organization:united states navy

  • Bugaled Breizh : la piste américaine relancée
    Publié le 17/10/2016 à 23:09
    http://www.ouest-france.fr/bretagne/quimper-29000/bugaled-breizh-la-piste-americaine-relancee-4566020

    Le USS Hyman G. Rickover, sous-marin américain, croisait dans la zone de naufrage du chalutier bigouden, le 15 janvier 2004, selon des documents déclassifiés de l’US Navy sortis dans la presse.

    Le nom de ce bâtiment américain figurait déjà, en 2013, dans la liste de douze bâtiments sous-marins d’attaques nucléaires fournie par l’expert Dominique Salles. Le USS Hyman G. Rickover, mais aussi le USS Albany.

    Selon des documents déclassifiés de l’US Navy sortis dans la presse, le USS Hyman G. Rickover aurait effectué une mission anti-terroriste en Atlantique-nord de la fin d’année 2003 à février 2004. Mission au cours de laquelle il aurait d’ailleurs effectué une escale à Portmouth, port situé à environ 200 nautiques du lieu de naufrage du chalutier.

    Le Bugaled Breizh a disparu, le 15 janvier 2004, au large du Cap Lizard au sud-ouest de l’Angleterre, avec cinq marins à bord, dont deux victimes n’ont jamais été retrouvées.

    « Pourquoi maintenant ? »

    « J’attends d’avoir des éléments, réagit Michel Douce, armateur du Bugaled Breizh. Pourquoi cette information, maintenant, 13 ans après le naufrage ? ». Ces documents déclassifiés par l’US Navy sortent alors qu’une procédure portant sur les causes du naufrage s’ouvrira en Grande-Bretagne début 2017. La justice britannique peut ouvrir une procédure car deux corps de victimes avaient été retrouvés dans les eaux territoriales. Si la présence du Hyman G. Rickover dans la zone du naufrage se vérifiait, la justice anglaise devrait s’y intéresser de près.

    « Info ou intox ? s’interroge encore Michel Douce. Si c’était vrai, cette nouvelle pièce pourrait peut-être permettre de rouvrir l’enquête sur le territoire français ». Prudence donc.

    « une mission anti-terroriste » ? ? ? qui fait cinq victimes.

  • The US just bombed Yemen, and no one’s talking about it | Moustafa Bayoumi | Opinion | The Guardian

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/15/us-bombed-yemen-middle-east-conflict

    What if the United States went to war and nobody here even noticed? The question is absurd, isn’t it? And yet, this almost perfectly describes what actually happened this past week.

    While many Americans, myself included, were all hypnotized by the bizarre spectacle of the Republican nominee for president, a US navy destroyer fired a barrage of cruise missiles at three radar sites controlled by the rebel Houthi movement in Yemen. This attack marked the first time the US has fought the rebels directly in Yemen’s devastating civil war.

    #yémen #bombardements #états-unis

  • Avec le « Zumwalt », les Etats-Unis rejouent « Star Trek » en mer
    http://www.lemonde.fr/ameriques/article/2016/10/14/avec-le-zumwalt-la-navy-americaine-rejoue-star-trek-en-mer_5014034_3222.html

    Etrange coïncidence, son commandant se nomme James Kirk, comme celui du navire spatial Enterprise dans la série de science-fiction Star Trek. Bien réel, ce bateau de guerre est présenté comme le destroyer américain du futur, électronique, furtif, puissant comme aucun autre avant lui avec ses 14 000 tonnes, et capable, demain, de tirer des armes laser. Le tout premier DDG 1000, baptisé Zumwalt, en mémoire d’un célèbre amiral, est mis en service officiellement par la marine américaine samedi 15 octobre, lors d’une cérémonie à Baltimore.
    […]
    Mais le Zumwalt, pour l’heure, est aussi un échec. La marine avait prévu d’en acquérir trente-deux. Elle s’arrêtera à… trois. A plus de 6 milliards de dollars l’unité (5,5 milliards d’euros), sans compter les frais de développement, le programme dépassera les 20 milliards. En 2009, le ministère de la défense a arrêté les frais en décidant de privilégier les destroyers de classe Arleigh Burke, un peu plus légers, un peu moins furtifs, mais tout aussi performants et pour moins cher.
    Pour toutes les armées modernes, la course à la technologie est un piège. « Pour payer de tels navires, la marine renonce à l’autre condition de la supériorité, le nombre et la présence, rappelle Thibault Lamidel. Aujourd’hui, l’US Navy compte 320 à 340 bateaux, et il lui en faudrait au moins 400 pour être une marine globale présente partout dans le monde comme le souhaitait Reagan. »

    Pour ce spécialiste, le Zumwalt « reste un exercice technologique ». Incapable de renverser un rapport de force dans la région Asie-Pacifique. Mais suffisamment impressionnant pour « faire de la diplomatie navale de prestige » en direction de la Chine.

