organization:international monetary fund

  • Big banks run everything: Austerity, the IMF and the real story about world economy that the media won’t tell you - Salon.com
    http://www.salon.com/2015/05/28/big_banks_run_everything_austerity_the_imf_and_the_real_story_about_world_eco

    One, Ukraine’s strategic importance is such that it will enjoy Western political and institutional support—and probably the haircut Jaresko wants to give the bankers—so long as there is anyone left in Kieve to cash the checks. Two, I question there is any case of the neoliberals’ ideological compulsions as extravagantly on display as they are in Ukraine today. This prize cannot be lost.

    Look at Greece. You have a government made of some serious intellects. Read what they write and listen to what they say. They are in search of credible, constructive alternatives. They have one on the table. The problem with it is simple: It is an alternative.

    Now Ukraine. Know-nothing stooges, evidence to the contrary always welcome. Yatsenyuk is a ventriloquist’s dream. And to propose an alternative to the orthodoxy must be the furthest thing from his mind.

    Fascinating. Among other things.

    #Dette #FMI #Grèce #Ukraine

  • 312,679,022.95 euros. This is how much Greece has to repay | euronews, world news
    http://www.euronews.com/2015/05/22/how-many-billions-of-euros-has-greece-to-pay-back-until-2057

    Greece will need another 42 years to pay back what it owes to its lenders, provided that no new debt is added and no punitary interest rates are added as a result of any missed payments.

    Year in, year out Greece will have to pay an average of 10 billion euro to the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank, the EU and each EU country separately not to mention several other financing institutions.

    According to the Data submitted to the Greek Parliament by the Public Debt Management Agency (ODDHX), the Debt of the Public Administration on 30th April 2015 was: 312,679,022.95 euro

    • « The Public Debt Management Agency has also submitted the road map for payments starting 30. April 2015 until 2057.

      2015 : 38.328 billion
      2016 : 7.227 billion
      2017 : 9.648 billion
      2018 : 4.600 billion
      2019 : 13.628 billion
      2020 : 5.080 billion
      2021 : 5.154 billion
      2022 : 6.907 billion
      2023 : 9.208 billion
      2024 : 8.964 billion
      2025 : 7.419 billion
      2026 : 8.059 billion
      2027 : 8.062 billion
      2028 : 7.469 billion
      2029 : 6.893 billion
      2030 : 7.220 billion
      2031 : 6.723 billion
      2032 : 9.523 billion
      2033 : 6.780 billion
      2034 : 9.520 billion
      2035 : 9.247 billion
      2036 : 9.316 billion
      2037 : 12.813 billion
      2038 : 12.516 billion
      2039 : 13.401 billion
      2040 : 6.369 billion
      2041 : 7.292 billion
      2042 : 7.682 billion
      2043 : 10.100 billion
      2044 : 6.23 billion
      2045 : 8.13 billion
      2046 : 4.83 billion
      2047 : 5.9 billion
      2048 : 2.5 billion
      2050 : 500 million
      2053 : 2 billion
      2054 : 6.3 billion
      2057 : 1.13 billion

      Repayments to the IMF extend until 2024 and the road map is :

      2015 : 5.498 billion
      2016 : 2.995 billion
      2017 : 708 million
      2018 : 1.763 billion
      2019 : 2.046 billion
      2020 : 2.046 billion
      2021 : 2.046 billion
      2022 : 1.910 billion
      2023 : 1.338 billion
      2024 : 284 million »

  • Why Greece’s Syriza party is not sticking to the script on an IMF deal | Paul Mason | Paul Mason
    http://blogs.channel4.com/paul-mason-blog/greeces-syriza-party-sticking-script-imf-deal/3717

    Privately, those within the ruling far-left party Syriza who were once confident of reaching a compromise with lenders, are now alarmed. Euro exit plans drawn up by the far left of the party are being studied seriously by those previously dismissive of them; articles contemplating a debt default have begun to appear in the party’s daily paper Avgi.

  • Fossil fuels subsidised by $10m a minute, says IMF
    http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/may/18/fossil-fuel-companies-getting-10m-a-minute-in-subsidies-says-imf

    The IMF calls the revelation “shocking” and says the figure is an “extremely robust” estimate of the true cost of fossil fuels. The $5.3tn subsidy estimated for 2015 is greater than the total health spending of all the world’s governments.

    The vast sum is largely due to polluters not paying the costs imposed on governments by the burning of coal, oil and gas. These include the harm caused to local populations by air pollution as well as to people across the globe affected by the floods, droughts and storms being driven by climate change.

