouvaient en jouir directement. Il alertait sur la perte de souveraineté que représentait l’Alena qu’il comparait au « super-étatisme de la Communauté européenne » car cet accord imposait la mise sur pied d’« institutions d’un super-gouvernement internationaliste arrachant la prise de décision des mains des Américains ». Face à cette « politique globaliste » (globalist policy), une « nouvelle coalition populiste » et « un nouveau nationalisme américain » devaient être définis : il fallait abroger l’Alena, se retirer de toutes les agences gouvernementales supranationales (ONU, OIT, UNESCO, etc.), stopper l’aide au développement et durcir les conditions d’immigration qui provoquaient l’élargissement de l’État social, au nom d’authentiques marchés libres.

    Comme chez Thatcher, on est à l’opposé d’une critique du libre-échange ; le nationalisme est au contraire là aussi un moyen de sauver le libre-échange mondialisé qui est confisqué par les institutions supranationales bureaucratiques et socialisantes – en un mot « globalistes ».

    Lorsque les populistes s’attaquent au « globalisme », ils emboîtent le pas d’une critique qui ne visait pas à l’origine la mondialisation des échanges de biens et de services, mais au contraire le super-étatisme des élites politiques mondiales qui parasitent le fonctionnement du libre-échange mondialisé. Une distinction conceptuelle s’impose donc entre le « globalisme » et le « mondialisme », puisque dans les cas des héritages de Thatcher ou de Rothbard, l’anti-globalisme va de pair avec un mondialisme libre-échangiste absolument revendiqué.
    Anti-globalisme et hiérarchie des nations de Buchanan à Trump

    Aux États-Unis, après la seconde campagne de Buchanan pour les primaires républicaines de 1996, les premiers doutes des libertariens ont cependant laissé place à la rupture avec les paléo-conservateurs autour de la question du protectionnisme et des barrières tarifaires. La rupture fut définitivement consommée en 1998 avec la publication du livre de Buchanan The Great Betrayal. How American Sovereignty and Social Justice Are Being Sacrified to the Gods of the Global Economy. C’est dans ce livre que Buchanan affirme son attachement au « nationalisme économique » et qu’il fait du « conflit » entre les « nationalistes » et les « globalistes » le « nouveau conflit de l’époque qui succède à la Guerre froide »[1], définissant la ligne que reprendront littéralement Bannon et Trump. Soutenant le protectionnisme industriel, il déplace le contenu de l’anti-globalisme dans le sens de la défense des intérêts économiques nationaux contre la mondialisation du libre-échange.

    Cependant, l’opposition simple entre le nationalisme économique à base de protectionnisme industriel et le libre-échange illimité mérite d’être approfondie. D’abord, Buchanan est toujours resté un adversaire résolu de l’État-providence et The Great Betrayal est surtout une défense de l’économie américaine pré-New Deal où l’existence de barrières tarifaires aux importations a coïncidé avec une période de croissance. Pour autant, cette période a été marquée par de fortes inégalités économiques et sociales.

    Ensuite, dans le cas de Trump, l’usage qu’il fait du protectionnisme est pour le moins pragmatique et ne relève pas d’une position de principe. Lorsqu’il a baissé drastiquement fin 2017 l’impôt sur les sociétés, il a montré que sa défense de l’emploi américain ne convergeait pas nécessairement avec la « justice sociale ». Ciblant certaines industries correspondant à son électorat comme l’automobile, il se sert surtout des barrières tarifaires aux importations comme d’une arme parfois purement psychologique et virtuelle, parfois effective mais temporaire, dans une guerre commerciale qui peut aboutir à davantage de libre-échange.

    Dans l’USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement), l’accord de l’Alena renégocié, si 75% des composants d’une automobile devront être fabriqués aux États-Unis pour qu’elle soit exemptée de barrières douanières (contre 62, 5% avec l’Alena), en revanche le marché laitier canadien sera davantage ouvert aux fermiers américains, tandis que Trump a récemment supprimé les barrières aux importations d’acier et d’aluminium venant du Mexique et du Canada, pour inciter ces pays à ratifier l’USMCA. S’il continue de se servir des droits de douane punitifs dans la guerre commerciale avec la Chine, il a recherché davantage de libre-échange avec l’Union européenne.

    Enfin, lorsque des journalistes demandèrent à Buchanan de quel économiste il s’inspirait, il répondit qu’il s’agissait de Wilhelm Röpke[2], l’un des principaux fondateurs de l’ordo-libéralisme, la forme prise par le néolibéralisme en Allemagne qui inspira la politique économique de Ludwig Erhardt sous Adenauer. Or Röpke n’était pas un thuriféraire, mais bien au contraire un opposant farouche au « nationalisme économique » et au « protectionnisme » qui représentait des fléaux pour l’ordre économique international qu’il cherchait à construire[3]. Cependant, il estimait que le libre-échange mondial ne pouvait intégrer les nations postcoloniales, car il n’avait été possible avant la première guerre mondiale que parmi le cercle des nations occidentales partageant un même ordre de valeurs culturelles et religieuses.

    Cette insistance sur des conditions extra-économiques morales et spirituelles au développement économique fait qu’il revendique une « troisième voie » appelée « économie humaine » entre le libre-échange purement fondé sur la concurrence et la social-démocratie. En cohérence avec cette « économie humaine », il s’engagea publiquement en faveur du maintien de l’apartheid en Afrique du Sud parce que les Noirs sud-africains se situaient « à un niveau de développement qui excluaient la véritable intégration spirituelle et politique avec les Blancs hautement civilisés »[4].

    Son nationalisme n’était finalement pas dirigé contre le libre-échange, mais pour un ordre hiérarchique international fondé sur des conditions de développement économiques différenciées, ne laissant pas aux nations non blanches les moyens d’intégrer le libre-échange mondial. Lorsque Buchanan tempête contre l’immigration et la reconquista économique mexicaine menaçant la culture américaine, il se situe effectivement dans le sillage de la position nationale-néolibérale de Röpke. Dans un débat télévisé en vue des élections européennes de 2019, Marine Le Pen promettait elle aussi, du reste, d’opposer au « capitalisme sauvage » une « économie humaine ».

    Lorsque des universitaires ou des commentateurs, y compris à gauche, insistent sur les aspects économiques positifs pour les populations, du nationalisme anti-globaliste, ils se méprennent absolument sur les origines comme sur les politiques menées par les populistes nationalistes. Ceux-ci revendiquent la récupération de la souveraineté nationale et critiquent les règles transnationales de la globalisation économique, non pour protéger leur modèle social et le droit du travail de leur population, mais pour s’affranchir de ce qui resterait en elles de contraintes environnementales ou sociales, et s’en servir comme tremplin vers plus de capitalisme et de libre-échange, ou pour contester le droit des nations non-blanches à intégrer équitablement le jeu du libre-échange mondial. Dans cette bataille, ce sont les national-néolibéraux qui affrontent les globalistes néolibéraux, dans une course qui pousse le monde dans une direction toujours plus mortifère, et ne comporte pas le moindre aspect positif.

    https://aoc.media/analyse/2019/10/28/les-origines-neoliberales-de-lantiglobalisme

    #nationalisme #globalisme #anti-globalisme #néolibéralisme #néo-libéralisme #populisme #discours_de_Bruges #industrie_agro-alimentaire #boeuf

    ping @karine4

  • North Korea’s police state hints at virus victory - Asia Times
    https://asiatimes.com/2020/06/north-koreas-police-state-hints-at-covid-19-victory

    North Korea, one of the most isolated states on earth, releases minimal data to the global community, making everything from its annual gross domestic product (GDP) to the whereabouts of its leader sources of speculation among Pyongyangologists in Seoul, Tokyo, Washington and elsewhere.Though North Korea has so not, so far, reported a single infection or death from Covid-19, indications are that it has taken the viral disease – as it did earlier pandemics such as SARS – very seriously.
    It was one of the first countries to close its borders as the pandemic spread, and in the early stages quarantined foreign residents in a compound in Pyongyang. Meanwhile, the state TV network has been running repeated messaging on how to prevent outbreaks.
    While it is impossible to guess how many infections or deaths North Korea has suffered, there have been signals of outbreaks. Reports from Daily NK, a website that gathers information from citizens in the country via smuggled cellphones, has reported related matters including the postponement of a major military parade and soldiers suffering Covid-like symptoms.The country has an underfunded healthcare system and a population that is significantly afflicted with malnutrition – a factor that weakens immune systems – but is systemically well equipped to deal with pandemics, experts say.

