organization:knesset

  • MK Ghattas: the Flotilla is peaceful, let them remove my immunity
    June 24, 2015
    http://www.maannews.com/Content.aspx?id=766130

    BETHLEHEM (Ma’an) — Arab MK Basel Ghattas said this week that threats by fellow Israeli lawmakers to remove his parliamentary immunity will not affect his decision to take part in the Freedom Flotilla III.

    The Israeli Knesset Committee reportedly voted in favor Tuesday of stripping Ghattas, a member of the Joint List— the Arab parliamentary bloc that won 13 Knesset seats in Israel’s last election— of his immunity from prosecution for joining the the protest flotilla.

    The Flotilla is the third of it’s kind to attempt to access the Gaza Strip by sea since 2010, aiming break the Israeli blockade with a convoy of ships carrying human rights activists, European lawmakers, Ghattas, and others.

    Israeli Culture and Sport Minister Miri Regev- member of Netanyahu’s Likud party- demanded earlier this week that Ghattas’ immunity be removed if he joined the flotilla.

    “We must end the use of the position of MK as a tool to undermine the government. Its time to instill order, and prevent Arab MKs from inciting against Israel,” Israeli news source Ynet reported Regev writing to an attorney general.

    Ghattas told Ma’an that Miri Regev’s statement represents Israeli racist rightist parties, saying “let them remove the immunity.”

    #Flotille_lll #Marianne #GAZA

  • Israël : la députée arabe Zoabi se rend aux USA pour une conférence sur l’"Apartheid israélien" | i24news - Voir plus loin
    http://www.i24news.tv/fr/actu/international/moyen-orient/74974-150615-israel-la-deputee-arabe-zoabi-se-rend-aux-usa-pour-une-conferen

    La commission de la Knesset a autorisé son voyage, affirmant qu’elle n’était pas un élément de censure

    A peine quelques semaines après l’investiture de la 20e Knesset, la député arabe israélienne Hanin Zoabi, qui n’en est pas à son premier scandale a été autorisée par le Parlement israélien à se rendre aux Etats-Unis pour assister à une conférence sur l’"apartheid mené par Israël", a rapporté le site israélien Walla lundi.

    « Israël est un projet de conquête raciste », a déclaré Zoabi de la liste arabe unie, aux côtés d’une assemblée d’organisations palestiniennes venues de l’étranger.

    Le comité d’éthique de la Knesset s’est de son côté défendu en affirmant qu’il n’était pas un outil de « censure politique », et n’avait pas son mot à dire sur les visites des députés.

    Voyageant avec l’approbation de la Knesset pour assister à la conférence intitulée « Israël, le racisme et l’apartheid » - selon les informations obtenues par Walla, elle s’est rendue aux USA pendant huit jours, grâce à des « financements émanant d’entités étrangères », et accompagnant deux organisations, le PACC (acronyme pour Palestinian American Community Center), et l’association des amis de la Palestine à Harvard.

    Zoabi, qui a participé à plusieurs séminaires de l’évènement, a attaqué ouvertement Israël. « En Israël, les Arabes sont considérés comme Palestiniens. Mais moi, je ne peux pas me considérer comme une ’Palestinienne’. En réalité, l’occupation nous oblige à renoncer à notre identité. L’occupation nous oblige à nous sentir et nous faire appeler Israéliens, mais nous ne le sommes pas en termes de droits, ni en termes de confiance », a accusé Zoabi.

    « Israël n’a pas seulement des lois racistes, mais aussi discriminatoire d’un point de vue économique. Selon la loi israélienne, l’égalité est illégale. »

    #Illégalité_légale

  • Who cares if she’s beautiful? Ayelet Shaked is dangerous
    Because the sexist attacks on Israel’s new justice minister have been so vile, the public debate has been hijacked by gender politics, and Shaked has been spared much of the criticism she rightly deserves.
    By Asher Schechter | May 14, 2015 Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/israel/.premium-1.656490

    The Justice Ministry doesn’t usually garner much interest among Israelis. It is, after all, a mid-level prize, modest compared to more lucrative ministerial posts like Defense, Finance and Foreign Affairs. However the announcement last week that Ayelet Shaked of Habayit Hayehudi would be Israel’s new justice minister seems to have struck a raw nerve.

    Reactions to her appointment were extreme, to say the least. Many responded with shock and fear, voicing concerns that a right-wing extremist who in the past has entertained quasi-genocidal thoughts will now be in charge of Israel’s entire justice system. A great many others chose to rebuke Shaked for her looks, instead of her politics.

    “Finally, we have a Justice Minister worthy of being featured on calendars in auto repair shops,” cracked former cabinet minister and Knesset member Joseph Paritsky on Facebook. In a later interview, Paritsky quipped that she was “as beautiful as the women of the Reich.”

    Paritsky’s comments, sadly, were not the only ones referring to Shaked’s looks. A gossip item in Israeli newspaper Yediot Aharonot told of a visit Shaked and her husband made to a hotel pool during a family outing. “Unfortunately for the others holiday makers,” the item concluded, Shaked remained clothed.”

    The sexist attacks on Shaked eventually led Meretz leader Zehava Galon and Meretz MK Michal Rozin to uncharacteristically rush to Shaked’s defense, forsaking for a short while their vehement criticism of her extremist ideology for a vehement defense of her as a woman.

    “I am fed up with all of the sexist and misogynist comments regarding Ayelet Shaked,” wrote Galon in a hugely viral Facebook post that also described the incoming minister as an “intelligent and hard-working politician with nationalist anti-democratic views.|”

    The problem is, in the great hullabaloo over Shaked’s sexist detractors, her “nationalist anti-democratic views” have been glossed over to a great extent. Because the sexist attacks regarding her looks have been so vile, the public debate has been hijacked by gender politics, and in the process, Shaked has been spared much of the criticism she rightly deserves.

    Indeed, to many Israelis, the idea of Shaked as justice minister is downright frightening. And it has nothing to do with her looks. It’s got everything to do, however, with her unyielding extremism.

    A rather obscure (but combative) right-wing activist up until a few years ago and the only secular woman in the otherwise religious Zionist party led by Naftali Bennett, Shaked has entered politics with the outspokenness and indignation of an activist. Among other things, she is one of the originators of the so-called “nation-state bill” that aims to turn Israel’s democratic values into unwanted subordinates of its Jewish identity. One of the major pieces of legislation she intends to promote as minister is her own so-called “NGO bill,” which limits the donations received by human rights groups and other left-wing organizations.

    In July, Shaked made international headlines when she took to Facebook to share an inflammatory article by the late right-wing journalist Uri Elitzur that called for the indiscriminate killing of Palestinians “including the mothers of the martyrs, who send them to hell with flowers and kisses” — and referred to Palestinian children as “little snakes.”

    Distorted views

    To have a person who entertains, however briefly, thoughts of indiscriminate killing, that promotes Jewishness over democracy, thereby admitting the two are mutually exclusive, in charge of the Israeli judicial system? That’s a scary thought indeed.

    But her extremism is not the only reason the prospect of her as justice minister is worrisome to many. It is also her distorted, dangerous views regarding the Israeli justice system, her repeated promises to act on those views and her new capacity as chair of the powerful and secretive Ministerial Committee for Legislation, which decides which bills are allowed onto the Knesset floor and is a perfect graveyard to bury unwanted bills. As chair of the committee, she won’t be able to make or break a bill on her own, but she’ll have enormous influence on the fate of legislation, and therefore on the actual functioning of Israeli democracy. What this means for gay rights legislation, some of which Shaked spoke against before, is anyone’s guess.

    She also harbors an intense dislike of Israel’s judiciary, specifically the Supreme Court. Shaked has never hidden her views on the Israeli legal system, or her intention of curbing its power and independence. Shaked and her party leader, incoming Education Minister Naftali Bennet, have repeatedly said in the past that Israel’s judges are too powerful and too left-wing and have to be reined in. One of Shaked’s major pieces of legislation during the last Knesset term was a bill aimed at allowing the Knesset to override the Supreme Court and reenact laws that the court disqualified. As justice minister, she is expected to push for a reform that would change the process by which judges are selected and move as much of the decision-making as possible to the Knesset.