    Nicholas Stern, an eminent climate economist at the London School of Economics, said: “This very important analysis shatters the myth that fossil fuels are cheap by showing just how huge their real costs are. There is no justification for these enormous subsidies for fossil fuels, which distort markets and damages economies, particularly in poorer countries.”

    Lord Stern said that even the IMF’s vast subsidy figure was a significant underestimate: “A more complete estimate of the costs due to climate change would show the implicit subsidies for fossil fuels are much bigger even than this report suggests.”

    The IMF, one of the world’s most respected financial institutions, said that ending subsidies for fossil fuels would cut global carbon emissions by 20%. That would be a giant step towards taming global warming, an issue on which the world has made little progress to date.

    Ending the subsidies would also slash the number of premature deaths from outdoor air pollution by 50% – about 1.6 million lives a year.

    Furthermore, the IMF said the resources freed by ending fossil fuel subsidies could be an economic “game-changer” for many countries, by driving economic growth and poverty reduction through greater investment in infrastructure, health and education and also by cutting taxes that restrict growth.

    Another consequence would be that the need for subsidies for renewable energy – a relatively tiny $120bn a year – would also disappear, if fossil fuel prices reflected the full cost of their impacts.

    Fossil fuel subsidies – how the costs break down

    #énergies_fossiles #hydrocarbures #subventions #FMI

  • Bygone glory days and brewing frustration | The UB Post
    http://ubpost.mongolnews.mn/?p=14592

    Mongolia is bracing for the worst, with projected economic growth of 4.4 percent in the upcoming year’s state budget, as opposed to the roaring 17.5 percent economic growth which topped the world in 2011.

    Parliament discussed the 2016 state budget and projections for the 2017-2018 state budget on Thursday. The state budget is expected to experience major cuts and hefty loan and bond repayment pressure next year as Mongolia’s infamous Chinggis Bond repayment is due in 2017.

    In 2017 and 2018, Mongolia will have to do a substantial repayment, amounting to more than one billion USD. Therefore, there is a need for a boost to the exchange rate to increase the favorability of the investment environment, attract foreign investment, and approve a plan to revive the economy,” said Minister of Finance J.Erdenebat.
    […]
    The IMF’s 2015 Article IV Consultation-Staff Report on Mongolia said, “Looking ahead, prudent macroeconomic management must be maintained to ensure that resource wealth can be harnessed effectively. Many resource-rich countries have failed to realize the promise of prosperity. Avoiding procyclical fiscal policy, saving resource revenues and investing them wisely, ensuring cautious monetary policy, and maintaining a competitive exchange rate to avoid the effects of Dutch Disease, are all essential components. Mongolia has a relatively large resource endowment compared to some other resource-rich economies, and managing that wealth wisely is of critical importance.

    The IMF advice is nothing new. These measures have been advised many times before but have not been put into action. The decisions of Mongolia’s leadership has resulted in the current economic downturn – the root of much frustration among businesses and the general public. If these long-term economic woes aren’t addressed with an effective solution, I fear, like many others who observe Mongolian affairs, that public frustration will grow and cause another wave of political instability, further delaying Mongolia’s growth and prosperity.

    Bref, on est (déjà !) loin de la croissance à deux chiffres qui était proclamée triomphalement partout. Il va falloir se serrer la ceinture. L’année risque d’être agitée.

  • #Ukraine debt talks reach boiling point - FT.com
    http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/0ad2796a-f8d8-11e4-8e16-00144feab7de.html

    Ukraine’s $23bn debt restructuring negotiations appeared to reach boiling point late on Tuesday after the government issued a sharply worded statement that questioned the #transparency, responsiveness and #good_faith of a creditors’ committee.
    With positions hardening weeks before a planned June deadline to avoid default, the finance ministry of war-torn and recession-battered Ukraine in the statement said it was “concerned about the approach taken by the creditors’ committee representing the country’s external debt holders and their lack of willingness to engage in negotiations.

