person:dan shapiro

  • Dan Shapiro sur Twitter :

    “1. Israel is making a major push for US recognition of Israeli sovereignty in the #Golan Heights. Yesterday, PM Netanyahu called for it directly in his press conference with NSA John Bolton yesterday. It’s worth considering the pros, cons, and implications of such a move.” / Twitter
    https://twitter.com/DanielBShapiro/status/1082256784495181825

    2. One has to assume the Trump Admin is giving this step serious consideration. Maybe the decision is already made, & it is just a question of announcing it. It could be presented as compensation to Israel for the withdrawal of US troops from Syria, which Israel advised against.

    #Syrie

  • Pourquoi Israël (et le lobby pro-Israël aux Etats-Unis) défend MBS

    Why we should go easy on the Saudi crown prince

    For 50 years we’ve prayed for a key Arab leader who agrees to sign a significant pact with Israel. Such a leader has finally arrived

    Tzvia Greenfield
    Oct 22, 2018 1:48 AM

    https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-why-we-should-go-easy-on-the-saudi-crown-prince-1.6576593

    Turkey, a human rights champion under Erdogan, is accusing Saudi Arabia, another human rights champion, of the abhorrent murder of a Saudi journalist who entered the lion’s den in Istanbul and, as befits horror stories typical of places like Syria China, Iran, Russia and North Korea, disappeared from sight. Now we have recordings and videotapes, allegedly from the Saudi consulate, suggesting that his body was chopped into pieces.
    The underlying reason for this gruesome act, that evokes something conjured up by the Coen brothers, is not completely clear. One shouldn’t treat any death lightly, particularly not a murder committed by an evil government. However, because of the political ramifications involved, it’s worth contemplating this episode a bit more.
    To really understand Israel and the Middle East - subscribe to Haaretz
    It’s possible that just like Putin, the Saudi royal house cannot tolerate any criticism, which is why it decided to eliminate the rogue journalist in an acid bath (a no less likely possibility that has not yet been suggested by the authorities in Ankara). It’s possible that Recep Tayyip Erdogan is gnashing his teeth over Saudi Arabia’s bolstered global status, particularly vis-à-vis U.S. President Donald Trump, and over the central role played by Mohammed bin Salman in a regional coalition meant to block Iranian influence in the Middle East — which is why Erdogan is bent on deflating the Crown Prince’s image.
    Erdogan may want to humiliate the Saudis, but his main goal is foiling the plan apparently devised by Trump and Mohammed to forge a regional alliance under the aegis of the United States, an alliance that includes Israel, the Gulf States, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt (and possibly Iraq). These countries will jointly try to block Iran, which endangers all of them. Turkey, which is struggling to find an as-yet-undetermined place within the Arab Muslim world, does not strive merely to lead the Sunni world. It also wants to depict Israel as a foreign colonialist implant in the Middle East. Any legitimization afforded Israel thanks to an alliance with Arab states has negative implications for Erdogan.
    Keep updated: Sign up to our newsletter
    Email* Sign up

    >> Why are some pro-Israel voices speaking out against Jamal Khashoggi? | Explained ■ Saudi Arabia, reeling from Khashoggi scandal, battles a new front: Arab media | Analysis
    But fate obviously has a sense of humor. It has embroiled the Turkish rivalry with Saudi Arabia in the U.S. midterm elections. Since Mohammed is currently Trump’s most important international ally, mainly for economic reasons, the campaign advocating a “liberal order,” espoused by international media assailing the Saudi leader, is buzzing with excitement. Its main objective is not the brushing aside of Saudi Arabia, but the delivery of a humiliating knockout blow to Trump and his economic plans.

    According to Time magazine, the level of public support for Trump remains stable at 43 percent, similar to that of Obama, Clinton and Reagan at comparative phases in their terms. It’s no wonder that after the failed attacks on Trump, who immerged unscathed from the intimidation of migrant children, the Stormy Daniels saga and the attempt to prevent the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh, the left is eager to pounce on the Saudi murder case as if it has found a treasure trove.
    However, this time it’s necessary to treat the suspect with kid gloves. Trump’s peace initiative, if it is ever put on the table, is apparently the direct result of pressure by Mohammed bin Salman, who wishes to legitimize Israel before embarking on open cooperation with it. For 50 years we’ve prayed for a key Arab leader who agrees to sign a significant pact with Israel. Such a leader has finally arrived, and calls to depose him, such as those by former U.S. Ambassador Dan Shapiro in an op-ed in Haaretz (October 21) are destructive and in keeping with the best Obama tradition. Anyone waiting for a world of the purely just will have to struggle all his life with the purely evil.

