organization:university of london

Et une vidéo sur le compte twitter de Al Jazeera :
▻https://twitter.com/AJEnglish/status/1084563237406945282

A mettre en lien, notamment, avec le travail de Charles et Lorenzo sur le désormais célèbre « Left to die boat » :
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/333036
#left_to_die_boat

È un omicidio con navi italiane” L’accusa del Nyt

Video-denuncia contro Roma e l’Ue per un naufragio di un anno fa: botte dei libici ai migranti, 50 morti.

Patate scagliate addosso ai soccorritori della Sea Watch invece di lanciare giubbotti e salvagente ai naufraghi che stavano annegando. E poi botte ai migranti riusciti a salire sulle motovedette per salvarsi la vita. Ecco i risultati dell’addestramento che l’Italia ha impartito ai libici per far fuori i migranti nel Mediterraneo. È un video pubblicato dal New York Times che parte da una delle più gravi tra le ultime stragi avvenute del Canale di Sicilia, con un commento intitolato: “‘È un omicidio’: come l’Europa esternalizza sofferenza mentre i migranti annegano”.

Era il 6 novembre 2017 e le operazioni in mare erano gestite dalla guardia costiera libica, in accordo con l’allora ministro dell’Interno, Marco Minniti. Il dettaglio non è secondario, lo stesso video mostra la cerimonia di consegna delle motovedette made in Italy ai partner nordafricani. Una delle imbarcazioni, la 648, la ritroviamo proprio al centro dell’azione dove, quel giorno, cinquanta africani vennero inghiottiti dal mare. Al tempo era consentito alle imbarcazioni di soccorso pattugliare lo specchio di mare a cavallo tra le zone Sar (Search and rescue, ricerca e soccorso) di competenza. Al tempo i porti italiani erano aperti, ma il comportamento dei militari libici già al limite della crudeltà. Il video e le foto scattate dal personale della Sea Watch mostrano scene durissime. Un migrante lasciato annegare senza alcun tentativo da parte dei libici di salvarlo: il corpo disperato annaspa per poi sparire sott’acqua, quando il salvagente viene lanciato è tardi. Botte, calci e pugni a uomini appena saliti a bordo delle motovedette, di una violenza ingiustificabile. Il New York Times va giù duro e nel commento, oltre a stigmatizzare attacca i governi italiani. Dalla prova delle motovedette vendute per far fare ad altri il lavoro sporco, al nuovo governo definito “di ultradestra” che “ha completato la strategia”. Matteo Salvini però non viene nominato. L’Italia, sottolinea il Nyt, ha delegato alle autorità della Tripolitania il pattugliamento delle coste e il recupero di qualsiasi imbarcazione diretta a nord. Nulla di nuovo, visto che la Spagna, guidata dal socialista Sanchez e impegnata sul fronte occidentale con un’ondata migratoria senza precedenti, usa il Marocco per “bonificare” il tratto di mare vicino allo stretto di Gibilterra da gommoni e carrette. Gli organismi europei da una parte stimolano il blocco delle migrazioni verso il continente, eppure dall’altra lo condannano. Per l’episodio del 6 novembre 2017, infatti, la Corte europea dei diritti umani sta trattando il ricorso presentato dall’Asgi (Associazione studi giuridici sull’immigrazione) contro il respingimento collettivo. Sempre l’Asgi ha presentato due ricorsi analoghi per fatti del dicembre 2018 e gennaio 2018; infine altri due, uno sulla cessione delle motovedette e l’altro sull’implementazione dell’accordo Italia-Libia firmato da Minniti.

https://st.ilfattoquotidiano.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/28/ED-img15445326.jpg

▻https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/premium/articoli/e-un-omicidio-con-navi-italiane-laccusa-del-nyt

Comment l’Europe et la Libye laissent mourir les migrants en mer

Il y a un peu plus d’un an, le 6 novembre 2017, une fragile embarcation sombre en mer avec à son bord 150 migrants partis de Tripoli pour tenter de rejoindre l’Europe. La plupart d’entre eux sont morts. Avec l’aide de Forensic Oceanography – une organisation créée en 2011 pour tenir le compte des morts de migrants en Méditerranée – et de Forensic Architecture – groupe de recherche enquêtant sur les violations des droits de l’homme –, le New York Times a retracé le déroulement de ce drame, dans une enquête vidéo extrêmement documentée.

Depuis l’accord passé en février 2017 entre la Libye et l’Italie, confiant aux autorités libyennes le soin d’intercepter les migrants dans ses eaux territoriales, le travail des ONG intervenant en mer Méditerranée avec leurs bateaux de sauvetage est devenu extrêmement difficile. Ces dernières subissent les menaces constantes des gardes-côtes libyens, qui, malgré les subventions européennes et les formations qu’ils reçoivent, n’ont pas vraiment pour but de sauver les migrants de la noyade. Ainsi, en fermant les yeux sur les pratiques libyennes régulièrement dénoncées par les ONG, l’Europe contribue à aggraver la situation et précipite les migrants vers la noyade, s’attache à démontrer cette enquête vidéo publiée dans la section Opinions du New York Times. Un document traduit et sous-titré par Courrier international.

►https://www.courrierinternational.com/video/enquete-comment-leurope-et-la-libye-laissent-mourir-les-migra

▻https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=10&v=dcbh8yJclGI

How We Made an Invisible Crisis at Sea Visible

An ambitious Opinion Video project produced across three continents — in collaboration with a pioneering forensic research group — shines a spotlight on the more than 16,000 migrants who have died trying to cross the Mediterranean since 2014.

Forensic Oceanography had created a report and a minute-by-minute reconstruction of the episode (▻http://www.forensic-architecture.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/2018-05-07-FO-Mare-Clausum-full-EN.pdf) intended partly to support a case that was about to be filed on behalf of survivors at the European Court of Human Rights.

https://i.imgur.com/V4Ceqrt.png

Their reporting was deep, but it was very technical. We wanted to build on the original research to create a short film that would sharpen the story while still embracing complexity.

▻https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/23/reader-center/migrants-mediterranean-sea.html
#visibilité #invisibilité #in/visiblité #Mare_clausum

Brésil : à peine élu, Jair Bolsonaro commence la chasse aux opposants de gauche

Les universités dans le viseur

Enfin, toujours pour lutter contre l’opposition à gauche, Jair Bolsonaro entend faire pression sur les professeurs d’université qui parleraient de politique pendant leurs cours.

Le président élu a récemment scandalisé une partie du monde éducatif en accusant des professeurs, cités avec leurs noms et prénoms, de défendre les régimes de Cuba et de Corée du Nord devant leurs élèves, dans une vidéo diffusée sur Internet.

Et pour y remédier, il compte installer des pancartes devant les salles de cours pour appeler les étudiants à dénoncer leurs professeurs par le biais d’une « hotline » téléphonique dédiée à la question.

▻https://www.bfmtv.com/international/bresil-a-peine-elu-jair-bolsonaro-commence-la-chasse-aux-opposants-de-gauche-

Au Brésil, vague de répression dans les universités à la veille du second tour

Quelques jours avant le second tour de l’élection présidentielle brésilienne, qui voit s’affronter le candidat d’extrême droite Jair Bolsonaro et le candidat du Parti des travailleurs (PT) Fernando Haddad, les campus universitaires du pays ont fait face à une vague inédite de répression de la liberté d’expression. Jeudi 25 octobre, la police a investi 27 universités, à la demande des tribunaux électoraux, dont les juges sont chargés de faire respecter les règles de communication et de propagande électorales des partis en lice. Les forces de police étaient à la recherche de supposé matériel de propagande électorale illégale. En fait, ces opérations ont visé des banderoles antifascistes, de soutien à la démocratie, un manifeste en soutien à l’université publique, des débats et des cours sur la dictature, la démocratie et les « fakes news » – ces mensonges ayant été largement diffusés pendant la campagne, en particulier par l’extrême-droite… [1]

À Rio, une juge a ainsi fait enlever une banderole du fronton du bâtiment de la faculté de droit de l’université fédérale Fluminense (UFF), sur laquelle était inscrit, autour du symbole antifasciste du double drapeau rouge et noir, « Droit UFF antifasciste ». À l’université de l’État de Rio, les agents électoraux ont retiré une banderole en hommage à Marielle Franco, l’élue municipale du parti de gauche PSOL assassinée en pleine rue en mars dernier.

220 000 messages de haine en quatre jours contre une journaliste

Dans une université du Pará, quatre policiers militaires sont entrés sur le campus pour interroger un professeur sur « son idéologie ». L’enseignant avait abordé la question des fake news dans un cours sur les médias numériques. Une étudiante s’en est sentie offensée, alléguant une « doctrine marxiste », et l’a dit à son père, policier militaire. Une enquête du journal la Folha de São Paulo a pourtant révélé mi-octobre que des entreprises qui soutiennent le candidat d’extrême droite avaient acheté les services d’entreprises de communication pour faire envoyer en masse des fausses nouvelles anti-Parti des travailleurs directement sur les numéros whatsapp – une plateforme de messagerie en ligne – des Brésiliens. L’auteure de l’enquête, la journaliste Patricia Campos Melo, et le quotidien de São Paulo, ont ensuite reçu 220 000 messages de haine en quatre jours ! [2] Le journal a demandé à la police fédérale de lancer une enquête.

Mais ce sont des conférences et des débats sur la dictature militaire et le fascisme qui ont pour l’instant été interdits. C’est le cas d’un débat public intitulé « Contre la fascisme, pour la démocratie », qui devait avoir lieu à l’université fédérale de Rio Grande do Sul (la région de Porto Alegre). Devaient y participer l’ex-candidat du parti de gauche PSOL au premier tour de la présidentielle, Guilherme Boulos, un ancien ministre issu du Parti des travailleurs, des députés fédéraux du PT et du PSOL. « J’ai donné des cours et des conférences dans des universités en France, en Angleterre, au Portugal, en Espagne, en Allemagne, en Argentine, et ici, même pendant la dictature. Aujourd’hui, je suis censuré dans l’État, le Rio Grande do Sul, que j’ai moi-même gouverné. Le fascisme grandit », a réagi l’un des députés, Tarso Genro, sur twitter.

Une banderole « moins d’armes, plus de livres » jugée illégale

Dans le Paraíba, les agents du tribunal électoral se sont introduits dans l’université pour retirer une banderole où était simplement inscrit « moins d’armes, plus de livres ». « Cette opération de la justice électorale dans les universités du pays pour saisir du matériel en défense de la démocratie et contre le fascisme est absurde. Cela rappelle les temps sombres de la censure et de l’invasion des facultés », a écrit Guilherme Boulos, le leader du PSOL, sur twitter, ajoutant : « Le parti de la justice a formé une coalition avec le PSL », le parti de Bolsonaro. « De telles interventions à l’intérieur de campus au cours d’une campagne électorale sont inédites. Une partie de l’appareil d’État se prépare au changement de régime », a aussi alerté l’historienne française, spécialiste du Brésil, Maud Chirio, sur sa page Facebook.

Dimanche dernier, dans une allocution filmée diffusée pour ses supporters rassemblés à São Paulo, Jair Bolsonaro a proféré des menaces claires à l’égard de ses opposants. « Ou vous partez en exil ou vous partez en prison », a-il dit, ajoutant « nous allons balayer ces bandits rouges du Brésil », et annonçant un « nettoyage jamais vu dans l’histoire de ce pays ». Il a précisé qu’il allait classer le Mouvements des paysans sans Terre (MST) et le Mouvement des travailleurs sans toit (MTST) comme des organisations terroristes, et menacé Fernando Haddad de l’envoyer « pourrir en prison aux côtés de Lula ».

https://www.bastamag.net/IMG/arton6990.jpg?1540572903#.jpg

We deplore this attack on freedom of expression in Brazil’s universities

107 international academics react to social media reports that more than 20 universities in Brazil have been invaded by military police in recent days, with teaching materials confiscated on ideological grounds

Reports have emerged on social media that more than 20 universities in Brazil have been subjected in recent days to: invasions by military police; the confiscation of teaching materials on ideological grounds; and the suppression of freedom of speech and expression, especially in relation to anti-fascist history and activism.

