person:gideon levy

  • Palestinian MP’s crimes: Visiting prisoners and talking to the media - Twilight Zone -
    Nothing demonstrates political persecution better than the 12 counts on which Khalida Jarrar was convicted and jailed.
    By Gideon Levy and Alex Levac | May 29, 2015 | - Haaretz Daily
    http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/twilight-zone/.premium-1.658602

    Her feet are shackled. She’s wearing faded jeans and sneakers, and a T-shirt under a sweatshirt bearing the name of an American university. Her hair is coal-colored. Occasionally she smiles or blows a kiss to someone in the small crowd in the courtroom. Khalida Jarrar, a member of the Palestinian parliament, has been imprisoned for the past two months by Israel and has been brought into the military court at Ofer Prison, near Ramallah.

    Here’s what a military court looks like when a member of the Palestinian parliament is brought in: A reinforced presence of Israel Prison Service officers, including a combat unit whose members don black shirts, is on hand, along with a few foreign diplomats in jackets and ties. The family is represented by her husband and sister; no others are permitted in. There are also a few activists, Israelis and internationals.

    This punitive facility of the occupation is actually a jumble of trailers that serve as courtrooms, as though to create an illusion of temporariness, located next to a prison for Palestinians. The military judge wears a knitted skullcap, so does the prosecutor; maybe they’re settlers, but that’s certainly a meaningless detail.

    The soldier who’s acting as the Arabic translator of the proceedings starts out loudly but soon stops. There’s no need; there isn’t even a semblance of justice in this court. The prosecutor, a lieutenant colonel, salutes the judge, a major, as he enters. Case no. 3058/15, “Military Prosecution vs. Khalida Jarrar / IPS present,” the transcript states.

    Jarrar sits down on the defendants’ bench when she enters the air-conditioned courtroom. Her legs remain shackled throughout the proceedings.

    “They want to silence our voice,” she tells us, before the session begins, “but we will continue the struggle against the oppression until we achieve our freedom.” Her husband, Ghassan, owner of a plant that makes children’s furniture and toys covered in brightly colored synthetic fur, gives her a soft smile.

    The judge, Major Haim Balilty, is about to hand down his decision regarding the prosecution’s request to keep Jarrar in custody until the conclusion of the proceedings against her. The 52-year-old lawmaker from El Bireh is a veteran political activist, feminist and fighter for the freeing of the Palestinian prisoners.

    At first the Israeli security authorities wanted to throw her into “administrative detention,” but in the wake of an international protest against the arrest without trial of a lawmaker, they decided to indict her on 12 counts. Nothing demonstrates better than these 12 counts, like a dozen witnesses, that if there is such a thing as incarceration on purely political grounds – this is it.

    The charge sheet has everything but the kitchen sink. The more the counts, the less substance they have. “Membership in an illegal association”; “holding office therein”; “performing a service for the illegal association”; and one count referring to incitement. But even the major prosecution witness related to the incitement charge stated that he “is not certain whether the defendant personally spoke about abducting soldiers, but noted that this matter was mentioned many times during the rally” (according to the judge’s remarks).

  • Soldier pays the price for criticizing the Israel army - Twilight Zone - - Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News | By Gideon Levy and Alex Levac | May 21, 2015 | 1:52 PM
    http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/twilight-zone/.premium-1.657553

    Berrin. ’We see every day how soldiers… look at these people not as human beings, not as someone who is equal, but someone who is less than them.’ Courtesy of the Berrin family

    IDF soldier Shachar Berrin was sentenced to a week in prison after he attended the taping of an international TV program, during which he stood up and expressed his opinion of the occupation.

    Corporal Shachar Berrin, an immigrant from Australia and a religiously observant lone soldier – he has no family in Israel – is waiting to be sent to military prison. Berrin is a member of the rescue unit of the Home Front Command, and is stationed in the Jordan Valley.

    The punishment, delayed for the time being, was meted out by his battalion commander. The charge: taking part in a political meeting and in an interview the media, without permission from the army.

    But Berrin did not take part in any sort of “political meeting,” nor did he give an interview. Last Thursday, the 19-year-old soldier was in the audience in the hall of the Mishkenot Sha’ananim conference center, in Jerusalem, for a taping of “The New Arab Debates” – a program of the German television network Deutsche Welle that’s broadcast around the world, moderated by former BBC interviewer Tim Sebastian.

    The proposition debated by the panel appearing on the show was: “The occupation is destroying Israel.” The speakers consisted of the settler-activist Dani Dayan and a member of the left-wing Meretz party, Uri Zaki. Berrin, who was in uniform, stood up to address Dayan. The settlers and right-wing activists in the audience filmed him, and in less than 12 hours he was ordered to return to his base, where he was tried and convicted – even before the program was broadcast. (It aired this week.) Berrin makes his comment at minute 43 of the hour-long show.

    This whole incident shows that when rapid, determined action is called for, the Israel Defense Forces knows how to act. When soldiers kill Palestinian children, the investigation is stretched out over years, gathering dust before usually going nowhere. When soldiers are filmed holding abusive slogans, or when they identify publicly with “David Hanahalawi” – the soldier from the Nahal Brigade who threatened a Palestinian youth with his rifle and roughed him up a year ago, prompting hundreds of soldiers to express solidarity with him on the social networks – no one considers putting them on trial. But if a soldier dares to attest publicly that his fellow soldiers are humiliating Palestinians, the IDF mobilizes rapidly to trample, punish and silence. That’s what happened to Shachar Berrin.

    In the question-and-answer segment, after Dayan remarked that the fact that Israel is in 11th place in the World Happiness Report demonstrated that the occupation is not destroying it, Berrin asked for the floor and said (in English): “My name is Shachar Berrin and my question is for Dani Dayan. It was mentioned that Israel is the 11th happiest country in the world… I propose that what makes a country good isn’t whether it is happy or not, it’s the ethics and morality of the country. When soldiers are conditioned and persuaded on a daily basis to subjugate and humiliate people and consider other human beings as less than human, I think that seeps in, and I think that when the soldiers go home… they bring that back with them.”

    Tim Sebastian asked Berrin whether he was speaking “from personal experience.”

    Berrin: “Sure. Definitely. Just the other week, when some Border Police soldiers were rough with Christian tourists, another soldier, a colleague, said she couldn’t believe what they were doing: ‘I mean, come on, they are people, not Palestinians.’ I think that resonates throughout the occupied territories. I serve in the Jordan Valley, and we see every day how soldiers… look at these people not as human beings, not as someone who is equal, but someone who is less than them. And to think that we can just leave the racism and the xenophobia – that they will only be racist when they humiliate Palestinians – of course not… I think that once you are conditioned to think something, you bring it back with you and that it deeply affects Israeli society and causes it, as our president says, to be more racist.”

    Murmurs were heard in the audience: “He’s a jobnik [derogatory term for noncombat soldier], he’s a liar.” Dayan also lashed out: “You’re not the only person who was in the army. I was in the army, I have a daughter in the army. It’s demagogy. I think the guy is lying.”

    Sebastian: “You think he’s lying? On the basis of what? Because you don’t like it?”

    Dayan: “I challenge him to bring one example in which a [commanding officer] gave him an order to treat Palestinians inhumanely.”

    Sebastian: “You’ve never seen the reports from [the organization] Breaking the Silence?”

    Dayan: “Breaking the Silence is also one of those groups that are part of an orchestrated effort against Israel.”

    Sebastian: “They’re all liars?”

    The event ended. The audience vote on whether to support the motion for the debate ended in a tie. But even before that, it was clear that some of those present would immediately report Cpl. Berrin’s subversive behavior to the IDF authorities. The program’s producer, Tanya Sakzewski, asked Berrin whether he wanted his face scrambled in the broadcast. But he told her he had nothing to hide.

    Berrin was born in Israel to Jewish-American parents and moved with them as an infant to Australia, where he lived approximately until bar-mitzvah age, when he moved back to Israel with his mother, brother and sister. His brother, Seraphya, told me this week from Melbourne, where he lives, that Shachar had agonized at length over whether to serve in the IDF, primarily because of the occupation. (...)

  • Cessez de vous plaindre. Longue vie à ce nouvel et brave gouvernement israélien
    Mercredi, 13 Mai 2015 11:47 Gideon Levy - Publié sur Haaretz le 10 mai 2014. Traduction : JM Flémal.
    http://www.pourlapalestine.be/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1980:-cessez-de-vous-pl

    Le 34e gouvernement méritera Israël tout comme Israël méritera son 34e gouvernement. C’est un gouvernement authentique et représentatif, la manifestation vraie de l’esprit de l’époque et des sentiments les plus profonds de la plupart des Israéliens. Ce sera un vrai gouvernement, sans faux semblants, sans cosmétiques et sans auto-justification. Ce que nous voulons, nous l’aurons. Bienvenue au quatrième gouvernement Netanyahu.

    Ils ne parleront pas avec arrogance et ils ne dégoiseront pas de slogans creux. Ni sur la paix, ni sur les droits de l’homme ; ni sur deux États, ni sur les négociations ; ni non plus sur les lois internationales, la justice ou l’égalité. C’est la vérité qui sera assénée à la face des Israéliens et du monde. Et cette vérité, la voici : La solution à deux États est morte (jamais elle n’est née), l’État palestinien ne naîtra pas, les lois internationales ne s’appliquent pas à Israël, l’occupation continuera à ramper rapidement vers l’annexion, l’annexion se muera en État d’apartheid ; le mot « Juif » supplantera le mot « démocratique », le nationalisme et le racisme obtiendront l’approbation officielle du gouvernement, mais ils sont déjà présents et ils le sont depuis longtemps.

