organization:french court

  • AIDA 2017 Update: Challenging access and strict Dublin procedures in France and Switzerland*

    The updated AIDA reports on Switzerland and France document the latest developments on access to the territory for those in need of protection, the asylum procedure, the Dublin system, reception conditions, detention and content of protection.

    France registered 100,412 asylum seekers with the Office for Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (OFPRA) in 2017, in addition to 41,500 asylum seekers placed under Dublin procedure. The situation of registration of asylum applications at the “single desks” of French Prefectures remains dire. In most areas, the Prefectures have been unable to register claims within the 3 working day deadline set by the law. To restore the 3-day time limit, the Minister of Interior published a Circular on 12 January 2018 which plans to increase the staff in Prefectures and OFII and to reorganise services.

    Switzerland, where the number of asylum seekers dropped to 18,088 last year, is proceeding with a restructuring of its asylum procedure which will enter into force in 2019. Ahead of this reform, State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) has confirmed the implementation of another pilot phase of the accelerated procedure in the federal centres of Boudry and Chevrilles.

    The two countries are among the main operators of the Dublin Regulation in Europe. France initiated 41,500 Dublin procedures to transfer people to other European countries, in addition to over 100,000 asylum seekers received throughout 2017. Switzerland issued 8,370 outgoing Dublin requests – “take charge” requests almost exclusively based on the documentation and entry criteria and “take back” requests – and implemented 2,297 transfers. The majority of procedures and transfers concerned Italy, followed by Germany and France.

    While authorities have taken strict measures to implement more transfers, courts have intervened to uphold legal safeguards in the operation of the Dublin system, particularly in relation to detention of asylum seekers awaiting a transfer. Following the Al Chodor ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the French Court of Cassation ruled that the detention of asylum seekers under the Dublin procedure is illegal due to the absence of legally defined criteria for a “significant risk of absconding”. In practice, however, even before the adoption of a new law defining those criteria, some Prefectures continued to order detention of asylum seekers under a Dublin procedure. For its part, the Swiss Federal Court ruled that the order of administrative detention pronounced by the canton of Zoug against an Afghan family whose three young children were simultaneously subject to a placement in a foster care, constituted a violation of the right to family life. In its judgment of 28 April 2017, the Federal Court recalled that such a measure is only admissible as an ultima ratio and after a thorough examination of other less coercive measures.

    https://www.ecre.org/aida-2017-update-challenging-access-and-strict-dublin-procedures-in-france-and
    #asile #migrations #réfugiés #Dublin #règlement_dublin #France #Suisse #comparaison
    Le #modèle_suisse se diffuse en France... sic
    ping @isskein

  • Le tribunal administratif de Toulouse a autorisé la tenue d’une réunion en faveur du BDS. Quelqu’un a t il vu passer cela dans les médias français ?
    French court overturns « illegal » ban on BDS event | The Electronic Intifada
    https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/french-court-overturns-illegal-ban-bds-event

    A court in France struck a blow for free speech when it overturned a government ban on a meeting to support individuals facing trial for their Palestine solidarity activism.

    The decision comes as governments and organizations around the world are showing increasing willingness to defend the legitimacy of the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement in support of Palestinian rights.

    On 26 May, the mayor’s office in the southern city of Toulouse banned the gathering scheduled for Tuesday evening at a public facility, featuring Mohammed Khatib of the Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network and writer Eric Hazan.

    The meeting was sponsored by the Support Committee for the BDS Accused of Toulouse, a coalition of dozens of groups backing four activists facing trial next month for handing out leaflets calling for the boycott of Israeli goods.

    But on Monday, the Toulouse administrative court overturned the mayor’s ban and ordered the city to provide a space for the meeting to take place.

    The court stated that the mayor’s ban on the meeting was “a grave and manifestly illegal infringement of the fundamental freedom of assembly,” according to BDS France and Association France Palestine Solidarité.

    #BDS

  • Activists protest delays in Georges Abdallah release |

    Al Akhbar English

    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/activists-protest-delays-georges-abdallah-release

    Dozens of activists demonstrated near the French embassy in Beirut Sunday to denounce the latest delays in the case of imprisoned Lebanese leftist Georges Ibrahim Abdallah.

    More than 50 demonstrators rallied early Sunday afternoon, after a French court postponed a hearing to discuss Abdallah’s parole Thursday, more than six weeks after he was due to be released.

