organization:idf

  • How a small group of Israelis made the Western Wall Jewish again
    http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.792857

    On Saturday, June 10, 1967, the fifth day of the Six-Day War, Yosef Schwartz, a contractor, entered the bomb shelter in the Kiryat Hayovel neighborhood in western Jerusalem and found his daughter and grandchildren. “It was quite normal to see us and bring bread and milk,” says his daughter Zehava Fuchs. “But this time he was very tense, he hugged me and the children and he looked different than usual.”

    Schwartz, who was wearing the uniform of the old Haganah police force, left without saying where he was going. “I went up to the apartment to call my mother, she told me he didn’t want to say where he wast going,” said Fuchs.

    “The next day he came back crying. My brother was a pilot then and I was very worried something had happened, but then he told me that he had been in the Old City and touched the Kotel. He told how at night they demolished all the Mughrabi neighborhood. He was completely secular, but he said that when they worked there was a mystical feeling, they felt they were on a mission,” she added.

    Schwartz was one of 15 older contractors from the Jeruslaem contractors association who were called on by then Mayor Teddy Kollek that night to come to the Western Wall, which had just been captured. The task was to demolish the houses in the Mughrabi (Moroccan) Quarter that was built right next to the Kotel and create the Western Wall Plaza.

    Sasson Levy, one of the two contractors who is still alive, remembers the excitement very well: “I was sky-high, it was a pleasure.”

    Kollek enlisted the contractors for the work, but to this day it is still not clear who made the decision about the demolition. It is clear Kollek was involved, as well as Shlomo Lahat, who was the new military governor of East Jerusalem (and later mayor of Tel Aviv), and the head of the IDF’s Central Command, Maj. Gen. Uzi Narkiss. It is clear they intentionally made the decision without asking for – or receiving permission. No written documents remain concerning the decision, except for a hand-drawn map on a piece of paper that marked the boundaries of the area to be demolished.

    The contractors association was the most readily available source of manpower, but that was not the only reason that Kollek turned to them. The fear of an international protest made it necessary to use an unofficial civilian body to take on the job. The demolition work was given to the Jerusalem contractors and builders organization to distance any involvement of official bodies in the demolition as much as possible, wrote Uzi Benziman in Haaretz Magazine last week (in Hebrew).

    Kollek explained the urgency of clearing the plaza stemmed from the Shavuot holiday in a few days, when tens of thousands of Israelis were expected to flock to the Kotel. Leaving the old buildings standing could be dangerous, said Kollek. But the contractors, who were not called up to the reserves because of their age, saw it as much more than just another engineering project: That night remained engraved in their memories as a historic moment. So much so that after the war they established the “Order of the Kotel,” a sort of imitation of an order of knights for those who “purified the Kotel plaza for the people of Israel,” as they wrote about themselves.

    A coincidence led researchers from Yad Ben Zvi, the Ben Zvi Institute in Jerusalem named after former President Yitzhak Ben-Zvi, to study the Order of the Kotel story. Next week an exhibition will go on display at the Institute about the Order and the creation of the Western Wall Plaza.

    The work began about 11 P.M. The first job was to demolish a toilet that was built up against the Western Wall. A day earlier, Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion visited the Kotel and reprimanded Yaakov Yannai, the head of the National Parks Authority, about the bathroom. “You come to place like this and you see a stench in the wall, we were surprised by it,” Levy remembers. “It made us angry in all the joy. At first we worked with hoes, pickaxes, cultivators and hammers. After that Zalman [Broshi, one of the largest builders in Jerusalem] brought in the tractor.”

    Two bulldozers worked to demolish the houses. They ran into difficulties when the rooms underground collapsed suddenly under the bulldozers, but the collapse also provided them with space to bury the rubble and flatten the ground. 135 houses were demolished, and in the end the demolition exceeded the area drawn on the map.

    Levy does not remember the residents of the houses or whether anyone was evacuated from them. Fuchs says that when she asked her father about them, “he said they went with a megaphone and asked the people to gather, and they went out through the Zion Gate, because through this gat they took out the refugees of the Jewish Quarter [in 1948].”

    Bruria Shiloni, the daughter of Yosef Zaban, and who was there that night, does not remember the residents. “I didn’t have the impression that people lived there, that there was life,” says Shiloni. “Later I heard that they smuggled them out of there. The feeling was that they were demolishing empty and piled up huts, I didn’t see movement of people.”

    Benziman tells how in one case the residents refused to leave the house and left only after the bulldozer rammed the wall. In one house, an elderly woman named Haja Ali Taba’aki was found dead in her bed. In one of the pictures a bulldozer can be seen demolishing a house with furniture, curtains and a vase with flowers inside.

    Zaban was the father of Yair Tsaban, who became a member of Knesset for the left-wing Mapam party. Shiloni went to the Kotel with her father and remembers the trip and Kollek standing on a crate or step, speaking to those present. During the demolition she was not there, after two officers accompanied her to find her husband, a platoon commander who had been wounded in the fighting.

    The Order of the Western Wall was founded that same night and the members continued to meet regularly until the 1990s, when most of them passed away. In 1967 they enlisted in another task from Kollek and built the structure near the windmill in the Yemin Moshe neighborhood of the capital that housed the original carriage used by Moses Montefiore in his travels. In 1983 they published album with almost prophetic predictions by Itamar Ben-Avi, a journalist and son of Eliezer Ben-Yehuda, about the creation of the Kotel Plaza. Ben-Avi died in 1943. In 1987 the members of the Oder attended a ceremony in their honor in the Knesset, and received the “Defender of the Kotel” decoration.

    The founder of the order was Baruch Barkai, who became the secretary of the group and a rather unusual figure. Barkai was born in Latvia, studied law, was a journalist, art collector and a member of the Lehi pre-state underground, also known as the Stern Gang. He was even arrested on suspicions of being involved in the murder of Chaim Arlosoroff. Barkai later wrote a number of books, two of which are etiquette guides, and founded the most polite Knesset member competition.

    “It was a difficult day for him,” says Barkai’s son Itamar, who was named after Ben-Avi, who his father admired. The 1983 album says the Order was founded on Sunday, the third day of the Hebrew month of Sivan, June 11, 1967 at 3 A.M. in the Kotel Plaza, with the 15 members who had answered the call of the engineering officer, Capt. Eitan Ben Moshe, to purify the Kotel Plaza. “In doing so they fulfilled the vision of Itamar Ben-Avi: ‘The Kotel with space on the right and space on the left too, the Kotel with a broad courtyard in front of it.”

    The Yad Ben- Zvi researchers discovered the story by accident, through a person who participated in the demolition, but not a member of the Order.

    Ze’ev Ben Gal was born to a Samaritan family, fled his parent’s home, enlisted in the Palmah and lived on Kibbuts Rosh Hanikra. During the Six-Day War he served as a bulldozer driver in the reserves and was called to the Mughrabi neighborhood. During his work he noticed a large iron lock, it seems the lock on the gate to the neighborhood, and kept it. After he died last year, the lock made its way to the kibbutz archive, where they decided to give it, and the story behind it, to Yad Ben-Zvi.

    Fuchs was photographed for the movie that was part of the “50 Faces, 50 years” project created by the Tower of David Museum in the Old City. She said about her father, Schwartz, that he was so proud of every house he built, and suddenly he was proud of demolishing houses, “but he felt that he was carrying out a great mission for the Jewish people.”

    Anyone who knew the Kotel before the demolition was amazed by the plaza that was born overnight. “I read in the newspaper that they demolished the houses and straightened the plaza in front of the Kotel, but I didn’t imagine they made a stadium,” an “elderly Yemenite” Jew was quoted in the Davar newspaper. The quote appears in an article that appeared recently by Shmuel Bahat in the journal Et-mol, published by Yad Ben Zvi. Kollek too is quoted justifying the demolitions: “It ws the greatest thing we could do and it is good we did it immediately.”

  • Pour mémoire : Wonder « Love IDF » Woman en 2014 pendant le massacre de Gaza : Wonder Woman Gal Gadot on Israel-Gaza : Israeli actress’s pro-IDF stance causes controversy
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/wonder-woman-gal-gadot-on-israel-gaza-israeli-actresss-pro-idf-stance

    Israeli actress Gal Gadot – who was recently unveiled as the caped superhero in Zack Snyder’s new DC movie Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice – caused a stir by posting a message of support for the Israel Defence Forces via her official Facebook page, just days before a poster of her in character first debuted.

    As the conflict between Israel and Gaza worsened, she uploaded a photograph of herself praying with her daughter Alma.

    “I am sending my love and prayers to my fellow Israeli citizens,” she wrote. “Especially to all the boys and girls who are risking their lives protecting my country against the horrific acts conducted by Hamas, who are hiding like cowards behind women and children...We shall overcome!!! Shabbat Shalom! #weareright #freegazafromhamas #stopterror #coexistance #loveidf

  • Anne Hidalgo et la Licra en croisade contre la non-mixité - regards.fr
    http://www.regards.fr/web/article/anne-hidalgo-et-la-licra-en-croisade-contre-la-non-mixite

    Certains, qui n’ont jamais eu besoin de lutter pour leur émancipation et pour l’égalité, ont trouvé un nouveau passe-temps : chercher quel événement organisé par et pour les personnes racisées ils vont pouvoir attaquer. L’été dernier, le camp décolonial de Reims avait donné des haut-le-cœur aux antiracistes spécialistes ès "racisme anti-blancs" (camp qui, au demeurant, avait réuni 170 personnes). Cette année, c’est donc au tour du collectif Mwasi d’en faire les frais. En cause : l’organisation du "Nyansapo Fest", un "festival afroféministe", à Paris du 28 au 30 juillet.
    Anne Hidalgo dans la foulée de la fachosphère

    Concrètement, ce festival se décompose en quatre espaces : un premier réservé aux femmes noires, un deuxième aux personnes noires, un troisième aux femmes racisées et un dernier ouvert à tout le monde, comme il est clairement indiqué sur la brochure du programme.

    Le 26 mai, sur le forum de jeuxvideo.com, la fachosphère organise la fronde pour dénoncer cet événement. Et les dominos tombent. Fdesouche et le FN d’abord. Puis la Licra s’en fait l’écho, osant sur Twitter un « Rosa Parks doit se retourner dans sa tombe ». Enfin viennent Ni putes ni soumises, SOS Racisme, la Délégation interministérielle à la lutte contre le racisme, l’antisémitisme et la haine anti-LGBT (DILCRAH), Raphael Enthoven, Joann Sfar, etc.

    Mais c’est surtout la vive réaction d’Anne Hidalgo, en sa qualité de maire de Paris, qui a le plus surpris. Via Twitter, elle « condamne avec fermeté l’organisation à Paris de cet événement "interdit aux blancs" », en « demande l’interdiction », annonce « saisir le Préfet de police en ce sens » et se « réserve également la possibilité de poursuivre les initiateurs de ce festival pour discrimination ».

    • Arrêter Madame Hidalgo vous ne connaissez rien du racisme ordinaire qu’une femme noire - ou métis subit au quotidien à Paris et en IDF, et quand plusieurs femmes noires parlent ensembles on sent suinter un mépris des blancs et des blanches autour d’elles qui est insupportable. Alors posez vous les bonnes questions, ne jouez pas au jeu du FN et d’une LICRA radi-laïqualiser, laissez les s’exprimer sans contrainte, et méditez aussi la position du CRAN : « Quelle hypocrisie ! Personne n’est choqué par une autre non-mixité, celle qui est omniprésente dans les milieux des dominants. Ils cultivent l’entre-soi comme une stratégie de domination, en restant dans un monde d’énarques qui est masculin, quinquagénaire et bourgeois. Nous le faisons sur une autre logique, celle de l’ “empowerment”, en nous fondant sur le principe du “For us, by us”… et nous suscitons les critiques ! »

  • Israeli Officers : You’re Doing ISIS Wrong - POLITICO Magazine
    http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/05/22/israeli-officers-to-trump-youre-doing-isis-wrong-215172

    (...) The United States has mishandled the situation in other ways, in the view of the Israelis I spoke with. For example, U.S. efforts to train rebel fighters inside Syria to fight ISIS are widely seen as counterproductive. “The CIA [training] program goes against Assad and the Pentagon program only goes for rebels against ISIS,” the intelligence officer complained. “So what is the U.S. stance is not really clear here.”

    Israeli analysts laid out several possible scenarios ahead for the Syrian civil war, including that Assad regains control of his country (not likely) and the regime grants some rebels group autonomy and economic incentives in return for coexistence (already well underway).

    What they agree on is that Assad is now unquestionably winning. And he owes Hezbollah, the radical Shia Muslim proxy of Iran, “big time” for it.

    The so-called Army of God, which has gone to war with Israel twice and constitutes a state within a state in neighboring Lebanon, has lost an estimated 1,700 fighters bleeding for the Syrian dictator and as payback is now seeking to expand its new base of operations in Syria—which also means a new sphere of influence for the mullahs in Tehran.

    “If Assad wins,” one IDF official in the Golan Heights told me, “we will have Hezbollah on two borders not one.”

    Yavne, the brigadier general, similarly described the Iranian influence as significantly more worrisome than ISIS or other Sunni Muslim terror groups:

    “If I can be frank, the radical axis headed by Iran is more risky than the global jihad one," said Yavne. “It is much more knowledgeable, stronger, with a bigger arsenal.”

    As far as these Israeli officers are concerned, the ideal strategy is to sit back and let both types of groups duke it out—and work to contain the conflict rather than trying to end it with military force. As the IDF intelligence officer put it, “the battle for deterrence is easier than the battle for influence.”

    But does that mean the United States and its allies should simply allow ISIS to retain its so-called caliphate in parts of eastern Syria and eastern Iraq?

    “Why not?” the officer shot back. “When they asked the late [Israeli] Prime Minister Menachem Begin in the Iraq-Iran War in the 80s, who does Israel stand for, Iraq or Iran, he said, ‘I wish luck to both parties. They can go at it, killing each other.’ The same thing is here. You have ISIS killing Al Qaeda by the thousands, Al Qaeda killing ISIS by the thousands. And they are both killing Hezbollah and Assad.”

    I asked an IDF official peering out into the Syrian frontier a similar question—about the consequences of America’s war against ISIS in the region.

    “There is no lack of Islamic militant groups here,” he said, clutching a machine gun in one hand and a pineapple popsicle in another. “You just haven’t heard of them yet.”