    Ni Netanyahu, ni le député Naftali Bennett, président du Habayit Hayehudi (Foyer juif), ni les députés de ce même parti, Ayelet Shaked et Eli Ben-Dahan, n’ont initié tout ce processus. Ils n’ont fait qu’accélérer les choses. Et il ne devrait y avoir ni commotion ni indignation, ni lamentations non plus sur l’âpreté du sort qui nous frappe. Ce gouvernement est placé sous le signe de la continuation, pas sous celui du changement.

    C’est vrai, certains de ses membres sont plus extrémistes que leurs prédécesseurs, mais il ne s’agit avant tout que de différences rhétoriques. Même la désignation la plus incendiaire, celle de Shaked comme ministre de la Justice, qui a secoué le monde entier durant tout le week-end, est moins révolutionnaire qu’il ne paraît. Shaked est brutale et violente, alors que la députée de l’Union sioniste, Tzipi Livni, qui l’a précédée, était délicate et convenable. Mais la ministre de la Justice Shaked ne devra pas fournir de gros efforts pour fissurer notre démocratie ; ces fissures étaient déjà présentes depuis très longtemps.(...)

  • Rencontre avec le mari de Khalida Jarrar.

    My wife, the jailed Palestinian MP - Twilight Zone - Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/twilight-zone/.premium-1.653137

    An elected representative like Khalida Jarrar, being sent to prison for six months without undergoing a trial – such things are everyday occurrences in Israel. But there’s no public discussion at all.
    By Gideon Levy and Alex Levac

    Ghassan Jarrar didn’t remember whether Khalida took her medications with her. When dozens of Israel Defense Forces soldiers came in the middle of the night to arrest her on April 2, and he was agitated by the thought that his wife, a member of the Palestinian Legislative Council, would be taken from him – he forgot to check if she had taken her medicines. Now he has been told she is receiving them at the prison.

    The Jarrars have been together for 35 years, ever since they met as students at Bir Zeit University, and his love for her is evident to this day. He even named his new factory for children’s furniture after her and their two daughters: “Sky” is an acronym for Suha, Khalida and Yifaa.

    The two daughters, incidentally, are currently in Ottawa, Canada, where they are pursuing their doctorates, Yifaa in law and Suha in environmental studies. They are also devoting their time to the international campaign for their mother’s release from an Israeli prison.

    Abroad, Khalida Jarrar’s arrest stirred a wave of protests among various activist groups, but in Israel, it was met with indifference – whether in the Knesset, in local women’s organizations, in the media or among the public. Jarrar is not only a legislator, human rights activist, feminist and freedom fighter – she is also the Palestinian representative to the Council of Europe, an international group promoting cooperation in different areas between European countries. However, none of her activities afford her any immunity from the Israeli occupation authorities, who can throw an elected representative into prison, even without a trial, after invading and searching her home in any manner they see fit, ordering her banished from her own city and preventing her from leaving her country for years.

    Jarrar is not alone. Sixteen of her colleagues in the PLC are currently in an Israeli prison – about one-quarter of the members of the legislature – but Jarrar is the only woman. She is also the only woman under administrative detention. An elected representative in prison without a trial – such things have become everyday events in Israel and do not prompt any discussion at all, or any questions.

    We met Ghassan near the entrance to the Balata refugee camp, near Nablus; his factory is nearby, in Beit Furik. The Jarrars’ home is in Ramallah. We passed through Balata in an easterly direction to get to the Sky factory – a sort of mini-temple of childhood dreams. In the colorful production halls opposite Beit Furik’s modern chicken coops, Jarrar’s plant manufactures children’s furniture and toys covered in brightly colored synthetic Chinese fur. Eighteen employees, some of whom are currently away on the haj to Mecca, build and upholster the charming items.

    Ghassan, too, is a charming man, with a mellow and appealing demeanor. He spent 11 years “behind Israeli bars,” as he puts it. The authorities came to arrest him 14 times, and the furthest he has ever traveled in his 55 years is the Ketziot Prison in the Negev, even though both he and his wife hold diplomatic passports by virtue of her status as a member of the legislature. Khalida too has for years already been forbidden to leave the country, even though she is invited to innumerable meetings and conventions abroad.

    Ghassan speaks fluent English and Hebrew, and sells most of the output of his factory, which he established two years ago, to the Israeli market. Among the gorgeous swings, beds, benches, stuffed animals and chests of drawers – all of them covered in red, pink, white, blue or black fur – we spoke about Khalida.

    She was elected to the PLC in 2006, the last time an election was held, after running on a list that bore the name of Abu Ali Mustafa, the leader of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine in the territories, whom Israel had assassinated in 2001. Most of her activity in the council was devoted to the struggle to free prisoners and, recently, to preparing the Palestinian Authority’s application to the International Criminal Court in The Hague – and that is apparently the real reason for her banishment from home last year and more recent detention.

    Last August 19, in the middle of the night, soldiers came to their home. That night, Ghassan slept at his factory in Beit Furik, which he did from time to time, and the soldiers presented Khalida with an order banishing her to Jericho for six months, signed by the IDF’s regional commander.

    Jarrar refused, telling the soldiers: “You are not my source of authority. I am a member of the Palestinian parliament, and I have a government.” She informed them that it was not her intention to obey the order and be expelled from her home, her city and the parliament to which she was elected. The soldiers threatened her with arrest if she did not obey. She said they could detain her then and there.

    The following day she set up a protest tent in the PLC building in Ramallah, and remained there for a month. Abroad, a campaign against her expulsion began. Jarrar did not abide by the banishment order and continued with her activity and her struggle in Ramallah. Earlier this month, on April 2, several dozen soldiers again came in the middle of the night, this time to arrest her. They shattered the front door, but Ghassan says they did not damage any other property, nor did they behave violently.

    Ghassan says he asked “Capitan Yihye” of the Shin Bet security service, who supervised the arrest: “Are you pleased with your work? Is this what you always wanted to do? To break into people’s homes at night?”

    Ghassan also relates that he heard Captain Yihye say to Khalida: “We came to you nicely and you refused: Anyone who doesn’t obey our orders must be punished.”

    The soldiers tried to keep Ghassan from embracing his wife before she was taken away, but the captain intervened and allowed them to do so.

    No one told Ghassan where they were taking Khalida and why. The following afternoon, her lawyer informed him that she was at the Shin Bet interrogation facility at Ofer Prison. Ghassan says his wife did not cooperate with the interrogators, answer any of the questions they asked, or even give her name. She was remanded into administrative detention for a period of six months, and was transferred to Hasharon Prison.

    On April 7, she was brought before a military judge at Ofer for final approval of the administrative detention order, in a session held behind closed doors.

    Initially, Israeli officials did not allow Ghassan to see his wife; only after the intervention of two Israeli MKs (Aida Touma-Suliman and Ahmad Tibi of the Joint Arab List) who came to the court was he finally able to do so, for a brief moment. From afar, Khalida asked after their two daughters.

    The hearing on approval of the detention order was postponed. Meanwhile, abroad, petitions and letters of protest were sent to Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon against what is seen as the arbitrary arrest of PLC member Jarrar. Then on April 15, the military prosecution suddenly decided to file an indictment against her, in parallel to discussion of her detention. The charge sheet enumerates no fewer than 12 security offenses, among them membership in the PFLP and incitement to abduct a soldier as a bargaining chip for the release of prisoners.

    Israel has decided to pursue two paths at once to ensure that, whatever happens, Jarrar will remain in prison. In the coming days, deliberations will continue on the detention order and on the offenses of which she has been accused. In the meantime, Ghassan is permitted to send her two books at a time at the prison; only after she returns them is he allowed to send her more. He sends her one political book and one book of prose.

  • Operation Protective Edge: A war waged on Gaza’s children
    http://www.dci-palestine.org/documents/operation-protective-edge-war-waged-gazas-children

    DCIP independently verified the deaths of 547 Palestinian children among the killed in #Gaza, 535 of them as a direct result of Israeli attacks. Nearly 68 percent of the children killed by Israeli forces were 12 years old or younger.

    #enfants #enfance #crimes #impunité #Israel

  • Netanyahu will be remembered for speaking Israel’s truth - Opinion - Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.648122

    For at least 25 years most Israeli statesmen have been lying, misleading the world, the Israelis and themselves, until Netanyahu arose. Better late than never.
    By Gideon Levy | Mar. 22, 2015 | 10:13 AM

    I would like to say thank you to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Thank you for telling the truth. Last week you were revealed as the first Israeli prime minister to tell the truth. For at least 25 years most Israeli statesmen have been lying, misleading the world, the Israelis and themselves, until Netanyahu arose – he of all statesmen – and told the truth. If only this truth had been told by an Israeli prime minister 25 years ago, maybe even 50 years ago, when the occupation was born. Still, better late than never. The public rewarded him for this truth, and Netanyahu was elected for a fourth term.