    #Covid-10#CoréeNord#fermeture-frontières#pandémie#isolationnisme#système-santé#quarantaine#santé#symptômes#migrant#migration

  • AYS Daily Digest 17/04/20

    GREECE
    An article has been published in the German newspaper DER SPIEGEL that gives insight into the Greek government’s plans to handle an outbreak of COVID-19 in the camps on the mainland and the islands. The plan is called Agnodike and comprises three levels:
    1. Preventive measures: Lockdown and partial curfew, controlled by police. A special area will be assigned in which new arrivals can be tested and cases of infection can be isolated.
    2. First cases inside the camp: complete curfew. NGOs are only allowed in with special permission. Health stations will be erected with space for 30 people.
    3. The virus spreads, evacuation: complete separation of healthy and infected people. The smaller of the two groups will be evacuated and accommodated in hotels, ships or gyms.

    A total of 2,300 most vulnerable people will be transferred from the islands to the mainland. These people are above 60 years of age or have chronic diseases. They will be transferred together with their families. The transfers are supposed to take place after the Orthodox Easter celebrations on April 19th. The people will be housed in camps, apartments, and hotels.

    The Moria Corona Awarness Team and the Moria White Helmets, two volunteer refugee groups, wrote a dramatic appeal to the European Union.
    “While Corona spread in Greece and here in Lesvos, we expected the worst, because this virus in the camp would be like a death sentence for old, sick and other vulnerable individuals”

    Three groups of people are still camping rough on the northern coast of Lesvos, without any substantial aid or support. They have been there for some 25 days now. The people told Mare Liberum: “different people tell us different things, and that changes day by day”. Apparently it is clear now that they will stay on the island and will eventually be able to apply for asylum. The local authorities are apparently fighting about who should take care of them. According to a new law, the communes in which the people are should take care of them, but they seem to be lacking the political will.

    IOM is proud to present a video of the distribution of food baskets and hygiene kits in the Malakasa camp in central Greece. The camp is run by IOM and hosts 1,600 people, including 620 children. The camp has been under quarantine since April 5th. If people have been without hygiene kits since that time, there is nothing to be proud of. “Immediate response” to a contagious disease for people who are not allowed to leave a facility and take care for themselves should not take almost two weeks.

    The journalist Mortaza Behboudi, who is an indispensable source on the ground who covers the living conditions in Moria for the French /German TV channel ARTE, has been attacked and exposed to threats of physical violence on Twitter by the Greek right wing politician Thanos Tzimeros. Reporters without borders is concerned about Mortaza’s security and calls on the politician to refrain from smearing journalists.

    Movement on the Ground donated 8,000 pieces of essential soap to the Vathy camp management on Samos. About 6,900 people live in and around the camp. The soap was distributed to all of them during the week.

    Recognized refugees in Greece face big challenges after their asylum process is completed. The UNHCR ESTIA program (Emergency Support to Integration and Accomodation) is not designed for recognized refugees. Since it is very difficult for them to find a job or receive state benefits, many of them become homeless. This is especially problematic for families, as homeless shelters do not accept them at all.

    The US Ambassador to Greece Geoffrey Pyatt announced that US will support Greece with 500,000 $ to support COVID-19 response efforts for migrants and refugees.
    This February 2020 Factsheet from UNHR gives a good overview on what UNHCR is doing in Greece.

    About 50 minors who are being transferred to Germany from the Greek islands will arrive in Germany today, on April 18th. We falsely reported that they had already arrived yesterday.

    CROATIA
    Violent push-backs from Croatia to Bosnia continue in the time of the pandemic, as No Name Kitchen reports:
    “Over the last several weeks, we have continued to receive reports and news updates of the violent push-back of people-on-the-move by Croatian authorities to the borderlands surrounding Velika Kladusa, Bosnia (the men in the pictures above experienced this brutality within the last week). These testimonies of violence include stories of individuals being beaten with batons, thrown into cold rivers, and having their clothing stolen.”

    BH
    The Red Cross in Bihac and the Civil Protection Headquarters of Bosnia’s Federation have set up a new camp, consisting of 50 tents with 200 beds in total. The camp is supposed to accommodate the people on the move who are currently in the northwestern Una-Sana Canton.
    About 7,000 people are currently stranded in the Bihac region. About 3,300 are accommodated in closed camps, the rest live in abandoned buildings and shelters. During the corona pandemic resentment against the people is rising; at the same time their life is getting even harder, as they are not allowed to use public transport, cannot be seen in groups, some shops won’t let them in to buy groceries and the police gets more violent towards them every day.

    #Covid-19 #Migration #Migrant #Balkans #Grèce #Bosnie-Herzégovine #Croatie #Confinement #Isolation #Couvrefeu #Transfert #Grècecontinentale #Hotel #Bateau #Gymnase #Lesbos #Malakasa #Quarantaine #Allemagne #mineursnonaccompagnés #Enfants #Bihac #Unasanacanton

    https://medium.com/are-you-syrious/ays-daily-digest-17-04-20-at-least-some-of-the-people-who-have-been-rescued-

  • La politique des putes

    Océan réalise, avec « La #Politique_des_putes », une enquête en immersion dans laquelle il tend le micro à des travailleuses·rs du sexe. Elles disent le stigmate, la marginalisation, la précarité, les violences systémiques mais aussi les ressources et l’empowerment. Pour elles, l’intime est résistance. Dix épisodes de 30 mn pour briser les préjugés.



    La Politique des putes (1/10) - Travailler
    La Politique des putes (2/10) - Stigmatiser
    La Politique des putes (3/10) - Militer
    La Politique des putes (4/10) - Choisir
    La Politique des putes (5/10) - Désirer
    La Politique des putes (6/10) - Migrer
    La Politique des putes (7/10) - Soigner
    La Politique des putes (8/10) - S’échapper
    La Politique des putes (9/10) - Agir
    La Politique des putes (10/10) - Construire

    http://www.nouvellesecoutes.fr/podcasts/intime-politique

    #sex_work #prostitution #patriarchy #capitalism #feminism #wage_labor #whorephobe #whorephobia #pimping #stigma #bias #prejudice #stigmatization #discrimination #systemic_violence #instiutional_violence #heterosexual_concept #sexual_education #normalisation #abolotionism #black_and_white #subventions #decriminalisation #penalty #laws #rights #transphobia #domination #marginalisation #vulnerability #invisbility #undocumented #isolation #fear #police_harassment #physical_violence #rape #precarity #affirmation #empowerment #dignity #trust #solidarity #network #community #choice #perception #society #associations #seropositive #access_to_healthcare #suicidal_thought #debt #menace #voodoo #exploitation #trafficking #migration #borders #family_pressure #clients_image #mudered #testimony #interview #podcast #audio #France #Paris

    “sex work is not dirty - dirty are all the representations about sex work” (La politique des putes 7/10, min 7).

  • Movement Ban Worsens Migrants’ Plight in #Serbia, #Bosnia-and-Herzegovina

    https://balkaninsight.com/2020/04/09/movement-ban-worsens-migrants-plight-in-serbia-bosnia

    Ivana Jeremic, Milica Stojanovic and Anja VladisavljevicBelgrade, Zagreb BIRN April 9, 202013:08

    The complete ban of moving in and out of #camps imposed in the current pandemic has left those locked inside them feeling more isolated, frustrated and information-starved than ever.
    Local and international #organisations that assist migrants and refugees are no longer able to enter reception centres in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina due to the complete ban on movement in and out of the camps related to the #COVID-19 pandemic.