    Bryan Bender is POLITICO’s national security editor and the author of You Are Not Forgotten .

    via @nidal

  • Actualisation de la situation des prisonniers politique palestiniens au 17 Mai 2017 | Agence Media Palestine
    17 Mai 2017, 31 ème jour de grève des prisonniers palestiniens.
    http://www.agencemediapalestine.fr/blog/2017/05/17/actualisation-de-la-situation-des-prisonniers-palestiniens-au-1

    L’avocat d’Addameer (association des Droits de l’Homme et de défense des prisonniers palestiniens) Farah Bayadsi, a rencontré Ahmad Sa’adat, gréviste et secrétaire général du Front Populaire pour la Libération de la Palestine (PFLP). L’avocat d’Addameer s’est déjà vu refusé le droit de visite, mais a reçu l’approbation suite à une requête de la Haute Cour présentée le 10 mai 2017.

    Sada’at a informé l’avocat d’Addameer que les prisonniers sont soumis à deux raids de recherche violents tous les jours, au cours desquels les prisonniers sont forcés de quitter leur chambre, ce qui est épuisant physiquement pour les prisonniers en raison de leur état de santé. Il a également ajouté que 10 prisonniers sont détenus dans une cellule exiguë avec un évier et un toilette, pas de ventilateur ni de climatisation et chaque prisonniers reçoit 3 couvertures. Il a précisé par ailleurs que les examens médicaux effectués par l’IPS (Israel Prison Service) ne sont pas suffisants, car seule la pression sanguine et le poids des grévistes de la faim sont examinés.

    L’IPS impose des restrictions aux prisonniers grévistes, y compris une amende disciplinaire de 200 NIS (équivalent à 50 euros environ), l’interdiction de visite familiale pendant deux mois, l’interdiction d’accès à la « cantine » (boutique où les prisonniers peuvent acheter des produits de la vie courante, tel que des cigarettes) et la saisie de sel ainsi que de tous les vêtements, uniquement un seul vêtement par prisonnier est autorisé.

    Plus inquiétant encore : l’IPS a rendu extrêmement difficile pour les médecins indépendants de rendre visite aux prisonniers grévistes et a fourni aux prisonniers des tasses en plastique afin de boire du robinet plutôt que de l’eau potable, habituellement fournie.

    35 autres prisonniers politiques palestiniens se sont joint à la grève dimanche 14 mai, a rapporté le média « Asra Voice ».

    (...) Sa’adat a également noté que les prisonniers en grève avaient refusé de rencontrer des délégués du Comité International de la Croix-Rouge (CICR), qui sont venus pour leur visite, parce que les délégués du CICR ont refusé d’entrer dans les sections et les salles des prisonniers afin de voir par eux-mêmes les conditions de détention.

    Les prisonniers en grève de la faim ont donc rejetés cette « proposition » du CICR et ont demandés au CICR de prendre ses responsabilités dans la protection des détenus et de leurs droits. (...)

    • Compte-rendu de la rencontre du vendredi 13 mai avec 3 responsables français du Comité International de la Croix Rouge au sujet de la situation dramatique des 1.800 prisonniers politiques palestiniens à leur 26e jour de grève de la faim illimitée

      Par Association Palestiniens IDF

      Nous étions 5 camarades représentant l’Association de Palestiniens en Ile-de-France, l’Union Générale des Etudiants de Palestine, le Forum Palestine Citoyenneté, l’Association Femmes Égalité, l’Association France Palestine Solidarité Paris-Sud – Campagne BDS France et avons :

      – rappelé le caractère unitaire de cette grève pour la dignité et la liberté et les risques encourus par les prisonniers politiques palestiniens (la mort, si le silence complice des diverses institutions, dont celui du CICR se perpétue), ainsi que leurs revendications, dont : fin de la détention administrative illégale, la fin des interdictions et interruptions des visites familiales, l’accès aux soins médicaux appropriés et la fin de la négligence médicale délibérée, la libération des prisonniers malades, en particulier des personnes handicapées et celles atteintes de maladies incurables, la fin de la tortures et humiliations...
      (...)
      Les 3 représentants du CICR ont répété à plusieurs reprises que cette organisation a choisi la confidentialité et que ses délégués mènent des discussions aussi bien avec les israéliens qu’avec les prisonniers, établissant ainsi une sorte d’égalité entre les bourreaux et les victimes.

      Nous avons dénoncé l’inefficacité de la méthode du CICR puisqu’il n’a obtenu aucune amélioration des conditions de détention des prisonniers politiques palestiniens, que celles-ci se sont aggravées, sont contraires à la dignité humaine et qu’elles les ont amenées a décidé une grève de la faim illimitée.

      Suite à cette rencontre et d’après les déclarations de ces trois représentants, la confidentialité du CICR se poursuivra, même en cas de décès de l’un des prisonniers. Cette déclaration confirme que le CICR a échoué dans sa mission de protéger les personnes emprisonnées en temps d’occupation et qu’il ne dénoncera pas les conditions de détentions qui condamne les prisonniers palestiniens à plus ou moins long terme à mort. Là est leur complicité dans les crimes de l’occupation.

      Tout en continuant à affirmer notre solidarité avec la résistance des prisonniers politiques palestiniens, nous devons aussi dénoncer tous ceux qui comme le CICR se rendent complices de l’occupant en lui écrivant :
      Siège du Comité International de la Croix Rouge (CICR) à Paris
      10 Bis Passage d’Enfer, 75014 Paris
      par_paris@icrc.org

  • La #CIP-IdF n’a jamais donné de consigne, de conseil, de recommandation, d’avertissement, d’encouragement à quiconque ni pour personne concernant des #élections. Pour autant, nous avons une pensée politique, ancrée dans notre pratique et notre observation de l’#intermittence et de la #précarité. Il nous paraît donc utile de relayer deux points de vue concernant le scrutin de dimanche. L’un prône le vote contre le #Front_National, l’autre le #non-vote. Le point commun entre ces deux textes est qu’ils sont écrits par des auteurs ne vivant pas en France - ou pas en permanence - bref un point de vue du dehors. Les deux partent aussi du constat de la radicalisation du capitalisme dans son mode de gouvernement des plus précaires.
    Nous invitons à les lire pour nourrir la réflexion de chacun concernant la situation politique en France.

    http://www.cip-idf.org/article.php3?id_article=8595

    #précariat #précariat_politique #néolibéralisme #fascisme #néofascisme #extrême_droite #Belgique #Grèce #France #CIP #chômeurs #abstention

  • Barghouti’s N.Y. Times article met by Israeli ritual of diversion and denial -

    Comparing article to terror attack and suggesting sanctions against the Times, as Michael Oren did, is more damaging to Israel’s image

    Chemi Shalev Apr 19, 2017
    read more: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.784060

    At the end of his opinion piece in the New York Times about the Palestinian prisoners’ strike, Marwan Barghouti was originally described as “a Palestinian leader and parliamentarian.” After 24 hours of outrage and condemnation, an editor’s note conceded that further context was needed, pointing out that Barghouti had been convicted on “five counts of murder and membership in a terrorist organization.” News of the clarification spread like wildfire on social media. It was described in glowing terms as yet another historic victory of good over evil and of the Jewish people over its eternal enemies.
    It was another example of the time-tested Israeli ritual of accentuating the insignificant at the expense of the essence, the results of which are well known in advance. First you manufacture righteous indignation over a minor fault in an article or the problematic identity of its writer, then you assault the newspaper or media that publicized it and cast doubt on its motives, then you demand to know how this was even possible and who will pay the price. In this way, the Israeli public is absolved of the need to actually contend with the gist of the article or public utterance, in this case Barghouti’s claims that he was physically tortured, that almost a million Palestinians have been detained over the years, that their conviction rate in the Israeli military court system is absurdly high, whether it’s really wise to hold as many as 6,500 security prisoners in custody at one time and so on.
    The guiding principle of this perpetual war waged by Israel and its supporters against the so-called hostile press - to paraphrase a legendary John Cleese episode about a visit by German visitors to Fawlty Towers - is “Don’t mention the occupation!” After one spends so much energy on protestations and exclamations of how unthinkable, how outrageous and how dare they, there’s very little enthusiasm left to consider eternal control over another people or the malignant status quo that many Israelis view as the best of all possible worlds or how is it even possible that someone who is defined by former Israeli Ambassador and current deputy minister Michael Oren as a terrorist and a murderer on a par with Dylann Roof, who killed nine African American worshippers in a church in Charleston, is considered by many people around the world, including those at the New York Times, as an authentic leader whose words should be read and heard.
    In an interview with IDF Radio on Tuesday, Oren put the ingenious diversionary strategy on full display. He described Barghouti’s op-ed as nothing less than a “media terror attack.” To this he added a pinch of conspiracy theory with a dash of anti-Semitism by claiming that the Times purposely published Barghouti’s article on Passover, so that Israeli and Jewish leaders wouldn’t have time to react. Then he approvingly cited the wise words of his new oracle, Donald Trump, describing the publication of the article and its content as “fake news.” And for his grand finale, Oren intimated that the proper Zionist response would be to close down the Times’ Israel office, no less.
    In this way, anyone who wants to address Barghouti’s claims substantively, even if it’s to criticize them, is seen as collaborating with a terrorist and enabling terror. It’s the same system by which anti-occupation groups such as Breaking the Silence are tarred as traitorous, backstabbing informants so that no one dares consider the actual testimonies they present about the hardships of occupation and the immorality of forcing the IDF to police the West Bank. What’s hilarious, however, is that so many Israelis and Jews are convinced that articles such as the one written by Barghouti, which most readers probably view as yet another tedious polemic about an intractable Middle East conflict, somehow causes more harm to Israel’s image than a senior government official who compares a news article to a terror attack and who recommends closing down the offices of the most widely respected news organization in the world, a la Putin or Erdogan.

    #Palestine #Israel #Barghouti

  • Will Israel be a casualty of U.S.-Russian tension after Trump’s missile attack? - Syria - Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/syria/.premium-1.782265

    Putin might want to prove that an attack on Russia’s ally has implications for America’s ally. But Israel needs coordination with Russia over Syria’s skies

    Zvi Bar’el Apr 08, 2017 7:30 AM
     
    Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, shakes hands with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during their meeting in the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Wednesday, Nov. 20, 2013. AP
    Analysis Syria strike marks complete turnaround in Trump’s policy
    Analysis Trump challenges Putin with first Western punishment for Assad’s massacres since start of Syria war
    Russia: U.S. strike in Syria ’one step away from military clashes with Russia’
    A military strike was warranted but the likelihood was low − so U.S. President Donald Trump surprised everyone, as usual. Russian President Valdimir Putin was furious, Syrian President Bashar Assad screamed, but the 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles fired by the USS Ross and USS Porter weren’t just another tug-of-war or show of strength.
    >> Get all updates on Trump, Israel and the Middle East: Download our free App, and Subscribe >>
    Without a UN Security Council resolution and without exhausting diplomatic chatter, the U.S. strike on the air force base near Homs slapped Assad and Putin in the face, sending a message to many other countries along the way.
    The military response was preceded by a foreign-policy revolution in which Trump announced that Assad can no longer be part of the solution. Only a few days earlier, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Haley, announced that Assad’s removal was no longer an American priority.
    Did American priorities change as a result of the chemical weapons attack on the town of Khan Sheikhoun near Idlib, and will Trump now work to bring down Assad? Not yet. Will Trump renew the military aid to the rebel militias so they can fight the regime? Far from it.

    Donald Trump after U.S. missiles strike Assad regime airbase in Syria, April 7, 2017JIM WATSON/AFP
    >> Read top analyses on U.S. strike in Syria: Trump challenges Putin, punishes Assad for first time | Russia, Iran, denounce strike, Saudi Arabia praises it | Trump’s move could backfire | Trump’s 48-hour policy turnaround <<
    Keep updated: Sign up to our newsletter
    Email* Sign up

    The American attack also provides no answers to the tactical questions. The Tomahawk missiles didn’t hit the warehouses where Assad’s chemical weapons may be stored, but rather the air force base where the planes that dropped the weapons took off.
    It’s possible the chemical weapons are still safely stored away. The logic behind the attack on the air force base is understandable, but does it hint that Trump won’t hesitate to attack the person who gave the order and the president who gave the initial approval? For now the answers aren’t clear.
    Trump did on a large scale what Israel has been doing on a smaller scale when it attacked weapons convoys leaving Syria for Hezbollah. Unless Washington decides to surprise us once again, it won’t return to being a power on the Syrian front, it won’t steal the show from Russia. Diplomatic efforts, as far as there are any, will be made without active American participation.
    So the immediate and important achievement for Trump is an American political one: He tarred and feathered Barack Obama and proved to the Americans that his United States isn’t chicken. Trump, who demanded that Obama receive Congress’ approval before attacking Syria in 2013, has now painted Congress into a corner, too. Who would dare criticize the attack, even if it wasn’t based on “the proper procedures,” and even though the United States didn’t face a clear and present danger?

    U.S. envoy to the UN Nikki Haley holds photographs of victims during a UN Security Council meeting on Syria, April 5, 2017. SHANNON STAPLETON/REUTERS
    The question is whether as a result of the American cruise missile attack, Russia and Syria will opt for a war of revenge in order to prove that the attack didn’t change anything in their military strategy against the rebels and the civilian population. They don’t feel they need chemical weapons to continuously and effectively bomb Idlib and its suburbs. They don’t need to make the entire world man the moral barricades if good results can be achieved through legitimate violence, as has been going on for six years.
    Such a decision is in the hands of Putin, who despite recent rifts with Assad is still committed to stand alongside the Syrian president against the American attack. This isn’t just defending a friend but preserving Russia’s honor. As recently as Thursday, Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Russia’s support for Assad was unconditional and “it is not correct to say that Moscow can convince Mr. Assad to do whatever is wanted in Moscow.” But the Kremlin has said such things before, every time Russia has been blamed for Assad’s murderous behavior.
    Read Russia’s response to the attack very carefully. Peskov called it “aggression against a sovereign state in violation of the norms of international law and on a made-up up pretext.” He didn’t embrace Assad and didn’t describe the attack as one that harmed an ally. And he didn’t directly attack Trump − just as Trump didn’t hold Putin responsible for the original chemical weapons attack.
    It seems that despite the loud talk, which included a Russian warning about U.S.-Russian relations, neither country is keen to give Assad the ability to upset the balance between the two superpowers.
    The only practical step taken so far by Russia − suspending aerial coordination between the countries over Syria based on the understandings signed in October 2015 − could turn out a double-edged sword if coalition planes start running into Russian ones. It’s still not clear if this suspension includes the coordination with Israel, which isn’t part of the Russian understandings with the United States.
    But Putin is angry about Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s comments about Assad, and might want to prove to Trump that an attack on Russia’s ally has implications for America’s ally. So he could freeze or cancel the agreements with Israel regarding attacks inside Syria.
    This would mean the war in Syria puts Israel in the diplomatic crossfire too, not just the military one. It could find itself in a conflict between Trump’s policies and its needs for coordination with Russia.