    Netanyahu said last week that if he were to be reelected, a Palestinian state would not be established on his watch. Plain and simple, loud and clear. This simple, pure truth was the case for all his predecessors as well – all the prime ministers, peace lovers and justice seekers from the center and the left, who gave false promises. But who thought to admit it before him? Who had the courage to reveal the truth? The latest of these deceivers was Zionist Union leader Isaac Herzog: His daring plan included five years of negotiations. The public rewarded him for that.

    After all, one had to deceive the Americans, bluff the Europeans and cheat the Palestinians, fudge things for the Mideast Quartet and lie to some Israelis. One also had to play for time, to build settlements and get rid of every possible Palestinian partner – Yasser Arafat, who was too strong; President Mahmoud Abbas, who is too weak; and Hamas, which is too extreme. One has to play for time, so the Palestinians become more extreme an

  • Why Israel’s Jews must vote for the Arab list -
    Those who hesitate because Joint List is an ’Arab party’ should remember the role that Jews played in the African National Congress during the apartheid era.
    By Gideon Levy | Mar. 8, 2015 Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.645750

    The Joint List is the clear ray of light in this election season. It’s important for many Arabs to vote for it, and no less important for many Jews to do likewise. There is no more appropriate way for anyone who is guided by moral and ethical standards to demonstrate empathy and register protest.

    Those who hesitate because it’s an “Arab party” should remember the role that Jews played in the African National Congress during the apartheid era. They did not recoil because it was a black movement. They did not hesitate because it was not their battle, supposedly.

    The ANC was the movement of the oppressed natives of South Africa, and the Joint List is the movement of the oppressed natives of Israel.

    There were a few South African Jews with a conscience who not only supported the ANC but also fought, were injured and were banned alongside their black comrades.

    Denounced as traitors then, today they are a great source of pride – to Jews as well. Joe Slovo, the commander of the ANC military wing who went on to become a cabinet minister in the post-apartheid government; Ronnie Kasrils; Albie Sachs, who became a justice in South Africa’s Constitutional Court; and Ben Turok, who became a member of parliament – these were among many who fought shoulder-to-shoulder with the oppressed blacks, despite or perhaps because they were white Jews who enjoyed all the privileges of the apartheid regime.

    Less is being asked of Jews in Israel, for now. They are called upon to identify with a new party that offers a promise of something new. There is no need to ignore its failure to put more Jews on its slate, and it is okay to be upset that it did not sign a surplus votes agreement with Meretz. One can be skeptical of the future relations of its various components, but anyone who dreams of genuine change, not about replacing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with Isaac Herzog, must vote for the Joint List.

    What better option is there for the Israeli voter who can no longer bear the occupation in the territories and the ultranationalism within Israel, of the ruse that Israel is both Jewish and democratic, of the injustices of present-day Zionism, and who perhaps has reached the conclusion that the two-state solution is dead? Who will they vote for?

    Are there many other party heads as impressive, eloquent and refreshing as Ayman Odeh? Are there many other MKs as outstanding as Ahmad Tibi, Jamal Zahalka, Dov Khenin and even, yes, even Haneen Zoabi? Is there another party that does not demand “support for Israel Defense Forces soldiers” at the start of every pointless war?

    If the overwhelming majority of Arabs vote for them, they will, for the first time, enter the heart of the political dialogue in Israel – to the annoyance of nearly all the other parties.

    If many Jews also vote for it, we can begin to speak of a “game changer,” and perhaps even of a good omen.

    Just imagine: The Joint List is the third largest party in the Knesset. The coalition belongs to Netanyahu, Herzog and Yair Lapid. Odeh is selected leader of the opposition – the heir of Menachem Begin, Shimon Peres, Yitzhak Shamir, Ehud Barak, Netanyahu, all prime ministers who held the position at one point.

    The prime minister is obligated to brief him on security and diplomatic matters, “no less than once a month,” by law. The law requires him to address the Knesset after every speech by the premier. Foreign heads of state meet with him and listen to his views. As a symbol of government, he is protected by the Shin Bet security service. Perhaps for the first time in its history, Israel has a true leader of opposition.

    A few stereotypes will be shattered in a single, not-imaginary act that might also usher in a deep change in consciousness.

    Odeh could surprise us yet, as he already surprised many Israelis who were not even aware of the existence of the combinations “Arab and impressive,” “Palestinian and charming.” His party must get a lot of votes for this process to begin. His friends must support him and many Jews must choose the Israeli ANC, which could yet prove it has what it takes to prevent the establishment of a second apartheid state, the apartheid state of the Land of Israel.

    Gideon Levy tweets at @levy_haaretz

  • Gidéon Levy : Une victoire des travaillistes ne fera qu’enraciner l’occupation | Agence Media Palestine
    http://www.agencemediapalestine.fr/blog/2015/03/03/gideon-levy-une-victoire-des-travaillistes-ne-fera-quenraciner-

    Gideon Levy – Ha’aretz – 1er février 2015

    Pour la question la plus fatidique, un autre mandat pour Netanyahu serait un désastre, mais une victoire du camp sioniste pourrait être un désastre pire encore.

    Un seul scénario est pire que la réélection le 17 mars de Benjamin Netanyahu comme Premier ministre, et c’est l’élection d’Isaac Herzog, du Parti travailliste (le Labor) (et de sa partenaire politique Tzipi Livni). Un autre mandat pour Netanyahu serait un désastre, mais une victoire du camp sioniste pourrait être un désastre pire encore.

    Oui, c’est vrai, il n’y a aucune comparaison entre Herzog et Netanyahu – ou entre leurs partis. Herzog est quelqu’un de modéré, modeste, juste, qui est bien mieux apprécié que Nethanyahu ; on peut dire la même chose pour Livni.

    Et le groupe du camp sioniste à la Knesset est de bien meilleure qualité que celui du Likoud. Non seulement le camp sioniste n’a pas de voyous comme en a le Likoud, mais il n’a non plus personne avec des idées nationalistes et racistes pratiquant l’incitation et l’agitation. Les parcours de la plupart des candidats du camp sioniste sont beaucoup plus impressionnants.(...)

  • Gideon Levy, journaliste à Haaretz, était hier à Oslo pour une série de conférences à la Litteraturhuset. Il a donné, le soir, une interview à la télé norvégienne (NRK TV - Urix - 03.03.2015) qui est entièrement visible ici.

    Le même jour, nous avons déjeuner avec lui à la Litteraturhuset, nous l’avons bombardé de question, c’était très intéressant. A la fin, Gideon Lévy nous a expliqué que pendant la destruction de Gaza à l’été 2014, il a été obligé d’avoir des gardes du corps (après avoir reçu nombre de menaces de mort), mais que finalement il trouvait plus dangereux d’avoir des ces gardes du corps que ne pas en avoir parce que c’était en fait... deux colons convaincus, qui ne cessaient d’argumenter, d’essayer de le mettre en défaut dans d’interminables et fatigantes conversations. Mais bon, a-t-il convenu, ils ont correctement fait leur boulot : « je suis toujours en vie » !

    En tout cas, Gideon Levy représente - avec quelques autres - l’honneur et la dignité d’Israël.

    http://tv.nrk.no/serie/urix/NNFA53030315/03-03-2015#t=10m18s

  • Israël se précipite vers la prochaine guerre à Gaza
    par Gideon Levy - traduction http://www.sayed7asan.blogspot.fr
    http://www.palestine-solidarite.org/analyses.gideon_levy.260215.htm

    (...)
    La situation de Gaza est désastreuse, épouvantable. Aucune mention n’en est faite dans le discours israélien, et certainement pas dans la campagne électorale la plus minable, la plus creuse qui se soit jamais tenue ici. Il est difficile de le croire, mais les Israéliens ont inventé une réalité parallèle, coupée du monde réel, une réalité cynique, insensible, enfouie dans le déni, alors que tous ces malheurs, la plus grande partie étant de leur propre fait, se déroulent à une courte distance de leurs maisons. Les nourrissons gèlent à mort sous les décombres de leurs maisons, les jeunes risquent leur vie et franchissent la clôture frontalière juste pour obtenir une portion de nourriture dans une cellule israélienne. Quelqu’un a-t-il entendu parler de cela ? Est-ce que quiconque s’en préoccupe ? Quelqu’un comprend-il que cela conduit à la prochaine guerre ?

    Salma n’a vécu que 40 jours, comme l’éternité d’un papillon. C’était un bébé de Beit Hanoun, au nord-est de la bande de Gaza, qui est décédé le mois dernier d’hypothermie, après que son corps frêle ait gelé sous le vent et la pluie qui ont pénétré dans la hutte de contreplaqué et de plastique où elle vivait avec sa famille, depuis que leur maison a été bombardée.

    « Elle a été gelée comme de la crème glacée », a déclaré sa mère au sujet de la dernière nuit de la vie de son nourrisson. Le porte-parole de l’UNRWA, Chris Gunness, a raconté l’histoire de Salma la semaine dernière dans le journal britannique The Guardian. Mirwat, sa mère, lui a dit que quand elle est née, elle pesait 3,1 kg. Sa sœur Ma’ez, âgée de trois ans, est hospitalisée pour des gelures.

