person:edward j. snowden

  • The NSA Report:
    Liberty and Security in a Changing World
    The President’s Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies: Richard A. Clarke, Michael J. Morell, Geoffrey R. Stone, Cass R. Sunstein & Peter Swire
    (December 2013)

    The Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technology, set up by President Obama in the wake of Edward Snowden’s revelations of NSA spying, published a 300-page report outlining 46 recommendations that could serve as a blueprint for a reconfigured spy agency.

    http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10296.html

    This is the official report that is helping shape the international debate about the unprecedented surveillance activities of the National Security Agency. Commissioned by President Obama following disclosures by former NSA contractor Edward J. Snowden, and written by a preeminent group of intelligence and legal experts, the report examines the extent of NSA programs and calls for dozens of urgent and practical reforms. The result is a blueprint showing how the government can reaffirm its commitment to privacy and civil liberties—without compromising national security.

    https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2013/12/18/liberty-and-security-changing-world

    The comprehensive report, unclassified in its entirety, sets forth forty-six recommendations designed to protect national security and advance our foreign policy while respecting our longstanding commitment to privacy and civil liberties. The Review Group’s product recognizes the need to maintain the public trust – including the trust of our friends and allies abroad – and proposes steps to reduce the risk of unauthorized disclosures.

    In particular, the report highlights the need to develop principles designed to create sturdy foundations for the future, safeguarding liberty and security amidst a changing world. The recommendations emphasize risk management and the need to balance a wide range of potential consequences, including both costs and benefits, in considering potential reforms.

    https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2013-12-12_rg_final_report.pdf

    The initial request of that report by Obama in August 2013

    https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/08/12/presidential-memorandum-reviewing-our-global-signals-intel

    What’s in the report?

    Highlights of the Report of the President’s Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies
    (Marty Lederman)
    https://www.justsecurity.org/4903/highlights-prgict

    Comment on the report by one of the writers

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/geoffrey-r-stone/inside-the-presidents-rev_b_4485016.html

    A review of that report

    Inside the White House N.S.A. report: the good and the bad
    (John Cassidy, December 2013)
    http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/inside-the-white-house-n-s-a-report-the-good-and-the-bad
    I have some doubts about whether the report is as radical as these reactions might suggest. Ultimately, it is more about preserving the essentials of the current system, and making them more palatable rather than knocking them down. Still, it’s a fair bet to say that when the White House recruited the Review Group, in August, it didn’t expect their conclusions to be hailed by the A.C.L.U. The fact that they were says two things: the critics of the N.S.A., Snowden included, were right; and the members of the Review Group tackled a serious subject in a serious manner.

    A critique of that report:
    (Fred Fleiz, Clare Lopez, January 2014)

    https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/011413RecordSub-Sessions.pdf

    #NSA
    #privacy
    #Snowden_revelations

    • Our review suggests that the information contributed to terrorist investigations by the use of section 215 telephony meta-data was not essential to preventing attacks and could readily have been obtained in a timely manner using conventional section 215 orders.

  • Russia Considers Returning Snowden to U.S. to ’Curry Favor’ With Trump : Official - NBC News

    http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/russia-eyes-sending-snowden-u-s-gift-trump-official-n718921

    Je ne sais pas si c’est vrai, mais ça mérite d’être vérifié.

    U.S. intelligence has collected information that Russia is considering turning over Edward Snowden as a “gift” to President Donald Trump — who has called the NSA leaker a “spy” and a “traitor” who deserves to be executed.

    #snowden #trump
    That’s according to a senior U.S. official who has analyzed a series of highly sensitive intelligence reports detailing Russian deliberations and who says a Snowden handover is one of various ploys to “curry favor” with Trump. A second source in the intelligence community confirms the intelligence about the Russian conversations and notes it has been gathered since the inauguration.

  • NSA Contractor Arrested in Possible New Theft of Secrets

    The contractor, Harold T. Martin, 51 y.o. worked for Booz Allen Hamilton, the same company as Edward Snowden.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/06/us/nsa-leak-booz-allen-hamilton.html

    The F.B.I. secretly arrested a former National Security Agency contractor in August and, according to law enforcement officials, is investigating whether he stole and disclosed highly classified computer code developed by the agency to hack into the networks of foreign governments.