    Pour le dernier point, on peut rester très dubitatif : pour tout ce qui concerne leur marine, les Chinois font preuve d’un pragmatisme certain. Et plutôt qu’une fuite en avant technologique, ils ne rechignent pas à acheter des navires d’occasion (le Varyag, pour ne pas le nommer) censément pour en faire un casino flottant (au moment de l’achat à l’Ukraine…) puis le réhabiliter totalement et se doter d’un premier groupe aéronaval autour du Lianoning. Pas vraiment la même démarche.

  • U.S. Navy ship targeted in failed missile attack from Yemen: U.S. | Reuters
    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-yemen-security-usa-ship-idUSKCN12A082

    A U.S. Navy guided missile destroyer was targeted on Sunday in a failed missile attack from territory in Yemen controlled by Iran-aligned Houthi rebels, a U.S. military spokesman told Reuters, saying neither of the two missiles hit the ship.

    The attempted strike on the USS Mason, which was first reported by Reuters, came just a week after a United Arab Emirates vessel came under attack from Houthis and suggests growing risks to the U.S. military from Yemen’s conflict.

    The U.S. government, which has become increasingly vocal about civilian casualties in the war, this weekend announced a review of its support to a Saudi Arabia-led coalition battling the Houthis after a strike on mourners in the capital Sanaa that killed up to 140 people.

    The failed missile attack on the USS Mason began around 7 p.m. local time, when the ship detected two inbound missiles over a 60-minute period in the Red Sea off Yemen’s coast, the U.S. military said.

    Both missiles impacted the water before reaching the ship,” Pentagon spokesman Captain Jeff Davis said. “There were no injuries to our sailors and no damage to the ship.

    • New Facts about Yemen Missile Attack on USS Mason : US Ship Fired 3 Missiles to Defend Itself
      https://southfront.org/new-facts-about-yemen-missile-attack-on-uss-mason-us-ship-fired-3-missil

      Three missiles were fired by the crew of the USS Mason (DDG-87) guided-missile destroyer in the Red Sea in order to defend it and the nearby USS Ponce (AFSB(I)-15) from an attack of two presumed cruise missiles, fired by the Iran-backed Houthi forces from the Yemini shore, on October 9, the USNI News informational website reported, citing two defense officials.

      According to the sources, the vessel was operating in international waters north of the strait of Bab el-Mandeb at the time of the attack. A single Enhanced Sea Sparrow Missile (ESSM) and two Standard Missile-2s (SM-2s) were launched by the USS Mason in order to intercept the two missiles. The Nulka anti-ship missile decoy also was used by the ship.

      As one of the defense officials told USNI News on October 10, the Masonemployed onboard defensive measures against the first suspected cruise missile, although it is unclear whether this led to the missile striking the water or whether it would have struck the water anyway.” However, it was not specified that the “defensive measure” was a missile fired from the ship.

      Débat sur l’utilisation ou non de missiles anti-missiles.

      Former aide to retired former-Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan Greenert and a naval analyst at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, Bryan Clark, noted that the use of both missiles by the US is “very significant.

      It might be the first time the SM-2 used against an actual threat for which it was designed,” Clark said. “It’s definitely the first time ESSM has been used… This is obviously a huge deal.

      At the same time, other experts noted that the fact that the Pentagon is not able to say if the missiles were intercepted indicates that this event did not take place. According to them, the Pentagon would actively use this incident to promote the US Navy and the defense industries due to the fact that the system has not ever been used to intercept a target in a real incident before.

      Enfin, analyse des dégâts sur le HSV Swift (cf. billet sur le sujet)

    • Apparemment, les navires états-uniens ont subi deux attaques au missile distinctes.