    Zvi Bar’el
    Haaretz Correspondent

    Send me email alerts
    skip -
     
    You Might also Like

    Haaretz | News
    Silent on Gas Attack, Assad Blames Israel, Blasts Trump

    Haaretz | News
    Russia Says It Would Recognize West Jerusalem as Israeli Capital in Deal…

    Haaretz | News
    Trump’s Move to Strike Assad Targets in Syria Draws Isolationist Rage…
    From The Web
    itelligence
    3 Reasons Why the Google and SAP Collaboration Benefits Enterprise…
    From The Web
    GenomeWeb
    Singulex Receives CE Mark for Sgx Clarity System
    From The Web
    Mother Nature Network
    Hyperlocal travel: What to do on Easter if you don’t celebrate
    Recommended by
    skip all comments
    Comments
    Add a comment
    skip - gone viral on facbook/haaretzcom
    Gone Viral

    skip - video
    Trending Now

    For Moscow, U.S. Strikes in Syria Encroach on Russia’s Turf


    ’I’m Not Sure It’s Possible to Have Democracy in a Jewish State’

    Gideon Levy IDF Gunfire Paralyzed This Palestinian and His Entire Family


    After Syria Chemical Attack, Israeli-Arab Journalist Asks Arab Leaders: Where Are You, Traitors?

    Security & Aviation

    Israeli Air Force Jets Buzz Greece’s Ancient Acropolis


    Israel Unveils Answer to Hamas and Hezbollah’s Deadly Rockets

    Israeli Air Force Holds Joint Exercise With United Arab Emirates, U.S. and Italy


    Hamas Faces Dilemma After Accusing Israel of Killing Top Militant in Gaza

    With Syria Attack, Trump Resets His Presidency - for Now
    By Chemi Shalev1 Hour Ago This article contains a video This article contains a slideshow gallery

    Sweden: Four Killed in ’Terror Attack’ as Truck Rams Into Pedestrians in Stockholm
    By Reuters12 Hours Ago

    Trump Challenges Putin With First Western Punishment for Assad’s Massacres
    By Anshel Pfeffer19 Hours Ago This article contains a slideshow gallery

    What 48 Hours Can Do Syria Strike Marks Complete Turnaround in Trump’s Policy
    By Amos Harel18 Hours Ago This article contains a slideshow gallery

    U.S. Strikes Syria in Response to Assad’s Chemical Attack
    Syria Russia Vladimir Putin
    Promoted content


    Your new home in Israel!

    Connection: Something New on the Seder Menu

    skip - tw

    skip - Subscribe elementskip -
     
    Sponsored Content

    Mother Nature Network
    World’s Easiest Apple Pie Recipe

    Daily Spikes
    20 Items Of Clothing Middle-Aged Women…

    LifeDaily
    Woman Goes Missing From Disney Cruise…

    Mansion Global
    Ivanka Trump Cuts Asking Rent for Manhattan Condo…
    By

    ICYMI

    Syria Gas Attack: Israeli-Arab Journalist Asks Arab Leaders - Where Are You, Traitors?

    How Breitbart Is Covering Bannon’s Removal From National Security Council

    We Tried Out the New Google Translate - and It Isn’t About to Replace Humans

    Silverman Slams Occupation in New Haggadah: ’Jews Know Oppression’

    New Pyramid Discovered in Egypt

    Amsterdam Residents Remove Holocaust Plaque Because It Reminds Them of Jew’s Murder

    Israel vs. America: What Jewish Millennials Think About God and the Occupation

    Hints of Disaster Found Under The Dead Sea Bed

    Opinion Boycott Israel’s Beloved Chocolate Spread

    Jewish Group Blacklists U.S. Professors Who Back Academic Boycott of Israel

    Cameras Are Changing the Fight Against the Israeli Occupation. This Is How

    Opinion Boycott Israel’s Beloved Chocolate Spread

    Nikki Haley, Rock Star to the Jews and Their Knight in Shining Armor

    Abbas Demands Britain Apologize for Balfour Declaration

    Hamas Obtains Heavy Rockets to Wreak Havoc on Israeli Gaza Border Towns

    Auschwitz Shuts Down After Nude Protesters Slaughter Sheep, Chain Selves to Gate

    Mossad Turned French Spies Into Double Agents After Joint Syria Op

    Flynn May Have Turned on Trump, Becomes FBI Informant, CNN Analyst Suggests

    This Canadian Model Is a Comedy Sensation in Israel

    Putin Told Israel That Its Freedom to Act Is Over, Syrian UN Envoy Says
    Scroll forward
    FAQ
    Contact us
    Newsletters
    Terms and conditions
    Privacy policy
    Management
    Editorial
    Accessibility
    Advertise on Haaretz.com
    RSS Contact us Download our Android app Download our iOS app gPlus Facebook Twitter

    Israel News
    Middle East
    Jewish World
    U.S./World
    Business
    Partnerships
    Dan Hotels in Tel Aviv
    Haaretz Labels
    Michael Laitman

    Life
    Archaeology
    Science
    Sports
    Culture
    Purim
    Books
    Travel
    Theater
    Movies and TV
    Food
    Poem of the Week

    Columnists
    Bradley Burston
    Chemi Shalev
    Allison Kaplan Sommer
    Anshel Pfeffer
    Sayed Kashua
    Ilene Prusher
    David Rosenberg
    Carlo Strenger
    Vered Guttman
    Opinion
    Daily Cartoon
    Letters to the Editor

    הארץ
    מתכונים לפסח
    חדשות
    גלריה
    ספורט
    ספרים
    סרטים מומלצים
    קפטן אינטרנט
    TheMarker
    Finance
    חדשות
    שוק ההון
    צרכנות
    נדל"ן
    Haaretz.com, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, and analysis from Israel and the Middle East. Haaretz.com provides extensive and in-depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab-Israeli conflict, the peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.
    © Haaretz Daily Newspaper Ltd. All Rights Reserved
    skip - Passover Rulerskip - skip - skip - skip - skip - Crazy eggskip - collecting surfing data - responsiveskip - skip - skip - skip - access list by IP scriptskip - skip - skip - skip - maavaron❞

  • After Trump request, Netanyahu formulating goodwill gestures toward Palestinians -

    At the meeting the security cabinet decided to curb settlement construction, Netanyahu told the ministers: We must not mislead the Americans, they are tracking every house in the settlements, including in East Jerusalem.

    Barak Ravid Apr 02, 2017
    read more: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.780952

    The Trump administration is asking Israel to carry out a series of goodwill gestures toward the Palestinians, both in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the security cabinet last Thursday, when he announced plans to curb construction in the settlements. 
    These measures should have an immediate effect on the Palestinians’ economic situation, ministers and senior officials who attended the meeting told Haaretz.
    >> Get all updates on Israel, Trump and the Palestinians: Download our free App, and Subscribe >>
    During Thursday’s meeting, Netanyahu said several times that U.S. President Donald Trump is determined to advance the Israeli-Palestinian issue and for the two parties to reach an agreement, the sources said.
    >> Analysis: Israel’s most right-wing cabinet ever curbs settlement construction - but the settlers keep mum >>
    Netanyahu said he did not know exactly how Trump wants to make progress, but the prime minister stressed the importance of Israel demonstrating goodwill and not being seen as the one causing the U.S. initiative to fail.
    Three ministers and two senior government officials who participated in Thursday’s meeting, or who were updated on the details of it, briefed Haaretz on what happened behind the scenes during the nighttime discussions about contacts between the United States and Israel on the Palestinian issue.
    All five asked to remain anonymous because of the sensitivity of the matter, and also because it was a closed meeting.
    Netanyahu said he intends to agree to the American demands for additional goodwill steps in the West Bank and Gaza, with the potential for an immediate uptick for the Palestinian economy. He did not provide details about what moves would be taken, but a number of the ministers present understood that one possible step would include granting the Palestinians permission to build in Area C (some 60 percent of the West Bank, under full Israeli civil and security control).
    Education Minister Naftali Bennett, who has blocked previous efforts by Netanyahu to take similar actions, once more presented his reservations. Bennett said he expects that any actions Israel takes on the ground, and the goodwill gestures to the Palestinians, will not expand into moves with major foreign policy implications.

    The Beit Aryeh settlement, north of Ramallah, April 1, 2017. Netanyahu has pledged to curb settlement construction.THOMAS COEX/AFP
    The leader of the far-right Habayit Hayehudi party added that if Netanyahu does consider such moves, he expects the matter to be brought back to the security cabinet for a further discussion and approval.
    Netanyahu scheduled a meeting with the Israel Defense Forces’ Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories, Maj. Gen. Yoav Mordechai, and other officials, for Sunday, when they will attempt to put together the package of goodwill gestures and other steps.
    Even though the Prime Minister’s Office stated in recent days no limitations will exist on construction in the Jewish neighborhoods of Jerusalem situated over the Green Line, Netanyahu sounded less emphatic in the security cabinet meeting and hinted that there would not be full normalization on this issue.
    “There are no limitations on construction in Jerusalem, but we will need to act wisely,” he told ministers, hinting it’s possible that certain limitations may be imposed on building in the capital.
    In addition, Netanyahu informed the security cabinet a decision had been made to limit the activities of the highest-level planning committee of the IDF’s Civil Administration, which approves building plans for the settlements. Instead of meeting once a week, as was customary, the committee will now meet only once every three months.
    Netanyahu told the ministers that each of the committee’s meetings – during which decisions are made and then revealed about building plans for the settlements, even if they are only minor technical decisions – leads to media reports, which then causes friction and tension with the international community. Accumulating such plans and having them brought up for discussion only four times a year will limit the amount of global protest, added Netanyahu.
    At the same time, limiting the activities of the IDF’s planning committee could also have an influence on the number of plans approved, as well as the pace at which they advance.
    A senior member on the Yesha Council of settlements in the West Bank said fewer committee meetings would mean a slowdown in the planning process. It would be enough for Netanyahu or Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman to cancel just a single committee meeting for supposedly technical reasons in order to create a situation in which no plans are approved for a full six months.
    In a meeting of the heads of the coalition, Bennet turned to Netanyahu and said that the new policy on settlement construction will be tested by how it would be implemented. “I ask that after Passover a date would be set for the Supreme Planning Committee to convene in order to approve construction plans,” said the education minister. Netanyahu did not respond, but his chief of staff, Horowitz, said that he will check and will soon schedule a committee meeting.
    Netanyahu also told the ministers Thursday that stricter limitations and supervision will be imposed on construction in unauthorized outposts. It is assumed no further construction will be allowed in existing unauthorized outposts, and new ones will be removed shortly after they go up.

    Palestinian women in Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip, March 30, 2017. New goodwill gestures would aim to improve the Strip’s dire economic situation.SAID KHATIB/AFP
    Even though the new construction policy is not part of an agreement with the United States, or even part of the unofficial understandings with the White House, the Trump administration is following their implementation very closely, said Netanyahu.
    Israel must keep to its new policy of restraint and implement it strictly, without trying to deceive the Trump administration, because the Americans know about every house being built in the settlements, he added.
    At Sunday’s Likud ministerial meeting Monday morning, Horowitz, who manages communications with the White House on the issue of the settlements, said that originally the Americans had requested a complete freeze in construction. "It started from zero," Horowitz told the ministers. “The result we reached was much better.” Prime Minister Netanyahu said in response: “I won’t go into it here, but you don’t know how right he is.”

    #Israël #Palestine #Etats-Unis #colonisation

  • Muslim baroness decries ’loophole’ that allows UK Jews to join IDF | The Times of Israel
    By Jenni Frazer March 30, 2017
    http://www.timesofisrael.com/muslim-baroness-decries-loophole-that-allows-uk-jews-to-join-idf

    LONDON — A once-prominent British politician has come under fire by Jewish and Conservative leaders for likening British citizens in the Israel Defense Forces to Muslims who join paramilitary and terrorist groups.

    Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, who resigned from the government in 2014 after calling its policy towards Israel “morally indefensible,” made the new inflammatory statement in a March 29 interview with Middle East Eye (MEE) ahead of the launch of her new book, “The Enemy Within.”

    Before she stepped down, Warsi was chairman of the Conservative Party and Foreign Office minister, which made her the highest-achieving Muslim politician in the country.

    In the interview this week with MEE, Warsi complained of a “loophole designed to protect Israel” and said that “the only reason we allow the loophole to exist is because of the IDF, because we are not brave enough to say if you hold British citizenship, you make a choice. You fight for our state only.”

    In the interview with MEE, Warsi said that she asked the Foreign Office about distinctions between state and non-state militaries. Those who joined paramilitary groups, Warsi claimed, were prosecuted upon their return to Britain. She felt the same laws should apply to those who fought for state armies such as Israel’s.

    “If you go out there and fight for any group, you will be subject to prosecution when you get back. If you go out and fight for Assad, I presume, under our law, that is okay. That can’t be right,” said Warsi.

    Public debate, she believed, focused “exclusively on demanding loyalty from British Muslims.”

    “The same rule should apply to all,” she said. “Let’s shut down this loophole. If you don’t fight for Britain, you do not fight.”(...)