As academics, researchers, graduates, students and workers at universities in the UK, Europe and further afield, we deplore this attack on freedom of expression in Brazil’s universities, which comes as a direct result of the campaign and election of far-right President Bolsonaro.

Academic autonomy is a linchpin not only of independent and objective research, but of a functioning democracy, which should be subject to scrutiny and informed, evidence-based investigation and critique.

We call on co-workers, colleagues and students to decry this attack on Brazil’s universities in the name of Bolsonaro’s wider militaristic, anti-progressive agenda. We will not stand by as this reactionary populist attacks the pillars of Brazil’s democracy and education system. We will campaign vigorously in whatever capacity we can with activists, educators and lawmakers in Brazil to ensure that its institutions can operate without the interference of this new – and hopefully short-lived – government.
Dr William McEvoy, University of Sussex, UK (correspondent)
Dr Will Abberley, University of Sussex
Nannette Aldred, University of Sussex
Patricia Alessandrini, Stanford University, USA
Dr Michael Alexander, University of Glasgow
Steven Allen, Birkbeck, University of London
Dr Katherine Angel, Birkbeck, University of London
Pedro Argenti, University of Antwerp, Belgium
Nick Awde, International Editor, The Stage newspaper, London
Professor Ian Balfour, York University, Toronto, Canada
Lennart Balkenhol, University of Melbourne, Australia
Nehaal Bajwa, University of Sussex
Dr Louis Bayman, University of Southampton
Mark Bergfeld, former NUS NEC (2010-2012)
Professor Tim Bergfelder, University of Southampton
Dr Patricia Pires Boulhosa, University of Cambridge
Dr Maud Bracke, University of Glasgow
Max Brookman-Byrne, University of Lincoln
Dr Conrad Brunström, Maynooth University, Ireland
Dr Christopher Burlinson, Jesus College, Cambridge
Professor Martin Butler, University of Sussex
Professor Gavin Butt, University of Sussex
Cüneyt Çakirlar, Nottingham Trent University
Guilherme Carréra, University of Westminster
Geoffrey Chew, Royal Holloway, University of London
Dr Maite Conde, University of Cambridge
Dr Luke Cooper, Anglia Ruskin University, UK, and Institute of Human Sciences, Vienna, Austria
Dr Sue Currell, University of Sussex
Professor Dimitris Dalakoglou, Vrije University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
William Dalziel, University of Sussex
Dr April de Angelis, Royal Holloway, University of London
Dr Olga Demetriou, Durham University
Dr Stephanie Dennison, University of Leeds
Dr Steffi Doebler, University of Liverpool
Dr Sai Englert, SOAS University of London
James Erskine, University of Sussex and Birkbeck, University of London
Professor Martin Paul Eve, Birkbeck, University of London
John Fallas, University of Leeds
Dr Lynne Fanthome, Staffordshire University
Dr Hannah Field, University of Sussex
Dr Adrian Garvey, Birkbeck, University of London
Dr Laura Gill, University of Sussex
Dr Priyamvada Gopal, University of Cambridge
Bhavini Goyate, University of Sussex
Dr Craig Haslop, University of Liverpool
Professor Björn Heile, University of Glasgow
Dr Phil Hutchinson, Manchester Metropolitan University
Professor Martin Iddon, University of Leeds
Dr Eleftheria Ioannidou, University of Groningen, Netherlands
Dr Chris Kempshall, University of Sussex
Andrew Key, University of California, Berkeley, USA
Professor Laleh Khalili, SOAS University of London
Dr Theodore Koulouris, University of Brighton
Professor Maria Lauret, University of Sussex
Professor Vicky Lebeau, University of Sussex
Professor James Livesey, University of Dundee, Scotland
Professor Luke Martell, University of Sussex
Dr N Gabriel Martin, Lebanese American University, Lebanon
Wolfgang Marx, University College, Dublin, Ireland
Andy Medhurst, University of Sussex
Professor Philippe Meers, University of Antwerp, Belgium
Dr Shamira A Meghani, University of Cambridge
Niccolo Milanese, CESPRA EHESS, Paris, France and PUC Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Dr Ian Moody, CESEM – Universidade Nova, Lisbon
Professor Lucia Naqib, University of Reading
Dr Catherine Packham, University of Sussex
Professor Dimitris Papanikolaou, University of Oxford
Mary Parnwell, University of Sussex
Professor Deborah Philips, University of Brighton
Dr Chloe Porter, University of Sussex
Dr Jason Price, University of Sussex
Dr Duška Radosavljević, Royal Central School of Speech and Drama, University of London
Francesca Reader, University of Sussex and University of Brighton
Naida Redgrave, University of East London
Professor Nicholas Ridout, Queen Mary, University of London
Professor Lucy Robinson, University of Sussex
Dr Kirsty Rolfe, University of Sussex
Dr Joseph Ronan, University of Brighton
Dr Michael Rowland, University of Sussex
Dr Zachary Rowlinson, University of Sussex
Professor Nicholas Royle, University of Sussex
Dr Eleanor Rycroft, University of Bristol
Dr Jason Scott-Warren, University of Cambridge
Dr Deborah Shaw, University of Portsmouth
Dr Lisa Shaw, University of Liverpool
Kat Sinclair, University of Sussex
Sandrine Singleton-Perrin, University of Essex
Despina Sinou, University of Paris 13 – Sorbonne Paris Cité, France
Dave Smith, University of Hertfordshire
John Snijders, Durham University
Dr Samuel Solomon, University of Sussex
Dr Arabella Stanger, University of Sussex
Professor Rob Stone, University of Birmingham
Bernard Sufrin, Emeritus Fellow, Dept of Computer Science, University of Oxford
Dr Natasha Tanna, University of Cambridge
Professor Lyn Thomas, University of Sussex
Simon Thorpe, University of Warwick
Dr Gavan Titley, Maynooth University, Ireland
Dr Pamela Thurschwell, University of Sussex
Dr Dominic Walker, University of Sussex
Dr Ed Waller, University of Surrey and University of Portsmouth
Dr Kiron Ward, University of Sussex
Helen Wheatley, University of Warwick
Ian Willcock, University of Herfordshire
Professor Gregory Woods, Nottingham Trent University
Dr Tom F Wright, University of Sussex
Dr Heba Youssef, University of Brighton

▻https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/01/we-deplore-this-attack-on-freedom-of-expression-in-brazils-universities
#liberté_d'expression

Brazil Court Strikes Down Restrictions on University Speech

Brazil´s Supreme Court issued an important decision striking down restrictions on political speech on university campuses in a unanimous ruling yesterday. Meanwhile, president-elect Jair Bolsonaro´s allies in Congress are pressing ahead with efforts to restrict what students and educators can discuss in the classroom.

The court ruling overturned decisions by electoral court judges who recently ordered universities across the country to clamp down on what they considered illegal political campaigning. The orders were spurred by complaints from anonymous callers and, in a few cases, by members of conservative groups.

For example, at Grande Dourados Federal University, court officials suspended a public event against fascism, according to the student group that organized it. At Campina Grande Federal University, police allegedly seized copies of a pamphlet titled “Manifesto in defense of democracy and public universities” and hard drives, said a professors´ association.

At Rio de Janeiro State University, police ordered the removal of a banner honoring Marielle Franco, a black lesbian human rights defender and councilwoman murdered in March, despite not having a judicial order.

The attorney general, Raquel Dodge, asked the Supreme Court to rule the electoral court judges´ decisions unconstitutional, and Supreme Court justice Cármen Lúcia Rocha issued an injunction stopping them. The full court upheld that decision on October 31.

“The only force that must enter universities is the force of ideas,” said Rocha.

“The excessive and illegitimate use of force by state agents … echoes somber days in Brazilian history,” said Justice Rosa Weber, referring to Brazil´s 1964 – 1985 military dictatorship.

The ruling comes as Bolsonaro, who remains in Congress until he assumes the presidency on January 1, and his allies push a bill that would prohibit teachers from promoting their own opinions in the classroom or using the terms “gender” or “sexual orientation,” and would order that sex and religious education be framed around “family values.”

A state representative-elect from Bolsonaro´s party has even called on students to film and report teachers who make “political-partisan or ideological statements.” Bolsonaro made a similar call in 2016. State prosecutors have filed a civil action against the representative-elect, alleging she instituted “an illegal service for the political and ideological control of teaching activities.”

In his long career in Congress, Bolsonaro has endorsed abusive practices that undermine the rule of law, defended the dictatorship, and has been a vocal proponent of bigotry.

More than ever, Brazil needs its judiciary to defend human rights within and outside the classroom.

https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/styles/1070w/public/multimedia_images_2018/201811americas_brazil_supremecourt.jpg?itok=gPmwyGyy#.jpg

Présidentielle au Brésil : relents de dictature militaire

Présidentielle au Brésil : Bolsonaro et le « risque d’un retour à l’ordre autoritaire en Amérique latine »

Porté par plus de deux cents universitaires, responsables politiques et citoyens d’Europe et du Canada, ce manifeste s’inscrit dans un mouvement mondial de soutien à la démocratie face à la violence déchaînée par la candidature de Jair Bolsonaro au Brésil. Il est ouvert aux démocrates de toutes les sensibilités politiques. Face au risque imminent d’un retour à l’ordre autoritaire en Amérique latine, la solidarité internationale est impérative.

Nous, citoyens, intellectuels, militants, personnalités politiques vivant, travaillant et étudiant en Europe et au Canada, exprimons notre vive inquiétude face à la menace imminente de l’élection de Jair Bolsonaro à la présidence du Brésil le 28 octobre 2018.

Le souvenir de la dictature militaire

La victoire de l’extrême droite radicale au Brésil risque de renforcer le mouvement international qui a porté au pouvoir des politiciens réactionnaires et antidémocratiques dans de nombreux pays ces dernières années.

Bolsonaro défend ouvertement le souvenir de la dictature militaire qui a imposé sa loi au Brésil entre 1964 et 1985, ses pratiques de torture et ses tortionnaires. Il méprise le combat pour les droits humains. Il exprime une hostilité agressive envers les femmes, les Afro-descendants, les membres de la communauté LGBT +, les peuples autochtones et les pauvres. Son programme vise à détruire les avancées politiques, économiques, sociales, environnementales et culturelles des quatre dernières décennies, ainsi que l’action menée par les mouvements sociaux et le camp progressiste pour consolider et étendre la démocratie au Brésil.

L’élection de Bolsonaro menace les fragiles institutions démocratiques pour la construction desquelles les Brésilien·ne·s ont pris tant de risques. Son arrivée au pouvoir serait aussi un frein majeur à toute politique internationale ambitieuse en matière de défense de l’environnement et de préservation de la paix.