      Navy launches Tomahawk missiles at rebel sites in Yemen after attacks on U.S. ships - The Washington Post
      https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2016/10/12/more-missiles-fired-from-rebel-held-territory-in-yemen-at-u-s-navy-s

      In the first attack launched at the U.S. Navy, two cruise missiles were launched Sunday at the USS Mason, a guided-missile destroyer, and the USS Ponce, an amphibious staging base. In that case, the first missile was launched while the ships were at least 12 miles away from Yemen’s shore in international waters near the Bab el-Mandeb strait, a waterway between Yemen and Djibouti that is heavily trafficked by oilers. The ships were even farther away when the second one was launched.

      In the second attack Wednesday, at least one missile was fired from rebel-held territory at the Mason, [Pentagon spokesman Peter] Cook said. That missile was launched at about 6 p.m. from south of the coastal city Al Hudaydah.

  • Littoral Combat Ship USS Montgomery Suffers Cracked Hull in Collision with Tugboat – gCaptain
    https://gcaptain.com/littoral-combat-ship-uss-montgomery-suffers-cracked-hull-collision-tugboat


    USS Montgomery (LCS-8)
    U.S. Navy File Photo

    The U.S. Navy’s newest littoral combat ship USS Montgomery has suffered a crack in its aluminum hull after being hit by a tug as the ship sortied from Mayport, Florida ahead of Hurricane Matthew.

    The incident occurred October 4 and was first reported by Navy Times, which obtained the following statement from the Navy:

    USS Montgomery (LCS 8) sustained a crack to its hull while getting underway from Naval Station Mayport under orders to sortie Oct. 4. This crack resulted in minor seawater intrusion, but was contained by the crew. An investigation into possible causes is underway, and the ship will receive more permanent repairs upon her return to port.

    Citing another report, the Navy Times said Tuesday’s incident opened up a foot-long crack amidships along a weld seam about three feet above the waterline. The water ingress was reported to be about a gallon of water every three minutes, the Navy Times said. Five of the ship’s horizontal beams in the hull, called stringers, were also bent.
    […]
    The USS Montgomery is the fourth ship in the Navy’s Independence variant of the LCS, featuring an all-aluminum trimaran hull and built by Austal USA.

    Tiens, un (autre…) trimaran tout alu.
    Celui-ci (et ceux de sa classe LCS Independence) coûte autour de 500 M$ pièce.

  • UAE likely to be building a naval facility in Eritrea | IHS Jane’s 360 (article d’avril 2016)
    http://www.janes.com/article/59561/uae-likely-to-be-building-a-naval-facility-in-eritrea


    Satellite imagery (right) showing the new military camp and the construction of a new port facility at Assab airport in Eritrea on 4 March. Al Khatem, a dredger operated by the UAE’s National Marine Dredging Company, can be seen operating at the site. The image on the left shows the same area in 2013, before the development began. (2016 CNES/Astrium/GoogleEarth/IHS)

    The United Arab Emirates (UAE) appears to be constructing a new port next to Assab International Airport in Eritrea, which could become its first permanent military base in a foreign country.

    Satellite imagery shows rapid progress has been made since work began sometime after September 2015. A square of coastline measuring about 250x250 m has already been excavated and dredged, while a pier and/or breakwater is being constructed and already extends over 700 m from the original coastline.
    […]
    Eritrea has little need of a new port in the Assab area, given that the existing one 12 km to the southeast of the construction site was rarely visited until the UAE’s navy began to use it last year to support the country’s military operation in Yemen.

    IHS Jane’s has published satellite imagery showing most of the naval vessels at the existing port since 21 September 2015 have been Emirati landing ships. IHS Maritime & Trade data show that many of the commercial vessels that docked there over the same period came from the UAE’s naval base at Fujairah. This indicated that the UAE is using Assab as a logistics hub where supplies are transferred from commercial to naval vessels for onward shipment to Yemen.

    • L’info de février 2016 sur l’utilisation du port d’Assab.

      UAE naval vessels using Eritrea’s Assab port | IHS Jane’s 360
      http://www.janes.com/article/58194/uae-naval-vessels-using-eritrea-s-assab-port


      Airbus Defence and Space imagery shows various foreign-operated vessels berthed in the Eritrean port at Assab. (CNES 2015, Distribution Airbus DS/2016 IHS) 1569186

      The United Arab Emirates (UAE) Navy is using the port of Assab in Eritrea, Airbus Defence and Space satellite imagery confirms.

      Landing ships that can be identified as UAE naval assets can be seen at the port in three separate satellite images.

      Taken on 5 February, the most recent image shows a landing ship that is approximately 80 m long and has a helicopter pad on its stern. This or a sister ship can also be seen at Assab in imagery taken on 21 September 2015.