    Claiming that the creditor committee refused “despite numerous requests” to reveal its membership, the finance ministry stressed that it and debtholders needed by June “to agree on a sustainable debt level and debt service objectives meeting the targets” of an International Monetary Fund programme granted earlier this year.
    The ministry is committed to transparency, responsiveness and good faith negotiations and expects the creditors’ committee to do the same,” Kiev added.
    The tough words come amid increasing market expectations that the restructuring talks are likely to stretch on through the summer as Ukraine continues — in the face of creditor disapproval — to demand a #haircut, cuts to the coupon and maturity extensions to free up $15bn over the next four years.
    […]
    The committee of creditors declined to comment on the finance ministry statement.
    International holders of Ukrainian debt, which include US investor Franklin Templeton, say there is little point in setting final terms for a debt restructuring while the country is fighting a war and its economic situation is in a state of flux. They disagree with Kiev’s insistence that the only way for Ukrainian debt to become sustainable is through a haircut for investors.
    Bondholders are promoting an alternative solution that would involve granting an extension to upcoming debt payments.

  • Russia signs up to $100 bn #BRICS_fund to rival IMF
    http://www.globalpost.com/article/6536056/2015/05/02/russia-signs-100-bn-brics-fund-rival-imf

    (AFP) Russian President Vladimir Putin ratified an accord Saturday to set up a $100-billion reserve fund for the so-called BRICS — the five leading emerging economies that include Russia, China, Brazil, India and South Africa.
    Moscow is expected to contribute $18 billion to the reserve, well behind the $41 billion China has promised to pour into the fund that was set up after an agreement signed in July 2014 in Brazil.
    The emerging economies also plan to form their own international bank based in Shanghai to challenge western dominance over international money markets.

  • Refugees don’t need our tears. They need us to stop making them refugees | Anders Lustgarten | Comment is free | The Guardian
    http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/apr/17/refugees-eu-policy-migrants-how-many-deaths

    In all the rage about #migration, one thing is never discussed: what we do to cause it. A report published this week by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists [ _voir http://seenthis.net/messages/361855_ ] reveals that the World Bank displaced a staggering 3.4 million people in the last five years. By funding privatisations, land grabs and dams, by backing companies and governments accused of rape, murder and torture, and by putting $50bn into projects graded highest risk for “irreversible and unprecedented” social impacts, the World Bank has massively contributed to the flow of impoverished people across the globe. The single biggest thing we could do to stop migration is to abolish the development mafia: the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, European Investment Bank and European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

    A very close second is to stop bombing the Middle East. The west destroyed the infrastructure of Libya without any clue as to what would replace it. What has is a vacuum state run by warlords that is now the centre of Mediterranean people-smuggling. We’re right behind the Sisi regime in Egypt that is eradicating the Arab spring, cracking down on Muslims and privatising infrastructure at a rate of knots, all of which pushes huge numbers of people on to the boats. Our past work in Somalia, Syria and Iraq means those nationalities are top of the migrant list.

    Not all migration is caused by the west, of course. But let’s have a real conversation about the part that is. Let’s have a real conversation about our ageing demographic and the massive skills shortage here, what it means for overstretched public services if we let migrants in (we’d need to raise money to meet increased demand, and the clearest and fairest way is a rise in taxes on the rich), the ethics of taking the cream of the crop from poor countries. Migration is a complex subject. But let’s not be cowards and pretend the migrants will stop coming. Because they won’t. This will never stop.

  • ’The west is wrong to write off Ukraine’s debts’ | World news | The Guardian
    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/13/ukraine-debts-lebedev-corruption

    The road to hell is paved with good intentions, they say, and so it may be with the west’s approach to Ukraine.

    On 11 March the International Monetary Fund announced a $40bn assistance package to Kiev, consisting of $17.5bn in new loans and $15-20bn write-offs of previous ones. Such a programme may well help any normal country, but the situation in Ukraine is far from normal.

    Before the former government was overthrown and then president Viktor Yanukovych fled for Moscow in February 2014, the country was renowned for its corrupt leadership. Yanukovych, convicted of robbery and assault under Soviet rule, is alleged to have received a share of each hryvnia (Ukrainian currency) that passed through the economy.

    According to western analysts, the overall scale of corruption reached 14% of GDP during the early 2010s, or roughly $30bn a year.

    We believe that a significant proportion of this ended in the pockets of the president and his family, or in the accounts of the oligarchs and other close associates of the ruling clan.

    For years these elites salted away their illicit profits in banks accounts around the world, with the west turned a blind eye.
    (…)
    Between 2010 and 2014, Ukraine was something unknown in modern history – a private state. All her neighbours, as well as all countries dealing with Kiev, are extremely invested in preventing this from happening again. It’s impossible to believe that none of those discussing the restructuring of the Ukrainian debt today were unaware of what happened in those years in Ukraine. Some knew this better than those who just sent planes with cash to Ukrainian banks or those who charged exhorbitant fees for “legal advice” for Ukrainian oligarchs settled in Europe.
    (…)
    We strongly believe that the holders of Ukraine’s government debt must rethink the conditions for dealing with this country and realise that rather than helping, debt relief may mean a full amnesty for a corrupt clique who has brought the nation to its knees. If the international community wants to fight against global corruption, Ukraine may be the best place to start.