    [...]

    According to court documents, the F.B.I. discovered thousands of pages of documents and dozens of computers or other electronic devices at his home and in his car, a large amount of it classified. The digital media contained “many terabytes of information,” according to the documents. They also discovered classified documents that had been posted online, including computer code, officials said. Some of the documents were produced in 2014.

    But more than a month later, the authorities cannot say with certainty whether Mr. Martin leaked the information, passed them on to a third party or whether he simply downloaded them.

    #NSA

  • Snowden to Receive Truth-Telling Prize - NYTimes.com

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/07/business/media/snowden-to-receive-truth-telling-prize.html?emc=edit_th_20140407&nl=todaysh

    The Ridenhour prize for truth-telling will be given to Edward J. Snowden and Laura Poitras, the filmmaker and journalist who helped Mr. Snowden disclose his trove of documents on government surveillance.

    The award, named for the Vietnam veteran who helped expose the My Lai massacre and later became an investigative journalist, is expected to be announced on Monday morning. It’s the latest honor for the reporting based on the top-secret material leaked by Mr. Snowden, who was a contractor for the National Security Agency.

    snowden #prism

  • Unlocking Private Communications - Graphic - NYTimes.com

    http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/09/05/us/unlocking-private-communications.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_201309

    Unlocking Private Communications

    Below are encryption tools the N.S.A. has had some success in cracking, according to documents provided by Edward J. Snowden describing the agency’s code-breaking capabilities.

    https://dl.dropbox.com/s/v5em5wwxwg761uo/cryptage.png

  • In Secret, [ FISA ] Court Vastly Broadens Powers of N.S.A. - NYTimes.com
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/07/us/in-secret-court-vastly-broadens-powers-of-nsa.html?hp

    La « Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court » est pratiquement devenue une « Cour Suprême parallèle »,

    The 11-member Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, known as the FISA court, was once mostly focused on approving case-by-case wiretapping orders. But since major changes in legislation and greater judicial oversight of intelligence operations were instituted six years ago, it has quietly become almost a parallel Supreme Court, serving as the ultimate arbiter on surveillance issues and delivering opinions that will most likely shape intelligence practices for years to come, the officials said.

    une cour qui a décidé que dans de nombreux cas le quatrième amendement ne peut s’appliquer,

    Last month, a former National Security Agency contractor, Edward J. Snowden, leaked a classified order from the FISA court, which authorized the collection of all phone-tracing data from Verizon business customers. But the court’s still-secret decisions go far beyond any single surveillance order, the officials said.

    “We’ve seen a growing body of law from the court,” a former intelligence official said. “What you have is a common law that develops where the court is issuing orders involving particular types of surveillance, particular types of targets.”

    In one of the court’s most important decisions, the judges have expanded the use in terrorism cases of a legal principle known as the “special needs” doctrine and carved out an exception to the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of a warrant for searches and seizures, the officials said.

    The special needs doctrine was originally established in 1989 by the Supreme Court in a ruling allowing the drug testing of railway workers, finding that a minimal intrusion on privacy was justified by the government’s need to combat an overriding public danger. Applying that concept more broadly, the FISA judges have ruled that the N.S.A.’s collection and examination of Americans’ communications data to track possible terrorists does not run afoul of the Fourth Amendment, the officials said.

    une cour qui a une interprétation très étendue de ses prérogatives...

    That legal interpretation is significant, several outside legal experts said, because it uses a relatively narrow area of the law — used to justify airport screenings, for instance, or drunken-driving checkpoints — and applies it much more broadly, in secret, to the wholesale collection of communications in pursuit of terrorism suspects. “It seems like a legal stretch,” William C. Banks, a national security law expert at Syracuse University, said in response to a description of the decision. “It’s another way of tilting the scales toward the government in its access to all this data.”