    This Tuesday Shaked sounded a conciliatory tone, saying “we are proud of our Supreme Court. It is among the world’s leading high courts, and its justices are outstanding.” Between judicial activism and judicial restraint, Shaked said she prefers “the conservative approach.” That’s as incendiary as she got, but it’s hard to imagine her detractors, who fear she will turn out to be a zealous minister persecuting human rights and religious freedoms and irreparably politicizing the justice system to suit her (and the right wing’s) needs, will be appeased by this.

    The real damage?

    Of course, as extreme as Shaked is, her views regarding the Supreme Court and her plans for it are not very new, and little is likely to actually change in this respect any time soon. The right wing has been trying to erode the Supreme Court’s independence and reform the judge-selection process for its own purposes for many years now, and so far its success can been measured in small increments. Daniel Friedman, Ehud Olmert’s justice minister, shared many of Shaked’s views regarding the justice system, yet the judicial selection process hasn’t changed.

    The truth is, it’s much harder to change the Israeli justice system than it may seem, and with designated Finance Minister Moshe Kahlon resisting many of the proposed changes to the Supreme Court, Shaked likely lacks the political muscle to force radical reforms.

    What’s more, the truth is, Israel’s Supreme Court is not the bastion of left-wing elitism Shaked makes it out to be. The image of the interventionist, ultra-left Supreme Court is one of the most enduring myths of Israeli politics. In fact, it regularly rules in favor of the government on security matters, and is a great enabler of Jewish ethnocracy in Israel.

    That doesn’t mean Shaked as justice minister is not a worrying prospect, or that she is not dangerous, just that she will most likely not lead a vast revolution of the Israeli justice system.

    Most likely, like her predecessors, she’ll just bring the system closer to the extreme right by another small increment. That small increment, though, might be slightly bigger than the rest.

  • Avant même que son government soit officiellement nommé, Netanyahu veut changer la Loi fondamentale d’Israël afin d’élargir son cabinet et de nommer des ministres sans portefeuille et vices ministres. Il faut contenter tout le monde…

    Les petits partis de la coalition sont les premiers servis, et reçoivent la part du lion. Sans eux, Netanyahou ne peut conserver son poste de premier ministre.

    Foyer juif : ministères de la justice, de l’Education, de l’agriculture et de la diaspora,
    Kulanu : ministères des Finances, du logement et de l’environnement,
    Shas : ministères de l’Economie, des affaires religieuses, du développement de la Galilée et du Negev,
    United Torah Judaism : ministère de la Santé ;

    Yair Lapid (Yesh Atid) veut saisir la Haute Cour de justice si la demande de Netanyahou est approuvée par l’actuel cabinet ministériel, au motif qu’un government de transition ne peut proposer des amendements à la Loi fondamentale.

    Par ailleurs, si cet amendement passe, il doit être également approuvé par la Knesset (en session plénière) . Tout doit se faire à une vitesse éclair. Si l’amendement n’est pas approuvé, la coalition peut s’effondrer, et un autre député peut être nommé afin de former une nouvelle coalition.

    Netanyahou s’est bien gardé de distribuer des portefeuilles aux membres du Likoud avant ce vote fatidique, afin d’éliminer tout scénario dans lequel des députés déçus du Likoud pourraient s’abstenir.

    Merveilleux scénario digne d’une série tv américaine.

    With coalition on the line, Netanyahu’s cabinet approves proposal to expand government - Israel - Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/israel/.premium-1.655719

    Amendment to Basic Law would enable Netanyahu to appoint ministers without portfolio and increase the number of deputy ministers in the next coalition ; if Knesset rejects bill, coalition likely to dissolve.

    • Eh bien voilà, Netanyahou a encore gagné, et la corruption avec. Il est vrai qu’il n’y a rien de nouveau sous le soleil, mais on veut toujours espérer, c’est fou, cette manie d’espérer...
      http://www.haaretz.com/news/israel/.premium-1.655874
      High Court rejects bid to block Netanyahu’s proposal to expand cabinet
      Knesset to debate amendment, which would enable Netanyahu to appoint ministers without portfolio and increase the number of deputy ministers in the next coalition.

    • Du coup, Bennett recevra probablement un budget de 50 millions de shekels pour les implantations, ce malgré l’appel du Procureur général à mettre fin au financement dispendieux des colonies.
      Et la législation limitant les donations étrangères aux ONG risque aussi de passer.

      Une nouvelle ère s’annonce pour la société « démocratique » juive et blanche israélienne. ...

  • Former MK Azmi Bishara wants to return to Israel, but fears unfair trial - Israel - Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/israel/.premium-1.655655

    Bishara, who fled to Qatar and is suspected of treason and espionage, gave a rare interview to local media.

    Azmi Bishara, the former Knesset member who fled to Qatar amid allegations that he had passed information to Hezbollah in Lebanon, says he will not be returning to Israel in the near future because he will not get a fair trial here and he still feels persecuted by the defense establishment.

    Speaking yesterday on Radio Ashams, which broadcasts from Nazareth, Bishara said that if it depended on him personally he would return to his homeland, friends and family but he does not see this happening in the foreseeable future. The program was aired to mark the 20th anniversary of the establishment of the political party Balad, which Bishara founded, and which is today part of the Joint Arab List.

    Lately, Bishara has rarely spoken to the media in Israel, including the Arab media, instead conveying his messages in articles or interviews to Al-Jazeera. Until the Arab Spring, Bishara was considered a senior commentator in the Arab world. Residing in Qatar, he toed the Qatari line in support of the Syrian rebels, which brought him into conflict with pro-Syrian-regime elements.

    Bishara explained that his opposition to the regime stems from his support for the democratic camp and the Syrian people, who initially came out, as was the case in Tunisia and Egypt, with a call for democracy and freedom. “I never supported radical and Salafi groups who view anyone different from them as infidels. But I explained even at the beginning of the events in Syria that the conduct of the regime and opening fire on people calling non-violently for change and freedom would lead to the arming and strengthening of those radical groups,” he said. According to the former MK, the situation in Syria today requires a political solution that would include the basis of the regime, to maintain the state institutions, “otherwise Syria will break apart like Somalia,” he said.

    Bishara said it is clear that Israel’s new coalition is not heading for peace and that the continued closure of Gaza will lead to another conflict, with the Palestinian Authority keeping a lid on protest in the West Bank.

    Bishara, who founded and runs a research institute in Doha, Qatar, is considered close to that country’s rulers, which also allows him to send funding to social affairs and sports associations, including the Nazareth soccer team Ahi Nazrat, which recently received a grant of half a million dollars from the Qataris.

  • Le nouveau ministre israélien de la Justice, une candidate génocidaire
    http://www.pourlapalestine.be/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1975:le-nouveau-ministr

    Un symbole éloquent de ce nouveau glissement vers l’extrême-extrême-droite (sans Avigdor Lieberman !) est l’attribution du portefeuille de la Justice et de la présidence de la Commission des lois de la Knesset (parlement israélien) au parti fasciste de Naftali Bennett, « Le Foyer Juif ». Et, au sein de ce parti, celle qui hérite de ce portefeuille n’est pas n’importe qui : il s’agit de Ayelet Shaked, députée qui en juillet 2014, pendant que l’armée israélienne se livrait à un massacre aveugle de civils, avait lancé via Facebook un vibrant appel à l’extermination de toutes les mères palestiniennes, et à vrai dire de la totalité de la population, vieillards et enfants compris.

