person:aaron david miller

  • Proche-Orient : Mike Pompeo enterre le plan de paix de Kushner | El Watan
    https://www.elwatan.com/edition/international/proche-orient-mike-pompeo-enterre-le-plan-de-paix-de-kushner-06-06-2019

    Jared Kushner, le conseiller du président Trump, s’est enfoncé davantage lundi en mettant encore en doute l’éventualité d’une solution à deux Etats, estimant que le peuple palestinien souhaitait « des choses différentes » de celles de l’Autorité palestinienne.

    En plus d’être rejeté par les Palestiniens, le plan de paix palestino-israélien élaboré par Jared Kushner, le conseiller du président américain, Donald Trump, et dont le contenu est encore mystérieux n’a visiblement pas la cote aussi au Département d’Etat américain. Le secrétaire d’Etat américain, Mike Pompeo, a affirmé, à ce propos, dimanche, lors d’une rencontre privée avec la Conférence des présidents des principales organisations juives américaines que ce plan est « inexécutable » et « peut être rejeté ».

    « Je comprends pourquoi les gens pensent qu’il s’agit d’un accord que seuls les Israéliens pourront aimer », a-t-il ajouté, selon le Washington Post qui a rapporté, dimanche, l’information. « Je comprends cette perception. J’espère juste qu’on laissera la place à l’écoute et qu’on la laissera s’installer un peu », a-t-il toutefois ajouté.

    Commentant les confidences de Mike Pompeo, l’ancien négociateur américain sur le dossier du Moyen-Orient, Aaron David Miller, a indiqué que ces propos représentent l’évaluation « la plus révélatrice et la plus réelle que j’ai entendue jusqu’à présent ». « Le fait que Pompeo ait si facilement admis la perception et probablement la réalité que le plan était fortement structuré et favorable aux Israéliens est frappant », a ajouté l’ancien négociateur, cité aussi par le Washington Post.

  • Ilhan Omar has sparked panic in AIPAC

    Rep. Ilhan Omar has apologized for her inexcusably insensitive tweet. But the core issue behind her comment - whether the U.S. should continue to reflexively embrace the views of the Israeli government - won’t go away
    David Rothkopf
    Feb 13, 2019 2:37 PM

    https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-ilhan-omar-has-sparked-panic-in-aipac-1.6935041

    U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota has apologized for her offensive tweet that suggested Israeli influence in the U.S. Congress was “all about the Benjamins.” But that does not mean that the core issue underlying the controversy surrounding the tweet, Representative Ilhan and new voices critical of Israel in U.S. politics, is likely to fade away.

    I’m not going to defend Omar.Her own apology was unequivocal and the tweet itself was, at best, inexcusably insensitive. But it is vitally important we distinguish between criticism of Israel and anti-Semitism. And, as importantly, we also must recognize the massive response against Rep. Omar for what it is - a spasm of fear about our changing times.

    >> Aaron David Miller: No, Israel and America Aren’t Breaking Up. Don’t Believe the Hype

    The entire infrastructure that has been built over the years to advance the interests of Israel in the U.S. is quaking in its boots - not because of the badly developed arguments of a rookie Congresswoman - but because of the coming generational change in U.S. views of Israel and because support for the Israeli government has been damaged among Democrats by the choice of the Netanyahu administration to so closely tie itself to Donald Trump and the Republican right wing in America.
    Supporters of US President Donald Trump cheer during a rally in El Paso, Texas on February 11, 2019
    Supporters of US President Donald Trump cheer during a rally in El Paso, Texas on February 11, 2019.AFP

    Rep. Omar damaged her own credibility by embracing an old anti-Semitic trope. There is no place for that in American politics. But even as she should be condemned, her views of Israel need to be heard. There is no reason all American views on a foreign government should be in lockstep.

    Quite the contrary, Americans who seek to protect and advance our interests should no more reflexively embrace the views of the Israeli government than they do those of a pro-Brexit UK government or an anti-refugee Italian government.