  • Ukraine’s Parliament moves to break up Naftogaz
    http://www.kyivpost.com/content/business/ukraines-parliament-moves-to-break-up-naftogaz-385913.html

    Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk calls it no less than the de-oligarchization and the de-monopolization of Ukraine’s heavily subsidized yet corrupt energy market.

    Yatsenyuk was referring to a sector spring cleaning that got a big boost after Ukraine’s Parliament passed legislation on April 9 to bust up monopolies and open up the natural gas market to competition.

    Adopted by 290 lawmakers, the bill intends to financially separate the main business lines of state-owned energy conglomerate Naftogaz: gas transmission, storage and sales. It also enables non-Russian foreign companies to form joint ventures with the energy holding’s units to lure crucial investments and upgrade the nation’s vast Soviet-era pipeline and underground gas storage network.

    We couldn’t for 10 years, and finally today, we de-oligarchized and de-monopolized the natural gas market in the country,” Yatsenyuk said after the vote.

    But don’t expect results quickly, despite the grand rhetoric.

    Mise en conformité, donc, avec le #Troisième_Paquet_Énergie de l’UE,…

    Legislatively, Ukraine’s gas market is in line now with the European Union’s Third Energy Package, which aims to eliminate conflict of interests on the market, increase transparency and boost competition, Dmytro Marunych, co-chairman of the Energy Strategies Fund in Kyiv, said by phone.

    However, much secondary legislation is still needed to make the process work, like drafting separate codes on storage and transportation, the energy expert said.

    … sous pression du FMI…

    The measures are key conditions of last month’s $17.5 billion rescue package by the International Monetary Fund, according to lawmaker Ostap Semerak, who is in the prime minister’s People’s Front party.

    … mais le consommateur de base n’a rien à craindre, on te va lui optimiser l’offre au petit poil…

    In turn, consumers will get “optimal prices, and on the other hand, the domestic extraction market will be stimulated,” Naftogaz business development director Yuriy Vitrenko said in a statement.

    … ou presque !

    Thanks to subsidies, households in the past paid around 20 percent of the full import price of gas, and because of the existence of different subsidies, they were an invitation for fraud because distributors would buy government-allotted gas at low prices intended for households and resell it at far higher prices to businesses.

    Energy expert Marunych said depending on how much the nation consumed, up to 2 billion cubic meters a year had been lost to theft. “Ukraine is consuming much less this and last year so I would say that less than 1 billion is being siphoned,” he said.

    On April 1, NERC raised gas prices for households by 285 percent on average in a bid to reach full import parity by 2017.

    The price of gas domestically produced – by Naftogaz’s subsidiary Ukrgazvydobuvannia – will eventually increase by 355 percent, according to Ukraine’s Feb. 27 letter of intent to the IMF.

    Ce qui ne peut qu’aboutir à cet heureux dénouement :

    [Naftogaz’s] will be eliminated by 2017 once gas and heating prices rise to cost recovery levels based on the restructuring.

  • CIGI paper says ECB president #Trichet blocked IMF debt relief to Greece - Business Insider
    http://uk.businessinsider.com/cigi-paper-says-ecb-president-trichet-blocked-imf-debt-relief-to

    The paper, released by the independent think-tank the Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI), claims that the negotiating team from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) had pushed for debt haircuts for private bank sector holders of Greek debt. That would have meant those banks getting less than the amount they expected to be paid back. The idea was to provide an orderly process out of the debt crisis and to put the country onto a sustainable footing to repay its creditors.

    However, the paper’s authors claim, the proposal came under fierce opposition from former ECB president Jean-Claude Trichet. At an ECB meeting in the spring of 2010 a member of the central bank’s executive board brought up the prospect of debt relief. Trichet allegedly “blew up,” the paper says:

    _The ECB president “blew up,” according to one attendee. “Trichet said, ‘We are an economic and monetary union, and there must be no debt restructuring!’” this person recalled. “ He was shouting ._ ”

    In response to questions from Business Insider on the accuracy of the account, an ECB spokesperson said “we don’t comment on executive board meetings”.