    C’est le 1er juillet, un jour avant qu’un jeune Palestinien de Jérusalem soit enlevé par des extrémistes sionistes et brûlé vif, que Ayelet Shaked avait proclamé que « la totalité du peuple palestinien est l’ennemi » et avait appelé à sa destruction « y compris les vieillards et les femmes, ses villes et ses villages, ses propriétés et ses infrastructures ». En d’autres termes, un génocide accompagné d’une guerre d’anéantissement digne de « l’opération Barbarossa ».

    #Ayelet_Shaked

  • Cisjordanie : 2026 structures construites sur des « terres palestiniennes privées » | Publié 04 Mai 2015
    http://www.i24news.tv/fr/actu/international/moyen-orient/69935-150504-cisjordanie-2026-structures-construites-sur-des-terres-palestin

    L’ONU se plaint de l’arrestation d’un Palestinien de 9 ans et fustige le « mauvais traitement » des mineurs

    Quelques 2 026 structures en Cisjordanie ont été construites sur des terres palestiniennes privées, selon une étude menée par l’organisation de droite Regavim et soumise aux membres de la Knesset dimanche.

    Le parlement israélien doit délibérer sur une législation visant à exproprier les terres des propriétaires palestiniens en échange de réparations, or Regavim affirme que sa mission est de « préserver les terres nationales. »

    Le député du Foyer Juif, Bezalel Smotrich cherche à contrer un ordre de la Cour suprême qui prévoit d’évacuer l’avant-poste d’Amona, et de démolir neuf maisons dans l’implantation d’Ofra. Selon Smotrich, ces démolitions pourraient engendrer un effondrement du gouvernement de coalition.

    Selon le rapport de Regavim, cité par la chaîne israélienne Arutz Sheva, les 2026 structures situées sur des terres palestiniennes privées comprennent 1232 maisons permanentes et 794 mobil-homes. Environ 1.500 familles vivent dans ces structures.

    De son côté, l’Autorité palestinienne a porté plainte auprès du Conseil de sécurité des Nations Unies, après qu’un garçon de 9 ans, de Jérusalem-Est a été arrêté par la police la semaine dernière. Le mineur, issu du quartier de Wadi Joz a été détenu pendant huit heures après avoir jeté des pierres sur un bus. Son grand-frère de 12 ans a également été arrêté lors de l’incident.

    L’ambassadeur palestinien à l’ONU, Riyad Mansour, a envoyé une lettre au président du Conseil de sécurité vendredi dernier, se plaignant du « traitement par Israël d’enfants palestiniens de Cisjordanie et de Jérusalem-Est ». Mansour a affirmé que l’enfant a été interrogé pendant des heures sans ses parents en soient informés, et sans recevoir de la nourriture ou de l’eau.

    « L’arrestation arbitraire d’un enfant de moins de 12 est illégale et Israël a violé la norme internationale », a écrit Mansour.

    Selon la loi, les enfants de moins de 12 ans - l’âge de la responsabilité pénale - ne peuvent pas être arrêtés ou détenus.

    Même en relisant plusieurs fois, difficile de comprendre qui va être exproprier, « une législation visant à exproprier les terres des propriétaires palestiniens en échange de réparations » ça doit être des colons .

  • 2,026 settlement homes built on private Palestinian land, right-wing study finds - Israel - Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/israel/1.654698

    Some 2,026 structures in the West Bank were built on privately owned Palestinian land, according to a study conducted by the right-wing organization Regavim and submitted to Knesset members ahead of deliberations on legislation aimed at expropriating land from Palestinian owners.

    Regavim claims that its mission is to “preserve national lands.” Until the recent election, it was run by Bezalel Smotrich, who has since joined Knesset on the Habayit Hayehudi roster. One of Smotrich’s primary goals in the Knesset will be passing legislation to expropriate land from Palestinian owners in exchange for reparations.

    Smotrich will seek to pass such legislation before December 2015, the date on which the Supreme Court has ordered the government to evacuate the Amona outpost, and demolish nine houses in the settlement Ofra. Smotrich has even stated that demolishing the Amona outpost could likely cause a governing coalition to collapse. When similar legislation was passed in 2012, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu thwarted it out of fear that it would lead to prosecution in the International Criminal Court in The Hague.

    Regavim supports the proposed legislation, claiming that demolishing a house or two would not solve the problem, which it says is much larger. The organization conducted a study, examining aerial photographs of private Palestinian land, which it then submitted to Habayit Hayehudi chairman Naftali Bennett and Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein (Likud). According to the report, the 2,026 structures located on private Palestinian land include 1,232 permanent homes and 794 mobile homes. Roughly 1,500 families live in these structures. The study was first reported by Arutz Sheva.

    The settlements mentioned in the report include Ofra with 530 houses, Beit El with 289, Eli with 166, Mechmesh with 133, Elon Moreh with 128, Psagot with 98, Kochav Ya’akov with 83, Kedumim with 71, Kokhav Hashahar with 65, Neve Tzuf with 52, Otniel with 47, Shavei Shomron with 45, Mitzpeh Yeriho with 45, Yitzhar with 43, Maon with 34, Tapuah with 27, Adam with 25, Beit Hagai with 25, Susya with 23, Neve Daniel with 19, Tekoa with 17, Har Bracha with 15, Nokdim with 15, Pnei Haver with 13, Ma’ale Amos with five houses, and Kedar with seven.

  • Why we took to the streets: Ethiopian Israelis who refuse to stay silent - Israel - Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/israel/.premium-1.654786

    Protesting what they say is police brutality toward Israeli Ethiopians, hundreds of demonstrators took to the streets of Tel Aviv on Sunday afternoon, blocking traffic on major arteries and junctions.

    Following a standoff with police outside a major intersection in the city, the protestors succeeded in circumventing security blocks and accessing the main Tel Aviv–Jerusalem highway, bringing traffic to a complete half in both directions at the height of rush hour.

    Sunday’s demonstration followed a protest in Jerusalem on Thursday, which culminated in violent clashes between police and the Ethiopian demonstrators.

    Both protests were prompted by an incident early last week, in which police were caught on video assaulting an Ethiopian soldier who did not move immediately upon their request. (The police were trying to clear the area around him because of a suspicious object.)

    Joining the Israeli Ethiopians at today’s protest were hundreds of supporters, including social activists, youth movement participants, and Knesset members from various parties on the center and left.

    Many of the protestors said they had come to demonstrate not only against police brutality but also against what they say is pervasive racism in Israeli society. Last week’s incident, they said, was the trigger.

    Several of the demonstrators explained to Haaretz what brought them out into the streets of Tel Aviv.

    Dana Sibaho, a 29-year-old bookkeeper from the southern town of Netivot, who immigrated to Israel in 1991.

    “We have long been the punching bag and scapegoat for everything in this country. People say that they’re with us, that they brought us here. They didn’t bring us here. We came because of Zionism, not like others who came for economic benefits. When you’re a Zionist, you believe with a full heart that this is your country.

    "Our forefathers lived here, and we also have the right to live here. But what is going on now is simply a catastrophe. It is racism for the sake of racism. You look for a job today, and even if you’re the best around, there’s a price. Your color carries a price.

    "But we will not stay silent any longer. We are not our parents’ generation, who kept quiet, kept their heads down and said ‘amen’ to everything. That period is over. We are a new generation fighting for our rights.

    "We are the first to volunteer for the elite units in the military. I personally know many in the community who’ve already fought in three wars. And the state – what it does it tell them to do? Pardon the expression, but it tells them to go stick it you know where. “


    Dana Sibaho.

    Yoav Gared, a 26-year-old former member of the Givati brigade from Beit Shemesh.

    “We’ve come not only because of police violence, but also because of the racism in society here. We feel it in the workplace and in the neighborhood.

    "The important thing is getting the following message out to the entire nation of Israel: We will not stay silent any longer. We will not accept violence any longer – not from the police and not from anyone else. I personally have never been a victim of police violence, but I’ve witnessed other members of the community who have been.”


    Yoav Gared.

    Getenet (last name withheld), a 40-year-old from the West Bank town of Ariel, who immigrated to Israel in 1984.