    Israel’s defenders would like the relationship to be deemed so important that it must not be criticized. This echoes the position, say, of the Saudis in the wake of the Khashoggi murder. And it is just as indefensible.

    A growing number of Americans realize that. Further, a growing number of American Jews feel the positions of the Netanyahu government are contrary to both U.S. interests and the values of Judaism, and thus the rationale for a Jewish state. In other words, they see Netanyahu’s actions as undermining the reasons Israel might have a special claim on their support.

    Indeed, no one, in fact, has done more to damage the standing of Israel than a Netanyahu government that has actively waged war on the Palestinian people, denied them their rights, responded disproportionately to threats and refused to acknowledge its own wrong-doing.

    Anti-Semites, with their stale and discredited attacks, can never do the kind of damage to the U.S.-Israel relationship that rampant Israeli wrong-doing can (especially when the Israeli government weakens the arguments against anti-Semites by embracing them, as in the case of Victor Orban in Hungary, or hugging those like Donald Trump who promote anti-Semites and anti-Semitic ideas about “globalists” or George Soros.)
    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his Hungarian counterpart Viktor Orban share a light moment during the reception ceremony in front of the Parliament building in Budapest, Hungary, July 18, 2017.
    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his Hungarian counterpart Viktor Orban in front of the Parliament building in Budapest, Hungary, July 18, 2017Balazs Mohai/AP

    None of this is to diminish the real and ever-present threat of anti-Semitism. Which is why, of course, it is essential that we are careful to distinguish between it and legitimate criticism of the government of Israel.

    In fact, if we in the U.S. stand for what is best about America and hope for the best for Israel, then we must welcome those who would criticize Israel’s government not as our enemies but as the true defenders of the idea of Israel, and of America’s deep investment in the promise of that country.

    With that in mind, we must be careful that we do not allow the justifiable aspects of the critique against Rep. Omar to lead to a reflexive position where we silence active criticism of the Israeli government, or the worst actions of the State of Israel.

    Judging from comments in the media about her that pre-dated these statements, and comments about Rep. Rashida Tlaib, and comments about the “left” becoming anti-Israel, in my view we are in the midst of a pre-emptive push to combat the coming rethinking of the U.S.- Israel relationship.
    Feb. 5, 2019, photo, Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., left, joined at right by Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., listens to President Donald Trump’s State of the Union speech, at the Capitol in Washington
    Feb. 5, 2019, photo, Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., left, joined at right by Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., listens to President Donald Trump’s State of the Union speech, at the Capitol in Washington.J. Scott Applewhite,AP

    It will seize upon the fact that some elements who offer the critique of Israel are in fact anti-Semitic or tap into anti-Semitic rhetoric and traditions, in order to tar with the same brush those who legitimately disapprove of the behavior of the Israeli government.

    That would be a mistake. Because it would not only silence a debate we need to and deserve to have, but it would undermine the ability of the U.S. to be a force for positive change in Israeli policies - change that is necessary to the future of Israel and to U.S. interests in that region.

    We must combat anti-Semitism. But we should also combat those who have no tolerance for democratic processes, or who would seek a political purity test for politicians based on narrowly-defined, traditionalist, outdated guidelines.

    The future of the U.S.- Israel relationship - and the future of Israel, the Palestinian people and peace in the region - depends on our willingness to look past biases of all sorts to the facts on the ground, to the justice that is required and to our interests going forward.

    David Rothkopf is a foreign policy expert and author, host of the Deep State Radio podcast and CEO of The Rothkopf Group, LLC a media and advisory firm. His next book, on the national security threat posed by the Trump administration, is due out later this year. Twitter: @djrothkopf

  • The Photos the U.S. and Saudi Arabia Don’t Want You to See - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/08/31/opinion/columnists/yemen-famine-cholera.html

    This catastrophe started under President Barack #Obama, although he tried — not nearly enough — to rein in Saudi Arabia. President Trump has removed the reins and embraced the rash and inexperienced Saudi crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, who is overseeing the assault on Yemen.