    ““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““
    UK citizens who fight in Israeli army should be prosecuted, Baroness Warsi says

    Britons can currently join the IDF through the ’Mahal’ program

    Shehab Khan | 9 hours ago
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/uk-citizens-fight-israeli-army-idf-mahal-prosecuted-baroness-sayeeda-

  • Inside the clandestine world of Israel’s ’BDS-busting’ ministry

    The Strategic Affairs Ministry’s leaders see themselves as the heads of a commando unit, gathering and disseminating information about ’supporters of the delegitimization of Israel’ – and they prefer their actions be kept secret.
    By Uri Blau Mar 26, 2017
    read more: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.779434

    The Haaretz report that Minister Gilad Erdan wants to set up a database of Israeli citizens who support the BDS movement has led to questions about the boundaries of freedom of expression and the government’s use of its resources to surveille people of differing opinions. The report also shone a light on the Strategic Affairs Ministry, which Erdan heads, and cast doubt about its ambiguous activities and goals.
    >> Get all updates on Israel and the Jewish World: Download our free App, and Subscribe >>
    Now, through official documents, Haaretz reveals some elements of the ministry’s clandestine activities, whereby even its location is a secret, described only as “greater Tel Aviv.” Its internal terminology comes from the world of espionage and security; its leading figures appear to see themselves as the heads of a public affairs commando unit engaged in multiple fronts, gathering and disseminating information about people they define as “supporters of the delegitimization of Israel.”
    That definition does not necessarily include only supporters of BDS, but intentional ambiguity remains, alongside campaigns and public diplomacy activities against these individuals in Israel and abroad.

    Israeli Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan. Olivier Fitoussi
    “If you want to win the campaign you have to do it with a great deal of ambiguity," the ministry’s director general, Sima Vaknin-Gil, who is a former IDF chief censor, explained to a Knesset panel recently. “The way I worked with military issues like Hezbollah or terror funds or Syria or any other country against which I conducted a campaign as an intelligence officer – we didn’t tell the other side what we intended to do; we left it ambiguous.”
    The ministry spends tens of millions of shekels on cooperative efforts with the Histadrut labor federation, the Jewish Agency and various nongovernmental organizations in training representatives of the “true pluralistic face” of Israel in various forums.

    The Strategic Affairs Ministry was established mainly as a consolation prize for ministers when the need arose to pad them with a semi-security portfolio during the formation of governing coalitions, and has taken on various forms. It was founded in 2006 as a portfolio tailored to Avigdor Lieberman. It was dismantled two years later and reestablished in 2009 in a different format. Under each ministry it was given new meaning and content.

    Strategic Affairs Ministry Director General Sima Vaknin. Alon Ron
    During Lieberman’s tenure, its authority was defined mainly as “thwarting the Iranian nuclear program.” In addition, Nativ, which maintained contact with Jews in Eastern Europe during the Cold War and encouraged aliyah, came under its aegis. Then, under Moshe Ya’alon (2009-2013), the ministry focused on “Palestinian incitement” as well as the Iranian threat. During the term of Yuval Steinitz (2013-2015), the ministry was unified with the Intelligence Affairs Ministry into the “Intelligence Ministry.” In May 2015, it was once again separated out and given to Erdan, incorporating the Public Diplomacy Ministry, which had been removed from the Prime Minister’s Office.
    A harsh state comptroller’s report in 2016 concerning the “diplomatic-media struggle against the boycott movement and manifestations of anti-Semitism abroad,” noted that the transfer of authority to fight BDS from the Foreign Ministry to the Strategic Affairs Ministry was damaging to the powers of the Foreign Ministry and created unnecessary duplication that paralyzed government action in that area, as Barak Ravid reported extensively at the time.
    According to the comptroller, after years of contention and mutual entrenchment, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had given in to pressure and shifted more powers for fighting BDS from the Foreign Ministry to the Strategic Affairs Ministry, together with major funding.
    In October 2015, the security cabinet finally gave the Strategic Affairs Ministry responsibility to “guide, coordinate and integrate the activities of all the ministers and the government and of civil entities in Israel and abroad on the subject of the struggle against attempts to delegitimize Israel and the boycott movement.”
    Nevertheless, tensions with the Foreign Ministry remained. The reason for this might also be a difference in approach. According to the comptroller’s report, the Foreign Ministry’s strategy of action against BDS “focuses on expanding dialogue with individuals, bodies, organizations, corporations and institutions abroad” – i.e., dialogue – as opposed to surveillance and more aggressive public diplomacy activities by the Strategic Affairs Ministry.

    Tzahi Gavrieli. Tomer Appelbaum

  • Ynetnews News - IDF troops detain 8-year-old Palestinian
    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4940064,00.html

    The boy’s mother, Amani, told B’Tselem that she asked a soldier to return her son, but he refused. “I was really scared and worried about Sufian,” she said. “I started crying and ran after the soldiers as they moved from house to house, to try and get them to let him go.”
     
    While the IDF claimed that the boy was being brought to his parents, and that the whole incident ended within ten minutes, the boy’s mothers claimed that IDF soldiers refused to let him go before he identified the other boys who threw rocks and Molotov cocktails.

    #Israel #enfants #Palestine

    • Ce « rendez-vous des droits » jamais entendu parler non plus. Un RDV avec la caf c’est une fiction.
      Bon si je fait une banderole je peu espéré que la caf débloque mon dossier (j’en suis « que » à 5 mois de blocage). On m’a deja privé d’APL au pretexte que j’ai trop peu de revenus et que pour eux les artistes grugent forcement alors ils estiment que j’ai des revenus supérieur à ce que je déclare. Ils m’ont inventé 14000€ de revenu en multipliant par 12 mes revenus de l’année dernière ! Et ils calculent mon APL sur cette base, donc pas d’APL... Je n’ai même pas de justificatif qui explique leur refus, juste un mec horrible au telephone qui m’a dit que j’avais aucun recours pour l’APL et qu’a rester patiente pour le RSA que le conseil général se bouge le fessier (avec donc 5 mois de retard et je découvre que ca peu duré 8 mois ou plus..). J’ai imprimé à partir du site leur réponse de 2 lignes qui dit « pas d’APL, ciao ».

      En plus si jamais j’ai le RSA un jour j’avoue que j’ai très peur qu’ils m’inventent un revenu comme ils ont deja fait et me demandent de remboursé des sommes délirantes sur la base de 12 fois le dernier dessin que j’ai vendu. Et je sais que si ils se trompent il faut payer quand meme et qu’après ils regardent si il y a vraiment une erreur et te remboursent à leur rythme de 5 à 8 mois de retard voire plus.
      A la MDA (asso) j’attend qu’ils me donnent un rdv avec leur service d’aide sociale, ils veulent même pas me donner une date de RDV depuis 3 mois. Au service sociale de mon quartier la dame qui s’occupait de mon dossier RSA y comprenais encore moins que moi et me disait de cocher « comme je voulais ». Elle osait même pas me regarder dans les yeux pendant qu’elle « m’aidait » à faire mon dossier. Et en plus les gens qui bossent là dedans font de la peine, ca ce voie qu’illes souffrent de faire ce boulot qui est devenu de la merde avant qu’illes soient tous remplacé par des robots et viennent rejoindre l’autre coté du guichet.

      Bon j’ai une super expo qui commence jeudi (je vais mettre l’annonce sur seenthis), j’espère que je vais vendre quelque chose et que je pourrait me passer du RSA. :)

    • On en parle au CAAP (syndicat des artistes) pour tenter d’avoir des référents CAF pour les artistes, parce qu’en fait, ils ne comprennent rien à nos spécificités, comme, par exemple, un résultat négatif. Eux, ils ont l’habitude des salariés, donc 0 = pas bossé, donc on te neutralise ceci et pas cela. Dans mon cas, ils ont fait sauter la PA (Prime d’Activité) alors qu’on avait une plus mauvaise année… et puis ils disent que ça revient au bout de 3 mois… mais on ne sait pas pourquoi. S’il faut, ils n’ont pas compris que je déclarais une pige en novembre : 225€ de pige = - 950€ de PA. On la sent bien la grosse incitation à jober…

      En gros, c’est portnawak, personne n’en trave que pouic, y compris en interne.

    • Arf je suis pas sortie de la galère. Bon en tout cas je suis syndiqué maintenant merci @monolecte et @colporteur

      Sur les APL j’ai trouvé ceci qui date de 2013 et auquel personne n’a répondu...
      http://forum.kob-one.com/statut-social-fiscal-mda-agessa-ursaff-f65/faire-valoir-ses-droits-aux-apl-en-tant-qu-artistes-auteurs-t42562.ht

      Voici donc : je suis artiste auteur affiliée au régime micro BNC. La CAF des Alpes maritimes refuse de me verser une aide au logement, pour la raison suivante : je suis assimilée à un travailleur indépendant, et suite au fait que j’ai déclaré 0 revenus en 2010 et 2011,"la législation CAF prévoit une application d’une assiette ressources de 14100 euros". Pour cette raison je ne serais pas éligible à l’allocation logement.

      En tout cas c’est exactement ce que la CAF parisienne m’a dit. Et cette partie montre une généralisation du problème, en 2016 la CAF parisienne s’est inspiré des methodes de fraude que la CAF des alpes maritimes utilise depuis 2013.

      « Je me demande alors comment cela se fait que mes amis artistes vivant à Paris n’ont pas eu de problème avec la CAF de Paris pour toucher leurs APL ? »
      arf

      A paris il existe une aide complémentaire à l’APL par la ville qui est de 89€ et auquel je devrais avoir droit aussi mais dont le droit m’est refusé puisqu’on me prive de l’APL, je ne peu pas demandé son complément.

    • sur les APL j’ai trouvé ceci :

      Par contre il faut faire attention à ne se déclarer travailleur indé que si l’on déclare du chiffre car si l’on fait une année à 0 ils partent du principe que l’on gagne 13500€. J’ai du batailler pendant plusieurs mois pour récupérer mes droit et c’est uniquement grâce au bilan de ma société car en AE je n’avais pas de solution.

      http://forum.kob-one.com/mda-f65/circulaire-caf-rsa-pour-les-artistes-t42381.html

      Donc la personne qui m’a « aidé » au service sociale pour faire mes papiers m’a fait perdre mes droits et me fesait faire une erreur de déclaration. Comme je suis pas en société à lire ce commentaire je n’ai apparament pas de solution pour récupéré mes droits... Bon je vais cherché encore.

      Là je trouve un commentaire de 2010 qui rend un peu plus optimiste mais sans donné trop d’indications

      Dernier info, une loi est passée en décembre dernier : Maintenant, L’obtention du RSA pour les auteurs et les auto-entrepreneurs ne dépends plus d’une commission du Conseil Géneral comme pour les autres travailleurs indés. Les auteurs et les auto-entrepreneurs peuvent bénéficier d’office du RSA sous conditions de ressources. C’est du déclaratif aupres de la CAF, comme pour les chômeurs quoi.

      http://forum.kob-one.com/graphistes-f7/artiste-auteur-apl-t35704.html

    • Oui, c’est la déclaration de ressources trimestrielle qui compte pour le calcul des droits RSA, sauf si un contrôle conclut à la fraude ou l’escroquerie. Mais la CAF prend aussi en compte le statut. Avoir un microBNC par exemple entrainera une vérif annuelle, même en cas d’absence de chiffre d’affaire. Ou bien, il aura suffit de déclarer trois mois de salaire, pour que la CAF considère que l’on est plus chômeur ou sans revenu, on doit faire valoir la situation réelle (par exemple ni salaire ni alloc’ chômage après ces mois d’emploi). Dans l’ensemble ils tentent leur chance pour priver les ayants droits d’alloc, pout tout ou partie, que cela soit justifié par la loi ou la règle ou pas.
      voir par exemple CAF Nationale : 8 cars de CRS, 10 policiers en civil (im)mobilisés, 2000 euros de « trop perçu » RMi récupérés
      http://www.cip-idf.org/article.php3?id_article=4570
      Ce qui compte c’est de ne pas lâcher l’affaire, mais c’est pas évident, là par exemple, il me prélèvent 50€ d"indu" chaque mois, une somme qui ne suffit pas à se lancer dans un bras de fer qui peut être éprouvant, surtout sans action collective à la clé).

      @mad_meg, je ne sais pas si tu as fait un recours, tu peux peut-être prendre le temps d’exposer en détails la situation (de ton côté et du leur) pour une demande de conseil à permanenceprecarite [at] cip-idf.org.

      Pour l’APL, la revenu de référence est celui de l’année fiscale écoulée. Or (la CAF ne le dit pas), il est toujours possible d’arguer d’un "changement de situation" pour faire réviser ses droits (ouvrir droit, ou faire augmenter le montant de l’APL)

    • Bah déjà pour prendre un RDV IRL… c’est quasi impossible… pour écrire depuis leur site tu es limité à 200 caractères… l’angoisse monte dès qu’on reçoit un courriel ou courrier de leur part… que vont-ils vouloir de plus comme document ? qu’on leur avait déjà fournis parfois… T’as l’impression de te mettre à poil devant eux pour quelques broutilles. C’est humiliant au possible. Comme si c’était déjà pas assez galère de galérer… Et encore je pense qu’on est loin d’être les pires à plaindre. On est blancs, on cause / écrit bien français, on s’énerve pas…

    • Aller à la CAF, c’est être menacé de poursuites en cas de désaccord :

      La #dématérialisation remplace l’accueil, ou lui préexiste (CAF fermées, pas de rdv sans démarche informatique). C’est encore une manière de mettre à distance les ayants droits, d’autant plus grave pour qui n’est pas assez francophone, un peu ou beaucoup illettré (en théorie on a le droit d’être accompagné lors de toute démarche administrative), étranger ou rétif à l’utilisation d’ordi, smartphone, etc.

