person:ahmed tibi

  • Israeli Arab slate, far-left candidate banned from election hours after Kahanist leader allowed to run
    Jonathan Lis and Jack Khoury Mar 07, 2019 7:07 AM
    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/elections/.premium-far-left-lawmaker-banned-from-israeli-election-for-supporting-terr

    Arab political sources say the move is evidence of racism and the delegitimization of Arab society in Israel, accusing Netanyahu’s Likud party of anti-Arab incitement

    The Central Election Committee disqualified the Arab joint slate Balad-United Arab List and Ofer Cassif, a member of politicial alliance Hadash-Ta’al, from running in the election on Wednesday, opposing the opinion of Attorney General Avichai Mendelblit.

    Michael Ben Ari and Itamar Ben-Gvir from the Kahanist, far-right Otzma Yehudit party had petitioned against both lists. The committee approved Ben Air to run in the election earlier Wednesday.

    The decisions will be referred to the Supreme Court on Sunday for approval. A ban against a party slate may be appealed in the Supreme Court, which holds a special “election appeals” process, while a ban on an individual candidate automatically requires approval by the Supreme Court if it is to take effect.

    Arab political sources described the disqualification of the Balad-United Arab List slate as evidence of racism and the delegitimization of Arab society in Israel and accused Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party of anti-Arab incitement.

    MK David Bitan petitioned on behalf of Likud against Balad-United Arab List, and Yisrael Beitenu chairman Avigdor Lieberman petitioned against Cassif. Petitioners claimed both lists and Cassif supported terror and ruled out Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish and Democratic state. Mendelblit said he opposed all the petitions.

    Ben-Gvir presented the committee with findings he claimed should disqualify the Hadash-Ta’al slate. He mentioned a call from Ta’al chairman Ahmed Tibi to annul the Declaration of Independence, and quoted a Facebook post by Ayman Odeh, the head of Hadash.

    In the post, written following a meeting with Fatah member Marwan Barghouti at an Israeli prison, Odeh compared Barghouti to Nelson Mandela. “The meeting was moving, as well as speaking to a leader who shares my political stances.” Ben-Gvir noted Odeh defined Ahed Tamimi as an “excellent girl,” and said she showed “legitimate resistance.” Tamimi, a Palestinian teenage girl, served time in prison for slapping an Israeli soldier in 2018.

    Cassif was accused of equating Israel and the Israel Defense Forces with the Nazi regime, and it was noted that he called to fight “Judeo-Nazism,” expressed support for changing the anthem, and called Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked “Neo-Nazi scum.” He did not attend the session, but was called after committee chairman Justice Hanan Melcer insisted on his presence.

    “I come from an academic background, and my area of expertise is among other things the subject of Fascism, Nazis and nationalism in general,” said Cassif, explaining his comments. “When I speak to a friend or write a post as a private person, I use metaphors. When I used the aforementioned terms – they were metaphors.”

    In an interview last month, Cassif said Israel conducts a “creeping genocide” against the Palestinian people.

    The top candidate on the slate, Mansour Abbas, said he had expected that most of the representatives of the Zionist parties on the election committee would support the move to disqualify the slate, but added: “We are a democratic Arab list that is seeking to represent Arab society with dignity and responsibility.”

    Commenting on Benny Gantz, the leader of Kahol Lavan, which is ahead of Likud in recent polls, Abbas said: “There’s no difference between Benjamin Netanyahu and Benjamin Gantz.”

    Mtanes Shehadeh, who is No. 2 on the Balad-United Arab list slate said the decision to disqualify his slate was expected because he said the Central Election Committee has a right-wing majority and “is also controlled by a fascist, right-wing ideology.”

    His Balad faction, Shehadeh said, “presents a challenge to democracy in Israel” and challenges what he called “the right-wing regime that is controlling the country.”

    Sources from the Balad-United Arab list slate said there is in an urgent need to strip the Central Election Committee of the authority to disqualify candidates and parties from running in elections. The considerations that go into the decision are purely political, the sources said.

    Balad chairman Jamal Zahalka said the decision to disqualify the slate sends a “hostile message to the Arab public” in the country. “We will petition the High Court of Justice against the decision and in any event, we will not change our position, even if we are disqualified.”

    Earlier Wednesday, the Central Elections Committee approved Ben Ari, the chairman of the far-right Otzma Yehudit party, to run for the Knesset.