      Although a ship matching this description has not previously been identified in open sources as being in service with any navy, the same vessel or a sister ship can be seen in Google Earth satellite imagery of the UAE’s new naval base in Dubai on two different dates.

      Another three landing ships can be seen at Assab in the 5 February imagery. One is approximately 60 m [check with Sean] in length and does not match any known to be operated by the UAE Navy, suggesting a second navy may also be using Assab.

      The other two are identical to the 64 m landing ships operated by the UAE. It is possible these are Kuwaiti naval vessels as Abu Dhabi Ship Building delivered two to Kuwait as well as three to the UAE.

      However, imagery taken on 7 November 2015 show three of the 64 m landing ships at Assab, meaning at least one must be operated by the UAE Navy. One of these landing ships can be seen in the 21 September image.

      The 7 November image also shows that the high-speed roll-on/roll-off (ro-ro) catamaran Swift 1 (IMO: 9283928) was also present. This vessel operated by the US Military Sealift Command between 2003-2013. The website of its manufacturer, Incat, said in 2015 that it was being operated by the UAE’s National Marine Dredging Company.

  • Arab coalition says targets Houthi forces after ship attack | World | Reuters
    http://af.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idAFKCN122064

    Arab coalition forces have launched operations against militia boats of Yemen’s Houthi group that struck a civilian logistics ship on a humanitarian voyage in a strategic Red Sea shipping lane, the Saudi-led alliance said.

    The vessel, an Australian-built high-speed logistics catamaran under lease to the United Arab Emirates military, was attacked by Houthi fighters near the Bab al-Mandab strait off Yemen’s southern coast on Saturday. The coalition rescued its civilian passengers. No crew were hurt.

    In a statement late on Saturday, the coalition said the vessel belonged to the UAE Marine Dredging Company “on its usual route to and from Aden to transfer relief and medical aid and evacuate wounded civilians to complete their treatment outside Yemen.

  • U.S. Navy’s New High Tech Destroyer Suffers ’Engineering Casualty’ – gCaptain
    http://gcaptain.com/u-s-navys-new-high-tech-destroyer-suffers-engineering-casualty


    The future guided-missile destroyer USS Zumwalt (DDG 1000) transits the Atlantic Ocean during acceptance trials April 21, 2016.
    U.S. Navy File Photo

    The U.S. Navy’s new high tech destroyer has been sidelined for repairs after suffering a seawater leak in its propulsion system less than a month before its expected commissioning.

    The U.S. Navy confirmed via a statement to USNI News that the future USS Zumwalt, the largest and most technologically advanced destroyer ever built for the Navy, suffered the engineering casualty that could take up to two weeks to repair.

    The fault was discovered during at sea testing on September 19.

    The crew discovered the casualty after detecting a seawater leak in the propulsion motor drive lube oil auxiliary system for one of the ship’s shafts,” U.S. Naval Surface Forces said in a statement to USNI News. “The built-in redundancy of the ship’s propulsion plant allows this first-in-class ship to operate with multiple engine configurations. However, it was determined that the repairs should be completed in port prior to the ship transiting to sea.

  • U.S. Navy Patrol Ship Forced to Dodge Iranian Fast Attack Craft in Persian Gulf – gCaptain
    http://gcaptain.com/u-s-navy-patrol-ship-forced-to-dodge-iranian-fast-attack-craft-in-persian-

    A U.S. Navy coastal patrol ship changed course after a fast attack craft from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps came within 100 yards (91 meters) of it in the central Gulf on Sunday, two U.S. Defense Department officials told Reuters on Tuesday.

    The officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Iranian vessel sailed directly in front of the USS Firebolt, forcing the 174-foot (53-meter) U.S. ship to change course.

    The interaction was “unsafe and unprofessional due to lack of communications and the close-range harassing maneuvering,” one of the officials said, adding that uncovered and manned weapons were seen on the Iranian vessel.

    The U.S. ship tried to communicate with the Iranian ship by radio three times but received no response.

  • Commentary: Here’s how the U.S. Navy will defeat Iran’s speedboats | Reuters
    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-navy-iran-commentary-idUSKCN1151SB

    And that’s not all. In 2014, the U.S. Navy fitted a new, large laser gun to the amphibious ship USS Ponce, which is permanently stationed in the Persian Gulf, where it acts as an at-sea base for helicopters, small boats and special operations forces. Big, slow and otherwise lightly armed, Ponce was uniquely vulnerable to the guard corps boat swarms.