    “I’m here today out of solidarity with that soldier who was beaten up. A soldier in uniform doesn’t deserve to get what he got. A soldier in uniform deserves to be respected and appreciated. But it’s not just that. That was the spark that triggered it all, but there are many young Ethiopians who are sitting in jail today for nothing. No reason at all. It’s painful. I took a day off work for this because it’s so important for me to make my voice heard.”

    Getenet.

    Maya Tzagay, a 19-year-old soldier, from Netanya, who was born in Israel.

    “There are too many instances of racism against our community. We kept quiet and kept quiet, and because of that, people who were victims of police violence ended up killing themselves. The boy who was beat up last week, you can see on the video that he didn’t do anything. He was beaten up for nothing, and it’s really enraging.

    "What we’re doing now has nothing to do with what’s going on in Baltimore. They have their issues. We have ours. But we understand them – we both suffer from racism. There, it’s more extreme. People were murdered by police. Here they just got beaten up. Who knows? Maybe somebody was killed by police here, and we don’t even know about it.

    "In any event, we will not be silent any longer. It can’t be that our blood is only good for fighting wars.”


    Maya Tzagay.

    Itay Kefale, a 29 year old from Bat Yam, near Tel Aviv, who immigrated to Israel in 2005.

    “I’m here because I want to bring about change, God willing, to the new generation. What happened last week with the Ethiopian soldier, we don’t deserve that. So I came here so that my voice would also be heard and so that in the future, what happened to our brother doesn’t happen to my son and to your son. Enough already.”


    Itay Kefale.

    Zemene Melesse, a 46-year-old singer from the ultra-Orthodox town of Bnei Brak, who immigrated to Israel in 1991. 

    “I’m here because of the racism against the Ethiopian community. For years, we’ve suffered from this racism, at work, when we go out, everywhere. When I get on stage at clubs, the police immediately interfere. They ask to see our identification cards. They try to get us to stop playing. What’s happening here today has nothing to do with what’s happening in Baltimore, but as a black man, I identify with them.”

    Zemene Melesse.

    Eli Malasa, a 33-year-old from Netivot, who immigrated to Israel in 1999.

    “Why am I here? Because of the police who beat us and open files on us. They get promoted on our backs. Whenever they see us hanging out together, having a good time, drinking a little, laughing, they have to break it up and beat us up. They don’t ask questions. They don’t tell us to be quiet. They just beat us up.

    "My whole life, wherever I’ve been, that’s been the story. I’m a truck driver, but they took away my license from me, and now I have no work. My brother was beaten to a pulp by them. We don’t even know why, but he’s not willing to do anything now. Not even leave the house. They ruined his life.”

    Eli Malasa.

    #Juifs-Ethiopiens

  • Entre le marteau et l’enclume.
    Les Arabes israéliens, sommés de s’identifier au récit juif et sioniste pour devenir des citoyens à part entière. En Israël, le mois d’avril est riche en commémorations nationale : Jour de l’indépendance, Jour de la Shoah, Journée du Souvenir des soldats tombés pour la défense d’Israël.
    Comment un Arabe israélien peut-il s’identifier ?
    « Toutes les histoires nationales me touchent. Mais pour s’identifier véritablement aux histoires de l’Holocauste, nous devons lutter contre le racisme et la persécution des minorités. Et ce n’est pas du tout le cas en Israël. C’est douloureux », explique Ayman Odeh.

    « Les juifs n’ont pas le sentiment d’être une majorité. La plupart sont forts, mais ils ont peur, et cela est terrible pour la minorité, ajoute le chef de file de la Liste arabe unie à la Knesset… Il y a quelque chose de psychologique dans la Knesset. Dans chaque coin, il y a un symbole de la nation, mais il n’y a presque aucun symbole civique. »

    Israeli Arab leader strives to teach Netanyahu something about suffering - National - Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/.premium-1.653396

    Between Holocaust Remembrance Day and Independence Day, Israel’s week of national holidays, Joint Arab List chief Ayman Odeh felt suffocated in the Knesset. State symbols watched him from all sides — the flag, the menorah, Theodor Herzl — and he felt excluded by them all.

    “There’s something psychological here. In every corner of the Knesset there’s a symbol of the nation, but there are almost no civic symbols. There are no pictures of the country’s landscapes, nature, Arabs and Jews together,” he says.

    “It seems the Jews don’t feel like a majority. Most of the Jews are strong, but they’re also afraid, and that’s awful for the minority. When there’s a majority that feels like a minority and is strong but feels weak and threatened, we pay the price.”

    Odeh has started his first Knesset term heading the grouping that contains four Arab parties in an artificial marriage. The goal was to eclipse the increased 3.25-percent electoral threshold, which the party did with ease — its 13 seats make it the Knesset’s third largest party.

    If Isaac Herzog’s Zionist Union enters a unity government — he insists he won’t — Odeh will probably become Israel’s first-ever Arab opposition leader. He was actually supposed to enter the Knesset before the election and replace Mohammed Barakeh as head of the Arab-Jewish Hadash party, but the vote was moved up to March 17.

    Alongside his 10-year plan to reduce inequality between Jews and Arabs, Odeh wants to help the poor and have the unrecognized Bedouin communities in the Negev recognized. He also wants to increase funding for Arab culture. He has already spoken with key Likud MK Zeev Elkin.

    “I told him: ‘The opposition rarely manages to pass bills when you’re coalition whip, so tell me what you can accept.’ He told me Jews should learn Arabic starting in the first grade. I said: ‘Okay, I’ll propose it.’”

    Before the swearing-in ceremony at the Knesset, Joint Arab List MKs had to decide whether to stand during the singing of the national anthem, which talks about “the Jewish soul.”

    “There was an argument in the party,” says Odeh. He says he asked the other MKs to treat it as an official ceremony and not walk out. In the end, no agreement was reached and Odeh and the other Hadash MKs remained along with Osama Saadia of Ta’al, a component of the Arab ticket. The others left.

    Odeh says that for nearly two weeks he argued with himself over whether to stay. “Sometimes I regret I stayed, sometimes not,” he says.

    After the swearing-in, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech was out of touch and nationalist, as if it came out of history 3,000 years ago, Odeh says, adding that Netanyahu spoke so heatedly he was more like an actor.

    A week ago Odeh took part in the Holocaust Remembrance Day ceremony. This time he left before the national anthem, but not because of it. “I’ve read ‘The Diary of Anne Frank’ — and also it hurts me how [a Holocaust survivor] collapsed during the Eichmann trial,” he says.

    “All nations’ stories touch me. But to identify in a true and deep way with the stories about the Holocaust, we must fight racism and the persecution of minorities. And that’s not what’s happening in this country. It hurts.”

    Odeh says Netanyahu backs racist laws and wants to discard democracy. He says he has greater credibility talking about the Holocaust than Netanyahu because he’s fighting racism and represents a minority that seeks cooperation based on respect.

    Odeh is due to meet Netanyahu soon, a meeting he says he learned about in the newspapers. Even though he considers the tête–à–tête a media exercise and the prime minister’s attempt to put out the fires he set on Election Day, Odeh asked his MKs whether he should attend — and they all said yes.

    “The burden of proof is on Bibi,” Odeh adds. “He needs to convince us he wants a serious meeting.”

    Odeh will also be meeting with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in the next two weeks, as well as with President Reuven Rivlin and Fatah leader Marwan Barghouti, who is serving five life terms for terror activity.

    Regarding the criticism that Israeli Arab leaders worry more about the Palestinians than their own voters, Odeh says he wants to lead the battle here in Israel. But he also believes that real equality will be only be possible by solving the Palestinian issue, because the country of which he’s a citizen is at war with the people he belongs to.

    “We’re between the hammer and the anvil,” he says.

    Odeh distinguishes between civil rights, which he thinks can be achieved now, and national rights. Issues such as employment for Arab women and public transportation “don’t need to be part of an ideological dispute. As for national rights, we can disagree.”