    Meretz, Stav Shaffir (Labor) and the Reform Movement, who filed the petition to the Central Elections Committee to ban Ben Ari from running for Knesset, all said they would file a petition with the High Court of Justice against the committee’s decision.

    Prior to deliberations, Attorney General Avichai Mendelblit submitted his opinion to the comittee, stating he was in favor of disqualifying Ben Ari from running for Knesset on the grounds of incitement to racism.

    In November 2017, for instance, at an annual memorial for Rabbi Meir Kahane, Ben Ari gave a speech in which he said of Israeli Arabs, “Let’s give them another 100,000 dunams [of land] and affirmative action, maybe they’ll love us. In the end, yes, they’ll love us when we’re slaughtered.”

    In May 2018, Ben Ari gave another speech in which he said, “The Arabs of Haifa aren’t different in any way from the Arabs of Gaza. How are they different? In that they’re here, enemies from within. They’re waging war against us here, within the state. And this is called – it has a name – it’s called a fifth column. We need to call the dog by its name. They’re our enemies. They want to destroy us. Of course there are loyal Arabs, but you can count them – one percent or less than one percent.”

    #Hadash

    • Outlaw Israel’s Arabs
      They are already regarded as illegitimate citizens. Why not just say so and anchor it in law?
      Gideon Levy | Mar 10, 2019 3:15 AM
      https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-outlaw-israel-s-arabs-1.7003010

      The time has come to put an end to the stammering and going around in circles: Outlaw the Arabs, all of them. Make them all illegal dwellers in their land and have the Border Police hunt them down like animals, as they know how to do. They are already regarded as illegitimate citizens. It’s time to say so and to anchor it in law.

      Discerning the differences among them is artificial: What’s the difference between the United Arab List–Balad ticket and between the Hadash–Ta’al ticket (acronyms for the Arab political parties)? Why is only the first one on this list being disqualified? And what is the difference between the Palestinians who are Israeli citizens and those living under occupation?

      Why does one group have rights while the others don’t? The time has come to rectify the situation: Ta’al should be treated like Balad; citizens of the state should be treated like those under occupation. Anything less is like paying lip service to the guardians of political correctness, to a supposed semblance of fairness, to a deceptive image of democracy. Outlawing all the Arabs is the way to ensure you have a Jewish state. Who’s against that?

      Whoever thinks what I’ve written is wrong or an exaggeration isn’t reading reality. Disqualifying the Arabs is the issue that has the broadest consensus of the current election campaign. “I’ll put it simply,” Yair Lapid, the democrat, said. “We won’t form a blocking majority with the Arabs. Period.”

      Now I, will humbly put it simply, too: This is a revolting display of racism. Period. More than the torture of the residents of Gaza and the West Bank under the guise of security concerns, in this we see a broader Israeli racism in all its glory: Pure, unadulterated and acceptable racism. It’s not Balad, but the Arabs who are being disqualified. It’s not Ofer Kassif but the left that’s being disqualified. It’s a step-by-step slide down the slope and we can no longer shut our eyes to it.

      If this discourse delegitimizing our Arab citizens isn’t driving Israeli democrats mad – then there is no democracy. We don’t need any studies or institutes: A regime that disqualifies voters and elected officials because of their blood and nationality is not a democracy.

      You don’t need to cite the occupation to expose the lie of democracy – now it’s also apparent at home, within. From Benny Gantz to Bezalel Smotrich – all of them are Ben-Zion Gopsteins. The laws against racism and all the rest are only lip service. The Israeli Knesset has 107 lawmakers; thirteen of them, most of them among the best there are, are outside the game, they have less say than the ushers.

      Now we must try to imagine what they’re going through. They hear everyone trying to distance themselves from them, as though they’re a contagious disease, and they’re silent. They hear nobody seeking to get near them as though their bodies stink, and they avoid comment. The Knesset is like a bus that has segregated its Jewish and Arab passengers, an arena of political apartheid, not yet officially so, which declares from the outset that the Arabs are disqualified.

      Why even bother participating in this game that’s already been decided? The response should have been to boycott the elections. If you don’t want us, we don’t want you. The fig leaf is torn and has long been full of holes. But this is exactly what Israel wants: A country only for Jews. Therefore Arab citizens must not play this game and must head in their masses to the polling stations, just like the prime minister said, to poke Israeli racism painfully in the eye.

