• Derna, la ville libyenne où flotte le drapeau noir de l’EI - L’Obs
    http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/monde/20141126.OBS6187/derna-la-ville-libyenne-ou-flotte-le-drapeau-noir-de-l-ei.html

    Située à quelques kilomètres de la frontière égyptienne, la ville de Derna est totalement administrée par le groupe terroriste.

    Totalement ? Pas d’après l’article qui suit de HRW, qui a de ce fait le mérite de montrer que ce n’est pas parce qu’on n’est pas de l’ISIS qu’on est un « #modéré »,

    Libya : Extremists Terrorizing Derna Residents | Human Rights Watch
    http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/11/27/libya-extremists-terrorizing-derna-residents

    In and around Derna, in addition to the powerful Islamic Shura Youth Council, the militias include members of Ansar al-Sharia and the Abu Saleem Martyrs Brigade.

    (...) One Derna activist (...) described Derna as “fully under the control of fundamentalists” who have imposed an extremist ideology, and enforced a strict interpretation of Shari’a law with public executions and floggings. He said extremist militias shared the same ideology and the only dispute between them related to the Islamic Youth Shura Council’s pledge of allegiance to #ISIS .

  • Inside the CIA’s Syrian Rebels Vetting Machine
    http://www.newsweek.com/moderate-rebels-please-raise-your-hands-283449

    Nothing has come in for more mockery during the Obama administration’s halting steps into the Syrian civil war than its employment of “moderate” to describe the kind of rebels it is willing to back.

    (...) 

    Behind the jokes, however, is the deadly serious responsibility of the CIA and Defense Department to vet Syrians before they receive covert American training, aid and arms. But according to U.S. counterterrorism veterans, a system that worked pretty well during four decades of the Cold War has been no match for the linguistic, cultural, tribal and political complexities of the Middle East, especially now in Syria. “We’re completely out of our league,” one former CIA vetting expert declared on condition of anonymity, reflecting the consensus of intelligence professionals with firsthand knowledge of the Syrian situation. “To be really honest, very few people know how to vet well. It’s a very specialized skill. It’s extremely difficult to do well” in the best of circumstances, the former operative said. And in Syria it has proved impossible.

    Une fois, selon un scénario maint fois répété , les larmes de crocodiles versées, le gentil Étasunien déclare :

    So what? responds former senior CIA operations officer Charles Faddis, who led a covert team into Kurdistan in advance of the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq. He says it’s time to act, no matter how shaky the foundations of the CIA’s Syrian army. “You can’t run covert action without getting your hands dirty. We can’t sit on the sidelines and have discreet, antiseptic contacts with these guys and accomplish anything,” Faddis said. “If we’re going to do this, we need to wade in.”

    Caution be damned. Hold our noses and pass the ammunition.

    “We need to have people on the ground. We need to give them serious money and weaponry,” Faddis said. “Unless we do that, we are never really going to have any control over what’s going on, or any real idea who we should be in bed with.”

    #'modérés' « #modérés »
    #Etats-Unis #il_est_puant_mais_il_se_pince_le_nez

  • Troisième Commission : la lutte contre la drogue ne peut être dissociée de la promotion du développement, soulignent plusieurs délégations
    http://www.un.org/press/fr/2014/agshc4100.htm

    Mme INAS AL-SHAHWAN (#Arabie_saoudite) (...) a enfin souligné que la #peine_capitale pour le trafic de drogues était le #châtiment le plus approprié pour ceux qui mettaient en péril la vie des citoyens et la stabilité des pays.

    « #modérés »

  • US-backed Hazm Movement, Muhajireen Army working together in Aleppo
    http://www.longwarjournal.org/threat-matrix/archives/2014/10/us-backed_hazm_movement_muhaji.php

    The U.S.-backed Harakat Hazm, or Hazm Movement, has joined several groups, including Jaish al Muhajireen wal Ansar, a Chechen-led jihadist group, and the Islamist Jaish Mujahideen (Army of Mujahideen) in fighting the Assad regime in the Handarat District of Aleppo.

    (...)

