organization:gay rights group

  • LGBT Catholic Group Gets VIP Treatment At Vatican
    http://www.brujitafr.fr/2015/02/lgbt-catholic-group-gets-vip-treatment-at-vatican.html

    A prominent American Catholic gay rights group was given VIP treatment for the first time at an audience with Pope Francis on Wednesday, a move members saw as a sign of change in the Roman Catholic Church.

    "This is a sign of movement that’s due to the Francis effect," said Sister Jeannine Gramick, co-founder of New Ways Ministry, which ministers to homosexual Catholics and promotes gay rights in the 1.2 billion-member Church.

    Gramick and executive director Francis DeBernardo led a pilgrimage of 50 homosexual Catholics to the audience in St. Peter’s Square.

    They told Reuters in an interview afterwards that when the group came to Rome on Catholic pilgrimages during the papacies of Francis’s predecessors John Paul and Benedict, "they just ignored us."

    This (...)

  • BBC News - UK asylum seekers ’told to prove they are gay’
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24479812

    UK asylum seekers ’told to prove they are gay’
    By Justin Parkinson Political reporter, BBC News
    UK Border controls sign at Heathrow Airport MPs complained about a backlog of asylum cases
    Continue reading the main story
    Related Stories

    Illegal migrants face new crackdown
    UK immigration acts through the ages

    Gay and lesbian people seeking asylum in the UK from persecution abroad are being ordered to “prove” their sexuality, MPs have said.

    In extreme cases claimants had handed over photographic and video evidence of “highly personal sexual activity” in an effort to persuade officials, the Home Affairs Committee found.

    The gay rights group Stonewall called the testing system “distressing”.

    The Home Office promised to monitor and maintain standards.

    In its report on the asylum system, the committee said it was concerned by the quality of the UK Border Agency’s decision-making, as 30% of appeals against initial decisions had been allowed in 2012.

    And a backlog of 32,600 asylum cases that should have been resolved in 2011 was yet to be concluded, while the number of applicants still waiting for an initial decision after six months had risen by 63% last year.
    ’Absurd’

    Some had been waiting up to 16 years, while the housing with which they were provided was sometimes “appalling”.

    It also said poor decision-making by officials was raising the risk of the UK harbouring war criminals.

    The committee also focused on the situation facing lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) people seeking asylum.

    In its report, the committee said they faced “extraordinary obstacles” in persuading immigration officers of their case.

    Its chairman, Labour MP Keith Vaz, told BBC News: "It is absurd for a judge or a caseworker to have to ask an individual to prove that they are lesbian or gay, to ask them what kind of films they watch, what kind of material they read.

    “People should accept the statement of sexuality by those who seek asylum. This practice is regrettable and ought to be stopped immediately.”

    A Supreme Court ruling in 2010 stated that the “underlying rationale” of the United Nations Refugee Convention was that people should be able to “live freely and openly” in their own country without fear of persecution.

    This judgement, the committee said, had effectively overturned the Border Agency’s previous emphasis on “voluntary discretion” - which had meant it should be seen an option for claimants to conceal their sexuality in order to avoid abuse.
    ’Weakness’

    The report said: “The battleground is now firmly centred in ’proving’ that they are gay. In turn, this has led to claimants going to extreme lengths to try and meet the new demands of credibility assessment in this area, including the submission of photographic and video evidence of highly personal sexual activity to caseworkers, presenting officers and the judiciary.”

    The committee said: “We were concerned to hear that the decision making process for LGBTI applicants relies so heavily on anecdotal evidence and ’proving that they are gay’.”

    It added that "it is not appropriate to force people to prove their sexuality if there is a perception that they are gay. The assessment of credibility is an area of weakness within the British asylum system.

    “Furthermore, the fact that credibility issues disproportionately affect the most vulnerable applicants - victims of domestic and sexual violence, victims of torture and persecution because of their sexuality - makes improvement all the more necessary.”

    The Refugee Council said the committee’s report reflected its “grave concerns” about the UK asylum system.

    Chief Executive Maurice Wren said: “Failing to treat asylum seekers with dignity and, simultaneously, failing to deal effectively and fairly with their claims has created an expensive and counter-productive bureaucratic nightmare that all too often denies vulnerable people the protection from persecution and oppression they desperately need.”

    Stonewall says LGBTI people in some countries have suffered rape, torture and death threats.

    Spokesman Richard Lane said: "Being gay isn’t about what nightclubs you go to; it is a fundamental part of who you are.

    "Sadly, in far too many cases, valuable time is spent attempting to ’prove’ a claimant is gay in this way rather than establishing whether they have a legitimate fear of persecution.

    “This is not only a waste of time and resources but can be deeply distressing to asylum seekers, many of who have fled for fear of their lives.”

    A Home Office spokesman said: "The UK has a proud history of granting asylum to those who need it. We are committed to concluding all cases as quickly as possible, but asylum cases are often complex and require full and thorough consideration.

    “We have robust mechanisms in place to monitor standards of housing provided to asylum seekers.”

    He added: “We will continue to monitor performance to ensure that standards are met.”

    Have you had to seek asylum in the UK from persecution abroad because of your sexuality? What do you think about the UK system? Please get in contact using the form below.
    (Required) Name (Required) Your E-mail address (Required) Town & Country (Required) Your telephone number
    (Required) Comments

    If you are happy to be contacted by a BBC journalist please leave a telephone number that we can contact you on. In some cases a selection of your comments will be published, displaying your name as you provide it and location, unless you state otherwise. Your contact details will never be published. When sending us pictures, video or eyewitness accounts at no time should you endanger yourself or others, take any unnecessary risks or infringe any laws. Please ensure you have read the terms and conditions.

    Terms and conditio

  • Secret Donors Finance Fight Against Hagel - NYTimes.com
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/27/us/politics/secret-donors-finance-fight-against-hagel.html

    Profitant de l’assouplissement des conditions de financement des campagnes politiques, des groupes de pressions reçoivent d’importantes contributions de donateurs anonymes pour s’opposer à la nomination de Chuck Hagel comme Secrétaire à la Défense.

    A brand new conservative group calling itself Americans for a Strong Defense and financed by anonymous donors is running advertisements urging Democratic senators in five states to vote against Chuck Hagel, President Obama’s nominee to be secretary of defense, saying he would make the United States “a weaker country.”

    Another freshly minted and anonymously backed organization, Use Your Mandate, which presents itself as a liberal gay rights group but purchases its television time through a prominent Republican firm, is attacking Mr. Hagel as “anti-Gay,” “anti-woman” and “anti-Israel” in ads and mailers.

    Those groups are joining at least five others that are organizing to stop Mr. Hagel’s confirmation, a goal even they acknowledge appears to be increasingly challenging. But the effort comes with a built-in consolation prize should it fail: depleting some of Mr. Obama’s political capital as he embarks on a new term with fresh momentum.