    The so-called #Laser_Weapon_System , aimed by an operator holding a video-game-style controller, shoots a 30-kilowatt laser over a distance of several miles. As #LaWS doesn’t fire conventional missiles or bullets, instead drawing power from a generator, it essentially never runs out of ammunition. Perfect for wiping out a swarm.

    The laser system is a one-off weapon – and, at $40 million, it didn’t come cheap. But having proved that a laser can work in real-world conditions, the Navy is planning to build more and bigger lasers and, potentially, outfit all its front-line warships with them. If that happens, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps swarms might finally meet their match.

    #swarm_attack

  • Littoral Combat Ship USS Freedom Suffers Engine Casualty – gCaptain
    https://gcaptain.com/littoral-combat-ship-uss-freedom-suffers-engineering-casualty

    The U.S. Navy is investigating a casualty to one of the main propulsion diesel engines (MPDE) on board the first littoral combat ship USS Freedom, which the Navy says will need to be removed and rebuilt or replaced altogether. 

    The Navy said Monday that the casualty occurred July 11 and was caused by a leak from the attached seawater pump mechanical seal that resulted in seawater entering the engine lube oil system.
    […]
    The casualty is the latest in the growing list of issues related to the Navy’s beleaguered Littoral Combat Ship program. Back in January, the USS Fort Worth (LCS 3) was sidelined in Singapore after suffering damage to the ship’s combining gears. The ship was expected to return San Diego under its own power this summer for an extensive repair period. Earlier in December 2015, the USS Milwaukee (LCS 5) had to be towed into port after losing propulsion during an Atlantic Ocean transit, just one month after being commissioned.

    Given the engineering casualties on USS Freedom and USS Fort Worth, I believe improvements in engineering oversight and training are necessary,” said Vice Adm. Tom Rowden, commander, Naval Surface Forces.

  • NAVY SAYS IRANIAN BOATS HARASSED US SHIP IN STRAIT OF HORMUZ — News from The Associated Press
    http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_UNITED_STATES_NAVY_IRAN

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McSC5LP15Gk

    Four Iranian small boats harassed a U.S. Navy warship near the Persian Gulf, but no missiles were fired, the chief of naval operations said Wednesday.
    […]
    A U.S. defense official said the Iranian boats approached the Nitze at high speed on Wednesday, in an unsafe and unprofessional manner. The destroyer fired ten flares in the direction of the Iranian boats and sounded the ship’s whistle several times in an effort to warn the boats away, the official said. The Nitze also tried to communicate with the Iranians over the radio, and also changed course to avoid the vessels.

    The official said two boats ignored the warnings and continued to speed toward the Nitze until they were within 300 yards of the U.S. ship.

    The USS Nitze was in international waters in the Strait of Hormuz with the USS Mason, also a guided missile destroyer. The official wasn’t authorized to discuss the incident publicly so spoke anonymously.

  • Climate Change Has Produced a New Underwater Sound Superhighway - Facts So Romantic
    http://nautil.us/blog/climate-change-has-produced-a-new-underwater-sound-superhighway

    In March, a team of scientists dragged a blast furnace on a sled across a giant slab of ice in the Beaufort Sea, above the Arctic Circle. With the furnace, the researchers (from the United States Navy and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology) melted a hole in the ice big enough to fit their 850-pound, 12-foot drone, which they dropped through to the icy waters below. Their mission: to measure how climate change is altering the acoustics of the Arctic Ocean. The USS Providence in the Arctic Ocean.Marion Doss / FlickrUnderstanding how sound travels under water is critical to the Navy because its submarines use sonar to communicate, and to track and identify foreign vessels. The speed of sound is variable in water, changing with temperature, salinity, and pressure. As temperature (...)

  • Military Sealift Command To Honor Gay Rights Activist Harvey Milk - gCaptain
    https://gcaptain.com/military-sealift-command-to-honor-gay-rights-activist-harvey-milk


    Rendering of a John Lewis class oiler in San Diego Bay.
    Courtesy NASSCO

    Military Sealift Command, the transportation provider for the US Navy, will name it’s newest ship after Harvey Milk, the San Francisco gay rights activist featured in Sean Penn’s award winning movie, Milk.

    U.S. Naval Institute News reported that a July 14, 2016 congressional notification, signed by Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus, indicated he intended to name a planned Military Sealift Command fleet oiler USNS Harvey Milk (T-AO-206). The ship would be the second of the John Lewis-class oilers being built by General Dynamics NASSCO in San Diego, California

    The Secretary of the Navy’s office is deferring releasing additional information until the naming announcement, a Navy official told USNI News on Thursday.

