organization:supreme court

  • L’Inde a vécu la plus grande grève de l’histoire humaine
    http://www.directmatin.fr/monde/2016-09-03/linde-vecu-la-plus-grande-greve-de-lhistoire-humaine-737701

    Selon les syndicats, ce seraient ainsi près de 180 millions de travailleurs, hommes et femmes, qui ont manifesté pour s’opposer à la politique économique du gouvernement. L’Inde comptant environ 1,250 milliards d’individus, ce serait donc un septième de la population qui a arrêté le travail pour une journée. Mais ces chiffres n’ont toutefois pas pu être vérifiés de façon indépendante.

    The Biggest Strike in World History ? No Thanks, We’re Focusing on the New iPhone
    http://fair.org/home/the-biggest-strike-in-world-history-no-thanks-were-focusing-on-the-new-iphone

    And yet there was virtually no coverage of the strike in commercial US media, according to searches of the Nexis news database. Not a word on ABC, CBS or NBC. No mention on the main cable news networks—CNN, Fox and MSNBC—either. (The Intercept‘s Zaid Jilani—9/6/16—noted that there was one mention on CNN International, when “the CEO of the human resources consulting firm ManpowerGroup cited the Indian strike as part of global concerns about technology suppressing wages.”) Neither the PBS NewsHour nor NPR touched the story.

    Not a single US newspaper found in the Nexis database—which includes most of the major papers, like the New York Times, Washington Post and USA Today—reported an original story on the strike. (Associated Press had a brief, 289-word report, which ran on the New York Times‘ website and was doubtless picked up by other papers.) The Wall Street Journal, whose full text isn’t on Nexis, also skipped the Indian strike story.

    That’s an example of the kind of story US corporate media don’t care about. What do they care about? Well, Apple is planning to release a new version of the iPhone next week. That’s already making news: CBS did a segment on its Money Watch program (9/7/16) previewing the phone, as did NPR‘s Morning Edition and All Things Considered (9/7/16); the product was front-page news in USA Today (9/8/16) and the Wall Street Journal (9/8/16), while you had to turn to page A12 in the Washington Post (9/7/16) or the first page of the business section in the New York Times (9/8/16) to get your future cellphone news.

    A hundred million or more workers striking for their rights hold no interest for the news managers in US corporate media. But a new gadget from a prominent advertiser? Now, that’s the news that’s fit to print.

    La « #réalité » telle que façonnée par les #MSM

    • citons la source des autres articles:

      India Is Making Labor History With the World’s Largest General Strike | Alternet
      http://www.alternet.org/world/india-worlds-largest-strike

      Trade unions leaders are reticent to say how many people struck work on September 2, 2016. They simply cannot offer a firm number. But they do say that the strike – the seventeenth general strike since India adopted its new economic policy in 1991 – has been the largest ever. The corporate news media – no fan of strikes – reported that the number of strikers exceeded the estimated 150 million workers. A number of newspapers suggested that 180 million Indian workers walked off the job. If that is the case, then this is the largest reported general strike in history.
      ...
      A leading international business consultancy firm reported – a few years ago – that 680 million Indians live in deprivation. These people – half the Indian population – are deprived of the basics of life such as food, energy, housing, drinking water, sanitation, health care, education and social security.
      ...
      Prime Minister Narendra Modi, ..., did not pay heed to these workers. His goal is to increase India’s growth rate, which – as judged by the example of when he was Chief Minister of the State of Gujarat – can be accomplished by a cannibal like attitude towards workers’ rights and the livelihood of the poor. Selling off state assets, giving hugely lucrative deals to private business and opening the doors of India’s economy to Foreign Direct Investment are the mechanisms to increase the growth rate. None of these strategies, as even the International Monetary Fund acknowledges, will lead to social equality. This growth trajectory leads to greater inequality, to less power for workers and more deprivation.

      La conclusion de l’auteur d’Alternet

      Class Struggle.

      Only four per cent of the Indian workforce is in unions. If these unions merely fought to defend their tenuous rights, their power would erode even further. Union power has suffered greatly since the Indian economy liberalised in 1991, with Supreme Court judgments against union democracy and with the global commodity chain pitting Indian workers against workers elsewhere. It is to the great credit of the Indian trade unions that they have embraced – in different tempos – the labour conditions and living conditions of workers and peasants in the informal sector. What power remains with unions can only grow if they do what they have been doing – namely, to turn towards the immense mass of the informal workers and peasants and draw them into the culture of unions and class struggle.

      L’auteur

      Vijay Prashad is professor of international studies at Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut. He is the author of 18 books, including Arab Spring, Libyan Winter (AK Press, 2012), The Poorer Nations: A Possible History of the Global South (Verso, 2013) and The Death of a Nation and the Future of the Arab Revolution (University of California Press, 2016). His columns appear at AlterNet every Wednesday.

      #lutte_des_classes #syndicalisme #privatisation

  • Supreme Court orders outpost demolished, Justice minister tries to bypass it
    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4849665,00.html

    Supreme Court President Miriam Naor decreed Thursday that the structures in the Way of the Patriarchs outpost, set up on private Palestinian land, be torn down by March 2018; amid much criticism from the right, Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked promises to work with the Ministry of Defense to stop the houses’ demolition.

    #Israel #vols

  • Virginia’s Governor Restores Voting Rights for 13,000 Ex-Felons - The New York Times
    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/23/us/virginia-governor-mcauliffe-voting-rights-felons.html

    Virginia’s governor said on Monday that he had signed papers restoring the voting rights of nearly 13,000 ex-felons, accomplishing on a case-by-case basis what the state’s Supreme Court last month had barred him from doing with a single executive order.

    Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a Democrat, cast the move as a civil rights victory in a state whose constitutional ban on voting by ex-felons has disenfranchised roughly one in five African-Americans. In a post on Twitter, the governor said, “We will continue to fight to ensure that our fellow citizens are not marginalized forever.

  • What next for #Manus_Island asylum seekers?

    Australia has agreed to close a detention centre on a Pacific island that is used to house asylum seekers.

    Manus Island is part of Papua New Guinea (PNG). Its Supreme Court ruled in April that holding people in such a camp was unconstitutional.

    So, what could happen next to about 850 men currently being held on the Pacific island?

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-36150758
    #asile #migrations #réfugiés #Australie #externalisation

  • North Carolina asks Supreme Court to restore strict voting procedures - The Washington Post
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/north-carolina-asks-supreme-court-to-restore-strict-voting-procedures/2016/08/15/d8a76060-6337-11e6-96c0-37533479f3f5_story.html

    North Carolina on Monday asked the Supreme Court to restore most of its strict voting procedures for the November elections, despite a lower court’s ruling that the law intentionally discriminates against African Americans.

    The state said the ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit was unprecedented and that “there is no reason to believe that [the law] will have any detrimental effect on voters, minority or otherwise.
    […]
    The court is split, with four conservatives and four liberals. The state may have a hard time finding the necessary five votes to stay the lower court’s ruling, because that three-judge panel was unanimous in finding the law unconstitutional.

    The judges agreed with allegations that the omnibus bill passed by the Republican- controlled legislature and signed by Gov. Pat McCrory (R) selectively chose voter-identification requirements, reduced the number of early-voting days and changed registration procedures in ways meant to harm blacks, who overwhelmingly vote for the Democratic Party.

  • Bernie Sanders’ Democratic National Convention speech / Boing Boing
    http://boingboing.net/2016/07/25/bernie-sanders-democratic-na.html


    La journée commence avec un type qui a du culot.

    Thank you. Good evening.

    It is an honor to be with you tonight and to be following in the footsteps of Elizabeth Warren, and to be here tonight to thank Michelle Obama for her incredible service to our country. She has made all of us proud.

    Let me begin by thanking the hundreds of thousands of Americans who actively participated in our campaign as volunteers. Thank you.

    Let me thank the 2 1/2 million Americans who helped fund our campaign with an unprecedented 8 million individual campaign contributions . Anyone know what that average contribution was? That’s right, $27. And let me thank the 13 million Americans who voted for the political revolution, giving us the 1,846 pledged delegates here tonight – 46 percent of the total.

    And delegates: Thank you for being here, and for all the work you’ve done. I look forward to your votes during the roll call on Tuesday night.

    And let me offer a special thanks to the people of my own state of Vermont who have sustained me and supported me as a mayor, congressman, senator and presidential candidate.

    And to my family – my wife Jane, four kids and seven grandchildren –thank you very much for your love and hard work on this campaign.

    I understand that many people here in this convention hall and around the country are disappointed about the final results of the nominating process. I think it’s fair to say that no one is more disappointed than I am. But to all of our supporters – here and around the country – I hope you take enormous pride in the historical accomplishments we have achieved.

    Together, my friends, we have begun a political revolution to transform America and that revolution – our revolution – continues. Election days come and go. But the struggle of the people to create a government which represents all of us and not just the 1 percent – a government based on the principles of economic, social, racial and environmental justice – that struggle continues. And I look forward to being part of that struggle with you.

    Let me be as clear as I can be. This election is not about, and has never been about, Hillary Clinton, or Donald Trump, or Bernie Sanders or any of the other candidates who sought the presidency. This election is not about political gossip. It’s not about polls. It’s not about campaign strategy. It’s not about fundraising. It’s not about all the things that the media spends so much time discussing.

    This election is about – and must be about – the needs of the American people and the kind of future we create for our children and grandchildren.

    This election is about ending the 40-year decline of our middle class the reality that 47 million men, women and children live in poverty. It is about understanding that if we do not transform our economy, our younger generation will likely have a lower standard of living then their parents.

    This election is about ending the grotesque level of income and wealth inequality that we currently experience, the worst it has been since 1928. It is not moral, not acceptable and not sustainable that the top one-tenth of one percent now own almost as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent, or that the top 1 percent in recent years has earned 85 percent of all new income. That is unacceptable. That must change.

    This election is about remembering where we were 7 1/2 years ago when President Obama came into office after eight years of Republican trickle-down economics.

    The Republicans want us to forget that as a result of the greed, recklessness and illegal behavior on Wall Street, our economy was in the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. Some 800,000 people a month were losing their jobs. We were running up a record-breaking deficit of $1.4 trillion and the world’s financial system was on the verge of collapse.

    We have come a long way in the last 7 1/2 years, and I thank President Obama and Vice President Biden for their leadership in pulling us out of that terrible recession.

    Yes, we have made progress, but I think we can all agree that much, much more needs to be done.

    This election is about which candidate understands the real problems facing this country and has offered real solutions – not just bombast, not just fear-mongering, not just name-calling and divisiveness.

    We need leadership in this country which will improve the lives of working families, the children, the elderly, the sick and the poor. We need leadership which brings our people together and makes us stronger – not leadership which insults Latinos, Muslims, women, African-Americans and veterans – and divides us up.

    By these measures, any objective observer will conclude that – based on her ideas and her leadership – Hillary Clinton must become the next president of the United States. The choice is not even close.