    Besides leaving the people in the camps in a state of forced #isolation and inactivity, these organisations warn that it is also leading to a lack of information and support which, combined with the ban on movement, could lead to incidents.

    Serbia imposed a state of quarantine on all its reception centres on March 17. Since then, people have not been allowed out of the centres unless it is to seek medical care, or with special permission. The ban works both ways, so no staff from rights organization can enter the facilities either.

    It has left the migrants and asylum-seekers inside without support, help or information, the director of the #Belgrade -based NGO Asylum Protection Center, Rados Djurovic, said.

    “Since the crisis began, for almost a month, access has been denied to anyone providing psychological, legal or other assistance, so they have no activities and are locked in the camps,” Djurovic told BIRN.

    Instead, the camp inmates “receive information through social networks and by phone contact with some of us”, he added.

    Media reports say at least two violent incidents have occurred in the last few days among migrants and asylum-seekers in centres in Serbia, one in #Krnjaca and the other in #Obrenovac, both in the wider area of Belgrade. Reports said #police and the #armée had to intervene to calm things down.

    “The problem here is that these people have been quarantined (#quarantaine) for 24 hours a day for almost a month now,” Djurovic told BIRN. “These people are completely shut inside in all the centres … and they have needs that can hardly be met in this way, so it causes a lot of fear and … affects their psycho-physical condition,” he added.

    The number of people affected by the quarantine measures in camps in Serbia is not small. On April 4, Serbia’s Commissariat for Refugees and Migrants said the camps in Serbia hosted a total of 8,703 persons.

    Djurovic said the measures imposed or recommended for Serbian citizens, especially when it comes to social distancing, were clearly not being applied to migrants and asylum-seekers cooped up in close proximity to one another in camps.

    “This is a group that is completely sidelined. Measures are being implemented for them that at first glance are the opposite of what our citizens are told, like [the need for] social distancing,” he said.

    “Everyone is put in one basket here, they are secured under arms and do not get enough information or enough protection,” Djurovic told BIRN.

    A video that BIRN has seen, sent by a person located in a centre in the town of Obrenovac, shows a lot of people waiting in a close line for food and then having their dinner in a crowded area. There is no social distancing.

    Bosnia’s crowded camps have only got worse:

    In neighbouring Bosnia and Herzegovina, the movement of migrants and refugees is also restricted as a result of the pandemic, creating additional problems in already overcrowded reception centres.

    Bosnia’s #Una-SanaCanton, in the west of the country, near the border with EU-member Croatia, has been hardest hit by the migrant crisis, owing to the number of people piling up there, hoping to cross over into the EU.

    On March 16, the Crisis Staff of the canton’s Health, Labour and Social Policy ministry ordered “a complete restriction on the movement of migrants outside the temporary centres”, which are estimated to hold about 2,000 persons.

    “It is forbidden to transport migrants by any means of transport – train, bus, van, taxi, etc – to the Una-Sana Canton, or use transportation in the Una-Sana Canton. In addition … the entry of migrants on foot into the Una-Sana Canton is prohibited,” the authorities said.

    IPSIA, an Italian NGO that has been working in Bosnia since 1997 and is helping migrants and refugees in the northwestern town of #Bihac, said it feared migrants camping in squats and improvised camps could end up living in even more dangerous conditions.

    “The police in any case cannot monitor whether the migrants are respecting these measures because of the large number of people [staying] outside the camps,” IPSIA told BIRN.

    “In general, the situation in the Bihac camps is not bad, even if it is somehow boring and sad, since many organizations cannot work inside them, as group activities and workshops can no longer be done,” it said.

    “Many NGOs in the camps have had to suspend their activities in the field, but are still working at a distance –for example [by providing], legal or psychological support,” it added.

    The #SarajevoCanton, which includes the Bosnian capital and various nearby towns and villages, has also imposed restrictions on the movement of migrants and ordered them into temporary reception centres.

    On April 8, the #Sarajevo Cantonal police told the media that they were actively working to remove migrants from the streets to reduce the risk of the coronavirus spreading.

    The canton’s Interior Ministry said the police would “carry out direct external security and checking of migrant centres in the Sarajevo Canton” and would “continue the activity of relocating migrants who may be found outside the reception centres”.

    Can’t go out to buy food or tobacco:

    The International Organization for Migration, #IOM, which manages temporary reception centres for migrants and refugees in Bosnia and Herzegovina, told BIRN it had so far found no cases of the coronavirus among the roughly 6,500 migrants held in them.

    But IPSIA said that situation was “frustrating” for migrants and refugees due to restrictions on the “basic right of freedom of movement, even if at this moment nobody has so much freedom because of COVID-19”, because they “can’t go to buy the food they like or recharge phone credits or buy cigarettes”.

    It said that the IOM had come up with a temporary solution for some camps in the area, such as #Miral, #Sedra and #Bira, however. Here, private companies (#compagniesprivées) are now bringing in food in vans and selling it to people for regular prices.

    With the cooperation of the IOM, IPSIA volunteers are helping migrants and refugees in the Borici camp, located on the outskirts of Bihac, by buying supplies for them from the local supermarket.

    The restrictions on the movement of migrants have also had one another side-effect. Few migrants in Bosnia can now run the gauntlet of trying to cross the nearby border into #Croatia – a process known locally among migrants and refugees as “The Game”.

  • No Coronavirus Cases Found Yet Among Migrants, Refugees in Bosnia

    https://balkaninsight.com/2020/04/06/no-coronavirus-cases-found-yet-among-migrants-refugees-in-bosnia

    The IOM says it has not found any cases of COVID-19 among the thousands of migrants and refugees hosted in centres it manages in Bosnia – though several hundred recent arrivals have been placed in isolation as a precautionary measure.

    The International Organization for Migration, IOM, which manages temporary reception centres, TRCs, for migrants and refugees in Bosnia and Herzegovina, told BIRN it had found no cases of coronavirus among the roughly 6,500 migrants held in them.

    “So far, there have been no suspected cases with pronounced symptoms, and one person referred for testing … tested negative,” Edita Selimbegovic, an IOM information officer told BIRN.

    Despite that, 715 migrants and refugees in centres located in the Una-Sana Canton, in western Bosnia, are being held in isolation in special rooms as a precautionary measure to prevent the spread of the coronavirus, Nermina Cemalovic, Health Minister for the canton, told the media on Thursday.

    Selimbegovic said they were not thought to be ill; they were only being kept in isolation because they had arrived in the country recently.

    “Just like any citizens or foreigners arriving in Bosnia from abroad, they are kept in isolation as a precautionary measure to prevent them from bringing COVID-19 to other beneficiaries of the centres,” Selimbegovic said.

    Many are migrants and refugees returning from failed attempts to cross the Bosnia border into EU-member Croatia, who are then treated like new arrivals in Bosnia, and put for 14 days in a separate isolation area.

    Minister Cemalovic said the situation was most critical in the Miral reception centre in the northwestern town of Velika Kladusa, near Croatia, which currently houses about 1,100 migrants and refugees – significantly higher than the projected capacity.

    “A few days ago, about 200 migrants crossed the [camp] fence and simply entered the camp. They had been returned from Slovenia and were immediately put in isolation. We are following the situation and so far have recorded four mild cases of illness, two in Miral and two in Sedra [another TRC]. They have no temperatures, have a cough, and their condition is under control,” Cemalovic said.

    All TRCs in Bosnia now have quarantine spaces where migrants and refugees who have COVID19-like symptoms can be placed. All the centres provide healthcare. The Danish Refugee Council, DRC, is in charge of medical co-ordination at the TRCs and works in conjunction with cantonal health teams.

    However, many migrants and refugees in Bosnia are not staying in TRCs, so their health status is less clear. Bosnian police routinely find them on the streets and take them to the TRCs. Many are not even aware of the new measures introduced in Bosnia, such as bans on outdoor movement and the curfew.

    Amid fears that their uncontrolled movement around the country could spread COVID-19, the authorities have introduced tighter controls in the reception centres, which migrants and refugees can no longer leave, or enter.