    Ibrahim Awarda, 15 ans, qui a perdu son père dans un bombardement israélien en 2002, fut plus chanceux. Il a décidé de traverser la barrière entre Gaza et Israël. « Je savais que je serais arrêté », a-t-il déclaré au journaliste du New York Times à Gaza la semaine dernière. « Je me suis dit, peut-être que je vais trouver une vie meilleure. Ils m’ont donné de la nourriture décente et m’ont renvoyé à Gaza. »

    Ibrahim a été détenu pendant environ un mois dans deux prisons en Israël avant d’être rejeté vers la destruction, la misère, la faim et la mort. Trois cents habitants de Gaza se sont noyés dans la mer en Septembre dernier, dans une tentative désespérée de quitter la prison de Gaza. Quatre-vingt-quatre habitants de Gaza ont été arrêtés par les Forces de défense israéliennes dans les six derniers mois après avoir tenté d’entrer en Israël, la plupart d’entre eux seulement pour fuir l’enfer dans lequel ils vivaient. Neuf autres ont été arrêtés ce mois-ci.

    Atiya al-Navhin, 15 ans, a également tenté d’entrer en Israël en Novembre, juste pour échapper à son sort. Des soldats de Tsahal ont ouvert le feu sur lui, il a été traité dans deux hôpitaux israéliens et est retourné à Gaza en Janvier. Maintenant, il est couché dans son domicile, paralysé et incapable de parler.

    Quelques 150 000 personnes sans-abris vivent dans la bande de Gaza et environ 10 000 réfugiés sont dans les abris de l’UNRWA. Le budget de l’organisation a été dépensé après que le monde ait totalement ignoré son engagement à contribuer à hauteur de 5,4 milliards de dollars à la reconstruction de Gaza. L’engagement à négocier la levée du blocus sur Gaza – la seule façon d’éviter la prochaine guerre et celle d’après – a également été rompu. Personne n’en parle. Ce n’est pas intéressant. Il y a eu une guerre, des Israéliens et des Palestiniens y ont été tués pour rien, passons donc à la prochaine guerre.

    Israël fera de nouveau semblant d’être surpris et offensé – les cruels Arabes l’attaquent à nouveau avec des roquettes, sans raison.

    ““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““

    Israel is galloping to the next war in Gaza - Opinion - Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.644219

    Israel is heading to the next violent eruption with the Palestinians as though it is some sort of natural disaster that can’t be avoided.
    By Gideon Levy | Feb. 26, 2015

    The next war will break out in the summer. Israel will give it another childish name and it will take place in Gaza. There’s already a plan to evacuate the communities along the Gaza Strip border.

    Israel knows this war will break out, it also knows why – and it’s galloping toward it blindfolded, as though it were a cyclic ritual, a periodical ceremony or a natural disaster that cannot be avoided. Here and there one even perceives enthusiasm.

    It doesn’t matter who the prime minister is and who the defense minister is – there’s no difference between the candidates as far as Gaza is concerned. Isaac Herzog and Amos Yadlin are saying nothing of course, and Tzipi Livni is boasting that thanks to her no port was opened in Gaza. The rest of the Israelis aren’t interested in Gaza’s fate either and soon it will be forced to remind them again of its disaster in the only way left to it, the rockets.

    Gaza’s disaster is dreadful. No mention of it is made in the Israeli discourse and certainly not in the most dumbed down, hollow election campaign there’s ever been here. It’s hard to believe, but Israelis have invented a parallel reality, cut off from the real one, a callous, unfeeling, denying reality, while all this adversity, most of it of their own making, is taking place a short distance from their homes. Babies are freezing to death under the debris of their homes, youths risk their lives and cross the border fence just to get a food portion in an Israeli lock up. Has anyone heard of this? Does anyone care? Does anyone understand that this is leading to the next war?

    Salma lived only 40 days, like the eternity of a butterfly. She was a baby from Beit Hanoun on the northeast of the Gaza Strip, who died last month of hypothermia, after her tiny body froze in the wind and rain that penetrated into the plywood-and-plastic hut she has been living in with her family, since their house was bombed.

    “She was frozen like ice cream,” her mother said of the last night of her infant’s life. UNWRA Spokesman Chris Gunness wrote about Salma last in week in the British newspaper the Guardian. Mirwat, her mother, told him that when she was born she weighed 3.1 kilograms. Her three–year– old sister, Ma’ez, is hospitalized due to frostbite.

    Ibrahim Awarda, 15, who lost his father in an Israeli bombardment in 2002, was more fortunate. He decided to cross the fence between Gaza and Israel. “I knew I’d be arrested,” he told the New York Times reporter in Gaza last week. “I told myself, maybe I’ll find a better life. They gave me good food and then threw me back.”

    Ibrahim was held for about a month in two prisons in Israel before being tossed back to the destruction, squalor, hunger and death. Three hundred Gazans drowned in the sea last September, in a desperate attempt to leave the prison Strip. Eighty-four Gazans were arrested by the Israel Defense Forces in the last six months after trying to enter Israel, most of them just to flee from the hell they live in. Nine more were arrested this month.

    Atiya al-Navhin, 15, also tried to enter Israel in November, just to escape his fate. He was shot by IDF soldiers, treated in two Israeli hospitals and returned to Gaza in January. Now he’s lying paralyzed and unable to speak in his home.

    Some 150,000 homeless people live in Gaza and about 10,000 refugees in UNRWA shelters. The organization’s budget was spent after the world totally ignored its commitment to contribute $5.4 billion to rebuild Gaza. The commitment to negotiate lifting the blockade on Gaza – the only way to avoid the next war and the one after it – has also been broken. Nobody talks about it. It’s not interesting. There was a war, Israelis and Palestinians were killed in it for nothing, let’s move on to the next war.

    Israel will again pretend to be surprised and offended – the cruel Arabs are attacking it with rockets again, for no reason.

  • Zionist Camp reveals its true, racist face
    The party that some hoped would defend Israeli democracy from attacks by the right wing has now joined the assault.
    By Gideon Levy | Feb. 8, 2015 |
    Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.641282

    Shimon Peres is back, his name is Isaac Herzog. The evil wind of Mapai is also back, it’s called Zionist Camp. Appease, appease, appease everyone; set your sights on the right, only on the right, emulate it, stay away from any courageous step. Sometimes one unfortunate decision is enough to learn how the whole thing works. In the case of Zionist Camp it’s the decision to support the disqualification of MK Haneen Zoabi (Joint List) from running for the Knesset. With a left like this, we don’t need Yisrael Beiteinu chairman Avigdor Lieberman anymore; Likud’s Yariv Levin will do just fine.

    The only hope that Zionist Camp had managed to create was that at least it would stop the crushing of democracy by the right wing. People like Herzog, MKs Tzipi Livni, Shelly Yacimovich, Merav Michaeli and Stav Shaffir know a thing or two about the dangers to democracy that lurk here. They also know that democracy’s real test is in its attitude to the Arabs and the radical left. Now this last hope has been dashed.

    If Zionist Camp disqualifies Zoabi, a brave, authentic and legitimate candidate who hasn’t hurt a fly and who reflects the views of her voters, the Arabs of Israel and lovers of democracy will know: On this issue too, there is no difference between the right wing and this left wing. After Herzog announced that “in the war on terror there is no difference,” now there’s no difference in the war on “Zoabis.” So what do we have this whole camp for? For Manuel Trajtenberg [the economist identified with the 2011 social protests, now on the Zionist Camp ticket]?

    The first thing the Arabs of Israel and their representatives in the Knesset must conclude is: No cooperation with Zionist Camp, not during the election and not after it. No voting for it and no recommending to the president that Herzog form the next government. Herzog signed the divorce decree himself, having already announced the exclusion of Joint List from his government. He has to pay the price.

  • A Labor win will only entrench the occupation
    On the most fateful issue, another term for Netanyahu would be a disaster, but a victory for Zionist Camp could be a worse disaster.
    By Gideon Levy | Feb. 1, 2015 | 3:15 AM
    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.640026

    Pour la « #communauté_internationale » le problème avec Netanyahu n’est pas que ses actes soient différents de ceux de la « gauche » #sioniste (tous deux volent les terres palestiniennes et massacrent ceux qui s’y opposent et ladite communauté en est grandement complice) et encore moins ses paroles (prétendre œuvrer en faveur de la paix), mais de ne pas mettre un certain temps avant de faire le contraire de ce qu’il dit comme savent si bien le faire les « modérés » sionistes afin que l’#ignoble #foutage_de_gueule soit moins perceptible.

  • Étienne Chouard vient de publier aujourd’hui un désaveu pour ses liens vers Soral…

    Pour que les choses soient claires | Blog du Plan C
    http://chouard.org/blog/2014/11/28/pour-que-les-choses-soient-claires

    Dans une vidéo en direct de juin 2014 (1 minute, à partir de 47:54), Soral dit les mots suivants, que je n’avais jamais entendus de lui avant, et qui me choquent tous profondément :

    [Bon, j’ai commencé à transcrire, mais j’ai honte de seulement écrire des trucs pareils… Donc, j’arrête. Je vous laisse lire le lien si ça vous chante.]

    Je ne peux évidemment pas valider une parole pareille, froidement raciste, sexiste, autoritaire. Je n’avais jamais vu Soral parler comme ça. C’est un peu comme un désaveu, parce que je l’ai entendu maintes fois jurer qu’il n’était pas antisémite.

