person:craig silverman

  • Fake news. It’s complicated. - First Draft News
    https://firstdraftnews.com/fake-news-complicated

    By now we’ve all agreed the term “fake news” is unhelpful, but without an alternative, we’re left awkwardly using air quotes whenever we utter the phrase. The reason we’re struggling with a replacement is because this is about more than news, it’s about the entire information ecosystem. And the term fake doesn’t begin to describe the complexity of the different types of misinformation (the inadvertent sharing of false information) and disinformation (the deliberate creation and sharing of information known to be false).

    To understand the current information ecosystem, we need to break down three elements:

    The different types of content that are being created and shared
    The motivations of those who create this content
    The ways this content is being disseminated

    Previous attempts to influence public opinion relied on ‘one-to-many’ broadcast technologies but, social networks allow ‘atoms’ of propaganda to be directly targeted at users who are more likely to accept and share a particular message. Once they inadvertently share a misleading or fabricated article, image, video or meme, the next person who sees it in their social feed probably trusts the original poster, and goes on to share it themselves. These ‘atoms’ then rocket through the information ecosystem at high speed powered by trusted peer-to-peer networks.

    This is far more worrying than fake news sites created by profit driven Macedonian teenagers.

    Absolument. C’est cette logique de la rediffusion qui est centrale dans la place que jouent les médias sociaux dans le nouvel individualisme autoritaire.

    They understand that we’re much less likely to be critical of visuals. We’re much less likely to be critical of information that supports our existing beliefs. And, as information overload exhausts our brains, we’re much easier to influence.

    We all play a crucial part in this ecosystem. Every time we passively accept information without double-checking, or share a post, image or video before we’ve verified it, we’re adding to the noise and confusion. The ecosystem is now so polluted, we have to take responsibility for independently checking what we see online.

    C’est typiquement américain cette manière de faire porter la responsabilité sur les individus... mais en l’occurrence, c’est certainement la première voie importante :
    Ne jamais faire circuler une information avant le l’avoir lue.

    Craig Silverman was a guest on the “On The Media” radio show and talked about the need for emotional skepticism. I couldn’t agree more. This isn’t just about funding more news literacy projects, this is about teaching people to second guess their instinctual reactions. If you find yourself incredibly angry at a piece of content or feeling smug (because your viewpoint has been reaffirmed), take another look.

    #fake_news #post-truth #litteratie_numerique

  • En ligne, pourquoi les rumeurs dépassent la vérité - The Upshot
    http://alireailleurs.tumblr.com/post/99557703762

    Le politologue Brendan Nyhan (@BrendanNyhan) pour The Upshot rappelle que les rumeurs l’ont toujours emporté sur l’information factuelle. Le journaliste Craig Silverman a développé Emergent, un outil pour tracer en temps réel les rumeurs et leurs réponses, qui recherche les sources de diffusion, trace la controverse et la diffusion de l’information et de la contre-information. A l’image de l’info sur la femme qui se serait fait implanter un troisième sein, partagé plus de 400 000 fois sur les réseaux sociaux. « Le problème des #hoax, c’est qu’ils sont souvent plus intéressantes que la vérité. Et le défi pour les décodeurs, les vérifieurs de faits, est de rendre les faits aussi amusant que les mythes qu’ils sont sensé remplacer ». Oliver Buckerman pour le Guardian rappelle d’ailleurs que nous sommes tous plus (...)

    #média #information #fact-checking