      Page fraude de la CAF, pour une fois les explications, dissuasives, sont longues (à défaut de porter sur les droits) :
      https://www.caf.fr/ma-caf/caf-de-loire-atlantique/actualites/annee/2016/fraude-l-affaire-de-tous

      À propos des droits des pigiste, un article (qui ne donnera pas de réponses aux questions sur l’application de l’actuelle convention Unedic) : Pigistes et intermittents, ébauche d’analyse comparative. Entre subordination et autonomie
      http://www.cip-idf.org/article.php3?id_article=4550
      Peut-être rédiger un mel détaillé à « conséquences du protocole Unedic » de la cip-idf : cap [at] cip-idf.org,

    • @aude_v dans le 59, moi j’ai plutôt l’impression qu’on resserre les boulons là, depuis l’élection de l’autre con, me souviens plus de son nom, à la tête du département. Moi (et bien d’autres) ils veulent me foutre dehors parce que je ne suis pas inscrit à Pôle emploi, alors que je leur ai déjà écrit deux fois que j’ai fait 137 ans d’études même pas payé mais diplomé par le Gouvernement, pour devenir cosmonaute, et que c’est pas chez pôle emploi que je vais trouver des petites annonces pour aller sur la lune. Là j’attends une réponse, mais ils commencent d’abord par te sucrer 100 balles avant d’étudier ton cas, les crevards... Sans parler de la prime de naissance de ma gamine qui risque d’arriver quand elle passera son bac... ni des #AME introuvable pour les gars des olieux... enfin... #ACAFB pour all caisse d’allocations familiale are bastard

      (la blague du cosmonaute est une expression du @colporteur )

    • Pour les piges, il te faudra déclarer trimestriellement les rentrées en droits d’auteur (en retard sur le taff...) en CAF.
      Bricolage défensif : il y a souvent moyen de jouer sur les « dates de valeur » (s’entendre avec le salariant, le client, sur les dates de versement) pour ne pas risquer un pic de revenu sur trois mois qui ferait baisser l’alloc’. Le mieux est d’arriver à grouper le/les versements sur un des mois de la DTR, avec deux mois sans revenu, et en précisant dans la case idoine que le revenu déclaré n’est pas régulier mais ponctuel.... (avoir à tabler sur l’astuce, sur la connaissance des règles et du fonctionnement de ces caisses montre combien ces dispositifs sont structurellement inégalitaires).
      Ce qui est dégueulasse, aussi, c’est qu’on est poussé à la #désalarisation_formelle (pas de fiche de paye mais une #subordination commerciale à des donneurs d’ordre, payeurs de mission, etc), perdant des périodes de taff qui aurait pu donner droit à de la sécu, du chômage, de la retraite. Fragiles #entrepreneurs_de_soi.

    • Non, ça dépend.
      Les piges, théoriquement, ça ne devrait être que du salaire.
      Donc, une vraie pige, c’est une feuille de paie avec un salaire net à reporter sur la déclaration trimestrielle (enfin, quand elle apparait !).

      Mais bien sûr, il y a des tas de piges qui sont facturées et là, c’est la fête.

      Si tu factures, tu es, le plus souvent, une entreprise individuelle.
      Beaucoup sont en AE. Là, c’est fastoche, ça se déclare aussi en trimestriel, mais je ne sais plus si tu déclares le brut perçu ou le net dont tu retires l’abattement forfaitaire de 34% pour frais de boulot ou si c’est la CAF qui calcule : à vérifier très soigneusement.
      Même combat si tu es en régime micro : trimestriel, puisque tes revenus net sont faciles à calculer.

      Par contre, si tu es en déclaration contrôlé, là, ça veut dire qu’on ne connais ton revenu qu’à la fin de l’année, quand tu as sorti tes frais réels. Là, c’est déclaration annuelle (que tu ne fais pas, vu qu’ils ont directement accès à ton IR, si, si, même s’ils te le réclament, probablement pour faire chier, vu qu’ils l’ont automatiquement).
      En déclaration contrôlée, tes revenus sont calculés sur les revenus professionnels non salariés de N-2 (ce qui pose des problèmes aux installés récents) en divisant par 12 le bénéfice et en le ventilant par mois. Tous tes revenus au réel ne doivent pas être déclarés quand tu les perçois. Seulement les revenus forfaitisés.

      On en a plein qui sont au réel et qui déclarent quand même leur brut en trimestriel, la trouille d’être traités de fraudeurs (c’est inconfortable de mettre 0 en revenus pro non salariés quand tu viens de palper le chèque du client), et du coup, ils déclarent deux fois et perdent leurs droits…

    • (au sujet de l’affiche - depuis début janvier)

      Qui reste poli est toujours bien accueilli

      Qui lance des menaces verbales risque des sanctions pénales

      Le premier invite au bon comportement, le second expose les pénalités encourues : par exemple, lorsqu’il s’agit d’une agression physique, la Caf porte systématiquement plainte et sachez que les outrages peuvent être punis au pénal par une amende allant jusqu’à 15 000 € et un an de prison.

      http://blog.caf-bourgogne.fr/rubriques/bon-a-savoir/qui-reste-poli-est-bien-accueilli

      Se détendre pour mieux s’entendre, avec le smiley...

    • Ce matin courrier de la CAF… 2h pour remplir toutes les paperasses demandées… faire un pdf de 12 pages pour leur envoyer sur leur site… recevoir une erreur « 4 pages maximum »… râler fort intérieurement… 1 minute plus tard avoir « session expirée »…

    • M’enfin... le 29 mars c’est dans deux semaines !! Quand on attend le RSA, qu’il saute ou est raboté, qu’avec ça vienne les agios, retard de loyer, la perte de la réduc transports, etc., etc. obliger à attendre son tour 15 jours en fermant la possibilité d’être reçu, c’est rien d’autre que de la non assistance à personne en danger.

      #accueil

    • La CAF du Nord ferme pour une durée indéterminée 40 points d’accueil
      http://www.lavoixdunord.fr/132872/article/2017-03-15/la-caf-du-nord-ferme-pour-une-duree-indeterminee-40-points-d-accueil

      La caisse d’allocations familiales du Nord a décidé de fermer à partir de ce jeudi 40 points d’accueil sur les 113 qu’elle compte dans le département. Objectif : redéployer les #agents concernés sur le traitement des #dossiers en #retard.

      #fermetures_de_CAF

    • @aude_v pour les RDV CAF, j’ai fait le procédure que tu indique, sauf que 3 jours après la Caf m’appel, me demande pourquoi j’ai pris RDV. Là on me dit « pour ce que vous voulez pas besoin de RDV, votre dossier est en attente » et paf plus de RDV...
      En tout cas vu ce que dit @colporteur ca va se gâté bientôt aussi pour le nord.

      @monolecte j’ai recu les infos pour le CAAP mais il y a beaucoup de choses qui passent par facebook et Twitter. C’est vraiment dommage.

    • Pour accélérer les choses, le mieux est d’arriver à faire descendre au guichet un "agent réglementaire" (qui traite les dossiers alors que l’accueil bloque) et un responsable CAF, en tapant le scandale, ce qui se fait jeux à plusieurs, si on veut éviter des sanctions individuelles à l’encontre de l’allocataire (cf les affiches, etc). (voir cet article cité plus haut qui montre bien la logique de l’action et ce qui lui est opposée, y compris lorsque la CAF a commencé par violer les règles de base pour se faire de la trésorerie sur notre dos : CAF Nationale : 8 cars de CRS, 10 policiers en civil (im)mobilisés, 2000 euros de « trop perçu » RMi récupérés)

      Il arrive que l’on obtienne seul de ne pas en rester à l’accueil de guichet qui ne débloque rien. C’est comme à l’usine, quand tu as repeint trois petits chefs, le patron commence à faire gaffe. Et on toujours le droit d’être accompagné par la personne de son choix (elles ils, peuvent jouir d’une plus grande marge de manoeuvre et apporter un appui sur les règles, lois, etc., et puis on préparer mieux à plusieurs, etc. et tout ça est déjà anormal pour la caf), voir "droit à l’accompagnement - droit à être accompagné/assisté/représenté" dans cette page : http://www.gisti.org/spip.php?article5258

      la dernière fois que je suis allé à la caf, j’ai dit à l’accueil que je venais avant de lancer une #procédure_contentieux, de ce fait j’ai eu la surprise (et la honte) d’être audiencé au guichet avant les 250 personnes qui étaient là
      j’ai ensuite pris la parole pour expliquer ce qui s’ait passé à tout le monde dans la caf (interrompue et menacé par les vigiles) et dans la queue dehors, histoire que d’autres disent le mot magique "contentieux" lors de l’aiguillage initial. histoire de bine piger que rien n’est fait pour notre bien dans ce genre d’endroits, à moins de s’en occuper.

      Notre accélérationnisme contre le leur (ils nous fluidifient vers l’emploi, la prison, la rue), en gros

    • @monolecte ca serait super cool mais est-ce que c’est pas des infos réserver aux adhérent·e·s ? en tout cas si c’est possible je suis très intéressée car j’ai pas du tout envie d’aller sur facebook ni sur twitter.

      @aude_v oui c’est claire que c’est de la fabrique à non recours. D’ailleurs c’est probablement ce que je vais finir par faire. Parce que le temps que la situation se débloque j’aurais j’espère vendu quelques dessins du coup je me retrouverais à devoir remboursé des sommes vu qu’ils vont multiplié par 12 mon dernier revenu de manière parfaitement aberrante.

      Autre joyeuseté liée à la CAF que j’ai découvert cette semaine : Depuis un an que je suis inscrite au chômage et que j’essaye d’obtenir le RSA, quant je prenais mes tickets de métro RATP sur le guichets robotique je prenais des tickets demi-tarif. Sur le robot vendeur (qui a mis tou·te·s les guicheti·ère·er·s au chômage) à coté de demi tarif il y a écrit entre parenthèse (famille nombreuses, demandeur d’emplois...) du coup je prenais ca de bonne foi en croyant respecter les règles. En fait le robot m’a induite en erreur et je dois être loin d’être la seule. Je sais que quant j’aurais le RSA je devrais bénéficié des transports gratuit et qu’en attendant que la CAF me débloque mon RAS et ce qui va avec, je payais mes tickets à moitié prix ce qui était mieux que plein pot. Et puis mardi dans le bus je suis contrôlé. Je présente mon ticket demi tarif composté comme il faut, le contrôleur me demande mon justificatif. Je sort ma carte de paul emploi, et le justificatif mensuel. Et là le mec me dit « ce que vous me sortez n’est pas valable » et il me colle une amande 35€...

      En fait pour avoir droit au demi tarif il fallait que je demande un justificatif à la CAF tous les 3 mois. Ce que l’automate RATP ne dit pas. Vu les retards de la CAF, bah je suis pas prête d’avoir une autorisation et encore moins tous les 3 mois.

    • La CAF viens de me refusé le RSA et tout ce qui va avec après plus de 10 mois d’attente sur les mêmes prétextes frauduleux qui me valait le refus des APL auxquels j’ai droit. Tous les droits associés me sont refusés...

    • oui enfin techniquement il y en a et je vais le faire, mais tout ce que je lie sur le sujet sur internet est très décourageant et je viens d’apprendre que je vais perdre aussi la CMU puisque la SECU se renseigne auprès de la CAF pour l’accordée.

    • @mad_meg dsl, je renouvelle la proposition de demander conseil à permanenceprecarite [at] cip-idf.org. Les perm fonctionnent pas l’été mais la liste mel oui. L’intérêt est de confronter plusieurs avis à partir du dossier (échanges de courriers, etc, dont les copies ou scan restent non publics) pour voir ce qui peut se faire.
      Là, je viens de parcourir rapido ce qui précède et je ne saisi pas exactement où le bât blesse et comment (sur quoi motivent ils précisément leur refus ?).

    • Merci @colporteur je vais contacté la permanence que tu m’indique. @monolecte m’a écrit pour me donner quelques conseils. La CAF dit que le refus est motivé par l’Article L 262-7 du code de l’action sociale et des familles.
      https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006074069&idArticle=LEGIART
      Circulaire à laquelle je ne comprend rien du tout. Mais en fait mon régime dépend de la circulaire suivante que je vais désormais joindre à toutes mes interactions avec la CAF ; http://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/fichiers/bo/2010/10-03/ste_20100003_0100_0105.pdf

      Merci à vous @aude_v @monolecte @colporteur

    • Faute de pouvoir entrer dans le détail, un principe de base, ils sont supposés motiver en fait et en droit leurs décisions sous peine d’illégalité, pas « justifier » une décision arbitraire en citant l’ensemble d’un texte légal sans prendre appui sur un de ses éléments en rapport avec ta situation. L’argument vaut pour presque tous les recours contre la CAF, et ça laisse ouvert la possibilité d’une action contentieux par delà le recours (ou la Caf est juge et partie).

    • L’article est insuffisant parce qu’il ne fait pas mention des artistes-auteurs qui sont rattachés au régime général de plein droit, même si leur dossier est géré par un organisme collecteur tiers (en l’occurrence la MDA).
      Selon l’article L382-3 du Code de la SS :

      Les revenus tirés de leur activité d’auteur à titre principal ou à titre accessoire par les personnes mentionnées à l’article L. 382-1 sont assujettis aux cotisations de sécurité sociale , à l’exception de celles dues au titre des accidents du travail et des maladies professionnelles, dans les mêmes conditions que des salaire s, sous réserve des adaptations prévues dans la présente section.

      Les cotisations dues au titre des assurances sociales pour les personnes mentionnées à l’article L. 382-1 sont calculées selon les taux de droit commun.

      Nous sommes donc assimilés de plein droit au régime général.

      Mais rien n’est plus clair que l’article L382-1 du Code de la SS, dans sa version en vigueur au 10 août 2017 :

      Les artistes auteurs d’œuvres littéraires et dramatiques, musicales et chorégraphiques, audiovisuelles et cinématographiques, graphiques et plastiques, ainsi que photographiques, sous réserve des dispositions suivantes, sont affiliés obligatoirement au régime général de sécurité sociale pour les assurances sociales et bénéficient des prestations familiales dans les mêmes conditions que les salariés.

      Donc, pour la partie légitimité des artistes à bénéficier des prestations sociales du régime général, c’est torché !

    • Sinon : http://www.lamaisondesartistes.fr/site/un-artiste-peut-il-toucher-le-rsa

      Pour les déclarations CAF pour les régimes micro :

      Pour la CAF, je peux te certifier qu’il faut procéder toi-même à l’abattement de 34% (si tu déclares des BNC en activité dites libérales).
      Déjà c’est simple, quand tu vas faire ta déclaration trimestrielle de revenus sur le site de la CAF, quand tu tombes sur la page avec le tableau où tu remplis tous tes types de revenus, sur chaque intitulé tu peux cliquer et il te donne une explication dans une fenêtre pop-up. Sur « Revenus non salarié », ils est donc précisé :

      Vous devez déclarer :
      - auto-entrepreneurs, artistes-auteurs et vendeurs à domicile indépendants (VDI) ayant opté pour le régime forfaitaire :
      Déclarer le montant du chiffre d’affaires après abattement fiscal applicable à l’activité.
      Pour l’autoentrepreneur : 71 % pour la vente de marchandises en l’état ou transformées ; pour la prestation de services : 50 % ; pour les professions libérales : 34 %.
      Pour les artistes auteurs(3) : 34 % sur les BNC.
      Pour les VDI : soit 71 % sur les BIC soit 34 % sur les BNC ;

      Voila ce que je peux dire pour la CAF, en revanche pour le reste, MDA, ça j’en sais rien, moi je suis AE cotisant à l’URSSAF.

