organization:ministry of truth

  • Fonts from the Future ?⚡️ | Alphabettes
    http://www.alphabettes.org/fonts-from-the-future

    Dear Leader has chosen His favorite typeface of 2116. Conceived, designed, and distributed exclusively by the Ministry of Truth, we are pleased to announce that with this release, we have leapt across a major technological hurdle amongst our news sources: the time-consuming task of editing conflicting stories. Propa saves journalists precious time by automatically replacing incorrect words with truthier words—taking advantage of simple OpenType technology.

    Our news sources have all agreed to use Propa, and they are very enthusiastic to do so because they no longer have the tedious task of choosing words. The Ministry happily serves the fonts, so we are able to continue to add words all the time, bettering our languages. When we make our language better, we make our Country better.

    #typo #futur

  • LICENCIER, C’EST EMBAUCHER
    http://www.telelib.com/words/authors/O/OrwellGeorge/prose/NineteenEightyFour/part1sec1.html

    The Ministry of Truth—Minitrue, in Newspeak—was startlingly different from any other object in sight. It was an enormous pyramidal structure of glittering white concrete, soaring up, terrace after terrace, 300 metres into the air. From where Winston stood it was just possible to read, picked out on its white face in elegant lettering, the three slogans of the Party:
    WAR IS PEACE
    FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
    IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
    The Ministry of Truth contained, it was said, three thousand rooms above ground level, and corresponding ramifications below. Scattered about London there were just three other buildings of similar appearance and size. So completely did they dwarf the surrounding architecture that from the roof of Victory Mansions you could see all four of them simultaneously. They were the homes of the four Ministries between which the entire apparatus of government was divided. The Ministry of Truth, which concerned itself with news, entertainment, education, and the fine arts. The Ministry of Peace, which concerned itself with war. The Ministry of Love, which maintained law and order. And the Ministry of Plenty, which was responsible for economic affairs. Their names, in Newspeak: Minitrue, Minipax, Miniluv, and Miniplenty.

    Nineteen Eighty-Four , George Orwell [Part 1, Section 1]
    #myriam_el_khomri

  • Journalists, free speech activists demand abolishing of newly-formed ‘Ministry of Truth’
    http://www.kyivpost.com/content/kyiv-post-plus/journalists-media-rights-activists-demand-abolishing-of-newly-formed-minis

    The Ministry of Information — despite lacking details and debate — was passed as part of a package vote for 17 ministers on Dec. 2. 

    Critics immediately compared the new ministry George Orwell’s Ministry of Truth. 

    But Yuriy Stets, the new head of the ministry, said the new agency is no threat.

    His department will only respond to foreign information attacks by create country’s information strategy and assist communication among state bodies.
    (…)
    A former lawmaker of the Poroshenko Bloc, Stets, 38, worked as chief producer at Channel 5, owned by Poroshenko. He is considered to be the president’s close ally. The fast promotion of Stets as a new minister signaled that the president is strongly pushing this idea.

    Stets made public the regulations of the new ministry, a draft of which he prepared back to 2007-2009, only a day after the vote. He said he used the experience of Great Britain and France after World War I, as well as the experience of Israel.

    Сritics say some features are scary.

    The ministry is going to “develop and implement professional standards in media sphere,” “ensure freedom of speech” and it should also prevent harm caused to people by “incomplete, outdated or unreal information.

    Other norms seem outdated, like the appointing the heads of state media enterprises, when Ukraine announced a move for reduction of state media. Some of them are just useless, like the aim to conduct media monitoring and preparing reports on information projects for the president and prime minister, a job that could be done by press services.

    Nommer les présidents des chaines publiques ? Quelle idée préhistorique !

    Audiovisuel public : le président ne nommera plus les patrons de chaînes
    http://www.lemonde.fr/actualite-medias/article/2013/10/02/le-senat-adopte-le-projet-de-loi-sur-l-audiovisuel-public_3488217_3236.html

    Le Sénat a adopté dans la nuit de mardi au mercredi 2 octobre [2013] le projet de loi sur l’indépendance de l’audiovisuel public, déjà voté à l’Assemblée, et qui rend notamment au Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel (CSA) le pouvoir de désigner les patrons des chaînes et radios publiques.
    (…)
    Au cœur du projet de loi figure la nomination pour cinq ans par le CSA, devenu une « autorité publique indépendante dotée de la personnalité morale », des présidents de France Télévisions, Radio France et France Médias Monde (rassemblant France 24, RFI et Monte Carlo Doualiya), et non plus par le président de la République, comme l’avait voulu Nicolas Sarkozy.

  • ’No Big Brother!’ Ukrainian Journalists Oppose Kyiv’s New Ministry Of Information
    http://www.rferl.org/content/ukraine-ministry-information-journalists-protest/26723352.html


    Parliamentary deputy and former journalist Serhiy Leshchenko holds a placard reading “Stop the Ministry of Truth” and equating the move with Nazi tactics as he protests during a pause in a session of the parliament in Kyiv on December 2.