    This election is about a single mom I saw in Nevada who, with tears in her eyes, told me that she was scared to death about the future because she and her young daughter were not making it on the $10.45 an hour she was earning. This election is about that woman and the millions of other workers in this country who are struggling to survive on totally inadequate wages.

    Hillary Clinton understands that if someone in this country works 40 hours a week, that person should not be living in poverty. She understands that we must raise the minimum wage to a living wage. And she is determined to create millions of new jobs by rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure – our roads, bridges, water systems and wastewater plants.

    But her opponent – Donald Trump – well, he has a very different point of view. He does not support raising the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour – a starvation wage. While Donald Trump believes in huge tax breaks for billionaires, he believes that states should actually have the right to lower the minimum wage below $7.25.

    Brothers and sisters, this election is about overturning Citizens United, one of the worst Supreme Court decisions in the history of our country. That decision allows the wealthiest people in America, like the billionaire Koch brothers, to spend hundreds of millions of dollars buying elections and, in the process, undermine American democracy.

    Hillary Clinton will nominate justices to the Supreme Court who are prepared to overturn Citizens United and end the movement toward oligarchy in this country. Her Supreme Court appointments will also defend a woman’s right to choose, workers’ rights, the rights of the LGBT community, the needs of minorities and immigrants and the government’s ability to protect our environment.

    If you don’t believe that this election is important, if you think you can sit it out, take a moment to think about the Supreme Court justices that Donald Trump would nominate and what that would mean to civil liberties, equal rights and the future of our country.

    This election is about the thousands of young people I have met all over this country who have left college deeply in debt, and tragically the many others who cannot afford to go to college. During the primary campaign, Secretary Clinton and I both focused on this issue but with somewhat different approaches. Recently, however, we have come together on a proposal that will revolutionize higher education in America. It will guarantee that the children of any family this country with an annual income of $125,000 a year or less – 83 percent of our population – will be able to go to a public college or university tuition free. That proposal also substantially reduces student debt.

    This election is about climate change, the greatest environmental crisis facing our planet, and the need to leave this world in a way that is healthy and habitable for our kids and future generations. Hillary Clinton is listening to the scientists who tell us that – unless we act boldly and transform our energy system in the very near future – there will be more drought, more floods, more acidification of the oceans, more rising sea levels. She understands that when we do that we can create hundreds of thousands of good-paying jobs.

    Donald Trump? Well, like most Republicans, he chooses to reject science. He believes that climate change is a “hoax,” no need to address it. Hillary Clinton understands that a president’s job is to worry about future generations, not the short-term profits of the fossil fuel industry.

    This campaign is about moving the United States toward universal health care and reducing the number of people who are uninsured or under-insured. Hillary Clinton wants to see that all Americans have the right to choose a public option in their health care exchange. She believes that anyone 55 years or older should be able to opt in to Medicare and she wants to see millions more Americans gain access to primary health care, dental care, mental health counseling and low-cost prescription drugs through a major expansion of community health centers.

    And What is Donald Trump’s position on health care? Well, no surprise there. Same old, same old Republican contempt for working families. He wants to abolish the Affordable Care Act, throw 20 million people off of the health insurance they currently have and cut Medicaid for lower-income Americans.

    Hillary Clinton also understands that millions of seniors, disabled vets and others are struggling with the outrageously high cost of prescription drugs and the fact that Americans pay the highest prices in the world for the medicine we use. She knows that Medicare must negotiate drug prices with the pharmaceutical industry and that drug companies should not be making billions in profits while one in five Americans are unable to afford the medicine they need. The greed of the drug companies must end.

    This election is about the leadership we need to pass comprehensive immigration reform and repair a broken criminal justice system. It’s about making sure that young people in this country are in good schools and at good jobs, not rotting in jail cells. Hillary Clinton understands that we have to invest in education and jobs for our young people, not more jails or incarceration.

    In these stressful times for our country, this election must be about bringing our people together, not dividing us up. While Donald Trump is busy insulting one group after another, Hillary Clinton understands that our diversity is one of our greatest strengths. Yes. We become stronger when black and white, Latino, Asian-American, Native American – when all of us – stand together. Yes. We become stronger when men and women, young and old, gay and straight, native born and immigrant fight together to create the kind of country we all know we can become.

    It is no secret that Hillary Clinton and I disagree on a number of issues. That’s what this campaign has been about. That’s what democracy is about. But I am happy to tell you that at the Democratic Platform Committee there was a significant coming together between the two campaigns and we produced, by far, the most progressive platform in the history of the Democratic Party. Among many, many other strong provisions, the Democratic Party now calls for breaking up the major financial institutions on Wall Street and the passage of a 21st Century Glass-Steagall Act. It also calls for strong opposition to job-killing free trade agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
    We have got to make sure that the #TPP doesn’t get passed by Cogress during a lame-duck session.

    Our job now is to see that platform implemented by a Democratic Senate, a Democratic House and a Hillary Clinton presidency – and I am going to do everything I can to make that happen.

    I have known Hillary Clinton for 25 years. I remember her as a great first lady who broke precedent in terms of the role that a first lady was supposed to play as she helped lead the fight for universal health care. I served with her in the United States Senate and know her as a fierce advocate for the rights of children, for the women, and for the disabled.

    Hillary Clinton will make an outstanding president and I am proud to stand with her tonight.

    Thank you all very much.

    #USA #politique

  • Refugee camp company in Australia ’liable for crimes against humanity’

    The company that has taken over the management of Australia’s offshore immigration detention regime has been warned by international law experts that its employees could be liable for crimes against humanity.