    #BCE #délétère #Grèce

  • Ukraine Creditors Fire Opening Salvos Before Restructuring Talks - Bloomberg Business
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-04-09/ukraine-creditors-fire-opening-salvos-before-restructuring-talks

    Ukraine’s creditors are expecting a “speedy resolution” to negotiations “without any principal debt reductions,” according to a statement on Thursday. Ukraine has said it will cut the face value of bonds as well as reducing coupons and extending maturities as it seeks to meet the conditions of an International Monetary Fund bailout. A deal without writedowns is “not viable,” according to Michael Ganske from Rogge Capital Partners Plc.

    This is how restructuring negotiations always start, with unrealistic proposals,” Ganske, the head of emerging markets at Rogge in London, said by e-mail Thursday. “There will be negotiations and they will meet in between.

  • Ukraine: The World’s Second-Highest Inflation | Cato Liberty
    http://www.cato.org/blog/ukraine-worlds-second-highest-inflation

    That rate is much higher than the “official” rate of 34.5%. Both the International Monetary Fund’s Extended Fund Facility for Ukraine (which has recently been approved) and Ukraine’s debt rescheduling negotiations (which have just commenced) are sitting on quicksand. Programs and negotiations based on a false premise are always treacherous affairs.

  • U.S. Getting Left Behind As More Allies Join China’s Infrastructure Bank
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2015/03/26/u-s-getting-left-behind-as-more-allies-join-chinas-infrastructure-bank

    China has basically been left out of having any say within the large Bretton Woods institutions — International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. In creating the AIIB, China is basically saying that they are willing to go it alone in helping to fund southeast Asia’s massive infrastructure needs.

    […]

    On Thursday, NATO member Turkey applied to join the AIIB too. Becoming a founding member depends on other members approving their membership. If approved, both Turkey and South Korea will be part of the growing AIIB family next month.

    The application deadline for prospective founding members is March 31.

    Twenty-one countries agreed to fund the $100 billion bank in a memorandum of understanding last October. All members were from Asia. Shortly after, European friends of the U.S. hopped on the bandwagon. Britain opened the flood gates. Then in came France, Germany, Luxembourg, Switzerland and Italy. Australia is considering it.

  • Ukraine oligarch calls for nationalisation of industrial assets - FT.com
    http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/77ed11d2-ce57-11e4-86fc-00144feab7de.html

    One of Ukraine’s most powerful oligarchs has called for some of the country’s prized industrial assets to be nationalised, claiming that their privatisation was a criminal conspiracy to rob the state of billions of dollars.
    Igor Kolomoisky, a billionaire businessman, told the Financial Times that Ukraine should not receive any new funds from the International Monetary Fund until all “illegally” privatised property had been restored to state ownership.

    “Ukraine is going round begging for money . . . and here is money that is due to the state. Return these enterprises, put them up for sale in an open tender and you will get 10 times more than you did [before],” he said, adding that any new auctions could raise tens of billions of dollars.
    (…)
    Mr Kolomoisky’s proposal represents a political bombshell, and a direct challenge to his fellow oligarchs who scooped up state assets at often knockdown prices in the privatisations of the 2000s. Critics say his motives may be less patriotism or a sense of fair play than a desire to gain advantage over his business rivals in the febrile atmosphere of post-revolutionary Ukraine.

    But opening up past privatisations could raise concerns over the sanctity of property rights in Ukraine and destabilise its already fragile business climate, experts warn, at a time when the country is struggling to cope with a deep economic crisis brought on by the war against Russian-backed separatists in the east.

    Arseniy Yatseniuk, Ukraine’s prime minister, reacted cautiously to Mr Kolomoisky’s proposal, telling the FT it could “open a Pandora’s box” if the decision on whether privatisations were right or wrong were made by a “corrupted judiciary”.
    (…)
    Mr Kolomoisky’s criticism of the Ukrrudprom process has added resonance because of the fact he was a beneficiary of it. He told a Ukrainian parliamentary committee this month that the privatisation procedure was designed to restrict the number of potential bidders and ensure the assets ended up in “the right hands”.
    The law [on Ukrrudprom] was shameful, humiliating and criminal,” Mr Kolomoisky told the FT. “This was a planned conspiracy to commit a crime.

    Mr Kolomoisky intends to submit evidence of the alleged wrongdoing to Ukrainian prosecutors, in the hope they will launch an investigation into the sell off of Ukrrudprom. He also said that if local prosecutors confirm evidence of collusion, bribery and tender rigging, all the Ukrrudprom mines privatised in 2004 should be “expropriated”, without compensating their current owners.