    Mabus has said the John Lewis-class – named after civil rights activist and congressman Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) – would all be named after civil rights leaders.

    • Harvey Milk — Wikipédia
      https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_Milk

      Harvey Bernard Milk (né le 22 mai 1930 à Woodmere, à Long Island, mort le 27 novembre 1978 à San Francisco) est un homme politique américain et un militant pour les droits des homosexuels. Il a été le premier « superviseur » (poste similaire à celui de conseiller municipal) ouvertement homosexuel de la ville de San Francisco.

      Harvey Milk a été assassiné avec le maire de San Francisco, George Moscone, le 27 novembre 1978. Leur meurtrier, Dan White, a été condamné à sept ans et huit mois de prison, pour homicide involontaire. Ses défenseurs plaidèrent qu’il aurait été perturbé par une « mauvaise alimentation » ; il sera finalement libéré après cinq ans de réclusion. Le verdict, considéré comme trop clément par la communauté gay mais pas seulement, a provoqué les émeutes de la Nuit White (qui ont eu lieu dans la nuit du 21 mai 1979), réprimées par la police de San Francisco.

  • Photos: U.S. Navy Shows Off Seabasing Ops with USNS Montford Point - gCaptain
    https://gcaptain.com/photos-u-s-navy-shows-off-new-seabasing-capabilities-with-usns-montford-po


    Photo: MSC

    The U.S. Military Sealift Command’s (MSC) expeditionary transfer dock USNS Montford Point (T-ESD 1) showed off some “skin-to-skin” maneuvers last week in the Pacific Ocean, part of the U.S. Navy’s new seabasing capabilities.
    […]
    The U.S. Navy considers Montford Point’s flexibility critical for humanitarian response to natural disasters and for support to warfighters ashore. The size of the ship allows for 25,000 square feet of vehicle and equipment stowage space and 380,000 gallons of JP-5 fuel storage.

  • Federal Court Rules Against The US Navy, In Favor Of Whales - gCaptain
    https://gcaptain.com/federal-court-rules-against-the-us-navy-in-favor-of-whales

    The US Navy has wrongly used sonar at levels that could harm whales, seals, dolphins and walruses and disrupt their feeding and mating, ruled a federal appeals court in San Francisco.

    In a 3-0 decision the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a 2012 lower court decision that allowed the Navy to use low-frequency sonar for “training, testing and routine operations” in the Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian Oceans and the Mediterranean Sea.

  • US accuses Russian warship of aggressive maneuvers for second time in as many weeks | Fox News
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/07/02/us-accuses-russian-warship-aggressive-maneuvers-for-second-time-in-as-many-

    The U.S. military Saturday accused a Russian warship of “high risk” and “highly unprofessional” maneuvers near a U.S. Navy ship in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, the second time in as many weeks that American and Russian ships had such a close encounter on the high seas.

    A statement from the U.S. European Command (EUCOM) claimed that the frigate Yaroslav Mudry passed unnecessarily near the guided missile cruiser USS San Jacinto. The statement added that the Yaroslav Mudry navigated in the San Jacinto’s wake. 

    EUCOM said the U.S. cruiser was not threatened and maintained its course and speed. However, the statement said the Russian maneuver was "contrary to international maritime regulations.

    These actions can unnecessarily escalate tensions between countries, and could result in dangerous miscalculations or accidents,” the EUCOM statement said.

    Reuters reported that at the time of the incident, the San Jacinto was carrying out operations against ISIS in Iraq and Syria along with the aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower.

  • Su-34 versus département d’État
    http://www.dedefensa.org/article/su-34-versus-departement-detat

    Su-34 versus département d’État

    21 juin 2016 – Faut-il établir une connexion entre deux évènements qui semblent si parfaitement se compléter, sur le fond aussi bien que chronologiquement, à savoir le “mémo interne” du département d’État sur la Syrie et un “accrochage” tendu entre deux Su-34 russes et des F-18 de l’US Navy au-dessus de la Syrie, à proximité de la frontière jordanienne ? L’exercice mérite d’être tenté. C’est donc la proposition que nous allons développer, d’abord en rappelant et en développant les deux évènements.