    Alors, je cède, je reconnais que me suis trompé, en publiant un lien sans mise en garde : il y a un risque d’escalade des racismes. Ce mélange de lutte légitime et courageuse contre de redoutables projets de domination (résistance qui m’intéresse toujours et dont je ne me désolidarise pas), avec un sexisme, une homophobie, et maintenant un antisémitisme assumés (qui me hérissent vraiment), ce mélange est toxique. Stop. Et puis, je n’arrive plus à m’occuper de nos ateliers constituants : on nous interpelle sans arrêt sur notre prétendue identification à Soral, et la violence des échanges qui s’en suivent partout me désespère ; j’en ai assez, il faut faire quelque chose pour marquer une différence, une limite : je supprime le lien de mon site vers Soral. Désormais, je ferai le filtre, en évoquant moi-même les auteurs que je trouve utiles, comme Shlomo Sand, Jacob Cohen, Bernard Lazare, Israël Shahak, Gilad Atzmon, Norman Finkelstein, Gideon Levy, Mearsheimer et Walt, Éric Hazan, etc.

    • Je n’ai pas fait l’exégèse de l’auteur et du site signalés : j’ai juste cité le lien déniché, comptant comme d’habitude sur l’intelligence des gens — que je considère comme des adultes — pour distinguer ce qui y est pertinent de ce qui ne l’est pas, ce qui est bon de ce qui est mauvais. Et puis, je suis passé à autre chose, évidemment ; ma vie est une course permanente d’une idée à l’autre.

      puis plus loin :

      Alors, je cède, je reconnais que me suis trompé, en publiant un lien sans mise en garde : il y a un risque d’escalade des racismes. Ce mélange de lutte légitime et courageuse contre de redoutables projets de domination (résistance qui m’intéresse toujours et dont je ne me désolidarise pas), avec un sexisme, une homophobie, et maintenant un antisémitisme assumés (qui me hérissent vraiment), ce mélange est toxique. Stop.

      E. Chouard aurait pu s’économiser tout ce temps et toute cette énergie en étant un peu plus rigoureux. Si avant de mettre un lien vers le site de Soral, il avait utilisé un moteur de recherche, il aurait pu très vite s’apercevoir que le bonhomme laissait derrière lui un sillage malodorant.
      Ah ! Et puis merde, quand on a une conscience politique de classe, on ne va pas s’acoquiner avec ce genre de lascar ... Trop naïf ou trop idéaliste, Étienne Chouard.

    • L’antisémitisme de Soral est de notoriété publique depuis un bail. Chouard, en faisant mine de le découvrir aujourd’hui, nous prend pour des buses.
      Soit Chouard est un âne et il ne mérite aucune confiance, soit c’est un lâche menteur et il ne mérite que mépris. Donc pas sûr qu’il retrouve le calme auquel il aspire en recourant à la petite combine de l’aveu outré...

    • Haha excellent le dernier lien @frederic :

      E&R, que je considère comme un portail utile pour comprendre et résister à certains abus de pouvoir terribles

      Non mais. Non.

      Au-delà de ça, il n’a toujours pas compris la différence entre accepter la liberté d’expression (y compris en étant capable, dans telle ou telle circonstance, de parler et d’argumenter contre des racistes sans se taper), et le fait de faire de la publicité pour ces gens, en les aidant ainsi à accroître à la fois la quantité de leur public, et leur légitimité auprès de gens qui ne se seraient pas intéressés à eux.

    • http://www.arretsurimages.net/articles/2014-11-29/M6R-Chouard-et-Soral-troublent-le-mouvement-de-Melenchon-id7265

      Sauf qu’aujourd’hui, samedi 29 novembre, le blogueur a publié un nouveau texte, dans lequel il estime qu’avoir retiré le lien vers Egalité et Réconciliation... était finalement une erreur. "Il fallait exprimer — clairement, fortement — mon opposition farouche aux paroles dangereuses, et peut-être corriger le lien en lui ajoutant un commentaire explicite sur le racisme, le non racisme et l’antiracisme ; mais pas supprimer un lien, ce petit lien, avec toute une communauté (geste trop fort, symboliquement)", estime Chouard, rappelant au passage qu’il refuse d’utiliser le "mot « raciste » pour désigner une personne, comme si elle n’allait jamais changer d’avis, comme si sa nature c’était d’être raciste, comme si elle n’était plus humaine, inférieure politiquement". Il regrette, dans son texte d’hier, de s’être "rendu coupable de cet « antiracisme » qui fabrique une race des « racistes », sorte de sous-hommes à combattre en toute matière", et s’estime victime de trop nombreuses pressions.

      Les mots me manquent, sérieusement.

    • J’ai échangé avec lui en 2005, quand il mettait en ligne ses premiers forums. J’ai tâché de lui expliquer ce que c’était que de devoir gérer des « trolls », parce qu’il ne comprenait pas du tout de quoi il s’agissait, de quoi il retournait. Il ne comprenait pas. Il ne comprenait pas comment des gens pouvaient s’en prendre verbalement à d’autres gratuitement. A la façon dont dans ce fil on le traite de girouette, ou dont on l’accuse d’insincérité.
      Il ne sait toujours pas comment gérer cette violence. Il est totalement inéquipé pour cela. Lui en vouloir pour cela... me semble inadéquat. Et continuer à l’agresser toujours plus violemment... est sans intérêt.
      Il a décidé d’affronter le sujet. Et c’est plutôt courageux de sa part. Lui qui n’a toujours pas compris comment reconnaître le troll de l’ami...

    • @biggrizzly Le pauvre amour, obligé de supporter notre « violence ». En revanche, la violence de Soral (contre les juifs, les femmes, les homos...), qui me semble un chouïa d’un autre niveau, elle n’a rien de rédhibitoire à ses yeux, visiblement. Parce que Soral est sympa avec lui ? C’est pitoyable.

      Ce n’est pas de la gentillesse, c’est, au mieux, une bêtise abyssale. Et ça le rend dangereux. Il a le sens politique d’une huître, et encore, j’insulte les huîtres, là. Pour un gars censé incarner la révolution démocratique, C’EST UN PROBLÈME.

    • http://blogs.mediapart.fr/blog/pierrick-le-feuvre/281114/la-fausse-confession-detienne-chouard-la-messe-est-dite

      J’ai écouté, vu, tout vu (il n’y pas que ce passage à être sordide) de cette interview. Et j’ai retranscrit ce qu’Etienne Chouard n’a pas pu faire, tellement cela lui faisait « honte ». Je suis toujours vivant et je ne suis pas mort de honte. Arrêtons la mauvaise mise en scène. Voici les propos de Soral. "...On a vu le petit Elkabach, c’est mon analyse un peu plus raciale-communautaire, qui est le petit sémite sépharade, se soumettre comme une femme à quelqu’un qui représente encore la virilité... aryenne, je dirais, même si elle est slave. Vous voyez, ça, c’est la juste hiérarchie traditionnelle, vous voyez... Quand Poutine ouvre sa gueule, un Elkabach la ferme. Et c’est comme ça que se conçoit un monde qui fonctionne bien. Parce qu’il y en a un qui incarne l’autorité légitime et la virilité, et l’autre qui incarne la place qu’il aurait du garder depuis toujours, la place d’intermédiaire, de courtisan et au mieux de diplomate..."

      Pendant les cinq mois où ce lien existait sur son blog, Etienne Chouard continuait de qualifier Soral de « résistant ». Il n’a pas, dans sa longue déclaration d’aujourd’hui, renié cette parole.

      Comme les Chrétiens du temps des templiers, Etienne Chouard se pense en croisade quand il nous dit : "les jeunes gens qui suivent et soutiennent Soral, et qui étaient assez radicalement antidémocrates quand ils m’ont connu, étaient en fait « anti-fausse-démocratie », mais ils ne le savaient pas encore : ils pensaient (comme tout le monde) que l’alternative politique était
      1) capitalisme-libéralisme-« démocratie » (complètement pourri, mafieux, esclavagiste, des millions de morts, à vomir) ou
      2) communisme-socialisme-« démocratie populaire » (complètement pourri, un capitalisme d’État, avec police de la pensée, des camps de travail en Sibérie, des millions de morts, à vomir) ou
      3) fascisme-« non-démocratie » (violent aussi, mais sans corruption — choix terrifiant, selon moi, évidemment)…
      Et puis, voilà qu’ils découvrent, en lisant les livres que je signale (Manin, Hansen, Rousseau, Sintomer, Castoriadis, Guillemin…) un régime alternatif, une quatrième voie"
      Sa voie, sa voix, Celle d’Etienne Chouard.

      Là encore, un aveu terrible. Relisez les lignes au dessus. Les deux premiers, le capitalisme-libéralisme ou le communisme-socialisme : "tous pourris". Le point 3, le fascisme-« non-démocratie » , "violent, mais sans corruption." Entre "tous pourris" et "sans corruption", que choisiriez-vous dans un contexte de violence qui pourrait nous tomber dessus bientôt ? Terrifiant, selon Chouard, évidemment.

      Terrifiant, oui.