  • Israeli Arab leader strives to teach Netanyahu something about suffering
    ‘To identify with the stories about the Holocaust, we must fight racism and the persecution of minorities,’ Ayman Odeh says. ’And that’s not what’s happening in this country.’
    By Ofra Edelman | Apr. 26, 2015 Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/.premium-1.653396

    Between Holocaust Remembrance Day and Independence Day, Israel’s week of national holidays, Joint Arab List chief Ayman Odeh felt suffocated in the Knesset. State symbols watched him from all sides — the flag, the menorah, Theodor Herzl — and he felt excluded by them all.

    “There’s something psychological here. In every corner of the Knesset there’s a symbol of the nation, but there are almost no civic symbols. There are no pictures of the country’s landscapes, nature, Arabs and Jews together,” he says.

    “It seems the Jews don’t feel like a majority. Most of the Jews are strong, but they’re also afraid, and that’s awful for the minority. When there’s a majority that feels like a minority and is strong but feels weak and threatened, we pay the price.”

    Odeh has started his first Knesset term heading the grouping that contains four Arab parties in an artificial marriage. The goal was to eclipse the increased 3.25-percent electoral threshold, which the party did with ease — its 13 seats make it the Knesset’s third largest party.

    If Isaac Herzog’s Zionist Union enters a unity government — he insists he won’t — Odeh will probably become Israel’s first-ever Arab opposition leader. He was actually supposed to enter the Knesset before the election and replace Mohammed Barakeh as head of the Arab-Jewish Hadash party, but the vote was moved up to March 17.

    Alongside his 10-year plan to reduce inequality between Jews and Arabs, Odeh wants to help the poor and have the unrecognized Bedouin communities in the Negev recognized. He also wants to increase funding for Arab culture. He has already spoken with key Likud MK Zeev Elkin.

    “I told him: ‘The opposition rarely manages to pass bills when you’re coalition whip, so tell me what you can accept.’ He told me Jews should learn Arabic starting in the first grade. I said: ‘Okay, I’ll propose it.’”

    Before the swearing-in ceremony at the Knesset, Joint Arab List MKs had to decide whether to stand during the singing of the national anthem, which talks about “the Jewish soul.”

    “There was an argument in the party,” says Odeh. He says he asked the other MKs to treat it as an official ceremony and not walk out. In the end, no agreement was reached and Odeh and the other Hadash MKs remained along with Osama Saadia of Ta’al, a component of the Arab ticket. The others left.

    Odeh says that for nearly two weeks he argued with himself over whether to stay. “Sometimes I regret I stayed, sometimes not,” he says.

    After the swearing-in, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech was out of touch and nationalist, as if it came out of history 3,000 years ago, Odeh says, adding that Netanyahu spoke so heatedly he was more like an actor.

    A week ago Odeh took part in the Holocaust Remembrance Day ceremony. This time he left before the national anthem, but not because of it. “I’ve read ‘The Diary of Anne Frank’ — and also it hurts me how [a Holocaust survivor] collapsed during the Eichmann trial,” he says.

    “All nations’ stories touch me. But to identify in a true and deep way with the stories about the Holocaust, we must fight racism and the persecution of minorities. And that’s not what’s happening in this country. It hurts.”

    Odeh says Netanyahu backs racist laws and wants to discard democracy. He says he has greater credibility talking about the Holocaust than Netanyahu because he’s fighting racism and represents a minority that seeks cooperation based on respect.

    Odeh is due to meet Netanyahu soon, a meeting he says he learned about in the newspapers. Even though he considers the tête–à–tête a media exercise and the prime minister’s attempt to put out the fires he set on Election Day, Odeh asked his MKs whether he should attend — and they all said yes.

    “The burden of proof is on Bibi,” Odeh adds. “He needs to convince us he wants a serious meeting.”

    Odeh will also be meeting with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in the next two weeks, as well as with President Reuven Rivlin and Fatah leader Marwan Barghouti, who is serving five life terms for terror activity.

    Regarding the criticism that Israeli Arab leaders worry more about the Palestinians than their own voters, Odeh says he wants to lead the battle here in Israel. But he also believes that real equality will be only be possible by solving the Palestinian issue, because the country of which he’s a citizen is at war with the people he belongs to.

    “We’re between the hammer and the anvil,” he says.

    Odeh distinguishes between civil rights, which he thinks can be achieved now, and national rights. Issues such as employment for Arab women and public transportation “don’t need to be part of an ideological dispute. As for national rights, we can disagree.”

  • Joint Arab List turns down invite from Arab League - National - Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/.premium-1.652757

    Knesset Members of the Joint Arab List decided on Monday to turn down an invitation by the Arab League’s for a meeting at the League’s headquarters in Cairo, saying they would rather focus on issues directly related to the Israeli Arab public.

    After holding consultations, party members said that the timing was not right for such a meeting, but that party would revisit the proposal in the future.

    Despite these official explanations, however, Haaretz has learned that party members were concerned that attending a meeting with the Arab League would draw criticism from their constituents for focusing on foreign affairs rather than urgent domestic issues.

    The Arab League has shown great interest in the Joint Arab List - which has become the third-largest party in the Knesset – and is keen to hear its views on the political developments in Israel.

    The invitation was relayed on Saturday night by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to party leader Ayman Odeh. While the party deliberated on whether to accept the invite, differences emerged between the different parties who make up the list regarding the scope of relations with the Arab world - particularly in the context of the crises in Arab countries such as Syria and Yemen. 

    According to Palestinian sources, a suggestion was made to hold the meeting in Doha, Qatar, rather than in Cairo. This idea, however, was turned down: “Qatar is perceived as a divisive element over which there is no consensus among the Arab Israeli public,” a party member explained. Qatar, the official added, is involved in almost every development in the Arab world, including the situation in Syria. “As far as we’re concerned, the Arab League’s headquarters is in Cairo, and such a visit – if it comes to fruition – should take place there,” the official said.

    This issue and others were discussed in the Joint Arab List’s meeting on Monday. Some members in the list – which is made up of four parties – are wary of Palestinian and Arab attempts to “smother” them. “We receive and hear things as if the List won the prime minister’s office,” said a party MK, “and there is a high level of expectations that is incongruous with Israel’s political map.”

    The party is still awaiting an exact date for a meeting with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. While the premier offered to meet on April 27 – a day before the planned strike over house demolitions in Kafr Kana and Dahamesh – the Joint Arab List prefers to meet as early as this week or postpone the meeting by one week. Postponing the meeting would allow the party to present the prime minister with a working plan rather than hold what would amount to a courtesy meeting.

  • Le yoyo de la politique israélienne : de l’art de ménager la chèvre et le chou en se tirant une balle dans le pied, avant de retourner sa veste, pour sauver les apparences, en vue de réaliser toujours le même but : grignoter des territoires

    Habayit Hayehudi pushing legislation to increase settlement construction - National - Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/.premium-1.650790

    In coalition negotiations with Likud on Monday, Habayit Hayehudi demanded that the new government’s guidelines include support for a bill to alter the Israeli justice system, and an increase in construction of settlements in the West Bank.

    The right-wing, largely religious party tried to advance this legislation in the previous government, but failed.

    Habayit Hayehudi’s representatives in the coalition negotiations demanded the advance of legislation to weaken the judiciary in relation to the Knesset. One of their demands was to enable the Knesset to reenact a law that the High Court of Justice had struck down because it contradicted the Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty.

    They also insisted on reducing the number of Supreme Court judges on the Judicial Appointments Committee and thus increase the influence of the politicians on the panel. The Likud’s representatives said they would examine the request and respond in the next few days.

    Both parties said they were examining how to draft Habayit Hayehudi’s demand to include an increase in settlement construction in the government’s guidelines.

    MK Yariv Levin, a member of Likud’s negotiation team, said he would advance the changes in the Judicial Appointments Committee as part of broader legislation he was planning to change “the face of Israel’s justice system.”