  • Statement by IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde on Ukraine

    “I am pleased to announce that the IMF team working in Kiev has reached a staff-level agreement with the Ukrainian government on a new economic reform program that would be supported by an Extended Fund Facility of SDR 12.35 billion (about $17.5 billion, €15.5 billion) from the IMF, as well as by additional resources from the international community. I intend to recommend this program for consideration to the IMF Executive Board. This new four-year arrangement would support immediate economic stabilization in Ukraine as well as a set of bold policy reforms aimed at restoring robust growth over the medium term and improving living standards for the Ukrainian people.

    http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2015/pr1550.htm?hootPostID=be4b44095786714a78713aa83dde7ea4

    #FMI #prêt #Ukraine

    • set of bold policy reforms aimed at restoring robust growth over the medium term and improving living standards for the Ukrainian people

      C’est bien connu que les accords imposés par le FMI à ces pays améliorent considérablement le niveau de vie des habitants.

  • As Greece gives its marching orders to the Troika - five reactions | Paul Mason
    http://blogs.channel4.com/paul-mason-blog/greece-european-troika-yanis-varoufakis-jeroen-dijsselbloem-syriza/3169

    As Greece gives its marching orders to the Troika – five reactions

    Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis told the head of the Eurogroup’s finance ministers, Jeroen Dijsselbloem, that Greece would no longer deal with the so-called Troika grouping as a single entity – that is, it would now deal separately as a sovereign government with its constituent parts: the EU, the European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

    After the brusque press conference, Mr Dijsselbloem reportedly told the Greek finance minister: “you have just killed the Troika”. Here are my thoughts.

    29 varoufakis r w As Greece gives its marching orders to the Troika five reactions

    1. Marxists, and the left in general, have a good knowledge of military strategy. Mr Varoufakis is not a Marxist: he is a left Keynesian, but comes from a political tradition where power is understood very well. His own father was dragged from the family home, its door broken before the young Mr Varoufakis’ eyes, during the Greek military coup of 1967 – and imprisoned for several months.

    Even moderate leftists in the Euro-communist tradition — which includes Syriza – have grown up studying the dynamics of power. The Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci, after whom numerous streets are named in left-controlled cities of his home country, said the modern communist party should be the “modern Machiavelli”: able to wield power, subterfuge and tactics adeptly and leverage, above all, its social support.

    2. By killing the Troika, on day five of the Syriza government, Mr Varoufakis was demonstrating a clear understanding of the power dynamic. All over Europe, people whose world view is normally never challenged are having to react to Syriza, but are confident that they control the timetable.

    31 greece2 r w As Greece gives its marching orders to the Troika five reactions

    The timetable is supposed to be: if Greece does not meet Troika bailout conditions on 28 February, when the current bailout extension runs out, then the ECB is free to stage the collapse of Greece’s banks. It probably won’t but is still thinking about it.

    By making clear on 29 January that Greece will refuse even to speak to the Troika, and seek no extension, Mr Varoufakis demonstrated an acute understanding of the principle of momentum. Otherwise known as “go ahead punk – make my day”.

    What happened – even though it was only a press conference – was that Syriza took control of the timetable. The Eurogroup and ECB will be forced to react at Syriza’s pace, not the other way around.

    3. However, in military theory, there is not just momentum – there is mass. Greece has very little mass in the coming clash. It owes its creditors 320bn euros and about 15bn euros come due in the back half of the year. Greece probably has a bit of liquidity arising from the cash the Troika forced it to hold, but only Mr Varoufakis and central bank governor Yanis Stournaras really know. So it does not need to go bust as a state in March-April.

    4. So Friday’s shenanegans were actually what they call in military academies “demonstrations”: I can do this if I want to, and here’s how it looks.

    5. I’m covering this crisis on a “what’s just happened basis”, not “what does it all mean”. But we don’t know certain things have happened except in hindsight. We don’t know how much money has left the Greek banks until the ECB tells us, a month in arrears. But the banks do.

    My biggest fear is that the Greek crisis reaches a critical denouement because the two key players — ECB boss Mario Draghi and Mr Varoufakis — are not only reading from different playbooks, but two different rulebooks: one written by Robert Schuman , the 1940s architect of European integration, and the other by military theorist Carl Philipp Gottfried von Clausewitz.

    • bizarrement ailleurs #Varouf dit: “that a recovery could not occur in Greece “just through old-fashioned Keynesian stimulus” but through private investment, which he predicted would return to the country once the debt burden was reduced.