    Ukrainian journalists are up in arms over the government’s creation of a new Ministry of Information that it says is needed to counter a steady stream of Kremlin propaganda and misinformation.

    About 40 journalists and activists demonstrated outside the Ukrainian parliament on December 2 as lawmakers approved the ministry along with the government’s new lineup of cabinet ministers.

    The journalists, who held up posters with the slogan “Hello, Big Brother,” likened the new agency to the Ministry of Truth in George Orwell’s classic novel “1984.

    The new ministry is headed by Yuriy Stets, a close ally of President Petro Poroshenko and formerly the chief producer for Channel 5, the television network that the president still owns.

    Journalists say they fear the new bureaucracy could seek to increase government influence and possibly control over what appears in the Ukrainian media.

    They say their fears are increased by the little information available about how the new ministry will function.

    We are protesting against the creation of the Ministry of Information because we do not understand what it will be doing, we have not seen any documents, any texts saying what their activities would be and we are also unaware of what the budget of the Ministry of Information would be,” one of the protesting journalists, Anastasia Stanko, told RFE/RL’s Ukrainian Service.

    The international media rights group Reporters Without Borders has also criticized Kyiv’s decision to establish the Information Ministry.

    The group’s secretary-general, Christophe Deloire, said in a press release on December 2 that “in a democratic society, the media should not be regulated by the government.

    He warned, “Putting the government in charge of ’information policy’ would be a major retrograde step that would open the way to grave excesses.

    The government says the ministry is needed to counter a steady stream of misinformation about events in Ukraine by Russia’s powerful state media. Russian television channels are easily accessible in many parts of Ukraine, where 20 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union most people continue to understand Russian.

    Interior Ministry adviser Anton Herashchenko said on November 30 that the main task of the new ministry would be “protection of Ukraine’s information space from Russian propaganda and counterpropaganda in Russia [and] in the temporarily occupied territories” of Crimea and the Donbas region.

    However, the move to create the ministry also closely follows the publication of reports by several Ukrainian journalists and human rights groups regarding possible war crimes committed in eastern Ukraine by right-wing nationalist militias as well as Russian-backed separatist forces.
     
    The Ukrainian military this week sent contradictory signals over whether it would seek to control Ukrainian journalists’ access to eastern Ukraine by insisting that reporters henceforth only travel to front-line areas in special groups escorted by soldiers.

    The press service of what the Ukrainian military calls its “Antiterrorist Operation” (ATO) said on December 1 that the new measure would also apply to the international media and was due to intelligence indicating that Russian-backed separatists were “hunting” journalists.

    But on December 2, the ATO’s press service said the military had decided to lift the new regulation. "We just wanted to protect you but it’s up to you if you don’t care about your safety," ATO spokesman Oleksiy Dmytrashkivskiy told the English-language “Kyiv Post.

    However, the speaker of the staff for the ATO, Vladislav Seleznev, subsequently told the press that the new order had not been canceled but merely postponed for two to three weeks to give the military and the media time to reach a consensus.

    Où l’on apprend, incidemment, que le retour à la libre-circulation des journalistes n’est que temporaire…

  • Amazon lance un appel par email à ses auteurs d’ebook pour qu’ils harcèlent Hachette ! Et ils ont le culot d’enrôler George Orwell (dont ils avaient déjà censuré 1984 pour une sombre histoire de droits d’auteurs)…

    From: Kindle Direct Publishing <kdp-support@amazon.com>
    8:55 AM (4 minutes ago)

    Dear KDP Author,

    Just ahead of World War II, there was a radical invention that shook the foundations of book publishing. It was the paperback book. This was a time when movie tickets cost 10 or 20 cents, and books cost $2.50. The new paperback cost 25 cents – it was ten times cheaper. Readers loved the paperback and millions of copies were sold in just the first year.

    With it being so inexpensive and with so many more people able to afford to buy and read books, you would think the literary establishment of the day would have celebrated the invention of the paperback, yes? Nope. Instead, they dug in and circled the wagons. They believed low cost paperbacks would destroy literary culture and harm the industry (not to mention their own bank accounts). Many bookstores refused to stock them, and the early paperback publishers had to use unconventional methods of distribution – places like newsstands and drugstores. The famous author George Orwell came out publicly and said about the new paperback format, if “publishers had any sense, they would combine against them and suppress them.” Yes, George Orwell was suggesting collusion.
    (...)

    We will never give up our fight for reasonable e-book prices. We know making books more affordable is good for book culture. We’d like your help. Please email Hachette and copy us.

    Hachette CEO, Michael Pietsch: Michael.Pietsch@hbgusa.com
    Copy us at: readers-united@amazon.com

    Please consider including these points:

    – We have noted your illegal collusion. Please stop working so hard to overcharge for ebooks. They can and should be less expensive.
    – Lowering e-book prices will help – not hurt – the reading culture, just like paperbacks did.
    – Stop using your authors as leverage and accept one of Amazon’s offers to take them out of the middle.
    – Especially if you’re an author yourself: Remind them that authors are not united on this issue.

    Thanks for your support.

    The Amazon Books Team

    http://www.readersunited.com