      EDIT : Renseignes-toi bien pour le Pôle Emploi, car moi j’avais bénéficié de l’ARCE (aide à la reprise et la cration d’entreprise) qui permettait d’avoir un complément de revenu du Pole Emploi (si on est chômeur indemnisé) en fonction de son CA mensuel, et je suis quasiment certain qu’il y avait également un abattement à appliquer, par contre je ne me souviens plus si c’est eux qui le faisant ou s’il fallait l’appliquer moi-même comme pour la CAF...

    • Et aussi : http://www.cnap.fr/navigation/profession-artiste/securite-sociale/chomage-rsa#node-334

      Et encore :

      PIECES COMPLEMENTAIRES RSA

      P
      our les personnes exerçant une activité indépendante (tout statut y compris statut auto-entrepreneur et gérant de
      société)
       :

      le formulaire CERFA « 
      demande complémentaire pour les non-salariés
       » dûment complété et signé

      les justificatifs liés à la création d’entreprise
       :
      l’immatriculation au registre du commerce, des métiers, à la Maison des artistes , URSSAF, (KBIS)

      Et là, la source… c’est la CAF : https://www.caf.fr/sites/default/files/RSA_PJ.pdf

      Maintenant, s’ils persistent à dire qu’en tant qu’artiste, tu n’as pas le droit au RSA, alors il nous faut une justification plus conséquente que cet article qui ne mène à rien et on passe en mode syndicat → je suis membre du syndicat des artistes CAAP, parce que j’ai bien compris que si on continue à se battre chacun dans notre coin, on l’aura dans le cul.

      Si la CAF annonce officiellement que les artistes n’ont plus le droit au RSA — ce qui, en l’état, est complètement faux —, j’informe le syndicat et on part au ministère !

      Voilà pour l’instant.

  • With Lebanon no longer hiding Hezbollah’s role, next war must hit civilians where it hurts, Israeli minister says
    http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.776419

    présenté comme d’habitude, et pour la énième fois, par le propagandiste Amos Harel,

    Lebanese President Michel Aoun paid an official visit to Cairo a month ago, ahead of which he gave a number of interviews to the Egyptian media. Aoun was only elected president after a long power struggle in which Iran and Hezbollah finally held sway, and he spoke about the fact that the Shi’ite organization continues to be the only Lebanese militia that refuses outright to disarm.

    Hezbollah is a significant part of the Lebanese people, Aoun explained. “As long as Israel occupies land and covets the natural resources of Lebanon, and as long as the Lebanese military lacks the power to stand up to Israel, [Hezbollah’s] arms are essential, in that they complement the actions of the army and do not contradict them,” he said, adding, “They are a major part of Lebanon’s defense.”

    Brig. Gen. Assaf Orion from the Institute for National Security Studies wrote recently that Aoun’s comments were a “lifting of the official veil and tearing off of the mask of the well-known Lebanese reality – which widely accepted Western diplomacy tends to blur. The Lebanese president abolishes the forced distinction between the ostensibly sovereign state and Hezbollah. Thus, the Lebanese president takes official responsibility for any actions by Hezbollah, including against Israel.”

    Aoun’s declaration also tallies with the facts on the ground. At a meeting of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee this past week, Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman said that the Lebanese army is now “a subsidiary unit of Hezbollah.”

    What does that mean with regard to an Israeli response against Hezbollah in case another war breaks out on the northern front? This column recently discussed the basic difficulty that faces the Israel Defense Forces in Lebanon: limited ability to deal with the threat of high-trajectory rockets directed against both the Israeli civilian population and the strategic infrastructure on the rear front. On the southern front, even though the air force lacks a proper offensive response to rockets, the missile intercept systems – chiefly the Iron Dome batteries – are enough to thwart most of the launches.

    In the north, with Hezbollah able to launch more than 1,000 rockets into Israel on a single day of fighting, the offensive solution seems partial and the defensive solution limited.

    The state comptroller’s report on the 2014 war in Gaza disappeared from the headlines within a few days, but the difficulties facing Israel in future conflicts in Gaza – and even more so in Lebanon – remain.

    At this point, it’s interesting to listen to security cabinet member Naftali Bennett (Habayit Hayehudi), whose opinions the state comptroller accepted with regard to disagreements with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over the Hamas attack tunnels in the Gaza Strip.

    While in the political realm Bennett seems determined to create unilateral facts on the ground (i.e., settlements in the territories) even at the risk of a potential face-off with the Europeans and embarrassing the Trump administration, it seems his positions on military issues are more complex. More than once he has shown healthy skepticism over positions taken by top defense officials, and he refuses to accept their insights as indisputable conclusions.

    Hunting rocket launchers during a war is almost impossible, Bennett told Haaretz this week, adding that he says this “as someone who specialized in hunting rocket launchers.”

    During the Second Lebanon War in 2006, when he served as a reserve officer, Bennett commanded an elite unit sent deep into southern Lebanon to find Hezbollah’s rocket-launching squads.

    “When we worked in a particular area, we did reduce the teams of rocket launchers there – but they simply moved a little farther north,” Bennett related. Since then, he said, 11 years have passed and Hezbollah has learned to deploy in a more sophisticated manner. “They moved their launchers from the nature reserves, outposts in open areas, to dense urban areas [ reconnaissance éhontée d’un mensonge passé et nouveau mensonge tout aussi éhonté ]. You can’t fight rockets with tweezers. If you can’t reach the house where the launcher is, you’re not effective, and the number of houses you have to get through is enormous,” he explained.

    “After I was released from reserve duty, I read all of the books you wrote about the war,” Bennett told me. “I understood in retrospect that the fundamental event of the war took place on its first day, in a phone call between [former Prime Minister] Ehud Olmert and Condoleezza Rice.” President George W. Bush’s secretary of state had asked the prime minister not to hit Lebanon’s infrastructure, and was given a positive response. As a result, “there was no way that Israel could win the war,” Bennett said.

    “Lebanon presented itself as a country that wants quiet, that has no influence over Hezbollah,” he continued. “Today, Hezbollah is embedded in sovereign Lebanon. It is part of the government and, according to the president, also part of its security forces. The organization has lost its ability to disguise itself as a rogue group.”

    Bennett believes this should be Israel’s official stance. “The Lebanese institutions, its infrastructure, airport, power stations, traffic junctions, Lebanese Army bases – they should all be legitimate targets if a war breaks out. That’s what we should already be saying to them and the world now. If Hezbollah fires missiles at the Israeli home front, this will mean sending Lebanon back to the Middle Ages,” he said. “Life in Lebanon today is not bad – certainly compared to what’s going on in Syria. Lebanon’s civilians, including the Shi’ite population, will understand that this is what lies in store for them if Hezbollah is entangling them for its own reasons, or even at the behest of Iran.”

    At the same time, he notes that this is not necessarily the plan for a future war, but instead an attempt to avoid one: “If we declare and market this message aggressively enough now, we might be able to prevent the next war. After all, we have no intention of attacking Lebanon.”

    According to Bennett, if war breaks out anyway, a massive attack on the civilian infrastructure – along with additional air and ground action by the IDF – will speed up international intervention and shorten the campaign. “That will lead them to stop it quickly – and we have an interest in the war being as short as possible,” he said. “I haven’t said these things publicly up until now. But it’s important that we convey the message and prepare to deal with the legal and diplomatic aspects. That is the best way to avoid a war.”

    Bennett’s approach is not entirely new. In 2008, the head of the IDF Northern Command (and today IDF chief of staff), Gadi Eisenkot, presented the “Dahiya doctrine.” He spoke of massive damage to buildings in areas identified with Hezbollah – as was done on a smaller scale in Beirut’s Shi’ite Dahiya quarter during the 2006 war – as a means of deterring the organization and shortening the war.

    That same year, Maj. Gen. (res.) Giora Eiland proposed striking at Lebanon’s state infrastructure. To this day, though, the approach has not been adopted as Israeli policy, open or covert. Bennett’s declaration reflects an attempt by a key member of the security cabinet (albeit Netanyahu’s declared political rival) to turn it into such policy.

    The fact that Israel only tied with Hamas in Gaza in 2014 only convinced Bennett that he is right. There, too, Hamas finally agreed to a cease-fire after 50 days of fighting only after the Israel Air Force systematically destroyed the high-rise apartment buildings where senior Hamas officials lived.

    #Liban #Israel #Israel #crimes #criminels #victimes_civiles #impunité #Eiland

  • Pourquoi nous appelons les chômeurs à soutenir la grève du 6 mars à Pôle emploi CIP-IDF >
    http://www.cip-idf.org/article.php3?id_article=8499

    Cette grève est appelée par 5 organisations syndicales pour dénoncer le Plan stratégique Pôle Emploi 2020 dont l’objet est la disparition pure et simple d’un certain nombre de missions fondamentales, inscrite dans la LOI n° 2008-126 du 13 février 2008, par étape, par couche, dont, entre autres : l’accès au service public par la fermeture des agences locales en demi journée, la dématérialisation acharnée des contacts (de l’inscription à la radiation en passant par les entretiens de suivis), les suppressions de services ou agences spécifiques (à destination des licenciés économiques, ou des cadres), la disparition du métier indemnisation en supprimant les professionnels de la « Gestion des Droits ».

    Le choix de l’alliance entre Pôle Emploi et des innovateurs digitaux qui se nomment eux-mêmes les barbares [1] fait partie de la stratégie. Ils fabriquent leurs gadgets modernes, nourris aux algorithmes [2] et donnent l’illusion que tout le monde peut s’inscrire, tout seul, à Pôle Emploi, s’indemniser sans l’aide de personnel compétent, se former, s’orienter, s’évaluer, et répondre à une multitudes d’offres d’emploi tailler sur mesure, pour soi, par Bob emploi [3].

    Cette grève dénonce « la vente à la découpe » du Service Public :

    L’externalisation de missions fondamentales de Pôle Emploi vers des entreprises privées (CAPGEMINI [4], WEBHELP [5] , INGEUS [6], AKSIS [7], TESSI [8] , ARVATOR...la liste est longue) qui se gavent grâce aux largesses du Service Public [9] et à la cécité de ceux qui l’administrent, le financent, le gèrent et le contrôlent (3,3 Md€ en 2016 proviennent de nos cotisations : Article L5422-24 [10]) participent à la liquidation de Pôle Emploi qui se voit, pour la première fois, réduire son budget de 30 millions d’euros en 2016.

    Un personnel en perte d’identité :

    Les psychologues se déqualifient, les conseillers de la « gestion des droits » se mettent la rate au court bouillon en assistant à leur mort annoncée, et les conseillers emplois, sous une pression jamais égalée, prescrivent à tours de bras, au privé, des prestations-à-la-noix nommées : Activ’Emploi [11], Activ’Projet, Activ’Créa (peu importe ce qu’il en sortira, mais surtout Activ’Toi ailleurs qu’à Pôle Emploi) !
    Cette grève est un appel à lutter contre la destruction de Pôle Emploi, et à défendre un service public humain, un service public de qualité, et une protection sociale digne de ce nom. Cette grève va dans le sens de l’intérêt de ses usagers.

    Nous serons présents, ce jour là, aux cotés du personnel de Pôle Emploi en grève, et nous appelons les chômeurs à nous rejoindre.

    Le texte est fort bien documenté :

    [1] La redoutable stratégie des barbares digitaux, Reflets
    [2] Voir par exemple Emploi store
    [3] J’ai testé Bob emploi : et si je devenais chauffeuse de salle ?, L’Obs.
    [4] Le « toyotisme » débarque à Pôle Emploi, Actuchômage.
    [5] Pôle emploi compte sous-traiter davantage le 3949, L’express entreprise
    [6] Pôle emploi  : quand le privé prend les choses en mains, L’Humanité.fr.
    [7] Activ’Emploi - Aksis, Recours radiation
    [8] Voir la délibération de la CNIL.
    [9] Capgemini traque les coûts des administrations La Croix.
    [10] Article L5422-24 du Code du travail.
    [11] Marchés publics : Pôle emploi appelle le privé à la rescousse, Cash Investigation.


    #grève #Pôle_emploi #dématérialisation #externalisation #big_data #droits_sociaux
    @rezo @paris

    • Il y a aussi ce texte, pour l’occitanie :

      Collectif chômage précarité :

      Nous, chômeurs, intermittent-es et précaires d’Occitanie, venons signifier notre soutien au mouvement des salarié-es du Pôle Emploi qui manifestent leurs inquiétudes quant à l’avenir de ce service public que nous fréquentons quotidiennement.

      Comme eux, nous ne voulons pas d’une dématérialisation qui exclue et qui isole les gens. Nous ne nous opposons pas à l’utilisation des nouvelles technologies, mais nous voulons que cette évolution se fasse au profit des usagers de Pôle Emploi, au lieu de déshumaniser les relations entre nos conseillers et nous. Il faut aussi que Pôle Emploi entende que nous ne sommes pas tous à égalité financière et de compétences face à internet et son utilisation.

      Comme eux, nous regrettons de ne plus pouvoir aller librement dans les agences l’après-midi. Le chômage et la précarité sont des situations violentes. Elles appellent une réponse humaine, une relation apaisée avec nos conseillers, le besoin d’être entendus par une personne et pas par un interphone.

      Comme eux, nous tenons à un service public de l’emploi de qualité, avec des conseillers formés, suffisamment nombreux et qui puissent répondre à nos questions sur nos droits. L’indemnisation du chômage est un élément indispensable à notre vie quotidienne, dans l’attente de peut-être retrouver un emploi, et pourtant seuls la moitié d’entre nous peuvent en bénéficier.

      Nous sommes fatigués d’un système d’assurance chômage complexe, aux règles incompréhensibles et au fonctionnement qui n’est plus adapté aux nouvelles formes d’emploi précaire (CESU, assistantes maternelles, autoentrepreneurs,…).
      Nous en avons assez des trop-perçus et de l’opacité des recours possibles, assez de la multiplication des contrôles et des radiations.