    In the northwestern town of Bihac, this has created major difficulties for local authorities. Hundreds of them – for whom there is now no space in the TRCs – have been left to roam in ruins and parks.

    A decision was made to establish a temporary tent settlement for them in controlled conditions in the village of Lipa, some 20 kilometres from Bihac, but this has not been completed yet.

    #Covid-19 #Migration #Migrant #Balkans #Bosnie-Herzégovine #Camp #Isolation #UnaSanaCanton #Miral #VelikaKladusa #Sedra #Bihac #Lipa #Quarantaine #Encampement #Squat #Refoulements #Croatie #Slovénie

  • [L’étranger] Show #400: Ave Disuniters Theism
    http://www.radiopanik.org/emissions/l-etranger/show-400-ave-disuniters-theism

    “Avis: This is about promiscuity and #isolation.The street giving way to the Internet. The end of body contact among the generations. The death of the city as we know it. It is the triumph of the archetypal Protestant—at home and alone with his God.” - Bruce Benderson, Sex & Isolation (University of Wisconsin Press, 2007)

    #virus #lockdown #virus,lockdown,isolation
    http://www.radiopanik.org/media/sounds/l-etranger/show-400-ave-disuniters-theism_08607__1.mp3

    • How to study at home during coronavirus – by online students and tutors

      Here’s how to study effectively from home, according to those who have been doing it all along

      For Dafydd Evans, 21, who studies media production at De Montfort University, online teaching has got off to a good start. “I didn’t think the new systems would cope, but they have,” he says. “We have contact with academics as normal and I really don’t think there’s much I’m missing out on.”

      Others, however, say it’s been an uphill struggle. “The sites are crashing and lecturers are struggling to turn face-to-face interactions into online discussions,” says Isabel Thomas (not her real name), who studies international development at the University of Sussex. “We don’t all log on at the same time as some don’t have stable enough internet connection for live chats. Everything is slower.”

      Scott Henderson, who studies esports at Staffordshire University, feels he’s missing out on valuable experience. “A big part of what we were doing this year was running a live event and we obviously can’t go forward with that,” he says.

      Although UK university learning has been moving online for a while in light of the coronavirus crisis, this wasn’t the experience most envisaged. For others, though, it was their first choice. We asked online learners and tutors for their tips on how to make it work.

      Create a study area …

      Although you may be competing with others in your household, try to mark out a work space. “Even if this is temporary each time you use it, place some physical objects around you to customise it. Make it comfortable,” says Martin Weller, professor of educational technology at the Open University. Set boundaries with others. If your study space is now the kitchen table, try to get an agreement that it is yours alone for a set time period.

      … and keep it tidy

      It’s hard to be disciplined to work at home, and even harder if the place is cluttered. “If you have piles of dishes or laundry around you it can be difficult to focus. I like to set a timer for 15 minutes and do a quick blitz of a room. It makes for a calmer environment,” says Kimberley Lowe, who studied Spanish and English at the Open University.

      Keep socialising

      Although you may miss campus and socialising in person, reaching out and connecting with staff and other students can maintain a sense of community. Use the online systems to maintain social contact. Stephane Bignoux, senior lecturer in management at Middlesex University, says although it can feel lonely, posting on discussion boards and reading other student’s posts can help. Set up informal discussions via Skype or FaceTime if you can.

      Reach out for help

      Not everyone has access to a laptop and reliable wifi. Some students are relying on mobile data to connect to their online lessons and many are missing physical resources such as the library and laboratories. Get in touch with your university if you don’t have access to the right equipment. “We are telling staff to make content easy to view and interact with on smartphones. It needs to be much more inclusive,” says Neil Morris, dean of digital education at the University of Leeds.

      Manage your time

      Recognise that different tasks require different levels of concentration. Watching a video can be easier than reading a complex text and taking notes. Divide your work in to manageable time slots and take proper breaks.

      Plan your day

      The fact that you can put off watching recorded lectures until later can be dangerous. Make sure you devote your full attention to the recording – don’t squeeze it in while eating or listening to music. Set a routine to use time efficiently, says Jack Yarrow, 28, a final year engineering student at the Open University. “If you’re tired or not feeling great don’t just sit there – go tidy up, and when you’re feeling more awake, apply yourself then.”

      Be clear when messaging colleagues

      As with other social media platforms, a simple misunderstanding in writing can quickly escalate. “What may have been intended as an ironic comment can be misinterpreted,” warns Weller.

      On discussion forums you may find that some who don’t speak up in class have more to say – which is a good thing. “My course generally don’t interact that much in lectures, but the interaction with online teaching has been constant,” says Evans. “It seems hiding behind the screen brings out confidence in our generation.”

      https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/mar/26/how-to-study-at-home-during-coronavirus-by-online-students-and-tutors

    • Some Advice for PhD Students and Their Mentors in the Time of Coronavirus
      View all posts by Meghan Duffy →
      13-17 Minuten

      This blog post started as an email conversation between Dana Turjeman and Meghan Duffy. Dana turned her initial outline into a twitter thread (starting here). We decided it would be fun (and hopefully helpful!) to turn this into a blog post that expands on these ideas. So, here are the perspectives of a PhD student and a faculty member who are trying to figure out how to maintain mental health – and also hopefully some productivity, but that definitely comes second to physical & mental health – while social distancing.

      First, this assumes that you are not going about your normal routine, but, rather, trying to stay home as much as possible. This is strongly encouraged! If you aren’t sure of why, please read this.

      Here’s our advice:

      Most importantly: your health and the health of your loved ones comes first.

      There has been advice on how to stay productive while working from home, and we understand the motivation behind this. But we think it’s important to note that this is not business as usual. Things will be different, and it’s important to emphasize that physical and mental health come first. This should always be true, but it’s especially important right now.

      Maintain a routine – plan out your working hours, exercise, sleep, eating regularly, connections with others, work breaks, etc. (Note: this should also include keeping a sense of weekends, taking some days off from work.)

      Maybe you already were a routine kind of person – if so, great! Keep it up, adjusting your schedule to accommodate the new reality. Maybe you are not a schedule person. Take a growth mindset and give it a shot now! A lack of structure can be tough for mental health. Create structure as much as possible.

      If you can, try to get outside every day, to non-crowded places with fresh air. This might not hold to those who must stay in strict isolation (which is different from social distancing) and cannot get closer to others. But, to the extent possible, try to get sunlight and fresh air, even when indoors.

      Make sure you keep up other aspects of your normal routine. Meghan remembers how, when she was writing up her dissertation and her advisor was in a different state, she was thinking that she could just stay home all the time. At that time, she got advice along the lines of: “You need to come in at least for lunch or else first you’ll stop getting dressed, then you’ll stop showering, then you’ll stop brushing your teeth”. He had a point. So, while we aren’t going to gather in person for lunch now, it is still important to keep up normal routines!

      At the same time, be flexible. Modify your plans. Experiment with new approaches.

      We’re all going to be learning on the fly. You will misjudge how much you can do. Your initial routine may end up not working well for you. You will realize things work differently than you thought they would. This is all normal. Be flexible, and be kind with yourself and others as everyone figures out how to adjust.

      Arrange virtual coffees or lunches with colleagues, even if you didn’t have those before. Start with some small talk. (Bonus points if some of the small talk is not about coronavirus!)

      Social distancing is important, but really it’s physical distancing that we need, not social isolation. So, to the extent possible, try to connect with folks virtually.

      Stay connected, but not too connected.

      The internet helps a lot with maintaining connections with people (which is good!), but it’s also easy to get sucked in in ways that are not helpful. There are real downsides to anxiety scrolling through social media and constantly checking the news. Set limits on where you get your news and how often you check it (e.g., something like: “I will only check X sites, and I will only do that for 15 minutes four times a day” or “I will not check social media or news within 1 hour of bedtime”.) If you feel you check the news in ways that harm your mental health or productivity, and need an external boundary, try using “website blockers” on PC/Mac, and/or one of the many iPhone/Android apps. Some examples: WebsiteBlocker, ColdTurkey, HeyFocus.