      For avowed racists, it’s all very clear. They say what they think: The Jews are a supreme race, the recipients of a divine promise, they have rights to this land, the Arabs are, at best, fleeting guests.

      The problem is with the racists in masquerade like Gantz and Lapid. I have a question for them: Why are Hadash and Ta’al not eligible to be part of a bloc? Why can’t you rely on their votes and why shouldn’t their representatives belong to the government? Would Ayman Odeh be any worse a culture minister than Miri Regev? Would Ahmad Tibi be any less skillful a health minister than Yaakov Litzman? The truth is this: The center-left is as racist as the right.

      Let’s hope no Gantz-Lapid government can be formed, just because of the Arab votes that it fails to have. That would be the sweetest revenge for racism.

    • La Cour suprême israélienne invalide la candidature d’un leader d’extrême droite
      La justice a interdit la candidature du chef d’Otzma Yehudit. Elle a approuvé la liste arabe, les présences d’un candidat juif d’extrême gauche et de Ben Gvir d’Otzma Yehudit
      Par Times of Israel Staff 18 mars 2019,
      https://fr.timesofisrael.com/la-cour-supreme-israelienne-invalide-la-candidature-dun-leader-dex

      (...) Les juges ont en revanche fait savoir que Itamar Ben Gvir, qui appartient également à la formation d’extrême-droite, est autorisé à se présenter.

      Ils ont aussi donné le feu vert à une participation au scrutin du 9 avril à Ofer Kassif ainsi qu’aux factions de Balad-Raam. Kassif est le seul candidat juif à figurer que la liste Hadash-Taal et il avait été disqualifié par la commission centrale électorale en raison de déclarations controversées faites dans le passé, notamment une dans laquelle il avait qualifié la ministre de la Justice Ayelet Shaked de « racaille néo-nazie ». (...)

      #Ofer_Kassif

  • Israel passes controversial nation-state law defining country as Jewish national homeland

    62 lawmakers vote in favor of the bill after a stormy debate ■ Arab lawmakers tossed out after they tear bill in protest, call it ’apartheid law’

    Jonathan Lis and Noa Landau Jul 19, 2018

    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/israel-passes-controversial-nation-state-bill-1.6291048

    The Knesset passed early Thursday a controversial bill that officially defines Israel as the national homeland of the Jewish people and asserts that “the realization of the right to national self-determination in Israel is unique to the Jewish people,” with 62 lawmakers voting in favor of the legislation and 55 opposing it.
    The nation-stae law also includes clauses stating that a “united Jerusalem” is the capital of Israel and that Hebrew is the country’s official language. Another says that “the state sees the development of Jewish settlement as a national value and will act to encourage and promote its establishment and consolidation.”
    It passed after a long and stormy debate that began in the afternoon, with lawmakers voting on hundreds of clauses presented by the opposition that objected to differents parts of the bill. 
    >> Nation-state bill heralds the end of Israel as a Jewish, democratic State | Analysis ■ As an Arab, I support Israel’s Jewish nation-state bill | Opinion ■ Israel’s nation-state bill betrays insecurity about its right to the land
    Immediately after the law passed, Arab lawmakers tore copies in protest, and were subsequently removed from the Knesset plenum hall. Lawmaker Ayman Odeh, chairman of the Joint List, released a statement saying that Israel “declared it does not want us here” and that it had “passed a law of Jewish supremacy and told us that we will always be second-class citiziens.”

    Speaking moments after the bill passed into law, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said: “This is a defining moment – long live the State of Israel.”

    Arab lawmakers tear the nation-state bill in protest after it passes in the Knesset.
    Netanyahu further said that “122 years after Herzl made his vision known, with this law we determined the founding principle of our existence. Israel is the nation state of the Jewish people, and respects the rights of all of its citizens.”
    The prime minister also said that "in the Middle East, only Israel respects [rights]. This is our country, the Jewish state. In recent years there have been those who have tried to undermine that and question the principles of our existence. Today we made it into law: This is the country, the language, the anthem and flag. 