    • Le premier est déjà connu, qui concerne le mémo interne de hauts-fonctionnaires du département d’État demandant une attaque contre Damas et le gouvernement syrien (voir le 17 juin). Nous précisions dans le texte référencé notre appréciation que cette affaire démontrait qu’en cas de (...)

  • Russia: We will respond to entry of U.S. naval vessel into Black Sea | Reuters
    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-usa-ship-idUSKCN0YW0PP


    U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer USS Porter sets sail in the Bosphorus, on its way to the Black Sea in Istanbul, Turkey, June 6, 2016.
    REUTERS/MURAD SEZER

    The Russian Foreign ministry said Moscow would respond to a U.S. naval ship’s entry into the Black Sea with unspecified measures, saying it and other deployments were designed to ratchet up tensions ahead of a NATO summit, the RIA news agency reported.

    Russian state media reported that the USS Porter, a U.S. naval destroyer, entered the Black Sea a few days ago on a routine deployment, a move it said raised hackles in Moscow because it had recently been fitted with a new missile system.

    U.S. Navy officials told reporters on Wednesday the U.S. military would also have two aircraft carriers in the Mediterranean this month ahead of a July NATO summit in Warsaw as Washington sought to balance Russian military activities.

  • The U.S. Navy Has Taken Delivery of Its Most Advanced Destroyer Ever - gCaptain
    https://gcaptain.com/the-u-s-navy-has-taken-delivery-of-its-most-advanced-destroyer-ever


    The future guided-missile destroyer USS Zumwalt (DDG 1000) in the Atlantic Ocean during acceptance trials April 21, 2016.
    U.S. Navy Photo

    The Navy on Friday accepted delivery of the future USS Zumwalt (DDG 1000), the lead ship of the Navy’s next-generation multi-mission surface destroyers.

  • U.S. Navy Fires Commander Over Iran’s Detention of 10 Sailors - ABC News
    http://abcnews.go.com/International/us-navy-fires-commander-irans-detention-10-sailors/story?id=39079977


    Screen grabs from video broadcast by Iran’s state broadcaster purport to show 10 American sailors being detained by Iranian authorities in the Persian Gulf, Jan. 12, 2016.

    The U.S. Navy has relieved of command the head of a Riverine Squadron who oversaw the 10 American sailors who in January were held by Iran for 15 hours after straying into Iranian territorial waters in the Persian Gulf.

    Commander, Coastal Riverine Group (CRG) 1, relieved Cmdr. Eric Rasch of his duties May 12 as commanding officer of Coastal Riverine Squadron (CRS) 3,” said a statement issued by the Navy on Thursday.

    According to the statement, “Rasch was relieved due to a loss of confidence in his ability to command.

    Rasch has been temporarily reassigned to another unit. He was responsible for the training and operational readiness of the 400 sailor squadron. Riverine boats provide maritime security in harbor areas as well as conducting escort support for U.S. Naval vessels.

    Capt. Gary Leigh, commander of Command Riverine Group 1, relieved Rasch after his review of the results of the Navy’s investigation into the incident.

    On January 12, two Navy Riverine craft and the 10 sailors aboard were detained by Iran after the craft strayed into the territorial waters off of Farsi Island. The two craft were en route from Kuwait to the U.S. Naval base in Bahrain. A Navy investigation found that faulty navigation equipment did not indicate the craft’s position in Iranian waters. Furthermore, one of the craft had mechanical problems that delayed their potential transit out of those waters.

  • U.S. launches long-awaited missile defense shield - CNNPolitics.com
    http://edition.cnn.com/2016/05/11/politics/nato-missile-defense-romania-poland

    The U.S. launched a new ground-based missile defense system in Romania Thursday, sparking fresh tensions with Russia, which quickly blasted the system as a threat to its security.

    The system, to be operated by NATO, is getting up and running nearly a decade after the U.S. first announced plans to do so, only to encounter pushback from Russia. The U.S. has long insisted that the shield is directed against rogue states like Iran and not intended to target Moscow’s missiles, but Russian officials have slammed the move as an “attempt to destroy the strategic balance” in Europe.
    The United States’ Aegis ashore system is declared certified for operations,” NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said Thursday at the ceremony launching the system.

    Missile defense is for defense,” he added. “It does not undermine or weaken Russia’s strategic nuclear deterrent.
    Russia has described the U.S. anti-missile shield in Europe as a “threat” and says it is taking “protective measures” to guard against it, the country’s state news agency TASS reported.
    President Barack Obama scrapped the George W. Bush administration’s planned bilateral deployment of a different system to Poland and the Czech Republic and has instead pursued a NATO-centric approach using alternate technology.