Premiers signataires : Martine Aubry , maire de Lille, ancienne ministre (PS) ; Luc Boltanski , sociologue, directeur d’études, EHESS ; Peter Burke , historien, professeur émérite à l’université de Cambridge ; Roger Chartier , historien, directeur d’études EHESS/Collège de France ; Mireille Clapot , députée de la Drôme, vice-présidente de la commission des affaires étrangères (LRM) ; Laurence Cohen , sénatrice du Val-de-Marne (PCF) ; Didier Fassin , professeur de sciences sociales, Institute for advanced study, Princeton ; Carlo Ginzburg , professeur émérite à UCLA et à l’Ecole normale supérieure de Pise ; Eva Joly , députée européenne (groupe Verts-ALE) ; Pierre Louault , sénateur d’Indre-et-Loire (UDI) ; Paul Magnette, bourgmestre de Charleroi, ex-ministre président de la Wallonie, ex-président du Parti socialiste belge ; Thomas Piketty , directeur d’études à l’EHESS.

▻http://jennifer-detemmerman.fr/index.php/2018/10/23/presidentielle-au-bresil-relents-de-dictature-militaire

Une pétition qui a été lancé avant l’élection...
Defend Democracy in Brazil. Say No to Jair Bolsonaro

Defend Democracy in Brazil,

Say No to Jair Bolsonaro

We, citizens, intellectuals, activists, politicians, people living, working, and studying in Europe and Canada, wish to express our growing alarm at the imminent threat of Jair Bolsonaro’s election to the presidency on October 28, 2018. The potential victory of a far-right radical in Brazil would reinforce a dangerous international trend of extremely reactionary and anti-democratic politicians gaining state power in recent years.

Bolsonaro explicitly defends the Brazilian military dictatorship that ruled the country from 1964-85 and praises torture and torturers. He condemns human rights efforts. He has expressed aggressive and vile hostility toward women, people of African descent, the LGBT+ community, indigenous people, and the poor. His proposed policies would effectively undo all of the political, social, economic, labor, environmental, and cultural gains of the last four decades, efforts by social movements and progressive politicians to consolidate and expand democracy in Brazil. A Bolsonaro presidency also threatens to undermine the still fragile democratic politics that people throughout Brazil have risked so much to build.

His election would seriously hamper any ambitious international effort for environmental protection, against climate change and for the preservation of peace.

Adapted version of the text « Defend Democracy in Brazil, Say No to Jair Bolsonaro! »

▻https://www.change.org/p/association-pour-la-recherche-sur-le-br%C3%A9sil-en-europe-pour-la-d%C3%A9fe

v. aussi : ►https://seenthis.net/messages/735560

New MRC research finds inaccuracies and distortions in media coverage of antisemitism and the Labour Party - Media Reform Coalition
▻http://www.mediareform.org.uk/blog/new-mrc-research-finds-inaccuracies-and-distortions-in-media-coverag

We use the concept of disinformation to denote systematic reporting failures that broadly privileged a particular political agenda and ideological narrative. This does not mean that these failures were intentional or that journalists and news institutions were inherently biased. We recognize, for instance, that resource pressures combined with acute and complex controversies can foster particular source dependencies or blind spots. 

Nor does our research speak in any way to allegations of smear tactics. To interrogate the root causes of disinformation would necessitate a far more wide-ranging study than was undertaken here.

Compilation des attaques contre #Jeremy_Corbyn (et accusations d’antisémitisme) :
►https://seenthis.net/messages/719714

Signé par:
Prof Noam Chomsky
Brian Eno
Francesca Martinez
Yanis Varoufakis
Ken Loach
Raoul Martinez
Justin Schlosberg Birkbeck, University of London
Prof Des Freedman Goldsmiths, University of London
Prof Imogen Tyler Lancaster University
Prof Aeron Davis Goldsmiths, University of London
Prof Annabelle Sreberny Soas, University of London
Prof Greg Philo University of Glasgow
Prof Natalie Fenton Goldsmiths, University of London
Prof David Miller Bristol University
Prof David Hesmondhalgh University of Leeds
Prof James Curran Goldsmiths, University of London
Prof Julian Petley Brunel University
Stephen Cushion Cardiff University
Jason Hickel Goldsmiths, University of London
Einar Thorsen Bournemouth University
Mike Berry Cardiff University
Tom Mills Aston University
Jenny Manson Jewish Voice for Labour
Leah Levane Jewish Voice for Labour
Lindsey German Stop the War Coalition
Mike Cushman Free Speech on Israel
Glyn Secker Jewish Voice for Labour

La pollution de l’air modifie le placenta au niveau #épigénétique : un risque pour le #foetus et sa #mère - Sciencesetavenir.fr
▻https://www.sciencesetavenir.fr/sante/grossesse/la-pollution-de-l-air-modifie-le-placenta-au-niveau-epigenetique-un

https://www.sciencesetavenir.fr/assets/img/2018/06/22/cover-r4x3w1000-5b2cf658b864d-epigenetique-grossesse-pollution-air-foetus-placenta.jpg

(étude antérieure)

L’exposition à la pollution atmosphérique pendant la grossesse peut entrainer des modifications épigénétiques du placenta potentiellement risquées pour la mère et le fœtus. C’est ce qu’explique une nouvelle étude française publiée dans la revue Environment International. Des scientifiques du CNRS et de l’Inserm ont en effet analysé le placenta de 668 mères et ont constaté que l’exposition à la pollution modifiait l’expression d’un gène bien précis.

On l’ajoute à la troisième compilation :
►https://seenthis.net/messages/680147

#effondrement #collapsologie #catastrophe #fin_du_monde #it_has_begun #Anthropocène #capitalocène

Royaume-Uni. Jeremy Corbyn, un homme à abattre
Jonathan Rosenhead, Orient XXI, le 12 septembre 2018
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/721593

New MRC research finds inaccuracies and distortions in media coverage of antisemitism and the Labour Party
Media Reform Coalition, le 27 septembre 2018
►https://seenthis.net/messages/725272

Damning new report reveals UK media guilty of “myriad inaccuracies and distortions” in Labour antisemitism reporting
Tom D. Rogers, Evolve Politics, le 27 septembre 2018
►https://seenthis.net/messages/725272

Flawed reporting on antisemitism claims against the Labour party
The Guardian, le 30 septembre 2018
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/725722

Signé par:
Prof Noam Chomsky
Brian Eno
Francesca Martinez
Yanis Varoufakis
Ken Loach
Raoul Martinez
Justin Schlosberg Birkbeck, University of London
Prof Des Freedman Goldsmiths, University of London
Prof Imogen Tyler Lancaster University
Prof Aeron Davis Goldsmiths, University of London
Prof Annabelle Sreberny Soas, University of London
Prof Greg Philo University of Glasgow
Prof Natalie Fenton Goldsmiths, University of London
Prof David Miller Bristol University
Prof David Hesmondhalgh University of Leeds
Prof James Curran Goldsmiths, University of London
Prof Julian Petley Brunel University
Stephen Cushion Cardiff University
Jason Hickel Goldsmiths, University of London
Einar Thorsen Bournemouth University
Mike Berry Cardiff University
Tom Mills Aston University
Jenny Manson Jewish Voice for Labour
Leah Levane Jewish Voice for Labour
Lindsey German Stop the War Coalition
Mike Cushman Free Speech on Israel
Glyn Secker Jewish Voice for Labour

UK pro-Israel charity investigated for anti-Corbyn campaign
MEMO, le 30 août 2018
▻https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20180830-uk-pro-israel-charity-investigated-for-anti-corbyn-campa

The Twitter Smearing of Corbyn and Assange
Mark Curtis, Consortium News, le 14 janvier 2019
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/751995

How To Think Clearly About Anti-Semitism Controversies In The Labour Party
Greg Afinogenov, Current Affairs, le 5 février 2019
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/758948

Jeremy Corbyn and the truth about Tom Bower’s book
Peter Oborne, Middle East Eye, le 9 mars 2019
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/766033

Autour du même thème :

Le parti Travailliste enquête sur un journaliste de The Electronic Intifada
Ali Abunimah, Electronic Intifada, le 11 mars 2019
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/767560

Le cordon sanitaire
Serge Halimi, Le Monde Diplomatique, avril 2019
►https://seenthis.net/messages/770125

Guardian accused of ‘vendetta’ for ignoring Chomsky’s Labour anti-Semitism comments
RT, le 7 juillet 2019
►https://seenthis.net/messages/791470

The Guardian publishes, then censors Jewish open letter defending smeared pro-Corbyn Labour MP Chris Williamson
Ben Norton, The Gray Zone, le 10 juillet 2019
►https://seenthis.net/messages/791470

#Chris_Williamson, mais aussi #Julian_Assange

Labour’s Anti-Semitism “Crisis” is Bollocks
Richard Silverstein, Tikun Olma, le 14 juillet 2019
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/792713

For the first time in my life, I’m frightened to be Jewish
David Graeber, Open Democracy, le 6 septembre 2019
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/800774

Labour Party risks bankruptcy over antisemitism investigation, executive members fear
Benjamin Kentish, The Independent, le 12 octobre 2019
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/806134

Anti-semitism bandwagon rolled out again
Jonathan Cook, le 11 novembre 2019
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/810571

The Contract on Corbyn
Gideon Levy, Haaretz, le 28 novembre 2019
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/813334

An election message from Tel Aviv: Corbyn would be good for Israel
Gideon Levy - 2 December 2019
▻https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/why-i-would-vote-jeremy-corbyn-if-i-were-british

A more just Israel is the real solution, possibly the only solution, to antisemitism today. Corbyn’s Labour could help make it happen

Bernie Sanders commence à subir le même genre d’attaques :
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/817699

#USA #Bernie_Sanders #Parti_Démocrate #antisémitisme #antisionisme #Palestine #censure

Le rapport trompeur sur l’antisémitisme, qui a coulé Jeremy Corbyn
Asa Winstanley – The Electronic Intifada – 24 août 2020
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/874159

#Sarah_Mardini #délit_de_solidarité #Lesbos #Grèce

#gorafi_encore_plagie
Mais en vrai, comment dire... Plus envie de rire.

GRÈCE : LA POLICE ARRÊTE 30 MEMBRES D’UNE ONG D’AIDE AUX RÉFUGIÉS

La police a arrêté, mardi 28 août, 30 membres de l’ONG grecque #ERCI, dont les soeurs syriennes Yusra et Sarah Mardini, qui avaient sauvé la vie à 18 personnes en 2015. Les militant.e.s sont accusés d’avoir aidé des migrants à entrer illégalement sur le territoire grec via l’île de Lesbos. Ils déclarent avoir agi dans le cadre de l’assistance à personnes en danger.

Par Marina Rafenberg

L’ONG grecque Emergency response centre international (ERCY) était présente sur l’île de Lesbos depuis 2015 pour venir en aide aux réfugiés. Depuis mardi 28 août, ses 30 membres sont poursuivis pour avoir « facilité l’entrée illégale d’étrangers sur le territoire grec » en vue de gains financiers, selon le communiqué de la police grecque.

L’enquête a commencé en février 2018, rapporte le site d’information protagon.gr, lorsqu’une Jeep portant une fausse plaque d’immatriculation de l’armée grecque a été découverte par la police sur une plage, attendant l’arrivée d’une barque pleine de réfugiés en provenance de Turquie. Les membres de l’ONG, six Grecs et 24 ressortissants étrangers, sont accusés d’avoir été informés à l’avance par des personnes présentes du côté turc des heures et des lieux d’arrivée des barques de migrants, d’avoir organisé l’accueil de ces réfugiés sans en informer les autorités locales et d’avoir surveillé illégalement les communications radio entre les autorités grecques et étrangères, dont Frontex, l’agence européenne des gardes-cotes et gardes-frontières. Les crimes pour lesquels ils sont inculpés – participation à une organisation criminelle, violation de secrets d’État et recel – sont passibles de la réclusion à perpétuité.