      Nous savons qu’il n’y a pas de travail pour tous [12] et que ce n’est pas la faute de Pôle Emploi. Mais sa responsabilité, en tant que service public, c’est de nous accueillir avec humanité, de nous accompagner, de nous indemniser en toute transparence et de nous informer d’une manière claire sur nos droits.

      Membres du collectif : CIP-MP (Collectif des Intermittents et Précaires de Midi-Pyrénées), MNCP (Mouvement National des Chômeurs et Précaires), ATTAC, DAL (Droit au Logement), Sud précaires, Sud Culture Solidaires.

      Reste cette phrase : « Nous ne nous opposons pas à l’utilisation des nouvelles technologies, mais nous voulons que cette évolution se fasse au profit des usagers de Pôle Emploi, au lieu de déshumaniser les relations entre nos conseillers et nous. »

      J’aimerai savoir pourquoi, précisément, pour ce qui est de la situation des chômeurs et des chômeuses, l’utilisation des nouvelles technologies par Pôle Emploi est avantageuse. Pour pointer à distance ? Mais on pourrait aussi être dispensé de pointer. Pour la recherche d’emploi ? Je demande à voir.
      En revanche, on peut être sûr que le management de Pôle Emploi se régale d’un outil numérique qui lui donne plus que jamais du pouvoir sur ses employés.
      Numériser, c’est-à-dire automatiser certaines tâches ou les faire réaliser par les usagers eux-mêmes, a pour fonction de réduire les effectifs et de mieux contrôler ceux et celles qui restent. Sous prétexte de s’en prendre à ce qui n’est que routine ou ce qui n’aurait pas besoin de savoir-faire complexe, on finit par laisser aux salariés de Pôle Emploi qu’un squelette de relation d’accompagnement, tandis que tout le reste est sous-traité et numérisé. Pour nous autres les usagers, ce sont des halls vides où une borne clignote doucement pour nous obliger à enregistrer notre arrivée au rendez-vous, un sentiment profond d’écrasement et d’impuissance.
      Le numérique sans la « déshumanisation » au boulot ou face à Pôle Emploi, j’aimerai savoir si quelqu’un connaît. Il me semble que cette possibilité n’est pas contenue dans le programme. Et si ça l’est, il ne faut pas hésiter à le dire ! Ne pas hésiter à dire qu’un autre usage du numérique à Pôle Emploi est possible, que cela pourrait être source de bien-être pour les salariés et pour les chômeurs ! Et proposer des plans alternatifs en trouvant des exemples probants ailleurs ! Ça manque de foi ces déclarations qui affirment ne pas vouloir s’opposer à l’utilisation des nouvelles technologies à Pôle Emploi ! Un petit peu d’ardeur, que diable ! De l’imagination !

    • https://exploitesenerves.noblogs.org/files/2017/02/Tract-d%C3%A9mat%C3%A9rialisation.pdf
      Rentrez chez vous, ON DÉMATÉRIALISE !
      Ou comment faire des économies et nous empêcher de nous défendre.

      Depuis quelques temps, on voit se développer la dématérialisation dans les administrations (#CAF, Pôle Emploi, #Sécu, #Retraites, #Trésor_public, #sous-préfecture…). On veut nous faire croire que ce changement faciliterait la vie des usagers, des allocataires et des agents… mais évidemment, comme toutes mesures étatiques, elle vise plutôt à faire des économies sur notre dos.

      https://exploitesenerves.noblogs.org/rentrez-chez-vous-on-dematerialise/#more-760
      https://seenthis.net/messages/572200

  • Sujets imprévus, guerres civiles, points de rupture, Maurizio Lazzarato, CIP-IDF
    http://www.cip-idf.org/article.php3?id_article=8488

    Une lecture du livre de Davide Gallo Lassere, Contre la Loi Travail et son Monde. Argent, précarité et mouvements sociaux (Eterotopia-France, novembre 2016)

    Le beau livre de Davide me semble fournir une excellente occasion de discuter de ce que le colloque C17 qui s’était tenu à Rome à la mi-janvier avait appelé « les taches que doivent accomplir les communistes ». Je dis « beau » parce qu’il pose des questions pertinentes et je voudrais, plutôt que de rédiger une recension, instaurer un dialogue à partir de certaines réponses possibles à ces questions.

    Davide se demande comment il est possible qu’après une succession de victoires qui a culminé dans les années 70, on ait pu subir une défaite_stratégique comme celle que nous a infligée le néolibéralisme. J’ajouterais qu’il s’agit de comprendre aussi les raisons des défaites ultérieures - celle subie par les mobilisations contre la Loi Travail n’étant que la dernière d’une longue série.

    C’est justement des concepts de « travail » et de « production » que j’aimerais partir. En réalité, ces derniers ne peuvent être compris (et cela depuis la conquête des Amériques) indépendamment du travail des esclaves dans les colonies et du travail de reproduction des femmes [3]. Or c’est une chose que le marxisme a eu du mal à intégrer politiquement quand il ne l’a pas ignorée ; elle ne joue en tout cas aucun rôle dans sa théorie de la « valeur ».

    #livre #défaite_stratégique #néolibéralisme #Loi_Travail #travail #marxisme

    https://seenthis.net/messages/573555
    https://seenthis.net/messages/567050

  • « Si nos vies ne valent rien, produisez donc sans nous ! » Appel à une grève mondiale des femmes – 8 mars 2017 - CIP-IDF
    http://www.cip-idf.org/article.php3?id_article=8489

    Suite aux grèves de femmes de l’année dernière et à l’énorme mobilisation féminine le jour de l’intronisation de Donald Trump [1], des assemblées se sont constituées dans de nombreux pays pour convertir la célébration du 8 mars [2] cette année en immense grève des femmes [3]. Nous invitons tou-te-s celles et ceux qui organisent des actions pour ce jour-là à faire circuler cet appel, afin de permettre une plus grande visibilité du caractère transnational de ce mouvement.

    De la Pologne à l’Argentine, de la Turquie à l’Italie, un mouvement mondial de femmes est en marche. Dans plus de 20 pays, des femmes descendront dans la rue ce 8 mars et se mettront en grève pour bloquer les activités productives et reproductives pendant une journée [4]. S’inspirant des grèves de femmes en Argentine et en Pologne, de l’immense manifestation italienne contre les violences faites aux femmes et de la marche mondiale des femmes qui a envahi des centaines de villes en commençant par Washington et Londres en janvier dernier, le 8 mars prochain sera l’occasion d’un nouveau soulèvement. Tout-e-s celles et ceux qui luttent contre le patriarcat néolibéral s’uniront pour combattre les violences machistes, dénoncer les limites imposées à notre droit à contrôler notre reproduction, et s’élever contre les obstacles symboliques et matériels qui entravent la liberté des femmes.

    La grève se déroulera au sein des #foyers [5], où les femmes prennent soin des personnes âgées et des enfants ; dans les usines, où les femmes produisent des biens à destination du marché mondial ; dans les écoles, les hôpitaux, les services publics et les entreprises privées, où les femmes participent à la perpétuation de cette société tout en étant moins payées que les hommes – parfois même pas payées du tout – et en travaillant dans des conditions souvent extrêmement précaires ; dans les universités et les écoles, où règnent la discrimination sexuelle et les assignations de genre tandis que s’accroissent l’appauvrissement et la privatisation des savoirs.

    Le 8 mars sera aussi un jour de lutte pour les femmes migrantes qui refusent quotidiennement l’exploitation dont elles sont victimes en franchissant les frontières mais qui restent les premières à assumer la charge des soins à la personne dans des pays d’« accueil » maniant l’attribution d’un permis de séjour comme un outil de chantage.

    #grève #femmes #8_mars

  • #pantin (93) Utilitaire Orange calciné
    https://nantes.indymedia.org/articles/37028

    En début #de semaine rue Chevreuil à Pantin, on a mis le feu à un utilitaire de l’entreprise Orange, un de ceux qui servent pour installer la fibre optique (avec les vitres arrières opaques car derrière il n’y a pas de siège mais du matériel électrique).

    #Informatique #Ecologie #contrôle #social #/ #prisons #centres #rétention #actions #directes #_idf_ #Informatique,Ecologie,contrôle,social,/,prisons,centres,de,rétention,actions,directes

  • ’State of Jenin’: A Palestinian refugee camp raided by Israeli troops night after night - Israel News -
    Haaretz.com | Gideon Levy and Alex Levac Feb 10, 2017 12:42 PM
    http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.770743
    http://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.770967.1486712382!/image/446912015.JPG_gen/derivatives/headline_1200x630/446912015.JPG

    After a soldier was wounded in Jenin, the IDF intensified its nighttime raids there. 
And when the Israelis don’t enter this West Bank refugee camp, the Palestinian security forces do.

    This is a type of anxiety that no Israeli civilian is familiar with: nights when sleep is marred by the noise of soldiers moving about, gunshots, armored vehicles outside the window, stun grenades and explosives in an adjacent alley. Night after night. Soldiers who storm the house rowdily, after blowing up the front door. Children who wake up in a fright to the sight of masked, heavily armed figures during dead-of-night kidnappings euphemistically called “arrests.”

    On one occasion during the second intifada, I slept over in the Jenin refugee camp. I’ll never forget the fear that seized me when soldiers raided it. It’s a particularly chilling experience in a densely crowded, yet determined and militant camp like that in Jenin. Last week, raids were carried out there almost every night. After a soldier sustained light to moderate wounds during one, the Israel Defense Forces ratcheted up even more the rate and intensity of its infiltration.

    Residents are convinced that on the night between Jan. 28 and 29, soldiers had come to avenge the wounding of their buddy and teach the camp a lesson it wouldn’t forget. “They came to kill,” people in the battered camp said this week, as they buried another of its sons, Mohammed Abu Khalifa, after he was killed by soldiers’ bullets on Sunday. He was buried in the cemetery of intifada victims at the edge of the camp, which, like Jenin itself, suffers from severe overcrowding.

    The young adults in the camp spend their days sleeping and their nights in wakefulness. They have no reason to get up during the day. They hang out in the meager café on the main street; some of them man observation posts at the camp’s entrances and instantly report every suspicious movement on Facebook. They also post real-time videos when the IDF enters. Facebook is the most widely used means of communication when it comes to warning about everything, including the arrival of Israeli troops. Of the Facebook groups in the camp, the best known is “State of Jenin Camp.”

    The soldiers usually show up at about 2 A.M. in armored vehicles, some of which look like civilian cars. They descend on foot from the hilltop where the houses are, and information about their whereabouts spreads like wildfire. By the time they reach the alleys below, half the camp is awake and young people are waiting for them with stones, pipe bombs and makeshift weapons. In contrast to the second intifada, when we met armed people at almost every street corner, there is hardly any standard-issue weaponry in evidence these days. The army uses tear gas, stun grenades and, of course, live ammunition.

    It’s not only the IDF that executes nocturnal raids. Similar operations are carried out by the forces of the Palestinian Authority, in coordination with the army. When the Israelis arrive, the PA personnel leave. The young people oppose them, too, but less intensely, and the mutual firing of weapons is mainly into the air. No one has been killed in the Palestinian forces’ raids of the past few months.

    In recent weeks, PA troops – who at one time were afraid to enter the camp – arrested 15 to 20 young people, taking them to Jericho for interrogation. The IDF arrested only four people in that period. No one from either group has been released yet.

    The same pattern played itself out last week: Almost every night, Israeli or Palestinian forces were in the camp. Never a dull moment. Last Thursday, an Israeli soldier was wounded. On the two nights that followed, the IDF entered in large numbers. On Saturday night, they didn’t arrest anyone – residents of the camp are convinced that they came not to detain people but to kill: They killed one young person and wounded four others.

    After a year in which no one was killed in the camp, they’re in mourning again here.

    Twenty-year-old Mathin Dabiyeh was in the café at the foot of the hill on that night. Now he hobbles about on crutches at the entrance to his house. At 3:15 A.M., after it was known that soldiers had entered the camp, he began to make his way home. The soldiers appeared opposite him in an alley, he recalls now. There’s no point asking him if he was carrying a pipe bomb or an improvised firearm, as I won’t get a straight answer. The soldiers shot him in the leg and he started to run up the alley, limping. The troops gave chase but he managed to elude them. A neighbor with a moped took him to the hospital just outside the camp’s entrance. The hospital’s ambulances don’t dare enter the camp when the IDF is present, so in most cases the wounded are taken out by local residents.

    The bullet lodged in Dabiyeh’s knee. His friend Aslam, who was wounded together with him, is still hospitalized; he was hit in the stomach. What will Dabiyeh do the next time soldiers enter? “I can’t run now,” he tells us, evasively. He wears a black knitted skullcap. His brother works as a security guard at the Jenin branch of Kentucky Fried Chicken.

    It all took place in the early hours of Sunday morning in the area between the buildings, next to the Queens’ Salon beauty parlor, which is now closed. According to eyewitnesses, IDF snipers positioned themselves on the roof of a house across from the beauty parlor, hiding behind a black plastic water container. The crying of an infant can now be heard from that house, which, like others nearby, is plastered with militant graffiti. The wounded men escaped through an alley at the end of which is an old poster with a photograph of Saddam Hussein. The home of Mohammed Abu Khalifa, who was killed in the incident, is located next to a mosque named for Abdullah Azzam, from the neighboring village of Silat al-Harithiya, who is said to have been a friend of Osama bin Laden.

    Narrow steps lead to a small, stark house, which is almost bursting with people. The last day of Mohammed’s life was his 19th birthday. In the evening he celebrated here with friends. There was a power outage, an almost-daily occurrence, so his friends played music from their cellphones. They drank juice. This is what a birthday party here looks like.

    The dead boy’s uncle, Jumaa Abu Jebal, who lost a leg in the IDF’s invasion of the camp in 2002, and his mother, Fatma, greeted us on our visit this past Monday. Mohammed dropped out of school in the 11th grade and began working with his father at his garage. After his friends left that night, we are told, he went to fix a car that had broken down in the camp. That was at about 10 P.M.

    An hour later or so, he returned home and went to sleep, his mother relates. At 2 A.M., friends knocked on the door. They came to summon him, after learning that soldiers were in the camp. Mohammed’s father forbade him to go out, but around 3, after his father went back to sleep, the teen snuck out of the house. That act cost him his life.