    Tzvia Greenfield

    • Israël est un état colonial par la décision qui l’a créé et par son racisme (dès l’origine les kibboutz, bien que laïques étaient « juifs only »). Les nationalistes sionistes étaient sans doute habités par l’idéologie raciste coloniale propre à la période.

      Cela n’aurait pas été un problème si Israël avait accepté plus tard de reconnaitre les souffrances infligées aux populations arabes autochtones et s’il avait cherché à les compenser.
      Au lieu de cela Israël n’a jamais envisagé de créer une société réellement multi-ethnique et n’a eu de cesse de s’étendre et de réprimer toujours plus massivement les arabes, crimes de guerre sur crimes de guerre ...

      Israël comme l’Arabie, bien que différents, sont deux créations de l’occident colonial, toutes deux structurées par le racisme.
      Leur rapprochement a une logique.

  • The U.S. is finally out of the closet -
    Following the appointment of a settlement-loving envoy, the pretense is over: the United States will no longer be able to claim that it is an honest broker in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict | Opinion

    Gideon Levy 18.12.2016
    read more: http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.759618

    President-elect Donald Trump has decided to appoint an anti-Israeli and racist lawyer as ambassador to Israel. That is, of course, his prerogative. With David Friedman’s appointment last Thursday, the United States has finally come out of the closet. From now on, it officially supports the establishment of an Israeli apartheid state between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River.
    Friedman is not the first Jewish ambassador to Israel – a matter that has always sparked questions of dual loyalty – but he is the first declared friend of the settlements in this position. His predecessor, Dan Shapiro, was also a friend of the settlements, like all the ambassadors before him – representatives of governments that could have stopped the settlement project but did not raise a finger to do so, and even financed it.
    But now we have an ambassador who has also contributed to the dispossession from his own pocket.
    This innovation means an end to ridiculous statements of denunciation by the U.S. Department of State, at which Israel thumbed its nose. No more black diplomatic cars following the construction of every new balcony in the occupied territories. From now on, we have an ambassador who will feel the pain of the Amona outpost’s evacuation and take part in cornerstone-laying ceremonies in every new settlement.
    skip - Email Alerts
    Sign up below and receive every new Gideon Levy column directly in your inbox
    This means the United States will no longer be able to claim that it is an honest broker. It never was one, but now the mask is off. In those terms, Friedman’s appointment is right and good. The Palestinians, Europeans and the rest of the world should know: America is for the occupation. No more pretense.
    Friedman is anti-Israeli, like anyone else who urges Israel to deepen the occupation. Friedman is a racist, like anyone else who pushes for an apartheid state. He is also antidemocratic and McCarthyist (saying supporters of J Street are “far worse than kapos”) – and we have enough of those of our own. Friedman will spur them on, and in that, too, he is patently anti-Israeli.

    • Le président élu Donald Trump a décidé de nommer un avocat anti-israélien et raciste comme ambassadeur en Israël. C’est, bien sûr, sa prérogative. Avec la nomination de David Friedman jeudi dernier, les États-Unis sont finalement sortis du placard. Désormais, elle soutient officiellement l’établissement d’un Etat d’apartheid israélien entre la Méditerranée et le Jourdain. Friedman n’est pas le premier ambassadeur juif en Israël - une question qui a toujours suscité des questions de double loyauté - mais il est le premier ami déclaré des colonies dans cette position. Son prédécesseur, Dan Shapiro, était aussi un ami des colonies, comme tous les ambassadeurs avant lui, des représentants des gouvernements qui auraient pu arrêter le projet de colonisation mais n’ont pas levé le doigt pour le faire et même financé. B Nous avons maintenant un ambassadeur qui a également contribué à la dépossession de sa propre poche. Cette innovation signifie la fin des déclarations ridicules de dénonciation par le Département d’Etat des États-Unis, au cours desquelles Israël s’est moqué du nez. Plus de voitures diplomatiques noires à la suite de la construction de chaque nouveau balcon dans les territoires occupés. Désormais, nous avons un ambassadeur qui sentira la douleur de l’évacuation de l’avant-poste d’Amona et participera aux cérémonies de pose des pierres angulaires dans chaque nouvel établissement. Skip - Alertes par courrier électronique Inscrivez-vous ci-dessous et recevez chaque nouvelle colonne Gideon Levy directement dans votre boîte de réception Cela signifie que les États-Unis ne pourront plus prétendre que c’est un courtier honnête. Il n’a jamais été un, mais maintenant le masque est éteint. En ces termes, la nomination de Friedman est bonne et bonne. Les Palestiniens, les Européens et le reste du monde devraient savoir : l’Amérique est pour l’occupation. Plus de prétention. Friedman est anti-israélien, comme n’importe qui d’autre qui exhorte Israël à approfondir l’occupation. Friedman est un raciste, comme n’importe qui d’autre qui pousse pour un état d’apartheid. Il est également antidémocratique et maccarthyste (disant que les partisans de J Street sont « bien pires que les kapos ») - et nous en avons assez de ceux de nos propres. Friedman les stimulera, et en cela, lui aussi, il est manifestement anti-israélien.