    The two parties also agreed to advance legislation restricting NGOs – in effect, leftist NGOs – from raising funds from foreign states. The final draft submitted by Habayit Hayehudi stipulates that an NGO seeking a tax exemption for a contribution from a foreign state will require the approval of the defense and foreign ministers and the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee.

    Habayit Hayehudi sources said no real progress was made on Monday but they believed Likud was interested in the party’s joining the coalition. During the campaign, Habayit Hayehudi, headed by Naftali Bennett, claimed that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu preferred a coalition with Zionist Union.

    The two sides are scheduled to meet again next Monday.

  • Is Israel ready for the new Arab leader Ayman Odeh? - Opinion - Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.649978

    The rise of Ayman Odeh, head of the Joint List of Arab parties – which became the third-largest faction in the Knesset when it garnered 13 seats in this month’s elections – presents a unique opportunity to improve Jewish-Arab relations in Israel.

    This week, Odeh led a four-day march by Bedouin of the Negev and their supporters to the Jerusalem residence of President Reuven Rivlin. In the president’s absence (he was attending the funeral of the first prime minister of Singapore) Odeh presented an alternative plan for Bedouin resettlement in the Negev to Mrs. Rivlin.

    In making the issue of unrecognized Bedouin villages his first priority since the elections, Odeh’s message was not just that he cares about Bedouin children who have no plumbing or electricity, but that under his leadership Arab Knesset members will put social issues and the needs of their constituents at the top of their agenda, rather than waving the flag of Palestinian statehood or anti-Zionist posturing. In choosing an issue involving competing land claims, Odeh also signaled that he is not afraid to tackle politically loaded subjects.

    But the transformation Odeh seeks to catalyze goes further than reprioritizing. Odeh wants genuine engagement with and by Israel’s Arab citizens in determining the course of this country and its policies. When Odeh says he will fight for equality for immigrants from Ethiopia and the former Soviet Union as well as for Israel’s Palestinian citizens, and that he is willing to cross any party lines to find allies for this cause, he is arguing that a Knesset member is responsible for all Israelis, not just his ethnic camp. Implied in this discourse is a critique not only of Jewish hegemony in the Knesset, but of the longstanding practices of Arab Knesset members.

    Odeh appears to be counting on broad – if dormant – Jewish support for equality for Israel’s Arab citizens. He will have to navigate between Palestinian nationalists in Israel’s Arab communities and Jewish nationalist charges – whether stated overtly or implied – that Israel’s Arabs are a Fifth Column.

    But, like author and screenwriter Sayed Kashua, Odeh seems singularly attuned to the complexities of both Arab and Jewish identity in Israel; he gets it. Leading the Bedouin march in his baseball cap and middle-aged paunch, Odeh looked like nothing so much as a typical (Jewish) Israeli father out on a nature hike. He comes across the small screen as thoughtful and affable.

    In the Knesset, Odeh will have to overcome a history of anti-Israel grandstanding that has become a shortcut to re-election for Arab parliamentarians. Among the public, he will have to overcome the low expectations Arab voters have of their representatives’ ability to deliver tangible benefits and to transform the perceptions among many Jewish Israelis of his faction, shaped by the reputations of some of his Joint List partners. Ahmed Tibi (United Arab List-Ta’al), for example, is an effective parliamentarian, but one that is identified with Yasser Arafat and the Palestinian Authority. Haneen Zoabi of the separatist Balad party, who famously took part in the Mavi Marmara flotilla to break Israel’s blockade of Gaza in an act some here consider treasonous, seems committed to outraging Jewish sensibilities.

    Jewish parliamentarians will also have to play a role, by permitting progress in their ties with their Arab counterparts. They will have to set aside the catcalls and race-baiting (means they use to rally the right-wing base), and recognize that Odeh is offering something new: genuine discourse without demagoguery. Honest engagement and discussion about the future of Jewish and Arab Israelis would benefit both populations.

    The hopes of Israel’s Arab voters were raised in this election, and while there was never an expectation that the Joint List would be a coalition partner, or even act as a cohesive unit after the election, there were expectations that voting might produce some concrete change for our Arab citizens. If Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu really wants to apologize for his Election Day anti-Arab incitement, he can engage Odeh and his colleagues in genuine policy discourse, addressing social services for sure, but also issues of state and identity.

    If our new government fails to seize this unique opportunity, the confidence of Israel’s Arab citizens in our democracy will be eroded and Jewish-Arab relations will sour.

    Don Futterman is the program director for Israel of the Moriah Fund, a private American Foundation working to strengthen civil society in Israel. He can be heard weekly on TLV1’s The Promised Podcast.

  • Document exclusif : la bombe à retardement de Jérusalem - Page 1 | Mediapart - 28 mars 2015 | Par René Backmann
    http://www.mediapart.fr/journal/international/280315/document-exclusif-la-bombe-retardement-de-jerusalem?page_article=1

    Selon un rapport confidentiel rédigé par les diplomates de l’Union européenne à Jérusalem, que Mediapart s’est procuré, la tension dans la ville n’a jamais été aussi forte depuis 1967. Si la politique de discrimination et de colonisation menée par Israël se poursuit, ce sont les bases mêmes d’une solution pacifique qui seront détruites. Il est peut-être encore temps d’agir, mais l’Europe doit faire preuve de courage.

    • L’Europe a fait un choix idéologique et diplomatique ou est le courage là dedans ? Est il besoin de rappeler, par exemple, l’accord de libre échange entre les deux entités. "Accord euro-israélien de stabilisation et d’association".
      Criminalisation du BDS, etc, etc...
      A part l’auteur qui croit encore a la moindre velléité de règlement pacifique, qu’elle teneur déjà sont les derniers propos de Nethanyou ?
      Je trouve ce genre de tribune de la dernière hypocrisie, illusion de processus en marche et mensonge sur les possibilités de règlement.
      Et la fin avec Fabius est remarquable dans ce genre à.
      Merci pour ce foutage de gueule de Médiapart.

      Relations entre Israël et l’Union européenne
      https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relations_entre_Isra%C3%ABl_et_l%27Union_europ%C3%A9enne

      "Pourquoi maintient-on alors la fiction de deux Etats possibles ?

      Je n’arrive pas à imaginer que les analystes des chancelleries, en Europe et même aux Etats-Unis, ne soient pas conscients qu’on n’évacuera pas 400 000 colons, et pas même 10 000. L’idée de deux Etats est morte. Dans mon film, Ouri Ariel, ministre du Logement dans le précédent gouvernement Netanyahou, un colon qui pousse à la colonisation partout où c’est possible, me dit qu’il ne peut y avoir qu’une seule souveraineté entre le Jourdain et la Méditerranée, celle d’Israël, et si « les Arabes », sous-entendu les Palestiniens, veulent davantage de droits politiques, on leur donnera le droit de vote pour la Knesset. « Nous pouvons faire face à trente députés arabes supplémentaires au parlement. En 3000 ans d’existence, le peuple juif a surmonté des crises bien plus graves », dit-il. C’est leur vision. Le sionisme religieux ne renoncera pas à la terre d’Israël, à Jérusalem et au Mont du temple. Les diplomates européens en sont conscients, ceux que je rencontre me disent qu’en continuant de financer l’Autorité palestinienne, l’Europe ne fait que maintenir l’occupation.
      Une lente descente en enfer

      Alors que faire ?

      Je ne sais pas. Puisqu’un Etat palestinien n’est plus possible, il faut chercher d’autres solutions. Mais c’est problématique avec un conflit religieux. 80 % des Israéliens croient aujourd’hui en Dieu, 51 % croient en la venue du Messie. La gauche séculière ne représente plus que 17 % de la population juive.

      Vous ne croyez pas à un Etat d’Israël plus démocratique et plus égalitaire pour tous, un Etat qui se doterait d’une Constitution ?