    As they left the Knesset plenum, Arab MKs from the Joint List party confronted Netanyahu. MK Ahmed Tibi and MK Ayeda Touma-Souliman yelled at Netanyahu: “You passed an apartheid law, a racist law.” 
    MK Tibi lashed at Netanyahu: “Why are you afraid of the Arabic language?” The premier retorted by saying: “How dare you talk this way about the only democracy in the Middle East?” 
    Opposition head Isaac Herzog also spoke up at the plenum, saying that “it’s a little sad to me that the last speech I make will be against this kind of backdrop. The question is whether the law will harm or benefit Israel. History will determine. I really hope that we won’t find the fine balance between a Jewish and democratic state to be hurt.”
    The sponsor of the bill, MK Avi Dichter, said during debates that took place prior to the vote that “unlike the disinformation and fake news that were tossed around [regarding the bill], this basic law doesn’t hurt the culture of minorities living in Israel, doesn’t hurt their sabbaticals and holidays and certainly doesn’t hurt the Arabic language, which remains a mother tongue for 1.5 million of Israel’s citizens.”
    The draft bill the Knesset voted on is fundamentally different form the version the coalition had sought to advance in the past decade. Its main clauses were moderated following pressure within the coalition ranks and beyond.
    Initially, the bill was intended to significantly limit the discretion of Supreme Court justices’ decisions, requiring them to set the state’s Jewish character above its democratic character in rulings where the two clashed. This clause was removed from the bill already in May.

    The most controversial clause, which appeared to pave the way for the creation of communities segregated by nationality or religion, was removed from the legislation earlier this week.

    The nation-state law establishes as a basic law, or quasi-constitutional law, a set of values, some of which already appear in existing laws. The law stipulates that Israel is the Jewish nation’s historic homeland and that this nation has the singular right to national self-determination in it. The law anchors the flag, menorah, Hatikva anthem, Hebrew calendar, Independence Day and Jewish holidays as national symbols.
    The law states that the “whole and united” Jerusalem is the state’s capital, which appears today in Basic Law: Jerusalem. The nation-state law further grants the status of an official language only to Hebrew.
    Another controversial clause stipulates that the state will invest resources in preserving Israel’s affiliation to world Jewry, but not in Israel. This wording was demanded by the ultra-Orthodox parties to prevent the state from linking up with the Reform and Conservative communities in Israel.
    As part of the protest against the law, Peace Now activists waved a black flag in the Knesset balcony during the debate, until security guards made them leave the room. Joint List chairman Ayman Odeh also raised a black flag during the debate against the legislation.
    “As [the 1956 massacre] in Kafr Qassem was a blatantly illegal order, with a black flag over it, so is a black flag hoisted over this evil law,” he said.
    J Street’s president and founder, Jeremy Ben-Ami, harshly criticized the nation-state bill and Netanyahu’s government: “It was born in sin, its only purpose is to send a message to the Arab community, the LGBT community and other minorities in Israel, that they are not and never will be equal citizens. Two months ago we celebrated the 70th anniversary of the Israeli Declaration of Independence, where it was written that the State of Israel ’will ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or gender.’ Today Netanyahu’s government is trying to ignore those words and the values that they represent.”
    On Monday, Netanyahu said the bill was “very important to guarantee the foundations of our existence, which is Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people” – though critics say he is mainly keen to drum up support before the next Knesset election, due by November next year.

  • Le renseignement britannique surveille aussi Israël de près
    LE MONDE | 07.12.2016 | Par Jacques Follorou
    http://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2016/12/07/le-renseignement-britannique-surveille-aussi-israel-de-pres_5044882_4408996.

    On ne se méfie jamais assez de ses amis, surtout les plus proches. Officiellement, Israël et les deux agences de surveillance anglo-saxonnes les plus puissantes, l’Agence nationale de sécurité (NSA) américaine et son homologue britannique, le GCHQ (Government Communications Headquarters), sont unis par une sacro-sainte alliance. Intense du fait des enjeux de survie pour Israël, confiante au regard de l’excellence reconnue aux Israéliens en matière d’espionnage, et en forte croissance depuis dix ans, cette coopération unique a pourtant une face plus obscure.