    Spanish infrastructure corporation #Ferrovial, which is owned by one of the world’s richest families and the major stakeholder in Heathrow airport, has been warned by professors at Stanford Law School that its directors and employees risk prosecution under international law for supplying services to Australia’s camps on #Nauru and #Manus_Island in Papua New Guinea.


    https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/jul/25/ferrovial-staff-risk-prosecution-for-managing-australian-detention-camp
    #crimes_contre_l'humanité #asile #migrations #réfugiés #Australie #privatisation #externalisation #camps_de_réfugiés
    cc @daphne @marty @albertocampiphoto

    • From the 1970s the Supreme Court made a bunch of decisions that allowed the corporate capitalist class to buy elections more easily than it could in the past.

      For example, you see reforms of campaign finance that treated contributions to campaigns as a form of free speech. There’s a long tradition in the United States of corporate capitalists buying elections but now it was legalized rather than being under the table as #corruption.

      #corruption_légale #acheter_les_lois

  • Applying Data Science to the Supreme Court: Topic Modeling Over Time with #NMF (and a #D3.js bonus) — Emily Barry
    http://www.emilyinamillion.me/blog/2016/7/13/visualizing-supreme-court-topics-over-time

    LDA was the obvious choice to do first, as is evident when you google “#topic_modeling algorithm.” (...)
    Then I read about Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) and found that in uses similar to mine, its robustness far surpassed LDA. NMF extracts latent features via matrix decomposition, and you can use TFIDF which is a huge plus.

    #text-mining #gensim ping @lewer

  • Japan’s top court has approved blanket surveillance of the country’s Muslims
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/muslims-japan-government-surveillance-top-court-green-lit-islamaphobi

    ’They made us terrorist suspects, we never did anything wrong,’ says Japanese Muslim, Mohammed Fujita Japan’s Supreme Court has upheld the government’s blanket surveillance of the country’s Muslim community. The court struck down the second appeal by Japanese Muslim plaintiffs against what they perceive as an unconstitutional invasion of their privacy and freedom of religion. A 2010 leak of 114 police files revealed nationwide surveillance of Japanese Muslims. The files revealed that Muslim (...)

    #procès #surveillance

  • Major New Brazil Events Expose the Fraud of Dilma’s Impeachment — and Temer’s Corruption – Glenn Greenwald
    https://theintercept.com/2016/06/30/major-new-brazil-events-expose-the-fraud-of-dilmas-impeachment-and-tem

    Even more significant is the growing evidence of the full-scale corruption of Dilma’s installed replacement, Michel Temer. In just over 30 days since his installation, Temer lost three of his chosen ministers to corruption. One of them, his extremely close ally, Romero Jucá, was caught on tape plotting Dilma’s impeachment as a way to shut down the ongoing corruption investigation, as well as indicating that Brazil’s military, the media and the courts were all participants in the impeachment plotting.

    A key investigation informant, former Senator and construction executive Sérgio Machado, has now said that Temer received and controlled R$ 1.5 million in illegal campaign funds, while a separate informant last week said Temer was the “beneficiary” of R$ 1 million in bribes. And Temer is now banned by a court order from running for any office for 8 years due to his own violation of election laws. Remember: this is who, in the name of fighting “corruption,” Brazil’s elites installed in the place of the elected President.

    Meanwhile, Temer’s political party, PMDB is almost certainly the most corrupt in this hemisphere. Its president of the lower House Eduardo Cunha – who presided over Dilma’s impeachment – is now suspended by the Supreme Court, and the House’s Ethics Commission just voted to expel him entirely because he lied about bribe-filled Swiss Banks he controls. The same construction executive, Machado, testified that three of PMBD’s key leaders – including Jucá – were paid a total of R$ 71.1 million in bribes. Meanwhile, two key Temer allies from the center-right PSDB that Dilma defeated in 2014 – Temer’s Foreign Minister José Serra and Dilma’s 2014 opponent Aécio Neves – are now both targets of the corruption investigation.

  • Chagos islanders cannot return home, says Supreme Court - BBC News

    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-36659976

    Former residents of the Chagos Islands who were forcibly removed from their homeland more than 40 years ago have lost their legal challenge to return.

    Families left the Indian Ocean islands in the 1960s and 70s to make way for a US Air Force base on Diego Garcia, the largest of the group of islands.

    An Immigration Order preventing anyone from going back was issued in 1971.

    The Supreme Court - UK’s highest court - upheld a 2008 House of Lords ruling that the exiles could not return.

    Olivier Bancoult, the Chagossian leader who has been fighting in the courts on behalf of the islanders, had argued that decision should be set aside.

    #diego_garcia #chagos #injustice #peuples_autochtones

  • Change for Peace Will Only Come From Outside Israeli Society

    The center is closer to Likud than the left, so the Paris conference is an important step if the United States and European Union treat it with the necessary gravitas.

    Zeev Sternhell Jun 03, 2016 12:33 AM

    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.722899

    It’s hard to understand what all the commotion was about. After all, the new government is exactly what most voters wanted to see when they left the polling booths at the last election.

    To most of the public, Avigdor Lieberman, Naftali Bennett and Benjamin Netanyahu were meant for each other. All three believe that liberal democracy – with its moral and intellectual values, respect for individual rights without regard to religion or nationality, and system of checks and balances – is nothing but an infantile invention or a mere deception.

    All three are united in their belief that the system has to undergo a thorough change and that in the nation-state of the Jewish people, Jews must enjoy absolute priority. To achieve this, the “judicial revolution” of previous years must be erased, with the justice system subordinated to the executive branch.