    ... notamment une interprétation très étendue de ce qui relève de l’étranger,

    “The definition of ‘foreign intelligence’ is very broad,” another former intelligence official said in an interview. “An espionage target, a nuclear proliferation target, that all falls within FISA, and the court has signed off on that.”

    une cour qui n’auditionne que l’accusation (ce qui ressemble fortement aux frappes de drones basées sur le comportement- « signature strike »-, la victime pouvant être innocentée à titre posthume)

    Unlike the Supreme Court, the FISA court hears from only one side in the case — the government — and its findings are almost never made public. A Court of Review is empaneled to hear appeals, but that is known to have happened only a handful of times in the court’s history, and no case has ever been taken to the Supreme Court. In fact, it is not clear in all circumstances whether Internet and phone companies that are turning over the reams of data even have the right to appear before the FISA court.

    une cour qui a été créée a l’origine pour surveiller les abus du gouvernement en matière d’écoute...

    Created by Congress in 1978 as a check against wiretapping abuses by the government, the court meets in a secure, nondescript room in the federal courthouse in Washington.

    ... mais qui ne refuse jamais rien à la NSA,

    None of the requests from the intelligence agencies was denied, according to the court.

    une cour qui s’insurge qu’on dise d’elle qu’elle n’est pas une cour mais une simple couverture...

    The FISA judges have bristled at criticism that they are a rubber stamp for the government, occasionally speaking out to say they apply rigor in their scrutiny of government requests.

    • US must fix secret Fisa courts, says top judge who granted surveillance orders | Law | guardian.co.uk
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/jul/09/fisa-courts-judge-nsa-surveillance

      James Robertson, who retired from the District of Columbia circuit in 2010, was one of a select group of judges who presided over the so-called Fisa courts, set up under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which are intended to provide legal oversight and protect against unnecessary privacy intrusions.

      But he says he was shocked to hear of recent changes to allow more sweeping authorisations of programmes such as the gathering of US phone records, and called for a reform of the system to allow counter-arguments to be heard.

      Speaking as a witness during the first public hearings into the Snowden revelations, Judge Robertson said that without an adversarial debate the courts should not be expected to create a secret body of law that authorised such broad surveillance programmes.

      A judge has to hear both sides of a case before deciding ,” he told members of a Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB) recently appointed by President Obama.

      “What Fisa does is not adjudication, but approval. This works just fine when it deals with individual applications for warrants, but the 2008 amendment has turned the Fisa court into administrative agency making rules for others to follow.”

      “It is not the bailiwick of judges to make policy,” he added.

      The comments, during the morning session of a PCLOB public workshop held in a Washington hotel, are the most serious criticism yet from a recently serving Fisa judge.

      Until now, Fisa judges have mainly spoken anonymously to defend the court process.

    • The Laws You Can’t See - NYTimes.com
      http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/09/opinion/the-laws-you-cant-see.html?_r=1&

      In the month since a national security contractor leaked classified documents revealing a vast sweep of Americans’ phone records by the federal government, people across the country have disagreed about the extent to which our expectation of personal privacy must yield to the demands of national security.

      Under normal circumstances, this could be a healthy, informed debate on a matter of overwhelming importance — the debate President Obama said he welcomed in the days after the revelations of the surveillance programs.

      But this is a debate in which almost none of us know what we’re talking about.

      ...

      When judicial secrecy is coupled with a one-sided presentation of the issues, the result is a court whose reach is expanding far beyond its original mandate and without any substantive check. This is a perversion of the American justice system, (...).

      (...)

      This court has morphed into an odd hybrid that seems to exist outside the justice system, even as its power grows in ways that we can’t see.

  • Why Snowden Asked Visitors in Hong Kong to Refrigerate Their Phones - NYTimes.com
    http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/25/why-snowdens-visitors-put-their-phones-in-the-fridge

    Before a dinner of pizza and fried chicken late Sunday in Hong Kong, Edward J. Snowden insisted that a group of lawyers advising him in the Chinese territory “hide their cellphones in the refrigerator of the home where he was staying, to block any eavesdropping,” as my colleague Keith Bradsher reported.

    Why a refrigerator? The answer does not, as some might assume, have anything to do with temperature. In fact, it does not matter particularly if the refrigerator was plugged in. It is the materials that make up refrigerator walls that could potentially turn them into anti-eavesdropping devices.

    “What you want to do is block the radio signals which could be used to transmit voice data, and block the audio altogether,” Adam Harvey, a designer specializing in countersurveillance products explained. Refrigerators made from metal with thick insulation could potentially do both, he says, regardless of whether it is mild or icy within.