    De nouvelles pièces, extraites par Le Monde, en collaboration avec le site The Intercept, des archives de l’ex-consultant de la NSA Edward Snowden confiées à Glenn Greenwald et Laura Poitras, dévoilent en effet l’ampleur de la surveillance des intérêts israéliens par le GCHQ. Les Britanniques ont espionné la diplomatie israélienne, aussi bien à Jérusalem qu’à l’étranger. Ils visaient aussi des sociétés privées du secteur de la défense, des organismes d’Etat chargés de la coopération internationale ou encore des centres universitaires connus pour leur très haut niveau scientifique. Ces cibles apparaissent sous forme d’adresses électroniques ou de numéros de téléphone dans des rapports d’interception des techniciens du GCHQ, heureux de montrer qu’ils étaient parvenus à les identifier dans les flux de communications satellitaires entre le continent africain et le reste du monde. Au bas de chaque compte rendu, il est mentionné que la collecte peut désormais devenir automatique.

    “““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““
    Espionnage d’Air France, d’Israël et de l’Autorité palestinienne : nouvelles révélations Snowden
    LE MONDE | 07.12.2016 | Par Martin Untersinger et Jacques Follorou
    http://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2016/12/07/espionnage-d-air-france-d-israel-et-de-l-autorite-palestinienne-ce-qu-apport

    Les documents consultés par Le Monde montrent que les Britanniques ont espionné la diplomatie israélienne, aussi bien à Jérusalem qu’à l’étranger. Ils visaient aussi des sociétés privées du secteur de la défense, des organismes d’Etat chargés de la coopération internationale ou encore des centres universitaires connus pour leur très haut niveau scientifique.

    The Wall Street Journal et Der Spiegel avaient déjà montré que les services anglais et américains avaient surveillé les communications du premier ministre Benyamin Nétanyahou et celles du bureau du premier ministre Ehoud Olmert. Selon nos informations, les espions ratissent beaucoup plus large. Ils visaient des services de l’Etat, notamment ses diplomates. Parmi ces identifiants figurent ainsi le numéro de téléphone du numéro deux du ministère des affaires étrangères israélien ou encore les e-mails d’ambassadeurs en poste à Nairobi, au Kenya, et à Abuja, au Nigeria. Mais on trouve aussi parmi les cibles de ces agences des employés de sociétés de défense, comme Ophir Optronics, l’un des fleurons de la fibre optique et du laser, deux éléments-clés des armements modernes et des industries de pointe, ou encore des centres de recherche de l’université hébraïque de Jérusalem.

    Au Proche-Orient, la NSA et le GCHQ ne font pas d’exceptions : tout comme Israël, l’Autorité palestinienne a été mise sous surveillance serrée par les agences américaines et britanniques. Là encore, la NSA et son homologue britannique entretiennent pourtant d’étroites relations avec la monarchie jordanienne et l’Autorité palestinienne dans le domaine du renseignement. La NSA et l’EWD, le service de renseignement électronique jordanien, sont même de très proches alliés : « A lui seul, l’EWD fournit une grande part des noms d’individus ciblés par la NSA » dans cette région, reconnaît une note des services américains. Pourtant, dans les longues listes d’interceptions du GCHQ, se trouvent les coordonnées de la cour royale de Jordanie, du chef du protocole du roi et de l’ambassade de Jordanie à Washington.

    L’Autorité palestinienne a également fait l’objet d’une surveillance intensive, loin de se limiter aux hauts responsables. Fin 2008 et en 2009, le GCHQ a ainsi ciblé les communications du cabinet du secrétaire général de l’OLP et celles d’un grand nombre de délégations palestiniennes dans le monde. Notamment en France, en Belgique, au Portugal, au Pakistan, en Afrique du Sud ou en Malaisie. Des figures palestiniennes modérées étaient également espionnées : le Dr Ahmed Tibi, homme politique et député arabe israélien, chef du Mouvement arabe pour le renouveau, ou encore Ahmed Qoreï, premier ministre de l’Autorité entre 2003 et 2006. Autant d’éléments qui rappellent une règle ancienne de l’espionnage : les amis n’existent pas.

  • La répression de la vie culturelle et médiatique palestinienne continue en #Israël - http://www.middleeasteye.net/fr/reportages/la-r-pression-de-la-vie-culturelle-et-m-diatique-palestinienne-contin

    Le gouvernement israélien a déclaré la guerre à une chaîne de télévision palestinienne qui a été lancée le mois dernier depuis un camion-studio mobile près de Nazareth en Israël.