Parmi les membres de l’ONG grecque arrêtés se trouve Yusra et Sarah Mardini, deux sœurs nageuses et réfugiées syrienne qui avaient sauvé 18 personnes de la noyade lors de leur traversée de la mer Égée en août 2015. Depuis Yusra a participé aux Jeux Olympiques de Rio, est devenue ambassadrice de l’ONU et a écrit un livre, Butterfly. Sarah avait quant à elle décidé d’aider à son tour les réfugiés qui traversaient dangereusement la mer Égée sur des bateaux de fortune et s’était engagée comme bénévole dans l’ONG ERCI durant l’été 2016.

Sarah a été arrêtée le 21 août à l’aéroport de Lesbos alors qu’elle devait rejoindre Berlin où elle vit avec sa famille. Le 3 septembre, elle devait commencer son année universitaire au collège Bard en sciences sociales. La jeune Syrienne de 23 ans a été transférée à la prison de Korydallos, à Athènes, dans l’attente de son procès. Son avocat a demandé mercredi sa remise en liberté.

Ce n’est pas la première fois que des ONG basées à Lesbos ont des soucis avec la justice grecque. Des membres de l’ONG espagnole Proem-Aid avaient aussi été accusés d’avoir participé à l’entrée illégale de réfugiés sur l’île. Ils ont été relaxés en mai dernier. D’après le ministère de la Marine, 114 ONG ont été enregistrées sur l’île, dont les activités souvent difficilement contrôlables inquiètent le gouvernement grec et ses partenaires européens.

►https://www.courrierdesbalkans.fr/Une-ONG-accusee-d-aide-a-l-entree-irreguliere-de-migrants

#grèce #asile #migrations #réfugiés #solidarité #délit_de_solidarité

▻http://www.unhcr.org/news/videos/2016/6/575150247/teamrefugees-yusra-mardini.html

http://www.unhcr.org/thumb1/575154e34.jpg

Arrest of Syrian ’hero swimmer’ puts Lesbos refugees back in spotlight

Sara Mardini’s case adds to fears that rescue work is being criminalised and raises questions about NGO.

Greece’s high-security #Korydallos prison acknowledges that #Sara_Mardini is one of its rarer inmates. For a week, the Syrian refugee, a hero among human rights defenders, has been detained in its women’s wing on charges so serious they have elicited baffled dismay.

The 23-year-old, who saved 18 refugees in 2015 by swimming their waterlogged dingy to the shores of Lesbos with her Olympian sister, is accused of people smuggling, espionage and membership of a criminal organisation – crimes allegedly committed since returning to work with an NGO on the island. Under Greek law, Mardini can be held in custody pending trial for up to 18 months.

“She is in a state of disbelief,” said her lawyer, Haris Petsalnikos, who has petitioned for her release. “The accusations are more about criminalising humanitarian action. Sara wasn’t even here when these alleged crimes took place but as charges they are serious, perhaps the most serious any aid worker has ever faced.”

Mardini’s arrival to Europe might have gone unnoticed had it not been for the extraordinary courage she and younger sister, Yusra, exhibited guiding their boat to safety after the engine failed during the treacherous crossing from Turkey. Both were elite swimmers, with Yusra going on to compete in the 2016 Rio Olympics.

The sisters, whose story is the basis of a forthcoming film by the British director Stephen Daldry, were credited with saving the lives of their fellow passengers. In Germany, their adopted homeland, the pair has since been accorded star status.

It was because of her inspiring story that Mardini was approached by Emergency Response Centre International, ERCI, on Lesbos. “After risking her own life to save 18 people … not only has she come back to ground zero, but she is here to ensure that no more lives get lost on this perilous journey,” it said after Mardini agreed to join its ranks in 2016.

After her first stint with ERCI, she again returned to Lesbos last December to volunteer with the aid group. And until 21 August there was nothing to suggest her second spell had not gone well. But as Mardini waited at Mytilini airport to head back to Germany, and a scholarship at Bard College in Berlin, she was arrested. Soon after that, police also arrested ERCI’s field director, Nassos Karakitsos, a former Greek naval force officer, and Sean Binder, a German volunteer who lives in Ireland. All three have protested their innocence.

The arrests come as signs of a global clampdown on solidarity networks mount. From Russia to Spain, European human rights workers have been targeted in what campaigners call an increasingly sinister attempt to silence civil society in the name of security.

“There is the concern that this is another example of civil society being closed down by the state,” said Jonathan Cooper, an international human rights lawyer in London. “What we are really seeing is Greek authorities using Sara to send a very worrying message that if you volunteer for refugee work you do so at your peril.”

But amid concerns about heavy-handed tactics humanitarians face, Greek police say there are others who see a murky side to the story, one ofpeople trafficking and young volunteers being duped into participating in a criminal network unwittingly. In that scenario,the Mardini sisters would make prime targets.

Greek authorities spent six months investigating the affair. Agents were flown into Lesbos from Athens and Thessaloniki. In an unusually long and detailed statement, last week, Mytilini police said that while posing as a non-profit organisation, ERCI had acted with the sole purpose of profiteering by bringing people illegally into Greece via the north-eastern Aegean islands.

Members had intercepted Greek and European coastguard radio transmissions to gain advance notification of the location of smugglers’ boats, police said, and that 30, mostly foreign nationals, were lined up to be questioned in connection with the alleged activities. Other “similar organisations” had also collaborated in what was described as “an informal plan to confront emergency situations”, they added.

Suspicions were first raised, police said, when Mardini and Binder were stopped in February driving a former military 4X4 with false number plates. ERCI remained unnamed until the release of the charge sheets for the pair and that of Karakitsos.

Lesbos has long been on the frontline of the refugee crisis, attracting idealists and charity workers. Until a dramatic decline in migration numbers via the eastern Mediterranean in March 2016, when a landmark deal was signed between the EU and Turkey, the island was the main entry point to Europe.

An estimated 114 NGOs and 7,356 volunteers are based on Lesbos, according to Greek authorities. Local officials talk of “an industry”, and with more than 10,000 refugees there and the mood at boiling point, accusations of NGOs acting as a “pull factor” are rife.

“Sara’s motive for going back this year was purely humanitarian,” said Oceanne Fry, a fellow student who in June worked alongside her at a day clinic in the refugee reception centre.

“At no point was there any indication of illegal activity by the group … but I can attest to the fact that, other than our intake meeting, none of the volunteers ever met, or interacted, with its leadership.”

The mayor of Lesbos, Spyros Galinos, said he has seen “good and bad” in the humanitarian movement since the start of the refugee crisis.

“Everything is possible,. There is no doubt that some NGOs have exploited the situation. The police announcement was uncommonly harsh. For a long time I have been saying that we just don’t need all these NGOs. When the crisis erupted, yes, the state was woefully unprepared but now that isn’t the case.”

Attempts to contact ERCI were unsuccessful. Neither a telephone number nor an office address – in a scruffy downtown building listed by the aid group on social media – appeared to have any relation to it.

In a statement released more than a week after Mardini’s arrest, ERCI denied the allegations, saying it had fallen victim to “unfounded claims, accusations and charges”. But it failed to make any mention of Mardini.

“It makes no sense at all,” said Amed Khan, a New York financier turned philanthropist who has donated boats for ERCI’s search and rescue operations. To accuse any of them of human trafficking is crazy.

“In today’s fortress Europe you have to wonder whether Brussels isn’t behind it, whether this isn’t a concerted effort to put a chill on civil society volunteers who are just trying to help. After all, we’re talking about grassroots organisations with global values that stepped up into the space left by authorities failing to do their bit.”

https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/dfda97afb0be8069e54daa62e04af602207ce7fa/0_22_5450_3271/master/5450.jpg?width=620&quality=85&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&s=a40a6f7b27a13e3db90966ebc0b4f4ef#.jpg https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/02bbfb68eeac0b7263a24ed2b1671bfe29593e30/0_0_3543_2126/master/3543.jpg?width=620&quality=85&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&s=dc6f681ac5d87bcac57d7463fb0d07d4#.jpg

#Sarah_Mardini

The volunteers facing jail for rescuing migrants in the Mediterranean

The risk of refugees and migrants drowning in the Mediterranean has increased dramatically over the past few years.

As the European Union pursued a policy of externalisation, voluntary groups stepped in to save the thousands of people making the dangerous crossing. One by one, they are now criminalised.

The arrest of Sarah Mardini, one of two Syrian sisters who saved a number of refugees in 2015 by pulling their sinking dinghy to Greece, has brought the issue to international attention.

The Trial

There aren’t chairs enough for the people gathered in Mytilíni Court. Salam Aldeen sits front row to the right. He has a nervous smile on his face, mouth half open, the tongue playing over his lips.

Noise emanates from the queue forming in the hallway as spectators struggle for a peak through the door’s windows. The morning heat is already thick and moist – not helped by the two unplugged fans hovering motionless in dead air.

Police officers with uneasy looks, 15 of them, lean up against the cooling walls of the court. From over the judge, a golden Jesus icon looks down on the assembly. For the sunny holiday town on Lesbos, Greece, this is not a normal court proceeding.

Outside the court, international media has unpacked their cameras and unloaded their equipment. They’ve come from the New York Times, Deutsche Welle, Danish, Greek and Spanish media along with two separate documentary teams.

There is no way of knowing when the trial will end. Maybe in a couple of days, some of the journalists say, others point to the unpredictability of the Greek judicial system. If the authorities decide to make a principle out of the case, this could take months.

Salam Aldeen, in a dark blue jacket, white shirt and tie, knows this. He is charged with human smuggling and faces life in jail.

More than 16,000 people have drowned in less than five years trying to cross the Mediterranean. That’s an average of ten people dying every day outside Europe’s southern border – more than the Russia-Ukraine conflict over the same period.

In 2015, when more than one million refugees crossed the Mediterranean, the official death toll was around 3,700. A year later, the number of migrants dropped by two thirds – but the death toll increased to more than 5,000. With still fewer migrants crossing during 2017 and the first half of 2018, one would expect the rate of surviving to pick up.

The numbers, however, tell a different story. For a refugee setting out to cross the Mediterranean today, the risk of drowning has significantly increased.

The deaths of thousands of people don’t happen in a vacuum. And it would be impossible to explain the increased risks of crossing without considering recent changes in EU-policies towards migration in the Mediterranean.

The criminalisation of a Danish NGO-worker on the tiny Greek island of Lesbos might help us understand the deeper layers of EU immigration policy.

The deterrence effect

On 27 March 2011, 72 migrants flee Tripoli and squeeze into a 12m long rubber dinghy with a max capacity of 25 people. They start the outboard engine and set out in the Mediterranean night, bound for the Italian island of Lampedusa. In the morning, they are registered by a French aircraft flying over. The migrants stay on course. But 18 hours into their voyage, they send out a distress-call from a satellite phone. The signal is picked up by the rescue centre in Rome who alerts other vessels in the area.

Two hours later, a military helicopter flies over the boat. At this point, the migrants accidentally drop their satellite phone in the sea. In the hours to follow, the migrants encounter several fishing boats – but their call of distress is ignored. As day turns into night, a second helicopter appears and drops rations of water and biscuits before leaving.

And then, the following morning on 28 March – the migrants run out of fuel. Left at the mercy of wind and oceanic currents, the migrants embark on a hopeless journey. They drift south; exactly where they came from.

They don’t see any ships the following day. Nor the next; a whole week goes by without contact to the outside world. But then, somewhere between 3 and 5 April, a military vessel appears on the horizon. It moves in on the migrants and circle their boat.

The migrants, exhausted and on the brink of despair, wave and signal distress. But as suddenly as it arrived, the military vessel turns around and disappears. And all hope with it.

On April 10, almost a week later, the migrant vessel lands on a beach south of Tripoli. Of the 72 passengers who left 2 weeks ago, only 11 make it back alive. Two die shortly hereafter.