    If the majority wishes to expel elected Knesset members whose loyalties it feels are unsatisfactory, or if the majority decides that leftist NGOs or human rights groups are foreign agents, the Supreme Court has no right to intervene. Justices weren’t elected and their guiding principles were never ratified by voters. This is what democracy means to these three.

    They also share the view that relinquishing control of the West Bank in order to end the conflict with the Palestinians is absurd. What sane country would volunteer to give up such assets? Israel is stronger than ever, so there is no need to change the status quo. The occupation and apartheid regime in the territories are legitimate and have become a permanent fixture via the settlement enterprise.

    All this leads to the conclusion that a profound change will not come from within Israeli society, only from without. This is so for the simple reason that most of the center’s leaders hold views similar to the right’s. The style is different and most centrist MKs don’t resemble Likud’s Miri Regev or Oren Hazan, but ultimately Moshe Kahlon, Yair Lapid and Isaac Herzog are closer to Likud than to Meretz.

    This is why the international conference in Paris is an important step forward if the United States and European Union treat it with the necessary gravitas. Recruiting international public opinion in the media and at universities is also important, but this effort will take several years to bear fruit.

    Indeed, if striving for a two-state solution becomes important enough to the Americans and Europeans, they have all the tools to take action. All the Israelis need to realize that the occupation has a price is for the Americans to whisper in the prime minister’s ear that if one more housing unit goes up in the West Bank beyond the 1967 borders or if one new outpost is established, American military aid will stop greasing the wheels of Israel’s arms makers.

    Let the Israeli taxpayer try paying for research and development and sustaining thousands of jobs. In addition, diplomatic assistance at the UN Security Council could be predicated on significant progress on the Palestinian front. No more free lunch. When the automatic American veto is lifted, Israel will be held responsible for its actions. Everyone knows that it takes one harsh Security Council resolution to shock us more than years of polite talk.

    The Europeans can do their part by deciding that the settlements are not part of Israel. They can support Israel’s economic and cultural prosperity while boycotting the settlements. This is the only way to help us extricate ourselves from the morass we’re mired in.

  • BDS Isn’t the Criminal Here
    Even those who don’t believe in the boycott, or think there are better ways to fight the occupation (such as?) cannot go along with this crushing move to criminalize it.

    Gideon Levy Jun 09, 2016 5:58 AM

    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.723947

    The struggle against the movement to boycott Israel has sunk to a new low – criminalization. From now on it’s not just a propaganda campaign against BDS (which only made it stronger), not the usual victim-like behavior, not the colonialist fibs about the boycott’s harming Palestinian laborers. It’s not even the demonization, which includes accusing anyone who dares support the boycott of anti-Semitism, the mother of all accusations.
    No, from now on the boycott is a crime. It’s a crime to boycott the criminal. A crime to avoid buying goods produced on territories of crime. A crime to avoid supporting a crime factory. A crime to fight violation of international law.
    The powerful Jewish-Israeli lobbying is scoring more achievements. The go-ahead was given by none other than France’s Supreme Court, which ruled last year that boycotting Israel is, incredible as it may sound, a “hate crime.” Not the settlements or the executions at checkpoints, not the settlers’ violence and not the mass arrests – no, it’s the boycott against them that’s a crime.
    America wasn’t far behind, of course. It will never miss an opportunity to cultivate, finance and encourage the occupation. Twenty states have enacted, or are about to enact, amendments against the boycott on Israel. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo even went as far as announcing this week that he signed an administrative order under which his state will boycott any organization or company that dares to take part in the boycott. “We want Israel to know we’re on its side,” said this pseudo Israel lover at a Jewish conference in Manhattan. “If you boycott Israel, New York will boycott you,” he tweeted.
    Thank you, New York. Thank you governor. Your move has proved that New York stands on the occupiers’ side, on the side of crime. Again you’ve proved how unworthy the United States is of the title “leader of the free world.” Again you’ve proved that when it comes to Israel all your declared values are abruptly distorted. Could anyone have imagined issuing a similar order against the international movement against apartheid in South Africa? Can anyone imagine criminalizing the sanctions against Russia following its invasion of Crimea?
    It’s not obligatory to support the boycott. It’s OK not to believe in its effectiveness. But it must be admitted that it’s impossible to be a person of conscience and buy the settlements’ products. Just as a law-abiding person won’t buy stolen property, we must not buy goods manufactured on stolen land. It’s obligatory to exhort people against this. It’s permitted to urge people to boycott such products. And it’s very difficult, in fact impossible, to separate between the settlements and Israel, which has erased the Green Line.
    Israel is invested in the occupation project in its entirety and there is no longer any distinguishing between them. Is there a bank without accounts from the West Bank? Is there a health maintenance organization without a branch in Ariel? Is there a supermarket chain without a supermarket for settlers?
    But even those who don’t believe in the boycott, or think there are better ways to fight the occupation (such as?) cannot go along with this crushing criminalization. The boycott is a legitimate, non-violent means that has and is being used by numerous states, including Israel.
    What are the international sanctions on Hamas, with Israel’s encouragement, if not a boycott? What about those on Iran? Hasn’t Israel violated international law as well?
    Israeli propagandists are delighting in the achievements against BDS. The struggle’s commander, Ambassador to the U.S. Danny Danon, last week held a propagandists’ conference in the UN building, where his forces briefed some 1,500 gullible Jewish students to recite: “Every other word that comes out of your mouths must be ‘peace.’”
    That is moving, of course, to the point of tears. But the hour of truth will come, and then all those who acted to criminalize the boycott will have to answer honestly: Who is the criminal here, what is the real crime and what have you done against it?