      Alors, ce mea-culpa finalement trop, beaucoup trop léger, renforce mes inquiétudes au lieu de me les enlever. Surtout quand je lis la conclusion (Je cite) "Sur l’essentiel : à mon avis, tous ces reproches sont montés en épingle de mauvaise foi par les professionnels de la politique pour entretenir une CONFUSION entre les vrais démocrates et « l’extrême droite » ; confusion qui leur permet de se débarrasser des vrais démocrates à bon compte, sans avoir à argumenter." Qui entretient la confusion sinon Etienne Chouard lui même.

    • @mona : cette incapacité de sa part est consternante, je suis d’accord. S’il ne parvient pas à renoncer à ces liens, c’est parce qu’il s’est politisé sur un certain nombre de sujets fondamentaux par leur intermédiaire. Du coup, l’accuser d’entretenir le confusionnisme inverse la causalité, car c’est lui qui est totalement confus sur ces sujets, et s’il l’entretient ce confusionnisme, c’est bien malgré lui. Il est en quelque sorte aussi consternant qu’un Virenque des Guignols...
      Et là, moi, ce que je trouve consternant, au delà de la faiblesse consternante d’analyse de Chouard, c’est qu’on n’ait pas été capables, nous là, les purs et les sachants à l’endroit, de l’aider à se politiser convenablement, sur ces sujets. Quand parviendrons-nous à expliquer la marche du monde en évacuant toutes les explications racistes et complotistes rances ? Je ne crois pas qu’on y parvienne en pratiquant l’excommunication.

    • @biggrizzly Je vais me gêner, tiens. Cette culpabilisation commence à me fatiguer. Tu as lu les propos retranscrits par @koldobika ? Qu’est-ce qu’il y a à « expliquer », au juste ? S’il n’est pas capable de comprendre en lisant ça que la seule chose à faire, c’est de partir en courant, personne ne peut rien pour lui !

    • @aude_v oui, je me souviens quand je suis tombée sur du Soral par hasard, il y a pas mal de temps et ne pas savoir trop si c’était du lard ou du cochon : il y avait des pépites de vrai gauchisme, avec une critique du système qui paraissait pertinente et en même temps un liant un peu flou et collant qui me mettait mal à l’aise sans que je sache pourquoi... et puis je suis tombée sur une de ses belles saillies sur la place des femmes et j’ai définitivement su que ce mec n’était pas de gauche, mais bien une saloperie du camp d’en face qui, en plus, avançait masqué.

      Manière, ça fait un moment que je pense qu’il y a une convergence des luttes et que cette convergence est non hiérarchique : on ne va pas abattre le capitalisme d’abord et s’occuper du machisme ensuite. C’est du flanc. Tous les systèmes oppresseurs se nourrissent les uns les autres et se combattent en bloc.
      C’est d’ailleurs pour cela que je ne pense pas qu’il puisse exister un réel féminisme de droite et encore moins fasciste : c’est totalement incompatible.

      Donc, tu vois bien comment les manipulateurs d’opinion vont faire semblant d’être anti-ceci ou cela tout en gerbant allègrement sur d’autres catégories. Tu ne peux pas être socialiste (au sens historique du terme) et faire la chasse aux Roms ou te foutre de la gueule des casso’s , ce n’est juste pas possible.

    • l’écrivaine Pascale Fautrier a accusé Judith Bernard de faire rentrer la mouvance soralienne dans le mouvement initié par Jean-Luc Mélenchon. À l’origine de cette attaque : la supposée complaisance de Judith Bernard vis-à-vis d’Étienne Chouard, avec qui elle partage une passion intellectuelle et politique pour le tirage au sort.

      Ça commence à faire beaucoup de ricochets ...

    • Au moment où j’écris ces lignes, Etienne Chouard parle de se mettre en retrait, de ne plus occuper pour l’heure de position publique, de fermer blog, page, et site ; et c’est une très bonne chose. Sa position politique s’est disloquée à ce point d’achoppement des demandes de clarification. C’est donc que cette position n’était soit pas assez réfléchie, soit pas complètement avouable.

      Voilà ...

    • Chouard s’explique, s’enfonce, et renonce
      http://lahorde.samizdat.net/2014/12/08/chouard-sexplique-senfonce-et-renonce

      Quoiqu’en dise Chouard, rares sont celles ou ceux qui le considèrent comme un « fasciste », ou même un soralien, car de toute évidence, il n’est ni l’un ni l’autre : partisans d’une démocratie intégrale, il est aux antipodes de toute forme d’autoritarisme et ou de racisme, et il s’est à plusieurs reprises prononcé sur ces questions. Mais il se trouve que justement, ce n’est pas ce qu’on lui reproche…

      Les problèmes que posent Chouard, d’un point de vue antifasciste, ce sont sa tolérance à l’égard des idées racistes, sexistes, autoritaires ; son ignorance volontaire des groupes actifs, organisés qui portent ces idées ; enfin, son mépris des victimes de ces idées, d’hier et d’aujourd’hui. Cela ne fait pas de lui un « fasciste », évidemment, mais un allié objectif de toutes les structures et individus qui revendiquent de façon plus ou moins assumée une vision inégalitaire du monde présentée comme « naturelle », et la désignation d’ennemis héréditaires à éliminer pour la défendre. C’est ce qui lui est répété depuis le début, et qu’il refuse d’entendre.

  • The future of Dr. A, an Israeli Arab physician, is the future of Israel - When Ashkelon says to fire all its Arab construction workers only because of their origin, the day is coming when the hospitals will dismiss Arab doctors. Some Israelis have wanted to do this for a long time now
    By Gideon Levy | Nov. 23, 2014 | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.627895

    She hides her name. She wears an ID card around her neck as required but it’s usually stuffed in her pocket, seemingly carelessly. Dr. A., a resident in one of the leading medical centers in the center of the country, goes around her department with an unclear identity. She was accepted for her residency in a highly desirable specialty, under a well-known and widely respected department head, and yet she feels it would be better if she concealed her name.

    Her accent doesn’t give up her identity, her beauty and charm are captivating, and she makes her rounds among the beds of the sick, caring for them devotedly and expertly, usually keeping her secret to herself.

    Dr. A. should be an all-Israeli physician. She was educated at Jewish schools, her parents live in a wealthy Jewish community, Hebrew is her first language. Her sister is also a resident in a large hospital in central Israel and the two of them share an apartment in old north Tel Aviv. Their little sister is studying medicine at the Technion in Haifa. Their parents did everything so their children would succeed in their country.

    When I met her for the first time by chance in the hallway of her department, she burst out crying. It was at the height of Operation Protective Edge and she was dismayed over the scenes from Gaza, torn between her people and her country. Dr. A. never lost her dignity and her identity, and she wants to live here, in her country.

    Her chances of doing so are disappearing. It seems to me that she knows it. Meanwhile, she hides her name to save herself the despicable comments of patients and their families. “It’s like the Jews in France,” she says, seemingly to comfort herself, but this comparison is baseless. It is hardly likely that a Jewish doctor in France would have to hide his or her name. At the airport Dr. A. is classified risk level 6, she discovered once, only two levels lower than the most dangerous. Caution, danger, the Israeli doctor, who travels to training and conferences abroad and works in an Israeli hospital, is subjected to a range of humiliations before every takeoff.

  • Jérusalem, capitale de l’apartheid, attend l’insurrection
    Gideon Levy
    http://www.agencemediapalestine.fr/blog/2014/10/24/gideon-levy-jerusalem-capitale-de-lapartheid-attend-linsurrecti

    Un résident palestinien de Jérusalem est maintenant en bien plus grand danger d’être lynché qu’un Juif à Paris. Mais ici, il n’y a personne pour réveiller Caïn. À la différence du Juif parisien, le Palestinien peut être expulsé de Jérusalem. Il peut aussi être arrêté terriblement facilement. Après que le jeune Mohammed Abu Khdeir de 16 ans a été brûlé à mort, provoquant une vague de protestations, Israël a arrêté 760 Palestiniens dans la ville, dont 260 enfants.

  • Jerusalem, the capital of apartheid, awaits the uprising - Opinion Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.622206

    Mass arrests, violent settlers, expulsion, and dispossession: With that as the lot of Jerusalem’s Palestinians, no one should have been surprised with Wednesday’s terror attack.
    by Gideon Levy | Oct. 23, 2014 | 12:01 PM

    The terror attack in Jerusalem on Wednesday night should not have surprised anyone. After all, two nations live in the Pretoria of the State of Israel. Unlike the other occupied areas, there is supposed to be a certain equality between the two peoples: blue ID cards available for everybody, freedom of movement, property tax payable to the municipality, national insurance — Israelis all. But Jerusalem is engulfed by lies. It has become the Israeli capital of apartheid.

    With the exception of Hebron, no place has such a blatant and brazen separation regime. And now the Israeli boot is coming down even harder in the capital, so the resistance in the ghetto-in-the-making is intensifying: battered and oppressed, neglected and poor, filled with feelings of hatred and an appetite for revenge.

    The uprising is on the way. When the next wave of terror emerges from the alleys of East Jerusalem, Israelis will pretend to be astonished and furious. But the truth must be told: Despite Wednesday’s shocking incident, the Palestinians are turning out to be one of the most tolerant nations in history. Mass arrests, violent settlers, deprivation, expulsion, neglect, dispossession — and they remain silent, except for the recent protest of the stones.