Lorenzo Pezzani, lecturer at Forensic Architecture at Goldsmiths University of London, was stunned when he read about the case. In 2011, he was still a PhD student developing new spatial and aesthetic visual tools to document human rights violations. Concerned with the rising number of migrant deaths in the Mediterranean, Lorenzo Pezzani and his colleague Charles Heller founded Forensic Oceanography, an affiliated group to Forensic Architecture. Their first project was to uncover the events and policies leading to a vessel left adrift in full knowledge by international rescue operations.

It was the public outrage fuelled by the 2013 Lampedusa shipwreck which eventually led to the deployment of Operation Mare Nostrum. At this point, the largest migration of people since the Second World War, the Syrian exodus, could no longer be contained within Syria’s neighbouring countries. At the same time, a relative stability in Libya after the fall of Gaddafi in 2011 descended into civil war; waves of migrants started to cross the Mediterranean.

From October 2013, Mare Nostrum broke with the reigning EU-policy of non-interference and deployed Italian naval vessels, planes and helicopters at a monthly cost of €9.5 million. The scale was unprecedented; saving lives became the political priority over policing and border control. In terms of lives saved, the operation was an undisputed success. Its own life, however, would be short.

A critical narrative formed on the political right and was amplified by sections of the media: Mare Nostrum was accused of emboldening Libyan smugglers who – knowing rescue ships were waiting – would send out more migrants. In this understanding, Mare Nostrum constituted a so-called “pull factor” on migrants from North African countries. A year after its inception, Mare Nostrum was terminated.

In late 2014, Mare Nostrum was replaced by Operation Triton led by Frontex, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, with an initial budget of €2.4 million per month. Triton refocused on border control instead of sea rescues in an area much closer to Italian shores. This was a return to the pre-Mare Nostrum policy of non-assistance to deter migrants from crossing. But not only did the change of policy fail to act as a deterrence against the thousands of migrants still crossing the Mediterranean, it also left a huge gap between the amount of boats in distress and operational rescue vessels. A gap increasingly filled by merchant vessels.

Merchant vessels, however, do not have the equipment or training to handle rescues of this volume. On 31 March 2015, the shipping community made a call to EU-politicians warning of a “terrible risk of further catastrophic loss of life as ever-more desperate people attempt this deadly sea crossing”. Between 1 January and 20 May 2015, merchant ships rescued 12.000 people – 30 per cent of the total number rescued in the Mediterranean.

As the shipping community had already foreseen, the new policy of non-assistance as deterrence led to several horrific incidents. These culminated in two catastrophic shipwrecks on 12 and 18 April 2015 and the death of 1,200 people. In both cases, merchant vessels were right next to the overcrowded migrant boats when chaotic rescue attempts caused the migrant boats to take in water and eventually sink. The crew of the merchant vessels could only watch as hundreds of people disappeared in the ocean.

Back in 1990, the Dublin Convention declared that the first EU-country an asylum seeker enters is responsible for accepting or rejecting the claim. No one in 1990 had expected the Syrian exodus of 2015 – nor the gigantic pressure it would put on just a handful of member states. No other EU-member felt the ineptitudes and total unpreparedness of the immigration system than a country already knee-deep in a harrowing economic crisis. That country was Greece.

In September 2015, when the world saw the picture of a three-year old Syrian boy, Alan Kurdi, washed up on a beach in Turkey, Europe was already months into what was readily called a “refugee crisis”. Greece was overwhelmed by the hundreds of thousands of people fleeing the Syrian war. During the following month alone, a staggering 200.000 migrants crossed the Aegean Sea from Turkey to reach Europe. With a minimum of institutional support, it was volunteers like Salam Aldeen who helped reduce the overall number of casualties.

The peak of migrants entered Greece that autumn but huge numbers kept arriving throughout the winter – in worsening sea conditions. Salam Aldeen recalls one December morning on Lesbos.

The EU-Turkey deal

And then, from one day to the next, the EU-Turkey deal changed everything. There was a virtual stop of people crossing from Turkey to Greece. From a perspective of deterrence, the agreement was an instant success. In all its simplicity, Turkey had agreed to contain and prevent refugees from reaching the EU – by land or by sea. For this, Turkey would be given a monetary compensation.

But opponents of the deal included major human rights organisations. Simply paying Turkey a formidable sum of money (€6 billion to this date) to prevent migrants from reaching EU-borders was feared to be a symptom of an ‘out of sight, out of mind’ attitude pervasive among EU decision makers. Moreover, just like Libya in 2015 threatened to flood Europe with migrants, the Turkish President Erdogan would suddenly have a powerful geopolitical card on his hands. A concern that would later be confirmed by EU’s vague response to Erdogan’s crackdown on Turkish opposition.

As immigration dwindled in Greece, the flow of migrants and refugees continued and increased in the Central Mediterranean during the summer of 2016. At the same time, disorganised Libyan militias were now running the smuggling business and exploited people more ruthlessly than ever before. Migrant boats without satellite phones or enough provision or fuel became increasingly common. Due to safety concerns, merchant vessels were more reluctant to assist in rescue operations. The death toll increased.
A Conspiracy?

Frustrated with the perceived apathy of EU states, Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) responded to the situation. At its peak, 12 search and rescue NGO vessels were operating in the Mediterranean and while the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) paused many of its operations during the fall and winter of 2016, the remaining NGO vessels did the bulk of the work. Under increasingly dangerous weather conditions, 47 per cent of all November rescues were carried out by NGOs.

Around this time, the first accusations were launched against rescue NGOs from ‘alt-right’ groups. Accusations, it should be noted, conspicuously like the ones sounded against Mare Nostrum. Just like in 2014, Frontex and EU-politicians followed up and accused NGOs of posing a “pull factor”. The now Italian vice-prime minister, Luigi Di Maio, went even further and denounced NGOs as “taxis for migrants”. Just like in 2014, no consideration was given to the conditions in Libya.

Moreover, NGOs were falsely accused of collusion with Libyan smugglers. Meanwhile Italian agents had infiltrated the crew of a Save the Children rescue vessel to uncover alleged secret evidence of collusion. The German Jugendrettet NGO-vessel, Iuventa, was impounded and – echoing Salam Aldeen’s case in Greece – the captain accused of collusion with smugglers by Italian authorities.

The attacks to delegitimise NGOs’ rescue efforts have had a clear effect: many of the NGOs have now effectively stopped their operations in the Mediterranean. Lorenzo Pezzani and Charles Heller, in their report, Mare Clausum, argued that the wave of delegitimisation of humanitarian work was just one part of a two-legged strategy – designed by the EU – to regain control over the Mediterranean.
Migrants’ rights aren’t human rights

Libya long ago descended into a precarious state of lawlessness. In the maelstrom of poverty, war and despair, migrants and refugees have become an exploitable resource for rivalling militias in a country where two separate governments compete for power.

In November 2017, a CNN investigation exposed an entire industry involving slave auctions, rape and people being worked to death.

Chief spokesman of the UN Migration Agency, Leonard Doyle, describes Libya as a “torture archipelago” where migrants transiting have no idea that they are turned into commodities to be bought, sold and discarded when they have no more value.

Migrants intercepted by the Libyan Coast Guard (LCG) are routinely brought back to the hellish detention centres for indefinite captivity. Despite EU-leaders’ moral outcry following the exposure of the conditions in Libya, the EU continues to be instrumental in the capacity building of the LCG.

Libya hadn’t had a functioning coast guard since the fall of Gaddafi in 2011. But starting in late 2016, the LCG received increasing funding from Italy and the EU in the form of patrol boats, training and financial support.

Seeing the effect of the EU-Turkey deal in deterring refugees crossing the Aegean Sea, Italy and the EU have done all in their power to create a similar approach in Libya.
The EU Summit

Forty-two thousand undocumented migrants have so far arrived at Europe’s shores this year. That’s a fraction of the more than one million who arrived in 2015. But when EU leaders met at an “emergency summit” in Brussels in late June, the issue of migration was described by Chancellor Merkel as a “make or break” for the Union. How does this align with the dwindling numbers of refugees and migrants?

Data released in June 2018 showed that Europeans are more concerned about immigration than any other social challenge. More than half want a ban on migration from Muslim countries. Europe, it seems, lives in two different, incompatible realities as summit after summit tries to untie the Gordian knot of the migration issue.

Inside the courthouse in Mytilini, Salam Aldeen is questioned by the district prosecutor. The tropical temperature induces an echoing silence from the crowded spectators. The district prosecutor looks at him, open mouth, chin resting on her fist.

She seems impatient with the translator and the process of going from Greek to English and back. Her eyes search the room. She questions him in detail about the night of arrest. He answers patiently. She wants Salam Aldeen and the four crew members to be found guilty of human smuggling.

Salam Aldeen’s lawyer, Mr Fragkiskos Ragkousis, an elderly white-haired man, rises before the court for his final statement. An ancient statuette with his glasses in one hand. Salam’s parents sit with scared faces, they haven’t slept for two days; the father’s comforting arm covers the mother’s shoulder. Then, like a once dormant volcano, the lawyer erupts in a torrent of pathos and logos.

“Political interests changed the truth and created this wicked situation, playing with the defendant’s freedom and honour.”

He talks to the judge as well as the public. A tragedy, a drama unfolds. The prosecutor looks remorseful, like a small child in her large chair, almost apologetic. Defeated. He’s singing now, Ragkousis. Index finger hits the air much like thunder breaks the night sounding the roar of something eternal. He then sits and the room quiets.

It was “without a doubt” that the judge acquitted Salam Aldeen and his four colleagues on all charges. The prosecutor both had to determine the defendants’ intention to commit the crime – and that the criminal action had been initialised. She failed at both. The case, as the Italian case against the Iuventa, was baseless.

But EU’s policy of externalisation continues. On 17 March 2018, the ProActiva rescue vessel, Open Arms, was seized by Italian authorities after it had brought back 217 people to safety.

Then again in June, the decline by Malta and Italy’s new right-wing government to let the Aquarious rescue-vessel dock with 629 rescued people on board sparked a fierce debate in international media.

In July, Sea Watch’s Moonbird, a small aircraft used to search for migrant boats, was prevented from flying any more operations by Maltese authorities; the vessel Sea Watch III was blocked from leaving harbour and the captain of a vessel from the NGO Mission Lifeline was taken to court over “registration irregularities“.

Regardless of Europe’s future political currents, geopolitical developments are only likely to continue to produce refugees worldwide. Will the EU alter its course as the crisis mutates and persists? Or are the deaths of thousands the only possible outcome?

▻https://theferret.scot/volunteers-facing-jail-rescuing-migrants-mediterranean

v. aussi :
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/778722

#architecture_forensique

début de liste ici ►https://seenthis.net/messages/665225 des sites de services public français qui incluent des scripts de traceurs type google ou realmedia voir par exemple
►https://www.service-public.fr
#espionnage
#données_personnelles

Beverley Skeggs
Goldsmiths, University of London · Department of Sociology
▻https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Beverley_Skeggs

Défendez Moshé Machover : demandez une enquête sur son exclusion du Parti travailliste
1er novembre | Science for the People |Traduction CG pour l’AURDIP
▻http://www.aurdip.fr/defendez-moshe-machover-demandez.html

Pétition pour la réouverture immédiate du carnet Russeurope, par Jacques Sapir
Pour une science ouverte à la liberté d’expression des chercheurs.
Demande de réouverture du Carnet en ligne de Jacques Sapir

▻https://www.change.org/p/marin-dacos-demande-de-r%C3%A9ouverture-du-carnet-en-ligne-de-jacques-sapir?