    #BDS

  • Brazilian prosecutor targets senior ruling party leaders: report | Reuters
    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-brazil-politics-idUSKCN0YT1H6

    Brazil’s top prosecutor is seeking the arrests of the Senate leader and other senior ruling party politicians for allegedly trying to obstruct a corruption probe, threatening to undermine President Michel Temer’s interim government, O Globo reported on Tuesday.

    Those targeted are Senate President Renan Calheiros, Senator Romero Jucá, the president of the ruling PMDB, former Brazilian President José Sarney and the suspended speaker of the lower house of Congress, Eduardo Cunha, the newspaper said.

    Prosecutor General Rodrigo Janot accuses them of seeking to block a sprawling two-year-old investigation into political kickbacks on contracts with state-run oil company Petrobras, according to the report.

    The four men, powerful members of Brazil’s political establishment and the centrist PMDB, the country’s largest party, have denied the accusations.

    The Supreme Court must authorize their arrests.

  • Court Rules Companies Cannot Impose Illegal Arbitration Clauses
    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/27/business/dealbook/court-rules-companies-cannot-impose-illegal-arbitration-clauses.html

    A federal appeals court on Thursday ruled that companies cannot force their employees to sign away their right to band together in legal actions, delivering a major victory for American workers and opening an opportunity for the Supreme Court to weigh in.

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago struck down an arbitration clause that banned employees from joining together as a class and required workers to battle the employer one by one outside of court.

    [...]

    The decision announced on Thursday, in Lewis v. Epic Systems, will almost certainly prove controversial because it directly conflicts with an earlier decision by an appeals court in Louisiana, a split that could prompt the Supreme Court to wade back into the fray. Similar cases are pending across the country.

    In a pair of decisions in 2011 and 2013, the Supreme Court blessed the widespread use of arbitration in a case pushed by a group of credit card companies. The credit card companies turned to a 1925 federal law that formalized arbitration as a means for companies to hash out their disputes with one another.

    Arbitration clauses have proliferated over the last 10 years. Companies have added them to tens of millions of contracts for things as diverse as cellphone service and nursing home care.

  • Federal​ marijuana smuggling is declining in the era of legal weed - The Washington Post
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/05/26/federal-marijuana-smuggling-is-declining-in-the-era-of-legal-weed

    It’s become a familiar lament in the age of legal marijuana: Weed from places like Colorado and Washington is making its way all over the country, creating headaches for law enforcement.

    Nebraska and Oklahoma recently sued Colorado over the state’s legal marijuana market (the Supreme Court declined to take up the case). Sheriffs in neighboring states have been complaining about the strain that Colorado weed is putting on tight law enforcement budgets. A recent USA Today story described a “flow of high-quality marijuana out of Colorado” and into other states.
    […]
    The United States Sentencing Commission (USSC), which compiles data on federal law enforcement efforts, recently released its latest drug trafficking statistics. And they show that federal marijuana trafficking offenses have fallen sharply since 2012, the year that Colorado and Washington residents voted to legalize marijuana. The decline continues through 2015, the most recent year for which data is available.

  • Azerbaijan
    Journalist detained for reporting on high-level Azerbaijan corruption is freed at last!
    In fantastic news from Azerbaijan today, the Supreme Court ordered the release of award-winning investigative journalist Khadija Ismayilova from prison.

    Khadija Ismayilova smiles as she leaves prison after 18 months of imprisonment on bogus charges, Baku, Azerbaijan, on May 25, 2016.
    EXPAND Khadija Ismayilova smiles as she leaves prison after 18 months of imprisonment on bogus charges, Baku, Azerbaijan, on May 25, 2016.
    © 2016 MeydanTV
    Khadija is known for her in-depth pieces on corruption and human rights abuses in Azerbaijan, the oil rich Caspian state. Her investigative pieces exposed evidence of corruption networks that pointed to the country’s top elite, including the President Ilham Aliyev and his family.
    http://bit.ly/20DgvPZ

  • Revealed: Saudi Arabia owns $117 billion of U.S. debt
    http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/16/investing/saudi-arabia-us-debt-ownership-revealed/index.html

    Unlike with most other major owners of U.S. debt, the Treasury Department kept Saudi Arabia’s precise holdings secret since the 1970s. Saudi’s holdings were lumped together with that of other oil exporting nations, including Venezuela and Iraq.

    But that policy ended on Monday as the Treasury Department disclosed precise holdings by specific countries that were previously grouped together. A Treasury official told CNNMoney the move was made following a review aimed at trying to provide more “comprehensive and transparent” data.

    • @nidal : oui j’avais fait le lien grâce à tes signalements (et ceux d’@kassem).

      Comme un vieux couple marié qui se déchire, la colère incite à révéler quelques secrets d’alcôve, à user du chantage, mais aussi à mentir effrontément, à mettre tous les torts sur l’autre, à se menacer et à se faire quelques vacheries. Scène de ménage géopolitique...
      En « conspirationniste prudent », j’espère que quelques bulles des noirs secrets que l’on peut soupçonner de cette entente viennent, à la faveur de cette dispute, éclater à la surface des eaux médiatiques.