    There is no self-deception from which the city doesn’t suffer. The capital is a capital only in its own eyes; the united city is one of the most divided in the universe. The alleged equality is a joke and justice is trampled on. Free access to the holy sites is for Jews only (and yes, for elderly Muslims). And the right of return is reserved for Jews.

    A Palestinian resident of Jerusalem is now in far greater danger of being lynched than a Jew in Paris. But here there’s nobody to raise hell. Unlike the Parisian Jew, the Palestinian can be expelled from Jerusalem. He can also be arrested with terrifying ease. After 16-year-old Mohammed Abu Khdeir was burned to death, sparking a wave of protest, Israel arrested 760 Palestinians in the city, 260 of them children.

    As always, the answer to every problem is a heavier hand. The prime minister has already ordered security forces to be bolstered, using the only language the people in his government know. And when the resistance, naturally, becomes more violent, they throw up their hands and say: “Look how they’re destroying the light rail system that we built for them.”

    Jerusalem could have been different. Had Israel exercised justice and equality there, it could have become a model city; the people who annexed it should have strived for that. In the worst days of the intifada, relatively little terror originated in the city, even though its residents could travel freely.

    The Palestinians are the same Palestinians, but the closure, the curfew and the siege are different. The result is that there was less terror in Jerusalem, disproving the theory that a siege prevents terror. Why? Because many residents of the capital actually long to become Israelis, but Israel is preventing them from doing so. United, united — but without Arabs.

    The mass arrests in Jerusalem that aroused no interest in Israel, the settlers’ invasion of Arab neighborhoods with the support of the government and courts, the criminal neglect for which the city is responsible — all this will have a price.

    How long will they see their children afraid to leave their homes for fear of being attacked by hooligans in the street? How long will they see their children arrested for every flying stone? How long will they watch the neglect in their neighborhoods?

    How long will they consent to their tacit expulsion from the city? Between 1967 and 2013, Israel revoked the residency status of 14,309 Palestinians in Jerusalem, with strange claims that don’t apply to any of its Jewish residents. Isn’t that apartheid?

    And then terror will erupt. In response, drones will ply the skies of the Shoafat refugee camp, there will be killings in the streets of Azariyeh and targeted assassinations in Beit Hanina, and another separation barrier will be built between the two parts of the city, just to be on the safe side. With a nationalist mayor, a violent police force and a government headed by Benjamin Netanyahu, nothing is more certain.

  • La différence entre les enfants
    Gideon Levy, Publié sur Haaretz le 24 août 2014. Traduction : JM Flémal.
    http://www.pourlapalestine.be/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1864:la-difference-entr

    Après le premier enfant, personne n’a remué un œil ; après le 50e, on n’a même pas perçu le moindre frémissement dans l’aile d’un avion ; après le 100e, ils ont cessé de compter ; après le 200e, ils ont rejeté la faute sur le Hamas. Après le 300e, ils ont rejeté la faute sur les parents. Après le 400e, ils ont inventé des excuses ; après les 478 (premiers) enfants, personne ne s’en soucie encore.

    Et c’est alors qu’il y a eu notre premier enfant et Israël est entré en état de choc. Et, en effet, le cœur saigne à voir la photo du petit Daniel Tragerman, 4 ans, tué vendredi soir dans sa maison de Sha’ar Hanegev. Un bel enfant qui, un peu plus tôt, avait été pris en photo dans un maillot de foot de l’équipe d’Argentine, bleu et blanc, avec le n° 10. Et qui n’aurait pas le cœur brisé à la vue de cette photo, et qui ne se lamenterait pas de la façon criminelle dont il a été tué ? « Hé ! Lionel Messi, regarde ce gamin », disait un message sur Facebook, « tu étais son héros. »
    (...)
    Nous devons admettre la vérité : les enfants Palestiniens sont considérés comme des insectes, en Israël. C’est un constat horrible, mais il n’y a pas d’autre façon de décrire l’état d’esprit qui règne en Israël en cet été 2014. Quand, pendant six semaines, des centaines d’enfants sont anéantis ; que leurs corps sont enfouis sous des décombres, s’entassent dans des morgues, et parfois même dans des surgélateurs à légumes vu le manque d’autre place ; quand leurs parents horrifiés portent les corps de leurs bambins comme s’il s’agissait d’une chose systématique, lors de funérailles qui ont lieu à tout moment, à 478 reprises – même les plus insensibles des Israéliens ne pourraient se permettre d’être si peu soucieux.

  • What would Israel do in Hamas’ shoes? -
    The Palestinian response to the killing of Mohammed Deif’s wife and son will be exactly like the Israeli response in the reverse situation: Vengeance and retribution.
    By Gideon Levy | Aug. 21, 2014 | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.611672

    Think of a terrible scenario: Hamas, heaven forbid, kills Sara and Yair Netanyahu, the prime minister’s wife and son. Another scenario, no less terrible: the targets are Revital and Nadav Gantz, the IDF chief of staff’s wife and son. What would Hamas have gotten out of such horrific murders? And how would Israel have reacted? Submitted to its demands? Would public opinion have moderated? Would Israel ever forgive?

    And what would Hamas benefit if it succeeded, heaven forbid, to kill the prime minister or the chief of staff? Wouldn’t we have found substitutes? Would Israel have renounced its leadership? Bowed its head to its leaders’ assassins? Would Israel have hastened to build them a deep-water seaport and airport in Gaza?

    Whoever decided to try to assassinate Mohammed Deif and succeeded in killing Vidad, his wife, and Ali, his son (an 8-month-old infant), didn’t think in those terms. Israelis are never willing to play the opposite-role game and consider what would have happened if we were in their place. It’s part of our dehumanization and demonization of the Palestinians. Murdering their leaders and commanders? Legitimate. Murdering ours? Monstrous horror. How can you even compare?

    Those responsible for murdering the members of the Deif family were looking for a victory picture, or at least a pain photo, painful enough to stop the rocket fire. But the effect was, and always will be, the opposite. This action too will only intensify the resistance, extremism and resolve, just as it would have done in the reverse situation, of killing an Israeli leader.

    A war that began with the “pain map” drafted by the Air Force, which included bombing the homes of “Hamas operatives” – a wondrously flexible term that comprised bombing the homes and families of a hospital director and police chief – was looking for a happy ending. The moral issue of bombing a house with all its residents inside, of attempting to assassinate Deif and killing his wife and baby son – aren’t they innocent? – raise only a snigger in the Israel of today. Setting the moral issues aside, as there’s no demand to consider them, what about sense or reason? That is likewise not a prevalent commodity. Not to mention learning the lessons from the futile past of targeted killings. The people want an assassination – let’s give it one.

    The Palestinian response to the killing of Deif’s wife and son will be exactly like the Israeli response in the reverse situation. Vengeance and retribution. We saw it in Tuesday’s and Wednesday’s barrages and we’ll see it in the days to come. There will be no substitute for Deif’s wife and son, but there would most certainly be one for Deif – as there was one for all his predecessors, fatalities of Israel’s targeted killings over the generations.

    None of the replacements was more moderate than his predecessor. Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi wasn’t more moderate than Ahmed Yassin, Deif is not more moderate than Ahmed Jabari, and Yahya Ayyash’s heir was not Mahmoud Abbas. No assassination has ever changed the picture for the better. Israel only hung more scalps on its belt, a false display of victory. Israel got nothing out of them but bloodshed, lust for revenge and feelings of hatred. But why should Israel learn from its past? That’s too sensible and self-evident.

    Like a used-up wad of chewing gum stuck to one’s sole, this war is sticking to Israel and Gaza, refusing to let go. Its end is nowhere in sight, it has no conclusion. Tuesday’s assassination only prolonged its days.

    Nobody knows what terms the Israeli delegation agreed to in Cairo and, just as inexplicably, nobody knows what terms it refused, either. The impression emerging from the smoke screen is that Israel did not agree to give Gaza much, if anything, and Hamas reacted, in self-evident frustration, with rocket fire.

    There are other (imaginary?) scenarios as well. For example, Israel saw the chance to kill Deif, so it retracted its agreements, preparing the ground for the mother of all victory photos. But what good did that do? Nothing. No quiet, not even a mock victory photo, only more blood and retribution.

  • Gevalt, anti-Semitism!
    Since its establishment, more Jews were hurt in wars and terror attacks in Israel than anywhere else. The war in Gaza endangered world Jews as well, as no other war has before it.
    By Gideon Levy | Aug. 14, 2014 |Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.610481

    Israel is today the most dangerous place in the world for Jews. Since its establishment, more Jews were hurt in wars and terror attacks that took place in Israel than anywhere else. The war in Gaza took this one step backward – it endangered world Jews as well, as no other war has before it. The Jewish home, the national refuge, not only doesn’t provide refuge, but even threatens Jews everywhere else. When you tote up the results of the war, include that too in the loss column.

    A wave of animosity is washing over world public opinion. In contrast to the complacent, blind, smug Israeli public opinion, people abroad saw the pictures in Gaza and were aghast. No conscientious person could have remained unaffected. The shock was translated into hatred toward the state that did all that, and in extreme cases the hatred also awakened anti-Semitism from its lair. Yes, there is anti-Semitism in the world, even in the 21st century, and Israel has fueled it. Israel provided it with abundant excuses for hatred.