Le 26 septembre 2017, les responsables de la plateforme Hypotheses.org et de OpenEdition décidaient de suspendre le carnet de recherche (blog) de Jacques Sapir, Russeurope.

Cette décision, que de nombreux juristes considèrent comme sans fondements et arbitraire, a immédiatement suscité une grande émotion dans le monde universitaire et au-delà. Cette décision met en cause le principe de la liberté des chercheurs.
Elle s’avère contradictoire avec le fait que ces chercheurs, et en particulier dans les sciences humaines et sociales, sont directement et immédiatement insérés dans l’espace politique. Enfin, cette mesure est de nature à porter un immense préjudice aux institutions de recherches en France, et à les déconsidérer aux yeux des chercheurs étrangers.
Des protestations très nombreuses ont été envoyées à M. Marin Dacos, responsable d’Hypotheses.org ainsi qu’à son supérieur au Ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la recherche, M. Alain Beretz. Pour l’instant, M. Marin Dacos se refuse de répondre.

Cette pétition sera remise à Marin Dacos, OpenEdition

Premiers signataires
*M. Denis Alland, Professeur en Droit Public, Université de Panthéon-Assas (Paris-2)

*Bernard Cassen, Professeur émérite d’Anglais à l’Université de Paris-8.

*David Cayla (Maître de Conférences en économie à l’université d’Angers).

*Franck Collard, Professeur d’Histoire Médiévale à Paris-Ouest (Paris-10, Nanterre)

*Daniel Bachet, Professeur des Universités, Sociologie, Université Paris-Saclay

*Michel Bergès, Professeur de Sciences Politiques, Université de Bordeaux

*Olivier Berruyer, actuaire et blogueur (Lescrises.fr)

*Bernard Bourdin, Professeur à l’Institut Catholique de Paris, Historien des idées, philosophe politique.

*Coralie Delaume, écrivain et blogueur (l-arene-nue.blogspot.fr)

*Eric Desmons, Professeur de Droit Public, Université de Paris-XIII

*Marcel Gaucher, Directeur d’études (retraité) à l’EHESS, Philosophe.

*Jacques Généreux, économiste, maitre de conférences des Universités, professeur à l’IEPP – Sciences Po.

*Jacques A. Gilbert, Professeur de Littérature comparée, Université de Nantes

*Brigitte Granville, Professor of International Economics and Economic Policy, Chevalier des Palmes Academiques, Fellow of The Higher Education Academy (FHEA), School of Business and Management, Queen Mary University of London

*Alain Guery, Directeur de recherche au CNRS, Historien.

*Éric Guichard, Philosophe de l’internet et du numérique, Enssib-Ens, Ancien Directeur de programme au Collège international de philosophie

*Annie Lacroix-Riz, professeur émérite d’histoire contemporaine, université Paris 7.

*Dominique Lecourt, Philosophe, professeur émérite des universités, ancien recteur d’académie, président d’honneur des Presses Universitaires de France.

*Laurent Loty, Historien des imaginaires et des idées scientifiques et politiques au CNRS, Président d’honneur de la Société Française pour l’Histoire des Sciences de l’Homme

*Roseline Letteron, Professeur des Universités, professeur de Droit à Paris-Sorbonne.

*Laurent Loti, Chargé de recherche au Centre d’Étude de la Langue et des Littératures Françaises (CNRS—Université Paris-Sorbonne)

*Jérôme Maucourant, Maître de conférences (HDR) en sciences économique à l’Université Jean Monnet de Saint-Etienne

*Laurent Pinsolle, blogueur (gaullistelibre.com)

*Nicolas Pons-Vignon, Senior researcher in development economics, University of the Witwatersrand, Afrique du Sud

*Benedetto Ponti, professeur de Droit administratif au département de Science Politique de l’Université de Perugia, professeur de droit des médias numériques.

*Bertrand Renouvin, Journaliste et écrivain.

*Stéphane Rials, professeur de relations internationales et de philosophie politique à Panthéon-Assas (Paris 2).

*Claude Roddier, Professeur des universités, retraitée depuis 2001. Professeur d’astronomie à l’université Aix-Marseille

*François Roddier, Professeur des universités, retraité depuis 2001. Directeur du département d’Astrophysique de l’Université de Nice

*Antoni Soy, Honorary Professor of Applied Economy, University of Barcelona. Former Deputy Minister of Industry and Business, Government of Catalonia. Former Mayor of Argentona

*Serge Sur, Professeur émérite à l’Université Panthéon-Assas (Paris 2)

*Pierre-André Taguieff, philosophe et historien des idées, directeur de recherche au CNRS

*Véronique Taquin, écrivain, normalienne et agrégée de Lettres modernes, professeur de chaire supérieure en khâgne au lycée Condorcet.

*Bruno Tinel, économiste, Maître de conférences, HDR, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne

*Michèle Tribalat, démographe

*Jérôme Valluy, Maître de Conférences (HDR) de Sciences Politiques à Paris-1

*Alain Venturini, archiviste-paléographe, conservateur général du patrimoine, directeur des Archives départementales de l’Aveyron

#étudiants #disparition #Mexique #AYOTZINAPA

v. aussi : ▻http://seen.li/7a0s

CAMEROONIAN TROOPS TORTURED AND KILLED PRISONERS AT BASE USED FOR U.S. DRONE SURVEILLANCE
▻https://theintercept.com/2017/07/20/cameroonian-troops-tortured-and-killed-prisoners-at-base-used-for-u-s-

TROOPS IN THE West African nation of Cameroon have tortured prisoners at a remote military base that is also used by U.S. personnel and private contractors for drone surveillance and training missions.

As the U.S. military has fortified the Cameroonian site, known as Salak, and supported the elite local troops based there, the outpost has become the scene of illegal imprisonment, brutal torture, and even killings, according to a new investigation by The Intercept and the Goldsmiths, University of London-based research firm Forensic Architecture, based on extensive research by Amnesty International. Nearly 60 victims held at Salak described to Amnesty International how they were subjected to water torture, beaten with electric cables and boards, or tied and suspended with ropes, among other abuses.

▻https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46dKuIPZIOg

▻https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlaEGdbv7cs&t

armed by Israeli private companies

Compile #Israfrique :
►https://seenthis.net/messages/685758

#Cameroun.

Torture and Detention in Cameroon
#Forensic_Architecture, le 20 juillet 2017
▻https://forensic-architecture.org/investigation/torture-and-detention-in-cameroon

Voir aussi :

Cameroun : Paul Biya sous protection israélienne
Jeune Afrique, le 19 novembre 2015
▻http://www.jeuneafrique.com/mag/276021/politique/cameroun-paul-biya-sous-protection-israelienne

#Cameroun #torture #crimes_de_guerre #Boko_Haram

Sur sa page facebook, l’ambassade d’israel au Cameroun a pris la peine de se désolidariser de propos antisémites du Ministre de la Justice du Cameroun :
▻https://www.facebook.com/IsraelinCameroon/photos/a.156660884388861/2119995211388742/?type=3&theater

à force de soutenir des dictatures et des fascistes, il ne faut pas s’étonner de retours de bâtons...

https://scontent.fyhu1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/51124197_2119995228055407_1967710988597723136_n.jpg?_nc_cat=111&_nc_ht=scontent.fyhu1-1.fna&oh=2f039328c3d7555ec8882edd4b38cde3&oe=5CB70AAF

Making a killing : Israeli mercenaries in Cameroon
Emmanuel Freudenthal & Youri van der Weide, African Arguments, le 23 juin 2020
►https://seenthis.net/messages/891585

Carton plein : des mercenaires israéliens au Cameroun
Emmanuel Freudenthal & Youri van der Weide, African Arguments, le 23 juin 2020
►https://seenthis.net/messages/893160

Voir aussi :
►https://seenthis.net/messages/699749
►https://seenthis.net/messages/794177

Desmond Tutu [...]: there is no neutrality in situations of grave injustice.

Radiohead slammed by pro-Palestinian action groups after Thom Yorke swears at concert protestors
Rebecca Lewis, Metro, le 11 juillet 2017
►http://metro.co.uk/2017/07/11/radiohead-slammed-by-pro-palestinian-action-groups-after-thom-yorke-swears-

►https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DEKc2IRUAAAdfmz.jpg:large

La réponse de Thom-Yorke à Ken Loach:

Thom Yorke responds to Ken Loach letter asking Radiohead to cancel Israel concert
Roisin O’Connor, The Independent, le 12 juillet 2017
►http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/radiohead-israel-concert-ken-loach-letter-thom-yorke-boycott-tel-aviv

La vidéo d’un fan palestinien, sous-titrée en français :
►https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6Q0gMHTXks

Palestinian artists ask Thom Yorke of Radiohead, “Can you hear us?”
Salim Abu Jamal, producer and director
Asma’a Azaizeh, poet
Mohammad Bakri, actor and director
Saleh Bakri, actor
Ziad Bakri, actor and filmmaker
Samir Eskanda, musician
Mahdi Fleifel, director
Annemarie Jacir, filmmaker and poet
Remi Kanazi, poet
Hannah Khalil, playwright
Firas Khoury, actor
Ramzi Maqdisi, actor
Ahmed Masoud, writer
Rakan Mayasi, director
Jowan Safadi, musician
Kareem Samara, musician
BNC, le 17 juillet 2017
►https://bdsmovement.net/news/palestinian-artists-ask-thom-yorke-radiohead-can-you-hear-us

Traduction française ci-dessous

Ca s’accélère, à la veille du concert:

Dear Thom
Un collectif d’étudiants, Palestiniens et alliés, de l’Université d’Exeter, le 16 juillet 2017
►https://exeterpalestineaction.tumblr.com/post/163070154001/dear-thom-we-are-a-collective-of-palestinian

#Mike_Leigh slams Radiohead for ignoring Palestinians
Artists for Palestine, le 17 juillet 2017
►https://artistsforpalestine.org.uk/2017/07/17/mike-leigh-slams-radiohead-for-ignoring-palestinians

Radiohead should not perform in Tel Aviv
Khalil Al-Batsh Palestinian Students Campaign for the Academic Boycott of Israel, Gaza
Huda Ammori Student, Manchester
Malaka Mohammed PhD student, Exeter University
Haidar Eid Academic and writer, Gaza
Ahmed Abbelfattah Quantity surveyor, Manchester
Odai AbbelFattah Project manager, Manchester
Yahya Abu Seido Medical student, London
Yara Hawari PhD student, Exeter University
Ayat Hamadan PhD student, Exeter University
Diana Alghoul Journalist, London
Abdulla Al Shamataan Student, London
Dima AlShami Student, London
Samir Eskanda Musician, London
Sara Mohtaseb Edinburgh
Yousef Mama Nurse, Gaza
Amani Kayed Student, Ramallah
Dr Issam Hijjawi Chair of Association of Palestinian Community in Scotland
Rama Sahtout PhD student, Exeter University
Mohammed Abdelfattah Chemist, Bury
Shahd Abusalama SOAS, University of London
Enas Mohammed Student, Palestine University, Gaza
Beth Jamal Student, Cambridge University
Ahmed Mohammed Student, Al-Aqsa University, Gaza
Laith Itmaiza Politician, Ramallah
Zakaraih Anis Engineer, London
Caaron Butt Carer, Walsall
Zeena Jojo LSE
Beleigh Jbara Lawyer, London
Doaa Althalathini PhD student, Plymouth
Salaheddin AbuEin London
Nowsheen Khondoker Student, London
Hazem Anuhabibi Student, University of Sussex
Ahmed Issa Student, Islamic University of Gaza
Lobna Mohammed Student, Islamic University of Gaza
Motaz Aljedaili Manchester
Mahmoud Abdou London
Marwan Hanbali Student, Cardiff University
Ahmed Abu Azzom Student, Gaza
Rasha Abushaban Student, University of Birmingham
Bernadette Lamoudi Teacher, Leicester
Hala Raed Student, Manchester
Nour Zaher Tamnous Student, Gaza
Muhammad Y Sammour Gaza
Mohammed Yousef Abdelnabi Gaza
Rami Yasir Student, Warwick University
Y Anis Student, London
Mohamed M Sakr Student, Manchester
Waleed Javaid Marketing professional, Huddersfield
Mohannad Ammori Surgeon, Manchester
Rawan Yaghi Oxford University
Nagham Shaker Manchester
Neda’a Mohammed Salha Student, Gaza
Islam Hamdi Alsayyed Student, Gaza
Layth Qutayri Student, Manchester
Zina Abdullatif Careworker, London
le 17 juillet 2017
►https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/17/radiohead-should-not-perform-in-tel-aviv