    La chaîne, qui diffuse ses programmes six heures par jour à 1,5 million de citoyens arabes palestiniens en Israël, se concentre sur les nouvelles, les arts, la nourriture et les célébrités, tout en offrant des programmes pour enfants et des jeux.

    Malgré le budget et les ambitions modestes de la chaîne, le ministre de la Sécurité publique d’Israël, Gilad Erdan, a ordonné sa fermeture la semaine dernière, décrivant ses activités comme une « violation de la souveraineté d’Israël ».

    Cette chaîne par satellite – appelée #Palestine ‘48 – est la première chaîne desservant la minorité palestinienne d’Israël à être financée par l’Autorité palestinienne, le gouvernement provisoire de Mahmoud Abbas en Cisjordanie occupée.

    Les responsables israéliens ont affirmé que la chaîne est utilisée par l’Autorité palestinienne pour « prendre pied » en Israël afin de promouvoir la désinformation et la provocation.

    Toutefois, les critiques affirment que la #répression dont est victime la chaîne fait partie d’une plus grande offensive menée par la nouvelle ministre de la Culture, Miri Regev, sur la vie culturelle des Palestiniens en Israël, lesquels représentent un cinquième de la population.

    Ahmed Tibi, membre palestinien du parlement israélien, a récemment rapporté au site web d’informations Ynet : « Regev agit envers les artistes arabes comme les policiers israéliens à l’égard des manifestants arabes : comme un ennemi qui doit être éliminé. »

    #Israel

  • Yisrael Beytenu to Appeal ’Surrender to Terror’ - Inside Israel - News - Arutz Sheva
    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/190958

    CEC Chairman, Justice Salim Joubran ruled Wednesday that Yisrael Beytenu was prohibited from distributing special copies of the French satirical magazine, wrapped in a cover attacking MK Ahmed Tibi (Balad).

    Arab parties have previously argued that the distribution of the issue, which features cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed on the cover, would spark outrage in the Arab sector.

    Où va le monde ? Lieberman, célèbre israélien militant pour la laïcité (on l’a vu dans les rues à Paris avec Netanhahou), interdit par des Arabes (musulmans et chrétiens, il faut le reconnaître bien que ce soit incompréhensible) de distribuer des copies de Charlie Hebdo.

  • Why the Left shouldn’t take boycott law to the High Court
    http://972mag.com/skip-the-court-system

    The Knesset approved yesterday the anti-boycott law, pretty much in its original form. The list of the undertakers of Israeli democracy can be read here (Hebrew). Exceptional swinishness was expressed by MK Uri Orbach, who heckled MK Ahmed Tibi’s speech by calling “your time is over – it was over in 1948.” This particular gem was repeated by MK Carmel Shama (Lamma Ding Dong) Ha’Cohen.

    #israël

  • Pendant qu’on supprime le mot Nakba des livres d’histoire en France, au même moment en Israël :

    Rivlin, deputies reject Tibi bill... JPost - Diplomacy & Politics
    http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=227876

    Knesset Speaker Reuven Rivlin and his deputies rejected on Monday a bill proposed by MK Ahmed Tibi (United Arab List-Ta’al) to forbid government funding of any organization that denies the “Nakba,” the catastrophe, what the Arab world calls the founding of the State of Israel.

    Les arguments des israéliens sont vraiment intéressants :

    “This bill is clearly defiant and provokes the State of Israel, and therefore, its place is not on the Knesset’s table,” Rivlin explained, adding that he voted against the bill because it rejects the State of Israel as a Jewish state.

    “This bill says the State of Israel is the reason for the Palestinian tragedy,” Rivlin said. “If the Nakba is a tragedy, then the establishment of the State of Israel is a tragedy. The Palestinians experienced a catastrophe that was brought on by their leaders, but the establishment of the State of Israel is not the reason for it.”

    De fait, ils reconnaissent explicitement que le négationnisme de la Nakba est un élément central de l’identité israélienne.

  • Israel pushes on with settlement plans on annexed land | Reuters
    http://in.reuters.com/article/2011/07/04/idINIndia-58079820110704

    Israel’s Jerusalem municipality approved a plan on Monday to build hundreds of new homes for Jews on annexed land in the occupied West Bank, a council member said.

    Elisha Peleg told Reuters that the city planning commission had approved building plans for 900 new units in Gilo, an urban settlement built on land Israel captured in a 1967 war and unilaterally annexed to Jerusalem.