      If a partner / housemate is staying with you at home, make sure to respect each other’s work time and routine. Try to get a break from time to time – by sitting in another room or, contrary to that, arranging fun games together to reduce the working stress. Being together more than you’re used to might cause stress and tension.

      Coming back to a common theme: we’re all trying to figure out new ways of working and living. Be kind, be compassionate, and communicate clearly and regularly.

      Find an accountability partner – someone you “promise” to show measurable progress of work to, and who will nudge you gently in the right direction if you’re not holding up to your promises.

      This may be a lab mate or a friend or someone else in your grad program or a colleague or a mentor. At first, it might help to check in pretty frequently – maybe three times a week or every week day. Keep the check in format short. One that Meghan has used (modified from resources from the National Center for Faculty Development and Diversity) has: 1) My goals for yesterday were ; 2) I accomplished ; 3) My goals for today are . Depending on who you are checking in with, it might also make sense to explicitly check in about non-work stuff (e.g., are you maintaining connections with folks? Taking breaks from work? Getting sleep and exercise?)

      If progress on a project is paused or delayed because you’re unable to collect data / run studies in the lab etc., try to think of all the things you can do otherwise – literature review, writing introduction of a paper, ideation for another paper etc.

      In Meghan’s group, as of last week, the only lab work going on is: 1) maintaining cultures (which cannot be frozen, unfortunately) and, 2) finishing up one experiment (the last block of an experiment that is the last chapter of the dissertation of a student who is finishing this summer). Everything else is on hold, and all but three people in the lab have been told to work from home, and we’ve discussed how even those two things that are currently going on might need to stop. The folks staying at home are analyzing data, planning for future experiments, and working on literature reviews and meta-analyses. It will be interesting to see if there’s a notable increase in lit reviews & meta-analyses in the next year!

      For the PIs/advisors/mentors, some things to keep in mind as you think about where people should work should include things like how they would get there (e.g., would they need to take public transit?), what other responsibilities they have (remember that many schools are closed now), their health, their comfort levels with being out (some people will not feel safe coming in and that should be respected), and possible impacts on their careers. For the last one, though, the bar has to be in a different place than it normally would – productivity is going to be impacted by this.

      We were really impressed with the leadership shown by Tom Finholt, the Dean of UMichigan’s School of Information, as summarized here:

      Communicate clearly and regularly

      Information vacuums cause a lot of stress. Do your best to avoid them.

      For the advisors: make sure you are in regular contact with everyone in your lab. Check on them. Keep them up to date on the status of things. Make sure they have opportunities for informal conversations where they can ask questions. You should be in touch with your lab several times a week (but also should allow for them to be on their own schedules – everyone’s solution to the current situation is going to be different!)

      One idea Meghan heard that she liked is to set up frequent (three times a week or more) virtual lab hours where people from the lab can gather online to check in and chat with each other. Bonus: this increases the number of opportunities for seeing everyone’s pets!

      For the students: If possible, update your advisers and co-authors more than you are used to. Schedule weekly meetings – even short ones – as much as possible, while recognizing that they have other things to focus on, too. Find measurable results of analyses / writing to present each time. Send short email updates to them, with small chunks of your progress. If things are requested from them, make sure to allow extra flexibility, and find things that you can do even without their feedback, so that they won’t feel obliged to respond if unable to. For example: “Hi, I did these analyses. Below you may find the results, and a draft of the text I will put in the manuscript. I would love to hear your feedback whenever you have time. However, no rush. I understand things might be busy on your side too. Therefore, meanwhile, I will be working on the literature review for the other part of the paper. “

      For everyone: It is especially important to keep up with regular check-ins right now!

      Schedule meetings with people you wanted to meet offline / online anyways – such as fellow PhD students / faculty from other places. Many conferences are cancelled (and more cancellations are surely coming), and networking will be lacking. Try being proactive in fixing this. Example: email seminar speakers who were supposed to come, or people you hoped to meet in (now cancelled) conferences, and ask to meet them online instead.

      Some people will be too busy with childcare, moving courses online, etc., but others will be excited to have a chance to connect and to have a welcome distraction from all the other chaos!

      Take advantage of the reduced commute time, and learn something fun and new – cooking, art, meditation…whatever can be done indoors (or away from others) in a healthy, respectful way.

      Yes, for some people, just getting the bare minimum done will be all they can manage. But also consider whether this is an opportunity to try something new. Maybe it’s time to pick up a long neglected instrument, or to finally download that meditation app you’ve been considering, or to perfect your croissant-making techniques. (Meghan admits to having been tempted to finally get a new dog, but, sadly, concluded this is not the time.)

      Recognize that people are making hard choices, dealing with difficult circumstances, and doing the best they can.

      Your advisers, peers and colleagues might not be as responsive as you’d like. This will likely be even more so if they face health concerns or familial obligations. Remember that lots of people have things going on right now, some of which you will not know about (e.g., worrying about loved ones who are far away). Try to be understanding, and find other routes of support, as needed. Everyone is adjusting to a new situation, and lots of folks are extremely stressed and anxious right now.

      Your work matters, even if it isn’t directly linked to coronavirus or health.

      People who are not doing research directly linked to epidemiology, medicine, or something that feels pretty close to the pandemic might feel a sense of unworthiness. However, once things settle down, the impact of that work will become clear again!

      Again, remember that the wellbeing of you and your loved ones comes first. Some people are talking about how productive they will be because of this, ignoring that people will be sick and worried and that some people have family responsibilities that need to come first.

      There have been waaaaaay too many tweets noting how much Newton did in the year he was isolated as a result of the plague. This is our favorite take on those:

      Work isn’t going to be perfect, parenting isn’t going to be perfect. Again, we need to be compassionate (with ourselves and others) and be flexible.

      But what to do? One common suggestion has been to set a routine. (Meghan’s 4 year old helpfully set an alarm for 6AM – perhaps he is trying to keep us on schedule? Dana, on the other hand, hopes her toddlers won’t wake her up before 6AM.) This schedule has been going around social media:

      schedule of different things to do during a typical day, from waking to bedtime

      That particular routine might not work for you & your family, but trying some sort of routine seems like a good plan. (And, for those who do follow it, here’s hoping for lots of days where the kids earn 9PM bedtimes!)

      If you have a partner who is also working from home, discuss your plans for sharing the load – for example, maybe one person takes the lead on childcare/homeschooling in the morning and the other in the afternoon. Another option is 3 days for one, 3 days for the other.

      Your children’s school may have given some assignments for the coming weeks. If not (or if you want to supplement), other resources are available, such as Khan Academy and Scholastic Learn at Home. For more, here’s a list of education companies offering free subscriptions due to school closings.

      Finally, Amy Cohn (a UMich Engineering Prof & the Associate Director of the Center for Healthcare Engineering & Patient Safety) shared her thoughts in this twitter thread:

      Which ends with this advice:

      We’re interested in your thoughts, too! What advice would you give? What have you been doing that’s been helping? What are you trying to figure out? We’re hoping people will share their thoughts, questions, and experiences in the comments!

      About the authors
      Dana is a PhD student in Quantitative Marketing at Michigan’s Ross School of Business, where she is also the wellbeing and research productivity chair in their PhD forum. Meghan, as regular readers of the blog know, is a Professor of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology at Michigan and Chair of the Rackham Graduate School’s Task Force on Graduate Student Mental Health.

      Additional resources that might be of interest (please share others in the comments!):

      From Active Minds: Coping and Staying Emotionally Well During covid-19 related school closures

      From Gina Baucom & her lab: How to Science During a Pandemic

      From UMich’s Center for Academic Innovation: Adjusting your study habits during COVID, which includes these tips for working with a group or team:

      https://dynamicecology.wordpress.com/2020/03/15/some-advice-for-phd-students-and-their-mentors-in-the-time

    • Why You Should Ignore All That Coronavirus-Inspired Productivity Pressure
      By Aisha S. Ahmad
      9-12 Minuten

      Among my academic colleagues and friends, I have observed a common response to the continuing Covid-19 crisis. They are fighting valiantly for a sense of normalcy — hustling to move courses online, maintaining strict writing schedules, creating Montessori schools at their kitchen tables. They hope to buckle down for a short stint until things get back to normal. I wish anyone who pursues that path the very best of luck and health.