    Jaish al Muhajireen wal Ansar (the Army of the Emigrants and Helpers), also known as the Muhajireen Army, is an #al_Qaeda allied jihadist group...

    (...)

    Underscoring the complexity of vetting Syrian rebel groups for US assistance, on September 23, the US-backed Hazm Movement released a statement condemning the recent coalition airstrikes in Syria:

    (...)

    The Hazm Movement is also known to fight alongside the Al Nusrah Front. An LA Times article in early September quotes a Hazm fighter as saying, “Inside Syria we became labeled as secularists and feared Nusrah Front was going to battle us. But Nusrah doesn’t fight us, we actually fight alongside them. We like Nusrah.”

    Les “#modérés” des #Etats-Unis en #Syrie

  • Israël est dans le camp des « modérés » : Tzipi Livni : Israel shares same “values” as “moderate” Saudi Arabia
    http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/tzipi-livni-israel-shares-same-values-moderate-saudi-arabia

    Siegel summarized Israel’s position in these terms: “Here’s Israel’s situation in the region it seems. You’re worried about the very movements and the very countries that worry the Egyptians, the Saudis, the Jordanians, the United Arab Emirates, the Turks, to a great extent – without a Palestinian agreement, though, they can’t deal with you as a public ally and partner in the region. Are regional concerns strong enough to lead the Israelis to say we’ve got to – we have to get a deal with the Palestinians to be above-board players in the Middle East?”

    Livni endorsed Siegel’s assessment, adding: “The world is divided between the good guys and the bad guys,” Livni said. “And we, Israel – of course, the United States – the legitimate Palestinian government, Egypt, Jordan and the Gulf States, we are part of the camp of so-called moderates or diplomatics against these terrorists.”

  • Syria and Iraq : Why US policy is fraught with danger
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/syria-and-iraq-us-policy-is-fraught-with-danger-9722276.html
    Patrick Cockburn

    En Irak, le nouveau gouvernement est à peine moins sectaire que le précédent,

    The new [Iraqi] government may be less divisive than the old one – it would be difficult to be more – but only to a limited degree.

    ... the Sunni are more terrified of the return of vengeful Iraqi government forces than they are of Isis.

    They have reason to be frightened since revenge killing of Sunni are taking place in Amerli, the Shia Turkoman town whose two-month siege by Isis was broken last month by Shia and Kurdish fighters aided by US air strikes. Mass graves of Shia truck drivers murdered by Isis are being excavated and local Sunni are being killed in retaliation. The family of a 21-year-old Sunni man abducted by militiamen was soon afterwards offered his headless body back in return for $2,000 (£1,240).

    In the 127 villages retaken by the Kurds from Isis under the cover of US air strikes, the Sunni Arab population has mostly fled and is unlikely to return. Often Sunni houses are burnt by Shia militiamen and in one village Kurdish fighters had reportedly sprayed over the word “apostate” placed there by Isis and instead written “Kurdish home”.

    (...)

    En Syrie, la #CIA, peu convaincue par les « modérés » des wahhabites, a constitué ses propres « modérés »,

    Isis will be difficult to defeat in Iraq because of Sunni sectarian solidarity. But the reach of Isis in Iraq is limited by the fact that Sunni Arabs are only 20 per cent of the 33 million population. In Syria, by way of contrast, Sunni Arabs make up at least 60 per cent of Syrians, so Isis’s natural constituency is larger than in Iraq. Motorised Isis columns have been advancing fast here, taking some 35 per cent of the country and inflicting defeats both on other Syrian opposition fighters, notably Jabhat al-Nusra, the al-Qaeda affiliate, and on the Syrian army. Isis is now within 30 miles of Aleppo, the largest city in Syria before the war.

    (...)

    The US is now desperately trying to persuade Turkey to close the border effectively, but so far has only succeeded in raising the price charged by local guides taking people across the frontier from $10 to $25 a journey.

    (...)