    But not every anti-Israeli sentiment is anti-Semitism. The opposite is true – most of the criticism of Israel is still substantive and moral. Anti-Semitism, racist as any national hatred, popped up on the sidelines of this criticism – and Israel is indirectly responsible for its appearance.

    But Israel and the Diaspora Jewish establishment automatically tag any criticism as anti-Semitic. It’s an old trick – the burden of guilt is shifted from those who perpetrated the Gaza horrors to those who are tainted with so-called anti-Semitism. It’s not us, it’s you, anti-Semitic world. No matter what Israel does, the whole world is against it.

    This is nonsense, of course. Just as not every policeman who gives a Jewish driver a traffic ticket is an anti-Semite, as the Jewish organizations try to put it, and not every robbery of a rabbi is a hate crime, so not every criticism of Israel is motivated by hatred of Jews.

    These organizations have become the lightning rods of the criticism of Israel and they have brought it on themselves. This is the price of their blind support of Israel, their noisy propaganda campaigns in Israel’s name, their turning of every Jewish community center into a PR agency for Israel, and their unanimous support for everything Israel does. We’re all one people, they say. In that case, if every Jew who dares to censure Israel, even when it’s involved in brutal conduct, is a self-hating Jew – then everyone bears responsibility.

    Quite a few Jews abroad sent me frightened messages during the war, pleading me to stop writing my articles, cease my criticism, because the anti-Semites use them. I replied to all of them that all my articles together haven’t affected Israel’s status as much as one news report from Gaza. I also know many who still harbor sympathy for Israel precisely because of the remnants here of a free society, one that allows criticism.

    In any case, the address for the Jews’ fear should be the State of Israel. Many Jews now feel afraid. Part of the fear may be exaggerated, part of it is justified. It seems to me that being a Muslim in Europe is still harder than being a Jew. But in Paris, Jews don’t dare wear a kippa, in Belgium a woman wasn’t allowed into a store because she was Jewish and a French journalist who visited Algiers last week told me that the hatred for Israel and the Jews in France has reached an all-time high.

    The address for all the complaints is Israel, because Israel is the one to blame for Gaza.

    Whoever is afraid for the Jews’ fate, whoever is shocked by the anti-Semitic incidents, should have thought about it before taking Israel to another runaway war. The world isn’t always against Israel. Suffice it to remember Israel’s status during the Oslo period, when the entire world cheered it, including parts of the Arab world. This world will be happy to embrace Israel again, if this country only changes its bullying, domineering behavior.

    Gevalt, anti-Semitism? Maybe. But Israel is supplying the fuse.

  • Gideon Levy, journaliste critique d’une société israélienne « malade »

    http://www.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2014/08/07/gideon-levy-journaliste-critique-d-une-societe-israelienne-malade_4467830_32

    Des insultes et des menaces, le journaliste israélien d’Haaretz, Gideon Levy, en a reçu beaucoup en trente ans d’une carrière consacrée à la couverture de la politique israélienne dans les territoires palestiniens. Jamais comme durant l’opération « Bordure protectrice ». Le 14 juillet, interviewé par une télévision dans les rues d’Ashkelon, ville méridionale d’Israël, le journaliste de 61 ans est pris à partie par un habitant : « Traître, va vivre avec le Hamas ! », lui hurle l’homme, lui jetant un billet à la figure. L’article qu’il a écrit le matin même, « Le mal que font les pilotes », lui a valu une pluie de menaces par téléphone et sur les réseaux sociaux. « Ils sont la crème de la jeunesse israélienne, (…) ils perpètrent les actes les plus mauvais, les plus brutaux et les plus méprisables. (…) Ils sont assis dans leur cockpit et appuient sur le bouton de leur joystick, jeu de guerre », a-t-il écrit. Dans la rue, où tous reconnaissent son imposante carrure et son visage tanné par le soleil, les regards se font mauvais et les insultes pleuvent.

  • Israël a volé l’avenir de Gaza... et son espoir
    par Gideon Levy
    (Traduction : JFG-QuestionsCritiques)
    http://questionscritiques.free.fr/edito/haaretz/Gideon_Levy/Israel_a_vole_l_avenir_de_Gaza_020814.htm

    Les chiffres sont écrits à l’encre sur la paume de sa main, comme s’il était un enfant préparant une antisèche pour un examen : 1.035 morts, 6.233 blessés, à 2h, lundi matin (28 juillet). Il efface quotidiennement ces chiffres et les met à jour.

    Cette semaine, le Pr Mads Gilbert a quitté l’hôpital de Shifa, dans la Bande de Gaza, pour prendre de brèves vacances dans son pays, la Norvège, après deux semaines ininterrompues à soigner les victimes de la guerre. Son collègue et compatriote, le Pr Erik Fosse, était censé venir le remplacer à Gaza, mais Israël l’empêchait, encore en milieu de semaine, de le faire. Fosse, lui aussi, a passé la première semaine de l’Opération Bordures Protectrices à Shifa et voulait y revenir.

    Gilbert et Fosse avaient aussi travaillé à Shifa durant l’Opération Plomb Fondu, en 2008-2009, après quoi ils avaient publié leur livre déchirant, Eyes in Gaza, un best-seller international. A présent, ils soutiennent que la guerre actuelle dans la Bande de Gaza est encore plus terrible que la précédente, en ce qui concerne les dommages causés à la population civile.

    Les deux hommes ont la soixantaine. Ils étaient des admirateurs d’Israël dans leur jeunesse, mais la première guerre du Liban en 1982 - lors de laquelle ils se sont portés volontaires pour soigner les blessés palestiniens - a modifié leur point de vue et changé leur vie à jamais. « C’est à ce moment-là que j’ai vu pour la première fois la machine de guerre israélienne », se souvient Gilbert.

    Fosse dirige une organisation humanitaire qui s’appelle NORWAC (Norwegian Aid Committee), qui fournit une assistance médicale aux Palestiniens et est financée par le gouvernement norvégien. Gilbert, qui est un volontaire indépendant, et Fosse ont tous deux consacré une bonne partie de leurs vies à aider les Palestiniens, et Gaza est devenue un deuxième foyer pour eux. Lundi après-midi, nous avons rencontré Fosse, un chirurgien cardiaque, à Herzliya après son retour de vacances en Norvège, sur son chemin de retour vers Gaza. Les images décrites par ces deux hommes devraient peser lourdement sur la conscience de tout être humain.

    « Durant Plomb Fondu, je pensais que ce serait l’expérience la plus horrible de ma vie », dit Gilbert, « jusqu’à ce que j’arrive à Gaza, il y a deux semaines - qui était encore plus épouvantable. Les données révèlent qu’il y a 4,2 victimes palestiniennes par heure [.] Plus d’un quart des morts sont des enfants, plus de la moitié sont des femmes et des enfants. Les Forces de Défense Israéliennes [Tsahal] admettent que 70% sont des civils, l’ONU dit 80%, mais de ce que j’ai pu voir à Shifa, plus de 90% sont des civils. Cela signifie que nous parlons d’un massacre de la population civile.

    « Shoujaiyeh a été un véritable massacre », poursuit-il. « Durant Plomb Fondu, je n’ai pas vu cette sorte d’attaque contre des immeubles d’habitation : à l’époque, c’était plutôt les structures publiques qui étaient attaquées. La brutalité, le mal intentionnel infligé aux civils et la destruction sont plus terribles que lors de Plomb Fondu. Je ne suis pas impressionné par le fait que les gens soient prévenus 80 secondes à l’avance d’évacuer leurs habitations. C’est inhumain. Le spectacle de Shoujaiyeh est plus terrible que tout ce que nous avons vu durant Plomb Fondu.

    Regardez Shoujaiyeh - ça ressemble à Hiroshima. Jamais je ne m’habituerai au spectacle d’un enfant blessé pour lequel nous ne disposons pas de moyens adéquats pour le soigner. Nous utilisons une anesthésie locale, en raison du manque de médicaments, et nous n’en avons même pas assez pour cela ».(...)

  • Au passage je découvre cet entretien entre Jon Snow et Gideon Levy, qui date de 2010, vraiment remarquable pour les extraits que j’ai regardé au milieu de la nuit.

    Je cite Gideon Levy citant "l’inoubliable Golda Meir" :

    « Nous ne pardonnerons jamais aux arabes de nous avoir forcé à tuer leurs enfants ! »

    Levy explique en substance à quel point les colonisateurs se sentent tellement bien dans leur peau et dans leur droit qu’ils réussissent à se victimiser.

    Quelle similitude intéressante avec ce qui se passe aujourd’hui à Gaza.

    ▶ Gideon Levy in conversation with Jon Snow - YouTube
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNXhlL3-5Uw

    On route to Edinburgh Literary Festival Gideon Levy will be joining us at the Frontline Club in conversation with Channel 4 News presenter Jon Snow. He will be discussing recent developments in the Middle East and his book The Punishment of Gaza. In which he documents Israel’s 2005 withdrawal from Gaza and charts the events leading up to the assault of 2009.

    Gideon Levy is a prominent Israeli journalist. For over twenty years he has covered the Israel—Palestine conflict, in particular the occupation of Gaza and the West Bank, for the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz in his column “Twilight Zone.”

    #gaza #gideon_levy for ever (Gideon Levy, comme Shlomo Sand ou Michel Warschawski ou encore Amira Hass représentent le vrai honneur d’Israël)