Des artistes palestiniens demandent à Thom Yorke de Radiohead : « Pouvez-vous nous entendre ? »
Salim Abu Jamal, producer and director
Asma’a Azaizeh, poet
Mohammad Bakri, actor and director
Saleh Bakri, actor
Ziad Bakri, actor and filmmaker
Samir Eskanda, musician
Mahdi Fleifel, director
Annemarie Jacir, filmmaker and poet
Remi Kanazi, poet
Hannah Khalil, playwright
Firas Khoury, actor
Ramzi Maqdisi, actor
Ahmed Masoud, writer
Rakan Mayasi, director
Jowan Safadi, musician
Kareem Samara, musician
BNC, le 17 juillet 2017
►https://www.bdsfrance.org/des-artistes-palestiniens-demandent-a-thom-yorke-de-radiohead-pouvez-vous

Epilogue?

He sang ’Creep,’ but we expected more of Thom Yorke
Gideon Levy, Haaretz, le 20 juillet 2017
►https://seenthis.net/messages/616358

Traduction en français :

#Thom_Yorke, voilà pourquoi vous devriez boycotter Israël
Gideon Levy, Haaretz, le 11 juin 2017
►https://www.bdsfrance.org/thom-yorke-voila-pourquoi-vous-devriez-boycotter-israel

#Palestine #BDS #Boycott_culturel #Royaume_Uni #Musique #Radiohead

Retour sur la polémique ici :
►https://seenthis.net/messages/604426

Revue de presse :

►http://pitchfork.com/news/radioheads-thom-yorke-condemned-by-pro-palestine-groups

►http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/pro-palestine-orgs-decry-thom-yorkes-defense-of-israel-show-w487727

►http://www.stereogum.com/1946502/pro-palestine-groups-respond-to-thom-yorkes-defense-of-radioheads-israel-concert/news

►http://www.nme.com/news/music/thom-yorke-radiohead-israel-gig-criticism-ken-loach-2088102

►http://www.spin.com/2017/06/radiohead-israel-thom-yorke-response-artists-for-palestine

►http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/rock/7825629/radiohead-concert-tel-aviv-other-israel-concerts

Des musiciens israéliens à Thom Yorke :

Annuler le concert de Radiohead abîmera la façade « comme si de rien n’était » d’Israël
Mondoweiss, le 29 juin 2017
►https://www.bdsfrance.org/des-musiciens-israeliens-a-thom-yorke-annuler-le-concert-de-radiohead-abi

Des artistes anglais à Radiohead:

Radiohead need to join the cultural boycott of Israel – why won’t they meet with me to discuss it?
Ken Loach, The Independent, le 11 juillet 2017
►https://seenthis.net/messages/614147

Radiohead are wrong to play in Israel. Here’s why
Dave Randall, The Guardian, le 11 juillet 2017
►https://seenthis.net/messages/614147

Radiohead slammed by pro-Palestinian action groups after Thom Yorke swears at concert protestors
Rebecca Lewis, Metro, le 11 juillet 2017
►http://metro.co.uk/2017/07/11/radiohead-slammed-by-pro-palestinian-action-groups-after-thom-yorke-swears-

►https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DEKc2IRUAAAdfmz.jpg:large

La réponse de #Thom_Yorke à Ken Loach:

Thom Yorke responds to Ken Loach letter asking Radiohead to cancel Israel concert
Roisin O’Connor, The Independent, le 12 juillet 2017
►http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/radiohead-israel-concert-ken-loach-letter-thom-yorke-boycott-tel-aviv

Rock sans conscience
Roderic Mounir, Le Courrier (Genève), le 14 juillet 2017
►https://www.lecourrier.ch/node/151033

La vidéo d’un fan palestinien, sous-titrée en français :
►https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6Q0gMHTXks

Palestinian artists ask Thom Yorke of Radiohead, “Can you hear us?”
Salim Abu Jamal, producer and director
Asma’a Azaizeh, poet
Mohammad Bakri, actor and director
Saleh Bakri, actor
Ziad Bakri, actor and filmmaker
Samir Eskanda, musician
Mahdi Fleifel, director
Annemarie Jacir, filmmaker and poet
Remi Kanazi, poet
Hannah Khalil, playwright
Firas Khoury, actor
Ramzi Maqdisi, actor
Ahmed Masoud, writer
Rakan Mayasi, director
Jowan Safadi, musician
Kareem Samara, musician
BNC, le 17 juillet 2017
►https://bdsmovement.net/news/palestinian-artists-ask-thom-yorke-radiohead-can-you-hear-us

Traduction française ici:
►https://www.bdsfrance.org/des-artistes-palestiniens-demandent-a-thom-yorke-de-radiohead-pouvez-vous

Ca s’accélère, à la veille du concert:

Dear Thom
Un collectif d’étudiants, Palestiniens et alliés, de l’Université d’Exeter, le 16 juillet 2017
►https://exeterpalestineaction.tumblr.com/post/163070154001/dear-thom-we-are-a-collective-of-palestinian

#Mike_Leigh slams Radiohead for ignoring Palestinians
Artists for Palestine, le 17 juillet 2017
►https://artistsforpalestine.org.uk/2017/07/17/mike-leigh-slams-radiohead-for-ignoring-palestinians

Radiohead should not perform in Tel Aviv
Khalil Al-Batsh Palestinian Students Campaign for the Academic Boycott of Israel, Gaza
Huda Ammori Student, Manchester
Malaka Mohammed PhD student, Exeter University
Haidar Eid Academic and writer, Gaza
Ahmed Abbelfattah Quantity surveyor, Manchester
Odai AbbelFattah Project manager, Manchester
Yahya Abu Seido Medical student, London
Yara Hawari PhD student, Exeter University
Ayat Hamadan PhD student, Exeter University
Diana Alghoul Journalist, London
Abdulla Al Shamataan Student, London
Dima AlShami Student, London
Samir Eskanda Musician, London
Sara Mohtaseb Edinburgh
Yousef Mama Nurse, Gaza
Amani Kayed Student, Ramallah
Dr Issam Hijjawi Chair of Association of Palestinian Community in Scotland
Rama Sahtout PhD student, Exeter University
Mohammed Abdelfattah Chemist, Bury
Shahd Abusalama SOAS, University of London
Enas Mohammed Student, Palestine University, Gaza
Beth Jamal Student, Cambridge University
Ahmed Mohammed Student, Al-Aqsa University, Gaza
Laith Itmaiza Politician, Ramallah
Zakaraih Anis Engineer, London
Caaron Butt Carer, Walsall
Zeena Jojo LSE
Beleigh Jbara Lawyer, London
Doaa Althalathini PhD student, Plymouth
Salaheddin AbuEin London
Nowsheen Khondoker Student, London
Hazem Anuhabibi Student, University of Sussex
Ahmed Issa Student, Islamic University of Gaza
Lobna Mohammed Student, Islamic University of Gaza
Motaz Aljedaili Manchester
Mahmoud Abdou London
Marwan Hanbali Student, Cardiff University
Ahmed Abu Azzom Student, Gaza
Rasha Abushaban Student, University of Birmingham
Bernadette Lamoudi Teacher, Leicester
Hala Raed Student, Manchester
Nour Zaher Tamnous Student, Gaza
Muhammad Y Sammour Gaza
Mohammed Yousef Abdelnabi Gaza
Rami Yasir Student, Warwick University
Y Anis Student, London
Mohamed M Sakr Student, Manchester
Waleed Javaid Marketing professional, Huddersfield
Mohannad Ammori Surgeon, Manchester
Rawan Yaghi Oxford University
Nagham Shaker Manchester
Neda’a Mohammed Salha Student, Gaza
Islam Hamdi Alsayyed Student, Gaza
Layth Qutayri Student, Manchester
Zina Abdullatif Careworker, London
le 17 juillet 2017
►https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/17/radiohead-should-not-perform-in-tel-aviv

Epilogue?

He sang ’Creep,’ but we expected more of Thom Yorke
Gideon Levy, Haaretz, le 20 juillet 2017
►https://seenthis.net/messages/616358

Radiohead plays concert in Tel Aviv, snubs Palestinian boycott calls
Graham Liddell | Thursday 20 July 2017
▻http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/radiohead-plays-concert-tel-aviv-snubs-palestinian-boycott-calls-1182

BDS successful?

Despite the fact that Radiohead went forward with the concert, BDS activists told MEE they felt the campaign has been successful in spreading the word about the boycott movement and the Palestinian cause in general.

“It has raised awareness of the cultural boycott to a new demographic of people, and has shown Palestinians that they will not be forgotten,” Ammori told MEE.

’A bit of me is dying. But I can’t stay’: the EU nationals exiting Britain

Feeling betrayed and bewildered after years in the UK, many EU citizens are leaving before Brexit. And some Britons are going too …

https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/d2698bf97323453323a521b8f53578ffab097bcc/0_175_4368_2621/master/4368.jpg?w=620&q=20&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&dpr=2&s=d63dd89c9f08eaa1631d64228746bbeb#.jpg

Struggling UK universities warn staff of possible job cuts

Deteriorating balance sheets and political uncertainty blamed for redundancy threats.

Universities are warning staff to prepare for redundancies in the new year as a result of deteriorating balance sheets and lowered forecasts for student recruitment, coupled with the uncertainty of Brexit and sudden shifts in government policy.

In recent days more than half a dozen universities have told staff there could be job cuts in 2019, including members of the research-intensive Russell Group such as Cardiff University, while others are privately bracing for cuts later in the year.

Universities are in the midst of reporting their financial results for 2017-18 and are monitoring student applications coming in for next year. Several have been alarmed by the projections they are seeing before a 15 January deadline for undergraduates.

Insiders say universities are more likely to cut staff because of a number of other threats in the next 12 months, including the potential effect on international students of a no-deal Brexit, as well as cuts to tuition fees in England as a result of a review of funding ordered by Theresa May that will report early next year.

“Knee-jerk cuts to staff will harm universities’ ability to deliver high-quality teaching and research and provide the support students need. Staff are already overstretched and asking those who remain to do even more is not a sustainable strategy,” said Matt Waddup, head of policy for the University and College Union (UCU).

“Students repeatedly say they want greater investment in their staff as a top priority, yet the proportion of expenditure spent on staff has fallen. Cutting staff will send out entirely the wrong signal to potential students. Axing educators is obscene at any time, let alone during the current uncertainty when we need our universities firing on all cylinders.”
Guardian Today: the headlines, the analysis, the debate - sent direct to you
Read more

Among the group of universities that have gone public, the University of Reading told staff in an email on Monday evening that a voluntary redundancy scheme was being drawn up and would open in January.