    ... Mr Obama (...) will (...) step up a pretence that there is a potent “moderate” armed opposition in Syria, capable of fighting both Isis and the Syrian government at once. Unfortunately, this force scarcely exists in any strength and the most important rebel movements opposed to Isis are themselves jihadis such as #Jabhat_al-Nusra, #Ahrar_al-Sham and the #Islamic_Front. Their violent sectarianism is not very different to that of Isis.

    Lacking a moderate military opposition to support as an alternative to Isis and the Assad government, the US has moved to raise such a force under its own control. The Free Syrian Army (FSA), once lauded in Western capitals as the likely military victors over Mr Assad, largely collapsed at the end of 2013. The FSA military leader, General Abdul-Ilah al Bashir, who defected from the Syrian government side in 2012, said in an interview with the McClatchy news agency last week that the CIA had taken over direction of this new moderate force. He said that “the leadership of the FSA is American”, adding that since last December US supplies of equipment have bypassed the FSA leadership in Turkey and been sent directly to up to 14 commanders in northern Syria and 60 smaller groups in the south of the country. Gen Bashir said that all these FSA groups reported directly to the CIA. Other FSA commanders confirmed that the US is equipping them with training and weapons including TOW anti-tank missiles.

    It appears that, if the US does launch air strikes in Syria, they will be nominally in support of the FSA which is firmly under US control. The US is probably nervous of allowing weapons to be supplied to supposed moderates by Saudi Arabia and the Gulf monarchies which end up in the hands of Isis. The London-based small arms research organisation Conflict Armament Research said in a report this week that anti-tank rockets used by Isis in Syria were “identical to M79 rockets transferred by Saudi Arabia to forces operating under the Free Syrian Army umbrella in 2013”.

    In Syria and in Iraq Mr Obama is finding that his policy of operating through local partners, whose real aims may differ markedly from his own, is full of perils.

    • For US, finding right allies in Syria will be tough
      Hannah Allam
      http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/09/11/239590_turkish-aid-to-al-qaida-linked.html

      Yet the Syrian Opposition Coalition, the closest thing Obama has to an alternative to the Assad government, called the explosion that killed the jihadists a deliberate attempt to “silence the voice of #moderation.” Only in polarized Syria, with the Islamic State skewing the curve, could such a group seriously be considered mainstream.

      #Syrie #modérés

    • Joshua Landis :
      http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/9/15/why-syria-is-thegordianknotofobamasantiisilcampaign.html

      U.S. intelligence estimates that Syrian rebels are organized into more than 1,500 groups of widely varying political leanings. They control a little less than 20 percent of Syrian territory. Those designated as moderate rebel forces control less than 5 percent of Syria. To arm and fund them without first unifying them under a single military and political command would be to condemn Syria to rebel chaos.

      The U.S. is arming and funding 12 to 14 militias in northern Syria and 60 more groups in the south, according to the head of the Syrian Opposition Coalition. These militias have not, thus far, been particularly successful on the battlefield, and none has national reach. Most are based on one charismatic commander or a single region and have not articulated clear ideologies. All depend on foreign money.

      The vast majority of Syria’s rebel groups have been deemed too Islamist, too sectarian and too anti-democratic by the U.S. — and these are the groups ranged against the ISIL. They span the Salafist ideological gamut, from al-Qaeda’s Nusra Front to the 40,000-strong conglomeration of rebel forces united under the banner of the Islamic Front. Despite U.S. skepticism, some of the Sunni Arab regimes Obama has courted as key allies in the anti-ISIL effort have worked with these groups.

      Gulf countries reportedly poured money into the Islamic Front until the U.S. convinced them to stop. Islamic Front leaders decried democracy as the “dictatorship of the strong” and called for building an Islamic state. Zahran Alloush, the military chief of the Islamic Front spooked Americans by insisting that Syria be “cleansed of Shias and Alawites.” The newly appointed head of Ahrar al-Sham and the political chief of the Islamic Front earned his stripes in the ranks of the Iraqi insurgency fighting the U.S.

      Turkey insists that the U.S. arm these anti-ISIL Islamist rebel groups, including the Nusra Front. Disagreement over which rebels to back is one of the reasons Ankara has refused the U.S. requests to use Turkish territory to train rebel forces and as a base from which to carry out attacks on ISIL. The United States’ principal allies simply do not agree on which rebel forces are sufficiently moderate to qualify for support.