      Yet as someone who has experience with crises around the world, what I see behind this scramble for productivity is a perilous assumption. The answer to the question everyone is asking — “When will this be over?” — is simple and obvious, yet terribly hard to accept. The answer is never.

      Global catastrophes change the world, and this pandemic is very much akin to a major war. Even if we contain the Covid-19 crisis within a few months, the legacy of this pandemic will live with us for years, perhaps decades to come. It will change the way we move, build, learn, and connect. There is simply no way that our lives will resume as if this had never happened. And so, while it may feel good in the moment, it is foolish to dive into a frenzy of activity or obsess about your scholarly productivity right now. That is denial and delusion. The emotionally and spiritually sane response is to prepare to be forever changed .

      The rest of this piece is an offering. I have been asked by my colleagues around the world to share my experiences of adapting to conditions of crisis . Of course, I am just a human, struggling like everyone else to adjust to the pandemic. However, I have worked and lived under conditions of war, violent conflict, poverty, and disaster in many places around the world. I have experienced food shortages and disease outbreaks, as well as long periods of social isolation, restricted movement, and confinement. I have conducted award-winning research under intensely difficult physical and psychological conditions, and I celebrate productivity and performance in my own scholarly career.

      I share the following thoughts during this difficult time in the hope that they will help other academics to adapt to hardship conditions. Take what you need, and leave the rest.

      Stage No. 1: Security

      Your first few days and weeks in a crisis are crucial, and you should make ample room to allow for a mental adjustment. It is perfectly normal and appropriate to feel bad and lost during this initial transition. Consider it a good thing that you are not in denial, and that you are allowing yourself to work through the anxiety. No sane person feels good during a global disaster, so be grateful for the discomfort of your sanity. At this stage, I would focus on food, family, friends, and maybe fitness . (You will not become an Olympic athlete in the next two weeks, so don’t put ridiculous expectations on your body.)

      Next, ignore everyone who is posting productivity porn on social media right now. It is OK that you keep waking up at 3 a.m. It is OK that you forgot to eat lunch and cannot do a Zoom yoga class. It is OK that you have not touched that revise-and-resubmit in three weeks.

      Ignore the people who are posting that they are writing papers and the people who are complaining that they cannot write papers. They are on their own journey. Cut out the noise.

      Know that you are not failing. Let go of all of the profoundly daft ideas you have about what you should be doing right now. Instead, focus intensely on your physical and psychological security . Your first priority during this early period should be securing your home. Get sensible essentials for your pantry, clean your house, and make a coordinated family plan. Have reasonable conversations with your loved ones about emergency preparedness . If you have a loved one who is an emergency worker or essential worker , redirect your energies and support that person as your top priority. Identify their needs, and then meet those needs.

      No matter what your family unit looks like, you will need a team in the weeks and months ahead. Devise a strategy for social connectedness with a small group of family, friends, and/or neighbors , while maintaining physical distancing in accordance with public-health guidelines. Identify the vulnerable and make sure they are included and protected.

      Get Fast Advice for Your Academic Life

      Sign up to get our Quick Tip newsletter : Twice a week, we’ll send you fast advice to help you thrive. It’s free to receive, and you’ll get a mix of small suggestions designed to help you succeed in your job and your academic life.

      The best way to build a team is to be a good teammate, so take some initiative to ensure that you are not alone. If you do not put this psychological infrastructure in place, the challenge of necessary physical-distancing measures will be crushing. Build a sustainable and safe social system now .

      Stage No. 2: The Mental Shift

      Once you have secured yourself and your team, you will feel more stable, your mind and body will adjust, and you will crave challenges that are more demanding. Given time, your brain can and will reset to new crisis conditions, and your ability to do higher-level work will resume.

      This mental shift will make it possible for you to return to being a high-performance scholar, even under extreme conditions. However, do not rush or prejudge your mental shift, especially if you have never experienced a disaster before. One of the most relevant posts I saw on Twitter (by writer Troy Johnson) was: “Day 1 of Quarantine: ‘I’m going to meditate and do body-weight training.’ Day 4: just pours the ice cream into the pasta” — it’s funny but it also speaks directly to the issue.

      Now more than ever, we must abandon the performative and embrace the authentic. Our essential mental shifts require humility and patience. Focus on real internal change. These human transformations will be honest, raw, ugly, hopeful, frustrated, beautiful, and divine. And they will be slower than keener academics are used to. Be slow. Let this distract you. Let it change how you think and how you see the world. Because the world is our work. And so, may this tragedy tear down all our faulty assumptions and give us the courage of bold new ideas .

      Stage No. 3: Embrace a New Normal

      On the other side of this shift, your wonderful, creative, resilient brain will be waiting for you. When your foundations are strong, build a weekly schedule that prioritizes the security of your home team , and then carve out time blocks for different categories of your work: teaching, administration, and research. Do the easy tasks first and work your way into the heavy lifting. Wake up early. The online yoga and crossfit will be easier at this stage.

      Things will start to feel more natural. The work will also make more sense, and you will be more comfortable about changing or undoing what is already in motion. New ideas will emerge that would not have come to mind had you stayed in denial. Continue to embrace your mental shift. Have faith in the process. Support your team.

      Understand that this is a marathon. If you sprint at the beginning, you will vomit on your shoes by the end of the month. Emotionally prepare for this crisis to continue for 12 to 18 months , followed by a slow recovery. If it ends sooner, be pleasantly surprised. Right now, work toward establishing your serenity, productivity, and wellness under sustained disaster conditions.

      None of us knows how long this crisis will last. We all want our troops to be home before Christmas. The uncertainty is driving us all mad.

      Of course, there will be a day when the pandemic is over. We will hug our neighbors and our friends. We will return to our classrooms and coffee shops. Our borders will eventually reopen to freer movement. Our economies will one day recover from the forthcoming recessions.

      Yet we are just at the beginning of that journey. For most people, our minds have not come to terms with the fact that the world has already changed. Some faculty members are feeling distracted and guilty for not being able to write enough or teach online courses properly. Others are using their time at home to write and report a burst of research productivity. All of that is noise — denial and delusion. And right now, denial only serves to delay the essential process of acceptance , which will allow us to reimagine ourselves in this new reality.

      On the other side of this journey of acceptance are hope and resilience . We will know that we can do this, even if our struggles continue for years. We will be creative and responsive, and will find light in all the nooks and crannies. We will learn new recipes and make unusual friends. We will have projects we cannot imagine today, and will inspire students we have not yet met. And we will help each other. No matter what happens next, together, we will be blessed and ready to serve.

      In closing, I give thanks to those colleagues and friends who hail from hard places, who know this feeling of disaster in their bones. In the past few days, we have laughed about our childhood wounds and have exulted in our tribulations. We have given thanks and tapped into the resilience of our old wartime wounds. Thank you for being warriors of the light and for sharing your wisdom born of suffering. Because calamity is a great teacher.

      Aisha Ahmad is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Toronto and the author of the award-winning book Jihad & Co: Black Markets and Islamist Power (Oxford University Press, 2017). Her Twitter is @ProfAishaAhmad.

      https://www.chronicle.com/article/Why-You-Should-Ignore-All-That/248366?cid=wcontentgrid_hp_1b

      Aisha Ahmad’s personal website: https://www.aishasahmad.com/about

      Subscribe Quick Tip Newsletter:
      https://www.chronicle.com/page/Get-The-Quick-Tip-Newsletter/713

    • Staying Grounded & Connected to Academic Work in the Time of COVID-19 - The Dissertation Coach

      Alison Miller, PhD, Owner of The DIssertation Coach & Kathryn Peterson, PhD, Dissertation Coach
      8-10 Minuten

      When we imagined the world in 2020, we didn’t conceive of this very strange and frightening reality of COVID-19. But here we are, living in some kind of dystopian existence, where our world has been turned upside down by a global pandemic.