      Une réflexion primesautière d’un ignorant en matière de droit : un truc me chiffonne quand même c’est que la possibilité pour les familles de victimes du 09.11 d’attaquer l’Etat saoudien devant les tribunaux américains pourrait renforcer une dynamique qui paraît faire du système judiciaire américain une justice internationale de fait, capable de sanctionner des Etats, ou de faire plier la législation d’autres pays, et ce sans accord politique et sans réciprocité. Ici comme sur d’autres questions : affaire du non-respect des sanctions unilatérales contre l’Iran, de l’évasion fiscale par HSBC, des fonds vautour en Argentine, voire dans les histoires de corruption de la FIFA...
      Avec l’avantage que cela fournit aux forces qui peuvent l’instrumentaliser.

    • @souriyam Il me semble qu’il y a quelques semaines, l’Iran a été condamné par un tribunal de New York à une somme totalement astronomique pour… sa responsabilité totalement farfelue dans les attentats du 11 Septembre. Alors du coup je ne sais pas bien quoi penser. (Peut-être une histoire de pénal/civil, mais je ne vois pas pourquoi les Séoudiens étaient protégés et par les Iraniens.)

    • Amusant, je viens juste de tomber sur un article d’al-Monitor qui traite du sujet, mais en insistant sur le fait que cette tendance constitue une menace pour la conduite de la politique étrangère américaine (ici l’accord sur le nucléaire iranien) et les investisseurs américains potentiels dans les pays ciblés, mais l’article fait aussi le lien avec d’autres affaires (non-respect des sanctions américaines par BNP ou les saoudiens et le 11 septembre) :
      How Supreme Court decision to freeze Iran assets undermines US foreign policy
      http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/05/us-supreme-court-iranian-asset-seizures-terror-victims.html#

      The concept that a nation is immune from lawsuits in the courts of another is accepted internationally, even in cases where the alleged harm is egregious. The United States enshrined state immunity as law through the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) of 1976. Since its enactment, FSIA has gone through transformations resulting in exceptions to the law that include the right of victims of terrorism to sue states listed as “state sponsors of terrorism.” This list includes Iran, but not US allies such as Saudi Arabia. Recent actions under the FSIA exceptions include the US Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the seizing of $2 billion of Iranian assets to compensate victims of the 1983 Marine barracks bombing in Beirut, a lawsuit against Iran filed by former Marine and prisoner Amir Hekmati and a widely mocked decision by a federal court that found Iran liable for the Sept. 11 attacks. The United States seems to be moving forward with the aggressive use of FSIA exceptions to account for past Iranian actions, but the further weakening of state immunity will have unintended consequences that are likely to backfire.

    • L’article parle surtout de la peine prononcée conte l’Iran au sujet de morts de militaires américains du temps de la guerre au Liban, mais aussi de ce que tu écris plus haut sur les plaintes au sujet du 11.09 contre l’Iran et les Saoudiens :

      While plaintiffs seek redress for foreign states’ actions through judicial actions, their desires may not necessarily square with US foreign policy interests — especially when there are doubts as to the defendant’s culpability.
      A prominent example of such a conflict is the recent court order for Iran to pay $10 billion to families of victims who died in the Sept. 11 attacks. The same court cleared Saudi Arabia of any responsibility for the attacks. The decision left foreign policy experts dumbfounded and the White House struggling to explain the judgment. The damage to American credibility would be unimaginable if sanctions violators were used to fund such a farcical judgment.

      Il me semble qui plus est que quelqu’un a signalé ici cette condamnation assez invraisemblable de l’Iran pour le 11.09 dont tu parles.

  • MAJOR, AND I MEAN MAJOR, BRAZIL IMPEACHMENT BREAKING NEWS
    Pepe Escobar.
    It’s all very fuzzy - announced a few minutes ago. The interim president of the lower house in Brazil’s Parliament signed a decision to NULLIFY Dilma Roussef’s impeachment in Congress. The decision will only be published tomorrow - so full details are scarce. What certainly happens is this decision nulls and voids the Congress sessions that dealt with the impeachment last month.

    The interim president - who’s replacing notorious crook Cunha, finally sidelined by the Supreme Court - is asking for the dossier to go back to Congress. The Senate was already supposed to vote on it this Wednesday, or Friday max, when senators would decide if Dilma will be sidelined for 180 days.

    All hell’s breaking loose now. No one knows what happens in the next few hours and days till the end of the week. Get ready for way more cliffhangers ahead.

  • Food Theft in Italy May Not Be a Crime, Court Rules - The New York Times
    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/04/world/europe/food-theft-in-italy-may-not-be-a-crime-court-rules.html?_r=0

    Stealing food from a supermarket may not be a crime in Italy if you are homeless and hungry, the nation’s highest appeals court has ruled.

    In a case that has drawn comparisons to“Les Misérables,” the Supreme Court of Cassation threw out the conviction of a homeless man from Ukraine, Roman Ostriakov, who was caught trying to take 4.07 euros — about $4.70 — worth of cheese and sausage from a store in Genoa without paying for it. A trial court sentenced him in February 2015 to six months in jail and a fine of €100.

    “The condition of the defendant and the circumstances in which the merchandise theft took place prove that he took possession of that small amount of food in the face of the immediate and essential need for nourishment, acting therefore in a state of need,” and therefore the theft “does not constitute a crime,” the appellate court wrote in its decision, which was reported on Monday by the Italian news agency ANSA.