  • Booz Allen Grew Rich on Government Contracts - NYTimes.com
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/10/us/booz-allen-grew-rich-on-government-contracts.html

    #privatisation #porte_tournante et #conflit_d’intérêt

    Edward J. Snowden’s employer, Booz Allen Hamilton, has become one of the largest and most profitable corporations in the United States almost exclusively by serving a single client: the government of the United States.

    ...

    As evidence of the company’s close relationship with government, the Obama administration’s chief intelligence official, James R. Clapper Jr., is a former Booz Allen executive. The official who held that post in the Bush administration, John M. McConnell, now works for Booz Allen.

    “The national security apparatus has been more and more privatized and turned over to contractors,” said Danielle Brian, the executive director of the Project on Government Oversight, a nonprofit group that studies federal government contracting. “This is something the public is largely unaware of, how more than a million private contractors are cleared to handle highly sensitive matters.”

    It has gone so far, Ms. Brian said, that even the process of granting security clearances is often handled by contractors, allowing companies to grant government security clearances to private sector employees.

    • Booz Allen Statement on Reports of Leaked Information
      http://www.boozallen.com/media-center/press-releases/48399320/statement-reports-leaked-information-060913

      June 9, 2013
      Booz Allen can confirm that Edward Snowden, 29, has been an employee of our firm for less than 3 months, assigned to a team in Hawaii. News reports that this individual has claimed to have leaked classified information are shocking, and if accurate, this action represents a grave violation of the code of conduct and core values of our firm. We will work closely with our clients and authorities in their investigation of this matter.

    • US security focus shifts to private sector experts - FT.com
      http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/9cc73438-d1f1-11e2-9336-00144feab7de.html

      Just as the Iraq war prompted a series of controversies about the role that private companies such as Blackwater were playing in assisting the military, the NSA revelations are casting a light on the close ties and revolving doors between private and public that characterise the intelligence business.

      ...

      The intelligence sector makes up around one quarter of Booz Allen Hamilton’s business, and the company has developed extremely close ties with many of the US intelligence agencies.

      ...

      “I worked as a contractor for six years myself, so I think I have a good understanding of the contribution they have made and continue to make,” Mr Clapper said at his 2010 confirmation hearing for the DNI position. Their expanded role was “in some ways a testimony to the ingenuity, innovation and capability of our contractor base”.

      ...

      The expansion in the intelligence sector has also led to a sharp increase in the number of people inside government who have access to top secret information. A 2010 Washington Post investigation calculated that 265,000 of the 854,000 people with top-secret clearances work for private organisations. The number of people who have access to classified information is believed to be more than 4m, which some experts believe has made leaks much more likely.

      “Everybody agrees that there is [sic] too many secrets being created by the system these days and too may people with access to them,” says William Leonard, a former Pentagon official who helped manage the classification system.

      The rapid expansion in private intelligence contractors helps explain why an individual like Mr Snowden, who claimed in an interview with The Guardian newspaper to have not graduated from high school, could have won such a sensitive security clearance at a young age. ...

      All the US’s big military contractors – led by Lockheed Martin, the largest – operate separate arms offering the US military a range of services, from managing air command systems to basic computing facilities such as making laptop computers more robust for use in combat zones. However, because contracts for most services are short term, they have been among the first to suffer from spending cuts. Many of the companies are hoping that the investment by the Pentagon and intelligence agencies in cyber security will cushion some of the blow from the other budget cuts.

    • Les marchands d’armes souhaitent une promotion de la « cyber-sécurité » pour compenser la baisse de leurs chiffres d’affaires écrit ci-dessus le FT.

      Obama ne demande qu’à rendre service
      http://seenthis.net/messages/146385

      ... une directive signée par Barack Obama où figure une liste de cibles potentielle de #cyber-attaques contre des pays étrangers (...) [et] daté[e] du 20 octobre 2012, vante les mérites des « Offensive Cyber Effects Operations (OCEO) » susceptible d’offrir « les capacité uniques et non conventionnelles susceptibles de faire avancer les objectifs nationaux américains à travers le monde ».