  • Sotloff Family Spokesman: Syria’s ’So-Called Moderate Rebels’ Sold Sotloff To ISIS
    http://dailycaller.com/2014/09/08/sotloff-family-spokesman-syrias-so-called-moderate-rebels-sold-sotloff-

    http://fr.timesofisrael.com/la-famille-de-sotloff-estime-quil-a-servi-de-monnaie-dechange

    Le porte-parole de la famille du journaliste américain assassiné Steven Sotloff (...) a révélé que Sotloff avait été enlevé par les rebelles « #modérés » puis revendu à l’organisation djihadiste de l’Etat islamique pour une somme comprise entre 25 000 et 50 000 dollars.

    (...)

    « Pour la première fois, nous pouvons dire que Steven a été vendu à la frontière » a-t-il dit, attribuant les informations à des sources sur le terrain. « Le nom de Steven était sur ​​une liste, disant qu’il avait été responsable de l’attentat d’un hôpital. C’était faux, et des militants ont ébruité cette histoire ».

    « Nous croyons que ces rebelles soi-disant modérés que des gens voudraient que notre pays soutienne – l’un d’entre eux l’a vendu sans doute pour entre 25 000 et 50 000 dollars à l’EI, et c’est la raison pour laquelle il a été capturé ».

  • Lors d’une partie de chasse, un prince saoudien tue 2 000 oiseaux menacés d’extinction | CitizenPost
    http://citizenpost.fr/2014/04/lors-dune-partie-chasse-prince-saoudien-tue-2-000-oiseaux-menaces-dextin

    Les autorités du Baloutchistan (une province pakistanaise) ont déploré la mort de nombreuses Outardes houbara en janvier dernier, une espèce pourtant menacée d’extinction à l’état sauvage. Le prince saoudien Fahd Bin Sultan accompagné par son entourage aurait utilisé des faucons dressés pour chasser des petites outardes houbara, une pratique responsable de leur quasi-disparition.

    Bien qu’elle soit protégée, cette espèce est encore chassée par les Émirs qataris qui viennent chasser en toute impunité dans les zones où vit l’oiseau, soit dans les zones semi-désertiques comme le Maroc, la Tunisie ou une partie du Moyen-Orient. Toutefois, les autorités pakistanaises peuvent à l’occasion délivrer (sous paiement) des permis spéciaux autorisant aux très riches de capturer ou chasser une centaine de ces oiseaux en 10 jours.

    #connard

  • Pourquoi nous ne pouvons pas attendre - Les mots sont importants (lmsi.net)
    http://lmsi.net/Pourquoi-nous-ne-pouvons-pas

    Martin Luther King, une pensée pour les modérés que je garde au chaud :

    Je dois vous faire deux aveux sincères, mes frères chrétiens et juifs. Tout d’abord je dois vous avouer que, ces dernières années, j’ai été gravement déçu par les Blancs modérés. J’en suis presque arrivé à la conclusion regrettable que le grand obstacle opposé aux Noirs en lutte pour leur liberté, ce n’est pas le membre du Conseil des citoyens blancs ni celui du Ku Klux Klan, mais le Blanc modéré qui est plus attaché à l’« ordre » qu’à la justice ; qui préfère une paix négative issue d’une absence de tensions à une paix positive issue d’une victoire de la justice ; qui répète constamment : « Je suis d’accord avec vous sur les objectifs, mais je ne peux approuver vos méthodes d’action directe » ; qui croit pouvoir fixer, en bon paternaliste, un calendrier pour la libération d’un autre homme ; qui cultive le mythe du « temps-qui-travaille-pour-vous » et conseille constamment au Noir d’attendre « un moment plus opportun ». La compréhension superficielle des gens de bonne volonté est plus frustrante que l’incompréhension totale des gens mal intentionnés. Une acceptation tiède est plus irritante qu’un refus pur et simple.

    #ordre_social #modérés