    Abdallah, 61, was due to be released on January 14 after serving 28 years in French prison over his alleged involvement in the 1984 killings an American military office and an Israeli diplomat.

    A court granted Abdallah parole on 21 November 2012 in a ruling that was upheld only days before his scheduled release.

    But France’s interior minister refused to sign Abdallah’s extradition order to repatriate him to Lebanon on the morning of his anticipated release, prompting accusations that France had capitulated to American and Israeli pressure.

  • France postpones hearing over Georges Abdallah release, again | Al Akhbar English
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/france-postpones-hearing-over-georges-abdallah-release-again

    A French court on Thursday postponed for the second time a hearing to discuss the parole of jailed Lebanese Marxist Georges Ibrahim Abdallah, more than six weeks after he was due to be released from a 28-year incarceration.

    The court now says it will hear the case on March 21.

    Activists in Lebanon have called for a gathering outside the French embassy in Beirut on Sunday to demonstrate against the newest delay, accusing France of succumbing to US and Israeli pressure to keep Abdallah behind bars.

    “The procrastination and delays by the French authorities … to release Georges Abdallah prove the policy of state reprisal,” read a statement by the International Campaign for the Release of Georges Abdallah.

    Abdallah’s supporters had rallied for his release outside France’s cultural centers across Lebanon on Thursday ahead of the hearing.

    Abdallah, 61, was due to be released on January 14 after serving 28 years in French prison over his alleged involvement in the 1984 killings an American military office and an Israeli diplomat.

  • France postpones hearing over Georges Abdallah release, again

    A French court on Thursday postponed for the second time a hearing to discuss the parole of jailed Lebanese Marxist Georges Ibrahim Abdallah, more than six weeks after he was due to be released from a 28-year incarceration. The court now says it will hear the case on March 21.

    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/france-postpones-hearing-over-georges-abdallah-release-again

    En français : http://www.lorientlejour.com/category/Derni%E8res+Infos/article/802990/Demande+de+lib.html

  • Building Solidarity for Georges Abdallah
    | Al Akhbar English
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/building-solidarity-georges-abdallah

    On 21 November 2012, a French court finally ordered the release of Georges Abdallah from prison and his immediate return to his country of origin, Lebanon. French Minister of Interior Manuel Valls was given until 14 January 2013 to sign the deportation papers, which he has refused to do until this day.

    For its part, the justice ministry appealed on the very same day, asking that Abdallah’s release from prison be overturned due to the fact that all the conditions for his release were not complete. The appeals judge responded on 10 January 2013, sticking to the 14 January 2013 deportation date.

    The justice minister appealed again, this time to France’s high court of cassation, which has yet to set a date for the hearing. Diplomatic and media sources suggest that the hearing will be held sometime in mid-March. This means that Abdallah’s deportation hearing, set for 28 February, is meaningless.

    This game of appeals and the postponement of hearings, combined with the dueling interventions of the interior and justice ministers could very well prolong Abdallah’s imprisonment.

  • French court sends EDF execs to jail for hacking, spying on Greenpeace
    http://boingboing.net/2011/11/10/french-court-sends-edf-execs-t.html

    9:10 am Thursday, Nov 10 2011

    EDF, the French energy company, has been fined €1.5 million and its head and deputy-head of nuclear operations have been jailed over its use of Kargus (a private security firm run by a French ex-secret service operative) to use illegal surveillance techniques against Greenpeace. I recently switched away from EDF at home and at the office (they were the energy company when we moved it) over their unbelievably awful customer service (we switched to Good Energy, who’ve been great) but I’m also glad to be shut of them now that I know they’re run by evil crooks.

    EDF condamné pour avoir espionné Greenpeace http://www.liberation.fr/societe/01012370893-edf-condamne-pour-avoir-espionne-greenpeace

    Le tribunal correctionnel de Nanterre a condamné hier EDF à une amende de 1,5 million d’euros pour espionnage informatique aux dépens de Greenpeace. Deux hauts responsables d’EDF, Pierre-Paul François et Pascal Durieux, ont été condamnés à des peines fermes, avec respectivement trois ans de prison dont trente mois avec sursis et trois ans de prison dont deux avec sursis. Les deux hommes et EDF devront verser 500 000 euros de dommages et intérêts à Greenpeace. EDF avait mandaté l’entreprise...