      Un Etat binational sous une forme ou une autre ? Dans tous les cas, ça voudrait dire la fin du sionisme libéral prôné par Theodore Herzl et par la gauche sioniste des débuts. Mais on n’y est pas. Le président Reuven Rivlin est un personnage intéressant : il est du Likoud, en faveur de l’annexion des territoires palestiniens, mais il souhaite donner aux Palestiniens tous les droits, politiques et civiques. Quand il était président de la Knesset il était de ceux qui défendaient les députés arabes israéliens face aux attaques de la droite et de l’extrême-droite. Le problème, c’est que l’Etat binational, ça ne marche pas vraiment au Liban, ça n’a pas marché en Yougoslavie, et ça ne marche même pas… en Belgique."
      http://television.telerama.fr/television/regardez-au-nom-du-temple-en-exclusivite-sur-telerama-fr,124664.

    • D’accord avec unagi.

      « Processus de Paix », « solution à deux états » ce sont des « leurres » criminels pendant que l’UE subventionne les entreprises israéliennes, pendant que les produits israéliens sont exonérés de droits de douane, pendant que les dons aux organisations israéliennes qui financent la colonisation et l’armée israélienne sont défiscalisés en France, pendant que des Franco-Israéliens sont soldats en Israël et participent dans l’impunité aux crimes de guerre (la colonisation est juridiquement un crime de guerre).

      Les journalistes de Mediapart traitent avec de longues pincettes la situation en Palestine.
      La « modération » du site est extrêmement sévère avec les abonnés qui sont critiques envers Israël.
      Soupçon d’antisémitisme pour ceux qui critiquent Israël mais aucun soupçon de racisme pour ceux qui le défendent.

      Il y a une analyse à faire sur la composition de la population des journalistes de grands médias en France, sur la manière dont est accordée la carte de presse, et sur la manière dont cela biaise la perception globale des phénomènes géopolitiques.

  • Abbas to host Arab list lawmakers to discuss Knesset agenda - Diplomacy and Defense - Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.648879

    Some members of Arab party alliance Joint List are not pleased Palestinian Authority has publicized the meeting.

    Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas is planning to host a reception for Joint List MKs after they are sworn in and hold discussions with them on political developments in Israel and the lawmakers’ Knesset activity, an official in Abbas’ office said Wednesday.

    The official said the PA does not expect the MKs to focus solely on the Palestinian issue, but said it was important for discussions of peace and ending the occupation to have a prominent place in Israeli political discourse.

    Joint List officials confirmed plans for the reception, but some of the 13 MKs on the ticket, an alliance between Israel’s Arab parties and the Arab-Jewish Hadash party, were not pleased the PA had publicized the meeting. Some of the MKs are concerned that close public ties with the PA could have a negative effect on the party in Israel.

  • The Joint Arab List: Seven new MKs, two women and a lot of hope - Israel News, Ynetnews
    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4638619,00.html

    The party has seven new MKs, among them the head of the Joint Arab List Aiman Uda, a resident of Haifa. The other new members include Aida Touma-Sliman (Akko), engineer Abd al-Hakim Hajj Yahya (Tayibe), Dr. Yosef Jabareen (Umm al-Fahem), lawyer Osama Sa’adi (Arraba), and Dr. Abdullah Abu Maaruf (Yarka).
     
    The Joint Arab List includes two women and 12 men.
     
    New MKs plan out Knesset term
    “I hope these results will be a lever for continued cooperation with the (Arab) sector, in order to serve it in all sorts of areas, even outside of the Knesset,” said MK Abd al-Hakim Hajj Yahya.
     
    “There are a lot of social causes that the Joint Arab List can contribute to. The results of the elections are not a surprise to us, but it is good news. The comments made by Netanyahu against the Arab sector in the last days of the campaign did not make a big impact, but the warning Netanyahu made is very dangerous for the continuation of co-existence,” said Hajj Yahya.
     
    The Arab Israeli politician has already begun to plan his term in the next Knesset. “I am going to serve the Arab sector on central issues such as planning and construction law, in light of the problems we have in planning, industrial areas and building without a permit,” he said. “I will also take care of the advancement of local authorities because in my opinion authorities which plan to rehabilitate have not failed, but rather it shows that there is something in the government’s policy that needs to change.”
     
    New MK Aida Touma-Sliman hopes to represent women. “I would like to deal with social issues in the next Knesset and the civil rights of the Arab population along with women’s rights which I have been occupied with for more than 20 years and will continue to be occupied with in the future.”
     
    “Likewise, I will focus on the employment of Arab women and legislation to protect women from violence. Of course the diplomatic issue cannot be ignored and the aspects of political activity,” she added.
     
    Regarding the election results, Touma-Sliman said: “Our results provide happiness and strengthen us. The public gave us its wide confidence and clearly said that it supports the approach of unity and the attempt to gain power and protect ourselves from the waves of racism that are washing over Israel.”
     
    New MK Osama Sa’adi was disappointed with the change that did not end up coming: “The national right-wing camp and Netanyahu came out with a surprise and kept their reign. We are the third largest faction and this is the first time something like this has happened in history. We achieved another goal – the Yachad faction along with Eli Yishai and the racist Baruch Marzel are outside of the Knesset. Now the work begins to impact and bring about achievement for the sector that sent us.”
     
    Sa’adi continued and said: “I want to work in my field, which is the Law and Justice Committee, to prevent racist legislation and to work for fair legislation for the Arab sector.”
     
    Sa’adi also said he would like to work on the issue of Palestinian detainees which he says is “a subject that has been close to my heart for over 25 years.” Sa’adi also plans to work on subjects such as land confiscation and housing demolitions.
     
    Regarding fears the list will separate once the new government forms, Sa’adi said, “We promised we would create a joint list and we created it, therefore the trust that the Arab sector gave us commits us to continue to work as one faction, there is no reason to break it down. We will not let the Arab public down.”
     
    Dr. Yosef Jabraan, another new addition to the Joint Arab List, said that the party will focus on issues that were the basis of their election to the Knesset. “Education, housing and violence are the main issues that I want to deal with. These are the issues that our voters clearly brought up during the campaign,” he explained.

     
    “The advancement of Arab education, including higher education, will be my priority, including the allocation of resources, including changing the curriculum to include the Arab-Palestinian identity as well as the restructuring of the system so that it will be managed by Arab educators. Without substantial reform of the education system, we cannot promote and advance the stance of the Arab citizens in Israel.”

  • Voilà une jolie vidéo trouvée sur le site du ministère israélien des Affaires étrangères expliquant le processus électoral à la Knesset, avec comme message subliminal : Israël est une vraie démocratie. La preuve ? Les Arabes peuvent aussi voter, ils ont même des partis. Et pardessus le marché, le chef de la commission électorale est lui-même arabe.
    Conclusion : La discrimination est interdite par la loi en Israël. Israël est une vraie démocratie.
    Commencer à 1:40, c’est là que ça devient intéressant

    https://www.youtube.com/embed/rzpWIXg3HtM?feature=player_embedded"

  • Pour ceux qui veulent voir le visage des prochains députés de la 20e Knesset (pas encore définitive)

    Bottom-of-list candidates benefit from shock election results - Israel News, Ynetnews
    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4638218,00.html

    Bottom-of-list candidates benefit from shock election results
    While Meretz barely holds on to four of its seven seats, Likud politicians like Avi Dichter and Tzipi Hotovely will return to Knesset.