  • « Réforme économique »,
    http://blogs.ft.com/the-world/2015/01/the-greek-economy-the-case-against-structural-reform

    Given the positive connotations of “reform”, the expression not only carries the propagandistic implication that any change is good, but also lumps together all microeconomic policy measures under one rubric. Thanks to its association (following the more sinister predecessor “structural adjustment”) with deregulation and privatisation pressed on developing countries by the IMF and World Bank, the label has the indelible taint of neoliberalism.

  • Bon j’y comprends goutte... for the reccord disons... si quelqu’un a un avis aussi...

    Meet the new Greek government | Open Europe
    http://openeurope.org.uk/blog/meet-the-new-greek-government

    [C’est #Varoufakis, le ministre des finances grec qui parle :]

    We owe our European partners €280bn. Fine: we will issue new bonds worth this amount, with exactly the same repayment schedule that we had agreed – but linked to nominal, not real, GDP growth. The IMF and the ECB claim that our nominal GDP will grow by 7% per year for the next 20 years. If this is the case, we will pay back the money they lent us. But if nominal GDP grows by between 5% and 7%, we will pay back a third of the money we committed to repay. And if [it grows] by less than 5%, we won’t pay anything back that year. In 2038, these bonds will expire. We will have repaid what we could. What we couldn’t repay, we wouldn’t. It is about making debt repayments conditional on progress in the real economy.

    El Mundo: “Si Grecia no crece, un gobierno de SYRIZA no pagará la deuda” (21 January 2015)

  • Greece gives EU the chance to rediscover its social responsibility

    http://www.wbs.ac.uk/about/person/marianna-fotaki

    The European Union should not be afraid of Syriza winning the Greek election, but see it as a chance to rediscover its founding principle - the social dimension that created it and without which it cannot survive.

    Greece’s entire economy accounts for three per cent of the euro zone’s output but its national debt totals €360 billion or 175 per cent of the country’s GDP and poses a continuous threat to its survival. While the crippling debt cannot realistically be paid back in full, the troika of the EU, European Central Bank, and IMF insist that the drastic cuts in public spending must continue. But if Syriza is successful – as the polls suggest – it promises to renegotiate the terms of the bailout and ask for substantial debt forgiveness, which could change the terms of the debate about the future of the European project.

    It would also mean the important, but as yet, unaddressed question of who should bear the costs and risks of the monetary union within and between the euro zone countries is likely to become the centrepiece of such negotiations.

    The immense social cost of the austerity policies demanded by the troika has put in question the political and social objectives of an ‘ever closer union’ proclaimed in the EU founding documents. Formally established through the Treaty of Rome in 1957, the European Economic Community between France, Germany, Italy and the Benelux countries tied closely the economies of erstwhile foes, rendering the possibility of another disastrous war unaffordable. Yet the ultimate goal of integration was to bring about ‘the constant improvements of the living and working conditions of their peoples’.

    The European project has been exceptionally successful in achieving peaceful collaboration and prosperity by progressively extending these stated benefits to an increasing number of member countries, with the EU now being the world’s largest economy. Since the economic crisis of 2007, however, GDP per capita and gross disposable household incomes have declined across the EU and have not yet returned to their pre-crisis levels in many countries. Unemployment is at record high levels, with Greece and Spain topping the numbers of long-term unemployed youth.

    There are also deep inequalities within the euro zone. Strong economies that are major exporters have benefitted from free trade and the fixed exchange rate mechanism protecting their goods from price fluctuations, but the euro has hurt the least competitive economies by depriving them of a currency flexibility that could have been used to respond to the crisis.

    Without substantial transfers between weaker and stronger economies, which accounts for only 1.13 per cent of the EU’s budget at present, there is no effective mechanism for risk sharing among the member states and for addressing the consequences of the crisis in the euro zone.

    But the EU was founded on the premise of solidarity and not as a free trade zone only. Economic growth was regarded as a means for achieving desirable political and social goals through the process of painstaking institution building. With 500 million citizens and a combined GDP of €12.9 trillion in 2012 shared among its 27 members the EU is better placed than ever to live up to its founding principles. The member states that benefitted from the common currency should lead in offering meaningful support rather than decimating their weaker members in a time of crisis by forcing austerity measures upon them.