    The system is to be turned over to NATO command and will be housed at a U.S. naval support facility in Deveselu, Romania, the site of a Romanian military base. Construction will begin on an additional anti-missile platform in Poland on Friday.

    The Aegis Ashore Missile Defense System unveiled Thursday is capable of firing SM-3 defensive missiles that can “defeat incoming short and medium range enemy missiles,” according to Lt. Shawn Eklund, a spokesman for the U.S. Navy.

    Eklund told CNN that the facility will be manned by approximately 130 U.S. sailors. The inaugural ceremony for the new system will be attended by top U.S. and NATO military officials.
    The Romania installation is the first land-based defensive missile launcher in Europe and will join other elements of the NATO defensive shield, including a command-and-control center at Ramstein Air Base, Germany, a radar installation in Turkey and four ships capable of identifying enemy missiles and firing their own SM-3s based in Rota, Spain.

    The U.S. and NATO have continually stressed that the system is intended to defend Europe from Iran and its expanding arsenal. Tehran has continued to test-fire ballistic missiles following the internationally negotiated deal to limit its nuclear program.
    But Russia has dismissed the justification.

    From the very outset we kept saying that in the opinion of our experts the deployment of an anti-missile defense poses a threat to Russia,” Russian presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, according to the Tass News Agency. “The question is not whether measures will be taken or not; measures are being taken to maintain Russia’s security at the necessary level.

    Russia believes the missile defense system breaches a 1987 agreement it signed with the U.S.

    In October, at a meeting of the meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club in Russia, Russian President Vladimir accused the U.S. of “lying” about a “hypothetical Iranian threat, which never existed” and called the system “an attempt to destroy the strategic balance.

    At a Wednesday press conference in Romania, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Frank Rose pushed back on Putin’s perspective.
    Russia has repeatedly raised concerns that U.S. and NATO missile defenses are directed against Russia and represent a threat to its strategic nuclear deterrent,” he said. “Nothing could be further from the truth.

    He added that the “U.S. and NATO missile defense systems are directed against ballistic missile threats outside the Euro-Atlantic area. NATO and the United States have explained this to Russia many times over the years.

    Heather Conley, the director of the Europe Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, told CNN that Russia has previously suggested that it could retaliate for the missile defense system by stationing S-300 surface-to-air missile systems in Crimea and Kaliningrad, its European enclave located between Poland and Lithuania.
    […]
    But she added, “Despite an incredible amount of consultations with Russia, the Russians never bought the argument that the system was not directed at them.”

  • War danger grows following new US provocation in South China Sea - World Socialist Web Site

    http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2016/05/11/chin-m11.html

    War danger grows following new US provocation in South China Sea
    By James Cogan
    11 May 2016

    On Tuesday, in an open military provocation, the Obama administration authorised the US Navy to send a guided-missile destroyer into the 12-nautical-mile territorial zone surrounding Chinese-held Fiery Cross Reef, located in the Spratly Island chain in the South China Sea. The operation was carried out on the fraudulent pretext of “freedom of navigation”—that is, the assertion by US imperialism that it has the right to send its military forces anywhere it chooses, at any time, in Chinese-claimed waters.

    Yesterday’s action achieved its real aim of ratcheting up military tensions in the Asia-Pacific. The Chinese military responded by scrambling at least two J-11 fighter jets. Chinese pilots reportedly issued warnings to the American destroyer, the USS William P. Lawrence, to leave Chinese territory or face engagement. The Chinese Navy dispatched three warships, but there have been no reports that the rival vessels came into contact.

    #mer_de_chine_méridionale #chine #états-unis

  • China scrambles fighters as U.S. sails warship near Chinese-claimed reef | Reuters
    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-southchinasea-usa-china-idUSKCN0Y10DM

    China scrambled fighter jets on Tuesday as a U.S. navy ship sailed close to a disputed reef in the South China Sea, a patrol China denounced as an illegal threat to peace which only went to show its defense installations in the area were necessary.

    Guided missile destroyer the USS William P. Lawrence traveled within 12 nautical miles of Chinese-occupied Fiery Cross Reef, U.S. Defense Department spokesman, Bill Urban said.

    The so-called freedom of navigation operation was undertaken to “challenge excessive maritime claims” by China, Taiwan, and Vietnam which were seeking to restrict navigation rights in the South China Sea, Urban said.