  • Netanyahu has taken Israel’s crackdown on Jewish dissent to a new low | Mairav Zonszein | Opinion | The Guardian

    http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/26/netanyahu-shapiro-israel-crackdown-dissent

    Dan Shapiro, the US ambassador to Israel – an American Jew who speaks Hebrew and who does not hide his deep bond with the country – made a simple observation last week: Israel, he said, seems to have “two standards of adherence to the rule of law: one for Israelis and another for Palestinians”.

    This is a simple fact. While he probably did not mean to call Israel out for its two separate systems of law – but rather for not enforcing the law as effectively when it comes to Israeli culprits as it does for Palestinian ones – everyone interpreted it this way. It is, after all no secret that Israel invented an intricate military-legal system for regulating its control over the Palestinian population living in the lands occupied in 1967 precisely in order to entrench separate systems for Israelis and Palestinians.

    #israel #palestine #brrr...

  • ’Perplexed’ Over Israel’s Double Standards in the West Bank? You Don’t Say, Mr. Ambassador
    The U.S. ambassador to Israel has made a historical, if not archaeological, discovery this week. Maybe his country could also do something about it.

    Zvi Bar’el Jan 20, 2016
    read more: http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.698400
    Haaretz - Israeli News Source Haaretz.com
    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.698400

    Double standards? The law is not being applied equally to Palestinians and Jews in the territories? That is what is worrying United States Ambassador Dan Shapiro, the representative in Israel of the greatest power in the world? Suddenly the U.S. is “concerned and perplexed” over Israel’s policy in the territories.
    Shapiro is in fact an expert on the Middle East, with long experience in American foreign policy in our serene region. He served on the National Security Council and advised Barack Obama on Middle Eastern policy during the latter’s first presidential campaign. His biographical details are important because of their relevance to the words “concerned and perplexed,” which describe the U.S. administration’s chronic condition.
    The U.S. ambassador is far from perplexed. Even back when he was an undergraduate at Brandeis University, he was aware of the “double standards” created by the 1967 occupation: one bundle of laws for the Jews and one for the Palestinians. Jordanian law, British and Ottoman law, military orders and the “law of the wink,” – all used as needed for the two communities.

  • Voilà ce que je craignais
    The settlers will rise in power in Israel’s new government - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/the-settlers-will-rise-in-power-in-israel-s-new-government.premium-1.509212

    U.S. Ambassador Dan Shapiro probably sat down Wednesday to write a long cable to the White House ahead of U.S. President Barack Obama’s visit to report on the new government in Israel. Aside from noting the obvious fact that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is even weaker and has become the political hostage of all of his coalition partners, Shapiro probably emphasized the dramatic rise in the power of the settlers in Netanyahu’s third government.

  • Tu sais qu’il y a actuellement un procès israélien pour le meurtre de Rachel Corrie ? Si tu ne le sais pas, ça n’est pas étonnant : à ma connaissance (et à la connaissance de Google News), rigoureusement aucun quotidien ou hebdomadaire francophone n’en a parlé, et côté anglophone, seul le Guardian a un article (et les habituels usual suspects russes et chinois) :
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/24/israel-rachel-corrie-us-ambassador

    At a meeting at the US embassy in Tel Aviv last week, the ambassador, Dan Shapiro, told Corrie’s parents and her sister that the government did not believe the Israeli military investigation had been “thorough, credible and transparent”, as had been promised by Israel. The investigation concluded that Corrie’s death was an accident and that she had endangered herself by entering a combat zone.