    This is not denying the responsibility for reckless borrowing resting with the successive Greek governments and their supporters. However, the logic of a collective punishment of the most vulnerable groups of the population must be rejected. The old poor and the rapidly growing new poor comprise significant sections of Greek society: 20 per cent of children live in poverty, while Greece’s unemployment rate has topped 20 per cent for four consecutive years now and reached almost 27 per cent in 2013. With youth unemployment above 50 per cent, many well-educated people have left the country. There is no access to free health care and the weak social safety net from before the crisis has all but disappeared. The dramatic welfare retrenchment combined with unemployment has led to austerity induced suicides and people searching for food in garbage cans in cities.

    A continued commitment to the policies that have produced such outcomes in the name of increasing the EU’s competitiveness challenges the terms of the European Union’s founding principles. The creditors often rationalize this using a rhetoric that assumes tax-evading unproductive Greeks brought this predicament upon themselves – they are seen as the undeserving members of the euro zone. Such reasoning creates an unhealthy political climate that gives rise to extremist nationalist movements in the EU such as the Greek criminal Golden Dawn party, which gained almost 10 per cent of votes in the last European Parliament elections.

    Explaining the euro zone debt crisis as a morality tale is both deleterious and untrue. The problematic nature of such moralistic logic must be challenged: one cannot easily justify on ethical grounds forcing the working poor to bail out a banking system from which many wealthy people benefit, or transferring the consequences of reckless lending by commercial outlets to the public. Nor can one explain the acquiescence of creditors to the machinations of the nepotistic self-serving corrupt elites dominating the state over the last 40 years that got Greece into the euro zone on false data and continue to rule it. As I have argued, the bailout money was given to the very people who are largely responsible for the crisis, while the general population of Greece is being made to suffer.

    Greece’s voters are determined to stop the ruling classes from continuing their nefarious policies that have brought the country to the brink of catastrophe, but in the coming elections their real concern will be opposing the sacrifice of the futures of an entire generation.

    #grèce

  • Grèce : le FMI suspend son aide à la Grèce jusqu’à la formation d’un futur gouvernement - RFI
    http://www.rfi.fr/contenu/ticker/grece-le-fmi-suspend-son-aide-grece-jusqu-formation-futur-gouvernement

    Le Fonds monétaire international a annoncé que le versement de la prochaine tranche d’aide à la Grèce était suspendue à la formation d’un nouveau gouvernement, après les élections législatives anticipées, fin janvier.

  • The International Monetary Fund and the #Ebola outbreak - The Lancet Global Health
    http://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(14)70377-8/fulltext

    Christine Lagarde peut bien, comme ses prédécesseurs, dire que la santé est prioritaire dans les actions du #FMI, la réalité est que les “conditionnalités” de son organisation ont contribué à détruire les systèmes de #santé du Sierra Leone, de la Guinée et du Liberia.

    Here we review the policies advocated by the IMF before the outbreak, and examine their effect on the three health systems. The information was extracted from the IMF archives of lending agreements covering the years 1990–2014.

    First, economic reform programmes by the IMF have required reductions in government spending, prioritisation of debt service, and bolstering of foreign exchange reserves. Such policies have often been extremely strict, absorbing funds that could be directed to meeting pressing health challenges. (...)

    Second, to keep government spending low, the IMF often requires caps on the public-sector wage bill—and thus funds to hire or adequately remunerate doctors, nurses, and other health-care professionals. Such limits are “often set without consideration of the impact on expenditures in priority areas”, and have been linked to emigration of health personnel. In Sierra Leone, for example, IMF-mandated policies explicitly sought the reduction of public sector employment. Between 1995 and 1996, the IMF required the retrenchment of 28% of government employees (...)

    Third, the IMF has long advocated decentralisation of health-care systems. The idea is to make care more responsive to local needs. Yet, in practice, this approach can make it difficult to mobilise coordinated, central responses to disease outbreaks. (...)

    All these effects are cumulative, contributing to the lack of preparedness of health systems to cope with infectious disease outbreaks and other emergencies.

  • It’s official: America is now No. 2 - MarketWatch
    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/its-official-america-is-now-no-2-2014-12-04

    The International Monetary Fund recently released the latest numbers for the world economy. And when you measure national economic output in “real” terms of goods and services, China will this year produce $17.6 trillion — compared with $17.4 trillion for the U.S.A.

    As recently as 2000, we produced nearly three times as much as the Chinese.

    To put the numbers slightly differently, China now accounts for 16.5% of the global economy when measured in real purchasing-power terms, compared with 16.3% for the U.S.

    This latest economic earthquake follows the development last year when China surpassed the U.S. for the first time in terms of global trade.

    #chine