    #chapardage #faim #nécessité #justice #Italie

  • Papua New Guinea court finds Australia’s detention of asylum seekers on #Manus_Island is illegal

    Immigration Minister Peter Dutton says about 900 men being held at the Manus Island detention centre will not be brought to Australia after Papua New Guinea’s Supreme Court ruled their detention was illegal.

    http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/papua-new-guinea-court-finds-australias-detention-of-asylum-seekers-on-manus
    #Australie #migrations #réfugiés #Papoue_Nouvelle_Guinée #détention_administrative

  • The secret rules of the #internet | The Verge
    http://www.theverge.com/2016/4/13/11387934/internet-moderator-history-youtube-facebook-reddit-censorship-free-speech

    Mora-Blanco is one of more than a dozen current and former employees and contractors of major internet platforms from YouTube to Facebook who spoke to us candidly about the dawn of content moderation. Many of these individuals are going public with their experiences for the first time. Their stories reveal how the boundaries of free speech were drawn during a period of explosive growth for a high-stakes public domain, one that did not exist for most of human history. As law professor Jeffrey Rosen first said many years ago of Facebook, these platforms have “more power in determining who can speak and who can be heard around the globe than any Supreme Court justice, any king or any president.”

    #free_speech #modération #surveillance #contrôle #liberté_d'expression #féminisme à plusieurs niveaux (ne serait-ce que parce que la grande majorité des modérateurices sont des femmes et mal payées, et décrivent ce #travail comme une #guerre), des #blackface aussi, etc etc ; énorme article donc, et avec un beau travail d’illustration

  • Inde : un quart de la population est touché par une grave sécheresse
    http://www.lemonde.fr/planete/article/2016/04/22/inde-un-quart-de-la-population-est-touche-par-une-grave-secheresse_4906970_3

    Après deux années d’une faible mousson, au moins le quart de la population indienne doit faire face à la sécheresse, a reconnu mardi 19 avril un avocat du gouvernement indien devant la Cour suprême. Dans l’est de l’Inde, une centrale thermique à charbon a cessé de fonctionner pendant dix jours par manque d’eau de refroidissement en provenance d’un canal relié au Gange.

    A l’autre extrémité du pays, dans l’Etat du Maharashtra, dont Bombay est la capitale, des trains spéciaux ont été affrétés pour approvisionner en eau plusieurs districts ruraux. Les réservoirs de cette région ne sont remplis qu’à 19 %, contre 32 % à la même date il y a un an. La Haute Cour de justice de Bombay a dû ordonner, mi-avril, aux autorités organisatrices du championnat de cricket d’organiser temporairement leurs matchs au-dehors de l’Etat pour éviter l’arrosage des terrains, qui consomme 6 millions de litres d’eau.

    grr, #paywall (ou la #sécheresse des médias) va trouver ailleurs

    • intéressant

      Le Maharashtra souffre d’un grave problème, bien humain celui-là : les millions d’euros investis pour développer l’irrigation depuis dix ans ont été siphonnés par un réseau sophistiqué de corruption venant du plus haut niveau de l’administration régionale. Et enfin, cet Etat comprend énormément de champs de canne à sucre, une plante qui requiert beaucoup d’eau, une aberration dans une région aussi sèche. Mais les barons du sucre dirigent également l’un des principaux partis politiques locaux. Et ne semblent pas vouloir assécher leur industrie, même si cela met en danger la vie de milliers d’autres paysans.

      http://www.rfi.fr/asie-pacifique/20160411-inde-maharashtra-secheresse-agriculteurs-suicide-corruption

    • Sècheresse des médias français peut-être

      http://indianexpress.com/tag/drought

      –—

      India drought: ’330 million people affected’ - BBC News
      http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-36089377

      India drought: ’330 million people affected’

      20 April 2016
      From the section India

      Image copyright EPA
      Image caption India is heavily dependant on monsoon rains which have been poor for the past two years

      At least 330 million people are affected by drought in India, the government has told the Supreme Court

      Authorities say this number is likely to rise further given that some states with water shortages have not yet submitted status reports.

      The drought is taking place as a heat wave extends across much of India with temperatures crossing 40C for days now.

      An 11-year-old girl died of heatstroke while collecting water from a village pump in the western Maharashtra state.

      –---

      Indian drought ’affecting 330 million people’ after two weak monsoons | World news | The Guardian
      http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/20/india-drought-affecting-330-million-people-weak-monsoons

      Indian drought ’affecting 330 million people’ after two weak monsoons

      Government says quarter of the population suffering, as NGO asks supreme court to order Modi government to do more to help
      People from the drought-affected districts of Maharashtra collect water from a tank in Mumbai.
      People from the drought-affected districts of Maharashtra collect water from a tank in Mumbai. Photograph: Divyakant Solanki/EPA

      Agence France-Presse in Delhi

      Wednesday 20 April 2016 12.07 BST
      Last modified on Wednesday 20 April 2016 12.36 BST

      Share on Pinterest
      Share on LinkedIn
      Share on Google+

      Save for later

      About 330 million people are affected by drought in India, the government has said, as the country reels from severe water shortages and desperately poor farmers suffer crop losses.

      A senior government lawyer, PS Narasimha, told the supreme court that a quarter of the country’s population, spread across 10 states, had been hit by drought after two consecutive years of weak monsoons.

      Narasimha said the government had released funds to affected regions where a crippling shortage of rainfall had forced the rationing of drinking water to some communities.

      As summer hits India, reports of families and farmers in remote villages walking long distances to find water after their wells dried up have dominated local media.

      Narasimha gave the figures on Tuesday after an NGO filed a petition asking the top court to order Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government to step up relief to the hardest-hit areas.

      High temperatures have hit parts of eastern, central and southern India in recent weeks, with scores of deaths reported from heatstroke.

      Every year hundreds of people, mainly the poor, die at the height of summer in India, but temperatures have risen earlier than normal, increasing concerns about this year’s toll.

      “We had never recorded such high temperatures in these months in more than 100 years,” said PK Mohapatra, the special relief commissioner in Orissa state.