      Just a little while ago, we were unfamiliar with terms like social distancing [sic #terminology —> physical distancing, smart distancing or distant socialising] , shelter in place, safer at home, or flattening the curve. Few of us have ever experienced empty supermarket shelves, toilet paper and hand sanitizer shortages, or scrambling to recalibrate our lives to work online. Many of us are having to make countless small and large adjustments. You may be teaching online, changing your routines and suddenly coworking with others, becoming homeschool teachers overnight while schools are shut down, or caring for others who cannot leave their homes at all.

      Even in the face of our new reality, we know it is important to maintain some sense of #routine and #normality. We also know that many of you still want to make progress on the path to earning a graduate degree. We are all needing a way to manage the #stress and #uncertainty of our new reality, yet still be able to #focus, #concentrate, and complete academic tasks. To that end, we want to offer you a few #ideas of how you can support yourself to stay grounded, productive, and connected to your academic work during this unprecedented time.

      PRIORITIZE

      To start, it can make a big difference to clarify your priorities . In terms of your academic work, we encourage you to consider what deadlines you have or goals are you seeking to meet. What work would it feel really good to (realistically and humanely) accomplish today, this week, this month? Take into account what can reasonably be accomplished given what is happening in your household, changes to your work or childcare responsibilities, and the stress of living through this pandemic. We recommend writing down the academic and life priorities you have over the next few weeks to set the stage for making progress and being able to care for yourself and loved ones. Each evening, write out your priorities for the next day and give yourself specific writing or other research tasks that can be completed in shorter intervals of time. For example, instead of a directive to “write chapter 2,” it may be more helpful to identify small subsections in chapter 2 to write in a given day.

      STRUCTURE YOUR DAY

      A great way to feel connected to your work is to set up a structure for your day that includes some academic zones , periods of time when you will commit to only doing academic tasks (and truly take a break from your phone, email, social media, and the news). This is especially important if you are not used to working from home. It can be very helpful to map out a plan for the day that includes when you are writing or doing other academic tasks, when you are exercising, and when you are managing other work and personal responsibilities with space to unwind and even do nothing. Alison closes out each work day by mapping out the next day on a yellow pad of paper and uses that written plan as a roadmap for how to move through her day including her own writing projects, phone calls and meetings, administrative tasks,etc. She often plans 1-2 hour blocks of phone and email free time for writing projects. Alison has learned from experience how vital it is to build in time to rest, eat, connect with her family and unwind so she can better focus and concentrate when it is time to work. Inside your academic work zones, you may find it especially helpful to use the Pomodoro Technique , where you work in 25 minute increments (check out Spotify’s Pomodoro Playlist) or virtually co-work with others via Skype or Zoom.

      FIND VIRTUAL COWORKERS

      Virtually #coworking with others can be a great way to feel more accountable and supported while also reducing the #isolation of only being able to work at home. We offer virtual writing boot camps for our clients and many of them tell us that coworking is the only way they can focus and make meaningful progress during this pandemic. Coworking can make a surprising difference in your productivity. Here is a suggested coworking strategy:

      Find one or more people to schedule a coworking call. Open the call with a 5-10 minute meeting to get connected and declare your work goals for the first work session. We find that using Skype or Zoom with video can be very helpful.
      Agree to a set amount of time you will all work and then turn off the video and sound during the work session. Set an alarm or timer so you know when to return to the call at the agreed upon time.
      Take a 5-10 minute break and share what you were able to accomplish. Support and encourage each other as needed and declare your goals for the next work session. Alison typically co-works with others for 1.5 to 2 hour blocks of time, checking in about every 40 minutes or so. Other people prefer the pomodoro method mentioned above, where they work for 25 minutes and check in for 5, doing between 2 and 4 pomodoros in a row.
      Close out the co-working session by acknowledging your accomplishments and anything you want to do to make future work sessions more effective. Schedule another coworking session.

      FOCUS ON WHAT YOU CAN CONTROL

      We are all facing challenges and uncertainty at this time. Many of us are experiencing that our bodies are flooded with adrenaline and cortisol leaving us in a chronic flight, fight, or freeze state. You may be losing track of time and feel like your brain is not fully functioning. If you feel like your IQ has dropped or you are struggling to remember, think, or write clearly, you are not alone. What we are experiencing with COVID-19 is pushing us into survival consciousness where the reptilian brain (more primitive part of the brain) takes charge, and the neocortex (where higher order functioning takes place) gets limited to rehashing the past or trying to control the future. Thus it becomes harder to think clearly and make thoughtful, conscious choices. We are more likely to be in a reactive mode. So please be gentle with yourself and keep focusing on what is in your control. None of us can control how long this pandemic will last, whether others will practice social distancing [sic] , or when life will feel more normal again. Yet we can all practice being kind and compassionate toward ourselves and others. We can stay informed while also maintaining a healthy boundary with news and social media, find enjoyable activities and do things like connect with loved ones virtually, engage in activities that help us unwind from stress, and practice social distancing [sic] and other recommended behavior. Believe it or not, some of you may find working on your dissertation to be a helpful refuge from the world . Also, don’t forget to take time to create a peaceful, organized workspace so you have an environment that feels good and is conducive to productivity..

      A SPECIAL NOTE ABOUT DEADLINES

      Some of you may work in healthcare or other fields that are seriously impacted by COVID-19 or now have children at home who require your attention and care. If your professional or parenting responsibilities are making it very difficult to meet external deadlines, we encourage you to be in communication sooner rather than later. Most likely, faculty and administration will be flexible and grant extensions to students given this pandemic. Communicate this message in a positive way that demonstrates your commitment to meet existing deadlines with an alert that you may need to ask for an extension. In our experience, it is better to communicate early and provide a proactive warning that you may not be able to meet deadlines .

      We are here rooting for you to put one foot in front of the other, taking it one day at a time, maybe one hour at a time. From all of us at The Dissertation Coach, we hope you and your loved ones stay healthy and safe.

      https://www.thedissertationcoach.com/blog/staying-grounded-and-connected-to-academic-work-in-the-time-of

  • Rénovation énergétique en maison : seul un quart des travaux réalisés ont un impact énergétique (gain d’une classe de DPE).
    https://www.batiactu.com/edito/travaux-renovation-energetique-encore-tres-minoraitaires-54341.php?MD5emai
    La plupart des ménages dépensent moins de 10 000€, pour un gain quasi nul qui assèche leurs finances pour la suite.

    Premier constat, pendant la période 2014-2016, 5,1 millions de ménages en maisons individuelles ont réalisé des travaux, soit 32% du parc de maisons françaises (59,3 milliards d’euros de travaux). Et 260.000 de ces rénovations ont permis un gain énergétique représentant deux classes énergétiques de diagnostic de performance énergétique (DPE) ou plus, soit 5% du total. Une opération sur cinq (20%) a permis de faire gagner une classe de DPE. Les 75% restants n’ont pas vu leur DPE modifié après les travaux. Le coût moyen des travaux pour gagner un niveau sont de 15.900 euros par logement, et de 25.900 euros pour gagner deux niveaux. La plupart des travaux en sont restés à un coût de 9.700 euros (DPE stable).