    #Yemen is a moral, humanitarian and strategic disaster for America,” says Aaron David Miller, a former State Department Middle East analyst who advised both Republican and Democratic administrations. “U.S. policy is being driven by its pro-Saudi proclivities and its own desire to contain Iran. But by enabling Riyadh, it’s only making an already fraught situation worse.”

    #Etats-Unis #Arabie_saoudite

    • With commercial flights banned, the way into rebel areas is on charter flights arranged by the United Nations and aid groups. But Saudi military jets control this airspace and ban any flight if there’s a journalist onboard. I don’t think the Saudis would actually shoot down a plane just because I was on it, but the U.N. isn’t taking chances.

      This is maddening: Saudi Arabia successfully blackmails the United Nations to bar journalists so as to prevent coverage of Saudi atrocities.

      #onu #triste_monde

  • Aaron David Miller, ancien négociateur américain au Proche-Orient : à #Gaza une médiation américaine n’est envisageable que si Israël n’en peut plus

    Gaza : « Le moment d’une médiation américaine n’est pas venu »
    http://www.lapresse.ca/international/dossiers/offensive-israelienne-a-gaza/201407/19/01-4785174-gaza-le-moment-dune-mediation-americaine-nest-pas-venu.php

    C’est une question de #timing. En ce moment, je ne vois pas un rôle déterminant pour les #États-Unis. Voyez où nous en sommes : nous avons connu neuf jours de roquettes et de frappes aériennes. #Israël a pris la décision pour une multitude de raisons d’envoyer des troupes au sol. Ce serait le pire moment pour une intercession. Le fait est que vous avez besoin de trois conditions pour intercéder. Vous avez besoin d’une urgence, c’est-à-dire que les parties doivent être prêtes à mettre fin à l’escalade. Vous avez besoin d’un médiateur ou d’un groupe de médiateurs. Et vous avez besoin d’une proposition d’entente. Franchement, aucune de ces conditions n’est présente. Le moment d’une médiation américaine n’est pas venu. Et les États-Unis, aussi influents soient-ils auprès d’Israël, n’ont aucune influence sur le Hamas.

    #Israel

  • The Forgotten Palestinians
    http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/189-israel-palestine/51844-the-forgotten-palestinians.html

    The Forgotten Palestinians
    ( Security Council and Israel/Palestine )
    2-15-6eca7palestine
    Picture Credit: ramallahonline.com

    On May 15, the New York Times published an article by Aaron David Miller entitled “Preserving Israel’s Uncertain Status Quo.” Miller’s picture of Israel as a struggling democratic state facing external threats presents the usual bland confection. Miller fails to address the genuine threats that are affecting hopes for peace and promoting extremist ideas within the country: Israeli police attacks on J14 demonstrators in Tel Aviv; trends towards greater economic inequality, the expansion of the separation wall, the continued siege of the Gaza Strip; and Israel’s categorical backing of violent West Bank settlers.

    By Patrick O. Strickland
    Counterpunch
    August 20, 2012

    On May 15, the New York Times ran an editorial authored by Aaron David Miller under the title of “Preserving Israel’s Uncertain Status Quo.” Miller argues that the Israeli government’s attempts to achieve a “more peaceful and prosperous future” must “count for something.”

    In his discursive analysis of the contemporary political climate, Miller unfolds an unabridged list of threats to Israel: the Israeli social justice movement, the Syrian uprising, the Egyptian ousting of Hosni Mubarak, Iran, the security vacuum in the Sinai, ultra-Orthodox Jewish Israelis, and ‘Arab Israelis’ (which is, of course, a crass euphemism intended to disavow the collective identity of Palestinian citizens of Israel).

    Cataloging this exhaustive account of dangers, he resorts to a number of boorish clichés and Western media assumptions. Indeed, despite Israel’s malicious enemies, he argues, “the Israelis will prosper and keep their state, but the Arabs and the Iranians will never let them fully enjoy it.”

    #palestine #israel