“I want to emphasise that voluntary redundancies are only one tool available to us,” wrote Prof Robert Van de Noort, the acting vice-chancellor, suggesting that staff should consider early retirement, reduced hours or changes to contracts to help to avoid compulsory redundancies.

Reading’s accounts, published a few days ago, reveal that the university made a £20m loss for the financial year, including a £27m loss on its subsidiary in Malaysia. Reading’s balance sheet was brought into the black only by £36m of pension “remeasurements”.

Van de Noort told staff: “There is no doubt that the year ahead will be difficult at times, but I am confident that as a university community we can address these difficulties and remain a leader in teaching and research in the UK and globally.”

Despite Reading’s deficit, the previous vice-chancellor, Sir David Bell, saw his total pay rise by £10,000 to £329,000. Bell announced his departure this year and is now vice-chancellor of the University of Sunderland.

At Cardiff, the vice-chancellor, Colin Riordan, has also written to staff telling them they will be offered voluntary redundancy from January. The university has said compulsory staff cuts “cannot be ruled out”.

In a joint statement the Cardiff University branches of the Unite, Unison and UCU unions said: “We are astonished that Cardiff University staff are facing their third voluntary severance scheme in six years, and we are very worried that the vice-chancellor still refuses to rule out further compulsory redundancies.”

At the University of Gloucestershire, based in Cheltenham, unions say they have been advised of more than 100 job cuts and other redundancies as a result of what the university called a “rebalancing” in challenging conditions.

“There is a demographic fall in the number of 18-year-olds in the population, which is affecting demand for higher education, the level of tuition fees universities are permitted to charge home undergraduate students is capped by the government, and there is increasing competition for recruitment,” the university said.

“At the same time, we are facing large increases in some of our costs, particularly external increases in what we are required to spend on staff pensions. The combined effect of these factors is that, in common with many other universities, our costs are rising faster than our income. That is not a situation we can allow to continue.”

In Scotland, union members at Queen Margaret University in Musselburgh begin voting on Wednesday on strike action over the possibility of 40 job cuts – about 10% of its staff – although the university says it hopes to meet the number through voluntary redundancies.

Other universities considering redundancies include Birkbeck, University of London and Bangor University in Wales.

The university financial reporting season also reveals that some universities continue to thrive. The University of Oxford said its income topped £1.5bn for the first time in 2017-18, with an overall surplus of £150m.

Oxford’s investments grew by £286m, which was £68m more than the previous year, while the Oxford University Press contributed a further £205m.

The financial statements suggest the public controversy over vice-chancellors’ high rates of pay has had some effect, with many leading universities showing little or no growth in pay for their leaders.

At the University of Manchester, where revenue topped £1bn for the first time, the total earnings of the vice-chancellor, Nancy Rothwell, fell from £306,000 to £276,000 owing to lower pension contributions.

▻https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/dec/11/struggling-uk-universities-warn-staff-of-possible-job-cuts

Brexit: EU citizens’ children could lose right to stay in UK, senior MP warns

‘You could have quite a lot of children who could pass the deadline for the settlement scheme, be completely unaware of their rights – and to lose their rights’

▻https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-settled-status-application-children-eu-citizens-yvette-cooper-

#enfants #enfance

Harriet Harman: Legislative protection must be provided to EU citizens in the UK

The Immigration Bill strips EU citizens living in the UK of their rights and leaves them in limbo. Legislative protection must be guaranteed, says Harriet Harman

▻https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/foreign-affairs/brexit/house/house-magazine/102890/harriet-harman-legislative-protection
#protection_législative

Bitter sweet citizenship: how European families in the UK cope with Brexit

About 80,000 EU nationals have applied for British citizenship since the UK voted to leave the European Union. The decision has rarely been easy. On the contrary, it has often been perceived as “forced” or as an attempt to “take back control” of life amid the Brexit uncertainty, a new research has revealed.

The contrasting feelings were highlighted in a study by “EU families and Eurochildren in Brexiting Britain”, a project by the University of Birmingham in cooperation with civil rights group the3million, Migrant Voice, and immigration barrister Colin Yeo.

Researchers interviewed 103 families in the UK in which at least one of the partners is a non-British EU national. They wanted to understand how Brexit is impacting the decisions they make about their legal status.

The study shows that while many are applying for naturalization, many more are still uncertain and “considering their options.” Better off and educated EU nationals from Western European countries are the most resistant to the idea of becoming British citizens as a solution to Brexit. This is especially true for Germans, “who feel like they somehow betray the European ideal in doing so,” says the report.

Others, particularly from Eastern Europe, take a more pragmatic approach. Those who apply often do it to protect their children. But instead of being seen as “the culmination of a path to integration”, naturalisation often generates “feelings of un-belonging and of disintegration”.

Lead author Nando Sigona, deputy director of the Institute of Research into Superdiversity at the University of Birmingham, discusses the research findings with Europe Street News.

Why a research on families rather than individuals?

We focused on families in which at least one of the partners is a non-British EU national because Brexit has legal implications for their rights and social implications for their choices. We wanted to explore the dilemmas these families face. For example, in a mix family ‘going back home’ is a complex issue: if you are a Polish-German couple who has met in the UK and speak English as main language, where is home? Probably in the UK.

We also thought about their children, the next generation. Even pro-migration groups have been very utilitarian in their approach to European migrants. They say they are needed because they work hard, they are young and they contribute to the economy. I personally hate this narrative because I do not like to have a price tag on my head. And for children the situation is even more complicated: they are not productive, they use schools and services, and yet they are in the UK as legitimate residents. According to Migration Observatory, there are more than 900,000 children of EU parents (Ireland excluded) in the UK. How will British society look like in 20 or 30 years, when these children will be adult? What will be the impact of the way they have been treated? These are the questions we wanted to examine.

Is this why the project refers to ‘Eurochildren’?

Yes, but let’s not forget that in these families there are British nationals too. We could have called the project “British families with European heritage” and probably we would have got more attention from politicians who have a responsibility towards their citizens, those they do not treat as “others”.

We usually refer to the 3.8 million EU nationals in the UK, according to the latest Eurostat data. But, as you say, many of them have British partners and children. How many people are really impacted by Brexit?

It is almost impossible to know because of the way official data are collected. In case of dual nationality, the Office for National Statistics prioritises the British one so people disappear from the statistics on EU nationals. Our research also looked at the census data of the past 40 years, with children of earlier migrants now registered as British. The legacy of EU’s free movement in the UK is much larger that what people think.

This means that no one knows how many people might or might not be protected by the withdrawal agreement – if there is one – or by the “settled status” scheme.

The situation is so complicated. Within the same family different members may have different rights. The problem with European families is also that, when they moved to the UK, this was not part of the deal. Their legal status was not something they had to worry about. The government is now ignoring or underestimating this situation by imposing a retroactive bureaucratic monstrosity like the “settled status”. The risk is that many will be left out. The only solution would be to turn the process into a registration rather than an application, and to leave it open. Some people will be inevitably left out, but at least they won’t become unlawful.

Based on your interviews, what has changed for these families since the Brexit vote?

Most people feel unsettled because they failed to see Brexit coming. They did not think a majority would vote against the EU and they were not prepared for it. Secondly, they feel forced to consider their options and to make important decisions such as applying for British citizenship or leaving. The configuration of the family, for example whether or not the partners are from the same EU country, can make a difference for their opportunities. There is also a sense of being forced to define themselves. Previously mix families could reconcile their identities under a European umbrella, but Brexit is changing that. However, it is important to acknowledge that people have different feelings about the situation and to not monopolise their voices.

Are the responses you received uniform across the UK?

There are places where people feel more secure. London feels safer, respondents said, as a majority voted to stay in the EU, the environment does not feel hostile and there are long standing EU communities. In Scotland, the positive narrative coming from the government helped too. In contrast, people in areas with a strong leave vote felt very isolated. Outside big cities, where immigration is a fairly new phenomenon, Polish and Eastern Europeans in particular did not have established communities and social networks to support them in this hostile transition.

Many of the people we interviewed were reflecting on neighbours and family members who voted for Brexit. It felt very personal. We heard of families avoiding Christmas meals and, in the most tragic situations, splitting up because the additional tension brought by Brexit pushed them beyond the tipping point. We have also seen tensions between parents and children, for example children asking parents not to speak their mother tongue in public or parents not speaking with their children in the native language because they do not feel safe. The Home Office and migration policies do not consider the reverberations within families of big geopolitical shifts.

What is the approach of these families to naturalisation?

Part of our respondents showed a lot of resistance to naturalisation. Especially those with higher social stardards do not want to be forced into it. Some who never felt the urge to become British eventually applied. Among the people who did so, there were often feelings of anger and frustration but this was seen as a strategy to secure the future of children, a sort of parental duty.

A number of people said they have lost trust in the British government, they are sceptical about the settled status and they think naturalization is the safest option. Others want to retain the right to move freely in and out of the country: becoming British for them does not necessarily mean wanting to stay but keeping all options open for themselves and their children. A minority also said they want to be able to vote. But there are large groups who are not applying. Some cannot because their countries do not allow dual citizenship. The cost attached to the process is also a factor. There are strict eligibility criteria and the test is not easy. Citizenship is not a right: it is something you have to earn, pay for and deserve.

What do you think of Michael Gove’s proposal to grant citizenship for free to EU nationals, if he becomes the leader of the Conservative Party and Prime Minister?

Great, but I’d feel uncomfortable if this applies only to Europeans. Fees are unfair for everyone and the government makes a large profit from them. Fees should be cut and the process simplified in general, especially for children. It would guarantee their future status and it would be good for the country.

Are there groups of EU nationals applying more than others?

Central and Eastern Europeans started to apply for British citizenship early, before the EU referendum. They were already victim of the hostile environment and they felt negatively targeted by populist media, so they tried to secure their rights earlier on. Free movement is also fairly recent for them [the country joined the EU in 2004].

For French, Spanish, Italian and German nationals there has been a 250-300% increase in applications since the referendum, but this is mostly because few were applying before June 2016. Before the Brexit vote they felt their position in Britain was fully secured.

Who is not applying?

There are people who cannot apply because they do not have regular jobs, they are from minorities, for example the Roma, they struggle with the procedure or cannot afford it. We heard of parents who had to prioritize which one of their children could apply for naturalisation, as they could not afford to pay for all. There were people at the margins before Brexit and they will be even more so when they will lose the protections of EU law.

How do children feel about these changes?

It depends on the age. Children up to 3 years old are usually shielded by their parents. The 5-6 years old are aware that something is going on and ask questions. Teenagers are aware and sometimes join the conversation, for example participating in demonstrations. Maybe they are more conflicted about family decisions. But kids are the ones normalising the situation trying to be like others.

Is the European identity of these families at risk?

Not necessarily. For the first time in Britain we see large numbers of European flags. In a sense, the European identity has become a topic of conversation. For many British citizens and policy makers the EU has only just been an economic project, but now it is a political one and this can further develop. The European heritage is not going to disappear. If anything, some of the people we interviewed started teaching their language to the kids or sending them to language schools. What is clear is that the EU is a topic we will have to confront for years to come. The issue of belonging will have repercussions that can go in many directions, depending on how things will settle. One of the challenges of this research is precisely that it is happening while event are unfolding.

▻https://europestreet.news/bitter-sweet-citizenship-how-european-families-in-the-uk-cope-with-br

US academic given two weeks to leave UK after eight years

#Visa system for researchers is hostile and costly and risks jamming a pipeline of talent, universities warn

▻https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/sep/17/us-academic-given-two-weeks-pack-up-after-eight-years-visa-system-resea

Ca fait penser à I Daniel Blake...
►https://seenthis.net/messages/596365

#Daniel_Blake

#Eyal_Weizman #forensic_architecture