    His mother heard shots at about 3:30 – the shots that killed her son, a few dozen meters from his home. She learned from a Facebook post that Mohammed had been wounded – that’s how parents find out about their children’s fate here. She tried to get to the hospital, but was forced back home by the shooting. It wasn’t until 5:45 A.M., after the last of the troops had left the camp, that she could leave. Mohammed died before she and her husband reached the hospital; he had been struck by three bullets in the chest and one in the stomach.

    A week earlier, Israeli troops had entered this house in search of Mohammed’s uncle, Jumaa, who lives on the upper floor. A Shin Bet security service agent ordered the amputee to get dressed, but he wasn’t arrested. Jumaa is a Hamas activist.

    “This is the last time I’m coming here. The next time I’ll send a drone to liquidate you,” the Shin Bet man told Jumaa, who replied, “If you have anything [on me], take me.” To which “Captain Haroun,” as the agent styles himself, retorted, “You know what people around you are doing.”

    Jumaa, an affable, smiling man who’s married to an Israeli Arab woman from Haifa and speaks broken Hebrew from his years in an Israeli prison, is certain the Shin Bet man was referring to his nephew Mohammed.

    The IDF Spokesperson’s Unit stated this week, in response to a query from Haaretz: “On Jan. 29, explosive devices were thrown at IDF soldiers during activity in the Jenin refugee camp. The force responded with gunfire at those who were throwing the devices, as a result of which one of them was killed. The IDF enters the refugee camp in accordance with operational needs and with the aim of preventing terrorist activity in the area.”

    Not far from the house of mourning, on a wall in another home, is a photograph of Majd Lahlouh, who was shot to death after going out to confront soldiers in the camp in August 2013, at the age of 22. Beneath the photo lies his cousin of 23, Izak Lahlouh. He, too, was wounded that night last month, by a bullet that hit an artery his leg. He was told in the hospital that if his evacuation had been delayed by another few minutes, he would have died from loss of blood. Now he’s bedridden, keeping warm with blankets and watching television, with crutches by his side.

  • Palestinian succumbs to gunshot wounds inflicted 3 months ago by Israeli forces
    Feb. 10, 2017 5:33 P.M. (Updated : Feb. 10, 2017 5:34 P.M.)
    http://www.maannews.com/Content.aspx?ID=775403

    BETHLEHEM (Ma’an) – A Palestinian held in Israeli custody succumbed to his wounds on Friday after being shot by Israeli forces in Nov. for allegedly attempting to carry out a stabbing attack.

    Issa Qaraqe, the head of the Palestinian Committee of Prisoners’ Affairs, told Ma’an that 24-year-old Muhammad al-Jallad (also reported as Muhammad Amr) died in Israeli custody while at the Beilinson Hospital in the city of Petah Tikva in central Israel.

    Al-Jallad was shot by Israeli forces on Nov. 9, 2016 at the Huwwara military checkpoint in the southern part of the occupied West Bank district of Nablus, Qaraqe said.

    Israeli authorities claimed that al-Jallad had attempted to stab an Israeli soldier with a screwdriver before Israeli forces opened live fire on him.

    According to Qaraqe, Israeli forces took al-Jallad into custody at the time and transported him to Beilinson hospital for treatment.

    Qaraqe added that al-Jallad had also suffered from lymphoma.

    Nov. 9, 2016 9:40 A.M. (Updated : Nov. 10, 2016 10:25 A.M.)
    http://www.maannews.com/Content.aspx?id=773882

    (...) Abdullah Abu Salim, 43, a merchant from Huwwara, told Ma’an at the scene that he and two of his friends, “saw [Amr] attempting to cross the road in Huwwara before being shot at by an Israeli soldier who then took out a knife and threw it next to the youth.”(...)

    #Palestine_assassinée

    • Palestinian Dies After Being Shot by Israeli Troops on His Way to His Last Chemo Session

      No one bothered to keep the young Palestinian’s family informed.
      Gideon Levy and Alex Levac Feb 17, 2017 9:52 AM
      read more: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.772183

      Mohammed-Aamar Jalad’s father, Thabath. - photo Alec Levac

      On his way to what was supposed to his final chemotherapy session, last November, he boarded the wrong shared taxi. Discovering his mistake, he got off and ran across the highway to catch a taxi going in the opposite direction. Israel Defense Forces soldiers who may have thought he was going to attack them, shot him, seriously wounding him. For the next three months, he was bedridden in Beilinson Hospital, in Petah Tikva, most of the time in the intensive care unit. Throughout that entire period, no one in the IDF thought of updating his parents and family about the condition of their loved one. His mother was the only one allowed who was supposed to be allowed to visit him, but even though she came a few times, on all but one occasion, she was not permitted to enter his room.

      Just as his condition seemed to be improving, he died, apparently last week. No one thought to inform the family about his death, or the circumstances surrounding it. Israel has not yet returned the body.

      In his native town of Tul Karm, in the northwestern part of the West Bank, no one believes that Mohammed-Aamar Jalad tried to attack soldiers on the way to his last chemo session. His father is the city’s legendary driving instructor – 45 years behind the wheel – and his grandfather was the first local resident to serve in the Israel Police. A photo of the grandfather in uniform hangs on a wall of Mohammed’s family’s house.

      This, then, was the life and death of the 25-year-old student, who dreamed of living in the United States, and who in 2010 won a U.S. green card through the lottery – but had fulfillment of his dream delayed by cancer, and terminated by Israeli soldiers.

      When we visited last weekend, women paying their condolences were going up and down the stairs leading to the elegant home in Tul Karm, which is shrouded in mourning. Mohammed’s sister, Samar, the dean of the nursing school at Ramallah’s Community College, and her father, Thabath, the driving teacher, greet us.

      It’s a very restrained, dignified home. The family is apolitical, we’re told by Abdulkarim Sadi, a field researcher for B’Tselem, the Israeli human rights organization.

      Mohammed was the youngest son; his two brothers live in the Persian Gulf region. A year ago, he was diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma. At that time, he’d completed two years of accountancy studies at Al-Quds Open University and had signed up for additional studies at the Ramallah college. His illness forced him to put his academic aspirations on hold. He was treated at An-Najah National University Hospital in Nablus, in biweekly intravenous chemotherapy sessions. The disease was in recession and he felt good.

      Wednesday, November 9, 2016, was set as the date for the final treatment. Samar called him that morning to ask if he was going to the hospital, and he replied that he was. At 7:30 A.M., his father took him to the Tul Karm central bus station, leaving him at the stand of shared-taxis heading to Nablus. The taxis for Ramallah were parked across the way, and Mohammed accidentally boarded one of them. He only realized his mistake next to the turnoff to the settlement of Yitzhar. The driver suggested that he get off at Hawara Junction, next to the checkpoint of that name, where he would be able to pick up the taxi to Nablus.

      Mohammed took his advice; after getting out of the vehicle, he had to cross the highway. He did so on the run. On the other side was an IDF jeep and a few soldiers, who were guarding the busy junction. The soldiers apparently thought that he was out to attack them.

      Mohammed was shot as he reached the middle of the road – one bullet to the stomach. He collapsed, bleeding. Just then, a Palestinian ambulance happened by, taking a patient from Jenin to the Allenby Bridge. The driver, Osama Nazal, wanted to assist him, but the soldiers and police who had arrived in the meantime kept him from evacuating the injured man. More forces arrived, along with an Israeli ambulance, which took Mohammed to Beilinson Hospital. Nazal later told Mohammed’s parents that their son was still fully conscious at that time.

      Some time later, the father got a call from Palestinian Preventive Security, asking him to come to the organization’s offices. Thabath waited until he’d finished the driving lesson he was giving before going. He says he thought he’d been summoned because his son had been involved in a quarrel with another passenger. He never imagined the news that awaited him. As he was sitting there, hearing only that his son had been hurt – he got a call asking him to come to the office of the Shin Bet security service at the Sha’ar Ephraim checkpoint, near Tul Karm.

      Thabath was met there by Agent “Karim,” whom he describes as being very polite when questioning him about his son. However, Karim, too, declined to tell him anything about Mohammed’s condition, or even whether he was alive or dead. In the meantime, one of Thabath’s friends told him that his son had been taken to Beilinson. Thabath drove home to get his wife, and the two set out for Sha’ar Ephraim in the hope that they would be allowed to pass through the checkpoint – as they should have been, because they are both over 55 – and get quickly to Beilinson. But they were stopped and peremptorily sent back without an explanation.

      From that moment, the family was plunged into three months of torment and mental abuse, during which the darkness of uncertainty about their son’s condition hung over their lives, and they swung back and forth between despair and hope. Never were they successful in receiving authoritative information. They knew Mohammed was in ICU in serious condition, in an induced coma and hooked up to a ventilator; at some point, the family, which they received informaton from their lawyer and from sympathetic medical staff, heard that his condition had improved. They sent information about his bout with lymphoma to the hospital and hoped for the best.

      Over those three months, Mohammed’s father was continually denied entry to Israel to visit his son. His wife, Maisir, was issued a permit on four occasions, but on three of them, after making the trip, she was blocked from entering Mohammed’s room by the soldier-warders guarding it. Once, they let her see him from the door for an instant; once they let her in for about two minutes, to caress him. His condition improved from one visit to the next. The doctors and nurses told Maisir he had regained consciousness and had been taken off the ventilator.

      A few days before his death, he was moved from ICU to the surgical ward. Throughout the period, he continued to be remanded in custody by an Israeli military court.

      For her part, Maisir went to visit for the last time on January 23. Again she was denied entry to his room, and only allowed to talk to the medical personnel. Dr. Kamal Natour, from the Palestinian Prisoners Club, a voluntary organization made up of former Israeli detainees, visited Mohammed at the time and reported to the family. They understood that he was getting better and had begun to eat. Then a few days went by without any news. Maisir had a sense of foreboding. She says now that throughout the three months, she barely slept for worry about her son, but last week she became even more worried.

      Last Friday, Maisir decided to call one of the physicians from the ICU, Dr. Jihad Bishara, whom she had met. Her daughter helped her find his number online, after she recognized a photo of him. He told her Mohammed had been transferred out of his unit; he’d been off that day, but he promised to look into the situation and get back to her. Maisir insisted on calling him again. She was very unsettled about her son’s condition, despite the recent optimistic reports.

      “Do you believe in God?” Dr. Bishara asked her when she called him again. “Your son is dead.”

      The doctor then called the family back shortly afterward, this time to inform them officially in the name of the hospital that Mohammed had died. But to this day, they don’t know when their son died and above all, the cause of death.

      This week, we asked the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit five questions:

      1. Why was Mohammed Jalad shot by the soldiers?

      2. Why was his family not allowed to visit him in the hospital?

      3. Why did his parents not receive an authoritative report about his condition?

      4. Why didn’t the IDF bother to inform them of his death and the reasons for his death?

      5. Why hasn’t his body been returned?

      The IDF Spokespersons Unit responded with the following statement: “On November 9, 2016, Mohammed-Amar Jalad carried out a knifing attack on soldiers at the Hawara checkpoint, using a knife sharpener. The force responded with fire, wounding the terrorist, who was evacuated to Beilinson Hospital for treatment.”

      Together with the mourning and grief, the family living in this sedate home in Tul Karm is reeling under a cloud of helplessness and lack of information. What did their loved one die of? Why was he arrested? What must they do to get possession of the body? Time and again they asked, and time and again their questions hung suspended in the air, unanswered.

    • Israel to return body of Palestinian who succumbed to injuries a week earlier
      Feb. 16, 2017 4:30 P.M. (Updated: Feb. 16, 2017 9:36 P.M.)
      http://www.maannews.com/Content.aspx?id=775506

      TULKAREM (Ma’an) — Israeli authorities will return the body of slain Palestinian Muhammad al-Jallad at 3 p.m. on Friday at the Enav checkpoint in the northern occupied West Bank district of Tulkarem, according to the Palestinian Committee of Prisoners’ Affairs.

      Al-Jallad — also known as Muhammad Amr — died on Feb. 10 in Israel’s Beilinson Hospital from injuries he sustained after Israeli forces shot him in the chest on Nov. 9, 2016 at the Huwwara checkpoint south of Nablus following an alleged stabbing attempt.

  • Epargne et #RSA ne font pas toujours bon ménage
    https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/economie/310117/epargne-et-rsa-ne-font-pas-toujours-bon-menage

    Certaines caisses d’allocations familiales ponctionnent illégalement le RSA des allocataires qui disposent d’une #épargne. Certains d’entre eux commencent à attaquer en justice les départements pour ne pas voir leur RSA amputé de dizaines d’euros chaque mois.

    #Economie #CAF #CIP-IDF #Cnaf #Marisol_Touraine #minima_sociaux #social

  • La petite couronne au cœur des transferts d’établissements franciliens | IAU-IDF
    https://www.iau-idf.fr/savoir-faire/nos-travaux/edition/la-petite-couronne-au-coeur-des-transferts-detablissements-franciliens.html

    Il est intéressant de noter que l’espace, support de la représentation, est symbolisé ici sur un seul axe...
    Cette représentation faisant état de la mise en relation des régions, par des flux d’établissements (un nombre de transfert), on regrette que la valuation des liaisons correspondantes ne soit pas représentée ; du moins autrement que par la mention du nombre d’établissements en étiquettes (label).
    De même que les répercussion sur le tissu productif...

  • Israeli army jails two conscientious objectors for fourth time
    +972 Magazine | Published January 10, 2017 | By Yael Marom
    https://972mag.com/israeli-army-jails-two-conscientious-objectors-for-fourth-time/124323

    Tamar Alon and Tamar Ze’evi stand outside the IDF’s Tel Hashomer induction base where they declared their refusal to serve in the army, and be sentenced to prison, Tel Aviv, November 16, 2016. (Haggai Matar)

    By the time their latest sentence comes to an end, Tamar Ze’evi, 19, and Tamar Alon, 18, will have spent a total of 74 days in jail for refusing to serve in the Israeli army.

    The Israeli army on Monday sent two conscientious objectors to jail for the fourth time, just five days after they had finished serving their third stint in prison. Presenting themselves at the Tel Hashomer military induction base, Tamar Ze’evi, 19, and Tamar Alon, 18, declared their refusal to join the army and take part in the occupation, for which they were sentenced to 30 days’ detention. The army also decided to separate the two women, sending them to different prisons. By the end of this latest period in jail, they will have spent a total of 74 days behind bars for refusing to serve in the army.