    #rénovation_énergétique #isolation #DPE #précarité_énergétique

  • Plan #canicule, ne sortez pas ! Heu si, les immeubles sont des fours ! | Les tiroirs de ma tête
    http://www.sophiemenart.info/2017/08/plan-canicule-ne-sortez-heu-non-immeubles-fours

    Ne pas sortir pendant les heures les plus chaudes, de 11h à 21h.
    Heuuuuu de 11h à 21 h !!!! Mais les gens vont aller bosser quand ? la nuit ?
    Et ceux qui n’ont pas d’autre choix que de rester chez eux dans des appartements qui ne sont adaptés ni pour la chaleur estivale, ni pour le froidure de l’hiver, comment vont-ils tenir ? Parce qu’il faut savoir que la plupart des immeubles du sud n’a pas d’#isolation thermique, et qu’aucuns travaux d’amélioration ne sont prévus !
    Et oui, comment tenir quand il fait plus chaud dans l’appart que dehors à l’ombre malgré le respect des consignes, et qu’on ne peut pas installer la clim ?
    Comment tenir quand on habite au dernier étage d’un immeuble dont le toit n’est pas du tout, mais alors pas du tout isolé contre les assauts du cagnard et que la température monte à plus de 36° à l’intérieur sans aucun courant d’air possible ? Bon là suis arrivée à descendre à 34° avec ventilos à fond et serviettes humides (rectification 35° à 18h).
    On fait quoi ? on vit à moitié évanouie toute la journée sur le canap’ sans même avoir la force de tendre le bras vers la bouteille d’eau, ou d’aller jusqu’à la salle de bain prendre une bonne douche bien froide, ou on sort affronter Râ à la recherche d’un peu de fraîcheur ailleurs ?

    • Tout le monde n’a pas accès à la clim et il y a même certaines entreprises qui l’interdisent pour limiter leurs dépenses énergétiques (les enfoirés), ou encore certaines personnes empêchent carrément leur utilisation car elles ne la supportent pas, et tant pis pour les autres (du vécu, improductivité et malaises garantis au boulot).

      Ca à quant même pas trop de sens de vouloir la clim et de reproché aux personnes que ca rend malade de faire chier. C’est polluant, énergivore, toxique la clim il me semble. Pollué plus pour supporter la pollution, c’est peut être une idée pour les personnes qui ont encore un emploi, car la clim au boulot est réservée aux gens qui ont un boulot. Ce qui manque c’est principalement de la végétation, des points d’eau, d’ombre et des horaires de travail adapté et des habitats adapté au climat, pas adapté à la climatisation. Ce texte est un coup de gueule légitime mais ce qu’il propose comme solution est dans la mentalité de courte vue qui nous plonge dans le four depuis un siècle.

    • Oui, d’accord avec toi @mad_meg, mais le point qui me semble intéressant dans ce billet d’humeur, c’est tout de même le total manque d’effort sur le logement et le fait que les recommandations sont incompatibles avec le médiocre niveau des logements actuels : elle vit tout de même dans un immeuble récent !

      De la même manière, il y a eu 300 000 euros de travaux de mises aux normes du bâtiment où bosse mon compagnon. À ce prix-là, ils auraient pu directement raser la baraque (c’est une grosse maison, pas un immeuble) et en construire une HQE au top.
      En fait, je n’en sais pas trop ce qu’ils ont payé avec cet argent : même les peintures intérieures n’étaient pas comprises. Et dès la conception, il y a eu des choix ridicules, comme vouloir à tout prix ajouter une véranda d’accueil devant l’entrée : on découvre une fois faite que la véranda ne permet pas les circulations ET l’accueil, parce que l’architecte n’avait pas compté la place de la personne derrière le bureau !!! Et surtout, qu’avec son orientation et les matériaux choisis, c’était un four non aéré 6 mois par an !

      Quant aux bureaux déplacés sous les toits… ben, sur le papier, c’est écrit que c’est super isolé, en vrai, c’est plus de 30 °C entre 2 et 4 mois par an (selon la météo) : quand on a signalé que c’était invivable, ça a juste été : démerdez-vous !
      On a obtenu la clim (ben ouais !) quand on a prouvé que les hautes températures nuisaient au matériel informatique qui tournait dans ce bureau (le matos, donc, pas les gens…).

      Tout ça, il y a moins de deux ans, c’est-à-dire qu’il est difficile de dire qu’on ne sait pas qu’il faut penser les bâtiments autrement !

    • Ce que tu donne comme exemple est effectivement scandaleux et typique du système de caste actuel. Je voie bien le truc de la clim pour les ordi et pas pour les personnes très conforme à mentalité actuel. Et les architectes qui sont issues des castes qui ne vivrons pas en logement sociaux ou ne fréquenterons pas de locaux professionnels mal conçus. Je suis sur que le même architecte si tu lui fait faire ses propres locaux il aura pas oublié l’espace pour son bureau ni les questions thermiques bio dynamiques et touti quanti.

      Et je suis toute à fait d’accord avec toi pour dénoncé l’incohérence des constructions contemporaines.
      Comme je vais souvent à Rome, je voie bien l’efficacité des architectures adapté. Murs épais, fenêtres plus petites vers le haut, circulation d’air prévu, terrasses végétalisées. L’hiver ca à ses inconvenants, mais ils sont courts là bas.

      Je parle bien sur dans l’idéal mais les personnes vouées à vivre et travaillé dans les bâtiments devraient être consulté à toutes les étapes. Les horaires devraient être adapté au climats et aux saisons. En Italie ou je vais souvent les petites villes s’arrêtent complètement de fonctionné de 14h à 17h au minimum et les grandes villes sont au ralenti. Il faut un max d’espaces publiques végétalisés (toitures, trottoirs, préaux végétalisés).

      Hier j’étais tombé sur cette construction végétale, qui est sensé être un endroit de prière mais sur le principe on doit pouvoir faire d’autres utilisation. Ca ne doit pas coûté très chère à construire ce genre de préaux végétalisées et ca permettrais de profité d’un peu de fraîcheur et d’ombre à tou·te·s.


      http://www.telerama.fr/sortir/une-insolite-cathedrale-vegetale-au-coeur-de-l-ile-de-france,161463.php

  • Haft in der Türkei: Verhandlungen über Gefangenenaustausch (http://...
    https://diasp.eu/p/5815000

    Haft in der Türkei: Verhandlungen über Gefangenenaustausch

    Es passt Erdoğan nicht, dass sich Dissidenten in Deutschland aufhalten. Aus lauter Zorn riskiert er die politische Isolation und den wirtschaftlichen Ruin der Türkei.

    #kultur #türkei #haft #verhandlungen #gefangenenaustausch #dissidenten #deutschland #zorn #isolation #ruin #news #bot #rss

  • L’aérogel d’amidon, un isolant biosourcé plein de promesses
    http://www.batiactu.com/edito/aerogel-amidon-un-isolant-biosource-plein-promesses-49216.php?MD5email=4bc

    Les aérogels sont des matériaux qui offrent de grandes perspectives en termes d’isolation : il s’agit en fait de gels dans lesquels le liquide est remplacé par de l’air, ce qui débouche sur un matériau extrêmement léger aux propriétés thermiques remarquables.

    Aérogel de silice :


    Illustration du pouvoir isolant :

    #aérogel #super-isolant #isolation #chimie

  • Quelqu’un connait le volume d’un kg de schiste expansé ?

    Dalle chaux schiste | GRANULEX
    http://www.granulex.fr/?page_id=113

    Formule indicative Isolation (Chape au sol)
    Lambda 0,4 à 0,5 Chaux NHL5 Eau Sable ordinaire Granulex® 1220
    Pour 1 M3 400 kg 180 l 400 kg 505 kg
    Au seau de 10 L 1 sac de 35 kg 1 + ½ 1+ ½ 8 + ½

    #shiste #chaux #dalle #grand_oeuvre #ecoconstuction #isolation_thermique

  • Grâce à la paille, la France pourrait isoler 500 000 logements par an
    http://www.bastamag.net/Grace-a-la-paille-la-France-pourrait-isoler-500-000-logements-par-an

    Quel est le point commun entre un agriculteur qui moissonne son champs en se demandant comment il pourra boucler ses fins de mois, et une famille qui peine à régler sa facture de chauffage tout en grelotant en hiver, à cause d’un #Logement mal isolé ? Une même solution existe à leurs deux problèmes : la paille. Chaque année, 40% de la paille – c’est à dire la tige des céréales – est laissée au sol, après les moissons. En prélevant seulement 5% de cette paille, la France disposerait de quoi isoler tous les (...)

    En bref

    / #Habitat_écologique, Logement, #Garantir_l'accès_au_logement, L’enjeu de la transition (...)

    #L'enjeu_de_la_transition_énergétique