  • #Israël et ses « #Infiltrés » : Réflexions sur une crise politique

    Les élections anticipées en Israël, appelées de ses vœux par Benyamin Netanyahu le 2 décembre 2014 et votées par la Knesset le 8 du même mois, devraient avoir lieu le 17 mars 2015. Elles font suite à deux ans d’instabilité gouvernementale et à vingt mois d’une troisième coalition trop fragile. Cette dissolution, largement critiquée à son annonce alors que la pratique est récurrente depuis les années 1980, pourrait permettre de placer certains sujets sensibles et controversés au cœur des débats. L’inscription du caractère juif de l’État dans la Constitution israélienne est l’un d’eux, puisque c’est entre autres l’opposition de Tzipi Livni et Yair Lapid, – respectivement ex-ministre de la Justice et des Finances – à cette mesure qui provoque la fin du gouvernement de coalition conduit par Benjamin Netanyahu. Assurément, l’idée de ce changement constitutionnel est intrinsèquement liée à la question palestinienne. Néanmoins, elle doit également être analysée aujourd’hui au regard de la situation des « Infiltrés »[1], migrants sub-sahariens (aujourd’hui principalement Soudanais et Érythréens) arrivés en Israël au début des années 2000 et progressivement devenus objet de débat dans le cadre même de la politique intérieure israélienne.[2]
    En effet, l’immigration en Israël est historique mais hautement sélective. Le pays s’est construit par vagues d’immigration juive depuis un siècle, tout en affichant un solde migratoire non juif quasi nul jusqu’aux années 1990. Dès lors, on estime qu’environ 200 000 travailleurs domestiques ou agricoles sont entrés en Israël entre 1990 et 2000, mais cette population reste politiquement marginale.[3] L’immigration non juive n’avait donc pas d’écho politique avant les années 2000 car les étrangers n’avaient pas vocation à s’intégrer. Jusqu’alors, la question principale concernait les menaces posées à l’identité juive de l’État, face à une population palestinienne arabe musulmane et chrétienne en expansion.

    http://www.noria-research.com/israel-et-ses-%C2%AB-infiltres-%C2%BB-reflexions-sur-une-crise-polit
    #migration #asile #réfugiés #Holot

  • PA holding 50 Islamic militants, fearing terror attack will give election to Likud
    Hamas officials call it the biggest round-up in years, say security coordination with Israel constitutes treason.
    By Amos Harel, Jack Khoury and Reuters | Mar. 10, 2015 Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.646100

    Palestinian Authority security services have arrested some 50 members of Hamas and Islamic Jihad in the West Bank over the last two days, acting out of apparent fear that a terror attack in the coming days would give the Israeli election to Likud.

    There’s a well-known precedent for this: the firebombing of a bus in Jericho on the eve of the 1988 Knesset election, which killed five Israelis, including a mother and her three children.

    In later years, that incident was cited as having cost the Labor Party the victory by shifting votes from Labor to Likud at the last moment. Shimon Peres, who was Labor’s prime ministerial candidate at the time, claimed the attack had cost the left two or three Knesset seats, and that if not for this attack, Labor would have won the election.

  • Israeli Court Overrules Ban on 1948 Palestinian MP Re-Election Bid
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/israeli-court-overrules-ban-1948-palestinian-mp-re-election-bid

    Firebrand Arab-Israeli member of parliament #Haneen_Zuabi, center, leaves the supreme court in Jerusalem on February 17, 2015 after a hearing related to the central election committee’s decision to ban her from standing in next month’s general election. AFP/Menahem Kahana

    The Israeli Supreme Court overruled on Wednesday a ruling banning a 1948 Palestinian member of #Knesset MP and an extreme right-wing Jewish activist from running in next month’s parliamentary election, an official said. Last week, the Central Elections Committee (CEC) barred MP Haneen Zuabi, a regular critic of #Israel's right-wing government, deeming her to be “hostile to the Jewish state.” read (...)

    #1948_Palestinians #Palestine

  • Duel serré à droite en Israël

    Globes - All still to play for, poll shows
    http://www.globes.co.il

    12/02/2015, 21:14
    Lilach Weissman

    Benjamin Netanyahu does not have the election in his pocket, and the battle with Naftali Bennett could get bloody.

    Contrary to the widespread assumption that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has election victory in his pocket, the latest Rafi Smith Institute poll for “Globes” indicates that the election is wide open. A month before polling day, Hamahane Hatzioni and Likud are running neck and neck with 24 projected Knesset seats each.

    The opinion polls show the current situation, but cannot really prophesy what will happen in the last ten days of the election campaign. In 2009, the polls projected 19 seats for Kadima ten days before the end. Under Tzipi Livni, the party reached the finishing line with 28 seats. The drama of Yair Lapid in the last election less than two years ago is still fresh in the memory.

    In another three weeks, money time will start. The movement of seats in the last two weeks could be dramatic. Anything could happen. Netanyahu now understands what was said here two months ago: if he wants to win the election, he has to be bigger than Hamahane Hatzioni. Hamahane Hatzioni leader Isaac Herzog, incidentally, has still not realized that what will count is not the right or left block. The name of the game is which will be the largest party, and all’s fair in attaining the goal, even stealing votes within the block.

    Netanyahu’s visit to the West Bank settlement of Eli, deep in Habayit Hayehudi territory, demonstrates the pressure Likud is under. The prime minister only crosses the Green Line when there’s an election, or sadly when there’s a funeral. While everyone is following the saga of whether or not he will speak in the US Congress, Netanyahu’s mind is mainly troubled by internal surveys by the ruling party and at least one additional party predicting that the Likud will lag Hamahane Hatzioni by several seats. To put that right, he decided to push hard the question of the size of the party and the block. He did it in Habayit Hayehudi leader Naftali Bennett’s backyard. Likud is not currently managing to lift the number of seats it looks like winning, and so it has no choice but to sharpen its stance towards Bennett. For the time being, the campaign is positive, but that might change later on. To win the election within 30 days Netanyahu has to gain at least another four seats for Likud. He may be left with no option but to take off the gloves viv-a-vis Bennett.

    Published by Globes [online], Israel business news - www.globes-online.com - on February 12, 2015❞

  • Arab list may seek place on sensitive Knesset security committee -
    ‘It is impossible to expose classified material to MKs who praise Azmi Bishara,’ says Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee chairman.
    By Jonathan Lis | Feb. 11, 2015 | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/.premium-1.641941

    Quite a number of Knesset members have been worrying in recent days over the possibility that the Joint List of the combined Arab parties (Balad, United Arab List and Ta’al) and the Arab-Jewish party Hadash will become the fourth largest party in the next Knesset after the election – and demand appropriate representation on the prestigious Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee. Until now, the Arab parties have never had representatives on the committee, and instead they were “compensated” with representation on other major Knesset committees.

    In addition to the ideological opposition of Arab MKs to sitting on the committee, the heads of the committee always claimed for years that there was a security risk in allowing members of Arab parties to attend confidential hearings and other meetings. “These are parties that cooperate regularly with the enemy, in coordination with them. They oppose cooperation with the Israel Defense Forces and view those who enlist in the IDF as traitors,” said current committee chairman MK Yariv Levin (Likud) Tuesday.

    “In security terms, it’s unacceptable to expose classified intelligence material to Knesset members on whose party website appears the picture and praise for [former Balad MK] Azmi Bishara, who acted on behalf of Hezbollah,” said Levin.

    It is impossible to ban the membership of Arab MKs on the committee, but “in a situation in which a Knesset member from the Arab parties sat on the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, I would hold only meetings of this forum without a security classification and open all the meetings to the press,” said Levin.

    Former MK Talab al-Sana (United Arab List – Ta’al) served for a few weeks as a regular member of the committee before the permanent composition of the committee was set after the elections. But then-committee chairman and now Strategic and Intelligence Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz canceled a series of scheduled committee meetings on defense matters after he found he could not prevent al-Sana from participating. Al-Sana at first demanded to visit the alleged nuclear reactor outside Dimona and to receive intelligence updates, but after a meeting with Steinitz – as well as criticism he received from fellow members of Arab parties in the Knesset – he decided to limit his committee activities only to meetings on foreign affairs and diplomatic issues. After a short time he resigned from the committee.

    The Joint List has not yet held a discussion on the matter and a number of its most influential leaders feel the chances they will ask for a seat on the committee are slim. The chairman of Balad, MK Jamal Zahalka, said Tuesday that he will object to placing a representative of the Joint List on the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee. “We do not want to be partners in making decisions for the defense establishment in Israel,” he said.